Postpartum Family Planning: Programming Strategies For

Programming strategies for
Postpartum Family Planning

Programming Strategies for
Postpartum Family Planning
WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
Programming strategies for postpartum family planning.
1.Family planning services. 2.Counseling. 3.Postpartum period. 4.Pregnancy, Unplanned.
5.Contraception. 6.National health programs. I.World Health Organization.
ISBN 978 92 4 150649 6 (NLM classification: WA 550)
© World Health Organization 2013

All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site
(www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia,
1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]).
Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial
distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO web site (www.who.int/about/licensing/
copyright_form/en/index.html).
The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression
of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any
country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed
or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not
mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital
letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained
in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either
expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no
event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use.
Table of contents
List of acronyms iv
Acknowledgments v
Preamble vi
Method of work vii
Chapter 1: Postpartum family planning and why it’s needed 1

1.1 Postpartum family planning: definition and parameters 1
1.2 Rationale for PPFP 2
1.3 The unique family planning needs of postpartum women 3
Chapter 2: General considerations – understanding the landscape for PPFP programming 5
2.1 Review of country-level data 5
2.2 Health systems issues 6
2.3 Moving from the general to the specific 10
Chapter 3: Integrating PPFP across contact points – setting considerations 13
3.1 Antenatal care 14
3.2 Labour and delivery/pre-discharge 16
3.3 Postnatal care 18
3.4 Infant health and immunization services 20
3.5 Country programme case examples 22
Chapter 4: Monitoring and evaluation 31
References 35
Annex 1: Statement for collective action for postpartum planning 36
Annex 2: Supporting evidence for programme design 38

iv Programming strategies for postpartum family planning
List of Acronyms
AIDS Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
ANC Antenatal care
BCC Behaviour communication change
BCG Bacille Calmette–Guérin (vaccine)
CHW Community health worker
CYP Couple-years protection
DPT Diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus
EBF Exclusive breastfeeding
EPI Expanded Programme on Immunization
FP Family planning
FP/RH Family planning/reproductive health
HIV Human immunodeficiency virus
HMIS Health management information system
HTSP Healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy
iCCM Integrated community case management
IEC Information, education, communication
IMCI Integrated management of childhood illnesses
IUD Intrauterine contraceptive device
LAM Lactational amenorrhoea method
LARC Long-acting reversible contraception
MCHIP Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program
MEC Medical eligibility criteria
MNCH Maternal, newborn and child health
MIYCN Mother, infant and young child nutrition
PMTCT Prevention of mother-to-child transmission
PNC Postnatal care
PPFP Postpartum family planning
PPIUD Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device
PPTO Postpartum tubal occlusion
RCT Randomized controlled trial
SDP Service delivery point
SPR Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use
STI Sexually transmitted infection
TO Tubal occlusion
UNFPA United Nations Population Fund
USAID United States Agency for International Development
WHO World Health Organization
Programming strategies for postpartum family planning v
Acknowledgments
This document is the result of collaboration between the World Health Organization (WHO) Department
of Reproductive Health and Research and the Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent
Health as well as a large number of international organizations and agencies active in the field of
family planning. Funding and other support for this collaboration was provided by the United States
Government through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
This support is gratefully acknowledged.
Lynn Bakamjian, consultant, was the principal technical writer. The development of the document was
led by Lynn Bakamjian; Mary Lyn Gaffield of WHO; Holly Blanchard, Barbara Deller, Catharine McKaig and
Anne Pfitzer of the Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP), Jhpiego; Patricia McDonald
of USAID; and Nuriye Ortayli of UNFPA. Elizabeth Sasser of Jhpiego provided administrative support
to the document team throughout the entire process. Erin O’Connell and Jane Patten of Green Ink
provided editorial assistance.
Before a global technical consultation, MCHIP hosted a technical meeting in Washington, DC, on
18 July 2012, to gather input on a draft of the Programming Strategies for Family Planning document.
The 22 participants included health-care providers, researchers and programmers representing 13
organizations. Their input was incorporated in the draft, which then served as the basis for deliberations
during the WHO Geneva technical consultation. These contributors included: Adrienne Allison, Mengistu
Asnane, Lynn Bakamjian, Holly Blanchard, Jeannette Cachan, Elaine Charurat, Carolyn Curtis, Selamawit
Desta, Maxine Eber, Leah Elliott, Mary Lyn Gaffield, Justine Kavle, Jan Kumar, Patricia MacDonald,
Catharine McKaig, Maureen Norton, Kate Rademacher, Saumya Ramarao, Elizabeth Sasser, Cathy Solter,
John Stanback and Daren Trudeau.
The following people provided their expertise during the technical consultation in Geneva in
September 2012: Salahuddin Ahmed, Moazzam Ali, Muna Ali, Ian Askew, Hashina Begum, Vicente
Bataglia, Virginia Camacho, Laurette Cucuzza, Carmela de Cordero, Mamadou Diallo, Juan Diaz, Monica
Dragoman, Maxine Eber, Mohammed Eslami, Mario Festin, Gathari Gichuhi, Sanjida Hasan, Rahila Juya,
Rosemary Kamunya, Nigora Karabaeva, Asma Khalid, Eugene Kongnyuy, Rachel Lockey, Mohammed
Mai, Chisale Mhango, Winnie Mwebesa, Josselyn Neukom, Sharon Phillips, Annie Portela, Ilka Rondinelli,
Gamal Serour and John Stanback. We would like to express our deep appreciation to all of them for
contributing their time and expertise towards the consensus-building process.
vi Programming strategies for postpartum family planning
Preamble
Family planning (FP) is an essential component of health care provided during the antenatal period,
immediately after delivery and during the first year postpartum (WHO 2009). Postpartum family
planning (PPFP) is defined as the prevention of unintended pregnancy and closely spaced pregnancies
through the first 12 months following childbirth.
This Programming strategies for postpartum family planning document was prepared to: 1) support the
Statement for collective action for postpartum family planning (Annex 1), and 2) be used by programme
planners and managers as a resource when designing interventions to integrate PPFP into national and
subnational strategies.
PPFP should not be considered a ‘vertical’ programme, but rather as an integrated part of existing
maternal and child health and FP efforts. Successful PPFP interventions require holistic and evidence-
based programme strategies that contribute to strengthened health systems and sustained
improvements in high-quality services that put people at the centre of health care (Figure 1).
Figure 1. PPFP programme model
Health system building blocks Activities Outcomes Impacts
 Health workforce
Institutionalizing
 Information evidence-based Reduced:
 Coverage
interventions, tools,
 Contraceptives  Mortality
Service and approaches  Quality
 Financing Delivery that ensure access  Morbidity
and provide  Contraceptive
use
 Leadership/ sustained  Fertility
governance improvements in
PPFP services
 Community
The elements involved in designing a PPFP programme or intervention are the focus of this document.
It is not, however, intended to be prescriptive or serve as a definitive ‘how-to’ for programme
design and implementation. Users are assumed to have general experience in the design of family
planning/reproductive health (FP/RH) programmes; this document provides additional support for
PPFP programming. The content offers strategies that can be applied towards either developing a
comprehensive programme that addresses a woman’s FP needs through the entire postpartum period,
or strengthening the delivery of FP services to women who are postpartum at one or more points of
contact within the health system. Clinical guidance on FP service delivery is available within WHO’s
two evidence-based guidelines: the Medical eligibility for contraceptive use (MEC) (WHO 2009) and
Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use (SPR) (WHO 2008). Additionally, the World Health
Organization (WHO) publishes a handbook which providers of family planning services can reference,
titled Family planning: a global handbook for providers (WHO 2011).
Programming strategies for postpartum family planning vii
Method of work
This document represents the culmination of a collaborative initiative among the World Health
Organization (WHO), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United States Agency for International
Development (USAID), and their development partners. Preliminary work to develop this document
included convening two stakeholder meetings at WHO to define the scope of work (March and
November 2010), and organizing panel sessions during the First Global Symposium for Health Services
Research (Montreux, Switzerland) and the Second International Conference on Family Planning (Dakar,
Senegal). Discussions during the stakeholder meetings led to prioritizing the focus of the document on
programmatic strategies for policy-makers and programme managers. The conference panel sessions
offered opportunities to review evidence on the topic and highlight gaps in research at international
conferences. Based on input from these forums, a draft document was prepared.
To support the preparation of this document, a synthesis of the literature describing programmatic
interventions for PPFP was created (Annex 2). Searches of the grey and peer-reviewed literature were
performed using PubMed and The Cochrane Library, as well as Google and Bing Internet search engines
through July 2012.
In July 2012, a draft version was presented to a multidisciplinary group of United States-based family
planning (FP) experts during a technical meeting in Washington, DC. The 22 participants included
providers, researchers, and programmers representing 13 organizations. Comments received from these
experts were incorporated with the draft and literature synthesis.
WHO convened a technical consultation on 10–12 September 2012. There, experts developed
programmatic strategies for policy-makers and programme managers to consider when designing
programmes to reduce the unmet need for FP among women after delivery. The 34 experts
represented 20 countries and 13 agencies. The multi-disciplinary group comprised experts in
international FP, including clinicians, researchers, epidemiologists, programme managers and policy-
makers. The background document and a synthesis of literature were provided to the experts prior
to the consultation and served as the basis for the group’s deliberations during the meeting. Final
development was done through a consensus-based process. All participants were asked to declare any
conflict of interest before the meeting commenced; none were declared.
viii Programming strategies for postpartum family planning
Programming strategies for postpartum family planning 1
Chapter 1
Postpartum family planning and
why it’s needed
1.1 Postpartum family planning: definition and parameters

While family planning (FP) is important throughout an individual’s and couple’s reproductive life,
postpartum family planning (PPFP) focuses on the prevention of unintended and closely spaced
pregnancies through the first 12 months following childbirth. Table 1 identifies the continuum of points
of contact within the health care system that can provide opportunities to integrate PPFP with maternal,
newborn and child health (MNCH) interventions during the 12-month period after childbirth. While
this document’s parameters cover the first year postpartum only, programmes should also undertake
strategies for continuing contraception, or effective switching, during the second and subsequent years
after birth, depending on a woman’s desire to space or limit future pregnancies (WHO 2012a).
Table 1. Continuum of points of contact for PPFP
CONTINUUM OF POINTS OF CONTACT FOR PPFP

   
Pregnancy Labour and Postnatal, including Infant care
delivery, prevention of mother-to-
(4–6 weeks through 12 months)
STAGE
Pre-discharge child transmission of HIV

(0–48 hours) (PMTCT)
(48 hours–6 weeks)
Facility-based Facility-based Facility or household Facility, home visit, or
antenatal care or home-based visits: community-based:
(ANC) with skilled
• If birth at home, • Immunizations (diphtheria-
birth attendant
Community- within 24 hours of pertussis-tetanus [DPT] or
based pregnancy birth Pentavalent 1, 2, 3; measles,
screening rotavirus; boosters; etc.)
• If birth in facility, prior
SERVICE DELIVERY
to discharge • Well child visits

• Day 3 (48-72 hours) • Nutrition/growth monitoring
• Between days 7-14 • Event days (e.g. vitamin A)
after birth
• Illness visits (e.g. Integrated
• 6 weeks Community Case
Management/Integrated
Management of Childhood
Illnesses [iCCM/IMCI])
• PMTCT/antiretroviral care and
treatment
2 Programming strategies for postpartum family planning
1.2 Rationale for PPFP

Globally, FP is recognized as a key life-saving intervention for mothers and their children (WHO 2012b).
PPFP has an important role to play in strategies to reduce the unmet need for FP. Postpartum women
are among those with the greatest unmet need for FP. Yet they often do not receive the services they
need to support longer birth intervals or reduce unintended pregnancy and its consequences. PPFP
addresses the needs of those who wish to have children in the future (referred to as ‘spacers’), as well as
those who have reached their desired family size and wish to avoid future pregnancies (referred to as
‘limiters’).
Further rationale for PPFP includes the following:
• According to an analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys data from 27 countries, 95% of
women who are 0–12 months postpartum want to avoid a pregnancy in the next 24 months; but
70% of them are not using contraception (Ross & Winfrey 2001).
• FP can avert more than 30% of maternal deaths and 10% of child mortality if couples space their
pregnancies more than 2 years apart (Cleland et al. 2006).
• Closely spaced pregnancies within the first year postpartum are the riskiest for mother and baby,
resulting in increased risks for adverse outcomes, such as preterm, low birth weight and small for
gestational age (Da Vanzo et al. 2007).
• Risk of child mortality is highest for very short birth-to-pregnancy intervals (<12 months). If all
couples waited 24 months to conceive again, under-five mortality would decrease by 13%. If
couples waited 36 months, the decrease would be 25% (Figure 2) (Rutstein 2008).
Figure 2. Annual number of under-five deaths with existing birth intervals and minimum
intervals of 24 and 36 months
Less-developed countries
10000
9500
9000
893 000 deaths averted
8500
Existing Intervals
Thousands of deaths
8000 Additional 943 000 Min. 24 mos.

deaths averted
Min. 36 mos.
7500
7000
6500
6000
5500
5000
LDC
Source: Rutstein 2008

