2019R1 Mechanical PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 201

1 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc.

December 31, 2018


AGENDA
SOLVERS & HPC EXTERNAL MODEL
CONTACT GENERAL AXISYMMETRIC
FRACTURE MAPDL ELEMENTS
MECHANICAL MATERIAL DESIGNER
CMS TOPLOGY OPTIMIZATION
RBD LEVEL SET
LINEAR DYNAMICS ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
ACOUSTICS COMPOSITES
EXPLICIT DYNAMICS AQWA
LS-DYNA CLOUD

2 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical APDL
2019 R1 Release

3 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SOLVERS & HPC

Distributed ANSYS Enhancements


• New features
–Now default for all simulations!
–Support for SMART fracture
–Support for prestressed substructuring generation pass
–Support for substructuring generation pass restarts
• Improved scaling
–Significantly improved scaling when contact is present

4 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SOLVERS & HPC

Distributed ANSYS Enhancements


• Distributed ANSYS is now default
–Distributed memory parallel (DMP) is now enabled by default when MADPL is
launched (“-dis” command line argument no longer necessary)
–To revert back to shared memory parallel (SMP) use “-smp” command line option
(or select SMP via the MAPDL launcher)

Caution:
Operations that were not supported in DMP in previous releases have NOT been automatically
parallelized in this release

5 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SOLVERS & HPC

Distributed ANSYS Enhancements


• Support added for SMART Fracture

DMP Scaling Performance


100

2019 R1
80

Solver Rating
60

40
• 2.7 million DOF; sparse solver
• Nonlinear static analysis
20
involving fracture with 101 crack
tips
• Linux server; 4 Intel Xeon E7- 0
8867v3 processors, 512GB RAM, 1 2 4 8 16 32
SSD, RHEL 7.0 Number of Cores
6 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
SOLVERS & HPC

Distributed ANSYS Enhancements


• Scaling when contact is present
–Some indicators for when contact is a performance bottleneck

D I S T R I B U T E D D O M A I N D E C O M P O S E R

...Number of elements: 635691


...Number of nodes: 628272
...Decompose to 256 CPU domains
Values > 4 generally indicate
...Element load balance ratio = 7.588
serious workload imbalance

*** WARNING *** CP = 291.883 TIME= 01:04:10


The work load is highly imbalanced for this solution, likely due to the
contact pair(s) in the model. This imbalance will negatively impact
the scaling of Distributed ANSYS. Please review the contact pair
Check for
associated with real constant set 55 to see if it can be altered to this warning
help improve performance. See the Performance Guide for more details
on scaling and for some tips on how to manually alter the contact
definition to improve the work load balance.

7 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SOLVERS & HPC

Distributed ANSYS Enhancements


• Scaling when contact is present
–Symmetric contact pairs improved
• In previous releases both sets of contact and target surfaces for a symmetric contact pair would
reside in a single domain → poor load balance
–MPC contact pairs improved
• In previous releases if an MPC and a non-MPC contact pair touched or overlapped, they would both
reside in a single domain → poor load balance

–Goal → Reduce the load imbalance

8 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SOLVERS & HPC

Distributed ANSYS Enhancements


• Contact pair splitting
–CNCH,DMP → Automatically split contact pairs during solution

–CNCH,SPLIT → Manually split contact pairs

–CNCH,MERGE → Manually merge contact pairs

9 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SOLVERS & HPC

Distributed ANSYS Enhancements


• CNCH,DMP scaling improvement DMP Scaling Comparison
100
R19.0
2019 R1
80
2019 R1 (Split)

Solver Rating
60
Generic model image

• 9.1 million DOF; sparse solver 40


• Nonlinear static analysis involving contact,
plasticity and gasket elements
• Linux cluster; each compute node contains 2 20
Intel Xeon E5-2695v3 processors, 256GB
RAM, SSD, CentOS 7.2
• Mellanox FDR Infiniband
0
16 32 64 128 256
Number of Cores
10 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
SOLVERS & HPC

Distributed ANSYS Enhancements


• CNCH,DMP scaling improvement DMP Scaling Comparison
16
R19.0
14
2019 R1
12 2019 R1 (Split)

Solver Rating
10
Generic model image
8

• 13.4 million DOF; sparse solver


6
• Nonlinear static analysis involving contact,
plasticity and NLGEOM
• Linux cluster; each compute node contains 2 4
Intel Xeon E5-2695v3 processors, 256GB
RAM, SSD, CentOS 7.2 2
• Mellanox FDR Infiniband
0
16 32 64 128 256
Number of Cores
11 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
SOLVERS & HPC

Distributed ANSYS Enhancements


• CNCH,DMP scaling improvement DMP Scaling Comparison
350
R19.2
300 2019 R1
2019 R1 (SS)
250

Solver Rating
2019 R1 (SS+Split)

200

150
• 10.2 million DOF; sparse solver
• Nonlinear static analysis involving contact,
plasticity 100
• Linux cluster; each compute node contains 2
Intel Xeon Gold 6148 processors, 384GB 50
RAM, SSD, CentOS 7.3 SS → Small sliding contact
• Mellanox EDR Infiniband Split → CNCH,DMP
0
32 64 128 256 512 1024
Number of Cores
12 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
SOLVERS & HPC

Results File Enhancements


• OUTRES command changes
–Eight new result item labels have been added

• New compression algorithm available (sparsify)


–Activated via the /FCOMP,RST,SPARSE command
–Lossless compression of results file data
–Typically reduces results file size by 10-50%
–Virtually no performance penalty

13 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SOLVERS & HPC

Results File Enhancements

• OUTRES command changes

OUTRES,Item,Freq,Cname,--,NSVAR,DSUBres

New labels added to provide additional user control

14 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SOLVERS & HPC

Results File Enhancements


• OUTRES command changes
–New labels enable additional user control over results file data
ETMP Element temperatures
CONT Element contact data
NLDAT Element nonlinear data
EHEAT Element heat generation rate
FMAG Electromagnetic nodal forces
CURD Element source current densities
BKSTR Element back stresses (requires EPPL too)
SRFS Element surface stresses

15 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SOLVERS & HPC

Results File Enhancements


• OUTRES command changes
General Labels Element quantities

ALL BASIC ESOL

STAT ERASE NLOAD STRS EPEL FFLUX FGRAD

EPPL EPTH EPCR VENG MISC


Nodal quantities
EPDI AESOL LOCI SVAR
NSOL RSOL

FMAG ETMP EHEAT SRFS


V A New in
2019 R1
NLDAT CONT BKSTR CURD
CINT

16 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SOLVERS & HPC

Results File Enhancements


• OUTRES command changes
–MAPDL default
• OUTRES,ALL → write everything except LOCI, SVAR, V, A
• No change in 2019 R1
–WB/Mechanical default
R19.2 2019 R1
OUTRES,ERASE OUTRES,ERASE
OUTRES,ALL,NONE OUTRES,ALL,NONE
OUTRES,NSOL,xxx OUTRES,NSOL,xxx
OUTRES,RSOL,xxx OUTRES,RSOL,xxx
OUTRES,NLOAD,xxx OUTRES,NLOAD,xxx
OUTRES,STRS,xxx OUTRES,STRS,xxx
OUTRES,EPEL,xxx OUTRES,EPEL,xxx
OUTRES,ETMP,xxx
OUTRES,CONT,xxx Extra OUTRES
OUTRES,NLDAT,xxx commands added

When used in 2019 R1, temperatures, Advocate caution when reusing .dat, .inp
contact data, etc.. are no longer written files from earlier version in 2019 R1
17 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
SOLVERS & HPC

Results File Enhancements


Technology Demonstration
Results file compression (sparsify) Manual models run on Linux
server while measuring results
Results File Compression file size at end of each simulation
1.4

R19.2 (Uncompressed) 25% file size reduction on average


1.2
2019 R1 (Compressed)
Compression Ratio

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0
Variety of simulations from Technology Demonstration Guide
18 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
SOLVERS & HPC

Miscellaneous Enhancements
• AVL/Excite interface writes out damping matrix (if applicable) to .exb
file
• MSC/Adams interface for .mnf file has been upgraded
–Code has been broken since R19.1 → fixed in this release
–Some additional items are now written to .mnf file

19 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical APDL
2019 R1

20 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Usability Enhancements
• Support added for Japanese/Chinese languages
–Input file can have Japanese/Chinese characters
• Ex. –i こんにちは.dat
–Jobname can be defined with Japanese/Chinese characters
• Ex. ex. –j こんにちは
–Directory paths containing Japanese/Chinese characters
• Ex. –dir C:\Users\user\Desktop\こんにちは\
–Output file can have Japanese/Chinese characters
• Ex. –o こんにちは.out
–NOTE: must continue to use ASCII characters (i.e., English) for file extensions

21 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. This Photo


December by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND
31, 2018
Usability Enhancements
• Support added for Japanese/Chinese languages
–Support added for command line, launcher and certain MAPDL commands

MAPDL commands:
/input,こんにちは.dat
/filname,ファイル
/assign,rst,結果

Command Line Use:


ansys193 –b –dir .\こんにちは –i こんにちは.dat –o こんにちは.out –j こんにちは

22 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Contact and FMDY
ANSYS 2019 R1 update

23 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Distributed Contact

Distributed (DMP) Contact


Goal:
To improve DMP scalability under higher core counts for contact model with large
contact pairs (large number of contact elements relative to the total number of elements
in the entire model)

Basic Idea:
It automatically decomposes the large contact pair into sub-pairs, transfers the sub-pairs
to different cores, which improves load balance among all CPU cores.

