1.7.9 Osteochondroma PDF
1.7.9 Osteochondroma PDF
1.7.9 Osteochondroma PDF
Objectives
1. Describe the pathology of osteochondroma (exostosis)
2. Describe the location and gross appearance of typical osteochondromata
3. Describe the radiographic appearance of osteochondromata
4. Discuss indications for removal of osteochondromata
5. Discuss the potential for malignant degeneration of solitary osteochondromata
Discussion
The most common bone tumor is an osteochondroma. Accounting for nearly half of all
bone tumors. The origin is unclear, but they appear to result from some type of insult to
the periphery of the growth plate, as a result of which the growth is directed more
laterally than normally. There are two general categories of osteochondromata, sessile
and pedunculated, depending on the size of the base. Both types are orientated away
from the growth plate. The radiographic appearance is so characteristic of an
osteochondroma that further imaging studies are unnecessary. The cortex of the
underlying bone opens to join the cortex of the osteochondroma. The distal bony of the
osteochondroma is capped by cartilage, which is felt to represent that part of the growth
plate rendered asunder from the rest of the plate, microscopically the cartilage cap does
resemble a growth plate. The cartilage cap is <1cm in thickness. The metaphyses of long
bones, especially about the knee, are most often affected. A myriad of symptoms have
been reported from osteochondromata appearing in unusual locations. Problems with
osteochondromata about the knee are symptomatic (under the pes anserinus), vascular
(popliteal fossa) or related to peroneal nerve pressure (posterolateral). Lesions in these
parts of the knee probably warrant excision if they are large enough to impinge on either
the vessels or the peroneal nerve. The process of excision is straightforward, recurrence
is not a problem. The entire exostosis should be excised if possible, although near the
peroneal nerve, this may not be feasible without unwise retraction of the nerve. The risk
of malignancy for a solitary osteochondroma is very low. The entity of multiple
hereditary exostosis is discussed under that topic. Radiation induced osteochondromata
may very well be more inclined toward malignant degeneration than the usual solitary
osteochondroma.
References
1. Vasseur MA, Fabre O. Vascular complications of osteochondromas. Journal of
Vascular Surgery 2000;31(3):532-8.
2. Govender S, Parbhoo AH. Osteochondroma with compression of the spinal cord.
A report of two cases. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - British Volume
1999;81(4):667-9.
3. Mahboubi S, Dormans JP, D'Angio G. Malignant degeneration of radiation-
induced osteochondroma. Skeletal Radiology 1997;26(3):195-8.
4. Fraser RK, Nattrass GR, Chow CW, Cole WG. Pes anserinus syndrome due to
solitary tibial spurs and osteochondromas. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics
1996;16(2):247-8.
5. Cardelia JM, Dormans JP, Drummond DS, Davidson RS, Duhaime C, Sutton L.
Proximal fibular osteochondroma with associated peroneal nerve palsy: a review of six
cases. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 1995;15(5):574-7.
6. Springfield DS. Bone and soft tissue tumors. In: Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL,
editors. Pediatic Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 423-57.
7. Simon MA, Springfield DS. Surgery for bone and soft tissue tumors.
Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.