• Many women and couples have reached their desired family size and would like to prevent
future pregnancies. Ensuring that every woman has only the number of children she desires is an
important means of decreasing maternal mortality. A recent 10-year study of maternal mortality in
46 countries found that the risk of maternal death increases as the number of children per woman
rises to four or more. The study also found that maternal deaths declined by 7–35% as the number
of children per woman fell (Stover & Ross 2010). PPFP, therefore, helps women who have an unmet
need to space and limit future pregnancies, while helping to lower rates of maternal and child
death.
1.3 The unique family planning needs of postpartum women

The purpose of PPFP is to help women to decide on the contraceptive they want to use, to initiate that
contraceptive, and to continue contraceptive use for 2 years or longer, depending on the reproductive
intentions of the woman or couple. There are unique considerations for providing PPFP services to
women during the 12-month postpartum period:
• A comprehensive PPFP intervention entails continuity of care for the woman and her baby at many
points of contact in the health system over a relatively long time horizon (i.e. from the antenatal
period to 12 months after birth).
• Following birth, postpartum women experience amenorrhea for varying lengths of time,
depending on their breastfeeding practices. For women who are not breastfeeding, pregnancy can
occur within 45 days of giving birth (Jackson & Glasier 2011). Among women who do not exclusively
breastfeed, pregnancy can also occur before menses resumes. Screening for pregnancy following a
checklist published within WHO’s Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use guideline
(SPR) (WHO 2008) or by performing a biochemical pregnancy test (if available) can be done to
ensure that postpartum women are not turned away from FP services.
• Sociocultural norms and expectations about resumption of sexual activity following a birth.
• Comprehensive PPFP may involve many cadres of health workers at different points along the
prenatal to postpartum continuum in both the facility and the community. In 2012, WHO issued
evidence-based recommendations in which health workers can offer maternal and newborn
interventions, including family planning services (WHO 2012c). Programme managers are advised
to refer to this guideline to ensure continuity of care so that all women have access to high-quality
PPFP services. Coordination within the health system – such as integrating services and providing
referral linkages between community and facility, antenatal care (ANC), birthing, postnatal care
(PNC), and child health and FP services – may ensure continuity of care and access to services (WHO
2012b).
• An important consideration when planning a PPFP programme or intervention is clinical safety,
that is, which methods can be used at what point in time following birth and given the mother’s
breastfeeding status. Figure 3 provides WHO’s recommendations for method use during the first
year postpartum (and beyond) within the Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use (MEC)
(WHO 2009). Note that these recommendations are also applicable to women living with HIV. (This
document will be kept up to date electronically in accordance with WHO guidance.) Briefly, WHO
recommends the following regarding the use of contraception among women during the first year
postpartum and beyond:
–– Immediately after birth and for up to 6 months following a birth, a woman who is
exclusively breastfeeding can use the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) and several
other methods safely. If a mother chooses LAM, she should transition from LAM to another
modern contraceptive method by the time the infant reaches 6 months of age, or sooner
if LAM criteria (WHO 2009) are not met. She should be provided information in a timely
manner to enable her to choose another modern contraceptive method.
–– A copper-bearing intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) can be inserted immediately

or up to 48 hours after birth, or any time after 4 weeks postpartum. A female sterilization
procedure or tubal occlusion (TO) can be performed immediately or up to 4 days after
birth, or any time after 6 weeks postpartum.
–– For non-breastfeeding women, in addition to IUD and TO, progestogen-only methods can
be initiated immediately following birth. Combined oral contraceptives can be initiated
starting at 3 weeks after birth.
–– For breastfeeding women, all progestogen-only methods – progestogen-only pills,
injections, implants – can be initiated at 6 weeks following birth, as per WHO MEC.
Combined estrogen and progestin pills cannot be initiated until 6 months after birth.
–– All women, breastfeeding or not, can initiate use of condoms immediately after birth,
emergency contraception after 4 weeks, and the diaphragm or cervical cap after 6 weeks.
Figure 3. Postpartum contraceptive options (timing of method initiation and breastfeeding

considerations)
12 months
48 hr 3 weeks 4 weeks 6 weeks 6 months and beyond
IUD
FEMALE STERILIZATION
All women
MALE STERILIZATION
CONDOMS/SPERMICIDES
EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION
DIAPHRAGM/CERVICAL CAP
LACTATIONAL AMENORRHEA METHOD

feeding
women
Breast-
PROGESTOGEN-ONLY METHODS
COMBINED HORMONAL METHODS

Non-breast-
feeding
PROGESTOGEN-ONLY METHODS
women
COMBINED HORMONAL METHODS

Chapter 2
General considerations – understanding the
landscape for PPFP programming
Designing an intervention that will result in effective delivery of services to achieve the greatest impact
– for example, serving those with the greatest need – requires a solid understanding of the context. This
chapter provides information needed to help guide the general considerations that should be taken
into account when shaping the design of programme interventions. At the end of the chapter, there are
suggestions for how findings from these analyses might help select programme areas for focus.
2.1 Review of country-level data

To understand the magnitude of need and the opportunities available for PPFP programming,
managers can review existing available datasets, such as the Demographic and Health Surveys, Multiple
Indicator Cluster Surveys, or other trusted local data and surveys. The data points below provide useful
markers for the status of MNCH and FP in a country at the national and subnational level, as well as
an understanding of the context for PPFP information and services. They can be used to advocate for
integrating FP with MNCH settings and to show what settings and interventions could be prioritized in
the design of PPFP programmes.
Table 2. Data points and programme implications
KEY QUESTION/DATA POINT PROGRAMME IMPLICATIONS

What is the number and percentage This indicates the potential group to be reached through
of women who are pregnant? integration of PPFP with MNCH-related service settings.
What is the percentage of If the majority of pregnancies are spaced less than 2 years apart,
pregnancies spaced less than 18, 24 this could indicate that most women are unaware of pregnancy
and 36 months apart? risk and/or are unable to access FP services during the extended
postpartum period.
What are the levels of unmet need Levels of unmet need above 10% indicate a need to review the
for: reach and effectiveness of the overall FP effort. High levels of
unmet need for spacing suggest efforts are needed to reach
• spacing?
women during postnatal/infant care. High levels of unmet
• limiting? need for limiting suggest the need for a review of contraceptive
method mix to determine if adequate, effective options exist
immediately postpartum and thereafter.
What is the total contraceptive use This indicates what options are currently available and used and
and what is the percentage of use by what needs to be done to improve choices. For example, does
method (i.e. the method mix)? Is LAM the method mix include at least three options for breastfeeding
part of the contraceptive method women at 6 weeks? Are there already some levels of IUD and
mix? postpartum sterilization use to suggest that strengthening
immediate postpartum provision of these methods has
potential for impact?
What percentage of women receive If the majority of women receive ANC, this indicates high
ANC? potential to reach pregnant women if a PPFP intervention is
systematically implemented.
KEY QUESTION/DATA POINT PROGRAMME IMPLICATIONS

What is the percentage of mothers Indicates potential for introducing EBF and LAM as a ‘win-win’
practising and the median duration strategy for mothers and babies.
of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF)?
What percentage of deliveries are If the percentage of facility-based births is significant, there
in health facilities? What is the is high potential for reaching women through pre-discharge
breakdown of deliveries in facilities counselling, as well as for referral back to primary and
by age group, residence and wealth community-based services for both follow-up and access
quintile? to other contraceptive methods. There may be potential for
offering postpartum IUD (PPIUD) insertion and postpartum
tubal occlusion (PPTO). Breakdown by age, residence, and
socioeconomic status will help to identify underserved groups.
What percentage of postpartum If a substantial percentage of women receive PNC, there is
women receive PNC for either good potential for reaching postpartum women with PPFP
mothers or infants? information and services. If this is not the case, exploring routine
immunization services may be another option.
What are the immunization rates If there is robust routine immunization coverage through
for children less than 1 year of age facility-based or outreach services, there is good potential for
(bacille Calmette–Guérin (BCG), DPT integrating PPFP information, counselling, and referrals.
and Pentavalent 1, 2, 3, or measles
• Pentavalent or DPT 1 and BCG: Promote EBF and LAM, and
vaccines)?
other appropriate contraceptive methods depending on
timing
• Pentavalent or DPT 3: Promote transition from LAM to other
PPFP methods PPFP for breastfeeding women, depending on
timing
• Measles: Fail-safe visit to promote all methods of FP
• WHO recommendations on routine immunizations for
children and immunization schedules can be consulted for
further information (WHO 2013a)
What is the percentage of first births If there is a significant percentage of first births for women age
in women under 18 years of age? 18 years and under, there is an opportunity to promote healthy
timing and spacing to delay second and subsequent births.
What percentage of women Significant levels indicate strategic consideration of integrating
experience violence during gender-based violence prevention with overall maternal and
pregnancy, childbirth or for using FP? PPFP efforts. In 2013, WHO published Responding to intimate
partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical
and policy guidelines. These guidelines include service delivery
and programme recommendations for integrating into existing
health services care for women experiencing intimate partner
violence and sexual assault (WHO 2013b).
2.2 Health systems issues

An understanding of the national health system (in terms of how it is structured, organized, staffed and
financed) and current government policies is essential and can provide insights on existing gaps and
opportunities for offering FP to postpartum women. Since PPFP information and services encompass a
range of contact points and providers within facilities and communities, a clear understanding of how
the health system is organized is an essential first step for programme design.
The questions posed in this section are organized according to the key elements of the Strengthening
health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action (WHO 2010a) with an additional
element for community and sociocultural issues. The questions provide a basis to assess and identify
what is currently in place and how best to approach advocacy and implementation of a PPFP
programme or intervention. The information can be gathered through discussions with key informants
and/or gleaned from published documents and reports. Responses to the inquiries will point to
strengths and gaps, and help determine where and how to integrate PPFP as a routine component of
MNCH services.
Health services
• Health services structure: Are FP/RH and MNCH services organized within the same directorate or
are they separate? If separate, what mechanisms or opportunities exist for collaboration and joint
planning for PPFP programming?
• Health services organization: What service delivery points (SDPs) exist and how are they organized
in relation to one another? (Consider tertiary, secondary, primary and community levels, and the
existence of a referral system and how well it functions.)
• Antenatal care (ANC): Where and how is ANC generally provided? In facilities? Communities? Or a
combination of the two settings?
• Internal linkages and referrals: What linkages (formal or informal) exist between maternity and FP
clinics? Is there effective referral? Do staff regularly identify and follow up pregnant women along
the continuum of care from ANC to PNC?
• Maternity units: Do maternity SDPs have adequate infrastructure to provide FP methods that can
be used immediately after delivery?
• Postnatal care (PNC): Where and how is PNC provided? In facilities? Communities?
• Contraceptive options: What contraceptive services, such as long-acting reversible contraception
(LARC), are available in maternities, the community health centre, and other SDPs?
• Immunizations: How are immunization, nutrition, and other child health services organized and
offered?
• Integrated services: Does integration of PPFP with other MNCH services provide an opportunity
for addressing gaps in service delivery or the health system? What gaps exist and can an integrated
programme help close them?
• Access to services: Do any population groups (e.g. youth, periurban, rural, poorest or high-parity
women) have restricted access to MNCH and/or FP/RH services? Why?
• Communications: Are there health behaviour change and communication initiatives at the
community level or in the mass-media that can be leveraged for PPFP awareness?
Health management information system (HMIS)

• PPFP tracking: Does the HMIS document the provision of PPFP services (i.e. the uptake of FP use
within the first year after birth)? If not, can the relevant records be adapted to do so?
• Continuity-of-care tracking: How well does the system promote and track continuity of care for
individual clients? Does any health-care provider support women over the continuum of care
from ANC to PNC? Consider how continuity of care and the care provider can be used to support
increased access to PPFP.
• Surveys and research: What monitoring, evaluation, and research data and findings (such as
Demographic and Health Surveys) might be helpful for the design of a programme?
Health workforce
• Staff development: What policies and plans exist to support the development of MNCH staff to be
able to offer high-quality FP/RH services and for FP staff to screen postpartum clients?
• National tools: Do national FP guidelines/protocols include explicit instructions for the provision of
PPFP?
• Task sharing: Are there policies and guidelines for mid-level staff to insert PPIUDs and for other
task sharing that increases access to PPFP? Do mid-level staff have the support of professional
organizations or the health ministry to perform these PPFP procedures? Is there a need for
harmonization of recommendations? What opportunities/challenges exist to advocate for task-
shifting to increase health worker capacity and to enable mid-level cadres to deliver high-quality
PPFP services? Recently issued recommendations from WHO on optimizing health-care worker roles
to improve access to key maternal interventions, including family planning through task shifting,
should be used to guide task-sharing decisions. (WHO 2012c)
• Skilled personnel: What gaps exist with respect to the number and/or skills of trained personnel
(e.g. physicians, nurses, midwives, other clinical staff and community health workers) in the health
system and with specific regard to MNCH and FP/RH services? Are there other cadres of staff who
can be trained to provide PPFP services?
• Community health workers (CHWs): What opportunities/challenges exist to support CHWs to
provide PPFP services? Do CHWs regularly identify and follow up pregnant women?
–– Do CHWs provide PNC to mothers and their babies? Which FP methods are they able to
provide?
–– Do CHWs provide integrated community case management (iCCM) of childhood illnesses?
Is it possible to integrate FP counselling and/or delivery with the iCCM?
• Pre-service education: Does pre-service education for physicians, nurses, midwives and CHWs
include FP generally and PPFP specifically? If not, what opportunities exist to add PPFP to MNCH
and FP/RH pre-service curricula? Do practicum sites offer PPFP services? Are tutors and preceptors
applying competency-based training approaches?
• In-service training: What opportunities and programmes exist for in-service training and updating
of health workers to provide MNCH and FP/RH services? Is training competency-based? Are clinical
and counselling skills and competencies for PPFP services included? How receptive are MNCH
providers to offering PPFP?
• Performance monitoring: Are protocols and job aids for PPFP monitoring and supervision
available? Do the performance appraisals address PPFP for staff working in eligible settings?
Medicines and technology

