Simcafe: Fluent - Flow Over An Airfoil-Problem Specification
Simcafe: Fluent - Flow Over An Airfoil-Problem Specification
Simcafe: Fluent - Flow Over An Airfoil-Problem Specification
SimCafe
Problem Specification
1. Create Geometry in GAMBIT
2. Mesh Geometry in GAMBIT
3. Specify Boundary Types in GAMBIT
4. Set Up Problem in FLUENT
5. Solve!
6. Analyze Results
7. Refine Mesh
Problem 1
Problem 2
Problem Specification
Consider air flowing over NACA 4412 airfoil. The freestream velocity is 50 m/s and the angle of attack is 2°.
Assume standard sea-level values for the freestream properties:
Pressure = 101,325 Pa
Density = 1.2250 kg/m3
Temperature = 288.16 K
Kinematic viscosity v = 1.4607e-5 m2/s
We will determine the lift and drag coefficients under these conditions using FLUENT.
Search Cornell
SimCafe
Problem Specification
1. Create Geometry in GAMBIT
2. Mesh Geometry in GAMBIT
3. Specify Boundary Types in GAMBIT
4. Set Up Problem in FLUENT
5. Solve!
6. Analyze Results
7. Refine Mesh
Problem 1
Problem 2
In an external flow such as that over an airfoil, we have to define a farfield boundary and mesh the region
between the airfoil geometry and the farfield boundary. It is a good idea to place the farfield boundary well away
from the airfoil since we'll use the ambient conditions to define the boundary conditions at the farfield. The farther
we are from the airfoil, the less effect it has on the flow and so more accurate is the farfield boundary condition.
The farfield boundary we'll use is the line ABCDEFA in the figure above. c is the chord length.
Start GAMBIT
Create a new directory called airfoil and start GAMBIT from that directory by typing gambit -id airfoil at the
command prompt.
Under Main Menu, select Solver > FLUENT 5/6 since the mesh to be created is to be used in FLUENT 6.0.
Import Edge
To specify the airfoil geometry, we'll import a file containing a list of vertices along the surface and have GAMBIT
join these vertices to create two edges, corresponding to the upper and lower surfaces of the airfoil. We'll then
split these edges into 4 distinct edges to help us control the mesh size at the surface.
The file containing the vertices for the airfoil can be downloaded here: naca4412.dat (right click and select Save
As...)
255 2
0 0 0
-0.00019628 0.001241474 0
-0.000247836 0.001759397 0
-0.000275577 0.002158277 0
-0.000290986 0.002495536 0
-0.000298515 0.002793415 0
-0.000300443 0.00306332 0
The first line of the file represents the number of points on each edge (255) and the number of edges (2). The
first 255 set of vertices are connected to form the edge corresponding to the upper surface; the next 255 are
connected to form the edge for the lower surface.
The chord length, c for the geometry in naca4412.dat file is 1, so x varies between 0 and 1. If you are using a
different airfoil geometry specification file, note the range of x values in the file and determine the chord length c.
You will need this later on.
Main Menu > File > Import > ICEM Input ...
For File Name, browse and select the naca4412.dat file. Select both Vertices and Edges under
Geometry to Create: since these are the geometric entities we need to create. Deselect Face. Click Accept.
We have more points around the nose area because of the high curvature around the nose.
Next, we will create the following farfield boundary. This picture of the
farfield nomenclature
will be handy.
We will create the farfield boundary by creating vertices and joining them appropriately to form edges.
Operation Toolpad > Geometry Command Button > Vertex Command Button > Create Vertex
Create the following vertices by entering the coordinates under Global and the label under Label:
Label x y z
A c 12.5c 0
B 21c 12.5c 0
C 21c 0 0
D 21c -12.5c 0
E c -12.5c 0
F -11.5 0 0
G c 0 0
Click the FIT TO WINDOW button to scale the display so that you can see all the vertices. The resulting image
should look like this:
Higher Resolution Image
Operation Toolpad > Geometry Command Button > Edge Command Button > Create Edge
Create the edge AB by selecting the vertex A followed by vertex B. Enter AB for Label. Click Apply. GAMBIT
will create the edge. You will see a message saying something like "Created edge: AB'' in the Transcript
window.
