Classical Sociological Theory: A-Glaeser@uchicago - Edu

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

eSociology 30003

Classical Sociological Theory


aka “History of Social Theory”
Spring 2008

Andreas Glaeser
SSRB 401d-e
[email protected]
702-8679
Office hours: Tu, 10:30 to 11:30; Th, 1:30 to 2:15

This is a basic reading course in classical sociological theory. It introduces you to some
of the most formative texts of the discipline which have provided long term research
agendas, concepts, models and methods for sociological inquiry. Throughout we will
wonder how the authors in question define the social as object of study, that is, how they
think it exists and what kinds of investigations they understand as yielding sociological
knowledge. In this sense, and putting it in more highfalutin language, this class is also an
introduction into basic ontological and epistemological issues of our discipline. This class
is a reading course in as far as you will have to read much more than we can possibly
discuss in class, where our discussion will focus on the main points. Therefore, I would
encourage you to form discussion groups among yourself to discuss the readings further.

The reading strategy we will pursue is to read these authors as theorists of modernity, that
is as intellectuals eager to develop a language capable of grasping what is relevant about
social life at their time (and putatively: ours). We will use this as a jumping board to think
about what it is that we needed to do, if we wanted to contribute to a theoretization of our
present. In other words we will read the classics not only to become reflexively aware of
the gaze and the blind spots of our discipline, to grasp key concepts and methods which
are still significant for us today, but also as role models in nourishing our sociological
imagination.

There are a number of standard questions you may want to keep in mind while reading
these texts. Questions along these lines are typical prelim questions.
1. What is the text’s underlying philosophical anthropology? What are the roles of
reason, emotion, desire and imagination? What is the role of creativity in the
model? How does suffering figure in? And hope? How are human beings social?
What is the role of social relations for their life? How are human beings moral?
How are human beings agents? What is the relationship between individual and
larger social wholes?
2. What are the texts notion of social organization and modes of thinking, feeling,
acting, that is what has traditionally been conceived as “social structure” and
“culture’ in our discipline? How are both related to each other?
3. Are there processes? What drives them? How do they relate to more stable
cultures and social structures?
4. What is the power for the author? What role does it play in his models? How
important is conflict?

1
5. What is history for the author? Are there laws of development? What is the role of
contingency? How is contingency theorized?

Requirements:

1. You have to participate actively in class discussions throughout the quarter.


2. For each author (safe Rousseau) you have to prepare a 1000 word “grid”, an analytical
essay in the style of an encyclopedia article that explains how the author conceives the
relationship between selves (“persons”, “individuals”…) cultural forms (“ideology”,
“religion”, “habitus”, “worldviews”…) and relational structures (“classes”, “status
groups”, “segmentary structures”….). You should think through what precisely these four
poles are for each other (being mindful of lexical choices), and how he defines and thinks
about power and the flows of effects (causality); you should explore how the author
investigates the historical transformation of social arrangements; you should conclude
your “grid” (for of course you are forced here to be schematic in the extreme) with a
reflection of the consequences of this particular grid for the analytical style of the author.
This exercise aims at making the approaches of each author transparent in comparison
with each other, as to prepare you for the preliminary examination at the end of the
summer. Two of these will be drawn at random and graded.
3. Your final paper should explore one interesting dimension of the thought of one of
these authors in more detail. This essay you should consult relevant secondary literature.
The grade weights are as follows. Oral participation: 20%, grids 40% (20% each), final
paper 40%.

Texts:
All texts are on Regenstein-Reserve. Most texts have also been ordered for purchase
at the Seminary Coop (marked with an asterisk)

1. * Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1997. The Discourses and other early political writings.
Edited by Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2. *Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader, second edition,
Robert Tucker, editor. New York: Norton. [TUCKER]
3. *Weber, Max. 2001. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London:
Routlege.
4. Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. H. Gerth and C. Wright
Mills Editors. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [G&M]
5. *Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Günther Roth, translator. Berkeley:
University of California Press.
6. *Durkheim, Emile. 1997 . The Division of Labor. New York: Free Press.
7. Durkheim, Emile. 1951. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York Free Press.
8. *Durkheim, Emile. On the Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
9. *Durkheim, Emile. Elementary Froms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.
10. Simmel, Georg. 1971. On Individuality and Social Forms. Edited by Donald Levine.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. *Simmel, Georg. 2004. Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.
12. *Elias, Norbert.2000. The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.

