Values of urban wetlands

Urban and peri-urban wetlands in Australia provide a variety of benefits and services to the
community.

In addition to providing habitat for plants and animals, wetlands provide water storage, improve water
quality and reduce pollution. Wetlands also protect against natural hazards, slowing floodwaters,
reducing the risk of fire and protecting against erosion of river banks and coastlines. Wetlands and
associated vegetation can provide a cooling effect to surrounding areas in summer and also moderate
strong winds.

Wetlands can also contribute to the well-being of the community by acting as urban green spaces
which provide aesthetic appeal, landscape diversity and recreational opportunities. They can also
contribute to cultural heritage, spiritual values and day-to-day living of Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander peoples. Additionally, wetlands provide easily accessible educational opportunities to learn
about the environment.

Potential impacts of urban development on

wetlands
Urban and peri-urban wetlands are potentially at risk of:

 direct habitat loss (from development, land reclamation, roads, in-stream dredging, etc)

 altered water regime (from dams/barriers, stream redirection, hard surfacing, water extraction, etc)

 pollution (from garbage, sewage, oil and chemical spills, pesticides, airborne toxins, etc)

 introduction of exotic species (weeds, pests and domestic pets)

 other ecosystem modifications (for example, altered fire regimes, dieback and changes in salinity).

Uses of wetlands[edit]
Depending partly on a wetland's geographic and topographic location,[45] the functions it performs
can support multiple ecosystem services, values, or benefits. United Nations Millennium
Ecosystem Assessment and Ramsar Convention described wetlands as a whole to be
of biosphere significance and societal importance in the following areas, for example:[citation needed]

 Water storage (flood control)

 Groundwater replenishment
 Shoreline stabilisation and storm protection
 Water purification
 Reservoirs of biodiversity
 Pollination
 Wetland products
 Cultural values
 Recreation and tourism
 Climate change mitigation and adaptation
According to the Ramsar Convention:
The economic worth of the ecosystem services provided to society by intact, naturally functioning
wetlands is frequently much greater than the perceived benefits of converting them to 'more
valuable' intensive land use – particularly as the profits from unsustainable use often go to
relatively few individuals or corporations, rather than being shared by society as a whole.
Unless otherwise cited, ecosystem services information is based on the following series of
references.[36]
To replace these wetland ecosystem services, enormous amounts of money would need to be
spent on water purification plants, dams, levees, and other hard infrastructure, and many of the
services are impossible to replace.

Water storage (flood control)[edit]

Major wetland type: floodplain and closed-depression wetlands
Storage reservoirs and flood protection: The wetland system of floodplains is formed from
major rivers downstream from their headwaters. "The floodplains of major rivers act as natural
storage reservoirs, enabling excess water to spread out over a wide area, which reduces its
depth and speed. Wetlands close to the headwaters of streams and rivers can slow down
rainwater runoff and spring snowmelt so that it doesn't run straight off the land into water
courses. This can help prevent sudden, damaging floods downstream."[36]Notable river systems
that produce large spans of floodplain include the Nile River, the Niger river inland delta, [the
Zambezi River flood plain], [the Okavango River inland delta], [the Kafue River flood plain][the
Lake Bangweulu flood plain] (Africa), Mississippi River (USA), Amazon River (South
America), Yangtze River (China), Danube River (Central Europe) and Murray-Darling River
(Australia).
Human impact: Converting wetlands to upland through drainage and development forces
adjoining or downstream water channels into narrower corridors. This accelerates watershed
hydrologic response to storm events and this increases the need in some cases for alternative
means of flood control. That is because the newly formed channels must manage the same
amount of precipitation, causing flood peaks to be [higher or deeper] and floodwaters to travel
faster.
Water management engineering developments in the past century have degraded these
wetlands through the construction of artificial embankments. These constructions may be
classified as dykes, bunds, levees, weirs, barrages and dams but serve the single purpose of
concentrating water into a select source or area. Wetland water sources that were once spread
slowly over a large, shallow area are pooled into deep, concentrated locations. Loss of wetland
floodplains results in more severe and damaging flooding. Catastrophic human impact in the
Mississippi River floodplains was seen in death of several hundred individuals during a levee
breach in New Orleans caused by Hurricane Katrina. Ecological catastrophic events from
human-made embankments have been noticed along the Yangtze River floodplains since the
middle of the river has become prone to more frequent and damaging flooding. Some of these
events include the loss of riparian vegetation, a 30% loss of the vegetation cover throughout the
river's basin, a doubling of the percentage of the land affected by soil erosion, and a reduction in
reservoir capacity through siltation build-up in floodplain lakes.[36]

