NERC2018 CPeB

NURSING EDUCATION
RESEARCH CONFERENCE
2018
Washington, DC
April 19-21, 2018
Washington Marriott Wardman Park
2018
NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH
CONFERENCE
CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS
ENHANCED ABSTRACTS OF ORAL AND POSTER

PRESENTATIONS
WASHINGTON, DC | APRIL 19-21, 2018

Copyright © 2018 by Sigma Theta Tau International
All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of it may be reproduced, stored in a
retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher. Any trademarks, service
marks, design rights, or similar rights that are mentioned, used, or cited in this book are the property of
their respective owners. Their use here does not imply that you may use them for similar or any other
purpose.
This book is not intended to be a substitute for the medical advice of a licensed medical professional.
The author and publisher have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information contained
within at the time of its publication and shall have no liability or responsibility to any person or entity
regarding any loss or damage incurred, or alleged to have incurred, directly or indirectly, by the
information contained in this book. The author and publisher make no warranties, express or implied,
with respect to its content, and no warranties may be created or extended by sales representatives or
written sales materials. The author and publisher have no responsibility for the consistency or accuracy
of URLs and content of third-party websites referenced in this book.
The Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing (Sigma) is a

nonprofit organization whose mission is advancing world health and celebrating
nursing excellence in scholarship, leadership, and service. Founded in 1922,
Sigma has more than 135,000 active members in over 90 countries and
territories. Members include practicing nurses, instructors, researchers,
policymakers, entrepreneurs, and others. Sigma’s more than 530 chapters are
located at more than 700 institutions of higher education throughout Armenia,
Australia, Botswana, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, England, Ghana, Hong Kong,
Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Malawi, Mexico, the Netherlands, Pakistan,
Philippines, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Swaziland, Sweden,
Taiwan, Tanzania, Thailand, the United States, and Wales. Learn more at
www.sigmanursing.org.
Sigma Theta Tau International

550 West North Street
Indianapolis, IN, USA 46202
To order additional books, buy in bulk, or order for corporate use, contact Sigma Marketplace at
888.654.4968 (US and Canada) or +1.317.634.8171 (outside US and Canada).
To request a review copy for course adoption, email [email protected] or call

To request author information, or for speaker or other media requests, contact Sigma Marketing at
PDF ISBN: 9781948057288

Glossary
A plenary session is a session in which an invited speaker, usually with a significant subject matter,
presents their work or viewpoint. All attendees attend these general sessions as they usually begin and
end a program of events. Plenary sessions vary in length from one (1) hour to one and a half (1½) hours
and can be accompanied by PowerPoint presentations, audio and/or video files and other visual aids.
An oral presentation is a brief 15-20 minute individual presentation time moderated by a volunteer.
An effective oral presentation should have an introduction, main body and conclusion like a short
paper and should utilize visual aids such as a PowerPoint presentation. Oral presentations are divided
into different categories based on the program presented. Categories can include: clinical, leadership,
scientific, evidence-based practice, or research.
A poster presentation is the presentation of research information by an individual or representatives

of research teams at a conference with an academic or professional focus. The work is peer-reviewed
and presented on a large, usually printed placard, bill or announcement, often illustrated, that is
posted to publicize. Exceptions to peer-reviewed posters include Rising Stars student posters and
Sigma Theta Tau International’s Leadership Institute participant posters.
A symposium is a presentation coordinated by an organizer similar to a panel discussion and contains

at least three (3) presentations concerning a common topic of interest. Each symposium session is
scheduled for 45-75 minutes and allows for questions at the end of the session. Symposia provide an
opportunity to present research on one topic, often from multiple perspectives, providing a coherent
set of papers for discussion.
A peer-reviewed paper is simply an individual abstract that has been reviewed by at least three (3)
peer-reviewers to determine the eligibility of the submission to be presented during a program. The
determination is made by the peer-reviewer answering a series of regarding the substance of the
abstract and the materials submitted. Scores from each reviewer are compiled. The average score
must be 3.00 on a 5-point Likert scale in order to quality for presentation. Sigma Theta Tau
International enforces a blind peer-review process, which means that the reviewers do not see the
name or institution of the authors submitting the work. All submissions, with the exception of special
sessions and invited posters are peer-reviewed.
An invited or special session is similar to a symposium in the length of time allotted for presentation,
but is not peer-reviewed. These sessions focus on a specific area, but are conducted by individuals
invited to present the work.
Introduction
Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing (Sigma) and the National League for Nursing
(NLN) conducted the 2018 Nursing Education Research Conference in Washington, DC, April 19-21,
with the theme of Generating and Translating Evidence for Teaching Practice, with 375 attendees.
Program outcomes:
• Translate research outcomes into educational practice and policy.
• Share research findings that impact learner preparation.
These conference proceedings are a collection of abstracts submitted by the authors and presented at
the research congress. To promptly disseminate the information and ideas, participants submitted
descriptive information and abstracts of between 300 and 1500 words. Each oral and poster
presentation abstract was peer-reviewed in a double-blind process in which three scholars used
specific scoring criteria to judge the abstracts in accordance with the requirements of Sigma’s
Guidelines for Electronic Abstract Submission.
The opinions, advice, and information contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views
or policies of STTI or its members. The enhanced abstracts provided in these proceedings were taken
directly from authors’ submissions, without alteration. While all due care was taken in the compilation
of these proceedings, STTI does not warrant that the information is free from errors or omission, or
accept any liability in relation to the quality, accuracy, and currency of the information.
Format for Citing Papers

Author. (Year). Title of paper. In Title of conference proceedings (page numbers). Place of publication:
Publisher.
Example:
Smith, C. C. (2015). Nursing Research and Global Impact. In Engaging Colleagues: Improving Global
Health Outcomes: Proceedings of the 25th International Nursing Research Congress
(pp. xxx–xxx). Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.
Table of Contents
Plenary Sessions
PLN1 - OPENING PLENARY: Empirical Analysis of Faculty-To-Faculty Incivility: Implementing Best Practices to
Foster Civility and Healthy Academic Work Environments
Special Sessions
A 12 - SPECIAL SESSION: Generating Simulation Evidence
B 11 – SPECIAL SESSION: Maximizing Undergraduate Research Outcomes Through Honors Education: A Win-
Win for Faculty and Student Development
D 12 - SPECIAL SESSION: Design-Based Educational Research in Nursing
E 01 and G 11 - SPECIAL SESSION: Nursing Education Research: Global Impact Through an Open Access
Platform
E 12 - SPECIAL SESSION: Clarifying the Review Conundrum: Literature, Integrative, Systematic, Scoping
F 12 - SPECIAL SESSION: Planning and Thinking Innovatively: Where to Start Your Nursing Education Research
I 12 - SPECIAL SESSION: Effect Sizes in Nursing Education Research: What, Why, and How?
Workshops
WKS1 - WORKSHOP 1: Intermediate Statistics and Data Analysis for Nursing Education Researchers
WKS2 - WORKSHOP 2: Becoming a Nursing Education Scholar: Reflections, Challenges, and Rewards
WKS3 - WORKSHOP 3: Differentiating Boundaries: Research and Practice Doctorates
WKS4 - WORKSHOP 4: Informatics: Integrating the Essentials Into Education and Practice
Oral Presentations
A 01 - Academic Partnerships
Development of Academic and Non-Profit Organization Partnership: Creating International Clinical Experience for
Nurse Practitioner Students
The Affiliate Faculty Role:A New Model for Clinical Nurse Education
A 02 - Enhancing Patient Care Competency
Assessing Clinical Judgment Behaviors and Self-Reflection Using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric
Using an e-Learning Course to Enhance Student Patient Care Competency Within Interprofessional Settings
A 03 - Faculty Shortage and Retention
The Nursing Faculty Shortage in Maryland: Findings of a Statewide Needs Assessment
Expanding Self-Efficacy of Nursing Faculty With Improved Orientation
A 04 - Genomics in Nursing Education
Engaging Nursing Students for Genetic/Genomic Learning
Innovative Teaching Strategies for Genomic Content Integration Into Nursing Curriculum
A 05 - Innovations in the Classroom
Faculty Mentorship to Facilitate MSN Nurse Educator Students in Reconceptualization of a RN-BSN EBP Course
A 06 - Mental Health Promotion
Preliminary Development and Testing of the Risk Assessment Checklist for Self-Injury in Autism (RACSA)
Promoting a Restraint Free Culture Through Sensory Modulation
A 07 - Research in Interprofessional Education
Changing Teamwork Attitudes With Interprofessional Education (IPE): A Comparative Study
State of the Science: Interprofessional Education in Nursing
A 08 - Responding to Uncivil Behaviors
Development of a Scale to Measure Self-Efficacy to Respond to Disruptive Behaviors
An Examination of Cognitive Rehearsal to Assist Nursing Students With Uncivil Behaviors
A 09 - Student Recruitment and Retention
Discovering the Hidden Forces of Successful Recruitment and Retention of African Americans in BSN Programs
Weathering the Perfect Storm: A Multifaceted Strategy to Improve Nursing Student Retention
A 10 - Workplace Violence Addressed in Education
Nurse Educators' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Horizontal Violence Measured Through Dimensions of
Oppression
Addressing Workplace Violence in Prelicensure Curriculum: Development, Administration, and Evaluation of an
Innovative Teaching Bundle
A 11 - Clinical Education Strategies
Virtual Interprofessional Simulation: Design, Delivery, and Impact
Dedicated Education Units and Traditional Units: A Comparison of Learning Outcomes
B 01 - Art Therapy in Mental Health
The Blending of Art and Science With Live Actors in Psychiatric Simulation
Undergraduate Student Nurses' Perceptions of Art Therapy in Mental Health Settings
B 02 - Asynchronous Online Education
Enhancing Asynchronous RN to BSN Online Instructor-Learner Engagement Using Video-Recorded Assignment
Directions:A Descriptive Study
The Use of Asynchronous Audio Feedback With Online RN-BSN Students
B 03 - Experiential Learning
Improving Nursing Student Empathy With Experiential Learning
A Community Engaged Learning Pedagogical Approach to Population Health and Primary Prevention
B 04 - Faculty Training in Simulation
The Effect of Faculty Training and Personality Characteristics on High Stakes Assessment of Simulation Performance
A Shared Mental Model for High-Stakes Simulation Evaluation in Nursing Education
B 05 - Innovations in Simulation by Faculty
Effects of a Simulation Education Program on Faculty Members’ and Students’ Outcomes
Role Modeling in Simulation
B 06 - Medication Errors
Strengthening Nursing Education Through Mobile Technology Integration Thus Promoting Technological
Competencyand Medication Error Reduction
The Lived Experience of Making a Medication Administration Error in Nursing Practice
B 07 - Quality Considerations
Measuring Student Perceptions of Quality and Safety Competencies in Baccalaureate Education
The 2017 National QSEN Faculty Assessment: Findings and Implications for Nursing Education
B 08 - Service Learning in Nursing Education
Endorsement and Use of Recommended Strategies for Implementing Service Learning in Schools of Nursing
Service Learning in Nursing Education: Bridging the Gap Between Classroom and Community
B 09 - Student Success
Learning How to Learn: Nurses' Experiences With Failure and Success
Examining Readmission Policies: Academic Performance After Readmission to Nursing School
B 10 - Clinical Studies
Treatment of the Oral Mucositis Severity in Patients of Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis
C 01 - Team-Based Learning Approaches
The Impact of Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Fundamental and Medical Surgical Nursing 11
Courses
Multidisciplinary Care: Using a Simple Approach to Promote Team-Based Learning and Patient Safety
C 02 - Caring in Nursing
Nurses' Perception of Caring Using a Relationship-Based Care Model
The Caring Studio Experience: Integrating QSEN With Caring Practice Competencies, a Research Study
C 03 - Evaluation Techniques in Clinical Learning
A Program-Wide Clinical Performance Grading Rubric: Reliability Assessment
Implementing Peer Evaluation of Clinical Teaching
C 04 - Faculty Use of Technology
Understanding the Effects of Technology Acceptance in Nursing Faculty: A Hierarchical Regression
Subscription Learning: A Technology-Based Component of Clinical Faculty Orientation
C 05 - Managing Intimate Partner Violence
Examining Knowledge and Retention Using Storytelling versus Board Game Toward Improving Intimate Partner
Violence Education
Evaluation of a Clinical Workshop to Improve Students' Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence
C 06 - NCLEX© Success Strategies
Exploration of Transcultural Self-Efficacy Strength and NCLEX-RN© Success in a Concept-Based Curriculum
Mastering the Content: A Systematic Evidence-Based Approach to Nursing Program Success
C 07 - Psychometric Testing
Development and Psychometric Testing of the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning Inventory©
Nursing Students' Caring Behavior Scale: Development and Psychometric Evaluation
C 08 - Disaster Simulation in Nursing Education
Exploring Evidence for the Use of Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation With Undergraduate Nursing Students
A Web-Enhanced Simulation for Pandemic Disasters
C 09 - Teaching and Educational Progression
Nursing Education Progression: A Snapshot of National Progress and Promising Practices
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies on Teaching and Learning Methods 1987 to 2015
C 10 - Women's Health
Female Genital Cutting (FGC) Digital E-Book: American Nursing Care Context
C 11 - Collaborations in Nursing Education
Collaborative Innovations of a STTI Chapter Advances Nursing Excellence Across the Globe
Raising the Bars: Re-Imagining Nursing Education Through Partnerships With Prisons
D 01 - Clinical Competency Evaluation
Description and Meaning of Clinical Competency: Perceptions of Nurse Managers and Baccalaureate Nurse Faculty
Clinical Evaluation of Competence: What Are We Measuring?
D 02 - Clinical Nursing Leadership Innovations
Improving the Charge Nurse’s Leadership Role: A Collaborative Learning Forum
Lend Me a Hand: A Collaborative Nurse Leadership Mentoring Program
D 03 - Exam Scores
Use of Crib Sheets and Exam Performance in an Undergraduate Nursing Course
D 03 - Exam Scores
A Retrospective View of the Effect of Double Testing on Nursing Student Examination Scores
D 04 - Health Promotion in Diabetes
A Student Organization and Peer Support Impacts College Students’ Health and Wellness: Diabetes Exemplar
Implementing Health Promotion for People With Disabilities: Process Evaluation of a Pilot HealthMatters Program©
D 05 - Collaborations to Enhance Learning
Substance Abuse Brief Intervention Referral to Treatment an Evidence-Based Approach to Reduce Risk
Nursing Student and Instructor Preference for Clinical Models: Evidence to Support Curriculum Development
D 06 - Novice Student Stress
Effects of Mindfulness Training on Perceived Level of Stress and Performance-Related Attributes in BSN Students
Obtaining Patient Information and Anxiety in Novice Nursing Students During the First Clinical Rotation
D 07 - Psychiatric Simulation Nursing Education Programs
Evaluation of a Psychiatric Mental Health Clinical Hybrid Program in a Baccalaureate Nursing Program
Psychiatric Simulation: Improve Outcomes and Maintain Course Enrollment
D 08 - Student Learning Environments
Vietnamese Nursing Students’ Perspectives on Learning Environments: A Multisite Benchmarking Study to Inform
Future Initiatives
An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis of Prelicensure Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Their Learning
Environment
D 09 - Teaching Leadership in Nursing Education
Teaching Undergraduate Nursing Students Leadership Skills Through Simulation and Inpatient Leadership Clinical
Empowering a Culture of Vulnerability Through Focused Nursing Education Leadership
D 10 - Use of the QSEN Competencies
Content Validation of a Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN)-Based Clinical Evaluation Instrument
Using Technology and Innovative Strategies to Promote QSEN Competencies of Patient-Centered Care and Safety
D 11 - Education Strategies
Promoting Meaningful Learning: Concept Mapping Applied in Case Studies
Health as Expanding Consciousness: Patterns of Clinical Reasoning in Senior Baccalaureate Nursing Students
E 02 - Clinical Reasoning and Communication in Simulation
Learning Experiences of Associate Degree in Nursing Students Using a Concept Map With Simulation
Undergraduate Nursing Student’s Reflections on the Effectiveness of Communication Training During Simulation:
Qualitative Analysis
E 03 - Innovations in Teaching Simulation
How the StrengthsFinder© Assessment Assists Faculty in Building Consensus to Achieve Consistency in Student
Evaluation
Learning How to Teach: Using Simulations to Prepare New Clinical Faculty
E 04 - Hygiene Practices in Healthcare Settings
Results of an Educational Intervention and Barriers to Antimicrobial Stewardship in a Skilled Nursing Facility
E 05 - Innovations in Nursing Education
Redesigning the Baccalaureate Curriculum to Address Population Health Using Simulation
Impact of Peer-Assisted Learning With Standardized Patients in an Undergraduate Nursing Course
E 06 - Nurse Faculty Caring Behaviors
Utilizing Collaborative Testing to Engage Nursing Students, Improve Academic Achievement, and Decrease Attrition
Nursing Faculty Caring Behaviors: Perceptions of Students and Faculty
E 07 - Curriculum Design
Improved Student Outcomes and Faculty Workload Allocations Through Gateway Course Redesign
The Agile Process: A Multidiscipline Team Method of Course Development
E 08 - Student Engagement and Perception Regarding Mental Health
Creating Student Engagement in Psychiatric Nursing Education for the Next Generation
Students' Cultural Beliefs Toward Mental Health
E 09 - Teaching Patient Safety
Critical Thinking of RNs in a Fellowship Program
Nursing Faculty's Competency to Teach Patient Safety to Their Students
E 10 - Using Facebook in Research
Snowballing Via Facebook: A Novel Way to Recruit Millennial Nursing Student Research Participants
Student Perceptions of Presenting a Case Study on Facebook
E 11 - Technology in Student Preparation
Can Technology Increase Student Engagement and Learning in the Classroom?
Authentic Simulation for Collaboratively Preparing Student Nurses and American Sign Language Interpreting Student
F 01 - Competency and Transition to Practice
Are Canadian Indigenous Students Feeling Ready for Registered Nursing Practice?
Competency Testing: Evaluating a BSN Student’s Readiness for Transition to Practice
F 02 - Promoting Diversity in Nursing Curricula
Translating the Lived Experience of Transgender Persons to Nursing Curricula
Fostering Inclusive Spaces for Diverse LGBTTQ+ Students and Clients in Nursing Curriculum
F 03 - Ethical Considerations in Nursing Education
African American Nurses Speak Out About Trust and Mistrust in Predominately White Nursing Programs
The Pedagogical Practices of Clinical Nurse Educators
F 05 - Innovations in Interprofessional Education
Using Virtual Reality 360 Video for Interprofessional Simulation Education
Capturing Meaningful Moments: Strategies to Enhance Affective Learning During an Interprofessional Service
Experience in Nicaragua
F 06 - Learner Engagement in Simulation
Overcoming Challenges in Evaluating Active versus Observer Roles in Simulation-Based Education
Evaluating Use of a Mobile Classroom Response System in the Classroom and the Simulation Lab
F 07 - Promoting EBP in Education
Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge and Beliefs Among Associate Degree Nursing Students: A National, Multisite
Study
Evidence-Based Approaches to Internationalizing Nursing Courses: Engaging Students as Stakeholders
F 08 - Student-Centered Mentoring
Reducing Performance Exam Anxiety: Student-Centered Skills Performance Exams Using Video and Peer-to-Peer
Mentoring
Peer Teaching in an Undergraduate Health Assessment Course to Promote Skills Retention
F 09 - Caregiver Confidence
Moving Beyond Written Reinforcement: Using Video Clips to Reinforce Patient Education and Increase Caregiver
Confidence
F 10 - Undergraduate Academic Partnerships
Interprofessional Education (IPE) Curriculum Innovation Using Academic and Practice Partners
A Collaborative Partnership Promoting Upward Mobility in Nursing
F 11 - Student Health
Model Development of Depression Prevention for Adolescents: Participatory Action Research
The Student Nurse Athlete: What Can We Learn From Them?
G 01 - Curriculum Development
An Intervention Designed to Enhance Reflective Debriefing Discussions With Nursing Students
BSN Students’ Perceptions of Social Determinants of Health
G 02 - Developing Professional Nurses in the Workforce
Resilience and Professional Value Development in Baccalaureate Nursing Graduates
Preparing Students to Become Extraordinary Nurses: Perspectives From Nurse Employers
G 03 - Advanced Practice Nurse Education
Strategies Associated With OSCE Simulation, Anxiety, and Clinical Competency in a Family Nurse Practitioner
Program
Evaluating a Web-Based Educational Module Designed to Enhance Advanced Practice Nurse Preceptors’ Clinical
Teaching Excellence
G 04 - Improving Student Attitudes Toward Mental Health
Interventions to Improve Nursing Student Attitudes About People With Mental Illness
Improving Nursing Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Mental Illness Using Standardized Patients
G 05 - Innovations in Healthy Living
It's Good to Be Blue: A Nursing Study Abroad Blue Zone Experience in Sardinia, Italy
Perceptions of Significance Regarding Prenatal Care Among Multiparous Patients
G 06 - Nursing Faculty in Online Education
Faculty Perceptions of Online Teaching
Culture of Curiosity: The Experienced Nurse Educator and Intellectual Curiosity in the Online Learning Environment
G 07 - Predictors in Nursing Education Success
A Basic Science Pre-Test to Assess Academic Risk of First Year Nursing Students
New Careers in Nursing: Pre-Entry Immersion Programs and Relationship to Graduation From Accelerated Nursing
Programs
G 08 - Simulation Use to Enhance Patient Care
Enhancing Knowledgeand Retention of Infant Safe Sleep Practices With Simulation
G 09 - Technology in Transition to Practice
What Learning Do Students Transfer to Practice Following Simulation?A Qualitative Exploration
ePortfolios: Collect and Reflect as Students Transition Into Professional Practice
G 10 - Impactful Educational Practices
Generating and Translating Evidence to Simultaneously Impact Nursing Education and Patient Care With
Undergraduate Research
H 01 - Promoting Civility
Incivility in Academic Environments: If You See Something, Say Something
Peer Training Using Cognitive Rehearsal to Improve Incivility Recognition and Response
H 02 - Disaster-Based Simulation
Using a Disaster-Based Simulation With Senior Nursing Students to Impact Self-Efficacy in Clinical Decision-Making
The Effectiveness of Educational Training and Simulation on Readiness to Respond to a Traumatic Event
H 03 - Doctoral Education Learning
Mentoring in Research Doctorate Nursing Programs and Students' Perceived Career Readiness
Hybrid Teaching in Graduate Education: Optimizing Virtual Engagement to Enhance Contextual Learning in Doctoral
Students
H 04 - Innovations for the APRN
Democratizing NP Student Education: Promoting Student and Faculty Participation in Flipped Learning
Growing Your Own APRNs in Rural and Underserved Communities
H 05 - Medication Administration in Nursing Education
Teaching Students to Administer Medications: Collaborative Supports Are Critical
The Lived Experiences of Undergraduate Nursing Students Learning Drug Dosage Calculation
H 06 - Nursing Student Health Assessment Innovations
A Comparison of Instructional Methods for an Undergraduate Nursing Health Assessment Course
Self-Efficacy of Health Assessment Skills for Nursing Students After a Comprehensive Health Assessment Video
Assignment
H 07 - Phenomenological Studies in Education
What Grades Really Mean to Undergraduate, Graduate, and Doctoral Nursing Students: A Phenomenological Study
Learning Psychomotor Skills Through Technology: Findings From a Phenomenological Study of Undergraduate
Nursing Students
H 08 - Strategies in Nursing Research
Designing an Innovative Recruitment Strategy While Navigating IRB Issues in Multisite Survey Research
Empowering Students and Faculty to Close Research Knowledge Gaps
H 09 - Technology to Improve Education and Practice
The Power of the Internet in Students Learning
Nursing Students’ Use of Social Media for Academicand Professional Purposes: A National Survey Report
H 10 - Transitioning Novice Nurses to the Clinical Setting
Meaningful Factors in Nurse Transition for Newly Licensed Registered Nurses in Acute Care Settings
A Community Hospital’s Approach for Bridging Novice Nurses Into Clinical Practice
H 11 - Instrument Development
Re-Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Nurses’ Perception of Patient Rounding Scale
Promoting Safe Medication Administration Using Simulation
I 01 - Doctoral Education Preparation
Faculty Helping Students Be Successful in Doctoral Education
A Motivational Profile of Nurses Who Pursue Doctoral Education
I 02 - Effective Teaching Strategies
Effective Teaching as Perceived by Baccalaureate Nursing Students and Nursing Faculty
Improving Learning Outcomes With Podcasting
I 03 - End-of-Life Care Training
Education/Training in End-of-Life Care for Certified Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care
Examining Nursing Student Stress in an End-of-Life Care Simulation: Grade Level and Simulated Patient Type
I 04 - Innovations in Health Promotion
Fidelity Testing of an HIV Prevention Intervention: An Opportunity to Enhance Nursing Students’ Research
Experience
"Headache Tools to Stay in School”: An Educational Guide for Nurses and Students With Headache
I 05 - Mentoring Students
Mentoring Online Students: Developing and Testing a Mentorship Model for the Capstone Practicum
University of Connecticut Major and Mentor: Nursing Mentoring Program
I 06 - Online Learning Curriculum
Does a Modified TeamSTEPPS® Online Educational Intervention Change Nursing Students’ Attitudes?
One Concept at a Time: Using VoiceThread to Engage Students in Learning Nursing Research
I 07 - Patient Education
Using the Teach-Back Method in Patient Education to Improve HCAHPS Scores
Improving Patient Self-Efficacy by Incorporating Patient Teaching by Registered Nursing Students in Primary Care
I 08 - Simulation Use in Health Disparities
Using Evidenced-Based Simulations to Enhance Care of Vulnerable Populations
The Effect of the Poverty Simulation on BSN Student Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes
I 09 - Technology Use in NCLEX© Success
A Model for Sustaining NCLEX® Success
Effectiveness of an Adaptive Quizzing System to Improve Nursing Students’ Learning
I 10 - Transition to Practice
An Educational Intervention to Enhance Nurse Practitioner Role Transition in the First Year of Practice
Minimizing Transition Shock: Preparing Graduates for the Real World
I 11 - Professional Career Development
The Transition From Military Nurse to Nurse Faculty
Empowering the Nurse Entrepreneur in Business and Work/Life Balance
Poster Presentations
PST1 - Poster Session 1
Nursing Specialty and Primary Ambulatory Care Education
The Integration of Mobile Technology Through Microblogging and Apps Into Nursing Curricula
Exploring Associate Degree Nursing Faculty’s Experiences Teaching Electronic Health Record Systems Use via
Qualitative Survey
An Interprofessional Initiative to Increase SBIRT Competencies in the Health Sciences
Tele-Education as a Support Tool in Mental Health, Education, and Nursing
Comparison of Face-to-Face and Distance Education Modalities in Delivering Therapeutic Crisis Management Skills
Content
Effectiveness of Active Learning Strategies: Student and Faculty Perceptions of Flipped Classrooms and Team-Based
Learning
Integration and Leveling of Nutritional Principles in Traditional ASN Nursing Curricula
Faculty Reported Essentials of Quality Online Teaching
Assessment of Understanding of Foundational Genomic Concepts Among RN-to-BSN Nursing Students
Augmented Reality: Using the Microsoft HoloLens® to Promote Student Success
WIL CONNECT: Connected Learning for Nursing and Allied Health Professionals via a Mobile App
Influencing Factors of NCLEX-RN© Pass Rates Among Nursing Students
Managing the Panic: High-Fidelity Simulation Prior to the First Clinical Experience of Undergraduate Nurses
Educating Critical Care Nurses on Moral Distress: Building a Sustainable Solution Through Online Continuing
Education
Strategies Teaching Interdisciplinary Collaborative Practice and Education at a Nurse Managed Clinic in Underserved
Communities
Games, Frames, and Decision-Making: A Multimodal Approach to Teaching Delegation to Prelicensure Nursing
Students
Diabetic Retina Exam at Onsite Work Health Clinic Utilizing Telehealth Technology
Investigating the Impact of a Video Response Discussion on Student Engagement in an Online Course
Incorporation of Community Health Virtual Simulation Into a Capstone Population Focused Project: A Pilot Study
Cultivating a Culture of Resilience: A Nursing Leadership Initiative
Script Concordance Model and Think Aloud Approach to Facilitate Clinical Reasoning in Baccalaureate Nursing
Students
Active Learning: A Concept Analysis
Developing Critical Thinkers Through the Use of A.V.I.D. Discussions
An Integrative Approach to the Implementation of a Veteran to BSN Pathway
Procedure for Cannulating a Dialysis Access: Using the ASSURE Model and Gagne's Events of Instructions
The Effect of Virtual Clinical Simulation Debriefing on Clinical Decision Making
The Use of Collaborative Testing to Promote Nursing Students Team Decision Making and Success
Low Literacy Breast Cancer Educational Module: A Collaborative Project
Reflection of Professional Nursing Growth Through E-Portfolio
Emotional Strain: A Concept Analysis for Nursing
A Pilot Study of Student Nurses’ Self-Efficacy in Performing Venipuncture
Using Simulation Technology to Validate Competency
Exploring the Writing Perceptions of Former Baccalaureate Nursing Students
The Relationship Between Nursing Student Test-Taking Motivation and the Exit Examination Score
AEDs in Faith-Based Communities
Exploring the Experiences of DNP-Prepared Nurses Enrolled in a DNP-to-PhD Pathway Program
Will Bi-Monthly Telephone Contact Help Compliance to Improve Exercise Regimen in Obese Type 2 Diabetes?
Competition-Based Learning (CBL) in Nursing Education
Guidelines for Development and Implementation of the DNP Scholarly Project
Interprofessional Educational Collaboration Between Graduate Outpatient Pharmacy and BSN Community Health
Nursing Students
Refusing to Let the Dust Settle: Creative Evaluation of a Concept-Based Curriculum
Assessing Acuity Adaptable Staff About Their Perceptions of Current Fall Prevention Practices
Nurse-Leader Rounds
The Medical Student Collaborative: An Innovative Model to Improve Interprofessional Collaboration,
Communication, and Patient Care
Utilizing Standardized Patients and High-Fidelity Simulation to Promote Interdisciplinary Communication
Pedagogical Strategy for Teaching Innovation and Business Concepts to Graduate Nursing Students
Implementation and Evaluation of a Journal Club for Acuity Adaptable Units
Partnering to Increase the BSN Prepared Workforce
Differences in Debriefing Practices in Nursing Education: Instructor-Led and Peer-Led
Enhancing Quality of Life of Cancer Survivors: Incorporating Survivorship Care Plan in Nursing Education
Grounded Theory Study of Family Happiness Among People Who Live in Urban Community in Bangkok
A Collaboration Challenge: Improving Processes for Immersion Experiences in BSN Programs
Benefits of Collaborative Practice Partnership: A Capstone Experience in the Perioperative Settings
The Future of Nursing Education: Multidisciplinary Community-Engaged Research for Undergraduate Nursing
Students
Doctoral Nursing Graduates Lived Experience of a Virtual Mentoring Program and Building Upon the Mentoring
Readiness to Integrate Evidence-Based Practice: What Is the Nurse Educators' Role?
Social Isolation and Emotional Loneliness in Older Adults With Congestive Heart Failure
The Evidence-Based Practice Fulcrum: Balancing Leadership and Emotional Intelligence in Nursing and
Interprofessional Education
Using Photo Journaling to Develop Affective Outcomes in Nursing Education
Assessing the Need for a Multidisciplinary Patient and Family Education Pediatrics Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting
Effectiveness of Using the Peanut Ball to Shorten the First and Second Stage of Labor
Associate-to-Bachelor's (ATB) Option: A Collaborative Practice Model
Enhancing Skills in Behavioral Health Management
Nurse Faculty Enhancing Best Practices in the Clinical Setting
Pathways to Progress: Academic Support for Students in Nursing Education Programs
LGBTQ Cultural Competency for Nurses
NICU Nurses and Families Partnering to Provide Family-Centered Care
Integrating Palliative Care Services With Heart Failure Management
Interprofessional Collaborative Approach for Improving Situation Awareness Using Simulation in a Nursing Residency
Program
Student Perceptions Regarding Collaborative Intraprofessional Nursing Education
Sexual Expression of Nursing Home Residents
The Lived Experience of Jordanian Nursing Students in Jordan
Nursing Mentorship: Clinical Coaching and Shared Leadership
Faculty Perceptions of the Impact of Service Learning on Nursing Students
Clinical Practice for Novice Nursing Students: Shorter Clinical Day or Longer Clinical Day?
Use of Electronic Clinical Tracking System for Documenting Competency Achievement in a DNP Program
Study Abroad Program With Dynamics of Collaborative Research: A Case of Two Universities
Implementing Clinical Accommodations for Students With Physical Disabilities in Nursing Education
Development and Pilot Testing of a Multidimensional Learning Environment Survey for Nursing Students
Factors Related to Learning-Support Competencies of Junior Faculty at Nursing Universities
Bridge the Diversity Gap by Collaborating, Mentoring, and Coaching
Start With What They Know: Student Perceptions of Self-Efficacy in Community Health Nursing
Using the Triangulated OSCE to Assess Student Performance in Simulation
Updating and Refining a Measure for Moral Distress: Introducing the MDS-2017
Perceptions of DNP-Prepared Nurse Educators on Their Preparation for the Faculty Role
Does a Community Health Simulation Enhance Student Learning More Than the Traditional Windshield Survey
Approach?
Mind Over Matter: Educating Nursing Students on the Art and Skill of Mindfulness
Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Vietnamese Clinical Learning Environment Inventory With Nursing
Students
Establishing Evidence-Based Faculty Development Strategies to Enhance Implementation of IPE in Nursing
Putting Nursing Students at the Helm of Health Literacy
A Baccalaureate Community Health Nursing Course Grounded in Nightingale’s Environmental Action Theory of
Nursing Practice
"Healthy Skin" Program for Family Caregivers of People With Chronic Disease
Student Opportunity for Success (S.O.S.): An Academic Recovery Program
Design and Evaluation of a Simulation-Based Assessment Instrument to Identify Performance Gaps in Graduate
Nurses
Examining Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Culture of Health in Nursing Curricula: A Delphi Study
Feasibility and Learning Outcomes Associated With Preparing Nursing Students for Simulation Using Virtual Gaming
Simulations
Validation of the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric and Predictors of Clinical Nursing Judgement in Simulation
Weaning Inconsistencies in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) and Modified Scoring
Fostering Acceptance of Sexual Identity and Expression of the LGBT Community in the Classroom
Psychometric Testing of the Presence of Nursing Scale in a Magnet Hospital
Opportunities and Barriers to Building EBP Skills in the Clinical Setting via Mobile Technology
Self-Awareness of Civility Among Nursing Faculty in Creating a Positive Learning Environment
Accelerated Nursing Students Perception of Factors Influencing Retention
Predictors of Work Engagement Among Doctorally-Prepared Nursing Faculty
Standardized Patient Simulation as an Active Learning Strategy in Oncology Symptom Management: A Pilot Study
Identifying Student Nurses’ Barriers to Research Participation
An Educational Method to Enable Nursing Students to Develop the Skills Needed for Clinical Reasoning
Factors Influencing Information Literacy Self-Efficacy of Prelicensure Baccalaureate Nursing Students
A Multiple Case Study of Associate Degree Nursing Student Experiences on NCLEX-RN© Preparation
Servant Leadership in a Baccalaureate Nursing Program: A Case Study
The Impact of Supplemented Simulation on Student Competence
Informing Andragogy: Voices of Graduates From Accelerated, Second-Degree Programs in Nursing Concerning
Faculty Teaching Practices
Relationship Between Compassion Fatigue and Health Promotion Behavior Practicing in Long-Term Care
Authentic Learning in Healthcare Education: A Systemic Review
ESL versus Non-ESL Nursing Students' Perceptions of Staff Nurse Incivility
Development of a Nurse Preceptor Program
How to Best Educate Nursing Adjunct Clinical Faculty
SNAPS+: Peer-to-Peer and Academic Support in Developing Clinical Skills
Negative Attitude and Anxiety Toward Aging in Students From a Nursing School in Saltillo, Mexico
Examination of Graduate Faculty Online Teaching Needs to Create a Center for Scholarship in Teaching/Learning
Health Policy Institute (HPI): Capitol Hill Experiential Learning to Gain Political Astuteness
Teaching Q Methodology to Baccalaureate Nursing Students
The Use of a Skills Simulation Boot Camp to Increase Self-Confidence in Prelicensure BSN Students
Do I Stay or Do I Go Now?” Exploring Moral Distress in Operating Room Nurses
Applying the Theory of the Dynamic Nurse-Patient Relationship to Develop Communication Skills for Nurses
Relationship Between Incident Occurrences and Feeling States of Nurses in a Surgical Ward
The Process of Adapting SafeMedicate© (Medication Dosage Calculation Skills Software) for Use in Brazil
An Explanatory Case Study That Includes Evidence-Based Practice in a Hospital Setting
The Impact of Structured Research Curriculum in Undergraduate Nursing Programs
Knowledge Surveys in Nursing Education: Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Their Knowledge and Clinical Skill Abilities
Utilizing Simulation and Experiential Learning to Make Onboarding Newly Hired Nursing Staff Fun and Engaging
Nursing Student Experiences of Clinical Data Use in Clinical Rotations
Effects of an Evidence-Based Approach to Recruit and Retain Underrepresented/Disadvantaged Students in a BSN
Program
Enhancing Student Nurses’ Multiple Patient Medication Administration Skills Using an Electronic Barcode System
E-Learning Modules: Promoting Success for Prenursing Students
Comparisons of Cooperative Teams While Using the Haptic Intravenous Simulator
Critical Thinking and Decision-Making Skills of Nursing Students Basis for Designing Instructional Strategies
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) Educational Strategies to Enhance Graduate/Undergraduate Nursing
Comprehension of Pathophysiology
The Effects of Early Adoption of Academic Electronic Health Records System: A Pilot Outcome Study
Improving Clinical Competence and Skills Acquisition by Student Nurses: Bridging the Preparation to Practice Gap
View and Do Simulation Method: Small Group Learning Experiences for Large Cohort RN Residencies
An Assessment of Errors and Near-Misses From Prelicensure Nursing Students
Impact of Hybrid Teaching on Prelicensure Baccalaureate Nursing Students
Using Virtual Patient Simulation in Substitution of Traditional Clinical Hours in Undergraduate Nursing
Post-Simulation Reflections: A Qualitative Review After Implementation of Video Debriefing Changes
The Global Nursing Education Study in an Online Graduate Course: Phase I
The Effects of Competency on the Nursing Careers of Novice Nurses
Evaluating the Level of Cultural Competence in Undergraduate Nursing Students Using Standardized Patients in
Simulation
The Effect of Root Cause Analysis on Safe Medication Administration
Nursing Education Research Conference 2018
(NERC18) Abstracts
Plenary Sessions
PLN1 - OPENING PLENARY: Empirical Analysis of Faculty-To-Faculty Incivility: Implementing
Best Practices to Foster Civility and Healthy Academic Work Environments
Cynthia Clark, PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Setting the Stage:
• Background and Overview: Contextualizing incivility in nursing education
• Previous studies
• Concept Analysis and Conceptual Model for Fostering Civility in Nursing Education
Mixed Methods instrument developed and tested: Instrument has been used in 34 studies to date (including replication and
intervention studies); Highly reliable instrument— secondary purpose; test the Conceptual Model for Fostering Civility in Nursing
Education
Present results and findings from the initial and subsequent studies:
Academic incivility can negatively impact individuals, teams, and organizations; cause physical, psychological, and emotional harm;
and seriously disrupt relationships and the teaching-learning environment. Dr. Clark presents findings from empirical studies
regarding faculty-to-faculty incivility and offers best practices to foster and sustain civility, collegiality, and healthy academic work
environments. Attendees will explore 1) examples of faculty incivility, 2) contributing factors, and 3) evidence-based strategies to
build positive relationships; promote collegial workplaces; and enhance faculty well-being and career satisfaction.
National Study on Faculty-to-Faculty Incivility
MIXED METHODS STUDY: 588 Nursing Faculty from 40 States
Quantitative Results
67.4% report F-F Incivility as a Moderate to Serious Problem
78.5% report that they avoid addressing incivility related to:
• Fear of retaliation
• Lack of administrator support
• No clear policies to address incivility
• It takes too much time and effort
• Lack of skill to address incivility
• Makes matters worse
• Feel powerless (new, non-tenured, adjunct, clinical faculty)
• Want to be liked—don’t rock the boat
Most frequently occurring uncivil faculty behaviors:

• Resisting change or unwilling to negotiate
• Consistently failing to perform one's share of the workload
• Distracting others while using media devices during meetings
• Refusing to listen or openly communicate on work-related issues
• Making rude remarks and putdowns towards others
Top factors that contribute to faculty incivility

• Stress
• Demanding workloads
• Unclear roles and expectations
• Imbalance of power
• Volatile or stressful organizational conditions
Level of confidence in addressing incivility, and ways to address the problem.
Qualitative Findings (8 Themes)

1. Berating, insulting, and allowing [incivility]
2. Setting up, undermining, and subverting
3. Power playing, derailing, disgracing
4. Excluding, gossiping, and degrading
5. Refusing, not doing, and justifying
6. Blaming and accusing
7. Taking credit [ripping off] others’ work
8. Distracting and disrupting during meetings
Discuss best practices to foster civility and healthy work environments

• Organizational and leadership support
• Assembling an Organizational Design (Civility) Team
• Measuring/assessing work environments
• Developing and implementing a sustainable ‘Action Plan’ including:
o Foundational Statements and Documents
o Civility Pledge/Team Charter/Co-creating Norms
o Guidelines and Policies
o Hiring for Civility
o Restorative Justice
o Effective Communication and Constructive Conflict Negotiation
References
American Nurses Association. (2015). Position Statement: Incivility, Bullying, and Workplace Violence. Retrieved from
http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/WorkplaceSafety/Healthy-Nurse/bullyingworkplaceviolence/Incivility-Bullying-and-
Workplace-Violence.html
Clark, C. M. (2017). Creating and sustaining civility in nursing education, 2nd. ed. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International Publishing.
Clark, C. M. (2013). National study on faculty-to-faculty incivility: Strategies to promote collegiality and civility. Nurse Educator, 38(3), 98-102.
Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Kenski, D., & Cardoni, C. (2013). Exploring and addressing faculty-to-faculty incivility: A national perspective and literature
review, Journal of Nursing Education, 52(4), 211-218.
Grust, P. L. (2013). A study of the relationship of incivility to faculty satisfaction and persistence in nursing education. (Order No. 3597793, Capella
University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 179.
Heinrich, K. T. (2007). Joy stealing: Ten mean games faculty play and how to stop the gaming. Nurse Educator, 32(1), 34–38.
Contact
[email protected]
Special Sessions
A 12 - SPECIAL SESSION: Generating Simulation Evidence
Bette A. Mariani, PhD, RN, ANEF, USA
Abstract
While there is an abundance of evidence in the literature supporting simulation as an effective strategy for teaching and learning in nursing
education, much of the research has measured satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-efficacy (Mariani & Doolen, 2016). While nursing education
and the pedagogy of simulation is moving towards more rigorous studies that measure more critical outcomes such as, student learning, patient
safety, clinical judgement, and patient outcomes, a gap in the literature still exists. There is no doubt that challenges exist in conducting studies
that can provide strong evidence in both the academic and clinical settings. And while these challenges exist, it remains critical that researchers
adhere to the foundations of a well-conducted simulation study to generate the necessary evidence to advance the science of simulation and
nursing education. A well-designed simulation study should be conducted within the context of a theoretical or contextual framework, with an eye
for how the study can continue to contribute to building the knowledge or theory behind the science. Adhering to the International Nursing
Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning StandardsSM (INACSL, 2016) is critical when conducting simulation research; it helps to provide
structure for the study, and offers the opportunity for replication in other settings. As with all studies, a rigorous methodology and valid and
reliable instruments are the foundation to a well-designed study. Nursing programs faced with increasing challenges of clinical placements and
faculty shortages are turning more and more to simulation as a method of clinical education. Studies such as the National Council of State Boards of
Nursing (NCSBN) (Hayden et al., 2014) provide strong evidence for using simulation for student learning, with positive outcomes on NCLEX, as well.
Nurse faculty and researchers need to continue to add to this body of evidence through rigorous, multi-site intervention studies that can
demonstrate the outcomes of simulation on quality patient outcomes in a variety of settings. This can only be accomplished with well-designed
studies that adhere to sound methodology, standards of best practice, and teamwork and collaboration.
References
Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M. A., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P. R. (2014). The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A longitudinal,
randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), S3-S40.
doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30062-4
INASCL Board of Directors (2016, August). Standard of Best Practice: Simulationsm. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, s3-s7. Jeffries, P. R. (2012).
Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. (2nd ed.) New York: National League for Nursing.
Jeffries, P. R. (2016). The NLN Jeffries Simulation theory. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
Mariani, B., & Doolen, J. (2016). Nursing simulation research: What are the perceived gaps? Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(1),30-36.
doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2015.11.004
Mariani, B. (2017). Generating simulation evidence (Chap. 9). In B. Patterson & A. M. Krouse (eds). Scientific inquiry in nursing education:
Advancing the science. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
Contact
[email protected]
B 11 – SPECIAL SESSION: Maximizing Undergraduate Research Outcomes Through Honors
Education: A Win-Win for Faculty and Student Development
Jennifer Wilson, DNP, RN, CPN, USA
Abstract
Nursing honors programs provide faculty an excellent forum for developing and cultivating the next generation of nurse leaders,
researchers, and scholars. In addition, with the guidance of faculty mentors, they equip nursing students with an early foundation
for advanced practice. They allow high-achieving students to gain early exposure to the roles and skills necessary to navigate
contemporary healthcare challenges and to advance the nursing profession through research, in alignment with recommendations
outlined in the Institute of Medicine’s Future of Nursing Report. Nursing honors education also provides faculty with the opportunity
to implement innovative ideas they have always wanted to try, but do not fit within the traditional nursing curriculum. When
approached strategically, these programs provide a structure for developing faculty and students, cultivating academic-clinical
research partnership, increasing productivity, and improving faculty satisfaction.
The challenges associated with effective nursing honors education, however, are complex, multifaceted, and widespread. A paucity
of literature leaves leaders with limited guidance for developing or sustaining high-quality programs. In addition, nursing honors
programs in the United States operate largely in silos, with few formal opportunities designated specifically for strategic
collaboration among program leaders, which could significantly increase program success and scope of impact. While some
programs thrive, many nursing honors programs struggle with sustainability.
This presentation will share strategies employed by a Scholar participating in the Sigma Theta Tau International (STTI) Experienced
Nurse Faculty Leadership Academy (ENFLA) to strategically transform a nursing honors program to promote sustainability, increase
productivity, cultivate new research opportunities, and develop a team of nursing honors faculty. The nursing honors program
highlighted, located in the southwest region of the United States, experienced rapid and significant expansion in student numbers
over a three-year period, accompanied by an increase in the depth, breadth, rigor, and quality of honors work and requirements. As
the program thrived and yielded meaningful outcomes, with tangible benefits to students, faculty, the University, the College of
Nursing, and to community partners, university leaders and administrators recognized the value of continued investment in the
program. However, as resources in higher education became increasingly competitive, resource allocation failed to keep pace with
the program’s growth, thereby jeopardizing program sustainability and research productivity.
This purpose of this Scholar’s ENFLA project was to develop a plan for sustaining the existing nursing honors program across the
university’s three campuses, and developing a team of talented faculty who were new to honors education. Current best practices in
nursing honors education served as the foundation for the project’s strategic imperatives. Preliminary initiatives included a
comprehensive review of the literature, a contextual evaluation of the existing honors program, and alignment of the program’s
mission, vision, and values with the University Honors Scholar Program, the College of Nursing, and the university at large. The data
from these activities provided a foundation for securing the buy-in from key program stakeholders. These preliminary processes also
provided valuable insight into the benefit and plethora of potential opportunities for faculty to thrive professionally and increase
scholarly productivity through active engagement in honors education. Therefore, the project approached program sustainability
from the perspective of faculty empowerment, which served as a primary foundational principle threaded into the project’s
initiatives.
The success of strategic initiatives to promote sustainability relied on assembling and coalescing a team of nursing faculty across
campuses. Early project activities provided clarity that the nursing honors program’s sustainability relied on significant changes in
the areas of faculty workload structure and recognition, ongoing faculty development, exploration of program funding sources, and
the development of a new nursing honors curriculum that integrates research and leadership into each course. Specific program
initiatives sought to promote efficient utilization of resources, increase productivity, and to yield increased mutually beneficial
outcomes.
ENFLA project outcomes brought university recognition to the College of Nursing as successful strategic initiatives were adopted and
integrated into the university’s honors scholar program. The project’s key concepts, strategies for promoting sustainability, project
outcomes, and recommendations for other honors leaders are described. Looking to the future and ideas for strengthening nursing
honors education are addressed, including the development of collaborative initiatives that provide resources and a supportive
network to empower nursing honors faculty and students to maximize their leadership and research potential.
References
Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2016). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty. (5th. ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, Inc.
Burkhart, P. V., & Hall, L. A. (2015). Developing the next generation of nurse scientists. Nurse Educator., 40(3), 160-162.
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, D.C.: The National
Academies Press
Lim, F., Nelson, N., Stimpfel, A. W., Navarra, A. M., & Slater, L. Z. (2015). Honors programs: Current perspectives for implementation. Nurse
Educator, 41(2), 98-102.
Nelson, N., Lim, F., Navarra, A.M., Rodriguez, K., Stimpfel, A.W., & Slater, L.Z. (2018). Faculty and student perspectives on mentorship in a nursing
honors program. Nursing Education Perspectives, 39(1), 29-31.
Contact
[email protected]
D 12 - SPECIAL SESSION: Design-Based Educational Research in Nursing
Anne M. Krouse, PhD, MBA, RN-BC, RN-BC, USA
Abstract
Advancing the science of nursing education requires a commitment to creating evidence-based educational interventions. Currently,
there is limited empirical evidence regarding the efficacy of educational interventions, particularly those that are able to be tested in
an iterative way. To increase the rigor of nursing education research, design must be a consideration in the initial phases of study
development. Design-based research can be used to generate theoretical evidence both through the intervention as well as on the
intervention, both testing the theory and refining the intervention. Consideration of context is important in educational research as
it is translated to practice. Using design, contextual variables that may affect outcomes and be considered, empirically tested, and
refined through iterative testing. Researchers may choose to use design-based research for the purposes of development, validation,
and effectiveness. Development studies are those where the goal is the production of an intervention and design theory related to
that intervention. Validation studies test and generate theories. Effectiveness studies examine student outcomes related to an
intervention. Good design-based research must have the following characteristics: 1) the goals of theory development and design
are intertwined; 2) iterative cycles of design, enactment, analysis, and redesign must be embedded; 3) research outcomes must be
disseminated to those in practice; 4) accounting for how the design functions in practice related to contextual issues; and 5)
methods to document and connect the processes within the intervention to the outcome. To design the intervention, one must look
to instructional design principles which are rooted in Behaviorism and General Systems theory, seeking a response from a learner
given a set of learning conditions. The iterative steps of design-based research in education include analysis, design, and evaluation
with a dual focus on theory and practice, integrated research and design processes, and theoretical and practical outcomes.
Educational outcomes reported in the nursing literature are often not well connected to the design of the intervention which limits
its usefulness in other environments with different contextual variables. Additionally, most nursing education intervention research
is limited to single site and single sample which limits the robustness and generalizability of their findings. In order to advance the
science of nursing education, nurse researchers must consider the theoretically driven design of educational interventions which are
able to be replicated and refined in an iterative way that informs both nursing education practice as well and the science of nursing
education. Context plays an important role in the outcomes of any educational intervention. Therefore, those individuals applying
the intervention in the learning environment must play a role in the design and refinement of that intervention.
Nursing education researchers should look to the principles of instructional design to develop a robust educational intervention.
Guided by theory to explain the how and why of the design, the ADDIE (analysis, design, development, implementation, and
evaluation) model of instructional design can provide guidance in the development of the intervention. Analysis includes problem
identification and setting learning goals. During the design phase, measurable learning objectives are developed as well as the
classification of the type of learning and learning activities. This is followed by the development and implementation of the design.
Formative and summative evaluation then contributes to the iterative cycle of refinement and testing of the intervention.
The inclusion of design-based research principles in nursing education research can significantly increase the strength of the
evidence if carefully considered as an integral part of the study design. Researchers in nursing education must partner with
colleagues in practice to ensure that the design is clear, can be repeated, and is context-dependent. Careful attention to this will
create opportunities to increase the reliability of the evidence generated from these studies.
References
Branch, R., & Merrill, M. D. (2012) Characteristics of instructional design models. In R. Resiser, & J.
Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 8-16). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
doi:10.3102/0013189x032001009
Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-
8. doi: 10.3102/0013189x032001005
Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121.
doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1101_4
Ferguson, L., & Day, R. (2005). Evidence-based nursing education: Myth or reality? Journal of Nursing Education, 44, 107-115.
Harper, S. P. (2007). Instructional design for affective learning in online nursing education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
ProQuest Central. (Order No. 3246873).
Herrington, J., & Reeves, T.C. (2011). Using design principles to improve pedagogical practiceand promote student engagement. Proceedings from
Ascilite: Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Herrington-
full.pdf
Hoadly, C. (2004). Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 203-212. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3904_2
Ironside, P. M., & Spurlock, D. J. (2014). Getting serious about building nursing education science. The Journal of Nursing Education, 53, 667-669.
doi:10.3928/01484834-20141118-10
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T.C. (2012) Conducting educational design research. New York, NY: Routledge.
Merrinboer, J. J. G. v., Bastiaens, T., & Hoogveld, A. (2004). Instructional design for integrated e-learning. In W. Jochems, J. J. G. v. Merrinboer & R.
Koper (Eds.), Integrated e-learning: implications for pedagogy, technology and organization (pp. 13-23). London: Routledge Falmer.
Merrill, D. (2002b). A pebble in the pond model for instructional design. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 39-44. doi:10.1002/pfi.4140410709
Nieveen, N., McKenney, S., & Van den Akker, J. (2006). Educational design research: The value of variety. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S.
McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds). Educational design research (pp. 151-158). London: Routledge.
Contact
[email protected]
E 01 and G 11 - SPECIAL SESSION: Nursing Education Research: Global Impact Through an
Open Access Platform
Kimberly Thompson, MLS, USA
Abstract
What are you waiting for? Have you written research, research-based, educational documents (for students, CE courses, patients, or a community),
and/or other evidence-based practice materials that are not a good fit for traditional scholarly and scientific journals, but are otherwise based on
sound principals? Do you want credit for all your work and not just a few select published manuscripts? Lucky you! The Honor Society of Nursing,
Sigma Theta Tau International (Sigma) via its free resource, the Virginia Henderson Global Nursing e-Repository (the Henderson Repository),
accepts the following types of documents and more: reports, white papers, faculty created learning objects, dissertations, theses, capstone
projects, best practice guidelines, quality improvement tools, surveys, measurements, patient education tools, unpublished manuscripts, and
certain published articles. The Henderson Repository has the capability to accept these materials as text-based documents, audio files, still images,
and even videos! A variety of formats are accepted: posters, presentation slides, handouts, pamphlets, brochures, reports.
Let the Henderson Repository be the solution for all of your dissemination needs! The repository features an open peer-review component for
works submitted to any of the collections under the Independent Submissions community. All other submissions are evaluated or assessed
according to community standards prior to posting. There are a number of ways to participate as individuals nurses, students, and groups (i.e.,
national and international nursing organizations, hospitals, healthcare systems, nursing consortia, and health-related businesses that employ
nurses).
Come to this session to learn more about this unique digital venue. The purpose of this session is to inform nurses in all areas of the profession
(nurse leaders, faulty members, researchers, clinicians, and nursing students) about the Henderson Repository’s mission, the participation options,
and the benefits to submitting authors and groups.
Once fully populated with full-text items, it will become a global resource for nursing research and evidence-based practice materials.
References
Biagioni, S. S., Goggi, S., & Pardelli, G. (2017). Grey Literature Citations in the age of Digital Repositories and Open Access. Grey Journal (TGJ), 13(1),
23-31.
Ćirković, S. (2017). Transition to Open Access and its implications on Grey Literature Resources. Grey Journal (TGJ), 13(2), 101-109.
Loan, F. A., & Sheikh, S. (2016). Analytical study of open access health and medical repositories. Electronic Library, 34(3), 419-434.
Ocholla, D. o., & Ocholla, L. o. (2016). Does Open Access Prevent Plagiarism in Higher Education? African Journal Of Library, Archives & Information
Science, 26(2), 187-200.
Odell, J., Coates, H. & PALMER, K. (July 2016). Rewarding open access scholarship in promotion and tenure: Driving institutional change. College &
Research Libraries News, [S.l.], v. 77, n. 7, p. 322-325. ISSN 2150-6698. Available at:
http://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/9518/10824
Serrano-Vicente, R. r., Melero, R. r., & Abadal, E. a. (2016). Open Access Awareness and Perceptions in an Institutional Landscape. Journal Of
Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 595-603.
Contact
[email protected]
E 12 - SPECIAL SESSION: Clarifying the Review Conundrum: Literature, Integrative,
Systematic, Scoping
Kim Alexander Noble, PhD, RN, ACCNS-AG, CPAN, USA
Abstract
Background: The explosion of Evidence based practice in nursing has triggered variation in author literature review approaches and nomenclature.
Example terms used to describe review methodology include comprehensive, systematic, critical, integrated, narrative, scoping and rapid realist.
The evolution of diversity in literature review is based in differences in approach and application of process, causing confusion. A review may be
foundational and be used to provide a basis for merging or deconstructing what is known to create a new application of research findings. The
review may identify gap(s) in empirical findings to guide researchers to new evidence generation. Reviews can be used to synthesize findings to
translate evidence to clinical practice, such as interdisciplinary guidelines. Additionally, the literature review can provide a critical summary of what
is known as background for novel approaches. The object of this presentation is to 1) discuss the global approach of literature review; 2)
compare/contrast forms of review based on approach and outcome; and 3) apply understanding of differences to exemplar publications.
Methods: This presenter will use examples of review strategies that are matched to purpose and outcome. Includes will be positive and negative
aspects of each approach and the rationale for use. A description of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review
(CSLR) methodology will be provided as an exemplar for methodological guidance for conducting systematic review and meta-analysis.
Results: Nurse educators are challenged to assist student understanding and utilization of research findings at both graduate and undergraduate
levels. This educational priority is difficult as it requires the educator to impart a love of research synthesis and translation to students. An
understanding of research is frequently not an adequate motivator for student mastery; the educator must understand research components, the
literature review description and make the case for the application of this information to the patient’s bedside for the student. The literature
review sets the stage for student understanding of the research results. The nurse educator must assist the student to deconstruct the research,
evaluate design and methodology, and then reassemble understanding with the interpretation to the patient.
Conclusion: The literature review will have different structure and components which dovetail to the research methodology and outcome. The
review provides a great contribution to research understanding and translation to practice. A global understanding of the structure and purpose of
the review is fundamental to nurse educators to transformation research to bedside practice to ensure nursing practice that is current and
empirically based.
References
Breytenbach, C., Ham-Baloyi, W. & Jordan, P. J. (2017). An integrative literature review of evidence-based teaching strategies for nurse educators,
Nurse Education Perspectives, 38(4), 193-196.
Cacchione, P. Z. (2016). The evolving methodology of scoping reviews, Editorial, Clinical Nursing Research, 25(2), 115-119.
Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing a narrative style literature review, Medical Writing, 24(4), 230-235.
Grant, M. J. & Bootht, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies, Health Information &
Libraries Journal, 26, 91-108.
Im, E. O. & Chang, S. J. (2012). A systematic integrated literature review of systematic integrated literature reviews in nursing, Journal of Nursing
Education, 51(11), 632-640.
Lockwood, C. (2017). Systematic reviews: Guidelines, tools & checklists for authors, Editorial, Nursing & Health Sciences, 19, 273-277.
Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D. & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews,
International Journal of Evidence€“Based Healthcare, 141-146.
Saul, J. E., Wills, C. D., Bitz, J. & Best, A. (2013). A time-responsive tool for informing policy: A rapid realist review, Implementation Science, 8(103),
1-15.
Ward-Smith, P. (2016). The fine print of literature reviews, Urological Nursing, 36(5), 253-258.
We, B. V. & Banister, D. (2016). How to write a literature review paper, Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278-288.
Contact
[email protected]
F 12 - SPECIAL SESSION: Planning and Thinking Innovatively: Where to Start Your Nursing
Education Research
Angela McNelis, PhD, RN, FAAN, CNE, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Launching a program of research in nursing education requires extensive knowledge and determination. Establishing a research trajectory is often
required for promotion and/or tenure, however, it is absolutely required if your goal is to contribute to the state of the science in nursing
education. Your program of research should be a systematic, planned series of studies that address a focus area or gap in the science. Construct
your plan with the intent to conduct sequential studies such that each successive study builds on your own and others’ prior work in a meaningful
way to advance the state of the science in nursing. Therefore, it is vital that what you choose is something you are passionate about and will
sustain your research trajectory. As you develop these ideas, keep in mind the ethical and financial implications of your work. Will the results from
your studies be possible to implement? Will solutions derived from the evidence be workable in academic or health care settings?
Your research plan needs to remain flexible and driven by the evidence generated, and not by the method (qualitative or quantitative). It is
important to be open to different paths while maintaining focus on the topical area. Thus, developing an important research idea that addresses a
large programmatic issue is the first and often most difficult step in the process. Content expertise, innovation, creativity, curiosity and scientific
rigor are the necessary foundations on which to develop, build and sustain your program. Strong mentors and team members are also essential to
your success and will help you develop your research plan. Finally, funding is necessary to support your work. Framing a compelling purpose
statement that is clear, addresses a significant issue in nursing education, and aligns with organizations’ funding priorities, will position you for
success in securing the financial support needed in your pursuit to develop the evidentiary base in nursing education.
References
Beck, C.T. (2016). Developing a program of research in nursing. Springer Publishing Company: NY.
Gennaro, S. (2015). Building a Research Trajectory. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(4), 285-286.
Lopez, V., & Epsnes, G. (2017). Developing a program of nursing research. Singapore Nursing Journal, 44(1), 2-7.
McNelis, A.M., & Patterson, B. (2016). Critical Points for Submitting Successful Nursing Education Research Proposals. National League for Nursing
online webinar.
Contact
[email protected]
I 12 - SPECIAL SESSION: Effect Sizes in Nursing Education Research: What, Why, and How?
Darrell Spurlock, Jr., PhD, RN, NEA-BC, ANEF, USA
Abstract
The importance of quantitative research findings cannot be judged solely by the presence of small p-values associated with the statistical tests
conducted to answer the study's research questions. In fact, with strong evidence the p-values are widely misunderstood and misused across many
fields, international efforts are underway to diminish the role that p-values play in the overall evaluation of the importance of study findings. In
addition to suggestions that the threshold for judging "statistical significance" be moved from its currently established (though arbitrary) position
of .05 to a much lower value (e.g., .005 or even lower), there is near universal agreement that when possible, estimates of the extent of the
observed effect, such as the difference between group means or a correlation coefficient, should be reported alongside p-values. A key issue is that
p-values are very sensitive to sample sizes in that if a large enough sample is used, even very small, meaningless differences or associations are
found to be "statistically significant" -- with no further consideration of whether the finding is clinically, educationally, or practically important.
Reporting of effect sizes alongside p-values in research reports enables research consumers to make better evaluations about not only questions of
the likelihood of the study's findings, but also about the magnitude of the observed effect. Though effect sizes are not widely reported in research
reports at the current time, several effect size estimates are quite easy to calculate and interpret. In this session, attendees will briefly explore
recent issues around the use of p-values, review several common effect sizes applicable to nursing education research, and learn how to quickly
calculate effect sizes for differences between means using information directly available in most quantitative research reports. Attendees will also
explore ways to calculate and include in their own research reports effect sizes for a variety of statistical tests using commonly available statistical
software and tools available online.
References
Benjamin, D.J., Berger, J., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B.A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., . . . Johnson, V. (2017, July 22). Redefine statistical
significance. Retrieved from http://psyarxiv.com/mky9j
Berben, L., Sereika, S.M., & Engberg, S. (2012). Effect size estimation: Methods and examples. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49,1039-
1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.01.015
Ferguson, C.J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians andÃ‚ researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 532-538.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808
Gaskin, C.J., & Happell, B. (2014). Power, effects, confidence, and significance: An investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51, 795-806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.09.014
Spurlock, D. (2017a). The purpose and power of reporting effect sizes in nursing education research. Journal of Nursing Education; Thorofare,
56(11), 645Ã¢€“647. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20171020-02
Spurlock, D. (2017b). Beyond p , 05: Toward a Nightingalean perspectiveÃ‚ on statistical significance for nursing education researchers. Journal of
Nursing Education, 56, 453-455. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20170712-02
Contact
[email protected]
Workshops
WKS1 - WORKSHOP 1: Intermediate Statistics and Data Analysis for Nursing Education
Researchers
Darrell Spurlock, Jr., PhD, RN, NEA-BC, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Background: Just as a great deal of what nurses learned in their pre-licensure nursing education programs one, two, or three decades ago is no
longer considered relevant and applicable to practice today, so too has the statistical and data analysis procedures available to nursing education
researchers advanced over that same period. New statistical procedures have been developed, other procedures have fallen (sometimes strongly)
out of favor, and perhaps more importantly, our understanding of the theoretical and empirical basis for many data analytic procedures has
evolved and matured over time. Despite advancements in the functionality and availability of modern data analysis software, many nursing
education research studies continue to rely on outdated, basic, and sometimes inaccurately applied statistical methods which limit the extent to
which any study can contribute to the nursing education evidence base.
Purpose: The purpose of this workshop is to help current or aspiring nursing education researchers and nursing faculty interested in quantitative
methods to understand several key intermediate-level statistical and data analysis procedures with a focus on selection, limitations, application,
and interpretation of the selected procedures. Procedures covered in the workshop include modern methods for calculating power analysis, effect
size, and confidence intervals, advanced correlation/regression, ANOVA/ANCOVA, multivariable non-parametric techniques, and longitudinal data
analytic procedures.
Methods: The workshop format is primarily hands-on, supplemented with lecture and frequent group discussion. Participants are strongly
encouraged to bring their own laptop computers with the statistical software of their choice installed. Worked examples will be presented using
SPSS v. 23 and for power analysis, G*Power (available free from http://www.gpower.hhu.de/en.html). Participants will be provided with sample,
working datasets via USB 2.0 thumb drive (and via direct download link) on-site to use during the workshop.
Expected Outcomes: At the conclusion of the workshop, participants will be able to describe the appropriate uses, data requirements, limitations,
and interpretations of selected intermediate-level statistical procedures covered in the workshop. Participants will gain experience conducting the
analyses and interpreting the output from commonly available statistical software, and will be able to identify 2-3 resources to support use of these
more advanced procedures in future research (or teaching) projects.
References
None.
Contact
[email protected]
WKS2 - WORKSHOP 2: Becoming a Nursing Education Scholar: Reflections, Challenges, and
Rewards
Barbara J. Patterson, PhD, RN, ANEF, USA

Celeste M. Alfes, DNP, MSN, RN, CNE, CHSE-A, USA
Kristina Thomas Dreifuerst, PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, USA
Susan Luparell, PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, USA
Abstract
There have been many calls in the literature to build the science of nursing education, yet development of a rigorous body of knowledge has been
slow because of a lack of funding, a lack of institutional support for faculty research in this area, and the challenges of implementing a robust
design for scientific inquiry in educational environments (Ironside & Spurlock, 2014; Valiga & Ironside, 2012).
A core competency for nurse educators is to engage in scholarship (Halstead, 2007). While scholarship and its components have been discussed for
many years in the literature, the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) is both the process and the product. Nurse faculty want to better
understand how students learn and how teaching strategies can maximize student learning. Scholarship involves a deliberative process that
includes original research, research that builds on previous work, and a theoretical perspective to frame the research (Kanuka, 2011). The
scholarship of nurse faculty as clinical practitioners, research scientists, and educators must be focused on advancing the science of nursing and the
science of nursing education.
To effectively engage in scholarship, faculty must exhibit a spirit of inquiry that embraces and demonstrates the qualities of a scholar: integrity,
courage, perseverance, vitality, and creativity (Halstead, 2007, p. 144). These qualities underpin the work of nurse scientists as they conceptualize,
design, and disseminate empirical studies that provide new knowledge to support the teaching and learning of students.
Nurse faculty need to use evidence to ensure that their students are successful and ready to meet the demands of the complex healthcare
environment. They need to step up to the challenge by reflecting on their teaching practice and the state of the science. These faculty will need the
skills to both evaluate and translate the evidence into practice.
This pre-conference panel session will showcase three exemplary nursing education scientists and their programs of research on diverse
educational topics and in a variety of settings. They will share their journeys as researchers advancing the science of nursing education.
Conversations with the panelists will include examining their experiences, the benefits and challenges of conducting pedagogical research, and
lessons learned. The second half of this preconference will offer participants the opportunity to converse with the panelists about conducting
research in nursing education and establishing a research trajectory to advance the science.
References
Halstead, J. (Ed.) (2007). Nurse educator competencies: Creating an evidence-based practice for nurse educators. New York: National League for Nursing.
Ironside, P. M., & Spurlock, D. R. (2014). Getting serious about building nursing education science. The Journal of Nursing Education, 53, 667-669.
doi:10.3928/01484834-20141118-10
Kanuka, H. (2011). Keeping the scholarship in the scholarship of teaching and learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), Article
3. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol5/iss1/3
Valiga, T. M., & Ironside, P. M. (2012). Crafting a national agenda for nursing education research. Journal of Nursing Education, 51, 3-4. doi:10.3928/01484834-
20111213-01
Contact
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
WKS3 - WORKSHOP 3: Differentiating Boundaries: Research and Practice Doctorates
Karen H. Morin, PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN, USA

