Brain Drain vs. Wisdom Gain!!!

Brain Drain Vs. Wisdom Gain!!!
BRAIN DRAIN!!!
A situation when highly qualified and trained people leave a country to

permanently settle, for better opportunities and a comfortable life style, in some
other country. It is also referred to as Human capital flight.
In ancient times the scholars of one country visited neighboring countries, and
they often stayed there for years, both learning and teaching. The great scholars
of China and Persia and other scholars from the West visited India during her
prosperous days in the past and wrote memories which are precious materials for
Indian history. But these were not considered brain drain then. On the contrary,
their experiences and wisdom gained from their visits enriched their countries.
Such exchanges benefited the countries in those days and built a bridge of
understanding and amity when communication between even the neighbors was
not easy.
The problem of Brain-drain, in our age, has become very elusive. The developing
countries like India are desperately in need of talents, especially in the field of
science and technology but for one reason or the other, the talents are fleeing
from their place, leaving their native lands impoverished in the process.
The destiny of such countries lies in the solution to this great problem. After
independence, India is engaged in difficult struggle against poverty. These
struggles cannot be launched in papers; they require armies of trained personnel –
the scientists, technical knowhow and specialists in the field of planned
development. If, instead of contributing to the prosperity of India, the Indian
scientists, research scholars, engineers, doctors and economists immigrate to other
countries, it is difficult to see how India can implement her development plans and
attain her goal of prosperity.
In India, the ambitious and highly educated people found it very difficult to climb
the peak, for the obstacles were the bureaucratic bungling, was irritating. Hence,
the alarming exodus started in the fifties and in the seventies the brain-drain
appeared to be complete. Hundreds of talents emigrated to the U.S.A. and Europe
which assured them of great opportunities for getting to the top, of secure and
comfortable living, of satisfaction and of glory in their respective fields. If the
emigrants could have all those assurances they would not think of leaving their
country.
But the problem lies in the satisfaction to accommodate so many ambitious

people, nor could the scope be made broad enough to secure affluence for all.
Some of them, after training and experiences in foreign countries, return home
with individual skills and when they fail to fit in with the evolving patterns at
home, despair drives them away again.
But India needs these professionally trained people, so they should be persuaded
to stay in India and be content with less lucrative jobs. When India is rich enough
to reward them, they would not find much to complain about. All these people are
among the fortunate few, enjoying the privilege of education, while some eighty
percent of Indians languish in dark hovels – poor, ignorant and superstitious. It is
their duty and responsibility of those privileged few to take them out of the
morass, instead of jointing the mad rush for careerism. There may be many
obstacles in their way, but their dedicated services and patriotic zeal will help
them rise above them and restore to India her lost glory.
People who have emigrated for several reasons are recoverable assets who can
play a part in developing opportunities at home. However, recovery requires the
opening of diverse and creative conduits. Only when health staff, whatever their
cadre, have the tools they require to do their job, training opportunities, a
network of supportive colleagues, and recognition for the difficult job they do, are
they likely to feel motivated to stay put when opportunity beckons from
elsewhere.
Foreign professionals could be used to develop innovative graduate education

opportunities at home and technology to be transferred to areas of national
priorities for research and development. Ultimately, involving individuals who are
living abroad in creating opportunities at home favors both the retention and
repatriation of national talent. Building an enlightened leadership and an
enabling national scientific community, with the help of expatriate citizens, for the
coherent development of scientific and technological capacity in developing
countries will be mutually beneficial.

Brain Drain vs. Wisdom Gain!!!

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Brain Drain vs. Wisdom Gain!!!

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Brain Drain vs. Wisdom Gain!!!

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Brain Drain Vs. Wisdom Gain!!!

A situation when highly qualified and trained people leave a country to

But the problem lies in the satisfaction to accommodate so many ambitious

Foreign professionals could be used to develop innovative graduate education

You might also like