Similarly, create the edges BC, CD, DE, EG, GA and CG. Note that you might have to zoom in on the airfoil to
select vertex G correctly or click on the to select the vertices from the list and move them to the picked list.
The rest of the tutorial will use this method for vertices selection.
Next we'll create the circular arc AF. Right-click on the Create Edge button and select Arc.
In the Create Real Circular Arc menu, the box next to Center will be yellow. That means that the vertex you
select will be taken as the center of the arc. Select vertex G and click Apply. Now the box next to End Points
will be highlighted in yellow. This means that you can now select the two vertices that form the end points of the
arc. Select vertex A and then vertex F. Enter AF under Label. Click Apply.
If you did this right, the arc AF will be created. If you look in the transcript window, you'll see a message saying
that an edge has been created.
Create Faces
The edges we have created can be joined together to form faces. We will need to define three faces as shown in
the image above. Two rectangular faces, rect1 and rect2 lie to the right of the airfoil. The third face, circ1 consists
of the area outside of the airfoil but inside of the semi-circular boundary.
Operation Toolpad > Geometry Command Button > Face Command Button > Form Face
This brings up the Create Face From Wireframe menu. Recall that we had selected vertices in order to create
edges. Similarly, we will select edges in order to form a face.
To create the face rect1, select the edges AB, BC, CG, and GA. Enter rect1for the label and click Apply.
GAMBIT will tell you that it has "Created face: rect1'' in the transcript window.
Similarly, create the face rect2 by selecting ED, DC, CG and GE.
To create the last face we will need to make two separate faces, one for the outer boundary and one for the
airfoil and then subtract the airfoil from the boundary . Create semi-circular face circ1 by selecting GA, AF, FE
and EG and enter circ1 for the label. Create the face for the airfoil by selecting corresponding edges. Subtract
the airfoil from circ1.
Operation Toolpad > Geometry Command Button > Face Command Button
The Face box will be highlighted yellow. Shift click to select circ1, the outer semi-circular boundary. Then select
the lower box labeled Subtract Faces which will allow you to select faces to subtract from our outer boundary.
Select the airfoil face and click apply.
SimCafe
Problem Specification
1. Create Geometry in GAMBIT
2. Mesh Geometry in GAMBIT
3. Specify Boundary Types in GAMBIT
4. Set Up Problem in FLUENT
5. Solve!
6. Analyze Results
7. Refine Mesh
Problem 1
Problem 2
Mesh Faces
We'll mesh each of the 3 faces separately to get our final mesh. Before we mesh a face, we need to define the
point distribution for each of the edges that form the face i.e. we first have to mesh the edges. We'll select the
mesh stretching parameters and number of divisions for each edge based on three criteria:
1. We'd like to cluster points near the airfoil since this is where the flow is modified the most; the mesh resolution as we
approach the farfield boundaries can become progressively coarser since the flow gradients approach zero.
2. Close to the surface, we need the most resolution near the leading and trailing edges since these are critical areas with
the steepest gradients.
3. We want transitions in mesh size to be smooth; large, discontinuous changes in the mesh size significantly decrease the
numerical accuracy.
The edge mesh parameters we'll use for controlling the stretching are successive ratio, first length and last
length. Each edge has a direction as indicated by the arrow in the graphics window. The successive ratio Ris
the ratio of the length of any two successive divisions in the arrow direction as shown below. Go to the index of
the GAMBIT User Guide and look under Edge>Meshing for this figure and accompanying explanation. This
help page also explains what the first and last lengths are; make sure you understand what they are.
Operation Toolpad > Mesh Command Button > Edge Command Button > Mesh Edges
Select the edge GA. The edge will change color and an arrow and several circles will appear on the edge. This
indicates that you are ready to mesh this edge. Make sure the arrow is pointing upwards. You can reverse the
direction of the edge by clicking on the Reverse button in the Mesh Edges menu. Enter a ratio of 1.15. This
means that each successive mesh division will be 1.15 times bigger in the direction of the arrow. Select Interval
Count under Spacing. Enter 45 for Interval Count. Click Apply. GAMBIT will create 45 intervals on this
edge with a successive ratio of 1.15.
For edges AB and CG, we'll set the First Length (i.e. the length of the division at the start of the edge) rather
than the Successive Ratio. Repeat the same steps for edges BC, AB and CG with the following specifications:
Note that later we'll select the length at the trailing edge to be 0.02c so that the mesh length is continuous
between IG and CG, and HG and CG.