Katherine J. Moran, DNP, RN, CDE, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Doctoral education in nursing is not new (Ponte & Nicholas, 2015). In the early to mid-1900s, doctoral education was obtained by
attending schools granting a Doctor of Education. Then, discussions ensued about whether nursing schools should offer their own doctoral
programs, including whether the degree awarded should be the universally recognized research doctorate (PhD) or a professional doctorate (DNS,
DNSc, DSN). However, the curricula for professional doctorates were, for the most part, identical to that of the research doctorate.
Soon after, the quality and cost of healthcare came into focus. Reports were released from the Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Quality Chasm
(2001) and the Future of Nursing (2010) that made an urgent call for fundamental change in healthcare delivery. The answer to this call was the
advent of yet another professional doctorate; the doctor of nursing practice (DNP) degree (Moran, 2017). The focus of this doctorate, however, is
clearly on improving practice by enhancing preparation in “evidence-based practice, quality improvement, and systems thinking, among other key
areas” (Bednash, Breslin, Kirschling, & Rosseter, 2014). Understandably, the number of doctorate designations has led to confusion within the
discipline and within the public. While clarification has ensued relative to what constitutes the final product of the research doctorate,
differentiating what constitutes a DNP product from a PhD product has remained fuzzy and problematic (Dols, Hernández, & Miles, 2017). Recent
AACN efforts have helped address this issue.
Purpose: The purpose of this presentation is to help clarify confusion about what distinguishes a practice doctorate product from a research
doctorate product as ways of generating knowledge for the discipline, with special emphasis on how these products contribute to the science of
nursing education.
Process: During this very interactive session, participants will have the opportunity to clarify their perspectives on practice and research doctoral
preparation, review approaches to knowledge generation with emphasis on how each approach to doctoral education addresses gaps in
knowledge, describe similarities in skills needed to address the gap in knowledge, discuss the critical role of collaboration between research and
practice scholars, and compare and contrast methods used and products generated by research and practice scholars.
Participants will have the opportunity to review their understanding of how to conduct research and quality improvement efforts by comparing and
contrasting such topics as statement of the problem, questions to be answered, methods to employ, human subjects’ consideration, and data
analysis. Examples of products produced by research and practice scholars will be provided and discussed. Participants are encouraged to bring
their current efforts in nursing education for input from the speakers and the audience.
References
Bednash, G., Breslin, E. T., Kirschling, J. M., & Rosseter, R. J. (2014). PhD or DNP: Planning for doctoral nursing education. Nursing Science Quarterly,
27, 296-301. DOI: 10.1177/08943184546415
Dols, J. D, Hernández, C., & Miles, H. (2017). The DNP project: Quandaries for scholars. Nursing Outlook, 65, 84-93.
Doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2016.07.009
Foote, J. M., Conley, V., Williams, J. K., McCarthy, A. M., & Countryman, M. (2015). Academic and institutional review board collaboration to ensure
ethical conduct of doctor of nursing practice projects. Journal of Nursing Education, 54, 372-377. Doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150617-03
Institute of Medicine (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D,C: National Academy Press
Institute of Medicine (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, D,C: National Academy Press
Melnyk, B. (2013). Distinguishing the preparation and toles of the doctor of philosophy and doctor of nursing practice graduates: National
implications for academic curricula and health care systems. Journal of Nursing Education, 52, 442-448. Doi: 10.3928/01484834-20130719-01
Moran, K., Burson, R. & Conrad. D. (2017). The doctor of nursing practice scholarly project: A framework for success. Sudbury, Massachusetts:
Jones & Bartlett.
Contact
[email protected]
[email protected]
WKS4 - WORKSHOP 4: Informatics: Integrating the Essentials Into Education and Practice
Melissa A. Stec, DNP, CNM, APRN, FACNM, FANN, USA
Abstract
Informatics happens at the intersection of people and technology. Embedded within the American Associations of Colleges of Nursing’s Essentials
documents are clear, leveled objectives on achieving informatics competencies prior to graduating from a BSN, MSN or DNP program. These
essentials are aimed at equipping students with advanced tools to implement in order to drive change. From the baccalaureate level, graduates
must have basic competence using technologies that support patient care interventions as well as integrating clinical support systems that guide
practice. The master’s level essentials then build upon this foundations and considerations are made for the evaluation of technology and data to
improve health outcomes. At the doctoral level, graduates are prepared as leaders to use these systems to extract data and evaluate and monitor
outcomes of care systems. This includes quality improvement aimed at the critical elements for patient care technology. As each degree level,
there is an emphasis on effective communication and ethical behaviors in the use of technology in patient care.
This session will focus on two key concepts to informatics in nursing. The first is the integration of the informatics essentials into education. The
challenge in nursing education is how to effectively integrate informatics within the context of curriculum when there are competing interest for
time, attention and clinical experiences. This session will start with a discussion of the strategies that are currently being used in education and
develop into a conversation encompassing innovative methods for the integration of informatics competencies in curriculum.
The second concept will explore the opportunities to use informatics based research to achieve the quad aim of improved outcomes, decreased
cost, improved patient satisfaction and improved provider satisfaction. Informatics tools are frequently employed throughout the process of
quality improvement projects however there is much to be said about the contributions to health care research that can be accomplished through
informatics.
References
http://thetigerinitiative.org
http://www.nursing.umn.edu/continuing-professional-development/nnideepdive/
http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/professional-development-programs/preparing-the-next-generation-of-nurses.pdf?sfvrsn=6
http://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials
Axley, L. (2008) The Integration of Technology into Nursing Curricula: Supporting Faculty via the Technology Fellowship Program. The Online
Journal of Issues in Nursing Vol. 13 No. 3.
Curran, C. R. (2008). Faculty development initiatives for the integration of informatics competencies and point-of-care technologies in
undergraduate nursing education. Nursing Clinics of North America, 43(4), 523-533.
Demiris, G., & Zierler, B. (2010). Integrating problem-based learning in a nursing informatics curriculum. Nurse Education Today, 30(2), 175-179.
doi: http://dx.doi.org.proxy.libraries.uc.edu/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.07.008
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2008.06.001
Drummond-Young, M., Brown, B., Noesgaard, C., Lunyk-Child, O., Maich, N. M., Mines, C., & Linton, J. (2010). A comprehensive faculty
development model for nursing education. Journal of Professional Nursing, 26(3), 152-161.
Frisch, N., & Borycki, E. (2013). A framework for leveling informatics content across four years of a bachelor of science in nursing (BSN) curriculum.
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 183, 356.
Hunter, K., McGonigle, D., & Hebda, T. (2013). The integration of informatics content in baccalaureate and graduate nursing education: A status
report. Nurse Educator, 38(3), 110-113. doi:10.1097/NNE.0b013e31828dc292
Hunter, K., McGonigle, D., & Hebda, T. (2013). The integration of informatics content in baccalaureate and graduate nursing education: A status
Jensen, R., Meyer, L., & Sternberger, C. (2009). Three technological enhancements in nursing education: Informatics instruction, personal response
systems, and human patient simulation. Nurse Education in Practice, 9(2), 86-90. doi:
http://dx.doi.org.proxy.libraries.uc.edu/10.1016/j.nepr.2008.10.005
Lee, J. J., & Clarke, C. L. (2015). Nursing students' attitudes towards information and communication technology: An exploratory and confirmatory
factor analytic approach. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(5), 1181-1193. doi:10.1111/jan.12611
Piercey, C. (2015). Embedding health informatics skills into an undergraduate curriculum. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Journal, 23(2), 41.
Spencer, Julie A, MSN, RN, CDE (2012). Integrating informatics in undergraduate nursing curricula: Using the QSEN framework as a guide. Journal of
Nursing Education, 51(12), 697-701.
Contact
[email protected]
Oral Presentations
Development of Academic and Non-Profit Organization Partnership: Creating International Clinical
Experience for Nurse Practitioner Students
Emily Barnes, DNP, FNP-BC, USA
Abstract
Introduction: A new partnership between a School of Nursing in the United States and a non-profit charitable organization (NPO)
serving patients in Honduras resulted in benefits to students, the School, the NPO, and the patients served by the NPO. Despite the
globalization of healthcare, pressure for a culturally competent workforce, and the noted benefits of study abroad experiences, no
published examples of academic nursing and NPO partnerships for graduate nursing students were found in the literature. One
example of a partnership between a School of Nursing in the United States and four non-government agencies in Guatemala was
found (Goodman, 2016). Benefits of study abroad experiences have been identified in the literature and include: deeper
understanding of nursing practice in another country, cultural competence development, professional and personal growth, and a
global view of health (Kent-Wilkinson, Leurer, Luimes, Ferguson, & Murray, 2015). A systematic thematic synthesis of the literature
focusing on undergraduate Australian nursing students and international clinical placements identified similar benefits (Browne, C.
A., Fetherston, C. M., & Medigovich, K., 2015). However, barriers to study abroad participation from nursing students include: cost of
study abroad, relationship responsibilities, work responsibilities, language barriers, safety concerns (Kent-Wilkinson, Leurer, Luimes,
Ferguson, & Murray, 2015), and curricular demands (Napolitano & Duhamel, 2017). It is possible that the barriers to participation
have delayed development of international clinical experiences for graduate nursing students. In addition to lack of published data
on academic nursing and NPO partnerships, there is an overall paucity of evidence related to study abroad experiences for nursing
students, particularly for graduate nursing students.
Process: A faculty member leveraged a personal volunteer opportunity into a new mutually beneficial partnership between the School of Nursing
and an established NPO. The faculty member volunteered to be part of a medical mission team to Honduras. The faculty member recognized the
potential learning opportunities for graduate nurse practitioner students and received approval from the Dean, the Office of Global Engagement,
and the President of the NPO to proceed with development of the partnership.
One student traveled with the faculty member the first year, and the teaching-learning environment was evaluated. Based on positive experience
and feedback from the faculty and the student, a formal course was developed, and a cohort of six students participated the following year.
Barriers in the Process: Barriers had to be overcome in order to successfully navigate the partnership. The NPO has a very specific goal, which is to
provide health care in remote areas of Honduras. Due to capacity limits on the facilities used by the NPO team members, the balance of skills on a
team must be carefully monitored. This means there is a limit to the number of students that can be on a given team. Within the School of Nursing,
the experience had to be approved for clinical practicum. Additionally, the course had to go through the process of development, curriculum
committee review, and finally approval at all levels in the University. The faculty member had to work closely with the Office of Global Engagement
for the University to ensure all requirements were met and followed.
Key Factors to Success: Several factors were key to success of this partnership. The vision and mission of the School of Nursing aligned with the
mission of the NPO. This particular NPO has been engaged in patient care in a specific geographic region of Honduras for over three decades. The
leadership of the NPO is able to provide significant support to participants. The NPO has worked with members of the local community to identify
needs and has hired Honduran staff and a Honduran Director of Operations to work with each team. Each team typically consists of physicians
and/or nurse practitioners, nurses, dentists, pharmacists, optometrists, lab techs, and other volunteers.
In order to address both the financial and time costs of participation, the NPO sends teams for seven to ten days at a time. To ensure continuity of
care, the NPO schedule twenty teams a year. The short time commitment for individual team members overcomes one of the noted barriers to
nursing student participation in international clinical placements (Kent-Wilkinson, Leurer, Luimes, Ferguson, & Murray, 2015), without
compromising patient continuity and access to care. The ability to meet both team member needs of short time commitment and patient needs of
regular access to care are unique features to this partnership.
Outcomes: The School of Nursing benefited by being able to offer an international experience to graduate nursing students, which appears to be
unique in the duration of the trip and in the targeting of graduate nursing students. The experience provided each of the seven nurse practitioner
students forty clinical practicum hours, which relieved some of the burden for clinical placement in the United States.
Students benefited from the experience by being part of an international and inter-professional team. Students were able to participate in care,
similarly to clinical rotations in the United States. The patients’ health issues included chronic diseases and rare and tropical diseases across the
lifespan. Students also gained experience in providing care in limited-resource areas. Student learning about the Honduran culture and social
determinants of health was evident in their reflective journal entries and course evaluations.
The NPO benefited from this partnership by having a full team of health professionals. Based on student comments, there is potential that students
as team members may lead to future participation after students become advanced practice professionals.
Patients in the host country benefited from the care provided. Each team cared for over 700 patients in less than seven days and dispensed over
2500 prescriptions. Many patients traveled hours or days to get to the clinics and would not have had access to healthcare if the teams had not
been there.
Conclusion: Significant opportunities exist for real-world learning and patient care in mutually beneficial partnerships between academic nursing
and NPOs. Studies are needed to determine the long-term benefits of short-term medical trip participation during graduate nursing programs.
These studies should consider not only the outcomes to patients in the host country, but also longitudinal studies on outcomes for the new nurse
practitioners’ patient population, the student perception of the educational program, and whether there is an influence on future participation in
humanitarian work. There is a need for global health competencies to be defined and accepted across academic institutions related to all levels of
nursing curriculum. Further investigation of academic and non-academic partnerships for clinical placements should also be explored so best
practices can be developed.
References
Browne, C. A., Fetherston, C. M., & Medigovich, K. (2015). International clinical placements for Australian undergraduate nursing students: A
systematic thematic synthesis of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 35(10), 1028-1036. https://doi-
org.www.libproxy.wvu.edu/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.05.012
Goodman, R. (2016). The lived experience of graduate nursing students in a study abroad cultural immersion in Guatemala. International Journal
for Human Caring, 20(2), 88-92.
Kent-Wilkinson, A., Leurer, M. D., Luimes, J., Ferguson, L., & Murray, L. (2015). Studying abroad: Exploring factors influencing nursing students’
decisions to apply for clinical placements in international settings. Nurse Education Today, 35(8), 941-947.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.03.012
Martiniuk, A. L. C., Adunuri, N., Negin, J., Tracey, P., Fontecha, C. & Caldwell, P. (2012). Primary care provision by volunteer medical brigades in
Honduras: A health record review of more than 2500 patients over three years. International Journal of Health Services, 42(4), 739-753. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/HS.42.4.i
Napolitano, N. & Duhamel, K. V. (2017). Reflections on an Innovative Approach to Studying Abroad in Nursing. Creative Nursing, 23(1), 53-57.
Wilson, L., Harper, D. C., Tami-Maury, I., Zarate, R., Salas, S., Farley, J., Warren, N., Mendes, I., & Ventura, C. (2012). Global health competencies for
nurses in the Americas. Journal of Professional Nursing, 28(4), 213-222. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.11.021
Contact
[email protected]
The Affiliate Faculty Role:A New Model for Clinical Nurse Education
Alyson J. Luckenbach, MSN, RN, PCCN-K, USA
Heather V. Nelson-Brantley, PhD, RN, CCRN-K, USA
Ginger R. Ireland-Hoffman, BSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: Undergraduate nursing programs across the nation are facing clinical faculty shortages challenging them to meet state
board authority requirements, including student-to-faculty ratios. Many programs use part-time or adjunct faculty to fill these roles.
In fact, there has been a 226% increase in the use of adjunct faculty from 1975 to 2011 (Curtis, 2013).
In a recent study, students identified a lack of clinical expertise by faculty who do not work at the bedside as a factor that contributes to
challenging clinical learning environments (O’Mara, McDonal, Gillespie, Brown, & Miles, 2014). Nurses who work at the bedside are well positioned
to teach undergraduate nursing students about current practices that meet the highest standards of quality and safety. However, staff nurses who
are interested in teaching often lack the education or professional development needed for assuming the role (Dahlke, Baumbusch, Affleck, &
Kwon, 2012). Academic-practice models that employ hospital staff nurses as clinical faculty could be an effective strategy for both reducing the
theory-practice gap commonly seen among new graduate nurses and supporting the development of nurses in practice to assume an educator
role. Results of a systematic review indicated that academic-practice partnerships were the most common method for addressing the clinical nurse
faculty shortage (Wyte-Lake et al., 2013). However, understanding the effectiveness of these partnership models from the perspective of students
and faculty who teach in these roles remains an underexplored area of research.
A mid-western school of nursing and its affiliated academic medical center developed an academic-practice model to address the clinical faculty
shortage and improve student and faculty learning experiences. The onboarding model was adapted from Letcher and Nelson’s Culture of Caring
Partnership Bundle (2014) and Reid’s Eastern Shore Faculty Academy and Mentorship Initiative (ES-FAMI) (2013). Staff nurses are contracted to
teach clinical one day per week while maintaining their full-time status in the hospital. Nurses who either hold or are actively pursuing a graduate
degree in nursing and are employed full-time at the hospital are eligible to apply for an affiliate faculty position. Affiliate faculty exchange one 12-
hour shift in the hospital for teaching one group of six BSN students one day per week in the hospital. Since the start of this partnership, the school
of nursing has been able to reduce student to faculty ratios from 8:1 [HN1] to 6:1, while reducing costs and time spent onboarding faculty.
Recently, there have been more RNs applying for clinical affiliate positions than openings available, showing the growing popularity and
sustainability of this model.
Purpose and Aims: The purpose of the study was to evaluate both student and affiliate faculty perceptions of the effectiveness of the academic-
practice partnership affiliate faculty model. The specific aims were to:
1. Understand the student perception of affiliate faculty as clinical experts and their ability to reduce the theory-practice gap.
2. Discover whether student perception of safety is improved in clinical settings when under supervision of an affiliate faculty.
3. Explore the affiliate faculty model as a way of addressing the clinical faculty shortage.
4. Describe the potential benefits and challenges of the affiliate faculty model.
Methods: This study used a mixed-methods descriptive survey design. Nursing students who completed the BSN program at the school of nursing
between the years of 2012-2017 and affiliate faculty who taught at least one BSN clinical in the affiliated hospital during that same time were
invited to participate in the study. A letter of invitation and link to an electronic survey was emailed to all potential participants. The survey
consisted of Likert-type questions (ranging from 1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly agree) and open-ended questions. Survey Monkey was used to
administer the survey and collect responses. Data were collected from March through April 2017. The study was approved by the academic medical
center internal review board prior to implementation.
Results: In total, 72 student graduates participated in the study. Students reported having more clinical experiences with affiliate faculty (3-5
semesters = 62.5% of respondents) than with non-affiliate faculty (2 semesters or less = 69.7%). An overwhelming majority (65/66 respondents)
agreed or strongly agreed that their affiliate faculty were clinical experts, and prepared them to deliver safe nursing care. The majority of student
respondents (54/65, 83.1%) also agreed or strongly agreed that their affiliate faculty impacted their ability to connect classroom concepts to clinical
practice. Students had mixed perspectives when asked to describe any differences they found between affiliate and non-affiliate faculty, with 12
reporting no difference, 10 reporting affiliates being less favorable than non-affiliates, and seven reporting affiliates as more favorable. When
asked to describe benefits they experienced in being taught by affiliate faculty, students (n=20/31) reported affiliate faculty’s knowledge of the
curriculum and health system, commitment to teaching, instilling confidence, support at the bedside, and being a resource for employment.
Twenty-five affiliate faculty participated in the study. There was a wide range in nursing experience, ranging from 0-3 years (28%) to 11 years or
more (24%). The majority (60.9%) of faculty respondents had taught as an affiliate faculty for 2-3 semesters. All faculty respondents agreed or
strongly agreed that their affiliate faculty role benefited the students, and benefited the unit they taught on. The majority (85.7%) of faculty
respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they were able to help students connect classroom concepts to clinical practice. All respondents (n =
23) agreed or strongly agreed that they were able to prepare students to provide safe patient care. When asked to describe any potential conflicts
in their role, affiliate faculty responded: none (n=11), time/scheduling (n=5), and staff nurse conflicts (n=2). When asked to describe what they
enjoyed the most about the role, affiliate faculty responded: being with students (n=7), connecting classroom to clinical (n=7), teaching hands
on/skills (n=5), and seeing students develop or “light bulb moments” (n=6). When asked to describe what was most challenging about their role,
affiliate faculty responded: time/grading/scheduling (n=11), barriers to teaching (n=4), and student issues (n=3).
Conclusions: Many benefits of the affiliate faculty model were identified, including student perceptions of their clinical faculty as experts and ability
to prepare them for safe nursing care delivery, and ability to connect classroom concepts to clinical practice, both from the perspective of the
students and affiliate faculty. Students either reported no difference or more benefits of having an affiliate faculty compared to non-affiliate
faculty. When implementing an affiliate faculty model, it is important to consider time management and scheduling needs of the affiliate faculty.
Overall, affiliate faculty reported enjoyment of their experience, especially with the “light bulb moments” that come with teaching.
References
Curtis J. (2013). Trends in faculty employment status. Retrieved from http://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/files/AAUP_Report_InstrStaff-75-
11_apr2013.pdf
Dahlke, S., Baumbusch, J., Affleck, F., & Kwon, J. (2012). The clinical instructor role in nursing education: A structured literature review. Journal of
Nursing Education, 51(12), 692-696. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20121022-01
Letcher, D. & Nelson, C. (2014). Creating a culture of caring: A partnership bundle. Journal of Nursing Administration. 44(3):175-186. DOI:
10.1097/NNA.0000000000000047
O'Mara, L., McDonald, J., Gillespie, M., Brown, H., & Miles, L. (2014). Challenging clinical learning environments: Experiences of undergraduate
nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(2), 208-213.
Reid, T. P., Hinderer, K. A., Jarosinski, J. M., Mister, B. J., & Seldomridge, L. A. (2013). Expert clinician to clinical teacher: Developing a faculty
academy and mentoring initiative. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(4), 288-93. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.03.022
Wyte-Lake, T., Tran, K., Bowman, C. C., Needleman, J., & Dobalian, A. (2013). A systematic review of strategies to address the clinical nursing faculty
shortage. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(5), 245-252. doi: http://dx.doi.org.proxy.kumc.edu:2048/10.3928/01484834-20130213-02
Contact
[email protected]
Assessing Clinical Judgment Behaviors and Self-Reflection Using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric
Dianne E. Slager, DNP, FNP, BC, USA
Abstract
Research and anecdotal evidence consistently demonstrate that new graduates are often neither prepared to care for high-acuity
patients nor sufficiently competent to recognize and intervene appropriately in unfolding situations (Thiesen & Sandow, 2013,
Miraglia & Asselin, 2016). Nurse educators in colleges and hospitals are challenged to educate nurses as critically thinking
participants in interdisciplinary teams (Aiken, Clarke, Sloane, Sochalski & Silber, 2002). Stakeholders, such as accrediting agencies,
employers, patients and students themselves increasingly demand accountability via valid and reliable assessment tools for quality
education (Murray, Gruppen, Cattom, & Woolliscroft, 2000).
Nurse educators work to develop critical thinking skills to enhance clinical judgement through a variety of means such as simulation (Kardong-
Edgren, 2012, Chen, Chen, Lee, Cheng,& Yeh, 2017), role-playing (Juarez et al, 2006) ), portfolios (McMullan, 2008) and clinical placements
(Woodley, 2013). Students must learn to develop self-awareness of their own clinical reasoning and judgement skills (Akerjordet & Severinsson,
2007) to continue their professional learning as novice and practicing nurses. Walsh and Seldomridge (2006) emphasize that students need to learn
specific types of thinking relevant to novice practice; such as problem solving, decision making and diagnostic reasoning in health care situations.
Nursing students need opportunities to act as detectives in order to develop clinical reasoning and judgment, learn how to act in given situations,
set priorities, respond to changes in a patient's condition, and attend to evidence-based rationales to guide practice (Benner et al., 2010).
Simulation with Human Simulation Manikins (HSM) permits faculty to expose students to complicated yet safe patient care situations that permit
development of and practice of these type of reasoning skills (Samei & Lasater, 2016). Indeed, Chee (2014) observed that education using
deliberate simulation experiences developed specific clinical skills more effectively than did traditional clinical experiences.
Lasater’s Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR, 2007) was used in a senior baccalaureate simulation course as a scaffolding for development of clinical
judgement behaviors and practices, and to measure awareness of behavioral deficits. The LCJR uses the nursing process framework which provided
a logical structural format already familiar to students. The LCJR provided direction for assessing clinical judgment for both faculty and students in a
new simulation course.
The primary research hypothesis theorized that through weekly reflection using the LCJR, students’ awareness of and incorporation of critical
thinking behaviors would improve their movement across a continuum of novice towards exemplary behaviors.
Secondly, we hypothesized that this increased self-awareness of critical thinking behaviors would lead to accurate student self-evaluation of
simulation lab participation. Therefore, faculty member’s evaluations and student self-evaluations using the LCJR should closely correlate. IRB and
LCJR author permissions were granted.
Participants (N=57), traditional undergraduate college students in their senior year, were assessed regarding use of the LCJR in three different
ways. Two methods were quantitative. A quasi-experimental design using repeated-measures test compared students’ scores at two different
points during the 14 week semester. And a quasi-experimental design compared between group comparisons of faculty and student final averaged
LCJR scoring. Qualitative student focus group surveys provided additional data to better triangulate particular strengths or concerns related to use
of the LCJR.
In two-tailed t-test analysis of LCJR scores, students’ self-evaluation scores (M=2.675, SD=0.2491) compared with faculty evaluation scores
(M=3.12, SD=0.3175), with a p-value of 0.0389 demonstrated no significant difference between the means using a 95% confidence interval. It was
found that students across all twelve sections consistently graded themselves lower than faculty at the interventional dimension, but graded
themselves slightly higher than faculty at the diagnosing dimension. This correlates with what Benner, Tanner and Chesla (2009) describe as a
tendency of novice nurses to focus on mastering skills versus developing a “big picture” perspective. However, unlike Fenske, Harris, Aebersold and
Hartman (2013), overall scores were similar between students and faculty with these traditional, inexperienced students. Faculty assessment of
students demonstrated movement across the continuum of novice towards exemplary behaviors over a 14 week course.
The LCJR provided direction for assessing clinical judgment for both faculty and students in a high acuity 14 week simulation course. It provided
consistent descriptors in debriefing feedback and promoted an objective measure of clinical evaluation (Lasater, 2007). Though orientation to LCJR
use proved cumbersome initially, the LCJR guided development of clinical judgement behaviors and reflection for students in a consistent and
deliberate manner.
References
1. Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Sochalski, J., & Silber, J. H. (2002). Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job
dissatisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Association. 288(16), 1987-1993.
2. Akerjordet, K. & Severinsson E. (2007). Emotional intelligence: A review of the literature with specific focus on empirical and
epistemologicalperspectives. Journal ofClinical Nursing, 16(8), 1405-1416.
3. Benner, P. Tanner, C. A., Chesla, C. A. (2009). Expertise in Nursing Practice: Caring, ClinicalJudgment and Ethics. New York: Springer Publishing. p
78.
4. Cato, M. L., Lasater, K., & Peeples, A. I. (2009). Nursing student’s self-assessment of their simulation experiences. Nursing Education Perspectives,
30(2), 105-108.
5. Chee, J. (2014). Clinical simulation using deliberate practice in nursing education: A Wilsonian concept analysis, Nursing Education in Practice, 14,
247-252.
6. Chen, S-H., Chen, S-C, Lee, S-C., Chang, Y. & Yeh, K-L. (2017). Impact of interactive situated and simulated teaching program on novice nurse
practitioners’ clinical competence, confidence and stress. Nurse Education Today,55, 11-17.
7. Fenske, C.L., Harris, M.A., Aebersold, M.L. & Hartman, L.S. (2013). Perception versus reality: A comparative study of the clinical judgement skills
of nurses during a simulated activity. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(9), 399-405.
8. Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. The Journal of Nursing Education,46(11),
496-503.
9. Sabei, S. D. A.L., Lasater, K. (2016). Simulation debriefing for clinical judgement development: A concept anaylsis. Nurse Education Today, 45, 42-
47. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.06.008
Contact
[email protected]
Using an e-Learning Course to Enhance Student Patient Care Competency Within Interprofessional Settings
Christine Pintz, PhD, RN, FNP-BC, FAANP, USA
Laurie Posey, EdD, USA
Pat Farmer, DNP, RN, FNP, USA
Abstract
The care of patients with multiple chronic conditions is becoming a significant factor in the delivery of health care in the U.S.
(Orenstein, Nietert, Jenkins & Litvin, 2013). Because of their holistic approach, nurse practitioners (NPs) are uniquely qualified to
care for the growing number of these patients, with the majority of NPs working in primary care (Van Vleet & Paradise, 2015).
Chronic health conditions must be treated differently than acute or episodic problems, and the best outcomes are achieved through
use of health care delivery frameworks that support chronically ill patients (Improving Chronic Illness Care, 2017). Patients with
complex health problems benefit from the diverse skills and perspectives of an interprofessional healthcare team (Institute for
Healthcare Improvement, 2014).
The Interprofessional Care of Individuals with Multiple Chronic Conditions (IPCMCC) eLearning course is designed to enhance the competency of
NP students to support patients in the self-management of their chronic conditions within interprofessional healthcare teams. This highly
interactive, open-access course integrates the competencies of the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) Expert Panel (2011) with the
Chronic Care Model (Wagner, et al, 2001). As we developed this eLearning course, we applied strategies to promote learner engagement and
authentic practice. We selected key course topics such as patient engagement in self-care, Motivational Interviewing and other coaching
techniques, behavior change facilitation, identification of community and family resources, promoting self-efficacy, and interprofessional
teamwork. The content was selected based on studies that identified the characteristics of effective management of multiple chronic conditions
(Bodenheimer, & Berry-Millett, 2009; Bodenheimer, T., & Abramowitz, S., 2010; Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2015; Parehkh, Goodman,
Gordon, & Koh, 2011). Throughout the course, real-world examples and scenarios provide the context for learning and contain interactive and
reflective exercises. The course concludes with an immersive, video-based practice experience in which learners make decisions, receive feedback
and experience consequences as they follow an interdisciplinary team through a day in the life of a patient-centered medical home.
Learners completed pre- and- post evaluation surveys to measure satisfaction and perceived learning with the eLearning course. Responses were
rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from poor (1) to excellent (5). The pre-and post-test results were as follows: applying the Chronic Care Model
to clinical practice, t = -11.67, df = 98 ρ<.0001, coaching patients for self-management, t = -9.46, df = 98 ρ<.0001, interprofessional collaboration
skills, t = -2.40, df = 98 ρ<.0001, indicating a significant difference in perceived knowledge between the pre-and post-test. The majority of the
learners were satisfied or very satisfied with the modules. Qualitative findings indicate high level of satisfaction with the video scenarios. Results of
our evaluation indicate that students found the Interprofessional Care of People with Multiple Chronic Conditions eLearning course to be engaging,
informative and applicable to real world practice.
The IPCMCC eLearning Course is freely available for use by educators, students and providers world-wide through an open-access learning
management system. We will demonstrate portions of the course and its complementary Instructor Guide for the benefit of faculty who may wish
to access and adopt the course within their own curricula.
References
Bodenheimer, T. & Berry-Millett, R. (2009). Care management of the patient with complex health care needs. Retrieved from the Center for
Excellence in Primary Care, University of California, San Francisco website:
http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2009/rwjf49853/subassets/rwjf49853_1
Bodenheimer, T., & Abramowitz, S. (2010). Helping patients help themselves: How to implement self-management support. Retrieved from the
California HealthCare Foundation website:
http://www.chcf.org/~/media/MEDIA%20LIBRARY%20Files/PDF/PDF%20H/PDF%20HelpingPtsHelpThemselvesImplementSelfMgtSupport.pdf
Improving Chronic Illness Care. (2017). Evidence for Better Care: Chronic Care Model Literature. Retrieved January 2017 from:
http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/index.php?p=Chronic_Care_Model_Literature&s=64
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2014). Team-based care: Optimizing primary care for patients and providers. Retrieved January 2017 from:
http://www.ihi.org/communities/blogs/_layouts/15/ihi/community/blog/itemview.aspx?List=0f316db6-7f8a-430f-a63a-ed7602d1366a&ID=29
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2015). Partnering in self-management support: A toolkit for clinicians. Retrieved from the Institute for
Healthcare Improvement website: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/SelfManagementToolkitforPatientsFamilies.aspx
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert
panel. Washington, D.C.: Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-
resources/ipecreport.pdf
Orenstein, S.M., Nietert, P.J., Jenkins, R.G. & Litvin, C.B. (2013). The prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity in primary care practice:
APPRNet Report. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 26, 518-524. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130012
Parekh, A., Goodman, R. A., Gordon, C., Koh, H.K., and the HHS Interagency Workgroup on Multiple Chronic Conditions. (2011). Managing multiple
chronic conditions: A strategic framework for improving health outcomes and quality of life.Public Health Reports, 126,460–471. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3115206/
Van Vleet, A., & Paradise, J. (2015). Tapping Nurse Practitioners to meet rising demand for primary care. Kaiser Family Foundation Issue Brief.
Retrieved January 2017 from: http://kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/tapping-nurse-practitioners-to-meet-rising-demand-for-primary-care/
Wagner, E.H., Austin, B.T., Davis, C., Hindmarsh, M., Schaefer, J. & Bonomi, A. (2001). Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into
action. Health Affairs, 20,64-78.
Contact
[email protected]
The Nursing Faculty Shortage in Maryland: Findings of a Statewide Needs Assessment
Lisa A. Seldomridge, PhD, RN, USA
Judith M. Jarosinski, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Tina P. Brown Reid, EdD, RN, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the Eastern Shore-Western Shore Faculty Initiative (ES-WSFI) was to create a comprehensive needs assessment
to identify common and unique issues related to the statewide shortage of undergraduate and graduate nursing faculty in Maryland.
The lack of qualified nursing faculty is a leading factor in the shortage or registered nurses (Kowalski & Kelly, 2013). Robeznieks
(2015) noted in the 2014-2015 academic year over half of all AACN member schools reported a total of 1,236 full-time vacancies. In
2015, among Maryland’s twelve baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs alone, there were 35 faculty vacancies (AACN, 2016).
Background: The needs assessment provided a foundation for subsequent planning to address the nursing faculty shortage in
regionally diverse nursing programs.
Method: In collaboration with 12 universities, colleges/community colleges, a mixed-methods approach comprised of web-based
surveys, faculty focus-groups and interviews with deans/directors was undertaken over a two-year period. Faculty and
administrators were invited to complete a needs assessment which included demographic and program information, their views on
current approaches to address faculty staffing needs, identification of possible untapped resources, and potential solutions. A
project-specific website was constructed to facilitate communication about the two-year project. The online survey, a 49 item,
researcher constructed instrument, was available through a password-protected site to avoid duplicate submissions. Respondents
were asked to indicate their level of agreement with statements using a Likert-type scale with options of “strongly disagree,
disagree, unsure, agree, and strongly agree”. They were also asked to answer questions about which clinical specialties were most
difficult to staff, the existence of organizational barriers to managing the faculty shortage, approaches to the faculty shortage that
had already been tried, and what additional strategies they would consider.
Results: Faculty from twelve nursing programs, representing all geographic regions of the state, responded. In undergraduate programs the
majority of respondents (53%) agreed/strongly agreed there were inadequate faculty for growth; 58% of respondents in graduate programs agreed
there were inadequate part-time faculty for growth. Recruiting faculty from under-represented groups for both undergraduate and graduate
teaching positions was identified as challenging by 90% and 87% of respondents respectively. Retaining faculty from under-represented groups was
also viewed as difficult for both undergraduate (80%) and graduate faculty positions (56%). Strategies used by undergraduate programs to address
the shortage of faculty included hiring more adjuncts, limiting enrollments, using simulations, and increasing clinical group size. At the graduate
level, strategies that had been tried or might be considered included joint appointments between academic and health care organizations,
“growing our own”, and delaying retirement. Organizational barriers reported by faculty at both levels included inadequate socialization and
preparation of clinical faculty for their roles, need for further education in evaluating students, low salaries, and heavy teaching loads.
Implications/Conclusions: The nursing faculty shortage is affecting programs across Maryland in similar ways. Of particular concern is the difficulty
in recruiting and retaining individuals from under-represented groups in nursing including those from racial and ethnic minorities and men. Current
strategies of increasing clinical group size and limiting enrollments are short-term solutions at best. Increasing reliance on part-time faculty will
require better preparation of clinicians-turned-educators to assure that quality instruction and oversight is provided. At the graduate level, when
enrollments in master’s and doctoral level programs are capped, the pipeline for future educators is likewise restricted. While this needs
assessment did not provide any clear-cut solutions, it did provide statewide data in a single place and opened dialogue across programs. Given this
infrastructure, future initiatives can be implemented, maximizing efficiency and effectiveness in utilization of precious faculty resources while
addressing the need for increasing capacity in all nursing education programs.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (March 2015). Fact sheet-Nursing faculty shortage. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-
relations/fact-sheets/nursing-faculty-shortage
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (March 2017). Policy brief. Nursing faculty: Spotlight on diversity. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/government-affairs/Diversity-Spotlight.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2016). Maryland state profile. Retrieved from: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/government-
affairs/resources/Maryland1.pdf
Kowalski, K. & Kelly, B. (2013). What's the ROI for resolving the nursing faculty shortage? Nursing Economic$, 31(2), 70-76.
Robeznieks, A. (2015). Looming nursing shortage fueled by fewer faculty, training sites. Modern Healthcare, 45,4-9.
Contact
[email protected]
Expanding Self-Efficacy of Nursing Faculty With Improved Orientation
Jacinda L. Heintzelman, USA
Abstract
The NLN (2015) reports that the complex healthcare system is being stressed by a nation-wide workforce shortage and this is being
exacerbated by nursing schools rejecting the qualified candidates due to an inadequate number of faculty to educate the entrants.
The constraints of limited and qualified nursing faculty is astounding and the effects are nationwide. Crocetti (2014) discusses that
on frequent occasions, the newly hired adjunct faculty are inexperienced in their new role as an educator and deficiencies are noted
in preparing the instructors on how to educate nursing students for the complex healthcare system they will encounter upon
graduation. Research reveals that in order to retain the clinicians, and increase a successful transition to academia, guidance is
needed by supporting the new educators through improved orientation and mentoring programs (Cranford, 2013; Danna et al.,
2010; Grassley & Lambe, 2015). The problem identified for the research study was that new faculty members were lacking an
appropriate orientation to transition into the faculty role and many were choosing to leave education due to the feeling of not
understanding their teaching role. A local nursing school updated and improved their nursing faculty orientation to better meet the
needs of the current instructors. The current research is a retrospective analysis of data from the enhanced orientation to compare
teaching self-efficacy before and after completing the orientation. The research question was the following: Will there be a
difference in adjunct faculty’s teaching self-efficacy after receiving an online orientation as measured by pre- and post-test? The
research of this pilot study revealed statistical significant in an increase of teaching self-efficacy scores following completion of the
orientation course at the local university, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test z = -2.52, p < 0.05, with a large effect size (r = -0.63). The study
findings supports acclimating nursing faculty to their role as educator will increase teaching self-efficacy. If the faculty are cultured
to their role, they may choose to stay in education which may assist to combat the nationwide nursing and nurse faculty shortages.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2005). Faculty shortages in baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs: Scope of the problem and
strategies for expanding the supply. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/white-papers/faculty-shortages
Carlson, J. (2015). Factors influencing retention among part-time clinical nursing faculty. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(1), 42-45.
Cranford, J. (2013). Bridging the gap: Clinical practice nursing and the effect of role strain on successful role transition and intent to stay in
academia. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 10(1), 1-7.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Crocetti, J. (2014). Nursing clinical faculty self-efficacy following an orientation using simulation. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(3), 193-194.
Danna, D., Schaubhut, R., & Jones, J. (2010). From practice to education: Perspectives from three nurse leaders. Journal of Continuing Education in
Nursing, 41(2), 83-87.
Grassley, J., & Lambe, A. (2015). Easing the transition from clinician to nurse educator: An integrative literature review. Journal of Nursing
Education, 54(7), 361-366.
Hinshaw, A. (2001). A continuing challenge: The shortage of educationally prepared nursing faculty. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 6(1).
Retrieved from
http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessionalNursing/workforce/NursingShortage/Resources/ShortageofEducati
onalFaculty.html
Hunt, C., Curtis, A., & Gore, T. (2015). Using simulation to promote professional development of clinical instructors. Journal of Nursing Education,
54(8), 468-471.
Institute of Medicine. (2010). Report brief: The future of nursing focus on education. Retrieved from
http://iom.nationalacademies.org/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing/Nursing%20Education%202010%20Brief.pdf
Institute of Medicine. (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: Author.
Kim, M., & Mallory, C. (2013). Statistics for evidence-based practice in nursing. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Marshall, E. S. (2011). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader. New York, NY: Springer Publishing
Company.
McAllister, M., Oprescu, F., & Jones, C. (2014). Envisioning a process to support transition from nurse to educator. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal
for the Australian Nursing Profession, 46(2), 242-250.
Nardi, D., & Gyurko, C. (2013). The global nursing faculty shortage: Status and solutions for change. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 45(3), 317-326.
National League for Nursing. (2006). Position Statement: Mentoring of nurse faculty. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-
source/advocacy-public-policy/mentoring-of-nurse-faculty.pdf?sfvrsn=0
National League for Nursing. (2015). The voice of nursing education. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/advocacy-public-policy/issues/faculty-
shortage
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual (5th ed.). New York: Open University Press.
Penn, B., Wilson, L., & Rosseter, R. (2008). Transitioning from nursing practice to a teaching role. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(3).
Reid, T., Hinderer, K., Jarosinski, J., Mister, B., & Seldomridge, L. (2013). Expert clinician to clinical teacher: Developing a faculty academy and
mentoring initiative. Nurse Education in Practice, 13, 288-293.
Santisteban, L., & Egues, A. (2014). Cultivating adjunct faculty: Strategies beyond orientation. Nursing Forum, 49(3), 152-158.
Contact
[email protected]
Engaging Nursing Students for Genetic/Genomic Learning
Christine W. Abbyad, PhD, RN, WHNP, USA
Leigh A. Goldstein, PhD, APRN, ANP-BC, USA
Abstract
Nursing accrediting bodies now require that genetic and genomic content be included in nursing curricula (American Association of
Colleges of Nursing, 2008). In addition, a consortia of nursing and other health care organizations have published a document on the
importance of genetic/genomic competencies for nurses (American Nursing Association, 2006). While genetic content may be
included in many courses it may also be taught as a separate course. At a southwestern university it has been taught as a three
credit and more recently a two credit nursing course.
How to teach genetic/genomic content is challenging. Nursing students at a southwestern university have complained that the mandatory genetics
course should be removed from the curriculum as it was not seen as necessary for clinical nursing. Course evaluations have been low. Students like
the hybrid format with 51% face to face class time and 49% online learning. However, there have been complaints that self-learning of power point
slides was not effective because the internet and book were needed to augment information and this took too much time. The two exams were
unpopular as they covered an enormous amount of material and it was not clear what content would be on the exam. Case studies were said to be
boring as at least 12 groups of students took 30 minutes each to present in class. Diseases and conditions selected were often rare or obscure. Exit
interviews of graduating students indicated that they did not value the course and saw little application to nursing. With this in mind, the course
was reimagined keeping the hybrid format.
In preparing for needed changes to the course the course instructor reviewed evidence based best teaching practices and contacted the
university’s Innovative Teaching Center. Recommendations from the literature are many. Billings and Halsted (2016) discuss the need to help
students to think and process information, the importance of reflection, appreciating a variety of learning styles, and the value of immediate
feedback. Also mentioned is the usefulness of including technology as a learning tool since today’s students are proficient in its use and respond
positively when it is used. Bradshaw and Hultquist (2017) in a review of the literature, add that non traditional teaching strategies and creative
approaches should be considered in engaging students. Further discussed is that cooperative and collaborative assignments allow students to be
actively involved and participate in the learning experience. Finally, empowering students is also an effective approach in engaging students. The
National League of Nursing (NLN) echoes the importance of a student centered approach and the high importance of actively engaging students in
the learning process (NLN, 2015).
Modifications made to the course took into account consistent student feedback that they wanted to keep the hybrid format as it allowed for a
more flexible schedule. Students also voiced they did not want a totally online course because genetics content is seen as challenging and requiring
faculty feedback and class discussion. Collaborating with the Innovative Teaching Center, the course was modified taking into account student
feedback, but also the teaching imperative to make the course more engaging.
The online portion of the course now requires students to review reading from their genetics book. Each week students review one module
choosing to read the chapters or listen to voice over power points of the chapters. The main points are covered in the PowerPoints but further
clarification can be obtained by referring to the text. Students are encouraged to review end of chapter questions for possible inclusion on quizzes.
Face to face class time is begun by taking a short online quiz on content covered in the week’s module. Quizzes are taken individually through the
university’s intranet. Then in assigned groups, students discuss the questions and take the same quiz again. Answers are entered on a scratch off
card. Group consensus of answers is required but the opportunity to submit a written rebuttal of a question is provided.
Additional class time is spent in a variety of ways. There may be a short PowerPoint presentation by the faculty related to an assignment. Video
tapes may also be shown during class asking students to reflect on the role of the nurse or issues around testing, counseling, and working with
families experiencing a genetic disease or condition. Thus, the class as a whole enters into discussion. There may also be small group exercises
related to topics covered from learned material.
The most popular class activity is listening to guest speakers. Speakers tell personal stories of how a genetic condition affected their lives and the
role played by nurses and other healthcare providers. Guests discuss issues related to finding out about the condition, their emotional reaction, the
financial impact, family reaction, emotional support, decisions around testing, and how the condition has affected their everyday life. These stories
are emotional and affect the students emotionally as well. Students have commented that they very much appreciated having guests present even
though they did not always agree with decisions that were made.
The face to face class time ends with work on assignments. Group homework is done during class time and posted to the intranet before the end of
class. Group homework focuses on ethical, legal, and social issues related to genetic conditions. Discussion of opinions for and against a particular
case are encouraged. The only individual assignment is to construct and submit a pedigree of the student’s family. Students enjoy this activity as it
allows them to gather a family history and reflect on their genetic pool.
Student feedback about the course changes is positive and the course evaluation has improved. Both in writing and anecdotally students have
commented that they enjoyed the class, learned a lot, and have been able to apply knowledge learned in class to cases seen in clinical. Above all
students’ voice that the guest speakers were “awesome” and provided a realistic picture of how genetics affects people’s lives.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Retrieved June 11,
2017 from http://www.aacn.nche.edu
American Nursing Association (2006). Essentials of genetic and genomic nursing: Competencies, curricula guidelines and outcomes indicators (2nd
Ed.). Retrieved June 11, 2017 from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/Genetics__Genomics_Nursing_Competencies_09-22-06.pdf.
Billings, D.M. & Halstead, J.A. (2016). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (5th Ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Bradshaw, M.J. Hultquist, B.L. (2017). Innovative teaching strategies in nursing and related health professions (7th Ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and
Bartlett Learning.
Caputi, L. (Ed.). (2015). Certified nurse educator review book: The official NLN guide to the CNE exam. Baltimore, MD: Wolters Kluwer.
Contact
[email protected]
Innovative Teaching Strategies for Genomic Content Integration Into Nursing Curriculum
Leighsa Sharoff, EdD, RN, PMHNP/CNS, AHN-BC, USA
Abstract
The effective use of technology to improve nursing education and practice, patient outcomes, and the value of nursing overall as a
collaborative inter-professional leader is essential. Integrating technology and genomic science into nursing education is a natural
progression. Genomic science is redefining the understanding of the continuum of human health and illness. With the advent of
genomics as a required core competency, it is incumbent of all nurse educators to be knowledgeable in this content. The National
Coalition for Health Professional Education in Genetics developed the Core Competencies in Genetics for Health Professionals, to
encourage clinicians and other professionals to integrate genetics-genomics knowledge, skills, and attitudes into routine health care,
thereby providing effective and comprehensive services to individuals and families (NCHPEG, 2007) The required competencies of
providing essential information, support, guidance and education pertaining to genetic conditions is expected for all levels of initial
pre-licensure preparation, as well as advanced practicing nurse professionals (AACN, 2008; Consensus Panel, 2009; Consensus Panel,
2011; Rogers, Lizer, Doughty, Hayden & Klein, 2017). Nursing students need to demonstrate an integrated knowledge of genetic
principles and frameworks applicable to nursing, research, healthcare and/or health education. These 21st century healthcare
providers must be proficient in interpreting scientific evidence relating to genomics in the clinical settings (Camak, 2016). They need
to practice in an effective and efficient manner in the post-genomic era, actively participating in the education of patients, practice
and policy-making regarding the application of genetic information and knowledge. The progress of genomic nursing competencies
has global implications for all nurses and especially for nurse educators who are responsible for preparing the future nursing
professional. The impact of nursing education science to embrace this competency must occur if nursing is to remain a collaborative
member of the inter-professional healthcare team. By exploring innovative and creative formats, nurse educators will learn how to
enhance their students learning process to become active participants, engaged and focused as they learn to apply their knowledge
of genomics.
Engaging and innovative teaching strategies while maintaining a class community to facilitate the professional education and discussion while
integrating genomics into pre-licensure through advanced degree students is a necessity in today’s educational realm. Organizing online
assignments and group discussions to enhance learner outcomes to increase knowledge base and comfort level is the nurse educators’ primary
expectation. Lack of knowledge of genomics and a lack of confidence in facilitating this complex content are significant obstacles to integrating this
specialty into education. Inclusions of Mashup webpages [web applications], hyperlinks and YouTube videos can further advance students’ pro-
active learning.
Another innovative strategy is integrating a genetic patient scenario into a simulation. Augmenting required content into constrained nursing
curricula is a challenge. Simulation prepares students for real-world experiences and simulation has an obvious role in expanding and developing
genomic competencies (Weatherspoon, Phillips, Wyatt, 2015). Integrating a genetic component into simulation is an effective educational format
to further enhance genomic knowledge of both students and facilitators. Pre-licensure students can be exposed to genomic content through
simulations on newborn testing for PKU (phenylketonuria); sickle cell anemia, familial hypercholesterolemia, Marfan Syndrome and Alzheimer’s
Disease, as well as integrating concepts of patient education. Advanced degree students’ simulation scenarios can provide an opportunity for
students to discuss complex multifactorial polygenetic conditions and the implications of pharmacogenomics, epigenetics and ecogenetics into
clinical practice (Cheek, Bashore & Brazeau, 2015). Research has already proven that simulation is an effective and efficient teaching tool and the
inclusion of genetic conditions is the next logical advancement (Howard, Englert, Kameg & Perozzi, 2011; Holt, Tofil, Hurst, et al., 2013).
The clinical relevance of promoting the transformation of genomic knowledge and practice to advance global health practices and nursing
competency is an ever-evolving process that begins with the realization that all educational levels must be involved and informed to integrate this
knowledge and confidence into practice to improve patient health outcomes. Despite the growing use of genomic applications in clinical practice,
health professional knowledge about genomic information and confidence in using it have not kept pace, as many nurses do not have the
knowledge or the tools they need in order to apply genomic information in their professional practices (Munroe& Loerzel, 2016; Ward, Purath &
Barbosa-Leiker, 2017).
This presentation will discuss the core competencies for all nurses, from pre-licensure baccalaureate to graduate degree practitioners. In addition,
strategies to integrate these core competences, either in a stand-alone course or threading through the curriculum, will be explored. With nursing
students of all educational levels, is it necessary for nurse educators to provide a variety of learning strategies, to stimulate self-directed and
collaborative learning. Finally, self-directed learning strategies will be explored to enhance the nurse educators’ own genetic/genomic knowledge.
Promoting the transformation of knowledge and practice to advance global health practices and nursing competency is an ever-evolving process
that begins with understanding the educational level of all involved.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice. Washington, DC:
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. 2008. Available from:http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/BaccEssentials08.pdf
Camak, D. (2016). Increasing importance of genetics in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 44, 86-91.
Cheek, D., Bashore, L. & Brazeau, D. (2015). Pharmacogenomics and implications for nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(6), 496-
504.
Consensus Panel on Genetic/Genomic Nursing Competencies. Essentials of Genetic and Genomic Nursing: Competences, Curricula Guidelines, and
Outcome Indicators. 2009. Available from: https://www.genome.gov/pages/careers/healthprofessionaleducation/geneticscompetency. pdf
Consensus Panel on Genetic/Genomic Nursing & the American Nurses Association. Essential Genetic and Genomic Competencies for Nurses With
Graduate Degrees. 2011. Available from: https://www.genome.gov/pages/health/healthcareprovidersinfo/gradgencomp.pdf
Holt, R., Tofil, N., Hurst, C., Youngblood, A., Peterson, D., Zinkan, J., et al. (2013). Utilizing high-fidelity crucial conversion simulation in genetic
counseling training. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 161A(6), 1273-1277.
Howard, V., Englert, N., Kameg, K. & Perozzi, K. (2011). Integration of simulation across the undergraduate curriculum: Student and Faculty
Perspectives. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 7(1), e1-e10.
Munroe, T. & Loerzel, V. (2016). Assessing nursing students’ knowledge of genomic concepts and readiness for use in practice. Nurse Educator,
21(2), 86-89.
National Coalition for Health Professional Education in Genetics. (2007). Core Competencies in Genetics Essential for All Health-Care Professionals.
Available from: http://www.nchpeg.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=237:core- competencies-for-all-health-professionals-
2007&catid=50:core-competencies-for-all-health-care-professionals-2007&Itemid=84
Rogers, M., Lizer, S., Doughty, An. Hayden, B. & Klein, C. (2017). Expanding RN scope of knowledge – Genetics/Genomics: The new frontier. Journal
for Nurses in Professional Development, 33(2), 56-63.
Ward, L., Purath, J. & Barbosa-Leiker, C. (2017). Assessment of genomic literacy among baccalaureate nursing students in the United States: A
Feasibility Study. Nurse Educator, 41(6), 313-318.
Weatherspoon, D., Phillips, K. & Wyatt, T. (2015). Effect of Electronic Interactive Simulation on Senior Bachelor of Science in Nursing Students'
Critical Thinking and Clinical Judgment Skills. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(2), e126-133. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.11.006
Contact
[email protected]
A 05 - Innovations in the Classroom
Faculty Mentorship to Facilitate MSN Nurse Educator Students in Reconceptualization of a RN-BSN EBP
Course
Carrie Riley Risher, DNP, MA (Ed), CMSRN, USA
Beverley E. Blair Brown, EdD, MSN, SCM, ARNP, FNP, USA
Carrie Ann Hall, PhD, ARNP, USA
Christy Skelly, DNP, WHNP-BC, USA
Laura Wilkinson, BSN, USA
Abstract
Florida Southern College School of Nursing has paired the MSN Educator student with an experienced faculty member as their
preceptor and mentor to guide the graduate nursing student in the role of nurse educator in the academic setting. The importance
of mentorship for MSN Educator students is critical to improve the student’s academic experience and ability to apply new teaching
and learning concepts. Of particular importance is the student’s ability to develop the essential skills to effectively create and
manage courses in hybrid formats. To accomplish this, a faculty mentor must guide the student, as the student immerses
him/herself into the construction of course objectives and curriculum. Faculty trained in blended course best practices, supported by
instructional technology and Web-based learning support team, is instrumental in guiding the student.
This presentation presents a case review of the Faculty- MSN Educator Student mentorship process. The MSN Educator student worked with a
faculty member for 15 weeks to complete 175 hours of mentorship and practice. The MSN Educator student was assigned to redesign an RN to BSN
evidence based course. The course had originally been delivered in a traditional format. The student worked closely with the faculty mentor to
create a hybrid course utilizing best practices for a multigenerational student body. The course reconstruction was monitored and feedback
provided on a weekly basis by the faculty mentor. The end result was a course that received strong positive student evaluations and a request by
some students for additional blended courses.
The faculty mentor guidance of the student through the experience was invaluable; this was instrumental as it allowed the student to recognize her
own strengths and opportunities for improvement as an academic nurse educator. This process allowed the student to appreciate the learning
journey even more as the student also became more knowledgeable about the many different challenges of providing education to
multigenerational classes that learn, behave and perceive course work differently. Additionally, the student gained new insights into how hybrid
courses are designed and the unique challenges these courses present. Finally, the project increased the student’s confidence in applying
information acquired through the program. Being able to discuss class strategies, identify gaps in knowledge, research, and practice was an
invaluable experience for the MSN Educator student working with a faculty mentor.
References
Callister, L. C., Matsumura, G., & Lookinland, S. (2005). Inquiry in baccalaureate nursing education: fostering evidence-based practice. Journal of
Nursing Education,44(2), 59-64.
Billings, D., Connors, H., & Skiba, D. (2001). Benchmarking best practices in web-based nursing courses. Advances in Nursing Science,23(3), 41-52.
Fish, W. W., & Wickersham, L. E. (2009). Best practices for online instructors: reminders. Quarterly Review of Distance Education,10(3), 279-284.
Kalb, K. A., O'Conner-Von, S. K., Brockway, C., Rierson, C. L., & Sendelbach, S. (2015). Evidence- based teaching practice in nursing education:
faculty perspectives and practices. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing),36(4), 212-219. doi:10.5480/14-1472
McLester, S. (2011). Building a blended learning program. District Administration,47(9), 40-42.
Nedder, M. M. (2017). Blogging as an innovative method of peer-to-peer educational sharing. Critical Care Nurse, 37(1), e1-e9.
doi:10.4037/ccn2017642
Newhouse, R., Buckley, K., Grant, M., & Idzik, S. (2013). Reconceptualization of a doctoral EBP course from in-class to blended format: lessons
learned from a successful transition. Journal of Professional Nursing, (29)4, 225-232.
Schmitt, M. B. (2004). Challenges of web-based education in educating nurses about evidence-based acute pain management practices for older
adults. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,35(3), 121-127.
York, A., Nordengren, F., & Stumbo, T. (2009). Teaching evidence-based medicine with an asynchronous Web module: measuring student
preferences and outcomes. Journal of Physician Assistant Education (Physician Assistant Education Association),20(1), 44-50.
Contact
[email protected]
Preliminary Development and Testing of the Risk Assessment Checklist for Self-Injury in Autism (RACSA)
Lisa Alberts, DNP, USA
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) define a group of neurologically-based conditions associated with impairments in social
communication and interactions, as well as evidence of restricted, repetitive behaviors (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The
prevalence of ASDs is increasing in the United States and other developed countries. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) published the 2014 report on the prevalence of ASD among 8-year-old children surveyed through the Autism and
Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (ADDM). Prevalence estimates indicate that one in 68 children meet diagnostic
criteria for ASD (CDC, 2014).
Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is a major treatment focus and area of concern for clinicians treating children with ASDs. Approximately 50 % of
individuals with ASD engage in some form of SIB (Minshawi et al., 2014). SIB describes a group of behaviors characterized by self-inflicted injuries
causing tissue damage, such as head banging on hard surfaces, self-biting, eye-poking, and self-hitting. SIB can result in physical injuries, fractures,
head injuries, detached retinas, and in extreme cases even death (Minshawi et al., 2014; Sisk, Motley, Yang, & West, 2013). Overuse of
psychotropic medications, use of restraint or physical hold procedures, and injuries to staff and individuals in treatment are all possible effects of
SIB.
A systematic review of the literature identified associations between a variety of medical conditions and SIB. Evidence from the literature also
suggests that common physical conditions are more prevalent in individuals with ASD including allergies, gastroesophageal reflux disease,
constipation, dental caries, and otitis media (Coury et al., 2015; Furtura et al., 2015; Malow et al., 2012; Mayer et al., 2014; Sikora, Johnson,
Clemons, & Katz, 2012). Challenging behaviors such as aggression and SIB and communication deficits make it less likely that health problems will
be diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. Patient compliance and difficulties with completing a physical exam impede assessment and
treatment. Untreated health conditions can result in pain and suffering, leading to SIB. Certain behavioral topographies can be associated with
underlying medical conditions. Chest tapping, chewing of clothing and pacing can be observed in individuals suffering from constipation (Bauman,
2010). Chin hitting, increased drooling and head hitting can be observed in individuals experiencing dental pain (Shanmugam et al., 2014). Targeted
assessment and treatment is needed to reduce SIBs in children with ASDs.
No evidence based tools were located to assist the healthcare team in identifying underlying health issues that may contribute to the emergence of
SIB in non-verbal children with autism. This project involved the development of and preliminary validation of a standardized assessment checklist
for the physical, behavioral, and diagnostic evaluation of non-verbal children with autism and SIB living in residential care facilities. Instrument face,
content, and expert validity was established. Expert review provided content validity of at least 75% on all checklist items. Satisfactory
interobserver agreement (IOA) was established. Two registered nurse raters conducted the IOA. Percent-agreement scores were between 74-90%
total, 83-95% agreement was established for any positive rating. Kappa scores ranged from .348-.792, with probability levels below .001 or highly
significant, demonstrating intermediate to good agreement beyond chance.
The checklist was piloted on 10 individuals between the ages of 12 and 21 living in residential treatment. Each checklist item was rated using an
ordinal scale, the physical items on the checklist were dichotomous. Each of the 60 items on the checklist were scored and subdivided into domains
that included; gastrointestinal, head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat (HEENT), dental, and miscellaneous. During the pilot testing phase, total domain
scores were calculated using the checklist and triangulated with a physical exam completed by an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) and
considered either a match or no-match. Nine out of the 10 subjects were a match, demonstrating that the scores obtained using the checklist
matched the findings of the physical exam. A high score on the checklist correlated with a positive physical exam finding, and a low score on the
checklist correlated with a negative exam. A grand total score for the checklist was also calculated by summing the domain scores. The grand total
score is useful as a longitudinal measure to assess the individual over time, and to establish an individual baseline.
Results of the project supported the literature, suggesting an association between underlying medical conditions and the emergence of SIB in non-
verbal children with ASD. Preliminary validation suggests that the checklist can provide a means for earlier identification of underlying medical
concerns and subsequently result in improved treatment outcomes and reduced pain and suffering for children with ASD. Educating nurses about
ASDs and the impact illness has on the emergence of SIB in non-verbal children with ASD is critical to improving nursing knowledge and patient
outcomes.
References
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Bauman, M. (2010). Medical comorbidities in autism: Challenges to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of the American Society for Experimental
NeuroTherapeutics, 7, 320-327.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged eight years-Autism and
developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63(2).
Coury, D., Ashwood, P., Fasano, A., Fuchs, G., Geraghty, M., Kaul, A....Jones, N. (2015). Gastrointestinal conditions in children with autism spectrum
disorder: Developing a research agenda. Pediatrics, 130, 160-168.
Furtura, G., Williams, K., Kooros, K., Kaul, A., Panzer, R., Coury, D.L., & Fuchs, G. (2012). Management of constipation in children and adolescents
with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 130, 98-105.
Malow, B., Byars, K., Johnson, K., Weiss, S., Bernal, P., Goldman, S....Glaze, D. (2015). A practice pathway for the identification, evaluation, and
management of insomnia in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 130, 106-124.
Mayer, E., Padua, D., & Tillisch, K. (2014). Altered brain-gut axis in autism: Comorbidity or cauusative mechanism? Bioessays, 36, 933-939.
Minshawi, N.F., Hurwitz, S., Fodstad, J.C., Biebl, S., Morriss, D., H., & McDougle, C.J. (2014). The association between self-injurious behaviors and
autism spectrum disorders. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 7, 125.
Shanmugam, M., Shivakumar, V., Anitha, V., Meenapriya, B.P., Aishwarya, S., & Anitha, R. (2014). Behavioral pattern during dental pain in
intellectually disabled children: A comparative study. International Scholarly Research Notices, 1-5.
Sikora, D., Johnson, K., Clemons, T., & Katz, T. (2012). The relationship between sleep problems and daytime behavior in children of different ages
with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 130, 83-90.
Sisk, R., Motley, W., Yang, M., & West, C. (2013). Surgical outcomes following repair of traumatic retinal detachments in cognitively impaired
adolescents with self-injuriouus behavior. Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus, 50, 20-26.
Contact
[email protected]
Promoting a Restraint Free Culture Through Sensory Modulation
Colleen Marie Glair, MSN, RN, PMHCNS-BC, USA
Caitlin Belvin, MS, OTR-L, USA
Abstract
The American Nurses Association (ANA) promotes registered nurse participation in reducing patient restraint and seclusion in health care settings.
Restraining or secluding patients either directly or indirectly is viewed as contrary to the fundamental goals and ethical traditions of the nursing
profession, which upholds the autonomy and inherent dignity of each patient (ANA 2012). The American Psychological Nurses’ Association (APNA)
supports the psychiatric mental health nurses’, critical role in the provision effective treatment and milieu leadership to maximize the individual’s
ability to effectively manage potentially dangerous behaviors in the psychiatric setting (APNA 2014). The profession of occupational therapy
emerged from some of the earliest restraint and seclusion efforts, realizing the need for more humane and nurturing interventions for people with
mental health and rehabilitation needs (AOTA, 2014). Given the safety, ethical, professional, regulatory and legal standards related to reducing
restraint, it is imperative that alternative, evidenced based strategies be employed throughout our health care settings. Sensory Modulation
teaches patient’s self-regulation skills and improves the rapport between staff and patients by giving them additional opportunities for therapeutic
communication, prevention of escalation and aggression, and tangible alternatives to PRN medications.
Trauma informed care is patient strength based approach to care, as a least ninety per cent of public mental health consumers have been exposed
to trauma (Felitti V. J. & Anda R. F. 2010). Instead of talk based therapies sensory approaches provide experiential opportunities to help individuals
recognize and regulate their unique sensory experiences. By using sensory modulation strategies in combination with a trauma informed approach
to care, patients can feel empowered by identifying their own individual preferences and can feel more secure knowing that staff will work with
them during times of crisis to prevent seclusion and restraint episodes. Patients can also identify their own signs of escalation and aggression and
alternative methods for coping during times of stress which can translate beyond the inpatient setting and can be used at home after discharge.
Additionally, is that nursing staff can feel empowered with the knowledge provided by patients and suggest patient identified methods of calming
during times of stress instead of blindly offering cookie cutter suggestions and care based on tradition instead of evidenced based care.
A sensory modulation program was developed and implemented on our 18 bed inpatient behavioral health unit. Results suggest that the use of
sensory modulation is an effective strategy in decreasing patient agitation and employee workplace violence related injuries. This project will
enable nurses to identify the importance of collaboration with other disciplines in finding alternatives to restraint and seclusion. As nurses we often
believe that we are the experts in knowing how to help people. It can be challenging to let go of our perceived control but it is actually a multi-
modal/multidisciplinary approach to challenges that serves people best. By the end of the presentation nurse will be able to describe how the use
of sensory modulation strategies can be applied to numerous areas of nursing care. Sensory Modulation Strategies can be applied to calming a
patient in emergency departments, medical floors and post-surgical units through the use of a mobile sensory cart. Additionally the use of sensory
modulation strategies being utilized by care givers themselves will be highlighted as part of our professional responsibility for our own self-care.
References
ANA March 12, (2012). Reduction of Patient Restraint and Seclusion in Health Care Settings, Status: Revised Position Statement Originated by:
Center for Ethics and Human Rights.
APNA (2014). Position Statement: The Use of Seclusion and Restraint.
AOTA (2014). Occupational Therapy’s Role with Restraint and Seclusion Reduction or Elimination, Fact Sheet.
Chalmers, A., S. Harrison, K. Mollison, N. Molloy, and K. Gray. (2012). "Establishing Sensory-based Approaches in Mental Health Inpatient Care: A
Multidisciplinary Approach. Australian Psychiatry 20.1, 35-39.
Champagne, T. (2003). Sensory modulation and environment: Essential elements of occupation. Southhampton, MA: Champagne Conferences &
Consultation.
Champagne, T. (2008). Sensory modulation & environment: Essential elements of occupation. Southampton, MA: Champagne Conferences.
Champagne, T. (2011). Sensory modulation & environment: Essential elements of occupation: Handbook & reference. Sydney, Australia: Pearson
Australia Group.
Champagne, T. (2015, October). Sensory Processing, Trauma & Attachment Informed Care. Lecture presented at Course 1 Sensory Modulation &
Trauma Informed Care: An Introduction in MA, Hadley.
Champagne, T., & Koomar, J. (2011, March). Expanding the Focus: Addressing Sensory Discrimination Concerns in Mental Health. Mental Health
Special Interest Section Quarterly, 34(1), 1-4.
Champagne, T., & Stromberg, N. (2004). Sensory Approaches in Inpatient Psychiatric Settings: Innovative Alternatives to Seclusion and Restraint.
Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 42(9).
Champagne, Tina, N. Stromberg, and R. Coyle (2010). "Integrating Sensory and Trauma-Informed Interventions: A Massachusetts State Initiative,
Part 1." American Occupational Therapy Association.
Web. Dunn, W. (2001) The sensations of everyday life: Empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations. American Journal of Occupational
Therapy, 55(6), 608-620.
Masick, April, and Jennifer Landy. (2015)."Calming Rooms: A Sense-able Alternative." VA, Fairfax. 17 June 2015. Lecture.
Miller, L. J., Reisman, J. E., McIntosh, D. N., & Simon, J. (2001). An ecological model of sensory modulation. In S. Smith Roley, E. Blanche, & R. C.
Schaaf (Eds.),
Moore, K. M. (2015). The Sensory Connection Program: Curriculum for Self-Regulation. Framingham, MA: Therapro. NASMHPD (2006). Prevention
Tools: A Core Strategy. Retrieved on March 28, 2016 from
http://www.nasmhpd.org/sites/default/files/Consolidated%20Six%20Core%20Strategies%20Document.pdf SAMSHA, (2006).
Roadmap to Seclusion and Restraint Free Mental Health Services. Retrieved on March 28, 2016 from
http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//SMA06-4055/SMA06-4055- F.pdf?
TJC 2010, The Hospital Accreditation Standards. Provision of Care, Treatment, and Services. Standards PC.03.05.01 through PC.03.05.19
Web. Dunn, W. (2001) The sensations of everyday life: Empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations. American Journal of Occupational
Therapy, 55(6), 608-620.
Contact
[email protected]
Changing Teamwork Attitudes With Interprofessional Education (IPE): A Comparative Study
Diane K. Brown, PhD, MSN, USA
Abstract
Interprofessional teamwork and collaboration among health professionals has been identified for decades as an effective way to
improve quality and safety in healthcare (Institute of Medicine, 1999; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2000). Educating
the next generation of health care providers to function using interprofessional collaboration (IPC) competencies is an important
step in achieving the goal of safety and high quality care for patients in all settings (Interprofessional Education Collaborative, 2016).
A healthcare team consists of individuals brought together for a common goal to work on a patient/community/global health
problem, with each member offering a unique perspective and expertise. Individual curricular programs delivered in professional
silos may or may not include opportunities for learning how to function in collaborative teams. Effective interprofessional education
(IPE) models for developing IPC competencies are needed to ensure all professionals have shared understanding and expectations.
A review of IPE literature reveals the important Interprofessional Collaborative competencies that consist of knowledge, skills and attitudes that
have been identified by an international team of experts (Interprofessional Education Collaborative, 2016). These competency statements can be
used to guide education design of IPE for developing these outcomes. Educators of health care professions need to be deliberate in planning,
designing and providing active interprofessional learning experiences that build toward IPC for transition into practice, as well as for ongoing
practice as a continuing education focus.
Interprofessional education literature reveals that there is an opportunity to build upon the evidence of earlier studies to establish which design
features are most effective in IPE models using robust research methods. Well-designed studies can help define best IPE practices that health
educators can replicate. While some IPE features have been studied, others such as time span of education, and team level outcomes have not
been addressed.
Interprofessional education in healthcare is a unique form of education that requires consideration of adult learning theory and beyond. It is
important for educators to remember that adult learners are practical and self-motivated individuals who want to be included in the learning
process, and who expect learning to be directly relevant to their immediate needs such as application to clinical practice (Knowles, 1984). I used
the concepts of adult learning theory in this research study by designing active learning that incorporated problem solving, critical thinking and
real-life application, as well as the concepts of Social Identity Theory (Allport, 1954) to address attitudes of stereotyping, hierarchies, and team
cohesiveness that can affect teamwork outcomes. Attention to developing the right attitude in interprofessional (IP) students can help lay the
groundwork for applying knowledge and skills that are not inherent, but must be learned and practiced.
The purpose of this research study was to explore the effect of time-span of IPE instruction on teamwork attitudes of interprofessional teams. The
education intervention in this study was a researcher-designed team-training curriculum based on TeamSTEPPS© concepts that included didactic,
discussions, and case studies, culminating in a high-fidelity interprofessional simulation (TeamSTEPPS Instructor Guide 2.0, 2014). To compare the
effect of time-span of instruction, alternate cohorts of students were provided one of two time delivery methods; one group (n=16 teams)
instructed in a single event over several hours, the other group (n=8 teams) instructed in small increments over several weeks. A convenience
sample from three cohorts, consisted of 161 nursing, medical, and respiratory therapy students. For the purpose of simulation, they were randomly
assigned to interprofessional teams of five to seven students. I measured team-level outcomes of each model by assessing 1) feelings of
preparation with a single-item Likert scale, pre-simulation, 2) feelings of anxiety with a single-item Likert scale, pre-simulation, and 3) teamwork
attitude pre and post simulation with the Teamwork Attitude Questionnaire (TAQ) (TeamSTEPPS Instructor Guide 2.0, 2014).
Research question: Does teamwork attitude change following interprofessional team training and simulation while controlling for team training
method? In order to compare the change of attitude over time at pre and post measurement points, and between the two training groups, a split
plot two-way ANOVA test was conducted. Results of the split-plot ANOVA comparison of pre to post team TAQ total scores across intervention
groups was equally and positively affected by both education models. The main effect of simulation (pretest to posttest) showed a statistically
significant difference in teamwork attitude scores, F(1, 22) = 14.67, p = .001, with a moderate effect size indicated by partial η2 = .40. This result
indicated that there was no difference between education models for influencing post-simulation teamwork attitude. However, both the short-
time and the extended time delivery of education led to significant increases in teamwork attitude following the IP simulation.
Research question: Which predictor team variables, pre-training teamwork attitude, feelings of preparation, or level of anxiety are most predictive
of post-simulation teamwork attitude? To determine if post-simulation teamwork attitudes could be predicted by various pre-simulation measures,
a multiple regression analysis was performed by entering pre-simulation teamwork attitude, feelings of preparation, and anxiety level into a model
with the criterion outcome of post-simulation teamwork attitude for both education delivery models combined. Results revealed that the model
was statistically significant R2= .701, R2adj = .642, F (3, 15) = 11.741, p < 0.001. Further analysis revealed that only pre-simulation teamwork attitude
was a statistically significant predictor of post-simulation teamwork attitude, accounting for 79.39% of the variance. These results indicate that
even feelings of preparation and levels of anxiety before engaging in IP simulations are less influential in teamwork attitudes than student baseline
attitudes before a simulation.
This study design contributes to the IPE and team training research literature in two ways: 1) as a model for collecting data at the team unit level as
opposed to the individual level, a noted gap in team research, and 2) comparison of education timespan deliveries on learning outcomes which has
been unstudied. Teams function as a unit, and to measure at the individual level may misrepresent the effect of a collective team attitude. Team-
level measures add a nuance that captures how team members can affect one another. There are examples in the literature of varied time spans of
IPE with some designed for a short duration delivered in hours, and some that are associated with courses that span several weeks. However, there
are no studies that directly compare the effectiveness of these very different time spans of IPE on student outcomes.
The results of this study indicate team-training positively affected teamwork attitude for both time delivery models, and builds on other studies
that measured the effect of team training on teamwork attitudes at the individual level. Similar results were found in studies that provided short
timespan IPE that demonstrated increased teamwork attitude (Kenaszchuk, Rykhoff, Laura, McPhail, & van Soeren, 2012; Lefebvre, Wellmon, &
Ferry, 2015). Similarly, a study by Wong, Gang, Szyld, and Mahoney, (2016) used extended time span team training, and found statistically
significant increases in teamwork attitude for teams of doctors and nurses comparing pre and post 1-year TAQ measurements. The results of this
study corroborate previous studies that showed both short time and extended time team training can positively affect teamwork attitude. Results
can be used by healthcare educators to inform their decisions for use of time and other resources for designing and implementing education for
the purpose of increasing teamwork attitudes.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2000). Doing what counts for patient safety: Federal actions to reduce medical errors and their
impact. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington D.C.:
Interprofessional Education Collaborative.
Kenaszchuk, C., Rykhoff, M., Laura, C., McPhail, S., & van Soeren, M. (2012). Positive and null effects of interprofessional education on attitudes
toward interprofessional learning and collaboration. Advances in Health Science Education, 17, 651-669. doi:10.1007/s10459-011-9341-0
Knowles, M. S. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Houston: Gulf.
Lefebvre, K., Wellmon, R., & Ferry, D. (2015). Changes in attitudes toward interprofessional learning and collaboration among physical therapy
students following a patient code simulation scenario. Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal, 26, 8-14.
TeamSTEPPS Instructor Guide 2.0. (2014). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from www.ahrq.gov
Wong, A., Gang, M., Szyld, D., & Mahoney, H. (2016). Making an "attitude adjustment": Using a simulation-enhanced interprofessional education
strategy to improve attitudes toward teamwork and communication. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare,
11(2), 117-125.
Contact
[email protected]
State of the Science: Interprofessional Education in Nursing
Tonya Rutherford-Hemming, EdD, RN, ANP-BC, CHSE, USA
Lori Lioce, DNP, FNP-BC, CHSE, FAANP, USA
Abstract
Background/Significance: The National Academy of Medicine’s (formerly the Institute of Medicine) The Future of Nursing: Leading
Change, Advancing Health called for a fundamental transformation of the nursing profession in 4 key areas: practice, education,
leadership, and the need for data on the health care workforce. Teamwork was cited as a key factor in transforming the area of
practice. Interprofessional education (IPE) is a strategy to address teamwork to transform practice. This review focused on the key
area of transforming practice through teamwork and IPE. It was based on three classic definitions regarding practice that are vital to
IPE.
• The World Health Organization (WHO) (2010, p. 7) defined IPE as occurring when “students from two or more professions
learn about, from, and with each other to enable effective collaboration and improve health outcomes.”
• The Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) (2011) produced Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative
Practice. Building on the WHO (2010, p.7) definition of interprofessional collaborative practice “When multiple health workers
from different professional backgrounds work together with patients, families, carers, and communities to deliver the highest
quality of care.”
• IPEC (2011, p. 24) defined interprofessional teamwork as, “The levels of cooperation, coordination and collaboration
characterizing the relationships between professions in delivering patient-centered care.”
Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to search, extract, appraise, and synthesize research related to interprofessional education
(IPE) between January 2011 and August 2016 in order to report the current state of the science related to IPE in nursing.
Design: This review was reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
Data Sources: A literature search was completed with assistance of a professional academic librarian in seven databases: PubMed, CINAHL,
ProQuest, Ovid, ERIC, Science Direct, and Scopus using a combination of medical subject headings, or Mesh terms, as well as keywords to retrieve
non-indexed citations.
Review Methods: The inclusion criteria for this review were broad in order to completely assess IPE and disseminate information on future
research needed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: IPE that included nurses (in academia or in practice) in the sample population, original
research, limited to the English language from 2009 to August 2016.
Results: The database search strategy yielded 202 citations. These results were narrowed to 49 studies based on inclusion criteria.
Conclusions: Findings suggest more studies with rigorous research designs are needed. There is a need to compare outcomes following
interprofessional interventions and to elicit findings related to the effectiveness of IPE on patient outcomes. These studies will provide evidence at
the higher levels of Kirkpatrick’s model of evaluation.
References
Bainbridge, L., & Wood, V. I. (2012). The power of prepositions: Learning with, from and about others in the context of interprofessional education.
Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(6), 452-458. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.715605
Bareil, C. P., Duhamel, F. P., Lalonde, L. P., Goudrea, J. P., Hudon, É. M. D., Lussier, M.-T. M. D.,...Ptacek, M. J. R. N. (2015). Facilitating
implementation of interprofessional collaborative practices into primary care: A trilogy of driving forces. Journal of Healthcare Management, 60(4),
287-301. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-24
Bondevik, G. T., Holst, L., Haugland, M., Baerheim, A., & Raaheim, A. (2015). Interprofessional workplace learning in primary care: Students from
different health professions work in teams in real-life settings. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(2), 175-182.
Brand, G., Miller, K., Saunders, R., Dugmore, H., & Etherton-Beer, C. (2016). Expanding the caring lens: Nursing and medical students reflecting on
images of older people. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 37(2), 167-184. doi:10.1080/02701960.2015.1059832
Czarnecki, G. A., Kloostra, S. J., Boynton, J. R., & Inglehart, M. R. (2014). Nursing and dental students' and pediatric dentistry residents' responses to
experiences with interprofessional education. Journal of Dental Education, 78(9), 1301-1312.
Dillon, P. M., Noble, K. A., & Kaplan, L. (2009). Simulation as a means to foster collaborative interdisciplinary education. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 30(2), 87-90.
Doucet, S., Loney, E., & Brown, P. A. (2016). Perceptions of graduating health professional students of their interprofessional education experiences
during pre-licensure education. Journal of Allied Health, 45(2), E5-E9.
Eccott, L., Greig, A., Hall, W., Lee, M., Newton, C., & Wood, V. (2012). Evaluating students' perceptions of an interprofessional problem-based pilot
learning project. Journal of Allied Health, 41(4), 185-189.
Ericson, A., Masiello, I., & Bolinder, G. (2012). Interprofessional clinical training for undergraduate students in an emergency department setting.
Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26, 319-325. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2012.676109
Feltham, C., Foster, J., Davidson, T., & Ralph, S. (2016). Student midwives and paramedic students' experiences of shared learning in pre-hospital
childbirth. Nurse Education Today, 41, 73-78. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.020
Fernandes, A. R., Palombella, A., Salfi, J., & Wainman, B. (2015). Dissecting through barriers: A mixed- methods study on the effect of
interprofessional education in a dissection course with healthcare professional students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8(4), 305-316.
Fitzsimmons, A., Cisneros, B., & Samore, J. (2014). A learner developed longitudinal interprofessional education curriculum. Journal of
Interprofessional Care, 28(1), 66-67. doi:10.3109/13561820.2013.820692
Foronda, C., MacWilliams, B., & McArthur, E. (2016). Interprofessional communication in healthcare: An integrative review. Nurse Education in
Practice, 19, 36-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.04.005
Gachoud, D., Albert, M., Kuper, A., Stroud, L., & Reeves, S. (2012). Meanings and perceptions of patient-centeredness in social work, nursing and
medicine: a comparative study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(6), 484-490. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.717553
Garcia-Huidobro, D., Skewes, S., Barros, X., Pizarro, C., & Gawinski, B. A. (2013). Learning together to work together: Interprofessional education for
students in a primary care setting in Chile. Family Medicine, 45(4), 272-275.
Gough, S., Hellaby, M., Jones, N., & MacKinnon, R. (2012). A review of undergraduate interprofessional simulation-based education (IPSE).
Collegian, 19(3), 153-170. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2012.04.004
Hobgood, C., Sherwood, G., Frush, K., Hollar, D., Maynard, L., Foster, B.…Taekman, J. (2010). Teamwork training with nursing and medical students:
does the method matter? Results of an interinstitutional, interdisciplinary collaboration. Quality & Safety in Healthcare, 19(6), e25.
Institute of Medicine. (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC, The National Academies Press.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an expert
panel. Washington, D.C.: Interprofessional Education Collaborative.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Koskinen, L., & Äijö, M. (2013). Development of an integrative practice placement model for students in health care. Nurse Education in Practice,
13(5), 442-448. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.10.005
L'Ecuyer, K., Pole, D., & Leander, S. A. (2015). The Use of PBL in an Interprofessional Education Course for Health Care Professional Students.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 9(1), 9-18.
Lee, C. T., Doran, D. M., Tourangeau, A. E., & Fleshner, N. E. (2014). Perceived quality of interprofessional interactions between physicians and
nurses in oncology outpatient clinics. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 18(6), 619-625. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2014.06.004
Liaw, S. Y., Siau, C., Zhou, W. T., & Lau, T. C. (2014). Interprofessional simulation-based education program: A promising approach for changing
stereotypes and improving attitudes toward nurse–physician collaboration. Applied Nursing Research, 27(4), 258-260. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2014.03.005
Liaw, S. Y., Zhou, W. T., Lau, T. C., Siau, C., & Chan, S. W. (2014). An interprofessional communication training using simulation to enhance safe care
for a deteriorating patient. Nurse Education Today, 34(2), 259-264. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.019
Liberati, A., Altmann, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gottzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A.…Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting
systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical
Epidemiology, 62, e1-e34.
Mager, D. R., & Lange, J. (2014). Teambuilding across healthcare professions: the ELDER project. Applied Nursing Research, 27(2), 141-143.
doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2013.06.006
McCaffrey, R., Tappen, R. M., Lichtstein, D. M., & Friedland, M. (2013). Interprofessional education in community-based Alzheimer's disease
diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(6), 534-536. doi:10.3109/13561820.2013.817384
McKenna, L., Boyle, M., Palermo, C., Molloy, E., Williams, B., & Brown, T. (2014). Promoting interprofessional understandings through online
learning: a qualitative examination. Nursing & Health Sciences, 16(3), 321-326. doi:10.1111/nhs.12105
Missen, K., Jacob, E. R., Barnett, T., Walker, L., & Cross, M. (2012). Interprofessional clinical education: clinicians' views on the importance of
leadership. Collegian, 19(4), 189-195.
Mohaupt, J., van Soeren, M., Andrusyszyn, M., MacMilan, K., Devlin-Cop, S., & Reeves, S. (2012). Understanding interprofessional relationships by
the use of contact theory. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(5), 370-375.
Morgan, S., Pullon, S., & McKinlay, E. (2015). Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: An integrative literature
review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(7), 1217-1230. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.008
Neville, C. C., Petro, R., Mitchell, G. K., & Brady, S. (2013). Team decision making: design, implementation and evaluation of an interprofessional
education activity for undergraduate health science students. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(6), 523-525.
doi:10.3109/13561820.2013.784731
Opina-Tan, L. A. (2013). A pilot implementation of interprofessional education in a community-academe partnership in the Philippines. Education
for Health (Abingdon), 26(3), 164-171. doi:10.4103/1357-6283.125992
Paige, J. T., Garbee, D. D., Kozmenko, V., Yu, Q., Kozmenko, L., Yang, T.…Swartz, W. (2014). Getting a head start: high-fidelity, simulation-based
operating room team training of interprofessional students. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 218(1), 140-149.
doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.006
Palaganas, J. C., Brunette, V., & Winslow, B. (2016). Prelicensure simulation-enhanced interprofessional education: A critical review of the research
literature. Simulation in Healthcare, 11, 404-418.
Park, J., Hawkins, M., Hamlin, E., Hawkins, W., & Bamdas, J. A. M. (2014). Developing positive attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration
among students in the health care professions. Educational Gerontology, 40(12), 894-908.
Poirier, T., & Wilhelm, M. (2014). An interprofessional faculty seminar focused on interprofessional education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical
Education, 78(4), 80. doi:10.5688/ajpe78480
Poore, J. A., Cullen, D. L., Schaar, G. L. (2014). Simulation-based interprofessional education guided by Kolb's experiential learning theory. Clinical
Simulation in Nursing, 10(5), e241-e247. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.01.004
Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013). Interprofessional education: Effects on professional practice and
healthcare outcomes (update). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Reeves, S., Goldman, J., Burton, A., & Sawatzky-Girling, B. (2010). Synthesis of systematic review evidence of interprofessional education. Journal of
Allied Health, 39(3), 198-203.
Riesen, E., Morley, M., Clendinneng, D., Ogilvie, S., & Ann Murray, M. (2012). Improving interprofessional competence in undergraduate students
using a novel blended learning approach. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(4), 312-318. doi:10.3109/13561820.2012.660286
Rossler, K. L., & Kimble, L. P. (2016). Capturing readiness to learn and collaboration as explored with an interprofessional simulation scenario: A
mixed-methods research study. Nurse Education Today, 36, 348-353. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.018
Salamonson, Y., Everett, B., Koch, J., Wilson, I., & Davidson, P. M. (2009). Learning strategies of first year nursing and medical students: a
comparative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(12), 1541-1547. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.05.010
Scherer, Y. K., Myers, J., O'Connor, T. D., & Haskins, M. (2013). Interprofessional simulation to foster collaboration between nursing and medical
students. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(11), e497-e505. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.03.001
Sigalet, E., Donnon, T., & Grant, V. (2012). Undergraduate students' perceptions of and attitudes toward a simulation-based interprofessional
curriculum: the KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire. Simulation in Healthcare, 7(6), 353-358. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e318264499e
Smith, K. A. (2014). Health care interprofessional education: encouraging technology, teamwork, and team performance. Journal of Continuing
Education in Nursing, 45(4), 181-187.
Solomon, P., & Salfi, J. (2011). Evaluation of an interprofessional education communication skills initiative. Education in Health (Abingdon), 24(2),
616.
Spence, J., Goodwin, B., Enns, C., Vecherya, N., & Dean, H. (2012). Patient safety education: an exploration of student-driven contextual learning.
Journal of Nursing Education, 51(8), 466-470. doi:10.3928/01484834-20120615-04
Wang, R., Shi, N., Bai, J., Zheng, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Implementation and evaluation of an interprofessional simulation-based education program
for undergraduate nursing students in operating room nursing education: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 15, 115.
doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0400-8
Watters, C., Reedy, G., Ross, A., Morgan, N. J., Handslip, R., & Jaye, P. (2015). Does interprofessional simulation increase self-efficacy: a
comparative study. BMJ Open, 5(1), e005472. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005472
Whiteley, R. F., Gillespie, J., Robinson, C., Watts, W., & Carter, D. (2014). Effective teaching and learning in interprofessional education in child
welfare. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(4), 148-158.
Wilbur, K., & Kelly, I. (2015). Interprofessional impressions among nursing and pharmacy students: a qualitative study to inform interprofessional
education initiatives. BMC Medical Education, 15, 53. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0337-y
Williams, B., Lewis, B., Boyle, M., & Brown, T. (2011). The impact of wireless keypads in an interprofessional education context with health science
students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 337-350.
Williams, B. M., Brown, T. P., Scholes, R. P., French, J. M., & Archer, F. M. (2010). Can interdisciplinary clinical DVD simulations transform clinical
fieldwork education for paramedic, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and nursing Students? Journal of Allied Health, 39(1), 3-10.
Wilson, M., Ice, S., Nakashima, C. Y., Cox, L. A., Morse, E. C., Philip, G., & Vuong, E. (2015). Striving for evidence-based practice innovations through
a hybrid model journal club: A pilot study. Nurse Education Today, 35(5), 657-662. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.026
World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health
Organization. Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf
Zhang, C., Thompson, S., & Miller, C. (2011). A review of simulation-based interprofessional education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 7(4), e117-
e126. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2010.02.008
Zwarenstein, M., Rice, K., Gotlib-Conn, L., Kenaszchuk, C., & Reeves, S. (2013). Disengaged: a qualitative study of communication and collaboration
between physicians and other professions on general internal medicine wards. BMC Health Services Research, 13, 494. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-494
Contact
[email protected]
Development of a Scale to Measure Self-Efficacy to Respond to Disruptive Behaviors
Ericka J. Sanner-Stiehr, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Disruptive behaviors in the nursing workplace contribute to negative outcomes for targeted individuals, patients, and organizations
where these behaviors are prevalent. Also referred to as bullying, lateral/horizontal violence, and incivilities, the literature is replete
with evidence that disruptive behaviors violate respectful communication between nursing staff and ultimately disrupt patient care.
Newly licensed nurses are likely to lack the ability to respond effectively to disruptive behaviors, contributing to a turnover rate as
high as 30% during their first year of professional practice. Consequently, nursing students anticipate have begun appealing to
educators to provide response training in pre-licensure curricula.
Cognitive rehearsal (CR), a form of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), has gained popularity as an intervention to increase the ability of nursing
students and newly licensed nurses to address disruptive behaviors. Variations of CBT have been utilized extensively in nursing and health care
education. These interventions focus on skill or behavior mastery by operationalizing the core concept of self-efficacy through education and the
opportunity to practice the skill or behavior.
Self-efficacy is domain-specific and requires particular measurements to determine the effectiveness of each type of training. Currently, there is no
published measure for specifically evaluating self-efficacy in responding to disruptive behaviors. The lack of a validated and reliable instrument
makes the effectiveness of CR interventions difficult to quantify. Thus, the purpose of this project was to develop a domain-specific, theoretically
grounded, valid, and reliable instrument to (1) measure self-efficacy related to responding to disruptive behaviors and (2) evaluate the
effectiveness of CR training.
The rigorous two-step Lynn process for content validity was followed in developing the Responding to Disruptive Workplace Behaviors Scale
(RDWBS). The first phase, the Development Stage, involved a thorough literature review to describe the full domain of self-efficacy related to
responding to disruptive behaviors and to guide item development. Results revealed that self-efficacy is reflected in an interaction of four
constructs: cognition, past behavior, affect, and motivation. Aligning with the literature, items developed for the RDWBS were designed to address
these four constructs in addition to measuring overall self-efficacy.
In the second phase, Judgment-Quantification Stage, an expert panel of six individuals with expertise in instrument development and SCT
established validity/relevance. Scale items were rated on a 1 -4 scale with anchors of 1 = “Not relevant at all” and 4 = “extremely relevant”. A
content validity index (CVI) was calculated for each item on the scale (I-CVI) by averaging assigned scores and for the scale as a whole (S-CVI). Items
with I-CVI scores ≥ .78 were considered acceptable for inclusion on the final RDWBS, without major revision. Only two items scored below this
accepted benchmark. These items were revised according to panelist feedback for improving clarity and wording and were subsequently retained
on the instrument for piloting. The S-CVI was calculated as the proportion of items scoring an average of 3 - 4 points on the relevance scale (S-
CVI/Ave). The final S-CVI/Ave = 1, indicating that all items were considered relevant reflections of measuring this domain-specific self-efficacy.
Finally, a social desirability item with content aligning with the scale items was added to the final scale for piloting.
The RWDBS was subsequently piloted among senior nursing students (N = 450). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted utilizing oblique
and orthogonal rotations with the Eigenvalue cutoff set at 1.0. The presence of two factors was revealed through EFA accounting for 63% of
variance among participants’ responses. These factor loadings were identical with both types of rotations utilized. The first factor accounted for
46% of variance and included items measuring overall self-efficacy, cognitions, past behaviors, and motivation. The second factor accounted for the
remaining 17% of variance, reflecting items measuring affect. The final RDWBS also demonstrated high internal scale consistency by a Cronbach’s α
= .889 and included a total of 13 items measuring self-efficacy to respond to disruptive behaviors in the nursing workplace.
Disruptive behaviors are an unfortunate yet common aspect of the nursing workplace and contribute to a sequela of negative consequences for
nursing staff, patients, and organizations. Fortunately, CR training can prepare nursing students to respond effectively to these disruptive behaviors
prior to entering the workplace. This instrument is the first of its kind to provide a valid and reliable instrument that nurse educators can use to
measure the effectiveness of CR training on increasing response self-efficacy among nursing students. Additional research is needed to further
refine the RDWBS as well as to evaluate CR training techniques for improving nursing education practice and retaining newly licensed nurses in the
workforce. (750 words)
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of self-control (1st ed.). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Brown, J. D. (2009). Choosing the right type of rotation in PCA and EFA. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newlsletter, 13(3), 20–25.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathlogy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(354),
349–354.
Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later.
The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20141122-02
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385.
National Student Nurses’ Association. (2015). Resolutions 2015. National Student Nurses’ Association. Retrieved from
http://www.nsna.org/Portals/0/Skins/NSNA/pdf/Final%20resolutions%205-2015%20FINAL.pdf
Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health
care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research
in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Rutherford-Hemming, T. (2015). Determining content validity and reporting a content validity index for simulation scenarios. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 36(6), 389–393.
Twohig, M. P., & Dehlin, J. P. (2012). Skills Training. In W. T. O’Donohue & J. E. Fisher (Eds.), Cognitive behavior therapy: core principles for practice
(pp. 37–73). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2017). Measurement in nursing and health research (5th ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co., LLC.
Contact
[email protected]
An Examination of Cognitive Rehearsal to Assist Nursing Students With Uncivil Behaviors
Cynthia R. Hammond, PhD, MSN, MS, RN, USA
Abstract
Incivility is a major threat to nurse safety. Researchers have identified incivility as a problem in the nursing profession (Christie & Jones, 2013). A
tragedy of incivility has been described as a psychological phenomenon decreased a nurse’s ability to deliver optimal patient care and
compromised patient safety (Christie & Jones, 2013). Additionally, nursing students’ lack of status and power make them especially vulnerable to
be victimized due to lack of hierarchy status (Christie & Jones 2013) Nursing students are particularly vulnerable to incivility, which may have led to
further abuse and bullying. The continued bullying has resulted in students leaving the profession, adding to the nursing shortage (Clarke, Kane,
Lafreniere, & Rajacich, 2012).Also, the negative effects of incivility toward student nurses mirror profession nurses’ uncivil behavior which may
cause minor to severe psychological effects (Clarke, Kane, Lafreniere, & Rajacich, 2012).Victims of uncivil behaviors reported a decreased sense of
well-being, physical health complaints, and depressive symptoms that resemble post-traumatic stress disorder (Dehue, Bolman, Vollink, &
Pouwelse, 2012). A tragedy of the uncivil psychological phenomenon was that it decreased a nurse’s ability to deliver optimal patient care and
compromised patient safety (Christie & Jones, 2013). This consequence is a direct correlation to the nursing shortage, which is an important
concern for the profession (Shaeffer, 2013). Incivility may interfere with student nurses’ professional development in nursing school, and ultimately
cause nurses to leave the nursing profession (Clarke, Kane, Lafreniere, & Rajacich, 2012, Rad & Moonaghi, 2016). Nursing students, in
undergraduate and graduate settings, are particularly vulnerable to incivility. The education of incivility among nurses increased their level of
awareness, and enhanced skills may (a) decrease the number of nurses leaving their first employment role, (b) diminish disruptive behavior, (c)
combat the future nurse shortage, and (d) recruit additional nurses into the workforce (Embree, Bruner, & White, 2013). Subsequently, knowledge
of the incidence of nurse-to-nurse incivility served as a guide for all workers to be accountable for incivility (Embree et al., 2013), Rad & Moonaghi,
2016)).
An innovative yet successful solution of cognitive rehearsal could be a milestone toward improving health-related outcomes and patient
satisfaction metrics (Fehr & Siebel, 2016). The use of cognitive rehearsal could be the variable solution to teach nursing students the application of
cognitive rehearsal in the workplace. One solution to impede incivility has involved using cognitive rehearsal (Griffin and Clark, 2014). Involved in
four steps, cognitive rehearsal is a systematic approach to thinking that recognizes: awareness, automatic thoughts, processing new received
information, and formulating a response against incivility (Griffin and Clark, 2014). The quantitative design which was used to test the assumption
that cognitive rehearsal would help decrease the incidence of incivility. The use of the pretest and posttest surveys, provided evidence to support
the application of cognitive rehearsal as a teaching-learning strategy. The statistical analysis used the one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)
test. The ANCOVA test examined the influence of the independent variable on the dependent variable using a regression analysis. The results of the
ANCOVA were not significant, suggesting that there were not statistically significant differences in the STSS-W posttest scores between the groups
while controlling for STSS-W pretest scores. The ancillary, independent sample t-tests were conducted and results indicated that there were not
significant differences in the STSS-W scores between the two groups. A series of dependent sample t-tests were conducted and results indicated
that there were significant differences between STSS-W pretest and posttest scores. Thus, time appeared to be a key factor in the change between
test scores but the group placement did not seem to have a strong effect. The data revealed both similarities and differences from calculating the
frequencies and percentages of the results. Future recommendations include: nurse educators and nursing students become aware of incivility and
use caring behaviors in their experiences. Researchers recommended more diverse nursing participants and the need to study larger nursing school
populations. The effort to like theoretical origins to incivility, will could clarify the conceptual frame of incivility (Oyeleye, Hanson. O’Connor &
Dunn, 2013).
An innovative yet successful solution of cognitive rehearsal could be a milestone toward improving health-related outcomes and patient
satisfaction metrics (Fehr & Siebel, 2016). The use of cognitive rehearsal could be the variable solution to teach nursing students the application of
cognitive rehearsal in the workplace. One solution to impede incivility has involved using cognitive rehearsal (Griffin and Clark, 2014). Involved in
four steps, cognitive rehearsal is a systematic approach to thinking that recognizes: awareness, automatic thoughts, processing new received
information, and formulating a response against incivility (Griffin and Clark, 2014). The quantitative design which was used to test the assumption
that cognitive rehearsal would help decrease the incidence of incivility. The use of the pretest and posttest surveys, provided evidence to support
the application of cognitive rehearsal as a teaching-learning strategy. The statistical analysis used the one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)
test. The ANCOVA test examined the influence of the independent variable on the dependent variable using a regression analysis. The results of the
ANCOVA were not significant, suggesting that there were not statistically significant differences in the STSS-W posttest scores between the groups
while controlling for STSS-W pretest scores. The ancillary, independent sample t-tests were conducted and results indicated that there were not
significant differences in the STSS-W scores between the two groups. A series of dependent sample t-tests were conducted and results indicated
that there were significant differences between STSS-W pretest and posttest scores. Thus, time appeared to be a key factor in the change between
test scores but the group placement did not seem to have a strong effect. The data revealed both similarities and differences from calculating the
frequencies and percentages of the results. Future recommendations include: nurse educators and nursing students become aware of incivility and
use caring behaviors in their experiences. Researchers recommended more diverse nursing participants and the need to study larger nursing school
populations. The effort to like theoretical origins to incivility, will could clarify the conceptual frame of incivility (Oyeleye, Hanson. O’Connor &
Dunn, 2013).
References
Christie, W., & Jones, S. (2013). Lateral violence in nursing and the theory of the nurse as wounded healer. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing,
19(1). doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol19No01PPT01
Clarke, C. M., Kane, D. J., Rajacich, D. L., & Lafreniere, K. D. (2012). Bullying in undergraduate clinical nursing education. Journal of Nursing
Education, 51(5), 269–276. doi:10.3928/01484834-20120409-01
Dehue, F., Bolman, C., Vollink, T., & Pouwelse, M. (2012). Coping with bullying at work and health related problems. International Journal of Stress
Management, 19, 175–197
Clarke, C.M., Kane, D.J., Rajacich, D.L, Lafreniere, K.D. (2012). Bully in undergraduate clinical nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(5),
269.
Embree J. L., Bruner D. A., & White A. (2013). Raising the level of awareness of nurse-to-nurse lateral violence in a critical access hospital. Nursing
Research and Practice, 2013, 1–7. doi:10.1155/2013/207306
Fehr, F.C. & Seibel, L.M. (2016). Cognitive Rehearsal Training for Upskilling Undergraduate Nursing Students Against Bullying: A Qualitative Pilot
Study. Journal of Quality Advancement in Nursing Education, 2(1), Article 5.
Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nurse: 10 years later.
Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542.
Oyeleye, O., Hanson, P., O’Connor, N., Dunn, D. (2013). Relationship of workplace incivility, stress, and burnout on nurses’ turnover intentions and
psychology empowerment. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 43(10), pp536- 542.
Rad, M., & Karimi Moonaghi, H. (2016). Strategies for Managing Nursing Students’ Incivility as Experienced by Nursing Educators: a Qualitative
Study. Journal of Caring Sciences,5(1), 23–32. http://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2016.003
Schaeffer, A. (2013). The effects of incivility on nursing education. Open Journal of Nursing,3, 178-181. doi:10.4236/ojn.2013.32023
Contact
[email protected]
Discovering the Hidden Forces of Successful Recruitment and Retention of African Americans in BSN
Programs
Anne Marie Jean-Baptiste, PhD, MSN, MS, RN, CCRN, CEN, USA
Elmira Asongwed, MS, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Introduction: A mismatch exists between the African American population and the number of African American nurses. White non-
Hispanics compose 69.3% of the nursing workforce with a baccalaureate as opposed to 10.7 % of African Americans (American
Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2015). The National League for Nursed (2014) reported an increase in enrollment of minorities in
basic nursing programs by 2% from 2012 to 2014. However, once stratified by race, African Americans’ enrollment has dropped from
12.9% to 12.2% as compared to Hispanics that have increased from 6.8% to 8.1%. Although many initiatives have been made to
recruit and retain students in different nursing programs, very few have specifically conveyed the experiences of African Americans
concerning their recruitment and retention in BSN programs to increase their representation in nursing workforce (Dapremont,
2014; Institute of Medicine, 2015; Murray, 2015; Sbaraini, Carter, Evans & Blinkhorn, 2011). The purpose of this qualitative study is
to investigate the driven forces behind successful recruitment and retention of African Americans in BSN programs.
