Providing Services As A Part of Network of Direct Selling, Other Than A Pyramid Scheme

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

 Introduction

The Indian Direct Sellers Association (“IDSA”) was incorporated in Mumbai in 1996 and
moved to its registered office to New Delhi in 1998. It is a self-regulatory body which
acts as an interface between the industry and policy-making bodies of the Government
(Ministry of Consumer Affairs) facilitating the cause of Direct Selling Industry in India.
Before the inception of Model Guidelines on Direct Selling, it was IDSA that was
maintaining the legal and ethical standards in the direct selling. In absence of any
legislation in place, the Model Guidelines are the rulebook to follow. The IDSA yet
prescribes standard and procedure for incorporating a direct selling company.

These guidelines provide not only for the consumers who are the direct recipient of the
practice but also for the ‘sellers’ who are appointed or authorised by the ‘Direct Selling
Entity’ to undertake the business activities.

 Highlights of the Model Guidelines


• Entry 6 of Clause 1 defines “Direct Selling” as marketing, distribution & sale of goods or
providing services as a part of network of Direct Selling, other than a pyramid scheme.
Thus, the definition in itself inter alia includes marketing of goods & services.
• Clause 2 provides for the Entity to be legal. It mentions protective measures for the
Direct Seller like fair remuneration and buy-back guarantee. It also requires for the
Entity to set up an office with identified jurisdiction in its place of operation – to address
concerns wrt prices, returns or replacements, delivery or after-sales service.
• Clause 3 talks about record keeping - be it as an owner or holder or any Intellectual
Property Rights (“IPR”) or as an employer/authoriser of Direct Sellers maintaining
registers, issuing IDs. It also requires to be set up, a website with particulars of the entity
like product profile & management and consumer redressal system; & mandates
redressal within 45 days.
• Clause 3 also provides for a restriction on practices to be indulged in by a Direct Selling
Entity, such as:-
i. Using misleading or deceptive recruiting practices including misrepresentation of
potential earnings.
ii. Making or permitting to make any factual representation to a non-member that
cannot be verified or making any promise that cannot be fulfilled.
• Clause 4 of the guidelines requires a Contract to be valid in law and prevents
mentioning of specifics such as unreasonable minimum purchase for direct seller.
Also, the Direct Seller is allowed to terminate his contract with reasonable notice.
• Clause 5 is consumer centric. It prohibits Direct Sellers to visit costumers’ premises
without prior notice and identification. It requires true, accurate and complete
disclosures and demonstrations of goods and services, prices, returns and after sales
policy and not to engage in unfair trade practices or deceptive selling.
• Clause 7 talks about consumer protections as both the Direct Selling Entity & the
Direct Sellers are governed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Providing a
complaint number and allowing tracking of the same should be enabled. Every entity
is required to constitute a Grievance Redressal Committee, who composition &
responsibilities are specified.
• Clause 9 has provided for the State Government (Dept. of Consumer Affairs) to set
up a mechanism to monitor & supervise the activities of Direct Sellers, Direct Selling
Entity’s and the guidelines.

You might also like