Groundwater replenishment[edit]
Major wetland type: marsh, swamp, and subterranean karst and cave hydrological systems
The surface water which is the water visibly seen in wetland systems only represents a portion of
the overall water cycle which also includes atmospheric water and groundwater. Wetland
systems are directly linked to groundwater and a crucial regulator of both the quantity and quality
of water found below the ground. Wetland systems that are made
of permeable sediments like limestone or occur in areas with highly variable and fluctuating water
tables especially have a role in groundwater replenishment or water recharge. Sediments that
are porous allow water to filter down through the soil and overlying rock into aquifers which are
the source of 95% of the world's drinking water. Wetlands can also act as recharge areas when
the surrounding water table is low and as a discharge zone when it is too high. Karst (cave)
systems are a unique example of this system and are a connection of underground rivers
influenced by rain and other forms of precipitation. These wetland systems are capable of
regulating changes in the water table on upwards of 130 m (430 ft).
Human impact: Groundwater is an important source of water for drinking and irrigation of crops.
Over 1 billion people in Asia and 65% of the public water sources in Europe source 100% of their
water from groundwater. Irrigation is a massive use of groundwater with 80% of the world's
groundwater used for agricultural production.[36]
Unsustainable abstraction of groundwater has become a major concern. In the Commonwealth
of Australia, water licensing is being implemented to control use of water in major agricultural
regions. On a global scale, groundwater deficits and water scarcity is one of the most pressing
concerns facing the 21st century.[36]

Shoreline stabilization and storm protection[edit]

Wetland type: Mangroves, coral reefs, salt marsh
Main article: Integrated coastal zone management

Tidal and inter-tidal wetland systems protect and stabilize coastal zones. Coral reefs provide a
protective barrier to coastal shoreline. Mangroves stabilize the coastal zone from the interior and
will migrate with the shoreline to remain adjacent to the boundary of the water. The main
conservation benefit these systems have against storms and storm surges is the ability to reduce
the speed and height of waves and floodwaters.
Human impact: The sheer number of people who live and work near the coast is expected to
grow immensely over the next fifty years. From an estimated 200 million people that currently live
in low-lying coastal regions, the development of urban coastal centers is projected to increase
the population by fivefold within 50 years.[46] The United Kingdom has begun the concept of
managed coastal realignment. This management technique provides shoreline protection
through restoration of natural wetlands rather than through applied engineering. In East Asia,
reclamation of coastal wetlands has resulted in widespread transformation of the coastal zone,
and up to 65% of coastal wetlands have been destroyed by coastal development.[47][48] One
analysis using the impact of hurricanes versus storm protection provided naturally by wetlands
projected the value of this service at US$33,000/hectare/year.[49]

Water purification[edit]
Wetland types: floodplain, closed-depresssion wetlands, mudflat, salt marsh, mangroves
Nutrient retention: Wetlands cycle both sediments and nutrients
balancing terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. A natural function of wetland vegetation is the up-
take, storage, and (for nitrate) the removal of nutrients found in runoff from the surrounding soil
and water.[50] In many wetlands, nutrients are retained until plants die or are harvested by animals
or humans and taken to another location, or until microbial processes convert soluble nutrients to
a gas as is the case with nitrate.
Sediment and heavy metal traps: Precipitation and surface runoff induces soil erosion,
transporting sediment in suspension into and through waterways. These sediments move
towards larger and more sizable waterways through a natural process that moves water towards
oceans. All types of sediments which may be composed of clay, sand, silt, and rock can be
carried into wetland systems through this process. Wetland vegetation acts as a physical barrier
to slow water flow and trap sediment for short or long periods of time. Suspended sediment often
contains heavy metals that are retained when wetlands trap the sediment. In some cases, certain
metals are taken up through wetland plant stems, roots, and leaves. Many floating plant species,
for example, can absorb and filter heavy metals. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia
crassipes), duckweed (Lemna) and water fern (Azolla) store ironand copper commonly found
in wastewater. Many fast-growing plants rooted in the soils of wetlands such as cattail (Typha)
and reed (Phragmites) also aid in the role of heavy metal up-take. Animals such as
the oyster can filter more than 200 litres (53 US gal) of water per day while grazing for food,
removing nutrients, suspended sediments, and chemical contaminants in the process. On the
other hand, some types of wetlands facilitate the mobilization and bioavailability of mercury
(another heavy metal), which in its methyl mercuryform increases the risk of bioaccumulation in
fish important to animal food webs and harvested for human consumption.
Capacity: The ability of wetland systems to store or remove nutrients and trap sediment and
associated metals is highly efficient and effective but each system has a threshold. An
overabundance of nutrient input from fertilizer run-off, sewage effluent, or non-point pollution will
cause eutrophication. Upstream erosion from deforestation can overwhelm wetlands making
them shrink in size and cause dramatic biodiversity loss through excessive sedimentation load.
Retaining high levels of metals in sediments is problematic if the sediments become
resuspended or oxygen and pH levels change at a future time. The capacity of wetland
vegetation to store heavy metals depends on the particular metal, oxygen and pH status of
wetland sediments and overlying water, water flow rate (detention time), wetland size, season,
climate, type of plant, and other factors.
Human impact: The capacity of a wetland to store sediment, nutrients, and metals can be
diminished if sediments are compacted such as by vehicles or heavy equipment, or are regularly
tilled. Unnatural changes in water levels and water sources also can affect the water purification
function. If water purification functions are impaired, excessive loads of nutrients enter waterways
and cause eutrophication. This is of particular concern in temperate coastal systems.[51][52] The
main sources of coastal eutrophication are industrially made nitrogen, which is used
as fertilizer in agricultural practices, as well as septic waste runoff.[53] Nitrogen is the limiting
nutrient for photosynthetic processes in saline systems, however in excess, it can lead to an
overproduction of organic matter that then leads to hypoxic and anoxic zones within the water
column.[54] Without oxygen, other organisms cannot survive, including economically important
finfish and shellfish species.
Examples: An example of how a natural wetland is used to provide some degree of sewage
treatment is the East Kolkata Wetlands in Kolkata, India. The wetlands cover 125 square
kilometres (48 sq mi), and are used to treat Kolkata's sewage. The nutrients contained in the
wastewater sustain fish farms and agriculture.