Method, Sample and Data Collection: A field test was conducted to evaluate the interview questions that would be presented to the participants
for proper wording (Schmidt & Brown, 2012). Panel was composed of four doctorally prepared educators. Once the experts concurred that the
interview questions adequately addressed the research questions and aligned well with the purpose of the study, approval was obtained from the
University’s Institution Review Board (IRB). Permission was also solicited and obtained from the Nursing Director to use the premise as interview
site and distribute letters requesting volunteers from recent, African American, nursing graduates who had completed their BSN. The participants
were born and raised in United States, and resided in the mid-Atlantic region. Furthermore, these graduates were between 25 and 45 years old
(Charmaz, 2014).
The letter indicated the researcher’s office as the site of the interviews. All efforts were made not to provide identifiable information about the
graduates nor the institution. All of the aspects of involvement were explained to the participants in clear and concise language. The consent form
included clauses such as: the reason the participants were invited to take part in the study, the permission to audiotape the interviews, the
information about the researcher, the purpose of the study, the location and duration of the study, and the potential risks and benefits of the
study. The right to withdraw at any time during the research process was also inserted (Marczyk, DeMatteo & Festinger, 2005). All documents and
data were stored electronically on a password-protected jump drive (USB drive) or in a locked filing cabinet located in the researcher’s office to
which only the researcher has access. Three years after the study completion, all of the information obtained from the participants will be
destroyed (Schmidt & Brown, 2012).
Fourteen participants were engaged in-depth and face-to-face interviews for the data collection process. After demographic data were objectively
collected through close-ended questions, the remainder of the interview was composed of open-ended questions to allow the participants to
narrate their responses (Bendasolli, 2013; Maykut & Morehouse, 1994). An interview guide, composed of nine semi-structured questions, was used
to ascertain the questions were answered. The interviews were conducted in English and a copy of the verbatim transcript for verification and
correction was provided to each participant. Each interview lasted approximately 45 to 55 minutes. The interview started by acquiring
demographic data from the participants, which included age, number of American generations, years of practice as a BSN, year of graduation from
the BSN program, place of birth, zip code of residence, and current level of education (Charmaz, 2014; O’Reiley & Parker, 2013).
Data Analysis: The interview responses were transcribed line-by-line. The qualitative software NVivo 10® (2014) was used to organize the data.
During open coding the collected data were assembled into building blocks (Walker, 2012). Axial coding consisted of conducting an in-depth and
sophisticated analysis to find the themes around which the other concepts pivoted (O’Reilly, 2013). The researcher used an iterative and cyclical
approach to data analysis to constantly compare data collected within each interview and across other interviews until data saturation signaled the
need to discontinue the effort of collecting and analyzing further data (Charmaz, 2014). The final step was characterized by the emergence of four
themes: (a) honoring the silent contract commitment, (b) uncovering inner strengths, (c) awaking the altruism within, (d) sacrificing on purpose.
Results: Theme 1(honoring the silent contract commitment) is a description of the graduates’ perceptions and experiences of their commitment to
themselves and others who contributed to their success in the program. The participants used terminologies such as “determination to break the
cycle” to describe their perceptions of the inner strengths needed to enroll, be retained, and successfully graduate from the program. The data for
this theme 1 also revealed participants’ perceptions of how their commitment to honor “a silent contract” between themselves and others served
as driven force for their success in the program. In Theme 2 (uncovering inner strengths), the participants provided data on the inner strengths
cultivated or discovered to be successful in the program. The participants perceived their intention to be highly educated in terms of “self-
actualization” and “true north discovery”. Although the indicated inner strengths help their recruitment, data also revealed the use of synonymous
terminologies such as “self-confidence” and “self-esteem” to describe participants’ perceptions of other inner strengths needed to survive the rigor
of the BSN program and succeed. Theme 3 (awaking the altruism within) emerged from five terms: advocacy, standing in the gap, be present, and
role modeling. The participants used these terms frequently to describe their perceptions of their function in the community as the impetus for
their successful recruitment and retention in the BSN program. The participants described their function they assume in communities where there
is a lack of health educators, role models, and presence of health authorities to empower members to advocate for themselves or to advocate for
those who cannot do so for themselves. The data for theme 4(sacrificing on purpose) supported the personal adjustments the participants had to
make to be recruited and retained in the program. The participants described the ways they sought available resources and how humility helped
them acknowledge and confront their academic weaknesses. The graduates also perceived the need to relinquish old habits and to adopt new ones
as necessary to their success.
Discussion and Limitations: The above results describe how African American students relied on their inner skills and dispositions for their
successful recruitment and retention in a BSN program. This study suggested other innovative recruitment and retention approaches that are more
effective as a bundle, instead of as isolated strategies (Prins & Mooney, 2014). This study reiterated the need to include experiential learning as a
teaching strategy to increase the program visibility and to use the community as the classroom to offer students opportunity to transfer their
theoretical knowledge into practice. Finally, this study revealed how African American students perceive experiential learning as one of the best
learning platforms. The experiential learning helped awaken the altruist within the BSN graduates to make decisions, advocate, stand in the gap,
and role model in their community. The research findings captured how, during different experiential learning activities, the students learned to
take advantage of their relatedness to create partnerships with the community members, provide services, and influence their health behaviors.
Nurse educators can use this revelation as stimuli to update resources in their programs. Nontraditional strategies should be used. Curricula,
pedagogical organizations, tests, and instructions should be redesigned (Porr, Brennan-Hunter, Crossman & Parsons, 2014). These researchers’
studies may also help the educators to identify and capitalize on students’ inner skills and dispositions.
The researcher recommends conducting studies in multiple states to verify whether geographic differences are relevant. A longitudinal study,
involving students in Historically Black Colleges and Universities and predominantly Caucasian programs could verify how learning context
influences the students’ perspective of their experiences with their recruitment and retention in BSN programs.
Conclusion: Students’ success was largely related to their psychological state. Those who brought to bear inner skills such as sense of commitment,
self-actualization, self-confidence, and self-motivation pursued their goals and succeeded in the nursing program. The nursing education must
undergo radical transformation of curricula, course offerings, and learning approaches. Finally, nursing leaders and educators must design new
performance indicators to accurately measure the effectiveness of learning activities. The findings of this study are merely the point of departure of
a chain of actions that are needed to accomplish social justice. Increasing the number of African Americans in the nursing workforce may lead to
increase trust and participation in research studies for the discovery of effective management or a cure for health issues that specifically affect
African Americans.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) (2015). The Changing Landscape: Nursing Student Diversity on the Rise. Retrieved from:
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/government-affairs/Student-Diversity-FS.pdf
Aiken, L. H., Sloan, D. M., Bruyneel, L., Van den Heede, K. V., Griffiths, P., Busse, R., Seermeus, W. (2014). Nurse staffing and education and hospital
mortality in nine European countries: A retrospective observational study. Lancet, 383(9931), 1824–1830. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62631-8
Bendasolli, P. F. (2013). Theory building in qualitative research: Reconsidering the problem of induction. Qualitative Social Research, 14(1), 15–22.
Blegen, M. A., Goode, C. J., Park, S. H., Vaughn, T., & Spetz, J. (2013). Baccalaureate education in nursing and patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing
Administration, 43(2), 89–94. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31827f2028
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dapremont, J. A. (2011). Success in nursing school: Black nursing students’ perception of peers, family and faculty. Journal of Nursing Education,
50(5), 254–260.
Dapremont, J. A. (2014). Black nursing students: strategies for academic success. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(3), 157–161.
Institute of Medicine. (2015). Assessing progress on the IOM Report: The future of nursing. Retrieved from
http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2015/Assessing-Progress-on-the-IOM-Report-The-Future-of-
Nursing.aspx#sthash.LIDL6MBE.dpuf
Institute of Medicine. (2016). New report: A framework for educating health professionals to address the social determinants of health. Retrieved
from http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2016/Framework-for-Educating-Health-Professionals-to-Address-the-Social-
Determinants-of-Health.aspx
Marczyk, G., DeMatteo, D., & Festinger, D. (2005). Essentials of research design and methodology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley and Sons.
Murray, B. S. (2015). Service–Learning in baccalaureate nursing education: A literature review. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(11), 621.
doi:10.3928/01484834-20131014-08
National league of nursing. ( 2014). Annual survey of schools of nursing: Academic year 2013-2014. Retrieved from:
http://www.nln.org/newsroom/nursing-education-statistics/annual-survey-of-schools-of-nursing-academic-year-2013-2014
National League for Nursing. (2013). Nursing education statistics. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/researchgrants/slides/index.htm
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2015). NSSE annual results, 2015. Retrieved from http://nsse.indiana.edu/html/annual_results.cfm
O’Reilly, M. (2013). Unsatisfactory saturation: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative
Research, 13(2), 190197. doi:10.1177/1468794112449106
Porr, C., Brennan-Hunter, A., Crossman, R., & Parsons, K. (2014). Revolutionizing an accelerated baccalaureate nursing curriculum. Journal of
Nursing Education and Practice, 4(9), 183. doi:10.5430/jnep.v4n9p183
Prins, E., & Mooney, A. (2014). Literacy and health disparities. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 142, 25–35.
doi:10.1002/ace.20092
Quinn, W., Spetz, J., & Bates, T. (2015). American Community Survey and nursing workforce data. Retrieved from
http://campaignforaction.org/sites/default/files/ACS%20Webinar%20Summary_20150325.pdf
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2013, December 18).The year in review: federal government takes steps to transform nursing, improve health
[Internet]. Princeton, NJ: Author. Retrieved from http://rwjf.org/en/about-rwjf/newsroom/news room-content/2011/12/the-year-in-review-
federal-government takes-steps-to-transform-n.html
Schmidt, N. A., & Brown, J. M. (2012). Evidence-based practice for nurses: Appraisal and application of research. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
Sullivan Commission on Diversity in the Healthcare Workforce. (2004). Missing persons: Minorities in the health professions: A report of the Sullivan
Commission on Diversity in the Healthcare Workforce. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/SullivanReport.pdf
Tri-Council for Nursing. (2010). Tri-Council for Nursing issues new consensus policy statement on the educational advancement of registered nurses.
Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Education/pdf/TricouncilEdStatement.pdf
Van Gennep. A. (1977). The rites of passage. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Vogt, W. P., Vogt, E. R., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2014). Selecting the right analyses for your data: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed
method. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Walker, J. K. (2012). The use of saturation in qualitative research. Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 22(2), 37–41. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22803288
Contact
[email protected]
Weathering the Perfect Storm: A Multifaceted Strategy to Improve Nursing Student Retention
Catherine McGeehin Heilferty, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
The purpose of the presentation is to share an experience in one BSN program during a time of significant challenge and change.
Implications for program improvement, increased nursing student retention and ameliorating the nursing shortage are discussed.
The relentless nursing shortage seems to resist every effort toward relief. The most recent information from the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
(2015) listed 2.8 million vacant nursing positions, with a 16% increase in that number expected by 2024, or 450,000 more vacancies. Twenty-one
percent of U.S. hospitals have a nurse vacancy rate above 10% (ANA, 2017), with an estimated 550,000 nurses retiring by 2022.
Factors related to nursing workplaces; the physical and psychosocial stress of the work; and limited nursing school placements due to faculty
shortages are placing increasing pressure on healthcare agencies and educators to manage more complex care with less experienced nurses than
ever before.
Given the current vacancies and the impending retirement of a large percentage of the workforce, colleges and universities are examining nursing
student retention more intensely. In the U.S., almost 50% of students do not progress in nursing programs (Mooring, 2016). Problems related to
nursing student retention and the shortage of nurses are not limited to the U.S. In Canada, the percentage of students lost to nursing school
progression is 25%; in Australia, 10-40%; in the U.K., 27-40% (Mooring, 2016).
Strategies to improve retention include identifying student-candidates capable of the rigorous work; identifying at-risk students who are already
enrolled; establishment of mentoring/tutoring/coaching/advising relationships; standardized instruction and testing; and remediation efforts such
as supplemental courses aimed at enhancing student critical thinking (Freeman & All, 2017; Hopkins, 2008)
The author describes one instructive experience faced by the leaders of one BSN program during a time of significant challenge and change. The
perfect storm included (1) the introduction of both a revised traditional BSN curriculum and a new second-degree BSN curriculum; (2) a decreasing
NCLEX-RN pass rate; and (3) increasingly tense student-faculty relationships. Administrators, faculty, and a few influential students rallied to
respond to these nursing academic challenges. Scientific theory holds that knowledge is achieved by altering one element at a time, so that results
can be measured and assessed. In the case presented, urgency for improvement did not allow for individual changes. What is postulated here,
interestingly, is that it was the layering of strategies that had the intended effect. The program was layered with remediation plans (Keller, 1968);
with academic coaching (Brown-O’Hara, 2013); with standardized instruction and testing; and with faculty development.
After the first year of the improvement plan, the greatest changes were in faculty-student relationships. From the outset, administrators were
transparent about the seriousness of the issues, and solicited student feedback and cooperation. As faculty members and students engaged in
improvement activities, trust between faculty and students improved. By the second year, results of the interventions continued as NCLEX-RN
scores improved and curricular adjustments began to show steady improvement in satisfaction.
Attendees will leave the session with ideas, tools, and motivation that can be applied in programs of all sizes to improve nursing student retention.
References
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2017). NUrsing shortage. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from
http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessionalNursing/workforce
Brown-O’Hara, P. (2013). The influence of academic coaching on: BSN students’ academic success, perceptions of the academic coaching
relationship, Perceived NCLEX-RN readiness and NCLEX success”, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Widener University. Retrieved July 30, 2015
from http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/1420357326.html?FMT=AI
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor,Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 Edition, Registered Nurses,on the Internet at
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/registered-nurses.htm(visitedMarch 27, 2017).
Freeman, J. C. & All, A. (2017). Academic support programs utilized for nursing students at risk of academic failure: A review of the literature.
Nursing Education Perspectives, 38(2), 69-74.
Hopkins, T. H. (2008). Early identification of at-risk nursing students: A student support model. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(6), 254-259.
Keller, F. S. (1968). “Goodbye teacher.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(79-89).
Mooring, Q. E. (2016). Recruitment, advising, and retention programs—Challenges and solutions to the international problem of poor nursing
student retention: A narrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 40: 204-208.
Contact
[email protected]
Nurse Educators' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Horizontal Violence Measured Through Dimensions
of Oppression
Brenda Petersen, PhD, USA
Abstract
A paradox exists within the profession of nursing. Despite the fact that nursing is known as the caring profession, empirical evidence
demonstrates that nurses do not care well for their own. In fact, an oft quoted statement has been that nurses eat their young. The
phenomenon of horizontal violence (HV) is an international problem within the nursing profession (McKenna, Smith, Poole &
Coverdale, 2003; Randle, 2003). HV is described broadly as any unwanted hostility or aggression within the workplace and is
empirically demonstrrated to be connected to oppressed group behaviors (Roberts, DeMarco & Griffin, 2009). Oppressed group
behaviors are the result of powerful groups determining what is valued. This devaluing leads to marginalization and the less
powerful group develops low self-esteem as well as a silent voice.
Described as nurse-to-nurse aggression, characteristic behaviors of HV within the nursing profession can be overt or covert (Vessey, et al. 2010;
Bechner & Visovsky, 2012). Overt examples include ignoring or minimizing concerns, or direct sabotage; while overt behaviors include making
sarcastic comments or belittling gestures (Conti-O'Hare & O'Hare, 2003; Hastie, 2002; Longo, 2007). In HV a power imbalance may or may not exist.
We know empirically that the novice nurse first experiences HV as a student and HV continues to exist at every level of the nursing profession
(Longo, 2007; Stanley, Martin, Michel, Welton & Nemeth, 2007; Vessey, DeMarco, Gaffney & Budin 2009). Abusive behaviors associated with HV
are psychological as opposed to physical and have a significant impact on the nurse as well as the patient. The Joint Commission issued a Sentinel
Event Alert (No. 40) in 2008 describing these characteristic behaviors and states that they “undermine a culture of safety.”
Cyclical behaviors which are characteristic of HV are passed on from the more experienced nurse to the novice nurse (Farrell, 2001). This cycle is
believed to perpetuate HV as these characteristic behaviors become culturally embedded within the nursing profession when negative behaviors
are passed on from one generation of nurses to the next. The literature suggests that HV proliferates through a culture which exists in nursing
whereby there is an acceptance of nurse-to-nurse abuse as a professional norm (Roberts, 1983; Roberts, Demarco & Griffin, 2009; Farrell, 2001;
Sofield & Salmond, 2003; Randle, 2003).
This study uses a newly validated instrument (NEKAP-HV©) and a national sample of nurse educators (n=254) and explores their knowledge,
attitudes and practice of horizontal violence measured through dimensions of oppression.
References
Becker, J. & Visovsky, C. (2012). Horizontal Violence in Nursing. MEDSURG Nursing 21(4), 210-213.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Conti-O’Hare, M. & O’Hare, J. (2006) Nursing Spectrum Online. Don’t perpetuate horizontal violence.
http://nsweb.nursingspectrum.com/cfforms/Guest Lecture/Horizontal Violence.cfm
Cox, H. (1991a). Verbal abuse nationwide: oppressed group behavior. Part 1. Nursing Management, 22 (2), 32-35.
Cox, H. (1991b). Verbal abuse nationwide: impact and modifications. Part 2. Nursing Management, 22 (3), 66-69.
Farrell, G. A. (1997). Aggression in clinical settings: nurses' views. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25 (3), 501-508.
Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Joint Commission, (2008). Behaviors that undermine a culture of safety. Retrieved from
http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/SEA_40.PDF.
Hastie, C. (2002). Horizontal violence in the workplace. Birth International. http://www.birthinternational.com/articles/hastie02.html.
Longo, J. (2007). Horizontal violence among nursing students. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 21, 177-178.
Longo, O., & Sherman, R. (2007). Leveling horizontal violence. Nursing Management. (38)3, 34-37, 50-51.
Maxfield D, Grenny J, McMillan R, Patterson K, Switzler A. Silence Kills: The Seven Crucial Conversations in Healthcare. Aliso Viejo, CA: American
Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) and Vital Smarts; 2005. http://www.aacn.org/WD/Practice/Docs/PublicPolicy/SilenceKills.pdf.
Matheson, L.K. & Bobay, K. (2007). Validation of oppressed group behaviors in nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing. 23(4), 226-234.
McKenna, B., Smith, N., Poole, S. & Coverdale, J. (2003). Horizontal Violence: Experiences of registered nurses in their first year of practice. Journal
of Advanced Nursing. 42(1), 90-96.
Randle, J. (2003 a). Bullying in the nursing profession. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43(4), 395-401.
Randle, J., (2003 b). Changes in self-esteem during a 3-year pre-registration diploma in higher education nursing programme. Journal of Clinical
Nursing. (12) 142-143.
Roberts, S.J. (1983). Oppressed group behavior: Implications for nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 5(4), 21-30.
Roberts, S. J. (1996). Point of view: Breaking the cycle of oppression: Lessons for nurse practitioners? Journal of the American Academy of Nurse
Practitioners. (8)5, 209-214.
Roberts, S.J., DeMarco, R., & Griffin, M. (2009). The effects of oppressed group behaviors on the culture of the nursing workforce: a review of the
evidence and interventions for change. Journal of Nursing Management. (17), 288-293.
Sofeld, L. & Salmond, S. (2003). Workplace violence: A focus on workplace abuse and intent to leave the organization. Orthopaedic Nursing. 22(4).
Stanley, K., Martin, M., Michel, Y., Welton, J., & Nemeth, L. (2007). Examining lateral violence in the nursing workforce. Issues in Mental Health
Nursing. 28, 1247-1265.
Vessey, J., DeMarco, R., Gaffney, D., & Budin, W. (2009). Bullying of staff registered nurses in the workplace: A preliminary study for developing
personal and organizational strategies for the transformation of hostile to healthy workplace environments. Journal of Professional Nursing. 25(5),
299-306.
Contact
[email protected]
Addressing Workplace Violence in Prelicensure Curriculum: Development, Administration, and Evaluation of
an Innovative Teaching Bundle
Margory A. Molloy, DNP, RN, CNE, CHSE, USA
Jayme Trocino Sherrod, MSN, USA
Sandra Yamane, MSN, USA
Ashley Schoenfisch, PhD, USA
Abstract
The burden of violence directed at workers in health care settings - particularly violence perpetrated by patients and visitors - is
well-documented (Gomaa et al., 2014; Pompeii et al., 2013). Research suggests nursing students are exposed to violence as well,
through clinical learning experiences and/or paid caregiving roles (Çelebioğlu, Akpinar, Küçükoğlu, & Engin, 2010; Ferns &
Meerabeau, 2008; Hinchberger, 2009; Magnavita & Heponiemi, 2011), a reality that supports the National Advisory Council on Nurse
Education and Practice’s call for formal and informal education and training to help students recognize, prevent, and mitigate
workplace violence (WPV) (NACNEP, 2007). Nurse educators are well-qualified to teach about occupational hazards, including WPV,
but such concepts are not systematically evident in pre-licensure curricula, effective pedagogical strategies related to such concepts
are limited, and students may leave educational programs not realizing the significance of workplace safety to their practice.
To address this gap, learner experiences and needs related to WPV were identified, lecture material and situational trigger films related to WPV
were created, and immersion simulation experiences were developed. This bundle of activities led to the implementation of a dynamic pedagogical
strategy that addressed all domains of learning: cognitive, psychomotor, and affective (Bloom, 1956). Trigger films are short films that are used to
engage the affective domain (Molloy, Sabol, Silva, & Guimond, 2016). Immersion simulation experiences are widely used throughout modern
nursing curricula to teach decision-making and psychomotor skill development through replication of patient scenarios in a safe environment
(Hayden, Smiley, Alexander, Kardong-Edgren, & Jeffries, 2014). While the use of trigger films alone or the use of immersion simulations alone can
be effective, when coupling the two strategies in a controlled environment, the learning effect may be enhanced.
This presentation will detail the authors’ experiences in conducting the needs assessment and designing the pedagogical interventions aimed at
increasing students’ understanding around patient/visitor-perpetrated violence and best-practice prevention and mitigation strategies. Such
interventions recognized the existing typology of workplace violence and integrated conceptual models applied to violence prevention. As such,
they served as an effective approach to prepare future nurses to recognize and respond to one of the more well-documented occupational hazards
facing health care workers today.
Needs Assessment. The needs assessment involved self-administration of an anonymous, brief (<5 minute) survey of pre-licensure students. The
survey tool was used in a completed CDC/NIOSH R01 (Pompeii et al., 2016; Pompeii et al., 2015; Schoenfisch et al., 2015) and edited to reflect the
target population. The definition of violence included physical assault, physical threat, and verbal aggression. Participants were asked to provide
information about their demographics, work history, clinical requirements, and experiences of patient/visitor-perpetrated violence. An open-ended
question sought concerns and recommendations to improve occupational safety and health for nursing students. Data were collected in REDCap
(Harris et al., 2009), and statistical analyses were conducted in SAS (SAS Institute, 2014).
The survey was completed by 58 pre-licensure students. Most were female (84%), in their first year of the program (81%), and less than 35 years
old (88%). More than forty percent (43%) had some kind of paid work experience in a health care setting (e.g., as a nursing assistant), and nearly all
(98%) had experience in the clinical setting as part of their curriculum requirements. Overall, 28% of pre-licensure students experienced at least
one episode of patient/visitor-perpetrated violence in the past 12 months as part of paid work in healthcare or during a nursing program clinical
experience. Half of these events (50%) were verbal in nature; the other half included a physical threat and/or physical assault. Over one-third (38%)
of pre-licensure students had thought of changing careers as a result of patient/visitor-perpetrated violence. WPV prevention training was
recommended by participants including: training with various occupational groups involved in responding to violent events (e.g., nursing, security),
de-escalation training, resiliency training, and simulation-based training.
Didactic Teaching. In the first-semester course “Health and Wellness Across the Lifespan,” a lecture was presented (n=142 students), covering the
topics of occupational safety and health (including WPV) among nurses, with attention paid to the epidemiology of the problem, key players (e.g.,
federal and state agencies, accrediting bodies, professional organizations), and current WPV prevention approaches.
Trigger Film and Immersion Simulation. Students attended a 10-minute pre-brief in which they met the involved faculty and content experts and
learned about the film and simulation process. Then, small groups of students (n=5-6/group) viewed the one-minute trigger film depicting a
patient-perpetrated violent event. The film was tailored to local needs and the student population by faculty and other content experts after
review of the literature and available materials from national and international organizations (e.g., Crisis Prevention Institute, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health). Immediately after viewing the film, a behavioral health expert facilitated an 8 to 10-minute debriefing period for
students to share their emotional response to the scenario. Students then transitioned to a 10-minute immersion simulation in which they were
confronted with an escalating situation including a (script-led) verbally aggressive hospitalized patient, played by a student volunteer; a second
student volunteer served as the caregiver. The simulation provided an opportunity to engage in de-escalating techniques and was followed by a 15-
minute small group debrief with content experts.
A pre-test and post-test was administered to evaluate changes in students’ knowledge related to WPV surrounding the trigger film and immersion
simulation. A majority of students “strongly agreed” that after participation they were able to “recognize behaviors of an escalating family member
or patient” (65%), “discuss how to maintain personal safety in an escalating situation (75%), and “identify aspects of the clinical environment they
may impact the safety of the workplace staff” (64%). Students conveyed general satisfaction with the addition of WPV content into their course
work, with emphasis on its conduct in a simulated, safe environment and the inclusion of content experts. They also offered suggestions on how to
improve the trigger film/simulation.
Details surrounding the needs assessment, content development, implementation of the intervention, pre-/post-test results, and lessons learned
will be shared during the presentation. Conference attendees also will be invited to engage in a discussion about implementing this strategy in their
own academic settings as a way to prepare students for future clinical practice. Materials will be made available to conference attendees upon
request.
References
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook 1: The cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
Çelebioğlu, A., Akpinar, R. B., Küçükoğlu, S., & Engin, R. (2010). Violence experienced by Turkish nursing students in clinical settings: Their emotions
and behaviors. Nurse Education Today, 30(7), 687-691.
Ferns, T., & Meerabeau, L. (2008). Verbal abuse experienced by nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 61(4), 436-444.
Gomaa, A. E., Tapp, L. C., Luckhaupt, S. E., Vanoli, K., Sarmiento, R. F., Raudabaugh, W. M., ...Sprigg, S. M. (2014). Occupational traumatic injuries
among workers in health care facilities—United States, 2012–2014. Health Care, 2012.
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven
methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of biomedical informatics, 42(2), 377-381.
Hayden, J.K., Smiley, R.A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P.R. (2014). The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal,
randomized, controlled study, replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), S4-
S64.
Hinchberger, P. A. (2009). Violence against female student nurses in the workplace. Paper presented at the Nursing forum.
Magnavita, N., & Heponiemi, T. (2011). Workplace violence against nursing students and nurses: an Italian experience. Journal of Nursing
Scholarship, 43(2), 203-210.
Molloy, M. A., Sabol, V. K., Silva, S. G., & Guimond, M. E. (2016). Using trigger films as a bariatric sensitivity intervention: Improving nursing
students’ attitudes and beliefs about caring for obese Patients. Nurse Educator, 41(1), 19-24.
NACNEP. (2007). National Advisory Council on Nurse Education and Practice. Violence against nurses: an assessment of the causes and impacts of
violence in nursing education and practice. Fifth annual report to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the US
Congress. Available at: https://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/bhpradvisory/nacnep/Reports/fifthreport.pdf.
Pompeii, L., Dement, J., Schoenfisch, A., Lavery, A., Souder, M., Smith, C., & Lipscomb, H. (2013). Perpetrator, worker and workplace characteristics
associated with patient and visitor perpetrated violence (Type II) on hospital workers: a review of the literature and existing occupational injury
data. Journal of Safety Research, 44, 57-64.
Pompeii, L.A., Schoenfisch, A.L., Lipscomb, H.J., Dement, J.M., Smith, C.D., & Conway, S.H. (2016). Hospital workers bypass traditional occupational
injury reporting systems when reporting patient and visitor perpetrated (type II) violence. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 59(10), 853-865.
Pompeii, L.A., Schoenfisch, A.L., Lipscomb, H.J., Dement, J.M., Smith, C.D., & Upadhyaya, M. (2015). Physical assault, physical threat, and verbal
abuse perpetrated against hospital workers by patients or visitors in six US hospitals. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 58(11), 1194-1204.
SAS Institute. (2014). SAS 9.4: SAS Institute.
Schoenfisch, A. L., Pompeii, L. A., Lipscomb, H. J., Smith, C. D., Upadhyaya, M., & Dement, J. M. (2015). An urgent need to understand and address
the safety and well‐being of hospital “sitters”. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 58(12), 1278-1287.
Contact
[email protected]
Virtual Interprofessional Simulation: Design, Delivery, and Impact
Heidi C. Sanborn, MSN, RN, CNE, USA
Teri L. Kennedy, PhD, MSW, LCSW, ACSW, FNAP, USA
Karen J. Saewert, PhD, RN, CPHQ, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Background/Rationale: Simulation-based training (SBT) is a powerful and well-established practice of experiential learning that
facilitates the acquisition of interprofessional knowledge, skills, and attitudes and fosters the development of critical thinking skills
at the individual- and team-based levels (Paige Barbee, Brown, & Rojas, 2015). These skills are foundational to interprofessional
education (IPE) and practice (Jeffries, Swoboda, & Akintade, 2015), and represent a leading focus for nurse faculty as they
incorporate new teaching and learning strategies to prepare the future nursing workforce to deliver safe, quality, and patient-
centered care (Institute of Medicine, 2011). Creative alternatives are needed to traditional face-to-face teaching and learning when
time, distance, course schedules, and other constraints serve as barriers to engaging nursing and health professions students in true
experiential IPE learning. The use of virtual reality software as a platform for simulation is one example of an effective vehicle to
deliver clinical case studies that foster experiential learning (Verkuyl et al., 2017) and clinical decision-making (Foronda, Hudson, &
Budhathoki, 2017).
Teaching with the use of virtual reality simulation provides new opportunities to promote development of real-world knowledge, skills, and
attitudes with a broad audience of learners (Leggette, et al., 2012) in a non-threatening learning environment without risk to patients (Paige et al,
2015). A review of studies evaluating education through the Second Life™ platform for simulations suggests effective transferability of theoretical
knowledge from the classroom into practice (Irwin & Coutts, 2015). Virtual simulation assists learners to translate course content into real-world
scenarios while promoting role socialization (Anderson, 2013). This orientation to the roles and responsibilities of interprofessional care providers
is one of four core competencies for effective interprofessional practice (Interprofessional Education Collaborative, 2016). Further, the use of a
Second Life™ virtual simulation may positively impact learner attitudes about team-based practice, which is an important focus for the
improvement of care delivery in the real world (Caylor, Aebersold, Lapham, & Carlson, 2015).
Utilizing a virtual simulation platform, such as Second Life®, provides nurse educators with an innovative, evidence-based teaching and learning
tool for bringing together students from diverse health professions to collaboratively practice the delivery of safe, quality, patient-centered, and
team-based care.
Method/Methodology: A palliative care conference scenario was developed for online simulation delivery using the Second Life® virtual world
platform integrated with an online learning management system and scheduling application. With faculty performing in the patient role, students
led a care conference intended to assist the patient in making end-of-life care decisions based on a new diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment plan.
The virtual simulation included: preparatory learning material and technology tutorials, a scheduled simulation event for groups of 6-8 students
representing at least three of the four health professions programs, and a guided asynchronous debrief discussion forum. The debrief discussion
featured self-assessment of demonstrated interprofessional skills and evaluation of interprofessional competencies essential to collaboration.
A mixed method exploratory evaluation design was used to examine student outcomes associated with the piloted virtual simulation learning
module. A non-random purposive sampling approach was used (n = 31). Quantitative data were collected using the Norris et al. (2015) five subscale
(Teamwork, Roles, and Responsibilities; Patient Centeredness; Interprofessional Biases; Diversity & Ethics; Community-Centeredness)
Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS) to assess attitudes related to interprofessional core competencies pre- and post- implementation.
Qualitative data were collected using a post-simulation survey.
Results/Outcomes: A Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed to analyze pre- and post- implementation survey data. Results indicated that
post-test ranks were significantly (significance level .05) higher than pre-test ranks for two Teamwork, Roles, and Responsibilities subscale items:
thinking positively about other health care professionals (z = -2.333, p < .020) and necessity for health care trainees to learn together (z = -2.321, p
< .020).
Thematic analysis was performed on the qualitative data. Findings support simulation-based training (SBT) as an effective vehicle to provide
students with an opportunity to practice interprofessional teamwork. Collaboration and communication were cited as the most valuable outcomes
of the learning experience.
Conclusions: Second Life® provided a creative and effective alternative to traditional face-to-face teaching and learning. Students emphasized the
impact of the learning experience on both their willingness to work as a team and commitment to encouraging collaboration between professions.
Students anticipated these new values as most likely to positively influence their future practice. While some Second Life® functionality
improvements are needed, the availability and cost of the software provides a tool for virtual interprofessional simulations that can be feasibly
implemented. Translating evidence from virtual interprofessional simulations advances evidence-based teaching practice in palliative care.
References
Anderson, J. K. (2013). Avatar-assisted case studies. Nurse Educator, 38(3), 106-109. doi:10.1097/NNE.0b013e31828dc260
Caylor, S., Aebersold, M., Lapham, J., & Carlson, E. (2015). The use of virtual simulation and a modified TeamSTEPPS™ training for multiprofessional
education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(3), 163-171. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.12.003
Foronda, C. L., Hudson, K. W., & Budhathoki, C. (2017). Use of virtual simulation to impact nursing students' cognitive and affective knowledge of
evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(2), 168-170. doi:10.1111/wvn.12207
Institute of Medicine. (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
doi:10.17226/12956
Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 Update. Washington, DC:
Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Retrieved from: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/IPEC-2016-Updated-Core-
Competencies-Report.pdf
Irwin, P., & Coutts, R. (2015). A systematic review of the experience of using Second Life in the education of undergraduate nurses. Journal of
Nursing Education, 54(10), 572-577. doi:10.3928/01484834-20150916-05
Jeffries, P. R., Swoboda, S. M., & Akintade, B. (2015). Teaching and learning using simulations. In D. Billings & J. Halstead (Eds.). Teaching in nursing:
A guide for faculty (5th ed., pp. 304-323). St Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Leggette, H. R., Witt, C., Dooley, K. E., Rutherford, T., Murphrey, T. P., Doerfert, D., & Edgar, L. D. (2012). Experiential learning using Second Life®: A
content analysis of student reflective writing. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(3), 124-136. doi:10.5032/jae.2012.03124
Norris, J., Lassche, M., Joan, C., Eaton, J., Guo, J., Pett, M., & Blumenthal, D. (2015). The development and validation of the Interprofessional
Attitudes Scale: Assessing the interprofessional attitudes of students in the health professions. Academic Medicine, 90(10), 1394-1400.
doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000764
Paige, J.T., Garbee, D.D, Brown, K.M., & Rojas, J.D. (2015, August). Using simulation in interprofessional education. Surgical clinics of North America,
95(4), 751-766. [NEW]
Verkuyl, M., Hughes, M., Tsui, J., Betts, L., St-Amant, O., & Lapam, J. L. (2017). Virtual gaming simulation in nursing education: A focus group study.
The Journal of Nursing Education, 56(5), 274-280. doi:10.3928/01484834-20170421-04
Contact
[email protected]
Dedicated Education Units and Traditional Units: A Comparison of Learning Outcomes
Deborah A. Raines, PhD, EdS, RN, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Designing a quality clinical learning experience for undergraduate nursing students is challenging. Reports by the Carnegie
Foundation, Institute of Medicine (IOM) and Robert Woods Johnson Foundation call for nurse leaders to improve how nurses are
prepared and educated by reducing the gap between classroom and clinical teaching. In addition, the IOM’s Future of Nursing report
encourages collaboration among organizations to better prepare nurses to deliver high-quality care.
The Dedicated Education (DEU) Model of nursing practice education is one strategy to bridge the gap between classroom and clinical teaching and
to enrich the quality of students’ learning opportunities.
A DEU model changes the traditional role of the faculty and the unit staff in their provision of clinical education to students. In a traditional model,
a school of nursing faculty member has primary responsibility for a group of 8 to 12 students, and each student is assigned to specific care delivery
activities by the faculty member who also supervises the delivery of care. The involvement of unit-based staff in a student’s provision of nursing
varies based on the relationships established by the individual faculty member. In some settings unit-based staff may have limited awareness of
students’ clinical expectations, their designated learning objectives, or their prior knowledge. In a DEU, each nursing student is paired with a unit
based nurse for the duration of the clinical rotation. The student and the nurse care for an assignment of patients together, with the student
assuming increasing responsibility over time.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate student confidence in performing nursing role responsibilities and to measure learning of specific nursing
skills performed during a clinical learning experience.
This was a quasi-experimental study using a pre-test/post-test survey design. Students are randomly assigned to a clinical setting by a coordinator.
Students completed a survey to measure level of comfort and skill performance before and after the clinical rotation. A total of 96 students, 48 in a
DEU and 48 in a traditional unit, completed both surveys. The survey included the Casey-Fink Nursing Student Transition Survey and 15 Likert scale
items focused on self-perceived comfort in performing specific nursing procedures, specific to the clinical course objectives. Two item collect data
on the participant’s prior work experience in health care and their desire to work in this setting after graduation.
The analysis examined the magnitude of the change in level of comfort and skill performance before and after the clinical experience. The data
revealed that students in the DEU performed a greater number of skills, reported a higher level of comfort and confidence in skill performance and
had a greater magnitude of change in pre and post clinical scores on the Casey-Fink Student Transition Survey.
This study provides a beginning body of evidence that the DEU is a positive factor in student learning in the clinical area. Future studies need to
examine the impact of DEU experiences on the students’ transition to new RN employee in the practice organizations.
References
Benner, P., Sutphen, M, Leonard, V. & Day, L (2010). Educating Nurses: A Call for Radical Transformation. The Carnegie Foundation for the
Advancement of Teaching, Stanford, CA.
Dapremont J, Lee S. (2013). Partnering to educate: dedicated education units. Nurse Education Practice, 13(5): 335-337
Goldman TR. (2014). Innovation in clinical nursing education: Retooling the old model for a 21st-century workforce. Charting Nursing’s Future, 23 1-
8 http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2014/rwjf415763 Retrieved June 11, 2017.
Hunt DA, Milani MF, Wilson S. (2015). Dedicated education units: An innovative model for clinical education. American Nurse Today, 10 (5)
https://www.americannursetoday.com/dedicated-education-units-innovative-model-clinical-education/ Retrieved June 11, 2017
Institute of Medicine. (2010a). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, D.C. National Academies Press.
Jeffries PR, Rose L, Belcher A E, Dang D, Fava Hochuli J, Fleischmann D, … Walrath JA. (2012). A clinical academic practice partnership: A clinical
education redesign. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29 (3). 128-136.
Raines, D A (2016). A Dedicated Education Unit for Maternal–Newborn Nursing Clinical Education. Nursing for Women's Health, 20 (1) 20-27.
Smyer T, Gatlin T, Tan R, Tejada M, & Feng D. (2015). Academic Outcome Measures of a Dedicated Education Unit Over Time: Help or Hinder?
Nurse Educator, 40 (6) 294–297. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000176.
Contact
[email protected]
The Blending of Art and Science With Live Actors in Psychiatric Simulation
Lisette Dorfman, PhD, USA
Justine Anne Taddeo, EdD, RN, USA
Kim Mcgaughan, MSN, USA
Abstract
At the heart of the nursing profession is the ability to demonstrate professionalism, to be therapeutic in one’s communication, the
ability to communicate caring behaviors in verbal and non-verbal interactions and the ability to provide safe, high quality care to
patients. Quite often nursing students in a psychiatric hospital setting have minimal exposure to patients as often these patients are
in team meetings, groups and individual sessions with their therapist. Subsequently, the exposure to the various psychiatric
disorders, the accompanying symptoms and the ability to practice therapeutic communication is limited.
To compound the problem, there are limited psychiatric settings for students to obtain their clinical experience due to the closure of psychiatric
institutions over the years and the increased competition with other nursing schools for limited clinical placements. Additionally, patient safety
initiatives at acute facilities have reduced the number of nursing students permitted on a patient unit at one time which creates fewer educational
opportunities (Hayden, Smiley, Alexander, Kardong-Edgren & Jeffries, 2014).
To meet curriculum objectives, live actors are frequently used as patients in simulation (Keltner, Grant, McLernon, 2011). Live actors have also
been used in response to the growing number of patients with a psychiatric diagnosis being treated on medical surgical floors at Birmingham VA
Medical Center. The US Department of Veterans Affairs Nursing Academy (VANA) in a joint effort between the Birmingham VA Medical Center and
the UAB School of Nursing, developed mental health simulation videos with live actors. Among the top 10 diagnoses treated on the medical
surgical floors, three are related to mental health (i.e. posttraumatic stress disorder, substance abuse, schizophrenia) (Keltner, Grant, McLernon,
2011).
According to Webster (2011), patients with mental illness are often unable to clearly express their needs due to their illness or barriers related
stigma. Furthermore, student anxiety may create additional challenges that impact the development of the therapeutic relationship. Although
communication is not the only focus of patient-centered care, it provides a strong foundation for the provision of care that recognizes and includes
the patient as a full partner in his or her care. The possession of effective communication and continuous assessment of one’s own communication
techniques is essential. The nursing student who does not possess these skills will be challenged with eliciting patient values and collaborating with
the patient to plan and provide quality care.
Incorporating actors as psychiatric patients is useful because nursing students have an opportunity to improve their skills in a safe and
nonthreatening environment. This teaching strategy represents an opportunity for immersive, interactive and reflective simulation experiences to
enhance nurses’ clinical practice (Keltner, Grant, McLernon, 2013). Although the literature contains ample examples of simulations used to teach
psychomotor skills, studies involving the use of live actors to teach therapeutic communication is limited (Webster, 2013).
Purpose: To meet specific learning objectives in a baccalaureate nursing curriculum, a five week psychiatric experiential experience was provided
to the nursing students in a simulated apartment. The aim was to identify the lived experience of nursing students experience with live actors.
Second, to identify if skills learned in simulation are transferred to students’ capstone hospital experience (120 hours clinical with a hospital
preceptor). Third, to determine the effectiveness of this nontraditional teaching strategy.
Objectives: Participants will be able to:
1. Understand the sequential approach to the development of live actors in psychiatric simulation.
2. Identify how to institute evidenced based changes in a baccalaureate nursing curriculum.
3. Understand how to incorporate simulation with live actors in the psychiatric clinical component of the curriculum.
Design and Method: This IRB approved study was conceptually orientated in Hildegard Peplau’s theory of Interpersonal Relations. Using a
qualitative design, seven senior nursing students from a traditional baccalaureate program, were asked to transition from a detached observer to
an involved performer in a simulated experiential setting. The students were asked to complete an anonymous, open-ended questionnaire after
their simulation experience and again after their post capstone experience. Seven textual responses were analyzed. An adaptation of Colaizzi’s
(1978) method of data analysis was used to extract and describe themes.
Findings: Four thematic categories that emerged from the data included: “Change in Expectations” “Improved Therapeutic Communication”,
“Strengthened Skills” and “Recommended for All”. Samples from the thematic analysis are the following: “Simulation has taught me how to provide
care on such a different level”, “Allowed me to communicate with confidence and empathy” and “Perhaps it would be great experience if nursing
students are able to have both experiences; the clinical setting and the experiential learning with live actors. There should be a lab or a class
devoted to therapeutic communication perhaps at the start of the nursing program.” This thematic analysis provided insight into a contemporary
experiential experience for senior nursing students in a baccalaureate accredited nursing program.
Conclusions: The results from this research study provide an increased understanding of nursing students’ perceptions of this specific educational
strategy; live actors in simulation. The students found their overall experience to be positive. Specifically, first, the interviewer having the ability to
call a “time out” during an interview to request feedback from peers and faculty. Second, peers could also call a “time out” to assist the interviewer
who might have not have inquired about essential information during the interview. Third, students had an opportunity to practice restraint and
seclusion documentation which is often not permitted in the hospital setting. Fourth, students were able to conduct an environmental rounds in an
apartment constructed specifically for the purpose of conducting simulation with live actors. Lastly, students reflected on their experiential
experience in weekly reflection papers with an underline focus to increase their level of self-awareness about their thoughts, emotions and
behaviors in simulation.
The faculty found this educational strategy to exceed expectations. The results of this research study has assisted to improve upon the experiential
experience for future nursing students at the College. Nursing students entering the Fall 2017 academic semester will all have one day of
simulation with live actors along with four weeks of clinical in a hospital setting. Additionally, there is a proposal to move the nursing psychiatric
course from the last semester of senior year to the first semester of Junior year. This course was recommended earlier as study participants
identified a need to improve their therapeutic communication skills as well as interviewing skills earlier in the nursing curriculum.
Clinical Relevance: Results of this research study provide an evidence based determination with regard to a contemporary and alternative form of
learning to the traditional clinical setting. This intensive experiential experience addresses the following QSEN competencies: patient centered care,
team work and collaboration, quality improvement and safety. Live actors in psych simulation creates a safe environment for nursing students to
improve upon their communication skills with patients. This is critical as therapeutic communication is an essential ingredient to improved patient
outcomes.
The results have also changed nursing education’s practicum requirement for psychiatry and have the potential to change other specialties like
palliative care. Palliative care is a sensitive area that presents its own unique challenges with regard to end of life care.
The blending of art and science with live actors in simulation holds great promise for nursing as a profession whether locally or internationally. In
addition to the college level, live actors in simulation can be incorporated on a nursing graduate level as well as the orientation of a newly hired
registered nurses in hospitals.
References
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological
alternatives for psychology (pp. 48-71). New York: Plenum.
Hayden, J.K., Smiley, R.A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P.R. (2014). The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A Longitudinal,
Randomized, Controlled Study Replacing Clinical Hours with Simulation in Prelicensure Nursing Education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), 1-64.
Keltner, N. L., Grant. J. S., & McLernon, D. (2011). Use of Actors as Standardized Psychiatric Patients. Facilitating Success in Simulation Experiences.
Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 49, 35-40.
Marriner Tomey, A. & Raile Alligood, M. (2010). Nursing Theorists and Their Work (7th Edition). St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
Webster, D. (2013). Promoting Therapeutic Communication and Patient Centered Care Using Standardized Patients. Journal of Education, 52, 645-
648.
Contact
[email protected]
Undergraduate Student Nurses' Perceptions of Art Therapy in Mental Health Settings
Robyn Rice, PhD, MSN, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Background: In today’s fast paced world of healthcare service delivery learning effective communication skills are imperative for student nurses.
These skills and techniques are emphasized within mental health courses as student nurse interactions are viewed as key interventions to foster
patient coping, stabilization, and recovery. However, patients with mental illness are not an easy population to communicate with as related to
their stress levels and disease processes. This situation is magnified for student nurses who are still learning ways to dialogue with mental health
patients and possibly being afraid of saying the wrong thing and further upsetting the patient. The purpose of this study was to explore the
perceptions of undergraduate (baccalaureate) student nurses regarding the use of art therapy to promote a therapeutic relationship and
communication with mental health patients. A review of the literature revealed a lack of research on this topic.
Method: This was a qualitative study using principles of thematic analysis following the process of using focus group interviews for analysis. In this
study art therapy is defined as coloring or drawing. Art therapy was rendered in each clinical setting in the form of crayons and paper or coloring
books. In some settings student nurses initiated the art therapy while in other settings it was conducted under the direction of an art therapist who
primarily provided suggestions for content. The content of the drawings were not included in this analysis. Student nurses and mental health
patients actively participated in coloring together on a one-to-one basis in an open, observed area such as in the dining room or in a group setting;
all in a locked and secured clinical unit.
Results: Major themes found in the study included: student nurses’ initial experiences with mental health patients, student nurses’ observations of
mental health patients, and student nurses’ and mental health patients’ responses to art therapy. Of significance, student nurses experienced a
sense of professional growth with communication skills when using art therapy with mental health patients. Additionally, students reported that
art therapy provided mental health patients with a sense of empowerment and improved self-esteem; a trusting relationship was established.
Conclusions: The intentional use of art therapy should be integrated into undergraduate nursing education. Further research should be conducted
to determine if art therapy is useful with students in clinical settings other than that of mental health. In addition, innovations using art therapy in
nursing education and clinical practice should be studied.
References
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 77-101.
Kamberelis, G. & Dimitriadis, G. (2011). Focus groups: Contingent articulations of pedagogy, politics, and inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.),
The sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 545-562). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Krueger, R.A. (2006). Analyzing focus group interviews. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing, 33(5), 478-481).
Rice, R., Hunter, J., Spies, M. & Cooley, T. (2017) Undergraduate student nurses’ perceptions of art therapy in mental health settings. JNE (pub date
Sept-Oct).
Savett, L. (2011). The sounds of silence: Exploring lessons about silence, listening, and presence. Creative Nursing, 17(4), 168-173. 10.1891/1078-
4535.17.4.168
Contact
[email protected]
Enhancing Asynchronous RN to BSN Online Instructor-Learner Engagement Using Video-Recorded
Assignment Directions:A Descriptive Study
Lela Hobby, DNP, MSN, PHNA-BC, RNC, USA
Jill Van Der Like, DNP, MSN, RNC, USA
Abstract
Online instructors who convey a personable, enthusiastic class presence promote student engagement for learning (Foronda, 2014).
Teaching strategies that use technology are especially important in asynchronous online programs (Quality Matters Standards, 2014)
where access to course content must be deliverable 24-hours a day. In this descriptive study, instructor-to-student interactions are
assessed before and after four (4) narrated video assignment directions are embedded in an online RN to BSN course.
Leaners enjoy the flexibility and accessibility of the online environment (Parsh, 2016). Asynchronous online courses are designed so learners do not
need to be present at a particular time for 'class lectures' Time zones do not impact an online course's availability. Yet, returning RN-to-BSN
learners, many new to the online environment, feel anxious and disconnected from their peers and instructor (Button, 2014) while sitting alone
with a computer screen. Many have self-doubt that their assignment understanding aligns with the instructor’s expectation (Fisher, 2014).
Technology is available today to increase personalized instructor presence in fully online asynchronous RN to BSN courses (Fisher, 2014).
Specifically in this study, Camtasia © video software was used to produce four short (< 10-minute) instructor-narrated videos introducing
assignment directions. The learner can view these screen-capture videos limitlessly, which is especially important to those who learn visually and
benefit from repetition (Holland, 2013).
This study looked at 131 learners’ questions in two (2) terms of a Public Health Nursing course. Instructor-narrated videos were not used in one
course, and were embedded in the second course. Results show that the proportion of learners’ course questions was reduced by 34% with video
intervention (Z value = 3.8; p < 0.001).
Qualitative data reveal that videos give learners a more personable connection to the instructor by seeing and hearing the instructor on screen-
capture videos. Learners, overall, approve of the 24-hour access that videos provide to demonstrate website navigations and assignment examples.
Conclusion: This study indicates that using technology for instructor-narrated videos promotes instructor-to-learner engagement. Access to both
written and video directions provides learners multi-modal instruction, as evidenced by the decrease in course questions. Around-the-clock video
accessibility is especially important for RN learners everywhere who have unpredictable work schedules. Another important, unforeseen benefit
was that instructor time was freed-up for other constructive course interactions.
References
Button, D., Harrington, A., & Belan, I. (2014). E-learning & information communication technology (ICT) in nursing education: A review of the
literature. Nurse Education Today,34(10), 13111-1323. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.002
Fisher, C., & Rietschel, M. J. (2014). Chapter 8 Interacting and Communication Online. In C. A. O'Neil (Ed.), Developing Online Learning Environments
in Nursing Education, 3rd Edition. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Foronda, C., PhD, RN, CNE. (2014). November/December). Spice up teaching online! Nurse Educator,39(6), 265-266. doi:
10.1097/NNE.0000000000000081
Holland, A., Smith, F., McCrossan, G., Adamson, E., Watt, S., & Penny, K. (2013). Online video in clinical skills education of oral medication
administration for undergraduate student nurses: A mixed methods, prospective cohort study. Nurse Education Today,33, 663-670.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.01.006
Parsh, B., EdD RN CNS, & Gardner, P., MSN RN. (2016). Teaching a great online class: Six tips for nurse educators. Nursing2016,46(2), 24-25. doi:
10.1097/01.NURSE.0000476247.24341.79
QM Quality Matters: Higher Education Program: Design Standards for Online and Blended Courses. (2014). 5th Edition. Accessed:
https://www.qualitymatters.org/rubric
Contact
[email protected]
The Use of Asynchronous Audio Feedback With Online RN-BSN Students
Julie E. London, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Purpose/Aim: Adding audio feedback to courses in an online asynchronous RN-BSN program improves students’ perceptions of
social, cognitive, and teaching presences, and thus, positively effects students’ academic satisfaction, achievement, and retention.
Background/Rationale: Research tells us that technological pedagogies such as chat, e-mail, and video conferencing contribute to increasing
student engagement and instructor -learner interaction. Students report increased learning, social knowledge, and inquiry when technological
pedagogies were used in the online course room, such as audio feedback (West, Thomas & Borup, 2017; Carruthers, McCaron, Bolan, Devine,
McMahon- Beattie & Burns, 2015; Moore, 1990).
Theoretical Framework: Audio feedback in asynchronous online courses is intended to allow students to experience a more personalized instructor
interaction. In Moore’s (1990) seminal work on the Theory of Transactional Distance suggests that transactional distance exists on a continuum and
any educational event is considered to have some aspect of distance. Increases in transactional distance increases learner autonomy, which is the
responsibility of students to learn on their own; decrease in distance brings the learner closer to their teachers, the content, and other learners.
Moore (1990) further stipulated that an active learning environment should include concepts of learner-instructor, learner- content, and learner-
learner interactions. Together all are essential to an online sense of community. The conceptual framework, Community of Inquiry introduced in
2000 by Garrison, Anderson, and Archer dovetails nicely with Moore’s theory of online sense of community. Both concur that the use of audio
rather than text online feedback may be effective in decreasing transactional distance, therefore, promoting teaching, social, and cognitive
presence as perceived by online learners (Garrison, 2011).
Method/Description: A quasi-experimental posttest web survey design with a comparison group was used. The participants were a nonrandom
convenience sample. The participants in the target population for this study were admitted to the university’s RN-BSN program and were enrolled
in one of the eight sections of nursing courses selected for the study (N=139). Four sections received audio feedback and 4 sections received text
only feedback in their discussion boards. The study used the Community of Inquiry survey comprised of 43 Likert style questions (Garrison, 2011).
Subsections addressed teaching presence, social presence, and cognitive presence. Data were collected at week 14 of a 16-week semester.
Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographic data and SPSS to analyze the survey responses.
Results/Outcomes: Results from this quantitative, quasi-experimental study were analyzed using multiple regression. The sample size was large
enough to achieve a moderate effect size. The data were normally distributed. The data also met all five standards for multiple regression linearity.
Survey data were collected from 43 questions using a 5-point Likert scale. The data indicated that out of the three presences, teaching presence
was the most significant predictor of student satisfaction and thus retention. Although, both positive and negative significant effects occurred, the
data did not fully support any of the three alternative hypotheses. However, correlational statistics indicated a positive indicator for using audio
within the online course in general for introductions and feedback on assignments but not in discussion boards.
Conclusion: The data reflected inverse results for teaching presence; both cognitive and social presences demonstrated insufficient evidence to
predict a relationship to audio and text discussion board feedback. RN-BSN students perceived an increase in teaching presence when text
feedback occurred in the online discussion board. Conversely, the perception of teaching presence decreased when the teacher used audio
feedback in the online discussion board. This correlated with the findings of Hew and Wing (2013) on the use of audio versus text feedback in
discussion boards.
Application/Recommendation for Nursing Education: Advancing technology, for example, using audio feedback to communicate with online
students, was intended to allow learners to experience more personalized interactions with instructors. Perceptions of online communities reveal
that students feel teaching presence is an important aspect of online learning, as they want available faculty that are willing to provide timely
feedback, listen to concerns, and guide them through learning tasks (Richardson, Besser, Koehler, Lim, & Strait, 2016). Although the study
described in this manuscript did not empirically support any of the proposed hypotheses, it did provide significant correlations which indicate that
different uses of audio feedback in the online course room should be explored, such as audio introductions and assignment feedback and even the
use of video (Thomas et al.,2017). The opportunity for further questioning on the constructs of the Community of Inquiry theoretical framework,
audio feedback and online nursing education is also recommended.
References
Carruthers, C., McCarron, B., Bolan, P., Devine, A., McMahon-Beattie, U., & Burns, A. (2015). "I like the sound of that"--An evaluation of providing
audio feedback via the virtual learning environment for summative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,40(3), 352-370. doi:
10.1080/02602938.2014.917145
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model.
The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105
Garrison, D.R. (2011). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Audio-based versus text-based asynchronous online discussion: Two case studies. Instructional Science, 41(2),
365-380. doi: 10.1007/s11251-012-9232-7
Moore, M. G. (1990). The three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2),1-7. doi:10.1080/08923648909665952
Richardson, J. C., Besser, E., Koehler, A., Lim, J., & Strait, M. (2017). Instructors' perceptions of instructor presence in online learning environments.
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning,17(4), 82-104. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/
contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1108404
Thomas, R. A., West, R. E., & Borup, J. (2017). An analysis of instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments.
The Internet and Higher Education,3361-73. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.003
Contact
[email protected]
Improving Nursing Student Empathy With Experiential Learning
Jessica Delano Holden, DNP, RN-BC, USA
Abstract
Background: Nursing is both a science and an art. The quality of the relationship between the nurse and the patient is essential to
the healing process. The ability of the nurse to connect with the patient in a way that is meaningful to the patient will determine the
patient outcome. Empathy serves as a foundational nursing principle inherent in the nurse’s ability to form those relationships from
which to care for patients. Empathy is the ability of a person to understand what another is experiencing from the receiver’s
perspective and the ability to communicate that understanding to the receiver. There exists, however, a need to examine methods
for instilling empathic tendency in nursing students. In nursing, empathy is believed to be a necessary component to the nurse-
patient relationship.
Objective: Evidence shows a decline in empathy specifically noted over time in nursing students who are preparing to graduate and enter the
workforce. The practice focused question for this project asked whether an experiential learning toolkit for development of nursing empathy can
improve sophomore nursing student empathy as measured via the Jefferson Scale of Empathy. This project was guided by evidence that
demonstrated a continued need to measure the effect of activities aimed at fostering empathy in nursing students. The literature provides a sound
basis for further exploration into the effectiveness of a toolkit to promote empathy in nurses. Evidence demonstrates that empathy is inherent to
the role of the nurse and essential to patient centered care. Additionally, evidence suggests that empathic behaviors can be taught and that
experiential learning may be an effective intervention. However, it is unclear at this time what the most effective method of experiential learning
may be or at what point in nursing curriculum it should be employed
Method: The design for this project was a one group pre and post evaluation of a current healthcare program experiential learning toolkit. The
project utilized a toolkit learning activity including case study and discussion in an undergraduate academic setting to assess whether empathy can
be fostered in nursing students. Empathy levels were measured pre and post intervention utilizing the Jefferson Scale of Empathy.
Results: Analysis demonstrated a 3% increase in overall Jefferson score post intervention indicating an increase in empathic tendency. Of the 20
items on the scale, most scores increased pre to post survey. The findings are suggestive that experiential learning may be a viable strategy to
increase empathy in nursing students. This project holds significant value for social change with the potential to identify effective methods to
develop student nurses’ expression of empathy.
References
Barry, M. & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient centered care. New England Journal of Medicine,366(9),
780-781. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283
Bernabeo, E., & Holmboe, E. (2013). Patients, providers, and systems need to acquire a specific set of competencies to achieve truly patient
centered care. Health Affairs,32(2), 250-258. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1120
Brunero, S., Lamont, S., & Coates, M. (2010). A review of empathy education in nursing. Nursing Inquiry,17(1), 65-74. doi:10.1111/j.1440-
1800.2009.00482.x
Cunico, L., Sartori, R., Marognolli, O., & Meneghini, A. (2012). Developing empathy in nursing students: A cohort longitudinal study. Journal of
Clinical Nursing,21(13-14), 2016-2025. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04105.x
Del Canale, S., Louis, D. Z., Maio, V., Wang, X., Rossi, G., Hojat, M., & Gonnella, J. S. (2012). The relationship between physician empathy and
disease complications: An empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Academic Medicine,87(9), 1243-
1249. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826102ad
Faust, C. (2002). Orlando's deliberative nursing process theory: a practice application in an extended care facility. Journal of Gerontological
Nursing,28(7), 14. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-20020701-05
Fields, S., Mahan, P., Tillman, P., Harris, J., Maxwell, K., & Hojat, M. (2011). Measuring empathy in healthcare profession students using the
Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: health provider–student version. Journal of Interprofessional Care,25(4), 287-293.
doi:10.3109/13561820.2011.566648
Grilo, A., Santos, M., Rita, J., & Gomes, A. (2014.) Assessment of nursing students and nurses' orientation towards patient centeredness. Nurse
Education Today34(1), 35-39. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.022
Hojat, M., Bianco, J. A., Mann, D., Massello, D., & Calabrese, L. H. (2015). Overlap between empathy, teamwork and integrative approach to patient
care. Medical Teacher,37(8), 755-758. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.971722
Hojat, M., Louis, D., Maio, V., & Gonnella, J. (2013). Editorial: Empathy and health care quality. American Journal of Medical Quality, 28(1), 6-7. doi:
10.1177/1062860612464731
Hojat, M., Louis, D., Markham, F., Wender, R., Rabinowitz, C., & Gonnella, J. (2011). Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients.
Academic Medicine,86(3), 359-364. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086fe1
Hojat, M., Louis, D., Maxwell, K., Markham, F., Wender, R., & Gonnella, J. (2010). Patient perceptions of physician empathy, satisfaction with
physician, interpersonal trust, and compliance. International Journal of Medical Education,1, 83. Doi: 10.5116/jime.4d00.b701
Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001).Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st
century. National Academy Press. http://www.nationalacademies.org
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lelorain, S., Brédart, A., Dolbeault, S., & Sultan, S. (2012). A systematic review of the associations between empathy measures and patient
outcomes in cancer care. Psycho‐Oncology,21(12), 1255-1264. doi:10.1002/pon.2115
Lovan, S. R., & Wilson, M. (2012). Comparing empathy levels in students at the beginning and end of a nursing program. International Journal for
Human Caring,16(3), 28. Retrieved from: http://internationaljournalforhumancaring.org/?code=iahc-site
McKenna, L., Boyle, M., Brown, T., Williams, B., Molloy, A., Lewis, B., & Molloy, L. (2012). Levels of empathy in undergraduate nursing students.
International Journal of Nursing Practice,18(3), 246-251. doi:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02035.x
MONASH University (n.d.) Office for Learning and Teaching Empathy Team: Empathy toolkit. Retrieved from:
http://med.monash.edu.au/med/cehpp/altc-empathy/index.html
Newell, S., & Jordan, Z. (2015). The patient experience of patient‐centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative
systematic review protocol. JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports,13(1), 76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072
Ouzouni, C., & Nakakis, K. (2012). An exploratory study of student nurses’ empathy. Health Science Journal,6(3), 534-552. Retrieved from:
http://www.hsj.gr/medicine/an-exploratory-study-of-student-nurses-empathy.pdf
Sleath, B., Carpenter, D. M., Slota, C., Williams, D., Tudor, G., Yeatts, K., ... & Ayala, G. X. (2012). Communication during pediatric asthma visits and
self-reported asthma medication adherence. Pediatrics,130(4), 627-633. Retrieved from:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/130/4/627.full.pdf
Smith, M. C. & Parker, M. E. (2015). Nursing theories and nursing practice. (4th ed.) Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company
Stein-Parbury, J. (2013). Patient and person: Interpersonal skills in nursing. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Thomas Jefferson University (n.d.) The Jefferson scales for the assessment of education and patient outcomes. Retrieved from:
http://www.jefferson.edu/university/skmc/research/research-medical- education/TheJeffersonScales.html
Tobiano, G., Marshall, A., Bucknall, T., & Chaboyer, W. (2015). Patient participation in nursing care on medical wards: an integrative review.
International Journal of Nursing Studies,52(6), 1107-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.010
Ward, J. (2016). The Empathy Enigma: Does It Still Exist? Comparison of Empathy Using Students and Standardized Actors. Nurse educator,41(3),
134-138. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000236
Ward, J., Cody, J., Schaal, M., & Hojat, M. (2012). The empathy enigma: an empirical study of decline in empathy among undergraduate nursing
students. Journal of Professional Nursing,28(1), 34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.10.007
Williams, B., Brown, T., Boyle, M., & Dousek, S. (2013). Psychometric testing of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy Health Profession Students' version
with Australian paramedic students. Nursing & Health Sciences,15(1), 45-50. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00719.x
Williams, B., Brown, T., McKenna, L., Palermo, C., Morgan, P., Nestel, D., ... & Wright, C. (2015). Student empathy levels across 12 medical and
health professions: an interventional study. Journal of Compassionate Health Care, 2(1), 4. doi:10.1186/s40639-015-0013-4
Yang, C., Hargreaves, W., & Bostrom, A. (2014). Association of empathy of nursing staff with reduction of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric
inpatient care. Psychiatric Services, 65(2), 251-254. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200531
Contact
[email protected]
A Community Engaged Learning Pedagogical Approach to Population Health and Primary Prevention
Tracy J. Perron, PhD, RN, CNE, CSN, USA
Tami L. Jakubowski, DNP, CPNP-PC, CSN, USA
Abstract
With the shift in healthcare to primary care, health promotion and population health, it is important for nursing students to engage
in a variety of learning venues. The need for collaborative practices in the community is an ever increasing necessity. Community
Engagement is a signature experience for the students at The College of New Jersey. This opportunity allows students to apply their
additional knowledge and enhanced skills to address a community need, as well as develop their own civic skills and clinical skills
through an experiential learning opportunity. Projects are guided by the learning objectives of the course as well as the needs of the
community. Students in their sophomore year spend 25 hours participating in community engagement in a variety of setting building
on their core content in nursing health assessment, nutrition and lifespan classes. This type of community based learning allows the
students to care for populations in the community setting that they would typically see in the outpatient settings with chronic
conditions, develop patient communication skills with various age groups, practice health promotion and disease prevention and
increase their awareness for the relevant health issues of rural and underserved communities.
Students projects varied, some students chose to organize a healthy walking club and/or a gym buddy for students with differing abilities on the
college campus. Another group was engaged in the local public school system where childhood obesity and Type II diabetes is prevalent, in a
program known as SNACK (Smart Nutrition and Collaboration for Kids). The students participated in recess get up and move activities twice a week.
Students also went to TASK (the Trenton Area Soup Kitchen) where they served meals, taught health lessons, performed screenings, and assisted in
teaching various topics to students who were earning their GED. Undergraduates provided breastfeeding and parenting classes to teen mothers at
Project Teach, a comprehensive educational program which provides pregnant and parenting adolescents with the skills needed to create a
positive life for themselves and their children. Finally the students participated with Dawn of Hope Project whose program is designed to provide
practical instruction to girls in critical areas such as character development, building self-esteem, embracing their identity, life skills, health and
wellness. The students provided educational information sessions on various topics related to health and wellness as well as self-esteem.
Students as well as faculty benefit from this type of educational/clinical setting. Students acquire the ability to apply what they have learned in “the
real world”, improved social responsibility and citizenship skills, connections with professionals and community members allow for learning and
career opportunities and improve assessment and clinical skills. Faculty benefit from new opportunities for research and publication via new
relationships between faculty and community partners and it allows networking opportunities with engaged faculty in other disciplines or
institutions as well as other healthcare professionals.
References
Clark, L. (2017). Implementing an institution-wide community-engaged learning program: The leadership and management challenge. In Learning
Through Community Engagement (pp. 133-151). Springer Singapore.
Hesson, G., Moskal, A. C. M., & Shephard, K. (2014). Using visual analytics to explore Community Engaged Learning and Teaching at the University
of Otago. In Rhetoric and reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology–Conference proceedings (pp. 500-504). Dunedin, NZ: ASCILITE.
Jameson, J. K., Clayton, P. H., Jaeger, A. J., & Bringle, R. G. (2012). Investigating Faculty Learning in the Context of Community-Engaged Scholarship.
Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning,18(2), 40-55.
Lloyd Michener, M., Cook, J., Ahmed, S. M., Yonas, M. A., Coyne-Beasley, T., & Aguilar-Gaxiola, S. (2012). Aligning the goals of community-engaged
research: why and how academic health centers can successfully engage with communities to improve health. Academic Medicine,87(3), 285.
Mikesell, L., Bromley, E., & Khodyakov, D. (2013). Ethical community-engaged research: a literature review. American journal of public
health,103(12), e7-e14.
Rubin, C. L., Martinez, L. S., Chu, J., Hacker, K., Brugge, D., Pirie, A., ... & Leslie, L. K. (2012). Community-engaged pedagogy: A strengths-based
approach to involving diverse stakeholders in research partnerships. Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and
action,6(4), 481.
Contact
[email protected]
The Effect of Faculty Training and Personality Characteristics on High Stakes Assessment of Simulation
Performance
Ann Holland, PhD, RN, USA
Deborah Bambini, PhD, WHNP-BC, CNE, CHSE, USA
Linda Blazovich, DNP, RN, CNE, USA
Vicki Schug, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Jone Tiffany, DNP, RN, CNE, CHSE, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Evaluating clinical competencies of nursing students is essential as faculty prepare them for the healthcare practice environment in
which quality, safety, and patient outcomes are of highest priority. As greater emphasis is placed on high stakes assessment of
clinical performance in nursing education, the training of faculty evaluators to assure good intra and inter-rater reliability of
simulation performance is paramount. Assessment methods must be consistent with the NLN Fair Testing Guidelines for Nursing
Education (NLN, 2012). Central to these guidelines is the definition of “fair”; that “all test-takers are given comparable opportunities
to demonstrate what they know and are able to do in the learning area being tested” (p.3). Well-designed research studies that
investigate all the factors needed for development and implementation of fair and reliable high stakes testing are necessary.
This presentation describes the results of a nationwide, experimental study conducted to test the effectiveness of a training intervention in
producing intra and inter-rater reliability among nursing faculty evaluating student performance in simulation. The study is an extension of the NLN
Project to Explore the Use of Simulation for High Stakes (Rizzolo, Kardong-Edgren, Oermann, & Jeffries, 2015) which evaluated the process and
feasibility of using manikin-based high fidelity simulation for high stakes assessment in pre-licensure RN programs. The NLN project resulted in
more questions than answers about simulation design, implementation, and performance assessment. Two questions that emerged from the NLN
project were: (a) are there specific qualities associated with faculty who are comfortable and consistent in the evaluator role? and (b) what are the
best methods to train raters? (Rizzolo, 2014).
These questions guided the research question for this experimental study: What is the effect of (a) a training intervention and (b) faculty
personality characteristics on faculty ability to achieve intra/inter-rater reliability when evaluating student performance during high-stakes
simulation? With NLN approval, the student performance videos and the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI) used in the NLN
project were used in the experimental study. The CCEI is a performance evaluation instrument that measures 23 skills related to assessment,
communication, clinical judgment, and patient safety. The instrument was found to be a valid and reliable instrument to assess clinical competency
in pre-licensure students in simulation in preparation for the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) National Simulation Study
(Hayden, Smiley, Alexander, Kardong-Edgren, & Jeffries, 2014). The CCEI tool used in this study specifies minimum performance behaviors that are
unique to the simulation scenario enacted in the student performance videos. This tool also asked participants to specify if they thought the
students performing the simulation were competent. Participants in the study evaluated student performances expected to demonstrate end-of-
program level of competence.
Consistent with the NLN project, high-stakes assessment was defined as “an evaluation process associated with a simulation activity that has a
major academic, educational, or employment consequence . . .” (Meakim et al., 2013, p. S7). Clinical competence was defined as the ability to
“observe and gather information, recognize deviations from expected patterns, prioritize data, make sense of data, maintain a professional
response demeanor, provide clear communication, execute effective interventions, perform nursing skills correctly, evaluate nursing interventions,
and self-reflect for performance improvement within a culture of safety” (Hayden, Jeffries, Kardong-Edgren & Spector, 2011).
A total of 102 faculty were recruited from nursing programs across the country. Inclusion criteria included full-time teaching status in an accredited
associate degree or baccalaureate degree nursing program, experience with simulation, experience with clinical competency evaluation in clinical
settings or simulation settings, education in evaluation and measurement, and proficiency with web-based technologies. Participants consented to
complete study activities requiring up to 20 hours over a 2 ½ month period. Participants were randomized into control and intervention groups.
The study sought to build, through a training intervention, a shared mental model of end-of-program competence in a video recorded simulation
performance among participants that had no prior relationship or shared curriculum, but that shared, in theory, a perspective on the clinical
knowledge, skills, and abilities needed by students at the end of a pre-licensure RN academic program. The research team designed a basic
orientation and an advanced evaluator training module that incorporated most elements of the training methodology established by Adamson and
Kardong-Edgren (2012) to evaluate inter-rater reliability for the CCEI and used in the NCSBN’s national simulation study (Hayden et al., 2014). The
intervention group received the basic orientation and the advanced evaluator training, while control group participants received only the basic
orientation. After receiving the basic orientation or the training intervention, all participants proceeded to the experimental procedure in which
student performance videos were evaluated using the CCEI. All participants completed the Clifton StrengthsFinder Inventory, a web-based
assessment of normal personality from the perspective of positive psychology (Rath, 2007), and completed a survey that elicited their perspectives
on the influence of their personality characteristics on student assessment. A total of 75 participants fulfilled all study activities, with equal
numbers remaining in the control and intervention groups.
Descriptive and reliability quantitative analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of training on inter/intra rater reliability in the scoring of the
CCEI. Qualitative analysis was conducted to identify themes reflecting the influence of faculty personality characteristics on performance
assessment. Participant decisions about student competency underwent qualitative analysis to identify performance factors that influenced
evaluation decisions.
The results of this study inform best practices in high stakes assessment using simulation. Descriptive and statistical findings will be presented that
extend the results of the original NLN project and suggest principles and methods for training faculty evaluators. The qualitative findings suggest it
is important for nursing faculty to be mindful of their strengths when evaluating student performance. The results of this study suggest important
implications for the design, implementation, and facilitation of simulation when used for high-stakes assessment. Ongoing research about the
multiple factors that influence high-stakes assessment of clinical simulation using experimental and multi-method designs is recommended.
References
Adamson, K. A. & Kardong-Edgren, S. (2012). A method and resources for assessing the reliability of simulation evaluation instruments. Nursing
Education Perspectives, 33(5), 334-339. http://www.nln.org
Hayden, J.K., Jeffries, P.J., Kardong-Edgren, S., Spector, N.(2009). The National simulation study: evaluating simulated clinical experiences in nursing
education. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing.(Unpublished research protocol).
Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P. R. (2014). Supplement: The NCSBN national simulation study: A
longitudinal, randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation,
5(2), C1-S64.
Meakim C., Boese T., Decker S., Franklin, A.E., Gloe, D., Lioce L., . . . Borum J.C. (2013). Standards of best practice: simulation standard I:
terminology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 9(6S): S3-S11. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.001
National League for Nursing (NLN). (2012). Fair testing guidelines for nursing education. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-
source/about/nln-vision-series-%28position-statements%29/nlnvision_4.pdf?sfvrsn=4
Rath, T. (2007). Strength finders 2.0. New York, NY: Gallup Press
Rizzolo, M. A. (2014). Developing and using simulation for high-stakes assessment. In P. R. Jeffries, (Ed.), Clinical simulations in nursing education:
Advanced concepts, trends, and opportunities. (p. 113-121). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Rizzolo, M. A., Kardong-Edgren, S., Oermann, M. H, & Jeffries, P. R. (2015). The National League for Nursing project to explore the use of simulation
for high-stakes assessment: Process, outcomes, and recommendations. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(5), 299-303. doi:10.5480/15-1639
Contact
[email protected]
A Shared Mental Model for High-Stakes Simulation Evaluation in Nursing Education
Vicki Schug, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Ann Holland, PhD, RN, USA
Deborah Bambini, PhD, WHNP-BC, CNE, CHSE, USA
Linda Blazovich, DNP, RN, CNE, USA
Dorie Fritz, MSN, USA
Abstract
Nurse educators provide subjective evaluations of student performance in high stakes simulation. Faculty may use nurse educator
standards, best practices, rubrics, and their experience to guide these evaluation decisions. The International Nursing Association for
Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL), provides nurse educators with Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Participant
Evaluation (2016). Required elements for high-stakes evaluation using simulation-based experiences include “trained, nonbiased
objective raters or evaluators,” “using a comprehensive tool,” and having more than one rater for each participant (INACSL, 2016, p.
S27). However, there is variability in the definition of terminology, criteria, and levels of training in using evaluation tools (Kardong-
Edgren, Oermann, Rizzolo, & Odom-Maryon, 2017; Oermann, Yarbrough, Saewert, Ard, & Charasika, 2009). Consequently, subjective
evaluation of student performance in high stakes simulation, by its definition, is open to bias and the possibility of being unfair.
One strategy to facilitate valid, evidenced-based methods of evaluation is for faculty to develop a shared mental model (SMM). McComb and
Simpson (2014) describe a SMM as “individually held knowledge structures that help team members function collaboratively in their environments
and are comprised of the attributes of content, similarity, accuracy and dynamics” (p. 1485). A shared mental model would enable faculty to have a
more consistent and standard approach for student assessment (Boulet, Jeffries, Hatala, Korndorffer, Feinstein, & Roche, 2011; Kardong-Edgren, et
al., 2017), which should lead to more fair and equitable evaluation of student performance. Kardong-Edgren et al. (2017) examine the challenges of
inter- and intrarater reliability and developing a SMM and stress the importance of utilizing faculty with “similar values and professional judgment
who are willing and capable of basing their judgments on the set criteria” (p.66). They also state “Our findings demonstrate how important this
preparatory work is when embarking on legally defensible high-stakes testing,” (Kardong-Edgren et al.,2017, p. 67).
This presentation describes the strategies employed to build a shared mental model for faculty evaluators in simulation performance assessment. A
nationwide, experimental study was conducted to test the effectiveness of a training intervention in enhancing intra and inter-rater reliability
among nursing faculty evaluating student performance in simulation. The study was an extension of the NLN Project to Explore the Use of
Simulation for High Stakes (Rizzolo, Kardong-Edgren, Oermann, & Jeffries, 2015) which evaluated the process and feasibility of using manikin-based
high fidelity simulation for high stakes assessment in pre-licensure RN programs. A total of 102 nursing faculty recruited from nursing programs
across the nation were randomized into control and intervention groups. Participants used the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI)
to evaluate student performance in the video recorded simulations. Following implementation of a pilot study to refine the full study procedures,
researchers formulated shared mental model agreements to more clearly interpret the CCEI criteria and incorporated this information in the
training intervention.
This presentation will also share findings from a qualitative analysis conducted to identify themes relative to the elements identified by study
participants to support their decision of student competency in the video-recorded high stakes simulation performance. Participants were asked
“Do you consider this student competent to practice nursing?” with ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response options. Two key elements in the student performance
that supported this conclusion were then listed. The definition of clinical competency for purposes of the study was the ability to “observe and
gather information, recognize deviations from expected patterns, prioritize data, make sense of data, maintain a professional response demeanor,
provide clear communication, execute effective interventions, perform nursing skills correctly, evaluate nursing interventions, and self-reflect for
performance improvement within a culture of safety” (Hayden, Jeffries, Kardong-Edgren, & Spector, 2011). Performance behaviors that reflect
student competency can further enhance the shared mental model in simulation evaluation.
The National League for Nursing (NLN) calls for “fair and equitable testing in relation to high-stakes evaluation” (NLN, 2012, p. 1). As nurse
educators strive to provide nursing students with an education that follows national standards, best practice guidelines, and prepares nursing
students to practice in their roles as professional nurses, nurse educators must make decisions about student performance. When a SMM is
formulated in the context of subjective evaluation, faculty have a clearer understanding of definitions and criteria, and can apply that SMM
towards student evaluations in a fair and equitable manner that allows for more consistent evaluations (Kardong-Edgren et al., 2017). The benefit
to students is that faculty are more consistent in subjective evaluations. Benefits to faculty are that a shared mental model enhances reliability in
evaluation and may provide defensible evaluations in high-stakes situations if students grieve the evaluation or decide to pursue legal action. This
study produced important conclusions about building a shared mental model which informs best practices in high stakes assessment.
References
Boulet, J. R., Jeffries, P. R., Hatala, R. A., Korndorffer, J. J., Feinstein, D. M., & Roche, J. P. (2011). Research regarding methods of assessing learning
outcomes. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 6, S48-S51. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822237d0
Hayden, J.K., Jeffries, P.J., Kardong-Edgren, S., Spector, N. (2009). The National simulation study: evaluating simulated clinical experiences in
nursing education. Chicago, IL: National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (Unpublished research protocol).
5(2), C1-S64.
International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning. (2016). INACSL standards of best practice: Simulation SM participant evaluation.
INACSL Standards Committee. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, S26-S29. http://dx.doi.org/10/1016.j.ecns.2016.09.009
Kardong-Edgren, S., Oermann, M. H., Rizzolo, M. A., & Odom-Maryon, T. (2017). Establishing inter- and intrarater reliability for high-stakes testing
using simulation. Nursing Education Perspectives, 38(2), 63-68. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000114
McComb, S., & Simpson, V. (2014). The concept of shared mental models in healthcare collaboration. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(7), 1479-
1488. doi:10.1111/jan.12307
National League for Nursing. (2012). Fair testing guidelines for nursing education. Available from http://www.nln.org/fairtestguidelines
Oermann, M. H., Yarbrough, S. S., Saewert, K. J., Ard, N. & Charasika, M. (2009). Clinical evaluation and grading practices in schools of nursing:
National survey findings part II. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(6), 352-357. Available from http://journals.lww.com
Rizzolo, M. A., Kardong-Edgren, S., Oermann, M. H, & Jeffries, P. R. (2015). The National League for Nursing project to explore the use of simulation
for high-stakes assessment: Process, outcomes, and recommendations. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(5), 299-303. doi:10.5480/15-1639
Contact
[email protected]
Effects of a Simulation Education Program on Faculty Members’ and Students’ Outcomes
Pelin Karaçay, PhD, Turkey
Hatice Kaya, PhD, Turkey
Abstract
Background: High-fidelity simulation (HFS) is a student-centered innovative teaching and learning strategy that allows nursing
students to gain experience without harming patients in a simulated environment that is very similar to clinical settings. Although
nursing education is based on both theory and practice, the latter is of considerable importance in nursing education. Nursing
students are expected to apply theoretical knowledge gathered during class to practice and transform this into behavior; however,
they experience difficulty in doing so. In addition, as a solution to the global nursing shortage, the number of students accepted into
nursing programs has increased in many countries, including Turkey; however, the number of educators available to guide students
individually in practice has decreased. Therefore, the acquisition of targeted skills prior to graduation has become more difficult for
nursing students. As in all types of education, educators are essential for the provision of successful learning experiences and serve
as facilitators and evaluators in HFS. The International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning published nine
standards for simulation, one of which is related to educators. According to these standards, facilitators play an important role in
simulation-based learning, should attend courses and receive education concerning simulation continuously, and study with
experienced mentors. While simulation laboratories have been designed and space has been provided for simulators, training for
educators is often overlooked. With the exception of training in simulator use provided by manikin vendors, no educational
programs have been established for nursing educators in Turkey. Therefore, this study was conducted to contribute to the
development of knowledge and skills regarding simulation strategies for faculty members using HFS, the effective implementation of
this strategy, and the nursing literature Specifically, the study aimed to examine the effects of a simulation education program (SEP)
on outcomes in nursing students and faculty members. The two research questions were as follows: (a) is the nursing SEP effective
in improving faculty members’ outcomes and (b) is the nursing SEP effective in improving students’ outcomes?
Materials and Methods: The aim of this research was to evaluate the outcomes of a simulation education program in faculty members and
students as a quasi-experimental, single group, pre-posttest design. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the institution with which the
first author was affiliated. The institution also granted permission for the use of classrooms and the simulation laboratory during simulation
training. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after they had received explanations regarding their responsibilities and the
aim, method, and duration of the study. Thirty faculty member who had access to a high-fidelity simulator, wanted to use simulation as a teaching
strategy was participated in to the simulation education program, and 249 volunteer students were included in the study. Data was collected by
using the “Determination of Educational Needs”, “Faculty Members’ Sociodemographic Characteristics”, “Knowledge Test for Faculty Members”,
“Faculty Members’ Self-Assessment”, “Students’ Sociodemographic Characteristics”, “Test of Students’ Knowledge Regarding Hypovolemic Shock”
and the “Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale”. Data was collected three times: before and after the simulation education
program and after the high-fidelity simulation with the student. The data analysis included descriptive statistics (means, standard deviations, and
frequencies), the Mann-Whitney U test, Friedman test, and Cochran’s Q test. Paired-samples t-tests were performed to analyze the variance for
some variables. The significance level was set at p < .05.
Results: Faculty members showed significant improvements in knowledge (p < .01) and self-assessment scores. In addition, students’ knowledge
scores increased following the simulation experience, and they reported high satisfaction and self-confidence levels.
Conclusions: The simulation education program was effective in improving faculty members’ and students’ outcomes. The study can be considered
to have contributed to the correct implementation of HFS with simulators. The findings indicate that SEPs should be implemented periodically by
experienced simulation facilitators and practical elements should be included in these programs to increase faculty members’ knowledge and skills
regarding simulation and to ensure efficient use of the simulators available in laboratories.
References
Boese, T., Cato, M. L., Gonzalez, L., Jones, A., Kennedy, K., Reese, C., ...Borum, J. (2013). Standards of best practice: Simulation standard V:
Facilitator. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9, S22–S25. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.010
Dowie, I., & Phillips, C., 2011. Supporting the lecturer to deliver high-fidelity simulation. Nursing Standard, 25(49), 35–40. doi:10.7748/ns.25.49.35.
s52 0.1097/CNQ.0b013e3181c8dfd4
Frank, B. (2013). Improving nurse faculty retention through a phased retirement process. Journal of Nursing Management, 21, 922–926.
doi:10.1111/jonm.12176
Kocaman, G., & Arslan Yürümezoğlu, H. (2015). Türkiye'de hemşirelik eğitiminin durum analizi: Sayılarla hemşirelik eğitimi (1996–2015) [Situation
analysis of nursing education in Turkey: Nursing education with numbers (1996–2015)]. Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 5, 255–262.
doi:10.5961/jhes.2015.127
Norman, J. (2012). Systematic review of the literature on simulation in nursing education. The ABNF Journal, 23, 24–28.
Contact
[email protected]
Role Modeling in Simulation
Ashleigh D. Woods, EdD, RN, CNE, USA
Betty Key, EdD, MSN, CCRN, USA
Brian Dickson, MSN, USA
Abstract
Over the last few years the use of simulation in the clinical laboratory setting in nursing school has become a standard teaching
strategy. Simulation provides a way to learn from mistakes without having devastating human consequences. Simulation in nursing
education provides a controlled, safe environment in which problem-based learning scenarios can be utilized to teach technical skills
as well as metacognitive skills. Some scenarios utilize low fidelity manikins, which are simply human body forms and have been used
for years to teach physical assessment and psychomotor skills. In more recent years High Fidelity Simulation (HFS) have been
integrated to teach cognitive skills along with technical skills to provide a more realistic clinical experience. HFS provides a tetherless,
wireless manikin that emulates many physiological functions such as the ability to feel pulses, fully articulated movement in the
wrists, elbows, knees, and ankles, pupils that react to light, chest rise and fall and comes with a variety of pre- programmed
scenarios. In addition, the instructor has the ability to program his or her own scenarios.
Role modeling occurs when someone demonstrates a skill or behavior that is then imitated by an observer. Role modeling is both an
effective teaching and learning strategy to demonstrate skills, and explain rationales and behaviors. Role modeling can also promote
patient safety by providing a visual demonstration of what could cause harm. Furthermore, role modeling provides inductive
learning because once the role modeled scenario has been presented, the student then has the opportunity to use critical thinking
skills to decide if the behaviors presented are appropriate or not and then reflect on what can be learned from the scenario. The
reflective learning opportunity allows students a time to analyze and discuss concepts learned. This usually occurs during the
debriefing. Debriefing is typically always held at the conclusion of a simulation.
This presentation will demonstrate the use of role modeling in simulation used in the classroom setting. In this simulation, the faculty used role
modeling to demonstrate effective communication and assessment skills in the initial assessment of a patient admitted to a medical-surgical unit.
The simulation was recorded with faculty demonstrating both effective and ineffective communication in two separate recordings. The ineffective
recording was shown to the students first, followed by a time of classroom reflection and discussion. Next, the effective communication simulation
was shown to students, also followed by a time of reflection and discussion as well as debriefing. The students displayed more interaction in class
through the reflective discussion after viewing the simulation scenarios. HPS has been touted as a solution to improving nursing education,
standardizing clinical experiences, and providing clinical time when clinical spaces are limited. Since HPS is utilized in nursing curriculums across the
country, nurse educators should continue to examine ways to incorporate innovative teaching and learning strategies to further promote student
engagement.
References
Aebersold, M., & Tschannen, D. (2013). Simulation in nursing practice: The impact on patient care. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18(2), 6.
Aronson, B., Glynn, B., & Squires, T. (2013). Effectiveness of role-modeling intervention on student nurse simulation competency. Clinical
Simulation in Nursing, 9(4), e121-e126.
Dunnington, R. M. (2014), The nature of reality represented in high fidelity human patient simulation: Philosophical perspectives and implications
for nursing education. Nursing Philosophy, 15: 14–22. doi:10.1111/nup.12034
Gavriel, J. (2015). Tips on inductive learning and building resilience. Education for Primary Care, 26(5), 332-334.
Johnson, E.A., Lasater, K., Hodson-Carltom, K., Siktberg, L., Sideras, S., & Dillard, N. (2012). Geriatrics in simulation: Role modeling and clinical
judgment effect. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(3), 176-180.
Myung-Nam, L., Kyung-Dong, N., & Hyeon-Young, K. (2017). Effects of simulation with problem-based learning program on metacognition, team
efficacy, and learning attitude in nursing students. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 35(3), 145-151.
Wayne, D., & Lotz, K. (2013). The simulated clinical environment as a platform for refining critical thinking in nursing students: A pilot program.
Nursing Education Research, 34(3), 163-166.
Contact
[email protected]
Strengthening Nursing Education Through Mobile Technology Integration Thus Promoting Technological
Competencyand Medication Error Reduction
Laly Joseph, DVM, DNP, CNE, RN-C, ARNP, ANP-BC, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this presentation is to educate nursing faculty to effectively integrate technology into their teaching
through mobile technology use thereby promoting technological competency, to provide students with classroom and clinical
experiences, to increase evidence-based practice and decrease medication errors by making relevant information available at the
point-of-care
Introduction: The practice environment for nurses has changed radically due to the advances in information technology and massive expansion of
knowledge in health care. Promoting technological competency is a priority in nursing which can be done by integrating the use of mobile
technology in the clinical setting and course work to better prepare graduate nurses for the current and future health care environment. Patient
safety is an important priority for nursing. Medication errors are a major cause of harm to patients and reducing medication errors is a major
concern in today’s technologically sophisticated healthcare environment. Nurses are the main professionals involved in administering medications
and administration is the part of the medication process with the least safeguards in place. Mobile technology, especially personal digital assistants
(PDAs) used by nursing students can provide access to information at the point of care to safely calculate medication dosages to reduce medication
errors thereby promoting technological competency.
Background/Significance: The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2005), the National League for Nursing (2008), and the Institute of
Medicine (2003), some of the major forces in professional health care and nursing education advocate the incorporation of technology in nursing
education (George et al., 2010). Technological competency is the skilled demonstration of intentional and authentic activities by nurses who
practice in environments requiring technological expertise. It supports current high-tech nursing practice by validating the dependency on nursing
on technologies in the management of health care (Locsin, 2005). Nurses are the bridge between the patient and technology. The nursing
curriculum and teaching strategies need to teach with and about technology to better inform health care interventions that improve health care
outcomes especially medication error reduction (NLN, 2015). IOM estimates that medication errors result in at least one death every day in the
United States and have stressed patient safety as a priority. They also conclude that it is not acceptable for patients to be harmed by the health
care system that is supposed to offer healing and comfort-a system that promises, ''First, do no harm.'' (IOM,1999). The National Coordinating
Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCCMERP) believes there is no acceptable incidence rate for medication errors and the
goal of every health care organization should be to continually improve systems to prevent harm to patients due to medication errors (NCCMERP,
2008). The IOM drew attention to the need for technology solutions that can make a difference in the ability of nurses to ensure safe, high-quality
patient care emphasizing the area of medication administration (McKesson, 2004). The American Association of College of Nursing (AACN)
recognized that technological advances are increasing opportunities to improve the quality of, and access to, nursing education (AACN, 2002).
Additionally, the Board of Governors of the National League for Nursing (NLN) in their position statement ''Transforming Nursing Education''
recommended nurse educators to effectively integrate technology into their teaching through the use of sustained, evidence-based practices,
distance learning, simulation and Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) to provide students with clinical experiences in diverse settings and to improve
care provided to patients (NLN, 2005). Technology solutions, especially PDA technology, can make a difference in the ability of nurses to provide
safe patient care in the area of medication administration, especially medication calculations by having access to the latest healthcare information.
Health care professionals require access to ever-expanding knowledge, and PDAs or other handheld computer devices can serve as valuable tools
for education, information storage and retrieval, and clinical practice (George et al., 2010). Using PDA technology at the point of care; by a bedside,
in the community, in the office, or in a patients home can reduce errors and promote patient safety. It provides a mobile platform whereby the
nursing student or nurse can download various types of software and access information quickly that supports evidence-based nursing practice
(Beard et al., 2011).
Methodology / Data Analysis: An evidence-based pilot study using Rosswurm and Larrabee's change model was conducted at a private School of
Nursing in Northern NJ. The stages are similar to the nursing process and are as follows: assess, link, synthesize, design, implement and evaluate,
and integrate and maintain (Rosswurm and Larrabee, 1999).
A convenience sample of twenty undergraduate junior nursing students enrolled in the medical-surgical nursing course was given a case study with
an attached medication administration record. Students were instructed to use the PDA with nursing software to complete the questions and
calculate drug dosages in the case study. The comparison group was the same twenty students who use the PDAs. They were required to complete
the same case study using textbooks and a calculator after 4 months. The two outcomes measured were accuracy and speed. Accuracy was
determined from the 10 questions asked in the case study. Each correct answer received a score of l, and each incorrect score was scored as 0, with
a maximum score of 10. The speed was the time each student took to complete the case study, the maximum time allotted was 15 minutes. The
groups are similar, since it was the same group used for the PDA exercise and textbook exercise to complete the case study. The t-test, a non-
parametric test was used. The mean accuracy, mean speed, the standard deviation (SD), the t value, the degrees of freedom (df) and the level of
significance (p value) were calculated.
The mean accuracy for the PDA group was 9.90 and 9.65 for the textbook group, df was 38 and p = 0.06. The level of difference between the means
for the two groups was not statistically significant. However, the mean accuracy was higher by 0.25 in the PDA group compared to the textbook
group. The mean speed was 7.25 minutes for the PDA group and 12.0 minutes for the text book group, df was 38 and p = 0.0001. The level of
difference between the means for the two groups was statistically significant. This shows that the group that used the PDA worked at a faster
speed than the group that used the textbooks. The standard deviation for the two groups revealed that the participants' responses were similar to
the mean. Post evaluation survey indicated that the students found the PDAs easy to use and perceived their use as beneficial to their learning in
the clinical area.
Findings/Implications: Based on the results of the study, the integration of PDA technology was built into the baccalaureate nursing program at the
University making it a requirement from the first clinical course. This supported the mission of the University to be a leader in providing high quality
technological and professional nursing education. After selection of the PDA and nursing software, financing, and IT support, students and clinical
faculty were provided education and training on the PDA use thereby promoting technological competency. Students use the PDA in the clinical
setting to access information that supports nursing practice thus reducing errors, improving care, and promoting patient safety by increasing
accuracy and efficiency. Medication administration is a critical step, and the nursing student or nurse administering that medication must be able
to perform this procedure safely. Medication administration is also performed frequently, which increases the chances for error, since it involves
calculations. When medication information is available in a PDA, it can be retrieved easily at the point of care, thereby reducing the incidence of
medication errors. It is an important technologic competency that will improve the quality of nursing practice and therefore should be included in
the nursing curricula. These outcomes are in concert with IOM's goal to provide safe medication administration at the point of care.
Discussion: The use of mobile technology in the nursing curriculum would introduce students to the habit of using technology for safe practice thus
promoting technological competency. The rapid influx of mobile technology into nursing practice also dictates that nurse educators train current
and future nursing students to deliver new strategies of care. This also provides an opportunity for nurse researchers to indulge in evidence-based
research to confirm the effectiveness of these strategies in providing optimum health care (Melynk, 2012). This technology will eventually help the
practicing nurse to spend more time on patient care and have access to the most current information. Health care employers are also expecting
graduate nurses to have the latest information technology skills. Providing nursing care in a highly technological, connected work environment is
the future of nursing practice. Mobile devices like the PDA can open a door of lifetime learning, as students are capable of moving from one
learning environment to another (Franklin, et al, 2007).
References
Beard, K.V., Greenfield, S., Morote, E., & Walter, R. (2011). Mobile Technology: Lessons learned along the way. Nurse Educator. May-June
36(3):103-106.
Franklin, T., Sexton, C., Lu, Y. & Ma, H. (2007). PDAs in teacher education: a case study examining mobile technology integration. Journal of
Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1): 39-58.
George, L.E., Davidson, L.J., Serapiglia, C.P., Barla, S., & Thotakura, A. (2010). Technology in nursing education: A study of PDA use by students.
Journal of Professional Nursing. Nov-Dec 26(6): 371-376.
Locsin, R. C. (2005). Technological competency as caring in nursing: A model for practice. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.
McKesson, (2004, February). White paper: Patient safety and nursing: Transforming the work environment with nursing.
Melnyk, B. M. (2012). The role of technology in enhancing evidence-based practice, education, heath care quality, and patient outcomes: a call for
randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 9(2): 63-65.
National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention. (2008). Statement on medication error rates. Retrieved November
15, 2016 from http://www.nccmerp.org/statement-medication-error-rates
Rosswurm, M. A. & Larrabee, J. H. (1999). A model for change to evidence-based practice. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31(4), 317-322.
The American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2002). AACN White Paper: Distance technology in nursing education. Assessing a new frontier.
Retrieved September 12, 2016, from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Publications/positions/whitepaper.htm
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) (1999). To Err is Human: Building a Safe Health System.Washington, D.C. National Academy of Sciences.
The National League for Nursing (2005). Position Statement: Transforming Nursing Education. Retrieved October 10, 2016, from
http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/PositionStatements/transforming052005.pdf.
The National League for Nursing (2015). Position Statement: Transforming Nursing Education. Leading the call to reform. A vision for the changing
faculty role: Preparing students for the technological world of health care. Retrieved November 20, 2016, from
http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/PositionStatements/transforming052015.pdf
Contact
[email protected]
The Lived Experience of Making a Medication Administration Error in Nursing Practice
Seema Lall, PhD, USA
Abstract
Medication administration is an important task performed daily by nurses and is one of the key aspects of safe patient care. The
multiple and varied roles of nurses, complexity of workplace, chaotic and technical nature of the work environment may result in
cognitive overload that may overwhelm nurses, which may possibly lead to medication errors. All medication errors committed are
considered serious events but some may consequently be harmful to patients. Research indicates that when medication errors occur
the concern is usually for the patients involved in the incident. However, making a medication administration error has a lasting
effect on the nurse as well as the patient (Schelbred & Nord, 2007; Treiber & Jones, 2010).
This study examined what it was like to make a medication error for eight registered nurses through in-depth and focused face to face interview
using the descriptive phenomenological approach rooted in the philosophical tradition of Husserl. Two interviews were carried out with each
participant and the research data were generated from a total of sixteen interviews and field notes. The transcripts were analyzed using the seven-
step methodological guidelines developed by Colaizzi for data interpretation to understand the meaning of the nurses lived experiences of making
medication errors.
Five theme categories emerged: Immediate Impact: Psychological and Physical Reactions; Multiple Causes within Chaos: Cognitive Dimensions;
Embedded Challenges: Healthcare Setting; Organizational Culture: Within the Place/Within the Person; Dynamics of Reflection: Looking Forward.
The essential structure of the phenomenon of making a medication administration error included the realization that a profound experience had
happened to them. This resulted in physical and emotional upheavals, a threatened professional status, with low self-esteem and confidence. An
overwhelming workload, a stressful work environment and ill-treatment by peers were descriptions of the cause of the errors. Nurses did offer
ways to improve the system but felt their concerns were often not valued. Implications for nursing practice to improve patient outcomes, and for
nursing education, to radically change the teaching of medication administration were formulated.
References
Barnsteiner, J., & Disch, J. (2012). Just culture for nurses and nursing students. Nursing Clinics of North America, 47(3), 407-416.
Bates, D., Spell, N., Cullen, D., Burdick, E., Laird, N., & Peterson, L. (1997). The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 277, 307-311.
Buchini, S., & Quattrin, R. (2011). Avoidable interruptions during drug administration in an intensive rehabilitation ward: Improvement project.
Journal of Nursing Management, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01323.x
Classen, D., Pestotnik, S., Evans, R., Lloyd, J., & Burke, J. (1997). Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: Excess length of stay, extra costs, and
attributable mortality. Journal of American Medical Association, 277, 301-306.
Cousins, D., Dewsbury, C., Mathew, L., Nesbitt, I., & Warner, B. (2007). Safety in doses: Medication safety incidents in the NHS. National Patients
Safety Agency, London.
Institute of Medicine. (2000). To err is human: Building a safer healthcare system. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. (2007). Preventing medication errors. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
National Medicines Information Centre. (2001). NMIC bulletin on medication errors., 7(3) (1-4).
Schelbred, A., & Nord, R. (2007). Nurses’ experiences of drug administration. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 317-326.
Treiber, L. A., & Jones, J. H. (2010). Devastatingly human: An analysis of registered nurses’ medication error accounts. Qualitative Health Research,
