Improving The Efficiency of Pelton Wheel and Cross-Flow Micro Hydro Power Plants
Improving The Efficiency of Pelton Wheel and Cross-Flow Micro Hydro Power Plants
Improving The Efficiency of Pelton Wheel and Cross-Flow Micro Hydro Power Plants
1047
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
1048
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
x x x x x
Typical system component efficiencies are shown in Table Selection of the turbine depends on the site characteristics,
I: the main factors being the head available, the flow rate and the
power required as well as the speed at which the turbine is
TABLE I
TYPICAL SYSTEM COMPONENT EFFICIENCIES [5] desired to run the generator [4]. All turbines have a power-
System Component Efficiency speed characteristic and an efficiency-speed characteristic. For
a particular head they will tend to run most efficiently at a
Canal 95%
particular speed, and require a particular flow rate.
Penstock 90% Water turbines are often classified as being either Reaction
Turbine 60 -80% or Impulse turbines. In a reaction turbine, the runners are fully
immersed in water and are enclosed in a pressure casing. In an
Generator 85%
impulse turbine, the runner operates in air and is turned by one
Step-up and down 96% or more jets of water which make contact with the blade. The
transformers water remains at atmospheric pressure before and after
Transmission 90% making contact with the runner blades. In this case, pressure
energy is converted into the kinetic energy of a high speed jet
of water in the form of a nozzle. Then it is converted to
To determine the actual power output from the MHS the rotation energy in contact with the runner blades by deflection
following equation that includes the system efficiency factor, of the water and change of momentum. The nozzle is aligned
ηtotal is used: so that it provides maximum force on the blades. An impulse
1049
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
turbine needs a casing only to control splashing and to protect A. Characteristics of Pelton Wheel Cups/Buckets
against accidents. The central part of each bucket has a splitter ridge. This is
Impulse turbines are cheaper than Reaction turbines the part that the water jet hits first. This splitter ridge should
because no specialist pressure casing and no carefully be sharp and smooth, so that it cleanly splits the jet into two
engineered clearances are needed. These fabrication halves. The force on the bucket comes from it catching the
constraints make impulse turbines more attractive for use in water and taking out as much of the water’s momentum as it
micro-hydro systems. Other advantages of using impulse can. The more the water’s momentum absorbed by each
turbines over reaction turbines in micro-hydro systems are that bucket, the better the turbine efficiency. Getting a good torque
impulse turbines are more tolerant to sand and other particles from this force requires the force to act at as large a radius as
in the water. They also allow better access to working parts possible. To achieve this, the position of the end point of the
and are easier to fabricate and maintain [7]. splitter ridge is important. The optimum position will have
In this study the Pelton wheel and the Cross-flow turbine most of the water hitting the bucket when it is nearly at right
are considered in detail. They are both Impulse turbines. angles to the jet. The angle of the splitter ridge is set so that it
is approximately at right angles to the jet when the full cross-
IV. PELTON WHEEL TURBINE section of the jet is hitting it. The rest of the internal shape is
A Pelton turbine consists of a series of cups mounted designed to allow water to flow freely round, and out at the
around the periphery of a circular disc. The shaft of the Pelton edges. The water should emerge at a favourable an angle to
turbine is mounted either horizontal or vertical. The turbine is give maximum moment from the momentum change. This is
not immersed in water but operates in air with the wheel achieved by having the cup surfaces smoothly curved, with a
driven by jets of high pressure water which hit the cups. The reasonably large radius [5].
kinetic energy of the water jets is transferred to the turbine as The jet should always strike the surface between the splitter
the water jet is deflected back. The kinetic energy of a jet of ridge first and never at the edges of the bucket. The surface
water is converted into angular rotation of the cups as the jet between the splitter ridge and the outside end of the bucket
strikes. The high-velocity jet of water emerging from a nozzle has to be shaped so that it directs all the water from the ridge
impinges on the cups and sets the wheel into motion. The into bucket cups [5].
speed of rotation is determined by the flow rate and the Ideally the bucket should take the water around a complete
velocity of water and these are controlled by the spear valve. ‘U’, removing all the energy from the jet, and leaving the
The water must have just enough speed to move out from water stationary in air and then have it fall under its own
between the cups and fall away under gravity from the wheel. weight into the tailrace. In reality this is not achievable
because the next bucket would hit the water left hanging in
mid-air. The edges of the bucket are consequently angled
outwards; just enough to make sure that the water clears the
next bucket [5].