Challenge:
Making identical results between no-splitting and splitting

WB/Mechanical: can just post contact results on the original contact pairs without
being noticed any split pairs.

24 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Distributed Contact

New Options in CNCHECK Command

CNCHECK, Option, RID1, RID2, RINC, InterType, Trlevel

SPLIT Split any original (or base) contact pair into smaller sub-pairs in /PREP7 phase which is
mainly for better scalability in DMP run. The split contact pairs may create additional
overlapped contact elements at split boundaries. Contact pairs can only be split once. A
repeated use of this option has no further splitting for the already split contact pairs.
DMP This option is similar to the SPLIT, but it is more automatic and contact pair splitting is done
at the solution level (SOLVE) of the first load step, not at the preprocessing level. This option
is valid only in a distributed-memory parallel (DMP) run. For this
option, TRlevel and InterType are valid; all other arguments are ignored.
MERGE Merge all sub-contact pairs which are previously split by prior Option = SPLIT, DMP back to
their original pairs. If this option is used, other labels will not work.

25 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Distributed Contact

Engine Block with Gasket


Decomposed into
9 sub-pairs

Split contact surfaces


Original contact surface
from the real ID=18
Full model

Original target surface Trimmed target surfaces


from the real ID=18
Original contact pairs

26 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Distributed Contact

Examples:
• 3.8 million DOF; sparse solver
• Nonlinear static analysis involving
3.50E+03 contact, plasticity and gasket elements
3.00E+03
60%
2.50E+03
faster

Total Wall Time


2.00E+03
Performance
gain expected
no split
1.50E+03
at higher core
counts
dmp split
1.00E+03

5.00E+02

0.00E+00
14 28 56 112 Engine Block with gasket
Number of Cores

1.60E+04
1.40E+04
5X faster With CNCH,TRIM,,,,SELF
Total Wall Time 1.20E+04
1.00E+04 Performance
8.00E+03
no split
gain expected
6.00E+03 at higher core
dmp split
4.00E+03 counts
Real model can 2.00E+03
not be shown 0.00E+00
14 28 56 112 Stent Deployment
Number of Cores

27 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Distributed Contact

DMP Contact: Other Customer’s Models


Models No-Split With Split Time reduction
model-1 6967 5363 30
model-2 26756 14584 83
Run 02 set with
model-3 37756 22204 Semiimplicit
60
Number of splitting = 4
Number of CPU cores= 16 model-4 8463 7414 14
model-5 17439 12559
39
Performance model-6 3259 1871 74
gain expected
at higher core model-7 5664 2685
111
counts
Model-8 155 101 Semiimplicit
53
model-9 4933 1372
260
model-10 1833 1519
21

28 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Semi-Implicit

Semi-Implicit Method To Improve Robustness of MAPDL


Goal:
• To solve complex problems that encounter convergence difficulty in an implicit solver by
switching to explicit time integration
• Support most features (e.g. CEs, LMs, Higher order elements, Joints, UP) of MAPDL

Basic Idea:
Central difference time integration (explicit/semi-implicit) transforms governing equations in an
explicit form that does not need Newton-Raphson iterations

Semi-Implicit Method guarantees a solution

• Start with Implicit

• Convergence difficulty ?-> Change to explicit to overcome hump

• Past the most non-linear part?-> Change back to implicit solver

29 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Semi-Implicit

Command for Semi-implicit Method


Semiimplicit, Option, Type, Value

MSCA Selective Mass Scaling Factor for the explicit solve phase.
Selective Mass scaling is needed to run quasi-static problem in explicit
Type = DTIM, Value = Desired initial minimum time increment
Type = MASS, Value = Value of Selective mass scaling Factor

ETOI Sets criterion for transitioning from explicit to implicit


Type= Time, Value= Time to be spent in explicit

SFAC Safety factor for time incrementation in the explicit solve phase

30 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Semi-Implicit

Semi-Implicit Method To Improve Robustness of MAPDL

Crushing of Thin Shell Box


Buckling of a Bottle
Tennis Ball impacting a net
Automatically transitions from
Cannot solve the problem in
implicit alone- has convergence Automatically transitions from HHT to explicit (half way) and
difficulties implicit to explicit and back to solves the problem in explicit.
Automatically transitions to implicit 9 times
explicit and solves the problem in
explicit

31 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


RESULT SECTION

Result Section Output


A result section is a user-defined surface that can be used to output and monitor section forces, moments, heat flow,
current, mass flow, and pore fluid volume flux during a solution.
Result section output quantities (like bending moments and axial forces etc. ) can be monitored without storing results for
all elements for each sub step, which significantly reduces the results file size.

RSMESH automatically creates the result section inside 2-D and 3-D continuum element meshes.
OUTPR,RSFO The section output quantities are written to a single Jobname.SECF text file at a user-specified frequency

NLHIST Certain result section quantities can also be monitored (or terminated) during solution

32 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


RESULT SECTION

Example: Result Section in a Bolt Thread Model


This 3-D model represents an M120 structural steel bolt with standard thread
dimensions.
The model includes a cover plate and a base plate. A bilinear isotropic plastic material
model is used for the bolt and the plates.

3-D Half Model of a Simplified Bolt Joint


/PREP7
ESEL,S,TYPE,,105 ! Select the bolt elements
RSMESH, , ,,y,280,,,elgr
/SOLU
OUTPR,RSFO,5 ! Define the frequency to output results Result Section in the Bolt at y = 280

33 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SMART Crack Growth
ANSYS 2019 R1 update

34 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SMART Fracture

SMART Crack Growth Simulation Framework


New SMART crack growth enhancement
• Support temperature loading
• Map temperature boundary condition
• Support surface pressure loading
• Map pressure load for external surfaces and current crack surfaces
• Allow to define pressure load for newly generated crack surfaces
• Support tabular pressure load as function of time
• Support both SMP and DMP
• Support PCG and SPARSE solvers
• Support displacement boundary condition mapping
• Fixed DIS boundary condition
• Face based DIS boundary condition

35 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SMART Fracture

SMART Crack Growth Simulation Framework


New crack surface pressure load
• Command to specify new crack surface pressure
– CGROW,CSFL,loadtype, loadkey,value
– loadtype: type of load, currently only pressure load as PRESSURE
– loadkey: load key for the crack surface load, current set to 0
– Value: the new crack surface load value for the load step
• Current only constant load value can be applied
• To define a varying load, use table function %table%, which table defines pressure load table as function of
time (and may be in the future as function of coordinates x, y, z). Use *DIM to define the table.

prsv=20000000 ! unit Pa (400MPa)


! apply presure to new crack surface
cgrow,csfl,press,,prsv

36 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SMART Fracture

SMART Crack Growth Simulation Framework


Problem description
• Edge crack panel subject to a
thermal load
• Static crack growth with J y
integral as criterion
x
Linearly varying temperature from
left to right,
T(x)=(2x/W)*T0, T0=20 oC, Plane strain boundary
Reference temperature = 0 oC Boundary conditions:
• At top and bottom faces, Ux=Uy=0 condition is maintained
• At all nodes, Uz=0 (plane strain) by the mapping of the
0.150 displacement boundary
4

Accumulated crack ext. (mm)


SMART 3.5 condition.
0.125 3
Static crack
2.5
0.100
JINT (N/mm)

Wilson & Yu (1979) 2


0.075 1.5
1
0.050 0.5
0
0.025 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.000 Substep
10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 *
( Wilson, W.K. and Yu, I.W., 1979. The use of the J-integral in thermal
Crack length, a (mm) stress crack problems. International Journal of Fracture, 15(4), pp.377-
387)

37 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SMART Fracture

SMART Crack Growth Simulation Framework


Center crack panel subjected to surface pressure
𝑎
𝐾𝐼 = 𝑝 𝜋𝑎 𝐹
Problem description 𝑊
𝑎 𝑎 2 𝑎 3

• Tensile panel with a center 𝐹


𝑎
=
1 − 0.5 𝑊 + 0.370 𝑊 − 0.044 𝑊
𝑊 1 − 𝑎/𝑊
crack
• Static crack growth with J (The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, ASME, 2000, Page
41)
integral as criterion 𝐾𝐼2 (plane stress)
𝐽=
𝐸
𝐾𝐼2 (plane strain)
𝐽 = 1 − 𝜈2
𝐸