20(10), 1327-1342.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. (2006). National patient safety goals. Retrieved from
http://www.jcaho.org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals/npsg
Joolaee, S., Hajibabaee, F., Peyrovi, H., Haghani, H., & Baharani, N. (2011). The relationship between incidence and report of medication errors and
working conditions. Clinical Issues, 37-44.
Rand Health. (2005). Assessment of the national patient safety initiative: Context and baseline evaluation report 1. Santa Monica, CA: Rand
Corporation.
Vogelsmeier, A., Scott-Cawiezell, J., Miller, B., & Griffith, S. (2010, October-December). Influencing Leadership Perceptions of Patient safety
Through Just Culture Training. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 25(4), 288-294.
Contact
[email protected]
Measuring Student Perceptions of Quality and Safety Competencies in Baccalaureate Education
Jennifer Bryer, PhD, RN CNE, USA
Virginia M. Peterson-Graziose, DNP, CNE, APRN-BC, RN, USA
Abstract
The Institute of Medicine (IOM, 1999, 2001) reported that tens of thousands of Americans die each year because of medical errors.
Current research indicates that number may be as high as 250,000 deaths per year (Makary & Daniel, 2016). The World Health
Organization (WHO, 2017) reported that unsafe medication practices and medication errors are a leading cause of avoidable harm in
healthcare systems globally. In response to these reports, the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) initiative was
developed to prepare future nurses with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) necessary to continuously improve the quality
and safety of healthcare systems (Barnsteiner et al, 2012, Sullivan, Hirst & Cronenwett, 2009). Nursing programs must ensure that
graduate competencies in quality and patient safety are sufficient to meet practice needs. These competencies should be integrated
into theoretical and experiential learning using active, student centered methodologies.
This study was designed to measure student perceptions of the extent to which they acquired the knowledge, skills and attitudes as well as self-
reported perceived importance and levels of preparedness associated with the QSEN competencies in their nursing program. It is the next logical
step to initial research investigating faculty perceptions of QSEN competency integration across nursing curricula (Bryer & Peterson Graziose,
2014). Moving forward from the faculty development phase of investigation, assessment of gaps in student learning is warranted, supporting the
need for additional inquiry regarding student perceptions of the QSEN competencies in nursing education.
Using a descriptive, cross-sectional design, a convenience sample of 73 nursing students from a suburban public college were surveyed using the
Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) Student Evaluation Survey tool (Sullivan, Hirst, & Cronenwett, 2009). Data were collected from
generic, advanced placement, and RN to BS students enrolled in a three-track baccalaureate nursing program. Survey percentages, mean scores,
and an ANOVA test were used to analyze study results to determine student perceived knowledge, preparation, and importance of QSEN
competencies in the nursing curriculum.
Study findings indicating students’ perception of the most frequently included QSEN competency items in the nursing curriculum correspond to
patient-centered care (90.3%). Items least frequently included in the curriculum corresponded to the quality improvement and evidence-based
practice competencies (12.5% and 12.3% respectively). Knowledge objectives were most frequently learned in the classroom setting (90.4%). The
overall mean of skill items was 3.2 (maximum score 4) indicating that students perceived they were somewhat prepared to very prepared to
perform specific actions or skills based on all six QSEN competencies. ANOVA results show statically significant differences between groups for the
patient-centered care (F(4.280) = 2, 70, p=.018), informatics (F(2.93) = 2,70, p=.021), teamwork and collaboration (F(2.516) 2, 70, p=.006, and
quality improvement (F(5.090), 2, 70, p=.009) competencies. Patient-centered care skills were rated most important for nurses to have in their first
year of practice (3.83) and skills in the quality improvement category were rated least important (3.53).
Results reveal an opportunity for faculty to enhance student learning of all quality and safety competencies, not only in the classroom but in the
clinical and laboratory settings as well. Overall, students perceived the QSEN competencies to be important and valuable to their professional
nursing practice however, gaps remain in student learning, particularly in quality improvement competency.
An assessment of faculty knowledge of current quality improvement practices may be necessary. Focusing faculty education on teaching strategies
that address this specific competency would be beneficial. Student participation in unit based quality improvement projects may narrow the gap in
knowledge, skills and attitudes regarding quality improvement. Faculty analysis identifying where in the curriculum quality improvement teaching
takes place and where it can be added may increase student perceptions of content in this competency area.
Implications for education include redesign of curricula emphasizing quality improvement and evidence-based practice competencies. Assessment
of faculty understanding of QSEN competencies may help assure that students graduate with the knowledge, skills and attitude to enter the
workforce prepared to provide safe, quality care.
References
Armstrong, G., & Barton, A. (2103). Fundamentally updating Fundamentals. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2(2), 82-87. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.006
Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., McGuinn, K., Chappell, K., Swartwout, E. (2012). Diffusing QSEN competencies across schools of nursing: The
AACN/RWJF faculty development institutes. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(2), 68-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.12.003
Bryer, J., & Peterson-Graziose, V. (2014). Integration of quality and safety competencies in undergraduate nursing education: A faculty
development approach. Teaching and Learning, 9(3), 130-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2014.04.004
Institute of Medicine. (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Makary., M. & Daniel, M., (2016). Medical error - the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ, 77(6), 325. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2139
Mennenga, H. Tschetter, L., Sanjaya, L. (2015). Student perceptions of quality and safety competencies. International Journal of Nursing Education
Scholarship, 12 (1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2015-0034
Pauly-O”Neill, S., Cooper, E., Prion, S., (2016). Student QSEN participation during an adult medical-surgical rotation. Nursing Education Perspectives,
37(3), 165-16.
Sullivan, D. T., Hirst, D., Cronenwett, L. (2009). Assessing quality and safety competencies of graduating prelicensure nursing students. Nursing
Outlook, 57(6), 323-331.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2009.08.004
World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Medication without harm: WHO’s third global patient safety challenge. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/patientsafety/medication-safety/en/
Contact
[email protected]
The 2017 National QSEN Faculty Assessment: Findings and Implications for Nursing Education
Gerry Altmiller, EdD, RN, APRN, ACNS-BC, USA
Gail Armstrong, PhD, DNP, ACNS-BC, CNE, USA
Abstract
The Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) national initiative which was started in 2005, has supported the adoption and
integration of updated quality and safety competencies in nursing education. The QSEN competencies identify the knowledge, skills,
and attitudes needed by nurses to meet the demands of the health care environment, emphasizing patient-centered care,
collaboration with other members of the health care team, evidence-based practice, continuous quality improvement, safety, and
the integrated use of informatics. Faculty needs regarding QSEN competency integration, and the degree to which QSEN
competencies are reflected in current nursing curricula, have not been assessed nationally until now. This presentation reports the
study findings of the 2017 National QSEN Faculty Survey and discusses implications for nurse educators and programs of nursing
education.
Done in partnership with the National League for Nursing (NLN), the aims of this national study were to assess: 1) whether QSEN competencies are
being taught in U.S. schools of nursing, 2) the degree of faculty development in schools where QSEN competencies are being taught, and 3) the
degree of integration into curricula where QSEN competencies are being taught. A 19 question instrument of mostly select all that apply items and
open text boxes for additional information, was distributed to NLN members over a 2 month period, resulting in 2037 participants.
Results indicate progress has been made in the last 12 years in the dissemination and adoption of the QSEN competencies, however significant
needs remain for faculty development and support. Faculty indicate that the QSEN competencies are being incorporated into nursing education to
some degree by many nurse educators; the degree to which varies greatly among programs, with a large number indicating the integration is
segmental and not throughout the curriculum. The competencies of patient-centered care, evidence-based practice, and safety were identified as
most evident in nursing curricula, while quality improvement and informatics have the lowest representation. Medical-surgical and nursing
fundamentals courses demonstrate more thorough integration while there is a clear need for increased integration of the competencies into
community-based care and nursing research. Resources identified by faculty included the QSEN website and learning materials from various
nursing organizations. Only a small number of faculty reported having received formal training about the QSEN competencies, while a large
percentage indicated they learned through self-study and other modalities. 133 participants did not know what QSEN is.
Future efforts will need to focus on supporting faculty to do this work by providing training, ideas, and strategies, and combining forces between
major nursing organizations to disseminate comprehensive resources and support to nurse educators in both academia and practice. It is essential
that deans and directors support this work, promoting formal faculty education in the QSEN competencies and time to devote to this work. Further
study is needed to determine if faculty understand and are teaching updated concepts that support the QSEN competencies.
References
1. Institute of Medicine. (2003). Health professions education: A bridge to quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
2. Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell, P., Sullivan, D. T., & Warren, J. (2007). Quality and safety education
for nurses. Nurs Outlook, 55(3), 122-131.
3. Smith, E. L., Cronenwett, L., & Sherwood, G. (2007). Current assessment of quality and safety education in nursing. Nurs Outlook, 55(3), 132-137.
4. Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., McGuinn, K., Chappell, K., & Swartwout, E. (2012). Diffusing QSEN competencies across schools of nursing:
The AACN/RWJF faculty development institutes. J Prof Nurs, 29(2), 68-74.
5. Disch, J., Barnsteiner, J., & McGuinn, K. (2013). Taking a “deep dive” on integrating QSEN content in San Francisco bay area schools of nursing.
Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(2), 75-81.
6. Bittner, N. P. & O’Connor, M. (2012). Focus on retention: Identifying barriers to nursing faculty satisfaction. Nurs Educ Perspect, 33(4), 251-254.
Contact
[email protected]
Endorsement and Use of Recommended Strategies for Implementing Service Learning in Schools of Nursing
Catherine Y. Read, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Service learning experiences (SLEs) have become increasingly common in nursing education as schools
strive to provide socially relevant curricula that improve students’ cultural competence and prepare them to confront and challenge
existing health disparities. Amerson (2014) reviewed research studies related to implementation of service learning and developed
recommendations for best practices. The purpose of the current study was to quantify the uptake of those recommendations in SLEs
offered in US nursing schools, and analyze the findings in relation to best practices.
Methods: The instrument for this exploratory, descriptive study was developed by the researcher and administered online using Qualtrics® after
approval by the university’s institutional review board. Participants were recruited through a survey link emailed to approximately 1600 deans or
directors of accredited US nursing schools, who were asked to forward it to faculty who oversee SLEs. Frequencies were tabulated using SPSS
(v.24).
Results: The sample consisted of 77 nursing faculty from 32 US states who provided complete data (58% of the 133 who opened the link).
Respondents were primarily female (97%), white (86%), and over the age of 50 (72%). Most faculty (75%) were affiliated with BSN programs and
accompanied the students to the SLE (47% for the entire time, 31% part of the time). Twenty-three percent of the SLEs were located outside of the
US with the majority of those being in the Caribbean, South America, or Central America; 55% were in local communities and 18% were within
commuting distance. Academic credit was conferred for 61% of the SLEs. For 55% of the SLEs, students incurred no cost, although some required
that students to pay for transportation (33%), meals (16%), lodging (12%) and/or a program fee (16%). The table summarizes selected
recommended practices (Amerson, 2014) and gives results for related survey items.
Recommended practice Selected survey results (% of total n=77)
Choice of location should be tailored to course -96% say it is extremely or somewhat important that the service provided by students be
content. coupled with course content.
-most student participants are enrolled in a required (73%) or elective (23%) course.
Preparation should include discussion of sociocultural -preparation includes experiences at home that give insight into host culture (42%).
aspects of the host community. -preparation topics include (to a great or moderate extent): host healthcare systems
(84%), health disparities (81%), cultural norms (80%), economic disparities (78%); cultural
humility (72%); stereotyping (75%); local customs/foods (70%); privilege (68%); racism
(69%); cultural arrogance/sense of superiority (67%); religious beliefs of hosts (55%);
poverty tourism (51%).
Experience should push students out of comfort zone; 94% say it is extremely or somewhat important that the experience take students out of
expect student anxiety and ambivalence about their their “comfort zone.”
own resources. -reflection sessions address: personal transformation or growth (95%), inequities in
resources and opportunities in the host community (95%).
Experiential learning, especially home visits, are the -activities onsite: nursing assessment or care of clients in homecare setting (48%); nursing
best way to understand real life in the host care of clients in a clinic-type setting (48%).
community and develop cultural competence.
Partnering with organizations in the host community -96% say it is extremely or somewhat important that efforts are made to build long-term,
sustains relationships and helps address their true sustainable partnerships that address the needs of the host community
needs. -69% say that the host community believes the service provided by the students
addresses the needs of the host community to a great extent.
-34% say that the planning phase includes asking members of the host community how
needs can best be served
Unstructured time promotes learning about culture -activities onsite: talk informally with people from the host community (70%);
and improves communication. interact/play with children (60%); share meals with people from host community (53%);
unstructured time for students (42%)
Students should teach people in the community and -students required to: develop some degree of foreign language competency (4%);
learn foreign language when necessary. complete teaching project for individuals and groups in the host community (70%)
Journaling/blogging/photography promote reflection -required assignment such as photo journal, blog, interview: onsite (57%), after return
and self-evaluation. (53%).
Conclusion: Overall, faculty involved with SLEs adhere to recommended practices. SLEs are usually coupled with course content so students likely
benefit from cohesive, integrated, experiential learning. Sociocultural issues that affect the host community and potential pitfalls of SLEs are
discussed by the majority of faculty in the preparation phase. Despite the anxiety and ambivalence SLEs may cause, faculty overwhelmingly agree
that SLEs should take students out of their comfort zone. Journaling and similar strategies allow for reflection and self-evaluation either onsite or
after return.
Some SLE leaders should consider increasing the amount of unstructured time for students to interact with people in the host community. Leaders
should plan experiences that give students a first-hand glimpse into host culture prior to the SLE. Opportunities for home care experiences should
also be explored. Schools that do not require teaching projects should consider adding those. Developing partnerships with organizations in the
host community to ensure meeting their true needs is viewed as important by a strong majority, although only 69% say that the host community
believes the service provided addresses their needs to a great extent. Balancing the needs of the community with the learning needs of the
students is a persistent challenge to service learning.
References
Amerson, R. (2014). Research-based recommendations for implementing international service –learning. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30 (2),
175–179.
Brown, J. M., & Schmidt, N. A. (2016). Service–Learning in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Where is the Reflection? Journal of Professional
Nursing,32(1), 48-53.
Charles, J. P. (2015). Cultural Immersion as a Strategy for Empowerment. Creative Nursing,21(3), 167-171.
Curtin, A. J., Martins, D. C., Schwartz-Barcott, D., DiMaria, L. A., & Ogando, B. M. S. (2015). Exploring the use of critical reflective inquiry with
nursing students participating in an international service-learning experience. Journal of Nursing Education,54(9), S95-S98.
Kohlbry, P.W. (2016). The impact of international service-learning on nursing students’ cultural competency. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(3),
303-311.
Long, T. (2014). Influence of international service-learning on nursing student self-efficacy toward cultural competence. Journal of Nursing
Education,53(8), 474-478.
Taylor, S. L., & Leffers, J. M. (2016). Integrative review of service-learning assessment in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives,37(4),
194-200.
Contact
[email protected]
Service Learning in Nursing Education: Bridging the Gap Between Classroom and Community
LaSonya A. Davis, DNP, USA
Barbara A. Christianson, BSN, USA
Natalie Rose Titcomb, BSN, USA
Abstract
Introduction/ Background: Service learning is increasingly being incorporated into institutional higher education settings with the
benefits of meaningful community engagement, experiential and reciprocal learning, and application of theory with a focus on
effective communication, cultural competence, and empathy (Voss, 2015; Brown & Schmidt, 2016). The definition commonly used
for service learning in the 1980’s and 90’s was “integration of community service with academic coursework” (Chapin, 1998). The
aim was to enhance student learning objectives and curriculum. This innovative teaching modality was designed to focus on social
action and considered separate from the more conservative reflective community service approach (Chapin, 1998). Currently service
learning is defined by the following criteria: the activities must be experiential; activities are designed to address individual and
community needs through a structured learning experience; reflection on the experience is incorporated; and students are guided to
embody reciprocity between themselves in their service and those they are serving (Yancey, 2016.).
It may appear that current nursing curriculum embraces service learning through clinical experiences however when the four elements above are
considered, clinical experiences alone fail to fulfill all the critical components of service learning (Yancey, 2016). There has been much discussion
surrounding the benefits of including service learning in nursing curriculum however the debate continues regarding if this type of learning
experience should be structured or unstructured in nature. Yancey (2016) concluded that although placing nursing students in unstructured
experiences may put them at risk for cultural discomfort, the benefits of including activities without clearly defined objectives are particularly
important when working with indigenous populations or those who do not subscribe to the core concepts of Western style education or healthcare
(Yancey, 2016). Furthermore, curriculum that does not include service learning may act as a barrier to practical application of knowledge and skills,
exposure to multicultural experiences, multidisciplinary collaboration, community engagement, and experiential learning. With this in mind,
nursing program faculty and educators require support in defining service learning, understanding the objectives and benefits, understanding the
implications for those providing and receiving services, and implementing a framework within their program to provide students with meaningful
and comprehensive community based service learning opportunities. The purpose of this research project was to explore the impact of community
based service learning on undergraduate nursing students’ achievement of university institutional mission-based learning outcomes and nursing
student learning objectives.
Methodology: Photo elicitation interviewing, also known as Photovoice, is utilized to mitigate barriers between participants and researchers (Polit,
2012). This methodology is also considered a valuable tool for reflection and self-evaluation by reinforcing learning through the process of choosing
a photo and expressing how it demonstrates a concept (Amerson, 2014). Photovoice methodology was utilized by the ten junior and senior
baccalaureate nursing students from a small, four-year public learning institution in southern California who participated in this study. The
participants were required to be a currently enrolled university student, aged 18 or over, having access to a digital camera, and able to consent to
participate in the study via written form in English. They were also required to volunteer at the collaborating church based faculty-student run
community clinic at least three times during the study period. These volunteer activities could either be structured or unstructured in nature.
Participants were asked to submit three to five photographs for each meeting representing the aims of the study. Instruction was given on basic
photography and obtaining of informed consent when using photography. The participant group met five times over a seven-week period to
discuss their photos. A total of 80 photographs were submitted and 47 were discussed. Discussions were recorded and transcribed by the
researchers and common themes and barriers were identified.
Results: Community based service learning impacted the participants by:
1. Enabling fulfillment of the university service learning mission statement and related nursing program student learning
outcomes.
2. Providing opportunities for reciprocal learning and collaboration between students, community members, organizations,
and peers.
3. Developing confidence in application of learned skills from nursing curriculum and nursing theory.
4. Enhancing cultural competency and understanding of the community needs of vulnerable populations and those at risk for
health inequities/disparities
Discussion: Service learning enhances cultural competency among students and can improve interactions with vulnerable or underserved
populations. When participating in service learning, with a minority or immigrant group, students become engaged with new populations and
improve their ability to communicate and work among diverse groups of people (Amerson, 2014). Nursing students are taught how to work with
vulnerable populations and diverse aggregate groups. Development and practice of these skills are essential to their attainment of related learning
outcomes. Students also identified that their experiences within the community were unique from previously assigned coursework and other class
requirements. For nursing students specifically, clinical curriculum is typically focused on the delivery of individual patient care, however service
learning provides an opportunity for nursing students to participate in inter-professional interaction and meaningful community engagement (Buff
et al., 2014). Student participants not only felt that service learning offered a unique learning opportunity but they also felt that they would not
have been able to fully meet general nursing program and course objectives without their participation in voluntary service learning experiences.
Limitations of this study include a lack of diversity in study participants and consistency of participant attendance in discussion group meetings.
Although interdisciplinary student majors volunteer at the study site regularly, nursing students make up the majority of students who staff the
clinic site thus the lack of participation of students from other disciplines was a further limitation.
This study explored nursing student perceptions of community based service learning and the impact it has on their fulfillment of the university
mission statement and mission-based learning outcomes, individual course content, and nursing student learning outcomes. The findings depict
service learning as an essential component to higher education and the fulfilment of related learning objectives not only for nursing student
coursework but also for the university as a whole. Participants expressed their service learning experiences as having a positive impact on student
learning, personal and professional development, and on educational outcomes. Student participant responses were consistently positive in
nature, thus supporting the literature by emphasizing the benefits of this innovative teaching modality. Consideration should be given to
incorporate this strategy across the nursing curriculum to further enhance community based learning.
References
Amerson, R. (2014). Research-based recommendations for implementing international service-learning. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30(2), 175-
179. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.09.006
Brown, J. M., & Schmidt, N. A. (2016). Service–learning in undergraduate nursing education: Where is the reflection? Journal of Professional
Nursing, 32(1), 48-53. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.05.001
Buff, S. M., Jenkins, K., Kern, D., Worrall, C., Howell, D., Martin, K., ...Blue, A. (2014). Interprofessional service-learning in a community setting:
findings from a pilot study. Journal of Interprofessional Care,29(2), 159-161. doi:10.3109/13561820.2014.934956
Chapin, J. R. (1998). Is service learning a good idea? Data from the national longitudinal study of 1988. The Social Studies, 89(5), 205-211.
doi:10.1080/00377999809599853
Polit, D.F. & Beck,C.(2012) T. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice(9th edition). Philadelphia, PA :Wolters
Kluwer Publishers.
Voss, H. C. (2016). Preceptors' experience of nursing service-learning projects. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(3), 150-154.
doi:10.3928/01484834-20160216-05
Yancey, N. R. (2016). Community-centered service learning: A transformative lens for teaching-learning in nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly,
29(2),116-119. doi:10.1177/0894318416630102
Contact
[email protected]
Learning How to Learn: Nurses' Experiences With Failure and Success
Rebecca B. Parnell, PhD, USA
Abstract
Background and significance: More than 1.02 million new nurses are needed by 2022 for the predicted nursing shortage. A potential way to
decrease the shortage is through increasing the number of nursing students entering the workforce. Unfortunately, nursing students in the United
States (U.S.) are among the college students with the lowest retention and graduation rates ranging from 30%-70%. This has also been identified as
an international problem. Research studies addressing this issue focus on admission criteria, retention, and remediation of students with no
consistent findings. No studies exist that utilize nursing students who have experienced both failure and success in a nursing program.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the experiences of nurses who have failed at least one nursing course during their Bachelor of
Science (BSN) nursing education program, then completed their nursing education and continued to be successful by passing the NCLEX-RN on the
first attempt.
Methods: A qualitative design of interpretive phenomenology was used for this study. The conceptual framework focused on the Hermeneutic
philosophy and David Kolb’s Experiential Theory. A purposive sample was identified by faculty and peers using snowball sampling. Recruitment
occurred until saturation was achieved. Participants were registered nurses who failed a nursing course, then successfully completed a nursing
program after failing a course, and successfully passed the NLCEX-RN on the first attempt. Using open-ended questions, the researcher conducted
face-to-face semi-structured interviews.. Audiotapes of the interviews were transcribed verbatim and entered into Ethnograph 6.0. A naïve reading
of the transcribed were completed. Data was then coded, a code book was created, and codes were verified by methods and content experts.
Content analysis, constant comparison, and use of field notes revealed two themes. An audit trail was completed to provide an ability to further
understand the research study and identification of themes. Trustworthiness of the data was established through credibility, dependability,
confirmability, and transferability.
Results: A total of fourteen participants were recruited from five different nursing programs. Two themes emerged, difficulty learning and learning
to learn. Participants noted that they did not know how to study for nursing, their prior learning experiences were not helpful, and they did not ask
for help. Participants identified the process of learning effective study skills/habits as essential to their success in a nursing program and on the
NLCEX-RN. The theme of learning to learn emerged from the interviews.
Conclusions: A unique sample was recruited for this study that provided an in-depth description of the nursing student’s experience of moving
from failure to success. The participants in this study actually learned how to learn effectively in a nursing program.
Implications for Nursing Practice: The participants revealed information about the process of becoming successful while in a nursing program.
Incorporation of the findings of this study were used to provide suggestions for nursing faculty, nursing education administrators, and students
with the goal of decreasing attrition, increasing retention, and ultimately impacting the nursing shortage. Further research to valid the findings will
need to be completed.
References
Abele, C., Penprase, B., & Ternes, R. (2013). A closer look at academic probation and attrition: What courses are predictive of nursing student
success? Nurse Education Today, 33(3), 258-261.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2013). Retrieved June 5, 2017 from http://www.aacn.nche.com.
Assessment Technology Institute (ATI). (2012). Predicting early nursing school performance in a BSN program: How do TEAS V preparedness levels
predict Fundamentals performance? Retrieved from http://www.atitesting.com on April 22, 2014.
Bryer, J. (2012). Peer tutoring program for academic success of returning nursing students. Journal of New York State Nurses Association, 43(1), 20-
22.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, (2015).U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2014-15 Edition, Registered Nurses, Retrieved on at
August 15, 2015. http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/registered-nurses.htm.
Campbell, A. & Dickson, C. (1996). Predicting student success: A 10-year review using integrative review and meta-analysis. Journal of Professional
Nursing, 12(1), 47-59.
Cameron, J., Roxburgh, M., Taylor, J., & Lauder, W. (2010). Why students leave in the UK: An integrative review of the international research
literature. Journal of Clinical Nursing,20, 1086-1096.
Gillen, S. (2012). Is enough being done to reduce undergraduate attrition rates? Nursing Standard, 27(8), 12-13.
Harding, M. (2012). Efficacy of supplemental instruction to enhance student success. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 7(1), 27-31.
Knaus, P. & Wilson, P. (2012). Predicting early academic success: HESI admissions assessment exam. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(2S). S28-
S31.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, CA. Prentice-Hall.
Lancia, L., Petrucci, C., Giorgi, F., Dante, A., & Cifone, M. (2013). Academic success or failure in nursing students: Results of a retrospective
observational study. Nurse Education Today, 33(12), 1501-1505.
Lockie, N., Van Lanen, R., & Gannon, T. (2013). Educational implications of nursing students’ learning styles, success in chemistry, and supplemental
instruction participation on National Council Licensure Examination-Registered Nurses performance. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(1). 49-58.
March, K. & Ambrose, J. (2012). RX for NCLEX-RN success: Reflections on development of an effective preparation process for senior baccalaureate
students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(4), 230-23.
National League for Nursing. (2013). National Nursing Education Database Survey. Retrieved May 1, 2014 from www.nln.org.
Pennington, T., & Spurlock, D. (2010). A systematic review of the effectiveness of remediation interventions to improve NCLEX-RN pass rates.
Journal of Nursing Education, 49(9), 485-492.
Peyrovi, H., Parvizy, S., & Haghani, H. (2009). Supportive counseling programme for nursing students experiencing academic failure: Randomized
controlled trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(9), 1899-1906.
Pitt, V., Powis, D., Levett-Jones, T., & Hunter, S. (2012). Factors influencing nursing students’ academic and clinical performance and attrition: An
integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 32, 903-913.
Scarbrough, J. E. (2013). Student-faculty trust and student success in pre-licensure baccalaureate nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 33(8),
919-924.
Contact
[email protected]
Examining Readmission Policies: Academic Performance After Readmission to Nursing School
Mariann M. Harding, PhD, USA
Shelly L. Stefka, MSN, USA
Mistey D. Bailey, MSN, USA
Abstract
Background. Nursing students must perform at a level which meets established minimum competencies. Unfortunately, every
school has students who do not meet performance expectations or find themselves unable to continue schooling for personal
reasons, making them subject to readmission policies. Many schools have strict readmission policies for students who have either
failed or withdrawn from the program with the most common response being to suspend or dismiss the student. This attrition is
costly to the student and program for multiple reasons. There is little evidence regarding academic performance of students
readmitted following a one-time program dismissal. The purpose of this study was to investigate factors influencing program
completion in nursing students readmitted to an associate degree nursing program.
Method. Data was collected using an archival design from the existing records of all students readmitted after dismissal, defined as leaving the
nursing program at any time before completion, between fall 2009 and fall 2015. Students were tracked until either dismissed a second time or
successful, defined as program completion. Variables of interest include GPA when dismissed; GPA upon readmission to the program; reason for
dismissal- personal or academic, number of semesters completed before the first dismissal, number of semesters out; midcurricular and exit HESI
scores, and NCLEX-RN examination scores for those who completed. Other variables of interest included the numbers of clinical failures,
medication math failures, skills test failures, as well as attendance and conduct reports before the second dismissal.
Results. Of the 107 students for whom complete records were available, 46 were dismissed a second time and 61 completed the program. The
semester a student was initially dismissed and reason for dismissal was significantly related to academic performance upon return. No student
readmitted after being dismissed the first semester for academic reasons in either nursing or chemistry completed the program (X2 37.492 (7), p <
0.001), while every student readmitted for the final semester or readmitted after withdrawing for personal reasons completed the program. As
students progressed through the second and third semesters, the percent of students completing the program increased, though the percent
completing after return in the third semester was just over 50% (53.2%). Those who completed the program had significantly higher GPAs on
readmission (t = 2.023, p = .05). Those students having to take coursework to raise more than 2 semesters of coursework to raise their GPA to meet
readmission requirements had only a 10% chance of completing the program (X2 21.080 (4), p < 0.001), while those who were initially dismissed for
conduct had a 12.1% chance of completing the program (X2 10.461, p =0.01). Students not completing the program had significantly more absences
(M= .5, SD= 1.1) than those who completed (M= .18, SD= .5; t= 2.027, p= .045) and skills test failures, with those not completing the program
having more failures (M= .41, SD= 1.1) than those who completed (M= .03, SD= .18; t= 2.641, p= .01). There was a significant difference between
the type of student and program completion, with advanced standing students being more likely to complete (X2 4.075, p =.044). There were no
differences in program completion rates by gender. There was no significant difference in program completion rates for those students (n = 21)
who failed multiple courses in any one semester (X2 .228, p = .63). A 2-factor logistic regression model consisting of GPA upon reentry and initial
semester dismissed was statistically significant (X2 100.5 (60), p =0.001), explaining 81.8% of the variance in program completion rates, correctly
classified 88.8% of the students.
Discussion. This study revealed major implications to consider when evaluating readmission of policies. The fact that no student readmitted after
academic dismissal the first semester did not complete the program was not surprising. Though program entrance criteria screen for academic
ability, it may be that the student who is not successful this early in their schooling is not prepared or able to meet the academic demands of
nursing school. The low completion rate for those students with a lower readmission GPA or who took additional coursework to raise their GPA is
congruent with reports regarding the predictive value of GPA in the general college and nursing student populations. Implementing policies that
lower the maximum time allowed for program completion would make it more difficult for students with low GPAs to be readmitted and reduce
student’s financial burden associated with continuing to take additional coursework towards a degree which will likely not be realized.
Conclusion. The results of this study provide faculty and administrators with data that can be used to evaluate and develop readmission policies
based on clearly defined criteria which measure a student’s ability to succeed, as well as develop and implement appropriate remediation
programs, such as tutoring or mentoring, designed to provide students with resources to support retention and improve the completion rate of
readmitted students. This analysis strongly supports the need for careful consideration regarding the timing of dismissal and the student’s GPA and
conduct, when considering the readmission of students and their chance for successfully completing the nursing program.
References
Abele, C., Penprase, B., & Ternes, R. (2013). A closer look at academic probation and attrition: What courses are predictive of nursing student
success? Nurse Education Today, 33(3), 258-261. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.017
Birkhead, S., Araldi, M.-J., & Cummings, R. (2016). A Model of Practical Nurse to Registered Nurse Educational Articulation: A Successful Approach
to Advancing the Nursing Workforce. Teaching & Learning in Nursing, 11(4), 152-156. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2016.07.003
Chan, Z. C. Y., Chan, Y.-t., Lui, C.-w., Yu, H.-z., Law, Y.-f., Cheung, K.-l., ...Lam, C.-t. (2014). Gender differences in the academic and clinical
performances of undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 34(3), 377-388. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.011
Dante, A., Fabris, S., & Palese, A. (2015). Predictive power of individual factors and clinical learning experience on academic success: findings from a
longitudinal study. Nurse Educator, 40(3), E1-E6. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000132
Harris, R. C., Rosenberg, L., & Grace O'Rourke, M. E. (2014). Addressing the Challenges of Nursing Student Attrition. Journal of Nursing Education,
53(1), 31-37. doi:10.3928/01484834-20131218-03
Olsen, J. M. (2017). Integrative Review of Admission Factors Related to Associate Degree Nursing Program Success. Journal of Nursing Education,
56(2), 85-93. doi:10.3928/01484834-20170123-05
Rejnö, Å., Nordin, P., Forsgren, S., Sundell, Y., & Rudolfsson, G. (2017). Nursing students' attendance at learning activities in relation to attainment
and passing courses: A prospective quantitative study. Nurse Education Today, 50, 36-41. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.025
Contact
[email protected]
B 10 - Clinical Studies
Treatment of the Oral Mucositis Severity in Patients of Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis
Patricia Ferreira, MSN, USA
Monica Antar Gamba, USA
Abstract
Background: According to the Brazilian Association of Organ Transplantation, in the year of 2016, of which 1385 autologous and 802
allogeneic were realized. (Brazilian Association of Organ Transplantation,2016). However, it is important to consider the collateral
effects deriving from it, among which are protruded: marrow aplasia, nauseas, vomits, diarrhea, mucositis and the Illness of the
Excerpt against the Host (DECH). The mucositis, the object of this study, occurs in approximately 75% of the patients that receive
ablative chemotherapy or total body irradiation (Total Body Irradiation – TBI), as a conditioning to the bone marrow transplantation
or of peripheral cells (Sonis, 2004). This complication is considered an important collateral effect due to its great repercussion in the
general state of the patient, being significantly associated to the mortality increase of the patients submitted to BMT (Sonis,
2004).This lack of sensible evidence limits the possibility of establishing the magnitude of the benefits, the risks and costs associated
to prevention, to the diagnosis and to the treatment of mucositis and its complications. Before the exposed, the scope of the study is
the investigation of the therapeutically measures for the oral mucositis in patients submitted to the BMT, as a manner of identifying
the best clinical evidences to plan the nursing care to patients in this condition.
Aims: To identify the interventions needed to treat oral mucositis; and to evaluate the evidences of effectiveness of these
interventions when performed in patients undergoing Bone Marrow transplantation (BMT).
Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
Setting: Cochrane Brazil and Nurse Department of São Paulo Federal University.
Method: A systematic review was carried out using the following key words: “mucositis”, and “bone marrow transplantation”. The
period searched was from 1972 to 2017 in the following data bases: LILACS, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE; CENTRAL (Cochrane Central
Register of Controlled Trials) and DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects). The investigated closing was the intensity
reduction of the oral mucositis.
Findings: 3.839 abstracts were found, from which 19 were included in the systematic review and 17 were submitted to meta-
analysis. Three topical and one systemic interventions presented statistically significant evidence in reducing mucositis severity: the
use of Traumeell®, mouthwash with clhorexidine, topic cryotherapy and amifostina. Cryotherapy presented better protective and
therapeutical effect with relative risk of 0,03 (IC95%; p= 0,02).
Discussion: In the realization of this meta-analysis, one of the difficulties found was the reduced number of controlled random
study. Other important aspect to be considered are the methodological failures identified in the studies that approached the
therapeutic intervention. The lack of accuracy in the measuring of this complication is also an impediment to the clinical research
and, undoubtedly, to the implementation of oral mucositis’ prevention and control protocols. (Stockman, 2005) In this review we
have found 19 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria; the number of studies could be greater if the accuracy in the evaluation of
this complication was realized in a systematic and controlled manner. The better treatment found in this investigation, and very
effective was the utilization of the topic ice or cryotherapy. A low cost therapeutic option, which does not offer risks, with high
efficacy and easy clinical applicability. Probably due to its vasoconstrictor effect, provides a decrease of the citotoxical drugs
concentration in the salivary glands and causes lesser cellular damage in the oral mucous membrane (Nikolett, 2005). The analyzed
studies demonstrate efficacy in the reduction of the mucositis’ severity, with an important protecting effect, when used (RR= 0.03).
In other uncontrolled study with patients in a specific conditioning regimen with Melfalane, this care has also revealed a protecting
and therapeutic effect (Cascinu, 1994). One of possible restrictions that could be identified in these studies is that one of them has
only used, in the conditioning regimen, Melfalane, which restricts the possibility of generalization of this intervention for the other
conditioning regimens utilized in the BMT, as well as Fluoracil that has its specific pharmacological proprieties. But, in both
researches, cryotherapy has show a therapeutic effect for the signals and symptoms associated to mucositis and prophylactic to its
severity. The efficacy of cryotherapy has also been proved in the mucositis’ treatment in patients with colon cancer submitted to
chemotherapy with Fluouracil (Nikolett,2005; Cascinu,1994;McGuire,2004).Among the 17 studies included in this meta-analysis it
was not possible to include the nursing researches, which were referred to hygiene protocols, education to health, daily oral cavity
self-care, as well as the protocols to technical scientific prepare of the nurses once they constitute narrative reviews and descriptive
researches. Nevertheless, it is good to protrude that international algorithms for the mucositis’ handling in patients that receive
antineoplasic treatment were proposed by Cochrane Collaboration researches (Worthington, 2011), National Comprehensive Cancer
Network- NCCN (Bensinger, 2008), European Oncology Nursing Society- EONS (European Oncology Nursing Society, 2008) and from
Oncology Nursing Society – ONS (Oncology Nursing Society, 2008), based on the opinion of specialists and studies with evidence
analysis and recommendation grade. Comparing the treatments the treatments proposed in these recommendations with the
results of this investigation, we can verify that some of the treatments recommended in this recommended in this research, such as,
for instance, the Traumeel, were not mentioned in the NCCN, EONS and ONS’ protocols. On the other hand, Palifermin,
recommended by NCCN, EONS and ONS, in this study and in the last Cochrane Collaboration (Worthington, 2011) review did not
reveal statistical significance to the prevention and treatment of the oral mucositis. The mentioned protocols protrude the necessity
of multiprofessional care to prevent or reduce the severity of the oral mucositis induced by chemo and/or radiotherapy, as well as
the education of the patients, relatives and health team for the handing of this affection.
Conclusions: The three topical interventions identified are essential for the management of oral mucositis for they are effective,
don’t demand high technology resources and have low cost. Implications for Nursing: The careful incorporation of this new
knowledge in nursing clinical practice opens a new perspective on evidence-based practice, in order to provide an effective clinical
care to patients undergoing BMT that present oral mucositis.
References
Al -Dasoogi N, Sonis ST, Bowen JM, Bateman E, Blijlevens N, Gibson RJ, Yazbeck R, Elad S, Lalla RV. Support Care Cancer 2013 Jul;21(7):2075-83
Bhatt, V, Ventrell, N. et al (2010) Implementation of a standardised protocol for prevention and management on oral mucositis in patients
undergoing haemopoitiec stem cell transplant. J. Oncol Pharm Pract. Sept 16 (3) 195-204
Sambunjak D, Nickerson JW, Poklepovic T, Johnson TM, Imai P, Tugwell P, Worthington HV (2011) Flossing for the management of periodontal
diseases and dental caries in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12
Sonis ST (2004) The pathobiology of mucositis. Nature Reviews Cancer. 4: 277–284.
Sonis ST, Elting LS, Keefe D, Peterson DE, Schubert M, Hauer-Jensen M, Bekele BN, Raber-Durlacher J, Donnelly JP, Rubenstein EB (2004)
Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for patients. Cancer2004
May 1;100(9 Suppl):1995-2025.
Contact
[email protected]
The Impact of Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in Fundamental and Medical Surgical
Nursing 11 Courses
Maureen C. Roller, DNP, RN, ANP-BC, USA
Susan Zori, DNP, RN, NEA-BC, USA
Erik Lyons, BSN, RN, CCRN, USA
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) teaching method utilizes student centered, interactive
learning rather than exclusively using a lecture style method. This innovative method has been shown in science disciplines and in
fundamental nursing to be effective in providing positive student satisfaction with learning and grade improvement. The method
involves students participating in small group work with the professor functioning as facilitator of learning not a lecturer. The
purpose of this study is to compare class final grades, Assessment Technologies Institute, LLC (ATi) national standardized exam
scores, demographic data, and satisfaction of students who are taking Fundamentals and Medical-Surgical 2 nursing classes in which
POGIL group case scenarios are used with students in classes that do not use POGIL as a teaching strategy.
Significance: POGIL enhances teamwork in that it uses small groups of students interacting together to analyze a problem – oriented case study.
Each of the students in the group is assigned a role that includes leader, recorder, manager or reflector (POGIL, 2016). The ability for nursing
students to work effectively in a team through the POGIL process may help to prepare future nurses for a work environment that requires
multidisciplinary teamwork. The Joint Commission (TJC) (2014) has identified teamwork as an essential factor in creating work environments that
promote safe patient care.
A priority in nursing education is to enhance the development of critical thinking, clinical thinking and teamwork, which is encouraged through use
of POGIL methodology. In a pilot study that compared using POGIL with a lecture based teaching method in a Fundamentals Nursing course those
students in the POGIL group had higher mean scores on the ATi national standardized exam (Roller, 2015) The findings from this pilot study are
consistent with previous POGIL studies conducted with science courses (Simonson & Shadle, 2013; Soltis, Verlinden, Kruger, Carroll, & Trumbo,
2015). Using pedagogy, such as POGIL in fundamental nursing education courses has been shown to improve final grades (Roller & Zori, 2017).
POGIL methodology also enhances the use of teamwork, which may help prepare students to meet an essential competency for professional
nursing. Students have reported a preference for a POGIL-based course rather than lecture only method (Case, Pakhira & Stains, 2013; Mulligan,
2014). Exploring POGIL as a teaching strategy is in alignment with NLN goal IV to promote evidence-based teaching practices through the
scholarship of teaching and transform nursing education(NLN,2016).
Study Aims:
1. Examine and compare the demographics, pre-study GPA, final course grades and (ATi) national test scores of students in Fundamentals and
Medical Surgical Nursing 2 sections, who comprise two groups: the experimental group will experience POGIL while analyzing case studies in the
classroom. The control group of students will receive the same case scenarios but will not analyze them using POGIL in the classroom. They can
choose to complete them individually. The completion of case studies with or without POGIL is not a graded assignment.
2. Describe the students’ satisfaction with completing the case studies whether in a class that used POGIL or not in a class that used POGIL.
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework: The POGIL method was modeled on Piaget’s Constructivist theory. In the process of learning, students must
be active participants. Learning occurs by allowing students to work in groups and present the topics in class as instructors facilitate (McLeod,
2015). POGIL method participants in this nursing study will work in groups to discuss and answer questions in a case study; a student team leader
presents the group’s findings to the entire class and the instructor acts as a facilitator, which is consistent with Piaget’s Constructivist Theory.
Design/Methods: This quantitative descriptive study used a comparative design, with two groups of students (Fundamentals and Medical-Surgical
Nursing 2) who experienced POGIL while analyzing case scenarios in class and a control group who did not experience POGIL. A t-test was used to
compare final grades, ATi scores, and satisfaction survey results.
Setting: A mid-size, private university in the northeastern United States was the setting.
Participants: A convenience sample of pre-licensure baccalaureate nursing students taking Fundamental in Nursing Courses during the junior first
semester and Medical Surgical Nursing 2 in the senior final semester.
Results: Comparing the pre-GPA of courses and both Fundamentals and Medical-Surgical 2 groups was non significant. The experimental group
Fundamentals (N=153) had higher ATi grades (75.69%) than control group (N=109) was (70.41%) and significant at p=. 001. The final course grade
of Fundamental experimental group was (88.19%), and the control group was (87.34%) revealing non-significance at p=. 124. Subjects in
experimental and control groups reported a better understanding of the course material, and greater satisfaction with grades in the Fundamental
course.
The experimental group Medical Surgical Nursing 2 (N=60) had no significance in ATi scores (72.78%) and the control group (N=54) was (72.00%)
with p=722. The final course grades of Medical Surgical Nursing 2 experimental group was (85.31%), and the control group was (87.01%) revealing
no significance at p=. 09. Subjects in experimental and control groups reported a better understanding of the course material, and greater
satisfaction with grades in Medical Surgical Nursing 2.
Conclusion: The results of this study revealed that Fundamental nursing students who experienced POGIL had improved ATi sores but had no
significance in final grades. Students reported better course understanding and grade satisfaction compared with students who did not experience
POGIL. These results may be attributed to students in the first course of clinical theory.
The results of this study revealed that Medical-Surgical Nursing 2 nursing students who experienced POGIL had no significance in final grades and
ATi scores. Students reported better course understanding and grade satisfaction compared with students who did not experience POGIL. These
results may be attributed to students in the final course of clinical theory.
The active learning and teamwork experienced during POGIL pedagogy may be beneficial as an effective student-centered learning to foster critical
and clinical thinking and teamwork, which is essential for nursing graduates’ professional success. Additional research using POGIL with a variety of
nursing courses could be beneficial in educating undergraduate nursing students.
References
Case, A., Pakhira, D., & Stains, M. (2013). Implementing process-oriented, guided-inquiry learning for the first time: Adaptions and short-term
impacts on students’ attitude and performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 409-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed300181tlJ.Chem.Educ
McLeod, S. (2015). Jean Piaget. Simply Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
Mulligan, E. A. (2014). Use of a modified pogil exercise to teach bacterial transformation in a microbiology course. Journal of Microbiology &
Biology Education, 15(1), 30-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i1.639
NLN. (2016). Mission and strategic plan. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/about/mission-goals
POGIL(n.d.). (2016). Description of Roles POGIL: Process Inquiry Guided Inquiry Learning. Retrieved from
http://www.pogil.org/uploads/media_items/descriptions-of- roles-expanded.original.pdf.
Roller, M.C. (2015). Fundamental nursing: Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning (POGIL) research. Journal for Leadership and Instruction, 14(1),
20-23.
Simonson, S.R., & Shadle, S.E. (2013). Implementing process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) in undergraduate biomechanics: Lessons
learned by a novice. Journal of Stem Education, 14 (1), 56-62.
Soltis, R., Verlinden, N., Kruger, N., Carroll, A., & Trumbo, T. (2015). Process-oriented guided inquiry learning strategy enhances students’ higher
level thinking skills in a pharmaceutical sciences course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(1), 11.
The Joint Commission. (2014). The joint commission safety goals. Retrieved from
http://www.jointcommission.org/standardsinformation/npsgs.aspx.
Contact
[email protected]
Multidisciplinary Care: Using a Simple Approach to Promote Team-Based Learning and Patient Safety
Carol Amann, PhD, RN-BC, CDP, FNGNA, USA
Valerie O'Toole-Baker, MSN, CNS, USA
Abstract
Students enrolled in health professional degree programs often learn, in theory, of the roles and responsibilities of other health care
team members in general. Little interaction is undertaken during their academic preparation, but rather this occurs when they are
indoctrinated into their professional roles outside of academia. With national shortages of nursing and other health care
professionals, employers are expecting new graduates to perform within the health care system as a highly functional member of
the team (Masters, O’Toole-Baker, & Jodan, 2013).
Academic preparation for nursing and other healthcare disciplines has undergone few curriculum changes over the years; other than the
implementation of patient simulation. New strategies to improve not only their individual level of readiness to care for simple to complex patient
scenarios, but to apply knowledge learned in collaboration with multiple healthcare disciplines is essential to prepare students for today’s
workforce, to increase professional satisfaction, and to contribute to the improvement of quality patient centered outcomes (Interprofessional
Education Collaborative Expert Panel, 2011). Educational strategies, implemented by a Northwest Pennsylvania university, have been shown to
increase student’s leadership ability, improve communication skills, utilize situation monitoring in the care of the patient, and increase their
appreciation for other disciplines by incorporating an intraprofessional care model across curriculums.
TeamStepps®, developed by the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ), to improve communication and promote patient safety, and
the SIMPLE® approach, a strategy developed and implemented by university faculty, were utilized to bring together health care professionals as a
collaborative team (Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, (2011). Disciplines inclusive of nursing, radiologic science, respiratory therapy,
and physician assistant students and faculty worked collaboratively to provide care for simple to complex patient care scenarios. Faculty
incorporated a shared vision and content inclusion for their respective curriculum inclusive of respiratory conditions, trauma and cardiac arrest.
This combination of strategies has been instrumental in redirecting educational methodologies that prepare our graduates to be workforce ready
using a multidisciplinary interactive simulation based learning environment to deliver care.
References
Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. (2011). TeamSTEPPS: National implementation. Retrieved from
http://teamstepps.ahrq.gov/.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel (IECEP). (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Report of an
expert panel. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. 70-74.
Masters, C., O’Toole-Baker, V., & Jodon, H. (2013). Multidisciplinary, team-based learning: The simulated interdisciplinary to multidisciplinary
progressive-level education (SIMPLE®) approach. International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. 9, e171-178.
Robertson, B., Kaplan, B., Atallah, H., Higgins, M., Lewitt, M., & Ander, D. (2010). The use of simulation and a modified TeamSTEPPS curriculum for
medical and nursing students team training. Simulation in Healthcare. 5(6), 332-337.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health
Organization. Retrieved from http://whqli.bdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf
Zafian, R., & Jansky, L. (2011). ISBAR: Adding an extra step in handoff communication. Retrieved from
http://www.strategiesfornursemanagers.com/content/222773.cfm.
Contact
[email protected]
Nurses' Perception of Caring Using a Relationship-Based Care Model
Annette Peacock-Johnson, DNP, RN, USA
Abstract
Throughout its history caring has been a central tenet to the practice of nursing. Despite the significance of caring, multiple factors today threaten
the ability of nurses to engage in caring and compassionate roles. The evolution of nursing science and emphasis on evidence-based practice have
contributed to a shift from holistic care to a more technically oriented practice contributing to an erosion in the ethos of compassion (Straughair,
2012). Socioeconomic factors may play a role by students who enter the profession for non-altruistic reasons including salary and job security
(Straughair, 2012). This trend is coupled with an underlying organizational culture and fast-paced unpredictable work environment which challenge
the ability of the nurse to engage in caring relationships (Koloroutis & Trout, 2012; Straughair, 2012).
A model on Relationship-Based Care (RBC) was developed as a method for transforming the health care environment to facilitate patient-centered,
relationship-based care (Koloroutis, 2004). At the center of relationship-based care is the concept of caring. Based on the Theory of Human Caring
by Watson (1988) and the middle range Theory of Caring by Swanson (1993), the model includes dimensions of leadership, teamwork, professional
practice, care delivery, resources, and outcomes (Koloroutis, 2004).
While considerable research has examined patient perceptions and outcomes in response to caring, only two studies examined nurses’ perception
of caring when using a relationship-based care (RBC) model. Winsett and Hauck (2011) observed statistically significant increases in both verbal and
nonverbal caring behaviors by nurses between the pre-implementation and the 3-month and 12-month post-implementation periods of RBC using
the Caring Behaviors Checklist. Porter, Cortese, Vezina, and Fitzpatrick (2014) found that participants had high perceptions of caring behaviors
following implementation of a caring, professional practice model using the Caring Behavior Inventory 24 (CBI-24).
This study extends what is known about nurses’ perception of caring using the Caring Assessment for Care Givers (CACG) instrument, a valid and
reliable instrument. Unlike the CBI-24 which has been used with both patients and nurses, the CACG instrument was developed specifically for use
with nurses in settings that use a RBC model. Using the CACG, nurses’ perception of caring will be examined including the dimensions of caring that
nurses report as most and least important. Additionally, the relationship between nurses’ perception of caring will be explored for nurses who care
for chronically ill, medical patients versus acutely ill, surgical patients. No previous research was identified which explored the relationship between
nurses’ perceptions of caring and the specialty area of practice when using a RBC model. Nurses who work with chronically-ill, medical patients
who have a longer length of stay or recurrent hospitalizations may have greater opportunity for the development of nurse-patient connectedness,
contributing to an overall higher perception of caring.
A cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational design will be used. All registered nurses who provide direct patient care on medical-surgical units
of a Midwestern medical center will be invited to participate.
Demographic results found that the typical respondent was female (90.4%), Caucasian (73.4%), 36.4 years of age, and held a baccalaureate degree
(61.7%). Using the CACG, nurses reported a high perception of caring (4.29 out of a possible 5.0). The subscale, doing for, had the highest score
while the subscale, knowing, had the lowest score followed closely by the subscale being with. No significant difference was found between nurses
who work with chronically ill versus acutely ill patients (t-.923), df = 83, p = .358). A small to moderate, positive relationship was found between the
overall nurses’ perception of caring score and the years of experience in nursing (r - .29, p <.01). There was no relationship found between the
overall nurses’ perceptions of caring score and the highest level of nursing education.
The finding of a high perception of caring using a RBC model is consistent with previous studies. The CACG subscale, doing for, describes the care
nurses provide for patients who are unable to provide for themselves including more technically oriented behaviors. This finding is consistent with
previous research. Porter, Cortese, Vezina, and Fitzpatrick (2014) found the highest perception of caring on the subscale for knowledge and skills.
While direct comparison between the subscales on the CBI-24 and the CACG cannot be made, findings from both studies suggest that nurses highly
value clinical knowledge and skills.
The CACG subscale, knowing, focuses on the nurse’s desire to understand events of those in the nurse’s care while the subscale, being with,
described the nurse’s ability to be emotionally present to others. Using the CBI-24, Porter, Cortese, Vezina, and Fitzpatrick (2014) found the lowest
score on the subscale of positive connectedness. While direct comparison between the two instruments cannot be made, results from both studies
may reflect the challenge that nurses’ perceive in fully meeting the therapeutic demands of individuals and families given required job
expectations, unpredictable events, or other personal and external factors in a fast-paced, intensive, and complicated clinical environment.
The study found no significant relationship between nurses’ perception of caring and the area of nursing practice. Nurses who work on medical
units with chronically ill individuals are confronted with similar obstacles to the development of therapeutic relationships as are nurses who work
on surgical units. It may be these challenges rather than the opportunities to build longer or ongoing relationships that account for the lack of a
relationship in nurses’ perceptions of caring. The finding that older, more experienced nurses report higher perceptions of caring suggests that
caring might be a skill that can be enhanced through situation-based, experiential learning that occurs with longer clinical practice.
The nurse is the single most important healthcare provider for patients during hospital encounters. It is the nurse who coordinates and
communicates with the health care team regarding the patient’s plan of care, monitors and assesses for changes in the patient’s status, and serves
as a patient advocate for changes in the health care plan. Nurses need to recognize the importance of their caring behaviors on patient advocation.
Nurse caring has been found to be a major factor in the patient’s intention to recommend or return to a health care facility which poses
implications for the financial well-being of the health care facility (Burtson & Stichler, 2010).
While nurses report an overall high perception of caring, lower mean scores on the subscales of knowing and being with suggest that there is still
room for improvement. Nursing leadership along with hospital administration should maintain or enhance programs to support use of the
relationship-based care practice model. Approaches could include recognition programs for staff who demonstrate exemplary, compassionate
patient care. Recognizing nurses for their exemplary care signifies a valuing of the behavior by administration and encourages continued growth of
a therapeutic, caring environment.
References
Burtson, P.L. & Stichler, J.F. (2010). Nursing work environment and nurse caring: Relationships among motivational factors. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 66(8), 1819-1831. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05336.x
Koloroutis, M. (Ed.). (2004). Relationship-based care: A model for transforming practice. Minneapolis, MN: Creative Health Care Management.
Koloroutis, M. & Trout, M. (2012). See me as a person. Minneapolis, MN: Creative Health Care Management.
Porter, C.A., Cortese, M., Veniza, M., & Fitzpatrick, J.J. (2014). Nursing caring behaviors following implementation of a relationship centered care
professional practice model. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3), 818-822.
Steele-Moses, S., Koloroutis, M., Ydarraga, D. (2011). Testing a caring assessment for care givers instrument. Creative Nursing, 17(1), 43-50.
Straughair, C. (2012). Exploring compassion: Implications for contemporary nursing. Part 1. British Journal of Nursing, 2(3), 160-164.
Swanson, K.M. (1993). Nursing as informed caring for the well-being of others. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 24(4), 352-357.
Swanson, K.M. (2015). Kristen Swanson’s theory of caring. In M.C. Smith and M.E. Parker (Eds.), Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice (pp.521-
531). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
Watson, J. (1988). New dimensions of human caring theory. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1(4), 175-181.
Winsett, R. P. & Hauck, S. (2011). Implementing relationship-based care. Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(6), 285-290.
Contact
[email protected]
The Caring Studio Experience: Integrating QSEN With Caring Practice Competencies, a Research Study
Claudia Grobbel, DNP, RN, CNL, USA
Barbara Penprase, PhD, MSN, RN, CNE, RNFA, USA
Abstract
AIM: To determine if an educational program called the Caring Studio Experience specifically designed for undergraduate nursing
students, will improve nursing students' caring abilities, professional values, and self-rated quality and safety competencies.
BACKGROUND: Caring practice is foundational to the nursing profession. Currently, traditional baccalaureate nursing education stresses the
science of nursing care with little education spent on the art of nursing--caring practice as it relates to Quality and Safety in nursing practice
(Benner, Tanner & Chelsea, 2009). The Caring Studio Experience (CSE) was implemented as a pilot program and a repeat study has been conducted.
The CSE was implemented integrating the Quality and Safety in Educating Nurses (QSEN) competencies with caring practice strategies with the goal
of strengthening the student nurse’s caring practices and quality outcomes. The CSE is a series of experiential sessions for student to attend outside
of class time. Caring practice and the impact on quality outcomes are explored under three guiding principles; caring for self, caring for colleagues
and caring for patients and families The CSE blends a variety of teaching strategies including role-play, reflective practice, mentoring, and dialogue
to engage students in learning about caring practice. Students learn about caring practice from the perspective of caring for self, colleagues as well
as patients and families. The CSE integrates the resources from the all the arts; music, theater and dance and collaborates with students in Theater
& Dance department to incorporate simulated care experiences, improvisational theater experiences with care studies to illustrate the range &
depth of care experiences. Outcome measures include a pre-posttest measuring caring abilities and quality knowledge and student evaluations.
SIGNIFICANCE TO NURSING: This study explores the impact of using caring practice teaching methods integrated with the Quality and Safety
Education in Nursing (QSEN) framework to seamlessly meld caring and quality into foundations of nursing practice as students learn these concepts
and application to practice (Penprase, Oakley & Tenres, 2013). Today’s healthcare environment is challenged with continuous quality
improvement. Quality research is strongly linked to the skillset associated with the QSEN competencies of Patient Centered Care, Teamwork &
Collaboration and Evidence Based Practice. (AHRQ, 2017; QSEN, 2017). Caring practice competencies will enhance a person’s ability to provide
patient centered care, work better in teams while understanding how it all relates to QSEN and best practice. Academia needs to incorporate
innovative educational methods to prepare future nurses to address the quality chasm as we shift to higher expectations of quality care through
QSEN.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: The Evolving Nature of Caring Knowledge and Practice (Grobbel, 2017, Watson, 1999) is the conceptual model for this
study. It is based on the belief that quality patient care is influenced by who a person is and what a person knows. In other words, the nurse’s
values, attitudes, experiences, and behaviors combined with what the nurse has learned through education, practice, and experience directly
influence the quality of patient outcomes. Enhancing students’ knowledge and perceptions will increase their knowledge and influence their quality
and caring practices.
METHODS: A quasi-experimental pretest posttest and correlational design using a convenience sample of self-selected pre-licensure baccalaureate
nursing students (N = 74) completed the CSE. Caring and quality were measured using the Nursing Quality and Safety Self-Inventory (NQSSI), an 18-
item self-rated inventory developed to measure nursing students’ self-rated knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding quality and safety
competencies (Piscotty & Grobbel, 2012) and the Caring Abilities Inventory (CAI), a 37-tem self-rated inventory developed to measure students’
perceptions about their ability to care for others (Nkongho, 1990).
RESULTS: Initial pilot study in 2012 and the repeat study in 2016 both demonstrated significant results in the Knowing subscale of the Caring Ability
Inventory (CAI) (t 1; p = 0.0022, t2; p = 0.043) and the Quality and Safety Self Inventory (NQSSI) (t1; p =.000, t2 p = 0.000). Both studies indicate an
ongoing effectiveness of using Caring Studios to increase caring abilities and QSEN knowledge.
CONCLUSION: Nursing students whose foundation for clinical practice is based on caring and quality knowledge will be better prepared to deliver
safe, high quality, patient-centered care and understand the important link between caring and QSEN competencies (Buckley, 2014).
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2017) retrieved from http://ahrq.gov
Benner, P., Tanner, C., & Chesla, C. (2009). Expertise in nursing practice: Caring clinical judgment and ethics. New York, NY: Springer.
Buckly, J. (2014). The cost of caring or not caring. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 40(1), 68-69.
Grobbel, C., Piscotty, R., Holka, K., Poly-Droulard, L., & Binge, A. (2017). An assessment of personal, professional and leadership values of nursing
students: Defining a path towards becoming a caring professional. International Journal of Human Caring.
Nkongho, N. (2003). The caring ability inventory. In O. Strickland& C. Dilorio (Eds). Measurement of Nursing Outcomes (pp. 84-198). New York:
Springer Publishing Company.
Penprase, B. , Oakley, B., Ternes, R., & Driscoll, D. (2013). Empathy as a Career Determinant for Nursing Career Selection. Journal of Nursing
Education, 52(4). 192-7.
Piscotty, R., Grobbel, C., & Abele, C. (2012). Psychometric evaluation of the Nursing Quality and Safety Self-Inventory: A self-report measure of
quality and safety knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Journal of Nursing Education.
QSEN competencies (2107) retrieved from http://www.QSEN.org.
Watson, J. (1999). Postmodern nursing and beyond. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Contact
[email protected]
A Program-Wide Clinical Performance Grading Rubric: Reliability Assessment
Mary Kopp, PhD, MSN, RN, CHPN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Background and Significance. Clinical instructors expect to see student performance improve, however attaching a grade to that
performance remains subjective.
Purpose of the study/project. To evaluate reliability of an undergraduate universal clinical performance grading rubric.
Literature Review: Clinical instructors expect to see student performance improve; however, attaching a grade to performance remains subjective
(Amicucci, 2012; Isaacson & Stacey, 2009; Oerman, Yarbrough, Saewert, Ard & Charasika, 2009). Standardized documented evaluation methods can
improve objectivity, define expected competencies, are easier to defend, avoid litigation, and empower the instructor, by shifting the paradigm
from highlighting student errors to an educational perspective (Bofinger & Rizk, 2006; DeBrew & Lewallen, 2014; Tanicala, Scheffer & Roberts,
2011). Evaluating performance based on a program-wide grading rubric to measure clinically specific criterion-based learning outcomes appears to
be a novel approach in clinical nursing education (Bourbonais, Langford & Giannantonio, 2008; Gantt, 2010; Heaslip & Scammel, 2012; Lasater,
2007).
Sample Description/Population. Convenience sample of 58 first semester clinical undergraduate baccalaureate nursing students.
Setting. Seven clinical instructors in nine clinical sections.
Method/Design & Procedure. A universal grading rubric with nine performance outcomes was tested retrospectively for measures of reliability and
consistency. Summative and formative measures were compared. Written assignments were compared to clinical performance. Clinical instructors
responded to questions related to the accuracy of the calculated letter grade with the use of the rubric.
Results/Outcomes. Significance was found between midterm (M =.89) and final performance evaluations (M = .94) (t(57) = -15.896, p <.001 (two
tailed) showing an increase in final performance. Using independent samples, no correlation was found between final written work and
performance evaluations (r(56) = .164, p =>.05 and a significant difference was noted between written work (M =.973) and performance
evaluations (M =.915) t(114) = 14.536, p = <.001. Cronbach alpha scores for all nine performance outcomes equaled .917, demonstrating excellent
internal consistency. All clinical instructors agreed that the results accurately measured student performance.
Conclusions/Implications. Use of the grading rubric was effective in measuring student clinical performance and provided an objective grade
calculation. Student’s written work consistently scored higher than clinical performance. This grading rubric, when used in an undergraduate
clinical experience, has the potential to increase reliability in grading clinical performance.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2017). Quality & safety education for nurses (QSEN). Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/qsen/home
Amicucci, B. (2012). What nurse faculty have to say about clinical grading. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 7(2), 51-55.
doi:10.1016/j.teln.2011.09.002
Benner, P. (2012). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation-How far have we come? Journal of Nursing Education, 51(4), 183-184.
doi:10.3928/01484834-20120402-01
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bofinger, R. & Rizk, K. (2006). Point systems versus legal system: An innovative approach to clinical evaluation. Nurse Educator, 31(2), 69-73.
Bourbonnais, F. F., Langford, S. & Giannantonio, L. (2008). Development of a clinical evaluation tool for baccalaureate nursing students. Nursing
Education Today, 8(1), 62-71. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2007.06.005
DeBrew, J. K. & Lewallwen, L. P. (2014). To pass or fail? Understanding the factors considered by faculty in the clinical evaluation of nursing
students. Nurse Education Today, 34(4), 631-636. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.014
Heaslip, V. & Scammell, J. M.E. (2012). Failing underperforming students: The role of grading in practice assessment. Nurse Education in Practice,
12(2), 95-100. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2011.08.003
Helminen, K., Coco, K., Johnson, M., Turunen, H. & Tossavainen, K. (2016). Summative assessment of clinical practice of student nurses: A review of
the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 53(2016), 308-319. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.09.014
Isaacson, J. J. & Stacy, A. S. (2009). Rubrics for clinical evaluation: Objectifying the subjective experience. Nurse Education in Practice, 9(2), 134-140.
doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2008.10.015
Krautscheid. L., Moceri, J., Stragnell, S., Manthey, L. & Neal, T. (2014). A descriptive study of a clinical evaluation tool and process: Student and
faculty perspectives. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(3s), s30-s33. doi:10.3928/01484834-20140211-02K
Neilsen, A. (2016). Concept-based learning in clinical experiences: Bringing theory to clinical education for deep learning. Journal of Nursing
Education, 55(7), 365-371. doi:10.3928/01484834-20160615-02
Oermann, M. H. Gaberson, K.B. (2016). Evaluation and testing in nursing education. (5th ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Oermann, M. H., Yarbrough, S. S., Saewert, K. J., Ard, N., & Charasika, M. (2009). Clinical evaluation and grading practices in schools of nursing:
National survey findings part II. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(6), 352-357.
Roberts, D. (2011). Grading the performance of clinical skills: Lessons to be learned from performing arts. Nurse Education Today, 31(6), 607-610.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.017
Seldomridge, L.A. & Walsh, C.M. (2006). Evaluating student performance in undergraduate preceptorships. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(5),
169-176.
Shin, H., Shim, K., Lee, Y., & Quinn, L. (2014). Validation of a new assessment tool for a pediatric nursing simulation module. Journal of Nursing
Education, 53(11), 623-633. doi:10.3928/01484834-20141023-04
Tanicala, M.L., Scheffer, B.K. & Roberts, M.S. (2011). Defining pass/fail: Nursing student clinical behaviors Phase I: Moving toward a culture of
safety. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(3), 155-161.
Contact
[email protected]
Implementing Peer Evaluation of Clinical Teaching
Rita A. Laske, EdD, MSN, BSN, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Clinical education provides the nursing student opportunities to learn the practice of nursing. In the clinical setting, the nursing
student applies classroom knowledge to the real patient care situation. The clinical instructor facilitates this important process by
assisting students to integrate knowledge into their practice, improve their critical thinking skills, and prepare them for practice as a
registered nurse. A clinical instructor can enhance or impede the nursing student's learning. Given that clinical practice is important
to nursing students' professional education, it is crucial for clinical practice to be evaluated for effectiveness. To address this issue,
this project examines the question-What might peer evaluation of clinical teaching look like?
Part one of the project presents background on types of feedback currently used to evaluate clinical teaching effectiveness. Both student and peer
evaluation are utilized as sources of evaluative information for faculty appraisal and development. A review of the literature also identified specific
teacher attributes that likely contribute to effective clinical instruction. These identified attributes should be considered for incorporation into a
peer evaluation system of a clinical teaching program.
Part two of the project reports the methods and data analysis used to answer the research question. A mixed method approach was utilized with
both quantative and qualitative methods. Survey data were collected from Temple University nursing faculty and select NLN accredited RN nursing
programs. In addition, personal interviews were conducted with Temple University faculty who participated in a pilot study of peer evaluation of
clinical teaching. Findings from these data sources showed that faculty (both Temple University and NLN accredited schools) valued peer feedback
on their teaching and advocated for a program for peer evaluation of clinical teaching effectiveness. The data also revealed resources needed to
successfully implement a program.
Part three of the project describes a feasible solution for peer evaluation of clinical teaching. This proposed program of peer evaluation of clinical
teaching is designed as a formative process of faculty feedback. This section outlines a program description, implementation strategies, needed
fiscal resources, and a program evaluation plan.
References
Blauvelt, M., Erickson, C., Davenport, N., & Spath, M. (2012). Say yes to peer review: a collaborative approach to faculty development.Nurse
Educator, 37(3), 126-130.
Donnelly, R. (2012). Perceived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher
Education, 19(2), 117-129.
Gaberson, K., Oermann, M., & Shellenbarger, T. (2014). Clinical teaching strategies in clinical teaching. New York: Springer.
Hou, X., Zhu, D., & Zheng, M. (2011). Clinical nursing faculty competence inventory-development and psychometric testing. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 67(5), 1109-1117. (tool used in survey).
Knox, J., & Mogan, J. (1985). Important clinical teaching behaviors as perceived by university nursing faculty, students and graduates. Journal of
Advanced Nursing, 10, 25-30. (seminal work)
Sullivan, P., Buckle, A., Nicky, G., & Atkinson, S. (2012). Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool. BMC Medical Education, 12, 26-
31.
Thomas, S.,Chie, Q.,Abraham, M.,Jalarajan Raj, S., &Beh, L. (2014).A qualitative review of literature on peer review of teaching in higher education.
Review of educational research, 84(1), 112-159.
Contact
[email protected]
Understanding the Effects of Technology Acceptance in Nursing Faculty: A Hierarchical Regression
Joseph Tacy, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Nursing faculty prepare new nurses to work in complex, technological environments which creates an urgency to
integrate new clinical technology into curricula at a rapid pace. Faculty are also expected to use technology in teaching to stimulate
and facilitate learning. Pressure for faculty to teach traditional courses in non-traditional ways has increased in response to student
demand and trends in nursing education. Technology and its integration can create stress, called technostress, which affects the
attitudes and use of technology.
The resulting stress may undermine job satisfaction and faculty role retention. It is important to recognize the effects of technostress in nursing
faculty and manage effectively to improve both the quality of work life and retention. Burgeoning technology with varied levels of administrative
support poses a challenge to academic stability. Increasing expectations for nursing faculty to embrace and incorporate new technology is
occurring at the same time faculty members are teaching growing numbers of students who must be prepared to work with technology in high
stakes health care arenas. How much these issues create technostress and influence their attitudes, use of technology, job satisfaction, and intent
to stay is unclear. This study aimed to fill that gap.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of nurse faculty technostress, perceived usefulness, ease of use, and attitude toward using
technology on use, job satisfaction, and intent to leave the profession.
Methods and Measurements: Below you will find bulleted the methods used for this study:
• Purposive, non-probability sampling of Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) member nursing schools. 121 schools of
nursing located across the south eastern United States were included in this study and associate, baccalaureate and
graduate nurse faculty (N = approximately 4,511) were invited to participate.
• Of the 4,511 emails sent, 1161 faculty participated (26% response rate). Data were cleaned and missing data reduced the
sample size to 1017.
• Study data were converted to an electronic data set and analysis of variables was performed using SPSS Version 23.
Exploratory data analysis was done using histograms, skew, and kurtosis to evaluate normality and Levene’s test to evaluate
homogeneity of variance. Transformations were done for data that were not normally distributed but did not yield better
results.
• Descriptive statistics such as age, gender, educational level, and academic rank were used to characterize the sample.
Hierarchical regression analysis was used to test three hypotheses with variable entry based upon the model.
• Nurse Educator Technostress Scale (NETS) yielded an internal consistency reliability of α = 0.94.
• Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) yielded the following for internal consistency reliability:
• Perceived usefulness α = .96, Perceived ease of use α = .97, Behavioral intent to use α = .92, and Actual system use α = .96.
• Attitudes Toward E-Learning (ATEL) yielded an internal consistency reliability of α = .89.
• The Job in General Scale (JIG) had an internal reliability in this study of α = .90.
Results: Mean substitution was performed via recoding missing data with the average instrument mean (N = 1017) for all models.
Ha1: Technostress, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude toward using, and behavioral intention to use technology explain variation
in technology use. The model was statistically significant, R2 = .80, F(5,1011) = 815.81, p < .000. The five variables explain 80% of the variation in
technology use indicating a strong model. Technology use was predicted by lower levels of technostress and higher levels of perceived usefulness,
perceived ease of use, attitude toward using, and behavioral intention to use. Technostress entered as step 1 had the best chance of explaining
variance yet only accounted for 4.3% of the variation in use.
Ha2: Technostress, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude toward using, behavioral intention to use, and use of technology explain
variation in job satisfaction. The model was statistically significant, R2 = .10, F(6,1010) = 19.460, p < .000, which demonstrates the six variables
explain 10% of the variation in job satisfaction. Job satisfaction was predicted by lower levels of technostress and higher levels of perceived
usefulness, behavioral intent, and system use. Neither attitude nor perceived ease of use were significant predictors of job satisfaction.
Ha3: Technostress, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude toward using, behavioral intention to use, use of technology, and job
satisfaction explain variation in intent to stay in the profession. The model was statistically significant, R2 = .04, F(7,1009) = 7.383, p < .000, which
demonstrates the seven variables explain 4% of the variation in intent to stay.
Discussion: The first study model validated the TAM model with the addition of technostress and explained 80% of the variation in system use. The
second model added job satisfaction as an outcome variable after technology use. While the goal was to see if the TAM model fostered better
understanding of job satisfaction, it did not perform well; and perceived ease of use and attitude toward using technology were not significant
predictors of job satisfaction. Thus, perceived usefulness, attitude toward using, and system use positively predicated job satisfaction, while
technostress negatively impacted job satisfaction. The 3rd model sought to evaluate whether it fostered understanding of nursing faculty intent to
stay in the job. On average the faculty intended to stay 9 years with a SD of 6.81, range of 0 to 40 years. 40% intended to stay 5 years or less.
Technostress, attitude toward using, behavioral intention to use, and use of technology were insignificant predictors of intent to stay. Therefore,
perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and job satisfaction predicted intent to stay in the profession. This model was the lowest performing of
the three studied with only 4% of prediction. The assumption driving this study was that technostress would be a strong predictor of technology
use, job satisfaction, and intent to stay in the profession. Surprisingly, technostress was found to be a weak predictor for technology use and job
satisfaction and irrelevant with intention to stay in the profession. Although surprising, the large sample size and addition of technostress did
provide strong study results with 80% explained variance in the TAM model.
Conclusion: Findings revealed that technostress undermines job satisfaction and technology use in nurse faculty, while supporting many other
variables that positively influenced technology use, job satisfaction, and intent to stay in teaching. This study along with future research should
propel administration and nursing programs toward engagement to create support of faculty struggling with technology issues to reverse
technostress and recognize key variables that promote job satisfaction and influence faculty intent to say.
References
Allen, E. I., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Retrieved from
http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/going_distance_2011
Agbu, J, & Simeon, O. (2011). Technostress in the age of information communication technology: A case study of distance education. Educational
Research, 2(11), 1654-1660.
Al-Fudail, M., & Mellar, H. (2008). Investigating teacher stress when using technology. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1103-1110.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2015a, March). Nurse Faculty Shortage. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2015b). Mission and values. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/about-aacn/mission-values
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2011, December 6). New AACN data show significant enrollment increases in baccalaureate, masters,
and doctoral nursing degree programs. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/news/articles/2011/11enrolldata
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2010). Addressing the nursing shortage: A focus on nurse faculty. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/government-affairs/archives/NrsShrtgStrats.pdf
Axley, L. (2008) The integration of technology into nursing curricula: Supporting faculty via the technology fellowship program. OJIN: The Online
Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(3), 12-22.
Ayyagari, R., & Purvis, V. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. Miss Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858.
Ball, D., & Levy, Y. (2008). Emerging education technology: Assessing the factors that influence instructors’ acceptance in information systems and
other classrooms. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(4), 431-443.
Beam, R. A., Kim, E., & Voakes, P. S. (2003). Technology-induced stressors, job satisfaction and workplace exhaustion among journalism and mass
communication faculty. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 57(4), 335-51.
Brodke, M., Sliter, M., Balzar, W., Gillespie, J., Gillespie, M., Gopalkrishnan, P., ...Yankelevich, M. (2009). Job Descriptive Index (2009 Revision) and
The Job in General Scales (2009 Revision). Bowling Green, MO: Bowling Green State University
Burke, M. (2009). The incidence of technological stress among baccalaureate nurse educators using technology during course preparation and
delivery. Nurse Education Today, 29(1), 57-64.
Burke, M. A. S. (2005). Technological stressors of Louisiana baccalaureate nurse educators (Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and
Agricultural & Mechanical College). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 304988993).
Chapman, D. (2011). Contingent and tenure/tenure track faculty: Motivations and incentives to teach distance education courses. Online Journal of
Distance Learning Administration, 14(3), p. 1-14.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems
Quarterly, 13(3), 983-1003.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management
Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Electronic learning (2013, November 13). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-learning
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
Georgina, D. A., & Olson, M. R. (2008). Integration of technology in higher education: A review of faculty self-perceptions. Internet and Higher
Education, 11(1), 1-8.
Green, T., Alejandro, J., & Brown, A. H. (2009). The retention of experienced faculty in online distance education programs: Understanding factors
that impact their involvement. International Review of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-15.
Han, S. (2003). Individual adoption of mobile commerce products and services: A proposed framework. Proceedings from of the 24th McMaster
World Congress: McMaster World Congress, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: 24th McMaster World Congress.
Health Resources and Services Administration Bureau of Health Professions (HRSA). 2013. The US nursing workforce: Trends in supply and
education. Retrieved from http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/reports/nursingworkforce/nursingworkforcefullreport.pdf
Health Resources and Services Administration Bureau of Health Professions (2010, August). The impact of nursing faculty shortage on nurse
education and practice. Retrieved from http://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/bhpradvisory/nacnep/Reports/ninthreport.pdf
Herman, J. (2012). Faculty development programs: The frequency and variety of professional development programs available to online instructors.
Journal Of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 87-106.
How much do nurses earn? Nursing salary and benefits information. (n.d.). CollegeAtlas. Retrieved from http://www.collegeatlas.org/nurse-
salaries.html#nurse-practitioner-salary
Institute of Medicine. (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Retrieved from http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/The-
Future-of-Nursing-Leading-Change-Advancing-Health.aspx
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) (2015). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Version 23.0.
Jena, R., & Mahanti, P. (2014). An empirical study of technostress among Indian academicians. International Journal of Education and Learning,
3(2), 1-10.
Khan, A., Rehman, H., Rehman, S. (2013). An empirical analysis of correlation between technostress and job satisfaction: A case of KPK, Pakistan.
Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science, 13, 9-15.
Kim, Y., Chun, J., & Song, J. (2009). Investigating the role of attitude in technology acceptance from an attitude strength perspective. International
Journal of Information Management, 29(1), 67-77.
La Paglia, F., Caci, B., & La Barbera, D. (2008). Technostress: A research about computer self-efficacy, internet attitude and computer anxiety.
Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 6, 62-29.
Lackey, K. (2011). Faculty development: An analysis of current and effective training strategies for preparing faculty to teach online. Online Journal
Of Distance Learning Administration, 14(4), 1-22.
Mishra, S., & Panda, S. (2007). E-learning in a mega open university: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators. Educational Media International,
44(4), 323-338.
Mitchell, M., Palacios, V., & Leachman, M. (2014). States are still funding higher education below pre-recession levels. Center on Budget and Policy
Priorities. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/files/5-1-14sfp.pdf
Moore, J., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and
Higher Education, 14, 129-135.
National League for Nursing. (2008). Preparing the next generation of nurses to practice in a technology-rich environment: An informatics agenda.
Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/positionstatements/informatics_052808.pdf
Nguyen, D., Zierler, B., & Nguyen, H. (2011). A survey of nursing faculty needs for training in use of new technologies for education and practice.
Osborne, R., Kriese, P, Tobey, H, & Johnson, E. (2009). And never the two shall meet? Student vs. Faculty perceptions of online courses. Journal Of
Educational Computing Research, 40(2), 171-182.
Park, N., Lee, K., & Cheong, P. (2008). University instructors’ acceptance of electronic courseware: An application of the technology acceptance
model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, 163-186.
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Cifre, E. (2013). The dark side of technologies: Technostress among users of information and communication
technologies. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 422-436.
Shu, Q., Tu, Q., & Wang, K. (2011). The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer related technostress: A social
cognitive theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27, 923-939.
Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E., & Ragu-Nathan, T.S. (2015). Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems
Journal, 25, 103-132.
Teo, T., & Schaik, P. (2012). Understanding the intention, the use technology by preservice teachers: An empirical test of competing theoretical
models. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 28, 178-88
VanVooren, C., DeVore, D., Ambriz-Galaviz, N. (2011). Managing positive stress for change in the implementation of technology in schools.
Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9(2), 28-31.
Venkatesh, V. (n.d). Theoretical models. Retrieved from http://www.vvenkatesh.com/organizations/Theoretical_Models.asp
Venkatesh, V, Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3),
425-478.
Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F., (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management
Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Weil, M., & Rosen, L. (1997). TechnoStress: Coping with technology @ work @ home @ play. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Wong, K., Osman, R., Goh, P., & Rahmat, M. (2013). Understanding student teacher’s behavioral intention to use technology: Technology
Acceptance Model (TAM) validation and testing. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 89-104.
Yuen, A., & Ma, W. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229-243.
Zhen, Y., Garthwait, A., & Pratt, P. (2008). Factors affecting faculty members' decision to teach or not to teach online in higher education. Online
Journal Of Distance Learning Administration, 11(3), 5-25.
Contact
[email protected]
Subscription Learning: A Technology-Based Component of Clinical Faculty Orientation
Kasey Hale Jordan, MSN, RN, USA
Nachiket Kumar, BA, USA
Abstract
This pilot study was designed to explore the potential of a technology-based subscription learning experience for use in clinical
faculty orientation. Orientation experiences for clinical nurse faculty are pivotal to their success and development, but little evidence
exists to guide high quality orientation experiences (Santisteban & Egues, 2014). The challenges associated with the new faculty
phase are well documented and represent a serious threat to positive program outcomes (Cangelosi, Crocker, & Sorrell, 2009; Peters
& Boylston, 2006). Evidence and expert opinion do suggest, however, that better nurse faculty orientation experiences can lead to
improved faculty retention and better student outcomes (Davidson & Rourke, 2012; Hewitt & Lewallen, 2010; Johnson, 2016).
Adequate nurse faculty orientation programs consist of learning experiences that includes education about department policies and
procedures as well as best practices for promoting student success (Hewitt & Lewallen, 2010). Unfortunately, new nurse faculty are
often overwhelmed with a barrage of information during a traditional faculty orientation that makes recall and implementation
difficult.
Subscription learning is an emerging style of education that combines modern technologic tools with learning science (Thalheimer, 2016). Instead
of exposure to a large amount of learning material at one time, learners are prompted with an intermittent stream of small learning sessions. A
subscription learning platform was developed and tested for potential use in clinical faculty orientation. Learning experiences were developed by a
full-time nurse faculty member and a community partner in the IT industry. Software-as-a-service (SaaS) products were utilized to develop a low-
cost subscription learning platform that included content and evaluation opportunities for each lesson. Eight lessons were developed, each
targeted to take between two and five minutes to complete. Content for each lesson included critical topics in the nursing student clinical
evaluation tool including holism, assessment, communication, diversity, documentation, compassion, evaluation, and models/frameworks. Two
lessons each week were delivered to consenting clinical faculty members over the course of four weeks. Feedback was assessed through a survey
including Likert-style questions and qualitative feedback. Nine clinical faculty provided feedback on the subscription learning platform. Results
indicated positive impressions of the learning methodology and support for future use in clinical faculty orientation. Clinical faculty reported
utilizing techniques and suggestions provided in the learning experience with their clinical groups. Feedback did suggest that clinical faculty desired
more depth in the content provided in each lesson. This study supports further exploration of subscription learning as a component of a
comprehensive clinical nurse faculty orientation program. Future directions may include development of a stand-alone application that would
streamline evaluation and monitoring by clinical supervisors. This technology could ultimately be used to promote high quality clinical experiences
for nursing students through the development of high quality clinical instructors.
References
Cangelosi, P. R., Crocker, S., & Sorrell, J. M. (2009). Expert to novice: clinicians learning new roles as clinical nurse educators. Nurs Educ Perspect,
30(6), 367-371.
Davidson, K. M., & Rourke, L. (2012). Surveying the orientation learning needs of clinical nursing instructors. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh, 9, Article 3.
doi:10.1515/1548-923x.2314
Hewitt, P., & Lewallen, L. P. (2010). Ready, set, teach! How to transform the clinical nurse expert into the part-time clinical nurse instructor. J
Contin Educ Nurs, 41(9), 403-407. doi:10.3928/00220124-20100503-10
Johnson, K. V. (2016). Improving Adjunct Nursing Instructors' Knowledge of Student Assessment in Clinical Courses. Nurse Educ, 41(2), 108-110.
doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000205
Peters, M. A., & Boylston, M. (2006). Mentoring adjunct faculty: innovative solutions. Nurse Educ, 31(2), 61-64.
Santisteban, L., & Egues, A. L. (2014). Cultivating adjunct faculty: strategies beyond orientation. Nurs Forum, 49(3), 152-158. doi:10.1111/nuf.12106
Thalheimer, W. (2016). Subscription Learning. Retrieved from http://www.subscriptionlearning.com
Contact
[email protected]
Examining Knowledge and Retention Using Storytelling versus Board Game Toward Improving Intimate
Partner Violence Education
Susan L. Hall, EdD, MSN, BSN, RNC-OB, USA
Melissa Schwartz Beck, PhD, MSN, BSN, RNC-OB, USA
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over 10 million incidents of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) occurs annually in the United States (CDC, 2015). The
World Health Organization [WHO], (2013), reports 38% of all female murders are committed by an intimate partner. PURPOSE: The
purpose of this quasi-experimental pretest/posttest design is to evaluate the use of storytelling compared to simulation board game
as an instructional strategy to enhance or improve IPV education in undergraduate baccalaureate nursing students. Unfortunately,
identifying IPV victims is a challenge for students to recognize because warning signs are often subtle or absent (Bradbury-Jones,
Appleton & Watts, 2016; Tuffs, Clements & Karlowics, 2008; Schwartz, 2007), and the lack of IPV content integrated in the classroom
(Tuff et al., 2008). METHODS: This study was conducted in a historically black university on the east coast with nursing students (n
=37) enrolled in one of two seven-week community health classes in the spring of 2017. Block 1 students (n=18) received IPV
education delivered in storied format using PowerPoint to highlight key points. Block two students (n=19) received IPV instruction
through a simulated board game. At the information session, prior to the start of the course, students who agreed to participate
completed demographic information and pre-test questions. Immediately following the intervention, students completed post-test
questions and a survey evaluating the methodology used. Three-weeks following the intervention students answered the same post-
test questions to evaluate knowledge retention. During the final exam, students were given similar yet different questions to
address concerns of question memorization rather than knowledge comprehension. RESULTS: Results suggest both groups of
students agreed or strongly agreed each method brought additional awareness and desire to help victims of IPV. All students agreed
the simulation board game was structured to meet content objectives, but not all agreed this method changed their opinion or
provided further insight in recognizing/responding to victims of IPV. Pre-test/Post-test questions showed improvement of scores for
participants using the simulation board game over students who heard the IPV story. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest
stories are a powerful source of persuasion; however, simulation board games may improve IPV knowledge acquisition and
retention. IPV experts agree there is a need for educational interventions to change attitudes and beliefs about IPV and more studies
on their use (Dill-Shackleford, Green, Scharrer, Wetterer, & Shackleford, 2015). Recognizing the limitations of a small sample size,
participant demographics, and previous IPV knowledge suggest that even more research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of
storytelling and simulation board games for IPV education in undergraduate nursing.
References
Bradbury-Jones, C., Appleton, J., & Watts, S. (2016). Recognizing and responding to domestic violence and abuse: the role of public health nurses.
Community Practitioner, 89(3), 24-28.
CDC (2015). Intimate partner violence Surveillance. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/intimatepartnerviolence.pdf
Dill-Shackleford, K.E., Green, M.C., Scharrer, E., Wetterer, C., & Shackleford, E. (2015). Setting the stage for social change: Using live theater to
dispel myths about intimate partner violence. Journal of Health Communication, 20(8), 968-976.
Schwartz, M. R. (2007). When closeness breeds cruelty: Helping victims of intimate partner violence. American Nurse Today,2(6), 42-48.
Tufts, K.A., Clements, P.T., Karlowicz, K.A. (2008). Integrating intimate partner violence content across the curricula: Developing a new generation
of nurse educators. Nurse Education Today, 29(1), 40-47.
World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner
violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization.
Contact
[email protected]
Evaluation of a Clinical Workshop to Improve Students' Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence
Jane R. Ierubino, DNP, USA
Abstract
Domestic violence (DV), also called intimate partner violence (IPV), is a major health issue affecting a significant portion of the
population. Roughly one in three American women (24.3%) will have experienced physical violence by an intimate partner in her
lifetime (De Boinville, 2013). This includes a variety of behaviors from slapping, pushing or shoving to severe acts of violence such as
being beaten, raped, burned, or strangled. Recent global prevalence figures indicate that approximately one in three (35%) of
women worldwide have experienced either physical and/or sexual violence in their lifetime (World Health Organization [WHO],
2016). In addition to the immediate acute injuries from an assault, violence can have devastating effects on victims’ long-term health
(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2016). Family members and the community are also affected by the violence.
Nurses are in a key position to identify victims, provide support and refer victims to appropriate resources (De Boinville, 2013).
Physical and sexual assaults, or threats to commit them, are the most apparent forms of domestic violence. However, perpetrators
of DV may use a larger system of abuse, including emotional, economic, social isolation, intimidation, coercion and threats, to
maintain power and control over the victim. There are many myths about domestic violence that hinder understanding of the
problem. Many believe that the DV is not a problem in their communities, that domestic violence only affects poor women of color,
and that drugs and alcohol are the cause of DV. Others believe some people deserve to be hit and that if the situation were that bad,
a victim would just leave (Domesticviolence.org, 2015). There is a need to replace these false ideas with the most current and
accurate knowledge available.
Despite the enormity of the problem, there is little information in the literature that describes effective educational interventions related to
domestic violence for nursing students. Nursing students may not be receiving the educational preparation to correctly assess, provide support and
referral, and to document domestic violence interventions. Opportunities for students to engage with victims of violence in the clinical setting are
rare. Confidentiality and safety are paramount and limit exposure. Many nurses feel unprepared to deal with DV and do not demonstrate best
practices in the clinical setting. Students learn by observing the behaviors of clinicians in the health care setting. Often screening for violence is
omitted or is done incorrectly. Many students are graduating from their programs with limited or no domestic violence education. Some students
observe inadequate assessment and nursing care of victims of violence, thus reinforcing inappropriate care. The lack of experience or exposure to
incorrect care can have a profound effect on students’ ability to provide comprehensive assessment, support and documentation to victims of
violence (Bryant & Benson, 2015).
Giving students information to increase their knowledge, experience, and skill, and promote positive attitudes toward victims of violence is
essential. The purpose of this research was to determine the effect an evidence-based educational intervention had on baccalaureate nursing
students’ ability to care for victims of DV. The educational intervention was a six-hour clinical workshop that included an evidence-based lecture,
films, video clips, games, role-play, guest speakers, and hands-on activities that simulate the nursing role related to assessment, support, referral,
and documentation of nursing interventions related to DV.
Evaluation of the workshop was done using a quasi-experimental design. Students in the control group experienced traditional clinical, while
students in the intervention group experienced traditional clinical with one of their clinical days spent attending the clinical workshop. Nursing
students at a four-year, private university in the Northeast were evaluated at the beginning and end of the Women’s Health course using the
Provider Readiness to Manage Intimate Partner Violence Survey – Revised (PREMIS-R). The survey measures three constructs, Perceived
Preparation, Actual Knowledge, and Opinions. Students who experienced the workshop had improved scores for Perceived Preparation and
Opinions. Actual Knowledge scores were unchanged.Students felt better prepared, more confident, and had attitudes that would empower them
to provide improved care for victims of violence.
References
Bryant, S., & Benson, K. (2015, November). Using Simulation to Introduce Nursing Students to caring for victims of elder abuse and intimate partner
violence. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(6), 408-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/15-1609
Centers for Disease Control. (2016). Intimate partner violence. Retrieved from
http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/intimatepartnerviolence/index.html
De Boinville, M. (2013). Screening for domestic violence in health care settings [Policy brief]. Retrieved from U. S. Department of Health and Human
Services: https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/76931/pb_screeningDomestic.pdf
Domesticviolence.org. (2015). Common myths and why they are wrong. Retrieved from http://www.domesticviolence.org/common-myths/
World Health Organization. (2015). Prevention of intimate partner and sexual violence (violence against women). Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/sexual/en/
Contact
[email protected]
Exploration of Transcultural Self-Efficacy Strength and NCLEX-RN© Success in a Concept-Based Curriculum
Mary Joan Polchert, PhD, BSN, USA
Abstract
Teaching cultural care to students with variations in life experiences prior to formal nursing education is complex. Nursing research provides
evidence of changes in measurement scores that are not always statistically significant because of the small sample sizes correlated to selected
outcomes. Data translation strategies exploring curricular program outcomes may contribute to the preparation of nursing student for NCLEX©
(National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses) success and future practice in diverse health care environments (NCLEX-RN©
Examination, 2015). Critical thinking has been a significant predictor of first-time NCLEX© success in a study by Romeo (2013).
Purpose and Significance: The purpose of this research is to explore student changes in Self-Efficacy Strength (SES) measured with the 83-Item
Transcultural Self-Efficacy Tool (Jeffreys, 2010) and the relationship of successful NCLEX© achievement in a Nursing Education program that has
implemented a Concept Based Curriculum (CBC). According to the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation (RWJ, 2011), NCLEX© serves as the
benchmark for achievement of safe patient centered care. The focus of a CBC is commonality of assessments and plans for nursing interventions in
the care of diverse clients and settings (Giddens, Caputi, & Rodgers, 2014). CBC uses a conceptual approach to reduce content saturation in the
application of nursing process along the health-illness continuum (Hendricks & Wangerin, 2017). The Transcultural Self-Efficacy Tool (TSET)
provides a measure of students’ perceptions of cultural awareness caring for diverse groups (Fisher, 2014). Exploring TSET scores and NCLEX©
success contributes to knowledge about the complex contributions for nursing education.
Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive correlational design with logistic regression was used, TSET scores were used as the independent variable
(IV) and first time success in NCLEX© licensure was used as the dichotomous dependent variable (DV). The data was collected in two cohorts of
pre-licensure students participating in a Concept Based Curriculum (CBC) in the Mid-west.
The TSET scores relate normal progression of perceived self-efficacy beliefs reflecting Self-Efficacy Strength (SES) measured over time. The TSET
was developed by Jeffreys (2010) and is an 83 item measure with three subscales reflecting knowledge development and confidence in the
cognitive, practical, and affective domains. The TSET has supported reliability with reported Cronbach’s alpha 0.92-0.98 (Jeffreys & Dogan, 2010).
Criterion related validity suggests that SES is influenced by cultural care experiences and changes over time. Nursing students more often score
higher in the affective dimensions of competence and lower in the cognitive dimensions. Students as novice learners generally score lower as
compared to advanced learners or professional nurses in practice with years of experience.
The NCLEX© is administered using Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) with a controlled percentage of questions. The category of Human
Functioning assesses respondents’ knowledge about alterations along the wellness continuum (NCLEX© Examination, 2015). The NCLEX©
dimensions of Human Functioning assess cognitive, practical, and affective domains and provide a good match to items on the TSET to provide a
score about perceptions of Self-Efficacy Strength in cultural care. Specific items on the TSET measure efficacy beliefs about growth and
development, self-concept, communication, sleep, rest, spiritual care, grieving, ethical concerns, and cultural beliefs (Jeffreys, 2010).
Results : TSET subscale scores were evaluated with paired t-tests and all three revealed statistically significant increases in scores in the sample (all
two tailed t-tests). A paired-sample t-test was calculated to compare the mean pretest TSET-Cognitive score to the mean final TSET-Cognitive score.
The mean on the pretest was 6.93 (sd = 1.57) and the mean on the final TSET-Cognitive was 8.32 (sd = 1.30). A significant increase from pretest to
final TSET-Cognitive was found (t(57.31) = 80, p <.000). A paired-sample t-test was calculated to compare the mean pretest TSET-Practical score to
the mean final TSET-Practical score. The mean on the pretest was 6.81 (sd = 1.65) and the mean on the final TSET-Practical was 7.99 (sd = 1.65. A
significant increase from the pretest to final TSET-Practical score was found (t(43.43) = 80, p<.000). A paired-sample t-test was calculated to
compare the mean pretest TSET-Affective score to the mean final TSET-Affective score. The mean on the pretest was 8.62 (sd = 1.04) and the mean
on the final TSET-Affective was 8.91 (sd = .98). A significant increase from pretest to final TSET-Affective score was found (t(81.20) = 80, p<.000).
Logistic regression was conducted to explore the relationship of changes in each TSET subscale score to NCLEX© success passing score. Growth in
TSET subscale scores were analyzed. After controlling for cohort, gender, and racial/ethnic status, there was no significant contribution of TSET-
Cognitive or TSET-Practical score to predicting the likelihood of passing the NCLEX©. The change in the TSET-Affective subscale is marginally
significant (p < .08) on the pass rate (β = 0.818). As noted, nursing students more often score higher in the TSET-Affective subscale throughout the
times of testing and there is less increase in this score over time (Jeffreys, 2010), yet the small changes that do occur contribute strongly to
increasing the likelihood to pass the NCLEX©. The preliminary results of analysis have potential implications in teaching professional nursing and
translation into educational practice or policy.
Impact on Learner Preparation and Translation to Education: This research contributes to knowledge about education of professional nurses and
shares findings that explore the relationship of cultural Self-Efficacy Strength (SES) to success with NCLEX© within a Concept Based Curriculum
(CBC). Changes in TSET scores assessing SES impact learner preparation and provide evidence of the cognitive, practical, and affective domains of
learning. Discussion and exploration of data with faculty in CBC is in progress to determine a theoretical model to guide curricular initiatives that
will include measurement of quality outcomes in educational processes.
Future research is in process with standardized testing to further explore program outcome data to continue to generate evidence about teaching
and learning. Suggestions for translation of evidence into teaching practices with enhanced integration of clinical components, simulation, and
practical experiences in the community is indicated. Reflective narratives with journaling may provide data about student perceptions supporting
assessment of the affective domain of learning and abstract concepts of significance to providing health services (Decker, Hensel, Kuhn, &Priest,
2017). Bernard (2015) suggests exploration of the attributes of student engagement, motivation, and resilience may provide insight for the
development of learner-centered strategies in the academic environment. Additional research about student learning through the use of reflective
narratives expands understanding of the student nurse perceptions of cultural competence, human functioning, care planning in diverse
populations, critical thinking processes, and the affective domain – all significant components that impact learner preparation.
References
Bernard, J. S., (2015). Student Engagement: A Principle-Based Concept Analysis. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 1-11.
Decker, K., Hensel, D., Kuhn, T., & Priest, C., (2017). Innovative implementation of Social Determinants of Health in a New Concept-Based
Curriculum. Nurse Educator, 42(3), 115-116.
Fisher, M., (2014). A comparison of professional value development among pre-licensure nursing students in Associate Degree, Diploma, and
Bachelor of Science Programs. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(1), 37-42.
Giddens, J., Caputi, L., & Rodgers, B., (2014). Mastering Concept-Based Teaching: A guide for Nurse Educators. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Hendricks, S., & Wangerin, V., (2017). Concept-Based Curriculum - Changing attitudes and overcoming barriers. Nurse Educator, 42(3), 138-142.
Jeffreys, M., (2010). Teaching Cultural Competence in Nursing and Health Care (2nd edition). New York, NY: Springer.
Jeffreys, M., & Dogan, E., (2010). Factor Analysis of the Transcultural Self-Efficacy Tool (TSET). Journal of Nursing Measurement, 18(2), 120-139.
NCLEX-RN© Examination (2015). Test Plan for the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses. Chicago, IL: National Council of
State Boards of Nursing.
Robert Woods Johnson Foundation, (2011). The Future of Nursing: Leading change advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Romeo, E. M., (2013). The Predictive Ability of Critical Thinking, Nursing GPA, and SAT Scores on First-Time NCLEX-RN Performance. Nursing
Education Perspectives, 34(4), 248-253.
Contact
[email protected]
Mastering the Content: A Systematic Evidence-Based Approach to Nursing Program Success
Laura J. Wallace, PhD, USA
Abstract
Nurse educators have been looking for an elusive set of pre-licensure nursing program admission criteria resulting in zero attrition
and 100% first time National Council Licensure Examination – Registered Nurse (NCLEX-RN) pass rate since nursing education left the
hospitals and moved into the collegiate setting (Romero, 2013). Should face-to-face interviews or essays be required? What is the
minimum grade point average (GPA) to guarantee not just program completion, but passing NCLEX-RN the very first time? Should
programs require a minimum score on a standardized nursing admission test and what should the score be? Will these preadmission
requirements lead to a zero attrition rate due to course or clinical failure? Research has determined a system wide approach to
program development, evaluation, and revision is linked to high rates of continued progression and NCLEX-RN first time pass rate
success (Carr, 2011; Cole & Adams, 2014; Koestler, 2015; Serumbus, 2016). The system wide approach is based on continuous
program assessment and evaluation providing data to guide improvements and change based on the evidence.
At a small southeastern university traditional prelicensure Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) program the most recent evidence indicates the
science GPA of the admission criteria as most predictive of program success and has shown the importance of learners “Mastering the Content” of
the nursing curriculum in order to be successful in both program completion and the first time when taking NCLEX-RN. Mastering the Content is not
just passing courses, achieving the 75% exam average for course exams, or obtaining a specific benchmark on a standardized end of course exam
(Wiles, 2014). Mastering the Content starts with building a strong curriculum founded on the knowledge and skills of general nursing practice,
