Bondurant's Landlord Says $675K Loan Isn't Enough.
Bondurant's Landlord Says $675K Loan Isn't Enough.
Bondurant's Landlord Says $675K Loan Isn't Enough.
Stapleton, 018646
OSBORN MALEDON, P.A.
2
2929 North Central Avenue
3 21st Floor
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2793
4 (602) 640-9000
5 E-mail: [email protected]
6
Attorneys for Sun Valley Marina Development Corporation
7
10 In re: Chapter 11
11 BOB BONDURANT SCHOOL OF HIGH No. 2:18-bk-12041-BKM
PERFORMANCE DRIVING, INC.
12
Debtor. SUN VALLEY MARINA
13 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION’S
LIMITED OBJECTION TO THE
14 DEBTOR’S EXPEDITED MOTION
FOR INTERIM APPROVAL OF
15 POST-PETITION FINANCING
16
Case 2:18-bk-12041-BKM Doc 153 Filed 02/12/19 Entered 02/12/19 14:18:06 Desc
Main Document Page 1 of 7
1 sublease dated March 1, 2017 (the “Lease”). A copy of the Lease is attached as Exhibit
2 A to Sun Valley’s Motion to Compel Payment of Rent, Dkt # 118, #s118-1 to 118-4. As
3 set forth in the Lease, Sun Valley rents the property from GRIC pursuant to that certain
4 Master Lease, Lease No. B-GR-71, dated March 4, 1974. See Exh. A, p. 4. The Lease
5 commenced on March 1, 2017 and expires on March 1, 2029. See Exh. A, § 3, p. 6.
6 Bondurant is currently occupying and in possession of the Property, and uses the
7 Property in connection with its driving school, automotive, and racing business
8 operations. As set forth in the Lease, Bondurant rents Parcel A, the West Track, and the
9 Carousel/Looper (as those terms are defined in the Lease) for a monthly payment of
10 $61,228.18 per month due in advance on the first day of each month. See Exh. A, § 5.1,
11 pp. 8-9. (With the rent price adjustment provided for under Section 5.1(e) the current
12 monthly rent is $61,350.64.)
13 Bondurant filed its voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the United States
14 Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) on October 2, 2018 (the “Petition Date”).
15 Although Bondurant made the “stub” rent payment for October 2018, Bondurant did not
16 pay its November rent (as it had indicated it would in connection with its cash collateral
17 budget). See Dkt #14, p. 11 (the budget). In addition, Bondurant missed the December
18 1, 2018 payment and the January 1, 2019 payment. Bondurant also did not pay the
19 February 1, 2019 payment contemplated in the budget attached to the Financing Motion.
20 See Dkt #146, p. 31 of 48 (as electronically stamped). This payment was to be made on
21 February 3, 2019, and has not been made. Thus, Bondurant is four months behind on
22 rent. The total amount now due and owing for post-petition rent is $245,402.56.
23 The Financing Motion proposes that Bondurant will borrow $675,000 from
24 “Arlington Street Investments or its nominee” (hereinafter the “Lender”). See Dkt #146,
25 p. 3. $281,186 of the loan proceeds will be funded within 48 hours of Court’s interim
26 approval of the Financing Motion. (The remaining $393,814 of the loan proceeds will be
27 funded within 24 hours of final approval of the Financing Motion. Id.) From the initial
28
2
Case 2:18-bk-12041-BKM Doc 153 Filed 02/12/19 Entered 02/12/19 14:18:06 Desc
Main Document Page 2 of 7
1 loan proceeds, Bondurant proposes to pay Sun Valley $212,000 (the approximate amount
2 sought in Sun Valley’s Motion to Compel Payment of Rent).
