1 - The Silent' Cinema PDF

Cambridge Books Online
http://ebooks.cambridge.org/
A History of Film Music
Mervyn Cooke
Book DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814341
Online ISBN: 9780511814341
Hardback ISBN: 9780521811736
Paperback ISBN: 9780521010481
Chapter
1 - The ‘silent’ cinema pp. 1-41
Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814341.002
Cambridge University Press

1 The ‘silent’ cinema
As has often been remarked, the cinema has never been silent: the so-called
silent films which represented the first flowering of the medium from the
1890s to the late 1920s often used sound as a vital part of the filmic experi-
ence. Accompanying music was only one of a diverse range of sonic options
available to exhibitors in the early years of cinema; yet the familiarity of the
fairly elaborate musical provision characterizing the later years of silent film
(c.1914–27) has tended to result in the assumption that music was both con-
stantly used and deemed aesthetically viable well before this period. As Rick
Altman has argued, however, during the early development of the moving
picture (c.1895–c.1913) it was not uncommon for films to be projected with
no organized sound component at all (Altman 2004, 193–201). Yet, by the
start of the 1920s, film-music pioneer George Beynon could declare without
fear of contradiction: ‘Allowing the picture to be screened in silence is an
unforgivable offense that calls for the severest censure. No picture should
begin in silence under any conditions’ (Beynon 1921, 76).
Why sound?
Altman’s careful research established that ‘silent films were in fact some-
times silent, . . . and what’s more it did not appear to bother audiences a bit’
(Altman 1996, 649); but audience noise and direct audience participation
were more prominent at the turn of the twentieth century than they are in
today’s cinema in the West, so to this extent films were never truly experi-
enced in silence. When Andy Warhol made his almost static silent films in
the 1960s he assumed the audience would supply sounds, thereby partici-
pating in the artistic event (Weis and Belton 1985, 369); and audience noise,
though reduced in modern times, has remained part and parcel of the cin-
ematic experience, most prominently in India. The desirability of masking
or discouraging audience noise is one of the many possible explanations –
some practical and others aesthetic – that have been advanced to account
for the provision of some kind of sound element to accompany screenings
of silent films.
Another reason for the provision of sound in the early years of cinema
may have been to mask intrusive noise both inside and outside the projection
[1] venue, including the sound of traffic passing by and the distracting whirring
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 198.211.119.232 on Sat Apr 16 00:57:29 BST 2016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814341.002
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2016
2 A history of film music
of the projector itself. Conventional modern projectors still generate a fair

degree of noise: the experimental film-maker Stan Brakhage, who attempted
to make genuinely silent films in the 1950s, attested to his irritation at having
neglected the fact that viewers would in effect never be able to watch his films
in total silence because the sound of the projector would always be present.
Mechanical quietness was used as a selling-point when some early projectors
were marketed: around 1900, for example, publicity for the Optigraph noted
that with rival projectors ‘the noise is so great that, as a rule, it is necessary to
keep a piano or other musical instrument going while the motion pictures
are being shown, to prevent annoyance to the audience’ (quoted in Altman
2004, 89). The issue of projector noise duly became a much-vaunted but
not entirely convincing theory for the origins of film music: as film theorist
Siegfried Kracauer pointed out, ‘this explanation is untenable; . . . the noisy
projector was soon removed from the auditorium proper [into a projection
booth], whereas music stubbornly persisted’ (Kracauer 1960, 133).
In those silent films that purported to represent reality, the absence of
naturalistic sounds might have been considered a more serious impedi-
ment to plausibility than the absence of dialogue. Yet even when films are
screened without any accompanying sound, the viewer will tend to imag-
ine noises that correspond to the images depicted. It is difficult to watch
the plate-smashing sequence in Sergei Eisenstein’s silent classic The Battle-
ship Potemkin (1925) or the images of spoons striking glass bottles in Dziga
Vertov’s The Man with the Movie Camera (1929) without ‘hearing’ the appro-
priate sound internally. (Vertov’s sensory suggestiveness even extended to
implying a smell: he directly juxtaposed images of nail-polishing and film
editing, both of which use acetone.) Audiences responded appropriately to
such visual stimuli from the earliest years of cinema: at an early screen-
ing of The Great Train Robbery (dir. Edwin S. Porter, 1903), silent images
of gunshots reportedly caused spectators to put their fingers in their ears
(Altman 1996, 648). MGM’s trademark roaring lion was born in the silent
era as a result of the studio’s desire for an arresting image that would ‘sound’
loud. In 1929 French director René Clair, lamenting the use of gratuitous
sound effects in the early sound film, declared that ‘we do not need to hear
the sound of clapping if we can see the clapping hands’ (Weis and Belton
1985, 94). Such internalized sounds were believed by Brakhage to emanate
from a ‘silent sound sense’ (Brakhage 1960). This phenomenon, referred
to as subception or subliminal auditive perception by psychologists, was
exploited by numerous makers of silent films, who peppered their products
with visual simulations of sound ranging from simple knocks at the door
to graphically realized explosions. Some silent films, such as Franz Hofer’s
Kammermusik (1914), placed a heavy emphasis on scenes of music-making
and on the act of listening to music, which may have a powerful associative
effect even if no music is heard by the audience (Abel and Altman 2001, 93,
96–7, 102–6). Furthermore, a direct correspondence between images repre-

senting the production of music and other sounds, and the act of listening
to such sounds, became after c.1909 a useful device – unique to the cinema –
not only for implying the existence of diegetic space beyond the confines
of the screen, but also a simple (and at the time novel) form of narrative
linkage in the montage; thus some silent films came to have what have aptly
been termed a ‘virtual sound track’ (Altman 2004, 214–16).
In real life, movement is never viewed in strict silence; indeed, without
special acoustic facilities, total silence is a physical impossibility even when
viewing static objects. In modern sound films, room tone (i.e. ambient
sound appropriate to the location depicted on screen) is specially recorded
so that it can be dubbed onto ostensibly silent scenes and thereby prevent
the audience from simply assuming that the sound system has failed (Weis
and Belton 1985, 395); it can also be used to replace ambient background
noise lost during the process of dubbing dialogue. Actual silence on the
soundtrack would be unrealistic in both cases, and unacceptable except
in contexts where it is used deliberately as a means of disconcerting the
viewer, as in the work of French director Jean-Luc Godard. When Alfred
Hitchcock wanted to create a threatening silence in The Birds (1963), he
preferred the use of a subliminal electronic humming noise rather than a
complete absence of sound (Truffaut 1967, 225). As film theorist Béla Balázs
observed, the silent film was a paradox: it could not of itself reproduce silence
as an artistic effect, since silence is relative and can only be appreciated
within a context of sounds (Balázs 1953, 205); thus, when a car is driven
away in complete silence at the end of The Birds, the same vehicle having
demonstrated its noisy engine in a previous scene, the effect is unsettling.
In short, as French director Robert Bresson pointed out, ‘the sound track
invented silence’ (quoted in Weis and Belton 1985, 323) – or at least gave it
a value that it did not possess in the silent film.
Silence in a musical context, however, has since the earliest years been
an important stock-in-trade of accompanists of silent films and film com-
posers, who have appreciated the fact that the sudden cessation of music
when the latter is expected to be continuous can have an enormous dramatic
impact on an audience. The phenomenon was debated in the motion-picture
trade press during the heyday of the silent film, with some commentators
approving of a strategic use of silence and others advocating continuity at
all costs: in 1912, Moving Picture World advised musicians that a maximum
silence of ten seconds was a useful rule-of-thumb (Kalinak 1992, 49). Organ-
ist Dennis James related how, when his instrument malfunctioned during
a live accompaniment to a modern screening of a silent Harold Lloyd com-
edy, one member of the audience afterwards praised him for interpolating
so dramatic and unexpected a silence (McCarty 1989, 66–7). Even well
after the advent of the sound film, Leonid Sabaneev anxiously warned film
composers against recoursing to abrupt silence on the grounds that the

device ‘gives rise to a feeling of aesthetic perplexity’ (Sabaneev 1935, 21),
though a few years earlier the trenchant critic Harry Alan Potamkin – in
the context of his general lambasting of the excessive use of music in the
exhibition of silent films – praised a Paris showing of Abel Gance’s J’Accuse
(1918) for the orchestra’s ‘terrific’ silence when the war dead come to life:
‘What vaudeville “fan” does not know the effectiveness of silence during an
acrobatic feat? This is the point: since music is inevitable, we can make the
best use of silence by selecting the intervals carefully at which the music will
be hushed’ (Potamkin 1929, 295).
In silent comedies dependent upon slapstick, and to enhance the excite-
ment of major sound events in serious silent films, real sound effects were
supplied by special machines such as the Kinematophone or Allefex, which
might be located behind the screen to enhance spatial verisimilitude, or by
performers using the kind of sound-generating paraphernalia still familiar in
modern radio drama. In France, these sound-effects performers were known
as bruitistes, and some commentators believed that, if handled creatively, an
imaginative use of sound might correspond to the bruit musical developed
by Italian futurist artists during the First World War (Lacombe and Porcile
1995, 24–5). Unfortunately, no such high artistic aims prevailed in movie
theatres, where the mindless use of sound effects was roundly criticized by
many contemporaneous critics on account of its essential crudity and often
excessive volume. This habit was in part responsible for the all-too-frequent
recourse to unsubtle sound effects in modern commercial cinema, in which
Foley artists (named after Jack Foley, who pioneered such techniques in his
work on early sound films in Hollywood during the 1940s) habitually sup-
ply artificial and over-prominent sounds for virtually all noises in a film, no
matter how trivial. Many are both redundant and somewhat condescending
to audience intelligence, but sound-effect production had become so slick
by the advent of the talkies that its retention in the sound film was inevitable.
In the work of sound-sensitive modern film-makers, however, effects may
be integrated with the musical score so that they work together in the sound-
track, the latter (as has long been overlooked, even in film scholarship) now
being increasingly treated as an indivisible composite greater than the sum
of its parts (Altman et al. 2000, 341).
Why music?
Music may initially have been supplied at film screenings simply because it
has always been an inevitable adjunct to almost all forms of popular enter-
tainment. Early moving-picture shows in the mid-1890s were little more
than show-booth attractions: fairgrounds, vaudeville and travelling shows

have traditionally been noisy affairs, and for the latest novelty spectacle to
have been presented without some kind of aural stimulation would have
been inconceivable. In this regard, it is important to note that music was
not necessarily performed inside an exhibition venue, nor at the same time
as a film was being shown. Altman has drawn attention to the significance
of music as a ballyhoo device for attracting custom before patrons had even
set foot in the venue: live music might be played at the entrance, or recorded
music blared out into the street through a barker phonograph horn (Altman
1996, 664, 674), and even the musicians inside the projection room might
be instructed to play loudly so they could be heard in the street (Altman
2004, 131). As cinema music became more elaborate and of better quality,
the live performance of musical numbers – again not necessarily related to,
or played simultaneously with, the films being shown – could be as strong
an attraction to customers as the moving pictures on offer.
The author of one of the first serious texts on film music stated that
music had been specifically conceived as compensation for the absence of
naturalistic sound (London 1936, 34). One of its early exponents, Max
Winkler, opined categorically that music was added to film in order to fill
the void created by the absence of dialogue: ‘music must take the place of
the spoken word’ (quoted in Limbacher 1974, 16). But music was by no
means the only medium that might be used for these purposes. Apart from
sound effects, other techniques included live narration, which had been a
prominent feature of magic-lantern shows and fairground moving-picture
attractions when barkers had provided a simultaneous commentary on the
images. Sometimes reciters (also known as ‘impersonators’) delivered lines
in an attempt to synchronize with the lip movements of the film actors,
an activity in which the comedian Leopold Fregoli specialized in the late
1890s (Prendergast 1992, 4). As late as 1908, an American venue secreted
actors behind the screen and had them perform synchronized dialogue in an
attempt to trick the audience into believing that the ‘talker’ film they were
witnessing constituted a genuine technological miracle (Abel and Altman
2001, 156–66). The most celebrated live narrators were the Japanese benshi,
who were star attractions in the silent cinema and survived well into the
sound era (Dym 2003); elsewhere, however, verbal narration died out once
film-makers had evolved editorial techniques sophisticated enough for the
sequencing of the film’s visual images to carry the necessary narrative infor-
mation (Fairservice 2001, 11).
As silent cinema developed, and especially after c.1912, music came to
play a crucial role in shaping and conditioning the viewer’s response to
moving pictures. Kathryn Kalinak has proposed that music, by its very
physical presence, created a sense of three-dimensionality singularly lacking
in the projected image: while the film was projected from the rear of the
hall to the screen at the front, so music played at the front was projected
backwards over the audience and ‘through a kind of transference or slippage
between sound and image, the depth created by the sound is transferred to
the flat surface of the image’ (Kalinak 1992, 44). The process of humanizing
the silent moving image with music was regarded by some commentators,
notably Theodor Adorno and Hanns Eisler, as a quasi-magical process in
which the spectator’s fear of the irrationality of the ghostly medium was
exorcized:
Music was introduced as a kind of antidote against the picture. The need
was felt to spare the spectator the unpleasantness involved in seeing effigies
of living, acting, and even speaking persons, who were at the same time
silent . . . [M]usic was introduced not to supply them with the life they
lacked – this became its aim only in the era of total ideological planning –
but to exorcise fear or help the spectator absorb the shock.
Motion-picture music corresponds to the whistling or singing child in the
dark. (Adorno and Eisler 1994 [1947], 75)
This view was echoed by Kracauer, who found soundless moving pictures
‘a frightening experience’ and that film music had a beneficial effect on
them: ‘Ghostly shadows, as volatile as clouds, thus become trustworthy
shapes’ (Kracauer 1960, 134–5). More mundanely, the use of exciting or
tear-jerking musical accompaniments of an increasingly elaborate nature
became perhaps the most effective mechanism for persuading spectators
willingly to suspend their disbelief. As Claudia Gorbman has pointed out,
this process – as familiar in the modern sound film as it was in the silent
cinema – conveniently involved an abrogation of critical faculties, rendering
the viewer ‘an untroublesome viewing subject’: ‘When we shed a tear during
a pregnant moment in a film melodrama . . . instead of scoffing at its
excess, music often is present, a catalyst in the suspension of judgment’
(Gorbman 1987, 5–6). Thus film-makers from the early days used music as
‘their panacea for encouraging audience empathy’ (Bazelon 1975, 13). This
concept was expressed as early as 1926 by Paul Ramain:
all that is required of the orchestra in the cinema is to play harmonious
background music with the idea not of being heard but of creating an
atmosphere to sink us into our subconscious and make us forget the
rustling paper, the shuffling feet, etc. in the auditorium . . . The role of
music is therefore subsidiary, helping to put us in a trance with a vague
background hum. (quoted in Mitry 1998, 248)
Cognitive psychologists have begun the daunting task of attempting to