exemplary teaching, and student utilization of metacognitive learning strategies. Mastering the Content continues with student application of the
comprehensive foundation and metacognitive strategies to perform an accurate nursing analysis and judgment in order to choose the safest, best,
or priority nursing action. Implementation of an introduction to nursing school success course, identification of and working with at-risk students,
course exam review, and ending with an NCLEX prep course are also important for learner success in Mastering the Content.
The results obtained during the continuous process of program assessment and evaluation, implementation of the Mastering of Content curriculum
and active learning enhancements, and regression analysis of student admission requirements support an evidence-based multifaceted system
approach to program reform. Analysis of the data supported (a) modification of admission criteria, (b) implementation of a nursing program
orientation course, (c) using technology enhanced active learning strategies to promote retention of learning, (d) providing students with
opportunities to learn how to develop metacognitive learning tools to assist in Mastering the Content, and (e) an NCLEX preparation course. The
end result demonstrated a greater than 10% increase in NCLEX-RN first attempt pass rates and decrease in attrition rate for course failure.
References
Carr, S.M. (2011). NCLEX-RN pass rate peril: One school’s journey through curriculum revision, standardized testing, and attitudinal change. Nursing
Education Perspectives, 32(6), 384-388. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/neponline/toc/2011/11000
Carrick, J.A. (2011). Student achievement and NCLEX-RN Success: Problems that persist. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2). 78-83. doi:
10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.78
Cole, L.G. & Adams, M.H. (2014). A multifaceted progression approach to enhancing student success. Nurse Educator, 39(6), 285-289. doi:
10.1097/NNE.0000000000000084
Corrigan-Magaldi, M., Colalillo, G., & Molloy. J. (2014). Faculty-facilitated remediation: A model to transform at-risk students. Nurse Educator,
39(4), 155-157. doi: 10.1097.NNE.0000000000000043
Cox-Davenport, R.A. & Phelan, J.C. (2015). Laying the groundwork for NCLEX success. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 33(5), 208-215. doi:
10.1097/CIN.0000000000000140
Docherty, A. & Dieckmann, N. (2015). Is there evidence of failing to fail in our schools of nursing? Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(4). 226-231.
doi: 10.548/14-1485
Geist, M.J. & Catlette, M. (2014). Tap into NCLEX success. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9, 115-119. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2014.02.002
Horton, C., Potek, C., & Hardie, T. (2012). The relationship between enhanced remediation and NCLEX success. Teaching and Learning in Nursing,
7(4), 146-151. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2012.06.002
Homard, C.M. (2013). Impact of a standardized test package on exit examination scores and NCLEX-RN outcomes. Journal of Nursing Education,
52(3), 176-178. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20130219-01
Jones, D. E. & Pendergraft, D. (2014). A three-tiered, blended approach to improving first-time test-taker pass rates on the NCLEX-RN exam.
Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ec99/09b4888f51d8d70098c41a8d391798ff6328.pdf
Koestler, D.L. (2015). Improving NCLEX-RN first-time pass rates with a balanced curriculum. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(10), 55-57. doi:
10.5480/11-591.1
Larocque, S. & Luhanga, F.L. (2014). Exploring the issue of failure to fail in a nursing program. International Journal of Nursing Education
Scholarship, 10(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2012-0037
March, A.L. & Robinson, C. (2015). Assessment of high-stakes testing, hopeful thinking, and goal orientation among baccalaureate nursing students.
International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 123-129. Doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2014-0075
McCarthy, M.A., Harris, D., & Tracz, S.M. (2014). Academic and nursing aptitude and the NCLEX-RN in baccalaureate programs. Journal of Nursing
Education, 53(3), 151-160. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140220-01
McDowell, B.M. (2008). KATTS: A framework for maximizing NCLEX-RN performance. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(4), 183-186. doi:
10.3928/01484834-20080401-04
Reinhardt, A., Keller, T., Orchart-Summers, L., & Schultz, P. (2012). Strategies for success: Crisis management model for remediation of at-risk
nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(6), 305-311. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20120409-03
Romeo, E.M. (2013). The predictive ability of critical thinking, nursing GPA, and SAT scores on first-time NCLEX-RN performance. Nursing Education
Perspectives,34(4), 248-253. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-34.4.248
Santo, L., Frander, E., & Hawkins, A. (2013). The use of standardized exit examinations in baccalaureate nursing education. Nurse Educator, 38(20,
81-84. doi:10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182829c66
Schroeder, J. (2013). Improving NCLEX-RN pass rates by implementing a testing policy. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(25), 543-547. doi:
10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.07.002
Sears, N.A., Othman, M., & Mahoney, K. (2015). Examining the relationships between NCLEX-RN performance and nursing student factors,
including undergraduate nursing performance: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 5(11), 10-15. doi:
10.5430/jnep.v5n11p10
Serumbus, J. F. (2016). Improving NCLEX first-time pass rates: A comprehensive program approach. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 6(4), 38-44. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(16)31002-X
Simon, E. B., McGinniss, S. P., & Krauss, B. J. (2013). Predictor variables for NCLEX-RN readiness exam performance. Nursing Education
Perspectives,34(1), 18-24. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-34.1.18
Sosa, M. & Sethares, K.A. (2015). An integrative review of the use and outcomes of HESI testing in baccalaureate nursing programs. Nursing
Education Perspectives,36(4), 237-243. doi: 10.5480/14-1515
Thomas, M.H. & Baker, S.S. (2011). NCLEX success: Evidence-based strategies. Nurse Educator, 36(6), 246-249. doi:
10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182333f70
Wiles, L.L. (2015). “Why can’t I pass these exams?”: Providing individualized feedback for nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(3S),
S55-S58. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150218-02
Yeom, Yei-Jin. (2013). An investigation of predictors of NCLEX-RN outcomes among nursing content standardized tests. Nurse Education Today, 33,
1523-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.004
Contact
[email protected]
Development and Psychometric Testing of the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning Inventory©
Cynthia Sherraden Bradley, PhD, RN, CNE, CHSE, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if the Debriefing for Meaningful Learning Inventory© (DMLI) is a valid measure
of the debriefing method Debriefing for Meaningful Learning© (DML).
Background: The evidence of improved learner outcomes through simulation debriefing has increased in the literature as the use of simulation has
proliferated throughout nursing education (Hayden, Smiley, Alexander, Kardong-Edgren, & Jeffries, 2014). Because of the significance of the
learning that occurs during debriefing (Shinnick, Woo, Horwich, & Steadman, 2011), the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN)
(Alexander et al., 2015) and the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL Standards Committee, 2016) have
recommended that debriefers receive formal training in a theory-based debriefing method to ensure consistent learning outcomes. However, it is
unknown how debriefing training improves the ability to apply a debriefing method with learners. Indeed, because of the lack of valid instruments
to measure the application of specific debriefing methods, it is not known how a debriefer enacts an evidence-based debriefing method during
debriefing.
Instrument Development: DML is a theory-based debriefing method adopted widely across nursing education because of the improved clinical
reasoning demonstrated with nursing students (Dreifuerst, 2012). DML facilitates guided reflective thinking using Socratic questioning through the
phases of the six E's: engage, explore, explain, elaborate, evaluate, and extend. The Debriefing for Meaningful Learning Evaluation Scale© (DMLES)
was developed as a behaviorally anchored rating scale. In psychometric testing, the DMLES demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha =
0.88), face validity, and content validity (scale-level CVI 0.92) (Author & Dreifuerst, 2016). The DMLI was developed from the DMLES to explore how
a debriefer describes their understanding of the central concepts of DML, and their application of the behaviors of DML during debriefing. While
the DMLES assesses observed DML debriefing behaviors, the DMLI was developed to further understand how a debriefer understands DML and
subsequently applies the method with learners. Therefore, the 31-item DMLES was modified into the 57-item DMLI to comprehensively explore a
debriefer’s understanding and application of DML. Five items of the DMLI assess the understanding of the DML central concepts with binary
options of yes or no. Fifty-one DMLI items describe application of DML debriefing behaviors, scored with ordinal frequency options of always,
sometimes, and never.
Methods: A confirmatory factor analysis was performed to determine if the 51 application items of the DMLI is a valid measure of DML. A latent
class factor analysis (LCFA) was conducted since LCFA is the most common model-based clustering method used with discrete data (Dean &
Rafferty, 2010). LCFA was used to identify latent case subtypes from the DMLI data set, and estimate parameter values for the model, thereby
confirming the measurement theory of DML. The bootstrapping approach was used, requiring no assumptions of the DMLI data. To assess model
fit, cross-classification frequencies were compared to the expected frequencies predicted by the model.
Sample: Known debriefers and members of INACSL were recruited for participation in this study. The DMLI was completed by 234 nurse educators
who reported having received debriefing training, and facilitated simulation debriefing with baccalaureate prelicensure nursing students.
Results: The DFactor model within Latent GOLD© 5.1 (2015) was used to estimate cluster models within the DMLI data. The latent class approach to
the DMLI data supported a six-class DFactor model, confirming the measurement theory of the six E’s of DML. The six class DFactor model provided
a good fit to the DMLI data, L-squared = 7.0803 with 85 degrees of freedom; p = 0.298. The Bayesian information criterion (BIC) also indicated the
preferred model was the six-class DFactor model (BIC = 6630.79). The factor loadings and commonalities were evaluated, and the factors were
ordered according to R-squared, indicating how well the model predicts the DFactor score. R-squared for the six DFactors ranged from 0.77 to 0.91,
indicating the amount of variance explained in the items of each DFactor.
Conclusions: LCFA was used to confirm the item groupings of the 52 DMLI application items. Each of the six DFactors correlated with the six E’s of
DML; each of the 52 DMLI application items loaded onto one of the six DFactors. Findings from the LCFA demonstrated that the 52 DMLI
application items did yield a model of good fit, indicating that the DMLI is a valid measure of the application of DML. This work is significant to the
nursing profession by contributing a tested valid instrument for use in assessing the application of a debriefing method. Assessment of how
evidence-based debriefing methods are translated into teaching practice is needed to advance the science of debriefing practice.
References
Alexander, M., Durham, C. F., Hooper, J. I., Jeffries, P. R., Goldman, N., Kardong-Edgren, S., Kesten, K. S., Spector, N., Tagliareni, E., Radtke, B., &
Tillman, C. (2015). NCSBN simulation guidelines for prelicensure nursing programs. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 6(3), 39-42. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30783-3.
Author & Dreifuerst, K. T. (2016). Pilot testing the debriefing for meaningful learning evaluation scale. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(7), 277-280.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.01.008
Dean, N., & Raftery, A. E. (2010). Latent class analysis variable selection. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 62(1), 11-35. doi:
10.1007/s10463-009-0258-9.
Dreifuerst, K. T. (2012). Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. The Journal of Nursing
Education, 51(6), 326. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20120409-02
Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., Jeffries, P. R. (2014) The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A longitudinal,
INACSL Standards Committee (2016). INACSL standards of best practice: Simulation SM Debriefing. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(S), S21-
S25.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.008.
Shinnick, M. A., Woo, M., Horwich, T. B., & Steadman, R. (2011). Debriefing: The most important component in simulation? Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 7(3), e105-e111.
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2015). Upgrade Manual for Latent GOLD 5.1. Belmont, Massachusetts: Statistical Innovations Inc.
Contact
[email protected]
Nursing Students' Caring Behavior Scale: Development and Psychometric Evaluation
Mary Gergis, PhD, MSN, BSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: Caring is the core and the essence of nursing (Nelson & Watson, 2012). Over the past decades, caring has gained
increasing attention as one of the major criteria of professional nursing and has been related to patient outcomes and patient
satisfaction (ANA, 2015; Dieppe, Roe, & Warber, 2015). Caring is so much a part of nursing that if nurses don't care, they have lost
the heart of what it means to be nurses (Holopainen, Nyström, & Kasén, 2017). However, caring receives little to no attention in
nursing education compared to the current emphasis on the acquisition of technical skills (Walker, Quinn, & Corder, 2016). Although
instruments that evaluate the cognitive and psychomotor aspects of nursing students' performance have been well developed, there
is no caring behaviors’ measuring instrument available that is designed from an educational perspective (Nelson & Watson, 2012;
Porr & Egan, 2013). This indirectly lead nursing students to pay little attention to caring since it is not part of their performance
evaluation.
It is essential that caring behaviors be evaluated during students' clinical training. Without such educational focus, nurses may remain unaware that
caring behaviors, like any other skill, need to be developed, practiced and perfected (Labrague, 2012; Loke, Lee, Mohd Noor, 2015). Therefore, a
valid and reliable instrument for measuring caring behaviors is needed to help cultivate and motivate nursing students' caring behaviors.
Objectives: This study aimed at the development and the psychometric evaluation of an instrument to measure nursing students’ caring behaviors.
Methods: The study consisted of two phases and five steps. The first phase concerned with the development of content domains and items, while
the second phase focused on the initial psychometric evaluation and data analysis of the Nursing Students’ Caring Behaviors Scale (NSCBS). In
Phase I, content domains were defined based on a qualitative study conducted by the researcher to examine the meaning of caring for the
seriously ill patients. Scale items were generated, the instrument content validity was evaluated, and the instrument was pretested. In Phase II: The
instrument was used to measure the caring behaviors of 112 nursing students. The derived data was analyzed to determine the construct validity
and internal consistency reliability of the scale.
Results: The study findings supported the scale’s content validity, construct validity and internal consistency reliability with a Content Validity Index
(CVI) of 0.97 and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93. The resulting scale consists of 28 items in three subscales. Subscale I: Having a relationship as a human
being/Presencing, subscale II: Preserving patient's dignity & subscale III: Comforting.
Conclusion: The Nursing Students Caring Behavior Scale (NSCBS) is a reliable and valid instrument to measure nursing students' caring behaviors.
Further research is needed to accumulate evidence for the validity and reliability of the scale.
References
American Nurses Association. (2015).Nursing Scope & Standards of Practice. Washington D.C.: American Association of Colleges of Nursing. ISBN:
978-1-55810-619-2.
Dieppe, P., Roe, C., Warber, S., L. (2015). Caring and healing in health care: The evidence base. Int J Nurs Stud, 52(10):1539-41. doi:
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.05.015.
Holopainen, G., Nyström, L., Kasén, A. (2017). The caring encounter in nursing. Nurs Ethics. doi: 10.1177/0969733016687161.
Labrague, L., J. (2012). Caring competencies of baccalaureate nursing students of Samar State University. J Nurs Educ Pract, 2 (4), 105–113. doi:
10.5430/jnep.v2n4p105.
Loke, J., C., Lee, K., W., Lee, B., K., Mohd Noor, A. (2015). Caring behaviors of student nurses: Effects of pre-registration nursing education. Nurse
Educ Pract, 15(6):421-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.05.005
Nelson, J. & Watson J. (2012). Measuring Caring: International Research on Caritas as Healing (1st. ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Porr, C., Egan, R. (2013). How does the nurse educator measure caring? Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh, 23(10). doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2012-0011.
Walker, M., Quinn. I., Corder, K. (2016). Improving compassionate care skills with education. Nurs Times, 112(17), 21-3. Retrieved from
https://www.nursingtimes.net/roles/nurse-educators/improving-compassionate-care-skills-with-education/7004248.article
Contact
[email protected]
Exploring Evidence for the Use of Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation With Undergraduate Nursing
Students
Sherrill J. Smith, PhD, RN, CNL, CNE, USA
Sharon Farra, PhD, RN, CNE, CHSE, USA
Deborah Ulrich, PhD, RN, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to assess learning outcomes of participants trained with two types of Virtual Reality Simulation (VRS) in
the disaster skill of decontamination. The study was framed by the NLN/Jeffries Simulation Theory. Based on the theory, participant outcomes were
measured that included the participants experience/satisfaction, cognitive knowledge, and performance. In addition, participant characteristics
were evaluated for correlation to outcomes. Two types of VRS with varying levels of immersive capability were evaluated: head-mounted display
and mouse and keyboard. Outcomes of VRS were compared to traditional teaching methods (written instructions).
Procedures: This mixed method study used a quasi-experimental design with repeated measures; the study was qualitatively informed by focus
groups. Subjects: Following IRB approval from all participating institutions, subjects were recruited from a convenience sample of senior
baccalaureate degree nursing students from four different campuses in the Midwest over two academic years. Participants were primarily
Caucasian (89%), 18-25 years of age (73%), and female (88%). Most had no disaster training or experience, although many students virtual reality or
gaming experience. Subjects were consented and then randomly assigned to one of three groups. Pretreatment each group completed a written
cognitive exam and demographic questionnaire followed by a web-based module on decontamination training. Treatment: Following web-
training, the control group received traditional written instructions (“Just in Time Training”) for decontamination (Group C). The intervention
groups completed a virtual reality simulation training using either an immersive head-mounted display (Group A) or a less immersive computerized
mouse and keyboard version/less immersive option (Group B). Post treatment Assessments: Cognitive knowledge and performance outcomes
were measured immediately post training and 5-6 months following intervention. Performance was measured based on time to complete task and
score using a 17-item checklist developed by the researchers based on the literature. Pilot testing of the checklist indicated a Content Validity Index
for the overall instrument score of 0.94, Internal consistency coefficient (KR-20) of 0.607, and Inter-rater reliability (Intra-class correlation) of
0.9114. Higher scores based on the checklist indicated higher levels of performance; shorter times indicated a faster performance. Cognitive
knowledge was measured using a 20 question multiple choice test based upon a Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) exam. A pilot
study indicated acceptable values of reliability and validity. Satisfaction and student experiences were examined via focus group interviews with
groups of students across all four campuses after the initial VRS training. Focus group questions were based on literature related to VRS and the
researchers’ experience using VRS. Analysis: Demographic characteristics were analyzed and descriptive statistics were used to characterize the
sample. A two sample t test was used to check the differences between any two treatments (A vs B, A vs C or B vs C). The detected differences
between any two treatments was further used to estimate the required sample size to satisfy 80% power and 0.05 type I error rate in the power
analysis. An ANOVA was used to analyze whether there were any differences among 3 treatments (A, B, and C). Finally, the generalized linear
model was applied to analyze the impacts of 8 covariates (gender, race, age, ethnicity, actual disaster experience, participation in a previous
disaster exercise, virtual reality, and gaming) on 3 outcomes (cognitive test, performance scores and time seconds).
Results: For the post-test and overall results, there were significant differences in performance scores between B (keyboard and mouse) and C
(control group; p=.0004, p= 0.0135). The results indicate that treatment group B performs better than C. For time of decontamination in seconds at
six months post, there was a significant difference between groups A (head-mounted display) and B (keyboard and mouse; p=0.0471). In the overall
comparison of time using both the post and 6 month post results, B (keyboard and mouse) group was faster in completing decontamination when
compared to C (control group; p=0.0486). For the cognitive test, there were no differences among three treatments and time points.
When exploring the effects of participant characteristics on outcomes, it was found that older participants spent significantly longer time
performing decontamination, compared to younger participants(t=2.48, p=0.014). In addition, female participants were significantly faster than
males in the decontamination performance (t=-2.99, p=.003).
Qualitative analysis of focus group interviews indicated that students were satisfied with both types of VRS, but found the immersive version was
significantly more interactive and encouraged muscle memory by providing movement during the simulation. Three themes that emerged were
simulation learning experience, simulation design, and participant outcomes. There was a preference for the simulation over traditional learning
methods.
Limitations: This study was limited by use of a convenience sample of students. While 4 different sites were used, they were all from the midwest
and showed similar demographic characteristics that may not be representative of students across all settings. In addition, only one skill was
evaluated in this study--that of the disaster skill of decontamination. Evaluation of performance was conducted in a laboratory setting and not in an
actual disaster.
Conclusions/Implications: This study identified that the use of a less immersive VRS lead to similar outcomes and student satisfaction as a more
complex and immersive VRS for the skill of decontamination. The outcomes were equivalent to traditional methods with high levels of satisfaction.
Given the need to develop knowledge, skills, and attitudes for safe practice in new nurses, nurse educators must understand how to select among
the numerous technological approaches for facilitating learning and which approaches best support learning outcomes. This is particularly
important for a skill, like decontamination of a contaminated patient, that must be done both accurately and quickly to promote safety of both the
patient and the nurse. With the cost of VRS becoming affordable and the opportunities for students to access this technology increasing, nurse
educators must understand how to incorporate VRS based on best practice standards and simulation theory.
References
Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA). (2013). FEMA IS-346: An Orientation to Hazardous Materials for Medical Personnel.
Retrieved from https://training.fema.gov/is/courseoverview.aspx? code=is-346.
Jeffries, P. (Ed.). (2016). The NLN/Jeffries simulation theory. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Farra, S., Smith, S., Gillespie, G., & French, D. (2015). Development of an assessment instrument to evaluate performance of the skill of
decontamination. Nurse Education Today, 35(10), 1016-1022. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.04.010
Farra, S., Smith, S., Gillespie, G., Nicely, S., Ulrich, D., Hodgson, E., & French, D. (2015). Decontamination training: With and without virtual reality.
Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 37(2), 125-133.
Miller, H.L., & Bugnariu, N.L. (2016). Level of immersion in virtual environments impacts the ability to assess and teach social skills in autism
spectrum disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19(4), 246-256. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0682.
Contact
[email protected]
A Web-Enhanced Simulation for Pandemic Disasters
Patricia Frohock Hanes, PhD, MAEd, MS-DPEM, RN, CNE, NEMAA, CLSSGB, USA
Abstract
Background/Purpose: The terrorist attacks on 9/11 marked a shift in U.S. policy on disaster preparedness and response. The Office
of Homeland Security was formed 11 days after the attacks. Homeland Security Presidential Directives (HSPD) were issued by then-
President George W. Bush. HSPD-21: Public Health and Emergency Preparedness required the development of public health/medical
preparedness plans and policies. As part of HSPD-21, the IOM was tasked with developing crisis standards of care; these were
published in 2009. Nursing groups followed with white papers and position statements. Nursing organizations in the United States
such as the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) and the National League for Nursing (NLN) advocate some form of
disaster nursing education across all levels of nursing (AACN, 2006, 2008, 20011; NLN, 2013). The International Council of Nurses
(ICN) developed a list of core competencies for disasters in 2009; the National Student Nurses’ Association in the United States
(2012) promoted the training and use of student nurses during disasters. Nurses lack confidence and adequate education to
participate in disaster activities (Hanes, 2016; Locke & Fung, 2014). Training exercises enhance learning; however, full scale exercises
are costly and often not feasible. Tabletop exercises are accepted, effective modes of learning frequently used in disaster education.
As part a “stand-alone” disaster nursing course, I developed a web-enhanced pandemic simulation, reflecting one of the 15 National
Response Framework Planning Scenarios. The purpose of this presentation it to discuss the development and conduction of that
simulation in the context of social learning and nurse disaster preparedness.
Conceptual Frameworks: Pender’s health promotion model; theories of social learning, Bloom’s learning domains and composite cognition.
Methods: Various scenarios were reviewed for relevance to student nurses and for feasibility; the decision was made to use a web-enhanced
tabletop exercise. Pandemic disaster was chosen because of its importance, applicability to nursing, and ease of presenting in this format. The
scenario was developed using progressive simulated news reports, graphics, and unfolding cases. Students were “situated” in their own
communities and were acting as nurses in their own neighborhoods to give them a more authentic, personal experience. Students were placed in
groups of four at individual computers to progress at their own rates through the simulation and engage in group process; each student/group
contributed to the exercise through submitting injects during the unfolding cases. Up to five faulty members or outside assistants were present as
expert observers and in case students felt uncomfortable with the program. Students were asked to make decisions on preparation, quarantine,
when and how to assist others, and disaster triage, including whether a key member of the “team” should die. Some scenarios were difficult and
intense. A “hotwash” debriefing was conducted for both students and faculty at the end of the simulation. To date, approximately 150 pre-and
post-licensure nursing students have participated in the pandemic disaster simulation as part of the larger disaster nursing course.
Results: At the debriefing, more than 93% of students felt that they were better prepared for a pandemic and for disasters in general. Students in
different groups had different reactions to the scenarios ranging from “I could never let someone die” to “we don’t have the means to save that
person”. Students were surprised at the level of social destruction in a pandemic. All said they were thinking about their own personal
preparedness and how they would respond differently after being in the class and going through the scenario. Modifications were made to the
simulation based on feedback.
Conclusions/Implications: During times of disaster, nurses are a critical component of our national response plan. National and international
nursing organizations support disaster education in nursing. Pandemics are terrifying disasters that will tax the healthcare system and require
extensive planning, preparation, and training/exercises. The use of low cost simulations that are portable and require minimal equipment are an
effective way to bring this important training to large numbers of student nurses leading to a better prepared workforce. Faculty need more
training in the use of exercises for disaster education; additional practice opportunities with community agencies need to be explored.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2006). Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice. Retrieved from:
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/essential-series
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008). Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice. Retrieved from:
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2011). Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing. Retrieved from:
American Red Cross. (2012). Nursing Students: New nation-wide student nurse disaster response course. Retrieved from:
http://www.redcross.org/support/volunteer/nurses/students
Hanes, P. F. (2016). Wildfire disasters and nursing. Nursing Clinics of North America. (51), 4; 2016. doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2016.07.006.
International Council of Nurses. (2009). ICN framework of disaster nursing competencies. Retrieved from:
http://www.icn.ch/images/stories/documents/networks/DisasterPreparednessNetwork/Disaster_Nursing_Competencies_lite.pdf.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2009). Crisis standards of care: A systems framework for catastrophic disaster response. Washington, D. C: IOM.
Retrieved from: https://www.nap.edu/read/13351/chapter/1#iii
Locke, A. Y. and Fung, O.W.M. (2014). Nurses’ competencies in disaster nursing: Implications for curriculum development and public health.
International Journal for Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 3289-3303. doi:10.3390/ijerph110303289
National League for Nursing. (2013). Emergency! Educating nurses and nursing students to handle disasters. NLN Report, 19, 1-4.
National Student Nurses’ Association, Inc. (NSNA). (2012). Guidelines for planning disaster preparedness, recovery, and relief projects. Retrieved
from: http://www.nsna.org/Portals/0/Skins/NSNA/pdf/Disaster%20Preparedness%20Guidelines%202011_12.pdf
Contact
[email protected]
Nursing Education Progression: A Snapshot of National Progress and Promising Practices
Pat Farmer, DNP, RN, FNP, USA
Tina Gerardi, MS, RN, CAE, USA
Bryan Hoffman, MA, USA
Donna E. Meyer, MSN, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Background: The need for a more highly educated nursing workforce has been widely recognized (Benner, Sutphen, Leonard & Day,
2010; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, 2011). Since the seminal work of Dr. Linda Aiken and colleagues
nearly 15 years ago, researchers continue to strengthen the link between patient outcomes and nursing education (Aiken, Clarke,
Cheung, Sloane & Silber, 2003; Friese, Lake, Aiken, Silber & Sochalski, 2008; Blegen, Goode, Park, Vaughn & Spetz, 2013; Yakusheva,
Lindrooth, & Weiss, 2014).
The need for Registered Nurses is expected to grow, and capacity of existing pre-licensure Baccalaureate of Science in Nursing (BSN) programs
remains insufficient to meet the need for BSN - prepared nurses (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2017). Although recent trends
demonstrate an upswing in nurses beginning practice with a BSN, nearly half of new nurses enter the profession through community college
Associate’s Degree programs (Buerhaus, Auerback, & Staiger, 2016). Supporting and expanding traditional BSN programs remains an important
mechanism to improve nursing educational levels, however the size of the nursing workforce and existing program capacity necessitate inclusion of
other approaches.
Purpose: The proposed presentation offers an overview of existing and developing academic progression programs in nursing. We provide an
overview of the underlying impetus for education transformation and identify key national leaders in the work. A primary objective is to identify
commonalities among successful programs as promising practices for others.
Methods: Recognizing the need to provide additional pathways to the BSN and to improve inefficiencies in nursing education, the Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation (RWJF) provided funding to explore and implement improvements via grants administered through the Academic Progression
in Nursing (APIN) program and the State Implementation Program (SIP) (RWJF, 2012; RWJF, 2013). With support from the APIN and SIP National
Program Offices, an ongoing collaboration of nursing education leaders, nursing employers, researchers and other stakeholders resulted in a
deeper understanding of models for nursing academic progression. The group recognized early the critical role of employers and nursing practice
partners and this was reinforced throughout the project. The Organization for Associate Degree Nursing provided early and ongoing support and
was instrumental in advancing the work.
As work continued, members of the collaborative identified and addressed common concerns. They recognized the need to standardize program
pre-requisites and co-requisites, although there was widespread objection to uniform curricula. Many education program leaders expressed
concerns about the impact of innovative education models on accreditation. Rural partners had unique issues related to geographic isolation and
limited resources. Each of these concerns was addressed through gatherings of key leaders and strategies for advancement. Throughout every
aspect of the project, leaders identified the need for improved data collection and synthesis. Impact of the innovative models on student diversity
was particularly difficult to assess. National experts on nursing workforce data and diversity provided critical consultation and guidance. The APIN
leaders identified other education projects across the nation and included representatives from each in the growing collaborative. The APIN
National Program Office summarized the iterative learning which resulted in their final report (Farmer, 2017).
Results: Of the programs studied, the model with the greatest likelihood of significantly impacting the proportion of nurses with a BSN or higher is
intentional and structured partnerships between community college and university schools of nursing, which provide seamless or integrated
pathways to the BSN. Partnership models embody many elements with the shared or common curriculum model described by the Center to
Champion Nursing in America (CCNA) (Campaign for Action, 2013). CCNA and APIN leaders found that successful partnerships require consideration
of many elements aside from nursing curriculum, and cataloging these elements allowed development of a continuum framework to describe
programs.
Many schools of nursing indicate partnership are in place, but the absence of standardized definitions has led to complexities in sharing
information and evaluating outcomes. In many cases, partnerships consist primarily of articulation agreements. These agreements are a useful
starting point in strengthening academic progression and in many cases have eased student advancement, but they have not historically had the
desired impact. Key features of successful programs included strengthening of relationships, effective leadership, plans for scaling and
sustainability, and infrastructure such as messaging, academic advising, and student financial aid (Gerardi, 2015).
Leaders of this project found models in which students are co-enrolled in the community college and university to be the most successful to date,
although many models have not been in place for a sufficient period to allow comprehensive assessment (Farmer, 2017). In most cases, co-
enrollment models have been capacity -controlled and cannot fairly be compared to state articulation or transfer models, which incorporate all AD
students into improved opportunities for progression.
Conclusion: Continued assessment and improved data collection are needed to evaluate the range of options available and identify the most
effective and efficient methods of education progression in nursing. A number of approaches will likely be required to meet the needs of individual
states and regions, but variations on partnership between community colleges and universities are showing the greatest promise. Highlighting
promising practices may accelerate advancement nationally on this important initiative.
References
Aiken, L., Clarke, S., Cheung, R., Sloane, D., & Silber, J. (2003). Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 290, p. 1617-1623.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2017). Nursing Shortage. Retrieved from: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/fact-
sheets/nursing-shortage.
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V. & Day, L. (2010). Educating Nurses: A Call for Radical Transformation. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
Friese, C.R. Lake, E.T., Aiken, L.H., Silber, J.H., & Sochalski, J. (2008) Hospital Nurse Practice Environments and Outcomes for Surgical Oncology
Patients. Health Services Research. 43(4). p.1145–1163.
Blegen, M.A., Goode, C.J., Park,, S.H., Vaughn, T. & Spetz, J. (2013) Baccalaureate education in nursing and patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing
Administration, 43(2), p. 89-94.
Buerhaus, P. I., Auerback, D. I., & Staiger, D.O. (2016). Recent changes in number of nurses graduating from undergraduate and graduate programs.
Data Watch. Nursing Economics January-February Vol 34 (1). p.47-48.
Campaign for Action. (2013). The Shared Curriculum Model: Part One - Leveraging the best of both worlds and The Shared Curriculum Model Part
Two - Unpacking ADN - BSN seamless progression. Webinars. Available at:
https://campaignforaction.org/resources/#66,t=shared+curriculum,p=1.
Farmer, P. (2017). Academic Progression in Nursing final program summary and outcomes. Available from: academicprogression.org.
Gerardi, T. (2015). Essential elements identified for successful APIN projects. Voice of Nursing Leadership, March 2015. Retrieved December 2016
from: http://www.aone.org/docs/apin/apin-voice-march-2015.pdf.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering & Medicine (NASEM). (2011). The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Washington,
DC. The National Academies Press.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). (2012). Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Launches Initiative to Support Academic Progression in
Nursing. Retrieved from: http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/articles-and-news/2012/03/robert-wood-johnson-foundation-launches-initiative-to-
support-ac.html.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). (2013). Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Announces Initiative to Support State Efforts to Transform
Health Care through Nursing. Retrieved from: http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/articles-and-news/2013/03/robert-wood-johnson-foundation-
announces-initiative-to-support-s.html.
Yakusheva, O., Lindrooth, R., & Weiss, M. (2014). Nurse Value-Added and Patient Outcomes in Acute Care. Health Services Research, December
49(6). p. 1767 - 1786.
Contact
[email protected]
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies on Teaching and Learning Methods 1987 to 2015
Kathleen A. O'Connell, PhD, RN, FAAN, USA
Tresa Kaur, PhD, RN-BC, CNE, CHSE, CTN-A, USA
Abstract
The National League for Nursing research priorities focus on the need to build the state of science in nursing education through
research (2016). Previous reviews have focused on specific teaching strategies like concept mapping (Daley, Morgan & Black, 2016),
e-learning (Koch, 2014), and simulation (Jumah & Ruland, 2015). Although Dunbar-Jacob’s presentation (2016) on the science of
nursing education at the NLN research conference included a brief review of the studies in nursing education, no published reviews
of the experimental and quasi-experimental studies of teaching and learning methods in nursing education could be found. The
purpose of this study was to enumerate the types of experimental nursing education research that has been done on teaching and
learning methods and to characterize the findings and the methodological challenges in this body of research.
The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) was searched using the search terms "education, nursing," "learning
methods" or "teaching methods" and "experimental studies" or quasi-experimental studies." The search was limited to peer reviewed research
articles in the nursing journal subset. This search produced a total of 145 studies. Initial review, which eliminated duplicates and articles not
meeting criteria (i.e., being published in English; and not solely published in Dissertation Abstracts), reduced the number of studies to 114. Each
article was reviewed by one investigator and coded on 14 variables. Inter-coder reliability was computed on 17% of the studies. It was not possible
to do a meta-analysis on this group of studies because of the wide variety of methods studied. Therefore, a structured literature review is
presented.
Sixty percent of the studies were published in journals devoted to nursing education, including journals on simulation and staff development.
Publication date of the studies ranged from 1987 to 2015 with 19% of the studies published before the year 2000, 30% published between 2000
and 2009 and 51% since 2010. Just over half (54%) of the studies appeared to be conducted the United States.
Coding of the major dependent variables in the studies revealed that 56% of the studies were concerned with learning outcomes only, 20% did not
report learning outcomes, but reported other outcomes such as attitudes and self-efficacy, and 24% reported both types of outcomes. Teaching
and learning methods studied included simulation (19 studies), online strategies (17 studies), cooperative methods (10 studies), and problem-
based learning (4 studies). However, 56% of the methods in the studies could not be grouped with any other method. The content taught appeared
to be mostly general nursing knowledge and skills, but 15 (13%) of the studies concerned pharmacology or medication calculation. Seventy-seven
percent of the studies showed statistically significant group differences on at least one major outcome variable.
Methodological coding revealed that 73% (N = 83) of the sample were quasi-experimental studies, 19 of which included no comparison groups.
Over 78% of those with no comparison groups were conducted since 2010. The sample sizes ranged from 14 to 900, with only 32% having more
than 100 participants. Eighty-two percent of the studies had undergraduate participants, while 16% involved staff nurses and 2% concerned
graduate students.
The findings of this review were similar to those presented by Dunbar-Jacob (2016) with respect to the focus on undergraduate students, the
paucity of randomized designs, the problems with small sample sizes, and the types of strategies tested. However, this presentation covers a longer
time span, indexes the countries where the research took place, discusses the content taught as well as the strategies used, reports the outcomes
studied, and the proportion with significant findings, and shows the trajectory of the research over time. Overall, review revealed a considerable
increase in the number of published studies of teaching and learning methods in the recent years, with nearly half of the studies conducted outside
of the United States. The majority of the studies included learning outcomes. Methodological rigor of the studies is a concern with 68% having
fewer than 100 study participants, the majority employing quasi-experimental designs and recent studies having no comparison groups. The
studies reviewed here often appeared to be single forays into research and pilot studies with little evidence that investigators continued to pursue
a program of research.
It is well known that there is little funding for research in higher education, requiring most research endeavors to be small scale and preventing
investigators from making research a major portion of their professional lives. Furthermore, Broome, Ironside, and McNelis (2012) conducted a
study of faculty at 21 schools, which showed that lack of funding and heavy workloads were barriers for conducting nursing education research.
With the publication of relatively more studies in recent years, it may be that nursing education research is finding a more prominent place in
academic nursing. Future research should focus on replication at different sites, with different instructors. Moreover, methods of collaborating that
allow multi-site studies to build nursing research around evidence based teaching and learning strategies should be explored.
References
Broome, M. E., Ironside, P. M., & McNelis, A. M. (2012). Research in Nursing Education: State of the Science. Journal Of Nursing Education, 51, 521-
524. doi:10.3928/01484834-20120820-10
Daley, B. J., Morgan, S., & Black, S. B. (2016). Concept Maps in Nursing Education: A Historical Literature Review and Research Directions. Journal of
Nursing Education, 55, 631-639. doi:10.3928/01484834-20161011-05
Dunbar-Jacob, J. (April 8, 2016). The Science of Nursing Education. Presented at the Nursing Education Research Conference, Washington, D.C.
Jumah, J. B., & 1Ruland, J. P. (2015). A Critical Review of Simulation-Based on Nursing Education Research: 2004-2011. International Journal of
Nursing Education, 7, 135-139. doi:10.5958/0974-9357.2015.00151.8
Koch, L. F. (2014). The nursing educator's role in e-learning: A literature review. Nurse Education Today, 34, 1382-1387.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.002
National League for Nursing. (2016). NLN Research priorities for nursing education 2016-2019. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-
source/professional-development-programs/nln-research-priorities-in-nursing-education-single-pages.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Contact
[email protected]
C 10 - Women's Health
Female Genital Cutting (FGC) Digital E-Book: American Nursing Care Context
Najla Ahmad Barnawi, MSN, BSN, MS, RN, USA
Carolyn S. Pierce, PhD, DSN, MSN, RN, USA
Nicole Rouhana, PhD, RN, FACNM, FNP-BC, USA
Abstract
Background: FGC affects at least 200 million women worldwide. Due to increasing transmigration, care of women with FGC has
become a national and global public health and human rights issue. The United States (US) is one of the Western countries that has a
large number of women who underwent or are at risk to undergo FGC. Based on the US Population Reference Bureau (PRB) report in
Feb 2013, there were more than 507,000 females with different migration statuses that were subjected to some form of FGC.
Around 55% of these women were between 15 to 49 years old. Accordingly, it is important to consider this group of women as a
vulnerable population in our healthcare system as it is usually associated with the existence of health disparities. Immigrant women,
and more specifically pregnant, who underwent FGC are more at risk for health disparities when compared to their non- immigrant
counterparts.
Statement of the Problem: Caring for immigrant women with FGC, especially those who are pregnant, is a key challenge in the American
healthcare context. The challenge occurs as a result of a lack of standardized clinical guideline that sustains the cultural and clinical aspects for
immigrant women with FGC. This void marginalizes this vulnerable group of women from accessing and utilizing the current healthcare and more
specifically perinatal services. Thus, the increased risk of poorer health status among these women impacts negatively on their quality of life. This
affects the image of the US healthcare in general and the perinatal health services in particular.
Justifications of the Current Challenge: A review of the literature indicated that the following issues challenge care of immigrant women who have
undergone FGC.
• Cultural Gap. Lack of understanding the cultural and social aspects behind FGC performance creates a cultural distance
between the healthcare providers and immigrant women.
• Clinical Gap. There is a clinical gap regarding how to manage the complications that occur as a result of FGC. The current
clinical management is focusing on preventing and managing the complications that occur in the severest type of FGC (Type
III) or infibulation.
• Lack of Trust. Women and their partner's concern about the increasing the performance rate of C-sections among women
with FGC, particularly among women who have Type III, in U.S.
• Lack of effective-Therapeutic commination. Misunderstanding the different cultural and ethnic backgrounds may block
effective therapeutic communication between American healthcare providers and immigrant women and their partners.
Such lack of an effective communication generates ethnocentrism, discrimination, stereotyping, cultural blindness, and
cultural imposition.
Scope & Purpose: International studies highlight the need for an educational tool that raises the healthcare providers’ awareness about various
aspects that concern FGC. The purpose of this presentation is to test the efficacy of the FGC digital e-book as a learning and educational tool to
improve the level of knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing students when caring for women who have undergone
FGC.
Significance of this Topic in Nursing Profession: A growing body of evidence from different western countries such as Norway, Sweden, USA, UK,
and Spain, indicates the existence of significant gaps in training providers, as well as gaps in general knowledge about caring for women who
underwent FGC, despite the availability of existing care protocols in most of these countries. Therefore, there is a need to examine the impact of
the FGC-digital eBook on nurses who provide perinatal care within American system. Targeting nurses in general and nursing students in specific is
ideal to exemplify the foundation of holistic care in FGC and perinatal healthcare context. These individuals are ideal primary care providers
because the ‘cornerstones’ of their practice model include continuity of care partnership with birthing families, and informed parental choice.
Methods & Evaluation: A pre-post test quasi-experimental design was conducted with a convenience sample of undergraduate nursing students at
Binghamton University. The FGC knowledge scale has 14 close-ended questions with a total score ranges from 14 to 42; 14 indicate the lowest
score and 42 indicate the highest. The attitude scale is 5 points Likert scale that measures the participant’s attitudes regarding 13 statements of
different aspects of FGC. The FGC self-efficacy scale has 14 close-ended questions; the total scale score ranges from 14 to 42; while 14 indicate the
lowest score, and 42 indicate the highest.
Findings: The preliminary data indicated that the FGC digital e-Book has a positive impact on the level of FGC knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy
among undergraduate nursing students.
Discussion: FGC is a complex socio-cultural phenomenon that has various health and clinical controversies, which interfere with the concept of
holistic care in the nursing profession. Therefore, assessing and exploring the level of knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy provided deeper
insights about the clinical and cultural aspects of FGC that focus on the holistic care. Further, optimal heath care must be based on effective
communication, cultural sensitivity, and trusting relationship to create a delicate balance that puts the women’s best interest in the forefront.
The FGC Digital eBook is an electronic learning tool that covered the clinical, cultural, social, and ethical aspects of FGC. It can easily accessed by
any personal laptop, smartphone, iPad, or tablet. This eBook emphasized the self-reflective learning strategy, which enhanced the student’s
effective learning-engagement, where the participants set, achieved, and monitored their progress through the course.
The eBook covered all clinical controversies that concern FGC in a professional and engaging way. Indeed, it represented the social aspects at
different historical periods and within different cultural contexts. Such information assisted the undergraduate nursing students in increasing their
level of knowledge, considering the appropriate attitudes and the self-efficacy skills that are needed to provide a competent clinical and socio-
cultural care for this group of women.
References
Abu-Sahlieh, S. (2012). Male and female circumcision: religious, medical, social and legal debate. (2nd ed.). Center of Arab and Islamic Law. US.
Akinsulure-Smith, (2014). Exploring female genital cutting among west African immigrants. Journal of Immigrant Minority Health, 16, 559–561.
Amersesekere, M., Borg, R., Frederick, J., Vragovic, O., Saia, K., & Raj, A. (2011). Somali immigrant women’s perceptions of caesarean delivery and
patient-provider communication surrounding female circumcision and childbirth in the USA. International Journal of Genecology and Obstetrics,
115(3), 227-230
Brown, E., Carroll, J., Fogarty, C., & Holt, C. (2010). “They get a C-section…they gonna die”: Somali women’s fears of obstetrical interventions in the
United States, Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 21(3), 220-227.
Mather, M., Feldman,-Jacobs, C. (2015). Women and girls at risk of female genital mutilation/cutting in the United States. Population Reference
Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2015/us-fgmc.aspx
Nour, N. (2015). Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Health Providers Should be Advocates for Change. Population Reference Bureau, Washington,
DC: USAID
Reisel, D., & Creighton, S. (2015). Long term health consequences of female genital mutilation (FGM). Matures, 80(1), 48-51.
Tuker, C., Marsiske, M., Rice, K., Jones, J., & Herman, K. (2011). Patient-centered culturally sensitive health care: model testing and refinement.
Health Psychology, 30(3), 342-350. Doi:10.103/a0022967
Contact
[email protected]
Collaborative Innovations of a STTI Chapter Advances Nursing Excellence Across the Globe
Caroline M. Peltz, PhD, MSN, MSHSA, BSN, RN, CNE, USA
Diane Porretta Fox, EdD, MSN, BA, LRT, RN, CNE, USA
Lisa F. Friedman, MS, USA
Vicki Lynn Washington, MSN, APRN, ACNS-BC, USA
Laurie C. Blondy, PhD, RN, PPCNP-BC, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this project was to support an Experienced Nurse Faculty Leadership Academy (ENFLA) scholar in her
leadership project to advance nursing education and practice by creating a global exchange between Global Health Services Network
(GHSN), American Nursing Institute Myanmar (ANIM) and Eastern Michigan University (EMU) School of Nursing (SON). Steps taken:
ENFLA Scholar presented to the STTI Eta Rho Chapter board her leadership project identifying the desire to use the Eta Rho Chapter
as a means to heighten awareness of EMU SON as a global academic partner with ANIM. Board members agreed the project was in
alignment with the mission and vison of STTI and could offer stability and visibility of a chapter that was fixed in the status quo. A
local team, composed of STTI members, faculty, students, and key stakeholders, who had a vested interest in this project was
created. STTI members were instrumental in fundraising efforts for a broader vision of project growth. The ENFLA Scholar traveled to
Mandalay, Myanmar, to make face to face connections with stakeholders in ANIM and build relationships, exemplifying that all have
a key role in the co-development and sharing of practice and education, STTI members continued their efforts at home. Steps
involving key stakeholders are being taken to deepen the relationship between ANIM, GHSN, and EMU by bringing faculty from
ANIM to EMU. Additionally, an effort is being made to coordinate calendars to provide ANIM faculty the opportunity to participate
in STTI 44th Biennial Convention. Funds raised by STTI Eta Rho Chapter will support these initiatives. Outcomes: STTI Eta Rho Chapter
was revitalized and given a sense of renewal and purpose through their involvement and active participation. Personal and
professional empowerment was achieved through the induction of three ANIM faculty into STTI Eta Rho Chapter. A sense of trust
and co-development was established between GHSN, ANIM, and EMU. A face from EMU SON was provided to GHSN, ANIM and
three private hospitals in Mandalay, Myanmar. All stakeholders have expressed a vested interest in this global mission. EMU SON
has initiated a global partnership with ANIM. Research exploring the mentoring relationships of the students enrolled in ANIM has
begun. Future directions: Discussion and planning continue within the STTI Eta Rho Chapter to develop future projects involving
EMU SON faculty and students with ANIM faculty and students to sustain this project. EMU nursing faculty, who are on the STTI Eta
Rho board, have expressed an interest in teaching at ANIM. STTI members have expressed an interest in helping ANIM to develop a
peer mentoring program based on research findings. Three private hospitals, affiliated with ANIM, are willing to host EMU nursing
students for clinical and leadership experiences through the development of future study abroad programs. EMU SON, in
collaboration with GHSN, has the potential to connect with other nursing programs around the globe, increasing opportunities for
faculty and students to advance nursing excellence in education and practice.
References
Bohman, D., & Borglin, G. (2014). Student exchange for nursing students: Does it raise cultural awareness? A descriptive, qualitative study. Nurse
Education in Practice, 14(3), 259-264. doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.11.006
Nilson, J., Carlsson, M., Johansson, E., Egmar, A.-C., Florin, J., Leksell, J., ...Gardulf, A. (2014). Nursing in a globalized world: Nursing students with
international study experience report higher competence at graduation. Open Journal of Nursing, 4,848-858. doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2014.412090
Underwood, M., Gleeson, J., Konnert, C., Wong, K., Bautista, V. (2016). Global host partner perspectives: Utilizing a conceptual model to strengthen
collaboration with host partners for international nursing student placements. Public Health Nursing, 33(4), 351-359. doi: 10.1111/phn.12258
Waterval, D., Frambach, J., Driessen, E., Scherpbier, A. (2015). Copy but not paste: A literature review of crossborder curriculum partnerships.
Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(1), 65-85. doi:10.1177/1028315314533608
Wilson, L., Callender, B., Thomas, H., Jogerst, K., Tores, H., Velji, A. (2015). Identifying global health competencies to prepare 21st century global
health professionals: Report from the global health competency subcommittee of the consortium of universities for global health. Annals of Global
Health, 81(2), 239-247. doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.03.006
Contact
[email protected]
Raising the Bars: Re-Imagining Nursing Education Through Partnerships With Prisons
Mary T. Bouchaud, PhD, MSN, RN, CNS, CRRN, USA
Madeline Brooks, BA, USA
Abstract
The system of health care in the United States is in crisis as it attempts to find more efficient and effective ways to improve the
delivery of health care while ensuring quality and safety for those receiving that care. Consumerism is changing how health care is
being defined and delivered, resulting in dramatic changes in health care and health care policy including a shift from acute care,
focused on disease and treatment delivered in hospital-centric environments, to primary and community-based care, focused on
coordinating care and managing transitions across providers and settings of care (Bouchaud, Swan, Gerolamo, et al, 2016; Fortier,
Fountain, Vargas et al., 2015). To adequately address the current failings of the United States’ health care system, including fiscal
constraints, disparity related to access to health care, and quality of care issues, a strategical shift in nursing education and practice
must occur, from individual to population-focused care (Bouchaud, 2011; Bouchaud & Gurenlian, 2013; Fisher Robertson, 2004). A
culture change among nurse educators and administrators and in nursing education is needed to prepare a competent
interprofessional health care workforce capable of practicing from a health promotion, disease prevention, community and
population focused construct in caring for a population of patients who are presenting health problems and conditions that persist
across decades and/or lifetimes. As a result, RNs, now and in the future, will need to be prepared with a broader scope of
knowledge, skills, and competencies (Fortier, Fountain, Vargas et al., 2015; Fraher, Spetz, & Naylor, 2015) which translates into new,
emerging, and unprecedented opportunities for nurses across the care continuum (Bouchaud, Swan, Gerolamo, et al, 2016;
Bouchaud & Swan, 2016). Yet many baccalaureate nursing programs continue to prepare new RN’s as generalists who function best
in hospital-centric environments, despite and in light of the prediction by Houle and Fleece (2011) that one-third of all hospitals will
be closed by 2020. A need for re-envisioning nursing education and practice, improving patient care and outcomes, and promoting
patient health and wellness from a community and population focused perspective is prompting the need for nurse educators and
administrators to re-define and prepare a new nursing workforce for the 21st century (Bouchaud, 2011; Bouchaud, Brown, & Swan,
2017 Bouchaud & Gurenlian, 2013).
While healthcare delivery is moving from hospital to ambulatory and community settings, community-based educational opportunities for nursing
students are shrinking due to increased regulatory requirements, the presence of competing numbers of nursing schools, increasing student
enrollment, and decreasing availability of community resources capable and willing to precept students in all-day interactive learning environments
(Bouchaud & Swan, 2016). Prisons, as microcosms of society, provide an ideal learning experience for not only technical nursing skills, but more
importantly, for reinforcing key learning goals and the new 21st century skills set in community and population-based care, cultural awareness and
sensitivity, and interprofessional efforts aimed at engaging patients in the management of chronic conditions (Bouchaud & Gurenlian, 2014;
Bouchaud & Swan,2017). A prison clinical rotation offers a new avenue through which to prepare population-focused nurses who can function in a
rapidly changing health care landscape. One urban college of nursing has been placing BSN students in maximum security prisons at the state and
federal level as well as juvenile detention centers for the past 11 years. Student interest in prison as a clinical site has become a sought after
immersion experience resulting in waiting lists starting on orientation day. More recently, the prison program has expanded to include students in
the graduate FNP program. Though evidence has demonstrated that prison and correctional health is an innovative and viable resource to educate
senior prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students in the new model of healthcare delivery and practice (Bouchaud & Swan, 2016), there is a need
in the literature to know what students think of this clinical experience.
This presentation will describe how one urban college of nursing has and continues to use correctional prison facilities as an innovative clinical
setting to educate BSN students about community/public health nursing, correctional health nursing, population health and the new health care
model of practice. It will describe how the use of private, state, and federally run prisons can serve to implement a redesigned baccalaureate
nursing curriculum and ignite student interest in working with and in the community, outside the hospital setting. This presentation will discuss
how educating nursing students in an all-male maximum prison setting can reinforce key learning goals and the new soft and hard skills set needed
for nursing practice in the 21st century that includes community-based care skills, population-based care awareness, cultural sensitivity and
awareness, empathy, therapeutic communication, the impact of social determinants on health, and strategies to implement health care and
nursing practice through a health promotion and disease prevention model especially for stigmatized and marginalized populations. The authors
will accomplish these aims by sharing a qualitative and quantitative analysis of eleven years of collected student feedback regarding their
perceptions and experiences of a community clinical rotation in a maximum security prison setting. Finally, the presentation will conclude with
additional knowledge gained from this 11 year study including one finding that not only did nursing students request to complete their community
clinical rotation in an all-male maximum-security prison despite its accompanying restrictive regulations, especially as it relates to their access to
personal technology devices, had to travel the farthest, start their clinical day the earliest, and complete more clinical hours in the day than their
classmates in other clinical sites, but there was an unknown desire for a unique clinical experience that was only satisfied by this prison rotation.
References
Bouchaud, M. (2011). Preparing baccalaureate nursing students for community/public health nursing: Belief systems and values of nurse educators
and administrators (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest LLC. Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 UMI:3486994.
Bouchaud, M. & Gurenlian, J. (2014). A qualitative study on preparing baccalaureate nursing students for community/public health nursing as
perceived by nurse educators and administrators. International Journal of Nursing, 2(2), 1-13. Retrieved June 15, 2017 from
http://www.ijnonline.com/index.php/ijn/article/view/121/pdf_21.
Bouchaud, M. & Swan, B.A. (2016). Integrating correctional and community health care: An innovative approach for clinical learning in a
baccalaureate nursing program. Nursing Forum, 52(1), 28-49. Retrieved May 28, 2017 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27102579.
Bouchaud, M., Swan, B.A., Gerolamo, A., Black, K., Alexander, K., Bellot, J., ...Sullivan, D. (2016). Accelerating design and transforming baccalaureate
nursing education to foster a culture of health. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(11), 97-103. DOI: 10.5430/jnep.v6n11p97.
Bouchaud, M., Brown, D., & Swan, B.A. (2017). Creating a new paradigm to prepare nurses for the 21st century. Journal of Nursing Education and
Practice, 7(10), 27-35. DOI: 0.5430/jnep.v7n10p27.
Fisher Robertson, J. (2004). Does advanced community/public health nursing practice have a future? Public Health Nursing, 21(5), 495-500. DOI:
10.1111/j.0737-1209.2004.021512.x.
Fortier, M., Fountain, D., Vargas, M., Heelan-Fancher, L., Perron, T., Hinic, K., & Swan, B. A. (2015). Health care in the community: Developing
academic/practice partnerships for care coordination and managing transitions. Nursing Economic$, 33(3), 167–175, 181.
Fraher, E., Spetz, J., Naylor, M. (2015, June). Nursing in a transformed health care system: New roles, new rules (Research brief). Retrieved June 15,
2017 from http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=ldi_researchbrief.
Houle, D. & Fleece, J. (2011). The New Health Age: The Future of Health Care in America. (n.p.): New Health Age Publishing.
Institute of Medicine (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Contact
[email protected]
Description and Meaning of Clinical Competency: Perceptions of Nurse Managers and Baccalaureate Nurse
Faculty
Carolyn D. Meehan, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Purpose: Clinical competency is a significant concept for nursing as it relates directly to the quality of patient care that nurses
provide in the healthcare setting. Despite the vital nature of this concept, there is no widely accepted understanding of the term
between the academic and clinical groups in nursing, in the literature. Consequently, there is a continuous struggle to set standards
to measure clinical competency in undergraduate nursing students. This imprecise understanding of clinical competency widens the
gap between education and practice. When acute care nurse managers and prelicensure baccalaureate nursing faculty share
expectations of what constitutes clinical competency in nursing students, that gap may be bridged.
The focus of this interpretive description study was to describe and gain an understanding of the concept of clinical competency from the
perspective of acute care nurse managers and baccalaureate nurse faculty.
Methods: A purposive sample was recruited through the snowballing method. Participants included eight acute care nurse managers and nine
prelicensure baccalaureate nurse faculty from Southeastern Pennsylvania. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with the
participants, and analyzed through a constant comparative analysis until the data reached saturation.
Results: Four themes emerged from the data of this interpretive description study when acute care managers and baccalaureate nurse faculty
described the meaning of clinical competency and what expectations managers have of the new graduate nurse in regards to clinical competency.
The themes are applying metacognitive judgment, getting the big picture, providing safe care, and developing professional nursing behaviors.
Transitions Theory is presented as a theoretical framework supporting the findings of this study, as student nurses transitioning to the role of the
new graduate nurse in the acute care setting. The application of the four themes described in this study to the Transitions Theory assists in further
understanding the meaning of clinical competency in nursing.
Conclusion: Implications of this study from the perspective of nursing science and research offered for the first time a shared view of the concept
of clinical competency from the perception of the managers in practice and the faculty educating undergraduate nursing students in the clinical
area. Implications for nursing education included providing faculty a means to structure the clinical experience so that students may be better
prepared to practice in the acute care setting as a new graduate nurse. In nursing practice, the benefits for the managers are an understanding of
the level of clinical competency and preparation of the new graduate nurse, which enables them to further support their transition to clinical
practice. Future research may include a tool for the objective measurement of clinical competency.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate
education for professional nursing practice. Retrieved from: http:// http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/BaccEssentials08.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2015). Nursing faculty shortage. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-
relations/factsheets/nursing-faculty-shortage
American Nurses Association (2007). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd Ed.). Silver Spring: MD.
Appleton, J. V., & King, L. (1997). Constructivism: A naturalistic methodology for nursing inquiry. Advances in Nursing Science, 20, 13-22.
Axley, L. (2008). Competency: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 43, 214-222. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00115.x
Blanzola, C., Lindeman, R., & King, M. (2004). Nurse internship pathway to clinical comfort, confidence, and competence.
Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 20, 27-37.
Chick, N. & Meleis, A. (1986). Transitions: A nursing concern. Boulder, CO: Aspen Publications.
Confidentiality and Transcription Hub. (n.d.). Retrieved January 26, 2015, from http://www.transcriptionhub.com/enterprise
Cowan, D. T., Norman, I., & Coopamah, V. (2005). Competence in nursing practice: A controversial concept: A focused review of literature. Nurse
Education Today, 25, 355-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.03.002
DeBrew, J. K., & Lewallen, L. P. (2014). To pass or to fail? Understanding the factors considered by faculty in the clinical evaluation of nursing
students. Nurse Education Today, 34, 631-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.014
Dell Acqua, M. C. Q., Miyadahira, A. M. K., & Ide, C. A. C. (2009). Planning nursing teaching: Educational purposes and clinical competence. Revista
da Escola de Enfermagem, 43, 264-271.
DiCiccio-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education Today, 40, 314-321.
Dudek, N., Marks, M. & Regehr, G. (2005). Failure to fail: The perspectives of clinical supervisors. Academic Medicine, 80, 84-87.
Edwards, H., Smith, S., Courtney, M., Finlayson, K., & Chapman, H. (2004). The impact of clinical placement location on nursing students’
competence and preparedness for practice. Nurse Education Today, 24, 248-255.
Garside, J., & Nhemachena, J. (2013). A concept analysis of competence and its transition in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 33, 542-545.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.007
Hunt, M. (2009). Strengths and challenges in the use of interpretive description: Reflections arising from a study of the moral experience of health
professionals in humanitarian work. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1284-1291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732309344612
Institute of Medicine (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Ironside, P., & McNelis, A. M. (2011). Transforming clinical education. Journal of Nursing Education, 50, 123-124.
The Joint Commission (2016). Patient safety systems. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals, 1-10.
Josephesen, J. (2014). Critically reflexive theory: A proposal for nursing education. Advances in Nursing, 2014, 1-8. doi.org/10.1155/2014/594360
Koch, T. (2006). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 91-103.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03681.x
Larocque, S., & Luhanga, F. L. (2013). Exploring the issue of failure to fail in a nursing program. International Journal of Nursing Education
Scholarship, 10, 1-8. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2012-0037.
Lejonqvist, G., Eriksson, K., & Meretoja, R. (2011). Evidence of clinical competence. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 26, 340-348.
doi:10.1111j.1471-6712.2011.00939.x
Levett-Jones, T., Gersbach, J., Arthur, C., & Roche, J. (2011). Implementing a clinical competency assessment model that promotes critical reflection
and ensures
Contact
[email protected]
Clinical Evaluation of Competence: What Are We Measuring?
Elizabeth Van Horn, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Lynne Porter Lewallen, PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Competence is a commonly used concept in nursing education, yet there is no widely accepted definition, consensus on the
essential components, or standardized instrument to measure it in the clinical setting. Concept analyses describe attributes of
competence using cognitive terms such as critical thinking and professional role modeling (Valloze, 2009), and psychomotor terms
such as performance (Garside & Nhemachena, 2013). Several leading nursing organizations in the U.S. (e.g., NLN, AACN) have
developed models of essential behaviors and competencies considered important in preparing a competent nurse. In the U.S. and
Canada, minimal competence for nursing practice is measured by the NCLEX-RN, which is written by the National Council of State
Boards of Nursing and based on actual nursing practice expectations. Nursing education programs are charged with evaluating
competence in their students, both in the evaluation of specific skills, and in the evaluation of general competence at the end of the
program. However, there is little consistency in how competence is measured in nursing education and no standardized instruments.
This presentation will report on findings from a larger NLN-funded research synthesis on clinical evaluation in nursing education programs.
Specifically, the studies focusing on clinical evaluation of competence will be examined. The research synthesis method described by Cooper (2010)
was used to guide the study, and the nursing research literature was searched through March 2017. A total of 88 research studies on clinical
evaluation of nursing students were analyzed and categorized into 10 categories. A total of 35 studies (40%) examined the topic of competence. Of
these, the majority of studies (n = 22) had the aim of measuring general competence at the end of a course or entire nursing program. About one
third of the studies evaluated a specific type of competence, including competence in a specific patient care environment such as perioperative
care (Ajorpaz, Tafreshi, Mohtashami, Zayeri, & Rahemi, 2016), related to a specific clinical skill including vaccinations (Nikula, Puukka, & Leino-Kilpi,
2012) and medication calculations (Macdonald, Weeks, & Mosely, 2013), or a professional nursing skill such as critical thinking (Pitt, Powis, Levett-
Jones, & Hunter, 2015) or cultural competence (Jeffreys & Dogan, 2013). Analyses of the studies revealed most used researcher-developed
instruments, and many used student self-report measures. Analysis of research designs indicated most of the studies were categorized as low
levels of evidence (Level 6 – single descriptive or qualitative study) according to Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt’s (2011) Levels of Evidence criteria.
The evaluation instruments included a variety of components to measure competence, including skill performance, knowledge, professional
behaviors, personal characteristics such as curiosity or self-confidence, and affective domain components such as caring and honesty. An analysis
of the differing components of competence measures across studies will be provided. Few of the measures were based on national standards of
competence, and those that did all originated outside the U.S.
The current state of the science in the measurement of competence in clinical evaluation demonstrates that there is no consistent definition of
competence, either globally or within nations. Based on the studies reviewed, there is little consensus on the essential components of competence,
and there is a lack of reliable and valid instruments being used to measure competence. Many of the studies reviewed relied on student self-
evaluation of competence. In addition, a variety of evaluators were used to measure clinical competence, including faculty and preceptors. Some of
the studies that compared different evaluators’ opinions of competence (e.g. students’, instructors’, preceptor’s) showed disagreement among
evaluators, even when using the same evaluation instrument.
To advance the science of nursing education, there needs to be reconciliation of the differing definitions and standards of competence provided by
national organizations and experts in nursing practice. Instruments measuring competence must be based upon a unified definition, with additional
items added to reflect the needs of specialty areas or skills. Implementation of a more standardized approach to the measurement of clinical
competence will facilitate comparison of findings across programs, nationally and internationally. Other issues that must be resolved include who
should measure student competence, and how consistency among evaluators can be ascertained. It is important that nursing education
researchers begin to address these important issues related to the measurement and evaluation of clinical competence in order to foster the
development of widely accepted, reliable, and valid measures of clinical competence that can be tested through multi-site research studies in a
variety of programs to build the foundation of nursing education science. The development and testing of such instruments is essential to foster
the educational development of clinically competent nurses nationally and internationally.
References
Ajorpaz, N.M., Tafreshi, M.Z., Mohtashami, J., Zayeri, F., & Rahemi, Z. (2016). The effect of mentoring on clinical perioperative competence in
operating room nursing students. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25, 1319-1325. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13205
Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Garside, J.R., & Nhemachena, J.Z.Z. (2013). A concept analysis of competence and its transition in nursing. Nurse Education Today, 33, 541-545. doi:
10.1016/jnedt.2011.12.007
Jeffreys, M. R., & Dogan, E. (2013). Evaluating cultural competence in the clinical practicum. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(2), 88-94.
Macdonald, K., Weeks, K., & Mosely, L. (2013). Safety in numbers 6: Tracking pre-registration students' cognitive and functional competence
development in medication dosage calculation problem-solving: The role of authentic learning and diagnostic assessment environments. Nurse
Education in Practice, 13(2), e66-e77. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.10.015
Melnyk, B.M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott,
Williams & Wilkins.
Nikula, A., Puukka, P., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2012). Vaccination competence of graduating public health nurse students and nurses. Nurse Education
Today, 32(8), 850-856. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.10.008
Pitt, V., Powis, D., Levett-Jones, T., & Hunter, S. (2015). The influence of critical thinking skills on performance and progression in a pre-registration
nursing program. Nurse Education Today, 35(1), 125-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.006
Valloze, J. (2009). Competence: A concept analysis. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 4, 115-118. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2009.02.004.
Contact
[email protected]
Improving the Charge Nurse’s Leadership Role: A Collaborative Learning Forum
Felicia K. Pryby, DNP, USA
Abstract
Staff nurses are frequently placed in charge nurse positions without the necessary formal training (McCallin & Frankson, 2010;
Schwarzkopf, Sherman, & Kiger, 2012; Wilmoth & Shapiro, 2014). An Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2010) report recommends that all
nurses should become leaders in transforming health care: all should be trained in leadership skills, such as conflict management
and delegation. To improve patient outcomes and staff satisfaction, health care organizations need to improve on how front-line
leadership, charge nurses, and staff nurses are trained for leadership positions within the organization. The long-term goal of this
project was to develop a curriculum for a formal institutional leadership workshop for the charge nurses at the practicum site. The
Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model and Lewin’s change theory were used to guide the development and
implementation of the workshop. Data were collected using a focus group approach with 4 novice and 5 expert medical-surgical
charge nurses. The short-term goal of the project was to understand the charge nurses’ perceptions of leadership and the challenges
as a front-line leader. Participating nurses were recruited from staff meetings and from a hospital flyer. Each participant answered
the 3 leadership questions. The charge nurses’ statements were categorized and color-coded to identify emerging themes from
repetitions of words and patterns; themes were subsequently prioritized from the most to the least occurring. Member checking
with participants as well as preceptor verification and validation of 10 themes that were utilized to develop the curriculum:
communication, patient safety, roles, teamwork, conflict management, generational diversity, mentoring, cheerleader,
prioritization, and delegation. Implementing the workshop 4 hours per month over a 3-month period and formal mentoring was
recommended for optimal sustainability based on the proposed theoretical framework. Implications for positive social change
include the potential for enhancing the quality of patient care delivered and improving patient safety as a result of charge nurse
leadership being modeled.
References
American Organization of Nurse Executives (2015). Leadership tools. Retrieved from
http://www.aone.org/resources/leadership%20tools/library.shtml
Assid, P. A. (2010). How to build an ED charge nurse training program. Nursing Management, 41(10), 49-51.
doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000388300.62352.d5
Billings, D., & Halstead, J. (2011). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.
Flynn, J. P., Prufeta, P. A., & Minghillo-Lipari, L. (2010). Cultivating quality: An evidence-based approach to taking charge. American Journal of
Nursing, 110(9), 58-63. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388268.65499.bc
Griffith, M. B. (2012). Effective succession planning in nursing: A review of the literature. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(7), 900-911.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01418.x
Hendricks, J. M., & Cope, V. C. (2013). Generational diversity: What nurse managers need to know. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(3), 717-725.
doi:10.1111/j.1365–2648.2012.06079.x.
Homer, R., & Ryan, L. (2013). Making the grade: Charge nurse education improves job performance. Nursing Management, 44(3), 38-44.
doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000427183.65177.76
Institute of Medicine. (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Retrieved from http://www.iom.edu/reports/2010/the-
future-of-nursing-leading-change-advancing-health.aspx
Kramer, L. W. (2010). Generational diversity. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 29(3), 125-128. doi:10.1097/DCC.0b013e3181d24ba9
Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. American Journal of Sociology, 44(6), 868-896.
doi:10.1086/218177
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in-group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social quilibria and social change. Human Relations,
1(2), 5-41. doi:10.1177/001872674700100103
McCallin, A. M., & Frankson, C. (2010). The role of the charge nurse manager: A descriptive exploratory study. Journal of Nursing Management,
18(3), 319-325. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01067.x
Nelsey, L., & Brownie, S. (2012). Effective leadership, teamwork and mentoring: Essential elements in promoting generational cohesion in the
nursing workforce and retaining nurses. Collegian, 19(4), 197-202. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2012.03.002
Normand, L., Black, D., Baldwin, K. M., & Crenshaw, J. T. (2014). Redefining charge nurse within the front line. Nursing Management, 45(9), 48-53.
doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000453274.96005.35
Patrician, P. A., Oliver, D., Miltner, R. S., Dawson, M., & Ladner, K. A. (2012). Nurturing charge nurses for future leadership roles. Journal of Nursing
Administration, 42(19), 461-466. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31826a1fdb
Prestia, A. S., Dyess, S. M., & Sherman, R. O. (2014). Planting seeds of succession. Nursing Management, 45(3), 1-10.
doi:10.1097/01.NUMA.0000443941.68503.09
Raterink, G. (2016). Reflective journaling for critical thinking development in advanced practice registered nurse students. Journal of Nursing
Education, 55(2), 101-104. doi:10.3928/0148434-20160114-08
Schwarzkopf, R., Sherman, R. O., & Kiger, A. J. (2012). Taking charge: Front-line nursing leadership development. The Journal of Continuing
Education in Nursing, 43(4), 154-159. doi:10.3928/00220124-20111101-29
Scott, E., & Miles, J. (2013). Advancing leadership capacity in nursing. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 37(1), 77-82.
doi:10.1097/NAQ.0b013e3182751998
Sherman, R. O., Schwarzkopf, R., & Kiger, A. J. (2013). What we learned from our charge nurses. Nurse Leader, 11(1), and 34-39.
doi:10.1016/j.mnl.2012.11.006
Sherman, R., & Pross, E. (2010). Growing future nurse leaders to build and sustain healthy work environments at the unit level. The Online Journal
of Issues in Nursing, 15(1), 1-11. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol15No01Man01
Swearingen, S. (2009). A journey to leadership: Developing a nursing leadership development program. The Journal of Continuing Education in
Nursing, 40(3), 107-112. doi:10.3928/00220124-20090301-02
Trepanier, S., & Crenshaw, J. T. (2013). Succession planning: A call to action for nurse executives. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(7), 980-985.
doi:10.1111/jonm.12177
Wilmoth, M. C., & Shapiro, S. E. (2014). The intentional development of nurses as leaders. Journal of Nursing Administration, 44(6), 333-338.
doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000000078
Contact
[email protected]
Lend Me a Hand: A Collaborative Nurse Leadership Mentoring Program
Janice Hobba-Glose, DNS, RN, USA
Deborah H. Merriam, DNS, RN, CNE, VCE, USA
Margarita Coyne, MS, USA
Jill Kaczor, MS (Ed), USA
Abstract
As aging nurse leaders retire, a gap is left for nurse leadership and a growing need to prepare an intergenerational workforce of
nurse leaders who will fill the gap (AHA, 2014; Dyess, Sherman, Pratt, & Chiang-Hanisko, 2016). Shirey (2006) has projected a
shortage of at least 67,000 nurse leaders by 2020. The rapidly changing current healthcare environment coupled with the projected
shortage of nurse leaders, necessitates an enhanced level of technical and professional expertise as well as the leadership capacity
to adapt and be successful (Center for Creative Leadership, 2016). As health care systems provide leadership in an evolving state of
change, Ibitayo and Baxley (2013) note a different model for support and development may be needed to alleviate concerns facing
newer nurse leaders (Ulrich et al., 2014). Dyess et al. (2016) noted the impact of challenges such as a rapidly evolving health care
environment, increased impact of outcomes on reimbursement, and increased span of control on a healthy work environment.
Ulrich et al.’s (2014) findings in a study of more than 8000 nurses that perceptions of healthy working environments were
diminishing for frontline managers as well as CNOs, suggested support for leadership development may alleviate concerns facing
newer nurse leaders. Nurse leaders of tomorrow must be equipped with the ability to transform knowledge into practice that will
positively impact the culture of the healthcare environment and effect positive patient outcomes.
Purpose: The purpose of this presentation is to articulate gaps identified in leadership development by aspiring and current nurse leaders in
Western New York (WNY) that will allow nurse leaders to chart a course to transition more fully into nurse leadership roles that transform care
through participation in a Nurse Leader Development Program (NLDP). The presentation will describe a collaborative effort between academia and
practice that is open to all WNY area nurse leaders and aspiring nurse leaders. Discussion will include the specific leadership gaps identified in
nursing leadership skills and attitudes. A NLDP will be described that was designed to helping nurse leaders make the climb to successful leadership
skills that enhance a healthy work environment and positive patient outcomes.
Methods: A qualitative study recruited nurse leaders (n = 14) and aspiring nurse leaders (n = 42) from the healthcare systems in WNY. After
receiving IRB approval and informed consent, participants were placed into nine focus groups dependent on their current leadership status:
established or aspiring nurse leader. Focus group participants were asked the same questions of their perceptions of the gaps in nursing leadership
in WNY. Digital recordings of the focus group responses were then transcribed and analyzed for themes using content analysis and nVivo 10
software; consensus was achieved among the team of researchers. The identified gaps in leadership development were used to create an outline
and objectives for the NLDP. The objectives for the NLDP were matched to the AONE Nurse Executive Competencies, giving structure to the NLDP.
Results: The data was analyzed both individually from the aspiring and current nurse leaders and then compared between the groups. When
speaking of charting a path to leadership, the experienced nurse leaders identified a need to develop essential relationships along the way stating,
“… start to develop relationships with multiple people that are going to be in life positions, and have come from different experiential base and they
need to spend time with the critical point people that they’re going to have to depend on, and develop a relationship with”. Additionally, they
expressed a need to better understand the role of a nurse leader with a rhetorical question of “What are their roles and responsibilities? I think
that’s another thing that is really important to make sure that everybody is aware and understands exactly what that is”. They lamented that “we
don’t have a common language” that helps nurse leaders to communicate with the interprofessional team. Finally, the nurse leaders stated a need
for mentoring of new nurse leaders: “we have a huge gap even from leadership to leadership roles, there’s not very much mentorship between our
senior leaders and you know we don’t have the resources.”
The aspiring nurse leader groups were frank in their admission that while they “would be interested in leadership”, they were not sure how to chart
the course to leadership, stating I am “not feeling the opportunity necessarily exists for you to step up that ladder because it is so well established as
it is already.” Navigating to the leadership role seemed to be nebulous and required “some sort of shadowing opportunity to really see because I
don’t really necessarily have a specific goal into leadership, I would like to really see different roles.” Some aspiring leaders were not sure of the
progression through leadership stating, “I think there is also a gap in steps. So like sometimes you will take a nurse off the floor and she will become
a manager, and there are no steps going up, there is no career ladder that moves you into that role.” The group further expressed that this
sometimes sudden thrust into leadership was not supported by recognition of their leadership abilities, noting a need for assistance with reaching
success in leadership: “they say good leaders should be grooming their succession plan, like you should be grooming the person who is going to take
over your job. That’s like what you should walk into a leadership role doing.”
There was an identified need among all participants for a nurse leader self-assessment “to help a young leader understand…It didn’t go well, you
look upset, let’s talk about that, what could you have done differently in that position, to make it more comfortable for you because in order to be
successful you have to be comfortable in your own skin”. Paramount to success as a nurse leader was “communication…I think they have to be able
to connect with people. I’ve just seen too many people that they are so smart that they could not navigate the relationships…conflict resolution‘s
something that every leader must be able to get over because if you can’t there's no way you can be successful…or be a leader.” Both the aspiring
and current nurse leaders identified a need for leadership development that included “an effective mentor, somebody’s who been through it, who
can coach you, and suggest avenues to take to ensure your success.”. The experienced nurse leaders had these words for the aspiring nurse
leaders: “Don’t expect to be perfect, because it’s not going to be. You don’t know everything, you will never know everything, and you don’t have
to know everything. You do have to know how to seek out the answer if you don’t’ know something.”
This presentation will review the identified leadership gaps as they were compared to the AONE (2015) Nurse Executive Competencies for the
purpose of developing a NLDP that will mentor nurse leaders to potentially increase retention of nurse leaders as well as enhance outcomes and
leadership capacity. The AONE Nurse Executive Competencies represent the transformational leadership knowledge, skills and attitudes needed to
excel as a nurse leader. Competencies identified as targets for leadership development included: Communication and relationship building,
Knowledge of the healthcare environment, Leadership, Professionalism and Business Skills. The goals for the NLDP included: Compare differences
in roles, expectations, and commitment of the nurse leader; Utilize findings from self-assessment to develop a plan for self-care; Apply acquired
knowledge of business and finances involved in healthcare in the role of a nurse leader; Utilize communication and relationship management skills
in the role of a nurse leader; Create a plan to achieve two measurable goals to strengthen leadership skills and professionalism; Design a 3-5 year
plan for consistent professional development in the role of a nurse leader.
Conclusion: This presentation will present identified leadership gaps in WNY that were used to develop a NLDP. The identified leadership gaps
represent the thoughts and experiences of aspiring and experienced nurse leaders. Both groups clearly described the need for a leadership
development program that addressed a lack of understanding related to the leadership role and how to make the leadership climb. The developing
NLDP will recruit and matches mentors (experienced nurse leaders) with protégés (aspiring nurse leaders) into a nine month multi-organizational
leadership development program where mentors will facilitate the cultivation of transformational leadership knowledge that will advance and
strengthen nursing leadership. The NLDP includes a logic model specifically focused on changes in knowledge, skills and attitudes to meet the
identified gaps in leadership development. Future nurse leaders are charting their paths to leadership success; a formal leadership mentoring
program will lend a hand to aspiring leaders as they navigate their leadership climb.
References
American Organization of Nurse Executives (AONE). (2015). Nurse Executive Competencies. Retrieved from http://www.aone.org/resources/nurse-
executive-competencies.pdf
Center for Creative Leadership. (2016). White Paper: Addressing the Leadership Gap in Healthcare: What’s Needed when it Comes to Leader Talent?
Retrieved from http://insights.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/addressingLeadershipGapHealthcare.pdf
Dyess, Sherman, Pratt, & Chiang-Hanisko. (2016). Growing nurse leaders: Their perspectives on nursing leadership and today’s practice
environment. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 21(1), 11 pp. Retrieved from
http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-21-2016/No1-Jan-
2016/Articles-Previous-Topics/Growing-Nurse-Leaders.html?css=print
Ibitayo, K. & Baxley, S. (2013). Challenges of the health care system and the need for mentoring. In S. Baxley, K. Ibitayo & M. Bond, (2014).
Mentoring Today’s Nurses: A Global Perspective for Success. Retrieved from www.amazon.com
Ulrich, B., Lavandero, R., Woods, D., & Early, S. (2014), Critical care nurse work environments 2013: A status report. Critical Care Nurse, 34(4):64-79.
doi: 10.4037/ccn2014731
Contact
[email protected]
D 03 - Exam Scores
Use of Crib Sheets and Exam Performance in an Undergraduate Nursing Course
Ann Malecha, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Pinky Budhrani-Shani, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: There is a growing body of evidence that the use of student-prepared testing aids (cheat sheets or crib notes) can have
a positive impact on student outcomes such as test anxiety and exam performance. Some researchers have suggested that the
actual preparation of a crib sheet can help students to organize course content, reduce the need for memorization, and focus on
conceptual knowledge and learning. A review of the literature indicates faculty-approved crib sheets during exams are becoming
more common in the disciplines of math, engineering, psychology, and other sciences. There are little to no published studies on the
use of authorized crib sheets with nursing students.
Purpose: A repeated measures, correlational study was conducted to assess the outcomes of allowing baccalaureate nursing students to use
authorized crib sheets during exams.
Methods: Senior nursing students (N=86), enrolled in a community health nursing course, received a blank crib sheet (10 cm X 15 cm index card)
one week before each exam. The students were allowed to write on the front and back of the index card and then use it during the exam. Use of
the sheet was not required. The crib sheet was collected after each exam and the students completed a post-exam survey developed by the
researchers. The survey included five scaled questions assessing the benefits of using the crib sheet across the domains of Exam Confidence, Exam
Preparedness, Test Anxiety, Assistance during Exam, and Recommend for Future Exams. Other survey items collected data on amount of time
spent creating the crib sheet and number of times crib sheet was used during exam. One open-ended question requested additional written
feedback.
Results: Even though it was not required, of the 86 students, 82 students (95%) used the crib sheet for all 3 of the exams. A repeated measures
ANOVA found significant changes on all variables. For example, mean time creating the crib sheet was much longer (p<.001) for Exam 2 (M = 218.2)
and the Final Exam (M = 230.89) compared to Exam 1(M = 151.79). The average number of times looking at the crib sheet during the exam was also
greater (p<.001) for Exam 2 and the Final Exam (6-10 times) than in Exam 1 (2-5 times). Spearman’s rho correlations were used to examine the
relationships between exam grades, confidence, preparation, anxiety, assistance during exam, and recommendation with time creating and looking
at the sheet. Looking at the crib sheet during the exams was positively correlated to confidence, preparedness, decreased anxiety, assistance, and
future recommendation. The amount of time creating the sheet was also positively correlated to these same outcomes except for assistance. The
crib sheet usage was not correlated to exam grade overall. Themes from the qualitative data included “creating the card helped me
learn/memorize,” and the “card was a security blanket during exams.”
Conclusion: Not only did almost all of the students use the crib sheets, but they overwhelmingly considered it to be a “great study tool.” This was
the first course that allowed the faculty-approved crib sheet and the students commented they wished other courses would allow this study aid. By
the Final Exam, the students were spending more time creating the crib sheet and using it more during the exam. Increasing the amount of time to
create the sheet and number of times looking at the sheet during the exam could decrease anxiety.
References
Burns, K.C. (2014). Security blanket or crutch? Crib card usage depends on students’ abilities. Teaching of Psychology, 41(1), 66-68.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098628313514181
Dickson, K.L., & Bauer, J.J. (2008). Do students learn course material during crib sheet construction? Teaching of Psychology, 35, 117-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080.00986280801978343
Erbe, B. (2007). Reducing test anxiety while increasing learning: The cheat sheet. College Teaching, 55(3), 96-97. Retrieved from
http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/vcol20/55/3?nav=tocList
Hamouda, S., & Shaffer, C.A. (2016). Crib sheets and exam performance in a data structures course. Computer Science Education, 26(1), 1-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1140427
Larwin, K. (2012). Student prepared testing aids: A low-tech method of encouraging student engagement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 39(2),
105-111. Retrieved from http://www.projectinnovation.biz/index.html
Larwin, K.H., Gorman, J., & Larwin, D.A. (2013). Assessing the impact of testing aids on post-secondary student performance: A meta-analytic
investigation. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 429-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648.013.9227.1
Contact
[email protected]
D 03 - Exam Scores
A Retrospective View of the Effect of Double Testing on Nursing Student Examination Scores
Donna Crawford, PhD, MSN, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Introduction: There are a variety of assessment methods available to nurse educators. The decision to use a particular strategy
depends on the objective being assessed, the setting in which learning occurs, the level and number of students, and time
constraints. This mixed methods study focused on the use of collaborative testing in a nursing Pharmacotherapeutics course at a
Midwestern university. Collaborative testing is defined as an assessment method in which pairs or small groups of students work
together to develop answers on course examinations (Oermann & Gaberson, 2017). This presentation will describe the use of double
testing in which students take each examination twice, first alone and again following a 15-20 minute discussion with an assigned
group. In this classroom group consensus was not required. When used in this manner collaborative testing becomes a type of
posttest review (Parsons and Teel, 2013; Centrella-Nigro, 2012). Collaborative testing functions to teach students the importance of
collaboration, which was identified as one of the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) project competencies. QSEN
defines teamwork and collaboration as the skills required for a nurse to “function effectively within nursing and inter-professional
teams, fostering open communication, mutual respect, and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient care” (QSEN, 2014).
Collaborative testing is a learning strategy that encourages students to participate, negotiate, and work together as a team during
testing. Social interdependent theory (Johnson & Johnson, 2005) identifies the positive effect of the use of effective communication
in order to reach a common goal. The use of collaborative testing can help students develop skills that are important for competent
nursing practice. Three research questions were used to guide this study: (1) Is there a difference between the class average
individual test score and the average class double-testing test score on unit examinations over eight semesters? (2) How much
difference occurs between the class average individual test score and the average class double-testing score on unit examinations
over eight semesters? (3) Are students satisfied with the double-testing method? Literature Review: Collaborative testing methods
have been used successfully in a variety of settings within nursing education. Research indicates that students have reported high
satisfaction with the use of collaborative testing (Gallagher, 2009; Hanna, Roberts, & Hurley, 2016; Sandahl, 2010; Wiggs, 2011).
Research also indicates that examination scores are higher with the use of collaborative testing (Eastridge, 2014; Martin, Frieson, &
Pau, 2014; Molsbee, 2013; Sandahl, 2010) causing some concern related to grade inflation (Duane & Satre, 2014). Heglund and Wink
(2011) studied the effect of collaborative testing on the examination scores of 166 nursing students and reported a 3% grade
increase that did not meet the criteria for statistical significance. Data Collection: There were two aims of this study. The first aim
was to determine the percentage of grade increase that students received over the course of eight semesters with the use of
double-testing (n=403). A second part of the study focused on student perceptions of the use of collaborative testing. This study
utilized a convenience sample of traditional nursing students in the first semester of a baccalaureate nursing program. Following IRB
approval, average examination scores were obtained from the Black Board grade book using the course statistics feature in order to
determine the amount of grade increase realized from the use of collaborative testing. Each semester six unit examinations are
administered using double-testing. Three average scores were obtained for each examination; an independent score for the solo
examination (Test A), the score received following the group discussion (Test B), and the final examination score which is usually the
average of Test A and Test B. Collaborative testing is not used for the comprehensive course final examination. In order to determine
student satisfaction, the course evaluation for the Fall 2016 semester included three questions concerning student satisfaction with
collaborative testing (n=38). Findings: The average grade increase over eight semesters was 3.3%, which is consistent with the
findings of Heglund and Wink (2011). As for student satisfaction, consistent with past research, most students (90%) strongly agreed
that they enjoyed the use of collaborative testing. Recommendations: To decrease concerns related to grade inflation an educator
may consider awarding collaborative testing points only to those students who independently pass the examination. A 3% grade
increase may or may not be sufficient to increase a student to a higher letter grade, but students do appreciate the opportunity for
further learning that may add a few points to their grade. Educators may feel that the time spent in test review is worth the
rewarding of a few extra points. Students do express high satisfaction with collaborative testing and feel that it is a worth-while
addition to learning.
References
Centrella-Nigro, A. M. (2012). Collaborative testing as posttest review. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(5), 340-341.
Duane, B. T. & Satre, M. E. (2014). Utilizing constructivism learning theory in collaborative testing as a creative strategy to promote essential
nursing skills. Nurse Education Today, 34, 31-34. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.005
Eastridge, J. A. (2014). Use of collaborative testing to promote nursing student success. Nurse Educator, 39(1), 4-5. doi:
10.1097/01.NNE.0000437366.96218.f1
Gallagher, P. A. (2009). Collaborative essay testing: Group work that counts. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 6(1), 1-13. doi:
10.2202/1548-923X.1845
Hanna, K., Roberts, T., & Hurley S. (2016). Collaborative testing as NCLEX enrichment. Nurse Educator, 41(4), 171-174. doi:
10.1097/NNE.0000000000000241
Heglund, S. & Wink, D. (2011). Impact of double testing on student knowledge in a professional issues course. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(5),
278-280. doi:10.3928/01484834-20110131-06
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs,
Nov; 131(4), 285-358.
Martin, D., Frieson, E., & DePau, Antonina (2014). Three heads are better than one: A mixed methods study examining collaborative versus
traditional test-taking with nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 34, 971-977. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.01.004
Molsbee, C. P. (2013). Collaborative testing and mixed results. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 8, 22-25. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2012.09.001
Oermann, M. H. & Gaberson, K. B. (2017). Evaluation and Testing in Nursing Education, 5th ed. Springer Publishing Company, New York.
Parsons, S. D. & Teel, V. (2013). Double Testing: A student perspective. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(2), 127-128.
QSEN Institute (2014). Pre-licensure KSAS. Retrieved from: http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/
Sandahl, S. S. (2010). Collaborative testing as a learning strategy in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(3), 142-147.
Wiggs, C. M. (2011). Collaborative testing: Assessing teamwork and critical thinking behaviors in baccalaureate nursing students. Nurse Education
Today, 31, 279-282. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.27
Contact
[email protected]
A Student Organization and Peer Support Impacts College Students’ Health and Wellness: Diabetes
Exemplar
Jennifer L. Saylor, PhD, APRN, ACNS-BC, USA
Emily Ike, MA, USA
Abstract
College Campus Living with a Chronic Condition
In the United States, 20% of youth have a chronic medical condition or special health care need (Health Resources Services Administration, 2016).
With rapid advances in medicine, young adults with chronic conditions are living longer, attend college at a higher rate, and develop into successful
adults. Students with a chronic condition have impaired health related quality of life (QOL) compared to those without a chronic condition and a
higher level of loneliness/isolation (Herts, Wallis, & Maslow, 2014). Surprisingly, only 7% of first year college students with chronic conditions knew
another student with a chronic illness and 57% reported not knowing anyone with chronic illness (Herts, Wallis, & Maslow, 2014). Fortunately,
some universities have student organizations with a medical focus, including Chronic Illness Advocates, Active Minds, Lori’s Hands, and College
Diabetes Network. These organizations may help college students with a chronic illness adjust to college living. However, to the authors knowledge,
no research exists on membership in a disease specific organizations and its impact on student health outcomes or college experience.
Collaborative Practice: University School of Nursing and a Non-profit Organization
A collaboration between a faculty member in a school of nursing at a university, and a diabetes non-profit organization The College Diabetes
Network (CDN) began with a common interest of improving the college experience and beyond for young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This is
best achieved through student organization membership, educational materials for patients and their families, and dissemination of data-based
research to the healthcare community. This evolving collaboration yielded a study examining the impact of involvement in a student organization
(CDN chapters) and physical and mental health outcomes.
College Campus Living with a Chronic Disease: Type 1 Diabetes
T1D is becoming more common in the United States. Between 2001 and 2009 there was a 21% increase in the prevalence of T1D in people under
age 20 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014: Dabelea et al., 2014) In the U.S., 5 million people are expected to have T1D by 2050,
including nearly 600,000 youth (Dabelea et al., 2014; Imperatore, et al., 2012). At any given time, there are an estimated 53,000 college students
with T1D in the United States (Roth, 2014). However, no specific data on prevalence in this age group is available, as research is lacking in this
population.
Many young adults without a chronic condition have difficulty adjusting to this campus living and balancing academic, social life, and psychological
well-being. This balancing act is even more complex for students with T1D who require vigilant self-management that includes consistent insulin
administration, proper nutrition, physical activity, and sleep patterns. Unlike other diseases, 95% of diabetes management decisions are made by
the patient. A qualitative study in Denmark of young adults found a need for peer support emerged from students feeling loneliness from a
diabetes perspective (Joensen, Filges, & Willaing, 2016).The newfound freedom of independent living, and loss of prior peer support from high
school coupled with the intensive management requirements of diabetes can be the perfect storm.
Management of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, daily blood glucose management, and fear of complications, on top of college living, can be an
extraordinary amount of pressure. In addition to day to day management decisions, there are a variety of other factors that must now be balanced
without the assistance of a parental support system. These include knowing the affect blood glucose on exercise, when it is not safe to drive, the
effects of alcohol on blood glucose levels, managing illnesses, ordering diabetes supplies, making doctors’ appointments, and even keeping track of
insurance claims.
Other challenges faced by these students include the effect of high/low blood sugar on cognitive function, classroom accommodations, dining, and
housing. As with other chronic conditions, mental health must not be overlooked. Of 150 teens and young adults (ages 11 to 25 years) with T1D,
Soren and Grey (2015) found depression and anxiety (11% and 21%, respectively) among the participants and 20% had disordered eating. Teens
and young adults with mental health issues are twice as likely to have poor diabetes control, putting them at risk of both short and long term
complications.
Diabetes Registered Student Organization
Started in 2009, the College Diabetes Network (CDN) is a non-profit organization that provides information and resources to young adults with T1D,
as well as access to peer support. Their “mission is to provide innovative peer based programs which connect and empower students and young
professionals to thrive with diabetes.” CDN currently has over 110 affiliated student-led Chapters on campuses across the US, with over 30
Chapters in the process of getting started.
In addition to CDN’s Chapter Network, additional programs include empowering young adult leadership with the diabetes community, and
programs for newly diagnosed young adults (those diagnosed with T1D between the ages of 17-25). Recent events hosted by CDN include a focus
group of newly diagnosed young adults to assist in the development of specific resources for this population (research article pending), as well as a
Student Leadership Retreat, which has recently completed its fourth consecutive year.
CDN also provides resources to assist with the transition to independence through audience-specific “Off to College” booklets, with both a student
and a parent version. These booklets include topics such as looking at schools, packing, finding a new clinician, parent/child communication,
expected campus challenges, talking to roommates, alcohol, and much more. Further, the “Off to College Event Host Guide” assists clinicians in
hosting “transition events” for high school students with T1D.
Recently, the CDN Campus Advisory Committee developed the “Campus Toolkit Program” that includes a toolkits for Disability Services, Counseling
Centers, and Health Centers. These toolkits are designed to help key departments on college campuses provide better support and resources to
students with diabetes, with the goal of minimizing negative health and academic outcomes and improving student experiences in college. A pilot
to 25 campuses will be conducted for the 2017-18 school year.
Evaluation of a Diabetes Registered Student Organization: Collaborative Practice
Design: This was a descriptive research design using an electronic survey. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between
membership of diabetes student organization (CDN Chapters) and mental and physical health outcomes including HbA1c, and perception of
isolation, and depression.
Methods: An electronic survey was developed based on challenges experienced by college students living with diabetes. A purposeful sample was
recruited for the study using the CDN database and emails were sent to those identified as “student”, which included members of local university
chapters and non-members across the United States. The survey was completed between April 3rd-24th, 2017. Of the 532 who completed the
survey, 375 met the inclusion criteria of young adults with T1D currently enrolled in an undergraduate or graduate college program. If interested
participants could enter their email for a chance to be entered into a raffle for Amazon gift cards after completing the survey.
Analysis: All data was analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23, Chicago IL. Standard descriptive statistics
were used to analyze the outcomes, demographic, and independent variables of interest. Chi Square and Pearson correlation was used to examine
the relationship and difference between member and non-members of a diabetes student organization.
Results: CDN Chapter members (n = 246) and non-members (n = 129) completed an online survey. There was an inverse relationship of college
students’ level of isolation when entering college and joining the diabetes student organization (20% and 49%, respectively). Thirty-one percent of
CDN chapter members reported a decrease in their HbA1c compared to 43% of non-members reporting a rise in HbA1c. Among those with an
eating disorder, almost half of the CDN chapter members reported an improvement, while more than half of non-members reported that their
eating disorder worsened. Similar results were found when asked about feelings of depression. Membership in CDN improved health and college
experience with less isolation among the group of study participants.
Conclusion: College transition is difficult for some and is more complex with a chronic illness such as T1D. Student organizations can have a
positive impact on college students health and improve their college experience. More than half of the participants strongly agreed that their
college CDN Chapter helped them connect with other people who understand what they are going through. The study cannot be generalized to
other organizations, however, it could be replicated with other organizations. More research is needed in this area of young adults transitioning
with chronic illnesses. Results translate in many areas of academia including student health, disability support services, faculty education, and
mental health services. Also, clinical practitioners must understand the resources available to college students as they transition their patients to
college or adult health care. Practice changes in transition and policies in the academic setting require leaders to understand the effect on young
adults with chronic conditions and make policy changes to improve college living for those with chronic conditions.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). National diabetes statistics report: Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States.
Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statsreport14/national-diabetes-report-web.pdf
Dabelea, D., Mayer-Davis, E. J., Saydah, S., Imperatore, G., Linder, B., Divers, J., .... & Hamman, R. F. (2016). Prevalence of type 1 and type 2
diabetes among children and adolescents from 2001to 2009. JAMA, 311(17), 1778-1786. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3201.
Health Resources Services Administration. (2016). Children with special health care needs. Retrieved from https://mchb.hrsa.gov/maternal-child-
health-topics/children-and-youth-special-health-needs
Herts, K., Wallis, E., & Maslow, G. (2014). College freshman with chronic illness: A comparison with healthy first- year students. Journal of College
Student Development,55 (5), 475-480.
Imperatore, G., Boyle, J. P., Thompson, T. J., Case, D., Dabelea, D., Hamman, R. F, ...& SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group. (2012).
Projections of type 1 and type 2 diabetes burden in the U.S. population aged < 20 years through 2050: Dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality,
and population growth. Diabetes Care; 35(12), 2515-2520. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0669
(Joensen, L. E., Filges, T. & Willaing, I. (2016). Patient perspectives on peer support for adults with type 1 diabetes: a need for diabetes-specific
social capital. Doverpress, 10, 1443-1451. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S111696
Contact
[email protected]
Implementing Health Promotion for People With Disabilities: Process Evaluation of a Pilot HealthMatters
Program©
Jo Ann Abbott, DNP, USA
Abstract
Regular physical activity together with healthy eating habits result in health benefits that include reducing the risks for chronic medical conditions
such as cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes (U.S._Department_of_Health_and_Human_Services, 2008). Currently, 40% of adults with a
disability are inactive compared to only 19% without a disability in one state’s survey (Sparling et al., 2015). Nationwide, adults with disabilities
experience higher health risks and health care utilization indicating the need for better health promotion training for health care providers
(Havercamp & Scott, 2015). To address this disparity, a pilot HealthMatters™ Program (Pilot), an evidence-based health promotion program
developed specifically for adults with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities (IDD) (Marks, Sisirak, & Chang, 2013), was implemented. To
better define best implementation practices the implementation process was retrospectively studied with the following PICOT question: for
participating adults with IDD (Population) attending a community day program, how did the implementation of HealthMatters™ Pilot intervention
(I) compare (C) to HealthMatters™ Program design with respect to process-oriented outcome (O) measures for this 12-week (T) Pilot? The training
of the staff trainers, the curriculum attendance of the 10 participants with IDD, the primary care providers (PCP) responses to Pilot participation
notifications, the participants’ weight/BMI and blood pressures prior to and at the conclusion of the 12 week curriculum were analyzed. Pilot costs
and survey tools were applied after completion of the Curriculum. Process-oriented measures focused on participation (reach), fidelity
(concordance of the Pilot’s implementation compared with the HealthMatters™ Program), context (environment) and the costs of the
implementation process (Bodde, Seo, Frey, Lohrmann, & Van Puymbroeck, 2012). Ten (10) participants, and their PCPs, participated in the
HealthMatters™ Pilot with 80% and 100% participation rates, respectively. The Pilot’s process strengths included high participation and survey
satisfaction with Curriculum and training, relatively low participant and sponsor costs (~ $300/participant). Weaknesses included limited
opportunities for caregiver participation and challenges with scheduling staff time leading to inconsistent curriculum fidelity. Opportunities
identified included the following: high potential to partner with PCPs and for organizational growth to sustain health promotion goals beyond the
12 week program; favorable cost-value projections for a future statewide implementation of HealthMatters™ Programs for eligible adults with IDD.
Pilot Health Promotion programs for individuals with IDD are well suited for process evaluations and the development of curricula for best nursing
practices to promote health in adults with disabilities.
References
Bodde, A. E., Seo, D. C., Frey, G. C., Lohrmann, D. K., & Van Puymbroeck, M. (2012). Developing a physical activity education curriculum for adults
with intellectual disabilities. Health promotion practice, 13(1), 116-123. doi: 10.1177/1524839910381698
Havercamp, S. M., & Scott, H. M. (2015). National health surveillance of adults with disabilities, adults with intellectual and developmental
disabilities, and adults with no disabilities. [Article]. Disability and Health Journal, 8(2), 165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.11.002
Marks, Beth, Sisirak, Jasmina, & Chang, YC. (2013). Efficacy of the healthmatters program train-the-trainer model. Journal of Applied Research in
Intellectual Disabilities, 26(4), 319-334. doi: 10.1111/jar.12045
Sparling, Eileen, Borras, Katie, Guinivan, Phyllis, Lee, Jae C, Magane, Kara, McDuffie, Mary Joan, & Rhonton, Laura. (2015). The current landscape
for disability and health in delaware: Public health assessment report summary. Newark, DE: University of Delaware, Center for Disabilities Studies.
Girls on the Run University of Delaware Student Wellness and Health Promotion, Boys & Girls Clubs, Christiana Care Cancer Center-Community
Health Outreach and Education Program Delaware YMCA, DHSS Synar Program.
U.S._Department_of_Health_and_Human_Services. (2008). 2008 physical activity guidelines for americans Retrieved 04/30/2017, 2017, from
https://health.gov/paguidelines/pdf/paguide.pdf
Contact
[email protected]
Substance Abuse Brief Intervention Referral to Treatment an Evidence-Based Approach to Reduce Risk
Julie A. Fitzgerald, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
In the United States, 88,000 deaths are related to alcohol, making it the fourth leading cause of preventable deaths (Stahre, Roeber,
Kanny, Brewer & Zang, 2014). It is estimated that about 30 percent of US adults experience a mental health or substance abuse