2
Meeting and Reading Schedule:

1st Week:

Tuesday, 1 April: Introduction

The problems, practical and theoretical, of our time—your thoughts

Thursday, 3 April: History

Rousseau, Second Discourse, pp 124-188 & Rousseau’s notes # 9, 10, 15

Karl Marx

Marx/Engels: Communist Manifesto (Tucker pp. 469-500)

2nd Week:

Tuesday, 8 April: Theorizing the Present

Encyclopedia Britannica: History of France 1830-1871, i.e. 1830


Revolution to Paris Commune (pp. 259 to 269)
Marx: The Eighteenth Brumaire of Luis Bonaparte (Tucker 594-617)
Marx: Civil War in France (Tucker 618-652)
Marx: Critique of the Gotha Programme (Tucker, 525-541)

Thursday, 10 April: Ideology

Marx: Theses on Feuerbach (Tucker pp. 143-145)


Marx: The German Ideology Part I (146-200)

3rd Week:

Thursday, 15 April: Capitalism

Marx: Capital (Tucker pp. 294-344)

Thursday, 17 April: Capitalism

Marx: Capital (Tucker pp. 344-438)

3
4th Week:

Tuesday, 22 April: Marx’ Method: Dialectics

Marx, Grundrisse, Introduction (Tucker, 221-246)


Engels, Anti-Dühring, Introduction (general) and part I, ch. XI, “Freedom
and Necessity”, ch. XII, “ Dialectic—Quantity and Qualilty” and
ch. XIII, “Dialektic—Negation of the Negation” at:
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1877/anti-
duhring/index.htm

Max Weber

Thursday, 24 April: Worldviews and Social Structures

Protestant Ethic (pp. 13-128, 155-184)


th
5 Week:

Tuesday, 29 April: Religion and Institutional Dynamics

Weber: The Social Psychology of World Religions (G&M pp. 267-301)


Weber: Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions (G&M
pp.323-359)

Thursday, 1 May: Political Sociology

Weber: Economy and Society, Part I, chapter 3, “Types of Domination”

6th Week:

Tuesday, 6 May: Weber’s Method: Hermeneutic Sociology and Ideal-types

Weber: “Objectivity” in Social Science and Social Policy


Weber: Economy and Society, Part I, chapter 1

Emile Durkheim

Thursday, 8 May: The Problem of Social Order I

Durkheim: Division of Labor intro, Part I, Introduction, chs. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6

4
7th Week:

Tuesday, 13 May: The Problem of social Order II

Durkheim: Division of Labor, Part II, ch. 2, 3, Conclusions


Durkheim: Suicide, pp. 241-276

Thursday, 15 May: Religion and Knowledge

Durkheim: Elementary Forms, pp. 1-44, 99-168, 190-236, 418-444


th
8 Week:

Tuesday 20 May: Durkheim’s Method: Structural homologies and feedback loops

Durkheim: Rules of the Sociological Method

Georg Simmel

Thursday, 22 May: Value

Simmel: Philosophy of Money, Preface and Chapter 1

9th Week:

Tuesday, 27 May: Modern life

Simmel: The Philosophy of Money, ch. 4 and ch. 6

Thursday, 29 May: Simmel’s Method: Building forms from interactions

Simmel: Sociology, chs 1, ch. 6 (reprinted in Levine reader as chs. 2 and


3; ch 6 will be on e-reserve available.

10th Week:
Norbert Elias

Tuesday, 3 June: History as Social Process

Elias: Process of Civilization, Synopsis


Evening:Film screening: “Arguing the World” location & time tba

Thursday, 5 June: Elias’ Method: Studying social formations in process

Elias: Process of Civilization, “Postscript” (i.e. preface to the new German


edition of 1969)

You might also like