explain how the brain’s functions enable this to happen (Cohen 2000,
365–8).
The birth of film music

The origins of film music are traditionally traced to Paris in the early 1890s,
where Emile Reynaud’s animated Pantomimes lumineuses were presented
in November 1892 with piano music specially composed by Gaston Paulin,
and a showing of short films by the Lumière brothers in December 1895
received a piano accompaniment from Emile Maraval, and a harmonium
accompaniment when their show opened in London in the following year.
At the launch of Vitascope in a New York music hall in April 1896, Dr
Leo Sommer’s Blue Hungarian Band performed. The experimental film-
maker Georges Méliès played the piano himself for the Paris première of
his Le Voyage dans la lune in 1902. These ventures continued the long-
standing practice of accompanying other types of popular entertainment,
such as magic-lantern shows, vaudeville and melodrama, with appropriate
music.
Many nineteenth-century lantern shows were elaborate affairs carefully
sequenced for dramatic effect, and bolstered by narration and (even in the
case of some illustrated scientific lectures) appropriate musical accompa-
niment. ‘Illustrated songs’, in which popular tunes were accompanied by
lantern slides while the audience sang along, were one form of entertain-
ment that was carried over directly into early cinemas, which in the first part
of the silent era continued to provide a varied bill of vaudeville-style fare;
early projectors combined both motion-picture and lantern-slide technol-
ogy (Altman 1996, 660–7). So popular were illustrated songs in the USA –
and so essentially different from the frequently melodramatic tone of
imported European films in the early days of silent movies – that Richard
Abel has plausibly suggested they were responsible not only for the initial
success of the nickelodeon industry (see below) but also as an early example
of a distinctively American psychology that would come to be important
in the later development of a national cinematic style (Abel and Altman
2001, 150–1). Illustrated songs gradually disappeared from nickelodeons
in 1910–13, perhaps in response to a widespread desire for movies to be
taken more seriously: this new-found aura of respectability required silent
contemplation on the part of the audience, and an avoidance of popular
culture.
Although it would be decades before synchronized pre-recorded sound
established itself in the cinema, several leading inventors attempted to com-
bine image and sound in this way as early as the 1890s. Thomas Edison’s
Kinetograph, on which work began in 1889, was developed specifically to
provide a visual enhancement to music reproduced on his already successful
phonograph – a reversal of the more common subordinance of music to
visual image that soon came to dominate mainstream cinema. Both Edison’s
Kinetograph (camera) and Kinetoscope (projector) were conceived with the

aim of synchronizing image and sound, and it is now known that Edison
took the credit for some technological marvels that had in fact been invented
by others (Allen and Gomery 1985, 57–8); but, no matter who was respon-
sible for it, the challenge of synchronization proved to be too ambitious for
its time and the handful of Kinetophone sound films his team produced had
unsynchronized accompaniments. After other devices for recording accom-
paniments on disc or cylinder were demonstrated at the Paris Exposition in
1900, some film-makers furthered the attempt to use pre-recorded sound; in
Germany, Oskar Messter worked on his Kosmograph disc system from 1903
onwards and began to release Tonbilder films in 1908 with recorded music,
and films of musical numbers accompanied by ‘an incredible gramophone
synchronized to the pictures and driven by compressed air’ enjoyed popu-
larity in Sweden in 1908–9 (Lack 1997, 14–15). These experiments were less
than satisfactory on account of poor synchronization, lack of amplification
and the need to change sound cylinders or discs every five minutes or so.
The absence of a standardized system also meant that the initiatives were
not commercially viable: apart from a short-lived revamping of Edison’s
Kinetophone productions in 1913–14, such ventures had already dwindled
in importance around 1910.
As the craze for moving pictures spread, the nature of their musical
accompaniment varied considerably according to the context in which they
were shown. Mechanical instruments were popular initially, and these pre-
served an audible link with the fairground; even as late as 1913, three-
quarters of projection venues surveyed in San Francisco still had nothing
but mechanical music, and close on 90 per cent had provision for it (Altman
1996, 685). Nevertheless, live music was always common, especially in cases
where touring motion-picture attractions were presented in vaudeville the-
atres or music halls to the accompaniment of the venues’ resident ensembles.
This appears to have been the case with tours of the Vitascope and Biograph
shows and similar attractions in both the USA and Europe during the later
1890s; in Paris, café-concert and music-hall entertainments also came to
include motion pictures, which formed part of the bill of fare at famous
venues such as the Olympia and Folies-Bergère. The German entrepreneurs
Max and Emil Skladanowsky toured Scandinavia with their Bioskop show
in 1896, and the incomplete set of performing parts that survives reveals
the musical accompaniment to have included both specially composed cues
and an extract from Glinka for use with a sequence depicting a Russian
dance. Another compilation, similar in function, was prepared by Leopold
Wenzel for a royal cinematographic show at Windsor Castle in 1897 (Marks
1997, 30–50). The American touring exhibitor D. W. Robertson set out with
a newly purchased Edison Kinetoscope in 1897 and by 1906 was advertising
shows with ‘descriptive musical accompaniment’ (Abel and Altman 2001,

125).
The success of these and other itinerant motion-picture enterprises led
to a major boom in the establishment of nickelodeons in the USA, which
began to appear in c.1905 and numbered some 10,000 by 1910; after their
humble beginnings, these establishments catered for increasingly discern-
ing audiences who would pay more for luxuries such as comfortable seats
and music. A parallel development in France, also beginning in 1905–6, saw
Charles Pathé and Léon Gaumont establish salles de cinéma in numerous
provincial towns. It was in venues such as these that the initial showbooth-
style ‘cinema of attractions’ became gradually supplanted by more sub-
stantial films with a strong narrative orientation, and with these came more
ambitious musical accompaniment. Comments published in the trade press
seem to indicate that a perceived need for incidental music was growing
stronger by c.1907 and that, by c.1911, music accompanying the picture
was regarded as more useful than the independent musical numbers that
had been performed previously; musical provision also became increasingly
standardized as a result of the systematic attempts of production compa-
nies to promote a consistent manner of film accompaniment in preference
to the widely contrasting types of aural stimulation on offer at various
establishments, which had formerly been regarded by the latter as compet-
itive selling-points (Altman 1996, 677–9, 690). The production companies
did this partly through the medium of live demonstrations, either given
by touring representatives or by invitation to exhibitors to attend presenta-
tions at major urban venues, especially in the period 1911–14 (Altman 2004,
272–3).
Categories of film music

At an early stage it was recognized that there were two fundamentally dif-
ferent types of film music. On the one hand, the music might be what
modern film scholars describe as diegetic: in other words, it formed part
of the film’s narrative world (diegesis) and its purported source was often,
though not exclusively, visible on the screen. On the other hand, the music
might be nondiegetic, serving as appropriate background listening. Diegetic
music-making in the visual image could easily be matched by a synchro-
nized instrumental or vocal accompaniment – whether supplied live or on
a gramophone recording – and this procedure became especially popu-
lar in c.1907–8 (Altman 1996, 682), being referred to specifically as ‘cue
music’. As greater attention was paid to the provision of nondiegetic music,
such accompaniments drew increasingly on features of the well-established
symbiosis between music and drama that had in the nineteenth century
shaped the development of major theatrical genres such as opera, ballet and
(above all) melodrama (Shapiro 1984). According to one early twentieth-
century commentator, the basis of the musical component in melodrama
(‘which accompanies the dialogue and reflects the feeling and emotion of the
spoken lines’) is simplicity of construction and subservience to the words:
‘It usually accompanies the most sentimental passages in the play . . . , fol-
lowing the hero and heroine most obstinately. But the villain too will have
his little bit of tremolo to help him along his evil path’ (O’Neill 1911, 88).
Recapitulation is used ‘to remind the audience of a previous situation’, later
a standard film-music technique; but on the whole ‘both music and drama
of this class have no great artistic value. The music is simply called in to
bolster up the weakness of the drama. It is used to stimulate (by what I may
call unfair means) the imagination of the audience, and to help the actor’
(O’Neill 1911, 88).
Since many influential silent-film directors had been schooled in melo-
drama, the transferral of its characteristics to the silver screen was inevitable.
Stagings of melodrama had utilized live organ or orchestral incidental music
to enhance the audience’s emotional response and to suggest character types
or geographical locations, the choice of appropriate music being indicated
in the scripts and aided by the existence of anthologies of specially selected
musical extracts. These were all features of early film music, which directly
inherited melodramatic clichés such as the use of string tremolo and delicate
pizzicato for tension and furtiveness respectively, and loud stinger chords
to emphasize physical action or rousing lines (Gorbman 1987, 33–5; Marks
1997, 28). These simple devices, combined with background music lulling
the spectator into an uncritical state, remained useful in inferior melodra-
matic film drama because, as Yves Baudrier put it, ‘if the music is taken away,
there is a risk of losing the necessary minimum emotional warmth which
must exist for us to believe (however temporarily) in the sentiments we are
supposed to be feeling, attracting, through a sort of magic, the complicity
of the audience’ (quoted in Mitry 1998, 253).
The importance of music as a mood-enhancer in early cinema was
reflected in the common practice of having live or recorded music played on
film sets during shooting to inspire the actors, a procedure later occasion-
ally used in the making of sound films by directors such as John Ford,
Alfred Hitchcock (who, while shooting The Birds, used a drummer on
set to terrify the actors in the absence of the film’s sophisticated avian
sound effects), Stanley Kubrick, Sergio Leone, David Lynch, Ken Russell
and Peter Weir. Cecil B. DeMille, for example, used the slow movement of
Dvořák’s New World Symphony to establish the mood for his portrayal of
1.1 Live music-making was often employed to inspire actors during the shooting of silent films, as seen here in
the making of The Little French Girl, directed by Herbert Brenon in 1925. (Museum of the Moving Image)
the Exodus in The Ten Commandments (1923). Geraldine Farrar, a silent-

film star who combined careers as an opera singer and screen actress,
recalled that after her first experiment with using an on-set pianist to
inspire her performance, ‘I always had a musician at my elbow whose
soulful throbs did more to start my tears than all the glycerine drops or
onions more frequently employed by less responsive orbs’ (quoted in Karlin
1994, 162). The image of music as a substitute for glycerine was echoed
by later observers of film-making practices, and contemporaneous com-
mentators found some pathos-inducing music laughably self-indulgent,
for example Alphons Czibulka’s Wintermärchen (1891), its theme identi-
cal with the contemporaneous hit tune Hearts and Flowers by Theo Tobani.
The most stereotyped and clichéd idioms used to accompany silent films
survived into the sound era almost exclusively in a context of parody, figur-
ing prominently in comedy and cartoon scores; but the tributes were often
affectionate.
Improvised accompaniments to screenings of silent films might typi-

