Fibonacci Numbers and The Golden Ratio
Fibonacci Numbers and The Golden Ratio
Fibonacci Numbers and The Golden Ratio
CHASNOV
FIBONACCI NUMBERS
AND THE GOLDEN RATIO
CONTENTS
Preface vi
5 Binet’s formula 9
7 Cassini’s identity 17
12 Spiraling squares 29
17 Continued fractions 45
A Mathematical induction 55
B Matrix algebra 57
B.1 Addition and Multiplication 57
B.2 Determinants 58
C Problem solutions 61
Preface
View an Introduction on YouTube
This book forms the lecture notes for my Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on the web platform
Coursera. These lecture notes are divided into chapters called Lectures, and each Lecture corresponds
to a video on Coursera. I have also uploaded the Coursera videos to YouTube, and links are placed at
the top of each Lecture.
Most of the Lectures also contain problems for students to solve. Less experienced students may
find some of these problems difficult. Do not despair! The Lectures can be read and watched, and the
material understood and enjoyed without actually solving any problems. But mathematicians do like
to solve problems and I have selected those that I found to be interesting. Try some of them, but if you
get stuck, full solutions can be read in the Appendix.
My aim in writing these lecture notes was to place the mathematics at the level of an advanced
high school student. Proof by mathematical induction and matrices, however, may be unfamiliar to
a typical high school student and I have provided a short and hopefully readable discussion of these
topics in the Appendix. Although all the material presented here can be considered elementary, I
suspect that some, if not most, of the material may be unfamiliar to even professional mathematicians
since Fibonacci numbers and the golden ratio are topics not usually covered in a University course. So
I welcome both young and old, novice and experienced mathematicians to peruse these lecture notes,
watch my lecture videos, solve some problems, and enjoy the wonders of the Fibonacci sequence and
the golden ratio.
Jeffrey R. Chasnov
Hong Kong
Oct. 2016
iii
Lecture 1
Fibonacci published in the year 1202 his now famous rabbit puzzle:
A man put a male-female pair of newly born rabbits in a field. Rabbits take a month to
mature before mating. One month after mating, females give birth to one male-female pair
and then mate again. No rabbits die. How many rabbit pairs are there after one year?
To solve, we construct Table 1.1. At the start of each month, the number of juvenile pairs, adult
pairs, and total number of pairs are shown. At the start of January, one pair of juvenile rabbits is
introduced into the population. At the start of February, this pair of rabbits has matured. At the start
of March, this pair has given birth to a new pair of juvenile rabbits. And so on.
month J F M A M J J A S O N D J
juvenile 1 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89
adult 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144
total 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233
We define the Fibonacci numbers Fn to be the total number of rabbit pairs at the start of the nth
month. The number of rabbits pairs at the start of the 13th month, F13 = 233, can be taken as the
solution to Fibonacci’s puzzle.
Further examination of the Fibonacci numbers listed in Table 1.1, reveals that these numbers satisfy
the recursion relation
Fn+1 = Fn + Fn−1 . (1.1)
This recursion relation gives the next Fibonacci number as the sum of the preceeding two numbers.
To start the recursion, we need to specify F1 and F2 . In Fibonacci’s rabbit problem, the initial month
starts with only one rabbit pair so that F1 = 1. And this initial rabbit pair is newborn and takes one
month to mature before mating so F2 = 1.
The first few Fibonacci numbers, read from the table, are given by
2. The Lucas numbers are closely related to the Fibonacci numbers and satisfy the same recursion
relation Ln+1 = Ln + Ln−1 , but with starting values L1 = 1 and L2 = 3. Determine the first 12 Lucas
numbers.
3. The generalized Fibonacci sequence satisfies f n+1 = f n + f n−1 with starting values f 1 = p and
f 2 = q. Using mathematical induction, prove that
4. Prove that
Ln = Fn−1 + Fn+1 . (1.3)
5. Prove that
1
Fn = (L + L n +1 ) .
5 n −1
6. The generating function for the Fibonacci sequence is given by the power series
∞
f (x) = ∑ Fn xn .
n =1
x
f (x) = .
1 − x − x2
Lecture 2
We can solve another puzzle that also leads to the Fibonacci sequence:
How many ways can one climb a staircase with n steps, taking one or two steps at a time?
Any single climb can be represented by a string of ones and twos which sum to n. We define an as
the number of different strings that sum to n. In Table 1, we list the possible strings for the first five
values of n. It appears that the an ’s form the beginning of the Fibonacci sequence.
To derive a relationship between an and the Fibonacci numbers, consider the set of strings that sum
to n. This set may be divided into two nonoverlapping subsets: those strings that start with one and
those strings that start with two. For the subset of strings that start with one, the remaining part of the
string must sum to n − 1; for the subset of strings that start with two, the remaining part of the string
must sum to n − 2. Therefore, the number of strings that sum to n is equal to the number of strings
that sum to n − 1 plus the number of strings that sum to n − 2. The number of strings that sum to
n − 1 is given by an−1 and the number of strings that sum to n − 2 is given by an−2 , so that
a n = a n −1 + a n −2 .
And from the table we have a1 = 1 = F2 and a2 = 2 = F3 , so that an = Fn+1 for all positive integers n.
n strings an
1 1 1
2 11, 2 2
3 111, 12, 21 3
4 1111, 112, 121, 211, 22 5
5 11111, 1112, 1121, 1211, 2111, 122, 212, 221 8
n strings an
1 1 1
2 12, 21 2
3 123, 132, 213 3
4 1234, 1243, 1324, 2134, 2143 5
Table 2.2: Strings of natural numbers obtained by allowing a number to stay fixed or change places
with its neighbor.
2. Consider a problem similar to that above, but now allow the first 1 to change places with the last
n, as if the string lies on a circle. Suppose n ≥ 3, and define bn as the number of different strings that
can be formed. Show that bn = Ln , where Ln is the nth Lucas number.
ZF.COM/CAREERS
Lecture 3
x y
We now present the classical definition of the golden ratio. Referring to Fig. 3.1, two positive numbers
x and y, with x > y are said to be in the golden ratio if the ratio between the larger number and the
smaller number is the same as the ratio between their sum and the larger number, that is,
x x+y
= . (3.1)
y x
Denoting Φ = x/y to be the golden ratio, (Φ is the capital Greek letter Phi), the relation (3.1) becomes
1
Φ = 1+ , (3.2)
Φ
Φ2 − Φ − 1 = 0. (3.3)
The negative of the negative root of the quadratic equation (3.3) is what we will call the golden ratio
conjugate φ, (the small Greek letter phi), and is equal to
√
5−1
φ= ≈ 0.618.