• Product registration: Do current policies facilitate the adoption, registration and procurement of
new contraceptive technologies to ensure a wide range of contraceptive methods?
• Procurement and supply chain: Is there an integrated system for procurement and supply of MNCH
and FP/RH commodities, equipment and supplies, or are there parallel systems?
• Contraceptive availability: Are contraceptive commodities, equipment, and supplies consistently
available at SDPs at various levels of the health system, in integrated service delivery settings (such
as labour and delivery or immunization) or for community distribution within MNCH and FP/RH
programmes?
• Logistics information: Is there a logistical management information system capable of accurately
forecasting needs and tracking usage of FP commodities, equipment and supplies among clients
attending for MNCH services?
Health financing
• FP funding: Are FP services part of basic health services in the country?
• PPFP funding: Is there specific funding dedicated to PPFP?
–– Do budget allocations exist for FP services and commodity support?
–– Does the government have an annual budgeted (work) plan for MNCH and/or FP/RH that
also includes PPFP?
–– Are there private insurance options that cover births/emergencies? Do they extend into
the postpartum period? If so, do they include PPFP?
• Private sector: Do private-sector initiatives exist that can be leveraged for PPFP programming?
• Client fees: What fees are charged to clients for antenatal, delivery, postpartum/postnatal checks,
and for RH and FP services within each sector (i.e. public, commercial and nongovernmental or
faith-based organizations)?
–– What happens when clients are unable to pay?
–– Do fees vary by contraceptive method?
–– If services are free, are there hidden costs such as the need for the client to purchase
supplies for PPIUD or PPTO services?
• Funding sources: How much of the budget for MNCH and FP/RH consists of external contributions?
–– Which donors are most involved in these programmes?
–– Is external donor support earmarked for certain line-items (e.g. training or commodities) or
specific districts/facilities?
–– How might government and donor priorities support increased attention to PPFP
programmes?
Leadership and governance

• Safe motherhood strategy and plan: Does the government have a safe motherhood strategy or
operational plan that promotes access to high-quality safe motherhood services?
–– Does it specifically promote the integration of FP?
–– Does it include PPFP? If so, how is PPFP defined?
–– Does it include counselling during ANC and initiation of modern FP methods during the
12-month postpartum period?
–– Does it address measures to support voluntary continuation of contraceptive use to
support healthy child-spacing intervals and for fertility interventions to complete family
size?
–– Do MNCH policies promote PPFP as a life-saving intervention to reduce maternal and
newborn mortality in an effort to reach Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5? If not,
what advocacy efforts are needed?
• PPFP strategy and plan: Alternatively, does the government have an FP/RH strategy or operational
plan that promotes access to FP by postpartum women?
–– Does it specifically promote integration with MNCH services?
–– Does it ensure a broad range of contraceptive methods?
–– Does it promote interventions (e.g. counselling) to support healthy timing and spacing of
pregnancy (HTSP)?
–– Does it include interventions that respond to the needs of limiters for preventing future
pregnancies?
• Resource allocation: Where is the authority for resource allocation and prioritization specifically for
MNCH and FP/RH services within the public health system?
• Government collaboration: To what extent does the government collaborate with and/or rely on
efforts of nongovernmental and private-sector partners in MNCH and FP/RH services? How might
these relationships be leveraged to support PPFP programming?
• National standards, guidelines and protocols: Do national FP standards, guidelines and protocols
exist? Are they widely available in service sites and to providers? Do they explicitly include PPFP-
related issues? Do these include policies and guidelines for mid-level staff to insert PPIUDs, implants
and permanent methods? Do mid-level staff have the support of professional organizations
or the health ministry to provide these PPFP services? Is there a need for harmonization of
recommendations?
Community and sociocultural issues

• Client perspective: What do policy-makers, programme managers, and providers know and
understand about the needs, desires, and constraints of postpartum women for FP services? How is
this information used to offer services?
• Cultural norms: What are the prevailing cultural norms (including health worker attitudes)
pertaining to postpartum women, both breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding, in relation to:
–– return to fertility?
–– pregnancy intervals?
–– family size?
–– return to sexual activity, including stigma regarding early return to sexual activity?
• Stopping breastfeeding: Do women stop breastfeeding infants when they become pregnant again
with another child?
• Mother and newborn residence: Do mothers of new babies return to their mother’s home or back
to their husband’s?
• PPFP perceptions: Are there beliefs and perceptions regarding contraceptive use after childbirth
that might affect or promote PPFP?
• Status of women and girls: How does women’s and girls’ status affect FP use? Are there traditional
practices (e.g. purdah, female genital cutting) that might jeopardize women’s access to PPFP?
• Male involvement: Are there constructive or harmful gender norms that influence male
involvement in MNCH and FP/RH care for women and girls, specifically within first year postpartum,
or about women’s economic participation and working outside the home?
• PPFP and HIV/AIDS: Do FP guidelines exist for persons living with HIV and AIDS? Do PMTCT)
programmes include PPFP information, services and commodities?
2.3 Moving from the general to the specific

The table below provides some illustrative examples showing linkages between responses to the
questions in Section 2.2 and potential programmes and interventions. These options may prompt
further exploration and discussion with stakeholders about the type of interventions that can be
undertaken to address needs within specific contexts and situations. These examples are not intended
to be exhaustive, as there are many ways the findings might array and point in a programmatic
direction.
Table 3. Illustrative findings and potential programme interventions
ILLUSTRATIVE FINDINGS  POTENTIAL PPFP PROGRAMME INTERVENTIONS

• High unmet need for Facility-based intrapartum services:
limiting future pregnancies
• Expand counselling and method mix to include LARCs and
• High percentage of births in permanent methods
facilities
• Integrate counselling and services for immediate IUD insertion,
• Health system with tubal occlusion and counselling on EBF within labour and delivery
infrastructure at district units and in postpartum maternity wards at facilities at the district
level for IUD and female or sub-district level if appropriate
sterilization services
• Low modern contraceptive Community:
prevalence
• Train CHWs to integrate community education and individual
• High use of traditional counselling about HTSP, EBF and LAM with referral for other FP
methods methods as a routine part of care
• Existing network of CHWs • Promote early PNC visits for home births to provide essential
who provide home-based newborn care and EBF/LAM
ANC and PNC
• Focus on LAM as a gateway method to the use of other modern
• Short birth intervals contraceptives
• High percentage of home • Discuss women’s reproductive intentions for spacing or limiting
births and provide information on contraceptive methods and where to
get them
• Use community-based integrated MNCH/FP services
• Insurance or other finance Financing:
mechanisms, such as
• Bundle PPFP with the birthing package to ensure that all
vouchers, exist for basic
contraceptive methods are covered during the extended
maternity services and PNC
postpartum period
• High breastfeeding rates PNC and infant care:
• Successful routine • Introduce LAM and counsel on transitioning to other effective
immunization sessions at contraceptive methods
health centres
• Add a dedicated FP provider to existing routine immunization
programmes or link/refer women to the FP unit at the clinic
• High rates of staff rotation Strengthening human resources capacity:
within and among facilities
• Strengthen policies and practices to address staff development and
• Lack of skills and knowledge retention to ensure that providers with FP skills are available within
about PPFP among facility ANC, labour and delivery, and PNC
staff, including the provision
• Introduce or strengthen a comprehensive RH education curriculum
of LARCs/permanent
that addresses safe motherhood, family planning, and neonatal and
methods
child health training issues
• Facilities lack available and
• Integrate concepts of PPFP within pre-service education and
trained staff to provide
ensure that PPFP and HTSP are well-covered in teaching curricula,
MNCH and FP services
practical training and examinations
• Dispatch mobile outreach teams to facilities in the short term in
order to provide services while building capacity of staff for the
long term
• Focus on community-based PPFP interventions, including EBF,
LAM, pills, injectables and condoms, while addressing health
worker and capacity needs at facility level
ILLUSTRATIVE FINDINGS  POTENTIAL PPFP PROGRAMME INTERVENTIONS

• High HIV prevalence and Meeting the needs of women living with HIV:
existence of PMTCT services
• Integrate PPFP with PMTCT services, promotion of EBF and LAM
use, as well as appropriate complementary feeding at 6 months,
with transition to another effective contraceptive method
Chapter 3
Integrating PPFP across contact points –
setting considerations
PPFP programmes and interventions are designed to reach women at one or more specific contacts
with the health system for information and services, including: 1) ANC, 2) labour and delivery including
pre-discharge, 3) PNC and 4) immunization and child health care visits. Chapter 3 provides information
for designing a PPFP intervention for one or more of the specific contact points, including illustrative
programme goals, strategies, activities and indicators. Although not meant to be exhaustive, the
information is presented as a menu for a range of strategies and actions to illustrate the kinds of
programme interventions that could be used to integrate PPFP within the various health care services
offered to women. These strategies can apply to the national, institutional, site or community level,
depending on the scope and scale of the programme intervention envisioned. Further, they can be used
to either design a new programme or strengthen an existing one. The strategies and activities can be
adopted or adapted to respond to context-specific needs and situations as defined by the results of the
landscape review in Chapter 2. In addition, each section includes examples from selected countries of
actual strategies used to reach postpartum women. Annex 2 summarizes published and unpublished
evidence evaluating programmatic interventions related to postpartum family planning. The supporting
evidence was used to inform the development of the illustrative programme strategies highlighted in
the tables within this chapter.
3.1 Antenatal care

ANC refers to the health services that a woman receives to monitor the health and progress of her
pregnancy and her well-being during her pregnancy. ANC provides an opportunity to encourage
deliveries with a skilled birth attendant and to advise and counsel on the importance of family planning
and the contraceptive options available to her, including those that can be provided at the time of a
facility-based birth (WHO 2006, WHO 2010b). Information and counselling about PPIUD insertion can be
provided and consent prior to labour can be obtained if a woman chooses this method. For the couple
or woman who does not desire future pregnancies, ANC also provides a time when counselling about
permanent methods can be offered, and voluntary informed consent can be obtained confirming the
understanding that these methods are permanent options. ANC can be provided as part of home-based
practices and/or in facilities. Thus, ANC helps support the essential link between health care services
that are provided in the community and those provided in the facility. It also provides an opportunity to
engage husbands and family members to support healthy pregnancy and postpartum behaviours.
Table 4. Contacts during antenatal care
Overall programme goal:

• Pregnant women discuss reproductive intentions for spacing or limiting and choose a PPFP method
during ANC.
Programme outcomes:
• Number/percentage of ANC clients who have received information and counselling regarding PPFP
and EBF
• Number/percentage of ANC clients who have chosen a PPFP method and have it marked on their
ANC card/client card
ILLUSTRATIVE
ILLUSTRATIVE PROGRAMME
PROGRAMME ILLUSTRATIVE INDICATORS
ACTIVITIES
STRATEGIES
Strengthen • Integrate PPFP information and • Number/percentage of ANC
awareness of and counselling with ANC and PMTCT sessions that include PPFP
demand for PPFP services offered at facility and information and counselling
during the ANC community levels
• Proportion of client records that
period
• Provide counselling that includes are completed and have PPFP
discussion of a woman’s or couples’ counselling and method choice, if
reproductive desires and the range any, documented
of contraceptive options available,
• Number/percentage of ANC service
including vasectomy
providers who are competent in
• Assign health workers to routinely providing PPFP counselling
provide group education on PPFP,
• Number/percentage of women
HTSP and EBF during ANC sessions
attending ANC who receive IEC
• Make information, education and materials about PPFP options
communication (IEC) materials
• Number/percentage of PMTCT
on PPFP available at facilities for
sessions that include PPFP
women to take home and for use in
information and counselling
home visits
• Promote the inclusion of husbands
and other family members in ANC
education and counselling
ILLUSTRATIVE
ACTIVITIES
STRATEGIES
Strengthen • CHWs regularly identify, refer and • Proportion of pregnant women who
continuity of follow up pregnant women for ANC have some level of continuity of
care linkages and services and provide/reinforce PPFP care (defined as the same provider,
referrals between messages the same place, or the same team of
facility and facility/community providers)
• Referral linkages developed or
community and
strengthened between ANC • Proportion of ANC SDPs with
ANC and birthing
services and labour and delivery referral protocols that include
services
services, whether they are located documentation of clients referred
in the same place or in different
• Number/percentage of ANC
facilities/settings
clients whose client cards are filled
• A mechanism is in place, such as the in completely with pregnancy
client card, that accurately captures information and PPFP counselling
and communicates data about and immediate PPFP method choice
clients’ health needs and immediate
• Number/percentage of PMTCT
PPFP choices
clients whose client cards are filled
• For women living with HIV, ensure in completely with pregnancy
there is a linkage to FP services information and PPFP counselling
during HIV services for infant care and immediate PPFP method choice
and continued HIV treatment for
the mother
Improve the • Integrate PPFP with national MNCH • Number of national MNCH, FP and
enabling and FP policies and strategies PMTCT policies and strategies that
environment for include PPFP
• Integrate PPFP with service delivery
PPFP as a routine
guidelines and quality-of-care • Number/percentage of SDPs that
part of ANC services
monitoring for ANC services have service delivery guidelines for
PPFP; number/percentage of SDPs
• Work to improve the knowledge,
that monitor the inclusion of PPFP
attitudes and practices of ANC
with ANC and PMTCT services
providers and CHWs to ensure
they support the provision of PPFP • Number/percentage of ANC and
information and services PMTCT providers and CHWs who
provide PPFP information and
• Integrate PPFP with pre-service
counselling to all ANC clients
education curricula
• Number/percentage of pre-service
• Verify that PPFP is included within
schools with PPFP included in
the national PMTCT programme
curricula, service guidelines
and protocols, and aligned with
international MEC and national
PPFP policies and strategy
guidance; number/ percentage of
pre-service graduates competent
in providing PPFP talks and
counselling during ANC and PMTCT
3.2 Labour and delivery/pre-discharge