disorder in a year, and many struggle with both. A recent survey indicated that only 19.8% were ever treated (Grant et al., 2015).
Substance abuse frequently begins in adolescence. Substance abuse at an early age can lead to long term physical and social
problems (Carney, Myers, Louw & Okwundu, 2016). Although substance abuse leads to deterioration of physical and mental health,
most nursing curriculum does not include information on screening and intervening for substance abuse. The United States Joint
Commission on Accredidation recently included SBIRT core measures for alcohol as part of their evaluation measures (Broyles,
Kraemer, Kengor, & Gordon,2013). Nurses, as the largest group of healthcare providers should be taught to screen and intervene for
substance abuse (Pushkar, 2013).
Substance Abuse, Brief Intervention and Referral for Treatment (SBIRT) is an evidence-based practice to reduce risk. SBIRT is built upon change
theory and motivational interviewing. Motivational interviewing is a person centered counselling style that can be utilized to promote a number of
lifestyle changes (Ostlund, Wadensten, Kristofferzon & Haagstrom, 2015). Motivational interviewing has been used as an effective strategy in a
variety of settings. Motivational interviewing has the client identify the positives and negatives of a behavior and describe benefits of change.
Motivational interviewing has had a positive impact on medication adherence in bipolar disorder, (McKenzie & Chang, 2015), weight loss and
increased physical activity (Hardcastle, Taylor, Bailey, Harley, & Hagger, 2013) and smoking cessation (Lindson‐Hawley,Thompson, & Begh, 2015).
Two faculty (one nursing and one social work) at Ramapo College participate in a nationwide learning collaborative on substance abuse. In
response to a call for funding, the faculty (Nursing and Social Work) collaborated on a proposal to introduce Substance Abuse Screening and Brief
Intervention (SBIRT) to both the graduate and undergraduate nursing and social work programs. SBIRT is an evidence based practice that has been
an effective strategy for risk reduction in persons with substance use disorders (Tanner-Smith & Lipsey, 2015). Studies have noted that SBIRT can
take five to thirty minutes, depending on the patient’s reported use and is appropriate for many settings. Nurse and social work led integration of
SBIRT into practice can identify patients at risk of substance abuse and allow intervention early in the addiction process.
To educate our nursing and social work students in the use of SBIRT, we introduced the topic of substance abuse through required readings and an
online education program on substance abuse. After completion of the introductory information students completed an online interactive
simulation with avatars as patients. The interactive learning simulation allowed students to learn and practice the skills needed for SBIRT. After
completing these three activities, the students signed up to participate in role play using SBIRT with their peers. Students were given the
opportunity to play both the client and the nurse/social worker. The student were given client scenarios and were asked to role play the assigned
client. The client’s background, age, substance use and willingness to change were on the client scenarios. The professional (nurse or social work
student) had a check sheet to use as they did their assessment. They took turns playing the client and nurse or social worker and used motivational
interviewing to discuss change. Peer and instructor feedback was provided to each participant. Debriefing in all groups included reflection and
discussion regarding beliefs about substance use and abuse.
The faculty decided to provide inter-professional learning opportunities. Due to class schedules and clinical, it was hard to arrange a joint time for
the undergraduates to engage in interdisciplinary education. However, we were able to arrange a joint experience with the graduate students. The
graduate nursing and social work students did inter-professional role plays with each other. When possible nurse-social work dyads were utilized.
Peer feedback was given and the role and perspective of nursing and social work was discussed. Both the nurses and social workers reported being
apprehensive at first, but said in the debriefing they appreciated the opportunity for inter-professional role play.
During two academic years, 250 nursing and social work students and field preceptors were educated on motivational interviewing and SBIRT.
Students completed surveys (before and after SBIRT) assessing knowledge and skills in discussing use of substances. Post surveys showed increased
knowledge, skills and attitude towards persons with substance abuse disorders after completion of the education. Widespread integration of SBIRT
into the curriculum will allow for SBIRT to become a routine part of care for nurses and social workers. The use of SBIRT at routine visits, during
hospitalizations and emergency department visits may help idenitfy persons and risk and lead to early intervention.
References
Broyles, L. M., Kraemer, K. L., Kengor, C., & Gordon, A. J. (2013). A Tailored Curriculum of Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to
Treatment (SBIRT) for Nurses in Inpatient Settings. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 24(3), 130-141. doi:10.1097/JAN.0b013e3182a4cb0b
Carney, T. ,Myers, B. J.,Louw, J.,& Okwundu C. I.(2016). Brief school-based interventions and behavioural outcomes for substance-using
adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2016, Issue1. Art. No.: CD008969. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008969.pub3.
Grant, B. F., Goldstein, R. B., Saha, T. D., Chou, S. P., Jung, J., Zhang, H., Pickering, R. P., Ruan, W. J., Smith, S. M., Huang, B., & Hasin, D. S. (2015).
Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions III.JAMA Psychiatry, 72(8):757-766. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0584
Hardcastle, S. J., Taylor, A. H., Bailey, M. P., Harley, R. A., & Hagger, M. S. (2013). Effectiveness of a motivational interviewing intervention on
weight loss, physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors: a randomised controlled trial with a 12-month post-intervention follow-up.
International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity,10(1), 40.
Lacey, J. (2012). Reducing alcohol harm: Early intervention and prevention. British Journal of School Nursing, 7(2), 8386.
Lindson‐Hawley, N., Thompson, T. P., & Begh, R. (2015). Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. The Cochrane Library.
McKenzie, K., & Chang, Y. P. (2015). The Effect of Nurse‐Led Motivational Interviewing on Medication Adherence in Patients With Bipolar
Disorder.Perspectives in psychiatric care,51(1), 36-44.
Östlund, A. S., Wadensten, B., Kristofferzon, M. L., & Häggström, E. (2015). Motivational interviewing: Experiences of primary care nurses trained in
the method.Nurse education in practice,15(2), 111-118.
Puskar, K., Mitchell, A. M., Kane, I., Hagle, H., & Talcott, K. S. (2014). Faculty Buy-In to Teach Alcohol and Drug Use Screening. Journal of Continuing
Stahre, M., Roeber, J., Kanny, D, Brewer, R.D., & Zhang, X. (2014). Contribution of excessive alcohol consumption to deaths and years of potential
life lost in the United States. Preventing Chronic Disease 11:130293. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130293
Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (2015). Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal of substance abuse treatment,51,1-18.
Whiteford, H. A., Degenhardt, L., Rehm, J., Baxter, A. J., Ferrari, A. J., Erskine, H. E., ... & Burstein, R. (2013). Global burden of disease attributable to
mental and substance use disorders: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.The Lancet,382(9904), 1575-1586.
Contact
[email protected]
Nursing Student and Instructor Preference for Clinical Models: Evidence to Support Curriculum
Development
Noelle K. Rohatinsky, PhD, RN, CMSN(C), Canada
Kathryn Chachula, MN, RN, Canada
Madeline M. Press, PhD, RN, Canada
Brenda J. Lane, MN, RN, CMSN(C), Canada
Abstract
Background: Clinical placements are the keystone of any baccalaureate nursing program to enhance student integration of
knowledge into practice. However, the curricular structure of the clinical placement has been minimally considered as it relates to
the perceived impact on student learning (Danner, 2014). A clinical model that allows for students to be in the clinical setting for
multiple consecutive shifts for approximately 36 hours per week can be described as a block clinical model. In this model, students
are not registered in other concurrent theory courses or labs. A clinical model that allows for students to attend clinical for 8 to 12
hours per week while concurrently taking other courses can be described as a non-block clinical model (Rohatinsky, Chachula,
Compton, Sedgwick, Press, & Lane, 2017).
Purpose: This descriptive exploratory study used a combined 91-item Likert survey tool with open ended questions to investigate the effects of two
different clinical models on student learning from both student and instructor perspectives. This presentation will describe the thematic analysis
results from the open ended question: Given a choice between [participating in /teaching in] block clinical or non-block clinical, which would you
choose? Why?
Methods: Perspectives from clinical instructors and baccalaureate nursing students in five universities located across four western Canadian
provinces were sought. The targeted universities offered both block and non-block clinical models. Instructors were eligible to participate in the
study if they had taught in at least one clinical rotation in any year of the nursing program. Nursing students were eligible to participate in the study
if they had completed at least one clinical rotation in any year of their program.
After ethical and organizational approvals were obtained from the participating institutions, students and instructors were invited to participate via
email containing a link to a secure survey site. Responses were received from 141 students and 52 instructors. The researchers used Braun and
Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis method to code and analyze the data from the open-ended question.
Results: When participants were asked about their preference for a block versus non-block clinical model, four major themes arose: learning and
applying nursing knowledge; time for growth, evaluation, and reflection; integrating and immersing into the clinical environment; and assimilating
and transitioning into the real world of nursing.
Learning and Applying Nursing Knowledge
Instructor perspectives. The non-block clinical model was seen as an opportunity to develop, facilitate, and scaffold student learning by building
upon the knowledge and skills learned in the classroom and applying them in the clinical environment.
Student perspectives. The development of knowledge, skills, and abilities was believed to occur in both block and non-block clinical models.
Students believed that praxis occurred in both clinical models and that the application of theory in practice was important to support evidence-
informed nursing care.
Time for Growth, Reflection, and Evaluation
Instructor perspectives. Instructors believed non-block clinical allowed students greater time to reflect and grow in their experiences and thus
facilitate student learning. This model also allowed students the ability to show growth and improvement and allowed instructors to more easily
evaluate and support students if required.
Student perspectives. Both block and non-block clinical environments encouraged time for growth and professional development as a student
nurse. Although, students indicated that block clinical allowed for more time to prepare for and focus on the clinical day, with fewer distractions
and more social time.
Integrating and Immersing into the Clinical Environment
Instructor perspectives. Block clinical allowed students the opportunity to refine their technical skills and develop proficiency in clinical reasoning,
problem solving, critical thinking, and organization. Some instructors mentioned drawbacks of block clinical including challenges in making up for
lost clinical time if students were absent. Opportunities with block clinical included mentoring of students by staff members.
Student perspectives. Students commented on developing greater confidence and increased independence as an outcome of the block clinical
model. The block model was also preferred over the non-block model with regards to developing professional relationships with staff and patients.
Assimilating and Transitioning into the Real World of Nursing
Instructor perspectives. Instructors believed block clinical simulated the realities of nursing and shiftwork expectations. Instructors believed that
the implementation and application of the nursing process was better enacted by students within the block model as it facilitated continuity of
patient care and the building of patient rapport. This type of clinical model allowed students to concentrate solely on their clinical experiences.
However, block clinical often resulted in exhaustion of students by the end of the block of shifts.
Student perspectives. Students reported that block clinical provided a greater experience that reflected the ‘real world’ of nursing and facilitated
transition into practice. Students also found that block clinical provided greater continuity of care and allowed them to follow their patients’
through the nursing process.
Conclusion and Implications for Nursing Curricula: According to participants, the acquisition and application of nursing knowledge occurred in
both block and non-block clinical models. Strengths and challenges were identified for each model. However, participants believed the non-block
model better supported learning within the early years of nursing education to create a foundation of practice that links theoretical content with
nursing skills; whereas the block model better supported immersion, consolidation of practice, and transition into nursing practice. This study aligns
with previous literature in which participants reported non-block clinical was better suited for novice students developing their nursing knowledge
who required time to adjust to the clinical environment, while the block model was better suited for students in upper years of the nursing
program for integration into practice (Rohatinsky et al., 2017). Ultimately, both types of clinical models are beneficial to integrate into nursing
curricula to facilitate student learning.
References
Birks, M., Bagley, T., Park, T., Mills, J., & Burkot, C. (2017). The impact of clinical placement model on learning in nursing: A descriptive exploratory
study. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(3), 16-23.
Braun. V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Danner, M. (2014). Comparison of 1 long versus 2 shorter clinical days on clinical learning outcomes of nursing students. Nurse Educator, 39(6),
280-284.
Rohatinsky, N., Chachula, K., Compton, R. M., Sedgwick, M., Press, M.M., & Lane, B. (2017). Nursing student preference for block versus non-block
clinical models. Journal of Nursing Education, 56(3), 152-157.
Contact
[email protected]
Effects of Mindfulness Training on Perceived Level of Stress and Performance-Related Attributes in BSN
Students
Denise Foster, PhD, USA
Abstract
A critical issue that continues to impact nursing students is the stress that develops during their academic program. Stress in nursing
education has been reported over several decades (Ratanasiripong, Park, Ratanasiripong, & Kathalae, 2015). The stress that students
experience during their curriculum negatively impacts their performance-related attributes, resulting in poor attention and
concentration (Capp & Williams, 2012) and decreased memory and problem-solving abilities (Spadaro & Hunker, 2016). Mindfulness
practice may offer a unique way to manage stress (Ratanasiripong et al., 2015), improve academic performance (Spadaro & Hunker,
2016; van der Riet, Rossiter, Kirby, Dluzewska, & Harmon, 2015), and ultimately mitigate stress, burnout, and attrition in
professional practicing nurses (Dwyer & Hunter Revell, 2015; Newsome, Waldo, & Gruska, 2012; Smith, 2014).
The literature is replete with evidence that suggests nursing students are subjected to stressors beyond typical college stressors (Chernomas &
Shapiro, 2013). Nursing students encounter stressful clinical experiences as they confront death and dying patients (Ek et al., 2014), communicate
with professionals and patients (Alzayyat & Al-Gamal, 2014), and use preprofessional judgment in high-pressured environments. Academic
challenges are related to the comprehension and application of extensive nursing knowledge and skills. The knowledge required for effective, safe
health care increases exponentially every year (Bordoloi & Islam, 2012) and students must learn within a limited academic period. Role strain and
role conflict (Higginson, 2006) arise as a majority of nursing students are female but gender bias also occurs and male nursing students face their
own unique stressors as they enculturate into the profession (Chan et al., 2014; MacWilliams, Schmidt, & Bleich, 2013).
Stress does not cease once the nursing student graduates and passes the NCLEX-RN. As the novice nurse enters professional nursing practice, he or
she is faced with overwhelming clinical responsibilities, continuing education requirements, professional incivility, and challenging work schedules
that may lead to attrition and burnout (Beck & Gable, 2012; Clark, Nguyen, & Barbosa-Leiker, 2014; Hickerson, Taylor, & Terhaar, 2016; Oyeleye &
Hanson, 2013; Rushton, Batcheller, Schroeder, & Donohue, 2015). It is clear that nursing students require an effective way to manage stress during
their academic program that has the potential to enhance their professional nursing practice.
This preliminary study utilized a pretest-posttest true experimental design to examine the differences in perceived level of stress and performance-
related attributes in baccalaureate nursing students who received mindfulness training and those who did not. A small (N = 12) convenience
sample of junior nursing students about to enter their first clinical experience participated in the study across 16 weeks. The experimental group
received mindfulness training for 8 weeks while the control group met in study sessions for 8 weeks. Both groups completed pre- and posttest
evaluations using two reliable and validated instruments (Derogatis, 1984; Weinstein & Palmer, 2002). Cumming’s (2014) Exploratory Software for
Confidence Intervals (ESCI) was utilized to calculate point estimates (i.e., group means) and confidence intervals.
The Derogatis Stress Profile (DSP; Derogatis, 1984) was used to examine students’ perceived stress levels. The DSP is a 77-item, self-report
inventory originating from interactional stress theory that proposes stress is comprised of three interactional components: environmental events,
personality mediators, and emotional responses. It also measures subjective stress to provide an estimate of the respondent’s conscious awareness
of his or her stress level. The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI; Weinstein & Palmer, 2002) was used to examine students’
performance-related attributes. The LASSI is an instrument that assesses respondents’ study strategies relating to three components of skill, will,
and self-regulation. This self-report inventory is a 10-scale, 80-item assessment of respondents’ awareness about and use of learning and study
strategies that focuses on covert and overt thoughts, behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs.
The findings of this preliminary study supported previous recommendations for the use of mindfulness as a method to decrease nursing students’
perceived levels of stress. The results of the posttest DSP suggested that the students who received mindfulness training demonstrated lowered
mean stress scores than students who did not receive such training, with noteworthy corresponding reductions in subjective and total stress
scores. However, this study also showed the potential for mindfulness to improve individual performance-related attributes. Mindfulness practice
has emerged as a method to reduce stress across many educational settings but has not yet been fully investigated as a method to influence
academic performance. The results of the posttest LASSI suggested that although both groups improved their study habits, the students who
received mindfulness training exhibited a greater strengthening in the performance-related attributes of concentration, selecting main ideas, time
management, study aids, and test strategies.
As exhibited by the results of this study, mindfulness training should be offered as an integral supportive resource in any nursing curriculum. Higher
education settings are presently experiencing a transformation in the student population as more students who have disabilities are included in
educational programs (Cortiella & Horowitz, 2014). The Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 requires nursing programs to include students with
learning disabilities (Betz, Smith, & Bui, 2012). Educational settings have developed student success programs to accommodate or assist learners
(Marks & McCulloh, 2016; Neal-Boylan & Smith, 2016) and mindfulness should be integrated into these programs. Mindfulness has been utilized to
improve concentration (Singleton et al., 2014), time management (McCloskey, 2015), and anxiety, mood problems, and social skills in adolescents
with learning disabilities (Beauchemin, Hutchins, & Patterson, 2008; Haydicky, Wiener, Badali, Milligan, & Ducharme, 2012).
Mindfulness has emerged as an innovative approach to stress management in educational settings but there is a paucity of literature that has
examined its use related to academic performance. Much of the historical and recent literature on mindfulness in nursing education has focused on
altering stress, depression, anxiety, empathy, and burnout in students. The few studies to date that have examined the use of mindfulness to affect
academic performance in nursing students have suggested the practice improves attention selection, concentration and focus, accuracy, and clarity
of thought (Spadaro & Hunker, 2016; van der Riet et al., 2015). The results of this preliminary study provide additional evidence that adds to the
growing body of literature related to the use of mindfulness training, stress, and performance-related attributes.
Mindfulness training is needed to help nursing students successfully complete their curriculum and has implications for professional nursing
practice. By decreasing stress levels while studying, students may be able to focus on their learning and integrate knowledge more effectively.
Nursing students who manage negative emotions and develop improved academic skills have a greater potential to successfully pass the NCLEX-RN,
which could mitigate the current nursing shortage (National League for Nursing, 2014) and prevent professional burnout (Horner, Piercy, Eure, &
Woodard, 2014). Mindfully-practicing nurses could impact clinical safety to help reduce the incidence of medical errors and improve patient
satisfaction (Brady, O’Connor, Burgermeister, & Hanson, 2012; Hallman, O’Connor, Hasenau, & Brady, 2014; Horner et al., 2014; Mumber, 2014;
Smith, 2014). Mindfulness training could be shared with patients, families, and colleagues as a health promotion strategy to improve levels of stress
in relation to chronic/acute diseases and professional stressors (Bryer, Cherkis, & Raman, 2013; Hensel & Laux, 2014; Williams, Simmons, & Tanabe,
2015). Further exploration utilizing larger samples is needed to determine if mindfulness training can be effective for modifying other nursing
students’ levels of perceived stress and performance-related attributes.
References
Alzayyat, A., & Al-Gamal, E. (2014). A review of the literature regarding stress among nursing students during their clinical education. International
Nursing Review, 61(3), 406–415. doi:10.1111/inr.12114
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328 (1990).
Beauchemin, J., Hutchins, T. L., & Patterson, F. (2008). Mindfulness meditation may lessen anxiety, promote social skills, and improve academic
performance among adolescents with learning disabilities. Complementary Health Practice Review, 13(1), 34-45. doi:10.1177/1533210107311624
Beck, C. T., & Gable, R. K. (2012). A mixed methods study of secondary traumatic stress in labor and delivery nurses. Journal of Obstetric,
Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 41(6), 747-760. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01386.x
Betz, C. L., Smith, K. A., & Bui, K. (2012). A survey of California nursing programs: Admission and accommodation policies for students with
disabilities. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(12), 676-684. doi:10.3928/01484834-20121112-01
Bordoloi, P., & Islam, N. (2012). Knowledge management practices and healthcare delivery: A contingency framework. Electronic Journal of
Knowledge Management, 10(2), 110-120.
Brady, S., O’Connor, N., Burgermeister, D., & Hanson, P. (2012). The impact of mindfulness meditation in promoting a culture of safety on an acute
psychiatric unit. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 48(3), 129-137. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6163.2011.00315.x
Bryer, J., Cherkis, F., & Raman, J. (2013). Health-promotion behaviors of undergraduate nursing students: A survey analysis. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 34(6), 410-415. doi:10.5480/11-614
Capp, S. J., & Williams, M. G. (2012). Promoting student success and well-being: A stress management course. Holistic Nursing Practice, 26(5), 272-
276. doi:10.1097/HNP.0b013e318263f32a
Chan, Z. C., Chan, Y. T., Lui, C. W., Yu, H. Z., Law, Y. F., Cheung, K. L., ... & Lam, C. T. (2014). Gender differences in the academic and clinical
performances of undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 34(3), 377-388. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.011
Chernomas, W. M., & Shapiro, C. (2013). Stress, depression, and anxiety among undergraduate nursing students. International Journal of Nursing
Education Scholarship, 10(1), 255-266. doi:10.1515/ijnes-2012-0032
Clark, C. M., Nguyen, D. T., & Barbosa-Leiker, C. (2014). Student perceptions of stress, coping, relationships, and academic civility: A longitudinal
study. Nurse Educator, 39(4), 170-174. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000049
Cortiella, C., & Horowitz, S. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues (3rd ed.). New York, NY: National Center
for Learning Disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.hopkintonsepac.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/2014-State-of-LD.pdf
Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7-29. doi:10.1177/0956797613504966
Derogatis, L. (1984). The Derogatis Stress Profile (DSP): A summary report. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.
Dwyer, P. A., & Hunter Revell, S. M. (2015). Preparing students for the emotional challenges of nursing: An integrative review. Journal of Nursing
Education, 54(1), 7-12. doi:10.3928/01484834-20141224-06
Ek, K., Westin, L., Prahl, C., Österlind, J., Strang, S., Bergh, I., & ... Hammarlund, K. (2014). Death and caring for dying patients: Exploring first-year
nursing students’ descriptive experiences. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 20(10), 509-515.
Hallman, I. S., O’Connor, N., Hasenau, S., & Brady, S. (2014). Improving the culture of safety on a high-acuity inpatient child/adolescent psychiatric
unit by mindfulness-based stress reduction training of staff. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 27(4), 183-189.
doi:10.1111/jcap.12091
Haydicky, J., Wiener, J., Badali, P., Milligan, K., & Ducharme, J. M. (2012). Evaluation of a mindfulness-based intervention for adolescents with
learning disabilities and co-occurring ADHD and anxiety. Mindfulness, 3(2), 151-164. doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0089-2
Hensel, D., & Laux, M. (2014). Longitudinal study of stress, self-care, and professional identity among nursing students. Nurse Educator, 39(5), 227-
231. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000057
Hickerson, K. A., Taylor, L. A., & Terhaar, M. F. (2016). The preparation-practice gap: An integrative literature review. Journal of Continuing
Higginson, R. (2006). Fears, worries and experiences of first-year pre-registration nursing students: A qualitative study. Nurse Researcher, 13(3), 32-
49.
Horner, J. K., Piercy, B. S., Eure, L., & Woodard, E. K. (2014). A pilot study to evaluate mindfulness as a strategy to improve inpatient nurse and
patient experiences. Applied Nursing Research, 27, 198-201. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2014.01.003
MacWilliams, B. R., Schmidt, B., & Bleich, M. R. (2013). Men in nursing. American Journal of Nursing, 113(1), 38-44.
Marks, B., & McCulloh, K. (2016). Success for students and nurses with disabilities: A call to action for nurse educators. Nurse Educator, 41(1), 9-12.
doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000212
McCloskey, L. E. (2015). Mindfulness as an intervention for improving academic success among students with executive functioning disorders.
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 221-226. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.650
Mumber, M. (2014). Effect of mindfulness training on mindfulness level in the workplace and patient safety culture as a part of error prevention in
radiation oncology practice: A pilot study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 1(90), S748.
National League for Nursing. (2014). Nursing shortage fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/NrsgShortageFS.pdf
Neal-Boylan, L., & Smith, D. (2016). Nursing students with physical disabilities: Dispelling myths and correcting misconceptions. Nurse Educator,
41(1), 13-18. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000191
Newsome, S., Waldo, M., & Gruska, C. (2012). Mindfulness group work: Preventing stress and increasing self-compassion among helping
professionals in training. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 37(4), 297-311. doi:10.1080/01933922.2012.690832
Oyeleye, O., & Hanson, P. (2013). Relationship of workplace incivility, stress, and burnout on nurses’ turnover intentions and psychological
empowerment. Journal of Nursing Administration, 43(10), 536-542. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182a3e8c9
Ratanasiripong, P., Park, J. F., Ratanasiripong, N., & Kathalae, D. (2015). Stress and anxiety management in nursing students: Biofeedback and
mindfulness meditation. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(9), 520-524. doi:10.3928/01484834-20150814-07
Rushton, C. H., Batcheller, J., Schroeder, K., & Donohue, P. (2015). Burnout and resilience among nurses practicing in high-intensity settings.
American Journal of Critical Care, 24(5), 412-420. doi:10.4037/ajcc2015291
Singleton, O., Hölzel, B. K., Vangel, M., Brach, N., Carmody, J., & Lazar, S. W. (2014). Change in brainstem gray matter concentration following a
mindfulness-based intervention is correlated with improvement in psychological well-being. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(1), 1-7.
doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00033
Smith, S. A. (2014). Mindfulness-based stress reduction: An intervention to enhance the effectiveness of nurses’ coping with work-related stress.
International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 25(2), 119-130.
Spadaro, K. C., & Hunker, D. F. (2016). Exploring the effects of an online asynchronous mindfulness meditation intervention with nursing students
on stress, mood, and cognition: A descriptive study. Nurse Education Today, 39, 163-169. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.02.006
van der Riet, P., Rossiter, R., Kirby, D., Dluzewska, T., & Harmon, C. (2015). Piloting a stress management and mindfulness program for
undergraduate nursing students: Student feedback and lessons learned. Nurse Education Today, 35, 44-49. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.05.003
Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. R. (2002). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI): User’s manual (2nd ed.). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
Williams, H., Simmons, L. A., & Tanabe, P. (2015). Mindfulness-based stress reduction in advanced nursing practice: A nonpharmacologic approach
to health promotion, chronic disease management, and symptom control. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 33(3), 247-259.
doi:10.1177/0898010115569349
Contact
[email protected]
Obtaining Patient Information and Anxiety in Novice Nursing Students During the First Clinical Rotation
Akiko Kobayashi, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: While admission to a nursing program is exciting, rigorous education demand can cause stress, depression and anxiety
in students, that interfere with learning, affect academic performance, and impair clinical performance (Chernomas & Shapiro,
2013). Particularly, novice nursing students (NSs) feel highly anxious during their first clinical rotation due to limited clinical
experiences and knowledge (Bayoumi, Elbasuny, Mofereh, Assiri & Al fesal, 2012; Sun, Long, Tseng, Huang, You & Chiang, 2016).
According to Hildegard Peplau’s theory of interpersonal relations, any threats to security (i.e. environment, health, interaction),
particularly the experiences of actual or potential unmet needs, are major sources of anxiety (Kim, 2003). Attaining patient
information during a fast-pace shift report with unfamiliar terminologies in an unfamiliar clinical environment can be a threat to
security for novice NSs. Nursing students, however, are required to obtain data on their assigned patients at the beginning of the
shift, as pertinent patient information guides to plan the care of the assigned patients. A study showed that students had difficulty
retaining information when their anxiety level was elevated (Cheung & Au, 2011). It is not clearly known how proficient novice NSs
are in obtaining information on their patients during the shift report when their anxiety levels are high. The purposes of this study
were to (1) identify the anxiety levels of novice NSs and (2) to gain the knowledge on the types of patient information and sources of
information that NSs utilized during the first clinical rotation. It is hypothesized that at the beginning of the first clinical rotation
when the anxiety levels were high, novice NSs would depend more on the computer to obtain patients’ data and that they would
gradually obtain more information from the shift report as they became less anxious.
Materials and Methods: Forty NSs in their first clinical rotation of a bachelor of science in nursing (BSN) program participated in this study. They
have completed four semesters of general education required for BSN program and have just been introduced to basic nursing skills and
pathophysiology in the fifth semester of BSN program. The expected learning outcome of the first clinical rotation is for NSs to demonstrate
fundamental nursing skills, critical thinking, and clinical reasoning to enhance patients’ health outcomes and quality of life, by developing nursing
care plans and applying theoretical content in the clinical setting. The novice NSs were divided into four groups. There were ten students with one
clinical instructor in each group and four groups were placed on four different units in an urban community hospital. Each group stayed on the
same unit throughout the semester. Students were generally assigned to different patients on each clinical day except on the second consecutive
clinical day if the same patients were available. The clinical days started at 7am and were composed of two 6-hour clinical days per week for three
weeks, then one 8.5-hour clinical day per week for the following five weeks, excluding pre and post conferences. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
(STAI) has been widely used to assess anxiety levels among various adults and children (O’Roark, Priet, & Brunner, 2014; Julian, 2011). The short
form of STAI was used to assess NSs’ anxiety levels in the morning of a clinical day. In the short form, state anxiety and trait anxiety are each
measured by the 10 best items from the original STAI (Spielberger, 2015). At the end of the day NSs were asked to indicate the types of patient
information that they obtained by 9am and from what resources they gathered the patient information. The anxiety levels and the patient
information were assessed on the first clinical day, fifth clinical day (midpoint) and the tenth clinical day (excluding onsite orientation day). A Paired
T test was used for the comparisons of the mean STAI scores between the first clinical day and the fifth day and between the fifth day and the
tenth day.
Results: The anxiety levels of novice NSs dropped significantly and consistently throughout the clinical rotation (P<0.0001 for the differences in
mean STAI scores both between the first and fifth day and between the fifth and the tenth day). The most prevalent resource for obtaining patient
information used by novice NSs was the facility's computer system throughout the rotation. In addition, there is a slight, progressive increase in the
number of NSs who obtained patient information from the previous shift RNs (18% of the students on the first day, 18% at midpoint, 22% on the
last day). As the anxiety levels decreased and NSs had more clinical experiences, more patient information was obtained as expected. By the tenth
clinical day, more than 90% of NSs obtained demographic information such as diagnoses, isolation status and allergies by 9am but less NSs
obtained night-shift vital signs (80% of the students), oxygen saturation (70%) and the pain levels (38%). By the tenth clinical day, the early morning
laboratory data of their patients were collected by 90% of NSs by 9am. The previous night’s sleep status and intake and output were not
consistently obtained by novice NSs.
Conclusions: The study was conducted to identify the types of patient’s information and the sources of information during the first clinical rotation
when the anxiety levels were high. Novice NSs’ anxiety levels decreased over time as they had more clinical experiences. Continuous reduction in
anxiety levels may indicate that students were gaining more confidence, becoming familiar with the clinical environments and becoming more
comfortable providing patient care as the semester progressed. Regarding resources for obtaining patient information, computer use was
consistently the most popular source for all types of patient information throughout the rotation and this indicates the importance of orienting NSs
to the facility's computer system at the very beginning of the clinical rotation. Not as many novice NSs as hypothesized obtained patient
information from the previous shift RNs even by the end of the first clinical rotation, though there was a slight trend that more NSs obtained
information from the previous shift RNs overtime. It is important to gradually encourage novice NSs, as their anxiety levels decrease, to obtain
patient information from the shift report, especially information such as pertinent events that occurred during the previous shift. There were
additional important findings from the results of this study. The fact that the majority of novice NSs obtained laboratory data by the tenth clinical
day indicated that they were quickly learning to use critical thinking to understand their patients’ conditions. On the other hand, it is eye opening
to discover that more than a half of novice NSs failed to obtain the previous shift’s pain levels of their patients. This suggests the importance of
instructing NSs that obtaining pain levels as well as other vital signs of their patients is essential as they assess the patients and plan to provide the
care for the patients. These findings will assist clinical instructors in guiding novice NSs to obtain essential information on the assigned patients at
the beginning of the clinical day. This will enable NSs to develop systematic plans to provide safe and appropriate care for their patients. This may
also help reduce novice NSs’ anxiety levels leading to positive clinical experiences with greater learning outcome.
References
Bayoumi, M. M., Elbasuny, M. M., Mofereh, A. M., Assiri, M. A., & Al fesal, A. H. (2012). Evaluating Nursing Students' Anxiety and Depression during
Initial Clinical Experience. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences,2(6), 277-281. doi: 10.5923/j.ijpbs.20120206.12
Chernomas, W. M., & Shapiro, C. (2013). Stress, Depression, and Anxiety among Undergraduate Nursing Students. International Journal Of Nursing
EducationScholarship, 10(1), 255-266 12p. doi:10.1515/ijnes-2012-0032
Cheung, R. Y., & Au, T. K. (2011). Nursing Students' Anxiety and Clinical Performance.Journal Of Nursing Education, 50(5), 286-289 4p.
doi:10.3928/01484834-20110131-08
Julian, L. J. (2011). Measures of Anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression
Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care & Research, 63 (S11), S467–S472 6p.
Kim, K. (2003). Baccalaureate nursing students’ experiences of anxiety producing situations in the clinical setting. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal
For The Australian NursingProfession, 14(2), 145-155 11p. doi:10.5172/conu.14.2.145
O’Roark, A. M., Prieto, J. M., & Brunner, T. M. (2014). Obituaries: Charles Donald Spielberger (1927-2013). American Psychologist, 69(3), 297-298.
Spielberger, C. D. (2015). STAI - Adult Manual 1983. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
Sun, F. K.,Long, A.,Tseng, Y. S.,Huang, H. M.,You, J. H., & Chiang, C. Y. (2016). UndergraduateStudentNurses' Lived Experiences ofAnxietyDuring
Their FirstClinicalPracticum: A Phenomenological Study. Nurse Education Today, 37: 21-26 6p.
Contact
[email protected]
Evaluation of a Psychiatric Mental Health Clinical Hybrid Program in a Baccalaureate Nursing Program
Nancy M. Bowllan, EdD, MSN, USA
Abstract
Though integration of simulation to enhance clinical competencies has gained significant attention within the nursing literature over
the past decade, minimal findings have been noted regarding the impact of a psychiatric mental health clinical simulation program
on overall learning outcomes in a baccalaureate nursing program. In a recent study published by the National Council of State
Boards of Nursing, Hayden, Smiley, Alexander, Kardong-Edgren, and Jeffries (2014) provided substantial evidence that standard
clinical competencies and learning outcomes could be maintained with up to 50% of the traditional clinical experience being
replaced by clinical simulation. This report, in combination with accelerated nursing student enrollments, increased competition for
psychiatric clinical sites and limited access to experienced advanced practice psychiatric nurses to fulfill the clinical instructor role
became the impetus for a pilot psychiatric mental health clinical hybrid program (PMHCHP) in a baccalaureate nursing program in
the spring of 2015. In the spring of 2016, approval by the program’s Institutional Review Board was obtained to evaluate the impact
of this PMHCHP on student learning outcomes and compare findings to students who did not receive this program in the previous
three semesters.
The PMHCHP incorporated inpatient, community and clinical simulation with lab to create a comprehensive psychiatric mental
health nursing clinical experience for senior nursing students. Thirty-six percent of required clinical hours were dedicated to
simulation and lab experiences. Guidelines from the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning: INACSL
Standards of Best Practice: Simulation (2013) assisted in the development of simulation components of the PMHCHP. These included
the importance of actively addressing affective, cognitive and psychomotor domains of learning along with incorporation of high and
low fidelity simulation opportunities for students. Core psychiatric mental health nursing competencies were also enhanced in the
clinical simulation with lab component through self-reflective exercises and learning activities that addressed the impact of stigma,
consumer and family perspectives, clinical interviewing skills, debriefing processes, suicide assessment and interventions, care of the
actively psychotic patient, alcohol/opioid withdrawal, non-violent crisis intervention training and application of competencies to
multiple clinical practice settings.
To evaluate the impact of this new clinical program on student learning outcomes, both quantitative and qualitative data were
collected. A quasi-experimental posttest only design with nonequivalent groups was used as students could not logistically be
randomly assigned to those who received the PMHCHP and those who did not receive the PMHCHP. A total of 524 senior nursing
students participated in this study: 246 students who did not receive the PMHCHP were considered the “control group” and 278
students who received the PMHCHP were considered the “intervention group.” This research study reflects data obtained over a
three year academic period from the fall, 2013 through the spring, 2016. Comparisons were made on individual students overall test
averages, ATI content mastery computerized proctored assessments for mental health with achievement of proficiency level 0,1,2 or
3 and final grades. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Version 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL) generated descriptive statistics to
summarize data.
Three research questions were established to evaluate quantitative data collected. The first research question addressed whether
students who received the PMHCHP scored differently on overall test averages than students who did not receive the PMHCHP.
Descriptive statistics were obtained on minimum, maximum and mean scores as well as standard deviation. An independent sample
t test was used. Results indicated no statistically significance (p=.260) between both groups on overall test averages. The second
research question addressed whether students who received the PMHCHP scored differently on final grades compared to students
who did not receive the PMHCHP. Descriptive statistics were obtained on minimum, maximum and mean scores as well as standard
deviation. An independent sample t test was used. Results indicated statistically significant findings for students who received the
PMHCHP (p=.017) on higher final grade averages. The final research question addressed whether students who received the
PMHCHP scored differently on ATI proficiency level scores than students who did not receive the PMHCHP. This question was best
answered with comparison of percentage reaching desired level. Findings reflected a 12.6% higher percentage of scores for ATI
proficiency level 2 & 3 for students who received the PMHCHP.
The qualitative component of this research project examined narrative responses by students who participated in the PMHCHP to
three questions that addressed their overall impressions of the psychiatric mental health clinical simulation and labs as an
alternative learning experience. Several themes emerged including 1) feeling safer and more able to connect with peers in a smaller
group setting, 2) the importance of engaging in mock clinical experiences in a non-judgmental, supportive learning environment to
reduce anxiety and enhance learning, 3) the value of mock interviews, role plays, crisis intervention training and case presentations
in building their sense of competency and confidence in providing safe care, 4) the importance of taking the time to reflect on own
personal perspectives with mental health issues and how this may impact patient care, and 5) the opportunity to develop empathy
for those who suffer from mental illness through open discussion, documentaries, movies and active engagement with consumers.
In conclusion, in lieu of increased patient acuity, limited clinical sites and limited seasoned clinical faculty, schools of nursing are
challenged to create innovative alternative experiential clinical opportunities to ensure students meet learning outcomes. The
findings of this research study suggest that the implementation of a comprehensive PMHCHP that integrates multiple opportunities
for simulated and lab experiences in combination with traditional direct care clinical experiences can effectively assist students with
achieving and potentially strengthening learning outcomes necessary in a psychiatric mental health nursing course. This is consistent
with other studies which have reported similar learning outcomes when examining the impact of replacing a percentage of
traditional clinical hours with clinical simulation. Continued research and dialogue within the academic nursing community are
warranted to build evidence-based models for student clinical experiences.
References
1. Crider, M.C., McNiesh, S.G. (2011). Integrating a professional apprenticeship model with psychiatric clinical simulation. Journal of
Psychosocial Nursing. 49(5) 42-49.
2. Essentials of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing in the BSN Curriculum: Collaboratively Developed by ISPN and APNA, (2007-2008)
approved 5/08. Retrieved from
http://www.apna.org/files/public/revmay08finalcurricular_guidelines_for_undergraduate_education_in_psychiatric_mental_health_
nursing.pdf
3. Fossen, P. Stoeckel, P.R. (2016). Nursing students’ perceptions of a hearing voices simulation and role-play: Preparation for mental health
clinical practice. Journal of Nursing Education. 55(4) 203-208.
4. Halstead, J. (2014). Innovation in Clinical Nursing Education: Retooling the old model for a 21rst-century workforce. Charting Nursing’s
Future. September, 1-8.
5. Hayden, J. Smiley, R. Alexander, M. Kardong-Edgren, S. Jeffries, P. R. (2014). The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A longitudinal,
randomized, controlled Study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulations.
5(2), S1-S64.
6. International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning: INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation (2013). Retrieved
from http://www.inacsl.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3407.
7. Ward, T. (2015). Do you hear wht I hear? The impact of a hearing voices simulation on affective domain attributes in nursing students.
Nursing Education Perspectives. 36(5) 329-331.
8. Weaver, A. (2011). High-fidelity patient simulation in nursing education: An integrative Review. Nursing Education Perspective. 32(1) 37-
40.
Contact
[email protected]
Psychiatric Simulation: Improve Outcomes and Maintain Course Enrollment
Selina H. McKinney, PhD, APRN, PMHNP-BC, USA
Abstract
Background: Only 43% of registered nurses in South Carolina hold Bachelor of Science in nursing (BSN) degrees while the national
average is 55% (AACN, 2013). South Carolina’s goal is to increase the proportion of BSN nurses compared to associate’s prepared
nurses to 65%. This proportion falls below the Institute of Medicine’s call for 80% BSN to increase the workforce capacities of policy,
leadership, and research competencies (IOM, 2010). According to AACN (2016), 61% of BSN programs cited insufficient clinical sites
as the primary reason for not accepting more qualified BSN program applicants. Problems with clinical placement availability are
especially acute in specialty areas such as psychiatric/mental health (MH) nursing (Doolen et al., 2014). MH clinical site closures
(Ollove, 2016) and the influx of propriety nursing school students creates more site demands and student overcrowding (Campaign
for Action, 2015). MH nursing clinical settings are particularly vulnerable to student overcrowding because imbalances in the
therapeutic milieu adversely affect the healing, psychosocial dynamics of the psychiatric unit (Doolen et al., 2014). These challenges
threatened the progression of BSN students through the BSN program at our College in a state significantly behind the national BSN
average. The purpose of this educational evaluation project, PsychSim, is to explore outcomes related to the transition from
traditional MH clinicals in the undergraduate MH nursing course to 50% simulation clinical replacement. The MH faculty members
conceptualized the project using engagement theory (Australian Council for Educational Research, 2010) where engagement
improves learning outcomes and is facilitated by active, collaborative learning and student-faculty interaction.
Project Description: The PsycSim project replaced traditional MH clinical with 50% simulation targeting critical, MH learning competencies and
optimal use of dwindling clinical placement sites. The project was divided into 3 phases. Phase 1: Development July-Oct 2015. Faculty members
met with the director of behavioral health and MH nurses at the largest health system in the local area. Directors, nurses and faculty collaborated
to develop a comprehensive simulation plan based on expected student outcomes, population health needs and health system priorities.
Therapeutic communication, assessment and evidence-based interventions such as risk identification, crisis management, screening brief
intervention, referral to treatment (SBIRT), and motivational interviewing were included in the scenarios. Scenarios were reviewed by health
system nurses for validity and relevancy. Phase 2: Course Preparation Aug-Dec 2015. Faculty members created schedules to rotate the first cohort
of 102 students (including regional campuses) between simulation and traditional clinical settings. The rotation plan allowed for 2 student groups
to utilize 1 clinical site thereby optimizing clinical placement capacity. Faculty revised clinical assignments to reflect the new rotation schedule and
trained the simulation coordinator and clinical faculty members in PsychSim methods and best practices in simulation education. Phase 3:
Implementation Jan 2016- May 2017: In phase 3, 102 undergraduate MH nursing students participated in PsycSim every week. The simulation
team and MH faculty members met regularly to discuss needed revisions in rotation schedules, simulation processes, scenarios, or technical issues
and revise the procedures appropriately. The team utilized a Plan-Do-Study-Act framework for implementation and project evaluation.
Evaluation Approach: The project evaluation included formative and summative quantitative and qualitative student and faculty surveys using the
Client Simulation Lab Questionnaire (CSLQ-S). The CSLQ-S measures student perceptions of simulation experiences. Group-level, student
performance data was compared to data from previous semesters for benchmarking. Final faculty and student evaluations included the Clinical
Learning Environment Comparison Survey (CLECS) (Leighton, 2015).
Feedback and Results: Faculty leveraged expertise gained from participation in the National Council of State Boards of Nursing landmark
Simulation Study (NCSBN, 2014) and expanded the proportion of simulation in the undergraduate MH clinical course from 8% to 50%. At baseline,
8-10 students per week participated in MH nursing simulation replacing 1 of 12 traditional clinical days per semester. PsychSim increased the MH
nursing simulation capacity to 102 students per week, effectively replacing 6 of the 12 traditional clinical days. The strategy doubled the number of
students able to use each clinical placement site through a rotation schedule, and tripled the number of simulation experiences available to
students.
Students reported that simulation scenarios prepared them to interact with mental health patients and intervene using evidence-based
interventions for patient anxiety, depressive symptoms, and situational challenges. On the CLECS, students scored the simulation portion of their
clinical experience as better meeting their clinical objectives compared to traditional clinical placement. Clinical faculty who predominantly taught
in the simulation area believed that simulation better prepared students for practice, while those teaching predominantly in the traditional clinical
setting preferred the traditional setting for meeting learning objectives. Both groups of clinical faculty noted that motivational interviewing and
other simulation experiences increased students’ confidence and professionalism in the clinical area.
Discussion: The traditional method of educating nurses by taking a group of 8-10 students to a clinical site is unsustainable because of changes in
health care delivery patterns and competition for clinical sites. Only by investing in innovative solutions including simulation expansion to
compensate for clinical placement insufficiency will the IOM (2010) goals be realized. The project also represents a substantive curriculum
enhancement and builds on the findings from the NCSBN simulation study (2014). PsycSim provides an individualized, innovative educational
experience wherein students are systematically prepared for the care complexities they will encounter upon graduation. Such practice-ready BSN
graduates are greatly needed in a state with an overall health care grade of “F” and a national rank for health of 45 (United Health Foundation,
2012).
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) (2013). Moving the conversation in forward: Advancing higher education in nursing. Retrieved
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/aacn-publications/annual-reports/AnnualReport13.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) (2016). Nursing faculty shortage fact sheet. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/FacultyShortageFS.pdf
Brown, A. M. (2015). Simulation in undergraduate mental health nursing education: A literature review.Clinical Simulation in Nursing,11(10), 445-
449.
Campaign for Action (2015). Growing role of proprietary nursing programs. Retrieved from https://campaignforaction.org/resource/growing-role-
proprietary-nursing-programs/
Doolen, J., Giddings, M., Johnson, M., Guizado de Nathan, G., & O Badia, L. (2014). An evaluation of mental health simulation with standardized
patients.International journal of nursing education scholarship,11(1), 55-62.
Hayden, J.K., Smiley, R.A., Alexander, M., Edren, S., & Jeffries, P.R. (2014). The NCSBN National simulation study: A longitudainal, randomized,
controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), suppl.
Institute of Medicine (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies of Science.
Leighton, K. (2015). Development of the Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(1), 44-51.
Ollove, M. (2016). PBS News: Amid shortage of psychiatric beds, mentally ill face long waits for treatment. Retrieved from
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/amid-shortage-psychiatric-beds-mentally-ill-face-long-waits-treatment/
Contact
[email protected]
Vietnamese Nursing Students’ Perspectives on Learning Environments: A Multisite Benchmarking Study to
Inform Future Initiatives
Joanne Ramsbotham, PhD, MN, RN, Australia
Thi Thuy Ha Dinh, PhD, Australia
Hue Thi Truong, MP, Viet Nam
Ann Bonner, PhD, MA, BAPSc (Nurs), RN, MACN, Australia
Dang Tran Ngoc Thanh, Viet Nam
Nguyen Minh Chinh, Viet Nam
Nguyen Huong, Viet Nam
Tran Thuy Duong, MSN, Viet Nam
Abstract
Over the last three decades Vietnam has experienced rapid economic growth and social change following the shift from a socialist
state to a market economy. Similarly, the Vietnamese health sector has been challenged by population growth and shifts from
traditional to western lifestyle practices. The disease profile of the population has also changed with greater prevalence of lifestyle
related chronic diseases (WHO, 2017). Health care provision, however, remains largely hospital based as there is little focus on
preventative or family/community care. Consequently, there is severe over-crowding in hospitals, often more than two patients to a
bed, extended lengths of stay, and for nurses, a very heavy workload (1 nurse: 25-30 patients is the norm). The Vietnamese health
sector is attempting to address these challenges through development of the health workforce and, in particular, nursing is being
transitioned toward an autonomous, university educated profession with nursing-specific benchmarks. However, what remains
unknown is how current factors within nursing education environments in both Vietnamese universities and health settings facilitate
or are a barrier to nursing students’ learning, and the subsequent impact on development of competence. Within the context of this
study the learning environment is defined as a combination of forces and interactions that impact negatively or positively on
students’ learning outcomes, in either the university or health care setting.
This study aimed to investigate undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing students’ perceptions of the education environment at both university and
clinical experiences in health, within new competency-based curriculum contexts in four universities across Vietnam.
Literature: Learning environments in health disciplines typically comprise both on-campus university based learning and off-campus work
integrated learning. Within the on-campus theoretical environment, nursing students commonly develop relevant knowledge and skills that
prepare them for experiences during off-campus clinical practice where they integrate learning and develop competence through participation in
real health care (Flott & Linden, 2016; Kristofferzon et al., 2013). Nursing practice is the cornerstone of developing future nurses and students learn
most effectively in clinical environments that support and encourage learning (Bisholt et al., 2014; Dale et al., 2013) yet issues concerning quality in
nursing placements persist internationally. In relation to nursing in Vietnam, where bachelor level programmes have been in place for about 15
years (Chapman et al., 2012), the issues affecting on-campus and clinical environments are considerable. For example in on-campus contexts,
nursing is taught largely by medicine and superficial recall-based assessment strategies such as multi-choice questions and rote learning dominate
curricula. In clinical practice anecdotal evidence from nurse teachers indicates growing levels of student overcrowding, lack of opportunities to
implement prior on-campus learning in the clinical situation; and a lack of consistency between university teaching and hospital care practices.
There is a paucity of research examining the quality of the university and clinical learning environment in Vietnam upon which recommendations
for improvement might be based.
Methods: During 2016 a cross-sectional multi-site study was conducted at four Vietnamese universities providing undergraduate nurse education
to investigate nursing students’ perceptions of on-campus and off-campus learning environment experiences. Following ethical approval, students
(n=891) completed two self-report instruments, previously translated into Vietnamese in separate studies using a forward and backward
translation process (Sousa & Rojjanasrirat, 2011). The Vietnamese language version of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (V-
DREEM) measures students’ perspectives of their university learning environment (four-point Likert scale; five subscales and 47 items) (Roff, 2005;
Huong, 2013). The Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (V-CLEI), also in Vietnamese language, measures students’ perspectives of their clinical
learning environment (four-point Likert scale; six subscales, 42 items) (Newton et al., 2010; Troung 2015). Additionally, two open-ended items
sought information about barriers and facilitators of learning in the clinical environment.
Results: Results showed students were predominately female (84%) and enrolled in 2nd, 3rd and 4th year (60%, 27% and 13%) respectively.
Statistical modelling showed that that university environments were different between universities (p < 0.001) and year of course (p < 0.001) but
not between gender (p = 0.35). V-DREEM scores were similar between year 3 (M=126.7, SD=16.5) and year 4 (M=125.8, SD=12.8) students, while
year 2 students (M=128.7, SD=16.4) rated the university environment significantly higher (p<0.001) than students in year 3 or 4. Students’ rated the
Perception of Teaching and Learning subscale highest reflecting satisfaction with this element of the university environment. Overall the V-CLEI
mean score was in the low range (M=138.7, SD 14.7, possible range 42-168). Modelling indicated that students’ experience in clinical environments
was statistically different between universities (p< 0.001) and length of clinical placement (p< 0.001). Year 2 (M=140.4, SD=14.9) and year 3
(M=138.7, SD=13.5) students scored the clinical environment higher than year 4 students (M=131.6, SD= 14.5, p< 0.001) but there was no
difference between male and female students (p = 0.66) and type of clinical wards (p = 0.46). Interactions with clinical staff were the most
frequently reported facilitating factor or barrier to student learning.
Discussion: Vietnamese students in this study are largely satisfied with new active methods of teaching and learning within their university
experience. The clinical environment score in this study was relatively low confirming anecdotal evidence and reflecting a clinical environment not
supportive of student learning. Ideally students rate their clinical environment and experiences highly as clinical practice is popular and students
usually engage enthusiastically (Bisholt et al., 2014; Dale et al., 2013). Consistent with patterns found globally, partnerships between universities
and hospitals in clinical nurse education, and use of supporting processes such as effective preceptorship are crucial to facilitating students’
learning. This study provides benchmarks from which priorities for change were identified for the participating universities. Other universities and
colleges across Vietnam will be able to conduct similar evaluations.
References
Bisholt, B., Ohlsson, U., Engstrom, A., Johansson, A. & Gustafsson, M. (2014). Nursing students’ assessment of the learning environment in
different clinical settings. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(3), 304-310.
Chapman, H., Lewis, P.A., Osborne, Y., Gray, G. (2012). The Vietnam teaching fellowship program: an action research approach to building capacity
for leading and sustaining curriculum change. Nurse Education Today, 32 (3), 315–319.
Dale, B., Leland, A., & Dale, J. G. (2013). What factors facilitate good learning experiences in clinical studies in nursing: bachelor students'
perceptions. International Scholarly Research Notices -Nursing, 628679.
Harvey, T., Calleja, P., & Phan Thi, D. (2013). Improving access to quality clinical nurse teaching: a partnership between Australia and Vietnam,
Nursing Education Today, 33, 671-676.
Flott , E. & Linden, L. (2016). The clinical learning environment in education: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(3), 501-513.
Kristofferzon, M., Mårtensson, G., Mamhidir, A., & Löfmark, A. (2013). Nursing students' perceptions of clinical supervision: The contributions of
preceptors, head preceptors and clinical lecturers. Nurse Education. Today, 33 (10), 1252–1257.
Sousa, V. & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a
clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268-274.
World Health Organisation (WHO) (2017). Vietnam country population profile. http://www.who.int/gho/countries/vnm/country_profiles/en/
accessed 13/06/17.
Contact
[email protected]
An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis of Prelicensure Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Their Learning
Environment
Sarah O. Watts, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
The learning environment in nursing education should be carefully cultivated to ensure positive, meaningful experiences are
provided to students. These experiences are critical in order to prepare students to become competent, entry-level nurses upon
graduation. Yet, little is known about students’ perceptions of their learning environment, including the people, places, policies,
processes, and programs (Purkey & Novak, 1996). Thus, exploring students’ perceptions of the learning environment is vital to the
profession to identify strengths and weakness in current undergraduate nursing education.
Background: Through learning experiences, nursing students develop the necessary knowledge and skills needed for entry-level practice (Benner,
Sutphen, Leonard, & Day, 2010). These experiences allow students to develop critical thinking skills and the ability to reason, which can lead to
more appropriate care for patients (Dauphinee, 2012; O’Mara, McDonald, Gillespie, Brown, & Miles, 2014; Paans et al., 2012). Yet, preparing
graduates of nursing programs for their careers has become a substantial challenge for educators. Students currently entering nursing programs
across the country have diverse learning needs and backgrounds, such as different life experiences, ages, abilities to utilize technology, and
personal demands (Popkess & Frey, 2016). Also, nurse educators report budget cuts in higher education, a nationwide nurse faculty shortage, and
note there is a lack of available clinical sites (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2015; Benner et al., 2010). Even though many barriers
and challenges exist, educators must maximize learning experiences to ensure graduates will be prepared to handle complex situations that will
arise in the clinical setting. This can be accomplished, in part, by providing an intentionally inviting learning environment for students’ experiences.
Gaps noted in the literature pertained to the overall learning experiences of prelicensure nursing students. Most of the published literature focused
on quantitative research methods, teacher-student relationships, the clinical environment, and the evaluation of students. It is critical that the
nursing profession explore students’ experiences of learning to ensure programs provide an optimal environment to promote student
development.
Methodology: This study aimed to explore and interpret the lived experiences of undergraduate students as they learned in a nursing program.
Data gathering occurred through face-to-face interview sessions with 12 prelicensure, senior-level students from two BSN programs in the
southeastern United States. Interviews were transcribed and narratives examined through the lens of invitational theory (Purkey & Novak, 1996)
and the National League for Nursing’s excellence in nursing education model (National League for Nursing, 2006). First and second cycle coding
methods as described by Saldaña (2013) were utilized. Next, van Manen’s (1990) thematic analysis process provided guidance for the identification
of themes and thematic statements.
Presentation of Findings: From data analysis, themes and subthemes emerged to describe prelicensure nursing students’ perceptions of their
learning experiences and the environment. The identified themes were: Preparing and Learning, Inviting Versus Disinviting, “Roll With the
Punches,” and The Evaluative Process: “Clicking Through.” In addition, nine subthemes were discovered.
Learning and Preparing: One of the strongest themes to emerge from the data focused on preparing and learning. Participants told numerous
stories highlighting the importance of preparing for class activities, tests, the simulation lab, and clinical experiences. These participants believed
teachers and students should prepare for all activities. Each participant’s preparation ritual appeared different; but, all students stressed the
importance of being prepared and knowing what they needed to do in order to maximize learning experiences.
Inviting Versus Disinviting: Participants perceived many aspects of the learning environment, including the people, places, processes, programs,
and policies, as inviting or disinviting to their personal knowledge development. As congruent with invitational theory, participants felt the people
aspect of the learning environment had the greatest impact on their personal learning. Students wanted faculty to serve as professional role
models, be relatable, easy to have a conversation with, knowledgeable about the content, and approachable.
Participants reported the layout of the building housing the nursing program greatly impacted their learning experiences. Study spaces and access
to faculty offices were necessary to facilitate their learning. One surprising finding from this study, was several participants told stories of how the
whiteboards were inviting to their learning. In a world where educators always want to utilize an application or other technology to promote
learning, several participants noted the simple whiteboards in the library and study rooms helped them to “connect the dots” while studying
concepts.
When asked about processes and programs, participants voiced their need for clear and realistic expectations. Unrealistic expectations were
extremely frustrating to students. Also, they struggled with the “ever-changing schedule.”
“Roll With the Punches”
“Roll with the punches” focused more on students’ perceptions of what was helpful for their learning and how they progressed through the nursing
program. The title came from a comment made by Lee, who said:
I mean that’s just a learning process of how to handle that kind of situation and what to do . . . So, I’ve had to learn how to handle those kinds of
situations and just kind of…roll with the punches.
This common theme was noted in many interviews, as students claimed they were “getting through” in numerous instances.
Participants routinely voiced the importance of being focused in order to learn. This required, for some participants, finding quiet study spaces,
moving to the front of the classroom in order to not be distracted by peers, and adapting to challenging situations. Though, participants noted
classmates served as a great source of distraction in the nursing program, they also believed relationships with fellow classmates were vital to
success in a program.
The Evaluative Process: “Clicking Through”
Students were asked to share their experiences of evaluating their learning during the nursing program. When questioned about the evaluative
process, students focused their reflections on course evaluations. Most were unsure of the purpose of and how institutions utilized the evaluations.
Participants also reported feeling overloaded at the end of the semester and did not put much effort into completing the evaluations. These
findings lead one to question the accuracy of student evaluations and the reliability of the data produced by these evaluations.
Implications and Recommendations for Nursing Education: Several implications and recommendations for nursing education were noted. Nurse
educators should provide clear and realistic expectations, serve as professional role models, and prepare the learning environment and students
for all activities. In regards to evaluation, educators must inform students of the processes and procedures regarding evaluation in order to obtain
reliable results from course evaluations. Overall, this study provides valuable knowledge to nursing education because results can guide faculty as
they structure and evaluate learning experiences. In the future, more research should focus on the student-teacher connection, technology to
enhance learning, various approaches to teaching/learning in nursing education, the evaluative processes, and how to cultivate all aspects of the
learning environment to promote student success.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2015). Nursing faculty shortage fact sheet.Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-
relations/FacultyShortageFS.pdf
Dauphinee, W. D. (2012). Educators must consider patient outcomes when assessing the impact of clinical training. Medical Education, 46, 13-20.
doi:10.111/j.1365-2923.2011.04144.x
O’Mara, L., McDonald, J., Gillespie, M., Brown, H., & Miles, L. (2014). Challenging clinical learning environments: Experiences of undergraduate
nursing students. Nursing Education in Practice, 14, 208-213. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2013.08.012
Paans, W., Sermeus, W., Nieweg, R. M., Krijnen, W. P., & van der Schans, C. P. (2012). Do knowledge, knowledge sources, and reasoning skills affect
the accuracy of nursing diagnoses? A randomized study. BioMed Central Nursing, 11(11), 1-12. doi:10.1186/1472-6955-11-11
Popkess, A. M., & Frey, J. L. (2016). Strategies to support diverse learning needs of students. In D. M. Billings and J. A. Halstead (Eds.), Teaching in
nursing: A guide for faculty (5th ed., pp. 15-34). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Purkey, W. W., & Novak, J. M. (1996). Inviting school success: A self-concept approach to teaching, learning, and democratic practice (3rd ed.).
Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York
Press.
Contact
[email protected]
Teaching Undergraduate Nursing Students Leadership Skills Through Simulation and Inpatient Leadership
Clinical
Tanya L. Johnson, MSN, RN, NE-BC, USA
Abstract
As professional nursing practice has become increasingly complex, it is well known that leadership skills among nursing are essential
to meet practice demands (Kilgore, Goodwin, & Harding, 2013). Nursing is fundamental to effective leadership in the world of
today’s healthcare. As nursing is the largest component of health care workers, patient safety outcomes, staff satisfaction, healthy
work environments, and staff turnover have been positively influenced by successful nursing leadership. To satisfy public demands
and expectations of professional nursing, it is essential for nurses to be experienced and educated to serve in leadership roles and
accept ownership for their practice (Jukkala, Greenwood, Motes, & Block, 2013). Healthcare facilities as well as nursing educators
acknowledge the extending gap between the real leadership ability of new graduate nurses as compared to the desired. As the
newer and less experienced nurses often serve in leadership roles, nurse educators take ownership to ensure they are prepared in
critical thinking, delegation, organization, and other leadership skills (Gore, Johnson, & Wang, 2015).
It is difficult to correlate a particular educational activity and it’s relation to achieving competency, especially with an intangible concept such as
nursing leadership (Abdrbo, 2012). Learning in the clinical setting is a common and valued component to nursing education as is simulation.
Research shows both environments provide effective learning and are essential to nursing education, not only with fundamental clinical skills but
with nursing leadership skills (Chunta & Edwards, 2013; Gore, Johnson, & Wang, 2015; McGrath, Lyng, & Hourican, 2012).
A southeastern university’s school of nursing defines leadership skill as a core curricular outcome and component within their conceptual
framework. Two critical factors identified in their mission are to exemplify excellence in teaching and to ensure graduates are prepared to assume
leadership roles in the provision of nursing care. The following is an excerpt from their Conceptual Framework/Vision and Mission Philosophy:
Leadership skills include ethical and critical decision making, mutually respectful communication and collaboration, care coordination, delegation,
and conflict resolution. These skills are built on an awareness of complex systems and the impact of power, politics, policy, and regulatory
guidelines on these systems. Professional nurses must have a solid understanding of the broader context of health care, including the organization
and financing of patient care services and the impact of regulatory guidelines on practice and reimbursement. Professional nursing also requires
knowledge of health care policy. Moreover, professional nurses practice at the microsystem level within a constantly changing health care system.
Professional nurses apply quality improvement concepts to minimize risk of harm to patients and providers within a systems framework (Faculty
Handbook, p. 2).
This particular southeastern university’s school of nursing offers two clinical nursing leadership courses in the final semester. In addition to a five
hour preceptorship course, NURS 4911: Professional Nursing Leadership in Complex Systems includes experiences in simulation and in the inpatient
clinical settings; Advanced Mock Hospital, SMART Training, and Leadership Clinical.
Advanced Mock Hospital and SMART (Safety Management and Response Team) Training are simulated experiences where evidenced based
practices are incorporated into scenarios. Students learn and demonstrate clinical reasoning, delegation, organization, and team response to
critical situations. Guided reflection is utilized by faculty facilitators during debriefing which strengthen critical components of the experiences and
encourage perceptive learning (Meakim et al, 2013; Aebersold, Tschannen, & Bathishl, 2011).
Leadership Clinical is direct inpatient clinical experience where emphasis is placed on developing organization, delegation, prioritization, and other
leadership skills. This experience consists of four 12 hour clinical shifts where students rotate serving in a charge nurse and staff nurse position.
They learn to provide care for and mange up to four patients by the end of the fourth shift. Students administer medications, complete
assessments and treatments, document in the medical record, and are supervised by faculty.
Student perceptions of these three clinical experiences are positive and encouraging to the future of nursing and nursing education. Statements
such as “I feel these three clinicals brought all of my learning together”, “I feel like a real nurse now”, and “These clinicals have definitely prepared
me for preceptorship” are common themes. The purpose of this presentation will be to describe in detail each simulation and clinical activity and to
ground the experiences based on evidenced based practice.
References
Abdrbo, A. A. (2012). Self-assessment of leadership behaviors among baccalaureate nursing students with different clinical training experience and
nurses. Paper presented at the 2012 International Conference on Management and Education Innovation, Singapore.
Aebersold, M., Tschanne, D., & Bathish, M. (2011). Innovative simulation strategies in education. Nursing Research and Practice, 12, 1-7. Doi:
10.1155/2012/765212.
Chunta, K. & Edwards, T. (2013). Multiple-patient simulation to transition student to clinical practice. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(11), 491-496.
Faculty Handbook, School of Nursing (2016).
Gore, T., Johnson, T., & Wang, C. (2015). Teaching nursing leadership: Simulation versus traditional inpatient clinical. International Journal of
Jukkala, A., Greenwood, R., Motes, T., & Block, V. (2013) Creating innovative clinical nurse leader practicum experiences through academic and
practice partnerships. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(3), 186-191.
Kilgore, R. V., Goodwin, M., E., Harding, R. A. (2013). Adding context to a simulation module for leadership and management baccalaureate nursing
students. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(9), 148-155. doi: 10.5430/jnep.v3n9p148
Lekan, D. A., Corazzini, K. N., Gilliss, C. L., & Bailey, D. E. (2011). Clinical leadership development in accelerated baccalaureate nursing students: An
education innovation. Journal of Professional Nursing, 27(4), 202-214. doi:10.1016./j.profnurs.2011.03.002
Meakim, C., Boese, T., Decker, S., Franklin, A.E., Gloe, D., Lioce, L., Sando, C., Borum, J.C. (2013). Standards of best practice: simulation standard I:
Terminology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(6S), S3-S11.ISSN: 1876-1399.
McGrath, M., Lyng, C., Hourican, S. (2012). From the simulation lab to the ward: Preparing 4th year nursing students for the role of staff nurse.
Clinical Simulation in Learning, 8(7), e265-e272/ Doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2010.10.003.
Contact
[email protected]
Empowering a Culture of Vulnerability Through Focused Nursing Education Leadership
Laura C. Dzurec, PhD, RN, PMHCNS-BC, ANEF, FAAN, ., USA
Jennifer A. Specht, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Brown (2015) noted that, generally speaking, individuals’ needs for cognitive certainty, accompanied by often-desperate,
simultaneous needs to ‘be right,’ have resulted in widespread fear of personal vulnerability. In common parlance, vulnerability is
seen as a relatively negative state, something to be “overcome” (deChesnay, 2005, p. xix). From a perspective that views
vulnerability as ‘susceptibility to harm’ (Sellman, 2005; Mechanic & Tanner, 2007; deChesnay & Anderson, 2016), vulnerability
becomes a negative circumstance, one that threatens possibility of attack or harm. In fact, within nursing, overcoming vulnerability
is a focus for a number of nursing theories (Boyle, 2008; Smith & Liehr, 2008).
It can be readily argued, however, that vulnerability is not inherently negative; rather, vulnerability is neutral, reflecting merely “an interaction
between the resources available to individuals and communities (including workplace communities) and the life challenges they face” (Mechanic &
Tanner, 2007, p. 1220; parenthetical phrase added). Viewed from a point beyond the mantle of a positive/negative dichotomy, vulnerability can be
understood to reflect a state of openness to environmental features, whether those features portend threat or opportunity (Brown, 2012). “All
people are vulnerable,” as Sellman (2005, p. 3) noted, because vulnerability is the essence of the human condition. Moreover, “being more-than-
ordinarily vulnerable may also provide opportunities for more-than-ordinary flourishing” (Carel, 2009, p. 216).
The investigators present an evidence-based model of leadership that supports ‘more-than-ordinary flourishing’ that exploits the vulnerability of
both students and faculty members. Abductively derived from metasyntheses of published literature and lived experiences, the model
demonstrates the centrality of vulnerability to personal and professional growth in academic settings. Integrated within the model are notions
from several theories that, when applied comprehensively, interact to guide nursing education program administrators toward openness for the
betterment of all. Specifically, the model combines features of vulnerability, itself (Brown, 2015; Mechanic & Tanner, 2007), with concepts from
Cross’s (1981) model of adult learning, Meleis’s (2010) theory of transitions, and Shelton’s (2003) model of academic support. Implications for
development of policy and for future research will be addressed.
The implementation of “new leadership” (Grossman & Valiga, 2017, p. vii) through the proposed model enables nurse educators and
administrators to shift “the distribution of relative advantage and disadvantage” (Vladeck, 2007, p. 1231). The model undergirds success among
education stakeholders, thereby strengthening the successes of the academic setting, itself. Reflecting findings of the literature they reviewed, the
investigators argue that as it supports vulnerability, the model simultaneously supports authenticity and courage. As, through the model, students
and faculty alike are empowered to embrace a sense of personal legitimacy (Brown, 2012, 2015), inspiring more-than-ordinary flourishing.
References
Boyle, J. (2008). Foreword. In M. deChesnay & B. Anderson (Eds.). Caring for the vulnerable: Perspectives in nursing theory, practice, and research
(2d. ed). pp. xix-xx. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. NY: Penguin.
Brown, R. (2015). Rising strong: How the ability to reset transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. NY: Random House.
Carel, H. (2009). A reply to ‘Towards an understanding of nursing as a response to human vulnerability’ by Derek Sellman: Vulnerability and illness.
Nursing Philosophy, 10, 214–219.
Cross, P. (1981). Adults as learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
deChesnay, M. (2005). Caring for the vulnerable: Perspectives in Nursing Theory, Practice, and Research. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
deChesnay, M. & Anderson, B. A. (Eds.). (2016). Caring for the vulnerable: Perspectives in nursing theory, practice, and research. (4th Ed.).
Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
Grossman, S. C., & Valiga, T. M. (2017). The New Leadership Challenge: Creating the Future of Nursing (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Davis.
Mechanic, D., & Tanner, J. (2007). Vulnerable people, groups, and populations: societal view.Health Affairs,26(5), 1220-1230.
Meleis, A. I. (Ed.). (2010). Transition Theory: Middle-range and situation-specific theories in nursing research and practice. NY: Springer.
Sellman, D. (2005). Towards and understanding of nursing as a response to human vulnerability. Nursing Philosophy, 6 (1), 2-10.
Shelton, E. (2003). Faculty support and student retention. Journal of Nursing Education, 42,
68-76. doi:10.3928/0148-4834-20030201-07
Smith, M. J., & Liehr, P. R. (2008). Middle range theory for nursing (2d ed.). NY: Springer.
Vladeck, B. C. (2007). How useful is ‘vulnerable’ as a concept?Health Affairs,26(5), 1231-1234.
Contact
[email protected]
Content Validation of a Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN)-Based Clinical Evaluation
Instrument
Gerry Altmiller, EdD, RN, APRN, ACNS-BC, USA
Abstract
The literature indicates that students view clinical performance evaluation as less objective than classroom evaluation and as such, it
can serve as a source of contention between students and faculty. Evaluation of clinical competency in prelicensure nursing
education is a high stakes assessment, therefore it requires the use of a valid method of measurement. This presentation will
describe the development of a clinical evaluation instrument based on the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN)
competencies and the process of establishing content validation for its items using the content validity index. The QSEN
competencies identify the knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed by nurses to meet the demands of the health care environment,
emphasizing patient-centered care, collaboration with other members of the health care team, evidence-based practice, continuous
quality improvement, safety, and the integrated use of informatics. Establishing content validation for a clinical evaluation
instrument based on these competencies is essential because while many educators use QSEN as a framework for developing
teaching strategies that integrate quality improvement and patient safety concepts into student learning, there is little evaluative
data regarding the efficacy of this practice.
The QSEN-Based Clinical Evaluation Instrument was developed by the researcher to standardize and clarify expectations of clinical performance for
medical-surgical nursing students. Once developed, six expert nurse educators were recruited as reviewers; three doctorally prepared and well
versed in QSEN, one masters prepared with expertise in simulation, and two masters prepared adjunct faculty members that had no knowledge of
QSEN but were aware of the concepts because they held full time practice positions in acute care centers. The six experts were ask to rate and
provide comments to refine the items. Two rounds of reviews yielded a 42 item instrument where each item had a content validity index of .83 or
higher indicating the item was content valid and appropriate for the final version of the clinical evaluation. The scale content validity index was
computed using two methods; scale content validity index/universal agreement was 1.0; scale content validity index/average was .979. The high
level of agreement among the 6 expert reviewers supports that the content is relevant and appropriate for inclusion in a QSEN-based clinical
evaluation instrument designed to define and evaluate prelicensure student clinical performance.
Using the QSEN competencies as a framework to measure clinical performance evaluation provides a clear structure for objective analysis of
student competency in the clinical setting and works to organize the expectations for clinical practice into coherent categories so that students can
more accurately identify areas of strength and weakness. Despite the varying knowledge level of the QSEN competencies by the expert nurse
educator reviewers, the high level of agreement for the relevance of the items suggest that the QSEN competencies provide a relevant framework
for clinical practice evaluation and that the items included in the QSEN Based Clinical Evaluation Instrument provide valid measures for both
contemporary nursing education and practice. Future work will include adapting and leveling this clinical evaluation for other clinical nursing
courses and establishing content validation for those instruments as well.
References
Altmiller G. (2012). Student perceptions of incivility in nursing education: Implications for educators. Nurs Educ Perspect, 33(1), 15-20.
Brink Y., & Louw, Q. (2011). Clinical instruments: Reliability and validity critical appraisal.J Eval Clin Pract; 18, 1126-32.
Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell, P., Sullivan, D.T., & Warren, J. (2007). Quality and safety education for
nurses. Nurs Outlook.55(3), 122-131.
Delprato D. (2013). Students’ voices: The lived experience of faculty incivility as a barrier to professional formation in associate degree nursing
education. Nurse Educ Today, 33(3), 286-290.
Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T., & Owen, S.V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res NursHealth,
30, 459-467.
Rutherford-Humming, T. (2015). Determining content validity and reporting a content validity index for simulation scenarios. Nurs Educ
Perspect,36(6), 389-393.
Contact
[email protected]
Using Technology and Innovative Strategies to Promote QSEN Competencies of Patient-Centered Care and
Safety
Janet K. Garwood, MSN (Ed), RN, USA
Abstract
AIM-To promote QSEN competencies associated with patient safety and patient-centered care using a case-study approach.
BACKGROUND-Patient-centered care is an essential value in nursing, (Grilo, Santos, Rita & Gomes, 2014) but patient safety must always take
precedence when nurses are making decisions (Edwards, 2013). When selecting student centered learning activities, it is important to consider
learner characteristics which may impact learning. Generational influences and learning style preferences are two characteristics which may be an
important consideration for educators (Nick, 2015). With this strategy, the author created a case study while also taking into consideration the
learning needs of the nursing students by using technology and media. This case study was designed for courses which contained student learning
outcomes related to legal and ethical aspects of nursing. One of the courses was an RN-BSN course, and all students enrolled in this course held
active nursing licenses. The other course is a mental health course in which pre-licensure BS students were enrolled. The Quality and Safety
Education for Nurses (QSEN) competencies of Safety and Patient-centered Care were used to define and measure student learning outcomes based
on the learner targets of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes.
QSEN defines Patient-centered care as to: “Recognize the patient or designee as the source of control and full partner in providing compassionate
and coordinated care based on respect for patient’s preferences, values, and needs” (p. 1-2, QSEN.org, 2014). The demonstration of the application
of knowledge can be assessed by the student responses when reflecting on patient/family/community preferences, values, coordination and
integration of care. The student can also reflect on how to provide comfort and emotional support in a safe and ethical manner. The achievement
of the skills required for a registered nurse also can be measured with the student reflections which consider patient values, preferences and
expressed needs to other members of healthcare team. The assessment of the affective domain of learning (attitudes) is accomplished by providing
case study examples which portray health care situations “through patients’ eyes” and evaluating the student responses to the case study
questions. Also, QSEN defines safety as such that it “Minimizes risk of harm to patients and providers through both system effectiveness and
individual performance”. The practical use of knowledge can be applied by students in this case study by reflecting on processes used in
understanding causes of error and allocation of responsibility and accountability (cause and failure mode effects analysis). The evaluation of
outcomes related to skills can be measured by identifying the efficient use of strategies to reduce the risk of harm to self or others. In this case
study, the outcomes of QSEN attitudes can be quantified by the student’s reflection on the value of vigilance and monitoring by patients, families,
and other members of the health care team.
METHOD-A longitudinal, qualitative approach was used to evaluate student reflection using a pre and post-survey. The implementation of this
teaching and learning strategy occurred in several courses, over several consecutive semesters. This case study provides a brief insight into a case
scenario by having students observe scenes 18-20 in the film titled “The Notebook.” The Notebook is a story about a married couple, who are very
close to one another, and the wife has Alzheimer’s Disease. The husband reads to his wife from a notebook as an effort to help her reorient her to
reality. An ethical dilemma emerges within these scenes, and without further discussion, students are asked to reflect on their thoughts and
attitudes relating to the how the nurse in the film chose to solve this ethical dilemma and complete a pre-survey. Students are then given a post-
survey to complete by collaborating with their group members which guide them through concrete steps when facing an ethical dilemma.
RESULTS-The majority of students in the pre-survey stated they would solve the dilemma just as the nurse in the film. After reflection and group
discussion, many of the students reported that the actions of the nurse could have legal and safety implications which were not considered and
would choose alternative methods to solve the dilemma. In mid-semester (formative evaluation) and end-of-semester surveys, all students
reported a high level of satisfaction with the learning activities and technology used for teaching and learning.
CONCLUSION-Millennial students who considered digital natives, appreciate the use of technology media and a collaborative approach to learning
(Garwood, 2015) and this case study was useful in promoting the QSEN competencies of knowledge, skills, and attitudes which are related to safety
and patient-centered care.
References
Edwards, D.S. (2013). Patient safety and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report recommendation for an 80% BSN workforce by 2020. Ohio Nurses
Review, 88(1), 26-27
Garwood, J.K. (2015). Millennial Students' Preferred Methods for Learning Concepts in Psychiatric Nursing. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and
Mental Health Services,53(9)38-43. doi:10.3928/02793695-20150728-06
Grilo, A.M., Santos, M.C., Rita, J.S., & Gomes, A.I. (2014) Assessment of nursing students and nurses’ orientation towards patient-centeredness.
Nurse Education Today, 34(1), 35-39. Doi:10.1016/nedt.2013.02.022
Nick, J.M. (2015) Facilitate Learning. In L. Caputi (Ed.), Certified Nurse Educator Review Book the Official NLN guide to the CNE exam. (pp.1-31)
Baltimore, Maryland:Walters Kluwer.
Quality and Safety Education for Nurses. (2014). QSEN Competencies. Retrieved online @ http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/
Contact
[email protected]
Promoting Meaningful Learning: Concept Mapping Applied in Case Studies
Yeijin Yeom, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
In these days, nurses’ abilities in high-level thinking and problem-solving are critically important because nurses are required to
assess and quickly evaluate available data for evolving problems to provide quality nursing care to patients with the complex health
problems (Simmons, 2010; Yoo & Park, 2014). This leads to requiring the higher cognitive ability to succeed the National Council
Licensure Examination-Registered Nurse (NCLEX-RN) that embeds current nursing practice. Therefore, identifying problems,
analyzing data and information, differentiating quality information from null information, and evaluating outcomes should be
embedded in learning activities throughout the nursing curriculum (Russell, Geist, & Maffett, 2013). Traditional pedagogical
methods, such as lectures and reading assignments, bring skepticism regarding its effectiveness in fostering analyzing and problem-
solving skills of students (Russell et al., 2013). Also, current nursing students, mostly Generation Y and Z, have unique preferences
and needs for learning. Nurse educators need to use effective educational strategies that are suitable for the current student
populations and can promote students’ higher cognitive ability required for nursing practice in the current healthcare environment
and success on the NCLEX-RN examination.
A combined educational strategy of concept mapping and case studies can promote meaningful learning that associates with students’ analyzing
and problem-solving skills development. Meaningful learning theory developed by Ausubel (1968) explains that meaningful learning occurs when
learners link new concepts to the existing knowledge in their cognitive structure that represents the residue of previous experiences. Concept
mapping signifies “meaningful relationships between concepts in the form of propositions that are two or more concept labels linked by words in a
semantic unit” (Novak & Gowin, 1984, p. 15), and learners also figure out misconceptions and missing connections between concepts that are
needed to construct new meaning. Concept mapping can be an educational method developing problem-solving skills as well as a tool for
representing problems by learners (Jonassen, 2004). In the process of concept mapping, possible solutions to a problem can be found by
understanding underlying concepts and their meanings related to the problem. Also, associations and relationships between the concepts and with
other concepts can be discovered to solve problems. Especially, when students work with others in creating concept mapping, students present the
ideas to build a common understanding and interpret the ideas in collaboratively (Gao et al., 2007). Concept mapping applied in case studies
provides a context to integrate concepts gained and focus on issues and problems associated with the cases (Huang, Chen, Yeh, & Chung, 2012). So,
students can have a systematic approach to find solutions to the problems by identifying underlying relationships between factors and associating
issues with theories.
Students’ perceptions of learning promoted by concept mapping applied in case studies in comparison with that promoted by using case study
alone were measured in a pre-nursing course. Forty-nine students were taught the concept mapping process including definition, purpose, layout,
types of concept mapping, and how to develop a concept map were presented. The students were also given an example of a concept map and
time to practice concept mapping. Then, the students had both learning activities of concept mapping applied in case studies and only case studies
without the benefit of concept mapping. An instrument containing 15 questions was used to measure students’ perceptions in understanding
content, increase in skills, and integration of learning. This instrument was developed based on for this project based on the Student Assessment of
their Learning Gains (Seymour, 1997), and its overall internal consistency was established by a Cronbach Alpha coefficient value at 0.94. The
students’ answers were given on a five-point Likert-type scale, and the answers were analyzed by using descriptive analysis. The data for the total
of the survey items (N = 49, M = 3.91, SD = .86) reveals that the participants felt that concept mapping applied in case studies more effectively
promoted their learning that case studies alone. The survey data for each item depicts that the participants agreed that they gained a better
understanding of how to use a critical approach to analyzing data and arguments in daily life (N = 49, M = 4.08, SD = .73), felt they gained a better
understanding of how studying nursing helps people address real world issues (N = 49, M = 4.02, SD = .83), and gained better skills in working
effectively with others (N = 49, M = 4.10, SD = .74) through concept mapping as applied in the case studies as compared to having case studies only.
The pedagogical application of concept mapping can extend beyond the generation of care plans that have been mostly implemented in nursing
education. Through concept mapping applied in case studies, students can have social interaction with others and explore new ideas and related
ideas. As they find solutions to problems, they expect consequences for the solutions, and it helps them to adjust the gap between the new ideas
and existing ideas in their cognitive structure. Therefore, eventually, students can learn how to effectively work with others and analyze data, and
they can construct new meaning for how nursing helps people address real world issues.
References
Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Reinhart and Winston.
Gao, H., Shen, E., Losh, S., & Turner, J. (2007). A review of studies on collaborative concept mapping: What have we learned about the technique
and what is next. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 479-492.
Huang, Y. C., Chen, H. H., Yeh, M. L., & Chung, Y. C. (2012). Case studies combined with or without concept maps improve critical thinking in
hospital-based nurses: A randomized-controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(6), 747-754.
Jonassen, D. H. (2004). Learning to solve problems. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning to how to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, B. H., Geist, M. J., & Maffett, J. H. (2013). Safety: An integrated clinical reasoning and reflection framework for undergraduate nursing
students. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(1), 59- 62.
Seymour, E. (1997). The student assessment of their learning gains. Retrieved from http://www.salgsite.org
Simmons, B. (2010). Clinical reasoning: Concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1151-1158.
Yoo, M. S., & Park, J. H. (2014). Effect of case-based learning on the development of graduate nurses’ problem-solving ability. Nurse Education
Today, 34(1), 47-51.
Contact
[email protected]
Health as Expanding Consciousness: Patterns of Clinical Reasoning in Senior Baccalaureate Nursing Students
Mary W. Stec, PhD, MSN, BSN, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Clinical reasoning has been identified as a necessary skill for practice in nursing. Multiple studies suggest that a gap exists between
the education of nurses and their ability to transition into practice. In addition to possessing necessary knowledge and skills specific
to the discipline of nursing, nurses must possess clinical reasoning skills to think through a situation as the patient’s condition
changes. To make a clinical judgment, nurses use an analytical process that includes pattern recognition, an attribute of clinical
reasoning. This analytical process of clinical reasoning is more developed in experienced nurses in contrast to novice nurses. Through
the qualitative lens of the researcher, the purpose of this study was to describe the evolving pattern of clinical reasoning in senior
baccalaureate nursing students as part of the decision-making process. A second purpose was to explore the meaning of clinical
reasoning.
Newman’s theory of Health as Expanding Consciousness served as the theoretical framework to study the phenomenon of clinical reasoning.
Newman’s Research as Praxis methodology was used to collect and analyze data. Individual interviews were conducted with seven participants.
The researcher entered a dialectical approach to uncover patterns of clinical reasoning at important choice points in the participants’ lives.
Together with the participants, the researcher gained an understanding of how the participants made decisions through the clinical reasoning
process.
Patterns of individual participants and across participants were examined to gain an understanding of the whole pattern of clinical reasoning. The
patterns of relating, knowing, and decision-making emerged in the participants and contributed to the evolving pattern of clinical reasoning. The
meaning of clinical reasoning for these participants was establishing a relationship with a patient to interact and connect with them. Through
formulation of a connection and trusting relationship, participants gained information to make clinical decisions that facilitated a transformation.
The evolving pattern of clinical reasoning was a maturing process over time as the participants gained insight and expanded consciousness through
multiple experiences and interactions with members of the interdisciplinary team and the instructor.
Implications for nursing science and research include that pattern recognition by the participants in nurse-patient interaction substantiate
empirical support for the Health as Expanding Consciousness theory. The findings broadened the theory to how students think in the clinical area.
In both education and practice prolonged engagement facilitates nurse-patient interaction to learn patient patterns. Collaboration with members
of the interdisciplinary team inspires the understanding of another’s thinking process. A consistent clinical instructor with whom the participants
engaged in a trusting interaction may facilitate a free exchange of thought that enhances decision-making. In practice, interaction between
experience and novice nurse mentorship supports the development of clinical reasoning. In both education and practice, increase in complexity of
assignments over time with choice points provide opportunities for students and novice nurses to make clinical decisions.
References
Cronenwett, L. (2010). In Institute of Medicine. Education. (pp. 8-9). Washington, D C: The National Academies Press.
Newman, M. (1994). Health as expanding consciousness (2nd ed.). New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
Newman, M. (1995). Searching for a more holistic method of inquiry. In M. Newman. A developing discipline (pp. 59-64). New York, NY: National
League for Nursing.
Newman, M. (1999). Health as expanding consciousness (2nd ed.). New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
Newman, M. (1999). The rhythm of relating in a paradigm of wholeness. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31, 227-230.
Newman, M. (2002). The pattern that connects. Advances in Nursing Science, 24 (3), 1-7.
Stec, M. (2016). Health as expanding consciousness: Clinical reasoning in baccalaureate nursing students. Nursing Science Quarterly, 29, 54-61. Doi:
10.1177/0894318415614901
Tanner, C. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45, 204-211.
Cappelletti, A., Engel, J., &Prentice, D. (2014). Systematic review of clinical judgment and reasoning in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45,
453-462. DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20140724-01
Contact
[email protected]
Learning Experiences of Associate Degree in Nursing Students Using a Concept Map With Simulation
Bernadette D. O'Halloran, EdD, MSN, RN, USA
Abstract
With the continuing gap in knowledge preparation and clinical nursing practice leading to errors in health care delivery, the nurse
faculty remains challenged in executing innovative changes to the curriculum to improve and maintain quality and safe patient care.
Graduate nurses have experienced a difficult transition as level-entry nurses to clinical practice. The use of simulation and other
simulation-based experiences such as concept mapping continue to develop in nursing education. Research using the simulation
with concept mapping has shown promising results in the baccalaureate nursing programs. However, the combined use of concept
mapping and simulation is limited in the associate level of nursing programs. The aim of this qualitative single case study was to
explore the learning experiences of seven nursing students enrolled in the beginning nursing course of a two-year program at a
private college in the New England state. Study participants received a video PowerPoint presentation about creating concept maps
using the nursing process with the reading assignments and information related to the simulation scenario before the actual
simulation performance. In using a purposeful sampling method, data collection and content analysis originated from the study
participants’ responses to a field-tested interview protocol that served as a guide to guarantee coverage of all relevant topics
reflective of the research questions (Castillo-Montoya, 2016). Two field nurse experts in simulation offered comments and
suggestions to the interview questions to uncover the most information acquired to understand the individual stories (Jacob &
Furgerson, 2012). The research questions focused on the learning perspectives of the value in using a concept map with simulation
in developing the critical thinking and reasoning skills and the appropriateness of a teaching strategy to help translate the
knowledge into the clinical practice. The techniques in qualitative research used include data saturation, member checking, and
triangulation. Participants received the opportunity to review the responses before performing actual data contextualization and
analysis (Houghton, Casey, Shaw, & Murphy, 2013). A between-method triangulation for data collection included the study
participants’ responses to the semi-structured open-ended interview questions and the concept map illustration with the
corresponding explanation and reaction to the completed concept map (Delost & Nadder, 2014). In using an inductive approach to
content data analysis, various themes and patterns emerged after achieving data saturation. Study findings revealed the feeling of
uncertainty, confusion, and an overwhelming experience. However, the study participants thought the use of a concept map with
simulation was beneficial in developing the essential nursing competencies such as the critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills to
form appropriate clinical decisions if utilized in the first nursing course and consistently across the program. Moreover, as a
metacognitive technique, concept mapping helped the study participants draw their understanding through a visual representation
using hierarchies, labeling or drawing lines to show connectedness to communicate the relationships between concepts (Gerdeman,
Lux, & Jacko, 2013; Jaafarpour, Aazami, & Mozafari, 2016). Study participants expressed the importance of knowing the facts,
checking the information, reviewing the situation, figuring things out, and anticipating future events. The study participants
acknowledged how the use of a concept map with simulation enhanced the learning style preferences either as a visual or
kinesthetic learner. The visualization of the concept map helped the study participants to follow an order, focus, and organize their
thoughts and actions in making decisions using the nursing process. The use of a concept map helped to break down broad concepts
in a more concise way to minimize and avoid the overwhelming feeling. As kinesthetic learners, the study participants relied on their
ability to perform the role of a nurse by feeling for the presence of pulses and listening for breath sounds displayed by the manikin.
These learning activities provided meaningful experiences that the study participants can model in the next clinical rotation.
Implications for nursing education based on the research findings contribute to an increased awareness of the nurse faculty on the
benefits of utilizing a concept map with simulation as teaching strategies to help the students learn about the nursing practice.
Nursing students need an early exposure, and consistent use of the learning strategies to gain more confidence and understanding
to address the different learning styles. Consequently, the teaching practices contribute to the advancement of science in nursing
education, improve the quality of instruction and faculty performance, and affect the student achievement of learning outcomes.
The utilization of a concept map with simulation in the early part of the nursing program serves as a foundation for developing the
critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills to make clinical decisions of a novice learner. A recommendation for future research is to
broaden the understanding by following the student progress in the associate degree in nursing program. Another recommendation
for future research is to acquire the learning perspectives of male nursing students in the associate degree in nursing programs and
perform a comparative study with female nursing students.
References
Alexander, M., Durham, C. F., Hooper, J. I., Jeffries, P. R., Goldman, N., Kardong-Edgren, S., ... Tillman, C. (2015). NCSBN simulation guidelines for
prelicensure nursing programs. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 6(3), 39-42. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30783-3
Benner, P. (2015). Curricular and pedagogical implications for the carnegie study, educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. Asian Nursing
Research,9(1), 1-6. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.02.001
Burrell, L. A. (2014). Integrating critical thinking strategies into nursing curricula.Teaching and Learning in Nursing,9(2), 53-58.
doi:http://dx.doi.org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.1016/j.teln.2013.12.005
Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. Qualitative Report,21(5), 811-831.
Retrieved fromhttp://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss5/2
Decker, S., Moore, A., Thal, W., Opton, L., Caballero, S., & Beasley, M. (2010). Synergistic integration of concept mapping and cause and effect
diagramming into simulated experiences.Clinical Simulation in Nursing,6, e153-e159. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2009.11.010
Delost, M. E., & Nadder, T. S. (2014). Guidelines for initiating a research agenda: Research design and dissemination of results. Clinical Laboratory
Science, 27(4), 237-244. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ascls.org/continuing-education/publications
Dowding, D., Gurbutt, R., Murphy, M., Lascelles, M., Pearman, A., & Summers, B. (2012). Conceptualising decision making in nursing
education.Journal of Research in Nursing,17(4), 348-360. doi:10.1177/1744987112449963
Everett-Thomas, R., Valdes, B., Valdes, G. R., Shekhter, I., Fitzpatrick, M., Rosen, L. F., ... Birnbach, D. J. (2015). Using simulation technology to
identify gaps between education and practice among new graduate nurses. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46(1), 34-40.
doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-01
Gerdeman, J. L., Lux, K., & Jacko, J. (2013). Using concept mapping to build clinical judgment skills.Nurse Education in Practice,13(1), 11-17.
doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2012.05.009
Giddens, J., Keller, T., & Liesveld, J. (2015). Answering the call for a bachelors-prepared nursing workforce: An innovative model for academic
progression. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31, 445-451. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.05.002
Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P. R. (2014). The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal,
Retrieved from http://www.journalofnursingregulation.com/article/S2155-8256(15)30062-4/pdf
Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2013). Rigour in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher,20(4), 12-17. Retrieved
fromhttp://rcnpublishing.com/journal/nr
Ironside, P. M., McNelis, A. M., & Ebright, P. (2014). Clinical education in nursing: Rethinking learning in practice settings. Nursing Outlook, 62, 185-
191. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2013.12.004
Jaafarpour, M., Aazami, S., & Mozafari, M. (2016). Does concept mapping enhance learning outcome of nursing students? Nurse Education Today,
36, 129-132. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.029
Jacob, S. A., & Furgerson, S. P. (2012). Writing Interview Protocols and conducting interviews: Tips for students new to the field of qualitative
research.The Qualitative Report,17(42), 1-10. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss42/3
Jamison, T., & Lis, G. A. (2014). Engaging the learner by bridging the gap between theory and clinical competence: The impact of concept mapping
and simulation as innovative strategies for nurse-sensitive outcome indicators. Nursing Clinics of North America,49(1), 69-80.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2013.11.004
Kaddoura, M. (2013). New graduate nurses' perceived definition of critical thinking during their first nursing experience. Educational Research
Quarterly, 36(3), 3-21.
Kaddoura, M., VanDyke, O., Cheng, B., & Shea-Foisy, K. (2016). Impact of concept mapping on the development of clinical judgment skills in nursing
students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2016.02.001
Morris, T. L., & Hancock, D. R. (2013). Institute of medicine core competencies as a foundation for nursing program evaluation. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 34(1), 29-33. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-34.1.29
Nielsen, A. E., Noone, J., Voss, H., & Mathews, L. R. (2013). Preparing nursing students for the future: An innovative approach to clinical education.
Nurse Education in Practice, 13(4), 301-309. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.nepr.2013.03.015
Taplay, K., Jack, S. M., Baxter, P., Eva, K., & Martin, L. (2015). The process of adopting and incorporating simulation into undergraduate nursing
curricula: A grounded theory study. Journal of Professional Nursing,31(1), 26-36. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.05.005
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive
study. Nursing & Health Sciences,15(3), 398-405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048
Wahl, S. E., & Thompson, A. M. (2013). Concept mapping in a critical care orientation program: A pilot study to develop critical thinking and
decision-making skills in novice nurses. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(10), 455-460. doi:10.3928/00220124-20130916-79
Wang, E. E. (2011). Simulation and adult learning. Disease-a-Month, 57, 664-678. doi:10.1016/j.disamonth.2011.08.017
Contact
[email protected]
Undergraduate Nursing Student’s Reflections on the Effectiveness of Communication Training During
Simulation: Qualitative Analysis
Penny A. Sauer, PhD, RN, CCRN, CNE, USA
Margaret M. Verzella, MSN, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Background: Nurses must be able to effectively communicate information to other members of the healthcare team. Between 33%
and 72.6% of nurses’ experience bullying in their work environment (Berry, Gillespie, Gates, & Schafer, 2012; Laschinger, Grau,
Finegan, & Wilk, 2010). Bullying and incivility can negatively impact a nurses’ ability to communicate vital information to other team
members. The Joint Commission reports that a root cause of the majority of Sentinel Events involve communication (Commission,
2015). There have been several initiatives aimed at improving communication between healthcare team members, but these
programs are aimed at practitioners, not students. Nursing students have limited opportunities to practice communication between
healthcare providers. Students are often exposed to incivility and bullying in clinical settings, but often do not report or seek help in
dealing with this challenges (Anthony, Yastik, MacDonald, & Marshall, 2014). Many schools of nursing teach students to report
findings using SBAR and CUS from TeamSTEPPS™. However, these skills are not always reinforced in clinical situations. Even more
difficult is the ability to use the communication skills that have been taught when faced with incivility or bullying.
Researchers have reported that when people are confronted with incivility or bullying the victim has an increase in anxiety (Einarsen, Hoel, Zapf, &
Cooper, 2011). Nursing students are particularly vulnerable to increased levels of anxiety when faced with incivility or bullying. These negative
behaviors can cause students to doubt their ability to function as a student nurse, decreasing their self-efficacy and damages the learning
environment.
Nursing students that have the opportunity to practice skills in simulation have decreased anxiety and increased self-efficacy in those skills (Megel
et al., 2012). This suggests that a simulation scenario where students can practice communication skills in dealing with incivility and bullying in the
workplace could alleviate some anxiety and increase self-efficacy in their communication skills when exposed to these situations as a registered
nurse.
Methods: Participants were recruited from undergraduate nursing students who are enrolled in a baccalaureate nursing program in the
Southeastern United States. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from the University. Subjects were a pre-test survey that included
demographic information, the State Trait Anxiety Instrument, and the General Self Efficacy scale. All students completed an online module on how
to communicate with difficult people prior to the simulation. Students completed a simulated nursing scenario that includes bullying behavior,
followed by a debriefing session. Research participants will complete another survey, with the same tools, after the simulation activity. Research
participants wrote a reflective journal describing their response to the simulation. The reflection journals were analyzed using content analysis
(Vaismoradi, Turunen, & Bondas, 2013).
Results: Of the 47 students who participated in the simulation, 93.6 % also participated in the research project. The mean age of participants was
22.72 (SD 5.31), and the majority of students were female (95.3%). Only 61.4% reported that they were comfortable or somewhat comfortable
addressing conflict in the demographic survey. Analysis of reflection journal revealed many student were confident in their ability to manage
conflict prior to the simulation. However, upon reflection they reported that they ‘froze’ or ‘hung up’ when faced with conflict. One student said, “I
calm up and get anxious…I need to learn to remain calm (to help my patient)”. Most the participants felt stated that they had the tools that they
need to address conflict, but were not able to utilize the tools in the moment. When faced with an abrupt provider some students found “I allowed
the doctor to make me feel incompetent”. Using the tools helped students be able to advocate, for their patient, guided them to be more assertive
in a way that “ allowed us to be heard when we need to be.”
Many students reported they had greater confidence in their communication skills after the simulation, “more prepared to handle a difficult
situation”, “I will not always be treated with respect and that some people are not good communication but given skills, I can handle the situation
and improve the outcomes”, “I will not be afraid to call provider in the future”.
Conclusion: Students have limited opportunities to report findings to health care providers. Using evidence based tools for communication like
TeamSTEPPS™ SBAR, and CUS provides students with a framework to report vital information. Incorporating communication into simulation allows
students to perfect these skills increasing their confidence, promoting advocacy for patients and increasing patient safety.
References
Anthony, M., Yastik, j., MacDonald, D. A., & Marshall, K. A. (2014). Development and validation of a tool to measure incivility in clinical nursing
education. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30(1), 48-55. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.12.011
Berry, P. A., Gillespie, G. L., Gates, D., & Schafer, J. (2012). Novice nurse productivity following workplace bullying. Journal of Nursing Scholarship,
44(1), 80-87. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01436.x
Commission, J. (2015). Joint Commission Online. Retrieved from http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/23/jconline_April_29_15.pdf
Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (2011). Bullying and harrasment in the workplace. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; Taylor and Francis Group.
Laschinger, H. K. S., Grau, A. L., Finegan, J., & Wilk, P. (2010). New graduate nurses’ experiences of bullying and burnout in hospital settings. Journal
of Advanced Nursing, 66(12), 2732-2742. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05420.x
Megel, M. E., Black, J., Clark, L., Carstens, P., Jenkins, L. D., Promes, J., . . . Goodman, T. (2012). Effect of high-fidelity simulation on pediatric nursing
students' anxiety. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(9), e419-e428. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.03.006
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive
study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398-405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048
Contact
[email protected]
How the StrengthsFinder© Assessment Assists Faculty in Building Consensus to Achieve Consistency in
Student Evaluation
Jone Tiffany, DNP, RN, CNE, CHSE, ANEF, USA
Barbara A. Hoglund, EdD, MSN, FNP-BC, CNE, USA
Abstract
Supported by recent findings from the National Council for State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) study, (Hayden, Smiley, Alexander,
Kardong-Edgren, & Jeffries, 2014), simulation is quickly developing into a core teaching strategy for nursing education. Evaluation of
learning during simulation, an essential component in the NCSBN study, informed nurse educators about valid and reliable
mechanisms to assess achievement and competency in practice. The growing interest in using simulation to evaluate student
competency led the National League for Nursing (NLN) to conduct a four-year study to evaluate the process and feasibility of using
mannequin -based high fidelity simulation for high stakes assessment in pre-licensure RN programs (Rizzolo, Kardong-Edgren,
Oermann, & Jeffries, 2015). Achieving clarity about the specific behaviors students need to exhibit in order to demonstrate
competency is paramount. Equally important is the training of evaluators to assure satisfactory intra/inter-rater reliability.
Furthermore, it is vital that faculty are aware of their own strengths and biases as they embark on evaluating students in simulation,
and other environments.
The aim of this study was to extend work begun by the NLN Project to Explore the Use of Simulation for High Stakes (Rizzolo, 2014) (hereafter