cally be provided by a pianist or harmonium player, sometimes resourceful
enough simultaneously to play piano with one hand and harmonium with
the other (Huntley [1947], 25). In its idealized but rarely attained form, a
good keyboard accompaniment mediated between the image and the spec-
tator, just as an effective pre-composed score would come to do in the sound
cinema: as Bernard Herrmann later observed, film music may be considered
as ‘the communicating link between the screen and the audience, reaching
out and enveloping all into one single experience’ (Herrmann 1945, 17). One
major advantage of improvised accompaniments was their ability, when skil-
fully executed, to lend a sense of continuity to the narrative; film music in the
later silent era was sometimes continuous from start to finish, though pre-
arranged compilation scores (see below) tended to be highly sectionalized;
strategically placed gaps in the aural continuum were also sometimes nec-
essary merely for practical reasons. The ability of all kinds of music to create
continuity and enhance a sense of momentum became increasingly evident
in the second decade of the century. Kurt London believed that the raison
d’être for film’s musical accompaniment was ‘the rhythm of the film as an art
of movement’ (London 1936, 35). Kracauer described music as ‘a meaning-
ful continuity in time’ and declared that music in film causes us to perceive
‘structural patterns where there were none before. Confused shifts of posi-
tions reveal themselves to be comprehensible gestures; scattered visual data
coalesce and follow a definite course. Music makes the silent images partake
of its continuity’ (Kracauer 1960, 135). Mitry concluded that the ‘real time’
component of music ‘provides the visual impressions with the missing time
content by giving them the powers of perceptible rhythm’ (Mitry 1998, 265)
and felt that musical continuity was necessary to compensate for what he
felt was an inherent inadequacy of film editing:
it is all too apparent that the editing of a series of fixed shots establishes a
feeling of continuity but is unable, unlike moving shots, to create the sensation
of the continuous, since this sensation is reconstructed intellectually and
not perceived as such – which means that reality appears as though it were
an idea or memory; or, to put it another way, it appears restructured.
(Mitry 1998, 162)
The habitual use of intertitles to convey information or dialogue essential

to the narrative was a major impediment to the continuity of silent films,
though the ease with which they could be replaced by intertitles in different
languages for export was one factor contributing to the rapid international
dissemination of new releases.
Another of music’s many functions was to play mild intellectual games
with the film’s spectators, who might be amused by appropriate references
to certain popular songs they were already familiar with through participa-
tion in illustrated-song shows. This practice proliferated in the first decade
of the century when the popular-song industry enjoyed its own boom,
but as early as 1910 at least one commentator had noted that it was an
entirely pointless procedure if members of the audience failed to recognize,
or did not know, the song being quoted (Abel and Altman 2001, 238). These
topical allusions were sometimes unaccountably light-hearted even during
serious scenes: for example, at a British screening of The Queen of Sheba
(dir. William Fox, 1921) the ensemble cheerfully trotted out ‘Thanks for
the Buggy Ride’ during the spectacular chariot race (Karlin 1994, 156). One
technical manual went so far as to lambast such musical puns as ‘not only
worthless, but offensive’ (Beynon 1921, 2). Such literal-mindedness in the-
matic allusion persists in mainstream narrative cinema, which frequently
draws on appropriate song tunes which the audience might be expected to
recognize. Tin Pan Alley songs and jazz standards are today usually heard
as diegetic performances, since these seem marginally less contrived than
thematic allusions in the nondiegetic score; the tunes are often rendered
by instruments alone in an attempt to make the allusion subtler by sup-
pressing the relevant lyrics. Woody Allen’s Manhattan (1979) and Hannah
and Her Sisters (1981) provide good examples of the use of appropriately
entitled instrumental standards in their nondiegetic music tracks, though
these are spotted with structural as well as punning intent (Marshall and
Stilwell 2000, 14). A far less subtle example occurs in An American in Paris
(1951; see Chapter 4) when Gene Kelly dances with his love in a jazz café
to the diegetic accompaniment of Gershwin’s ‘(It’s Very Clear) Our Love is
Here to Stay’ – and feels the need to point out the title to her in case it wasn’t
quite clear enough.
The popular classics were plundered for suitable extracts for use with
silent films, while the style of freshly composed cues drew heavily on the
idioms of romantic opera and operetta. The most influential by far was that
of Wagner, whose name is invoked time and again in contemporaneous
commentary on music in the silent cinema. A journal proclaimed in 1911
that all musical directors were disciples of Wagner (Flinn 1992, 15), and the
influence was manifested both in specific compositional techniques such as
the use of leitmotifs as both narrative and structural device – considered
to be a cutting-edge technique in early film music and persisting to the
present day, in spite of the attempts of later commentators to discredit it –
and in an aspiration towards unendliche Melodie in the interests of musico-
dramatic continuity. The Wagnerian ideal of the Gesamtkunstwerk became
applied to the cinematic medium as a whole, and the connection emphasized
the vital role played by music in shaping the impact of the drama (Paulin
2000).
Camille Saint-Saëns and film d’art

Original scores were rare in the early years of silent film. A singular example
came into being when French cinema, which achieved international market
dominance in 1906–10 largely through the phenomenal success of Charles
Pathé’s production company and the work of Léon Gaumont, attempted
to reach a high artistic plateau with the launching of the intensely the-
atrical style of film d’art. Unlike other film companies, the Société Film
d’Art employed renowned stage directors, screenplay writers, actors from
the Comédie Française and established composers in its striving for a quality
product. The best-known music by Camille Saint-Saëns, such as ‘The Swan’
from The Carnival of the Animals, was already familiar in French cinemas
(R. S. Brown 1994, 53), so it was logical enough that he be invited to compose
a score for Henri Lavédan’s eighteen-minute L’assassinat du Duc de Guise
(dir. André Calmettes and Charles Le Bargy), which launched film d’art on
17 November 1908 in a programme at the Salle Charras featuring two other
films with original music by Fernand Le Borne and Gaston Berardi.
The ever-practical Saint-Saëns made his film-scoring task easier by
reworking extracts from an unpublished work, his symphony Urbs Roma
(B. Rees 1999, 382) – and, according to a review of L’assassinat published two
weeks after its première screening, composed his film score ‘in front of the
screen as the film was being projected’ (quoted in Abel and Altman 2001, 54).
In contrast to the bittiness of much film music in this period, Saint-Saëns’
music for L’assassinat, performed by classical instrumentalists drawn from
the orchestras of the Concerts Colonne and Concerts Lamoureux, showed
how structural coherence could articulate the drama across relatively broad
time-spans, and it proved to be prophetic of the later mainstream film com-
poser’s art. Prophetic too was Saint-Saëns’ decision to recycle his film music
for concert use (as Op. 128, for the original ensemble scoring of wind, piano,
harmonium and strings), a procedure later adopted by many composers who
wished to rescue their film music from its ephemeral source; his publisher,
Durand, also issued a version for solo piano intended for use in projection
venues which could not afford the full ensemble.
Contemporaneous reviewers of L’assassinat declared that the promoters
of such productions ‘cannot imagine them without the help of a power-
ful music which from the point of view of the audience will replace the
human voice in the minute details of its expressivity . . . [T]here is the
great display, the whole kit and caboodle of invisible yet present music, the
mystery appropriate for cinematographic evocations’ (quoted in Abel and
Altman 2001, 50–1). The film received critical acclaim in France, though
some observers lamented its utter subservience to old-fashioned theatrical-
ity, and others later exhibited it with designedly ridiculous music (Sadoul
1948, 541). It exerted a powerful influence on global film production, which

quickly turned to canonic works of literature – and even opera – as fodder
for more ambitious silent-film treatments. In the UK, an early original score
was written by operetta composer Edward German for the Ealing film Henry
VIII in 1911 (Huntley 2002); in the USA, original scores did not begin to be
produced in earnest until later in the decade.
Cue sheets and anthologies

Production companies had meanwhile begun to take a keen interest in the
nature of the music that might accompany exhibitions of their products. In
1907, for example, Gaumont began publishing a weekly pamphlet entitled
Guide Musicale for distribution to exhibitors in France. In 1909, Edison
Pictures in the USA started publishing cue sheets in the pages of its Edi-
son Kinetogram to encourage the selection of appropriate musical numbers
from both classical and popular sources to accompany screenings of its
films, and a range of similar suggestions began to appear in the trade press.
A major motivation behind this initiative was the apparent ineptitude of
many movie-theatre pianists, amongst whom the standard of proficiency
was wildly variable. Few intelligent movie-goers seemed to agree with Jean
Cocteau’s opinion that ‘one can only love this pianist who created sound cin-
ema’ (quoted in Lacombe and Porcile 1995, 27). London recounted a typical
example of what was undoubtedly widespread audience dissatisfaction with
shoddy accompaniments:
a man in a cinema audience . . . had been sitting in long-suffering silence
while a very bad pianist accompanied the film. When the heroine was about
to seek an end of her troubles by plunging to a watery grave, he called out to
her image on the screen, in a voice full of disgust: ‘Take the pianist with you,
while you’re about it!’ (London 1936, 41)
In France, mediocre pianists were so commonplace that they had their own
name (tapeurs).
Cue sheets were supplemented by, and sometimes made specific refer-
ence to, more substantial published anthologies of motion-picture music
that were organized by mood or dramatic type. In France, no fewer than
30 such anthologies were available by 1910, and some original pieces
were specially commissioned for this purpose (Lacombe and Porcile 1995,
30–1) – a procedure that adumbrated the modern practice of setting
up music libraries from which pre-existing cues can be sourced rela-
tively cheaply. One of the first anthologies to appear in America was
Gregg A. Frelinger’s Motion Picture Piano Music, issued in 1909. Another
American pioneer of these publications was Max Winkler, who persuaded

his employer, the New York publisher Carl Fischer, to back the issuing of cue
sheets; Winkler claimed this occurred in 1912 but Altman has demonstrated
this date to be erroneous, the relevant initiative having probably dated from
as late as 1916 by which time many other rivals were involved in similar
enterprises (Altman 2004, 346–7). In Winkler’s own much-quoted words,
‘extracts from great symphonies and operas were hacked down to emerge as
“Sinister Misterioso” by Beethoven, or “Weird Moderato” by Tchaikovsky’
(Max Winkler 1951, 10). A popular favourite was Rossini’s William Tell
overture, which proved ideal for chases or what were termed ‘hurry’ scenes,
while Beethoven’s Coriolanus overture was deemed ‘suitable for tree-felling
or lumber-rolling’ (Irving 1943, 225).
In 1913 John S. Zamecnik, a former pupil of Dvořák’s, published a collec-
tion of 23 original keyboard cues as the first volume of a series entitled The
Sam Fox Moving Picture Music, his approach to the task showing a typical
predilection for short repeated segments. Other American publishers who
provided scores and parts for movie music were G. Schirmer and Morse
Preeman. In 1916, Walter C. Simon conceived a novel ‘Phototune’ format
in which eleven different eight- or sixteen-bar keyboard compositions were
superimposed in a single-page chart, the principal barlines extending unbro-
ken from the top to the foot of the page to show the alignment, and related
keys used ‘to enable the musician to instantly jump from place to place
on the sheet as may be desired’ (facsimile in Altman 2004, 264). Giuseppe
Becce’s Kinothek (its title a contraction of ‘Kinobibliothek’), published in
instalments in Berlin in 1919 and in the USA by Belwin, was a seminal
anthology, and Becce later collaborated with Hans Erdmann and Ludwig
Brav to produce the encyclopaedic Allgemeines Handbuch der Filmmusik in
1927. In 1924 Ernö Rapée, a Hungarian with wide experience of musical
direction in cinemas both in Europe and the USA, issued in New York his
Motion Picture Moods for Pianists and Organists, and followed this a year
later with an Encyclopaedia of Music for Pictures. Rapée recognized a general
paradox of film music, to which attention is still often drawn today:
If you come out of the theatre almost unaware of the musical

accompaniment to the picture you have just witnessed, the work of the
musical director has been successful. Without music the present day
audience would feel utterly lost. With it they should obtain an added
satisfaction from the show, and still remain unconscious of the very thing
which has produced that satisfaction. (quoted in Lack 1997, 34)
Several of the themes and techniques popularized by cue sheets and

anthologies such as Rapée’s, many of which were directly inherited from
melodrama, became clichés that remain firmly in the popular imagination:
for example, diminished-seventh chords for villains, ‘weepie’ love themes

on solo violin and the bridal march from Wagner’s Lohengrin for wedding
scenes. The last was brutally dismissed by Adorno and Eisler: ‘The per-
son who around 1910 first conceived the repulsive idea of using the Bridal
March from Lohengrin as an accompaniment is no more of a historical figure
than any other second-hand dealer’ (Adorno and Eisler 1994 [1947], 49).
Diminished-seventh harmony was routinely used for scenes of evil and vil-
lainy, as shown by a typical cue entitled ‘Treacherous Knave (Villain Theme,
Ruffians, Smugglers, Conspiracy)’ composed by Zamecnik for The Sam Fox
Moving Picture Music in 1927 (facsimile in Kalinak 1992, 62). The impor-
tance of this simple chord, already long outdated in concert music, as a
melodramatic device was outlined by a pianist in Anthony Burgess’s novel
The Pianoplayers (1986) recalling the basic instructions he had received from
his mentor as he embarked on the art of silent-film accompaniment:
Here’s a chord you can’t do without, he said, if you’re a picture palace