Constructed wetlands[edit]

Constructed wetland in an ecological settlement in Flintenbreite near Luebeck, Germany

Main article: Constructed wetland

The function of most natural wetland systems is not to manage wastewater. However, their high
potential for the filtering and the treatment of pollutants has been recognized by environmental
engineers that specialize in the area of wastewater treatment. These constructed wetland
systems are highly controlled environments that intend to mimic the occurrences of soil, flora,
and microorganisms in natural wetlands to aid in treating wastewater effluent. Constructed
wetlands can be used to treat raw sewage, storm water, agricultural and industrial effluent. They
are constructed with flow regimes, micro-biotic composition, and suitable plants in order to
produce the most efficient treatment process. Other advantages of constructed wetlands are the
control of retention times and hydraulic channels.[55] The most important factors of constructed
wetlands are the water flow processes combined with plant growth.
Constructed wetland systems can be surface flow systems with only free-floating macrophytes,
floating-leaved macrophytes, or submerged macrophytes; however, typical free water surface
systems are usually constructed with emergent macrophytes.[56] Subsurface flow-constructed
wetlands with a vertical or a horizontal flow regime are also common and can be integrated into
urban areas as they require relatively little space.[57]

Reservoirs of biodiversity[edit]
Wetland systems' rich biodiversity is becoming a focal point at International Treaty Conventions
and within the World Wildlife Fund organization due to the high number of species present in
wetlands, the small global geographic area of wetlands, the number of species which
are endemic to wetlands, and the high productivity of wetland systems. Hundred of thousands of
animal species, 20,000 of them vertebrates, are living in wetland systems. The discovery rate of
fresh water fish is at 200 new species per year. The impact of maintaining biodiversity is seen at
the local level through job creation, sustainability, and community productivity. A good example is
the Lower Mekong basin which runs through Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. Supporting over
55 million people, the sustainability of the region is enhanced through wildlife tours. The U.S.
state of Florida has estimated that US$1.6 billion was generated in state revenue from
recreational activities associated with wildlife.
Biodiverse river basins: The Amazon holds 3,000 species of freshwater fish species within the
boundaries of its basin, whose function it is to disperse the seeds of trees. One of its key
species, the Piramutaba catfish, Brachyplatystoma vaillantii, migrates more than 3,300 km
(2,100 mi) from its nursery grounds near the mouth of the Amazon River to its spawning grounds
in Andean tributaries, 400 m (1,300 ft) above sea level, distributing plants seed along the route.
Productive intertidal zones: Intertidal mudflats have a level of productivity similar to that of
some wetlands even while possessing a low number of species. The abundance
of invertebrates found within the mud are a food source for migratory waterfowl.
Critical life-stage habitat: Mudflats, saltmarshes, mangroves, and seagrass beds have high
levels of both species richness and productivity, and are home to important nursery areas for
many commercial fish stocks.
Genetic diversity: Populations of many species are confined geographically to only one or a few
wetland systems, often due to the long period of time that the wetlands have been physically
isolated from other aquatic sources. For example, the number of endemic species in Lake
Baikal in Russia classifies it as a hotspot for biodiversity and one of the most biodiverse wetlands
in the entire world. Evidence from a research study by Mazepova et al. suggest that the number
of crustacean species endemic to Baikal Lake (over 690 species and subspecies) exceeds the
number of the same groups of animals inhabiting all the fresh water bodies of Eurasia together.
Its 150 species of free-living Platyhelminthes alone is analogous to the entire number in all of
Eastern Siberia. The 34 species and subspecies number of Baikal sculpins is more than twice
the number of the analogous fauna that inhabits Eurasia. One of the most exciting discoveries
was made by A. V. Shoshin who registered about 300 species of free-living nematodes using
only six near-shore sampling localities in the Southern Baikal. "If we will take into consideration,
that about 60% of the animals can be found nowhere else except Baikal, it may be assumed that
the lake may be the biodiversity center of the Eurasian continent."[58]
Human impact: Biodiversity loss occurs in wetland systems through land use changes, habitat
destruction, pollution, exploitation of resources, and invasive species. Vulnerable, threatened,
and endangered species number at 17% of waterfowl, 38% of fresh-water dependent mammals,
33% of freshwater fish, 26% of freshwater amphibians, 72% of freshwater turtles, 86% of marine
turtles, 43% of crocodilians and 27% of coral reef-building species. Introduced hydrophytes in
different wetland systems can have devastating results. The introduction of water hyacinth, a
native plant of South America into Lake Victoria in East Africa as well as duckweed into non-
native areas of Queensland, Australia, have overtaken entire wetland systems suffocating the
wetlands and reducing the diversity of other plants and animals. This is largely due to their
phenomenal growth rate and ability to float and grow on the surface of the water.

