3 - 4-11 Edited

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
At a glance
Powered by AI
Larry needs to determine the minimum cost staffing plan for scheduling computer consultants at different times of the day.

Larry needs to determine the minimum cost way to staff full-time and part-time computer consultants across different shifts to meet demand.

The decision variables are the number of full-time consultants working each shift (ft1, ft2, ft3) and the number of part-time consultants working each shift (pt1, pt2, pt3, pt4).

3.4-11. Larry Edison is the director of the Computer Center for the Buckly College.

He now
needs to schedule the staffing of the center. It is open from 8 am until midnight. Larry has
monitored the usage of the center at various times of the day, and determined that the following
number of computer consultants are required:

Time of the Day Minimum Number of Consultants Required


to be on Duty
8 am – Noon 4
Noon – 4 pm 8
4 pm – 8 pm 10
8 pm – Midnight 6

Two types of computer consultants can be hired: full-time and part-time. The full-time
consultants work for 8 hours a day in any time of the following shifts: morning (8am – 4pm),
afternoon (noon- 8pm) and evening (4pm – midnight). Full-time consultants are paid $40 per
hour.

Part-time consultants can be hired to work of any of the 4 shifts listed in the above table.
Part-time consultants are paid $30 per hour.

An additional requirement is that during every time period, there must be at least 2-full-
time consultants on duty for every for every part-time consultant on duty.

Larry would like to determine how many full-time and how many part-time workers
should work each shift to meet the above requirements at minimum possible cost.

a. Formulate a linear programming model for this problem

b. Solve this model by the simplex method

Solutions:

a. Linear Programming model

Let ft1 = number of full-time consultants working the morning shift (8 a.m.-4 p.m.)

ft2 = number of full-time consultants working the afternoon shift (Noon-8 p.m.)

ft3 = number of full-time consultants working the evening shift (4 p.m.-midnight)


pt 1 = number of part-time consultants working the first shift (8 a.m.-noon)

pt 2 = number of part-time consultants working the second shift (Noon-4 p.m.)

pt 3 = number of part-time consultants working the third shift (4 p.m.-8 p.m.)

pt 4 = number of part-time consultants working the fourth shift (8 p.m.-midnight)

Minimize

C  (40  8)  ( ft1  ft2  ft3 )  (30  4)  ( pt1  pt 2  pt 3  pt 4 )

Constraints

ft1  pt1  4
ft1  ft2  pt2  8
ft2  ft3  pt3  10
ft3  pt4  6
ft1  2 pt1
ft1  ft2  2 pt2
ft2  ft3  2 pt3
ft3  2 pt4
ft1 , ft2 , ft3 , pt1 , pt2 , pt3 , pt4  0

b. Simplex Model

Total cost Variables Constraints Inequalities Constants


4106.667 Full-time 1 (8am-4pm) 2.666667 4 >= 4
Full-time 2(noon -
2.666667 8 >= 8
8pm)
Full-time 3(4pm-
4 10 >= 10
midnight)
part-time 1(8am-noon) 1.333333 6 >= 6
part-time 2(noon-4pm) 2.666667 0 >= 0
part-time 3(4pm-8pm) 3.333333 0 >= 0
part-time 4(8pm-
2 0 >= 0
midnight)
0 >= 0
2.666666667 >= 0
2.666666667 >= 0
4 >= 0
1.333333333 >= 0
2.666666667 >= 0
3.333333333 >= 0
2 >= 0

Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report


Worksheet: [Book1]Sheet1
Report Created: 11/03/2019 10:40:44 PM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$L$10 ft1 2.666666667 0 320 0 80
$L$11 ft2 2.666666667 0 320 80 0
$L$12 ft3 4 0 320 1E+30 80
$L$13 pt1 1.333333333 0 120 80 0
$L$14 pt2 2.666666667 0 120 80 520
$L$15 pt3 3.333333333 0 120 0 360
$L$16 pt4 2 0 120 80 520

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$M$10 Constraints 4 120 4 0 1.333333333
$M$11 Constraints 8 173.3333333 8 2 0
$M$12 Constraints 10 120 10 0 2
$M$13 Constraints 6 173.3333333 6 2 0
$M$14 Constraints 0 0 0 0 1E+30
$M$15 Constraints 0 26.66666667 0 4 0
$M$16 Constraints 0 0 0 0 4
$M$17 Constraints 0 26.66666667 0 4 0
$M$18 Constraints 2.666666667 0 0 2.666666667 1E+30
$M$19 Constraints 2.666666667 0 0 2.666666667 1E+30
$M$20 Constraints 4 0 0 4 1E+30
$M$21 Constraints 1.333333333 0 0 1.333333333 1E+30
$M$22 Constraints 2.666666667 0 0 2.666666667 1E+30
$M$23 Constraints 3.333333333 0 0 3.333333333 1E+30
$M$24 Constraints 2 0 0 2 1E+30

The optimal solution has fractional components: 2.666667, 2.666667, 4, 1.333333,


2.666667, 3.333333, and 2. If the number of consultants have to be integer, then the problem
is an integer programming problem and the solution is (3,3,4,1,3,3,2) with cost of $4,106.667.

You might also like