Guide For VFD
Guide For VFD
Guide For VFD
+ motors
While the connection between motor and inverter supply is usually
straightforward, there are still a number of issues which need to be
carefully considered, as this article explains
The rapid rate of development of variable speed drives and motors brings with it
many challenges for manufacturers, installers and users.
Variable speed AC drives are now being designed in to equipment and plant in ever
increasing numbers, fuelled by the two key benefits of costs reduction (through energy
saving and lower maintenance demands) or process improvements (better product
quality, higher dynamics, more flexible production etc).
Many modern automated production systems, batch processes and continuous
manufacturing operations, such as web printing, rely on the accurate control of
motor/drive systems.
As industry demands ever more precision and power, at reduce cost of purchase and
operation, so motor and drive producers are striving to build components and sub
systems that deliver the expected performance.
While the connection between motor and inverter supply is usually straightforward,
there are still a number of issues which need to be carefully considered.
Whilst the vast majority of VSD driven motors are applied without issue, some special
cases require additional guidance.
To date, little independent advice on handling such issues has been available.
Some information on the motor is available from the technical report IEC34 -17 1998
"Guide for the application of cage induction motors fed from converters", but this does
not reflect current state of the art and is inadequate for modern inverters.
A little further guidance on VSD issues may be obtained from BS EN 61800-2 "
Adjustable speed electrical power drive systems - Part 2: General requirements".
Users may therefore feel that an important area has lacked clear guidance so far.
Considerable work relating to the characterisation and specification of cage induction
motors and variable frequency converter supplies is being pioneered here in the UK, by a
joint working group comprised of industry experts.
Both GAMBICA, the Association for the Instrumentation, Control and Automation
Industry, and REMA, the Rotating Electrical Machines Association, have been working
on standards and guidelines relating to motors and variable speed drives (VSD).
However, although both associations were working independently towards the same
ultimate objective, it fell to Steve Barker (product marketing manager for variable speed
drives) at Siemens Automation and Drives in Manchester, to suggest that they teamed
up and formed a joint technical committee.
Mr Barker, who is Chair of the GAMBICA Association's VSD Group, explains:
"Although it seemed obvious that GAMBICA and REMA should pool their expertise,
the idea did appear to be somewhat revolutionary at the time it was suggested."
The concept was enthusiastically embraced by the manufacturers and a taskforce (also
convened by Steve Barker) was commissioned to investigate the issue of motor
insulation under inverter operation.
The results of the groups joint efforts can already be seen, with the publication of their
first Technical Guide, entitled: "Variable Speed Drives and Motors: Motor Insulation and
PWM Inverter Drives".
The guide, which is the forerunner to a much more detailed technical report (also now
available) on the subject, is one of a series of planned publications that will provide
OEM equipment designers, systems integrators and end users with help on the correct
selection and use of motor/drive systems.
The co-operation between GAMBICA and REMA has not gone unnoticed
internationally.
Through the various international connections of both REMA and GAMBICA, the IEC
(International Electrotechnical Commission), who are responsible for setting so many of
the product standards now found in factory automation and process control, have also
taken up the challenge.
Previously, one IEC committee concerned itself with motors another group concentrated
on drives and power electronics.
Impressed with what they saw happening in the UK, the two IEC committees took the
decision to create a joint working group to address the specific issues applicable to
motors designed to be operated from inverter supplies.
The working group consists of nearly twenty international experts active in the field of
both drives and motors.
Together with end users, most of the major manufacturers are represented with
delegates from across Europe, North America and Japan.
Based on his similar experience in the UK, Steve Barker was appointed as the group
convenor challenged with steering the team to achieve the set objectives.
"At the inaugural meeting in London, last September, the priorities were set to
concentrate on cage induction motors designed for VSD operation operating at less than
1000 Volts."
Mr Barker explains.
" The aim of the team is clarify the key points of consideration and the outcome of this
working group's activity, WG26, will hopefully be new guidelines to address our core
issues."
The core issues are: Additional motor insulation stress due to inverter operation
Increases and effects on motor losses (efficency) Oscillating transient motor torques
Increased stray motor Bearing currents Electro-magnetically excited motor audible
noise.
Under some unfavourable conditions, the above can cause problems or unnecessary
irritation to the user and all these points require further investigation.
The remit of IEC's WG26 is to characterise each of these issues in detail, identify
possible solutions and finally to suggest design changes where appropriate.
It is hoped that new international guidelines or standards will be in place by within two
years, although Mr Barker admits that this is a tough task.
His objective is to provide authoritative information which will assist users to apply
equipment correctly and will persuade manufacturers to improve designs where needed.
In the UK study, GAMBICA and REMA evaluated the situation where the quality
motors offered by REMA members were controlled by PWM inverters from the
GAMBICA suppliers.
Although motor insulation stress is increased with VSD operation (dependent on cable
length), the key findings of the team were:- Motors running on a supply voltage of 500V
or less are not affected by these stresses Enhanced winding insulation systems are
required for supply voltages over 500V A key challenge for the team was to ensure that
the guidance was clear and straightforward.