Wetland products and productivity[edit]

Wetland productivity is linked to the climate, wetland type, and nutrient availability. Low water
and occasional drying of the wetland bottom during droughts (dry marsh phase) stimulate plant
recruitment from a diverse seed bank and increase productivity by mobilizing nutrients. In
contrast, high water during deluges (lake marsh phase) causes turnover in plant populations and
creates greater interspersion of element cover and open water, but lowers overall productivity.
During a cover cycle that ranges from open water to complete vegetation cover, annual net
primary productivity may vary 20-fold.[59] The grasses of fertile floodplains such as the Nile
produce the highest yield including plants such as Arundo donax (giant reed), Cyperus
papyrus (papyrus), Phragmites (reed) and Typha (cattail, bulrush).
Wetlands naturally produce an array of vegetation and other ecological products that can
harvested for personal and commercial use.[60] The most significant of these is fish which have all
or part of their life-cycle occur within a wetland system. Fresh and saltwater fish are the main
source of protein for one billion people and comprise 15% of an additional two billion people's
diets. In addition, fish generate a fishing industry that provides 80% of the income and
employment to residents in developing countries. Another food staple found in wetland systems
is rice, a popular grain that is consumed at the rate of one fifth of the total global calorie count. In
Bangladesh, Cambodia and Vietnam, where rice paddies are predominant on the landscape, rice
consumption reach 70%.[61] Some native wetland plants in the Caribbean and Australia are
harvested sustainably for medicinal compounds; these include the red mangrove (Rhizophora
mangle) which possesses antibacterial, wound-healing, anti-ulcer effects, and antioxidant
properties.[61]
Food converted to sweeteners and carbohydrates include the sago palm of Asia and Africa
(cooking oil), the nipa palm of Asia (sugar, vinegar, alcohol, and fodder) and honey collection
from mangroves. More than supplemental dietary intake, this produce sustains entire villages.
Coastal Thailand villages earn the key portion of their income from sugar production while the
country of Cuba relocates more than 30,000 hives each year to track the seasonal flowering of
the mangrove Avicennia.
Other mangrove-derived products:

 Fuelwood
 Salt (produced by evaporating seawater)
 Animal fodder
 Traditional medicines (e.g. from mangrove bark)
 Fibers for textiles
 Dyes and tannins
Human impact: Over-fishing is the major problem for sustainable use of wetlands. Concerns are
developing over certain aspects of farm fishing, which uses natural waterways to harvest fish for
human consumption and pharmaceuticals. This practice has become especially popular in Asia
and the South Pacific. Its impact upon much larger waterways downstream has negatively
affected many small island developing states.[62]
Aquaculture is continuing to develop rapidly throughout the Asia-Pacific region specifically in
China with world holdings in Asia equal to 90% of the total number of aquaculture farms and 80%
of its global value.[61] Some aquaculture has eliminated massive areas of wetland through
practices seen such as in the shrimp farming industry's destruction of mangroves. Even though
the damaging impact of large scale shrimp farming on the coastal ecosystem in many Asian
countries has been widely recognized for quite some time now, it has proved difficult to check in
absence of other employment avenues for people engaged in such occupation. Also burgeoning
demand for shrimps globally has provided a large and ready market for the produce
Threats to rice fields mainly stem from inappropriate water management, introduction of invasive
alien species, agricultural fertilizers, pesticides, and land use changes. Industrial-scale
production of palm oil threatens the biodiversity of wetland ecosystems in parts of southeast
Asia, Africa, and other developing countries.
Over-exploitation of wetland products can occur at the community level as is sometimes seen
throughout coastal villages of Southern Thailand where each resident may obtain for themselves
every consumable of the mangrove forest (fuelwood, timber, honey, resins, crab, and shellfish)
which then becomes threatened through increasing population and continual harvest.[citation needed]

Additional functions and uses of wetlands[edit]

Some types of wetlands can serve as fire breaks that help slow the spread of minor wildfires.
Larger wetland systems can influence local precipitation patterns. Some boreal wetland systems
in catchment headwaters may help extend the period of flow and maintain water temperature in
connected downstream waters. Pollination services are supported by many wetlands which may
provide the only suitable habitat for pollinating insects, birds, and mammals in highly developed
areas. It is likely that wetlands have other functions whose benefits to society and other
ecosystems have yet to be discovered.