2
1.8 J (plane
1.6 stress)

J-integral (N/mm)
1.4 J (plane
1.2
1 strain)
0.8
0.6
JIC = 0.1 N/mm
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
time

J (average of 5 contours) evaluated at the middle of the crack front


38 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
SMART Fracture

SMART Crack Growth Simulation Framework


Distributed Solution
• Work within ANSYS distributed solution Pressure loads
architecture
• FEM model solved in distributed mode
• Fracture and SMART Crack Growth Calculation
including remeshing are conducted only in
master node
# of CPU Time (seconds) Speedup
Solution 1 1 163 1
Elements: 0.058M 2 109 1.50
Equations: 0.23M
4 82 1.98
Crack tips : 23
Remeshing: 5 times 8 70 2.32
16 72 2.26

Solution 2 # of CPU Time (s) Speedup in total


Elements: 0.67M 1 8799 1
Equations: 2.7M
8 2010 4.38
Crack tips : 101
16 1327 6.63
Remeshing: 3 times
32 991 8.88
39 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
SMART Fracture

SMART Crack Growth Simulation Framework


Multi load step and tabular load
• Various load magnitude for the fatigue *dim,prsload,table,6,1,,TIME
prsload(1,0) = 0 p
prsload(1,1) = 100
prsload(2,0) = 1.0
Crack faces node
prsload(2,1) = 100 components
prsload(3,0) = 1.0001
prsload(3,1) = 160 time
prsload(4,0) = 2
prsload(4,1) = 160 1 2 3

prsv=20000000 ! unit Pa (400MPa) ! Apply tabular pressure to crack surface


cmsel,s,NS_Crack_TopFace,node
! Apply pressure to crack surface cmsel,a,NS_Crack_BottomFace,node
cmsel,s,NS_Crack_TopFace,node SF,all,pres,%prsload%
cmsel,a,NS_Crack_BottomFace,node
SF,all,pres,prsv ! apply surface pressure to new crack surface
cgrow,csfl,press,, ,%prsload%
! apply surface pressure to new crack surface
cgrow,csfl,press,,prsv

40 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


SMART Fracture

SMART Crack Growth Simulation Framework


Solution results output control
• Use OUTRES command to control for different results output
OUTRES,ALL,30 ! Write solution to rst file for every 30 substeps
OUTRES,CINT,ALL ! Write CINT (fracture) results to rst file for all substeps

SMART crack growth usually generates a large number of substeps,


writing results at every substep will result in a very large rst file.

41 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical Enhancements
ANSYS 2019R1 update

42 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Part Transform
The new Part Transform feature that allows you to reorient
parts by specifying translations and/or rotations within
Mechanical
Allows you to transform mesh and/or automatically
regenerate contacts along with transforming parts
Graphical preview allows you to see the location of the parts
before and after the transform

Part Transform
with Mesh

43 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Part Transform
Allows you to reorient one or more parts around arbitrary
coordinate systems
Allows you to reorient one or more parts using a pair of
coordinate systems (source and target). The application
automatically calculates the transform such that the
source is aligned with the target after transform.
You can apply multiple transforms to a
part. The transforms are applied in the
order they appear in the tree.
You can reorder the transforms by drag-drop in the tree.

44 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Simulation Template
Workbench now allows users to enter/edit Mechanical without
attaching geometry.
Users can setup their analysis system using criterion based
named selections without having to attach geometry. Such an
analysis setup is called a Simulation Template.

45 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Attach/Replace Geometry
From Mechanical, the new option Attach Geometry, available
from the Geometry object toolbar, enables you to import a
geometry from with the application.

Once you attach a geometry, or for a


system that already includes a
geometry, the Replace Geometry
option replaces Attach Geometry
enabling you to replace an existing
geometry.

46 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Convection Fluid Flow


The Convection boundary condition now supports vertex and
node scoping when using information from Thermal Fluid line
bodies.
This feature enables you to use a specific vertex or node to get
the bulk temperature in the convection calculations.
Both direct and coping and named selections are supported

47 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Restart Controls For Nonlinear Adaptivity Analysis


Independent Restart Controls are now available under
Nonlinear Adaptivity Remeshing Controls.
The options control the generation/retention of .RDnn
remeshing database files, which are needed for mesh
nonlinear adaptivity analysis.

48 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Miscellaneous Usability Enhancements


Quickly Save Mechanical Session
• A new File menu option is available: Save Database. This option enables
you to save the current Mechanical session without having to save the
entire project. However, you must save the project when you exit the
application to properly save your changes.

Project Object
• The Project object in the Outline now displays with an asterisk (*) in its
name to indicate that you have not yet saved the Mechanical database
since the last change or set of changes.

Parametrizing MAPDL Elapsed Time


• The MAPDL Elapsed Time can now be parametrized and is available as an
output parameter in the Parameter Set in workbench.

49 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

New Solution Combination


With the new solution combination, users can:

● Specify multiple combinations.


● Combine solutions for Static Structural, Transient Structural, and Harmonic Response analyses.
● Specify solution combinations as either Linear or SRSS (Square Root of Summation of Squares).
● Use Tabular Data or a result Set Number to specify which combination you wish to display.
● Import and/or Export the Solution Combination Worksheet as a Comma Separated Value (CSV) file.

50 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Keyframe Animation
Keyframe animation enables you to string together different snapshots of the
model in the Geometry window to create an animation
● Keyframes are created by positioning the model in the desired orientation
and clicking on Create Keyframe.
● The application interpolates the transition from keyframe to keyframe to
create a smooth animation.

● Export the video in various formats:


MP4, WMV , AVI and GIF

51 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Keyframe Animation (continued) for Results


● Keyframe animation for Results enables stitching different
snapshots (different view settings) of the model for smooth
visualization of results, coordinating the animation in time/steps
space (natural for results) with the one in the 3D space (natural
for keyframe animation).
● This can be enabled by clicking the keyframe animation icon in
the animation toolbar and the user can have a choice of
synchronizing the frame rate similar to the one set in the
keyframe animation window

Frames Synchronized with Keyframe animation

52 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Export Animation
Animation Tool animates the results to show the evolution of the specified result of a simulation.
Keyframe Animation Tool, allows the examination of the models( geometry and result ) from different points of view in a
dynamic way.
The animation can be exported by selecting the export animation option on the animation toolbar after selecting the result
on the solution tree.
The supported formats to export animation are MP4, WMV , AVI and GIF.
● Varying the frame rate allows the capture of
a specific number of snapshots to export the
video file
● Varying the play length allows the generation
of animation video of a specific duration.
● When the keyframe animation for result is
enabled the keyframe animation for the
solution result is exported as media file

53 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Export Animation (continued)


The generated keyframes can be exported by the export keyframe option on the
keyframe animation toolbar.

•The total number of intra frames between main keyframes for exported animation
can be specified by the Subframe Count .
•The total play duration of exported animation file can be specified by the Total
Time option .

54 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Mechanical Scripting API improvements - Camera


The WB Camera is analogous to a digital camera.
The visualization of the model can be manipulated by
changing the properties and methods of the camera ACT.

The following properties together represent the state of the


camera.
● FocalPoint: specifies the location on the object where
the camera is looking at.
● ViewVector: direction the camera is looking at.
● UpVector: specifies the orientation (tilting) of the
camera.
● ZoomFactor: a value of 1 will roughly fit the window.
Larger values will make the model appear smaller while
smaller values will make the model appear larger.

55 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Scripting API - Camera (continued)


These methods are available to manipulate the camera in a more user-friendly manner:
● SetFit: Fit the view to the whole model
● Rotate: Rotate along a particular axis
● SetSpecificViewOrientation: Set the orientation to one of the following predefined viewing orientations (with respect to the
global Cartesian coordinate system):
○ Front: Front direction (i.e. 0, 0, 1)
○ Back: Back direction (i.e. 0, 0,-1)
○ Top: Top direction (i.e. 0, 1, 0)
○ Bottom: Bottom direction (i.e. 0,-1, 0)
○ Left: Left direction (i.e. -1, 0, 0)
○ Right: Right direction (i.e. 1, 0, 0)
○ Iso: Iso direction (i.e. 1, 1, 1)

56 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Scripting API improvements - Export Graphics Display


The graphics display can be exported using the following properties
● Export3D method can be used to export the 3D model in STL and AVZ format.
● ExportImage exports the image to a PNG, JPG, TIF, BMP, or EPS file.
● Graphics3DExportSettings and GraphicsImageExportSettings lets modify settings (background,
resolution etc.) to export model and image.