Now that the appropriate edge meshes have been specified, mesh the face rect1:
Operation Toolpad > Mesh Command Button > Face Command Button > Mesh Faces
Select the face rect1. The face will change color. You can use the defaults of Quad (i.e. quadrilaterals) and
Map. Click Apply.
Next mesh face rect2 in a similar fashion. The following table shows the parameters to use for the different
edges:
The resultant mesh should be symmetric about CG as shown in the figure below.
Split Edges
Next, we will split the top and bottom edges of the airfoil into two edges so that we have better control of the
mesh point distribution. Figure of the splitting edges is shown below.
We need to do this because a non-uniform grid spacing will be used for x<0.3c and a uniform grid spacing for
x>0.3c. To split the top edge into HI and IG, select
Operation Toolpad > Geometry Command Button > Edge Command Button > Split/Merge Edge
Make sure Point is selected next to Split With in the Split Edge window.
We'll use the point at x=0.3c on the upper surface to split this edge into HI and IG. To do this, enter 0.3 for x:
under Global. If your c is not equal to one, enter the value of 0.3*c instead of just 0.3.For instance, if c=4, enter
1.2. From here on, whenever you're asked to enter (some factor)*c, calculate the appropriate value for your c
and enter it.
Click Apply. You will see a message saying "Edge edge.1 was split, and edge edge.3 created'' in the Transcript
window.
Repeat this procedure for the lower surface to split it into HJ and JG. Use the point at x=0.3c on the lower
surface to split this edge.
Finally, let's mesh the face consisting of circ1 and the airfoil surface. For edges HI and HJ on the front part of the
airfoil surface, use the following parameters to create edge meshes:
HI From H to I 0.02c 40
HJ From H to J 0.02c 40
For edges IG and JG, we'll set the divisions to be uniform and equal to 0.02c. Use Interval Size rather than
Interval Count and create the edge meshes:
For edge AF, the number of divisions needs to be equal to the number of divisions on the line opposite to it, in
this case, the upper surface of the airfoil(this is a subtle point; chew over it). To determine the number of divisions
that GAMBIT has created on edge IG, select
Operation Toolpad > Mesh Command Button > Edge Command Button >Summarize Edge Mesh
Select edge IG and then Elements under Component and click Apply. This will give the total number of
nodes (i.e. points) and elements (i.e. divisions) on the edge in the Transcriptwindow. The number of divisions
on edge IG is 35. (If you are using a different geometry, this number will be different; I'll refer to it as NIG). So the
Interval Count for edge AF is NHI+NIG= 40+35= 75.
Similarly, determine the number of divisions on edge JG. This comes out as 35 for the current geometry. So the
Interval Count for edge EF is 75.
Create the mesh for edges AF and EF with the following parameters:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
Adaptavist Theme Builder (4.2.4-M1) Powered by Atlassian Confluence 3.4.8, the Enterprise Wiki
Search Cornell
SimCafe
Problem Specification
1. Create Geometry in GAMBIT
2. Mesh Geometry in GAMBIT
3. Specify Boundary Types in GAMBIT
4. Set Up Problem in FLUENT
5. Solve!
6. Analyze Results
7. Refine Mesh
Problem 1
Problem 2
Group Edges
We'll create groups of edges and then create boundary entities from these groups.
Operation Toolpad > Geometry Command Button > Group Command Button > Create Group
Select Edges and enter farfield1 for Label, which is the name of the group. Select the edges AF and EF.
Note that GAMBIT adds the edge to the list as it is selected in the GUI.
Click Apply.
In the transcript window, you will see the message "Created group: farfield1 group".
Similarly, create the other two farfield groups. You should have created a total of three groups:
farfield1 AF,EF
farfield2 AB,DE
farfield3 BC,CD
Now that we have grouped each of the edges into the desired groups, we can assign appropriate boundary types
to these groups.
Operation Toolpad > Zones Command Button > Specify Boundary Types
Select any edge belonging to the airfoil surface and that will select the airfoil group. Next to Name:, enter airfoil.
Leave the Type as WALL.
Click Apply.
In the Transcript Window, you will see a message saying "Created Boundary entity: airfoil".