1050
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
then the water, relative to the bucket, leaves at a speed and Vω1 = Vr1 cos ф – v1
of the force exerted by the jet of water in the direction of motion
So if the bucket is moving at a velocity of vb and the water is:
is coming out of the bucket at a speed of vb, in almost the
opposite direction, this would mean that the speed of the water F = ρaVω [Vω + Vω1]
coming out relative to the housing is nearly zero; its energy
where ‘a’ is the area of the jet given as:
having been completely removed by the bucket [5].
a = πd2 / 4
The rotational speed of the buckets hence the runner is
d = diameter of the jet
determined by the jet velocity as illustrated in Fig. 8.
the angle β is an acute angle, therefore positive sign is taken
work done by the jet on the runner per second
= ρaVω[Vω + Vω1] x v
weight of water striking/s
Fig. 8 Water jet hitting the bucket
= ρaVω[Vω + Vω1] x v
The net head acting on the Pelton wheel
ρaVω x g
H = Hg - hf
= [Vω + Vω1] x v
where Hg = gross head
g
the energy supplied to the jet at inlet is in the form of kinetic
hf is the head loss due to friction,
energy and is equal to mV2 / 2
which is given by the Darcy – Weisbach Equation
and kinetic energy of jet per second
= ρaVω x Vω2
2
Therefore the kinetic energy of the water jet is transferred
where f = Darcy friction factor (dimensionless)
to the buckets and hence the runner. So the runner rotational
speed depends on the jet velocity.
L = length of the penstock (m)
V = volumetric flow rate (m/s) B. Pelton Wheel Turbine Efficiency
g = acceleration due to gravity (m/s2) The parameters of the runner that affect efficiency are:
D* = diameter of penstock (m) diameter of runner, number of jets, number of buckets of a
runner and method used to attach buckets to a runner.[5]
then
A small runner is cheaper to make than a larger one. It takes
velocity of the jet at inlet = √(2gH)
less material and the housing and associated components can
in fig 10 this is = Vω be made smaller. To use smaller runners requires dividing the
v = v1 = πDN / 60 flow of water among a large number of jets. Multiple-jet
Pelton turbines can have up to six jets before interference
where N = speed of the wheel in rpm effects between jets lead to too much inefficiency. Multiple-jet
D = diameter of the wheel machines have the following advantages over the single-jet
machines: [5]
the velocity triangle at inlet will be a straight line where • higher rotational speed
• smaller runner and case
Vr = Vω – v • some flow control is possible without extra equipment
α = 0 and θ = 0 such as the spear valve
• less chances of blockage in most designs due to reduced
from the velocity triangle at outlet surge pressures
Vr1 = Vr
1051
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
In order to optimize efficiency, the number of buckets on The power delivered by water to the runner of a
the turbine runner is generally between 18 and 22. For the turbine is transmitted to the shaft of the turbine. Due
Pelton wheel turbine to function as expected, the buckets must to mechanical losses, the power available at the shaft
be attached securely onto the runner. This is to avoid buckets of the turbine is less than the power delivered to the
flying off the runner during operation or buckets moving from runner of a turbine. The ratio of the power available
their original positions, hence compromising efficiency. There at the shaft of the turbine to the power delivered to
are a number of ways of mounting buckets onto the runner the runner is defined as mechanical efficiency.
hub. The whole runner and buckets may be cast as one piece Hence, it is written as:
or buckets may be cast separately and are then bolted,
clamped or welded onto the runner [2]. Casting of buckets and ηm = power at the shaft of the turbine
mounting them to the runner is the process widely used in the power delivered by water to the runner
manufacturing of turbines. It is cheap, reliable and can
produce complex shapes easily. ii. Volumetric efficiency
The volume of the water striking the runner of a
C. Materials for Pelton wheel turbine buckets
turbine is slightly less than the volume of water
The chief material requirements are high strength, abrasion supplied to the turbine. Some of the volume of the
resistance, casting suitability and ability to withstand extended water is discharged to the tail race without striking
use in water. Materials in common use are Aluminium, the runner of the turbine. Thus the ratio of the
Copper Alloys, Grey Cast Iron, Stainless Steel and Plastic. volume of the water actually striking the runner to
the volume of water supplied to the turbine is defined
D. Flow control for Pelton wheel turbine efficiency
as volumetric efficiency. It is written as:
In order to maximise the efficiency of the turbine, it is
important to be able to control the flow rate. The need to ηv = volume of water actually striking the runner
control this flow arises due to site conditions that include volume of water supplied to the turbine
change in water flow rate with changing seasons. There are
various options that are used to control the flow of the water iii. Overall efficiency
jet, and these include the varying of number of jets, the spear Overall efficiency is the ratio of power available at
valve and the replacement of nozzles [3]. the shaft of the turbine to the power supplied by the
water at the inlet of the turbine. It is written as:
E. Friction
Turbine efficiency can be considered separately as ηo = volume available at the shaft of the turbine
hydraulic efficiency, mechanical efficiency, volumetric power supplied at the inlet of the turbine
efficiency and overall efficiency [5].
