Growth Engineering The Business Case For ELearning
Growth Engineering The Business Case For ELearning
Growth Engineering The Business Case For ELearning
FOR E-LEARNING
OR: How online learning can improve the ROI of your training programmes!
Contents
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
INTRODUCTION
When there are cuts to be made in the business world, the training budget is often the first on the chopping
block. Whilst decision makers sharpen their knives, Learning & Development professionals are left to fight their
corner. Training programmes are now expected to deliver the same results at a fraction of the price. This has
left the door open for eLearning to make its grand entrance.
There is a mass of literature which provides evidence to suggest that eLearning is just as effective (and in many
cases more effective) at imparting knowledge as traditional classroom learning. Our aim is to amass all the
research and information available into a forceful, undeniable nugget of eLearning enticement. This is the
business case for eLearning.
To do this we will show that online learning can be utilised to maximise return on investment (ROI) in
organisational training. How does it pull off this miraculous feat? By providing a:
As companies attempt to survive in the knowledge and information age, the importance of intellectual capital
only continues to grow. Organisations often speak of the value of human capital – the combined human capacity
to use skills, know-how and expertise to meet a wide variety of business needs and problems. Boil any business
down to its basics and all you are left with is its people. Yet many organisations fail to invest enough in their
staff.
‘…Another reason why our human capital is so important is intensifying competition… our ability to develop
productive relationships with these resource holders, and thus to win important business opportunities, is
rooted in our technical knowhow. That’s one reason why we have maintained heavy investment in research and
development and specialists skills in recent years.’ (Hugh Mitchell, Chief Human Resources at Shell)
ELEARNING ACCEPTANCE
So what is the solution for those looking to prove their dedication to the development of their workforce and
organisational growth? The ordinary response is ‘training’. We would like to clarify that further – what is
important here is not just delivering training; it is delivering the right kind of training. Training that engages,
stimulates and most importantly: sticks.
Adopting a classroom training approach because it is the traditional method is akin to sending an important
message by snail mail instead of via email, or carrying your CD collection wherever you go because you refuse to
upload it to your iPod. It may fill you with a hearty sense of nostalgia, but it’s also wholly inefficient.
eLearning has earned widespread acceptance throughout the corporate world and the number of companies
willing to invest in an online learning programme continues to grow on a yearly basis. In 2009, 39% of those
surveyed said they had used eLearning (up 11% from the previous year). This number is only likely to increase as
big companies continue to embrace the online learning revolution (DestinationCRM.com).
2
As Generation Y and Z members take up more roles in the working world, the level of technological comfort has
increased. We now spend 36.5 hours a week on the internet. It is fair to say that we know our way around a
computer. eLearning is no longer the girl that you are too afraid to ask out on a date. She is the girl you take
home to meet your mother with a worldly sense of pride. In today’s wired world workforces are not only ready
to take their learning experience online – many of them actually expect to.
eLearning has cast off any stigma it may have once had and thrust itself into the corporate mainstream. There is
a good reason for the prominence of eLearning: it just makes good business sense. Over the course of this
research paper, we aim to show that eLearning can provide your L&D campaigns with considerable return on
investment (ROI).
But before we start churning out the facts and stats, we would first like to note something of great importance.
Just like classroom training, eLearning requires engagement at every level of the process. From upper
management down to the learners themselves – there has to be some kind of engagement strategy in place.
Without this, your training programme is doomed to failure. Your training’s ROI is this often reliant on the
amount of effort you put into effectively engaging your staff with their own self-development.
An eLearning approach can save you a lot of money – but only if you enter into it with the right attitude.
We will return to this point later. Let us first look at the ways eLearning can help bolster your ROI.
CALCULATING ROI
With L&D professionals being forced to do more with less, it’s essential that their training programmes present a
healthy ROI. Whilst there are numerous ways of calculating ROI, it is mostly a matter of comparing the benefits
of the training against the investment placed within the training initiative. As with most things in life, when the
benefits outweigh the costs, you are onto a winner.
Anything less than a 100% ROI would represent a loss on investment and would (in most cases) be considered a
failure. If Sally spent £200,000 on her training campaign, which delivered organisational benefits equivalent to
£450,000 then she has delivered a 225% ROI – a rousing success.
