AFGE, NFFE, NAGE vs. VA
AFGE, NFFE, NAGE vs. VA
AFGE, NFFE, NAGE vs. VA
INTRODUCTION
1
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 2 of 24
Plaintiffs bring this action to hold unlawful and set aside determinations by the U.S.
Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) that, effective November 15, 2018, employees who
occupy positions listed in 38 U.S.C. Section 7421(b) may not, under any circumstances, perform
union representational activities while on “official time,” notwithstanding that, inter alia, 5
U.S.C. Section 7131 specifically guarantees employees the right to engage in such union
representational activities while on official time. Plaintiffs are the American Federation of
FD-1, IAMAW, AFL-CIO (“NFFE”) and the National Association of Government Employees,
Inc. (“NAGE”). The VA issued separate copies of these determinations, which it entitled in each
Determination”) to each plaintiff union dated November 7, 2018. True and accurate copies of
the Official Time Determination received by AFGE, NFFE and NAGE are attached to this
The Official Time Determination is contrary to 38 U.S.C. § 7422 and to the Federal
Service Labor Management Relations Statute, 5 U.S.C. § 7101, et seq. (hereinafter “Chapter
71”). Chapter 71 establishes a comprehensive labor relations scheme for federal sector
employees and their unions. See, e.g., AFGE, et al. v. Trump, et al., 318 F. Supp. 3d 370 (D.D.C.
2018). As part of this scheme, 5 U.S.C. Section 7131 specifically authorizes federal employees
to receive official time for work performed by unions in support of bargaining unit employees.
Plaintiff unions are certified as the exclusive representative of bargaining unit employees at their
workplace.
Section 7422 of Title 38 (“Section 7422”) creates a narrow exception for certain VA
positions listed in Section 7421 (“Title 38 employees”). Section 7422 allows the Secretary of the
2
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 3 of 24
VA to prescribe by regulation the hours and conditions of employment for Title 38 employees
and to remove certain matters relating to Title 38 employees from collective bargaining in three
delineated instances: (1) professional conduct or competence, (2) peer review, and (3) the
7422(b). But outside of these three discrete instances, the Secretary’s authority to prescribe
regulations regarding Title 38 employees is subject to the right of Federal employees to engage
in collective bargaining pursuant to Chapter 71. 38 U.S.C. Section 7422(a). See AFGE, et al. v.
Trump, et al., 318 F. Supp at 434 (“Congress enacted [Chapter 71] to protect and preserve
collective bargaining rights, not to destroy them. . . Quite frankly, it is hard to even imagine a
The Official Time Determination is unsupported and unsupportable. The use of official
time by Title 38 employees does not fall under the statutory exemption from collective
bargaining for professional conduct and competence contained in 38 U.S.C. Section 7422.
Plaintiffs therefore seek a judgment declaring that the Official Time Determination is invalid and
setting it aside pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A) and (C) because it is arbitrary and capricious, an
abuse of discretion and contrary to law and exceeds the VA Secretary’s authority under 38
I. JURISDICTION
1. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 2201 and 2202; 38 U.S.C. § 7422(b)
and (d); and 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.; see AFGE Local 446 v. Nicholson, 475 F.3d 341,
3
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 4 of 24
II. VENUE
III. PARTIES
having its headquarters at: 80 F Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001. AFGE
4. AFGE and its affiliated councils and locals are the certified exclusive representative,
Title 38 employees.
1225 New York Ave., N.W., Suite 450, Washington, D.C. 20005. NFFE is affiliated
with its parent organization the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace
Workers.
representative of these employees, NFFE advances the social and economic welfare and
bargaining, filing and arbitrating grievances to uphold the provisions in such agreements,
4
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 5 of 24
filing complaints with administrative agencies, lobbying Congress for legislative action,
8. Plaintiff NAGE is a national labor organization and is affiliated with the Service
Employees International Union. NAGE in incorporated in the state of Delaware with its
9. NAGE and its local units are the certified exclusive bargaining representative of
represents bargaining units in the VA. These units include Title 38 employees.
10. NAGE and its locals are the certified exclusive representative, under 5 U.S.C. § 7111, of
Title 38 employees.