pianoplayer. You use it for fights, burst dams, thunderstorms, the voice of
the Lord God, a wife telling her old man to bugger off out of the house and
not come back never no more. And he showed me . . . Always the same like
dangerous sound, he said, as if something terrible’s going to happen or is
happening (soft for going to happen, loud for happening) . . . and you can
arpeggio them to make them like very mysterious.
(quoted in Kershaw 1995, 125)
‘Soft for going to happen, loud for happening’ was to remain an absolutely
fundamental approach to dynamics in much later film music.
So-called ‘special music’, expressly designed to accompany specific films,
became more common after c.1910. The idea originated in the use of musi-
cal extracts to accompany highly compressed silent films of popular operas,
which may be one reason why the subsequent development of film music
was so indebted to operatic prototypes. In 1911, for example, the commer-
cially successful Italian film Dante’s Inferno appropriated music from Boito’s
Mefistofele (Marks 1997, 73–4). In the same year, the Kalem Company in
the USA commissioned the first sustained series of special piano scores,
featuring the work of Walter C. Simon, an experienced theatre musician
who also published a Progress Course of Music for budding cinema pianists.
Simon’s highly sectionalized scores, which included one for the three-reel
Arrah-Na-Pogue (dir. Sidney Olcott, 1911), juxtaposed arrangements and
original compositions, consolidating existing performance practices. Many
of the items were structured on the principle that short segments could be
repeated ad lib. until a visual cue (e.g. an intertitle card) prompted a shift
to a new musical idea. Kalem’s venture was followed in 1913 by a similar
series of piano scores issued by Vitagraph. From c.1916 onwards there was a
proliferation of ‘photoplay’ library music arranged for flexible instrumen-

tation (ranging from large orchestras down to a violin-and-piano duo or
solo piano as a bare minimum), taking the form of both classical extracts
and original cues based on compositional principles similar to those in the
early keyboard anthologies. Prominent composers and arrangers of such
library music were Ernst Luz (Photoplay Music Co.), Zamecnik (Sam Fox
Photoplay Edition), J. C. Breil (Schirmer) and Otto Langey (Chappell).
Although such music was offered at competitive prices, and some of it was
evidently geared towards players of limited abilities (the difficulty of sight-
reading more elaborate ‘special’ scores in advanced keys having been one
factor which inhibited the widespread adoption of accompaniments based
on complex classical repertoire), interest in the idea was not as widespread
as might have been predicted, since many projection venues continued to
arrange their own music to cut costs. Similarly, as film music developed
during the sound era so studios came to realize that commissioning original
music was often cheaper than having to pay to use copyright material or
meet reproduction fees on existing recordings.
Venues and ensembles

The often modestly appointed nickelodeons were very different from the
luxurious picture palaces that became prominent in the second decade of
the twentieth century. The first venue of this kind, the Omnia-Pathé, opened
in Paris in December 1906; nearly five years later, the former hippodrome at
Place Clichy was transformed into the 3,400-seat Gaumont-Palace, featuring
a Cavaillé-Coll organ and, at the venue’s inauguration on 11 October 1911,
an orchestra of 60 conducted by Henri Fosse. A description of a Gaumont-
Palace programme from January 1913 reveals that an orchestral overture
was followed by the screening of short actualités (including a colorized
documentary about butterflies) and a comedy film, followed by an orchestral
entr’acte, after which came more documentaries and a two-part film about
Napoleon (Lacombe and Porcile 1995, 22, 27). The first of the gargantuan
American picture palaces was the Strand on Broadway, New York, which
opened in 1914 and could also seat in excess of 3,000 spectators; its music
was provided by a 30-piece orchestra and enormous Wurlitzer organ.
In keeping with the grandeur of the viewing facilities, serious narra-
tive films had grown considerably longer in duration and more sumptu-
ous in their production values. Most early movies were only one reel in
length, a single reel holding up to 1,000 feet of film stock and running for
approximately fifteen minutes at the projection speed of sixteen frames per
second often used in silent films (though shooting and projection speeds
could vary considerably: see Brownlow 1980). As multi-reel ‘feature’ films

became popular, so narrative continuity became even more important and
the more lavish production values seemingly cried out for correspondingly
elaborate musical accompaniment. It was not uncommon to exploit the per-
formance space by using antiphonal effects, such as the locating of trumpets
at the rear of the hall to provide an echo device in a Belfast tour of The Four
Horsemen of the Apocalypse (dir. Rex Ingram, 1921), screenings of which also
featured special sound effects to suggest the hooves of the galloping horses
(Huntley [1947], 27–8). Prestigious screenings were sometimes mounted
in revered theatrical venues. For example, Eugene Goossens conducted the
London Symphony Orchestra in the Royal Opera House for the screening of
a silent version of The Three Musketeers (dir. Fred Niblo), starring Douglas
Fairbanks and shown in the USA with a score by Louis Gottschalk. For the
London show, part of a season of silent epics mounted at the opera house
by United Artists in 1921–2, Goossens based his compilation score heavily
on the work of August Enna, an obscure composer whose music ‘fitted any-
thing, and also conveyed a spurious impression of great emotional depth,
making it very suitable for my purpose’ (quoted in Kershaw 1995, 128; see
also Morrison 2004, 176). In 1926, a silent film of Richard Strauss’s opera
Der Rosenkavalier was shown in the Dresden Opera House, not in a popular
projection venue – as Adorno and Eisler, who were disturbed by the cultural
implications of the venture, might well have preferred it to have been (see
Chapter 4). In 1925, the Paris Opéra hosted the première of Pierre Marodon’s
film Salammbô, featuring music by Florent Schmitt, and two years later
the same venue screened Abel Gance’s Napoléon (see below), with a lavish
accompaniment featuring live actors and full chorus. In New York, the finest
film-related musical performances were those masterminded by respected
music director Hugo Riesenfeld at picture palaces that rivalled opera houses
in their opulence; his classical credentials as a former leader of the Vienna
Opera and the Metropolitan Opera orchestras were impeccable.
Instrumental ensembles resident in movie theatres of varying sizes
ranged from duos (e.g. violin and piano, or piano and drums), through
small groups of five or six players up to (by the 1920s) large orchestras with
40 players or more – the formation of the latter in major cities in both the
USA and Europe sometimes resulting in a dwindling of the ranks of lead-
ing symphony orchestras. A lone pianist might be employed to accompany
films during the week, with an ensemble brought in for better-attended
weekend shows or to launch a high-profile new picture. Some featured
soloists, especially violinists and ‘funners’ who specialized in witty musical
commentaries, commanded considerable popular followings in their own
right (Berg 1976, 244–5). The small ensembles were often versatile. Cinema
organist Gaylord Carter recalled:
The first thing you had to have, if you had any kind of a combo, was the
drummer. So you could get the punches and rifle shots and cataclysmic
things like an earthquake. You’d need a trumpet for bugle calls. And it would
be nice to have a clarinet . . . You had to have usually one violin and a second
violin. You wouldn’t have a viola, but you’d have a cello and maybe a bass.
(interviewed in McCarty 1989, 49–50)
Violas were considered to be a dispensable luxury (London 1936, 46), and

they are still often omitted in the string arrangements of modern film
scores, which may feature just one rather than the two violin lines cus-
tomary in classical orchestras. Percussion was absolutely vital in providing
onomatopoeic effects. According to a contemporaneous report, a resource-
ful percussionist at the Bijou Dream theatre in New York in 1909 made the
screen characters appear to ‘talk, almost; they groan, they laugh, kiss, whisper
under his magic touch’ (Marks 1997, 67). Comic drumming effects in par-
ticular were a direct holdover from vaudeville. Alberto Cavalcanti noticed
that percussive effects could produce a far greater impact than realistic
sounds:
An airplane was flying towards us [on screen]. The music director ‘cut’ the
orchestra, and a strange, frightsome sound began, and got louder and
louder. It was nothing like an airplane, but very frightening. When I got
home I was still wondering how this noise was done. Then I got it. It was a
noise I had known all my life – an open cymbal beaten with two soft-headed
drumsticks. How familiar! Yet it had lost its identity, and retained only its
dramatic quality, used in conjunction with the picture. Pictures are clear and
specific, noises are vague. The picture had changed a cymbal noise into an
air-noise. That is why noise is so useful. It speaks directly to the emotions.
(Weis and Belton 1985, 109)
As Altman has shown (1996, 698–9), production of musical sound effects

was by no means restricted to the drummer, and the piano proved to be
equally versatile in capable hands: such diegetic effects appear to have dom-
inated accompanying music in c.1908–12.
Resident music directors were variously referred to as music illustra-
tors, fitters or synchronizers – the last term then used differently from its
modern application, in that synchronization was more a matter of finding
music of exactly the right length for a particular scene rather than attempt-
ing to tie its details to specific on-screen events (Kalinak 1992, 58). Music
directors were responsible for arranging and conducting appropriate reper-
toire drawn either from the classical extracts or short original pieces pub-
lished in anthologies, from cue sheets, or preparing freshly selected passages;
such pre-existing material might be linked by specially composed or impro-
vised transitions. The fact that music was often accorded a high degree of
importance is shown by the working practice of Riesenfeld, who habitually

edited segments of film himself or had the projector run at variable speeds
so that the images would fit better with the musical extracts he had selected
(Buhrman 1920).
Photoplayers and cinema organs

Silent-film pianists had frequently struggled with inferior instruments and
limited technique, one journal’s editorial making a plea that nickelodeon
pianos should either be tuned or burnt – and preferably replaced by instru-
mental groups (Moving Picture World, 3 July 1909). The piano and hum-
ble harmonium were supplanted in grander venues by mechanical key-
board instruments (photoplayers) which exploited up-to-date pneumatic
and electric technology to include integrated sound-effect mechanisms,
and then by specialized and highly versatile cinema organs, of which noted
manufacturers included Compton, Marr and Colton, Robert Morton, Estey,
Barton and Moller. The most imposing organs were made by Kimball and
Wurlitzer, both regarded as status symbols for any venue prosperous enough
to be able to afford them. Wurlitzer became involved in the motion-picture
industry in 1909 when they found an application for their mechanical instru-
ments as vehicles for nickelodeon ballyhoo, but from 1910 onwards they
devoted attention to the cinema organ and by 1916 organ sales had begun
to overtake the dwindling demand for photoplayers (Altman 2004, 335). At
the grand end of the spectrum was the Kimball organ at the Roxy Theatre,
New York, originally planned to have been played by no fewer than five
organists seated at five independent consoles – an ambitious scheme later
reduced to three performers, who nevertheless still had at their disposal a
total of eleven manuals and three pedal boards operating in excess of 300
stops.
Most theatre organs had at least two manuals, and the console could
often be raised and lowered on a special elevator for added visual impact;
translucent panels were designed to reveal patterns of coloured lights within
the instrument’s casing, and this enhanced the sense of virtuosic show-
manship. Capacity for mechanical sound effects was considerable and
could include the sounds of surf, hail, aeroplanes, birds, various whis-
tles (e.g. police, train and steamboat), horses’ hooves, fire gong, klaxon
horn, electric bell and a crockery-smashing effect comprising ‘a clev-
erly devised electro-pneumatic crane which literally drops metal plates
onto a metal surface below’ (Whitworth 1954, 308). Cavalcanti scathingly
observed that the provision of such novelties ‘will give you some idea
of the absurdity of referring to “the great days of the silent cinema”’
(Weis and Belton 1985, 101). Genuine untuned percussion instruments

