The document discusses key concepts related to Philippine territory, maritime zones, and environmental law. It provides definitions for terms like archipelagic doctrine, UNCLOS, zones under UNCLOS, Philippine territory, and pacta sunt servanda. It also discusses provisions in the Philippine Constitution relating to the right to health and a balanced ecology. Specifically, it defines what a balanced ecology is and discusses the precautionary principle in relation to field trials when there are reasonable concerns.
The document discusses key concepts related to Philippine territory, maritime zones, and environmental law. It provides definitions for terms like archipelagic doctrine, UNCLOS, zones under UNCLOS, Philippine territory, and pacta sunt servanda. It also discusses provisions in the Philippine Constitution relating to the right to health and a balanced ecology. Specifically, it defines what a balanced ecology is and discusses the precautionary principle in relation to field trials when there are reasonable concerns.
The document discusses key concepts related to Philippine territory, maritime zones, and environmental law. It provides definitions for terms like archipelagic doctrine, UNCLOS, zones under UNCLOS, Philippine territory, and pacta sunt servanda. It also discusses provisions in the Philippine Constitution relating to the right to health and a balanced ecology. Specifically, it defines what a balanced ecology is and discusses the precautionary principle in relation to field trials when there are reasonable concerns.
The document discusses key concepts related to Philippine territory, maritime zones, and environmental law. It provides definitions for terms like archipelagic doctrine, UNCLOS, zones under UNCLOS, Philippine territory, and pacta sunt servanda. It also discusses provisions in the Philippine Constitution relating to the right to health and a balanced ecology. Specifically, it defines what a balanced ecology is and discusses the precautionary principle in relation to field trials when there are reasonable concerns.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
Q: What is Preamble?
the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and
other submarine areas. The waters around We, the sovereign Filipino people, imploring the between, the connecting the islands of the aid of Almighty God, in order to build a just and archipelago, regardless of their breadth and humane society and establish a Government that dimensions, from part of the internal waters of shall embody our ideals and aspirations, promote the Philippines. Art 1 of the 1987 Constitution. the common good, conserve and develop our patrimony, and secure to ourselves and our Q: What is archipelagic doctrine? posterity the blessings of independence and Unclos, ratified by 165 states comprising 85% of democracy under the rule of law and a regime of the entire membership of the United Nations, is truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace, the primary international law governing the use do ordain and promulgate this Constitution. of the oceans and seas of our planet. Specifically, Dean Vicente Sinco says of the Preamble: “The Unclos governs the use of the following maritime preamble performs a vital function in a zones constitution. Its value is not merely formal but Q: What is UNCLOS? real and substantive. It is to the constitution what the enacting clause is to a statue. The authenticity (a) internal waters or archipelagic waters, the of the authorship of the constitution is made landward waters adjacent to the territorial sea; patent in the preamble. Without this or something equivalent to it, the source of (b) territorial sea, an area of 12NM from the authority that gives valid force to the baselines along the coast, constitutional mandates may lie concealed, (c) exclusive economic zone (EEZ), an area of perhaps left to the dangers of uncertain 200NM from the baselines; conjectures.” (d) extended continental shelf (ECS), an Thus, it was pointed out that “general welfare” additional are of 150 Nm from the outer limits of should really mean “ikabubuti ng nakararami” the EEZ, and while “common good” shall mean “ikabubuti ng e) The High Seas AREA which is the maritime lahat”. Thus, all efforts and rules of society and zone beyond the ECS. The High Seas belong to government should be for the welfare of all, all states, whether coastal or land-locked. without exceptions. “The patrimony of the Nation” now read “our patrimony”, to make it Q: Zones and rights under UNCLOS more emphatic, a Nolledo amendment. The words “blessings of independence and The exclusive Economic Zone is an area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea, which shall not democracy”, an Edmundo Garcia amendment, to underscore the importance of true extend beyond 200 nautical miles from the independence even in the presence of democratic baseline from which the territorial sea is measured. beliefs and practices. Territorial sea is 12 nautical miles from the Q: Define Philippine Territory baseline. Contiguous zone is 24 nautical miles The national territory comprises the Philippine from the baseline. Continental Shelf is 150 archipelago, with all the islands and waters nautical miles from the baseline. embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or Q: Pact sunt servanda? jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial Tre states really bound to fulfill the commitments and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, they undertake pursuant to a bilateral or multilateral treaty once it has been ratified and lanes passage. he imposition of these passage then enters into force? According to pacta sunt rights through archipelagic waters under servanda, they are. This Latin phrase, which may UNCLOS III was a concession by archipelagic be roughly translated as “treaties shall be States, in exchange for their right to claim all the complied with,” describes a significant general waters landward of their baselines, regardless of principle of international law—one that underlies their depth or distance from the coast, as archipelagic the entire system of treaty-based relations waters subject to their territorial sovereignty. If the between sovereign states. maritime delineation is contrary to UNCLOS III, the international community will of course reject Petitioners submit that RA 9522 "dismembers a it and will refuse to be bound by it. UNCLOS III large portion of the national territory" because it favors States with a long coastline like the discards the pre-UNCLOS III demarcation of Philippines. Nevertheless, the prerogative of Philippine territory under the Treaty of Paris and choosing this option belongs