As presented in their technical guide, they point to the need for users of motors running
above 500V to pay special attention to the way the motor winding insulation has been
constructed.
It is recommended that for supply voltages between 500V and 690V, motors are chosen,
from the range offered by REMA members, with an enhanced insulation system.
These readily available motors may cost between 10 and 20 per cent more than a
standard design, but they offer the required assurance against costly failures.
If a motor is being considered from alternative suppliers, it is important, say the working
group, to establish the pulse withstand capability by discussing the application with the
supplier.
These can then be compared to the benchmark pulse withstand characteristics which are
included as part of the technical guide.
However, in some cases, for example where a drive is being retro-fitted to an existing
motor, or the characteristics of the motor cannot be identified, these recommendations
cannot be followed.
In these cases, alternative solutions such as output filters are available and it is usually
advisable to consult with the drive and/or motor manufacturer.
Beware, some special cases merit further attention.
For example, drives that use alternative non PWM control strategies (such as direct
torque injection schemes), could actually further double the motor's peak voltage stress
and therefore special mitigation measures may be needed.
The guide also offers advice on other applications such as active front end drives where
further limitations apply.
Finally, the working group points out that it is especially important to note that the use
of inverter drives with "Ex" rated motors used in hazardous environments may invalidate
the hazardous area certification and the application must be referred to the equipment
supplier Mr Barker feels that it is more important than ever to consider the motor and
drive as an integral package.
"The persuasive benefits offered by frequency converters will ensure that the expansion
of inverter control continues as VSD technology develops.
For optimum selections and increased assurance, the converter and motor components
need to be assessed together", he concludes.
More information:
• See contact details for Siemens Automation and
Drives and other news
• Email this news to a colleague
Vince
Reply
James Bouchard
Reply
You will need to increase the applied voltage since the current drawn by the motor will start to fall
because of increasing impedance. If the applied voltage is not enough, the rotor can not pick up
to the speed and the slip will increase and you will be at a point at which the speed does not
increase anymore irespective of increase in freuency.
By the way the cost of an inverter is half the price of a set of high speed mist cooled ball
bearings. Since you are prepared to go for the bearings you as well try this with an inverter
instead first.
Best regards,
Sekar
Reply
Max safe operating frequency depends only on mechanical durability of the bearings and rotor
itself. But be careful as starting from the nominal frequency voltage cannot be higher then the
nominal voltage of the motor - this means that at 500 Hz you will get only 1/10 of the nominal
torque (if nominal frequency is 50).
Regards,
AC
White Paper: Motors
Induction Motors -
Constant Frequency / Constant Voltage
Variable Frequency / Variable Voltage
| Abstract | Intro. | Terminology & Equivalent Circuits | Speed-Torque Curves | Efficiency & Losses | Adj. Freq. Variable Speed Op. |
Field Oriented Control | Constant Power Op. | Non-Fundamental Voltages, Current | Additional Motor Losses | Heat Dissipation |
Switched Voltage Waveforms | Noise | Oversizing-Derating | Conclusions |
Abstract
As more AC induction motors are applied to variable speed applications, it is increasingly
important to understand how these motors operate. The differences between operation on
"sinewave" power and "static" power supplies can be quite significant.
This session will review the basics of constant frequency / constant voltage operation of ac
induction motors. These principles of operation will then be extended to the case of
operation from variable frequency / variable voltage power. Finally, the effects of the non-
sinusoidal voltage and/or current waveshapes will be covered.
Introduction
AC induction motors have for many years been reliable workhorses in converting
electricity into rotating power. The last 20 years has seen increasing usage of these motors
with adjustable frequency controls to add variable speed capability to AC motors. While
AC motors were initially applied to relatively simple variable speed applications (such as
varying the flow rate of a fan or pump), advances in AC motors and control technology
have allowed their use in higher performance applications.
With these higher performance applications (and higher performance motors and controls)
has come the need for "high performance" matching of the control, motor, and the
application. This session will provide additional understanding of the adjustable-frequency,
variable-speed operation of AC induction motors, with the intent of fostering "smarter"
application and improved performance.
The motor counter-emf (Eg) can also be thought of as the voltage across the magnetizing
reactance (xm) in the equivalent circuit of Figure 2b. Maintaining constant flux while the
speed (frequency) is varied can then be seen as requiring constant ratio of Eg / f .
Since Eg is a motor internal voltage, this needs to be related to the terminal voltage of the
motor. From the AC motor equivalent circuit, it can been seen that the voltage drops
across the stator resistance and leakage reactance represent the "difference’ between Eg
and the terminal voltage Vt.
If a controller were to maintain a constant ratio of AL voltage to frequency (Vt / f), rather
than Eg / f, this would result in a decreasing flux level at lower speeds (frequencies). The
curves of Figure 7 demonstrate the effect of this failure to maintain the motor flux. It can
be seen that the peak value of torque falls of at the reduced flux levels. In fact, the peak
torque is approximately proportional to the square of the flux level, so the drop-off can be
significant. The torque per amp is also proportional to the motor flux, so increased current
draw for a given load will also result from reduced flux.