(traps) were operated by thumb and toe pistons, with tuned percussion
(various metallophones, chimes and xylophones) played via the keyboards.
Ranks of pipes might be disposed antiphonally on opposing sides of the pro-
jection screen, and the enormous Christie instrument at London’s Marble
Arch Odeon even included full-length 32 reeds.
In many venues both organist and orchestra would be involved in per-
formances, with the organist playing a reduction of the orchestral music
for matinées and participating with the orchestra in the evening shows; it
was common practice for the organist gradually to start playing after the
orchestra had been in action for 30–45 minutes, allowing the instrumen-
talists to drop out one by one and take a break before reassembling for a
grand finale (McCarty 1989, 24). The organist might also be called upon to
provide improvised transitional passages between orchestral items. Organ-
ists were primarily required to imitate orchestral effects, and those who
sounded as if they were playing in church were unpopular. Among the most
respected American organists during the 1920s were Gaylord Carter, Milton
Charles, Jesse Crawford, Lloyd Del Castillo, Ann Leaf, John Muri, Henry B.
Murtagh, Albert Malotte and Alexander Schreiner, and their art was taken
sufficiently seriously for the Eastman School of Music in Rochester to be
founded specifically to provide instruction in it (McCarty 1989, 45), with
similar training provided by special schools in other American cities. Regi-
nald Foort made history by giving a radio broadcast from the organ of the
New Gallery Cinema in London’s Regent Street in 1926 and, along with
artists such as Quentin Maclean and Firmen Swinnen, helped establish the
cinema organ as a concert instrument in its own right.
The many composers and musicians who benefited from apprenticeships
as silent-film accompanists on piano and/or organ included composers such
as Jacques Ibert in France; Dmitri Kabalevsky, Dmitri Shostakovich and
Dimitri Tiomkin in the Soviet Union; and, in America, jazz musicians Count
Basie and Fats Waller. The cinema organ survived well into the sound era,
but playing standards continued to vary wildly. As late as the early 1950s,
one commentator lamented (in terms equally applicable to commercial film
music in general) that
the music demanded from the cinema organist by managements is only too
often cheap and tawdry. Frequently it is associated with songs of a sickly
sentimentality that has fostered an abuse of the tremulant and a paucity of
registration . . . Managers have a habit of insisting that this is the kind of
thing the public demands, forgetting or choosing to overlook that
picture-going audiences do not know what they want, but accept what they
are given and imagine it must be good if it is played to so large a public.
(Whitworth 1954, 309)
Music for silent epics

Among the most ambitious films distributed on the eve of the First World
War were the Italian historical epics that took the movie-going world by
storm in 1913–14. Quo vadis? (dir. Enrico Guazzoni, 1913) occupied nine
reels and for its New York screenings in 1914 was furnished with a score
compiled from music by composers such as Gounod, Puccini and Wagner
by exhibitor Samuel L. Rothapfel. Though musically uneducated, ‘Roxy’
Rothapfel was a sensitive businessman who felt that clichéd and over-
familiar music should be avoided, as should novelty trap drumming and
gratuitous sound effects; his quest for musical quality seems to have been
successful, since one reviewer remarked that the admission price for Quo
vadis? was justified by the music alone (Marks 1997, 97). The Punic War
epic Cabiria (dir. Giovanni Pastrone, 1914) was even more lavish, occupying
twelve reels and shot to a massive budget with thousands of extras. It was
furnished in Italy with a score compiled by Manlio Mazza from popular
classics linked by modulatory passages. For American showings of the film,
Mazza’s score was adapted by Joseph Carl Breil, a composer of incidental
music for stage plays who had compiled scores for various films d’art in
1911–13, among them the famous Sarah Bernhardt vehicle Queen Elizabeth
(dir. Louis Mercanton, 1912), for which Breil claimed his score was entirely
original apart from its (anachronistic) use of the British national anthem
to accompany the defeat of the Spanish Armada (Marks 1997, 102). Breil’s
adapted score for Cabiria – which, like his music for Queen Elizabeth, fea-
tured leitmotivic construction – was an extravagant affair scored for large
orchestra and unseen chorus. It undoubtedly served as a useful preparation
for his subsequent and influential collaboration with the ground-breaking
director D. W. Griffith, whose refinement of narrative editing techniques
and encouragement of a naturalistic style of acting established him as the
most important film-maker of the era.
Griffith’s Civil War epic The Birth of a Nation (1915), costing in excess of
$100,000 and the longest film so far made in the USA, met with phenom-
enal success and considerable controversy arising from its racist content –
which led to its being banned in numerous states and censored in others.
The film was first screened (under the title The Clansman) in Los Angeles
in February 1915 with a score compiled by Carli Elinor, who believed that
‘there was no need for original music since so many good tunes had already
been written’ (Darby and Du Bois 1990, 3). The theatre’s publicity proudly
proclaimed: ‘The arrangement and selection of the music for “The Clans-
man” was accomplished after a diligent search of the music libraries of Los
Angeles, San Francisco and New York. To select and cue the scenes it was
necessary to run the twelve reels comprising the story eighty-four times;
and also to render a perfect score six complete full orchestral rehearsals
were necessary’ (facsimile in Marks 1997, 134). Composers whose work was
featured in Elinor’s compilation included Beethoven, Bizet, Flotow, Mozart,
Offenbach, Rossini, Schubert, Suppé, Verdi and Wagner. A sextet of vocal
soloists joined the orchestra for certain items.
Breil’s hybrid score for this three-hour epic, partly original and partly
compiled, contained well over 200 individual musical cues and was first used
when the film was screened in New York in March 1915. The score appears
to have been prepared under the close supervision of Griffith himself, and
included metronome markings as an aid to synchronization (Karlin 1994,
161). The director evidently regarded the New York opening as more impor-
tant than the West Coast première, as suggested by reporter Grace Kingsley
in the Los Angeles Times (8 February 1915), who noted that Breil and Griffith
were collaborating on the score for the upcoming New York screenings and
commented that the music was to be
no less than the adapting of grand-opera methods to motion pictures! Each

character playing has a distinct type of music, a distinct theme as in opera.
A more difficult matter in pictures than in opera, however, inasmuch as any
one character seldom holds the screen long at a time. In cases where there
are many characters, the music is adapted to the dominant note or character
in the scene.
From now on special music is to be written in this manner for all the big
Griffith productions.
Breil’s original cues included a theme for ‘The Bringing of the African to
America’ which took its lead from Dvořák in its use of syncopation and
hints of pentatonicism, several numbers in popular dance forms (with a
clear penchant for waltz rhythm), an attempt to represent the diegetic music
sung by the character of Elsie Stoneman as she strums her banjo, and an
amoroso love theme. Civil War songs appeared alongside extracts from the
classics, the most memorable of which was the use of Wagner’s ‘Ride of the
Valkyries’ to accompany the equestrian riders of the Ku Klux Klan. According
to actress Lillian Gish, director and composer argued intensely over the
‘Valkyrie’ material: Griffith wanted some of the notes to be altered but Breil
refused to ‘tamper’ with Wagner, whereupon the director remarked that the
music was not ‘primarily music’ but rather ‘music for motion pictures’; he
clinched his argument by noting that ‘Even Giulio Gatti-Casazza, General
Director of the Metropolitan Opera, agreed that the change was fine’ (Gish
and Pinchot 1969, 152). Jane Gaines and Neil Lerner have demonstrated
how Breil’s syncopated ‘African’ theme (which acquired the label ‘Motif of
Barbarism’ when published in a piano album in 1916) was used throughout
the film to promote the image of black men as primitives (Abel and Altman
2001, 252–68). A simple repeated falling semitone in the bass was used to
punctuate and create tension in the scene in which Gus preys on Flora, this
technique looking ahead to modern economical scoring methods.
Breil’s love theme from The Birth of Nation met with success of its
own when it was entitled ‘The Perfect Song’ and furnished with lyrics for
publication; other selections from the score were issued in arrangements
for piano and for ensemble. These were amongst the earliest commercial
spin-offs in the history of film music, and later silent-film scores began to
include a ‘big theme’ in an attempt to cash in on the marketability of such
material. By 1927, the abuse of ‘theme scores’ had become so acute that one
commentator lamented the film composer’s tendency towards ‘theme-ing
an audience to death’ (quoted in Altman 2004, 376). In an early exam-
ple of using film tie-ins to sell independent popular songs, the faces of
Charlie Chaplin and other movie stars began to be featured on the covers
of sheet music, no matter how tenuous the connection between music and
film (Barrios 1995, 106). Major hit songs from film scores began with the
theme song to Mickey (dir. F. Richard Jones and James Young, 1918; music
by Neil Moret), and towards the end of the silent era million-copy sales
were achieved by Rapée’s songs ‘Charmaine’ and ‘Diane’, from What Price
Glory? (dir. Raoul Walsh, 1926) and Seventh Heaven (dir. Frank Borzage,
1927) respectively: the trend continued with hit songs from the Jolson vehi-
cle The Singing Fool during the transition to pre-recorded soundtracks (see
Chapter 2).
Breil’s and Griffith’s collaboration on Intolerance (1916) failed to equal
either the artistic or commercial success of The Birth of a Nation in spite of a
grossly excessive budget of nearly $2 million. Other joint projects included
The White Rose (1923) and America (1924); Breil also contributed original
music to films by other directors, including The Birth of a Race (dir. John
W. Noble, 1918). In 1930, after the introduction of the sound film, a com-
pressed version of The Birth of a Nation was released with a synchronized
orchestral score adapted from Breil’s by Louis Gottschalk, who had been
responsible for the music for several of Griffith’s later silent films (including
The Fall of Babylon, 1919). The familiarity of Breil’s score for The Birth of a
Nation on both sides of the Atlantic led to an increased interest in the com-
position of original film music, no doubt prompted by the realization that
the more sophisticated narrative structuring pioneered by Griffith seemed
to demand more sophisticated accompaniment. Breil had shown how the
character of individual Wagnerian leitmotifs could be transformed to serve
dramatic developments: as he himself put it in 1921, ‘the motif must in its
further presentations be varied to suit the new situations. And the greatest
development of the theme must not appear in the early part of the score, but
towards the end where is the climax of the whole action’ (quoted in Marks
1997, 156).
An entirely original score was composed for The Fall of a Nation (dir.
Thomas Dixon, 1916) by Victor Herbert who, like some later commen-
tators, objected to the use of pre-existing classical music on account of
the potential distraction it offered to an audience already familiar with the
material. (However, as Mitry pointed out (1998, 31), visual images of famil-
iar objects can just as easily conjure up distracting personal reactions in a
viewer.) According to a review in Musical America, ‘Mr. Herbert’s stimu-
lating score clearly indicates the marked advance that music is making in
the domain of the photoplay and should prove encouraging to composers
who have not yet tried their hand at this type of work’ (quoted in Karlin
1994, 161). The Fall of a Nation proved to be Herbert’s sole venture into film
scoring, but others were more prolific: among the notable composers of orig-
inal scores in the USA were William Axt, Gottschalk, Henry Hadley, Leo
Kempinski, Ernst Luz, David Mendoza, Joseph Nurnberger (who supplied
an overture to Elinor’s score for Griffith’s The Clansman), William F. Peters,
Rapée, Riesenfeld, Victor Schertzinger (including a score for Thomas Ince’s
Civilization, 1916), Louis Silvers, Mortimer Wilson and Zamecnik. Several of
these had started their careers in film as cue-sheet compilers, and some col-
laborated with others in joint arrangements. A well-known pairing was Axt
and Mendoza, who provided music for Ben-Hur (dir. Fred Niblo, 1925) and
many other Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer productions; such team efforts contin-
ued as a familiar working pattern in Hollywood music departments during
the early sound era. It remained common for individual films to be screened
with different scores in different locations: The Four Horsemen of the Apoc-
alypse, for example, was scored independently by Axt, Gottschalk, Luz and
Riesenfeld (McCarty 2000, 119). High-profile original scores composed on
the eve of the advent of sound films were Wilson’s The Thief of Bagdad
(dir. Raoul Walsh, 1924), and Riesenfeld’s The Covered Wagon (dir. James
Cruze, 1923), Beau Geste (dir. Herbert Brenon, 1926) and Sunrise (dir. F. W.
Murnau, 1927) – the last reissued with synchronized recorded music in the
same year as the phenomenal success of The Jazz Singer marked the demise
of the silent film.
Although original scores were generally favourably received, Wilson’s
landmark contribution to The Thief of Bagdad was harshly criticized in one
review for its harmonic boldness that incorporated ‘bizarre extensions, aug-
mentations, depleted sixteenths, vigorous minor forte passages and other
incongruous music idioms under the guise of oriental music’, the com-
plainant picking up on the press agent’s infelicitous hyperbole to ask: ‘When
the music of the world is at the disposal of an arranger and the libraries are
rich in beautiful numbers, written by renowned composers, suitable for

accompanying such a delightfully fantastic picture, why worry any one man
to write a new “note for every gesture”?’ (quoted in Anderson 1987, 288–9).
Charlie Chaplin and music for comedies