Costs are usually fairly easy to determine. General considerations may include (but are not limited to): the cost
of development, the cost of delivery (through a Learning Management System or Academy Platform) and
administration costs. Calculating the benefits may not always be so easy. How do you quantify all benefits in
monetary terms? For instance – can you put a price on your company’s intellectual capital?
In some fields, you may also be able to calculate whether any additional revenue was generated as a result of
training. Perhaps your sales force has undergone training to help them handle objections better and this in turn
has helped them to close more sales. In monetary terms, how has this impacted on the organisation? Is the
sales team closing deals quicker before moving on to the next customer? What is the benefit of this to your
organisation and can you state this in monetary terms?
Calculating a precise ROI is often an impossible task. That being said, thanks to the benchmarking processes
involved in eLearning, it is considerably easier to calculate your training regime’s ROI in contrast to classroom
3
training. Thanks to the pre- and post-test knowledge checks, you are able to monitor the growth of your
workforce and then apply your own value to it. Using the Kirkpatrick model of training evaluation and applying
sensible monetary values to all benefits linked to the training regime, you can make a good stab at producing an
accurate figure.
Cutting Driving
costs efficiency
Developing
Intellectual
Capital
Evaluating these three benefits and applying monetary terms to them are key to establishing your ROI. Let’s take
a look at each benefit on a one-by-one basis.
It’s true that eLearning can cut costs in just about every area of the training budget. There is no need to pay for
travel or finding accommodation for your workforce. All you need is internet access. This flexible approach
allows learners to work towards their self-development at their convenience. Learning can now take place
during lunch breaks and in PJs just before bed. eLearning saves you money by increasing the number of home
workers.
Because eLearning is considerably quicker and more effective than the classroom alternative, you will save a
significant sum when it comes to opportunity costs. Induction times will be quicker and downtime amongst your
staff will decrease to a minimum. eLearning saves money by ensuring that staff are away from work for the
smallest period of time possible.
There is no need to book venues or hire instructors and you no longer need to supply your team with lunch. All
these incidentals have been wiped from the board.
4
Let’s take a look at some examples of how eLearning has been used to cut costs.
Growth Engineering recently helped Bensons for Beds roll out Bensons Academy. The aim was to
improve staff performance, remove costs and raise staff engagement. Through the Academy, Bensons
were able to communicate their future direction to every member of staff (1,500+) and help their team
to develop a more effective sales process. The Academy was a rousing success and saved Bensons
£500,000 in training costs.
When Dow Chemical switched to an eLearning approach, they cut their average spending per learner by
$84 to just $11. In total, this saved them $34m (Shepherd, 2002).
Since 2001, BT have utilised eLearning to make 1,700 courses available to their staff. This has saved
them upwards of £12m (Computing.co.uk, 2005).
Looking to save money on their training budget and push the benefits on their customers, Nortel
adopted an eLearning training programme. Nortel estimates that North American customers saved $7.7
m between 2005 and 2006 thanks to their new learning approach (Bersin, 2007).
These are clear cases of organisations using eLearning to cut costs and secure substantial ROI on their training
spending. It has been estimated that, ‘companies… experience a 40-60% cost savings when comparing
instructor-led courses with technology-delivered courses’ (GeoLearning, 2003).
eLearning has evolved into a remarkably efficient and sophisticated form of training delivery. Yet it’s often
difficult to quantify this benefit in monetary terms. For those struggling to formalise their ROI calculations,
Donald Kirkpatrick may be able to help. Since its first appearance in 1976, Kirkpatrick’s training evaluation
process has grown substantially in stature. He holds that the evaluation process is divided into four levels:
Reaction, Learning, Behavioural impact and Results. Analysing all four levels can help you apply a monetary
value to the efficiency of your training campaign and deduce your ROI.
Reaction refers to the response from those who took the eLearning. Was the learning experience a positive one?
Are they awaiting their next online learning session with baited breath? Have any issues or concerns risen to the
surface? Was the programme as a whole embraced? Analysis of this feedback can tell you the levels of eLearning
5
acceptance amongst a workforce, or whether they thought the content was relevant to their job. It cannot tell
you, however, whether the training actually worked.
