History of Cad
History of Cad
History of Cad
I. Introduction
II. History
The earliest CAM software was a simple computer attached to a milling machine.
Punching buttons on the computer's front panel programmed the software for the
machine. Since the mid-1980s CAD and CAM have come closer together, as
some CAM software operates within the CAD software programs instead of
through shared databases.
While they may seem new to some, many of the computer-aided design
programs we use today have been around for more than a decade, and virtually
all trace their lineage to work begun more than 50 years ago.
During the war, considerable work was done in the development of real-time
computing, particularly at MIT, and by the 1950s there were dozens of people
working on numerical control of machine tools and automating engineering
design. But it’s the work of two people in particular—Patrick Hanratty and Ivan
Sutherland—who are largely credited with setting the stage for what we know
today as CAD.
The 1960s brought other developments, including the first digitizer (from Auto-trol)
and DAC-1, the first production interactive graphics manufacturing system. By the
end of the decade, a number of companies were founded to commercialize
their fledgling CAD programs, including SDRC, Evans & Sutherland, Applicon,
Computervision, and M&S Computing.
By the 1970s, research had moved from 2D to 3D. Major milestones included the
work of Ken Versprille, whose invention of NURBS for his Ph.D. thesis formed the
basis of modern 3D curve and surface modeling, and the development by Alan
Grayer, Charles Lang, and Ian Braid of the PADL (Part and Assembly Description
Language) solid modeler.
With the emergence of UNIX workstations in the early ’80s, commercial CAD
systems like CATIA and others began showing up in aerospace, automotive, and
other industries. But it was the introduction of the first IBM PC in 1981 that set the
stage for the large-scale adoption of CAD. The following year, a group of
programmers formed Autodesk, and in 1983 released AutoCAD, the first
significant CAD program for the IBM PC.
3 HISTORY OF COMPUTER AIDED DRAWING
AutoCAD marked a huge milestone in the evolution of CAD. Its developers set out
to deliver 80% of the functionality of the other CAD programs of the day, for 20%
of their cost. From then on, increasingly advanced drafting and engineering
functionality became more affordable. But it was still largely 2D.
That changed in 1987 with the release of Pro/ENGINEER, a CAD program based
on solid geometry and feature-based parametric techniques for defining parts
and assemblies. It ran on UNIX workstations—PCs of the time were simply not
powerful enough—but it was a game changer. The later years of the decade saw
the release of several 3D modeling kernels, most notably ACIS and Parasolids,
which would form the basis for other history-based parametric CAD programs.
“Engineers and designers are being asked to create more, faster, and with higher
quality,” says Bill McClure, vice president of product development at Siemens PLM.
He notes that CAD really hasn’t changed much beyond adding more features
and updating the user interface. “We need a new way of working to keep up
with demands,” he says. Siemens’ synchronous technology “was developed to
address this trend, as it combines the precision and control of feature-based
design with the speed and flexibility of explicit modeling. The result is designers
spend less time planning a model’s construction, less time waiting for design
changes, and less time remodeling imported or customer data for new uses.”
4 HISTORY OF COMPUTER AIDED DRAWING
PTC is taking a similar approach with the recent announcement of its Project
Lightning, which was revealed as Creo in October.
“Almost all CAD revenue has been through parametric modelers, following the
paradigm that Pro/E invented,” he says. But parametric modeling is an abstract
approach for creating geometry. “You build a recipe and then the recipe creates
the geometry. Direct modeling is much easier for people to understand,” says
Shepherd. “We think the right answer is a blend of parametrics and explicit
modeling.”
Creo promises to do just that by releasing a series of apps that allow users to
design in 2D, 3D direct or 3D parametric modes, with the data updated and
reusable in any of those modes. It also offers different user interfaces for different
kinds of users, and promises to allow users to incorporate data from any CAD
system.
“The feature-based paradigm will not get us to the next level,” says Mike Payne.
“Something like direct modeling is needed to attract a larger audience to CAD.”
And Payne should know. Over the years, he has been vice president of
development at PTC, was a co-founder of SolidWorks, CTO of Dassault Systèmes,
CEO of Spatial Corp., and co-founder and former CEO of SpaceClaim.
Robert “Buzz” Kross, senior vice president of the Manufacturing Industry Group at
Autodesk, sees three technologies that will have the greatest impact on the future
of CAD: “new, very friendly, very interactive interfaces, embedded simulation,
and the cloud.” The first, he explained, will attract new users and will support faster
design iterations. Embedded simulations will enable users to analyze design data
as they model, so that “designers will immediately know the result of any change
before they commit to it.” And the cloud, “will deliver immense compute power
to everyone’s device, even mobile devices.”
5 HISTORY OF COMPUTER AIDED DRAWING
“Microsoft Windows still maintains over 90% market share of the client operating
systems,” says McClure. “Until this changes, native versions of CAD programs on
other platforms will be interesting for some users, but will not represent a significant
market share opportunity.” He notes that the cost to develop and support multiple
hardware platforms is daunting.
Will low-cost CAD software take a bite out of the big companies’ market share?
It depends on who you ask. Grayson says it’s already happening, while Payne
notes that was what AutoCAD did in ’83. “Once AutoCAD could do everything
that the expensive systems could do, the game was over,” he says. “The volume
guy wins. Everyone knows that except big CAD companies.”
But it appears that the “big” CAD companies have learned something. Shepherd
says PTC’s Creo will feature “role-based apps,” with some of the company’s new
tools being “very low cost. Maybe free.” But then he hedged, noting that the
company needs to be able to fund innovation for its high-end users. For them, he
says, “I think we’re already at the price point that makes sense.”