3 In exchange for this funding, Bondurant will give the Lender a priming lien on all
4 of its assets. Id. at p. 4. The priming lien includes securitization of Bondurant’s interest
5 in the lease. See Dkt #146, p. 22 of 48, ¶ 12(a) (proposed order grant’s lien in Bondurant’s
6 “leasehold interests”); Shaffer Declaration, Dkt #150, ¶ 14. In addition, Bondurant will
7 grant Lender a super-priority administrative expense claim for the amount of the loan. Id.
8 at p. 4. In other words, the lien that is to be granted to Lender will prime any landlord’s
9 lien, and grant Lender a preferred position vis a vis any administrative expense claims
10 that may arise in the case.
11 II. Limited Objection.
12 It should be noted at the outset that representatives of Sun Valley and
13 representatives from the Lender have met and had positive communications. Sun Valley
14 understands that the post-petition lending is critical and likely a precursor to the Debtor’s
15 sale of the business to Lender (or a Lender-controlled nominee). At this point, that looks
16 like the best option available to the Debtor, although Sun Valley is aware that there are
17 other potential purchasers interested in the business.
18 Nevertheless, in view of the broad securitization proposed – and the impact that
19 such securitization will have on Sun Valley’s landlord’s lien and administrative expense
20 claims – Sun Valley objects to the extent that its current administrative claim for post-
21 petition rent is not paid in full. As noted above, Sun Valley has not been paid for
22 November, December, January, or February rent. The total amount owing is $245,402.56
23 (or $33,402.56 more than the current Financing Motion provides). As a practical matter,
24 if the February rent is not paid, then Sun Valley would be forced to continue to pursue its
25 motion to compel payment of rent – which could close the business and result in less for
26 all concerned.
27 In addition, Sun Valley objects to Bondurant’s grant of a lien over its leasehold
28 interest. The lease that governs the parties’ relationship does not permit Bondurant to
3
Case 2:18-bk-12041-BKM Doc 153 Filed 02/12/19 Entered 02/12/19 14:18:06 Desc
Main Document Page 3 of 7
1 grant such liens without Sun Valley’s permission, without the Gila River Indian
2 Community’s (“GRIC”) permission (GRIC is the Master Lessor), or the permission of
3 the Secretary of the Bureau of Indian Affairs. See Dkt #118-1, pp. 10 and 16-17 of 53
4 (dealing with Approved Encumbrances). A lessee may not reject parts of the lease (like
5 one giving the landlord the ability to approve liens on the leasehold), without rejecting
6 the whole lease. See, e.g., NLRB v.Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513, 531, 104 S.Ct.
7 1188, 1199 (1984);In re Abitibibowater, Inc., 418 B.R. 815 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009).
8 In any case, allowing the Debtor to place a lien on the leasehold would have a
9 negative impact on the Debtor’s future ability to assume and assign the lease. Ordinarily,
10 a Debtor would only have to “cure” the past-due obligations to assume a lease, but if the
11 Debtor’s leasehold is covered by the Lender’s security interest, then assumption of the
12 leasehold would require satisfaction of the amount owed to the Lender as a condition of
13 assumption and assignment, i.e., it could not transfer the Lender’s collateral without
14 paying the Lender in full. Such a circumstance plainly negates the free transferability
15 policy underlying the statutory scheme of Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. This not
16 only harms the Debtor and the landlord (Sun Valley), but potentially hurts Bondurant’s
17 other creditors – as the position of the Lender may chill bidding for a sale of Bondurant’s
18 assets.
19 III. Landlord’s Lien/Fixtures – Reservation of Rights.
20 In the event that the Court declines to approve the Financing Motion, Sun Valley
21 reminds the Court and the parties that it has a landlord’s lien over the personal property
22 located on the leased realty. See A.R.S. § 33-362. That lien predates Chase Bank’s 2011
23 lien (Bondurant has been leasing the premises since 1993). 1 In addition, Sun Valley has
24
1
The landlord's lien attaches at the commencement of the lease or when the personal
25 property is brought on the leased premises and exists independently of the institution of
26
any proceeding. Dewar v. Hagans, 61 Ariz. 201, 205, 146 P.2d 208, 209 (1944); U. S.