a) Hydraulic efficiency = ηm x ηh
Hydraulic efficiency is defined at the ratio of power given
by water to the runner of a turbine to the power supplied by
the water at the inlet of the turbine. The power at the inlet of
the turbine is the highest and this power goes on decreasing as
the water flows over the buckets of the turbine due to
hydraulic losses as the buckets are not as smooth. Hence the
power delivered to the runner of the turbine will be less than
the power available at the inlet of the turbine. From Fig 10,
mathematically the hydraulic efficiency of a turbine is:
=ρaVω[Vω + Vω1] x v
(ρaVω) x (Vω)2 / 2
= 2 [Vω + Vω1] x v
(Vω)2
i. Mechanical efficiency
1052
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
1053
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
TABLE II
MICRO-HYDRO POWER PLANT BY SITE
SITE NAME GROSS DESIGNED TURB DESIGNED
HEAD FLOW INE EFFICIEN
(m) RATE TYPE CY (%)
(m3/s)
A BONDO, 51 0.325 Pelton 60%
MALAWI
B DAZI, NYANGA 138 0.035 Pelton 60%
C NYAMWANGA, 26 0.277 Cross- 60%
HONDE flow
VALLEY
D CHITUNGA, 35 0.180 Cross- 60%
MOZAMBIQUE flow
1054
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
1055
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
process. Visits were also made to the project sites to produce the mould, the hollow section in the sand box where
physically test turbine efficiencies. the molten metal is poured in to produce the required Pelton
buckets.
C. Physical Testing Of Efficiency Of Turbines
Physical testing of the turbine rotational speed was done by
using two methods. Firstly a tachometer was used.
A tachometer is an instrument that measures the rotational
speed of a shaft or disk. Secondly, a load may be used. A load
(e.g. an industrial welding machine) is carried to site. A
typical example is one which operates at 25amps and about
35Amps when striking an arc. The community is then
disconnected and the load is connected. The operating current
is measured and multiplied by the system voltage. This gives
the power output which is then compared to the designed
power output. From this, one can tell if the turbine is still
performing as designed.
D. Key Personnel Interviews
Some information on micro-hydro designing and especially
current methods of designing Pelton and Cross-flow turbines Fig. 18 Pelton bucket that has been sand cast.
was provided by interviewing key personnel.
Fig. 18 is showing a single bucket that has been sand cast.
E. Data Collection and Analysis The feeder and the riser are still attached to the bucket. The
Financial data was collected through online quotations. feeder is the entrance through which the molten metal is
Tables and graphs were used to compare financial information poured into the mould and the riser is the way excess metal
and data on current methods used to manufacture turbines and goes through.
show how efficiencies can be better improved.
TABLE III
In Fig. 19 the bucket has been machined to remove the
THE TWO MHS SITES THAT HAVE THE PELTON WHEEL TURBINE INSTALLED feeder and riser. It has 2 holes drilled through it for bolting to
ON THEM the runner. It is important to have the holes expertly drilled
SITE GROSS FLOW CAPACITY TURBINE EFFICIENCY
otherwise the buckets will not sit on the runner perfectly and
HEAD RATE (kW) TYPE (%)
(m) (m3/s)
the turbine is misaligned. This reduces the efficiency of the
A 51 0.325 88 Pelton 60% turbine as some energy is lost to heavy vibrations and noise
B 138 0.035 20 Pelton 60% since the water jet will not be hitting on the correct spot
anymore.
The capacity for each site is the actual power output .