called NLN High Stakes Project) to explore fair and balanced high-stakes evaluation of student nurse performance in a simulation. The focus of this
study was on testing the impact of an evaluator training intervention on reliability of high-stakes assessment in simulation. Furthermore, the study
sought to find out if increasing faculty self-awareness of their strengths and personality characteristics could improve inter/intra-rater reliability. A
training intervention for faculty evaluators was developed based on best practices in simulation and evaluation as well as general education
principles and previous work by the NLN and NCSBN.
In order to investigate if specific faculty personality characteristics are associated with evaluator performance, each participant completed the
Clifton StrengthsFinder assessment tool (Rath, 2007). The Clifton StrengthsFinder tool is a web-based assessment of normal personality from the
perspective of Positive Psychology. Positive Psychology includes dimensions of happiness and well-being by which individuals, groups, and
organizations can flourish (Gable & Haidt, 2005). One characteristic of Positive Psychology is the identification of distinct talents or strengths and
the maximization of these abilities. Positive Psychologist Don O. Clifton developed the concept of a strengths-based approach after conducting
multiple research studies (Gallup Inc., Strengths, 2016; Gallup Strengths Center, 2017). The driving force behind Clifton’s discovery was based on
one question, “What would happen if we studied what was right with people versus what was wrong with people?” (Clifton & Nelson, 1992).
The Clifton StrengthsFinder is a web-based assessment of normal personality from the perspective of Positive Psychology. The Clifton
StrengthsFinder presents 177 items to the participant. Each item consists of a pair of potential self-descriptors, such as "I read instructions
carefully" versus "I like to jump right into things." The participant is then asked to choose the descriptor that best describes them, and to identify
the extent to which that chosen option is descriptive of the person. The participant is given 20 seconds to respond to a given pair of descriptors
before the assessment automatically presents the next pair. This assessment helps identify areas where the person has the greatest potential for
building strength. It measures recurring patterns of thought, feeling, and behavior (Rath, 2007).
The Clifton StrengthsFinder profile was de-identified for each participant in the study data, but participants were given access to their own profile
results and were able to use the results to their own advantage in their personal and professional lives.
Clifton noticed commonalities amongst the thirty-four themes and clustered them into four domains: executing, influencing, relationship building,
and strategic thinking (Rath & Conchie, 2008). The executing domain traits primarily highlight productivity and attention to detail, while influencing
characteristics show persuasive tendencies. Relationship building focuses on relational collateral and the good of the organization, and strategic
thinking centers on possibilities and options (Rath & Conchie, 2008).
This study was multi-site, and involved a mixed methods approach. The StrengthsFinder component of the study had both quantitative and
qualitative survey questions. This presentation describes the results of one portion of a nationwide, experimental study that looked at factors
affecting inter and intra-rater reliability among nursing faculty evaluating performance during simulation, specifically using the StrengthsFinder
assessment to assist faculty in building consensus to achieve consistency in student evaluation. The findings from the StrengthsFinder component
of this study suggest it is valuable for nursing faculty to be aware of their strengths when evaluating students. The results of this study will help
inform best practices for faculty when evaluating students.
References
Clifton, D. O., & Harter, J. K., (2003). Investing in strengths. In K.S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship:
Foundations of a new discipline, pp. 111-121. San Francisco: Berrett-Kohler
Clifton StrengthsFinder (2017). Gallup Strengths Center. Retrieved from: https://www.gallupstrengthscenter.com/
Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 103-110. Retrieved from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103
5(2), C1-S64
International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) (2013).Standards of Best Practice: Simulation. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing,9(65), Supplement, S1-S32
Jeffries, P. R. (2012).Theoretical framework for simulation design. In P. R. Jeffries (Ed.)Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to
evaluation (2nd ed.) (p. 25-43). Washington, DC: National League for Nursing.
Rath, T., & Conchie, B. (2008). Strengths based leadership: Great leaders, teams, and why people follow. New York, NY: Gallup Press.
Rath, T. (2007). Strength finders 2.0. New York, NY: Gallup Press
Rizzolo, M. A., Kardong-Edgren, S., Oermann, M.H., and Jeffries, P.R. (2015). The National
League for Nursing project to explore the use of simulation for high-stakes assessment: Process, outcomes, and recommendations. Nursing
Rizzolo, M. A. (2014). Developing and using simulation for high-stakes assessment. In P. R.
Jeffries, (Ed.), Clinical simulations in nursing education: Advanced concepts, trends, and opportunities. (p. 113-121). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters
Kluwer
Contact
[email protected]
Learning How to Teach: Using Simulations to Prepare New Clinical Faculty
Judith M. Jarosinski, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Tina P. Brown Reid, EdD, RN, USA
Abstract
The dearth of nursing faculty is a prime factor in the ongoing shortage of registered nurses (AACN, 2015). Recruitment and retention
of qualified individuals from diverse backgrounds to teach students in clinical settings is especially challenging (AACN, 2017).
Educating practicing nurse experts about the complexity of the clinical academic environment requires a multifaceted approach
(Hinderer, Jarosinski, Seldomridge, & Reid, 2016).
Simulation activities using high fidelity human patient simulators, standardized patient actors, or a combination of both have been used in the
education of health care professionals (Szauter, 2014). Realistic situations are recreated to promote learning, while providing protection from real-
life errors (Foronda, Liu, & Bauman, 2013). Skills acquisition and critical thinking can be refined as participants have opportunities to learn from
their mistakes (Richardson et al., 2014). Simulated experiences offer rich educational opportunities for novice faculty as they learn how to be
effective clinical teachers (Hunt, Curtis, & Gore, 2015).
The Eastern Shore Academy and Mentorship Initiative (ES-FAMI), a partnership of three nursing programs and three hospitals in rural Maryland,
was designed to develop quality adjunct faculty to address regional needs for clinical teachers. With an emphasis on recruiting multiethnic,
multicultural faculty, a 30 contact hour program was established to provide foundational knowledge about teaching/learning theory, structuring a
clinical experience, and providing feedback on student written work and clinical performance. Participants also engaged in simulated teaching
encounters to refine their skills as new faculty. Simulations were used in two ways. First, participants viewed and critiqued teaching encounters
developed by ESFAMI program faculty. Next, participants engaged in encounters with “standardized students”, trained actors who depicted
common student behaviors requiring feedback and correction that were video-recorded for review and critique. Standardized students were
current nursing students recruited from partner schools as well as actors from community theater groups. All “standardized students” attended a
training session to master three scripts: a late and unprepared student, a student persistently using a cell phone to text with friends during a
clinical rotation, and a student experiencing a dramatic downturn in quality of clinical performance. Each academy participant was assigned to one
of the three scenarios which were enacted and video-recorded while the others completed a different activity. After everyone had completed a
simulation, the group gathered to watch and discuss each video. Debriefing focused on the variety of approaches, how they reflected principles of
teaching, learning, and giving feedback, as well as strengths and areas for growth. Based on participant feedback, the simulation activities were
expanded to assure that everyone experienced at least two encounters with discussion and debriefing between each round of encounters.
Standardized students also provided comments on how each faculty member made them feel during the encounter as well as their assessment of
the effectiveness of each teacher’s feedback.
Results: All participants completed the online Academy Experience Evaluation (AEE), a 13 multiple choice item instrument with a 5-point Likert
scale (higher scores indicating greater satisfaction) and four additional open-ended questions. Responses on the AEE revealed an overall positive
experience with the ES-FAMI program with mean scores on the multiple choice items ranging from 4.40(+.50) to 4.76(+.52). The highest scoring
items on the AEE related to applicability of the modules to clinical faculty role and the quality of the simulation experiences in participants for the
clinical faculty role. Data from the open-ended questions supported the effectiveness of simulations in facilitating learning, problem solving, and
developing skills in giving feedback among novice nursing faculty.
Discussion/Conclusion: The use of simulated teaching encounters is an effective strategy to prepare new part-time faculty but is not without its
challenges. These include the time-intensive nature of recruitment, training, and re-training the standardized students, the need for budgetary
support to underwrite actor costs ($16/hour), the availability of a dedicated simulation center with audio-video capture capabilities, and
developing/refining the debriefing skills of the simulation facilitators. Nonetheless, the findings of this study have global implications for nursing
education. Helping clinicians actualize the faculty role through the use of simulations in conjunction with a multi-modal educational experience,
strengthens their transition from clinical practice to academia.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (March 2015). Fact sheet-Nursing faculty shortage. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (March 2017). Policy brief. Nursing faculty: Spotlight on diversity. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/government-affairs/Diversity-Spotlight.pdf
Foronda, C., Liu, S., & Bauman, E. B. (2013). Evaluation of simulation in undergraduate nurse education: An integrative review. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 9(10), e409-e416.
Hinderer, K., Jarosinski, J., Seldomridge, L. & Reid, T. (2016.) From expert clinician to nurse educator: Outcomes of a faculty academy initiative.
Nurse Educator, 41(4). doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000243.
Hunt, C., Curtis, A. & Gore T. (2015). Using simulations to promote professional development of clinical instructors. Journal of Nursing Education,
54(8), 468-471.
Richardson, H., Goldsamt, L., Simmons, J., Gilmartin, M. & Jeffries, P. (2014) Increasing faculty capacity: Findings from an evaluation of simulation
clinical teaching. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35 5), 308-314.
Sautzer, K. (2014) Adding the human dimension to simulation scenarios. Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 9(2), 79-80.
Contact
[email protected]
E 04 - Hygiene Practices in Healthcare Settings
Results of an Educational Intervention and Barriers to Antimicrobial Stewardship in a Skilled Nursing Facility
Gloria M. Escalona, DNP, RN, PHN, USA
Abstract
This study was part of a quality improvement effort by a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) to develop and establish an antimicrobial
stewardship program to comply with recently enacted California State Senate Bill 361 (SB 361), which went into effect January 1,
2017 (All Facilities Letter 15-30, 2015; Skilled nursing facilities, 2015). In addition, this project provided a research opportunity for a
doctoral nursing student with an interest in and passion for appropriate use of antimicrobials in nursing homes. This study is also
among the very first, if not the first, to examine the impact of an educational intervention to licensed nurses on antimicrobial
stewardship in a nursing home and to differentiate the licensed nurses.
The researcher defined antimicrobial stewardship as a set of activities and commitments by the community or, in this case, a facility to protect the
use of antimicrobials in order to ensure appropriate and optimal treatment of infections at the same time reducing the chance of resistant
organisms and other adverse reactions.
The researcher utilized three methods of study: 1) an educational intervention presented to licensed nurses in October 2016; 2) a post-educational
intervention Nurse Survey, which was collected in November and December 2016; and 3) a retrospective pre- and post-educational intervention
medical records audit in September and November 2016 of residents reported as having an actual or potential infection. The educational
intervention to licensed nurses consisted of information on SB 361, the definition of and need for antimicrobial stewardship, use of the McGeer-
Stone Criteria, and an infection decision algorithm. The medical records audit measured antimicrobial use and adherence to standardized infection
surveillance criteria, specifically, the McGeer-Stone Criteria.
The facility contained two nursing care areas: long-term units (LTUs) providing custodial care for elderly residents and staffed largely by Licensed
Vocational Nurses (LVNs); and short-term units (STUs) providing post-acute rehabilitation for adults and staffed largely by Registered Nurses (RNs).
This division enabled easy differentiation of licensed nurses and the impact of the educational intervention on adherence to infection criteria for
the initiation of antimicrobial use. While there was a large increase in adherence to standardized infection criteria post-educational intervention,
especially in the LVN staffed LTUs, this change was not statistically significant. However, a significant change (p=0.007) was noted in adherence to
criteria by Nurse Practitioners (NPs) in the LTUs. The increase in adherence to criteria noted in the LTUs was due to a change in the prescribing
behavior of the NPs and that NPs did not have prescribing capability in the STUs. NPs received the educational intervention, while other facility
prescribers did not.
In conclusion, while educational efforts on antimicrobial stewardship in SNFs should include all licensed nurses and prescribers, concentrating such
efforts on NPs and allowing them to practice in all areas of a SNF, may provide the greatest impact on antimicrobial stewardship programs in these
facilities. It is also recommended that education of licensed nurses in antimicrobial stewardship begin in the nursing school curriculum.
References
All Facilities Letter (AFL) 10-27: To long-term care facilities and general acute care hospitals: Enhanced standard precautions (ESP) for long-term
care facilities (2010, September 7). California Department of Public Health. Retrieved from
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/facilities/Documents/LNC-AFL-10-27-Attachment-Included.pdf
All Facilities Letter (AFL) 14-36: To general acute care hospitals – SB 1311 Antimicrobial stewardship programs (2014, December 19). California
Department of Public Health. Retrieved from https://archive.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/facilities/Documents/LNC-AFL-14-36.pdf
All Facilities Letter (AFL) 15-30: To skilled nursing facilities – SB 361 Antimicrobial stewardship (2015, December 30). California Department of
Public Health. Retrieved from http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/facilities/Documents/LNC-AFL-15-30.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2016). The core elements of antibiotic stewardship for nursing homes. Webpage: Nursing
homes and assisted living. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/longtermcare/prevention/antibiotic-stewardship.html
Corazzini, K.N., McCollall, E.S., Day, L., Anderson, R.A., Mueller, C., Vogelsmeier, A.,…Haske-Palomine, M. (2015). Differentiating scopes of practice
in nursing homes: Collaborating for care. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 6(1), 43-49.
Crnich, C.J., Jump, R., Trautner, B., Sloane, P.D., & Mody, L. (2015). Optimizing antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes: A narrative review and
recommendations for improvement. Drugs and Aging, 32:699–716. DOI 10.1007/s40266-015-0292-7
Edwards, R., Drumright, L.N., Kiernan, M., & Holmes, A. (2011). Covering more territory to fight resistance: Considering nurses’ role in antimicrobial
stewardship. Journal of Infection Prevention, 12(1), 6-8.
Executive Order 13676 of September 18, 2014 – Combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria. (2014). Federal Register, 184(79), 56931-56935. Retrieved
from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-09-23/pdf/2014-22805.pdf
Fleet, E., Rao, G.G., Patel, G., Cookson, B., Charlett, A., Bowman, C., & Davey, P. (2014). Impact of implementation of a novel antimicrobial
stewardship tool on antibiotic use in nursing homes: a prospective cluster randomized control pilot study. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy,
69(8), 2265–2273. (Advance Access publication 28 April). DOI:10.1093/jac/dku115
Gillespie, E., Rodrigues, A., Wright, L., Williams, N., & Stuart, R.L. (2013). Improving antibiotic stewardship by involving nurses. American Journal of
Infection Control, 41(4), 365-367. DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2012.04.336
Loeb, M., Bentley, D.W., Bradley, S., Crossley, K., Garibaldi, R., Gantz, N.,…Strausbaugh, L. (2001, February). Development of Minimum Criteria for
the Initiation of Antibiotics in Residents of Long-Term–Care Facilities. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 22(2), 120-124. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/10.1086/501875.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true
Loeb, M., Brazil, K., Lohfeld, L., McGeer, A., Simor, A., Stevenson, A., …Walter, S.D. (2005, September 8). Effect of a multifaceted intervention on
number of antimicrobial prescriptions for suspected urinary tract infections in residents of nursing homes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ
Online, 1-5. DOI:10.1136/bmj.38602.586343.55
Masters, K. (2015). The environmental model of nursing: Florence Nightingale. In J.B. Butts & K.L. Rich, Philosophies and theories for advanced
nursing practice, Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, pp. 378-383.
McGeer, A., Campbell, B., Emori, T.G., Hierholzer, W.J., Jackson, M.M., Nicolle, L.E., …Wang, E.E-L. (1991). Definitions of infection for surveillance in
long-term care facilities. American Journal of Infection Control, 19: 1–7.
McGilton, K.S., Bowers, B.J., Heath, H., Shannon, K., Dellefield, M.E., Prentice, D., …Mueller, D.A. (2016, February 1). Recommendations from the
international consortium on professional nursing practice in long-term care homes. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association,
17(2),99–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.11.001
Olans, R.N., Olans, R.D., & DeMaria, A. Jr. (2016). The critical role of the staff nurse in antimicrobial stewardship – Unrecognized, but already there.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 62(1):84–9. DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ697
Olson, B. (2017). Personal communications – April 28-30 emails.
Olson, B., Stone, N.D., & Chinn, R. (2017, May 3). Antimicrobial stewardship in long term care facilities. PowerPoint presentation at the Infectious
Disease Association of California (IDAC) and California Department of Public Health (CDPH) annual conference on Practical Antimicrobial
Stewardship: Implementation and Expansion in Healthcare Facilities at the Doubletree Hotel SFO in Burlingame, California
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th Ed.). NY: Free Press.
Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory. The
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 5(2), 14-23. 3I SSN: 1303-6521
Scales, K., Zimmerman, S., Reed, D., Beeber, A.S., Kistler, C.E., Preisser, J.S., …Sloane, P.D. (2017). Nurse and medical provider perspectives on
antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(), 165–171. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14504
Selanders, L.C. (2010, March). The power of environmental adaptation Florence Nightingale’s original theory for nursing practice. Journal of Holistic
Nursing, 28(1), 81-88 10.1177/0898010109360257
Skilled nursing facilities: Antimicrobial stewardship guidelines act of 2015. California Health and Safety Code Chapter 764 §1275.4 (2015 October
15).
Smith, P.W., Bennett, G., Bradley, S., Drinka, P., Lautenback, E., Marx, J., …Stevenson, K. (2008). SHEA/APIC guideline: Infection prevention and
control in the long-term care facility. American Journal of Infection Control, 36(7), 504-35. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2008.06.001
Stone, N.D., Ashraf, M.S., Calder, J., Crnich, C.J., Crossley, K., Drinka, P.J., …Bradley, S.F. (2012). Surveillance definitions of infections in long-term
care facilities: Revisiting the McGeer criteria. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 33(10), 965-977. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/667743
Stuart, R.L., Wilson, J., Bellaard-Smith, E., Brown, R., Wright, L., Vandergraaf, S., & Gillespie, E.E. (2012). Antibiotic use and misuse in residential
aged care facilities. Internal Medicine Journal, 42(10), 1145-1149. DOI:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02796.x
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group, Director Survey and
Certification Group. (2013, January 25). Memo: Clarification of Interpretive Guidance at F Tag 441-Laundry and Infection Control. Retrieved from
http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/Downloads/Survey-and-Cert-Letter-13-
09.pdf
Zimmerman, S., Sloane, P.D., Bertrand,R., Olsho,L.E.W., Beeber,A., Kistler,C., …Mitchell, C.M. (2014, April). Successfully Reducing Antibiotic
Prescribing in Nursing Homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [0002-8614], 62(5), 907-912. DOI:10.1111/jgs.12784
Contact
[email protected]
Redesigning the Baccalaureate Curriculum to Address Population Health Using Simulation
Ann Marie P. Mauro, PhD, RN, CNL, CNE, FAAN, USA
Debora L. Tracey, DNP, RN, CNE, USA
Maria Torchia Lo Grippo, PhD, RN, USA
Sharon Anderson, DNP, NNP-BC, APNG, USA
Angelica Bravo, MPH, MSW, USA
Claire Byrne, MSN, RN, NE-BC, USA
Bonnie Geissler, MS, RN, USA
Lori Ann Escallier, PhD, RN, CPNP, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Background: Today’s healthcare environment is largely focused on illness treatment in an aging population with increasingly
complex health needs resulting in rising healthcare costs. To promote health and well-being, there must be a shift toward improving
population health outcomes, enhancing the patient care experience, and reducing per capita costs (Institute for Healthcare
Improvement, 2017). To address social determinants and health disparities in populations, nurses require sophisticated knowledge
and skills in cultural competence, health promotion, self-management of chronic illnesses, care coordination, data translation, and
use of technology (Cronenwett et al., 2007; Institute of Medicine, 2010; Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel,
2016).
Literature Review: There is a critical need to redesign baccalaureate curricula to promote better integration and attainment of essential population
health competencies (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2008; Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, & Day, 2010; Cronenwett et al., 2007; Institute
of Medicine, 2000, 2003; Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel, 2016). Simulation based learning provides realistic clinical
experiences that promote competencies and readiness for professional nursing practice (Hayden, Smiley, Alexander, Kardong-Edgren, & Jeffries,
2014). Flipped classroom assignments, online activities, and academic-practice partnerships have been reported to increase student population
health learning (Ezeonwu, Berkowitz, & Vlasses, 2014; Randolph, Evans, & Bacon, 2016; Simpson & Richards, 2015). Research is lacking regarding
effective strategies to promote baccalaureate population health competencies across the curriculum.
Purpose: The study aim was to evaluate use of high-fidelity patient simulation to redesign our baccalaureate nursing curriculum to address
population health through an academic-practice partnership.
Method: Theoretical framework. Using the NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory as a framework (Jeffries, 2016), our academic-practice partner team
developed two patient cases using de-identified patient data that unfolded over the adult health I/II, pediatrics, and community courses: 1) an 82-
year-old African American female with heart failure, diabetes, and 2) a 9-year-old Hispanic Latino boy with chronic asthma. Multiple, innovative
learning strategies comprised of five videotaped simulated patient encounters (VSE), five high-fidelity simulation (HFS) experiences, five
faculty/student guides, flipped classroom activities, and population health resources were developed and implemented in didactic and simulation
settings. Six population health competency based learning outcomes were addressed: delivers culturally competent care, advances self-
management of chronic illnesses, facilitates transitions in care, promotes culture of health, collects meaningful use data to address care gaps, and
utilizes an electronic health record for assessment.
Sample. A pretest/posttest, descriptive, electronic survey design was used to collect data from 585 baccalaureate students and 78 faculty on three
statewide campuses at a large US public university in fall 2016 and spring 2017.
Outcomes measures. Investigator developed evaluation surveys were used by students and faculty to assess student attainment of population
health competencies using a 4-point Likert scale. Qualitative themes were extracted from additional comments. Cultural competence was assessed
using the Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professions-Student Version (IAPCC-SV©) (Campinha-
Bacote, 2007).
Procedure. University institutional review board exemption approval and informed consent were obtained. Didactic simulation activities involved a
student guide pre-assignment (1-2 hrs) with a VSE (10-15 mins), activities (e.g., care plan), and resources. The faculty guide included the student
assignments and resources along with a debriefing activity for a class VSE discussion (1.25-1.5 hours). The HFS experience with manikins or
standardized patients occurred approximately one week later, and included: student guide pre-assignment (1-2 hrs) activities (e.g., online
modules), and resources; and dedicated simulation team and clinical faculty guides for the pre-briefing (1 hour), simulation (2 hours), and
debriefing (1 hour) activities. Students and faculty were allotted instructional time to complete the electronic surveys.
Results: Sample. There was a 100% student (n = 585) and 87% faculty (n = 68) response rate. Students were ethnically diverse (48%), predominantly
female (81%), and mostly between 20-25 years-old (61% fall 2016, 68% spring 2017). Faculty were primarily white (59%), Asian (13%), Black/African
American (12%), female (96%), and over age 40 (55%).
Population health competencies. Students overwhelmingly agreed/strongly agreed (90% to 100%) that they met the population health
competencies for all VSE and HFS activities across all courses. Faculty also agreed/strongly agreed (89% to 100%) that student groups met four to
six population health competencies for the VSE and HFS activities across all courses, with slightly less agreement/strong agreement (75% to 80%)
that students improved outcomes through culturally competent care and facilitating connections to community resources for the patient in the
unfolding pediatrics case. No difference in population health competencies was noted between VSE and HFS activity learning outcomes across
courses.
Cultural competence. Reliabilities for the IAPCC-SV© showed excellent to good internal consistency (.93 overall, subscales .67 to .87). Students’
cultural competence increased in both fall 2016 [mean diff (SD) = 1.25 (7.62), t (df) = 2.996 (335), p = .003], and spring 2017 [mean diff (SD) = 1.64
(8.11), t (df) = 4.577 (510), p = .000]. ANOVA results showed no differences in outcomes based on ethnicity, race, gender, or course enrollment.
Student and faculty qualitative feedback. Four themes consistent with quantitative findings were revealed: student population health learning
outcomes achievement, active/engaging collaborative learning experiences, skills gained, and faculty facilitator characteristics.
Discussion: Didactic VSE discussions and HFS experiences with flipped classroom pre-assignments and structured debriefing were equally effective
in advancing student population health competencies. Rigorous, systematic study design enabled successful, large scale integration of population
health competencies across the curriculum on all campuses. Benefits to students and faculty included: new opportunities to engage in culturally
competent care in multiple settings across the continuum, collection of electronic health information to avoid care gaps, electronic health record
documentation, increased understanding of big data, and a shift toward a population health focus. The clinical partner stated the realistic clinical
experiences were enriched through our academic-clinical partnership and provided support to new nurses for a smoother transition to practice.
Rapid cycle quality improvements were made to improve communication with students and faculty, and to address internal and external challenges
(e.g., survey software and new email systems glitches).
Conclusions: Students and faculty perceived simulation based learning strategies to be effective in advancing baccalaureate students’ knowledge
and skills to address population health. A strong project design and widespread support led to successful student outcomes. Enhanced academic-
practice partnerships aimed at ongoing, collaborative efforts to integrate population health competencies into baccalaureate curricula and future
research on actual patient outcomes are needed.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Washington, DC:
Author.
Campinha-Bacote, J. (2007). Inventory for assessing the process of cultural competence among healthcare professions – student version (IAPCC-
SV©). Copyrighted instrument. Retrieved from http://transculturalcare.net/iapcc-sv/
Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell, P., Sullivan, D. T., & Warren, J. (2007). Quality and safety education for
nurses. Nursing Outlook, 55(3),122-131. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006
Ezeonwu, M., Berkowitz, B., & Vlasses, F. R. (2014). Using an academic-community partnership model and blended learning to advance community
health nursing pedagogy. Public Health Nursing, 31(3), 272-280. doi:10.1111/phn.12060
Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P. R. (2014). The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A longitudinal,
randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), S1-S64.
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2017). The triple aim initiative: Better care for individuals, better health for populations, and lower per
capita costs [Web log post]. Retrieved from
http://www.ihi.org/communities/blogs/_layouts/15/ihi/community/blog/itemview.aspx?List=81ca4a47-4ccd-4e9e-89d9-14d88ec59e8d&ID=50
Institute of Medicine. (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine. (2003). Health professions education: A bridge to quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine. (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update.
Washington, DC: Author.
Jeffries, P. R. (Ed.). (2016). The NLN Jeffries simulation theory. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Randolph, S., Evans, C., & Bacon, C. T. (2016). Preparing BSN students for population-focused nursing care. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(2),
115-117. doi:10.5480/13-1122
Simpson, V., & Richards, E. (2015). Flipping the classroom to teach population health: Increasing the relevance. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(3),
162-167. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2014.12.001
Contact
[email protected]
Impact of Peer-Assisted Learning With Standardized Patients in an Undergraduate Nursing Course
Dorie Lynn Weaver, MSN, FNP-BC, USA
Tracy P. George, DNP, RN, APRN-BC, CNE, USA
Sarah H. Kershner, PhD, CHES, USA
Abstract
The purpose of this research project was to investigate peer-assisted learning (PAL) with two levels of pre-licensure nursing students. Through PAL,
students at different levels are actively involved in the teaching/learning process (Williams & Reddy, 2016). This collaborative educational strategy
provides positive benefits for both the student learners and student teachers. Because nurses provide patient education and precept nurses and
nursing students, teaching is an integral part of their professional role. Therefore, educational programs should encouraged this innovative
teaching strategy (Irvine, Williams, & McKenna, 2017).
A subset of PAL is near-peer teaching, in which students who act as teachers have at least one additional year of experience than learners.
According to McKenna and Williams (2017), near-peer learning allowed student learners to identify with their peer teachers and better understand
the course expectations, alleviated students’ anxiety about clinical rotations, and helped them learn to manage difficult situations. Studies similar
to this have been conducted with medical students. The benefits to the student learners included receiving helpful feedback on clinical skills and
having a supportive learning environment. The advantages for the student teachers included developing their teaching skills and refining their own
knowledge and clinical competence (Khaw & Raw, 2016; deMenezes & Premnath, 2016). Students were also introduced to role models through the
near-peer teaching process, and the student teachers voiced a greater interest in being involved with medical education after the experience
(Nelson et al., 2013). Brauer, Axelson, Emrich, Rowat, and Stafford (2014) found that a near-peer shadowing program alleviated students’ anxiety
about the transition from the classroom setting to clinical rotations. In addition to improving clinical skills, near-peer teaching assisted the learners
to develop (effective) communication skills (Aba Alkhail, 2015). In near-peer education with junior medical residents and third-year medical
students, the junior residents felt that the experience helped them to become more aware of their own limitations, encouraged collaboration, and
helped to stress the importance of using a systematic approach when evaluating sick patients (Antonelou, Krishnamoorthy, Walker, & Murch,
2014).
In undergraduate nursing programs, PAL has been incorporated through the use of standardized patients. By utilizing standardized patient
simulation experiences, students are exposed to real-life scenarios within the confines of a nonthreatening environment. They are also a realistic
way to evaluate the health assessment skills of nursing students (Sarmasoglu, Dinç, & Elçin, 2016). In addition, the debriefing process that occurs
between the student teacher and student learner is an invaluable tool to provide feedback to the student learners. Sideras et al. (2013) also found
that students’ communication skills were enhanced through the use of standardized patients. Students provided positive feedback about
standardized patient experiences in which higher-level nursing students served the role of patients for first-year nursing students (Owen & Ward-
Smith, 2014; Bryant 2017).
In this study, PAL was used among the first semester junior and second semester junior undergraduate nursing students in a rural, bachelor of
science in nursing program. Eight second- semester junior students who were enrolled in the Adult Health I course were recruited to be
standardized patients and student teachers for the 62 first semester junior Health Assessment students, who were in in the role of student
learners. The first semester students randomly received one of six focused health assessment scenarios, and the second semester junior students
provided feedback to students on their assessment skills after the conclusion of each standardized patient simulation. The research study was
approved by the institution’s Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained prior to the simulation experience. The students
completed an anonymous, online survey immediately following the standardized patient experience and then six weeks later. The survey was
adapted from the instrument utilized in a similar, prior study and used with permission from the authors (Owen & Ward-Smith, 2014).
The participants in this study consisted of first semester junior (N=62) and second semester junior (N=8) undergraduate nursing students. Of the 70
prelicensure students who participated in the simulation experience, 100% completed the post-test survey (PT1) immediately following the
experience, and 56 students (80%) completed the post-test survey administered six weeks later (PT2). Students’ opinions and perceptions of the
simulation experience were measured on a Likert scale, with 1 being strongly agree and 5 being strongly disagree. The total median score for the
ten perception questions was 2.3 at immediate post-test and 2.2 at six-weeks after the simulation experience, corresponding to a consistent level
of agreement from immediate post-test to the six-week post-test. Participants were asked to provide qualitative feedback about their experience
in both the immediate post-test and the six-week post-test after the simulation experience. General themes in responses included that working
with nursing students at a different level in the program was helpful. Some participants reported feeling “intimidated” and “nervous” but felt that
it was a helpful experience. Participants reported the “most useful” aspect of the experience was the feedback provided to by the second semester
students. The predominate theme in responses regarding the “least useful” aspect of the experience was the time allowed for the scenario (8
minutes) and the limitation of only one standardized patient experience per semester. Many participants recommended this experience to all
nursing students.
Our study has demonstrated benefits of PAL for student teachers and student learners alike. Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is a growing area of
research in nursing education. Future PAL studies could research the experiences of students with at least one year between their program levels
and could be conducted over a longer time frame. In addition, it may be helpful to have students participate in multiple standardized patient
scenarios during a semester. In conclusion, intraprofessional simulation is an innovative teaching strategy which offers beneficial learning
opportunities for all students involved.
References
Aba Alkhail, B. (2015). Near-peer-assisted learning (NPAL) in undergraduate medical studentsand their perception of having medical interns as their
near peer teacher. MedicalTeacher, 37(sup1), S33-S39.
Antonelou, M., Krishnamoorthy, S., Walker, G., & Murch, N. (2014). Near‐peer facilitation: Awin–win simulation. Medical Education, 48(5), 544-545.
Brauer, D. G., Axelson, R., Emrich, J., Rowat, J., & Stafford, H. A. (2014). Enhanced clinical preparation using near-peer shadowing. Medical
Education, 48(11), 1116.doi:10.1111/medu.12589
Bryant, S. G. (2017). Keeping it in the program: Second year nursing students as stand-in patients for first year head-to-toe assessment check-offs.
Nurse Educator, 42(2), 60-61.
de Menezes, S., & Premnath, D. (2016). Near-peer education: A novel teaching program. International Journal Of Medical Education, 7,160-167.
doi:10.5116/ijme.5738.3c28
Irvine, S., Williams, B., & McKenna, L. (2016). How are we assessing near-peer teaching inundergraduate health professional education? A
systematic review. Nurse EducationToday, 50, 42-50.
Khaw, C., & Raw, L. (2016). The outcomes and acceptability of near-peer teaching among medical students in clinical skills. International Journal Of
Medical Education, 7,188-194. doi:10.5116/ijme.5749.7b8b
McKenna, L., & Williams, B. (2017). The hidden curriculum in near-peer learning: Anexploratory qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 5077-81.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.010
Nelson, A. J., Nelson, S. V., Linn, A. J., Raw, L. E., Kildea, H. B., & Tonkin, A. L. (2013).Tomorrow's educators€‰…€‰today? Implementing near-peer
teaching for medical students.Medical Teacher, 35(2), 156-159. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.737961
Owen, A. M., & Ward-Smith, P. (2014). Collaborative learning in nursing simulation: Near-peer teaching using standardized patients. Journal of
Sarmasoglu, S., Dinç, L., & Elçin, M. (2016). Using standardized patients in nursing education: Effects on students' psychomotor skill development.
Nurse Educator, 41(2), E1-E5.doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000188
Sideras, S., McKenzie, G., Noone, J., Markle, D., Frazier, M., & Sullivan, M. (2013). Making simulation come alive: Standardized patients in
undergraduate nursing education.Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(6), 421-425.
Williams, B., & Reddy, P. (2016). Does peer-assisted learning improve academic performance?A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 4223-29.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.024
Contact
[email protected]
Utilizing Collaborative Testing to Engage Nursing Students, Improve Academic Achievement, and Decrease
Attrition
Theresa H. Jackson, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: Research indicates that approximately 20% to 42% of students leave nursing programs after the first year. To address this issue, it has
been recommended that nurse educators utilize new approaches to engage students in the classroom. However, studies show nursing lacks
evidence that one method of teaching is more effective than another or that there is a relationship between learning outcomes and teaching
strategies. Purpose: The purpose of this research was to determine if students who participate in a collaborative teaching process in the classroom
have decreased attrition and increased levels of academic achievement and engagement than do students who do not participate in a collaborative
teaching process. Theoretical Framework: The educational theory used to guide this investigation was Bandura’s social cognitive theory, which
combines both behavioral and cognitive orientations. Method: A quasi-experimental, after-only, nonequivalent control group design was used. The
sample size consisted of 153 students. Students in both the control and experimental groups were enrolled in either a fundamental or a behavioral-
health nursing course. Health Education Systems Incorporated–Specialty Exams were utilized to measure academic achievement. A Survey of
Student Engagement was used to measure student engagement. Results: No statistical significance was found for any of the three research
questions. Odds ratios indicated traditional students in the experimental group were five times more likely to pass the fundamentals Health
Education Systems Incorporated–Specialty Exam (HESI-SE) than traditional students in the control group. Non-traditional students in either the
control or experimental groups were thirteen times more likely to pass the HESI-SE with a score of 850 or higher. Seven students passed the
fundamentals nursing course because of points obtained during the collaborative testing process. The literature indicates nursing students, who
pass nursing courses because of points awarded in the collaborative testing process, complete the nursing program and pass the National Council
Licensure Examination (NCLEX)-RN on their first attempt. Findings indicated, when controlling for the seven students that passed the fundamentals
nursing course because of the collaborative testing process, the passage rate of traditional age students increased by10% and non-traditional
students by 24%. The Survey of Student Engagement results remained flat. Conclusions: Further research, using larger sample sizes, is needed to
determine the effect of collaborative testing and its impact on student engagement in both the traditional and non-traditional nursing students. A
tool that measures student engagement specific to the classroom also needs to be developed. A study is being developed to determine the
outcome of the seven students that passed the fundamentals course because of the use of the collaborative testing process.
References
Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL
methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), 5-20.
Blau, G. & Snell, C. (2013). Understanding undergraduate professional development engagement and its impact. College Student Journal 47(4), 689-
702
Centrella-Nigro, A. (2012). Collaborative testing as posttest review. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(5), 340-1.
Eastridge, J. (2014). Use of collaborative testing to promote nursing student success. Nurse Educator, 39(1), 4-5.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E. Lang, A, & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and
biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
Fraher, E., Belsky, D., Carpenter, J., & Gaul, K. (2008). A study of associate degree nursing program success: Evidence from the 2002 cohort. (A final
report compiled by The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services.Research University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Retrieved from
http://www.shepscenter.unc.edu/hp/publications/NCCCS_ADN_Report.pdf
Fraher, E., Belsky, D., Gaul, K., & Carpenter, J. (2010). Factors affecting attrition from associate degree nursing programs in North Carolina. Cahiers
de Sociologie et de Démographie Médicales, 50, 213-246
Hadenfeldt, C. (2012). Effects of an intervention plan on nursing student success. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(2), 89-94.
Jeffreys, M. (2012). Nursing student retention: Understanding the process and making a difference (2nded.). New York, New York: Springer
Publishing Company.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (2007). The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology
Review, 19, 15-29. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8
Kuh, G. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2).
National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). (2017). 2017 NCLEX pass rates. Retrieved from https://www.ncsbn.org/4128.htm
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). [2013]. About NSSE: What is student engagement. Retrieved from
http://nsse.iub.edu/html/about.cfm
Pitt, V., Powis, D., Levett-Jones, T., Hunter, S. (2012). Factors influencing nursing students’ academic and clinical performance and attrition: An
integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 32 (8), 903- 913.
Peck, S. D., Stehle Werner, J. L., & Raleigh, D. M. (2013). Improved class preparation and learning through immediate feedback in group testing for
undergraduate nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(6), 400-404. doi:10.5480/11-507
Peterson-Graziose, V., Bryer, J., Nikolaidou, M. (2013). Self-esteem and self-efficacy as predictors of attrition in associate degree nursing students.
Journal of Nursing Education 52(6), 351-354.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20130520-0
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Sandahl, S. (2009). Collaborative testing as a learning strategy in nursing education: a review of the literature. Nursing Education Perspectives,
30(3), 171-175.
Sweet, M. & Svinicki, M. (2007). Why a special issue on collaborative learning in postsecondary and professional settings? Educational Psychology
Review, 19(1), 13-14. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9037-9
U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). Table 8. Occupations with the largest projected number of job openings due to
growth and replacement needs, 2012 and projected 2022. Economic News Release. Retrieved from http://data.bls.gov/cgi-
bin/print.pl/news.release/ecopro.t08.htm
Zweighaft, E. (2013). Impact of HESI specialty exams: The ninth HESI exit exam validity study. Journal of Professional Nursing 29(25), S10-S16.
Contact
[email protected]
Nursing Faculty Caring Behaviors: Perceptions of Students and Faculty
Jeannie Scruggs Garber, DNP, USA
Denise Foti, DNP, USA
Rhoda R. Murray, PhD, MSN, FNP-C, BSN, RN, USA
Deidra S. Pennington, MSN, USA
Cynthia Marcum, DNP, USA
Sonia Vishneski, DNP, USA
Abstract
A Health Sciences College in Southwest Virginia conducts exit surveys for all graduating students. The spring 2015 survey revealed
many positive results and comments; however, there were some concerning results regarding faculty caring behaviors from nursing
program graduates. This descriptive, exploratory, comparative study titled Nursing Faculty Caring Behaviors: Perceptions of Students
and Faculty resulted in findings that offer further insight into student and faculty perceptions of caring behaviors. The study also
identified specific behaviors that demonstrate the presence or absence of faculty caring. Participation was invited from full time,
part-time, and adjunct nursing faculty and students enrolled in the traditional BSN, accelerated BSN, RN-BSN, and graduate nursing
programs. The review of the literature on the phenomena of caring faculty behaviors revealed that there have been many studies
conducted in the past 20 years on the topic of student perceptions of faculty caring. However, very few studies that evaluate faculty
self-assessment of their caring behaviors have been published. Wade and Kasper's (2006) Nursing Students’ Perception of Instructor
Caring (NSPIC) semantic differential scale instrument was used to measure faculty caring behaviors. Dr. Jean Watson, world
renowned nursing theorist, served as a consultant to this research team. Study results revealed when comparing nursing faculty self-
perception to nursing faculty perceptions of other nursing faculty (N=20), there were statistically significant differences in 19/30
questions. The phenomenon identified as illusory superiority cognitive bias was present and is defined as when individuals
overestimate their own qualities and abilities relative to others. According to social sciences research, this is a common and
expected finding and no interventions are recommended. Independent T-test comparison between nursing faculty perception of
other nursing faculty (N=20) and student perceptions of nursing faculty (N=28) 27/30 items revealed 3 significant findings: both
entities care about each student as a person, p=.015, inappropriately disclose personal information about students to others, p=.03
and make students nervous in the clinical setting p=.014. Results were presented at an annual faculty meeting. The intervention to
be implemented is first class meeting and/or course announcement talking points that are focused on identified caring behaviors.
Further study is encouraged with a broader population and with more innovative interventions. A collaborative study with multiple
schools is being considered. The findings from this study will allow further review of this tool and will provide additional insight into
faculty caring behaviors and practices that support student success. This study’s’ results offer new information that is not currently
in the literature.
References
Labrague, L., McEnroe-Petitte, D., Papathanasiou, I., Edit, O., & Arulappan, J. (2015). Impact of instructors’ caring on students’ perceptions of their
own caring behaviors. Nursing Scholarship, 47, 338-346.
Mikkonen, K., Kynga, H., & Kaariainen, M. (2015). Nursing students’ experiences of the empathy of their teachers: A qualitative study. Advances in
Health Sciences Education, 20, 669-682. doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9554-0
Palmehl, T., Zamanazdeh, V., & Shohani, M. (2015). Nursing students’ perception of instructors’ caring behaviors. Tabriz University of Medical
Sciences Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(1), 55-62. doi:10.5681/jcs.2015.006
Wade G., & Kasper, N. (2006). Nursing students’ perceptions of instructor caring: An instrument based on Watson’s theory of transpersonal caring.
Watson, J. (2002). Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health science. New York, NY: Springer.
Contact
[email protected]
Improved Student Outcomes and Faculty Workload Allocations Through Gateway Course Redesign
Kimberly D. Allen, DNP, RN, USA
Mary DiBartolo, PhD, RN-BC, CNE, USA
Abstract
Many students do not see a direct relationship of topics covered in a foundational course to clinical nursing practice. As novice
learners, the value of mastering foundational concepts is not always recognized. Often, nursing students in their first semester of
required nursing courses are more interested in 'hands-on' learning than mastering fundatmental concepts. Undesirable subsequent
outcomes include minimal student engagement in course content and student difficulty in the application of previously learned
content in subsequent courses. As the nursing faculty shortage is worsening, workload of nursing faculty must be allocated to areas
requiring skills and expertise of faculty. The foundational course in one institution required overload of faculty in a face-to-face
work-intensive, non-uniform delivery of course content. To address the challenges of quality student learning, as well as, workload
challenges escalated from the nursing faculty shortage for this program, faculty determined a course redesign should be explored.
The Replacement Model was the redesign approach chosen for this gateway course in an undergraduate baccalaureate program.
The Replacement Model reduces the number of face-to-face class meetings with online and interactive learning activities and makes
significant changes in remaining face-to-face class meetings. Elements incorporated into the Replacement Model for redesign
included active learning, computer-based learning resources, mastery learning in module format, and alternative staffing with
undergraduate learning assistants (senior nursing students) who participated in hands-on class activities, scoring of student
assignments, and leading supplemental instruction sessions. With greater flexibility in attending to course activities and
appropriately matching student learning outcomes with various learning strategies, course faculty anticipated the course to be
delivered more efficiently and students would be more actively engaged in their learning.
After IRB approval was attained, a pilot study was conducted. Two sections of 24 students (48 in total) received course content utilizing traditional
face-to-face class meetings three times per week and were evaluated with three exams and one paper. Fifty students in one redesigned section
received course content utilizing a hybrid format. This section met face-to-face a total of 11 times throughout the semester. Content modules were
developed through a course management system and enhanced through video-capture technology for delivery of faculty–developed supplemental
highlights of content, study guides, discussions, journals, exercises, Wiki tools for collaborative work, case studies, and quizzes. The three exams in
each course were identical. The same faculty taught in all three sections.
Evaluation of the pilot study was completed in several ways. Course evaluations helped capture subjective student comments while interviews with
undergraduate learning assistants helped identify strengths of alternative staffing for specific course activities. All exam and final course grades for
the traditional and hybrid sections were compared at the conclusion of the semester using t-tests for equality of means. There was no statistical
difference found. Student testing of American Psychological Association (APA) citation and dosage calculation content were measured at the end of
the pilot semester and at the end of the semester prior to student graduation. This was done in an effort to evaluate if instructional delivery format
impacted student retainment of curricular content more specific to this foundational course. Longitudinal data was grouped into original hybrid
versus face-to-face sections. T-test for equality of means indicated there was no statistical difference in longitudinal retainment of these course
contexts.
In summary, there were no significant differences in student attainment of course objectives. The use of undergraduate learning assistants as a
means for alternative staffing proved effective and allowed senior students an opportunity to explore their interests in a career in academia.
Students were actively engaged in their learning and use of hybrid delivery of content for a foundational 'gateway' nursing course was determined
to be successful. Finally, use of this redesign model resulted in a 16.5% reduction in staffing costs that allowed for greater faculty workload to be
utilized in applied settings.
Faculty evaluation of this course redesign pilot lead to the addition of three scheduled face-to-face class meetings for subsequent course offerings
(care planning application and communication scenarios) and the elimination of two discussion questions. Supplemental instruction sessions were
changed to Friday afternoons when students generally do not have scheduled classes. Direct changes driven from student feedback includes the
development of an orientation module and resourse manual for future undergraduate learning assistants and concrete assignment of point
percentages for all student learning activities rather then use of satisfactory/unsatisfactory ratings.
This course redesign has been fully implemented and there are now two hybrid sections for each course offering.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), (2017). Nursing faculty shortage fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-
relations/FacultyShortageFS.pdf.
Nomme, K. & Birol, G. (2014). Course redesign: An evidence-based approach. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and
Learning,(5)1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2014.1.2
Robeznieks, A. (2015). Looming nursing shortage fueled by faculty shortfall. Retrieved From
http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20150124/MAGAZINE/301249971
The National Center for Academic Transformation (NCAT). (n.d.). How to redesign a college course using NCATs methodology. Retrieved from
http://www.thencat.org/Guides/AllDisciplines/ADChapterI.html.
Twigg, C.A. (n.d.). An overview of course redesign. Retrieved from
http://thencat.org/Articles/An%20Overview%20of%20Course%20Redesign.pdf.
Contact
[email protected]
The Agile Process: A Multidiscipline Team Method of Course Development
Marylee Rollins Bressie, DNP, RN, USA
Abstract
A competency based online program was looking for a more efficient method of course development. Course development was
typically done with one subject matter expert and an instructional designer in isolation. This often resulted in redundancy of some
content while other competencies were under or unrepresented in a process that was laborious and at times, tedious. The Agile
Process was a method of software development that allows teams to deal with uncertainty in a process of high quality products by
breaking tasks into small incremental pieces as opposed to delivering the entire project at one time. Adopting the Agile Process
helped develop a team of subject matter experts, instructional designers, instructional architects, media specialists, editors, and
various leadership representatives, and an overall project manager to revise and develop competency based courses for online
programs. The story of the decision to adopt the process that no one was familar with required a leap of faith and as the team
worked together, the process was amended and modified to improve quality, speed, and results. As selected courses were
developed or revised, the process changes allowed the team to work smarter and not harder. The process involved interviewing,
brainstorming, literature review for the best evidence, and frequent meetings of various groups to break up the work into realistic
pieces in order to ensure the devvelopment of high quality competency based offerings. Everyone on the team knew whre each
course was in the development process and issues were discussed in daily meetings as needed. While there were occassional
disagreements, misunderstandings, and missteps, the team was able to determine when to maintain a process and when to change
it. Following course release monitoring by the team the course in real time helped to identfy and fix issues for faculty and learners.
These just in time changes helped improve learner and faculty satisfaction with the course. In reviewing end of course evaluations by
faculty and learners, the process improved the speed of revision as well as the quality of the online competency based courses.
References
Burnette, D. M. (2016). The renewal of competency-based education: A review of the literature. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education. 64 (2)
pp.84 - 93. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2016.1177704.
Fontana, R.M., Fontana, I.M., daRosa Garbuio, P.A., Rinehr, I.M., & Malucelli, A. (2014). Processes versus people: How should agile software
development maturity be defined? The Journal of Systems and Software 97 pp.140 -155. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.030
Fontana, R.M., Meyer, V., Reinehr, S. & Malucelli, A. (2014). Progressive outcomes: A framework for maturing in agile software development. The
Journal of Systems and Software.102 pp.88 -108.Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.12.032
Melnyk, B.M., Gallagher-Ford, L., Long, L.E., Fineout-Overholt, E. (2014). The establishment of evidence-based practice competencies for practicing
registered nurses and advanced practice nurses in real-world clinical settings: Proficiencies to improve helathcare quality, reliability, patient
outcomes, and costs. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 11 (1) pp.5 -15. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12021
Oermann, M.H., &Gaberson, K.B. (2017). Evaluation and testing in nursing education (5th ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Contact
[email protected]
Creating Student Engagement in Psychiatric Nursing Education for the Next Generation
Jennifer Graber, EdD, MSN, BSN, APRN, CS, BC, USA
Abstract
The purpose of this presentation is to discuss student learning styles and student outcomes in a psychiatric mental health nursing
course as measured by overall grade point average (GPA), class grade, and student satisfaction survey results. The students were
given a peer reviewed questionnaire at the end of the course to elicit information regarding learning styles, course satisfaction, and
demographic data. This is important information for educators to determine how to best engage the next generation of students in
the learning environment.
Albert Bandura developed the Social Learning Theory, which suggests that people learn from one another (Tomey & Alligood, 2002). Today the
Social Learning Theory is referred to as the Social Cognitive Theory. Social Cognitive Theory is based on observational learning, self-evaluation and
self-efficacy, (Bandura, 1986, Tomey & Alligood, 2002; Clark, 2008). Bandura suggests that the person’s nature explains learning where behavior,
personal factors and environmental factors all play a key role (Bandura, 1986). Social Cognitive Theory has been shown to have positive educational
benefits in the areas of developing attitudes, beliefs, and performance skills (Bandura, 1969). Several advantages of Social Cognitive Theory have
been noted, which include the focus on social aspects of learning and interaction of the environment and learner (Callery, 1990).
It is important for nurse educators to develop learning environments that promote self-beliefs, or self-efficacy, in nursing students (Clark, 2008).
Self-efficacy is important in vicarious learning experiences, especially in collaborative, or group, learning experiences versus distance education
learning experiences. Self-efficacy is also a major proponent in Social Cognitive Theory. Self-efficacy is the belief in the “capabilities to exercise
control over [the] level of functioning and environmental demands” (Bandura, Barbarenelli, Caprara, & Pastorelli, 1996, p. 1206). Bandura (1997)
also defined efficacy as “beliefs in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the course action required to produce given attainments” (p. 3).
Self-efficacy shapes a person during childhood and an increased belief in efficacy leads to an increased choice in life as well as an increase in
educational preparation and persistence. Bandura et al. (1996) surveyed 279 children ages 11-14, parents and teachers on social, academic and
self-regulatory behaviors and found that the child’s overall well-being and academic efficacy were linked together. Hodges (2008) states that “self-
efficacy beliefs are context-specific and must be considered carefully as situations change.
The concepts of the Adult Learning Theory include the need to know, learner’s self-concept, role of the learners’ experiences, readiness to learn,
orientation to learning, and student motivation (Knowles, 2011; Lehmann & Chamberlin, 2009). It is interesting to note that the Adult Learning
Theory has viable applications to the Millennial student, since an adult is someone considered to be older than eighteen.
Members of Generation X are comprised of those generally born between the years 1960 and 1980 (Lohrmann, 2011; Niles, 2011; Weston, 2010).
Generation X members tend to be independent, energetic, assertive, resourceful, and less loyal (Lavoie-Tremblay et al., 2010; Niles; 2011; Weston,
2006). Generation X grew up mostly in unstable family environments where parents were not around, but technology was abundant with
microwaves, computers, and video games (Niles, 2011; Weston, 2010).
Millennials have a new set of characteristics different from previous generations due to varying life events as well as growing up in difficult and
changing times. This generation is more racially and ethnically diverse as well as less religious than previous generations (Weston, 2010).
Millennials believe that their generation is special and unique, which is how their parents brought them up. There are seven main characteristics of
the Millennial generation. Howe and Strauss (2000) state that Millennials are special, sheltered, confident, conventional, team-oriented, achieving,
and pressured. This generation relies on technology as a way to make life easier while remaining connected with friends and family (Bennett,
Maton, & Kervin, 2008; Bonaduce & Quigley, 2010; Pardue & Morgan, 2008). Technology immersion of the Millennials may be the most important
aspect for an educator to consider when trying to meet the educational needs of this generation (Bennett et al., 2008).
According to Silverman (2006), there are three main types of learning style modalities: auditory-sequential, visual-spatial, and tactile-kinesthetic.
Auditory-sequential learners use a step-wise process and learn from hearing material and being able to discuss the subject matter (2006). Visual-
spatial learning takes place “all at once” and relies on images (2006, p. 71). The learning modality where the student uses touch and hands on
demonstration is known as tactile-kinesthetic learning (2006). Learning styles, specifically styles where an individual can assimilate information
learned, are important predictors of performance (Manochehri & Young, 2006).
It is important for nurse educators to take into account all the different aspects and individuality each student brings to the classroom. Educators
should incorporate a variety of learning activities to keep all students engaged in the learning environment (Lohrmann, 2011; Tanner 2006). The
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009) states that it is important for students to learn the essential skills, such as critical thinking, problem
solving, communication, and collaboration, in order to succeed in the world. Educators can teach these essential skills through a variety of means.
“Learning is mainly an active and self-regulatory effort in the learning environment” which fits into educating Millennials (Korhonen, 2004, p. 109).
Educators must take into account the different and unique life experiences of all students in order to teach them effectively. Instructors must
understand the students they are teaching and adjust andragogies accordingly.
There is research that suggests Millennials must be taught differently from previous generations (Bennett et al., 2008; McDermott, 2011;
McWilliam, 2008; Reilly, 2012). This is a generation that likes a structured learning environment that is objective driven (Wilson & Gerber, 2008).
Students also only want to be taught what they need to know in an environment that is conducive to their learning style (Skiba, 2005). There has
been noted to be a movement from the “sage on the stage” to the “guide on the side” by instructors teaching this generation of students (Barnes
et al., 2007; Bonaduce & Quigley, 2010; McWilliam, 2008; Skiba, 2005). The “old way” of didactic teaching with an instructor delivering a power
point presentation in front of the classroom is no longer beneficial to student education (Bennett et al., 2008). Instructors are discovering that
lectures are no more than 15 to 20 minutes in duration before the students are broken up into small groups for discussion and teamwork building
exercises (Carlson, 2005). Some of these techniques can be carried over into the clinical setting with the use of simulation and standardized
patients. McWilliam (2008) even goes on to state that the instructor becomes the “meddler in the middle” for the Millennial generation. The
meddler in the middle notion involves the student and instructor as co-creators of the learning environment, where both parties share input and
feedback.
An independent samples t-test was employed to identify performance differences between students in face-to-face interaction and distance
education sections. A t-test was also performed to assess differences in course grades and GPAs of students who were in their preferred setting
and those who were not. Type I errors were controlled for by using SPSS software.
A quantitative analysis regarding satisfaction was performed with a series of questions on a researcher-developed survey. For categorical responses
on the questionnaire, such as age, gender, ethnicity, learning styles, and satisfaction counts and percentages are presented. All tests were
conducted at a significance level of 0.05.
There were 110 participants who were eligible and agreed to participate in the study. There were 63 participants in the distance education group
and 47 participants in the face-to-face interaction group. The majority of participants were 18 to 29 years of age (59.1%, n=65), female (84.5%,
n=93), and Caucasian (79.1%, n=87). The age distribution of the remainder of the participants was as follows; 23.6% (n=126) categorized
themselves as between the ages of 30 to 39, 17.3% (n=19) categorized themselves as between the ages of 40-59. The majority of the participants,
42.7%, (n=47) categorized themselves as visual and auditory learners, 32.7% (n=36) categorized themselves as tactile and visual learners, 24.5%
(n=27) categorized themselves as other style learners.
Nurse educators know that engaging the learner is imperative to preparing students who will be critical thinkers. Research on the practice of active
learning strategies suggests that when students are actively involved in thinking about what they do there are improved student outcomes
(Braxton, Milem, & Sullivan, 2000). The use of active learning strategies in learning activities has demonstrated positive effects on problem solving,
critical thinking, and persistence in college students (Braxton et al., 2000; Kuh, Kinzie, Buckley, Bridges, & Hayek, 2007). One way to develop
effective teaching strategies is to better understand the background as well as current needs of nursing students. Student engagement of this new
generation of students will help improve student outcomes.
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child
Development, 67, 1206-1222.
Barnes, K., Marateo, R.C., & Pixy Ferris, S. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate, 3(4). Retrieved from
http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view+article&id+382
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2007). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Education Technology,
39(5), 775-786.
Bonduce, J., & Quigley, B. (2011). Florence’s candle: educating the millennial nursing student. Nursing Forum, 46(3), 157-159.
Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the
college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569-590.
Callery, P. (1990). Moral learning in nursing education: A discussion of the usefulness of cognitive-developmental and social learning theories.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15, 324-328.
Cheng, C. Liou, S., Hsu, T., Pan, M., Lie, H., Change, C. (2014). Preparing nursing students to be competent for future professional practice: Applying
the team-based learning-teaching strategy. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30(4), 347-356.
Hodges, C.B. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: A review of the literature and directions for research.
Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3-4), 7-25.
Jones, G.H. (2017). Mental health student nurses’ satisfaction with problem-based learning: A qualitative study. Journal of Mental Health Training,
Education & Practice, 12(2), 77-89.
Knowles, M.S., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2011). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource
Development. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Korhonen, V. (2004). Contextual orientation patterns as describing adults’ personal approach to learning in a web-based learning environment.
Studies in Continuing Education, 26(1), 99-116.
Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. (2007). Piecing together the student
success puzzle: Research, propositions and recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lehmann, K., & Chamberlin, L. (2009). Making the move to Elearning: Putting your course online. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Education.
Lohrmann, D.K. (2011). Thinking of a change: health education for the 2020 generation. American Journal of Health Education, 42. Retrieved from
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/
Manochehri, N., & Young, L.I. (2006). The impact of student learning styles with web-based learning or instructor-based learning on student
knowledge and satisfaction. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 73(3), 313-316.
McDermott, R.J. (2011). Health education circa 2035 – A commentary. American Journal of Health Education, 42(1), 2-3.
McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovations in education and teaching International, 45 (3), 263-269.
Niles, P. (2011). Meeting the needs of the 21st century student. Community & Junior College Libraries, 17(2), 47-51.
Pardue, K.T., & Morgan, P. (2008). Millenials considered: A new generation, new approaches, and implications for nursing education. Nurse
Popkess, A.M., & McDaniel, A. (2011). Are nursing students engaged in learning? A secondary analysis of data from the national survey of student
engagement. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 89-94.
Reilly, P. (2012). Understanding and teaching generation Y. English Teaching Forum, 1, 2-11.
Skiba, D.J. (2005). The Millennials: Have they arrived at your school of nursing? Nursing Education Perspectives, 25(6), 370-371.
Tam, M. (2014). Intergenerational service learning between the old and young: What, why and how. Educational Gerentology, 40(6), 401-413.
Tanner, C.A. (2006). Changing times, evolving issues: The faculty shortage, accelerated programs, and simulation. Journal of Nursing Education,
45(3), 99-100.
Tomey, A.M., & Alligood, M.R. (2002). Nursing theorists and their work. St. Louis, MI: Mosby.
Weston, M.J. (2006). Integrating generational perspectives in nursing. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2). doi:
10.3912/OJIN.Vol11No02Man01.
White, C., Bradley, E., Martindale, J., Roy, P., Patel, K., Yoon, M., & Worden, M.K. (2014). Why are medical students ‘checking out’ of active learning
in new curriculum? Medical Education, 48, 315-324.
Wilson, M., & Gerber, L.E. (2008). How generational theory can improve teaching: Strategies for working with the “millennials.” Currents in
Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 29-44.
Contact
[email protected]
Students' Cultural Beliefs Toward Mental Health
Alison Claire Hansen, RN, MAdvNursPrac, GCHE, Australia
Denise Elizabeth McGarry, BA, RN, CMHN,MPM, GCHE, Australia
Amanda Johnson, PhD, MstHScEd, DipT(Ng), RN, Australia
Michael Roche, PhD, MHSc, BHSc, DipAppSc, MHCert, Australia
Abstract
Mental health issues are common. The most recent national survey (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2007) indicates that, of Australians
aged 16-85, one in five (20% or 3.2 million) had experienced a mental disorder over the previous 12-months, and almost half (45% or 7.3 million)
will experience a mental disorder during their lifetime. People with mental health problems have significant contact with all types of health services
(Mather, Roche, & Duffield, 2014), and nurses need the appropriate knowledge, skills, and attitudes to care for these people regardless of the
setting. Studies in Australia and elsewhere have demonstrated that quality educational and clinical experiences can improve attitudes to mental
health nursing (Brunero, Jeon, & Foster, 2012; Happell & Gaskin, 2013; Surgenor, Dunn, & Horn, 2005).
One of the foundations of working effectively with people with mental health problems is the development of a therapeutic alliance (Pitkänen,
Hätönen, Kuosmanen, & Välimäki, 2008), which itself is influenced by the beliefs and attitudes of the clinician (Albery et al., 2003; Hughes et al.,
2008) .
The beliefs and attitudes held by individuals towards mental health problems vary between cultures (Chambers et al., 2010). These beliefs reflect
different historical and cultural antecedents. Consequently, these beliefs impact on the understanding of mental health and resultant attitudes, for
example by attributing agency to the development of disorder. Findings from an international study on beliefs and attitudes established their
impact on how nurses deliver mental health practice (Chambers et al., 2010).
Students undertaking the BN course will provide care for people who experience mental health problems across a range of practice settings. Self-
awareness of one’s own beliefs and attitudes concerning mental health influences an individual’s capacity to achieve therapeutic outcomes for
people receiving nursing care (Stein-Parbury, 2013). Central to an undergraduate nursing curriculum is its capacity to provide teaching and learning
activities which challenge and remedy fallacious beliefs and attitudes held by students on entering the course.
A systematic integrative review of the topic was undertaken (Whittemore & Knafl, 2005). An electronic search was conducted for the period
January 2000 to January 2017. Databases searched included CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, Medline and Informit. Key words used included attitudes
to mental illness, cultural beliefs, undergraduate nursing students, religious beliefs, in combination with mental illness and mental disorder, and
were informed by checking suggested subject terms. Secondary searches were conducted by hand examining references lists of identified papers.
Inclusion criteria included English language, peer reviewed journal articles, and those addressing attitudes towards mental health problems,
services and treatments. Exclusion criteria included those papers addressing attitudes and beliefs of established clinicians.
The above search strategy returned numerous papers. However, when these were examined more closely and different key word combinations
applied, the number of papers significantly reduced. Further, application of exclusion criteria resulted in few papers meeting the criteria for review.
Results were tabulated to facilitate comparison and integration of findings.
Findings reiterated the commonality of negative attitudes and beliefs about people with mental health problems and that these attitudes and
beliefs are global in nature. Variation was noted between countries of origin, gender and clinical practice area of encounter during study (Hampton
& Zhu, 2011; Linden & Kavanagh, 2012). Personal experience of mental health problems was not a significant predictor of attitudes and beliefs
(Schafer, Wood, & Williams, 2011).
This paper addresses in detail the findings and ramifications for mental health nursing education design.
References
Albery, I. P., Heuston, J., Ward, J., Groves, P., Durand, M. A., Gossop, M., & Strang, J. (2003). Measuring therapeutic attitude among drug workers.
Addictive Behaviors, 28(5), 995-1005.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2007). National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing: Summary of Results. (4326.0). Retrieved 1 August, 2016,
from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/4326.02007
Brunero, S., Jeon, Y.-H., & Foster, K. (2012). Mental health education programmes for generalist health professionals: An integrative review.
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 21(5), 428-444. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2011.00802.x
Chambers, M., Guise, V., Välimäki, M., Botelho, M. A. R., Scott, A., Staniuliené, V., & Zanotti, R. (2010). Nurses’ attitudes to mental illness: A
comparison of a sample of nurses from five European countries. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(3), 350-362.
Hampton, N., & Zhu, Y. (2011). Gender, Culture, and Attitudes Toward People With Psychiatric Disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation
Counseling, 42(3), 12-19.
Happell, B., & Gaskin, C. J. (2013). The attitudes of undergraduate nursing students towards mental health nursing: A systematic review. Journal of
Clinical Nursing, 22(1-2), 148-158.
Hughes, E., Wanigaratne, S., Gournay, K., Johnson, S., Thornicroft, G., Finch, E., . . . Smith, N. (2008). Training in dual diagnosis interventions (the
COMO Study): randomised controlled trial. BMC psychiatry, 8(1), 12.
Linden, M., & Kavanagh, R. (2012). Attitudes of qualified vs. student mental health nurses towards an individual diagnosed with schizophrenia.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(6), 1359-1368. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05848.x
Mather, B., Roche, M. A., & Duffield, C. (2014). Disparities in Treatment of People With Mental Disorder in Non-Psychiatric Hospitals: A Review of
the Literature. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 28(2), 80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2013.10.009
Pitkänen, A., Hätönen, H., Kuosmanen, L., & Välimäki, M. (2008). Patients’ descriptions of nursing interventions supporting quality of life in acute
psychiatric wards: a qualitative study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(11), 1598-1606.
Schafer, T., Wood, S., & Williams, R. (2011). A survey into student nurses' attitudes towards mental illness: Implications for nurse training.
Nurse Education Today, 31(4), 328-332. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.010
Stein-Parbury, J. (2013). Patient and person: Interpersonal skills in nursing: Elsevier Health Sciences.
Surgenor, L. J., Dunn, J., & Horn, J. (2005). Nursing student attitudes to psychiatric nursing and psychiatric disorders in New Zealand. International
Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 14(2), 103-108.
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553.
Contact
[email protected]
Critical Thinking of RNs in a Fellowship Program
Susan Zori, DNP, RN, NEA-BC, USA
Abstract
Background: This qualitative study explored how reflective journaling about critical thinking (CT) dispositions by RNs in a critical care
and emergency department fellowship program influenced development and use of critical thinking dispositions during the first 7
weeks of a critical care/ emergency department fellowship program (Zori, 2016).
Developing strong critical thinking skills and behaviors is essential to the development of clinical judgment in nurses as they engage in nursing
practice and assume a key role in transforming the health care system (Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, & Day, 2010). Critical thinking dispositions are
the internal behavioral intent to use critical thinking skills. Critical thinking skills and seven dispositions were identified in a seminal study
conducted by the American Philosophical Association [APA] (1990). The seven CT dispositions identified in the APA (1990) study (inquisitiveness,
systematicity, analyticity, open-mindedness, judicious, truth-seeking and self-confidence in CT) were used in the current study that explored the
development and use of CT dispositions of RNs in a fellowship program.
Finding strategies, such as reflective journaling, that foster the development of critical thinking in nursing education has been explored. Strategies
that promote the development of critical thinking are necessary in a variety of nursing education programs (Burrell, 2014; Chan, 2013; Martyn,
Terwijn, Kek, & Huijser, 2014; Zori, Kohn, Gallo & Friedman, 2013)). Nurse residency programs are considered a best practice for transitioning new
nurses to specialty practice (Benner, et al. 2010; Letourneau & Fater, 2015). Using learning strategies such as reflective journaling to foster use of
critical thinking for participants while in a residency program could help to foster the development of critical thinking as a basis of clinical judgment
in beginning RNs.
Purpose: To explore how using reflective journaling focused on CT dispositions by participants in a critical care/ emergency department fellowship
program might influence use of CT dispositions.
Design: This qualitative, descriptive study used content analysis to analyze participant’s journal entries on critical thinking dispositions
Setting: The setting for this research was a large multi-hospital health system in the northeastern United States with a nurse fellowship program of
1 year duration that transitioned nurses to specialty practice in critical care and the emergency department.
Methods: IRB approval was obtained. A convenience sample of all participants in the fellowship program held twice during a calendar year were
invited to participate. On the first day of the fellowship program, the researcher presented a 1 hour session on critical thinking dispositions through
use of simulated videos and discussion. Participants were invited to participate in the research and informed consent was obtained.
The researcher emailed a weekly prompt with a brief description of one of the CT dispositions for each of the first 7 weeks of the fellowship
program. Participants were asked to journal about their experiences with the particular disposition and email it to the researcher. Journal entries
were read and then coded by the researcher, initial coding was validated by another researcher with expertise in qualitative methods. Categories
were given a descriptor and further reduced resulting in sub-themes for each disposition and then over-arching themes were identified from
commonalities of the disposition themes (Krueger & Casey, 2009).
Results: A total of 71 participants agreed to participate on the first day of the fellowship program. The number of journal entries submitted for
each of the CT dispositions were: 56 for inquisitiveness, 55 for analyticity; 58 for truth-seeking; 46 for sysematicity; 42 for critical thinking maturity;
43 for open-mindedness; 38 for critical thinking confidence.
Participants in the study were 74.8% female, 51.1% were white; 80.0% had baccalaureate degrees and 74.8% had less than 1 year of RN experience.
Over-arching and Disposition Sub-themes
Over-arching themes: 1. CT Is a process that develops during a period of time
2. Purposefully Using CT dispositions may help prevent negative patient outcomes.
Inquisitiveness 1. Facilitates patient assessment and prevents missed information and errors.
2. Furthers individual learning.
Systematicity 1. Essential to the nursing process, develops over time with experience.
2. Helps with organizing and prioritizing the delivery of patient care.
Open mindedness 1. Prevents judgmental, biased behavior.
2. Promotes teamwork.
Analyticity 1. Works together with inquisitiveness and puts puzzle pieces together.
2. Allows one to recognize patterns and anticipate and prevent complications, thus promoting patient safety.
Truth seeking 1. Requires courage to question and result in better learning.
2. Requires putting biases and preconceived notions aside to focus on the patient.
CT maturity 1. Develops over time and helps make sense of different ways of doing things to reach the same goal.
2. Works with open mindedness and allows for learning through reflection.
CT self-confidence 1. Develops over time with clinical experience and allows one to question things and verbalize it to other team members.
2. Works together with the other dispositions to help make decisions and problem solve.
As an exemplar included here is a journal entry from a nursing fellow describing the importance of inquisitiveness in assessment of patients.
“I was in the Emergency Department when a patient came in complaining about feeling generally unwell. Since this is a complaint that is not taken
seriously especially when combined with perfect lab results, it would have been very easy for this patient who was in his 20s to be sent home fairly
quickly. I felt there must be a reason that this patient brought himself to the emergency department, and so I sat down with him to have a more in
depth conversation about what was happening. After a period of time, the patient started to open up more and started to cry… it turned out he
was suicidal. Without being inquisitive the patient would have been discharged too soon … and possibly could have ended his life”.
Another entry reinforcing the notion that inquisitiveness allows one to take ownership of individual learning.
“I found being inquisitive can be intimidating as a new grad. As the week progressed I felt more comfortable asking questions. I realized this is a
learning experience and I am the one in the driver’s seat. If I want to get as much out of this experience then I must be as inquisitive as possible”.
Conclusions and Recommendation: Many of the participants in this study described how valuable being proficient in the use of CT dispositions
were to their own individual learning and to delivering safe nursing care. Reflective journaling was a strategy that seemed to validate and stress the
importance of using CT during the first 7 weeks of a fellowship program. This is consistent with Burrell’s (2014) findings that reflective journaling is
a useful strategy that helps the learner connect theory with practice (Burrell, 2014) and Chan’s (2013) findings that reflective journaling positively
impacts use of CT.
Further research that explores the internalization of the purposeful use of CT dispositions over time as they progress through their careers would
be helpful. Participant satisfaction with journaling as a learning strategy was not explored and would also be helpful in further research.
References
American Philosophical Association. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and
instruction. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.
Burrell, L.A. (2014). Integrating critical thinking strategies into nursing curricula. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9, 53-58.
doi:10.1016/j.teln.2013.12.005
Chan, Z. (2013). A systematic review of critical thinking in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 33, 236-240. doi:10.1016/j. nedt.2013.01.007
Krueger, R.A., & Casey M. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Letourneau, R.M., & Fater, K.H. (2015). Nurse residency programs: An integrative review of the literature. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36, 96-
101 doi:10.3928/00220124-20151230- 06
Martyn, J., Terwijn, R., Kek, M., & Huijser, H. (2014). Exploring the relationships between teaching, approaches to learning and critical thinking in a
problem-based learning foundation course. Nurse Education Today, 34, 829-835. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.023
Zori, S., Kohn, N., Gallo, K., & Friedman, M.I. (2013). Critical thinking of registered nurses in a fellowship program. The Journal of Continuing
Education in Nursing, 44, 374-380. doi:10.3928/0022012420130603-03.
Zori, S. (2016). Teaching critical thinking using reflective journaling in a nursing fellowship program. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47
(7), 321 – 329.
Contact
[email protected]
Nursing Faculty's Competency to Teach Patient Safety to Their Students
Susan Mellott, PhD, RN, CPHQ, CPPS, FNAHQ, USA
Abstract
In 1999 the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published the To Err is Human report, which stated that 44,000 to 99,000 patients died in the hospital from
adverse events. Since that time the Quality Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) initiative in 2012 developed quality and safety competencies that
they felt should be incorporated into all nursing undergraduate and graduate curriculums (Barnsteiner, Disch, Johnson, McGuinn, Chappell &
Swartwout, 2012). Unfortunately, that momentum was not maintained in many nursing baccalaureate programs. Since that time, patient safety has
become an ever evolving discipline that now encompasses many aspects of the science of safety. (Mitchell, Cristancho, Nyhof, Lingard, 2017). It is
also well know that nursing faculty is not able to participate in ongoing education in all areas of nursing. A study by Suplee, Gardner, & Jerome-
D’Emilia (2014) demonstrated that only 57% of nursing faculty studied developed their teaching skills through conferences. Aging nursing faculty,
who are reaching their retirement age, may not keep expanding their knowledge, skills and teaching modalities. (Falk, 2014)
Unfortunately this has resulted in a lot of nursing faculty not having the knowledge and competencies to teach the science of patient safety to their
students. In order to determine if this was the case, one College of Nursing in southwestern United States conducted a needs assessment regarding
the faculty’s knowledge and ability to teach the science of patient safety to their students. The needs assessment was conducted at a Nursing
faculty meeting to determine the demographics, self-assessment of the faculty’s knowledge and a 10 question quiz to determine if there was a
relationship between the self-reported assessment and the score from the Quiz.
The self-assessment for the faculty ranking included terms such as just culture, Swiss cheese model, human factors, near miss, and other terms.
The faculty was to rank each word as to whether that faculty member felt they had no knowledge or some knowledge about those topics and then
indicate if they felt they could teach that topic and if they needed more education on the topic. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) (2013) ten
(10) general Patient Safety Questions was utilized for the quiz. The WHO utilizes this quiz to determine if there is a need for their patient Safety
curriculum to be implemented.
Out of the 103 faculty signed into the faculty meeting, 86 completed the survey. The average score on the 10 question quiz was 5.77. Four of the 10
questions on the quiz had a majority of the faculty answering incorrectly. These questions included near miss, Swiss cheese model, the connection
between ties and scarves and infection, and following the clinical leader’s directions. The self-assessment results were interesting in that the
answers varied widely with significant statistical differences noted between the knowledge of the faculty and their ability to teach the material,
some of which had a p value of 0.001. Some of the faculty selected some knowledge of the patient safety topic but low ability to teach it. Others
noted a low knowledge of the patient safety topic and a high level of being able to teach it. The disparity between the faculty having some
knowledge and the ability to teach that topic was that the faculty had some knowledge (72.8 – 88.9%) and only a few felt that they could teach the
topic (3.7-24.7%). Most interesting was with the topics of informed consent where 18.5% indicated they had some knowledge, but 81.5% indicated
they could teach the topic! Also, human factors, a very important part of patient safety, 85% of the faculty indicated that they have some
knowledge of human factors, but only 5% felt that they could teach about this topic. Of the topics where the faculty indicated some knowledge but
little ability to teach those topics, the majority did not want education about the topic. Only 4% of the faculty wanted education regarding
consents. Only one topic, mindfulness, had 98% of the respondents asking for education on that topic. All the other topics scored below 30% of the
faculty asking for education.
Given this response rate, it was determined that two actions were needed. The first was to give the faculty resources to utilize if they so wished.
The Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goals (2017) were included on all skill check lists so that the faculty/student would be more aware
of theses. Patient Safety posters were hung in the Skills lab for use during the experiences there. And all faculty were given information regarding
the Institute of Healthcare Improvement's (2017) Open School program which contains modules on patient safety, quality and other such topics.
The second set of actions were to utilize Brown bag lunch sessions that would be filmed and offered at any time, development of a patient safety
newsletter that the faculty and students will be asked to contribute content, placing a 5 minute ‘Safety Moment’ at the beginning of every faculty
meeting, and monthly emails with one patient safety topic, article or other resources.
Some of these actions plans were put into place during the spring 2017 semester, with the remainder being implemented in fall 2017. This faculty
education will evolve over time as there is a patient safety research project underway to re-implement patient safety topics, didactic, followed by
clinical, into the undergraduate curriculum during the fall 2017 – Spring 2019 semesters. In conjunction with this research project, as it is
implemented with a cohort of undergraduate students, the faculty on one campus has agreed to place all patient safety topics in a slide that has a
stop sign with the words Patient Safety and STOP in the right hand corner of the slides. Hopefully this will encourage both faculty and students to
explore and implement more patient safety into their education!
References
Barnsteiner, J. Disch, J., Johnson, J., McGuinn, K., Chappell, K., & Swartwout, E. (2012). Diffusing QSEN competencies across schools of nursing: The
AACN/RWJF faculty development institutes. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(2), 68-74. http:/dx.doi.org/j.profnurs.2012.12.003.
Falk, N. (2014). Retaining the wisdom: Academic nurse leaders’ reflections on extending the working life of aging nursing faculty. Journal of
Professional Nursing, 30(1), 34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.06.012
Institute of Healthcare Improvement. (2017). Open School. Retrieved from http://www.ihi.org/education/ihiopenschool/Pages/default.aspx.
Institute of Medicine. (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academy Sciences. Retrieved from
http://nationalacademies.org/HMD/Reports/1999/To-Err-is-Human-Building-A-Safer-Health-System.aspx
Mitchell, B., Cristancho, S., Nyhof, B., & Lingard, L. (2017). Mobilising or standing still? A narrative review of surgical safety checklist knowledge as
developed in 25 highly cited papers from 2009 to 2016. BMJ Quality Safety, Published online 3 June 2017. http://dx.doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-
006218
Suplee, P., Gardner, M., & Jerome-D’Emilia. (2014). Nursing faculty preparedness for clinical teaching [Supplemental material]. Journal of Nursing
Education, 53(3), S38-S41. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140217-03
The Joint Commission. (2017). 2017 National Patient Safety Goals. Retrieved from
https://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/npsgs.aspx .
World Health Organization. (2013). Patient Safety Quiz. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/patientsafety/education/quiz.html
Contact
[email protected]
Snowballing Via Facebook: A Novel Way to Recruit Millennial Nursing Student Research Participants
Denise Elizabeth McGarry, BA, RN, CMHN,MPM, GCHE, Australia
Janet Anne Green, RN, DipAppSc, BHSc, GrdCertPaedNsg, Australia
Cathrine Fowler, PhD, RN, RM, Australia
Abstract
Snowball sampling is a method of convenience sampling (Cohen & Arieli, 2011, p. 424) and is an example of a non-probability
method, which does not recruit a random sample(Sadler, Lee, Lim, & Fullerton, 2010, p. 370). Non-probability sampling can be
accidental or purposive.
Respondents to recruitment via social media do not represent a random sample, and this form of purposeful sampling can also be thought of as
selection bias. Selection bias occurs in recruitment via social media, because it favours in its initial stages those who access on-line sites. However,
research recruitment utilising social media can be argued to be an example of the adaptability and flexibility inherent in non-probability sampling
strategies in the use of snowball recruitment strategies (Sadler et al., 2010, p. 371).
Only those who participate in on-line forums such as Facebook are initially included in snow-ball recruitment via social media. However, those who
do not use such social online forums can still be recruited via recommendation and provision of the link to the on-line survey. It can be completed
independently of membership of any on-line forum.
A potential problem with snowball sampling is `gatekeeper bias'. Snowball sampling relies on others to facilitate contact between the researcher
and potential research participants, and gatekeepers may have their reasons for referring or not referring the researcher to potential participants
(Cohen & Arieli, 2011, p. 428). These reasons may vary from the mundane (lack of time, forgetfulness) to unconscious bias (reflecting societal
stigma for example) to conscious curating for the sites perceived ‘fit’ for the requested research recruitment.
Concerns have been raised that online data collection is less reliable (Antoun, Zhang, Conrad, & Schober, 2016), however more recent research has
shown that online data collection is comparable in terms of validity and reliability (Denissen, Neumann, & van Zalk, 2010, p. 565). Validity is the
degree to which the survey questionnaire will measure what it is supposed to measure and reliability the overall consistency of a measure.
Snowball sampling represents a method of choice for accessing marginalised populations (Cohen & Arieli, 2011). Nurses, although ubiquitous
within health care, can be argued to represent a marginalised or oppressed population (Cox, 2016; Kuokkanen & Leino-Kilpi, 2000; Matheson &
Bobay, 2007). Their participation in research is not unfettered and their role as gate-keepers for patient research is well documented (Kars et al.,
2016). However, it can be argued that the participation of nurses themselves as participants in research, as the focus of the research project, is
itself subject to gate-keeping in traditional practice domains.
In keeping with observations from oppressed group behaviour, these gate-keepers are frequently other nurses(Matheson & Bobay, 2007). Clearly
in the hierarchical work place of health services, senior nurses exercise control over the flow of information to other nurses. It can also be
speculated that the elements of anti-intellectual culture that characterise some of the nursing profession (Miers, 2002; Pringle, 2016)may also
serve to discourage participation in research projects between nurses of similar seniority. Elements of this cultural characteristic of the nursing
profession are witnessed in the persistence of the so-called “Theory - Practice gap” and continuing arguments to return nursing preparation to the
workplace (El Haddad, Moxham, & Broadbent, 2013).
Social media acts as a disrupter to these prior patterns of nursing relationships. In terms of nursing, as previously noted social media has been
adopted avidly. Social media offers the researcher access to nurses in ways not previously available. Traditional gate-keepers have been
disempowered. The flow of information (about research participation) responds to fresh gatekeeping imperatives (Christensen, Bohmer, & Kenagy,
2000; Weeks, 2015).
Nurses who have enthusiastically adopted social media as a professional platform are usually believed to be millennials – that is those born
between 1982 and 2004, also known as Generation Y (Gen Y). General Australian social media profiles support this (Australian Bureau of Statistics
(ABS), 2016). Marketing analysis of the profile of Facebook users – Facebook being the largest social media platform – reveal that there are 17
million Australian monthly users (Cowling, 2017). The typical user is a female at 76% of all females compared to 66% of males (Unknown, 2017).
Further, millennials represent the largest group of Facebook users at 29.7% (Unknown, 2017). It is reasonable to suspect that Facebook use by
nurses also reflects these uses of social media. However, research of the nursing demographics of social media use is largely unreported (Green,
2017).
Social media is being adopted as a component of routine formal nursing and health public communication profiles. Formal nursing organisations
such as educational providers, regulation authorities and industrial bodies all maintain social media profiles. So a number of nursing social media
sites, are traditional nursing groupings. These contrast to a broad range of spontaneously and non-traditional nursing groups that form other users
of social media.
What are the values that guide those gate-keeping these sites? Is it uniformly the case that access is unmoderated for research postings? Do
acceptance requirements for membership of some ‘closed’ sites represent a new consideration for researchers in recruiting representative
samples?
These issues will be addressed in this paper.
References
Antoun, C., Zhang, C., Conrad, F. G., & Schober, M. F. (2016). Comparisons of online recruitment strategies for convenience samples: Craigslist,
Google AdWords, Facebook, and Amazon Mechanical Turk. Field Methods, 28(3), 231-246.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2016). Household Use of Information Technology 2014-15. Retrieved from
http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/8146.0
Christensen, C. M., Bohmer, R., & Kenagy, J. (2000). Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harvard business review, 78(5), 102-112.
Cohen, N., & Arieli, T. (2011). Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research,
48(4), 423-435.
Cowling, D. (Producer). (2017). Social Media Statistics Australia - April 2017. SocialMediNews.com.au. Retrieved from
https://www.socialmedianews.com.au/social-media-statistics-australia-april-2017/
Cox, V. M. (2016). Horizontal Violence Effect on Nurse Retention.
Denissen, J. J., Neumann, L., & van Zalk, M. (2010). How the internet is changing the implementation of traditional research methods, people’s daily
lives, and the way in which developmental scientists conduct research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(6), 564-575.
El Haddad, M., Moxham, L., & Broadbent, M. (2013). Graduate registered nurse practice readiness in the Australian context: an issue worthy of
discussion. Collegian, 20(4), 233-238.
Green, J. A. (2017). Nurses’ online behaviour: lessons for the nursing profession. Contemporary nurse. doi:10.1080/10376178.2017.1281749
Kars, M. C., van Thiel, G. J., van der Graaf, R., Moors, M., de Graeff, A., & van Delden, J. J. (2016). A systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in
palliative care research. Palliative medicine, 30(6), 533-548.
Kuokkanen, L., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2000). Power and empowerment in nursing: three theoretical approaches. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(1),
235-241. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01241.x
Matheson, L. K., & Bobay, K. (2007). Validation of oppressed group behaviors in nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing, 23(4), 226-234.
Miers, M. (2002). Nurse education in higher education: understanding cultural barriers to progress. Nurse Education Today, 22(3), 212-219.
Pringle, R. (2016). The purpose of university education in relation to nursing. York Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Sadler, G. R., Lee, H. C., Lim, R. S. H., & Fullerton, J. (2010). Recruitment of hard‐to‐reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball
sampling strategy. Nursing & health sciences, 12(3), 369-374.
Unknown. (2017). Top 20 facebook statistics. Retrieved from https://zephoria.com/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics/
Weeks, M. R. (2015). Is disruption theory wearing new clothes or just naked? Analyzing recent critiques of disruptive innovation theory. Innovation,
17(4), 417-428.
Contact
[email protected]
Student Perceptions of Presenting a Case Study on Facebook
Jennifer Gunberg Ross, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Brittany Beckmann, MSN, RN, CNRN, USA
Abstract
Background: Members of the millennial generation, as technology natives, show a strong preference for informatics and technology-
rich educational environments (Schmitt, Sims-Giddens, & Booth, 2012). Furthermore, informatics has been identified as a necessary
component of undergraduate nursing education to prepare nursing students to practice in an increasingly technology-rich
healthcare environment (AACN, 2008; Cronenwett, Sherwood, & Gelmon, 2009; NLN, 2008). As a pervasive component of twenty-
first century life, social media offers an innovative platform to engage students in their learning. Although various forms of social
media have been documented as teaching strategies in collegiate education, there is very limited research exploring the use of social
media in nursing education (Ross & Myers, in press). The limited nursing education literature suggests that students enjoy using
social media as a teaching strategy (Morley, 2014; Stephens & Gunther, 2016). Additionally, social media demonstrates potential as
a platform for interaction and collaboration among students which supports peer-learning (Chan & Nyback, 2015; Garrett & Cutting,
2012; Morley, 2014; Tower, Blacklock, Watson, Heffernan, & Tronoff, 2015). There is no existing nursing education literature that
explores student perceptions or outcomes with the use of Facebook as a platform to present patient case study data.
Purpose: The purpose of this descriptive, qualitative study was to understand baccalaureate nursing students’ perceptions of the use of Facebook
as a platform to present patient case study data.
Procedure: Nineteen baccalaureate nursing students enrolled in an Introduction to Professional Nursing Practice course in a private, Catholic
University in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States (U.S.) participated in the study. A simulated patient was created on Facebook. The
simulated patient’s Facebook page was maintained by a Research Assistant. At the completion of the didactic portion of the Teaching and Learning
unit, students were instructed to “friend” the simulated patient on Facebook and follow her posts in between class sessions. After following the
simulated patient on Facebook for two days, students worked in pairs in-class to develop a teaching plan based upon data collected from the
simulated patient’s Facebook page. After the completion of this activity, participants completed a researcher-developed survey including nine
Likert-style and five open-ended questions to determine their perceptions of this teaching strategy.
Results: Overall, students responded positively to the presentation of case study information on Facebook. Five themes that emerged from the
qualitative data were: 1) realism, 2) relatability, 3) engagement, 4) uniqueness, and 5) desire for expansion.
Discussion: The results from this descriptive, qualitative research study suggest that baccalaureate nursing students respond positively to the use
of Facebook as a platform to present patient case study data. As the demographics, preferences, and learning styles of undergraduate nursing
students change, nursing education strategies must likewise evolve to meet the learners’ needs. Given the millennial student’s preference for
technology-driven active learning in collegiate education, it is imperative that nurse educators explore innovative, technological teaching strategies
to engage these students both inside and outside the classroom. As the most frequently used social media site, Facebook offers a freely available
platform to foster student engagement and active application of course material that is well received by students. Because of the dearth of
evidence supporting the use of social media as a teaching strategy, this remains an important area for nursing education research. More empirical
evidence is needed to support the use of social media as an evidence-based teaching strategy in undergraduate nursing education.
References
US Government Printing Office. Retrieved from: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/baccessentials08.pdf
Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., & Furlong, M.J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the
construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Chan, E.A. & Nyback, M.H. (2015). A virtual caravan- a metaphor for home-internationalization through social media: A qualitative content analysis.
Nurse Education Today, 35, 828-832. Doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.024
Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., & Gelmon, S. (2009). Improving quality and safety education: The QSEN learning collaborative. Nursing Outlook, 57,
304-312. Doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2009.09.004
Garrett, B.M. & Cutting, R. (2012). Using social media to promote international student partnerships. Nurse Education in Practice, 12, 340-345. Doi:
10.1016/j.nepr.2012.04.003
Morley, D.A. (2014). Supporting student nurses in practice with additional online communication tools. Nurse Education in Practice, 14, 69-75.
National League for Nursing. (2016). NLN research priorities in nursing education: 2016-2019. Retrieved from: http://www.nln.org/docs/default-
source/professional-development-programs/nln-research-priorities-in-nursing-education-single-pages.pdf?sfvrsn=2
National League for Nursing. (2008). Preparing the next generation of nurses to practice in a technology-rich environment: An informatics agenda
[Position Statement]. Retrieved from: http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/positionstatements/informatics_052808.pdf
Nicoletti, A. & Merriman, W. (2007). Teaching millennial generation students. Momentum, 38(2), 28-31.
Ross, J.G. (2015). Integration of social media into nursing education. PA Nurse, 70(1), 4-9.
Ross, J.G. & Myers, S.M. (2017). The current use of social media in nursing education: A review of the literature. Computers, Informatics, Nursing.
Advanced online publication.
Schmitt, T.L., Sims-Giddens, S.S., & Booth, R.G. (2012). Social media use in nursing education. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17(3),
Manuscript 2.
Stephens, T.M. & Gunther, M.E. (2016). Twitter, millennials, and nursing education research. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(1), 23-27. Doi:
10.5480/14-1462.
Tower, M., Blacklock, E., Watson, B., Heffernan, C., & Tronoff, G. (2015). Using social media as a strategy to address ‘sophomore slump’ in second
year nursing students: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 35, 1130-1134. Doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.06.011
Contact
[email protected]
Can Technology Increase Student Engagement and Learning in the Classroom?
Cara M. Gallegos, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of technology on student engagement and learning in an
undergraduate nursing research course, and to describe nursing students’ confidence in their research and evidence-based practice
(EBP) skills.
Background: EBP is an integral part of clinical decision-making for nurses, yielding quality patient outcomes, as well as reducing variations in patient
care and cost. Despite these clear benefits, EBP is not the standard of care practiced consistently across the U.S. This is partially due to barriers
such as inadequate EBP understanding and skills and resistance by healthcare workers (Melnyk et al., 2014). To combat these issues, baccalaureate
nursing programs typically require completion of a research course in order to establish competencies in EBP and research (AACN, 2008).
Establishing such competencies requires not only skills, but is also dependent on one’s self-confidence to use skills effectively (Bandura, 1993).
Therefore, cultivating student self-confidence in EBP and research skills is essential to prepare future nurses with the tools necessary to improve
the quality and safety of the healthcare systems in which they will work (Melnyk, et al., 2014). Unfortunately, demonstrating the significance of a
research course to baccalaureate nursing students has shown to be difficult, making it challenging for faculty to engage nursing students in learning
these important skills (Halcomb & Peter, 2009). Using mobile technologies, such as the iPad, could potentially promote student engagement
through active and collaborative learning (Diemer et al., 2012).
Methods: This study used a descriptive design to describe student confidence in specific EBP and research skills, and the impact of mobile device
use on student engagement and learning. Following IRB approval, 58 students in an undergraduate nursing research course at a public university in
the Northwestern U.S. completed an online 16 question likert scale survey.
Results: Preliminary results suggest that students reported increased In regards to mobile technology use, a substantial number of students agreed
that using a mobile device in their research class helped them develop skills that they can apply to academics (89.7%), apply course content to
solve problems (82.8%), and participate in course activities that enhance learning (89.7%).
Implications: Requiring a stand alone baccalaureate nursing research class is essential to developing student confidence in research and EBP skills,
as well as in applying this material to solve problems. Establishing such pedagogical approaches to improve nursing student engagement in
research and EBP courses is essential to future healthcare system improvement. However, further studies should be implemented to evaluate
mobile device use further, as well as student skill proficiency in practice after graduation.
References
Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of
Tinto’s theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569-590. doi:10.2307/2649260
Clark, W. & Luckin, R. (2013). What the research says: iPads in the classroom. London Knowledge Lab Report. Retrieved from
http://digitallearningteam.org.
Diliberto-Macaluso, K., & Hughes, A. (2016). The Use of Mobile Apps to Enhance Student Learning in Introduction to Psychology. Teaching of
Psychology, 43(1), 48-52. doi:10.1177/0098628315620880
Diemer, T.T., Fernandez El, & Streepey, J.W. (2012), Student Perceptions of Classroom Engagement and Learning using iPads. Journal of Teaching
and Learning with Technology. 1, 13-25.
Elliott, L., Decristofaro, C., & Carpenter, A. (2012). Blending technology in teaching advanced health assessment in a family nurse practitioner
program: Using personal digital assistants in a simulation laboratory. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 24(9), 536-543.
doi:10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00728.x
Junco, R. (2012). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2236-2243. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.031
Kay, R. H., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Unstructured vs. structured use of laptops in higher education. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10.
Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions and
recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mango, O. (2015). Ipad use and student engagement in the classroom. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 14(1).
Mcclean, S., & Crowe, W. (2017). Making room for interactivity: using the cloud-based audience response system Nearpod to enhance engagement
in lectures. FEMS Microbiology Letters. doi:10.1093/femsle/fnx052
Noohi, E., Abaszadeh, A., & Maddah, S. (2013). University engagement and collaborative learning in nursing students of Kerman University of
Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research. 18(6), 505-510.
Popkess, A. M., & Mcdaniel, A. (2011). Are Nursing Students Engaged in Learning? A Secondary Analysis of Data from the NATIONAL SURVEY OF
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 89-94. doi:10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.89
Redish, E., Saul, and Steinberg R. (1997). On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories. American Journal of
Physics, 65 (1),
Rossing, J., Miller, W., Cecil, A., & Stamper, S. (2012). iLearning: The future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile
tablets. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 12(2), 1-26. Retrieved from http://josotl.indiana.edu
Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ. The International Review of
Research in Open and Distance Learning. 8(2), doi:10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.346
Contact
[email protected]
Authentic Simulation for Collaboratively Preparing Student Nurses and American Sign Language Interpreting
Student
Linda K. Connelly, PhD, ARNP, USA
Cynthia L. Cummings, EdD, MS, RN, CHSE, CNE, USA
Abstract
Objectives:
1.) Demonstrate simulation education that provides training for nursing students and American Sign Language interpreting students in a safe,
effective, and compassionate environment to better develop their clinical skills.
2.) Exhibit how to bridge the communication barrier between English and American Sign Language with interpreting students and nursing students
in an interprofessional simulation.
3.) Explain the incorporation of inter-professional education in pre-licensure curricula for student nurses and interpreting students through
simulation.
Interdisciplinary learning and collaboration are necessary to continue to improve the quality of health professions and signed language interpreter
education in the post-secondary setting. Incorporation of interprofessional education in pre-licensure curricula is advocated in nursing education
by The National League for Nursing and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing and is equally valued in the interpreter education field.
This simulation project unites the Brooks College of Health (BCH), School of Nursing and the College of Education and Human Services (COEHS),
ASL/English Interpreting Program in strengthening our preparation of students to work as members of healthcare teams in which the patients or
family members are deaf and use American Sign Language as their native language. Our goal is to improve healthcare services to deaf children and
families in north Florida and fill training gaps for nurses and interpreters. Given the deaf population’s density in north Florida and the proximity of
the Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind (St. Augustine) to UNF, this collaborative model is uniquely-situated and innovative in its plan to
enhance the competency of UNF students to work in family-centered healthcare settings that create complex communication, role, ethical, and
qualification demands on nurses and interpreters. This project seeks to combine the two colleges teaching efforts to (1) improve the quality of
health professions education and (2) prepare interpreters and nurses to function as members of the healthcare team when deaf patients and
family members are involved. Interdisciplinary learning and collaboration in the specialty area of healthcare has been a focus of the ASL/English
Interpreting program and the School of Nursing since fall 2014, when the School of Nursing began arranging joint simulation training on campus
and at a local hospital in response to requests from the interpreting program faculty. A recent example of joint simulation training was when
nursing and interpreting students worked in the St. Vincent’s Medical Center Operating Room with deaf actors as ‘patients’ in pre-op, conscious-
sedation surgery, and post-op. This joint venture has proven to be very successful for both programs and provides a much-needed exposure to
both professionals in training.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2016). Improving patient safety through simulation research. Retrieved from
http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/factsheets/errors- safety/simulproj11/index.html
Bachrach, C., Robert, S, & Thomas, Y. (2016). Training in interdisciplinary health science: Current successes and future needs. [Monograph
commissioned by the Institute of Medicine] Retrieved from
http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Activity%20Files/PublicHealth/PopulationHealthImprovementRT/Commissioned%20Paper
s/Training%20Population%20Health%20Science%20final.pdf
Yardley, S., Irvine, A.W., & Lefroy, J. (2013). Minding the gap between communication skills simulation and authentic experience. Medical
Education, 47(5), 495-510.
Yuksel, C., & Unver, V. (2016, July). Use of simulated patient method to teach communication with deaf patients in the emergency department.
Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(7), 281- 289.
Zhang, C., Thompson, S., & Miller, C. (2011, July). A review of simulation-based interprofessional education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 7(4), 117-
126. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2010.02.008
Contact
[email protected]
Are Canadian Indigenous Students Feeling Ready for Registered Nursing Practice?
Noelle K. Rohatinsky, PhD, RN, CMSN(C), Canada
Michele Parent-Bergeron, PhD, RN, Canada
Carrie A. Pratt, RN, Canada
Kristopher Bosevski, MPH, GN, Canada
Abstract
Background: Baccalaureate degree nursing graduates in Canada are prepared for generalist nursing practice and have a solid
grounding in critical thinking, clinical reasoning, self-evaluation, self-regulation, and inter-professional practice skills (CASN, 2016). It
is not uncommon for senior students to lack confidence in their abilities and to feel overwhelmed with respect to their upcoming
nursing role (Guner, 2014; Saber, Anglade, & Schirle, 2015). The nursing work environment poses numerous challenges for new
graduates and this time of transition can be extremely stressful. Unique transitional challenges occur when new graduates are from
ethnically diverse backgrounds and include lack of emotional and moral support, discrimination, isolation and loneliness, and family
responsibilities (Loftin, Newman, Dumas, Gilden, & Bond, 2012).
Due to their own lived experiences, Indigenous nurses are considered experts in providing care to Indigenous peoples (Exner-Pirot & Butler, 2015).
Cultural congruency between nurses and clients results in positive therapeutic relationships and enhanced satisfaction with care provided, which
can positively influence the health status of Indigenous peoples (Banister, Bowen-Brady, & Winfrey, 2014).
Numerous issues hinder the success of Indigenous new nursing graduates (Kulig et al., 2010). Job dissatisfaction and turnover can occur in an
already stressful work environment for a newly graduated Indigenous nurse due to racial challenges, strained interprofessional relationships, and
lack of inclusivity in the workplace (Kulig et al., 2010).
By understanding the readiness for practice perceptions of Indigenous nursing students and facilitating the successful transition from student to
nurse, nursing education programs can honor the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s (2015) Calls to Action related to: 1) increasing
the number of Aboriginal professionals working in the healthcare field and 2) ensuring the retention of Aboriginal healthcare providers in
Aboriginal communities. Overall, Indigenous peoples represent an important and growing part of the Canadian population and this study aimed to
address the lack of literature regarding Indigenous nursing students’ preparedness for practice and new graduates’ experiences as they transition
into practice.
Purpose: The purpose of this presentation is to explore the readiness for practice perceptions of senior undergraduate nursing students of
Indigenous ancestry.
Methods: A descriptive, exploratory study design was utilized for this project which was conducted in the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. The
Readiness for Practice Survey (Casey, Fink, Jaynes, Campbell, Cook, & Wilson, 2011) was used to measure senior nursing students’ perceived
readiness for practice and was divided into three sections: 1) demographic data, 2) a self-report on level of confidence and comfortability with both
clinical and relational skills, and 3) an open-ended question related to students’ perceptions on what could have assisted them to feel more
prepared to enter nursing practice (Casey et al., 2011). Indigenous nursing students who were in the final two months of their nursing program
were eligible to participate in the study. Quantitative data were entered, stored, and analyzed using SPSS (v. 23) software.
Results: Twenty-six First Nations and Métis senior nursing students participated in the study. The mean age of participants was 29 years and the
majority were female. Participants specified the nursing skills they were most uncomfortable performing were electrocardiogram or telemetry