12. Defendant Robert Wilkie is the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. He
13. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs is a federal agency whose headquarters are
IV. FACTS
14. 5 U.S.C. Chapter 71 governs labor relations in the federal civilian workplace.
15. When enacting Chapter 71, Congress explicitly found that labor organizations and
5
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 6 of 24
16. 5 U.S.C. § 7102, as part of Chapter 71, protects the right of employees to form, join, or
assist any labor organization freely and without fear of penalty or reprisal.
17. 5 U.S.C. § 7131(a) provides that employees representing an exclusive representative shall
18. 5 U.S.C. § 7131(c) provides that the Federal Labor Relations Authority shall determine,
except as provided in § 7131(a), whether employees are entitled to official time in any
representative,” or “in connection with any other matter covered by this chapter, any
granted official time in any amount the agency and the exclusive representative involved
20. 38 U.S.C. Section 7421 provides that the Secretary of the VA “shall prescribe by
regulation the hours and conditions of employment and leaves of absence of employees
21. 38 U.S.C. § 7421(b) refers to the following Title 38 positions: Physicians, Dentists,
22. 38 U.S.C. Section 7422(a) provides “Except as otherwise specifically provided in this
title, the authority of the Secretary to prescribe regulations under section 7421 of this title
6
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 7 of 24
23. 38 U.S.C. § 7422(b) provides: “Such collective bargaining . . . in the case of employees
described in section 7421(b) of this title may not cover, or have any applicability to, any
24. 38 U.S.C. § 7422(c) provides: “For purposes of this section, the term ‘professional
conduct or competence’ means any of the following: (1) Direct patient care. (2) Clinical
competence.”
25. 38 U.S.C. § 7422(d), provides that “an issue of whether a matter or question concerns or
Secretary and is not itself subject to collective bargaining and may not be reviewed by
26. The VA and AFGE executed a national collective bargaining agreement on March 15,
27. Eric K. Shinseki, then Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, approved
the VA/AFGE Master Agreement, including those articles governing the use of official
28. The Duration of Agreement provision stated that the VA/AFGE Master Agreement
would be implemented and become effective after it had been approved, ratified, signed
by the Parties, and subjected to Agency head review pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7114(c).
7
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 8 of 24
30. Article 48, Section 1(B) of the VA/AFGE Master Agreement states, “As provided in 5
U.S.C. § 7131, official time shall be granted as specified in law and in any additional
amount the Department and the Union agree to be reasonable, necessary, and in the
public interest. Official time shall be granted for activities as specified in law and in
31. Article 48, Section 2 of the VA/AFGE Master Agreement sets forth agreed-upon amounts
of official time for Union officials designated at the national and district levels.
32. Article 48, Section 10 of the VA/AFGE Master Agreement sets forth agreed-upon
amounts of official time for Union officials designated at the local level.
33. Pursuant to the VA/AFGE Master Agreement, other collectively bargained agreements
between AFGE and/or its affiliated councils and locals and the VA, and past practice,
Title 38 employees in the AFGE/VA bargaining unit have received official time.
34. The VA and NFFE executed a national collective bargaining agreement on June 6, 2011
35. Eric K. Shinseki, then Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, approved
the VA/NFFE Master Agreement, including those articles governing the use of official
36. The Duration of Agreement provision stated that the VA/NFFE Master Agreement would
be implemented and become effective after it had been approved, ratified, signed by the
8
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 9 of 24
38. The VA and NFFE are in bargaining over a successor agreement to the VA/NFFE Master
Agreement, pursuant to the terms of a private settlement agreement between the parties
39. Article 2 of the VA/NFFE Master Agreement provides, among other things, that NFFE
has the exclusive right to represent employees in presenting grievances (Art. 2, Sec.