The Learning level of evaluation is relatively self-explanatory. By comparing the pre- and post-test assessments,
you should be able to see a clear positive development path throughout your workforce. This can also help you
to determine whether they have picked up the knowledge or skills that the training was supposed to
communicate. There are obvious limitations here. You are offered only a snapshot of the current developmental
state of the workforce. There’s no way of knowing whether the training has inspired users to continue their
progression on the job or whether the learning process will trail off once training is complete.
That is why it is important to monitor Behavioural change following training. In most cases once the learner is
released back into their work environment, the evaluation is complete. If you want to determine a training
regime’s ROI accurately, it is important that precise behavioural data is supplied and then qualified in monetary
terms.
Has your workforce adopted a new skillset and are they utilising it at the right moments? Are they responding to
scenarios and situations in the manner the training suggested? This kind of data can be collated through
observation, interview and follow-up assessments. It is then up to you to boil this data down into monetary
terms that can be fed into the ROI calculation.
Finally we reach the Results strand of the evaluatory process. This seeks to establish the level of improvement
that training has engendered throughout the organisation. Did the training resolve in organisational growth?
When calculating the ROI on an eLearning training program you have to balance all these different levels of
evaluation. Here are just a few success stories where eLearning has proven to be uniquely affective:
Spicers are Europe’s leading wholesaler of office products. They rely on a network of 2,500
geographically displaced independent office dealers. Growth Engineering helped to roll out an Academy
Platform LMS for Spicers and their dealer chums. The goal: up-skilling Spicers’ channel partners and
imparting a more effective approach to sales strategy. The Academy was a success. Tests showed that
staff possessed an average 24.7% increase in sales knowledge. This in turn transferred into a 28%
increase in the conversion ratio of prospects to customers.
BUPA have estimated that adopting the use of eLearning has reduced training time by 40%
(elearnity.com)
BT’s eLearning consultant Christina Humphrey Evans claims: ‘We have found that eLearning saves
people time, saves BT money and makes us a more efficient organisation. What would have taken at
least 18 months to deliver using traditional methods saw 20,000 staff trained in just 12 weeks’
(Computing.co.uk, 2005)
In 2009, a study of a number of prominent European organisations demonstrated that between them
30,000 hours of instructor-led training had been reduced into less than 700 hours of eLearning. That is
an incredible 76% reduction! (Ezine, 2009)
These studies make it quite clear that classroom led training is no longer the most effective means for imparting
new skills and information to a workforce. As we will see in the next section eLearning’s scope can also
introduce new opportunities to build upon your ROI.
6
USING ELEARNING TO DEVELOP INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL
As the importance of intellectual capital continues to grow, so too will the need for knowledge management.
With the brutal sense of competition currently spreading through the business landscape, easy access to job-
relevant knowledge has become a means for increasing chances of survival. The right information stored in the
right place could enable a member of your sales team to deliver a perfect sales presentation. It could also
enable your workforce to adapt seamlessly around new technology. eLearning does more than simply dispense
training – it affords knowledge-hungry workforces access to important information and a variety of reference
materials. It is also an opportunity for a workforce to share their expertise and nurture communities of
knowledge.
The need for a connected, systematic approach to organisational knowledge should be a major area of concern
for any forward thinking business. eLearning and knowledge management are fast friends. Both attempt to
improve individual, team and organisational performance by disseminating knowledge. Taking advantage of the
potential for an LMS (Learning Management System) to act as a knowledge share is a great opportunity to boost
the ROI of your training campaign.
A study involving 182 sales teams seeking to attract new client contracts within a management consulting
company, found that the teams that utilised advice and expertise from their workmates produced higher quality
work and finalised more contracts than those that did not (Martine Haas, M. T. Hansen, 2007).
Creating a culture where knowledge sharing is the norm is not easy. Knowledge is often stored at an individual
level as employees try to engineer personal advantage. A bright salesperson may not wish to share his winning
techniques for fear that they will drop down the rankings and no longer be considered top dog. Unless a
collaborative culture is encouraged, an effective knowledge share may well be an unachievable goal.
But what better place to encourage knowledge transferal than through a Learning Management System? It is a
great place for workmates to talk about their experiences, log effective practices and offer tips to their
colleagues. The social learning potential of eLearning offers personal recognition to those who are good at their
jobs and willing to offer their expertise. An LMS grants your workforce a voice and a chance for self-expression.