Speed Torque with Contant Terminal V/Hz
Figure 7
As a means to improve the system characteristics (beyond the curves of Figure 7),
controllers often compensate for the difference between Vt and Eg in order to select tile
correct voltage for a given frequency. This compensation is often referred to as "voltage
boost." Since the major detrimental effect of constant Vt / f is at low voltages, low
frequencies (low speeds), the voltage drop across the stator leakage reactance is usually
ignored (as the impedance of an inductor is proportional to frequency). This leaves the
drop across the stator resistance as the major source of a discrepancy between Vt and Eg
at these low speeds.
Many controllers use a value of voltage boost which compensates for the IR drop of the
stator at a current equal to the motor full load amps.
Vb =If1 x r1 (3)
Vb is the per phase (line-to-neutral) voltage boost,
rl is the per phase stator resistance,
Ifl is the motor full load current.
This would result in a voltage versus frequency characteristic as shown in Figure 8. A
weakness in this technique of boosting voltage is that the value of Vb is only "correct" for
a single value of load current. If the full load current is used to set the voltage boost, then
the motor will be overfluxed for lighter loads, and underfluxed for overload conditions.
Depending on the low speed performance required by a given application, this may or may
not be a problem.
Low Speed Voltage Boost
Figure 8
Heat Dissipation
Adding to the motor heating caused by the additional losses discussed above, a "self-
ventilated’ (e.g. DPG, TEFC) motor WM have less ability to dissipate these losses at
lower speeds (Figure 13). For this reason, it is often appropriate to use a motor with
ventilation which is speed-independent (TENV, DPFV, TEBC) when operating across a
wide range of speeds. As can be discerned from Figure 13, the desirability of speed-
independent cooling is typically more pronounced for larger machines.
Influence of Speed on Heat Dissipation
Figure 13
In addition to the problem of loss of dissipation at lower speeds, the use of a TEFC or
DPG motor for operation at high speeds can result in large windage losses, as well as
acoustic noise problems.
While motors are often not thought of as having a characteristic capacitance, there are
both phase to ground as well as phase to phase capacitances associated with AC induction
motors. This capacitive effect is "distributed’ in that the windings have various "Positions"
relative to the stator core, as well as to the other phases. This causes the capacitively-
coupled current flow to also be (unequally) distributed. These currents, while very short in
duration, also occur at every transition (dV/dt) and can cause failure of an inadequately
insulated motor in a short time.
Another result of these capacitively-coupled currents is that if a ground connection is not
provided (from the motor frame), significant psuedo-square wave voltages will occur on
the motor frame which can be a hazard to personnel. A proper ground connection will
eliminate these voltages, but there will be fairly high frequency currents flowing to ground.
The leads connecting the controller to the motor also will experience some of the same
capacitively coupled currents as the motor (phase to phase and phase to ground).
Noise
Another effect of the non-fundamental waveforms of Figure 12 on AC induction motors is
the possibility to produce acoustic noise. Beyond noise due to "windage" effects, the
majority of motor noise is due to components deforming in a manner which can pump air
in the audible frequency range.
While all structures have characteristic sets of natural frequencies and corresponding mode
shapes, some of these are of more concern. If any of the non-fundamental waveform
frequencies are closely aligned with motor natural frequencies, the forces produces by
these voltages and currents may excite mode shapes which could result in high audible
noise at a specific frequency.
The use of motor designs which have as "sparse" as possible a set of (potentially noise
producing) natural frequencies is a good starting point to reduce opportunities for noise
problems. By appropriate design of the electromagnetic structure, the force distribution of
the higher frequencies can also be mitigated.
Oversizing / Derating
An approach to applying AC induction motors to adjustable-h-frequency, variable-speed
operation can be to oversize or derate motors for the application. This is an approach
which may in simple applications be successful, but a number of potential hazards exist.
Whether or not a motor is derated / oversized will not be of any help if the insulation
system is inadequate for the switched voltage wavefronts from the controller. A motor
loaded to less dm full load can fail just as quickly as one fully utilized if the insulation
dielectric capability is lacking.
A motor which is derated will have lower reactances, which in a CSI application may be
fine, but can cause excessive current ripple in a PWM environment. This high ripple can
cause IIET trips of the controller, overheating of the controller transistors, or motor
overheating. Also a derated motor will have low damping as a result of the its low slip,
which can cause instability problems in open loop drives, or modeling problems in a field-
oriented controller.
Since AC induction motors can have a significant level of no load (magnetizing) current
compared to full load current, a derated motor will often operate at a reduced power
factor at the application load. This can result in higher full load current which may exceed
the continuous rated current of the controller.
Conclusions
AC induction motors are likely to continue to be reliable sources of fixed speed rotating
power. Their successful use in variable speed applications is increasing. In order to avoid
unsuccessful applications, the users, controller and motor manufacturers need to
communicate well. This will allow appropriate matching of the load, motor, and controller.
Document B-7097-2