Buckets are sand cast individually and bolted to a runner.
Figs. 25 to 30 show this process. The pattern is used to
1056
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
Fig. 20 Alignment of buckets on the runner
Fig. 20 shows how individual buckets are aligned on the
runner. They sit at an angle to each other. This allows for the
full force of the jet to be applied on each bucket one after
another without hindrance from the previous bucket. This
ensures maximum efficiency of the turbine.
Fig. 23 The inside of the turbine showing the nozzle
2. Cross-flow turbine manufacturing
Cutting and welding are basically the two procedures
carried out in the fabrication of Cross-flow turbines. The site
head and flow rate are collected from the site as the critical
parameters. These are used to calculate the expected power
output hence the size of the runner, number, length and width
of blades the turbine. The overall efficiency of the turbine is
also designed at 60%. Two of the four sites that were studied
are using the Cross-flow turbine as shown in Table IV.
TABLE IV
Fig. 21 A complete turbine THE TWO MHS SITES THAT HAVE THE CROSS-FLOW TURBINE INSTALLED ON
THEM
A finished turbine is shown is Fig 21. Seventeen buckets SITE GROSS FLOW CAPAC TURBIN EFFICIE
HEAD RATE ITY E NCY
are bolted onto the runner. The number of buckets per runner (m) (m /s) (KW) TYPE (%)
is important in making sure there is enough space between the
buckets to allow the water jet to hit individual buckets with C 26 0.277 30 Cross-flow 60%
the same force.
Fig 22 shows the turbine housing being welded together. D 35 0.180 34 Cross-flow 60%
1057
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
The blades are then cut using a cutting torch and welded to Fig. 26 The turbine casing
the runner. Figs 23 to 25 show the Cross-flow turbine ready
for mounting. The turbine casing is shown in Fig 26. The cutting torch is
used to cut the different parts which are then welded together.
1058
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
1059
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
as stones and sand find their way to the turbine. This is TACHOMETER 1 2 3 4 5
READINGS
because it has the lowest hardness. The roughness of Grey
495 rpm 515 rpm 511 rpm 492 prm 498 rpm
Cast Iron is too high. This compromises the turbine efficiency
despite having a low price and a fairly high hardness.
The average of these numbers was used to calculate turbine
6. Effect of increasing turbine efficiency on MHS power power output.
out put The designed power output for this site is 34kW and turbine
The resultant change in actual power output due to increase efficiency is designed at 60%. The calculated power output
in turbine efficiency of the four MHS that were studied is from these readings was 33.3kW. The two power outputs are
shown in the Table VII. comparable to each other, therefore it was concluded that the
turbine was still operating at 60%.
TABLE VII The need for performance measurement is invaluable.
DIFFERENCES IN POWER OUTPUT DUE TO INCREASE IN TURBINE EFFICIENCY
SITE TURBIN CURRENT CURRENT NEW POSSIBLE When done on regular intervals problems are identified and
E TYPE TUBINE
EFICIENCY
POWER
OUTPUT
TURBINE
EFFICIENC
POWER
OUTPUT
rectified before the MHS needs to be shut down.
(kW) Y (kW)
TABLE IX
COSTS INVOLVED IN THE SELECTED FOUR PROJECTS
SITE TURBINE TURBINE MHS TURBINE TOTAL PROJ
TYPE EFFICIENC CAPA COST (US$) PROJEC ECT
Y CITY T COST
COST(U PER
S$) kW
A Pelton 60% 88kW 5000.00 509 5
444.00 789.14
B Pelton 60% 20kW 5000.00 81 775.20 4
088.76
C Cross- 60% 30kW 7000.00 174 5
flow 719.00 823.97
D Cross- 60% 34kW 7000.00 158 4
flow 340.00 166.84
Fig. 30 Difference in MHS power output for the four sites analysed
Using quotations from suppliers new MHS capacity were
calculated, total project cost and project cost per kW as shown
In all the four cases there is a remarkable increase in power
in Table X.