What’s more, adopting a system that rewards users for sharing can provide ample motivation for individuals to
disseminate their knowledge.
Whilst it is possible to share experiences in the classroom, eLearning offers a knowledge share on a much
grander scale. It is a fantastic opportunity to grow your ROI over time and build upon what is already a cost-
effective and efficient training campaign.
7
workforce who are subject to the training. Many Learning Management System implementations fall at the first
hurdle because L&D professionals fail to provide any real engagement strategy. If you fail to get your workforce
engaged in their own development, you cannot expect your training campaign to be a success.
You wouldn’t sign up for a gym membership if you weren’t prepared to put in the time and effort it takes to get
fit, lose weight, or bolster your biceps. Training is no different. If you’re not prepared to flex your engagement
muscle, there’s little point of initiating the campaign in the first place.
Of course, support at every level depends on the quality of eLearning material presented. If the content is smart,
relevant and informative, it is generally going to capture the imagination of learners. However, much more can
be done to manipulate user engagement throughout eLearning campaigns. It is up to those in positions of
leadership to develop an enticing engagement strategy by:
Motivating staff to want to learn and offering a reward for doing so.
Outlining and advertising the benefits of the training.
Providing a clear, consistent message.
The diagram below details how we view engagement strategy. It starts with the creation of engaging learning
content that is supported by L&D Professionals who then provide the engagement strategy for their workforce.
The key to engagement is providing an emotional hook. Effective learning revolves around the manipulation of
our emotions. Gamification – the process of applying game mechanics to non-gaming environments is a great
tool for gripping learners emotionally. By adopting game mechanics like badges, awards and leadership boards,
you are adding an entirely new level of involvement.
These trinkets satisfy our basic human need for reward. They act as markers of our hard work. Upon collection,
something in our brain says, ‘I like this and I want more’ and compels us to continue. Gamification is just one of
our methods for creating user engagement. It is more than just a passing fad. According to a prominent
Technology Research company, ‘Gamification will be a key trend that every CIO, IT planner and enterprise
architect must be aware of as it relates to business’ (Garter Group, 2010).
8
Engaging your workforce during a training campaign is one means for ensuring that it earns the maximum ROI
on investment possible. By failing to get your team gripped, you are committing yourself to earning only the
minimum level of return on your investment.
Growth Engineering seek to raise user engagement through gamification and social learning. But our unique
design methodology The Discovery Method can also raise levels of engagement throughout a workforce.
In 2010, Russell Poldrack a University of Texas psychologist published a report that looked to establish the best
means ‘for effective studying’. He found that if the pattern of activity present in the learner’s brain is the same
each time they study that information, it is more likely to ‘stick’. In other words, we learn new information
quicker the more we relate them to existing concepts within the mind. (Russell Poldrack, Science, 2010)
The Discovery Method is moulded upon this psychological insight. It draws from concepts already located within
your brain (your work place experiences) and challenges you to derive fresh information from them. You are not
dealing with new, hard to grasps concepts – all the information you need is already present in your head. You
just need to unlock it.
The Discovery Method asks you to take work-place examples and analyse and reflect upon them. In essence,
you are using these familiar starting points to begin a voyage of discovery. It then uses role–playing situations
and scenarios to grant the learner an opportunity to establish right-behaviours and attitudes. It forces students
to break down their experiences and define what worked and what did not work.
We do not ask you to read through reams of text and memorise answers – after all, it has been found that
‘Elements such as video or online quizzes do not appear to influence the amount that students learn in online
classes.’ (Barbara Means, International Department of Education Report) The Discovery Method instead uses
your own experiences to determine an effective learning environment.
Yes, eLearning needs assessment sections that measure your development. But the real focus is on giving you
an opportunity to apply your knowledge to real world contexts. To draw from your own unique perspective and
put you in the position where you need to use your nous to work towards a happy conclusion. We do not like to
ask ‘What should you do?’ We prefer to ask: ‘What would you do?’ This subtle change makes all the difference.
75% of what they learn when they practice what they learned.
50% of what they learn when engaged in a group discussion.
30% of what they learn when they see a demonstration.
20% of what they learn from audio-visual.
