THE TAROT |
| why, how and how far
ZEXS
TCHALAIT
for |GRIMAUD) 1982The English version of this
method is dedicated
to John Boorman.
You are interested in the Tarot.
You do not know very clearly why. You are
vaguely aware that it contains elements
which could help you grasp a number of truths
about yourself, your orientations and your
future, or about things that have from time
immemorial remained difficultly accessible,
concerning the nature of the world and the
destiny of human beings, about what people
mysteriously call “knowledge”.
But you do not know which way to handle the
Tarot. You are disturbed by the appearance of
some cards. Possibly, you recognize shapes,
images or ideas which seem familiar or mea-
ningful, but what is to be done with, say, the
VI of Cup? You have reads books that deal
with the Tarot, you have realized that a consi-
derable ammount of big words are to be found
there, and a great deal of moralizing. You
have noted that the authors display a lot of
confidence about what they profess while
remaining rather hazy; you wonder to whase
authority they are indebted for such asser-
tiveness, while as far as you are concerned
you just manage to skim over the surface of
the Tarot; you wonder how true their affirma-
tions are: for, in order to butress their own
explanation of the Tarot, they keep referring to
other systems, or to their own inner convic-
tions, which, admittedly, are not necessa-
rily erroneous.
But, although unable to articulate your
impression, you have a deep-rooted feeling
that there is something more, that the Tarot
is something other than this muddy, muzzy
and dusty mixture. You are right. The Tarot is
in itself a living construction, a pure and inte-
1gral path. {It is you; it is the Universe. What
you only need is a means to see it.
Here is a method. Yes, a method — even if the
word sounds unpleasant with this schoolish
and rational ring toit. Be aware of this straight
off: The Tarot is indeed a school. A simple
school for children (and for those who know
how to become children again). And, in fact,
access to what is called the irrational is
possible only via arational methed. A method
that science could accept, and which would
allow one to substantiate a series of objective
proofs of the validity of the Tarot — and no
longer subjective ones, based on too personai
4 scaie of values.
At the threshold of the year 2000, or of what
astrologists call “the Aquarian Era", Tarot
study belongs to the fields which border upon
advanced science, touching the fringe bet-
ween two clearly defined domains — though
often merging into each other: the collective
unconscious on the one hand — in the sense
given to it by C.G. Jung — and the holonomic
laws of the Universe, on the other hand. The
Tarot makes up a set of 78 cards, but also
infinitely more numerous series and cycles,
each element of which is undetachable from
the others, bound to them in a state of inter-
connectedness (*) which cannot be pulled
apart. Could it then be a model, a “design” of
the Universe ?
You are lucky enough to hold in your hands the
Marseille Tarot, the most experience-packed,
therefore the most reliable that has ever been
produced: conform to tradition in its minutest
details, with colours owing their lasting quality
to the art of the 1981 chemist and printer,
and yet accurate and very beautiful.
Let us now consider how to approach it.
With method !
Our Ariadne thread will consist in this: WHY
does the Tarot exist ? WHY can it be said that
it comes from the Future ? etc. HOW will you
be able to find your own inner schemas in the
Tarot, and those common to the whole known
Universe, without breaking loose from day-
to-day reality ? etc. HOW FAR canyou go, avoi-
ding approximate and dangerous divination,
while replacing it by something far superior,
vaster, far more beautiful, i.e. by becoming a
co-creator of the Future: yours, and that of the
world.
(*) The expression “inseparable interconnec-
tednass" is from the physicist David Bohm.