This point of contact involves various points throughout the stay in the facility, including admission,
early labour, delivery room, maternity ward, immediate postpartum and pre-discharge. Counselling
on the importance of family planning and available contraceptive method options, including LAM, is
recommended during this period (WHO 2006, WHO 2010b). For women with limited access to health
care in facilities, delivery at a facility affords a unique opportunity to address their fertility intentions
and need for contraception: it does not require a return visit that may be prohibitively expensive or
inconvenient. If a woman seeks to have an IUD inserted or a sterilization procedure immediately after
delivery, special care must be taken to ensure that high-quality counselling has been done to verify the
woman’s choice. According to WHO’s MEC guideline (WHO 2009), appropriate methods for FP service
provision during the immediate postpartum period include: LAM, IUD, condoms and sterilization (male
or female). Progestogen-only methods are appropriate for non-breastfeeding women prior to discharge.
Table 5. Contacts during labour and delivery/pre-discharge
Overall programme goals:

• Postpartum women who choose a method during ANC or at time of delivery receive high-quality
PPFP services prior to discharge.
• Postpartum women are counselled about EBF and LAM prior to discharge and begin breastfeeding
immediately.
Programme outcomes:
• Proportion of women who select a method during ANC and who request and receive desired method
prior to discharge
• Proportion of maternity clients who request a method during early labour or pre-discharge
counselling and receive their desired method before leaving the facility
• Proportion of women who intend to exclusively breastfeed who begin to breastfeed prior to
discharge and practice LAM after discharge
ILLUSTRATIVE
ACTIVITIES
STRATEGIES
Effective linkages and • Strengthen capacity of skilled birth • Proportion of skilled
protocols are in place to attendants to provide accurate and birth attendants trained
support FP counselling effective FP counselling, including to competency in PPFP
and referrals of maternity LAM, to women who deliver information, counselling,
clients for PPFP at home and, when requested, service provision (where
information and services referrals for PPIUD (within 48 hours) appropriate) and referrals
and continuity of care or PPTO (within 1 week)
• Number/percentage of client
• Ensure pre-discharge counselling cards and facility registers
includes messages about danger that are accurately completed
signs for mothers and infants, EBF, and include data on PPFP
LAM, fertility desires for spacing counselling, contraceptive
and limiting, and HTSP, return to method selected, services
fertility, return to sexual activity, provided and follow-up care
safe modern methods to use while
breastfeeding, and transition from
LAM to a modern method (if she is
using this method), as well as when
and where to go for return visits
ILLUSTRATIVE
ACTIVITIES
STRATEGIES
Infrastructure of maternity • Select and/or upgrade maternity • Proportion of maternity SDPs
SDPs is adequate for SDPs to provide PPIUD or PPTO that have on-site supplies,
providing high-quality services, including the availability of IEC materials, provider
PPFP services running water, electricity and space reference materials and job
available for private counselling aids (protocols, standards and
and surgical or procedure rooms; guidelines), commodities,
procurement is managed so that equipment and instruments
there is a continuous supply of for PPFP, including PPIUD and
FP commodities, equipment, PPTO
instruments and expendable
supplies
High-quality PPFP • Conduct competency-based • Number of clinical staff
information, counselling counselling and clinical skills trained to competency in
and services, including training in pre-service and PPFP counselling and PPIUD
PPIUDs and PPTOs, are in-service settings and/or PPTO services; number
provided at maternity of in-service and/or pre-
• Provide health-care workers
SDPs by competent, service curricula that include
with job aids, up-to-date service
confident and committed clinical skills for PPIUD and
protocols, guidelines, screening
providers PPTO provision
checklists and other reference
materials (WHO 2012c) • Indicator for job aids,
protocols
• Introduce or strengthen supervision
to support providers, including • Number of providers who
providing routine feedback and reach 80% of PPFP standards
updates
• 100% of informed consent
• Develop/improve the protocol forms properly executed
for ensuring that informed and for clients who adopted
voluntary consent is obtained for immediate PPTO as their
all clients requesting PPTO prior to method
labour and delivery
• Conduct other educational
activities beyond one-on-one
counselling to increase informed
demand, such as group information
sessions in the postpartum ward,
videos and posters, ensuring that
messages resonate with clients and
communities
EBF and LAM counselling • Conduct training to ensure • Proportion of health-care
are routine components of providers are competent to provide providers who can cite the 3
pre-discharge counselling accurate counselling and messages LAM criteria
regarding LAM
• Proportion of maternity
• Develop and implement guidelines clients who are counselled on
and protocols to assist mothers in EBF and LAM
breastfeeding their baby within
the first hour postpartum and to
provide them with support during
their stay
3.3 Postnatal care

PNC presents an opportune moment when women should be counselled on birth spacing and family
planning. Contraceptive options should be discussed and contraceptive methods should be provided
if requested (WHO 2010b, WHO 2013c). WHO recommends that women who have delivered in a health
facility should receive PNC for at least 24 hours after birth. If a birth is at home, the first postnatal contact
should be as early as possible within 24 hours of birth. Three additional PNC contacts are recommended
on day 3, between days 7–14 after birth and 6 weeks after birth (WHO 2013c) . It is important to reach
women before they are at risk for an unintended pregnancy with information about return of fertility,
their options to space or limit future pregnancies, and the benefits to their own and their newborn’s
health of doing so. Community-based interventions are critical during the vulnerable period when
women return home from a facility-based birth, as well as for those women who do not give birth in a
facility. For both facility-based and community-based births, WHO recommends that counselling and
support for EBF should be part of each postnatal contact. It is further recommended that women should
be counselled on birth spacing and family planning during PNC contacts. Contraceptive options should
be discussed and contraceptive methods should be provided if requested. Women should also be
counselled on safer sex, including use of condoms.. For women living with HIV, PPFP can be integrated
with routine PNC services if these exist within the PMTCT programme.
Table 6. Contacts during postnatal care

• Postpartum women have initiated immediate breastfeeding and are exclusively breastfeeding and
practising LAM.
• Postpartum women who are not exclusively breastfeeding or non-breastfeeding are using a
modern contraceptive method by/before 6 weeks postpartum to avoid a closely spaced pregnancy
(pregnancy can occur as soon as 45 days after birth if not exclusively breastfeeding).
Programme outcomes:
• Number and proportion of postpartum women exclusively breastfeeding and practising LAM at 6
weeks postpartum
• Number and proportion of postpartum women who are not exclusively breastfeeding or non-
breastfeeding who are using a modern contraceptive method by 6 weeks postpartum
• Number and proportion of women referred for and using contraception by 6 weeks postpartum.
ILLUSTRATIVE
ACTIVITIES
STRATEGIES
Home-based maternal • Midwives and other health-care • Proportion of CHWs providing
and newborn care is providers, including CHWs provide PPFP interventions (screening,
provided to postpartum PPFP messages and referrals for referral and method provision,
women by midwives PNC and PPFP services, including where approved)
and other health-care HTSP, EBF/LAM, return to fertility,
• Number of community
providers, including CHWs and contraceptive options
mobilization activities
for breastfeeding and non-
conducted that include
breastfeeding women
PPFP (including home visits,
• CHWs are able to provide short- community meetings and
term methods, such as pills, health fairs)
condoms and injections, to the
• Number of CHWs supervised
postpartum woman in her home
(and resupplied with
contraceptive commodities)
in their PPFP activities by staff
at the primary health centre
ILLUSTRATIVE
ACTIVITIES
STRATEGIES
• CHWs are trained in counselling • Number/percentage of
skills and interpersonal postpartum women who
communication, equipped with job started contraceptive use by 6
aids and contraceptive supplies, weeks postpartum
and receive updates and supportive
• Number of fathers reached
supervision to ensure high-quality
with PPFP messages
PPFP information, referrals and
services
• CHWs conduct community
education activities that engage
men, families and communities to
support PPFP
SDPs provide PNC • At the time of the 6-week • Proportion of facilities offering
including PPFP postpartum check-up, women at least three FP methods,
information, counselling are provided PPFP information plus LAM
and services and counselling, and are offered
• Proportion of postpartum
appropriate methods depending on
women with children under
their breastfeeding status
6 weeks of age counselled on
• PNC providers are trained and PPFP during PNC, or PMTCT
competent to counsel and visits
provide appropriate methods
• Proportion of SDPs that have
for breastfeeding and non-
at least one PNC or PMTCT
breastfeeding women and for
provider trained in PPFP
women with medical conditions
counselling and method
that limit which options can be
provision
provided
• Proportion of facilities with
• Strong referral linkages exist
stock-outs of FP methods
between the various postpartum/
within the last 3 months
PNC providers and facilities,
including FP clinics, to ensure • Proportion of facilities that
continuity of care have job aids specific to PPFP,
including counselling and
timing of method provision
• Proportion of facilities that
have referral system in place
with community and higher-
level facilities
• Proportion of postpartum
women who were referred
for IUD, implant, or surgical
methods
3.4 Infant health and immunization services

Infant and child health care visits are often the woman’s most frequent or only visits to the health
facility during the first year after birth. Routine immunization services; maternal, infant and young child
nutrition information, education and communication (MIYCN) visits; and healthy and sick child visits
offer important opportunities to discuss FP with postpartum women. Immunization contacts occur
regularly according to the country schedule, such as at 6 weeks, 10 weeks, 14 weeks and 9 months.
Infant nutrition and feeding sessions, including growth monitoring and promotion and/or distribution
of vitamin A, also occur regularly and offer an opportunity to reach many postpartum women during
group education talks about PPFP. Mothers are advised to transition from LAM to another modern FP
method when they initiate complementary foods to their infants, if not before. When a sick child is seen
by CHWs or health providers during Integrated Community Case Management/Integrated Management
of Childhood Illnesses (iCCM/IMCI) visits (WHO 2008b), the mother can be asked about her own health
and FP needs. Women and health workers alike are often unaware of the risk of pregnancy during the
postpartum period and may not consider contraception important until the return of menses. Advocacy
efforts can promote positive partnerships between child health and FP programmes as a ‘win-win’ for
the health of both the mother and the infant.
Table 7. Contacts during infant health and immunization services

• Postpartum women begin using a modern contraceptive within the first year following birth.
• Postpartum women are exclusively breastfeeding and practising LAM until the infant is 6 months old,
then transitioning to another modern contraceptive method (if not already using another method by 6
months).
Programme outcomes:
• Number and percentage of postpartum women attending child health/immunization visits that initiate
using a modern contraceptive method within the first year following a birth (this includes practising
LAM for up to 6 months and transitioning from LAM to another modern method by/before 6 months)
ILLUSTRATIVE
PROGRAMME ILLUSTRATIVE PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES ILLUSTRATIVE INDICATORS
STRATEGIES
Integrate PPFP • Group talks are provided during • Number/proportion of SDPs
with routine immunization sessions on HTSP, return to that have integrated PPFP with
immunization fertility, EBF/LAM, fertility desires to space or routine immunization visits
services limit, and FP methods
• Number/proportion of
• Immunization providers screen women mothers at immunization
about their FP needs and give a voucher or sessions screened for PPFP
referral card for FP services needs
• Dedicated FP provider offers co-located FP • Number/proportion of
services, including LARCs, the same day, screened mothers referred for
before mother returns home FP services
• Linkages and protocols exist among • Number/proportion
immunization and FP staff and clinics to of mothers attending
support effective referrals for PPFP immunization sessions who
accept an FP method the day
• Community-based workers mobilize
of immunization services
mothers for immunization days and assist
with/participate in FP group education • Number/proportion of women
sessions, and follow up mothers in the with a child 12 months of age
household for FP or younger who are currently
using a contraceptive method
(by type of FP method used)
ILLUSTRATIVE
PROGRAMME ILLUSTRATIVE PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES ILLUSTRATIVE INDICATORS
STRATEGIES
Integrate PPFP • FP information, counselling and referrals are • Number/proportion of
messages provided through structured contact with MIYCN staff who are trained
with MIYCN mothers attending growth monitoring and to counsel women on EBF,
interventions nutrition visits the three LAM criteria, and
(e.g. growth transition to another method
• Mothers with infants under 6 months of age
monitoring, of FP if any of the criteria are
are supported to continue EBF and LAM,
nutrition no longer met (or by the time
and mothers with infants 6 months of age
promotion, food the infant is 6 months of age)
or older are counselled to transition from
distribution
LAM to another modern method of FP • Number/proportion of MIYCN
and vitamin A
staff who are trained to screen
distribution) • Providers are trained to rule out pregnancy
women about their FP needs
among breastfeeding women
and refer them to FP services
postpartum women attending
MIYCN services who received
FP messages, were screened
for contraception needs and
referred for an FP method
• Number/proportion of women
with a child 12 months or
younger who are currently
using a contraceptive method
(by type of FP method used)
Integrate PPFP • Providers treating a sick infant/child ask the • Number/proportion of SDPs
with child health mother about her FP needs, and provide that have integrated PPFP with
services (e.g. referral or linkage to FP services child health visits
iCCM/IMCI)
• CHWs screening a sick child also screen • Number/proportion of SDPs
the mother for her FP needs and provide, that have implemented
resupply or refer her for FP services protocols to counsel women
about HTSP, and risk of
pregnancy, and refer her for
contraception
postpartum women with a
child 12 months of age or
younger provided/using a
contraceptive method
3.5 Country programme case examples