10% of what they learn when they’ve learned from reading.
9
5% of what they learn when they’ve learned from lecture.’
(psychotactics.com)
As you can see, the more active an individual is in their learning, the more likely it is to stick. All too often, the
places where the biggest emphasis is placed on the acquisition of knowledge through structured learning are
not the kind of places where you get to put this knowledge to good use. In the classroom, you are usually asked
to soak up information passively – paying little attention to any real life application that it may have. Indeed, the
only time this knowledge gets applied is when you’re forced to recall it in order to pass an assessment or exam.
Have you ever sat through a lecture or a classroom training session and wondered what you were doing there?
You can often get the feeling that you would have benefited equally simply by getting hold of a copy of the
lecture notes or finding the curriculum online. Simply restating information that is already available in other
literature is not the most effective way of learning and it certainly does not help present learning as a
particularly attractive or inspirational activity.
There are also numerous studies (Cavus et al. 2007; Dinov, Sanchez and Christou 2008; Gao and Lehman 2003;
Zhang 2005) that offer evidence supporting the hypothesis that the more control a learner has over his learning
process and the more active they are (through either active or interactive learning experiences in our conceptual
framework) the larger the learning gains. ‘Studies indicate that manipulations that trigger learner activity or
learner reflection and self-monitoring of understanding are effective when students pursue online learning as
individuals.’ (Barbara Means, International Department of Education Report)
Consider this. How long would you stick by a removals company that lost 80% of your goods whilst in transport?
Would you keep going back and forth, spending more money to make sure you were able to transport
everything you need? Or would you look for a more effective method?
The answer is obvious – you would look for a different means of getting the job done. Why should it be different
in the training environment?
In the training world, classroom learning is predominantly made up of lectures, reading, and some audio-visual
content. It may also present students with demonstrations and the occasional group discussion (though time
limitations often curtail this). It rarely ever gives students an opportunity to ‘practise’ right behaviours. In
essence, those who undergo classroom training will be lucky to retain 30% of what they have learned. On the
other hand, those who put what they have learned into practise – as the Discovery Method demands – will retain
a lot more information.
The use of role-plays and simulations has also been shown to boost learning performance. In 2008, a study was
produced that detailed the impact simulations within a web-based environment had on knowledge retention.
The findings proved that ‘computer based simulations’ helped to aid the ‘learner’s performance’ and improve
‘knowledge gain when compared with online instruction with no simulation’ (Castaneda, 2008).
There may be some who remain unconvinced. Old methods of learning and knowledge retention have worked
up until now, so why change things? Business training campaigns have been successful without embracing a
learning methodology that puts practise front-and-centre. It’s worth questioning, however, exactly how
successful these campaigns have been. What level of knowledge retention was achieved? Was the ROI lower
than training campaigns that have adopted a more forward thinking learning methodology?
10
CONCLUSION
The business case for eLearning is crystal clear. It’s a three-pronged attack on those naysayers who remain
disenchanted by the power of modern technology to provide an inspirational platform for learning and self-
development. It’s cheaper, more effective and broader in scope than its classroom equivalent. Throughout the
numerous reports that detail eLearning’s rise to prominence a noticeable through line can be deduced: this is a
powerful tool that can be used to engineer impressive results at a fraction of the cost commonly associated with
training.
As a tool for improving your organisation’s ROI when it comes to training – it’s unparalleled. There are a wealth
of case studies out there that prove just how effective it can be. Furthermore, it comes replete with staying
power. Learning Management Systems can act as knowledge shares and offer your team an opportunity to
prove their expertise and provide an outlet for self-expression.
As with any training campaign, it’s reliant on engagement at each and every level. The top brass need to
embrace it as much as the workforce and there needs to be a clear strategy in place to ensure that the training
delivers the maximum ROI possible. Even here, eLearning holds an advantage over its classroom alternative.
The seamless integration of social learning and gamification into the world of online learning offers endless
opportunities for raising engagement and powering an effective training programme.
Finally, there’s Growth Engineering’s unique learning methodology, The Discovery Method. By adopting this
approach, online learners can enjoy levels of interactivity and involvement that just can’t be matched in the
classroom.
So not only is our eLearning cost-effective and remarkably efficient, it is good fun too.
11