57 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Scripting API improvements - Section Plane


This allows the user to perform functionalities related to creating a slice or section plane on your model so that you can view
internal geometry, mesh, and/or result displays.
The following methods can be used to manipulate section planes:
• Add: adds a new section plane to the collection.
• Remove: remove a section plane from the collection.
• RemoveAt: remove a section plane at a given index.
• Clear: clears all section planes from the collection.
The following properties can be used to get/modify state
of the section plane:
• Capping: capping style
• ShowWholeElement: element visibility of section
plane
• Center: center point of a section plane
• Type: type of section plane
• Name: name of section plane
• Active: active state of section plane
• Direction: normal direction of section plane

58 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical

Fatigue results export


The Fatigue results Rainflow Matrix and Damage Matrix can now be exported
as a text file

59 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


CMS in WB-Mechanical
ANSYS 2019R1 update

60 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


CMS

Outline
CMS exposure for MSUP harmonic response analysis
Bushing formulation exposure for Bushing joint which can be internal to Condensed Part
Support of Acceleration loads in MSUP harmonic using Substructure restart procedure
Improve disk space and performance by performing file reference for use pass and
expansion pass instead of file copy

61 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


CMS

CMS exposure for MSUP harmonic analysis


Standalone and Linked MSUP Harmonic analysis can now use CMS based matrix
reduction method to work with Substructures.

Expansion enabled for Condensed Part 2


and seen in the deformation results

Graphics are made transparent for


condensed part and MDOF is
displayed on condensed parts

62 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


CMS

Bushing formulation for CMS based Modal + Harmonic


Bushing joint now supports Bushing formulation which can be internal to Condensed
Part and can be included in Generation Pass for Modal and Harmonic analysis

Bushing joint is internal to


condensed part and all other
joints are in the interface

63 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


CMS

Acceleration load support for Harmonic analysis


CMS based MSUP Harmonic analysis supports Acceleration load. Since Acceleration is
scoped to All Bodies in the analysis, it needs to be applied to both Condensed Part which
are within substructures as well as Non-Condensed parts. To support the Acceleration
load, substructure restart procedure is performed in Harmonic analysis during use pass.

64 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


CMS

Improve disk space and performance


MODDIR is activated in the Super-element Generation pass of MAPDL solution. This
enables the Use pass and Expansion pass to do file reference, when required. This
avoids file copy of the LN22 files and other files shown below to improves disk space and
performance due to file copy

cp128.rst
cp128.LN22/LN09/LN20
cp128.full These files are read remotely
cp128.cms
cp128.emat
through file reference
cp128.bcs

cp128.sub (c)
cp128.bclv (c) These files are copied from
cp128.seld/mlv (c) condensed part folder during
cp128.db (c)
cp128.esav (c) use pass and expansion pass

65 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Rigid Body Dynamics
ANSYS 2019 R1 update

66 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


RIGID BODY DYNAMICS

Stabilized Generalized Alpha time integration


• A posteriori correction of constraints leads to high frequencies oscillations that needs
➔ penalizes NR convergence and timesteps
• New Stabilized Generalized Alpha time integration enforces constraints while
preserving dynamic equilibrium ➔ no spurious oscillation ➔ faster convergence and
larger time steps

Stabilized vs Generalized Alpha


100.00%
15271 2916 203
80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%
43
1305 216
0.00%
# CUMULATIVE # TIME STEPS ELAPSED TIME (S)
ITERATIONS

Generalized Alpha Stabilized Generalized Alpha

67 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


RIGID BODY DYNAMICS

On-demand CMS expansion


• CMS expansion may lead to large RST files with large meshes and/or large number of time points
(transient simulation) which are expensive to write/read
➔ Perform expansion on the fly during post to avoid any file
➔ Based on the Data Processing Framework

Medium size model: 14 Condensed Parts, 165867 nodes, 60859


elements, 102 time points
• MAPDL expansion: 4ms16, 14 RST files, total: 3.5 Gb
• On-demand expansion: 22s (deformation+stress), no RST file

68 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


RIGID BODY DYNAMICS

Miscellaneous
• Worksheet to review step aware analysis settings
• Ability to define restitution factor as a parameter
• Command to output detailed contact forces
• Command to print body force balance
• 8 Customer Defects addressed.

69 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Linear Dynamics

70 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Cyclic Symmetry Analysis – Initial State


Objective
Include non-zero initial stress or strain in a cyclic symmetry analysis
Feature
Support INISTATE command (DTYP = STRE or EPEL)
Example Scenario: Jet Engine Simulation
• Read in the initial state for room temperature and impose it on
a cyclic symmetry sector model. The initial stress/strain is, for example,
caused by machining process. Residual stresses from additive
• Specify the temperature profile and rotational speed at the engine manufacturing is an example
condition. Run a prestress static analysis. of an initial stress state
• Run a linear perturbation cyclic symmetry modal analysis.

71 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Cyclic Symmetry Analysis – Damped Modal Analysis


Objective
Include damping and/or Coriolis effect in a cyclic symmetry modal analysis
Feature
Support damped eigensolvers (MODOPT,DAMP and QRDAMP)

Real Mode Imaginary Mode damping oscillation

Complex Mode Complex frequencies

72 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Substructuring / CMS – Remote Files Usage


Objective
Optimize substructuring/CMS file handling for Mechanical scenarios. Avoid
copies. Access files remotely.
Feature
Support MODDIR command during the first solution of the first restart of a
generation pass, or during the first solution of the expansion pass.

73 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Substructuring / CMS – Remote Files Usage


Application: Mechanical Scenario

74 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Rotating Structure Analysis - Rotating Reference Frame Analysis

Objective
Extend the applicability and improve the accuracy of the
rotating reference frame analyses
Features
When activating CORIOLIS,ON:
• Coriolis and spin-softening on rotational degrees of freedom
• SYNCHRO procedure
• Campbell procedure
• Rotating damping effect
• Periodic transient forces (COMBI214)
Documentation
Enhanced and cleaned-up dedicated part in Advanced Analysis
Guide. 3 new Verification Manual examples.

75 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Rotating Structure Analysis - Rotating Reference Frame Analysis


Rotating Machine Dynamics
Linearization to support linear analyses:
modal, harmonic, and linear transient Full non-linear transient analysis

Axisymmetric One body on No limitation


possibly multi- orthotropic on the model
body supports

Stationary Reference Frame Rotating Reference Frame Co-rotational Reference Frame - Flexible
Analysis = Rotordynamics analysis Analysis in 2019R1 (MAPDL multi-body analysis:
(MAPDL Rotordynamics Guide, Advanced Analysis Guide) - RBD
some Mechanical exposure) - MAPDL

76 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS
Rotating Structure Analysis - Rotating Reference
Frame Analysis – Verification Manual Examples

77 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS
Rotating Structure Analysis - Rotating Reference
Frame Analysis – Jeffcott Rotor

±Ω relationship between stationary reference frame


and rotating reference frame frequencies is verified

78 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS
Rotating Structure Analysis - Rotating Reference
Frame Analysis – Stability and Damping Effect

Asymmetric shaft
(BEAM188) with
disks (MASS21) on
bearings
(COMBI214)

79 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


2019 R1 Linear Dynamics, CMS,
Acoustics & NVH
ANSYS 2019R1 update

80 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Outline
1. Material dependent damping based on Constant Structural Damping Coefficient
2. Bushing formulation ( COMBI250 ) for Modal and Harmonic analysis
3. Participation factor output for Modal analysis
4. Command snippet enhancement to exclude solve command for a particular step or
number of steps
5. CMS
6. Acoustics & NVH

81 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Material based Constant Structural Damping Coefficient


1. Engineering data supports Material Dependent Damping group, which consists of
two properties Damping Ratio and Constant Structural damping coefficient.
2. Constant structural damping coefficient is supported in 2019 R1 for Full Harmonic,
Fully damped Modal, Reduced Damped Modal ( When complex solution is set to Yes)
and Full transient analysis.
3. The default of Constant Structural Damping Coefficient is set to twice of that of
Damping Ratio specified by the user

82 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Material based Constant Structural Damping Coefficient


1. In current release, Constant Damping Coefficient in Engineering data has been
renamed to Damping Ratio
2. The naming convention for these properties are made consistent across MAPDL and
Mechanical and also within Analysis Settings and Engineering data in Mechanical
3. If Damping ratio is specified for the material on database resumed prior to 2019 R1
release, then it will add Material Dependent Constant Structural Damping Coefficient
and will make its value twice of Damping ratio
4. Material Dependent Damping Ratio is no longer applicable for Full Harmonic analysis
5. Material Dependent Damping based on Damping ratio is sent as MP,DMPR
command and Material Dependent Damping based on Constant Structural Damping
Coefficient is sent to the solver as MP,DMPS command. Please see this link for
supported analysis

83 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Bushing formulation (COMBI250) for Modal + Harmonic