2
The relationship between the golden ratio conjugate φ and the golden ratio Φ, is given by
φ = Φ − 1,
or using (3.2),
1
φ= .
Φ
(a) φ = Φ − 1,
(b) φ = 1/Φ,
(c) Φ2 = Φ + 1,
(d) φ2 = −φ + 1,
Φ n +1 = Φ n + Φ n −1 .
φ n −1 = φ n + φ n +1 .
Lecture 4
Fn+1 = Fn + Fn−1 .
Dividing by Fn yields
Fn+1 F
= 1 + n −1 . (4.1)
Fn Fn
We assume that the ratio of two consecutive Fibonacci numbers approaches a limit as n → ∞. Define
limn→∞ Fn+1 /Fn = α so that limn→∞ Fn−1 /Fn = 1/α. Taking the limit, (4.1) becomes α = 1 + 1/α, the
same identity satisfied by the golden ratio. Therefore, if the limit exists, the ratio of two consecutive
Fibonacci numbers must approach the golden ratio for large n, that is,
Fn+1
lim = Φ.
n→∞ Fn
The ratio of consecutive Fibonacci numbers and this ratio minus the golden ratio is shown in Table
4.1. The last column appears to be approaching zero.
Fk+n
lim = Φn .
k→∞ Fk
95,000 km
—that’s more than twice around the world.
careers.slb.com
Lecture 5
Binet’s formula
View this lecture on YouTube
The Fibonacci numbers are uniquely determined from their recursion relation,
and the initial values, F1 = F2 = 1. An explicit formula for the Fibonacci numbers can be found, and
is called Binet’s Formula.
To solve (5.1) for the Fibonacci numbers, we first look at the equation
x n +1 = x n + x n −1 . (5.2)
This equation is called a second-order, linear, homogeneous difference equation with constant coeffi-
cients, and its method of solution closely follows that of the analogous differential equation. The idea
is to guess the general form of a solution, find two such solutions, and then multiply these solutions
by unknown constants and add them. This results in a general solution to (5.2), and one can then solve
(5.1) by satisfying the specified initial values.
To begin, we guess the form of the solution to (5.2) as
xn = λn , (5.3)
λ n +1 = λ n + λ n −1 ,
λ2 − λ − 1 = 0.
Use of the quadratic formula yields two roots, both of which are already familiar. We have
√ √
1+ 5 1− 5
λ1 = = Φ, λ2 = = −φ,
2 2
obtain
Fn = c1 Φn + c2 (−φ)n , (5.4)
which must satisfy the initial values F1 = 1 and F2 = 1. The algebra for finding the unknown constants
can be made simpler, however, if instead of F2 , we use the value F0 = F2 − F1 = 0.
Application of the values for F0 and F1 results in the system of equations given by
c1 + c2 = 0,
c1 Φ − c2 φ = 1.
We use the first equation to write c2 = −c1 , and substitute into the second equation to get
c1 (Φ + φ) = 1.
√
Since Φ + φ = 5, we can solve for c1 and c2 to obtain
√ √
c1 = 1/ 5, c2 = −1/ 5. (5.5)
Φn − (−φ)n
Fn = √ , (5.6)
5
Bio-Rad is a longtime leader in the life science research industry and has been
voted one of the Best Places to Work by our employees in the San Francisco
Bay Area. Bring out your best in one of our many positions in research and
development, sales, marketing, operations, and software development.
Opportunities await — share your passion at Bio-Rad!
www.bio-rad.com/careers
Φn = Fn Φ + Fn−1 (5.7)
n
(−φ) = − Fn φ + Fn−1 (5.8)
∞
x
∑ Fn xn = 1 − x − x2
n =1
5. Determine the analogue to Binet’s formula for the Lucas numbers, defined as
L n +1 = L n + L n −1
with the initial values L1 = 1 and L2 = 3. Again it will be simpler to define the value of L0 and use it
and L1 as the initial values.
6. Use Binet’s formula for Fn and the analogous formula for Ln to show that
√
Ln + 5Fn
n
Φ = .
2
Lecture 6
month J F M A M J J A S O N D J
juvenile 1 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89
adult 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144
Consider again Fibonacci’s growing rabbit population of juvenile and adult rabbit pairs shown in
Table 6.1. Let an denote the number of adult rabbit pairs at the start of month n, and let bn denote the
number of juvenile rabbit pairs. The number of adult pairs at the start of month n + 1 is just the sum
of the number of adult and juvenile pairs at the start of month n. The number of juvenile pairs at the
start of month n + 1 is just the number of adult pairs at the start of month n. This can be written as a
system of recursion relations given by
a n + 1 = a n + bn ,
bn + 1 = a n ;
or in matrix form as
a n +1 1 1 an
= . (6.1)
bn + 1 1 0 bn
Repeated multiplication by Q advances the population additional months. For example, advancing k
months is achieved by
an+k an
= Qk .
bn + k bn
Powers of the Q-matrix are related to the Fibonacci sequence. Observe what happens when we
multiply an arbitrary matrix by Q. We have
1 1 a b a+c b+d
= .
1 0 c d a b
Multiplication of a matrix by Q replaces the first row of the matrix by the sum of the first and second
13
rows, and the second row of the matrix by the first row.
If we rewrite Q itself in terms of the Fibonacci numbers as
F2 F1
Q= ,
F1 F0
INDEPENDENT DEDNIM
LIKE YOU
We believe in equality, sustainability and
a modern approach to learning. How about you?
Apply for a Master’s Programme in Gothenburg, Sweden.
www.gu.se/education
3. Use the Fibonacci addition formula to prove the Fibonacci double angle formulas
4. Show that
F2n = Ln Fn .
Lecture 7
Cassini’s identity
View this lecture on YouTube
with
1 1
Q= . (7.2)
1 0
From the theory of matrices and determinants (see Appendix B), we know that
Applying (7.3) to (7.1) and (7.2) results directly in Cassini’s identity (1680),
Examples of this equality can be obtained from the first few numbers of the Fibonacci sequence
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, . . . . We have
2 × 5 − 32 = 1,
2
3 × 8 − 5 = −1,
5 × 13 − 82 = 1,
2
8 × 21 − 13 = −1
13 × 34 − 212 = 1.
Cassini’s identity is the basis of an amusing dissection fallacy, called the Fibonacci bamboozlement,
discussed in the next lecture.