Below are several examples – published and unpublished – from a range of settings that illustrate how
various programmes have implemented PPFP interventions in different countries and across one or
more of the contact points described in this chapter. For each case example, additional references are
provided.
Table 8. Country programme case examples
COUNTRY/PARTNER
INSTITUTIONS/DATE/ PPFP CONTACT POINT(S)/PROGRAMME DESCRIPTION/RESULTS
REFERENCES
Country: Bangladesh PPFP contact points: Antenatal and postnatal care
Programme description: The Healthy Fertility Study was designed
to examine the impact of integrating FP with a community-based
Partners: Bangladesh
MNH programme and the effect on prospective pregnancy spacing
Ministry of Health and
and adverse newborn outcomes. The strategy used a two-pronged
Family Welfare, Shimantik
approach: the first component focused on system and capacity-
(in-country nongovernmental
building of service providers, including the referral system; the second
organization), MCHIP and
focused on community-based advocacy and behaviour change
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg
communication at the household, community and facility levels. Both
School of Public Health; with
study groups received a basic package of MNCH information and
funding from USAID
services through CHWs during antenatal and postpartum periods. The
intervention group received additional FP information and community-
based services during counselling visits.
Date: 2007–2012
Results: Contraceptive method use was approximately 2.5 times
higher in the intervention arm than in the control arm at 24 months
postpartum. The incidence of a subsequent pregnancy up to 24
months after a live birth was significantly lower in the intervention
arm and the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding until 6 months
was higher in the intervention arm. The integration did not adversely
affect the MNH programme and increased equity in FP coverage.
Findings from this study are currently being applied in MaMoni, the
Integrated Safe Motherhood, Newborn Care and Family Planning
Project implemented by Jhpiego and Save the Children in the Sylhet
and Habigang Districts in northeast Bangladesh.
Reference:
Salahuddin A et al. Operations research to address unmet need for
contraception in the postpartum period in Sylhet District, Bangladesh.
Submitted for publication, 2012 (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/trial.
aspxtrialid=NCT01702402).
COUNTRY/PARTNER
REFERENCES
Country: Egypt PPFP contact points: Antenatal and postnatal care
Programme description: To respond to the challenge of supporting
women in achieving healthier birth intervals of at least 2 years, an
Partners: Population Council,
operations research study was conducted to compare the acceptability
Ministry of Health and
and effectiveness of two clinic and community-based behaviour
Population (MOHP), Social
communication change (BCC) and service delivery models. The ‘health
Planning, Analysis and
services’ model communicated birth spacing and PPFP messages to
Administration Consultants
women via health workers during their prenatal and postpartum care
(SPACC), with funding from
visits. The ‘community awareness’ model, in addition to providing this
USAID through the Extending
education for women, also involved an awareness-raising component
Service Delivery (ESD) Project
that targeted men. The study used an experimental design in 20 health
facilities in 6 health districts.
Date: 2005–2007 (operations Findings from the operations research study were applied to scale up
research phase) and 2009– the original intervention into the entire governorates of Assiut and
2011 (scale-up phase) Sohag. Activities included: 1) revising and updating HTSP messages
protocol for pregnant and postpartum women; 2) training of trainers
for FP and MCH managers and supervisors; 3) on-the-job training of
clinic staff (doctors, nurses, RRs (FP outreach workers) and provision
of job aids; 4) providing information, education and communication
materials to clients; 5) monitoring and supervision by MOHP and
Council staff; 6) educational seminars for husbands; 7) Steering
committee meetings; and 8) a national orientation and dissemination
workshop.
Results: The operations research study demonstrated that using the
health services and community models to provide birth spacing and
PPFP messages to low-parity women and their husbands was both
feasible and acceptable. Both models proved effective in changing
knowledge and attitudes towards HTSP and in enhancing use of PPFP
at 10–11 months postpartum. Both models were associated with
increased use of services, especially for FP, by women who only had
one child. However, a fear of contraceptive side-effects continues to
be a major concern among women and men in both groups and is an
obstacle in achieving healthy birth intervals.
The PPFP intervention was scaled up in a total of eight districts in
Assiut and Sohag, which created conditions for scale-up in other
districts within those two governorates as well as other governorates in
Egypt. The main achievement, however, was securing the support and
investment of senior MOHP officials at the central level, as well as the
support and commitment of managers and supervisors at governorate
and district levels. With the rise of more conservative Islamist forces
and concern over negative reactions against FP in Egypt, adopting the
HTSP approach to providing FP messages may prove to be a useful and
politically acceptable approach.
References:
Scaling up the provision of family planning messages in antenatal and
postpartum services in Upper Egypt. New York, Population Council (no date)
(http://www.popcouncil.org/projects/305_ScaleUpFPUpperEgypt.asp)
COUNTRY/PARTNER
REFERENCES
Country: El Salvador PPFP contact points: Antenatal care and labour and delivery/pre-
discharge
Programme description: The purpose of this intervention is to increase
Partners: PASMO/El Salvador,
access to PPFP by increasing the number of providers and facilities that
The Salvadoran Ministry
perform post-obstetric IUD insertions and by improving the quality
of Health (MINSAL), the
of FP consultations conducted during pregnancy. The intervention
Salvadoran Social Insurance
is a public-private partnership which started as an externally driven
Institute, and Population
approach, whereby PASMO/El Salvador co-located providers at
Services International (PSI),
two public-sector maternities to provide PPIUD services alongside
with funding from the large
residents and doctors. As new sites were added, the approach shifted
anonymous donor
to capacity-building by PASMO/El Salvador master trainers who
trained and supervised staff from eight public and two private-sector
maternities, including nurses. PASMO/El Salvador provided trainers
Date: 2009–present
and providers, training and education materials and models, quarterly
supervision visits and socially marketed IUD commodities and insertion
equipment.
Results: Prior to 2009, PPIUD services were not offered in maternity
hospitals. By training doctors on post-obstetric IUD insertions and
gaining the support of nurses, PPIUD services have been offered since
late 2011 on a regular basis by host clinic staff at 10 maternity hospitals
(eight public-sector and two private-sector Salvadoran Social Insurance
Institute maternity hospitals), with PASMO/El Salvador providing
ongoing support to high-level trainers and directors in the form of
quarterly supervision. To date, 134 providers (28 private) were trained
in PPIUD insertions and the number of PPIUD insertions has increased
from 747 in 2009 to 993 in 2010 and 1044 in 2011. In 2012, IUD
insertion training was incorporated with the existing post-graduate
curricula at a Salvadoran medical school.
Reference: none
COUNTRY/PARTNER
REFERENCES
Country: India PPFP contact points: Antenatal care and labour and delivery/pre-
discharge
Programme description: This programme builds on Jhpiego’s ongoing
Partners: Jhpiego, the
support of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government
Government of India and
of India to introduce an alternative training approach that uses
state governments, National
competency-based training, anatomical models, service delivery
Rural Health Mission, with
performance standards and technical support for strengthening
funding from USAID, the Bill
interval IUD services in India. There has been a more than 15-fold
& Melinda Gates Foundation,
increase in institutional deliveries after the Janani Suraksha
David and Lucille Packard
Yojna (a conditional cash transfer scheme) was initiated by the
Foundation, and Norway India
Government under the National Rural Health Mission, providing an
Partnership Initiative
excellent opportunity to strengthen PPIUD services as part of PPFP
programming at scale.
Date: 2007–present To institutionalize the PPFP/PPIUD services at the participating sites,
a holistic set of interventions included: setting up of clinical training
sites in respective states; training a team of four providers at each
facility to provide PPFP/PPIUD services; on-site orientation of the entire
obstetrics and gynaecology department and facility management to
provide a supportive environment; the provision of instruments and
IEC materials; dedicated counsellors to provide routine counselling and
referral for PPFP at ANC clinics and follow up of PPIUD clients; national
and state-level workshops to set standards and share experiences,
successes and challenges; supportive supervision and monitoring,
including additional needs-based training where needed; and
advocacy among professional organizations and policy-makers.
Results: India’s PPIUD programme has successfully expanded the
method mix and the service delivery timing of FP options available
to women and couples. As of December 2012, almost 82 000 women
received a PPIUD, based on data from 260 facilities in 19 states,.
Some states had an IUD adoption rate more than 10% among
women who had delivered in that facility (highest at 33%). Follow-up
results revealed an expulsion rate of 2% and infection rate of 1%,
demonstrating the high quality of services despite the rapid scale-up
of these services. The effort has leveraged funding and is being scaled
up in more than 20 states. Through sustained advocacy efforts, the
programme has succeeded in creating a major policy shift, resulting
in nurse-midwives being allowed in India to insert PPIUD at their
respective health facilities and the hiring of MNCH counsellors at all
high-volume SDPs throughout country.
COUNTRY/PARTNER
REFERENCES
Country: India PPFP contact points: Unspecified
Programme description: The objective of this programme is to
mobilize the community to promote PPFP for healthy birth spacing
Partners: Population Council,
in rural India among young couples. The approach used existing
Lala Lajpat Rai Medical
community workers from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
College, district-level units
and from the Ministry of Women and Child Development to implement
of the Ministry of Health
a community-based BCC intervention conducted through integrated
and Family Welfare, and
public delivery systems. Key intervention components included the
Ministry of Women and
reorientation of community workers; provision of counselling aids to
Child Development, with
community workers; provision of a storybook to pregnant women
funding through USAID the
to share with family members; wall paintings at prominent places in
Population Council Frontiers,
villages; and group meetings with men and women separately. The
and the Pathfinder ESD
topics for the community worker reorientation included maternal
Project
and child health, safe delivery, LAM and different methods of
contraception. The messages in the counselling aids and storybook
were developed through participatory approach and were pre-tested
Date: 2006–2007 for the pilot
in community for clarity, word choice, appropriateness of pictures, etc.
phase; 2009–2011 for the
A checklist was developed to assist in monitoring and supervision.
scale-up phase
The supervisors were trained to use these findings to help community
workers improve their skills in conveying messages to pregnant
women. A project advisory committee was formed with the district
collector – the highest development and administrative authority of
the district – as its chairperson. The committee met every quarter to
review the progress of the work and passed on advice to all concerned.
The main challenge experienced was related to collaboration between
both the departments of the Ministry and in encouraging their
community workers to work together on the BCC approach.
Results: Correct knowledge among community workers on topics
covered in training rose from 32–44% to 91–93% in pre/post-
test questionnaires. In the pilot phase, significant use of modern
contraceptives for spacing at 9 months postpartum was reported:
57% women from the experimental (intervention) area versus 30%
women from control sites. The intervention also successfully increased
spousal communication; 60% of women shared and discussed the
BCC materials with their husbands. The pilot phase intervention was
implemented in two blocks of the district covering a population of 1
million. It demonstrated that the PPFP BCC model is not only feasible
and effective, but can be introduced without any additional human
resources or organizational changes in the existing health structure.
Expansion and the scale-up to the entire district of 2 million people has
been planned and implemented by district authorities, with limited
technical assistance from research partners.
References:
Sebastian MP et al. Increasing postpartum contraception in rural India:
evaluation of a community-based behaviour change communication
intervention. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,
2012, 38(2):68–77.
Sebastian MP, Khan ME & Roychowdhury S. Promoting healthy spacing

between pregnancies in India: need for differential education campaigns.
Patient Education and Counseling, 2010, 81:395–401.
Sebastian MP & Khan ME. Promoting optimal inter-pregnancy interval in