Bushing formulation is now supported for Bushing joints in Modal and Harmonic analysis
( COMBI250 element ). This formulation supports element coordinate system and only
diagonal terms can be specified for Stiffness and Damping coefficients. It can be used as
internal to Condensed Part for CMS analysis. In prior releases, only MPC formulation was
used behind the scene ( formulation property is new)

84 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Participation factor for Modal analysis


Participation factor summary is now supported for 2D Modal analysis

85 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LINEAR DYNAMICS

Commands enhancement for Issuing solve command


Commands object now supports new property Issue Solver Command. This property
when set to No for applicable steps using Step Selection Mode, then the solve command
is not issued for those load steps. In the example below the solve is skipped for second
load step and can be seen from the results
Total
Loading deformation
Graph and
Tabular data

86 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Acoustics & NVH
ANSYS 2019R1 update

87 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ACOUSTICS

Maxwell-Mechanical: Multiple RPMs & ERP Waterfall Diagram


For Electric Machine design, it is important to analyse the acoustic signature of the system. In that goal,
Equivalent Radiated Power can be calculated for a range of Rotational Velocities and Frequencies. We
have develop a fully automated workflow to reach this goal.
✓ Perform DX Parametric study in Maxwell
✓ Transfer EMAG forces to Mechanical for all RPMs
✓ Plot ERP Waterfall Diagram

88 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ACOUSTICS

Maxwell-Mechanical: Multiple RPMs & ERP Waterfall Diagram


Two mapping strategies available depending on the geometry compliance:
✓ Object Based: Integrated Forces / Moments
✓ Mesh Based: Surface Force Densities

89 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ACOUSTICS

Maxwell-Mechanical: Multiple RPMs & ERP Waterfall Diagram


Equivalent Radiated Power waterfall diagram results provide a global acoustic signature
for a range of RPMs and frequencies.

90 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ACOUSTICS

Harmonic Acoustics to Harmonic Acoustics Coupling


FSI Harmonic Acoustics can be coupled to downstream Harmonic Acoustics.
Interesting to analyse the radiated noise of a structure containing liquid (transformer …)

91 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ACOUSTICS

Cyclic expansion option for FSI cyclic symmetry


Cyclic Expansion options for available in Acoustics:
✓ Number of sectors to display
✓ Starting sector

92 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ACOUSTICS

Export Results to XML format for VRXP Sound Dimension (Beta)


Allows XML export for Equivalent Radiated Power and Sound Power Level. XML file can
be read in Optis VRXP Sound Dimension to synthesize the sound and create a .WAV file.

Listen to computed ERP

93 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ACOUSTICS

Option to ignore damping in modal Acoustics (Beta)


Available option to ignore acoustic damping material properties (viscosity…) which are
defined by default for Air and Water materials. That allows to avoid using Damped
solver without deleting those properties in Engineering Data.

94 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical Explicit Dynamics
ANSYS 2019 R1 update

95 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


EXPLICIT DYNAMICS

Mechanical Explicit Dynamics – 2019 R1

Energy Trackers now include:


• Hourglass & Contact Energy
Energy Probes

Energy probes can be added after the solve Energy Trackers need to be defined before the
solve
96 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
EXPLICIT DYNAMICS

Mechanical Explicit Dynamics – 2019 R1


New Manual Contact Treatment = <Lumped/Pairwise>
• <Lumped>: default – original behaviour
• <Pairwise>: new behaviour:
• Affects the Manual Contact Regions:
– Scoping:
• Contact region: nodes in contact
• Target region: faces in contact
– Symmetry behaviour:
• Accounted for in the solver
– Friction:
• Definition is applied per contact pair
• Should not conflict – if so: error.

97 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


EXPLICIT DYNAMICS

Mechanical Explicit Dynamics – 2019 R1


• The worksheet for stepawareness is
available now for Damping Controls

Beta
• Tabular acceleration input

98 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Workbench LS-DYNA
ANSYS 2019 R1 update

99 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LS-DYNA

Body Interactions of Type Reinforcement


Body Interactions with type reinforcement
are now available with LS-DYNA. They allow
modeling of reinforced solid structures, like
reinforced concrete.

Nodes in the reinforcement beams and the


matrix in which they sit do not have to be
coincident.

100 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LS-DYNA

Imported Temperature
Transfer links have been enabled between
steady state thermal , transient thermal
calculations and Workbench LS-DYNA.
allowing to transfer body temperatures from
a thermal calculation to Workbench LS-
DYNA.

Temperature induced deformations can now


be taken account in a LS-DYNA explicit
calculation

101 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


LS-DYNA

Deformation Transfer
The deformation from a Workbench LS-DYNA
calculation , can now be transferred to
downstream systems , like Static Structural ,
allowing a user to initiate those simulations
from a deformed state.

102 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


External Model
ANSYS 2019 R1 update

103 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


EXTERNAL MODEL

Import Beam shear transverse stiffness for Nastran

104 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


EXTERNAL MODEL

Import fluid116 elements for MAPDL

105 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


EXTERNAL MODEL

Import ICEM .uns files with topology (Bodies/Faces)

v192 2019R1

106 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


2019 R1 General Axisymmetric
ANSYS 2019R1 update

107 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


GENERAL AXISYMMETRY

General Axisymmetric in WB-Mechanical


Applicable for 3D Static Structural analysis. General Axisymmetric definition is added
under Symmetry folder and when scoped to 2D/Surface body makes the behavior of
that Body as General Axisymmetric

108 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


GENERAL AXISYMMETRY

General Axisymmetric Definition


1. General Axisymmetric (Solid 272/273) introduces Fourier series into interpolation function to
describe the change of displacements in the Circumferential (θ) direction.
2. General Axisymmetric object in mechanical takes Nodal planes input to define number of
planes and Coordinate system with Axis input to specify the circumferential direction.
3. The graphics view shows the Axis and Orientation by drawing the line and circle. And it shows
the number of nodal planes by showing the transformed geometry in different nodal planes

Solid 272/273 Nodal planes value range from 1 to 12 excluding 2


Axis definition must not cut through the body
109 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
GENERAL AXISYMMETRY

General Axisymmetric Mesh


1. General Axisymmetric mesh is generated using Generate Mesh/Update action on
Mesh folder
2. The base mesh is created on the surface body and then General Axisymmetric mesh
is generated on all the nodal planes as post operation on base mesh.

12 nodal planes

110 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


GENERAL AXISYMMETRY

Loads and Boundary Conditions


1. Nodal loads are directly applied through the Named selections scoped to Nodes. These loads
can be non-axisymmetric loads as nodes can be picked from any nodal plane
2. Pressure, Remote force, Moment and Displacement load can be applied to the geometric
scoping which can be edge or vertex. If edge of General Axisymmetric body is selected for
load application, then load is applied to all the nodal planes. For Pressure load using Surface
effect option, SURF159 is created to apply the load

Graphics shows the face selected in θ direction where


Load applied to nodes load is applied when Pressure is scoped to edge

111 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


GENERAL AXISYMMETRY

General Axisymmetric behavior with Contacts


1. Node to surface contact is created between General Axisymmetric body in contact
with other bodies. CONTA175 is created for the contact side which will be General
Axisymmetric body and TARGET170 element is created for 3D target surface
2. Only Bonded contact is supported when Nodal plane 1 is defined
3. Number of nodal plane should be same when General Axisymmetric body is in
contact with other General Axisymmetric body
Nodes in all nodal planes for the General
Axisymmetric scoped edge is considered for contact
Edge to Face contact
between General
Axisymmetric body and
Solid body

112 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


GENERAL AXISYMMETRY

Results
1. All regular results can be extracted on the General Axisymmetric body scoping or Mesh.
The results shown below are Deformation and Stress which are symmetric in the
circumferential direction in the presence of Axisymmetric loading applied in this case

Total deformation scoped to All Stress shown in all nodal planes when
Bodies scoped to an edge

113 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL Elements
ANSYS 2019 R1 update

114 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

List of 2019 R1 Features


• Thermal Reinforcing Elements
• 10-Node Tetrahedral Thermal Solid
• Enhanced Pre- & Post-processing for Reinforcing Elements
• General Distributed Load for Solid Elements
• Hybrid Cable Element
• Linear Perturbation for General Axisymmetric Elements
• Anisotropic Structural and Dielectric Losses for Piezoelectric Analysis

115 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

THERMAL REINFORCING: Motivation

Complex PCB thermal model

~ 72 million dof with 3D detailed mesh


Extended model preparation time
Excessive computational cost

116 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

THERMAL REINFORCING: Basic Approach

Use reduced order model for the embedded metal regions – line / plate elements
Use Reinf Technology to capture the thermal solution by embedding the line/plate
Elements in a base element

=
Reinforced element Base element

117 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

THERMAL REINFORCING: 2019 R1 Scope


• 3D Discrete Reinforcing element REINF264 for SOLID278/279
• 3D Smeared Reinforcing element REINF265 for SOLID278/279
• Support both uniaxial and homogeneous options for Reinf265
• Provide lower & higher order options
• Allow base material removal
• Analysis options (static & transient & quasi )
• The base elements must be homogeneous ( ie. KYOP3=0 )
• EREINF command modification for thermal to structural conversion and load
application