17
2. Using the Cassini’s identity (7.4) and the Fibonacci addition formula (6.4), prove Catalan’s identity
Lecture 8
Cassini’s identity
Fn+1 Fn−1 − Fn2 = (−1)n
can be interpreted geometrically: Fn+1 Fn−1 is the area of a rectangle of side lengths Fn+1 and Fn−1 ,
and Fn2 is the area of a square of side length Fn . Cassini’s identity states that the absolute difference in
area between the rectangle and the square is only one unit of area. As n becomes large, this one unit
of area difference becomes small relative to the areas of the square and the rectangle, and Cassini’s
identity becomes the basis of an amusing dissection fallacy, called the Fibonacci bamboozlement.
To perform the Fibonacci bamboozlement, one dissects a square with side length Fn in such a way
that by rearranging the pieces, one appears able to construct a rectangle with side lengths Fn−1 and
Fn+1 , with either one unit of area larger or smaller than the original square.
We illustrate this bamboozlement in Fig. 8.1 using a square of area 8 × 8 = 64, and a rectangle of
area 5 × 13 = 65, corresponding to n = 6 in Cassini’s identity. We begin by dissecting a square into
two rectangles, the bottom rectangle of dimension 8-by-5 and the top rectangle of dimension 8-by-3.
Here, 5 and 3 are the two Fibonacci numbers immediately preceeding 8.
The bottom 8-by-5 rectangle is then further dissected into two equal trapezoids. The bases of the
two trapezoids are the Fibonacci numbers 5 and 3, and the heights are 5. The top rectangle is further
dissected into two equal right triangles. The bases of the triangles are the Fibonacci number 8 and the
heights of the triangles are the Fibonacci number 3. The dissected square is shown in Fig. 8.1a.
To construct a rectangle of dimension 5-by-13, one of the trapezoids fits into the bottom of the
rectangle and the other trapezoid fits into the top of the rectangle. The two triangles then fill the
remaining spaces. The resulting rectangle is shown in Fig. 8.1b, and it superficially appears that the
the square has been recombined to form a rectangle of a larger area.
The honestly reconstructed rectangle, however, is shown in Fig. 8.2, where the missing unit area is
seen to be almost evenly distributed along the diagonal of the rectangle.
Why is the missing (or extra) unit area distributed along the diagonal of the rectangle? In our
example, the side slope of the trapezoids is given by F5 /F3 = 5/2 = 2.5 while the slope of the
triangle’s hypotenuse is given by F6 /F4 = 8/3 ≈ 2.67. This slight mismatch in slopes results in a
steady increase or decrease in distance between the trapezoid and the triangle when they are aligned.
Here, the gap between the trapezoid and the triangle can be easily hidden by splitting the difference
between the aligned pieces, as done in the dishonestly constructed rectangle.
19
(a) Square of dimension 8-by-8 and area 64. (b) Rectangle of dimension 13-by-5 and area 65.
Figure 8.2: The honest rectangle. The white space shows the missing unit area.
Lecture 9
n
∑ Fi = Fn+2 − 1. (9.1)
i =1
For example, consider the first eight Fibonacci numbers, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21. With n = 6 in (9.1), we
have
n
∑ Fi = 1 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 5 + 8 = 20,
i =1
and
Fn+2 − 1 = 21 − 1 = 20.
One can use mathematical induction to prove (9.1), but a direct derivation uses the relation Fn =
Fn+2 − Fn+1 . Constructing a list of identities, we have
Fn = Fn+2 − Fn+1
Fn−1 = Fn+1 − Fn
Fn−2 = Fn − Fn−1
.. ..
. .
F2 = F4 − F3
F1 = F3 − F2 .
Adding all the left hand sides yields the sum over the first n Fibonacci numbers, and adding all the
right-hand-sides results in the cancellation of all terms except the first and the last. Using F2 = 1
results in (9.1).
23
n
∑ Fi = Fn+2 − 1. (9.2)
i =1
2. Prove by construction that the sum over the first n Lucas numbers is given by
n
∑ Li = Ln+2 − 3. (9.3)
i =1
3. Prove by construction that the sums over the first n odd or n even Fibonacci numbers are given by
n n
∑ F2i−1 = F2n , ∑ F2i = F2n+1 − 1.
i =1 i =1
Lecture 10
In this lecture, I derive a combinatorial identity obtained by summing over the squares of the Fi-
bonacci numbers:
n
∑ Fi2 = Fn Fn+1 . (10.1)
i =1
For example, consider the first seven Fibonacci numbers, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13. With n = 6 in (10.1), we have
12 + 12 + 22 + 32 + 52 + 82 = 8 × 13,
where by doing the arithmetic one finds that both sides are equal to 104.
To prove (10.1), we work with the right-hand side, using the Fibonacci recursion relation. We have
Fn Fn+1 = Fn ( Fn + Fn−1 )
= Fn2 + Fn−1 Fn
= Fn2 + Fn−1 ( Fn−1 + Fn−2 )
= Fn2 + Fn2−1 + Fn−2 Fn−1
= ...
= Fn2 + Fn2−1 + · · · + F22 + F1 F2 .
25
2. Prove by construction that the sum over the first n Lucas numbers squared is given by
n
∑ L2i = Ln Ln+1 − 2. (10.2)
i =1
Lecture 11
A golden rectangle is a rectangle whose side lengths are in the golden ratio. In a classical construction,
first one draws a square. Second, one draws a line from the midpoint of one side to a corner of the
opposite side. Third, one draws an arc from the corner to an extension of the side with the midpoint.
Fourth, one completes the rectangle. The procedure is illustrated in Fig. 11.1.
√
1 5/2 1
1 1/2
√ √
1/2 5/2 (1 + 5)/2
(c) Draw an arc using the internal line as radius. (d) Complete the golden rectangle.
27
Lecture 12
Spiraling squares
View this lecture on YouTube
1 φ
Figure 12.1: Two golden rectangles. The full rectangle and the rectangle next to the square are both
golden rectangles. Here, φ = Φ − 1 = 1/Φ.
To construct a golden rectangle of length L = Φ and width W = 1, a smaller rectangle was attached to
a unit square as illustrated in Fig. 12.1. The smaller rectangle has vertical length L = 1 and horizontal
width W = Φ − 1, but since Φ − 1 = 1/Φ, the smaller rectangle satisfies L/W = Φ, and so it too is a
golden rectangle.