One successful director and star of silent films who took music especially
seriously was Chaplin, who began his acting career as a protégé of the
silent-comedy director Mack Sennett in 1913. In the following year Chaplin
starred in Sennett’s feature-length Tillie’s Punctured Romance (1914), which
includes a scene inside a typical nickelodeon of the day, complete with
pianist located to one side of the projection screen. Chaplin directed all his
own films from 1915 onwards and the popularity of his baggy-trousered
tramp character earned him a million-dollar contract with First National
in 1917. Chaplin liked to control all parameters of his films and as such can
be regarded as an early auteur director. A self-taught amateur musician, he
‘composed’ the music for many of his films, believing (like many of the more
didactically inclined film commentators of the time) that filmed entertain-
ment could expose to good music audiences who might not otherwise be
minded to listen to it. In reality, Chaplin depended heavily on the skills
of various orchestrators and arrangers in order to realize his sometimes
primitive musical raw material. On the evidence of the music by Eric James
and Eric Rogers accompanying the 1971 re-release of Chaplin’s directorial
feature debut, The Kid (1921), a characteristic mixture of physical comedy
and melodrama, the main ingredients were a sentimental lyricism, mock-
sinister music for villains, circus slapstick for comic capers, a light operetta
style enlivened by occasional ragtime syncopations, folksy jauntiness, sten-
torian pomposity and banal Edwardian waltzes. Use might also be made of
familiar song melodies appropriate to the plot: examples are to be found in
Arthur Kay’s score to The Circus (1928), prepared under Chaplin’s super-
vision at the time and reconstructed by Gillian Anderson in 1993. Wilfrid
Mellers, commenting on Chaplin’s recourse to banality as a source of pathos,
described his music as a paradoxical ‘apotheosis of the trivial’ (Irving et al.
1954, 104).
After the advent of sound, Chaplin resisted dialogue but showed himself
keen to use synchronized music and sound effects in his films; he claimed
the credit for the music of all seven of his sound features for United Artists,
including City Lights (1931), The Great Dictator (1940) and Limelight (1952),
which won the Academy Award for Best Score when re-released in 1972. He
confessed that a major advantage bestowed on his work by the sound film
was the fact that he could now exert absolute control over the constitution
of the soundtrack and not be at the mercy of the exigencies of differing

projection venues, as was the case in the silent era. Among the composers
who assisted him were Arthur Johnston (City Lights), Meredith Willson
(The Great Dictator), Raymond Rasch and Larry Russell (Limelight). Carl
Davis later paid tribute to the consistency of Chaplin’s ideas: ‘how is it that
the Chaplin style maintains itself through widely differentiating and widely
changing arrangers? There is a line that goes through, no matter who is
working with him. He’s saying, “I like it like this,” he’s humming the tunes,
he’s making the decisions about the harmonies and orchestrations. There
are important lessons in melody and economy to be learned from Chaplin’s
music’ (quoted in E. James 2000, xv).
In Modern Times (1936), silent segments featuring typical Chaplin
clowning were juxtaposed with sometimes satirical sound elements; the
1.2 Charlie Chaplin (left) and David Raksin (right), reminiscing about their collaboration on
Modern Times (1936) after seeing a final print of Limelight in 1952.
elaborate score was conducted by Alfred Newman and arranged by Edward

Powell and newcomer David Raksin, who updated the silent-era idiom with
a greater use of ostinato and dissonance. Raksin recalled the collaboration:
Charlie would come in with these musical ideas and we would work on
them together, because he didn’t read or write music. It’s a total mistake for
people to assume that he did nothing. He had ideas. He would say, ‘No, I
think we should go up here, or we should go down there’ . . . But he had
fired me after a week and a half because he was not used to having anybody
oppose him. And I was just saying, ‘Listen, Charlie, I think we can do better
than this.’ Eventually, he hired me back on my own terms.
(interviewed in R. S. Brown 1994, 285)
Raksin recalled the friction coming to a head when he dared to suggest

Chaplin’s old-time music-hall idiom was vulgar; after his reinstatement on
the project he spent hours with Chaplin developing musical sketches while
running the film repeatedly in the projection room (Raksin 1985, 162).
During the subsequent recordings sessions, Newman snapped his baton and
refused to work with Chaplin when the latter accused his exceptionally fine
orchestra of complacency: the sessions had to be completed by orchestrator
Eddie Powell, Raksin having sided with Newman in the dispute (Raksin
1985, 170).
Newman’s and Raksin’s Chaplin-based score in places included examples
of a technique popularly known as ‘mickey-mousing’: illustrative musical
effects synchronized with specific events in a film’s physical action. The
term was derived from Walt Disney’s famous cartoon character (who first
appeared on screen in 1928), but the procedure had also been common in
music for live action: animation had borrowed some of its musical tech-
niques from the circus, vaudeville and silent live-action comedies such as
those starring Buster Keaton and Harold Lloyd. Gaylord Carter provided
organ music for many of Lloyd’s films in the later 1920s, and recalled how
the comedian instructed him to make effects with musical devices, such
as stinger chords, rather than resorting to realistic sound effects, and well
understood the power of music to bolster weaker moments in his films:
on one occasion Lloyd told the organist, ‘when they’re laughing, play soft.
It’s when they’re not laughing that I need you’ (McCarty 1989, 53–7). After
its initial popularity in serious sound films of the Hollywood Golden Era,
mickey-mousing became discredited for its essential redundancy and fre-
quent crudity, and even as early as 1911 some commentators had expressed
the opinion that comedies were best played without musical accompani-
ment to maximize their effectiveness (Altman 1996, 681).
Chaplin himself disliked mickey-mousing and strove to avoid it alto-

gether when adding synchronized music to his silent films after his reloca-
tion to Europe in 1952. Between 1958 and 1976 he worked in Switzerland
on new but old-fashioned scores to his classic comedies with his ‘music
associate’, Eric James, who was legally bound not to claim authorship of
any of the films’ music – even when on their final project he had to sug-
gest virtually all the material to the ailing Chaplin (E. James 2000, 66,
111–12). Like Raksin’s, James’s account of their collaboration reveals that
Chaplin could not read music, nor play the piano with any more than
three fingers, and would messily thump out tunes on the keyboard or
sing them, using a tape recorder to preserve his ideas if his music asso-
ciate were not present at the time, so that they could be polished, har-
monized and subsequently scored: the process often took an inordinate
length of time, with great attention paid to detail and much irascibility
on Chaplin’s part. An unusual form of shorthand, which demonstrated
how unoriginal his thematic style could be, was to jot down verbal aides-
mémoire indicating, for example, ‘first two notes of Grieg’s “Morning”, next
four notes, those in the opening bars of Liszt’s “Liebesträume”’ and so on
(E. James 2000, 71). His obsessive desire to control all aspects of the sound-
track extended to personal interventions at recording sessions, on matters
concerning both recording levels and aspects of scoring – James learning that
if he cued principal melodies into various alternative instruments’ perform-
ing parts in advance it would save considerable time when Chaplin changed
his mind.
Early film music in Europe and the Soviet Union

The early market dominance of French and Italian film productions was
checked by the First World War, which effectively allowed Hollywood to
take the lead, though for a time film-making continued to flourish in those
Scandinavian countries that took no part in the conflict. During the early
war years, a major Hollywood studio could easily release several feature films
per week, going on to make massive profits through distribution practices
such as enforced block-booking and the monopolization of theatre owner-
ship. At the end of the First World War, 90 per cent of all films shown in
Europe were of American origin (D. Cook 2004, 41). As European cinema
regained its strength during post-war reconstruction, it was not uncom-
mon for established composers of concert music to compose film scores
for major silent productions, this situation contrasting sharply with that
prevailing in the USA. As Bernard Herrmann once remarked of later Holly-
wood practice, ‘America is the only country in the world with so-called “film
composers” – every other country has composers who sometimes do films’

(quoted in Thomas 1997, 189).
In France, several prestigious scores accompanied bold films made by
young avant-garde directors associated with the film theorist Louis Delluc.
One of the most memorable of these so-called ‘impressionist’ films was Mar-
cel L’Herbier’s L’inhumaine (1924), featuring a score by Darius Milhaud and
described by David Cook as ‘an essay in visual abstraction thinly disguised
as science-fiction; it ends with an apocalyptic montage sequence designed
to synthesize movement, music, sound, and color [tinting]’ (D. Cook 2004,
305). Swiss composer Arthur Honegger was asked to provide scores for Abel
Gance’s La Roue (1922), which Cocteau deemed to be as important to the
development of cinema as Picasso had been to the development of painting,
and Napoléon (1927), a film which Gance himself described as ‘music of light
which, gradually, will transform the great cinemas into cathedrals’ (Ballard
1990, xxi). According to Henri Colpi, Gance drew his cinematic inspiration
from musical structures: he used musical notation to help him edit part of
La Roue, this notation then being passed on to Honegger so that he could
match the filmic rhythm with appropriate music (R. S. Brown 1994, 20);
but Honegger testified to Mitry that he in fact ‘ran out of time and did not
compose a single note for La Roue. He merely assembled an arrangement
with special sound effects’ (Mitry 1998, 384). Famously, the breathless edit-
ing in the film’s depiction of the rapid motion of a train inspired Honegger’s
mechanistic symphonic poem Pacific 231 (1924), a score which later formed
the basis for filmic interpretations by Mikhail Tzekhanovsky (1933) and by
Mitry himself (1949). Before his collaboration with Honegger, Gance had
already conducted notable experiments with the music for his films, using
it as a potent structural tool: for example, in La Dixième symphonie (1917;
music by Michel-Maurice Lévy), the continuity of the score compensated
for, and complemented, the designedly bitty nature of the film’s treatment
of the process of assembling a symphony worthy to succeed Beethoven’s
Ninth (Lack 1997, 36–7).
Gance had been strongly influenced by Griffith’s Intolerance, both in
specific shooting and editing techniques and in a tendency towards mega-
lomania. Napoléon originally ran to 28 reels in length, itself merely the first
part of a planned six-film cycle, and was designed to have images shown on
three screens simultaneously using the Polyvision process; Gance claimed
that he developed this triple-screen presentation in order to realize his ambi-
tion that the ‘visual harmony’ and complexity of cinematic images should
become directly analogous to a musical symphony (Lacombe and Porcile
1995, 34). Similar parallels were drawn by other French film-makers and
theorists such as Emile Vuillermoz (‘composition in the cinema is with-
out a doubt subject to the confined laws of musical composition. A film is
written and orchestrated like a symphony’), Léon Moussinac (‘cinegraphic

rhythm . . . has an obvious counterpart in musical rhythm . . . the images
being to the eye what the musical sounds are to the ear’), Germaine Dulac
(‘only music is capable of stimulating the same sort of impression as the cin-
ema . . . the visual idea . . . is inspired by musical technique far more than any
other technique or ideal’) and Léopold Survage (‘The basis of my dynamic
art is colored visual form (serving a similar function to that of sound in
music)’: quotations from Mitry 1998, 111–13). Survage declared the struc-
tural functions of musical and cinematic rhythm to be similar, though such
parallels were felt to be specious by Mitry and many others (Mitry 1998,
118). Nevertheless, an overriding concern to achieve audio-visual ‘rhythm’
was an explicit preoccupation in Gance’s screenplay for Napoléon and its
visual realization. While shooting, Gance had music played on set by a trio
of violin, cello and organ, claiming (somewhat more prosaically) that it was
necessary ‘not only to give the mood, but to keep everyone quiet. You can
capture their attention more easily by the use of music. In the scene where
the young Napoleon lies on the cannon . . . he had to cry in that scene. He
couldn’t, until the musicians played Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata’ (quoted
in Anderson 1988, xlii). During editing, some elaborate montage sequences
were cut to fit music that had already been composed. The screenplay called
for the Marseillaise and Dies irae to take starring roles: in a deleted scene,
the organist playing the latter ‘looks up with strange, terrible eyes . . . stops
playing momentarily, and says in solemn, terrifying tones: “I am burying
the Monarchy!”’ (Ballard 1990, 40). Later versions of the film with synchro-
nized sound featured a form of stereophonic reproduction for Honegger’s
score (D. Cook 2004, 308) and alternative music by Henry Verdun, a former
silent-film pianist who hailed from the music halls and did not possess an
academic background (Lacombe and Porcile 1995, 48).
Erik Satie composed an idiosyncratic score for Entr’acte (dir. René Clair,
1924), a short avant-garde film, designed to be screened between the two
acts of Francis Picabia’s Dadaist ballet Relâche, which (like many provocative
artistic events in Paris at the time) came close to provoking riots amongst its
first audiences. Satie not only composed the music: he also appeared in the
film (as Milhaud was later to do in La P’tite Lilie), clutching his umbrella and
appearing to jump off the terrace of the Théâtre des Champs-Elysées. Surre-
alist and witty, the essentially non-narrative Entr’acte was matched by frag-
mentary music which, while referring ironically to contemporaneous pop-
ular styles in places and wryly distorting Chopin’s Funeral March to accom-
pany shots of a camel-drawn cortège, remained as detached and dispassion-
ate as its composer’s concert works (Marks 1997, 167–85). As Stravinsky later
commented of Satie’s importance to twentieth-century music in general, he
opposed to ‘the vagueness of a decrepit impressionism a precise and firm
language stripped of all pictorial embellishments’ (Stravinsky 1936, 93).

