Preliminaries
Preliminaries
Preliminaries
High School
“Name of Student”
May 2018
ii
Approval Sheet
_____________________________
DR. REYNALDO C. CRUZ
Adviser
May 2018
Approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in
Education.
___________________________________
DR. ALVIN V. NUQUI
Chairman
_______________________________ __________________________________
SR. IMELDA A. MORA, OSA, Ph.D DR. MARIANO C. DE JESUS
Member Member
Accepted and approval as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in
Master of Arts in Education.
________________________________
DR. ALVIN V. NUQUI
Dean, Graduate School
iii
Acknowledgement
Writing a thesis paper is a rigorous but rewarding endeavor. It marks the highest
profound wisdom and elusive truths. Truly, to accomplish such challenging test for
academic excellence wells contentment and inspiration to the essential aspects of the
human person. Yet, one cannot deal with the labors of an overwhelming activity alone.
Even Hercules with the gifts of being a demigod would be wasted away without the
assistance of other heroes. I myself would never be able to complete this humble paper
without the guidance of several wonderful persons around. For this reason, I would like
to extend my utmost gratitude to the following individuals who religiously dedicated their
To Dr. Reynaldo C. Cruz, my adviser, who, since the very first day of our
Statistics and Probability class, relentlessly and patiently shared to me his expertise,
wisdom and values upon writing this paper from the beginning till the end. To Dr. Alvin
V. Nuqui, Dean of the Graduate School, for his fervent passion and sincere
To Dr. Alvin V. Nuqui, Sr. Imelda A. Mora, OSA, Ph.D and _________ , the panel
members, for painstakingly reviewing every aspects and parts of the paper and for
kindheartedly giving constructive criticisms and advices for the full development of the
thesis project.
To Dr. Romeo M. Alip, CESO V for granting the approval to administer the
instruments of the study and for reminding the researcher the specific standard operation
iv
procedures on such request. To the school heads and teachers of the public high schools
in the Municipality of Hagonoy, Bulacan for their guidance and support regarding the
data collection in their respective schools. To the respondents, whom this paper got its
flesh and bones, who diligently responded to the inquiries of the study.
through the chapters editions, data tabulation, and other related tasks. To Regina, a
special friend, for ceaselessly and selflessly boosting my morale every passing day since
the beginning of this project. To the family of the researcher for their undying love and
Abstract
The major problem of this study was to assess the impact of language learning strategies
(LSS) to the language learning anxiety and self-perceived language proficiency of the
senior high school learners in the public high schools in the Municipality of Hagonoy,
Bulacan. The study made use of the descriptive-correlation research design in which
standardized instruments were the primary data gathering tool. The respondents of the
study were the 302 Grade 12 General Academic Strand (GAS) learners. The data were
presented using tables and the results of the study were tabulated and processed using
Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPPS). The results of the study revealed that the
learning strategies. On the other hand, the anxiety of the respondents was experienced in
moderation while the level of self-perceived language proficiency was recorded average.
The findings of the study indicated that language learning strategies did not influence
significantly the anxiety conditions except metacognitive strategies. Thus, the study
accepted the null hypothesis which stated that language learning strategies would not
impact significantly on the language learning anxiety of the learners. Moreover, further
analysis of data suggested that language learning strategies did impact significantly on
the students’ self-perceived language proficiency. Hence, the null hypothesis which
postulated that the identified strategies would not impact significantly on the learners’
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction…………………………………………………………… 1
Significance of the Study……………………………………………… 4
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework………………………………….. 5
Statement of the Problem……………………………………………… 7
Hypotheses of the Study……………………………………………….. 8
Definition of Terms…………………………………………………… 9
Scope and Delimitation of the Study………………………………….. 10
Summary of Findings………………………………………………….. 57
Conclusions……………………………………………………………. 60
Recommendations……………………………………………………… 61
References……………………………………………………………………… 63
Appendices…………………………………………………………………….. 69
Curriculum Vitae……………………………………………………………... 76
List of Tables
viii
Page
List of Figure
ix
Page
List of Appendices
x
Page
A Permission Letters………….……………………………………… 69
B Instruments of the Study…………………………………………... 71