This smaller golden rectangle can again be subdivided into a still smaller square and golden rect-
angle, and this process can be continued ad infinitum. At each subdivision, the length of the square is
reduced by a factor of φ = 1/Φ.
The subdivisions can be done in either a clockwise or counterclockwise fashion. For clockwise, the
square is positioned first on the left, then top, then right, and then bottom of the rectangle, and so
on. Eventually, we obtain Fig. 12.2, where the side lengths of some of the squares are written in their
centers as powers of φ.
Notice that each golden rectangle in Fig. 12.2 is a reduced-scale copy of the whole. Objects con-
taining reduced-scale copies of themselves are called self-similar.
29
φ
1 φ4
φ 3
φ5
φ6
φ 2
Figure 12.2: Spiraling squares. The side lengths of the squares are the numbers in their centers.
A visual proof of this identity is given by Fig. 12.2, where the left-hand-side is the sum of the areas of
all the imbedded squares and the right-hand-side is the area of the big rectangle.
Lecture 13
The celebrated golden spiral is a special case of the more general logarithmic spiral whose radius
r is given by
r = aebθ , (13.1)
where θ is the usual polar angle, and a and b are constants. Jacob Bernoulli (1655-1705) studied this
spiral in depth and gave it the name spira mirabilis, or miraculous spiral, asking that it be engraved on
his tombstone with the enscription “Eadem mutata resurgo”, roughly translated as “Although changed,
I arise the same.” A spiral was engraved at the bottom of his tombstone, but sadly it was not his
beloved logarithmic spiral.
The golden spiral is a logarithmic spiral whose radius either increases or decreases by a factor of
the golden ratio Φ with each one-quarter turn, that is, when θ increases by π/2. The golden spiral
therefore satisfies the equation
r = aΦ2θ/π . (13.2)
In our figure of the spiraling squares within the golden rectangle, the dimension of each succeeding
square decreases by a factor of Φ, with four squares composing each full turn of the spiral. It should
then be possible to inscribe a golden spiral within our figure of spiralling squares. We place the
central point of the spiral at the accumulation point of all the squares, and fit the parameter a so that
the golden spiral passes through opposite corners of the squares. The resulting beautiful golden spiral
is shown in Fig. 13.1.
33
Figure 13.1: The golden spiral. The central point is where the squares accumulate.
φ
1 φ4
φ3
φ5
φ6
φ 2
Lecture 14
Figure 14.1: Spiral center. The intersection of the red and blue diagonal lines marks the accumulation
point of all the golden rectangles, and locates the center of the golden spiral.
Consider again the spiralling squares shown in Fig. 14.1. As shown in the problems, if the diagonals
of the two largest golden rectangles are drawn, their intersection point marks the center of a golden
spiral.
By symmetry, we should be able to mark four possible spiral centers. These four centers are located
in Fig. 14.2 as the intersection of the red and blue diagonals. If we then draw the rectangle with vertices
√
at the four spiral centers, we obtain yet another golden rectangle, with horizontal length L = Φ/ 5
√
and vertical width W = 1/ 5.
37
√1
1 5
Φ
√
5
Figure 14.2: An inner golden rectangle. The four spiral centers in a golden rectangle are indicated by
the intersections of the red and blue diagonals. These four points form the
√vertices of another golden
rectangle, whose sides are reduced from that of the original by the factor 5.
Lecture 15
n
∑ Fi2 = Fn Fn+1 . (15.1)
i =1
This identity can be interpreted as an area formula. The left-hand-side is the total area of squares with
sides given by the first n Fibonacci numbers; the right-hand-side is the area of a rectangle with sides
Fn and Fn+1 .
For example, consider n = 2. The identity (15.1) states that the area of two unit squares is equal to
the area of a rectangle constructed by placing the two unit squares side-by-side, as illustrated in Fig.
15.1a.
For n = 3, we can position another square of side length two directly underneath the first two unit
squares. Now, the sum of the areas of the three squares is equal to the area of a 2-by-3 rectangle, as
illustrated in Fig. 15.1b. The identity (15.1) for larger n is made self-evident by continuing to tile the
plane with squares of side lengths given by consecutive Fibonacci numbers.
The most beautiful tiling occurs if we keep adding squares in a clockwise, or counterclockwise,
fashion. Fig. 15.2 shows the iconic result obtained from squares using the first six Fibonacci numbers,
where quarter circles are drawn within each square thereby reproducing the Fibonacci spiral.
Consider the close similarity between the golden spiral in Fig. 13.1 and the Fibonacci spiral in Fig.
15.2. Both figures contain spiralling squares, but in Fig. 15.2 the squares spiral outward, and in Fig.
13.1 the squares spiral inward. Because the ratio of two consecutive Fibonacci numbers approaches
the golden ratio, the Fibonacci spiral, as it spirals out, will eventually converge to the golden spiral.
41
1 1
1 1
2
(a) n = 2: 12 + 12 = 1 × 2. (b) n = 3: 12 + 12 + 22 = 2 × 3.
Figure 15.1: Illustrating the sum of the Fibonacci numbers squared. The center numbers represent the
side lengths of the squares.
5
8
11
2 3
Figure 15.2: The sum of Fibonacci numbers squared for n = 6. The Fibonacci spiral is drawn.
Lecture 16
Consider the photo of a sunflower shown in Fig. 16.1, and notice the apparent spirals in the flo-
rets radiating out from the center to the edge. These spirals appear to rotate both clockwise and
counterclockwise. By counting them, one finds 21 clockwise spirals and 34 counterclockwise spirals.
Surprisingly, the numbers 21 and 34 are consecutive Fibonacci numbers. In the following lectures, we
will try to explain why this might not be a coincidence.
43
Lecture 17
Continued fractions
View this lecture on YouTube
The appearance of consecutive Fibonacci numbers in some sunflower heads can be related to a very
special property of the golden ratio. To reveal that property requires first a short lesson on continued
fractions.
Recall that a rational number is any number that can be expressed as the quotient of two integers,
and an irrational number is any number that is not rational. Rational numbers have finite continued
fractions; irrational numbers have infinite continued fractions.
1
x = a0 + , (17.1)
1
a1 +
1
a2 +
.. 1
.+
an
where a1 , a2 , . . . , an are positive integers and a0 is any integer. The convenient shorthand form of
(17.1) is
x = [ a0 ; a1 , a2 , . . . , a n ].
If x is irrational, then n → ∞.