1(C)); the Union has the right to attend all discussions between the Employer and
employee(s) conducted to resolve grievances (Sec. 1(D); the Union will be given the
opportunity to represent employees at formal meetings (Sec 2(A)); and establishes the
right for Union representatives to hold and attend meetings with the Agency and among
themselves (Art. 2, Sec. 5). Art. 2, Sec. 3. Article 48, Section 2 of the VA/AFGE Master
Agreement sets forth agreed-upon amounts of official time for Union officials designated
40. Article 2, Section 8 details official time that is automatically granted to certain NFFE
officers and locals, so that they need not request official time for each pay period where
they work to represent NFFE bargaining unit members. Article 2 establishes that certain
NFFE officers are granted official time as a set percentage of their work week. For
example, the NFFE VA Council President is on 100% official time, whereas NFFE
41. Article 2, Sec. 8 is the main grant of official time to NFFE officers under 5 U.S.C. §7131
(d); however, official time appears, incidentally, elsewhere throughout the collective
bargaining agreement. See, for example, Art. 10, Sec. 5 (“All partnership activities and
9
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 10 of 24
42. Pursuant to the VA/NFFE Master Agreement, other collectively bargained agreements
between NFFE and/or its affiliated councils and locals and the VA, and past practice,
Title 38 employees in the NFFE/VA bargaining unit are granted official time.
43. The VA and NAGE executed a national collective bargaining agreement on September
44. Robert A. McDonald, then Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved the VA/NAGE Master Agreement, including those articles governing the use of
45. The Duration of Agreement provision stated that the VA/NAGE Master Agreement
would be implemented and become effective after it had been approved, ratified, signed
by the Parties, and subjected to Agency head review pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7114(c).
46. The VA/NAGE Master Agreement remains in effect through September 30, 2019, at
which point it will automatically be renewed for a period of three (3) years, or, if either
party choses to open the contract for renegotiations, remain in full force and effect during
47. Article 6, Section 1(D) of the VA/NAGE Master Agreement states, “Consistent with the
requirements of this Article, should the Union exhausts [sic] its allocations of official
time in Sections 2 and 3 below, any additional requested time will be provided consistent
48. Article 6 Section 2 of the VA/NAGE Master Agreement sets forth agreed-upon amounts
10
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 11 of 24
49. Article 6, Section 3 of the VA/NAGE Master Agreement sets forth agree-upon amounts
50. Article 6, Section 4 of the VA/NAGE Master Agreement sets forth the activities official
51. Pursuant to the VA/NAGE Master Agreement, other collectively bargained agreements
between NAGE and/or its locals and the VA, and past practice, Title 38 employees in the
52. On November 7, 2018, Jacquelyn Hayes-Byrd, Acting Assistant Secretary for Human
Resources and Administration of the VA, issued the Official Time Determination at issue
in this case.
53. The Official Time Determination stated that, “pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7422, employees
time because the use of official time by Title 38 employees negatively impacts direct
patient care.”
54. Regarding the VA/AFGE Master Agreement, the Official Time Determination stated that
“[t]he official time exclusion applies to all Title 38 employee official time provisions
55. The Official Time Determination listed the following articles of the VA/AFGE Master
Agreement as containing provisions that reference official time and were therefore
11
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 12 of 24
Section 2-General
Section 3—Policy
12
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 13 of 24
Section 2-National
Section 4—Local
Section 1—Purpose
Section 10—Local
56. The Official Time Determination stated, “Beginning on November 15, 2018, the
Department will no longer comply with the official time provisions for Title 38
employees contained in the VA/AFGE Master Agreement, any MOUs, past practices,
effect.”
13
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 14 of 24
57. On November 7, 2018, Jacquelyn Hayes-Byrd, Acting Assistant Secretary for Human
Resources and Administration of the VA, issued the Official Time Determination at issue
in this case.
58. The Official Time Determination stated that, “pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7422, employees
time because the use of official time by Title 38 employees negatively impacts direct
patient care.”
59. Identically to the VA/AFGE Official Time Determination - the VA/NFFE Master
Agreement Official Time Determination stated that “[t]he official time exclusion applies
to all Title 38 employee official time provisions found in the VA/NFFE Master
supplemental agreements, and collectively bargained agreements with AFGE that are
currently in effect.”