Similarly, create boundary entities corresponding to farfield1, farfield2 and farfield3 groups. Set Type to
Velocity-Inlet for farfield1 and farfield2. Set Type to Pressure-Outlet for farfield3.
Export Mesh
SimCafe
Problem Specification
1. Create Geometry in GAMBIT
2. Mesh Geometry in GAMBIT
3. Specify Boundary Types in GAMBIT
4. Set Up Problem in FLUENT
5. Solve!
6. Analyze Results
7. Refine Mesh
Problem 1
Problem 2
Launch FLUENT
Import File
Navigate to your working directory and select the airfoil.msh file. Click OK.
Analyze Grid
Note what the surfaces farfield1, farfield2, etc. correspond to by selecting and plotting them in turn.
Define Properties
Click OK.
The speed of sound under SSL conditions is 340 m/s so that our freestream Mach number is around 0.15. This is
low enough that we'll assume that the flow is incompressible. So the energy equation can be turned off.
Make sure there is no check in the box next to Energy Equation and click OK.
3
Make sure air is selected under Fluid Materials. Set Density to constant and equal to 1.225 kg/m .
Click Change/Create.
We'll work in terms of gauge pressures in this example. So set Operating Pressure to the ambient value of
101,325 Pa.
Click OK.
For each, click Set.... Then, choose Components under Velocity Specification Method and set the x-
and y-components to that for the freestream. For instance, the x-component is 50*cos(1.2)=49.99. (Note that
1.2° is used as our angle of attack instead of 2° to adjust for the error caused by assuming the airfoil to be 2D
instead of 3D.)
Click OK.
Set farfield3 to pressure-outlet boundary type, click Set... and set the Gauge Pressure at this boundary
to 0. Click OK.
Go to Step 5: Solve!
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
Adaptavist Theme Builder (4.2.4-M1) Powered by Atlassian Confluence 3.4.8, the Enterprise Wiki
Search Cornell
SimCafe
Problem Specification
1. Create Geometry in GAMBIT
2. Mesh Geometry in GAMBIT
3. Specify Boundary Types in GAMBIT
4. Set Up Problem in FLUENT
5. Solve!
6. Analyze Results
7. Refine Mesh
Problem 1
Problem 2
Step 5: Solve!
Solve > Control > Solution
As you may recall from the previous tutorials, this is where we set the initial guess values (the base case) for the
iterative solution. Once again, we'll set these values to be equal to those at the inlet (to review why we did this
look back to the tutorial about CFG programs) . Select farfield1 under Compute From.
Click Init.
Now we will set the residual values (the criteria for a good enough solution). Once again, we'll set this value to
1e-06.
Click OK.
Under Coefficient, choose Lift. Under Options, select Print and Plot. Then, Choose airfoil under Wall
Zones.
Lastly, set the Force Vector components for the lift. The lift is the force perpendicular to the direction of the
freestream. So to get the lift coefficient, set X to -sin(1.2°)=-020942 and Y to cos(1.2°)=0.9998.
Similarly, set the Force Monitor options for the Drag force. The drag is defined as the force component in the
direction of the freestream. So under Force Vector, set X to cos(1.2°)=0.9998 and Y to sin(1.2°)=0.020942
Turn on only Print for it.
Now, set the reference values to set the base cases for our iteration. Select farfield1 under Compute From.
Click OK.
Note that the reference pressure is zero, indicating that we are measuring gage pressure.
Make note of your findings, make sure you include data such as;
How does the Lift coefficient compared with the experimental data?
Main Menu > File > Write > Case & Data...
Save case and data after you have obtained a converged solution.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
Adaptavist Theme Builder (4.2.4-M1) Powered by Atlassian Confluence 3.4.8, the Enterprise Wiki
Search Cornell
SimCafe
Problem Specification
1. Create Geometry in GAMBIT
2. Mesh Geometry in GAMBIT
3. Specify Boundary Types in GAMBIT
4. Set Up Problem in FLUENT
5. Solve!
6. Analyze Results
7. Refine Mesh
Problem 1
Problem 2
Lift Coefficient
From FLUENT main window, we see that the lift coefficient is 0.647. This compare fairly well with the literature
result of 0.6 from Abbott et al.