Now for some examples. To construct the continued fraction of the rational number x = 3/5, we
can write
1 1
3/5 = =
5/3 1 + 2/3
1 1
= = ,
1 1
1+ 1+
3/2 1 + 1/2
45
π = 3 + 0.14159 . . .
1
= 3+
7.06251 . . .
1
= 3+ ,
1
7+
15.99659 . . .
and so on, yielding the beginning sequence π = [3; 7, 15, . . . ]. The historically important first-order
approximation is given by π ≈ [3; 7] = 22/7 = 3.142857 . . . , which was already known by Archimedes
in ancient times.
Finally, to determine the continued fraction for the golden ratio Φ, we can use a trick and write
1
Φ = 1+ ,
Φ
1
Φ = 1+ ,
1
1+
Φ
Φ = [1; 1̄],
4. Define xn to be the nth rational approximation to x obtained from its continued fraction, where, for
example, x0 = [ a0 ; ], x1 = [ a0 ; a1 ], and x2 = [ a0 ; a1 , a2 ]. Using Φ = [1; 1̄], verify that Φ0 , Φ1 , Φ2 , and Φ3
are just the ratios of consecutive Fibonacci numbers.
Lecture 18
Our model of the sunflower will make use of the golden angle. The golden angle is defined as the
acute angle g that divides the circumference of a circle into two arcs with lengths in the golden ratio
(see Fig. 18.1).
x y
Φ= , φ= ,
y x
g y φ
= =
2π x+y 1+φ
φ
= = φ2 ;
Φ
49
g y 1
= =
2π x+y 1+Φ
1
= ,
1
1+1+
1
1+
1+...
which yields g/2π = [0; 2, 1]. The trailing ones in the continued fraction ensure that g/2π is difficult
to represent as a rational number. Indeed, the successive rational approximations to g/2π can be
computed to be 1/2, 1/3, 2/5, 3/8, 5/13, and so on, which is just the sequence given by the ratio
Fn /Fn+2 .
siemens.com/careers
Lecture 19
We can now understand a simple model for the growth of a sunflower head, and why the Fibonacci
numbers might appear. Suppose that during development, florets are created close to the center of the
head and subsequently move radially outward with constant speed during growth. Also suppose that
as each new floret is created at the center, it is rotated through a constant angle before moving radially.
Our goal is to derive an angle of rotation that in some sense is optimum: the resulting sunflower head
consists of well-spaced florets.
Let us denote the rotation angle by 2πα. We first consider the possibility that α is a rational
number, say n/m, where n and m are positive integers with no common factors, and n < m. Since
after m rotations florets will return to the radial line on which they started, the resulting sunflower
head consists of florets lying along m straight lines. A simulation of such a sunflower head for α = 1/7
is shown in Fig. 19.1a, where one observes seven straight lines. Evidently, rational values for α do not
result in well-spaced florets.
What about irrational values? For α irrational, no number of rotations will return the florets to
their first radial line. Nevertheless, the resulting sunflower head may still not have well-spaced florets.
For example, if α = π − 3, then the resulting sunflower head looks like Fig. 19.1b. There, one can
see seven counterclockwise spirals. Recall that a good rational approximation to π is 22/7, which is
slightly larger than π. On every seventh counterclockwise rotation, new florets fall just short of the
radial line of florets created seven rotations ago.
The irrational numbers that are most likely to construct a sunflower head with well-spaced florets
are those that can not be well-approximated by rational numbers. Here, we choose the golden angle,
taking α = 1 − φ. The rational approximations to 1 − φ are given by Fn /Fn+2 , so that the number of
spirals observed will correspond to the Fibonacci numbers.
Two simulations of the sunflower head with α = 1 − φ are shown in Fig. 19.2. These simulations
differ only by the choice of radial velocity, v0 . In Fig. 19.2a, one counts 13 clockwise spirals and
21 counterclockwise spirals; in Fig. 19.2b, one counts 21 counter clockwise spirals and 34 clockwise
spirals, the same as the sunflower head shown in Fig. 16.1.
53
(a) (b)
Figure 19.1: Simulation of the sunflower model for (a) α = 1/7; (b) α = π − 3 and counterclockwise
rotation.
(a) (b)
Figure 19.2: Simulation of the sunflower model for α = 1 − φ and clockwise rotation. (a) v0 = 1/2; (b)
v0 = 1/4.
Lecture A A
Appendix
Mathematical induction
View this lecture on YouTube
Mathematical induction is a method of proof used to establish a statement about the natural num-
bers. The standard example used to illustrate this form of proof is
n ( n + 1)
1+2+3+···+n = , (A.1)
2
valid for n a positive integer. We will suppose that this formula is given, and that our task is to prove
it using mathematical induction.
The first step in the proof is to establish what is called the base case. Here, we prove that the given
statement is true for the smallest integer for which it is claimed to be valid:
Base case: For n = 1, the left-hand side of (A.1) equals one, and the right-hand side of (A.1) equals
(1 × 2)/2 = 1, so that (A.1) is true for n = 1.
The next step is called the induction step. Here one assumes that the statement is true for n = k,
and then proves it is true for n = k + 1. Once the induction step is proved, then the statement is
declared true for all integers greater than or equal to the base case.
Why is the proof then complete? Well, if the statement is true for n = 1 as shown in the base case,
then the induction step shows it is also true for n = 2. And if the statement is true for n = 2, then the
induction step shows it is true for n = 3. And so on, leading to the conclusion that the statement is
true for all the counting numbers starting from one.
So let us proceed to prove the induction step. The method of proof usually writes the left-hand side
of the statement when n = k + 1, and then makes use of the induction hypothesis—the assumption
that the statement is true for n = k—and some additional information to obtain the right-hand side of
the statement.
k ( k + 1)
1 + 2 + 3 + · · · + k + ( k + 1) = + ( k + 1) (from induction hypothesis)
2
k ( k + 1) + 2( k + 1)
= (from combining fractions)
2
(k + 1)(k + 2)
= , (from factoring)
2
and since (k + 2) = (k + 1) + 1, we have shown that A.1 is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of
55
www.sylvania.com
We do not reinvent
the wheel we reinvent
light.
Fascinating lighting offers an infinite spectrum of
possibilities: Innovative technologies and new
markets provide both opportunities and challenges.
An environment in which your expertise is in high
demand. Enjoy the supportive working atmosphere
within our global group and benefit from international
career paths. Implement sustainable ideas in close
cooperation with other specialists and contribute to
influencing our future. Come and join us in reinventing
light every day.