Wetlands and climate change[edit]

Wetlands perform two important functions in relation to climate change. They have mitigation
effects through their ability to sink carbon, converting a greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide) to solid
plant material through the process of photosynthesis, and also through their ability to store and
regulate water.[63] Wetlands store approximately 44.6 million tonnes of carbon per year
globally.[64] In salt marshes and mangrove swamps in particular, the average carbon
sequestration rate is 210 g CO2 m−2 y−1 while peatlands sequester approximately 20–30 g
CO2 m−2 y−1.[64][65] Coastal wetlands, such as tropical mangroves and some temperate salt
marshes, are known to be sinks for carbon that otherwise contributes to climate change in its
gaseous forms (carbon dioxide and methane). The ability of many tidal wetlands to store carbon
and minimize methane flux from tidal sediments has led to sponsorship of blue carbon initiatives
that are intended to enhance those processes.[66]
However, depending on their characteristics, some wetlands are a significant source of methane
emissions and some are also emitters of nitrous oxide[67][68] which is a greenhouse gas with a
global warming potential 300 times that of carbon dioxide and is the dominant ozone-depleting
substance emitted in the 21st century.[69] Excess nutrients mainly from anthropogenic sources
have been shown to significantly increase the N2O fluxes from wetland soils
through denitrification and nitrification processes (see table below).[70][67][71] A study in the intertidal
region of a New England salt marsh showed that excess levels of nutrients might increase N2O
emissions rather than sequester them.[70]

Nitrous oxide fluxes from different wetland soils

Table adapted from Moseman-Valtierra (2012)[72] and Chen et al. (2010)[73]

N2O flux
Wetland type Location
(µmol N2O m−2 h−1)

Mangrove Shenzhen and Hong Kong 0.14 – 23.83 [73]

Mangrove Muthupet, South India 0.41 – 0.77 [74]

 Mangrove Bhitarkanika, East India 0.20 – 4.73 [75]

Mangrove Pichavaram, South India 0.89 – 1.89 [75]

Mangrove Queensland, Australia −0.045 – 0.32 [76]

Mangrove South East Queensland, Australia 0.091 – 1.48 [77]

Mangrove Southwest coast, Puerto Rico 0.12 – 7.8 [78]

Mangrove Isla Magueyes, Puerto Rico 0.05 – 1.4 [78]

Salt marsh Chesapeake Bay, US 0.005 – 0.12 [79]

Salt marsh Maryland, US 0.1 [80]

Salt marsh North East China 0.1 – 0.16 [81]

Salt marsh Biebrza, Poland −0.07 – 0.06 [82]

Salt marsh Netherlands 0.82 – 1.64 [83]

Salt marsh Baltic Sea −0.13 [84]

Salt marsh Massachusetts, US −2.14 – 1.27 [85]

Data on nitrous oxide fluxes from wetlands in the southern hemisphere are lacking, as are
ecosystem-based studies including the role of dominant organisms that alter sediment
biogeochemistry. Aquatic invertebrates produce ecologically-relevant nitrous oxide emissions
due to ingestion of denitrifying bacteria that live within the subtidal sediment and water
column[86] and thus may also be influencing nitrous oxide production within some wetlands.

Peatswamps in Southeast Asia[edit]

In Southeast Asia, peatswamp forests and soils are being drained, burnt, mined, and overgrazed,
contributing severely to climate change.[87] As a result of peat drainage, the organic carbon that
was built up over thousands of years and is normally under water is suddenly exposed to the air.
It decomposes and turns into carbon dioxide (CO2), which is released into the atmosphere. Peat
fires cause the same process to occur and in addition create enormous clouds of smoke that
cross international borders, such as happens every year in Southeast Asia. While peatlands
constitute only 3% of the world's land area, their degradation produces 7% of all fossil
fuel CO2 emissions.
Through the building of dams, Wetlands International is halting the drainage of peatlands in
Southeast Asia, hoping to mitigate CO2 emissions. Concurrent wetland restoration techniques
include reforestation with native tree species as well as the formation of community fire brigades.
This sustainable approach can be seen in central Kalimantan and Sumatra, Indonesia.

Wetland Disturbance[edit]
Wetlands, the functions and services they provide as well as their flora and fauna, can be
affected by several types of disturbances. The disturbances (sometimes termed stressors or
alterations) can be human-associated or natural, direct or indirect, reversible or not, and isolated
or cumulative. When exceeding levels or patterns normally found within wetlands of a particular
class in a particular region, the predominant ones include the following[88][89]

 Enrichment/Eutrophication
 Organic Loading and Reduced Dissolved Oxygen
 Contaminant Toxicity
 Acidification
 Salinization
 Sedimentation
 Altered Solar Input (Turbidity/Shade)
 Vegetation Removal
 Thermal Alteration
 Dehydration/Aridification
 Inundation/Flooding
 Habitat Fragmentation
 Other Human Presence
Disturbances can be further categorized as follows:
Minor disturbance
Stress that maintains ecosystem integrity.[90]
Moderate disturbance
Ecosystem integrity is damaged but can recover in time without assistance.[90]
Impairment or severe disturbance
Human intervention may be needed in order for ecosystem to recover.[90]
Just a few of the many sources of these disturbances are[87]

 Drainage
 Development
 Over-grazing
 Mining
 Unsustainable water use
 They can be manifested partly as:
 Water Scarcity
 Impacts to Endangered species
 Disruption of wildlife breeding grounds
 Imbalance in sediment load and nutrient filtration
Conservation[edit]
Main article: Wetland conservation

Fog rising over the Mukri bog near Mukri, Estonia. The bog has an area of 2,147 hectares
(5,310 acres) and has been protected since 1992.

Wetlands have historically been the victim of large draining efforts for real estate
development, or flooding for use as recreational lakes or hydropower generation.
Some of the world's most important agricultural areas are wetlands that have been
converted to farmland.[91][92][93][94] Since the 1970s, more focus has been put on
preserving wetlands for their natural function yet by 1993 half the world's wetlands
had been drained.[95][full citation needed]
In order to maintain wetlands and sustain their functions, alterations and
disturbances that are outside the normal range of variation should be minimized.