India through integrated public delivery systems. New Delhi, Population
Council, 2007 (http://paa2007.princeton.edu/papers/70351).
COUNTRY/PARTNER
REFERENCES
Countries: Kenya and PPFP contact points: Postnatal care
Swaziland (Integra Initiative)
Programme description: The PPFP intervention is part of a 5-year
research project that seeks to generate rigorous evidence on the
feasibility, effectiveness, cost and impact of different models for
Partners: International
delivering integrated HIV and sexual and reproductive health services
Planned Parenthood
in high and medium HIV prevalence settings to reduce HIV infection
Federation (IPPF), the
(and the associated stigma) and unintended pregnancy. Its objective
Population Council, and the
is to determine the benefits of different integrated models (HIV/FP and
London School of Hygiene
HIV/PNC) to increase range, uptake and quality of selected sexual and
and Tropical Medicine
reproductive health and HIV services.
(LSHTM), funded by Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation Using the postnatal consultation as the entry point, HIV and FP
services were strengthened for postpartum women attending facilities
following childbirth in Kenya and Swaziland. The interventions
Dates: 2008–2013 included strengthening provider skills to offer both HIV counselling
and testing (and/or referral to antiretroviral therapy units) and PPFP
services through a mentorship approach. Mentors skilled in (for
example) provision of LARCs, were encouraged to impart their skills
to colleagues within the same health facilities through a structured
process. All women attending PNC were offered the following: HIV
counselling and testing, a list of danger signs for the mother and
newborn, immunizations, and PPFP counselling and provision. The
Balanced Counselling Strategy Plus toolkit, which includes PPFP
counselling cards, was used as the core job aid.
Results: Health facility assessments and client interviews with women
leaving postnatal services documented improved client-provider
interactions. There were statistically significant increases in the
proportion of observations where providers discussed return to sexual
activity (from 13.8% to 41.7%), return to fertility (17.4% to 53.4%), HTSP
(from 34.9% to 60.8%), and the benefits of spacing for both the mother
and baby (7.3% to 52%). A composite mean score of the four attributes
increased from 0.7 to 2.1.
References:
www.integrainitiative.org
COUNTRY/PARTNER
REFERENCES
Country: Mali PPFP contact points: Child health/immunizations
Programme description: This intervention aims to increase women’s
access to PPFP, particularly LARC, and relies on immunization services
Partners: PSI/Mali, ProFam,
as the point of access to expand the provision of on-site FP counselling
the Malian Ministry of Health
and services. By applying a social marketing approach as well as
(MOH) Department of
lessons learned from FP programmes in other countries, the model
Reproductive Health, and the
overcomes historical challenges to increasing LARC uptake. Building
Bamako Regional Department
on the success of a pilot effort at ProFam private-sector clinics, a
of Health, with funding from
partnership was developed with the MOH to facilitate its replication in
the Dutch Government’s
the public sector at community health centres.
Choices and Opportunities
Fund, USAID’s MCHIP and The strategy builds on women’s existing health-seeking behaviour by
KFW integrating FP counselling and service delivery efforts with routine
child immunization events. Thirty-minute group presentations were
provided to women waiting to have their child immunized, followed by
Date: 2009–present individual counselling sessions with those interested in obtaining FP. In
this partnership, PSI/Mali midwives were embedded in MOH facilities
to provide services and to train and coach public-sector providers in
counselling and service delivery. LARC services were subsidized along
with products, equipment and consumables.
Results: By the end of 2011, 149 public-sector providers from
73 community health centres were trained and certified in LARC
counselling and service delivery and over 41 000 Malian women
had received a LARC method. Through multisectoral collaboration,
the prices of LARCs in the government central medicines store were
reduced. LARC was identified as a key priority in the national strategic
plan around FP.
References:
ProFam urban outreach: a high impact model for family planning.
Washington, DC, Population Services International, 2012.
COUNTRY/PARTNER
REFERENCES
Country: Zambia PPFP contact point: Labour and delivery/pre-discharge
Programme description: PPIUD insertion services were among those
introduced within a larger Dedicated LARC Provider Programme,
Partners: The Zambian
designed to offer LARCs at public-sector MCH facilities. The approach
Ministry of Health, the Society
involved attaching LARC services to existing, high-volume public
for Family Health (SFH) and
health centres that were offering MCH and only limited FP services.
PSI with funding from USAID,
It aimed to generated informed demand for and provide increased
the Dutch Ministry of Foreign
access to LARC by leveraging existing infrastructure to reach large
Affairs and an anonymous
audiences for women with an unmet need for FP in the postpartum
donor
period. Contraceptive implants and IUDs were introduced at all
programme sites; PPIUD insertion services were added to one third
of the sites. Providers offered a range of short- and long-acting
Date: 2008–present
contraception and used client feedback to guide and improve the
quality of the education they provided.
The interventions included training and placing SFH midwives as
dedicated LARC providers at high-volume facilities, where they
supplemented the work of MCH staff. This enabled providers to
increase the number of days and hours that services were offered
at the clinics. In addition the programme supported the capacity
building of MCH staff in LARC, improving the availability of educational
materials, providing on-site counselling to prospective clients waiting
to receive services, and performing on-site insertions.
Results: A total of 38 midwives were placed as of December 2012 and
176 880 women were provided the LARC of their choice, including
3926 PPIUD insertions (representing 5% of the total IUDs provided
by the program). The overall programme reached an unexpectedly
younger demographic and lower-parity demographic, and 50% of
programme participants were not using any contraception at the time
of insertion.
Reference:
Neukom J et al. Dedicated providers of long-acting reversible
contraception: new approach in Zambia. Contraception, 2011, 83:447–452.
COUNTRY/PARTNER
REFERENCES
Country: Zambia PPFP contact point: Postnatal care
Programme Description: To improve the health and survival of
mothers and infants in the postnatal period, and to address the gap
Partners: Zambian Ministry
between PMTCT, FP and maternal health programmes, the partners
of Health and the Population
collaborated to develop The Integrated Postnatal Care Guidelines and
Council, with support from
implement an intervention to strengthen PNC and PPFP for both
WHO/RHR
women and their infants. The guidelines focus on the core elements of
care every woman and newborn should receive during the postnatal
period (prior to discharge, at 1-week and 6-week consultations, and
Date: 2011–2012
at 6 months) to enable women to access time-relevant services for
themselves and their babies.
Eight intervention areas were identified for strengthening service
delivery of postpartum and postnatal care, including: development
and adaptation of guidelines and protocols; organizational change and
role clarification with all staff in intervention sites; ensuring availability
of minimum equipment, supplies and materials; and strengthening
data collection, recording systems and the referral system. The
programme was conducted in two districts in Eastern Province and two
districts in Southern Province, from June 2011 to April 2012. The study
used a pre-/post- intervention design for assessing quality of care
within facilities before and after introduction of the intervention.
Results: Comparisons within and between groups at baseline and
end line showed that conducting integrated PNC was feasible for all
health facilities and that intervention activities had a positive effect on
competence in providing FP and PNC in intervention facilities, as well
as on availability of guidelines. However, there were limited changes
between the baseline and end line, and few differences between
intervention and comparison sites. Intervention hospitals were more
likely to be better equipped, however. At end line, more providers
in intervention sites used the Balanced Counselling Strategy Plus
(BCS+) toolkit to address women’s postpartum needs related to HIV,
sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and FP, as well as their knowledge
improved on FP commodities, STIs, and danger signs during the early
postpartum period and for the newborn. Of note was the fact that
traditional birth attendants were providing much PNC at end line in
intervention facilities.
References:
Warren C et al. Evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, quality and
effectiveness for strengthening postnatal care in Zambia. New York,
Population Council, 2012.
Chapter 4
Monitoring and evaluation
An indispensable tool for programme management, monitoring and evaluation is used to define goals
and objectives, determine what ‘success’ looks like if the goals and objectives are achieved, and assess
progress (and adjust, if needed, along the way) towards achieving the goals and objectives. Being clear
from the beginning about the indicators that will be used for monitoring and evaluating progress is an
important component of programme design. Determining how and where data can be obtained and
collected is also an important step. Monitoring and evaluating PPFP programmes is especially important
as evidence about the effectiveness of various programme models is currently limited. Monitoring
and evaluation data help programme planners advocate for additional and/or continued funding and
support for programmes. A key limitation within the published literature concerns a lack of information
about the design and process elements that underpin the intervention studies. Programme leaders are
encouraged to give priority to systematically evaluating their PPFP efforts and, as part of that effort, to
fully describe processes undertaken to implement the interventions.
Chapter 3 provided illustrative programme goals and activities with related indicators to show how one
might approach monitoring and evaluating a PPFP programme component or intervention. Ideally,
recordkeeping of FP delivery is available within existing HMIS for ANC, childbirth, PNC and child health
services. Additional indicators are provided in this chapter, along with definitions and suggestions
for the data source and frequency of data collection are included for reference. These indicators are
organized into sections on policy/enabling environment, service delivery, and client and demand
factors.
Table 9. Sample programme indicators and data collection methods
NUMERATOR/ DATA
INDICATOR DEFINITION FREQUENCY
DENOMINATOR COLLECTION
Policy/Enabling Environment
Number of Number of laws, policies, Numerator: Number Programme Annually
improvements to or guidelines developed or of laws, policies, report
PPFP law, policy, changed to improve access regulations, including
regulations, to and use of PPFP services protocols, or a review of
protocols, guidelines national and
curricula, or developed and subnational
guidelines related changed to improve policies
to improved access to and use
access to and of PPFP services
use of health
Denominator: N/A
services drafted
or changed with
programme
support
NUMERATOR/ DATA
Percentage Curricula include explicit Numerator: Review of Annually
of pre-service content on PPFP and core Number of pre- curricula
education competencies required for service institutions and training
institutions the relevant cadre of health- implementing reports
implementing care provider curricula that
curricula that include PPFP core
include PPFP core competencies
competencies
Denominator: Total
number of pre-
service institutions
Service delivery/capacity
Number and Counselling includes Numerator: Observation, Quarterly
proportion of discussion of client’s Number of SDPs supervision
SDPs providing experience with FP, desire for by type where visits
PPFP counselling spacing or limiting, preferred PPFP counselling
or services method, HTSP, plans for or services are
breastfeeding, medical provided
history, information on
Denominator: Total
appropriate options (how it
number/type of
works, effectiveness, benefits,
SDPs
disadvantages, common
side-effects, warning signs,
where to go with problems,
and information on STI/HIV
prevention)
Number of SDPs (excluding

community-based
distribution) providing
counselling or services, by
type of service (vertical FP/
RH, HIV, including PMTCT,
prenatal, postnatal or other
MNCH services)
Number/ Proportion of SDPs that offer Numerator: Number Direct Semi-
percentage at least three FP methods of SDPs that offer observation annually
of SDPs in appropriate for postpartum at least three FP
programme- women (including LAM) methods (including
supported areas and have at least a 3-month LAM) and have a
that offer a range supply of IUD, progestogen- 3-month supply of
of appropriate only pills, injectables, IUD, progestin-only
contraceptive implants or condoms for pills, injectables,
options for postpartum women implants or
postpartum condoms for
women postpartum women
Denominator: Total
number of SDPs
NUMERATOR/ DATA
Proportion of Client IEC materials, such Numerator: Number Observation, Quarterly
SDPs that have as brochures, posters and of SDPs with supervision
PPFP IEC materials provider job aids, are visible client and provider visits
for clients and and used materials
PPFP job aids for
Denominator: Total
providers
number of SDPs
Percentage of SDPs that conduct pre- Numerator: Observation, Semi-
SDPs that have discharge PPFP counselling, Number of SDPs supervision annually
implemented IEC and/or method provision that have PPFP in visits
pre-discharge in the maternity according to the maternity pre-
protocols that protocol discharge protocol
include PPFP
Denominator: Total
number of SDPs
Proportion of Proportion of providers Numerator: Number Programme Semi-
providers who trained by the programme of providers trained reports annually
know the timing who know what methods who meet the
for initiation of can be used during the definition
PPFP methods postpartum period, including
Denominator: Total
timing, correct use, side-
number of providers
effects and complications,
trained in the PPFP
along with their prevention
program
and management, and
follow-up
Number/ Improved compliance refers Numerator: Number Self- or Semi-
proportion to SDPs implementing a of SDPs who meet supervisor- annually
of SDPs standards-based quality the definition administered
demonstrating improvement process that assessments
Denominator: Total
improved achieves a predetermined using
number of SDPs
compliance with level of acceptable quality standard
implementing a
clinical standards (e.g. 80% of PPFP standards) checklists and
standards-based
for provision of observations
quality improvement
PPFP or simulations
process
of client-
provider
interactions
Demand/client and community
Number/ Proportion of postpartum Numerator: Number Client exit Semi-
proportion women interviewed who of postpartum interview annually
of maternal report receiving information women interviewed
health clients and/or counselling about as per the definition
at programme- PPFP, including LAM
Denominator:
supported
Total number of
SDPs or events
postpartum women
who received
interviewed
information and/
or counselling
about PPFP
NUMERATOR/ DATA
Proportion of Proportion of CHWs trained Numerator: Number Programme Quarterly
CHWs trained in in PPFP, including screening, of CHW trained as report
PPFP referral and method per the definition
provision, where approved
Denominator: Total
number of CHWs
trained by the
program
Number/ Proportion of CHWs Numerator: Number Programme Quarterly
proportion providing PPFP screening, of CHWs providing report,
of CHWs referral and method interventions as per including
providing PPFP provision, where approved the definition CHW and
interventions, supervisory
Denominator:
information and reports
Total number
referral
of programme-
supported CHWs
FP service coverage
Couple-years The estimated protection Numerator: Service Annually
protection provided by FP services CYP calculation statistics or
(CYP) provided during a 1-year period, logistics data
Denominator: N/A
by MNCH based on the volume of from HMIS
programme all contraceptive methods
provided to PPFP clients
during that period. CYP is
used as an interim measure
of coverage, as contraceptive
prevalence rates are
generally calculated at 3-
or 5-year intervals. CYP is
calculated by multiplying
the quantity of each method
distributed or provided to
clients by a conversion factor,
to yield an estimate of the
duration of contraceptive
protection provided per unit
of that method. The CYPs
for each method are then
summed over all methods to
obtain a total CYP figure (see
www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/
prh/rh_indicators/specific/
fp/cyp for conversion
factors).
References
Cleland J et al. Family planning: the unfinished agenda. The Lancet, 2006, 368(9549):1810–1827.
DaVanzo J et al. Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy
outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh. BJOG, 2007, 114(9):1079–1087.
Jackson E & Glasier A. Return of ovulation and menses in postpartum nonlactating women: a systematic review.
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 117:657–662.
Ross J & Winfrey W. Contraceptive use, intention to use and unmet need during the extended postpartum period.
International Family Planning Perspectives, 2001, 27(1):20–27.
Rutstein SO. Further evidence of the effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under-five-years
mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
DHS Working Papers, Demographic and Health Research (41), 2008.
Stover J & Ross J. How increased contraceptive use has reduced maternal mortality. Maternal and Child Health
Journal, 2010, 14(5):687–695.
World Health Organization. Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and newborn care: a guide to essential practice,
2006. (http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/924159084X/en/,
accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2nd edition and 2008 Update,
2008 (http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9241562846index/en/index.html,
accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. Integrated management of childhood illness, 2008b(http://www.who.int/maternal_