Light is OSRAM
Lecture B B
Appendix
Matrix algebra
For those readers who have never studied matrices or linear algebra, it will be helpful to understand
a few basic concepts. A matrix with n rows and m columns is called an n-by-m matrix. Here, we need
only consider the simple case of two-by-two matrices.
A two-by-two matrix A, with two rows and two columns, can be written as
a b
A= .
c d
The first row has elements a and b, the second row has elements c and d. The first column has elements
a and c; the second column has elements b and d.
Matrices can be added and multiplied. Matrices can be added if they have the same dimension,
and addition proceeds element by element, following
a b e f a+e b+ f
+ = .
c d g h c+g d+h
Matrices can be multiplied if the number of columns of the left matrix equals the number of rows of
the right matrix. A particular element in the resulting product matrix, say in row k and column l, is
obtained by multiplying and summing the elements in row k of the left matrix with the elements in
column l of the right matrix. For example, a two-by-two matrix can multiply a two-by-one column
vector as follows
a b x ax + by
= .
c d y cx + dy
The first row of the left matrix is multiplied against and summed with the first (and only) column of
the right matrix to obtain the element in the first row and first column of the product matrix, and so
on for the element in the second row and first column. The product of two two-by-two matrices is
given by
a b e f ae + bg a f + bh
= .
c d g h ce + dg c f + dh
57
B.2 Determinants
View this lecture on YouTube
ax + by = 0,
(B.1)
cx + dy = 0,
When does there exist a nontrivial (not identically zero) solution for x and y?
To answer this question, we solve directly the system of equations given by (B.1). Multiplying the
first equation by d and the second by b, and subtracting the second equation from the first, results in
( ad − bc) x = 0.
Similarly, multiplying the first equation by c and the second by a, and subtracting the first equation
from the second, results in
( ad − bc)y = 0.
Therefore, a nontrivial solution of (B.1) exists only if ad − bc = 0. The quantity ad − bc defines the
determinant of the two-by-two matrix, that is
a b
det = ad − bc. (B.2)
c d
The determinants of larger square matrices can be found similarly. Just for fun, I can show you the
determinant of a three-by-three matrix:
a b c
det d e f = a(ei − f h) − b(di − f g) + c(dh − eg).
g h i
Although this is a general result for all n-by-n square matrices, we need only the result for the 2-by-2
case, which can be easily proved by an explicit calculation.
Let
a b e f
A= B= .
c d g h
Then
ae + bg a f + bh
AB = ,
ce + dg c f + dh
and
Impact matters.
navigant.com
©2013 Navigant Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Navigant Consulting is not a certified public accounting firm and does not provide
audit, attest, or public accounting services.
See navigant.com/licensing for a complete listing of private investigator licenses.
Lecture C C
Appendix
Problem solutions
Solutions to the Problems for Lecture 1
so that (C.1) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (C.1) is therefore true for all positive
integers.
61
Induction step: Suppose that (1.2) is true for positive integers n = k − 1 and n = k. Then we have
f k +3 = f k +2 + f k +1
= ( Fk p + Fk+1 q) + ( Fk−1 p + Fk q) (from induction hypothesis)
= ( Fk + Fk−1 ) p + ( Fk+1 + Fk ) q
= Fk+1 p + Fk+2 q, (from recursion relation)
so that (1.2) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (1.2) is therefore true for all positive
integers.
5. We have
1 1
( Ln−1 + Ln+1 ) = (( Fn−2 + Fn ) + ( Fn + Fn+2 )) (from (1.3))
5 5
1
= ( Fn−2 + 2Fn + Fn + Fn+1 ) (from recursion relation)
5
1
= ( Fn−2 + 3Fn + Fn + Fn−1 ) (from recursion relation)
5
= Fn . (from recursion relation)
6. We write
f ( x ) = F1 x + F2 x2 + F3 x3 + F4 x4 + . . .
x f (x) = F1 x2 + F2 x3 + F3 x4 + . . .
x2 f ( x ) = F1 x3 + F2 x4 + . . . .
We then subtract the second and third equation from the first, and use F1 = F2 = 1 and Fn+1 − Fn −
Fn−1 = 0 to obtain
(1 − x − x2 ) f ( x ) = x,
resulting in
x
f (x) = .
1 − x − x2
1. Consider the set of different possible strings. This set may be divided into two nonoverlapping
subsets: those strings that start with one and those strings for which one and two are interchanged.
For the former, the remaining n − 1 numbers can form an−1 different strings. For the latter, the
remaining n − 2 numbers may can form an−2 different strings. The total number of different strings is
therefore given by the Fibonacci recursion relation
a n = a n −1 + a n −2 .
2. Again consider the set of different possible strings. This set may be divided into two nonoverlapping
subsets: those strings for which the one and n are not interchanged, and those strings for which they
are interchanged. For the former, the number of different strings is given by an = Fn+1 . For the latter,
the number of different strings is given by an−2 = Fn−1 . We therefore have
bn = Fn+1 + Fn−1 .
From (1.3), the relation satisfied by bn is the same as that satisfied by the nth Lucas number, so that
bn = L n .
1.
(a)
√
5+1
Φ−1 = −1
√ 2
5−1
=
2
= φ,
(b)
√
1 2 1− 5
= √ × √
Φ 1+ 5 1− 5
√
2 1− 5
=
−4
√
5−1
=
2
= φ.
(c)
√ 2
2 5+1
Φ =
2
√
5+2 5+1
=
√ 4
5+3
=
2
= Φ + 1.
(d)
√ 2
5−1
φ2 =
2
√
5−2 5+1
=
√ 4
− 5+3
=
2
= −φ + 1.
2. We multiply
1
= Φ−1
Φ
by Φ and rearrange to obtain
Φ2 = Φ + 1.
Φ n +1 = Φ n + Φ n −1 .
φ n −1 = φ n + φ n +1 .
1. Write
Fk+n F F F
= k + n × k + n −1 × · · · × k +1 .
Fk Fk+n−1 Fk+n−2 Fk
Then taking limk→∞ , and using
Fj
lim = Φ,
j→∞ Fj−1
one obtains directly
Fk+n
lim = Φn .
k→∞ Fk
Φk+1 = ΦΦk
= Φ ( Fk Φ + Fk−1 ) (from induction hypothesis)
2
= Fk Φ + Fk−1 Φ
= Fk (Φ + 1) + Fk−1 Φ (from Φ2 = Φ + 1)
= ( Fk + Fk−1 ) Φ + Fk
= Fk+1 Φ + Fk (from recursion relation)
so that (4.2) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (4.2) is therefore true for all positive
integers.