118 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

THERMAL REINFORCING: Example

• Discrete and smeared


members
• Heat generation load
on the members

TEMP solution on the


combine model

TEMP solution on the TEMP solution on the base


members solid elements

119 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

Command Enhancements for Reinforcing Elements


EGID – new command to specify group Id for mesh200 element
EMODIF – allow EGID modification for all elements
EREINF – allow for REINF element update based on base element
BFE – can be used with mesh200, reinf264, reinf265 for HGEN
*GET – modified to return group identifier, number of members for selected REINF
element
*GET – modified to return min/max TEMP for specified or selected group identifier
*VGET – modified to return array of min/max TEMPS for specified or selected group
identifier

120 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

THERMAL REINFORCING: Chip Thermal Analysis

REINF members (/ESHAP, 0)

REINF model: Homogenous Substrate &


Embedded Traces (Discrete and Smeared)
REINF members, expanded 3D display

121 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

THERMAL REINFORCING: Chip Thermal Analysis

TEMP distribution on the wire members

TEMP distribution on the combined model


Members can be grouped with global
identifiers (GID) and selected by GIDs for
post-processing
TEMP distribution on the plate members

122 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

Other Thermal Enhancements: 3D 10-Node Tetrahedral


New generation 10-noded thermal tetrahedral element (beta)
-USERMATTH is supported
-TB commands can be used

123 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

Other Thermal Enhancements: Nonlinear Heat Generation


• Overcome convergence difficulty with strongly nonlinear heat generations
• SOLID278/279 have been enhanced with consistent linearization in REV 2019 R1 to
address this issue

124 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

Enhanced pre-/post-processing for Reinforcing elements


Global identifiers (GID) for reinforcing members
• EGID: Assign a Global ID to selected elements
• EMSEL: Select reinforcing members by GIDs
• Supported for visualization and result post-processing

Heat generation load on reinforcing members


• Direct application to the members
• Application to MESH200 elements in a mesh independent procedure
*GET and *VGET new capabilities
• Retrieve member information : number of members, min/max GIDs, and more
• Retrieve min/max temperature results
Support node-based Initial State via mesh independent method
Enhanced PRNSOL command for thermal reinforcing result listing

125 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

Application of GIDs
/prep7

! Assign Global ID to MESH200
esel,
Assign a Global ID (GID) to EGID, 2
selected MESH200 elements esel,
EGID, 3
esel,
EGID, 4
EREINF command assigns …
the Global ID to reinforcing EREINF

members ! Select Members


esel, all
EMSEL,,,,2,4,2
Solid elements
EPLOT
- Select the reinforcing
members by GID: EMSEL /post1
- Use pre-/post-processing ! plot stress output
commands esel,,ename,,264
EMSEL,,,,2,4,2
plesol,s,x

126 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

EMSEL vs LAYER command

EMSEL,,,,1,32,8 LAYER,2
/ESHAP,1 /ESHAP,1
EPLOT EPLOT

Selection reinforcing Selection reinforcing


members by GIDs members by sequence
→ More intuitive number (local)

127 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

General Distributed Load on Structural Solid Elements


• Before REV 2019 R1 solid elements are capable of normal and constant pressure only
• For general distributed load (normal, tangential, fixed direction, tapered, etc),
surface effects element must be used
• Lack of direct general surface load on solid elements
• Added complications to modeling
• Difficult to use
• Affected solution robustness and accuracy

• In REV 2019 R1 (beta), the following elements are supported for general surface
loading:
• SOLID185, SOLID186, SOLID187, SOLSH190, SOLID285

128 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

Eigenvalue Buckling of a Straight Pipe with Tangential Surface Load

SURF154

SOLID185 + SURF154 New tangential load on


Load stiffness not SOLID185 with Load Stiffness
accounted for → → correct
incorrect result

129 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

Example 2: Global tapered pressure

SOLID185 + SURF154

SOLID185 Only

130 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

CABLE280 Element (beta)


z

• Current ANSYS elements suitable for 4


1
L
2
y
simulating cables: LINK180, BEAM188, I
3
BEAM189.
Y K
• Convergence difficulty for extremely flexible x
J
cables (e.g., undersea cables) 5
X
• Require fine mesh to achieve accurate
Z CABLE280 Geometry
solution in both displacements and axial force.

CABLE280
• Four nodes. Fourth orientation node required only for applying transverse load.
• Degree of freedom: UX, UY, UZ.
• Two integration points for stiffness, three integration points for mass and distributed
loads.
• Mixed U/F formulation: quadratic approximation for displacements and linear
approximation for axial forces.
• Axial force DOFs are incompatible and internal to the element.
131 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
MAPDL ELEMENTS

CABLE280 Example #1: Suspension Cable


Cross-section area 548.4 mm2 , elastic modulus 131 GPa, length 312.73 m.
Final shape

0 Ref
1 element

Y [m]
-20 2
4
-40 8
0 50 100 150 200 250 300

X [m]

-30
Start from a straight horizontal reference

Midspan displacement [m]


configuration, apply a prescribed -31

displacement on the right support Δ𝑢𝑥 = -32


180
− 7.93 m and gravity. -33
188
-34 189

High accuracy even with a coarse mesh: -35


New
280

relative error is 0.7% with one element. -36


0 5 10 15
Number of elements

132 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

CABLE280 Example #2: Suspension Cable with a point load


Cross-section area 548.4 mm2 , elastic modulus 131 GPa, length 312.73 m.
Start from a straight horizontal reference
configuration, apply a prescribed
displacement on the right support Δ𝑢𝑥 =
− 7.93 m, gravity, and a point load at 2/5
of the cable span.
CABL280 is able to capture the jump in the axial force where a concentrated force applied,
with coarse mesh.
94.5
Reference 94
93.5
93

Axial force [kN]


92.5
92
91.5
91
90.5
90
89.5
0 100 200 300
X [m]
133 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
MAPDL ELEMENTS
Linear Perturbation for Axisymmetric Structures
under General 3D loads
• General axisymmetric solid elements SOLID272 / 273 are powerful to simulate
axisymmetric structures under asymmetric loads.
• Due to the lack of Linear Perturbation (LP) support to the elements, the application of
elements in linear dynamic analysis based on large deformation or deflections was
limited.
• SURF159 is supported for applying various surface loads on SOLID272/273
• All LP analysis types supported: modal, Eigenvalue buckling, full Harmonic ..
• Supports both linear and tangent material stiffness options

134 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

SOLID273 Liner Perturbation Buckling Analysis

Deformed Shape after nonlinear static analysis Subsequent LP Eigenvalue buckling mode

135 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

SOLID273/SURF159 Linear Perturbation Modal Analysis

Deformed Shape after nonlinear static analysis Subsequent LP Pre-stressed modal analysis
based on the nonlinear results

136 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

Piezoelectric Analysis Enhancements


Dynamic piezoelectric analyses that use elements PLANE223, SOLID226, and SOLID227:
• Anisotropic elastic and dielectric losses Poynting Vector in the Tuning Fork
− Input using new material tables:
• TB,AVIS – Anisotropic viscosity
• TB,ELST – Anisotropic elastic loss tangent
• TB,DLST – Anisotropic dielectric loss tangent
− For the simulation of loss anisotropy in bulk and surface acoustic wave devices

• Heat generation rate (JHEAT) due to the combination of structural


and electric losses
− For a subsequent thermal analysis to predict the heating of a piezoelectric
devices due to structural and electric losses

• New output item: Poynting vector


− For power flow visualization in piezoelectric devices

137 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

Piezoelectric Vibrations with Anisotropic Structural Loss


Piezoelectric harmonic analysis of quartz crystals with AT-cut quartz plate vibrating in THICKNESS
structural losses SHEAR mode at 1664 kHz

• Losses are modeled using the anisotropic viscosity table


(TB,AVIS)
• Different modes of vibration have different loss factors
Tuning fork quartz crystal with Coriolis effect
! Viscosity constants for Quartz, N/m**2 s vibrating in FLEXURE mode at 32.768 kHz
eta11= 1.37e-3
eta12= 0.73e-3
eta13= 0.72e-3
eta14= 0.01e-3
eta33= 0.97e-3
eta44= 0.36e-3
eta66= 0.32e-3

! Anisotropic viscosity table


tb,AVIS,1,,,0
tbda,1,eta11,eta12,eta13,,eta14
tbda,7,eta11,eta13,,-eta14
tbda,12,eta33
tbda,16,eta66,,eta14
tbda,19,eta44
tbda,21,eta44