output coming from the same resources. Therefore using the
materials and manufacturing processes that give the highest TABLE X
possible yield from each site and resources is most ideal. COSTS INVOLVED WITH BETTER EFFICIENCY TURBINES
SITE TURB TURBIN NEW TURBINE TOTAL PROJEC
7. Performance measurements INE E CAPACITY COST (US$) PROJECT T COST
After the turbine has been set up and the micro hydro is just TYPE EFFICIE COST(US$) PER kW
NCY
starting to run, it is of utmost importance to measure the
A Pelton 85% 125kW 6500.00 510 944.00 4 087.55
efficiency of the turbine in order to verify if it is meeting the
B Pelton 85% 28kW 6500.00 83 275.20 2 974.12
expected efficiency. This is done using a tachometer. This is C Cross- 80% 40kW 8200.00 175 919.00 4 397.98
done at the initiation of a project and after it has run for six flow
months to check if all is performing as expected. During the D Cross- 80% 45kW 8200.00 159 540.00 3 545.33
period of study the tachometer was used to check the flow
1060
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 83 2013
higher total project costs. However, because a turbine with These processes offer far less roughness compared to
better efficiency also improves the MHS capacity the projects current methods that include sand casting, flame cutting and
are made even more viable because in the end the project cost oxyacetylene welding. That reduction in roughness lessens
per kW is reduced. The change in project cost per kW for friction and the overall efficiency of a turbine is increased.
each site is shown in Table XI.
XI. CONCLUSION
TABLE XI
THE DIFFERENCE IN PROJECT COSTS PER KW This study has revealed that turbines of better efficiencies
SITE CURRENT PROJECT EXPECTED PROJECT can be manufactured, made available for MHS and the
COST PER kW COST PER kW projects remain financially viable. This was achieved through
A 5 789.14 4 087.55 the comparison of current fabrication methods used locally to
B 4 088.76 2 974.12 methods used by different suppliers of turbines. Even though
C 5 823.97 4 397.98 the better efficiency turbines are more expensive than the ones
D 4 166.84 3 545.33 being used currently the overall benefit is clear. More
electricity is generated hence the cost per unit kW actually
decreases making the projects even more viable. The financial
This reduction is shown graphically in Fig. 39. viability of a project was determined by the project cost per
kilowatt produced. Use of better efficiency turbines will make
it possible to harness more electrical power from the same
resources.
REFERENCES
[1] Balino, Design Pelton Bucket Runner.
<http://www.balino.com/ingles/turbinas/pelton.htm> viewed on 6
October 2012
[2] Development book shop, Micro-hydro Pelton Turbine
Manual<http://developmentbookshop.com/product_info.php?products_i
d=441> viewed on 13 sept 2012
[3] Greenstone, Community Development Library, Pelton Turbine
<http://www.greenstone.org/greenstone3/nzdl%3Bjsessionid=0f.9.pp&si
Fig. 31 The reduction in project cost per kW on each site b=1&p.s=ClassifierBrowse&p.sa=&p.a=b> viewed on 6 October 2012
The graph is showing that even though turbines of higher [4] HARC, Turbines
<http://files.harc.edu/Documents/EBS/CEDP/HydropowerPart2.pdf>vie
efficiencies are more expensive the overall project cost per wed on 1 November 2012
kW actually decreases. [5] Hydropower ( 2012), Axco Generators for hydropower
applications<http://www.axcomotors.com/hydropower_generator.html>
viewed on 16 September 2012
X. RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS [6] John F Douglas, Janus M Gasiorek, John A Swaffied, Lynn B Jack (
It is highly recommended to consider investing in processes 2005). Fifth edition. Fluid Mechanics
[7] R.K. Bansal ( 2005). A textbook of fluid mechanics and hydraulic
that produce turbines with higher efficiencies such as: machines: (in S.I. units)
• Pressure die casting of turbines. They may be cast as [8] Akvopedia. <http://akvopedia.org/wiki/Micro_hydropower > viewed on
whole turbines or as segments made up of a number of 17 July 2013
[9] Sustainable Green Homes
buckets. <http://eco.allpurposeguru.com/2013/09/micro-hydropower-another-
• Investment casting of whole turbines. renewable-energy-source/> viewed on 17 July 2013
• CNC milling of Pelton buckets. [10] Free flow Hydro www.freeflowhydro.co.uk/13/
24/CINK/CINK.htmlViewed on 16 July 2013
• Cutting of Pelton runner and Cross-flow runner and [11] Fundamental form
blades using CNC laser, CNC plasma. http://www.fundamentalform.com/html/francis_turbine.html
• Electron beam and laser welding of blades to runners. Viewed on 16 July 2013
1061