Balancing wetland conservation with the needs of

people[edit]
Wetlands are vital ecosystems that provide livelihoods for the millions of people who
live in and around them. The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) called for
different sectors to join forces to secure wetland environments in the context of
sustainable development and improving human wellbeing. A three-year project
carried out by Wetlands International in partnership with the International Water
Management Institute found that it is possible to conserve wetlands while improving
the livelihoods of people living among them. Case studies conducted in Malawi and
Zambia looked at how dambos – wet, grassy valleys or depressions where water
seeps to the surface – can be farmed sustainably to improve livelihoods.
Mismanaged or overused dambos often become degraded, however, using a
knowledge exchange between local farmers and environmental managers, a
protocol was developed using soil and water management practices. Project
outcomes included a high yield of crops, development of sustainable farming
techniques, and adequate water management generating enough water for use as
irrigation. Before the project, there were cases where people had died from
starvation due to food shortages. By the end of it, many more people had access to
enough water to grow vegetables. A key achievement was that villagers had secure
food supplies during long, dry months. They also benefited in other ways: nutrition
was improved by growing a wider range of crops, and villagers could also invest in
health and education by selling produce and saving money.[96]

Ramsar Convention[edit]
Main articles: Ramsar Convention and List of Ramsar wetlands of international
importance
The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, especially as Waterfowl
Habitat, or Ramsar Convention, is an international treaty designed to address global
concerns regarding wetland loss and degradation. The primary purposes of the
treaty are to list wetlands of international importance and to promote their wise use,
with the ultimate goal of preserving the world's wetlands. Methods include restricting
access to the majority portion of wetland areas, as well as educating the public to
combat the misconception that wetlands are wastelands. The Convention works
closely with five International Organisation Partners. These are: Birdlife International,
the IUCN, the International Water Management Institute, Wetlands International and
the World Wide Fund for Nature. The partners provide technical expertise, help
conduct or facilitate field studies and provide financial support. The IOPs also
participate regularly as observers in all meetings of the Conference of the Parties
and the Standing Committee and as full members of the Scientific and Technical
Review Panel.

Valuation[edit]
The value of a wetland to local communities, as well as the value of wetland systems
generally to the earth and to humankind, is one of the most important valuations that
can be conducted for sustainable development. This typically involves first mapping
a region's wetlands, then assessing the functions and ecosystem services the
wetlands provide individually and cumulatively, and evaluating that information to
prioritize or rank individual wetlands or wetland types for conservation, management,
restoration, or development. Over a longer period, it requires keeping inventories of
known wetlands and monitoring a representative sample of the wetlands to
determine changes due to both natural and human factors. Such a valuation process
is used to educate decision-makers such as governments of the importance of
particular wetlands within their jurisdiction.

Assessment[edit]
This section does not cite any sources. Please
help improve this section by adding citations to
reliable sources. Unsourced material may be
challenged and removed. (August 2018) (Learn how and
when to remove this template message)

Rapid assessment methods are used to score, rank, rate, or categorize various
functions, ecosystem services, species, communities, levels of disturbance,
and/or ecological healthof a wetland or group of wetlands. This is often done to
prioritize particular wetlands for conservation (avoidance) or to determine the degree
to which loss or alteration of wetland functions should be compensated, such as by
restoring degraded wetlands elsewhere or providing additional protections to existing
wetlands. Rapid assessment methods are also applied before and after a wetland
has been restored or altered, to help monitor or predict the effects of those actions
on various wetland functions and the services they provide. Assessments are
typically considered to be "rapid" when they require only a single visit to the wetland
lasting less than one day, which in some cases may include interpretation of aerial
imagery and GIS analyses of existing spatial data, but not detailed post-visit
laboratory analyses of water or biological samples. Due to time and cost constraints,
the levels of various wetland functions or other attributes are usually not measured
directly but rather are estimated relative to other assessed wetlands in a region,
using observation-based variables, sometimes called "indicators", that are
hypothesized or known to predict performance of the specified functions or
attributes.
To achieve consistency among persons doing the assessment, rapid methods
present indicator variables as questions or checklists on standardized data forms,
and most methods standardize the scoring or rating procedure that is used to
combine question responses into estimates of the levels of specified functions
relative to the levels estimated in other wetlands ("calibration sites") assessed
previously in a region.[97] Rapid assessment methods, partly because they often use
dozens of indicators pertaining to conditions surrounding a wetland as well as within
the wetland itself, aim to provide estimates of wetland functions and services that
are more accurate and repeatable than simply describing a wetland's class type.[98] A
need for wetland assessments to be rapid arises mostly when government agencies
set deadlines for decisions affecting a wetland, or when the number of wetlands
needing information on their functions or condition is large.
In North America and a few other countries, standardized rapid assessment
methods for wetlands have a long history, having been developed, calibrated,
tested, and applied to varying degrees in several different regions and wetland types
since the 1970s. However, few rapid assessment methods have been fully validated.
Done correctly, validation is a very expensive endeavor that involves comparing
rankings of a series of wetlands based on results from rapid assessment methods
with rankings based on less rapid and considerably more costly, multi-visit, detailed
measurements of levels of the same functions or other attributes in the same series
of wetlands.