As can be seen, the velocity of the upper surface is faster than the velocity on the lower surface.
On the leading edge, we see a stagnation point where the velocity of the flow is nearly zero. The fluid
accelerates on the upper surface as can be seen from the change in colors of the vectors.
Higher Resolution Image
On the trailing edge, the flow on the upper surface decelerates and converge with the flow on the lower surface.
Do note that the time for fluid to travel top and bottom surface of the airfoil is not necessarily the same,
as common misconception
The reference pressure, density, and velocity are defined in the Reference Values panel in Step 5. Please refer
to FLUENT's help for more information. Go to Help > User's Guide Index for help.
Change the Y Axis Function to Pressure..., followed by Pressure Coefficient. Then, select airfoil
under Surfaces.
Click Plot.
The lower curve is the upper surface of the airfoil and have a negative pressure coefficient as the pressure is
lower than the reference pressure.
Select Pressure... and Pressure Coefficient from under Contours Of. Check the Filled and Draw Grid
under Options menu. Set Levels to 50.
Click Display.
Higher Resolution Image
From the contour of pressure coefficient, we see that there is a region of high pressure at the leading edge
(stagnation point) and region of low pressure on the upper surface of airfoil. This is of what we expected from
analysis of velocity vector plot. From Bernoulli equation, we know that whenever there is high velocity, we have
low pressure and vise versa.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
Adaptavist Theme Builder (4.2.4-M1) Powered by Atlassian Confluence 3.4.8, the Enterprise Wiki
Search Cornell
SimCafe
Problem Specification
1. Create Geometry in GAMBIT
2. Mesh Geometry in GAMBIT
3. Specify Boundary Types in GAMBIT
4. Set Up Problem in FLUENT
5. Solve!
6. Analyze Results
7. Validate the Results
Problem 1
Problem 2
Force Conventions
FLUENT report forces in term of pressure force and viscous force. For instance, we are interested in the drag on
the airfoil,
where
where
Report Force
C = (C ) + (C )
d d pressure d skin friction
where
In reality, (C ) has biggest contribution to drag but ignored because of the inviscid model that we
d skin friction
specify. (C ) should be zero, but it is not zero because of inaccuracies and numerical dissipation during
d pressure
the computation.
Select Forces. Under Force Vector, enter -0.02094 next to X. Enter 0.9998 next to Y. Select airfoil under Wall
Zones. Click Print.
Similarly, lift force is due to the contribution of pressure force and viscous force.
C = (C ) + (C )
l l pressure l skin friction
where
Since our model is inviscid, (C ) is zero. We see that the lift coefficient compare well with the experimental value of
l skin friction
0.6.
Do note that the lift coefficient for inviscid model is higher than the experimental value. In reality, if we take into
account the effect of viscosity, we will have (C ) of negative value. The viscous effect will lower the
l skin friction
overall lift coefficient. Since our inviscid model neglect the effect of viscosity, we have a slightly higher lift
coefficient compared to the experimental data.
Grid Convergence
A finer mesh with four times the original mesh density was created. The lift coefficient was found to be 0.649.
We see that the difference in drag coefficient is very large. We used inviscid case for our model, so we are expecting a C
d
of zero. However, since the parameter of interest is the lift coefficient, and the value lift coefficient does not deviate much
from original mesh to fine mesh, we concluded that the fine mesh is good enough.
The modeling result obtained is still off from the literature result. Further validation steps are needed before we
can conclude about the accuracy of our model. Other parameter that will affect the validity of our result is the
choice of viscous model. We used inviscid model which basically assumed that the flow inviscid and totally ignore
the effect of boundary layer near the airfoil surface. We might want to try out turbulence model for this high
Reynolds number flow.
Summary
Following table shows comparison of modeling result with experimental data.
C C
l d
Theory - 0
Though further validation steps are still needed before we can come up with a model that will accurately represent the
physical flow, this simple tutorial demonstrates the use of reasonable assumption and approximation in obtaining
understanding of physical flow properties around an airfoil.
Reference
The experimental data is taken from Theory of Wing Sections By Ira Herbert Abbott, Albert Edward Von Doenhoff pg. 488
Go to Problem 1
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
Adaptavist Theme Builder (4.2.4-M1) Powered by Atlassian Confluence 3.4.8, the Enterprise Wiki