child_adolescent/topics/child/imci/en/, accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, Fourth edition, 2009 (http://www.who.
int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9789241563888/en/index.html, accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. Strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action,
2010a (http://www.who.int/healthsystems/strategy/everybodys_business.pdf, accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. Packages of interventions for family planning, safe abortion care, maternal, newborn
and child health. 2010b (http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_FCH_10.06_eng.pdf, accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. Family planning: a global handbook for providers, 2011 update, 2011 (http://www.who.
int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9780978856304/en/index.html, accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. From evidence to policy: Strengthening health system response: no opportunities
missed, 2012a (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/75162/1/WHO_RHR_HRP_12.22_eng.pdf ).
World Health Organization. Family planning: a health and development issue, a key intervention for the survival
of women and children, 2012b (http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/
rhr_12_23/en/index.html, accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. Optimizing health worker roles to improve access to key maternal
and newborn health interventions through task shifting, 2012c (http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/77764/1/9789241504843_eng.pdf, accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for routine immunizations – summary tables, 2013a.
(http://www.who.int/immunization/policy/immunization_tables/en/index.html, accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women:
WHO clinical and policy guidelines, 2013b. (http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/85240/1/9789241548595_
eng.pdf, accessed on 10 October 2013).
World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Postnatal Care of the Mother and Newborn, 2013c.
(http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/guidelines-recommendations-maternal-health.pdf,
accessed on 4 November 2013).
Annex 1: Statement for collective action for

postpartum planning
Annex 2
Supporting evidence for programme design
A review of literature was conducted to identify evidence on programmatic interventions for PPFP from
2000 through July 2012. The searches of the grey and peer-reviewed literature were performed using
PubMed and The Cochrane Library, as well as Google and Bing Internet search engines. Key findings and
their programme design implications gleaned from the literature are presented in the table below for
each of the contact points where there are opportunities for integrating PPFP with MNCH services. This
supporting evidence was reviewed by the experts participating in the 2012 WHO Technical Consultation
to inform the development of the illustrative programme strategies featured in Chapter 3. Citations for
the studies noted in this table follow.
KEY FINDINGS/CONSIDERATIONS
SUPPORTING EVIDENCE IN LITERATURE
FOR PROGRAMMING
Antenatal care
FP counselling during the • A randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Egypt demonstrated
antenatal period may increase increased adoption of PPFP in the immediate postpartum
postpartum contraceptive use. period and within 3 months as a result of an antenatal education
The quality of FP counselling intervention (Soliman 1999). Two other RCTs in Turkey and
appears to make a difference Scotland and China and South Africa found no difference
(Akman et al. 2010; Smith et al. 2002).
• A non-equivalent control group study found increased use
of postpartum contraception following ANC counselling
that included husbands. However, this article included little
description of the intervention (Varkey et al. 2004).
• One RCT conducted in a facility was preceded by a qualitative
study of focus group discussions and also included a community
component (Turan et al. 2001).
• One RCT looked at knowledge rather than contraceptive usage
as its outcome (Mullaney et al. 2010).
Interventions conducted during • An RCT in four countries found that the addition of one
ANC were more effective when antenatal counselling session to standard care did not influence
part of multiple contacts than contraceptive use or pregnancy rates (Smith et al. 2002). This
when conducted during ANC is in contrast to studies above with multiple sessions showing
alone positive influence on contraceptive knowledge and/or usage.
Labour, delivery and pre-discharge
Provision of pre-discharge • An RCT in Pakistan compared contraceptive uptake among
PPFP counselling (including IEC women who were provided with an informal didactic
materials) can increase use of counselling session of 20 minutes duration (with husbands or
contraception close relatives) along with a one-page leaflet about PPFP prior
to discharge versus controls who received routine care. Women
who received the intervention were more likely to be using
any form of contraception, as well as modern contraceptive
methods, at 8–12 weeks postpartum (Saeed et al. 2008).
• In Nepal, immediate postpartum health education of 20 minutes
duration focussing on FP provided by trained female health
workers showed a small improvement in contraceptive uptake at
6 months after birth versus controls (Bolam et al. 1998).
FOR PROGRAMMING
Access to contraceptive methods • A randomized prospective cohort study in Peru included an
in the immediate postpartum experimental labour ward, where women were offered pre-
increases contraceptive uptake discharge IUD insertion, barrier methods or oral contraceptives
(including LAM, IUD and for non-breastfeeding women. Women in the control group
sterilization services) were referred for desired FP services after discharge. Women
in the experimental group had significantly more reported
contraceptive use at 40 days (44.7% versus 25.9%) and at 6
months (81.8% versus 68.7%) than women in the control group
(Foreit et al. 1993).
• Potter et al. (2003) demonstrate a high unmet need for female
sterilization at time of birth in Brazil but do not describe
subsequent contraceptive use after an unfulfilled request.
• An RCT evaluating the timing of IUD insertion (immediate
post-placental, 10 minutes to 48 hours after delivery and
interval) found very little difference in IUD use at 3 and 6 months
between groups. This was a United States feasibility study that
was included in the literature review (Dahlke et al. 2011).
Supportive government policies • A prospective study of 1612 pregnant women in Brazil found
can play an important role in that when legislation discouraged PPTO following caesarean
facilitating access to TO when section, 47.5% of ANC clients in the public sector and 14.6%
desired in the postpartum in the private sector stated that they wanted to be sterilized
before leaving the hospital after the birth of their baby. Of these
women, 69% in the private sector and only 33% in the public
sector received PPTO (Potter et al. 2003).
Improving provider ability to • In Honduras, intensive staff training focused on effective FP
offer high-quality counselling counselling, and service promotion was provided to physicians,
and competent services with nurses, nurse auxiliaries, social workers and educators in
consistent commodities improves obstetrics and gynaecology wards at hospitals. Additionally,
use of PPFP in the immediate physicians and nurses completed proficiency training in IUD
postpartum insertion and equipment to support subsequent IUD insertion
(including post-placental and pre-discharge). The programme
demonstrated an increase in the proportion of women receiving
contraceptive education at the time of birth, the proportion of
women interested in contraceptive use, and the proportion of
women receiving a method during their hospital stay (Medina
2001*).
Pre-discharge counselling • Project data from a vasectomy programme in Guatemala yielded
that includes information on evidence that providing information on vasectomy to women
vasectomy to discuss with partner in the immediate postpartum period increased vasectomy use
can identify clients among their partners (Vernon, Solórzano & Muñoz 2007).
Task-shifting that encourages the • A pre-/post-intervention longitudinal cohort study in Kenya
provision of PPFP services by non- found that when a comprehensive postpartum care package,
physician skilled birth attendants that included PPFP services was introduced, significantly more
should be considered women in the post-intervention group received a method of
family planning (65% versus 35%), including IUD (30% versus
3%), than prior to the intervention. All but one of the service
providers was a nurse or nurse-midwife (Mwangi et al. 2008*;
Warren et al. 2010).
• A project evaluation in Kenya demonstrated that clients who
had an IUD inserted immediately postpartum by nurses and
nurse-midwives had a 76% continuation rate at 3–6 months
postpartum (Chaurat et al. 2011*).
FOR PROGRAMMING
LAM counselling, including • A quasi-experimental design study nested within a community-
supportive home visits and based RCT in Bangladesh found that women in the intervention
breastfeeding support, increase group who received family planning messages and commodities
LAM use provided by a CHW were more likely to use LAM at 3 months
(23% versus 0%), to use any method of contraception at 3
months (36.4% versus 10.8%) and to use any method at 12
months (42.1% versus 27.1%) (Baqui et al. 2011, unpublished).
• A quasi-experimental pre-/post- control group study in India
found that women in the experimental group were more likely
to use a contraceptive at 9 months postpartum (62% versus
31%) and more likely to use LAM at 4 months postpartum (22%
versus 0%). The intervention included facility- and community-
based counselling and an educational campaign with CHWs
that included husbands and mothers-in-law (Khan et al. 2008,
Sebastian, Khan & Roychowdhury 2010).
Include LAM in any programme • A study of 519 LAM users from 10 countries found that among
that aims to increase prevalence all women studied, 68% were using a contraceptive method at
of other modern methods of 9 months, which was 79% of women who reported wanting to
contraception by 12 months space their births (Labbok et al. 1997).
postpartum and EBF up to 6
• A study in Brazil showed that the proportion of women who
months
were counselled on and accepted LAM were more than twice
as likely to be using contraception at 12 months than women
who had not been counselled on and accepted LAM (Hardy et al.
1998).
• A post-intervention survey in Jordan found that LAM users were
more likely than breastfeeding non-LAM users (38% versus 20%)
and non-family planning users (16%) to be using a modern
method of contraception at 12 months (Bongiovanni 2005*).
Postpartum/postnatal care
A community-based programme • A quasi-experimental pre-/post- control group study in India
that involves training and found that women in the experimental group were more likely
support of CHWs to provide to use a contraceptive at 9 months postpartum (62% versus
PPFP counselling, together with 31%) and more likely to use LAM at 4 months postpartum (22%
effective IEC and coordinated versus 0%). The intervention included a community educational
district support, can increase campaign and coordination between district authorities and
postpartum contraceptive use, CHWs (Khan et al. 2008).
including early uptake at 3 or 4
months postpartum
Supportive home-based care • A prospective cohort study in India found a significant increase
during the antenatal and/or (61.8% versus 30.6%) in contraceptive use at 9 months
postpartum periods can increase postpartum by women in the intervention group compared with
postpartum contraceptive use, the control group. The intervention included an educational
including LAM campaign carried out by community workers using leaflets,
posters, wall paintings and booklets. The campaign addressed
pregnant women, their husbands, mothers-in-law and
community opinion leaders (Sebastian et al. 2010 and 2012).
• A quasi-experimental design study nested within a community-
based RCT in Bangladesh found that women in the intervention
group who received FP messages and commodities provided by
a CHW were more likely to use any method of contraception at 3
months (36.4% versus 10.8%), to use any method at 12 months
(42.1% versus 27.1%) and to use LAM at 3 months (23% versus
0%) (Baqui et al. 2011*).
FOR PROGRAMMING
Home-visits during ANC and PNC • One prospective cohort study in Chile found no positive effect
may not increase contraceptive on contraceptive usage or pregnancy rates for ANC and PNC
use home visits compared with women seen in public clinics in
contraceptive usage or pregnancy rates. Of the control/clinic
group, 21% was lost to follow-up, while none in the community
arm were lost to follow-up (Alvarado et al. 1999).
• An RCT in Syria found no positive effect on contraceptive
usage among for women who had 1–4 postpartum home visits
compared with women who had no home visit in contraceptive
usage. There was a significant increase in breastfeeding in the
intervention groups, but LAM was not included in this study
(Bashour et al. 2008).
• A prospective cohort study in Palestine found no significant
difference between women who received home visits in addition
to basic care, compared with women who only received basic
care in relation to use of contraception at <2 months and at 6
months postpartum (Center for Development in Primary Health
Care 2003*).
Community-based care that • A prospective cohort study in India found a significant increase
includes husbands and mothers- (61.8% versus 30.6%) in contraceptive use at 9 months
in-law, as well as IEC material, postpartum by women in the intervention group compared with
may effectively increase the use the control group. The intervention included an educational
of PPFP campaign carried out by community workers using leaflets,
posters, wall paintings and booklets. The campaign addressed
pregnant women, their husbands, mothers-in-law and
community opinion leaders (Sebastian et al. 2010 and 2012).
• A similar study in India examined a quasi-experimental pre-/
post- control group and found that women in the experimental
group were more likely to use a contraceptive at 9 months
postpartum (62% versus 31%) and more likely to use LAM at 4
months postpartum (22% versus 0%). The intervention included
a community educational campaign with CHWs that included
husbands and mothers-in-law (Khan et al. 2008).
Longer programmes with • A study in Egypt used a post-test panel design with a non-
multiple contacts across the equivalent control group with Model 1 delivering PPFP
continuum of care may have messages in ANC and PNC at facilities and Model 2 including
more effect on PPFP use than a community component in addition. This study found that
short programmes with few women in the intervention groups were more likely to use
contacts contraception at 10 and 11 months postpartum (48% and 43%
versus 31%) and to have a longer duration of protection against
pregnancy than women in the control group (6.8 months and
4.5 months versus 2.9 months) (Abdel-Tawab, Loza & Zaki 2008*).
• A pre-/post-intervention study in Honduras that included
multiple ANC and postpartum encounters for counselling and
wider method choice resulted in an increase for acceptance
of sterilization, IUD and oral contraceptives from 8.8% at the
beginning of the programme to 41.2% after 14 months (Vernon
et al. 1993).
FOR PROGRAMMING
The implementation of a • An experimental pre-/post-intervention design with control in
comprehensive PNC package Guatemala found an increase at <3 months postpartum from 7%
that includes PPFP may result to 19% in experimental group and reduction from 23% to 15% in
in earlier and increased use of the control group, as well as an increase at 3 months postpartum
contraception by postpartum from 18% to 25% in the experimental group and decrease from
women 20% to 14% in the control group. The intervention included IEC
materials, training of health-care providers, and monitoring at
the community and facility levels (Jacobs, Brambila & Vernon
2002*).
• A pre-/post-intervention survey in the Russian Federation found
an increase in postpartum contraceptive use from 0% to 65%
following a comprehensive ANC and PNC intervention that
included providing supplies, training providers and improving
quality of care for comprehensive services (Stephenson et al.
1998).
Infant health and immunization services
FP uptake may increase if • A cluster, randomized two-group pre-/post-intervention study in
contraception is offered during Rwanda in which FP was integrated with immunization services
immunization services found an increase of FP use from 51% to 57% in the intervention
group, and a decrease from 58% to 49% in the control group
without a detrimental effect on immunization rates (Dulli et al.
2012*).
• A comparative time series survey in Togo found a significant
increase in contraceptive acceptors from 200/month to 307/
month in the intervention group, and compared with a non-
significant increase from 144/month to 167/month (NS) in
the control group after introducing referrals for FP at the
expanded programme on immunization (EPI) clinic. There was
also a significant increase in mean users, from 1035/month to
1311/month in the intervention group compared with a non-
significant 704/month to 768/month in the control group during
the same period (Huntington and Aplogan 1994).
• A case study from Mali found that after introduction of family
planning messages and services at immunization event days,
uptake increased from 330 IUDs and implants annually before
the intervention to 3997 annually after 1 year and 292 event
days, and to 5600 annually after 2 years and 1100 event days.
(PSI 2010*).
• A pre-/post-experimental and control group designed study
in India found that women attending clinic for immunization
services who also obtained FP services increased from 0.42 per
visit to 0.62 per visit in the intervention group while it decreased
from 0.37 per visit to 0.36 per visit in the control group. The
intervention included use of a systematic screening tool to
identify women bringing a child for immunization services who
also needed FP services (Das et al. 2005*).
• A cluster RCT in Guinea Bissau in which breastfeeding and FP
messages were included in a first ANC visit, plus immunization
sessions at 6, 10 and 14 weeks, resulted in 31 IUD insertions in
the intervention group and only 14 insertions in the control
group (RR=2.45) (Jakobsen et al. 1999).
FOR PROGRAMMING
Expanded Programme on • Most of the studies cited above mention the training of
Immunization (EPI) providers immunization service providers in providing FP messages
may need FP skills development, (Huntington and Aplogan 1994; PSI 2010*; Das et al. 2005;
while FP providers may need skills Jakobsen et al. 1999).
development in EPI.
Postpartum family planning for women living with HIV
High rates of contraceptive Among 319 women living with HIV who were counselled in
coverage can be attained among ANC and referred after birth for FP, 72% of women were using
women living with HIV if they hormonal contraception for at least 2 months during the
are given ANC counselling and postpartum, initiating use at approximately 3 months postpartum
referral to a FP clinic in the (range: 1–11 months). Overall, 44% used DMPA, 31% used oral
postpartum contraception, and 25% switched methods during follow-up.
Partner notification, infant mortality and condom use were similar
between those using and not using other forms of contraception
(Balkus et al. 2007).
Use of LARC among postpartum In a prospective cohort study, the uptake of implants was
women living with HIV is significantly higher (38%) at the site where contraceptives were
increased where access provided free and on-site, than at the site (6%) from which a
(availability and cost) issues are woman was referred for contraceptive services. The IUD uptake was
addressed extremely low at both sites (2%) (Dhont et al. 2009).
*Article not published in a peer-reviewed journal
References for Annex 2