Inventory[edit]
Although developing a global inventory of wetlands has proven to be a large and
difficult undertaking, many efforts at more local scales have been successful.
Current efforts are based on available data, but both classification and spatial
resolution have sometimes proven to be inadequate for regional or site-specific
environmental management decision-making. It is difficult to identify small, long, and
narrow wetlands within the landscape. Many of today's remote sensing satellites do
not have sufficient spatial and spectral resolution to monitor wetland conditions,
although multispectral IKONOS and QuickBird data may offer improved spatial
resolutions once it is 4 m or higher. Majority of the pixels are just mixtures of several
plant species or vegetation types and are difficult to isolate which translates into an
inability to classify the vegetation that defines the wetland. Improved remote sensing
information, coupled with good knowledge domain on wetlands will facilitate
expanded efforts in wetland monitoring and mapping. This will also be extremely
important because we expect to see major shifts in species composition due to both
anthropogenic land use and natural changes in the environment caused by climate
change.

Monitoring[edit]
A wetland needs to be monitored over time to assess whether it is functioning at an
ecologically sustainable level or whether it is becoming degraded. Degraded
wetlands will suffer a loss in water quality, loss of sensitive species, and aberrant
functioning of soil geochemical processes.
Mapping
Practically, many natural wetlands are difficult to monitor from the ground as they
are quite often are difficult to access and may require exposure to dangerous plants
and animals as well as diseases borne by insects or other invertebrates..Therefore,
mapping using aerial imagery is one effective tool to monitor a wetland, especially a
large wetland, and can also be used to monitor the status of numerous wetlands
throughout a watershed or region. Many remote sensing methods can be used to
map wetlands. Remote-sensing technology permits the acquisition of timely digital
data on a repetitive basis. This repeat coverage allows wetlands, as well as the
adjacent land-cover and land-use types, to be monitored seasonally and/or annually.
Using digital data provides a standardized data-collection procedure and an
opportunity for data integration within a geographic information system. Traditionally,
Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM), Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus
(ETM+), and the SPOT 4 and 5 satellite systems have been used for this purpose.
More recently, however, multispectral IKONOS and QuickBird data, with spatial
resolutions of 4 by 4 m (13 by 13 ft) and 2.44 by 2.44 m (8.0 by 8.0 ft), respectively,
 have been shown to be excellent sources of data when mapping and monitoring
smaller wetland habitats and vegetation communities.
For example, Detroit Lakes Wetland Management District assessed area wetlands in
Michigan, USA, using remote sensing. Through using this technology, satellite
images were taken over a large geographic area and extended period. In addition,
using this technique was less costly and time-consuming compared to the older
method using visual interpretation of aerial photographs. In comparison, most aerial
photographs also require experienced interpreters to extract information based on
structure and texture while the interpretation of remote sensing data only requires
analysis of one characteristic (spectral).
However, there are a number of limitations associated with this type of image
acquisition. Analysis of wetlands has proved difficult because to obtain the data it is
often linked to other purposes such as the analysis of land cover or land use.
Further improvements
Methods to develop a classification system for specific biota of interest could assist
with technological advances that will allow for identification at a very high accuracy
rate. The issue of the cost and expertise involved in remote sensing technology is
still a factor hindering further advancements in image acquisition and data
processing. Future improvements in current wetland vegetation mapping could
include the use of more recent and better geospatial data when it is available.

Restoration[edit]
Restoration and restoration ecologists intend to return wetlands to their natural
trajectory by aiding directly with the natural processes of the ecosystem.[90] These
direct methods vary with respect to the degree of physical manipulation of the
natural environment and each are associated with different levels of
restoration.[90] Restoration is needed after disturbance or perturbation of a
wetland.[90] Disturbances include exogenous factors such as flooding or
drought.[90] Other external damage may be anthropogenic disturbance caused by
clear-cut harvesting of trees, oil and gas extraction, poorly defined infrastructure
installation, over grazing of livestock, ill-considered recreational activities, alteration
of wetlands including dredging, draining, and filling, and other negative human
impacts.[90][16] Disturbance puts different levels of stress on an environment
depending on the type and duration of disturbance.[90] There is no one way to restore
a wetland and the level of restoration required will be based on the level of
disturbance although, each method of restoration does require preparation and
administration.[90]

Levels of restoration[edit]
Factors influencing selected approach may include[90]