(−φ)k+1 = −φ(−φ)k
= −φ (− Fk φ + Fk−1 ) (from induction hypothesis)
= Fk φ2 − Fk−1 φ
= Fk (−φ + 1) − Fk−1 φ (from φ2 = −φ + 1)
= − ( Fk + Fk−1 ) φ + Fk
= − Fk+1 φ + Fk , (from recursion relation)
so that (4.3) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (4.3) is therefore true for all positive
integers.
Φ n +1 = Φ n −1 + Φ n , (C.2)
n −1 n n +1
φ = φ +φ . (C.3)
so (5.6) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (5.6) is therefore true for all positive
integers.
2.
And since
lim (φ/Φ)n = 0,
n→∞
we obtain
lim Fn+1 /Fn = Φ.
n→∞
Fn (Φ + φ) = Φn − (−φ)n .
Φn − (−φ)n
Fn = √ .
5
4. To derive Binet’s formula, we will Taylor series expand the function f ( x ) = x/(1 − x − x2 ) and
equate the coefficients of the resulting power series to the Fibonacci numbers.
The roots of the quadratic equation 1 − x − x2 = 0 are given by φ and −Φ so we can write
x x
= .
1 − x − x2 (φ − x )(Φ + x )
where the last step uses φΦ = 1. We now use the Taylor-series expansions
1
= 1 + Φx + Φ2 x2 + Φ3 x3 + . . . ,
1 − Φx
1
= 1 + (−φ) x + (−φ)2 x2 + (−φ)3 x3 + . . . .
1 − (−φ) x
Therefore,
x Φ − (−φ) Φ2 − (−φ)2 Φ3 − (−φ)3
= √ x+ √ x2 + √ x3 + . . . ,
1 − x − x2 5 5 5
and equating the coefficients of this Taylor-series expansion with the coefficients of the generating
function for the Fibonacci sequence results in Binet’s formula
Φn − (−φ)n
Fn = √ .
5
5. The derivation follows the method we used to obtain Binet’s formula, but here the initial values
differ. We can use L0 = L2 − L1 = 2, and L1 = 1. The general solution to the Fibonacci recursion
relation is given by
Ln = c1 Φn + c2 (−φ)n .
Application of the two initial values that yields the Lucas sequence results in the system of equations
given by
c1 + c2 = 2,
c1 Φ − c2 φ = 1.
Multiplying the first equation by φ and adding it to the second equation results in
c1 (Φ + φ) = 2φ + 1.
√
Now 2φ + 1 = Φ + φ = 5. Therefore c1 = 1 and c2 = 1. Our solution is therefore
Ln = Φn + (−φ)n .
6. Binet’s formula and the analogous formula for the Lucas numbers are given by
Φn − (−φ)n
Fn = √ , Ln = Φn + (−φ)n .
5
√
Add the equation for Ln to the equation for Fn multiplied by 5, and divide by two to obtain
√
n Ln + 5Fn
Φ = .
2
�e Graduate Programme
I joined MITAS because for Engineers and Geoscientists
I wanted real responsibili� www.discovermitas.com
Maersk.com/Mitas �e G
I joined MITAS because for Engine
I wanted real responsibili� Ma
Month 16
I was a construction Mo
supervisor ina const
I was
the North Sea super
advising and the No
Real work he
helping foremen advis
International
al opportunities
Internationa
�ree wo
work
or placements ssolve problems
Real work he
helping fo
International
Internationaal opportunities
�ree wo
work
or placements ssolve pr
Qk+1 = QQk
1 1 Fk+1 Fk
= (from induction hypothesis)
1 0 Fk Fk−1
Fk+1 + Fk Fk + Fk−1
=
Fk+1 Fk
Fk+2 Fk+1
= , (from recursion relation)
Fk+1 Fk
so that (6.3) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (6.3) is therefore true for all positive
integers.
3. The first result can be obtained by taking m = n − 1 in (6.4); the second result can be obtained by
taking m = n.
4. Using Ln = Fn−1 + Fn+1 in the second formula of (6.5) yields the desired result.
so (7.4) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (7.4) is therefore true for all positive
integers.
2. We first rewrite (7.5) using a simple substitution. Let x = n − r and y = r. Then n = x + y and (7.5)
becomes
Fx2+y − Fx Fx+2y = (−1) x Fy2 . (C.4)
We write
2
Fx2+y − Fx Fx+2y = Fx−1 Fy + Fx Fy+1 − Fx−1 F2y + Fx F2y+1 Fx (from (6.4))
= Fx2−1 Fy2 + 2Fx−1 Fx Fy Fy+1 + Fx2 Fy2+1
− Fx−1 Fx Fy−1 Fy + Fy Fy+1 − Fx2 Fy2 + Fy2+1 (from (6.4))
= Fx−1 Fx Fy Fy+1 − Fy−1 + Fy2 Fx2−1 − Fx2
= Fy2 Fx−1 ( Fx−1 + Fx ) − Fx2 (from recursion relation)
= Fy2 Fx−1 Fx+1 − Fx2 (from recursion relation)
Base case: When n = 1 the left side of (9.2) is F1 = 1 and the right side is F3 − 1 = 1, so (9.2) is true for
n = 1.
k +1 k
∑ Fi = ∑ Fi + Fk+1
i =1 i =1
so (9.2) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (9.2) is therefore true for all positive
integers.
L n = L n +2 − L n +1
L n −1 = L n +1 − L n
L n −2 = L n − L n −1
.. ..
. .
L2 = L4 − L3
L1 = L3 − L2 .
Adding all the left hand sides yields the sum over the first n Lucas numbers, and adding all the right-
hand-sides results in the cancellation of all terms except the first and the last. Using L2 = 3 results in
(9.3).
3. Here, we use the relation Fn+1 = Fn+2 − Fn . The first list of identities is
Adding the equations yields ∑in=1 F2i−1 = F2n − F0 , and since F0 = 0 the result for odd Fibonacci
numbers is obtained.
Adding the equations yields ∑in=1 F2i = F2n+1 − F1 , and since F1 = 1 the result for even Fibonacci
numbers is obtained.
k +1 k
∑ Fi2 = ∑ Fi2 + Fk2+1
i =1 i =1
so (10.1) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (10.1) is therefore true for all positive
integers.
