Saison Lawsuit
Saison Lawsuit
Saison Lawsuit
10
415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663
17 Defendants.
18
19 Plaintiff Barbara Shih ("Plaintiff") alleges as follows:
20 PARTIES
21 1. Plaintiff Barbara Shih is, and at all times herein mentioned was, a resident of Hong
22 Kong, China.
23 2. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that at all times herein
24 mentioned Defendant Saison Dining Group LLC ("Saison Dining") is, and at all times herein
25 mentioned was, a limited liability company organized under the laws of the state of California
26 with its principal place of business in San Francisco, California. Plaintiff is further informed and
27 believes, and thereon alleges, that Saison Dining is doing business as and/or operates the three-
1 3. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Defendant Saison
2 Group LLC ("Saison Group") is, and at all times herein mentioned was, a limited liability
3 company organized under the laws of the state of California with its principal place of business in
5 4. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Defendant Josh
One Montgomery Street, Suite 3000, San Francisco, California 94104-5500
6 Skenes ("Skenes") resides in San Francisco, California and is, and at all times herein mentioned,
7 held an ownership interest in, was a managing member of, and was the person in control of
8 Defendant Saison Dining. Plaintiff is further informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that
9 Defendant Skenes is, and at all times herein mentioned also, held an ownership interest in, was a
COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP
10 managing member of, and was the person in control of Defendant Saison Group.
415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663
11 5. Plaintiff is ignorant of the true names and capacities of Defendants sued as DOES 1
12 through 50, inclusive, and therefore sue those Defendants by fictitious names. Plaintiff will
13 amend this complaint to allege their true names and capacities when ascertained. Plaintiff is
14 informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that each of these fictitiously named Defendants are
15 legally responsible in some manner for the actions herein alleged, and that Plaintiff's damages
17 6. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Skenes and DOES
18 1 through 50, through their majority and de facto control over both Saison Dining and Saison
19 Group treat those entities as their alter egos and manages them as a single "Saison" enterprise.
20 Plaintiff is further informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Skenes and DOES 1
21 through 50 have:
22 A. comingled Saison Dining and Saison Group funds by, inter alia, paying
23 Saison Dining expenses with Saison Group funds pursuant to fictitious loans that Skenes and
24 DOES 1 through 50 never intended to and never caused Saison Dining to pay and Saison Group to
25 collect;
26 B. utilized Saison Dining and Saison Group funds to pay for and maintain
27 Skenes's personal lifestyle, including but not limited to paying his personal credit card debt,
28 funding his extravagant wedding in Japan, and funding his and his family's personal travel;
15512.001 4811-9075-8277.1 2
COMPLAINT
Case 3:19-cv-00244-JSC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 3 of 6
2 Group member interests such that they in fact control both entities;
3 D. used both Saison Dining and Saison Group as mere shells, instrumentalities
4 or conduits, without independent assets or operations, for the single business venture of operating
9 Saison Group;
COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP
10 G. formed Saison Group and solicited its investors and creditors with the
415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663
11 undisclosed intent of using the Saison Group corporate form to raise funds for the Saison
12 restaurant while simultaneously permitting Saison Dining, Skenes and DOES 1 through 50 to
15 7. As a consequence, at all times material hereto the Defendants, were alter egos of
16 each other and/or were part of a single enterprise in that they so dominated and controlled each
17 other, and so conducted their business affairs as though their identities were the same such that
18 there is and should be no separateness among them. The Defendants are for all practical and legal
19 purposes the same as each other, and they are all jointly and severally liable for the acts, omissions
21 JURISDICTION
22 8. This Court has diversity jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
23 1332(a) because the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and there is diversity of citizenship
24 between the parties. Plaintiff is a citizen of the Republic of China. Defendant Skenes is a citizen
25 of California. Defendants Saison Dining and Saison Group are entities organized and existing
26 under the laws of the State of California with their principal places of business in the State of
27 California.
28
15512.001 4811-9075-8277.1 3
COMPLAINT
Case 3:19-cv-00244-JSC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 4 of 6
1 VENUE
3 Defendants are citizens of the State of California, and they reside, conduct business, and/or
4 maintain their principal places of business in this District. Venue is also proper pursuant to 28
5 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to this claim
One Montgomery Street, Suite 3000, San Francisco, California 94104-5500
7 INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT
8 10. Assignment in the San Francisco division of the United States District Court for the
9 Northern District of California is proper pursuant to Rule 3-2(c) of the Civil Local Rules because a
COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP
10 substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in San Francisco.