Satie’s music, which was revived in a synchronized re-release of Entr’acte
in 1967, was considerably ahead of its time in its use of obsessive repeti-
tion (easier to synchronize than fully blown themes, as later film composers
were to discover) and fragmentary, unrelated ideas in a kaleidoscopic aural
montage ideally suited to the creative dissolves, superimpositions and trick
photography of Clair’s cinematography. At times Satie chose to draw out
the black humour in the images: for example, popular dance-hall clichés
are heard when we see, in slow motion, the mourners cavorting behind the
cortège. When they begin to run after the out-of-control hearse, however,
the music turns surprisingly sombre and eventually builds up an extraordi-
nary momentum for the frenetic and dizzying rollercoaster ride with which
the film concludes. Some sense of autonomous structure is created by Satie’s
use of a spiky and insistent ritornello figure for the full ensemble, serving
as an obvious musical punctuation mark whenever it recurs.
Less adventurous composers active in the French silent cinema were
Marius François Gaillard (El Dorado, dir. L’Herbier, 1921), Roger Des-
ormière (A quoi rêvent les jeunes films?, dir. Henri Chomette, 1924), Henri
Rabaud (Le Miracle des loups, dir. Raymond Bernand, 1924; Le Joueur
d’échecs, dir. Bernand, 1925) and Yves de La Casinière, who collaborated
with Cavalcanti (Rien que les heures, 1927; En Rade, 1928). Concert com-
poser Jacques Ibert provided music for Clair’s Un Chapeau de paille d’Italie
(1927), while Le Mensonge de Nina Petrovna (dir. Hanns Schwarz, 1929)
launched the career of Maurice Jaubert, celebrated in the 1930s as the doyen
of French film composers (see Chapter 8).
Cinema in Germany before the First World War featured substantial
compilation and hybrid scores, such as those by Joseph Weiss for Der Stu-
dent von Prag (dir. Stellan Rye, 1913), its Faustian scenario treated in a
refreshingly non-theatrical manner, and by Becce for Richard Wagner (dir.
Carl Froelich and William Wauer, 1913). Expressionism and Angst took
their hold on post-war German cinema after the impact of Das Cabinet des
Dr Caligari (dir. Robert Wiene, 1919), which was screened in New York
in 1921 with an unorthodox selection of modern music by Debussy, Mus-
sorgsky, Richard Strauss, Prokofiev, Ornstein, Schoenberg and Stravinsky
(Altman 2004, 315), all arranged by Rothapfel and Rapée. Traditional com-
pilation scores continued to be prepared in Germany by Becce, Erdmann
and Friedrich Holländer for the films of F. W. Murnau (including Nosfer-
atu, 1922) and other seminal directors. Gottfried Huppertz prepared the
score for Fritz Lang’s Siegfried (1923), which retold the Wagnerian myth
without the accompaniment of Wagner’s music. Lang detested Wagner, and
resented the addition of Wagnerian cues to the film when it was shown out-
side Germany (D. Cook 2004, 98): in the USA, for example, Siegfried was
screened in 1925 with a compilation score by Riesenfeld. Huppertz provided

lush music for Lang’s futuristic Metropolis (1927), couched in an expansive
idiom clearly influenced by Strauss and Zemlinsky but in places hinting at
the harmonic adventurousness of early Schoenberg. Rooted in leitmotivic
procedures, including use of pre-existing themes such as the Dies irae and
the Marseillaise (which is subjected to distortion when the underground
workers turn rebellious), Huppertz’s music includes mechanistic writing
for machinery, dark-hued textures for the subterranean setting, an opulent
Viennese waltz for flirtation in the gardens, pulsating and struggling music
for the building of the Tower of Babel, delicate love music, and atmospheric
impressionism for special effects such as the creation of the robot.
The Viennese composer Edmund Meisel achieved international fame
with his music for German screenings of Soviet director Sergei Eisenstein’s
controversial The Battleship Potemkin (1925). One of at least three indepen-
dent scores composed for the film at the time, Meisel’s music remains the
best known on account of the scandal it created: its hard-hitting idiom was
deemed sufficiently disturbing as to warrant suppression of the score in some
countries, including Germany. Eisenstein believed that Potemkin’s specta-
tors should be ‘lashed into a fury’ by the music, and Meisel achieved this by
composing aggressively percussive and militaristic cues that use repetitive
material to powerful cumulative effect. As Alan Kriegsman commented of
the combined impact of Eisenstein’s vivid imagery and Meisel’s score, ‘For
sheer visceral agitation, there is nothing in all film history to rival it’ (quoted
in Prendergast 1992, 14). In the words of an early American reviewer,
The score is as powerful, as vital, as galvanic and electrifying as the film. It is

written in the extreme modern vein, cacophonies run riot, harmonies grate,
crackle, jar; there are abrupt changes and shifts in the rhythm; tremendous
chords crashing down, dizzy flights of runs, snatches of half-forgotten
melodies, fragments, a short interpolation of jazz on a piano.
(New York Herald Tribune, 29 April 1928)
The writer noted, however, that the score was not bombastic throughout,
and he was particularly moved by a melody Meisel introduced to represent
the people of Odessa: ‘It soars and endears itself to the heart. It is full of
gratitude and the love of man for man. It’s one of the warmest, tenderest
passages that has found its way into the cinema-music repertoire.’ Espe-
cially impressive was the manner in which the combination of Eisenstein’s
montage techniques and Meisel’s obsessive music manipulated the specta-
tor’s temporal perceptions, as when a few seconds of real-time tension on
the Quarterdeck are stretched out to form an utterly compelling extended
climax in the final reel.
As evidenced by his later collaboration with Prokofiev (see Chapter
9), whose services he initially wished to acquire for Potemkin, Eisenstein
believed in the necessity to establish a genre of ‘sound-film’ in which the

music and images were governed by an interdependent audio-visual struc-
ture far more sophisticated than the formulaic approach to scoring already
prevalent in the popular film industry. But not all commentators were lavish
with their praise for the music of The Battleship Potemkin. The English com-
poser Constant Lambert declared that Meisel’s score was ‘a great improve-
ment on the ordinary cinema music of the time, but it would be idle to
pretend that it was a worthy counterpart of the film itself’ (Lambert 1934,
223). While recognizing that Meisel was only a ‘modest composer’ and
that his score was ‘certainly not a masterpiece’, the ever-elitist Adorno and
Eisler nevertheless praised him for avoiding a commercially viable idiom
and noted that the music’s modernistic aggressiveness impacted powerfully
on the film’s spectators (Adorno and Eisler 1994 [1947], 123–4).
Meisel also wrote music for Eisenstein’s October and Walter Ruttmann’s
experimental documentary Berlin: Symphony of a Great City (both 1927; for
the latter, see Chapter 7). Eisenstein drew attention to the audio-visual struc-
tural parallel by which Meisel’s cue for the toppling of the statue of Alexander
III in October was played in retrograde when the statue subsequently ‘flew
back together’ (Taylor 1998, 181). In his music for Ilya Trauberg’s The Blue
Express (1929), Meisel used a jazz band, though the film was in some coun-
tries accompanied by Honegger’s Pacific 231 (Lambert 1934, 209). Meisel
was fascinated by the possibilities of sound montage, undertaking experi-
mental work at Berlin’s German Film Research Institute and in 1927 issuing
(on the Deutsche Grammophon label) recordings of onomatopoeic instru-
mental sound effects for filmic use; in 1930, shortly before his untimely
death, he recorded his music for both Battleship Potemkin and Blue Express
for the purposes of sound-on-disc synchronization when the films were
re-released.
The development of cinema in the Soviet Union had been personally
encouraged by Lenin, who (for its propaganda value) regarded it as the
most important of all art forms: film production came under the control of
the People’s Commissariat of Education in 1919, two years after all those who
worked in film – including pianists – were organized into a trade union. As in
other countries, Soviet silent films could be accompanied by anything from
a lone pianist up to a full orchestra of 60 players, as was to be found in Kiev’s
Shander cinema, where complete Tchaikovsky symphonies might be per-
formed as part of the programme. Original but pastiche scores – one dating
from as early as 1908 – were composed by Alexander Arkhangelsky, Dmitri
Astradantsev, Yuri Bakaleinikov, Igor Belza, Mikhail Ippolitov-Ivanov and
Georgii Kazachenko (Robinson 1990, 46–9; Egorova 1997, 5–7). Musical cue
sheets proliferated in the early 1920s, the Soviet film industry having accel-
erated production in the wake of the enormously successful importation of
Griffith’s Intolerance.
Shostakovich, the most famous musician who worked in the Soviet silent
cinema, initially gained valuable experience as a pianist at the Bright Reel,
Splendid Palace and Piccadilly theatres in Leningrad, where he worked in
the mid-1920s in order to support his family. Later he composed a flam-
boyant orchestral score for The New Babylon, directed by Grigori Kozintsev
and Leonid Trauberg in 1929; as was the case with Saint-Saëns’ score for
L’assassinat du Duc de Guise, the music was made available in a version
for solo piano for use in small venues. According to Kozintsev, ‘we at once
came to an agreement with the composer that the music was to be con-
nected, not with the exterior action but with its purport, and develop in
spite of the events, regardless of the mood of the scene’ (quoted in Egorova
1997, 8). For this reason, Shostakovich in places supplied what might on
the surface have appeared to be anempathetic accompaniment: in an article
bemoaning the impoverished state of much film music, the composer drew
attention to a scene in an empty restaurant at the end of the second reel
which is overlaid with music depicting the imminent onslaught of the Prus-
sian cavalry, and to a moment in the seventh reel in which the music depicts
the melancholy and anxiety of a soldier, not the merry-making by which
he is surrounded (Shostakovich 1981, 23; Pytel 1999, 26). Synchronization
between image and music is notable during a seminal scene in the sixth reel
in which piano music by Tchaikovsky is supplied for a diegetic keyboard
meditation; however, as Fiona Ford has noted in her unpublished study of
the film’s musical sources, by building repeated material and pauses into
the score at appropriate places Shostakovich afforded the conductor sev-
eral ‘recovery opportunities’ so that image and music would not come to
diverge too uncontrollably in live performance (Ford 2003, 39). Typical of
its composer’s early style and replete with sardonic parodies of popular
idioms, including several slick waltzes to characterize the bourgeoisie and
circus-like galops reminding the listener that Soviet film in the silent era
remained deeply rooted in the cinema of attractions, Shostakovich’s score
made effective use of famous melodies such as Offenbach’s can-can (from
Orpheus in the Underworld) and the Marseillaise, these being appropriate to
the film’s French setting; no fewer than three songs from the French Revo-
lution are used to support the Soviet ideology underlying the film’s action.
The Marseillaise had previously been used by Meisel (for a similar reason)
in Potemkin.
In spite – or perhaps because – of its visual and musical interest, The New
Babylon was not a success. Audiences found the film and its music incom-
prehensible, and some alleged that Shostakovich had been drunk when he
composed the score. Like Potemkin, international paranoia resulted in the
banning of the film in various countries. In the Soviet Union, Shostakovich’s
overly challenging music was quickly ditched, and thus one of the most
intriguing and original scores of the silent era lay forgotten until its revival
in the 1970s (see below).
The strong tradition of artistic independence from international styles
that characterized the German and Soviet silent cinemas was the excep-
tion rather than the rule. Elsewhere the global market was dominated by
films imported from the USA, and (to a lesser extent) influential Euro-
pean countries such as France, Germany, Italy and the UK; in less powerful
countries, indigenous cinema and its associated film music inevitably strug-
gled to come into existence during the silent era. A typical example was the
situation in Greece. Film music in the silent era was here considered not
for its aesthetic value, but principally as a means of luring audiences into
cinemas; lavish orchestral accompaniments were reserved almost exclu-
sively for American films featuring famous stars, with native Greek films
usually having to make do with a pianist, sometimes with the addition of
two to three instruments and perhaps a singer (Mylonás 2001, 22, 197).
The high-profile nature of music for imported films was perpetuated by
the fact that these films made the most money, thus readily permitting
cinemas to finance the often costly orchestras required: one of the most
popular ensembles serving this function in c.1914–15 was that directed by
Iánnis Krassás at the Kyvélis cinema in Athens. By the end of the silent
era, Krassás was music director at the capital’s Pántheon cinema, where his
contribution still mainly consisted of conducting popular classical pieces
(such as overtures by Adam, Suppé and Rossini) as simple introductions
and interludes to each film screened; there was no direct link between the
subject-matter of the music and the subject-matter of the picture. Original
Greek film music first emerged in 1917 when Theófrastos Sakelları́dis wrote
a score for the Italian film operetta The Nine Stars and, in the following year,
Dionýsios Lavrázas composed original music for voices and a fourteen-piece
ensemble to accompany the imported film Pierrot’s Ring. Sakelları́dis went
on to compose music for two more foreign films, Daughter of the Waves
and Barbara, Daughter of the Desert – the latter featuring an original song
entitled ‘Kamómata’ (‘Antics’), which became a popular attraction and was
featured by Krassás at the Pántheon in 1928–9. The first original score for a
Greek silent film was that by Manólis Skouloúdis for Daphnis and Chloë (dir.
Oréstes Láskos, 1931), partly based on ‘archaic motifs’; but by this time the
sound cinema had already made its way to Greece (Mylonás 2001, 18–23).
Postlude: the silent-film revival