to Congress, not to related treaties, however, petitioners’ theory fails this Court. The enactment of UNCLOS III to persuade us. UNCLOS III has nothing to do compliant baselines law for the Philippine with the acquisition (or loss) of territory. It is a archipelago and adjacent areas, as embodied in multilateral treaty regulating, among others, sea- RA 9522, allows an internationally-recognized use rights over maritime zones. It only recognizes delimitation of the breadth of the Philippines’ coastal and archipelagic States’ graduated maritime zones and continental shelf. RA 9522 is authority over a limited span of waters and therefore a most vital step on the part of the submarine lands along their coasts. On the other Philippines in safeguarding its maritime zones, hand, baselines laws such as RA 9522 are enacted consistent with the Constitution and our national by UNCLOS III States parties to mark-out interest. specific basepoints along their coasts from which baselines are drawn, either straight or contoured, C. Article II to serve as geographic starting points to measure Section 15 Article II the breadth of the maritime zones and continental shelf. Thus, baselines laws are The State shall protect and promote the right to nothing but statutory mechanisms for UNCLOS health of the people and instill health III States parties to delimit with precision the consciousness among them. extent of their maritime zones and continental shelves. Territorial claims to land features are Section 16. The State shall protect and advance outside UNCLOS III, and are instead governed the right of the people to a balanced and healthful by the rules on general international law. ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature. Whether referred to as Philippine "internal waters" under Article I of the Constitution or as Q: Balanced ecology "archipelagic waters" under UNCLOS III "a state of dynamic equilibrium within a (Article 49 [1]), the Philippines exercises community of organisms in which genetic, sovereignty over the body of water lying species and ecosystem diversity remain relatively landward of the baselines, including the air space stable, subject to gradual changes through natural over it and the submarine areas underneath. succession." Thus, domestically, the political branches of the Philippine government, in the competent Q: What is Biodiversity? discharge of their constitutional powers, may Biodiversity is the variability among living pass legislation designating routes within the organisms from all sources, including terrestrial, archipelagic waters to regulate innocent and sea marine, and other aquatic ecosystems and the reasonable grounds for concern, the ecological complexes of which they are part; this precautionary principle should be applied and, includes diversity within species, between thereby, the field trials be enjoined species, and of ecosystems. Biodiversity forms Q: What is the objective of the Petitioner in the foundation of the vast array of ecosystem conducting its experiment? services that critically contribute to human well- being. Petitioner University of the Philippines Los Banos (UPLB), the implementing institution of Q: What is your understanding of the concept of the field trials, conducted a contained experiment GMO? on Bt talong under the supervision of the GMO (genetically modified organism) is the National Committee on Biosafety of the result of a laboratory process where genes from Philippines (NCBP).7 The NCBP, created under the DNA of one species are extracted and Executive Order No. (EO) 430,8 is the artificially forced into the genes of an unrelated regulatory body tasked to: (a) "identify and plant or animal. The foreign genes may come evaluate potential hazards involved in initiating from bacteria, viruses, insects, animals or even genetic engineering experiments or the humans. introduction of new species and genetically engineered organisms and recommend measures Q: What is the claim of Greenpeace on the to minimize risks"; and (b) ''formulate and review conduct of experiment conducted by the national policies and guidelines on biosafety, Petitioner of BT Talong? such as the safe conduct of work on genetic A: Greenpeace Southeast Asia filed before the engineering, pests and their genetic materials for Court a Petition for Writ of Continuing the protection of public health, environment[,] Mandamus and Writ of Kalikasan with Prayer for and personnel[,] and supervise the the Issuance of a Temporary Environmental implementation thereof." Upon the completion Protection Order (TEPO)18 (petition for Writ of of the contained experiment, the NCBP issued a Kalikasan) against herein petitioners alleging that Certificate10 therefor stating that all biosafety the Bt talong field trials violated their measures were complied with, and no untoward constitutional right to health and a balanced incident had occurred. ecology considering, among others, that: (a) the Q: What action did the SC take in order to Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC), as carry out the constitutional guarantee to required by Presidential Decree No. (PD) good health 1151,19 was not secured prior to the field trials;20 (b) the required public consultations A: Agreeing with the CA, the Court held that the under the Local Government Code (LGC) were precautionar; principle applies in this case since not complied with;21 and (c) as a regulated article the risk of harm from the field trials of Bt talong under DAO 08-2002, remains uncertain and there exists a possibility of serious and irreversible harm. The Court Bt talong is presumed harmful to human health observed that eggplants are a staple vegetable in and the environment, and that there is no the country that is mostly grown by small-scale independent, peer-reviewed study showing its farmers who are poor and marginalized; thus, safety for human consumption and the given the country's rich biodiversity, the environment.22 Further, they contended that consequences of contamination and genetic since the scientific evidence as to the safety of Bt pollution would be disastrous and irreversible. talong remained insufficient or uncertain, and that preliminary scientific evaluation shows
2 GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM (GSIS), petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, (Thirteenth Division), JOSE SALONGA, TAN KIAT TIAN and JOSEFINA USMAN joined by her husband ESTEBAN TAN, respondents.
8 AURORA TAMBUNTING, ANTONIO TAMBUNTING, JOSE P. TAMBUNTING and THE ACTING PROVINCIAL SHERIFF FOR THE PROVINCE OF RIZAL, petitioners, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, DAMASO R. CRUZ, and MONICA ANDRES, respondents