138 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MAPDL ELEMENTS

Heating of a Piezoelectric Disc due to Anisotropic Electric Losses


Barium Titanate Disc vibrating in RADIAL mode at 263 kHz
Piezoelectric harmonic analysis of a Barium Titanate disc vibrating
in radial mode at 263 kHz
• Electric losses are modeled using the dielectric loss tangent table (TB,DLST)
• Time-averaged heat generation due to these losses is stored as JHEAT and
transferred to a thermal analysis via LDREAD,HGEN

• Thermal transient analysis of the disc is performed


Heating of a Piezoelectric Disc
to determine the temperature rise due to
dielectric heating
! Loss tangent coefficients in radial and axial
directions
tand11=0.005
tand33=0.009

! Dielectric loss tangent table


TB,DLST,1
TBDATA,1,tand11,tand11,tand33

139 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Material Designer
ANSYS 2019 R1 update

140 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MATERIAL DESIGNER

Content
• Additional Lattice Structures
• Non-Uniformly Distributed Chopped Fiber Composites
• UI Improvements

141 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MATERIAL DESIGNER

Additional Lattice Structures


• Additional Predefined Lattice Structures

Cubic with Cubic with side Double pyramid Cubic with bottom
center supports cross supports center supports

• User Defined Lattice Structures


with a Rectangular Cuboid as Unit Cell
i.e. different sizes in each direction

142 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MATERIAL DESIGNER

Non-Uniformly Distributed Chopped Fiber Composites


Specify a target orientation tensor

In particular, this allows to generate RVEs, in which fibers are

mostly aligned with the X axis or oriented parallel to the XY plane

143 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


MATERIAL DESIGNER

UI Improvements
• Easily Access the (Solver) Log Files

• See an Image of each Variation (for variable materials)

• Easily Access the Material Designer User’s Guide

144 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical Topology Optimization
ANSYS 2019R1 update

145 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Outline
Support thermal compliance objective and Temperature constraint optimization of
Steady State Thermal system
Reload Volume Fraction from last optimized iteration
Support stress constraints in regions outside the optimization region
Support optimization of shell bodies
Support Smoothing Result for Smoothed STL

146 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Optimization of Steady State Thermal System


Thermal Compliance objective and Temperature Constraint associated to Steady State
Thermal System is supported
Mass and Volume is supported as Optimization objective/constraint

147 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Optimization of Steady State Thermal System


For the plate model, Temperature and Heat Flow is applied to Steady State Thermal
System; Thermal compliance is chosen as Objective and Response constraint of type
Mass is chose with Range specified between 1 and 40 percent. The topology density
result shows the optimized topology with mass percentage as 34.797 percent, which will
achieve the maximum heat transfer

148 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Reload Volume Fraction from last optimized iteration


Reload Volume Fraction from last iteration to continue optimization with modification of
Objectives and Response Constraints. Solve or Interrupt the optimization run, set the
Reload Volume Fraction to Manual, Pick the Current Reload point based on last solved
iteration, modify objective or constraints and perform optimization. This will continue
optimization by reloading the volume fraction computed in the previous run

Icon to indicate the


Reload Volume
Fraction option
149 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Stress constraint and Shell body optimization


Support stress constraints in the region outside of Optimization region. It could be
exclusion region or other parts of the entire model.

Topology density
results in the
Local Von-Mises Stress constraint Optimization region
of 7 MPa is applied to connector
edges which is not part of
Optimization region

150 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Optimization of Shell bodies


Shell bodies are also optimized if included in the optimization region, but it is not
optimized in the thickness direction

Shell body

151 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Smoothing Result
Smoothing result can be added under Topology Density result. It creates Smoothed STL,
which can then be used for design validation study

Topology Density result with No Smoothing

Smoothed STL with Move limit = 2


Move limit default is
0. The STL is
smoothed further
with increasing value
of Move limit

152 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Thermal Stress Optimization (Beta)


Support thermal compliance objective for Steady State Thermal System and Compliance
objective for Static Structural system to optimization thermal stress case. Temperature
constraint on Steady State Thermal System and Response constraint like Stress on Static
Structural system can be added at the same time to Topology optimization

In this problem, both thermal compliance for


Steady state thermal system and compliance
for static structural is applied with Volume
response constraint of 30 percent

153 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical Level-Set based Topology
Optimization –BETA
ANSYS 2019R1 update

154 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Outline
Mesh
➢ Support Tetra mesh (linear or quadratic) for the optimizable regions. No restriction for non optimizable
regions.
Static Linear Analysis
✓ Support the following BC: fixed parts, prescribed displacement
✓ Support the following Loads: surface load, nodal load, volume load (acceleration, gravity, etc)
✓ Available criterion: “generalized” compliance (both valid for standard loads and prescribed displacement)
Modal Analysis
✓ support the following criterion: eigen frequency
Geometric analysis
✓ Support volume, mass
Optimization
✓ Each criterion can be handled as an objective or a constraint

155 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Activate the option

➢ Activate beta version


➢ And the level-set method

156 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Level-set based Top Opt.


➢ Chose the « level-set solver »

157 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Static Linear Analysis


“Generalized” Compliance is supported as objective or constraint

158 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Some examples
… without any smoothing !

159 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Use case: stopper


Mesh
✓ Tetra linear
✓ 117,000

Analysis
✓ Static lin (1): pressure

Optimization
✓ Min compliance
✓ St: mass<50%

Result
✓ 27 iterations
✓ Current shape is feasible:
✓ (min) objective 0 : 7202.64

✓ constraint 0 : 1.84326e+07 <= 1.84475e+07

160 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


TOLOPOLGY OPTIMIZATION

Use case:TOPO_OPT_LONG_WB2_002

Mesh
✓ Tetra linear
✓ 373,000

Analysis
✓ Static lin (1): force + pressure + remote force
✓ + nodal force + nodal pressure + remote disp +

Optimization
✓ Min comliance(1)
✓ St: mass<25%

Result

✓ 373kel : 52 iterations, objective1: 5.04038e-06, constraint 1: 3.89791, limit: 3.89848

161 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Additive Manufacturing
ANSYS 2019R1 update

162 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Summary
Workbench Additive ANSYS Additive (Print & Science)
• Ability to orient part after geometry attach • New Voxelization Method
• Layered tetrahedron meshing • User Defined Supports
• Heat treat step added • Single Bead Parametric (Additive Science)
• Support restarts (add step after complete of build • Porosity Parametric (Additive Science)
and cooldown)
• Allow powder in build step • Beta Thermal History (Additive Science)

• Allow non-build elements in build step • Thermal Solver Updates

• Allow symmetry to be used • Thermal Mesh Control


• Added 17-4 PH and AlSi10Mg to the sample • Updated Part Size Limitations
materials
• Added Al357 and Ti64 Thermal
• Tmelt can be specified as a tabular entry (beta)
• Added Mesh Visualization Output
• Blade interference prediction (beta)

163 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Ability To Orient Part After Geometry Attach


You can orient the part after importing it
It can be parameterized, so you can investigate the effect of orientation on support
needs and on build distortion and stresses

164 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Layered Tetrahedron Meshing


You can use a tetrahedral mesh for build simulation
• Captures geometry details
• More suitable for thin-walled parts
• Produces layered mesh
Cartesian Mesh Layered Tetrahedron Mesh

165 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Heat Treat Step Added


Can add a heat treat process step to stress relieve the part after it has
been built
• Stress relief before the part has been cut off or after
• Can use creep properties to predict the stress relief, or a simplified approach is
available:
– If the temperature at a point during the heat treat exceeds a user-provided relaxation
temperature, all the plastic strain history is removed (the material point annealed)

After Build + Cooldown 1st Cutoff Before HT 2nd Cutoff After HT

166 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Support Restarts
You can now add a step after the completion of the build and cooldown steps
• Allows you to ensure those steps are properly performed before going on
• Also allows you to try different heat treat and/or removal steps

167 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Allow Powder In Build Step


You can now include material that remains as powder during the build
• Useful if you have multiple parts in close proximity on the build plate and the heat transfer between
them is important to consider
• Also useful if you have a part with features close together where the heat transfer between them is
important

No Powder (Equivalent Convection) With Powder

168 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Allow Non-build Elements In Build Step


Experimental builds often have clamps, thermocouples, and other measuring devices
inside the build chamber
You can now include them in the simulation as they will not be part of the build process
(but will carry heat and stress)

169 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Allow Symmetry To Be Used


If you have a symmetric part, you can use symmetry to reduce the model size

170 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Added 17-4 PH And AlSi10Mg To The Sample Materials


17-4 PH steel and AlSi10Mg have been added to the list of available and validated
materials
• Both temperature-dependent thermal and structural properties are provided

171 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Tmelt Can Be Specified as a Tabular Entry (Beta)


The melt temperature can be specified as a tabular parameter
• Tmelt can be a function of (x,y,z) or time
• Allows control of thermal history that some users are doing with the machine build settings

172 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Blade Interference Prediction (Beta)


You can predict areas where there is likely blade interference (blade crash) during the
build

173 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

New Voxelization (AP)


Sample Rate of 5
= 125 Subvoxels
Subdivide voxels in pre-processing to get
voxel density approximation
Helps to address meshing problems with
extremely fine features on large
components
Voxel Sample Rate
Users can view voxel density file
Mechanical properties are scaled based on
voxel density
More accurate distortion
Limitation: stress visualizations are known
to look odd due to stiffness of partial
density voxels

174 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Uploading Supports (AP)


Utilizes new voxelization
User can design their support structures
User can upload multiple support designs per
part
Approximate geometry and supplement with
voxel density
More accurate comparisons on customer
parts
Addresses the request of many customers
during evaluation period
Standard or Volumeless support .stl files
Limitations: Cannot output optimized
supports

175 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Single Bead Parametric (AS)


New Additive Science Feature
Dimensions of meltpool (Length,
Width, Depth)
Helps users set machine parameters
of power and speed
Parametric Capability: up to 300
permutations
Tuned and validated for multiple
materials (IN718, IN625, CoCr, 17-4
PH, Ti64, Al357)
Limitations: Tuning function only
supports a specific range of
parameters, so range is limited in
UI.