415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663
11 JURY DEMAND
17 13. On or about February 13, 2013, for valuable consideration, namely funds in the
18 amount of $300,000.00, Defendant Saison Group executed a written promissory note in favor of
19 Plaintiff, in the principal sum of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00), plus interest at a
20 fixed rate equal to five percent (5%) per annum, and delivered the same to Plaintiff. All principal
21 and accrued interest on the note was payable in one lump sum and was required to be paid no later
22 than one year from the date of the note, or February 14, 2013.
23 14. By early 2014, it was clear that Saison Group would be unable to make the lump
24 sum payment required under the terms of the February 13, 2013 note. On or about January 18,
25 2014, Saison Group executed a replacement promissory note in favor of Plaintiff, in the principal
26 sum of three hundred and fifteen thousand dollars ($315,000.00), plus interest at a fixed rate equal
27 to five percent (5%) per annum. All principal and accrued interest on the note was payable in one
1 15. By late July 2014, it again became clear that Saison Group would be unable to
2 make the lump sum payment required under the terms of the January 18, 2014 note. On or about
3 August 1, 2014, Saison Group executed a second replacement promissory note in favor of
4 Plaintiff, in the principal sum of three hundred and twenty-two thousand, eight hundred and
5 seventy-five dollars ($322,875.00), plus interest at a fixed rate equal to five percent (5%) per
One Montgomery Street, Suite 3000, San Francisco, California 94104-5500
6 annum (the "Saison Group Note"). A true and correct copy of the Saison Group Note is attached
8 16. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the Saison Group Note was the
9 execution by Saison Dining of a separate promissory note in favor of Plaintiff in the principal
COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP
10 amount of $201,986.39. That condition precedent was met, and that separate promissory note
415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663
11 executed by Saison Dining related to a different indebtedness that is not the subject of this action.
12 17. Pursuant to the terms of the Saison Group Note, Defendant Saison Group was
13 required to pay all principal and accrued interest in full no later than August 1, 2015.
14 18. Defendant Saison Group has never paid any payment on the Saison Group Note,
15 and the full amount of principal ($322,875.00) and accrued interest remains outstanding.
16 19. On March 2, 2016 Plaintiff made a written demand for payment of the full amount
17 of principal and interest due under the Saison Group Note. Since that time, Plaintiff has made
18 other, repeated demands that Saison Group either repay or renegotiate the Saison Group Note.
19 20. Defendant Saison Group has breached the Saison Group Note by refusing to pay,
20 by August 1, 2015, and then subsequently upon demand, all sums required to be paid under the
22 21. As of March 2, 2016, the total unpaid indebtedness under the Saison Group Note
23 was $394,526.71.
24 22. As alleged in paragraphs 6 and 7, supra, all of the defendants were the alter egos of
25 each other and/or were part of a single enterprise, and there exists and at all times herein
26 mentioned there existed, a unity of interest and ownership between and among all of the
27 Defendants, such that any individuality and separateness between them have ceased.
28 23. Adherence to the fiction of the separate existences of Defendants would permit an
15512.001 4811-9075-8277.1 5
COMPLAINT
Case 3:19-cv-00244-JSC Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 6 of 6
1 abuse of the limited liability company privilege and would promote the injustice of, inter alia,
2 permitting Skenes, Saison Dining and DOES 1 through 50 to retain Saison Group funds at the
7 with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon accruing at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum
10 4. For attorney's fees and costs of suit incurred herein on all causes of action; and
415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663
11 5. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper with respect to
13 DATED: January 14, 2019 COBLENTZ PATCH DUFFY & BASS LLP
14
15
By: /s/ Fredrick C. Crombie
16 Fredrick C. Crombie
Attorneys for Plaintiff
17 BARBARA SHIH
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15512.001 4811-9075-8277.1 6
COMPLAINT