2. Write
L n L n +1 = L n ( L n + L n −1 )
= L2n + Ln−1 Ln
= L2n + Ln−1 ( Ln−1 + Ln−2 )
= L2n + L2n−1 + Ln−2 Ln−1
= ...
= L2n + L2n−1 + · · · + L22 + L1 L2
Because L1 = 1 and L2 = 3, we have L1 L2 = L21 + 2, and bringing the two to the left-hand-side proves
the identity (10.2).
x = 1 + φ2 + φ4 + φ6 + . . . ,
φ2 x = φ2 + φ4 + φ6 + . . . .
1
x=
1 − φ2
Φ2
= (from φ = 1/Φ)
Φ2 − 1
Φ2
= (from Φ2 − Φ − 1 = 0)
Φ
= Φ.
1. We first obtain the equations for the two diagonal lines. Recall that Φ = 1 + φ = 1/φ. With
the origin of the coordinate system at the lower left-hand side of the largest golden rectangle, the
longer diagonal passes through the boundary points (0, 1) and (Φ, 0), and the shorter diagonal passes
through the boundary points (1, 0) and (Φ, 1). The two diagonal lines can then be determined to be
Now, the figure of the spiralling squares is self-similar, and the first unrotated copy of the whole
can be seen to have the attached square of side length φ4 . If we can show that the drawn diagonal
lines pass through the same boundary points of the reduced-size copy, then these two lines continue
to pass through all smaller copies and must eventually intersect at the accumulation point of all the
spiralling squares.
The longer diagonal of the reduced-size copy must pass through its boundary points (1, φ2 ) and
(1 + φ3 , φ3 ), and we need to show that these points satisfy (C.5). We will need to make use of the
following relationship proved earlier:
φ2 = −φ + 1.
We proceed by substituting in the x values into the equation for the diagonal line to show that we
obtain the correct y values. For x = 1, (y = φ2 ), we have
y = −φ + 1,
= φ2 ,
y = − φ (1 + φ3 ) + 1
= 1 − φ − φ4
= 1 − φ − (1 − φ )2
= 1 − φ − 1 + 2φ − φ2
= φ (1 − φ )
= φ3 .
Similarly, the shorter diagonal of the reduced-size copy must pass through its boundary points
(1 + φ3 , φ2 ) and (1 + φ4 , φ3 ), and we need to show that these points satisfy (C.6). For 1 + φ3 , (y = φ2 ),
we have
y = Φ(1 + φ3 ) − Φ,
= φ2 ,
y = Φ (1 + φ4 ) − Φ
= φ3 ,
RUN FASTER.
RUN LONGER.. READ MORE & PRE-ORDER TODAY
RUN EASIER… WWW.GAITEYE.COM
1. We have already found that the coordinates of one of the centers of a golden spiral is given by
√ √
5+3 5 5− 5
( x, y) = , . (C.7)
10 10
Note that the origin of the largest golden rectangle is taken to be at the bottom-left corner.
The centers of the four possible golden spirals are symmetric about the mid-point of the largest
golden rectangle, the midpoint having coordinates (Φ/2, 1/2). The four vertices can then be deter-
mined from (C.7) to have coordinates
√ √ √ √
Φ 5+ 5 1 5 Φ 5+ 5 1 5
+ , − , − , − ,
2 20 2 10 2 20 2 10
√ √ √ √
Φ 5+ 5 1 5 Φ 5+ 5 1 5
− , + , + , + .
2 20 2 10 2 20 2 10
The length of the two sides of the rectangle can then be calculated to be
√
1+ 5 1
L= √ , W= √ ,
2 5 5
√
which is just a golden rectangle reduced in dimensions by the factor of 5.
1. We have
√ √
2 = 1 + ( 2 − 1)
1
= 1+ √ ,
1+ 2
√ 1
2 = 1+ √
1+ 2
1
= 1+
1
2+ √
1+ 2
1
= 1+ ,
1
2+
1
2+ √
1+ 2
√
and so on, so that 2 = [1; 2̄].
2. We have
√ √
3 = 1 + ( 3 − 1)
2
= 1+ √ ,
1+ 3
√ 2
3 = 1+ √
1+ 3
2
= 1+
2
2+ √
1+ 3
1
= 1+
1
1+ √
1+ 3
1
= 1+ ,
1
1+
2
2+ √
1+ 3
√
and so on, so that 3 = [1; 1, 2].
3. We have
e = 2 + 0.718281 . . .
1
= 2+
1.392211 . . .
1
= 2+
1
1+
2.549646 . . .
1
= 2+
1
1+
1
2+
1.819350 . . .
1
= 2+
1
1+
1
2+
1
1+
1.220479 . . .
1
= 2+ ,
1
1+
1
2+
1
1+
1
1+
4.535573 . . .
giving us the beginning of the expansion e = [2; 1, 2, 1, 1, 4, . . . ]. Remarkably, this expansion continues
in a regular fashion as
e = [2; 1, 2, 1, 1, 4, 1, 1, 6, 1, 1, 8, 1, 1, 10, . . . ]
4. We have
1 F2
Φ0 = [1; ] = 1 = = ,
1 F1
1 2 F3
Φ1 = [1; 1] = 1 + = 2 = = ,
1 1 F2
1 3 F4
Φ2 = [1; 1, 1] = 1 + = = ,
1 2 F3
1+
1
1 5 F5
Φ3 = [1; 1, 1, 1] = 1 + = = .
1 3 F4
1+
1
1+
1
Base case: Our previous calculation already shows that (17.2) is true for n = 0, 1, 2, and 3.
Induction step: Suppose that (17.2) is true for positive integers n = k. Then we write
so that (17.2) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (17.2) is therefore true for all non-
negative integers.
This e-book
is made with SETASIGN
SetaPDF
www.setasign.com
1. We have
g0 /2π = [0; ] = 0,
1 F1
g1 /2π = [0; 2] = = ,
2 F3
1 1 F2
g2 /2π = [0; 2, 1] = = = ,
1 3 F4
2+
1
1 2 F3
g3 /2π = [0; 2, 1, 1] = = = .
1 5 F5
2+
1
1+
1
Fk+1 Fk+1
= (from recursion relation)
Fk+3 Fk+1 + Fk+2
1
=
Fk+2
1+
Fk+1
1
= (from Φk = Fk+2 /Fk+1 )
1 + Φk
gk +1
= (from inspection of the continued fraction)
2π
so that (18.1) is true for n = k + 1. By the principle of induction, (18.1) is therefore true for all positive
integers.