60. The Official Time Determination listed the following articles of the VA/NFFE Master
Agreement as containing provisions that reference official time and were therefore
Section 2
Section 3
Section 5
Section 8
14
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 15 of 24
Section 9
Section 11
Section 12
Section 5
Section 3
Section 4
Article 22 - Leave
Section 5 – Procedures
Section 1 - Policy
Section 6
Section 1
Section 9
Section 3
61. The Official Time Determination stated, “Beginning on November 15, 2018, the
Department will no longer comply with the official time provisions for Title 38
15
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 16 of 24
employees contained in the VA/NFFE Master Agreement, any MOUs, past practices,
effect.”
62. On November 7, 2018, Jacquelyn Hayes-Byrd, Acting Assistant Secretary for Human
Resources and Administration of the VA, issued the Official Time Determination at issue
in this case.
63. The Official Time Determination stated that, “pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7422, employees
time because the use of official time by Title 38 employees negatively impacts direct
patient care.”
64. Identically to the VA/AFGE Official Time Determination and the VA/NFFE Master
Time Determination stated that “[t]he official time exclusion applies to all Title 38
employee official time provisions found in the VA/NAGE Master Agreement, as well as
and collectively bargained agreements with NAGE that are currently in effect.”
65. The Official Time Determination listed the following articles of the VA/NAGE Master
Agreement as containing provisions that reference official time and were therefore
16
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 17 of 24
Section 1 – General
Training,
17
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 18 of 24
Section 2 – Representation
COUNT I
5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(C)
18
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 19 of 24
67. The use of official time by Title 38 employees does not concern professional conduct or
68. The use of official time by Title 38 employees does not concern direct patient care within
the meaning of within the meaning of 38 U.S.C. § 7422(b), Section 7422(c) or Section
7422(d).
69. By issuing the Official Time Determination that applied the 38 U.S.C § 7422(b)
70. By the conduct set forth in paragraphs 1 through 66, the VA Secretary acted outside the
COUNT II
5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A)
72. The use of official time by Title 38 employees does not concern professional conduct or
73. The use of official time by Title 38 employees does not concern direct patient care within
the meaning of within the meaning of 38 U.S.C. § 7422(b), Section 7422(c) or Section
7422(d).
74. By issuing the Official Time Determination that applied the 38 U.S.C § 7422(b)
19
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 20 of 24
75. By the conduct set forth in paragraphs 1 through 66, the Official Time Determination is
U.S.C. § 706(2)(A).
COUNT III
5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A)
77. The use of official time by Title 38 employees does not concern professional conduct or
78. The use of official time by Title 38 employees does not concern direct patient care within
the meaning of within the meaning of 38 U.S.C. § 7422(b), Section 7422(c) or Section
7422(d).
79. By issuing the Official Time Determination that applied the 38 U.S.C § 7422(b)
80. By the conduct set forth in paragraphs 1 through 66, the Official Time Determination is
U.S.C. § 706(2)(A).
20
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 21 of 24
COUNT IV
5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A)
82. The use of official time by Title 38 employees does not concern professional conduct or
83. The use of official time by Title 38 employees does not concern direct patient care within
the meaning of within the meaning of 38 U.S.C. § 7422(b), Section 7422(c) or Section
7422(d).
84. By issuing the Official Time Determination that applied the 38 U.S.C § 7422(b)
85. By the conduct set forth in paragraphs 1 through 66, the Official Time Determination is
not in accordance with law in violation of 38 U.S.C. § 7422(b), 38 U.S.C. § 7422(d), and
5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A).
RELIEF REQUESTED
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court grant the following relief:
1. Hold unlawful and set aside the Official Time Determination because its holding that the
Agreement, the VA/NFFE Master Agreement and the VA/NAGE Master Agreement
authority;
21
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 22 of 24
2. Hold unlawful and set aside the Official Time Determination because its holding that the
discretion;
3. Hold unlawful and set aside the Official Time Determination because its holding that the
4. Order the Defendants to comply with the VA/AFGE Master Agreement, the VA/NFFE
Master Agreement and VA/NAGE Master Agreement regarding official time for Title 38
employees;
Respectfully submitted,
22
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 23 of 24
23
Case 1:18-cv-02629 Document 1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 24 of 24
24