(Treasury Dep't, Internal Revenue Serv.) v. Globe Corp., 113 Ariz. 44, 47, 546 P.2d 11,
27 14 (1976). However, the landlord's lien does not take priority over a creditor who
obtained a security interest in collateral prior to the time the collateral is brought on the
28 premises, even where the lease pre-existed the loan by the secured creditor. Ex-Cell-O
4
Case 2:18-bk-12041-BKM Doc 153 Filed 02/12/19 Entered 02/12/19 14:18:06 Desc
Main Document Page 4 of 7
1 a property interest in all property affixed to the realty. Sun Valley reserves all rights with
2 respect to fixtures and its landlord’s lien.
3 IV. Conclusion.
4 In light of the foregoing, Sun Valley respectfully requests that the Court only
5 approve the Financing Motion if it is amended to (a) include full payment for November,
6 December, January, and February rent out of the interim loan amount, and (b) delete
7 Bondurant’s leasehold interest from the Lender’s collateral. Sun Valley respectfully
8 requests any further relief that the Court deems appropriate.
9 DATED this 12th day of February, 2019.
10
OSBORN MALEDON, P.A.
11
17
18
19
COPY of the foregoing sent via email and/or
20 U.S. Mail this 12th day of February, 2019.
21
Hillary L. Barnes Elizabeth C. Amorosi
22
Allen Barnes & Jones, PLC Office of the U.S. Trustee
23 1850 N. Central Ave., Ste. 1150 230 N First Ave Ste 204
Phoenix, AZ 85004 Phoenix AZ 85003-1706
24 [email protected] [email protected]
25 Attorney for Debtor
26
27 Corp. v. Lincor Properties of Arizona, 158 Ariz. 307, 309, 762 P.2d 594, 596 (App.
1988); Schatt–Ajax Industries v. Churchill, 3 Ariz. App. 34, 411 P.2d 457 (1966)
28 (landlord's lien is subordinate to creditor's interest under conditional sales contract).
5
Case 2:18-bk-12041-BKM Doc 153 Filed 02/12/19 Entered 02/12/19 14:18:06 Desc
Main Document Page 5 of 7
1 Michelle E. Shriro Thomas E. Littler
Singer & Levick, P.C. Littler, PC
2
16200 Addison Rd Ste 140 341 W Secretariat Dr
3 Addison TX 75001 Phoenix AZ 85284
[email protected] [email protected]
4 Attorneys for Moses Smith Racing LLC Attorneys for Semple Marchal Cooper
5 PLC
6
Case 2:18-bk-12041-BKM Doc 153 Filed 02/12/19 Entered 02/12/19 14:18:06 Desc
Main Document Page 6 of 7
1
S&S Paving and Construction Inc. Semple, Marchal & Cooper
2
3401 E Illini St 2700 N Central Ave 9th Fl
3 Phoenix AZ 85040 Phoenix AZ 85004-1147
4 Sun Valley Marina Development Corp. Tempe Dodge Chrysler Jeep Ram Kia
5 PO Box 5090 7975 S Autoplex Loop
Chandler AZ 85226 Tempe AZ 85284
6
Western States Petroleum Christopher R. Kaup
7
450 S 15th Ave Tiffany & Bosco P.A.
8 Phoenix AZ 85007 2525 E Camelback Rd 7th Floor
Phoenix AZ 85016-4237
9 Attorneys for Patricia and Robert
10 Bondurant
20 James E. Cross
The Cross Law Firm, PLC
21 1850 N Central Ave Ste 1150
Phoenix AZ 85004
22
Attorneys for Arlington Street
23 Investments
24
27
28
7
Case 2:18-bk-12041-BKM Doc 153 Filed 02/12/19 Entered 02/12/19 14:18:06 Desc
Main Document Page 7 of 7