Abdel-Tawab N, Loza S & Zaki A. Helping Egyptian women achieve optimal birth spacing intervals through
fostering linkages between family planning and maternal/child health services. Cairo, Population Council, 2008
(http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/frontiers/FR_FinalReports/Egypt_OBSI.pdf ).
Akman M et al. The influence of prenatal counselling on postpartum contraceptive choice. Journal of
International Medical Research, 2010, 38(4):1243–1249.
Alvarado R et al. Integrated maternal and infant health care in the postpartum period in a poor neighborhood in
Santiago, Chile. Studies in Family Planning, 1999, 30(2):133–141.
Balkus J et al. High uptake of postpartum hormonal contraception among HIV-1-seropositive women in Kenya.
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 2007, 34(1):25–29.
Baqui A et al. Healthy fertility study: operations research to address unmet need for contraception in the
postpartum period in Sylhet District Bangladesh. Twelve month postpartum follow-up survey report. 2011.*
B
ashour HN et al. Effect of postnatal home visits on maternal/infant outcomes in Syria: a randomized controlled
trial. Public Health Nursing, 2008, 25(2):115–125.
Bolam A et al. The effects of postnatal health education for mothers on infant care and family planning practices
in Nepal: a randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 1998, 316:805–811.
Bongiovanni A. Promoting the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) in Jordan increases modern contraceptive
use in the extended postpartum period. 2005. (http://www.linkagesproject.org/publications/LAM%20
Research%20Report,%20Final,%20November%201,%202005.pdf?detail=14).*
Center for Development in Primary Health Care. Improving postpartum care among low parity mothers
in Palestine, final report. Cairo, Population Council. 2003 (http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/frontiers/FR_
FinalReports/West_Bank_LowParity.pdf ).*
Chaurat E et al. An assessment of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device services in Embu, Kenya. 2011.*
Dahlke JD et al. Postpartum insertion of levonorgestrel–intrauterine system at three time periods: a prospective
randomized pilot study. Contraception, 2011, 84:244–248.
Das NP et al. Systematic screening to integrate reproductive health services in India. New Delhi, Population
Council, 2005. (http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/frontiers/FR_FinalReports/India_Screen.pdf ).*
Dhont N et al. Improved access increases postpartum uptake of contraceptive implants among HIV-positive
women in Rwanda. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 2009, 14(6):420–425.
Dulli L et al. Improving postpartum family planning through immunization services. Presentation to the FHI360
closeout meeting in Washington, DC, 2012.*
Foreit KG et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of postpartum IUD insertion in Lima, Peru. International
Family Planning Perspectives, 1993, 19(1):19–24, 33.
Hardy E et al. Contraceptive use and pregnancy before and after introducing lactational amenorrhea method
(LAM) in a postpartum program. Advances in Contraception, 1998, 14 (1):59–68.
Huntington D & Aplogan A. The integration of family planning and childhood immunization services in Togo.
Studies in Family Planning, 1994, 25(3):176–183.
Jacobs E, Brambila C & Vernon R. Reproductive health care in the postnatal period in Guatemala. Mexico City,
Population Council, 2002 (http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/frontiers/FR_FinalReports/Guatemala_Postnatal_
Care.pdf ).*
Jakobsen MS et al. Promoting breastfeeding through health education at the time of immunizations: a
randomized trial from Guinea Bissau. Acta Paediatrica, 1999, 88(7):741–747.
Khan ME et al. Promoting healthy timing and spacing of births in India through a community-based approach.
New Delhi, Population Council, 2008 (http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/frontiers/FR_FinalReports/India_HTSP.
pdf ).*
Labbok MH et al. Multicenter study of the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM): I. Efficacy, duration and
implications for clinical application. Contraception, 1997, 55:327–336.
Medina R et al. Postpartum and postabortion patients want family planning. Honduras Contraceptive Choice
OR Summary. New York, Population Council, 2001a (http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/frontiers/orsummaries/
orsum25.pdf ).*
Mwangi A et al. Strengthening Postnatal Care Services Including Postpartum Family Planning in Kenya. Nairobi,
Population Council, 2008 (http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/frontiers/FR_FinalReports/Kenya_PPFP.pdf ).*
Potter JE et al. Frustrated demand for postpartum female sterilization in Brazil. Contraception, 2003, 67:385–390.
PSI. Case study, Mali: reaching women in need of family planning at clinic immunization days. Washington, DC,
Population Services International, 2010.*
Saeed GA et al. Change in trend of contraceptive uptake – effect of educational leaflets and counseling.
Contraception, 2008, 77:377–381.
Sebastian MP, Khan ME & Roychowdhury S. Promoting healthy spacing between pregnancies in India: need for
differential education campaigns. Patient Education and Counseling, 2010, 81(3):395–401.
Sebastian MP et al. Increasing postpartum contraception in rural India: evaluation of a community-based

behaviour change communication intervention. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,
2012, 38(2):68–77.
Smith KB et al. Is postpartum contraceptive advice given antenatally of value? Contraception, 2002, 65 (3):237–243.
Soliman MH. Impact of antenatal counseling on couples’ knowledge and practice of contraception in Mansoura,
Egypt. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 1999, 5(5):1002–1013.
Stephenson P et al. World Bank Technical Paper 404: Improving Women’s Health Services in the Russian
Federation. Washington, DC, World Bank, 1998.
Turan JM et al. Including expectant fathers in antenatal education programmes in Istanbul, Turkey. Reproductive
Health Matters, 2001, 9(18):114–125.
Varkey LC et al. Involving men in maternity care in India. New Delhi, India, Population Council, 2004 (http://www.
popcouncil.org/pdfs/frontiers/FR_FinalReports/India_MIM.pdf ).*
Vernon R et al. The impact of perinatal reproductive health programs in Honduras. International Family Planning
Perspectives. 1993, 19(3):103–109.
Vernon R, Solórzano J & Muñoz B. Introducing sustainable vasectomy services in Guatemala. International Family
Planning Perspectives, 2007, 33(4):182–187.
Warren C et al. Safeguarding maternal and newborn health: improving the quality of postnatal care in Kenya.
International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care/
ISQua, 2010, 22(1):24–30.
* Not published in a peer-reviewed journal.

For more information please contact:
Department of Reproductive Health and Research ISBN 978 92 4 150649 6
World Health Organization
Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
Fax: +41 22 791 4171
E-mail: [email protected]
www.who.int/reproductivehealth

Postpartum Family Planning: Programming Strategies For

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Postpartum Family Planning: Programming Strategies For

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Postpartum Family Planning: Programming Strategies For

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Programming strategies for

Postpartum Family Planning

ISBN 978 92 4 150649 6 (NLM classification: WA 550)

© World Health Organization 2013

Chapter 1: Postpartum family planning and why it’s needed 1

Annex 1: Statement for collective action for postpartum planning 36

Annex 2: Supporting evidence for programme design 38

Figure 1. PPFP programme model

Health system building blocks Activities Outcomes Impacts

1.1 Postpartum family planning: definition and parameters

Table 1. Continuum of points of contact for PPFP

CONTINUUM OF POINTS OF CONTACT FOR PPFP

Pre-discharge child transmission of HIV

to discharge • Well child visits

1.2 Rationale for PPFP

8000 Additional 943 000 Min. 24 mos.

Source: Rutstein 2008

1.3 The unique family planning needs of postpartum women

–– A copper-bearing intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) can be inserted immediately

Figure 3. Postpartum contraceptive options (timing of method initiation and breastfeeding

LACTATIONAL AMENORRHEA METHOD

COMBINED HORMONAL METHODS

COMBINED HORMONAL METHODS

2.1 Review of country-level data

Table 2. Data points and programme implications

KEY QUESTION/DATA POINT PROGRAMME IMPLICATIONS

KEY QUESTION/DATA POINT PROGRAMME IMPLICATIONS

2.2 Health systems issues

Health management information system (HMIS)

Medicines and technology

Leadership and governance

Community and sociocultural issues

2.3 Moving from the general to the specific

Table 3. Illustrative findings and potential programme interventions

ILLUSTRATIVE FINDINGS  POTENTIAL PPFP PROGRAMME INTERVENTIONS

ILLUSTRATIVE FINDINGS  POTENTIAL PPFP PROGRAMME INTERVENTIONS

3.1 Antenatal care

Table 4. Contacts during antenatal care

Overall programme goal:

3.2 Labour and delivery/pre-discharge

Table 5. Contacts during labour and delivery/pre-discharge

Overall programme goals:

3.3 Postnatal care

Table 6. Contacts during postnatal care

Overall programme goals:

3.4 Infant health and immunization services

Table 7. Contacts during infant health and immunization services

Overall programme goals:

3.5 Country programme case examples

Table 8. Country programme case examples

Sebastian MP, Khan ME & Roychowdhury S. Promoting healthy spacing

Sebastian MP & Khan ME. Promoting optimal inter-pregnancy interval in

Table 9. Sample programme indicators and data collection methods

Number of SDPs (excluding

World Health Organization. Integrated management of childhood illness, 2008b(http://www.who.int/maternal_

Annex 1: Statement for collective action for

*Article not published in a peer-reviewed journal

References for Annex 2

Sebastian MP et al. Increasing postpartum contraception in rural India: evaluation of a community-based