The document provides design details for a 3.5m high cantilever retaining wall, including input parameters, calculations for earth pressures, stability analysis, and reinforcement design for the toe, heel, base slab, and stem. Key outputs include factors of safety against overturning and sliding greater than minimum requirements, reinforcement areas and sizes designed to resist bending and shear stresses, and pressures on the base slab within allowable limits.
The document provides design details for a 3.5m high cantilever retaining wall, including input parameters, calculations for earth pressures, stability analysis, and reinforcement design for the toe, heel, base slab, and stem. Key outputs include factors of safety against overturning and sliding greater than minimum requirements, reinforcement areas and sizes designed to resist bending and shear stresses, and pressures on the base slab within allowable limits.
The document provides design details for a 3.5m high cantilever retaining wall, including input parameters, calculations for earth pressures, stability analysis, and reinforcement design for the toe, heel, base slab, and stem. Key outputs include factors of safety against overturning and sliding greater than minimum requirements, reinforcement areas and sizes designed to resist bending and shear stresses, and pressures on the base slab within allowable limits.
The document provides design details for a 3.5m high cantilever retaining wall, including input parameters, calculations for earth pressures, stability analysis, and reinforcement design for the toe, heel, base slab, and stem. Key outputs include factors of safety against overturning and sliding greater than minimum requirements, reinforcement areas and sizes designed to resist bending and shear stresses, and pressures on the base slab within allowable limits.
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 8
DESIGN OF CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL 3.
5 m HEIGHT Input data:
Ht above GL (a) = 4.50 m Angle of repose (Φ) = 30.00
Ht below GL (b) = 3.00 m Unit Wt of soil = 18.00 Base width (c) = 5.50 m Slop of stem Towards = Heel Width of toe (d) = 2.00 m SBC = 106 Width of heel (e) = 2.90 m Concrete Grade = 25 Thk of stem (Top t1)= 0.23 m Steel Grade = 500 Thk of stem (Bottom t2)= 0.60 m Coefficent of Friction = 0.577 Thk of base slab (t3)= 0.35 m FOS (Overturning) = 1.2 Width of Key (sb)= 0 m FOS (Sliding) = 1.4 Depth of Key (sd) = 0 m Effective cover = 0.05 Key Dis from A (x)= 0 m Surcharge = 25 m m
Active/Passive earth pressure:
Ka = 0.39 from soil dynamic
Kp = 3.00 **(1+sinΦ)/(1-sinΦ)
Stability calculation :
Overturning Hori Force Vertical force Vertical Dis Hori. Dis from moment Resisting Load Type (kN) (kN) from A (m) A (m) (kNm) moment (kNm)
Max Pressure = 100.22 kN/m2 < SBC, OK ** (P/A)+(M/Z)
Min Pressure = 106.34 kN/m2 > 0, OK ** (P/A)-(M/Z)
FOS (overturning) = 2.75 OK ** (0.9 x RM/OM)
FOS (Sliding) = 10.70 OK ** (0.9 X Friction X P/H)
Width of Key (sb)= 0.00 m Dis from A (x)= 0 m
Depth of Key (sd) = 0.00 m **FOS =(Kp ϒ [(h1+a)2-h12]/2+μs Rtoe+μ Rheel)*0.9/Hor force FOS (Sliding) = 10.70 OK **h1= ht of filling at toe, neglect top 300mm , a = depth of key
Design of Toe :
8.75 kN/m2 137.45 kN/m2 31.11 kN/m2
34.34 kN/m2
93.70 kN/m2 103.11 kN/m2 106.34 kN/m2 91.47 kN/m2 100.22 kN/m2 102.45 kN/m2 Net soil pressure acting on base slab
Reinforcement for Toe:
Dist. Of Critical section = 2.00 m Mu @ critical section = 276.64 kN.m Pt(%) Req = 0.85 % Min Pt(%) = 0.12 % Ast req = 2557 mm2 Dia = 16 + 0 Spacing = 125 200 Ast prov = 1608 mm2 < Ast req, revised
Distribution steel Ast req = 210 mm2 Dia = 10 + 0 Spacing = 200 300 mm Ast prov = 393 mm2 > Ast req, OK Each face
Design fo Shear reinforcement
Dist. Of Critical section = 1.70 m Vu @ critical section = 236.09 kN/m τv= 0.79 Mpa τc= 0.50 Mpa τv>τc,Revised Reinforcement Design of Heel :
Reinforcement for Heel:
Dist. Of Critical section = 2.90 m Mu @ critical section = 203.03 kN.m Pt(%) Req = 0.59 % Min Pt(%) = 0.12 % Ast req = 1764 mm2 Dia = 16 + 0 Spacing = 125 200 Ast prov = 1608 mm2 < Ast req, revised
Distribution steel Ast req = 210 mm2 Dia = 10 + 0 Spacing = 200 300 mm Ast prov = 393 mm2 > Ast req, OK Each face
Design fo Shear reinforcement
Dist. Of Critical section = 2.60 m Vu @ critical section = 127.63 kN/m τv= 0.43 Mpa τc= 0.50 Mpa τv<τc,OK Design of stem :
- BM (Support) = 1060.83 kN.m
Pt(%) Req = 1.01 % Min Pt(%) = 0.12 % Ast req = 5561 mm2 Dia = 16 mm + 16 Spacing = 125 mm C/C 125 mm C/C Ast prov = 3217 mm2 < Ast req, revised
Check for shear
Shear force (Vu) = 384.59 kN/m ** at distance d from face =w l/2 τv= 0.70 Mpa τc= 0.52 Mpa τv>τc,Revised Reinforcement
Height BM kN.m Ast req (mm2) Dia Spacing Dia Spacing
2.42 67.70 424 16 mm 125 mm C/C + 0 mm 200 mm C/C 4.85 372.23 1285 16 mm 125 mm C/C + 0 mm 200 mm C/C 7.27 1060.83 5561 16 mm 125 mm C/C + 16 mm 125 mm C/C
The Variation of Thermal Conductivity of Fibrous Insulation Materials Under Different Levels of Moisture Content 2013 Construction and Building Materials
The Variation of Thermal Conductivity of Fibrous Insulation Materials Under Different Levels of Moisture Content 2013 Construction and Building Materials