The flexibility of sound provision in the silent cinema made the medium
unpredictable, with films never shown in precisely the same way on more
than one occasion. This spontaneity was immediately lost once synchro-
nized soundtracks were permanently fixed onto film stock in the 1930s; but,
although it may have seemed so to pessimists at the time, the loss was not
irrevocable. Connoisseurs of silent cinema long lamented the sound era’s
inevitable neglect of film as an art enhanced by live sound, and various
attempts were made to reinstate something of this abandoned dimension:
the experimental film-maker Ken Jacobs, for example, mixed pre-recorded
and live sound in screenings of his work (Weis and Belton 1985, 370), while
Warhol, in The Chelsea Girls (1966), used two screens, one silent and the
other with sound. Film-music scholars soon afterwards began to resurrect
the glories of the silent era by embarking on a systematic preservation of
historic scores, and this initiative was subsequently enhanced by the creative
work of numerous composers – many of whom were born long after the
demise of the silent cinema – commissioned to provide classic silent films
with new music that at once tapped into the strengths of the old tradition
and made the works seem more relevant to the modern age.
Landmark authentic scores for silent films were reconstructed, by schol-
ars and performers such as Gillian Anderson and Dennis James, not merely
to languish in historical archives but more importantly for resurrection in
live performance in conjunction with screenings of the images for which
they were originally prepared. Anderson’s first such project was a recreation
in 1979 of Victor Alix’s and Léo Pouget’s score to one of the last great classics
of the silent era, The Passion of Joan of Arc (dir. Carl-Theodor Dreyer, 1928);
her later reconstructions included Breil’s score for Intolerance and Wilson’s
for The Thief of Bagdad. James resurrected the art of the cinema organist in
a series of screenings at Indiana University, the Ohio Theatre and elsewhere
from 1969 onwards, and in 1971 reconstructed the score to Griffith’s Broken
Blossoms (1919); he worked on many other reconstructions and live organ
accompaniments, including music for Gance’s Napoléon (McCarty 1989,
61–79). Many historic scores were systematically catalogued and preserved at
national and university archives in the USA, with some institutions (notably
New York’s Museum of Modern Art) committed to mounting live perfor-
mances of them to accompany showings of the relevant films. High-profile
tours that married screenings and live orchestral accompaniment became
relatively common, an important example being the exposure accorded to
Shostakovich’s music for The New Babylon: commercially recorded for the
first time (in the form of a suite) by Soviet conductor Gennadi Rozhdestven-
sky in 1976, Shostakovich’s complete score was relaunched with the film at
that year’s Paris Film Festival and was widely performed live to accompany
screenings in both Europe and the USA in 1982–3. At around the same
time, the performing parts for Meisel’s Battleship Potemkin music were dis-
covered, permitting this seminal score to be reconstructed (Kalinak 1983).
Silent films were revived earlier than this within the Soviet Union, some-
times with memorable results: a new score to Potemkin was composed by
Nikolai Kryukov in 1950, and in 1967 a surprisingly effective score compiled
(by others) from pre-existing orchestral works by Shostakovich accompa-
nied a re-release of October on the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of
the Revolution, the composer’s propulsive ostinato textures fitting well with
images such as the rapid jump cuts conveying the stuttering of machine-
gun fire and here proving just as agitational as Meisel’s Potemkin. Simi-
larly, a new score for Potemkin was fashioned from parts of Shostakovich’s
symphonies when the film was restored to mark its fiftieth anniversary in
1975.
New scores were widely commissioned in the 1980s to accompany re-
releases of silent films in theatrical, televisual and video formats. Carl Davis
scored Napoléon (1980) for Thames Television and the British Film Insti-
tute, including some of Honegger’s original music, and received a standing
ovation at the London première (Ballard 1990, xiii); Davis also scored The
Thief of Bagdad (1984), Intolerance (1986) and the 1925 Ben-Hur (1987),
his music for the last taking inspiration from Bruckner to achieve reverence
in biblical scenes. Other Davis projects included Griffith’s Broken Blossoms
(1919) and Eric von Stroheim’s Greed (1923), and a British tour of his new
music to The Phantom of the Opera (dir. Rupert Julian, 1925) with the Hallé
Orchestra in 2002 continued his popular successes in the field. In 1986,
Griffith’s Intolerance celebrated its seventieth birthday and was furnished
with a new score by Antoine Duhamel and Pierre Jansen at the Avignon
Film Festival. In sharp contrast to traditional scoring techniques, Giorgio
Moroder supplied an up-to-date (and therefore almost instantly dated) syn-
thesized music track to a shortened and colour-tinted restoration of Lang’s
Metropolis in 1983; the inclusion of modern pop songs provided, according
to Claudia Gorbman, ‘a choruslike commentary on what is seen, some-
times with brilliant irony. Some listeners, their primary attention divided
between the lyrics and the [newly subtitled] “dialogue,” find this difficult
to assimilate’ (Gorbman 1987, 20). Metropolis has inspired many modern
musicians to endow it with new music, including the Alloy Orchestra, Club
Foot Orchestra, Peter Osborne, Bernd Schultheis and Wetfish. Huppertz’s
original orchestral score was reconstructed by Berndt Heller for video release
in 2002. Two years later the Pet Shop Boys’ Neil Tennant wrote a new score
for Potemkin.
Other composers, arrangers, keyboard players and ensembles who con-
tributed to the silent-film revival included James Bernard, Neil Brand (of
London’s National Film Theatre), Carmine Coppola (who provided a con-
ventional hybrid score for the American release of Napoléon in 1980), The
Curt Collective, Alan Fearon, Edward Dudley Hughes, Robert Israel, Adrian
Johnston, Benedict Mason, Richard McLaughlin, David Newman, Michael

Nyman, Paul Robinson, Geoff Smith (applying his hammered dulcimers to
classics of German silent expressionism), Joby Talbot, Jo Van den Booren
and Wolfgang Thiele (who reworked Erdmann’s music to Nosferatu). Vet-
eran cinema organists such as Gaylord Carter came out of retirement to
contribute their own reminiscences of the silent era: Carter had remained
active as a silent-film accompanist in the 1960s and in 1986–7 recorded
historically authentic accompaniments for the video release of Paramount
silents. These included Lang’s The Golden Lake (1919) and The Diamond
Ship (1920), and DeMille’s The Ten Commandments (1923), the original
compilation score for which had helped to popularize Dvořák’s New World
Symphony and Tchaikovsky’s Piano Concerto No. 1 (Huntley [1947], 27).
At the other end of the stylistic spectrum, British saxophonist Jan Kopinski’s
slowly evolving modal jazz found an unlikely application in his 2004 score
to Alexander Dovzhenko’s Earth (1930), where it was nevertheless perfectly
in tune with the leisurely pace and haunting visual beauty of the Russian
director’s bold images.
Adrian Johnston’s music for Harold Lloyd’s Hot Water (1924; Thames
TV, 1994) is a model example of a silent-film score conceived for a modern
1.3 George Fenton conducts a live performance of his orchestral music from the BBC television series The Blue
Planet at Manchester in 2006, sustaining the venerable tradition of touring exhibitions of silent film.
television audience. It uses a mere six instruments with resourcefulness and

imagination in an idiom sufficiently sophisticated to satisfy contemporary
tastes but deeply rooted in traditional scoring techniques, even down to
the prominent use of the Dies irae in a ghostly sequence. Carter recalled
how he used this melody in his organ accompaniment to the unmasking
scene of The Phantom of the Opera: as seen above, the plainchant was used
in Huppertz’s score for Metropolis and thereafter remained one of the most
frequently quoted melodies in later film music. Prominent later appearances
in films of widely differing styles and genres include Foreign Correspondent
(dir. Alfred Hitchcock, 1940; music by Alfred Newman), in which it is sung
diegetically by an unseen choir in London’s Westminster Cathedral before
an attempt is made to push the film’s hero off the tower; in Erik Nordgren’s
score to Ingmar Bergman’s The Seventh Seal (1957), where it is several times
suggested merely by its first four notes, in addition to receiving a full-blown
arrangement sung diegetically by a procession of monks in the context of
the Black Death; in three of Bernard Herrmann’s scores: his music for the
death of Hydra in Jason and the Argonauts (dir. Don Chaffey, 1963), in The
Bride Wore Black (dir. François Truffaut, 1967), and delicately on a harp for
a graveyard scene in Obsession (dir. Brian De Palma, 1975); in The Shining
(dir. Stanley Kubrick, 1980; music by Walter Carlos), where an electronic
version alluding to its arrangement by Berlioz creates a sense of foreboding
in the main-title sequence; in Sleeping with the Enemy (dir. Joseph Ruben,
1990; music by Jerry Goldsmith), where its famous incarnation in Berlioz’s
Symphonie fantastique appears diegetically on a hi-fi system as a symbol
for the male protagonist’s depravity; and in the fantasy animated musical
The Nightmare Before Christmas (dir. Tim Burton, 1993; music by Danny
Elfman).
Such is the renewed popularity of silent-film screenings with live musical
accompaniment that other media, such as television documentary, have in
recent years been adapted for this purpose. Extracts from British composer
George Fenton’s substantial orchestral score to the monumental BBC TV
series about the oceans, The Blue Planet, have been performed live in several
countries, commencing with a show in London’s Hyde Park in 2002 in which
Fenton conducted a live accompaniment to a large-screen projection of the
stunning wildlife photography from the series. The venture led to a release
of a documentary film for theatrical exhibition, Deep Blue (dir. Andy Byatt
and Alastair Fothergill, 2004).

1 - The Silent' Cinema PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 - The Silent' Cinema PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 - The Silent' Cinema PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cambridge Books Online

A History of Film Music

Book DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814341

Online ISBN: 9780511814341

Hardback ISBN: 9780521811736

Paperback ISBN: 9780521010481

1 - The ‘silent’ cinema pp. 1-41

Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814341.002

Cambridge University Press

of the projector itself. Conventional modern projectors still generate a fair

96–7, 102–6). Furthermore, a direct correspondence between images repre-

composers against recoursing to abrupt silence on the grounds that the

than show-booth attractions: fairgrounds, vaudeville and travelling shows

Cognitive psychologists have begun the daunting task of attempting to

The birth of film music

Kinetograph (camera) and Kinetoscope (projector) were conceived with the

shows with ‘descriptive musical accompaniment’ (Abel and Altman 2001,

Categories of film music

the Exodus in The Ten Commandments (1923). Geraldine Farrar, a silent-

Improvised accompaniments to screenings of silent films might typi-

The habitual use of intertitles to convey information or dialogue essential

Camille Saint-Saëns and film d’art

1948, 541). It exerted a powerful influence on global film production, which

Cue sheets and anthologies

American pioneer of these publications was Max Winkler, who persuaded

If you come out of the theatre almost unaware of the musical

Several of the themes and techniques popularized by cue sheets and

for example, diminished-seventh chords for villains, ‘weepie’ love themes

Here’s a chord you can’t do without, he said, if you’re a picture palace

proliferation of ‘photoplay’ library music arranged for flexible instrumen-

Venues and ensembles

could vary considerably: see Brownlow 1980). As multi-reel ‘feature’ films

Violas were considered to be a dispensable luxury (London 1936, 46), and

As Altman has shown (1996, 698–9), production of musical sound effects

importance is shown by the working practice of Riesenfeld, who habitually

Photoplayers and cinema organs

(Weis and Belton 1985, 101). Genuine untuned percussion instruments

Music for silent epics

no less than the adapting of grand-opera methods to motion pictures! Each

rich in beautiful numbers, written by renowned composers, suitable for

Charlie Chaplin and music for comedies

of the soundtrack and not be at the mercy of the exigencies of differing

elaborate score was conducted by Alfred Newman and arranged by Edward

Raksin recalled the friction coming to a head when he dared to suggest

Chaplin himself disliked mickey-mousing and strove to avoid it alto-

Early film music in Europe and the Soviet Union

composers” – every other country has composers who sometimes do films’

written and orchestrated like a symphony’), Léon Moussinac (‘cinegraphic

language stripped of all pictorial embellishments’ (Stravinsky 1936, 93).

screened in 1925 with a compilation score by Riesenfeld. Huppertz provided

The score is as powerful, as vital, as galvanic and electrifying as the film. It is

believed in the necessity to establish a genre of ‘sound-film’ in which the

Postlude: the silent-film revival

Johnston, Benedict Mason, Richard McLaughlin, David Newman, Michael

television audience. It uses a mere six instruments with resourcefulness and

You might also like