 Budget
 Time scale limitations
 Project goals
 Level of disturbance
 Landscape and ecological constraints
 Political and administrative agendas
 Socioeconomic priorities
1. Prescribed Natural Regeneration
There are no biophysical manipulation and the ecosystem is left to recover based on the
process of succession alone.[90] The focus of this method is to eliminate and prevent
further disturbance from occurring.[90] In order for this type of restoration to be effective
and successful there must be prior research done to understand the probability that the
wetland will recover with this method.[90] Otherwise, some biophysical manipulation may
be required to enhance the rate of succession to an acceptable level determined by the
project managers and ecologists.[90] This is likely to be the first method of approach for
the lowest level of disturbance being that it is the least intrusive and least costly.[90]
2. Assisted Natural Regeneration
There are some biophysical manipulations however they are non-intrusive.[90] Example
methods that are not limited to wetlands include prescribed burns to small areas,
promotion of site specific soil microbiota and plant growth using nucleation planting
whereby plants radiate from an initial planting site,[99] and promotion of niche diversity or
increasing the range of niches to promote use by a variety of different species.[90] These
methods can make it easier for the natural species to flourish by removing competition
from their environment and can speed up the process of succession.[90]
3. Partial Reconstruction
Here there is a mix between natural regeneration and manipulated environmental
control.[90] These manipulations may require some engineering and more invasive
biophysical manipulation including ripping of subsoil, agrichemical applications such as
herbicides and insecticides, laying of mulch, mechanical seed dispersal, and tree planting
on a large scale.[90] In these circumstances the wetland is impaired and without human
assistance it would not recover within an acceptable period of time determined by
ecologists.[90] Again these methods of restoration will have to be considered on a site by
site basis as each site will require a different approach based on levels of disturbance
and ecosystem dynamics.[90]
4. Complete Reconstruction
The most expensive and intrusive method of reconstruction requiring engineering and
ground up reconstruction.[90] Because there is a redesign of the entire ecosystem it is
important that the natural trajectory of the ecosystem be considered and that the plant
species will eventually return the ecosystem towards its natural trajectory.[90]
Important considerations[edit]
 Constructed wetlands can take 10–100 years to fully resemble the vegetative
composition of a natural wetland.
 Artificial wetlands do not have hydric soil. The soil has very low levels of organic
carbon and total nitrogen compared to natural wetland systems, and this
reduces the performance of several functions.
 Organic matter added to degraded natural wetlands can in some cases help
restore their productivity.[100]
Legislation[edit]
International Efforts

 Ramsar Convention[16]
 North American Waterfowl Management Plan[16]
Canadian National Efforts

 The Federal Policy on Wetland Conservation[101]

 Other Individual Provincial and Territorial Based Policies[101]

List of wetland types[edit]

The following list is that used within Australia to classify wetland by type:[102]
 A—Marine and Coastal Zone wetlands

1. Marine waters—permanent shallow waters less than six metres deep at low
tide; includes sea bays, straits
2. Subtidal aquatic beds; includes kelp beds, seagrasses, tropical marine
meadows
3. Coral reefs
4. Rocky marine shores; includes rocky offshore islands, sea cliffs
5. Sand, shingle or pebble beaches; includes sand bars, spits, sandy islets
6. Intertidal mud, sand or salt flats
7. Intertidal marshes; includes saltmarshes, salt meadows, saltings, raised salt
marshes, tidal brackish and freshwater marshes
8. Intertidal forested wetlands; includes mangrove swamps, nipa swamps, tidal
freshwater swamp forests
9. Brackish to saline lagoons and marshes with one or more relatively narrow
connections with the sea
10. Freshwater lagoons and marshes in the coastal zone
11. Non-tidal freshwater forested wetlands

 B—Inland wetlands

1. Permanent rivers and streams; includes waterfalls

2. Seasonal and irregular rivers and streams
3. Inland deltas (permanent)
4. Riverine floodplains; includes river flats, flooded river basins, seasonally
flooded grassland, savanna and palm savanna
5. Permanent freshwater lakes (> 8 ha); includes large oxbow lakes
6. Seasonal/intermittent freshwater lakes (> 8 ha), floodplain lakes
7. Permanent saline/brackish lakes
8. Seasonal/intermittent saline lakes
9. Permanent freshwater ponds (< 8 ha), marshes and swamps on inorganic
soils; with emergent vegetation waterlogged for at least most of the growing
season
10. Seasonal/intermittent freshwater ponds and marshes on inorganic soils;
includes sloughs, potholes; seasonally flooded meadows, sedge marshes
11. Permanent saline/brackish marshes
12. Seasonal saline marshes
13. Shrub swamps; shrub-dominated freshwater marsh, shrub carr, alder thicket
on inorganic soils
14. Freshwater swamp forest; seasonally flooded forest, wooded swamps; on
inorganic soils
15. Peatlands; forest, shrub or open bogs
16. Alpine and tundra wetlands; includes alpine meadows, tundra pools,
temporary waters from snow melt
17. Freshwater springs, oases and rock pools
18. Geothermal wetlands
19. Inland, subterranean karst wetlands

 C—Human-made wetlands

1. Water storage areas; reservoirs, barrages, hydro-electric dams,

impoundments (generally > 8 ha)
2. Ponds, including farm ponds, stock ponds, small tanks (generally < 8 ha)
 3. Aquaculture ponds; fish ponds, shrimp ponds
4. Salt exploitation; salt pans, salines
5. Excavations; gravel pits, borrow pits, mining pools
6. Wastewater treatment; sewage farms, settling ponds, oxidation basins
7. Irrigated land and irrigation channels; rice fields, canals, ditches
8. Seasonally flooded arable land, farm land
Other classification systems for wetlands exist. In the US, the best known are
the Cowardin classification system[103] and the hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification
system .