176 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Porosity Parametric (AS)


New Additive Science Feature
Helps users set process parameters
of scanning strategy in addition to
power and speed
Parametric Capability: up to 300
permutations
Tuned and validated for multiple
materials
Limitations: Tuning function only
supports a range of parameters, so
range is limited in UI.

177 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

BETA Thermal History (AS)


New Additive Science Beta Feature
Helps users to visualize temperature
profile of a part
Allows users to evaluate meltpool
dimensions based on scan vectors of
a specific part
Users choose their designed
geometry
User selects layers of interest
Coaxial average sensor allows users
to choose radius of sensor over
which to average data points

178 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ADDITIVE

Existing Feature Updates (AP & AS)


• Thermal Solver: the thermal solver has undergone multiple updates to more
accurately approximate the physics, which provides more realistically
accurate thermal strain results
• MRF parameter introduced: This is a Mesh Resolution Factor, which controls
how much the full fidelity thermal mesh will be expanded for thermal strain
and thermal history simulations. This parameters allows users to control Cloud 500MB
the speed, fidelity, and data generation for simulations
• Part Size limitations: removed for desktop increased to 500 MB for Cloud
• Download .stl component from an uploaded build file Desktop Unlimited
• Expanded thermal simulation material database to include Ti64
• Added Al357 for thermal and mechanical simulations
• Support Parameters have been updated to be more clear and provide users
with clarity in controlling optimized support structures that are output
• Added voxelized mesh file output, so that users can view the mesh as soon
as the simulation starts instead of needing to wait for the entire simulation
to complete before mesh can be visualized

179 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Composites 2019 R1 Release Notes
ANSYS Composite PrePost (ACP)
ANSYS Composite Cure Simulation (ACCS)

180 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


COMPOSITES

Outline
• Composite PrePost (ACP)
• UD Draping
• Cut-off Feature for The Lay-up Mapping
• Geometrical Selection Rule
• Material Plot
• New Serialization Format
• Miscellaneous
• Composite Cure Simulation (ACCS)

181 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


COMPOSITES

Draping Woven material


model
• The draping functionality has been extended to
unidirectional (UD) fabrics. The draping algorithm
now differentiates between a woven and a UD
material model.

• The transverse deformation of the draping mesh


(modeling spreading and compacting of fibers) can be UD material
model
controlled with the UD coefficient.

Effect of the draping material model on


the shear angle calculated by ACP draping
Draping a patch in the back of a helicopter rooftop. simulation.
182 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
COMPOSITES

Cut-off Geometry Feature for the Lay-up Mapping


• The lay-up mapping feature for solid meshes now
supports the cut-off geometry feature in the same way as
the standard extruded solid model does. A
• This feature allows you to shape the imported solid model
after the lay-up mapping. That gives you further control
of geometry and mesh and it simplifies the pre- B
processing.
C

A) Simple solid with structured mesh


B) Cut-off geometry that is applied after the mapping
C) Shaped solid with mapped lay-up

183 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


COMPOSITES

CAD Selection Rule becomes Geometrical Selection Rule


• The Geometrical Selection Rule allows for a
parametrized lay-up definition in relation to
Element Sets. As a result, you can now easily
define a ply staggering from an Element Set
inward or outward.
• The functionality of the former CAD selection
rule remains the same.
• The Geometrical Selection Rule can thus be
based on CAD geometries as well as Element
Sets by switching the rule type.

Outward ply staggering defined by a


geometrical rule and templated tube rule.
184 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
COMPOSITES

Material Plot
• The new Material Plot allows to plot variable material
properties such as orthotropic elasticity, density, strain
and stress limits at a ply-wise level.
• It is available as lay-up and solution plot. The latter
one also allows to consider temperature dependency.
• Reviewing the effect of field variables (shear angle,
temperature and user-defined variables) on the
mechanical properties of the material has been
greatly enhanced.

Plot of the Young’s Modulus in the fiber


direction as a function of Temperature,
Shear Angle and Curing status.

185 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


COMPOSITES

New Serialization Format ACPH5


• The serialization has moved from a text to the binary
ACPH5 serialization format.
• The composite workflows in WB are not affected by this
change and previous models can be upgraded to the
new format with ease.
• The new format is more efficient and flexible.

186 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


COMPOSITES

Miscellaneous
• GUI Improvements
• Hide and Show All actions have been added to some groups such
as Element Sets, Edge Sets etc. to control the visualization for all
items in a group
• For direction definitions a flip button is now available enhancing
the usability.
• The performance bottle neck when loading models
with thousands of plies has been resolved.
• Various bug fixes.

187 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


COMPOSITES

ANSYS Composite Cure Simulation (ACCS)


Improvements in the Cure Simulation workflows and ACCS module:

• ACCS supports now variable material properties during the cool down (solidified
material state).
• Bugs in the unit handling have been resolved.
• The stability, especially for bigger models, has been improved.

188 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


Mechanical Aqwa
ANSYS 2019 R1 update

189 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


AQWA

SA799: Hydrodynamic load mapping ACT extension


● Replaces previous multi-step workflow
● Simplifies the load transfer process significantly
● Represent results in WB
● Valid for combination of solid/surface and line elements

Hydrodynamic diffraction -> Static Mechanical


190 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
AQWA

SA799: Hydrodynamic load mapping ACT extension

Pressure/loads on hydrodynamic model Mapped pressure/loads on FE model

HD model of fixed jacket platform Axial force on FE model


(Morison equation for load on tube)
191 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
AQWA

SA800: Aqwa model data file import


● To encourage existing users with old models to move to WB
● To transfer data from one project to another.

192 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


AQWA

SA800: Aqwa model data file import


● Flexible import to WB
Project/Model Level Individual Aqwa Specific item

Whole existing Aqwa model data Each item listed in left column
(geometry, connection, constraint,
environment)

193 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


AQWA

SA801: Internal tank hydrodynamic coupling


● Coupling effects between liquid motion (sloshing) in the partially filled
internal tanks and the attached marine structures
● Hydrostatic and hydrodynamic coupling included
● Analysis is available in frequency and time domain in Workbench

Molin test model


194 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
AQWA

SA801: Internal tank hydrodynamic coupling (example)


● Two models: (1) with liquid sloshing effects; (2) liquid is frozen (no sloshing)

Roll-roll added mass

red line : with sloshing effects


blue line: no sloshing

Roll motion in frequency domain Time history of ship roll motion


195 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018
ANSYS Cloud

196 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ANSYS CLOUD

ANSYS Cloud

Cloud-based service that provides easy


access to on-demand HPC directly from
ANSYS Mechanical & Fluent solver

197 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ANSYS CLOUD

ANSYS Cloud Compute enables “Solve on Cloud”

Preprocessing on desktop –
geometry prep, meshing,
Pre physics, boundary conditions

Files uploaded to cloud for


solve, including automated
Solve optimization and DOE

Validate results with remote


3D viewer. Leave heavy
Check weight results in cloud

Download results to desktop


for detailed post-processing
Post and data management

198 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ANSYS CLOUD

Accessing ANSYS Cloud

Register for ANSYS Account


Download ANSYS Cloud Compute ACT App
from ANSYS Cloud Portal

199 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ANSYS CLOUD

Using ANSYS Cloud with ANSYS Mechanical

Install the ANSYS Cloud App


Launch and log-in into the App
Monitor the job from the app and the portal
Post processing in the cloud
Downloading results to your desktop

200 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018


ANSYS CLOUD

ANSYS Cloud Forum


Forum to get help and provide feedback
Users can:
• search the forum for relevant articles
• ask a question
• post ideas for feature enhancements

201 © 2019 ANSYS, Inc. December 31, 2018

You might also like