monitoring and interpretation, responding to an emergency or code blue, and performing trach care and suctioning. Students indicated their level
of comfort in caring for two, three, and four patients and students became less confident as the number of patients they cared for increased. When
asked what could have been done to help students feel more prepared to enter the nursing profession, participants had several suggestions
including greater assistance with NCLEX preparation, additional clinical hours, greater physiology and pharmacology in upper years, and more
hands-on practice with nursing related paperwork.
In terms of students’ perceived clinical problem solving, they believed they used evidence to make clinical decisions and they were confident in
their ability to problem solve. They also felt confident identifying actual or potential safety risk to patients. Students were least comfortable
knowing what to do for a dying patient. When considering student learning perspectives, students believed simulation activities assisted them in
being prepared for clinical practice. The least effective learning strategy they perceived was reflective journal writing.
Most participants were satisfied in choosing nursing as a career, however, they were less confident in their readiness for entering the nursing
profession. Students were comfortable asking for help and communicating with patients and family members. Participants did not feel
overwhelmed with ethical issues and believed they had opportunities to practice skills more than once.
Implications for Nursing Curricula: The readiness for practice experiences of Indigenous nursing students from our study appear to be similar to
other research projects that have sampled from a non-Indigenous population (Casey et al., 2011; Saber et al., 2015; Usher, Mills, West, Park, &
Woods, 2015; Woods, West, Mills, Park, Southern & Usher, 2014). Based on our study findings, cultural background does not appear to influence
students’ readiness for practice perceptions. This study contributes to the sparse literature on readiness for practice perceptions of Indigenous
nursing students and demonstrates that feelings of lack of preparation are common for most senior nursing students as they transition into the
workforce regardless of cultural heritage. Nurse educators have a responsibility to facilitate student supports that increase confidence, decrease
anxiety, and promote successful transition of new graduates into the nursing workforce.
References
Banister, G., Bowen-Brady, H.M., & Winfrey, M.E. (2014). Using career nurse mentors to support minority nursing students and facilitate their
transition to practice. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30(4), 317-325.
Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing [CASN]. (2016). Position Statement: Baccalaureate Education and Baccalaureate Programs. Ottawa, ON:
Author.
Casey, K., Fink., R., Jaynes, C., Campbell, L., Cook, P., & Wilson, V. (2011). Readiness for practice: The senior practicum experience. Journal of
Nursing Education, 50(11), 646-652. doi:10.3928/01484834-20110817-03
Exner-Pirot, H., & Butler, L. (2015). Healthy Foundations: Nursing's role in building strong Aboriginal communities. Ottawa, ON: The Conference
Board of Canada.
Guner, P. (2014). Preparedness of final year Turkish nursing students for work as a professional nurse. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(5-6), 844-854.
doi:10.1111/jocn.12673
Kulig, J.C., Lamb, M., Solowoniuk, J., Weaselfat, R., Shade, C, Healy, L., White, T., & Hirsch-Crowshoe, H. (2010). Nurturing a dream: The support
program for Aboriginal nursing students. First Nations Perspectives, 3(1), 89-106.
Loftin, C., Newman, S.D., Dumas, B.P., Gilden, G., & Bond, M.L. (2012). Perceived barriers to success for minority nursing students: An integrative
review. International Scholarly Research Network Nursing, 2012, 9 pages, article ID 806543, doi:10.5402/2012/806543
Saber, D.A., Anglade, D., & Schirle, L.M. (2015). A study examining senior nursing students’ expectations of work and the workforce. Journal of
Nursing Management, 24, 183-191. doi:10.1111/jonm.12322
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada [TRC]. (2015). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to Action. Winnipeg, MB:
Author.
Usher, K., Mills, J., West, C., Park, T., & Woods, C. (2015). Preregistration student nurses’ self-reported preparedness for practice before and after
the introduction of a capstone subject. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24, 3245-3254. doi:10.1111/jocn.12996
Woods, C., West, C., Mills, J., Park, T., Southern, J., & Usher, K. (2014). Undergraduate student nurses’ self-reported preparedness for practice.
Collegian, 22, 359-368. doi:10.1016/j/colegn.2014.05.003
Contact
[email protected]
Competency Testing: Evaluating a BSN Student’s Readiness for Transition to Practice
Kimberly Dillon-Bleich, MSN, RN, USA
Patricia A. Sharpnack, DNP, RN, CNE, NEA-BC, ANEF, USA
Lauren Patton, MSN, RN, CCRN, CHSE, USA
Abstract
Background: Clinical competence is a critical requisite of nursing education, yet new graduates are not adequately prepared for the
transition to professional practice. Rapid changes to the healthcare landscape require educators to create and implement innovative
strategies to facilitate, as well as, evaluate learning. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) have been used in medical
schools to facilitate assessment of clinical competency; however, there is limited use in undergraduate nursing programs (Salem,
Ramadan, El-Guenidy & Gaifer, 2012). An OSCE requires students to demonstrate skills and behaviors in a simulated environment
(Najja, Docherty & Miehl, 2016). With the limited use of OSCE’s in undergraduate nursing programs there is minimal understanding
of the benefits of OSCE’s, as well as, best practice for facilitating success in undergraduate nursing students transition to practice.
Purpose: To explore the use of competency testing through objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) in facilitating the transition to
professional nursing practice.
Research Question: Does systematic integration of competency testing prepare the undergraduate nursing student for the transfer of knowledge to
practice?
Methodology/implementation: Exploratory study. Nurse educators designed a series of OSCE’s as a final semester summative assessment for
students in a baccalaureate nursing program. Clinical practice partners provided input and guidance on station design and evaluated testing criteria
and processes. Station design was aligned with the state action coalition's nurse competency model designed by nurse leaders in education and
practice. Clinical scenarios that provided students an opportunity to demonstrate competency at patient management skills and identification of
quality and safety concerns were included. Students were required to make clinical judgments based on assessments, initiate interventions, and
demonstrate a professional, therapeutic relationship with the patient and/or family. Faculty evaluated each student on achievement of
competencies using an objective evaluation tool; inter-rater reliability was maintained through consistent trained evaluators and the use of
Panopto technology to record all stations. Student demographics and data from competency scores, participant feedback and NCLEX –RN results
from more than 65 students was obtained.
Results: A chi-square test was performed to assess the relationship between competency testing stations, the ATI Pharmacology standardized
assessment and NCLEX passage. The results for the ATI standardized assessment (1, N=65, = 6.08, p<.05), the clinical decision making competency
station (1, N=65, = 4.4, p<.05), and the quality and safety station (1, N=65, = 4.69, p<.05), were significant. No significance was found with the
delegation, patient assessment, or medication administration stations. Student and faculty feedback indicate that the OSCE effectively and fairly
evaluated clinical competencies and judgment skills. Students suggested that the use of OSCE’s be integrated early in the curriculum to reduce
stress level and promote improved accountability for best practice and maintenance of clinical competency. The lack of a reliable and valid tool for
competency assessment was a limitation of the project.
Conclusion: The association between preparedness for practice and competency development has implications for nursing. Including competency
testing throughout the curriculum, specifically testing that requires clinical decision-making is vital for safe transition to practice. The use of OSCE’s
at key points in the educational process can assist in evaluating student performance, identifying the need for remediation opportunities prior to
graduation, and preparing students for the transition to practice. The use of Panopto video recordings of student testing provided opportunity for
student reflection and self-assessment. Evidenced-based strategies that promote the use of competency testing and the integration of technology
are essential for transference of knowledge into professional practice. Further research to evaluate student outcomes and develop a valid and
reliable tool is essential in this process.
References
Katowa-Mukwato, P., Mwape, L., Kabinga-Makukula, M., Mweemba, P., Maimbolwa, M. (2013) Implementation of objective structured clinical
examinations for assessing nursing students’ competencies: Lessons and Implications. Creative Education, 4(10A), 48-53.
McWilliam, P., Botwinski, C. (2012). Identifying strengths and weaknesses of utilization of OSCE in a nursing program. Nursing Education
Perspectives. 33(1), 35-39.
Mok, H. T., So, C. F., & Chung, J. W. Y. (2016, October). Effectiveness of high-fidelity patient simulation in teaching clinical reasoning skills. Clinical
Simulation in Nursing. 12(10) 453-467.
Najja, R., Docherty, A., Miehl, N. (2016). Psychometric properties of an Objective Structured Assessment Tool. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2(3),
88-95.
Saliman, H., Mohammed sheble, A., Shrief, W. (2014). Effectiveness of Simulation training on clinical Nursing Education and competence:
Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Advanced Nursing Research. 2(4), 387-393.
Salem, A., Ramadan, F., El-Guenidy, M., Gaifer, M. (2012). Using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in undergraduate psychiatric
nursing education: Is it reliable and valid? Nursing Education Today. 32(3), 283–288.
Contact
[email protected]
Translating the Lived Experience of Transgender Persons to Nursing Curricula
Holly Carter, MSN, RN, FNP-BC, USA
Noreen E. M. Lennen, PhD, RN, USA
Stephanie L. Lewis, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Stacey J. Jones, DNP, FNP-BC, USA
Shawna "Missy" Mason, DNP, MSN, RN, FNP-BC, USA
Amy Yoder Spurlock, PhD, RN, USA
Eula W. Pines, PhD, DNP, PMHCNS-BC, USA
Abstract
The lesbian, bisexual, gay, and transgender (LBGT) population is a vulnerable and underserved health care population. In the United
States, approximately 1.4 million adults identify as transgender—double the number reported in 2011 (Flores et al, 2016). The
transgender population is at higher risk for many health issues. Depression estimates for the population are 27.8-51.3% (Bockting,
Miner, Swinburne, Hamilton & Coleman, 2014; Budge, Adelsen & Howard, 2013; Nuttbrock et al., 2014) with suicide attempts for
transgender veterans reported as 4085-5128/100,000 (Blosnich, et al., 2013). Additionally, 41.9% report experiencing non-suicidal
self-injury (Dickey, Reisner & Juntenen, 2015). Several studies have discovered relationships between these mental health concerns
and a history of violent experiences, exposure to transphobia, and denial of health care (Bockting et al, 2013; McCarty, Fisher, Irwin,
Coleman & Pelster, 2014; Nuttbrock et al., 2014).
The United States Department of Health and Human Services stated that one of the goals of its Healthy People 2020 initiative was to “improve the
health, safety, and well-being of LBGT individuals” (2014, para 1). Evidence suggests that gender-nonconforming individuals are becoming more
visible in local primary care settings in both rural and urban environments. Nurses have challenging roles in transforming evidenced-based care and
intervention into practice to provide culturally sensitive patient care for transgender people. Emerging evidence suggests that content related to
LGB and transgender health disparities in the nursing curriculum is suboptimal (Lim, Brown & Jones, 2013).
Recent social gains made by LGB and transgender communities indicate a need for a national LGBT health care agenda and illustrate the need for
nurses to address health parity for LGB and transgender individuals. Halloran (2015) states that few practitioners have received formal education
on the evolving needs of transgender patients. Undeniably, the nursing profession has consistently provided care for vulnerable diverse
populations. However, like other health care providers, nursing is influenced by sociopolitical values and society's expectations for health care
delivery systems. This may result in gaps in practicing nurses’ knowledge and skills, which may, in turn, adversely affect LGB and transgender
patients’ health care (Carabez et al., 2015; Chinn, 2013; Sirota, 2013).
Makadon, Goldhammer, and Davis (2015), assert that “there is no question that the actions and inactions of health professionals have had a
significant effect on the health of LGBT people” (p. 6). Chinn (2013)—a pioneer nurse educator and LGBT advocate—stated that LGBT content has
been missing from the nursing curricula for too long, and has encouraged nursing faculty to integrate LGBT issues into their curricula. Chinn (2013)
identified four common barriers faculty experience related to the integration of LGBT-related curriculum content: sexual identity, lack of sufficient
time, issues regarding religious beliefs, and fear of negative student evaluations. Levesque (2015) asserted that the increasing visibility of
transgender students in academia requires nurse educators to build a culturally congruent curriculum wherein the next generation of nurses can
feel safe and free from harm and prejudices, including the threat of bullying (Zou, Andersen, & Blosnich, 2016).
Understanding the transgender experience as these individuals transition to an appropriate gender expression will have a positive impact on
nursing knowledge and professional collaborative nursing practice. Although research related to this vulnerable population has been conducted,
little is known about the transition experience of transgender people. A phenomenological study was conducted to explore the lived experience of
11 individuals who have undergone gender transitions. The secondary aims of the study were to better address the health disparities of
transgender individuals and guide faculty in implementing curricula to meet health disparities of transgender individuals.
After data analysis from in-depth interviews was completed, four major themes emerged and were threaded through the participants’ experiences:
a) it’s gravity; b) shedding your skin; c) navigating the way; and d) a turning point. Participants shared the unrelenting recognition of their biological
gender not matching their emotional gender. Most participants experienced a turning point in their gender identification journey. Many
experienced thoughts of suicide and recurring depression before their gender transitions. Locating high quality healthcare resources was a
common theme. They identified word of mouth and transgender groups as their primary sources of information. Participants shared their desire to
make meaning from their experience in order to help and advocate for others. Understanding these commonalities of the lived experience of
transgendered people is a fundamental objective for healthcare providers and educators so that quality care is given to improve patient outcomes
in this vulnerable population.
References
Blosnich, J. R., Brown, G. R., Shipherd, J. C., Kauth, M., Piegari, R. I., & Bossarte, R. M. (2013). Prevalence of gender identity disorder and suicide risk
among transgender veterans utilizing Veterans health administration care. American Journal of Public Health, 103 (10), e27-e32. doi:
10.2105/AJPH.2013.301507
Bockting, W. O., Miner, M. H., Swinburne Romine, R. E., Hamilton, A. & Coleman, E. (2013). Stigma, Mental health, and resilience in an online
sample of the transgender population. American Journal of Public Health, 103 (5), 943-951. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301241
Budge, S. L., Adelson, J. L. & Howard, K. A. S. (2013). Anxiety and depression in transgender individuals: The roles of transition status, loss, social
support and coping. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 81 (3), 545-557. doi: 10.137/a0031774
Carabez, R., Pellegrini, M., Mankovitz, A., Eliason, M., Ciano, M., & Scott, M. (2015). “Never in all my years...”: Nurses education about LGBT health,
Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(4), 323-329. doi: retrieved from http://dx,doi.org/101016/profnurs.2015.01003
Chinn, P. (2013). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender health disparities: Disparities we can change. Nurse Educator 38(3), 94-95. doi:
110.1097/NNE097/NNE.0b013e31828dc8dc235
Dickey, L. M., Reisner, S. L. & Juntenen, C. L. (2015). Non-suicidal self-injury in a large online sample of transgender adults. Professional Psychology:
Research and Practice, 46 (1), 3- 11. doi: 10.137/a0038803
Flores, A.R., Herman, J.L., Gates, G.J., & Brown, T.N.T. (2016). How many adults identify as transgender in the United States? Los Angeles, CA: The
Williams Institute. Retrieved from http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/How-Many-Adults-Identify-as-Transgender-in-the-
United-States.pdf
Halloran, L. (2015). Caring for transgender patient. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 11(9), 915-916.
Levesque, P. (2015). Meeting the needs of the transgender nursing student. Nurse Educator, 40(5), .doi: 10 1097/NNE.0000000000000163
Lim, F. A., Brown, D.V., & Jones, H. (2013). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health: Fundamentals for nursing education. Journal of Nursing
Education, 52(4). doi: 10.3928/01484834-20130311-02
Makadon, H. J., Goldhammer, H. & Davis, J. (Eds.). Changing the clinical environment and educating professions. pp, 1-39. In The Fenway guide to
lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health. (2nd ed.), Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians.
McCarty, M. A., Fisher, C. M., Irwin, J. A., Coleman, J. D. & Pelster, A. D. K. (2014). Using the minority stress model to understand depression in
lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals in Nebraska. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Mental Health, 18 (4), 346-360. doi:
10.1800/19359705.2014.908445
Nuttbrock, L., Bockting, W. Rosenblum, A., Hwahng, S. Mason, M., Macri, M., & Becker, J. (2014). Gender abuse and major depression among
transgender women: A prospective study of vulnerability and resilience. American Journal of Public Health, 104 (11), 2191- 2198. doi:
10.2105/AJPH.2013.301545
Sirota, T, (2013). Attitudes among nurse educators toward homosexuality. Journal of Nursing Education 52(4), 219-227. doi: 10. 3928/014484834-
20130320-01
United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020. Lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender health. Retrieved from http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=25
Zou, C., Andersen, J. P., & Blosnich, J. R. (2016). The association between bullying and physical health among gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals,
Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, (19),6, 356-365. doi 10.1177/1078390313510739
Contact
[email protected]
Fostering Inclusive Spaces for Diverse LGBTTQ+ Students and Clients in Nursing Curriculum
Roya Haghiri-Vijeh, MN, Canada
Tara McCulloch, MA (Ed), Canada
Gabriel Bedard, MA, Canada
Abstract
Peggy McIntosh and Emily Style coined the metaphor that curriculum should be both a “window” and “a mirror” for students. The
curriculum should ideally provide “windows out into the experiences of others, as well as mirrors of the student’s own reality”
(Michie, 2014, para. 2). It is evident in research that when students feel excluded from curriculum they may not be engaged fully
with the content. In reverse, when students are exposed to an inclusive curriculum, they feel motivated and engaged with the
content of the course (Haghiri-Vijeh, 2013; Lim & Kim, 2014; Knowles, 1980). Similarly, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, two-spirit,
and queer (LGBTTQ+) communities are often missed from nursing education and their health and social care needs are not
addressed in the nursing curriculum (Merryfeather & Bruce, 2014). This is relevant to programs in nursing education at diploma,
undergraduate, and graduate degree programs (Echezona-Johnson, 2017; Daley & MacDonnell, 2015). Foundational nursing
textbooks highlight the importance of inclusivity for all clients, but is this really the case when it comes to LGBTTQ+ clients? Nursing
programs must shed light on the importance of acceptance, access, and health equity for the health of LGBTTQ+ populations. Yet,
nursing faculty and researchers lack the tools to provide an inclusive and positive space for their LGBTQ+ students in the classroom,
lab, and clinical placements (Lim & Hsu, 2016; Sirota, 2013; Sugden, Bosse & LeBlanc, 2016). This presentation aims to provide
suggestions and tools on how to foster inclusive environments in nursing education for diverse LGBTTQ+ communities.
This presentation will include lessons learned from providing 3-hour Positive Space training to students. The aim of this study was to examine
students’ knowledge and comfort with LGBTTQ+ communities before and after the Positive Space training and its impact on their professional
practice. This study employed a mixed method quasi-experimental research study with pretest, posttest, and focus group interviews. The
participants included 160 urban city students in Canada. The results showed statistically significant increases in students’ knowledge and comfort
about LGBTQ+ communities post training. Unexpected findings were that students had started to educate and inform family and friends about
LGBTTQ+ communities after the training. Therefore, incorporation of Positive Space training for healthcare professionals is crucial and has been
found beneficial.
References
Daley, A., & MacDonnell, J. A. (2015). ‘That would have been beneficial’: LGBTQ education for home-care service providers. Health and Social Care
in the community, 23(3), 282-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12141
Echezona-Johnson, C. (2017). Evaluations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender knowledge in basic obstetricalnursing education. National
League for Nursing, 38(3), 138-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000136
Haghiri-Vijeh, R. (2013). The Importance of Including the Needs of the LGBTIQ Community in the Millennium Development Goals and Education of
Healthcare Professionals. The Journal of Global Citizenship and Equity Education, 3(1). Retrieved from
http://journals.sfu.ca/jgcee/index.php/jgcee/article/view/86/144
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education, from pedagogy to andragogy. Revised and updated. Chicago, Follett Publisher.
Lim, F. A., & Hsu, R. (2016). Nursing Students’ Attitudes Toward Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Persons: An Integrative Review. National
League for Nursing, 144-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000004
Lim, F. A., & Kim, S. M. (2014). Addressing Health Care Disparities in the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Population: A Review of Best
Practices. American Journal of Nursing, 114(6), 24-34.
Merryfeather, L., & Bruce, A. (2014). The invisibility of gender diversity: understanding transgender and transsexuality in nursing literature. Nursing
Forum: An Independent Voice for Nursing, 49(2), 110-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12061
Michie, G. (2014, July 22). On the importance of mirrors for students (and teachers). Huffington Post. Retrieved from
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gregory-michie/on-the-importance-of-mirr_b_5604494.html
Sirota, T. (2013). Attitudes Among Nurse Educators Toward Homosexuality. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(4), 219-227.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20130320-01
Sugden, B., Bosse, J., & LeBlanc, R. (2016). A Dialogue on difference: Addressing the health needs of LGBT individuals through nursing education.
Nursing Research, 65(2).
Contact
[email protected]
African American Nurses Speak Out About Trust and Mistrust in Predominately White Nursing Programs
Barbara J. White, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: The nursing profession has attempted to become a more diversified workforce over the last forty years. A diverse workforce is needed
to serve the needs of an increasingly diverse client population (IOM, 2004, 2010, 2015). Greater racial diversity in the healthcare professions
improves communication with clients, access to healthcare for minority populations, and client outcomes (IOM, 2003, 2004, 2010; National Center
for Cultural Competence, 2004). Further, healthcare workforce diversity improves client trust, reduces discrimination, and promotes more positive
experiences (Anderson et al., 2003; J. Cohen, Gabriel & Terrell, 2002; LaVeist, Nickerson & Bowie, 2000). While 12.4% of the U.S. population is
African American[1] (Humes, Jones, & Ramirez, 2011), only 5.5% of RNs are African American (Budden, Harper, Brunell & Smiley, 2016). Therefore,
the nursing profession is dependent on pre-licensure nursing programs to increase the enrollment and graduation of minority students to increase
workforce diversity.
Graduation gaps: The Education Trust (2017) describes that though enrollment for African American students in colleges and universities is an
accurate reflection of the African American population, six-year graduation is disparately lower for African American students; 70.2% compared to
80.5% for European American[2] students at non-Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). However, African American enrollment in
nursing programs does not reflect the African American population (AACN, 2014). Attrition is widely believed to be a significant problem for African
American nursing students, though there are no national attrition data published by the AACN or the NLN documenting the problem. The AACN
reports that African Americans have a lower graduation rate than all other racial and ethnic minorities (AACN, 2013).
Study: The purposes of this study were to describe the experiences, and the meaning those experiences had, for African American students who
attended predominately European American schools of nursing. Qualitative descriptive design was used to answer the research questions. 14 study
participants who self-identified as African American registered nurses and who reported that they attended predominately European American
nursing programs were interviewed to reflect back on their nursing school experiences. The percentage of African American students in the nursing
programs participants attended ranged from 1% to 18%. The participants came from 6 different states in the US including three regions: the east,
mid-west, and south-central. Semi-structured interviews were used for this study using open-ended broad questions in order for the participants to
choose what experiences were important for them to share with the investigator.
Findings: Thematic analysis of the interview transcripts resulted in theme of trust/mistrust with some European Americans encountered during
nursing school including faculty, classmates, advisors, and administrators. Participants reported mistrust as behaviors by European Americans of
looking down or judging them, not keeping information private, having a double standard between African American and European American
students, and different life experiences compared to the African American students. Trust was described by study participants as people who
cared, worked for diversity, and showed their genuine support through actions. Trust usually developed over time, sometimes taking longer than
one semester to develop.
Trust in education: Trust between instructors and students is integral for learning (Willie, 2000) and contributes to enrollment and graaduation
from colleges and universities (Ghosh, Whipple & Bryan, 2001). Faculty members who exhibit caring, respect, and active listening, and who
engender trust and build and create a respectful classroom environment, are viewed by underrepresented minority students as most effective
(Case, 2013). Feeling sterotyped or stigmatized by European American faculty members and classmates creates distrust in African American
students that in turn hinders motivation and academic achievement (Cohen & Steele, 2002).
Implications: These findings are important in order to shed new light on a persistent problem in nursing in so that faculty members and program
administrators can develop new strategies for recruiting and retaining African American nursing students. For example, nursing programs need to
intentionally create fair and respectful learning environments that value and embrace racial and ethnic diversity in the nursing programs. Faculty,
advisors, and administrators need to learn about, and work to minimize, micro-aggressions (Sue, 2010) and implicit bias (Banaji & Greenwald,
2016). For example, faculty who grade should be shielded from the student names whenever possible (Banaji & Greenwald, 2016). Focus groups
and student surveys can provide important information about the nursing program’s environment. Trustworthiness is demonstrated by adhering to
policies fairly for all students, participation in campus diversity programs and events by non-minority students, faculty and administrators, listening
without judging, and acting on student feedback. Student trust is gained with convenient and welcoming office hours and timely response to
emails. Faculty may need to continue to invite students into their offices after they have left the course since for some students trust is only gained
over an extended period of time.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN] (2013). 2012-2013 Enrollment and Graduations in Baccalaureate and Graduate Programs in
Nursing. Retrieved from http://www.AACN.nche.edu.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN] (2014). The Changing Landscape: Nursing Student Diversity on the Rise. Retrieved from
http://www.AACN.nche.edu/diversity-in-nursing.
Anderson, L., Scrimshaw, S., Fullilove, M., Fielding, J., & Normand, J. (2003). Culturally competent healthcare systems: A systematic review.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(3S), 68-79.
Benaji, M. & Greenwald, A. (2016). Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Budden, J. M., P.; Harper, K.; Brunell, M.L.; Smiley, R. (2016). The 2015 national nursing workforce survey. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 7(Suppl 1),
S4-S51.
Case, K. (2013). Teaching strengths, attitudes, and behaviors of professors that contribute to the learning of African-American and Latino/a college
students. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 24(2), 129-154.
Cohen, G., & Steele, C. (2002). A barrier of mistrust: How negative stereotypes affect cross-race mentoring. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic
achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 303-327). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Cohen, J., Gabriel, B., & Terrell, C. (2002). The case for diversity in the health care workforce. Health Affairs, 21(5), 90-102. Education Trust,
2017IOM, 2003
Ghosh, A., Whipple, T. & Bryan, G. (2001). Student trust and its antecedents in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(3), 322-340.
Humes, K., Jones, N., & Ramirez, R. (2011). Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010. Retrieved from
http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf
Institute of Medicine [IOM] (2004). In the Nation's Compelling Interest: Ensuring Diversity in the Health Care Workforce. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine [IOM] (2010). The Future of Nursing: Focus on Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine [IOM] (2015). Assessing Progress on the IOM Report the Future of Nursing. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
LaVeist, T. A., Nickerson, K. J., & Bowie, J. V. (2000). Attitudes about racism, medical mistrust, and satisfaction with care among African American
and White cardiac patients. Medical Care Research and Review: MCRR, 57 (Suppl 1), 146-161.
National Center for Cultural Competence (2004). Bridging the cultural divide in health care setting: The essential role of cultural broker programs
(pp. 1-29). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Sue, D. W. (2010). Microagressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender and Sexual Orientation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Willie, C. (2000). Confidence, trust and respect: The preeminent goals of educational reform. The Journal of Negro Education, 69(4), 255-262.
Contact
[email protected]
The Pedagogical Practices of Clinical Nurse Educators
A. J. Jennings, PhD, Canada
Abstract
Clinical practica are an essential component in undergraduate nursing programs and clinical nurse educators are primarily involved
in teaching in the clinical arena. Clinical instruction is a pedagogical process (Fowler, 1996; Lyth, 2000), where the clinical instructor
guides and instructs students in their learning about nursing in the clinical environment. The teaching practice of nurse educators is
underrepresented in the literature in nursing education and the ethical challenges that clinical instructors encounter are absent.
A grounded theory methodology suggested by Charmaz (2010) guided this study design. The purpose of this study was twofold; to theorize the
pedagogical practices of clinical nurse educators and to uncover the challenges that participants encountered while teaching in the clinical
arena. Exploratory, semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve clinical nurse educator participants teaching in undergraduate nursing
programs in a large metropolitan city in Ontario, Canada. The data was coded and analyzed using the procedures outlined by Corbin and Strauss
(2008, 2015) and Charmaz (2010) such as constant comparison, theoretical sampling, theoretical sensitivity and reflexivity. Rigour is this study
involved both methodological rigour(Cooney, 2011) and interpretive rigour (Charmaz(2010).
A central concept emerged from the data and encompassed the main concepts found in the results. In this presentation, the author discusses one
of the study results, Ethics in Teaching (Campbell, 2003; 2003a; Hansen, 1998) that underpins the teaching practice of the participants. This
concept includes the personal and professional values of the participants; Moral conflict experienced by the participants; Ethics found in the
Traditional and Progressive approach to teaching and its impact on learning and teaching. The author provides exemplars from the data and
situates the concept in the literature. Furthermore, this result explicates ethical teaching practices in nursing in detail and its effect on learning and
teaching in the clinical arena.
Teaching in the clinical arena in nursing is complex and multilayered. The practice of clinical nurse educators and how they contribute to student
learning will also be discussed in this presentation.
References
Campbell, E. (2003). The teacher as a moral person. The Ethical Teacher. Publisher: Open University Press, McGraw Hill Publication UK.
Campbell, E (2003a). The teacher as a moral educator. The Ethical Teacher. Publisher: Open University Press McGraw Hill Publication. UK
Charmaz, K. (2010). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative Analysis. Publisher- Sage publications.
Cooney, A. (2011). Rigour and grounded theory. Nurse researcher. 18(4). 17-22.
Corbin, J; & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd Ed. Publisher: Sage
Publications.
Corbin J.; & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 4Ed. Sage Publisher.
Fowler, J. (1996). The organization of clinical supervision within the nursing profession: A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 23,
471-478.
Hansen, D. T. (1998). The moral is in the practice. Teaching and Teacher Education. 14(6). 643-655.
Lyth, G. M. (2000). Clinical supervision: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 31(3), 722-729.
Contact
[email protected]
Using Virtual Reality 360 Video for Interprofessional Simulation Education
Sherleena Ann Buchman, PhD, MSN, RN, USA
Deborah Ellen Henderson, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
AHRQ (2017) identified communication breakdown among patients, providers of care, and healthcare staff as one of the top four
threats to patient safety. The care provided to patients has grown more complex, leading to a need for novel solutions from nursing
educators to prepare students for practice. Understanding how interprofessional healthcare students are immersed in technology
use and how students experience being in the psychological presence of learning through VR 360 use will inform educators
regarding opportunities to improve teaching and learning in an interactive and meaningful manner.
By arranging learning in interprofessional teams where nursing students can learn about, from and with each other, nurse educators and
interprofessional colleagues can begin to make a meaningful impact on learners’ preparation (WHO, 2010). It is important to contribute to the
body of knowledge on best practices for real to life scenarios in an environment that does not include risk to real patients. Educating
interprofessional students in a team approach can enhance exposure to the interprofessional competencies such as enhanced communication and
the value of teams and teamwork (IPEC, 2016; Gaba, 2006). One clear example of applying communication and teamwork competencies is through
debriefing (Ruterford-Hemming et al, 2016). Debriefing brings various professional viewpoints into the learning and can be used to develop
appreciation and experiences in teamwork.
Virtual Reality (VR) is the digital creation of scenarios that are interactive visually and aurally, as well as immersive (Jerald, 2015). By adding 360
degrees of video into a virtual reality world, it is possible to immerse the learner in every aspect of their environment with the simple turn of the
head toward a new direction. During an educational experience, coupling the virtual reality 360-degree video experience with an embodiment as a
patient places the participant learner in the situation of patient during the scenario. The body interacts with the world and the brain in turn
believes that the interactions are a true cognitive experience (Wilson, 2002). In addition to the value of patient embodiment experiences, the
development and delivery of virtual reality 360-degree video becomes more cost efficient as more are available, as the equipment costs decrease,
and as the faculty resource costs decline.
Simulated scenarios using VR 360 video could lead to more informed patient care by healthcare students and interprofessional teams by arranging
interprofessional healthcare students in an embodied virtual reality 360 learning experience where students are immersed in the role of the
patient, allows for a more consistent multi user experience.
In a pilot study, a group of healthcare students arranged in interprofessional teams encountered a VR 360 video experience. Students experienced
the same embodied experience of Alfred © for a seven minute, set of six live action VR 360-degree video scenario of a patient with multiple health
concerns (Washington & Shaw, 2016). All of the interprofessional participant learners heard, saw and experienced the same conditions.
Transitioning simulation to a virtual reality 360 video experience from a common simulation experience like using manikins or standardized actors
as patients, holds promise for learning improvement, student success and student satisfaction.
If embodying interprofessional healthcare students in virtual reality is as or more effective than traditional simulation methods, then it will have
positive implications on improving nursing simulation education and practice. Multiple students will be able to experience a given scenario in a
synchronous, or possibly asynchronous environment, while maintaining consistency in the simulation learning opportunity.
The pilot research involved arranging interprofessional health care students in an embodied patient scenario via virtual reality 360 video. The
findings will guide the development of future research for health related virtual reality 360 video experiences. Further research is needed involving
virtual reality 360 video efficiencies and effectiveness for interprofessional simulations learning. This pilot research explored a novel approach for
interprofessional students to experience a patient experience through the virtual reality 360 Alfred © embodiment experiences and results will be
shared.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ]. (2017). Mission & Budget. Retrieved from
https://www.ahrq.gov/cpi/about/mission/index.html
Bednash, G. P., Kirschling, J., Breslin, E. T., & Rosseter, R. (2014). Building the ResearchEnterprise in the Academic Environment. Quality
Advancement in Nursing Education-Avancées en formation infirmière, 1(1), 8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17483/2368-6669.1006
Gaba, D. M. (2006). What does simulation add to teamwork training? AHRQ WebM&M. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Retrieved from https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/25/simulation-training
Interprofessional Education Collaborative [IPEC]. (2016). Core competencies for Interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington,
DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative.
Jerald, J. (2015). The VR book: Human-centered design for virtual reality. New York, NY: Morgan & Claypool.
Rutherford-Hemming, T., Lioce, L., Jeffries, P. R., & Sittner, B. (2016). After the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Simulation Study—
recommendations and next steps. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(1), 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.10.010
Washington, E. & Shaw, C. (2016). The effects of a VR intervention on career interest, empathy, communication skills and learning with 2nd year
medical students. Embodied Labs Inc. Retrieved from
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57237ac420c647f685d44510/t/58efe557a5790a8991a2db43/1492116825960/EL+Whitepaper+-
+Effects+of+a+VR+Intervention.pdf
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636. doi: 10.3758/BF03196322
World Health Organization (WHO). 2010. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/framework_action/en/
Contact
[email protected]
Capturing Meaningful Moments: Strategies to Enhance Affective Learning During an Interprofessional
Service Experience in Nicaragua
Gay Lynn Armstrong, MSN, RN, USA
Marylyn Kajs-Wyllie, APRN, MSN, USA
Star Mitchell, PhD, RN, CCRN, USA
Abstract
Purpose: This project highlights implementation of SHOWeD, an arts-based strategy, as a teaching method used to promote affective learning in an
interprofessional clinical experience in Nicaragua.
Design/Methods: Faculty from the College of Health Professions collaborated to develop an interprofessional clinical experience in an underserved
area of Nicaragua using the Interprofessional Core Competencies for Collaborative practice (IPEC, 2016). The SHOWeD method, (Schaffer, 1986), a
common technique employing photovoice methods, (Woodgate, 2017), was utilized with students from laboratory science, nursing, and respiratory
care. During this clinical experience abroad, students were encouraged to take photos they found personally meaningful and were also provided
daily photo journaling prompts designed to enhance self-awareness. After completion of the study abroad and in preparation for a group
summative debriefing, students were asked to identify and submit a favorite and a least favorite photo. For each self-selected photo, students
were then encouraged to reflect and provide written responses to the five SHOWeD questions; “What do you see here?” “What is really happening
here?”, “How does this relate to our lives?” “Why does this situation exist?” and “What can we do about it?” Faculty compiled the submitted
photos into a PowerPoint presentation which was viewed by all participating students and faculty. During the viewing, each student was provided
one to two minutes to share their photos and personal reflections. Upon conclusion of this viewing and reflective sharing, students responded in
writing to the following four questions; 1. What factors influenced your choice of the favorite and least favorite photograph you submitted? 2. How
did the sharing of other team members’ photos expand your experience? 3. Reflecting on your team members least favorite photos, what image(s)
stand out and why? 4. Reflecting on your team members most favorite photos, what image(s) stand out and why? Written answers, oral narratives,
and the photos were compiled, analyzed, and coded to provide insight into themes and student reflections of using the SHOWeD technique.
Results/Findings: Eighteen nursing students, four laboratory science students, and two respiratory care students participated in this project.
Students identified emotional responses to situational experiences as influencing their choice of photos selected to submit for presentation to their
peers. In choosing their least favorite photo, student’s selected images that reflected moments when they were feeling ineffective, out of place, or
not contributing to the situation at hand. Their most favorite self-produced photos had a connection to personal experiences from home, were
related to the practice area they hoped to pursue, or reflected moments when they perceived they were making a difference in the community
being served.
In addition to reflecting on their own photos chosen for presentation, students were also asked to reflect on those photos selected by their peers.
Images that were least favored among the group were those that reflected the stark differences between the Nicaraguan community and their own
communities. Oddly, these photos did not include people. Photos that were most favorite among the group reflected themes of joy, remembrances
of beauty, human resilience, and commonalities of people from different cultures. When asked how sharing of other tema members' photos
expanded their study abroad experience, students responded that they were better able to understand the varied perspectives of other group
members. They recognized similarities in photo themes even though group members had different backgrounds, motives, and desires.
Impact: Based on student’s responses and faculty observations, the SHOWeD technique utilized in this interprofessional approach impacted this
group of students by providing an avenue to engage interprofessionally and enhance affective learning. Choosing and reflecting on self-produced
photos encouraged development of the affective domain of learning by capturing meaningful moments, which many times cannot be achieved by
written journal, essay, or oral story telling. The act of sharing their photos and reflections with other group members helped the student’s develop
mutual respect as they recognized shared values, increased their knowledge of other professional roles, and encouraged relationship building.
Discussion/Implications: Nurse educators involved in collaborative interprofessional education efforts must adopt and master strategies to
promote affective learning and self -awareness that will ignite the interdisciplinary groups’ ability to maintain a climate of mutual respect and
shared values, increase the knowledge of their own roles and those of other professions, and learn to communicate with other health disciplines
and apply relationship- building values and principles of team dynamics to provide health programs. (IPEC, 2016). Arts-based reflection is an
effective teaching strategy that can be used to encourage learning within the affective domain (Ondrejka, 2014). The SHOWeD method is one
strategy that should be considered. Findings from this project indicate that students enjoy the participatory nature of these activities and believe
them to be effective learning activities. Further research is needed to provide evidence of changes in values, behaviors, or critical actions that
result from using this method in collaborative interprofessional learning.
Conclusions: As nurse educators participate in interprofessional education, it is essential that evidenced based teaching strategies be used that
encourage affective learning focused on achieving competencies established by IPEC. The SHOWeD method of teaching is one approach that shows
possibility with this challenge.
References
Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice (IPEC). 2016). Retreived May 31st, 2017, from
http://ipecollaborative.org/uploads/IPEC -2016 Updated-Core-Competencies-Report_final_relese_.PDF
Evans-Agnew, R. A., & Rosemberg, M. S. (2016). Questioning photovoice research: Whose voice? Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1019-1030
Gilliland, I., Attridge, R. L., Attridge, R. T., Maize, D. F., & McNeill, J. (2016). Building cultural sensitivity and interprofessional collaboration through a
study abroad experience. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(1), 45-48.
Hannes, K., & Parylo, O. (2014). Let's Play It Safe: Ethical considerations from participants in a Photovoice research project. International Journal of
Qualitative Methods, 13255-274.
Ondrejka, D. (2014). Affective teaching in nursing: Connecting to feelings, values, and inner awareness. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Shaffer, R. (1983). Beyond the dispensary. Nairobi, Kenya: African Medical and Research Foundation.
Woodgate, R. L., Zurba, M., & Tennent, P. (2017). Worth a Thousand Words? Advantages, challenges and opportunities in working with Photovoice
as a qualitative research method with youth and their families. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1), 126-148.
Contact
[email protected]
Overcoming Challenges in Evaluating Active versus Observer Roles in Simulation-Based Education
Brandon Kyle Johnson, MSN, RN, CHSE, USA
Deanna L. Reising, PhD, RN, ACNS-BC, FNAP, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Different student roles are frequently used in simulation-based education. A participant in the active role such as the primary nurse
makes decisions and is involved in total patient care in the scenario. Alternatively, a participant in the passive role such as the
observer, is frequently watching the simulation unfold without direct involvement in the decision-making. In the National Simulation
Study, authors noted that students spend a large amount of time in the passive observation role (Hayden, Smiley, Alexander,
Kardong-Edgren, & Jeffries, 2014).
Current research and practice within the nursing discipline has equated having students observe nursing practice with constructivist and
experiential learning—the guiding frameworks that underpin simulation-based education (Jeffries, Rogers, & Adamson, 2016). However, there has
been no research in nursing education to explore if these experiences for learners in observational roles do in fact support constructivist and
experiential learning models. These theories include concepts of assimilation, accommodation, and active experimentation which would require
two experiences, similar in nature, to allow for these to be evaluated (Kolb, 2015; Piaget & Cook, 1952). Therefore, the purpose of this pilot study
was to establish that two simulation-based experiences, involving a clinical situation with respiratory distress, were contextually equivalent
scenarios.
Research in nursing education is beginning to demonstrate that learning outcomes are not significantly different based on the student role in
simulations (Fluharty et al., 2012; Kaplan et al., 2012; Livsey & Lavender-Stott, 2015; Rode et al., 2016; Scherer et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2013;
Thidemann & Soderhamn, 2013; Zulkosky et al., 2016). However, only three studies examine more than one simulation (Livsey & Lavender-Stott,
2015; Rode et al., 2016; Scherer et al., 2016). Additionally, a significant amount of the existing studies failed to report psychometric analyses of
knowledge assessments and/or behavioral instruments raising questions to stated outcomes (Kaplan et al., 2012; Smith et al., 2013; Thidemann &
Soderhamn, 2013.) As nursing education simulation programs seek to increase simulation-based experiences, research is needed to demonstrate if
one simulation-based experience is enough, despite role, for learners to assimilate and accommodate in subsequent scenarios. Assimilation and
accommodation are suggested as the “ultimate goal in a practice profession and the essence of reflection” in simulation-based education
(Dreifuerst, 2009, p. 111).
This study took place at a large multi-campus university baccalaureate prelicensure nursing program in the Southwest and involved 78 students and
10 faculty across two campuses. Data collection for the two simulations included four pre/post-tests that were designed to measure knowledge
related to respiratory distress. Efforts to establish equivalency included constructing each exam with a similar number of questions assessing equal
numbers of knowledge domains and NCLEX-RN competencies in alignment with the 2016 NCLEX-RN Test Plan. Content validity was established
with an expert NCLEX-RN item writer. Item analyses were conducted to assess difficulty, discrimination, and instructional sensitivity (Haladyna,
2016; Waltz, Strickland, & Lenz, 2017) as well as internal consistency using the Küder-Richardson Formula 20. Additionally, data collection included
a list of action-items that was developed to assess if each simulation required similar actions to address respiratory distress. Content validity was
established with course faculty and a PhD prepared nurse with expertise in nursing education research. Interrater reliability was conducted through
viewing recorded simulations.
Preliminary findings from this study include that psychometric testing of multiple-choice knowledge assessments can assist nursing education
researchers not only in demonstrating the validity and reliability of measurements, but also in understanding how sensitive the simulation scenario
and debriefing are to the content of the assessment. Although critiqued as a passive form of knowledge, multiple-choice tests are feasible to
implement in simulation-based education (O’Donnel et al., 2014). Low validity and reliability scores were apparent; however, through the
examination of additional discriminants including the Pre-Post Discrimination Index, the Individual Gain Index, and the Net Gain Index (Waltz,
Strickland, & Lenz, 2017), the simulation markedly improved performance on individual questions indicating the sensitivity of the simulation.
The list of action items demonstrated moderate internal consistency using Cronbach’s alpha (Simulation 1= .692, Simulation 2=.795); however,
faculty that participated and viewed recorded simulations reported issues in the facilitation of simulation-based education across instructors and
campuses that confounded the ability to state that two simulation experiences were equivalent. This finding supports that multi-site/multi-campus
programs of simulation need to be strongly based on the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standards
of Best Practice: Simulation (2016). Otherwise, it is highly likely that simulation-based experiences are different from facilitator-to-facilitator and
campus-to-campus.
Lastly, when evaluating action items, preliminary findings support research regarding formative and summative testing that while “all faculty are
content experts, not all are expert evaluators” (Kardong-Edgren, et al., 2017). Interrater reliability was not established during this pilot study.
Traditional simulation design with more students observing than participating presents challenges to conducting research regarding student role
due to a clustered simulation design that is present. While the action items were present in each simulation as demonstrated by the moderate
Cronbach’s alpha, evaluation would need to be individualized which provides challenges with time, resources, and feasibility to occur as part of a
clinical course.
Findings from this pilot study revealed numerous challenges in conducting research regarding role in simulation, multiple simulations, inter-rater
reliability, validity and reliability in educational research, and multi-site/multi-campus research. These findings, although inconclusive, contribute to
ongoing discussions in nursing education that will assist researchers and educators when using simulation as an educational intervention.
Additional item analyses can provide educators and researchers with information regarding instructional versus content sensitivity. For novice
researchers and educators, these additional discriminants can inform how effective classroom, clinical, or simulation-based instruction is in
comparison to content examined. Further, a discussion regarding integration of INACSL Standards of Best Practice for Simulation will further
contribute to advancing simulation-based experiences in individual schools, multi-campus schools, and multi-site research. Finally, while pilot
studies in research and doctoral programs may result in inconclusive data, the learning experience is crucial to developing an understanding of
research processes, challenges, and limitations in nursing education research.
References
Dreifuerst, K. T. (2009). The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: A concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 109-114.
Fluharty, L., Hayes, A. S., Milgrom, L., Malarney, K., Smith, D., Reklau, M. A., . . . McNelis, A. M. (2012). A multisite, multi–academic track evaluation
of end-of-life simulation for nursing education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(4), e135-e143. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.08.003
Haladyna, T. M. (2016). Item analysis for selected response test items. In S. Lane, M. R. Raymond, & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of Test
Development. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P. R. (2014). The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal,
randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), S1-41.
INACSL Standards Committee. (2016a). INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Debriefing. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, S21-S25.
doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.008
INACSL Standards Committee. (2016b). INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Facilitation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, S16-S20.
doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.007
INACSL Standards Committee. (2016c). INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Outcomes and Objectives. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12,
S13-S15. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.006
INACSL Standards Committee. (2016d). INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Participant Evaluation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, S26-
S29. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.009
INACSL Standards Committee. (2016e). INACSL Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Simulation Design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, S5-S12.
doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.005
Jeffries, P. R., Rodgers, B., & Adamson, K. (2016). NLN Jeffries simulation theory: Brief narrative description. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(5),
292-293. doi:10.5480/1536-5026-36.5.292
Kaplan, B. G., Abraham, C., & Gary, R. (2012). Effects of participation vs. observation of a simulation experience on testing outcomes: Implications
for logistical planning for a school of nursing. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 9(1), 1-15.
Kardong-Edgren, S., Oermann, M.H., Rizzolo, M.A., & Odom-Maryon, T. (2017). Establishing inter- and intrarater reliability for high-stakes testing
using simulation. Nursing Education Perspectives 38(2), 63-68. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000114
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education,
Inc.
Livsey, K., & Lavender-Stott, E. (2015). Impact of vicarious learning through peer observation during simulation on student behavioural measures.
Focus on Health Professional Education, 16(4), 64-73.
O'Donnell, J. M., Decker, S. I., Howard, V., Levett-Jones, T., & Miller, C. W. (2014). NLN/Jeffries Simulation Framework State of the Science Project:
Simulation Learning Outcomes. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10(7), 373-382. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.06.004
Piaget, J., & Cook, M. T. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press.
Rode, J. L., Callihan, M. L., & Barnes, B. L. (2016). Assessing the value of large-group simulation in the classroom. Clinical Simulation in Nursing,
12(7), 251-259. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.02.012
Scherer, Y. K., Foltz-Ramos, K., Fabry, D., & Chao, Y.-Y. (2016). Evaluating simulation methodologies to determine best strategies to maximize
student learning. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(5), 349-357. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.003
Smith, K. V., Klaassen, J., Zimmerman, C., & Cheng, A.-L. (2013). The evolution of a high–fidelity patient simulation learning experience to teach
legal and ethical issues. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(3), 168-173. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.04.020
Thidemann, I.-J., & Soderhamn, O. (2013). High-fidelity simulation among bachelor students in simulation groups and use of different roles. Nurse
Education Today, 33(12), 1599-1604. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.12.004
Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2017). Measurement in nursing and health research. New York: Springer Publilshing Company.
Zulkosky, K. D., White, K. A., Price, A. L., & Pretz, J. E. (2016). Effect of simulation role on clinical decision-making accuracy. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 12(3), 98-106. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.01.007
Contact
[email protected]
Evaluating Use of a Mobile Classroom Response System in the Classroom and the Simulation Lab
Marian Luctkar-Flude, PhD, MScN, RN, Canada
Katie Goldie, PhD, RN, Canada
Cheryl Pulling, MSc, RN, Canada
Idevania Costa, MSc, RN, Canada
Abstract
Background: A variety of classroom response systems (CRSs) are available to support interactive learning in the classroom. Simple
“clicker” systems, with multiple choice questions only, have evolved to interface with multiple devices including smart phones,
tablets and laptops. Different question and response types are now available to enhance classroom interactions. Studies evaluating
traditional clicker technology have demonstrated that CRSs can foster learner engagement, participation and satisfaction in the
classroom (Collins, 2007; Levesque, 2011). Fewer studies have evaluated mobile CRSs. In a recent study, both computer science and
dental students reported that use of the PollEverywhere Audience Response System promoted interactivity, increased participation,
focused attention, provided feedback on comprehension, and increased motivation to learn (Meguid & Collins, 2017). Limitations of
the use of CRSs include potential for technical problems for the instructor and/or learners, cost to learners, increased time for
course planning, and decreased time to deliver lecture content (Collins, 2007). Both students and instructors are diverse and have
different levels of experience using technology. Thus a thorough analysis of logistical challenges for instructors and learners should
be weighed against perceived and actual benefits of using a particular CRS. As well, there is a lack of good quality evidence of the
effectiveness of CRS technology on learning outcomes in health professionals and students (Atlantis & Cheema, 2015; Patterson et
al., 2010). Thus further research is needed to support their use in undergraduate nursing education. Specifically, studies evaluating
these technologies in undergraduate nursing courses (Welch, 2013) and studies evaluating novel applications of these technologies
beyond the classroom are needed. One innovative approach that we are implementing is to use a CRS in the classroom and
simulation lab as part of presimulation preparation and postsimulation assessment and debriefing.
Objective: To evaluate instructor and learner perspectives of feasibility, benefits and limitations of using a mobile CRS in the classroom and clinical
simulation lab for undergraduate nursing students.
Methods: This descriptive study utilized survey methods to obtain quantitative and qualitative data.
Sample: Participants were instructors (n=4), and second (n=100), third (n=41), and fourth (n=85) year students from a BNSc program; however,
only learners enrolled in a second year medical-surgical course used the CRS in both the classroom and the simulation lab, thus, this presentation
will focus on data from that cohort.
Use of CRS in the Classroom: The instructor in the year two medical-surgical nursing course used the CRS in about half of the class lectures; the CRS
was not used by any of the guest lecturers. This instructor generally used four to five questions per lecture; with two to three questions being
multiple choice questions and one or two questions in alternate forms (word answers, matching, sorting, or discussion). In addition, the CRS was
used during a lecture focused on management of the unresponsive patient to collect self-assessment data and knowledge of the content before
and after the lecture, and again after participation in an unresponsive patient simulation session in the laboratory.
Quantitative Data Collection: Instructor perceptions were measured using the Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales and the
Overall Degree of Interactivity Scale (Siau et al., 2006).Learner perceptions were measured using the Classroom Response System Perceptions
(CRiSP) Questionnaire (Richardson et al., 2015). The CRiSP Questionnaire was also adapted for the simulation lab by including 8 original items, and
substituting 4 new items to capture relevance to the simulation lab, demonstrating high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.92).
Qualitative Data Collection: Open-ended questions were included on both the instructor and learner surveys to determine: (1) perceived benefits
and limitations of using the CRS in the classroom lecture and the clinical simulation lab setting; and (2) CRS features that were useful or not useful.
The purpose of collecting this qualitative data is to inform selection of a CRS in the future and to provide guidance on CRS implementation by
faculty members.
Results: Instructor perspectives: Four instructors successfully integrated the CRS into their lecture courses and one instructor was able to include
the CRS in one simulation lab component. Results of the instructor survey scales demonstrated that instructors felt the CRS increased classroom
interactivity, and that generally instructors found the CRS relatively easy to use, and fairly useful in the classroom; however, interpretation of
instructor scores is limited by the small sample size. Qualitative survey results demonstrated that despite some technical challenges, using the CRS
helped instructors to identify and address learning gaps in real time.
Learner perspectives: Overall, 2nd year nursing students ratings on the CRiSP Questionnaire were moderately high, with a mean total score of 97.3
(SD=14.0) out of 135, with no significant differences between scores obtained in the classroom and the simulation lab (p=.122). Mean subscale
scores were also moderately high for usability (15.7 out of 20; SD=3.4), engagement (38.2 out of 55; SD= 6.7) and learning (43.2 out of 60; SD=6.1).
Results of the qualitative questions on the learner surveys suggest learners preferred a mobile CRS to a traditional “clicker” system because it can
be used on multiple devices and employs a variety of question styles not limited to multiple choice questions. Most learners who participated in
the simulation lab reported CRS questions during the lecture and at the beginning of the lab helped them to better prepare for the simulation.
Many learners also felt that repetition of self-assessments via a learning outcomes assessment rubric embedded into the CRS helped them to
reflect on their own knowledge and skills prior to and following the simulations. The greatest limitations reported by learners was the cost to
purchase the CRS ($24 for the term), and not wanting to be graded in the classroom or simulation lab for using the CRS; they preferred using the
CRS for learning purposes only.
Conclusions: Results of this study suggest that a mobile CRS can support learner engagement and learning in undergraduate nursing classrooms, as
well as support presimulation preparation and pre/post simulation assessment. Further research is required to evaluate other novel multi-platform
mobile CRSs and to further explore use of CRSs in the simulation lab. In particular, “free” versions of CRSs that are available should be evaluated to
address financial implications for learners who cannot afford the extra cost to purchase a CRS. This novel study will contribute to the nursing
education literature on teaching technologies used in classroom and clinical simulation.
References
Atlantis, E., & Cheema, B.S. (2015). Effect of audience response system technology on learning outcomes in health students and professionals: An
updated systematic review. International Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare, 13(1), 3-8. Doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000035.
Collins, L.J. (2007). Livening up the classroom: Using audience response systems to promote active learning. Medical References Services Quarterly,
26(1), 81-88. Doi: 10.1300/J115v26n01_08
Levesque, A.A. (2011). Using clickers to facilitate development of problem-solving skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10, 406-417. Doi:
10.1187/cbe.11-03-0024
Meguid, E.A., & Collins, M. (2017). Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: Traditional versus interactive teaching. Advances in Medical
Education and Practice, 8, 229-241. Doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S131851
Patterson, B., Kilpatrick, J., & Woebkenberg, E. (2010). Evidence for teaching practice: The impact of clickers in a large classroom environment.
Nurse Education Today, 30, 603-607. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.008
Richardson, A.M., Dunn, P.K., McDonald, C., & Oprescu, F. (2015). CRiSP: An instrument for assessing student perceptions of classroom response
systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24, 432-447. Doi: 10.1007/s10956-014-9528-2
Siau, K., Sheng, H., & Fui-Hoon Nah, F. (2006). Use of a classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity. IEEE Transactions on
Education, 49(3), 398-403. Doi:10.1109/TE.2006.879802
Welch, S. (2013). Effectiveness of classroom response systems within an active learning environment. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(11), 653-
656. Doi: 10.3928/01484834-20131014-01
Contact
[email protected]
Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge and Beliefs Among Associate Degree Nursing Students: A National,
Multisite Study
Amy Hagedorn Wonder, PhD, RN, USA
Darrell Spurlock, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, ANEF, USA
Abstract
The importance of evidence-based practice (EBP) to reduce undesirable variability in healthcare and afford optimal outcomes for
patients and organizations has long been acknowledged (Institute of Medicine, 2001); yet, full implementation at the point of care is
still lacking (Melnyk, Gallagher-Ford, Long, & Fineout-Overholt, 2014). While a strong emphasis is placed on preparing baccalaureate
nursing (BSN) students for EBP, associate degree (ADN) nurses often work in similar, generalist roles – and little is known about the
extent to which they are prepared to deliver evidence-based care. A further complication is the routine reliance by educators and
researchers on self-reports of knowledge or competence which have been found to correlate poorly with more objective measures
of the construct of interest (e.g., knowledge), both within and outside nursing (Wonder et al., 2017; Zell & Krizan, 2014). To prepare
pre-licensure students to implement EBP at the point of care it is essential to: a) accurately evaluate students’ EBP knowledge with
measures with solid validity and reliability evidence; b) develop and test educational strategies to facilitate development of EBP
knowledge across levels of education; c) identify what supports are needed as graduates transition into practice; and d) study the
durability of EBP knowledge to determine what supports are needed over the course of nurses’ careers.
Here we report results from a descriptive, correlational study of 149 ADN students from 5 programs located in the Midwest and Northeast United
States conducted in 2016-2017. The purpose of the study was to describe the levels of EBP knowledge among the sample of ADN students, describe
relationships between demographic factors and EBP knowledge, describe the relationships between objective and subjective measures of EBP
knowledge, and lastly, to gather validity and reliability evidence for the EKAN in a sample of ADN students from programs in the United States.
In proctored computerized data collection sessions, study subjects from all study sites first completed a demographic and personal characteristics
questionnaire. Next, subjects completed the Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ), a self-report questionnaire by Upton and Upton (2006)
that contains three subscales focusing on EBP practice/use, attitude, and knowledge/skills. Subjects then completed the Evidence-based Practice
Knowledge Assessment in Nursing (EKAN; Spurlock & Wonder, 2015), a 20-item multiple-choice exam with items addressing EBP-related domains
described by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2008) Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice
(Essentials) and the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN; Cronenwett et al., 2007) prelicensure competencies.
Subjects were predominantly female (81.9%, n=122), White/Caucasian (83.2%, n=124) and reported English as their primary language (95.3%,
n=142). A mean age of 30.3 years (range=19-58 years) was noted for the sample.
Results showed the mean EKAN sum score was 8.77 (SD=2.09) out of a possible 20 (range=3-13). In a prior study by Spurlock and Wonder (2015),
BSN students showed a mean EKAN sum score of 10.4 (range 5-16), a mean difference of about 1.6 points and a lower range of scores. The current
study showed no significant relationships between EKAN sum scores and any demographic variable.
In the current study, the EKAN demonstrated a strong item reliability (0.96) under the single parameter Rasch model (1-PL), but low person
reliability (0.16), indicating extreme trait restriction (homogeneity in scores/ability). All EKAN infit and outfit parameters were between 0.8 and 1.2,
indicating strong item-model fit. The EBPQ demonstrated a Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency reliability of 0.95 for the total scale, with the
following subscale results: 0.92 for practice/use subscale, 0.75 for the attitude subscale, and 0.95 for the knowledge/skills subscale. Strong,
statistically significant correlations were noted among each of the EBPQ subscales. However, there were no statistically significant correlations
between any of the subjective (EBPQ subscales) and objective (EKAN) measures. The correlation between the EKAN and the EBPQ subscale for
knowledge was -0.20, indicating that subjects with higher self-rated knowledge levels had fewer correct answers on the EKAN. Subjects were asked
to rate their agreement with the statement, “I am sure I can deliver evidence-based care” on a 5-point Likert type scale where 1=Strongly Disagree
and 5=Strongly Agree. A total of 126 subjects (84.6%) responded as either Agree or Strongly Agree (M = 4.05). Subjects’ responses to this statement
correlated strongly with the EBPQ subscales for practice (r = 0.347) and knowledge (r = 0.359), showing positive relationships that were significant
at the < 0.01 level. There was no significant correlation between subjects’ responses to this statement and the EKAN (r = .037, p = .650), providing
additional evidence on the lack of correlation between subjective and objective measures of knowledge.
This presentation will provide insight into what areas of EBP knowledge were more familiar to ADN students and how to use rigorous evaluation to
develop and test educational strategies across levels of education. Through the use of consistent evaluation, faculty can work collaboratively to
prepare all prelicensure students to be providers of evidence-based care.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN]. (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Retrieved
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/BaccEssentials08.pdf.
Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J. Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell, P.,…Warren, J. (2007). Quality and safety education for nurses.
NursingOutlook, 55(3), 122-131.
Institute of Medicine [IOM]. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press.
Melnyk, B. M., Gallagher-Ford, L., Long, L. E., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2014). The establishment of evidence-based practice competencies for
practicing registered nurses and advanced practice nurses in real-world clinical settings: Proficiencies to improve healthcare quality, reliability,
patient outcomes, and costs. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(1), 5-15.
Spurlock, D., & Wonder, A. H. (2015). Validity and reliability evidence for a new measure: The evidence-based practice knowledge assessment in
nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(11), 605-613.
Upton, D., & Upton, P. (2006). Development of an evidence-based practice questionnaire for nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(4), 454-458.
Wonder, A. H., McNelis, A. M., Spurlock., D., Ironside, P. M., Lancaster, S., Davis, C. R.,…Verwers, N. (2017). Comparison of nurses’ self-reported and
objectively measured evidence-based practice knowledge. The Journal of ContinuingEducation in Nursing, 48(2), 65-70.
Zell, E., & Krizan, Z. (2014). Do people have insight in their abilities? A metasynthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 111-125.
Contact
[email protected]
Evidence-Based Approaches to Internationalizing Nursing Courses: Engaging Students as Stakeholders
Jo Ann Mulready-Shick, EdD, MSN, RN, CNE, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Studies have demonstrated that internationalization of curriculum and teaching and learning approaches are critical elements in the
overall internationalization strategy of an institution. Furthermore, an internationalized curriculum supports a student-centered
learning experience and is important in preparing all students for success in today's increasingly interdependent global society
(American Council on Education, 2017). The on-campus curriculum is viewed as a central location for preparing all students as global
citizens. Curriculum levels that demand educators’ attention for creating a comprehensive internationalized student learning
experience include individual courses, academic programs, and disciplines as a whole (Helms & Tukibayeva, 2013).
This presentation describes the findings of an internationalization evaluation from student and faculty perspectives. An internationalization review
comprises various components of course evaluation processes: its content, materials, activities, and student learning outcomes. At the individual
course level, building global competencies and bringing international perspectives into the classroom expands the learning environment for all. In
addition to the subject matter of the curriculum, pedagogical implications of teaching and learning approaches to promote and foster
transformative internationalization of the curriculum are important considerations.
Students are viewed as important stakeholders in internationalization processes. Graduate level students, both PhD and DNP students, who had
completed a graduate level nurse educator course were asked to participate in the course content review. The review also included the course
instructor’s level of internationalization awareness. This inquiry was guided by Korhonen & Well’s (2015) framework of internationalization
processes and included a reflection on ‘How does one make sense of his or her self-conception and role as an educator in internationalizing nursing
education? Further, self-concept and awareness is conceptualized as personal traits and attitudinal drivers, or components of “internal readiness
aptitude” for global competence (Global Leadership Excellence, 2017).
At a theoretical level, student and faculty involvement encompasses the ‘individual and team behavioral level’ in the knowledge translation
process, with the overall goal of multiple stakeholder involvement in making decisions based on evidence (Patterson & Krouse, 2017). Lave &
Wenger’s (1991) Situational Learning Theory and the Knowledge to Action Framework (Field, Booth, Ilott, & Gerrish, 2014) influenced the
evaluation of implementation activities conducted. Additional processes, including examining internationalization models and evaluation
measurement tools will also be presented.
Lastly, next steps in reviewing best practices and designing theoretically supported educational interventions to improving pedagogical approaches
will be offered. The conclusion will also address collaborative practice and implications for funding and future research. This initiative was funded
by a curriculum internationalization grant. This presentation supports Sigma Theta Tau International’s vision for global thought and practice
leadership. Furthermore, the National League for Nursing’s vision for expanding U.S. nursing education for global health engagement promotes
nurse educators to act as catalysts in strengthen nursing education’s capacity to prepare nurses for the development of viable, comprehensive and
culturally appropriate care in a global context (NLN, 2017).
References
American Council on Education (ACE). (2017). Internationalization toolkit. Center for Internationalization and Global Engagement. Retrieved from
http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Pages/Internationalization-Toolkit.aspx
Field, B., Booth, A., Ilott, I., & Gerrish, K. (2014). Using the Knowledge-to-Action Framework in practice: A citation analysis and systematic review.
Implementation Science, 9, 172-186.
Global Leadership Excellence, LLC. (2017). Global competence model. Global Competence Aptitude Assessment. Retrieved from
http://www.globallycompetent.com/model/GCAAmodel.html
Helms, R. M., & Tukibayeva, M. (2013). Internationalization in action: Internationalizing the curriculum, Part 1 -Individual courses. American Council
on Education. Retrieved from http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Pages/Intlz-in-Action-2013-December.aspx
Korhonen, V., & Weil, M. (2015). The internationalisation of higher education: Perspectives on self- conceptions in teaching. Journal of Research in
International Education, 14 (3), 198-212.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (seminal work)
National League for Nursing (NLN). (2017). A vision for expanding US nursing education for global health engagement. Retrieved from
http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/about/nln-vision-series-%28position-statements%29/vision-statement-a-vision-for-expanding-us-
nursing-education.pdf?sfvrsn=6
Patterson, B. J., & Krouse, A. M. (Eds.). (2017). Scientific inquiry in nursing education: Advancing the science. Washington, DC: National League for
Nursing.
Contact
[email protected]
Reducing Performance Exam Anxiety: Student-Centered Skills Performance Exams Using Video and Peer-to-
Peer Mentoring
Abstract
Purpose: Nursing education has a large and unique skills based component which include high stakes skills such as medication
administration and catheter insertion. The process of teaching these various skills requires an integration of theoretical classroom
content and “hands-on” skill development with all skills being inter-dependent on the other for application in the patient care
management setting. Prior to performing skills in the hospital, faculty must evaluate the student’s ability to safely perform a skill.
Traditionally, in many schools of nursing, nursing skill performance examinations are conducted in a face-to-face (F2F) meeting where a student
performs the skill with the faculty watching and evaluating the performance of the skill. Within this teaching institution, nursing students often
expressed and exhibited high levels of stress and anxiety during high stakes skills performance testing.
High levels of test anxiety can prevent students from performing well in traditional F2F exams. This form of testing may also keep students from
reaching their academic potential by disrupting focus, attention, and concentration increasing the risk for poor performance test outcomes
(Driscoll, 2007; Gibson, 2014; Khalaila, 2015). Performance and other types of exams create high levels of anxiety which can be seen in physical and
psychological symptoms such as sweating, palpitations, forgetfulness, fear, and doubt (Gibson, 2014). Some literature suggests nursing students
are under significantly higher levels of stress than the average college students’ due to the understanding that their academic success directly
impacts the quality of care they give and even the smallest mistake can have dire repercussions for the patient and future careers. Because quality
of care and safety are of primary concern, academic progression is especially important in nursing school. Failing high stakes exams can lead to
failing the overall program (Gibson, 2014; Driscoll, 2007).
Previous nursing skills course evaluation surveys were analyzed which identified grading interrater reliability, faculty reputation, and faculty grading
fatigue as factors contributing to student stress and anxiety. Students expressed concerns that the stressful testing environment contributed to
their poor test performance. When critically examining the testing process faculty concurred with many of the students concerns.
To reduce nursing student stress and anxiety a new innovative student-centered approach to performance exam testing was piloted over six
academic semesters. The focus of this presentation is the analysis of course evaluation data relating to the student’s stress and anxiety in both the
traditional face-to-face and video performance examinations.
Methods: Developed as a course evaluation, a mixed methods analysis was used to compare the reported stress and anxiety levels of nursing
students being tested using both the traditional skills performance exam and the new video performance exam. In addition to collecting
quantitative data, additional qualitative questions were asked. Qualitative questions focused on student’s personal perceptions of stress and
anxiety as well as general perceptions related to their respective testing methods.
An instrument that included demographics, qualitative questions, and the Westside Test Anxiety Scale was administered pre/post-performance in
the 2015 fall semester as a pilot during the Adult Nursing Skills I class. The Westside Test Anxiety Scale (Driscoll, 2007), is a validated ten item
student self-assessment instrument used to evaluate nursing student pre-test anxiety. The standardized performance exam used during the
evaluation was the Medication Administration exam. Student participation in the test evaluations was voluntary and anonymous.
Findings: The pilot sample size was 33 nursing students, 21 students took the traditional performance exam and 12 took the performance video
exam. Findings in the pilot study found high levels of anxiety among pre-performance exam students. For example, 87% of all students felt they
would forget exam information due to anxiety. Post-performance exam survey found high satisfaction from the students testing with the
performance video exam. After testing was completed 100% of the pilot student group was satisfied with the video performance exams and
reported lower levels of anxiety once they were comfortable with the testing procedure. Results indicated 54% of all students felt they would be
comfortable being tested using the video performance exam. When analyzed from a qualitative perspective, the major theme identified for the
traditional F2F exam was the negative effects related to the presence of the instructor. There were also positive comments regarding instructors
being present but not as numerous. Major themes identified for the video performance exam were “less stressful”, “autonomy”, and “confidence”.
References
Driscoll, R. (2007). Westside Test Anxiety Scale Validation. ERIC, 6pp. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506526.pdf
Gibson, H. A. (2014). A conceptual view of test anxiety. Nursing Forum, 49(4), 267-277. doi:10.1111/nuf.12069
Khalaila, R. (2015). The relationship between academic self-concept, intrinsic motivation, test anxiety, and academic achievement among nursing
students: Mediating and moderating effects. Nurse Education Today, 35(1), 432-438. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.0010260-6917
Contact
[email protected]
Peer Teaching in an Undergraduate Health Assessment Course to Promote Skills Retention
Melissa Owen, PhD, RN, CNE, CTCC, USA
Angela Frederick Amar, PhD, RN, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Historically, as an upper division Baccalaureate nursing program, students do not take courses in the nursing school
prior to formal matriculation in their third year. To enhance connections with pre-nursing students as well as increase opportunities
for students to take outside courses within the college while in the nursing program, a new initiative has been to offer courses to
this student population, including pre-requisites and nursing courses. Therefore, a new course was offered to undergraduate
students who would be matriculating into the School of Nursing that combined Anatomy and Physiology with an undergraduate
health assessment entitled Assessment of Normal Human Form and Function. Completion of this course allowed students to
participate in a summer elective providing health screenings in a rural setting, and also decreased students' fall course load as it took
the place of the traditional health assessment course. However, one challenge associated with presenting health assessment
content early was related to how students could retain the information from the time course ended in May (or the health screenings
ended in June), until the students entered the clinical setting in late September as knowledge and skill loss may occur over time.
Prior research has demonstrated that over time, knowledge retention can diminish, but can also be impacted by practice (Sankar,
Vijayakanthi, Sankar, & Dubey, 2013). The purpose of this abstract is to describe a program implemented which was designed to
impact this potential knowledge and loss.
Methods: An innovative program was piloted entitled “STARS: Students Teaching Assessment to Retain Skills.” STARS students participated in a
peer teaching experience in the laboratory setting. Prior research suggests that peer teaching programs can be beneficial to students by increasing
confidence and proficiency in skills, enhancing interpersonal skills, and developing leadership abilities (Bensfield, Solari-Twadell, & Sommer, 2008;
Harmer, Huffman, & Johnson, 2011; Ross, Bruderle, & Meakim, 2015). It has also been well-received by tutees (Weyrich, et al., 2008), and student
mentors have reported verification of their own knowledge and skill ability (Smith, Beattie, & Kyle, 2015). Students who participated in Assessment
of Normal Human Form and Function enrolled in a directed study with the health assessment course faculty and these students were utilized as
peer teachers within the laboratory setting. Unique to this experience was that the STARS students were in the same cohort as the students to
whom they served as peer teachers, rather than upper level students. Each STARS student was assigned to a lab group for the duration of the
semester and facilitated lab activities with the lab instructor. All students also had the opportunity to participate in health screenings within a
community organization. STARS students did not participate in the student evaluation or grading process.
Findings: Feedback from the STARS students’ experience was overwhelmingly positive. Students reported enhancing their own knowledge through
review and preparation for lab. Students also enjoyed functioning in the leadership role and developing closer relationships with faculty. Students
reported that once clinical rotations started, they used time in the clinical setting to practice health assessment techniques to prepare for lab
activities in subsequent weeks. STARS students have also demonstrated continued leadership beyond the semester through informal peer teaching
opportunities and student government leadership positions. Due to the success of this program, a second cohort of STARS students will be
participating in this program in the upcoming semester.
Conclusions: Peer teaching appears to be promote both skill retention and leadership development in students. Future directions for this program
include formal evaluation of peer teachers and quantitative skills assessment.
References
Bensfield, L., Solari-Twadell, P.A., & Summer, S. (2008). The use of peer leadership to teach fundamental nursing skills. Nurse Educator, 33,(4), 155-
158.
Harmer, B.M., Huffman, J., & Johnson, B. (2011)., Clinical peer mentoring: Partnering seniors and sophomores on a dedicated education unit. Nurse
Educator, 36(5), 197-202.
Ross., J.G., Bruderle, E., & Meakim, C. (2015)., Integration of deliberate practice and peer mentoring to enhance studennts’ mastery and retention
of essential skills. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(S3), S52-S54.
Sankar, J., Vijayakanthi, N., Sanker, M.J., & Dubey, N., (2013). Knowledge and skill retention of in-service versus pre-service nursing professionals
following an informal training program in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A repeated measures quasi-experimental study. Biomed
Research International. doi: 10.1155/2013/403415.
Smith, A., Beattie, M., & Kyle, G. (2015). Stepping up, stepping back, stepping forward: Student nurses’experiences as peer mentors in a pre-nursing
scholarship. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(6), 492-497.
Weyrich, P., Schrauth, M., Kraus, B., Habermehl, D., Netzhammer, N., Zipfel, S., … Nikendei, C. (2008). Undergraduate technical skills training guided
by student tutors – Analysis of tutors’ attitudes, tutees’ acceptance and learning progress in an innovative teaching model. BMC Medical Education,
8, 18. http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-8
Contact
[email protected]
F 09 - Caregiver Confidence
Moving Beyond Written Reinforcement: Using Video Clips to Reinforce Patient Education and Increase
Caregiver Confidence
Mary A. Grady, DNP, RN, CNE, CHSE, USA
Abstract
Purpose: Pediatric nurses frequently teach caregivers to care for their ill child in the home environment. When this care involves
learning how to operate medical equipment and perform treatments and procedures, it can be very challenging and intimidating for
a caregiver. In the majority of hospitals, caregivers are given written materials upon discharge to reinforce education received from
a hospital nurse educator. While written materials alone are acceptable for many caregivers, they do not always meet the needs of a
growing population of 21st century learners.
This study explored the use of video skill clips to teach caregivers to perform medical procedures required in the careof their children. The purpose
was to determine from the caregiver’s perspective the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of video skill clips to reinforce discharge education
and if this method of instruction increased their knowledge and confidence levels.
Design and methods: This One- Group Pretest-Posttest study was conducted at a large Midwestern pediatric hospital in the United States where
participants completed an investigator developed questionnaire before and after viewing the video skill clips. The study inclusion criteria were
caregivers: (a) 18 years of age or older; (b) able to speak and understand English, and (c) with a child requiring a medical procedure at
home. Exclusion criteria were caregivers (a) unable to complete the educational sessions; (b) who had received medical skill teaching or had
watched the clips during previous admissions; (c) who were professional healthcare providers themselves. Data analysis consisted of paired t-test
and descriptive statistics.
Results: The 100% of participants stated the clips were feasible and acceptable (n=40, M= 94.15, SD 6.84). Medical procedural knowledge and
confidence levels significantly increased among participants after watching the video skill clips (p=<.001).
Conclusion and Practice Implications: These findings highlight a strong need for the use of video in patient education. These skill clips provide
an opportunity to caregivers who learn best through visual and auditory methods, especially those with low literacy levels. They are a highly
accessible and efficient tool for caregiver review of medical skills.
References
Atzema, C.L., Austin, P.C., Wu, L., Brzozowski, M., Feldman, M.J., McDonnell, M. & Mazurik, L. (2013). Speak fast, use jargon, and don’t repeat
yourself: a randomized trail assessing the effectiveness of online videos to supplement emergency department discharge instructions. PLoS One, 8
(11), e77057. doi:10.137/journal.pone.0077057.
Barr, G.C., Rupp.V.A., Hamiliton, K.M., Worrilow, C.C. Reed, J.F. Friel, K.S., & Greenberg,M.R. (2013). Training mothers in infant cardiopulmonary
resuscitation with an instructional DVD and manikin. The Journal of the Osteopathic Association, 113 (7), 538-545.
Bloch, S.A. & Bloch, A.J. (2013). Using video discharge instructions as an adjunct to standard written instructions improved caregivers’
understanding of their child’s emergency department visit, plan, and follow –up. Pediatric Emergency Care, 29 (6), 699-703.
Davidson, J.E. (2010). Facilitated sensemaking: a strategy and new middle-range theory to support families of intensive care unit patients. Critical
Care Nurse,30(6), 28-39.
Harrington, M. (2015). Health literacy in children with chronic kidney disease and their caregivers. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 42 (1), 53.
Heerman, W.J., Perrin, E.M., Yin, H.S., Sanders, L.M., Eden, S.K., Shintani, A.,…& Rothman, R.L. (2014). Health literacy and injury prevention
behaviors among caregivers of infants. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46 (5), 449-456.
Morrison, A.K., Schapria, M.M, Gorelick, M.H., Hoffmann, R.G., & Brousseau, D.C. (2014). Low caregiver health literacy is associated with higher
pediatric emergency department use and nonurgent visits. Academic Pediatrics, 14 (3), 309-314.
Mortensen, C. J., & Nicholson, A.M. (2015). The flipped classroom stimulates greater learning and is a modern 21st century approach to teaching
today’s undergraduates. [Abstract]. Journal of Animal Science, 93 (7), 3722-3731.
Oh, E., & Reeves, T.C. (2014). Generational differences and the integration of technology in learning, instruction, and performance. In M. Spector
(Ed. ), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 819-
828). New York., NY: Springer.
Roehl, A., Reddy,S.L., & Shannon, G.J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to enagage millennial students through active learning
strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105 (2), 44-49.
Contact
[email protected]
Interprofessional Education (IPE) Curriculum Innovation Using Academic and Practice Partners
Gloria A. Brummer, DNP, CNE, CEN, USA
Mary Barnes, MSN, USA
Abstract
Is your college looking for ways to enhance your interprofessional education (IPE) curriculum? This presentation describes the use of academic and
practice partnerships to create curricular innovation in interprofessional education (IPE). These partnerships can enhance the preparation of
baccalaureate nursing students, as well as students from other professions, for collaborative practice and patient-centered care. Core
Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice (IPEC, 2011) are used to help develop graduates who can function with the knowledge,
collaborative skills and attitudes to solve practice challenges in today’s healthcare settings.
This case study launches by engaging the audience with questions related to IPE. After the interactive presentation there will be time for question
and answers along with closing remarks about the factors that contributed to positive student outcomes. Presenters discuss the IPE curriculum
planning, implementation, evaluation and the dissemination at national, regional and local levels.
The goal of this change project stems from this college’s mission and strategic plan to provide academic excellence through innovative teaching-
learning strategies. More qualitative and quantitative research is needed to fully understand best practices in preparing healthcare students for
collaborative practice. Outcomes achieved within the change project for recently graduated students are as follows: (1) Baccalaureate graduates
meet national accrediting expectations regarding IPE as perceived by faculty, beginning in May 2014; (2) Students will find IPE experiences and
simulation helpful in developing skills related to collaboration and patient-centered care; (3) There is collaboration among stakeholders regarding
IPE and at least two meaningful learning opportunities resulting annually beginning in the 2013-2014 academic year.
Like many schools across the nation, our college seeks ways to transform nursing education and patient experiences in ways that will both enhance
IPE) and assist students to meet nationally accepted IPE competencies. Examples of titles of some past and present IPE experiences include: Wit
End of Life Care, Civility Workshop (both classroom); Newborn Dyspnea (simulation); Cardio-Respiratory Care Day (simulation/cardio-respiratory
Jeopardy game/ interprofessional panel discussion and blogs); MSIII ACLS simulation and clinical medication review; Hotspotting (classroom and
clinical practice); and Transition to home (community setting). Presenters will share their lessons learned throughout the presentation.
The change project began as this Midwestern college was transitioning to a revised curriculum in the fall of 2013 and adding other nursing
programs. Through academic partnerships, baccalaureate nursing students now participate in a variety of interprofessional simulation and
classroom learning activities involving the disciplines of respiratory care, pharmacy and medicine and more. The project was sustained over the
past three academic years with positive outcomes. To date, the project has resulted in the participation of approximately 550 students across at
least four disciplines, eight different and successful IPE events and dissemination of project outcomes that provide the opportunity for project
replication. Interprofessional relationships have been strengthened over the past few years through experiences with academic and practice
partners. The college now has enhanced interprofessional resources and opportunities that promote leadership for the college and its graduates.
This innovation increases the involvement and visibility of nursing as a key interprofessional partner while generating new knowledge about
educating professionals who will solve healthcare challenges in the future.
Performance measurement is the primary evaluation design for the IPE. This design serves as both an evaluation tool and a management system to
guide decision making and improve program outcomes. Measurements include formative and summative student clinical evaluations, student
surveys including the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) (Parsell & Bligh, 1999), and faculty evaluations. Descriptive correlations
were measured among the baccalaureate nursing groups and learners from other professions throughout the various IPE events held over the past
academic years.
An example of results from the largest IPE, the “Cardio-Respiratory all day event” held in fall of 2013 with Year 3 PharmD students, Year 2
Respiratory Care students, & Year 4 BSN students, showed there was no significant difference on change scores pre and post event on the
Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS). Pre and post event mean scores on the Team Roles Perception survey indicated that
participants levels of agreement were higher post event on both “understanding my role” and “defining the roles of others.” In addition, when
comparing cumulative faculty mean scores and cumulative student scores using a two factor analysis of variance, all p values were significant on all
items. IPEs have showed positive student outcomes.
Our most recent IPE was Student Hotspotting. For the past two years student-faculty teams represented the college in the national
six-month Interprofessional Student Hot Spotting Collaborative, Camden NJ. During these experiences, interprofessional teams of
several students and faculty members identify barriers and root causes to patients’ over-utilization of care in terms of repeat
emergency room visits, hospital readmissions, and overall healthcare costs. Over the two six-month projects, eight patients in the
community were defined as high utilizers of the healthcare system received care from the team. Project results, including cost
savings, were shared locally and nationally. One of our academic partners was selected to be a hub for this national effort. Lessons
from this program add a rich layer to an existing curriculum and places students in positions to think systematically about the root
causes of illness, high utilization of healthcare and associated costs.
References
Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (2014). ACEN 2013 Standards and Criteria, Baccalaureate.
http://www.acenursing.org/accreditation-manual/
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2008). The Essentials of Baccalaureate Education for Professional Nursing Practice. Washington, DC.
Cuff, P., Schmitt, M., Zierler, B., Cox, M., De Maeseneer, J., Maine, L.L., … & Thibault, G. E. (2014). Interprofessional education for collaborative
practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28(1), 2-4.
Curran, V., Hollett, A., Casimiro, L. M., Mccarthy, P., Banfield, V., Hall, P., ... & Wagner, S. (2011). Development and validation of the
interprofessional collaborator assessment rubric ((ICAR)). Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25(5), 339-344.
Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell, P., ... & Warren, J. (2007). Quality and safety education for nurses.
Nursing Outlook, 55(3), 122-131.
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies (2010). The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing health. Washington DC: National
Academy of Sciences.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert panel. (2011). Core Competencies for interprofessionalcollaborative practice: Report of an expert
panel. Washington, D.C.: Interprofessional EducationCollaborative.
Parsell, G. & Bligh, J. (1999). The development of a questionnaire to asses the readiness of health care students to interprofessional learning
(RIPLS). Medical Education 33, 95-100.
Lennen, N., & Miller, B. (2017). Introducing interprofessional education in nursing curricula. Teachingand Learning in Nursing, 12(1), 59-61.
Reeves, S., Perrier, L. Goldman, J., Freeth, D., Zwarenstein, M. (2013). Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare
outcomes (update). Cochrane Database ofSystematic Reviews Issue 3, Art. N0.: CD002213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub3.
Russell, R. G., Davidson, H., Rhoads, C., & Petrusa, E. R. (2017). How do we understand the determinants of health? An exploration of distributed
knowledge and interprofessional health scienceseducation. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(1), 118-121.
Contact
[email protected]
A Collaborative Partnership Promoting Upward Mobility in Nursing
Lynne C. Borucki, PhD, RNC-OB, USA
Abstract
Educating a nursing workforce with the knowledge and skills necessary to provide quality care to diverse populations is critically
necessary to reduce health disparities among underserved populations. Schools of nursing are currently challenged in serving
students from historically underrepresented communities who aspire to become baccalaureate nurses. This project describes a
collaborative partnership between a school of nursing and a tertiary care hospital to enable working health care paraprofessionals
from historically underrepresented groups to access and successfully progress through a baccalaureate nursing program. Unlicensed
assistive personnel (UAP) employed at the hospital, predominantly Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino, were the target
population for the project. The UAP positions consisted of patient care associates, critical care technicians, patient companions, unit
secretaries, and transporters. Ten qualified students were selected from 65 applications of unlicensed UAPs. Key program
components contributing to the success of this cohort of students included: 1) academic support; 2) mentoring; 3) a nursing
education navigator, serving as an educational case manager; 4) workplace support; and 5) financial support. In order to achieve
success for these students, academic and psychological supports were planned for and implemented. Academic supports included a
one-year foundational curriculum to build academic skills and refresh basic knowledge in math, English, and the life sciences;
recitations for foundational courses, prerequisite life science courses, and introductory nursing courses; extensive academic support
workshops; and a cohort program supporting integration into the university learning community. Additional supports included a
Nursing Education Navigator (NEN), conceived as academia’s counterpart to the patient navigator, and a Hospital Project
Coordinator (HPC) working together to holistically assess, support and assist students during their educational journey. The NEN,
functioned as a source of guidance, advocacy, and support within the academic institution to mitigate individual barriers to
academic success and maximize access to available support services and networks within the academic institution. The HCP
interfaced frequently with the director of nursing education and the employees’ nurse managers in the interest of designating stable
work schedules for the students and troubleshooting other actual and/or potential workplace issues. In addition to the integral roles
of the NEN and the HCP, other psychosocial supports included school of nursing advisors; faculty members of the project team;
peers from the school of nursing; and baccalaureate nurse mentors, recruited from the students’ respective units, who interfaced
regularly with the students in the interest of student success in the classroom and workplace settings. These BSN RN mentors, were
strongly invested in seeing their mentees achieve their goal of a BSN and provided coaching, tutoring, and ongoing advice. Other
mentors included the students’ unit-based educator and, in some cases, their nursing clinical leaders. Mentorship, an important
component in the academic success of underrepresented students, provided needed student support and professional socialization
from competent, enthusiastic nurse role models from the academic and work environments. Financial support included tuition and
fees, stipends, state and federal aid, and educational financial support from the hospital. Success of underrepresented, working
students in baccalaureate nursing programs is dependent on a concerted academic, workplace, and community team effort to
maximize resources and integrate students into the social and academic life of such a rigorous educational program. To date, six of
the ten UAP students have matriculated into the school of nursing; are maintaining above a 3.0 GPA as a nursing student; continue
to work a flexible, full time schedule; and are respected, responsible members of the hospital staff. This project addresses a way to
meet the national need of a more diverse nurse workforce and contributes to increasing nursing education opportunities for
individuals who are from underrepresented and disadvantaged backgrounds.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) (2015). Fact Sheet: Enhancing Diversity in the Nursing Workforce. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/diversityFS.pdf
Banister, G., Bowen-Brady, H.M., & Winfrey, M. (2014). Using career nurse mentors to supportminority nursing students and facilitate their
transition to practice. Journal ofProfessional Nursing, 30, 317-325.
Bond, M.L., Cason, C.L.,& Baxley, S.(2015). Institutional support for diverse populations: Perceptions of Hispanic and African-American students and
program faculty.NurseEducator, 40, 134-138.
Budden, J.S., Smiley, R., Moulton, P., Harper, K.J, & Brunell, M.L. (2016). The 2015 Nationalnursing workforce survey. Journal of Nursing Regulation,
7, S1-S90.
Crooks, N. (2013). Mentoring as the key to minority success in nursing education. ABNFJournal, 24, 47-50.
Degazon, C.E., & Mancha, C. (2012). Changing the face of nursing: Reducing ethnic and racial disparities in health. Family and Community Health,
35, 5-14.
Evans, D.B. (2013). Examining the influence of non-cognitive variables on the intention of minority baccalaureate nursing students to complete
their program of study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29, 148-154.
Harris, R.C., Rosenberg, L., & O’Rourke, M.E. (2014). Addressing the challenges of nursing school attrition. Journal of Nursing Education, 53, 31-37.
Johnson, J., & Bozeman, B. (2012). Perspective: Adopting an asset bundles model to support and advance minority students’ careers in academic
medicine and the scientific pipeline. Academic Medicine, 87(11), 1488-95.
Mellilo, K.D., Dowling, J., Abdallah, L. & Knight, M. (2013). Bring diversity to nursing: Recruitment, retention, and graduation of nursing students.
Journal of Cultural Diversity, 20, 100-104.
Murray, T.A. (2015). Factors that promote and impede the academic success of AfricanAmerican students in pre-licensure nursing education: An
integrative review. Journal ofNursing Education, 54, S77-S81.
Núñez, A.M., Hoover, R.E., Stuart-Carruthers, C., Vázquez, M. (Eds.) (2013). Latinos in higher education and Hispanic serving institutions: Creating
conditions for success. AscheHigher Education Report, 39. San Francisco: Wiley/Josey-Bass.
Walker, L.P. (2016). A bridge to success: A nursing student success strategies improvement course. Journal of Nursing Education, 56, 450-453.
White, B. & Fulton, J.S. (2015). Common experiences of African American students: An integrative review. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36, 167-
175.
Contact
[email protected]
Model Development of Depression Prevention for Adolescents: Participatory Action Research
Kwaunpanomporn Thummathai, MSc (ClinPsych), Thailand
Abstract
Background: Depression among young adolescents is a critical mental health problem. Such problem could result in future quality of
life, both lowering learning capability and social life adjustment among adolescents. Depression prevention intervention at the early
onset is thus important. This research study aimed to develop depression prevention model for Thai adolescents.
Methods: The development of depression prevention model for Thai adolescents involved a spiral of self-reflective cycles (plan, act and observe,
and reflect) and methodology of the participatory action research (PAR). Twenty adolescents aged 10-14 years old, five parents and seven teachers
identify critical components of depression prevention throughout four focus group discussions and 17 in-depth interviews. The eleven participants
consisted of four teachers, five adolescents and two parents who volunteered to take part in the research team, four teachers and two of the
adolescents acted as co-researchers in order to develop depression prevention model for adolescents based on the critical components. All of them
worked on the participatory depression prevention model development cycle, namely 5Ps: 1) problem identification, 2) planning to collaboratively
identify appropriate solution, 3) production of essential media and materials, 4) putting plan into action, and 5) propose depression prevention
model. Descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis while qualitative data from focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were
analyzed through content analysis.
Findings: The depression risk problems were decreased by a collaborative mutual communication and creating easy and enjoyable activities for
depression prevention among adolescents, parents, and teachers based on three critical components of the participatory depression prevention
model for Thai adolescents: 1) early detection of depression risks among adolescents, 2) self-worth enhancement activities for depression
prevention, and 3) effective communication regarding depression prevention. Feasibility testing of the appropriate depression prevention model
for adolescents demonstrated that six adolescents aged 12-13 years old who received PDP training, which led to the understanding of the key
concepts for depression prevention, the practice of the depression risk assessment, and the skill training to minimize the risk of depression,
enhance self-esteem and promote problem-solving skill through media and activities. They had lower depression mean scores (pre-post: 9.33 and
7.17), higher mean scores for self-esteem (pre-post: 27.83 and 32.00), resilience (pre-post: 109.67 and 113.00), and problem solving (pre-post:
92.83 and 97.33). The research participants reflected satisfaction with the PDP model.
Conclusions: The PDP model was developed based on PAR approach, which is empowering the participants to collaborate and create depression
prevention for Thai adolescent. The findings provide three critical components of depression prevention model are that; early detection of
depression risks among adolescents, self-worth enhancement activities for depression prevention, and effective communication regarding
depression prevention. The model would be suitable for the prevention of depression by adolescents themselves as well as their peers, their school
teachers, and their family members. Health care providers can employ the participatory depression prevention model training guide to prevent
depression in adolescents. Additionally, the findings of this study can be the knowledge based for further study regarding depression prevention for
adolescents. The government could set up a depression prevention policy and enhance collaborative early depression prevention in adolescents.
References
Hernandez, O.S., Mendez Carrillo, F.J., & Garber, J. (2014). Prevention of depression in children and adolescents. Review and Reflecrion, 19(1), 63-
76.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2007). Participatory action research: communicative action and the public sphere. Retrived from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/
Kindt, K., Van Zundert, R., & Engels, R. (2012). Evaluation of a Dutch school-based depression prevention program for youths in high risk
neighborhoods: Study protocol of a two-armed randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 12, 212. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-212
Maughan, B., Collishaw, S., & Stringaris, A. (2013). Depression in childhood and adolescence. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry, 22(1), 35-40.
Thapar, A., Collishaw, S., Pine, D. S., & Thapar, A. K. (2012). Depression in adolescence. Lancet, 379(9820), 1056-1067. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(11)60871-4.
Trangkasombat, U., & Rujiradarporn, N. (2012). Gender differences in depressive symptoms in Thai adolescents. Asian Biomedicine, 6(5), 737-745.
doi:10.5372/1905-7415.0605.115
Waingort, E. (2013). Liberatory ethnographic research – changing the lives of researchers and participants. The Qualitative Report, 19, Review 3, 1-
3
Contact
[email protected]
The Student Nurse Athlete: What Can We Learn From Them?
Eileen C. Engelke, EdD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Healthcare is constantly undergoing major transformations that require the need for highly qualified healthcare workers and
leaders, particularly in response to technological advances, the aging population, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act. Because not all challenges can be anticipated, nursing and nursing education must be adaptable to these evolving healthcare
landscapes. Nursing education in particular is charged with renovating the curricula to develop the knowledge, skills and attitudes to
prepare graduates for these transformational changes in healthcare. In addition to critical thinking skills, collaboration, teamwork
and leadership have been recognized as necessary requirements to assure safe patient care (Benner, Sutphen, Leonard & Day, 2010;
Institute of Medicine [IOM], 1999; 2011). Teamwork within the healthcare environment is becoming more essential given its
importance in preventing medical errors (Clancy & Tornberg, 2007). The educational preparation of all health professionals must
transition from one of silos to one that fosters communication, collaboration and a team approach (Clancy & Tornberg, 2007).
This emphasis on healthcare teamwork began as a result of the publication of the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) report, To Err Is Human: Building a
Safer Health System (IOM, 1999). A principal finding of the report was that systematic failures in the delivery of healthcare account for more errors
than does poor performance by individuals and that success and failures depend on a great extent on the performance of teams. John M.
Eisenberg, a leading groundbreaker in patient safety and former administrator for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
observed that “patient safety is a team sport” (Clancy, 2005). It is nearly unthinkable to imagine a winning team composed of individuals with
essential and complementary abilities who have not practiced together, yet healthcare professional training has historically been isolated in silos
(Clancy & Tornberg, 2007).
The Institute of Medicine, the World Health Organization, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing and the Association of American Medical
Colleges all boost the promotion of teamwork and collaboration as one of the core competencies for all healthcare educational programs
(Finkelman & Kenner, 2012). It is the intent that all new graduate nurses will utilize evidence-based practice, quality improvement, informatics and
teamwork and collaboration to assure safe, patient centered care. Yet embedding these core competencies throughout the nursing curricula has
been a difficult movement for nurse educators (Bryer & Peterson-Graziose, 2014; Barnsteiner, Disch, Hall, Mayer, & Moore, 2007). If healthcare
institutions expect new graduate nurses to have the tools necessary to communicate, collaborate and work in interprofessional teams, then
academic institutions and nurse faculty must seek innovative resources within their institution or community to enhance teamwork opportunities
with students of all disciplines.
Collegiate athletics have long been a part of university life. Physical educators, sport experts and researchers have touted the conflicting benefits
and disadvantages of playing a collegiate sport while prioritizing academic performance. The general benefits frequently agreed upon include
enhanced leadership qualities, competition, character building, student engagement, confidence, motivation, improved health, a persistence to
stay in school, and the ability to learn how to deal with failure and difficult situations. It is no doubt that many of these characteristics would be of
great benefit to the nursing profession, yet no studies have been done citing nursing student’s collegiate sport participation and the attributes and
characteristics gained from playing a college sport. It is interesting to note that at the time of this research in 2016, there were only a few research
studies done identifying student nurses’ activity in any collegiate activity, never mind sports.
This research used a phenomenological design to illuminate and bring light to the experiences of having dual collegiate roles; that of the student
nurse and the student athlete. Thirteen practicing nurses were interviewed about their collegiate experience. Each role, that of student nurse and
that of student athlete, had various challenges and coordinating both roles was not easy, yet the participating nurses shared very poignant stories
of how and why both roles enhanced the other. This study proved that student nurses can and should have the opportunity to participate in
collegiate activities as do other college students. Nursing courses should not limit a student’s drive to succeed in more than one role and that
athletics may not be the only way nursing students can build a sense of belonging in their college community as they build their confidence in
nursing.
Although this study's goal was not to identify whether playing a sport in college increased the nurses ability to communicate and collaborate, it did
identify that despite the rigors of nursing school and the physical and time demads of playing a college sport, nursing students were able to be
successful in both endeavors. Most explained that each role enhanced the other; taking one away would be a conflict of their persona. The
repeated themes that were shared throughout the interviews destinquishing the dual role phenomena were: 1) Athletic Identity, 2) Perseverance,
3) Support, 4) Acceptance and Belonging and 5) Transitioning the Sports Mentality into Nursing. The presentation will expand on these themes and
will share some of the stories of these student nurse athletes; their determination to succeed at both roles and how their experience affects them
as nurses today.
References
Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Hall, L., Mayer, D., & Moore, S. (2007). Promoting interprofessional education. Nursing Outlook, 55(3), 144-150.
Bryer, J., & Peterson-Graziose, V. (2014). Integration of quality and safety competencies in undergraduate nursing education: A faculty
development approach. Teaching & Learning in Nursing,9(3), 130-133. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2014.04.004
Clancy, C.M. & Tornberg, D.N. (2014). TeamSTEPPS: Assuring optimal teamwork in clinical settings. American Journal of Medical Quality, 22(3):214-
217.
Engelke, E. C. (2016).Dual collegiate roles: From belonging to becoming the lived experience of the student-nurse-athlete(Order No. 10117105).
Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1794656181). Retrieved from http://0-
search.proquest.com.liucat.lib.liu.edu/docview/1794656181?accountid=12142
Finkelman, A. & Kenner, C. (2012). TeachingIOM: Implications of the Institute of Medicine reports for nursing education. Maryland: American Nurses
Association.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine and National
Academics Press.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change and advancing health. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press
Contact
[email protected]
An Intervention Designed to Enhance Reflective Debriefing Discussions With Nursing Students
Elizabeth Ann Andersen, PhD, Canada
Abstract
Background: In undergraduate nursing programs, reflective debriefing discussions are an essential component of clinical practice.
These discussions typically occur in quiet spaces at the end of the clinical day. Students share information with their peers and the
clinical instructor, and analyze situations or significant events that occurred during the day, while also reflecting on their actions.
Although the most consistent empirical evidence points to the importance of reflective debriefing during clinical discussions, there is
a lack of evidence about practices or strategies that will enhance the quality of discussions, and the capacities of nursing students to
engage in meaningful discussions.
Empirical evidence suggests that it can be quite difficult for some instructors to engage undergraduate nursing students consistently and effectively
in reflective post-clinical discussions. Lack of student engagement is due to various factors including boredom, fatigue, feelings of discomfort, self-
consciousness, anxiety, and/or feeling insecure speaking in front of the instructor and student colleagues (Chernomas & Shapiro, 2013; Cox Dzurec,
Allchin, & Engler, 2007; Edwards, Burnard, Bennett, & Hebden, 2010; Jimenez, Navia-Osorio, & Diaz, 2010; Kim, 2003). Anecdotal evidence suggests
that some undergraduate nursing students may decide ahead of time whether they will play an active and prominent role in these discussions, or a
less active, less prominent role.
Study Design: In this multi-site study, we used a randomized crossover research design (Sibbald & Roberts, 1998; Wellek & Blettner, 2012). A
period of rest just before discussions (called an incubation interval) in combination with an unrelated distracting task with light cognitive load
(during discussions) was the intervention. The intervention was aimed at preventing students’ constrained or focused concentration on their
instructor’s prompts to allow creative and less accessible ideas to surface (Dijksterhuis & Meurs, 2006). The primary research question was: What
are the effects of a period of rest combined with a repetitive, unrelated distracting task with a light cognitive load, on undergraduate nursing
students’ capacities and intentions to participate in reflective, debriefing discussions?
Nursing students’ capacities and intentions to participate in reflective, debriefing discussions were the ‘behaviours’ of interest in this study, which
was guided by the Theory of Planned Behaviour (Ajzen, 2003; Francis et al., 2004). According this theory, nursing students’ intentions to engage in
reflective, debriefing discussions with clinical instructors are predictable and guided by their beliefs about: a) the likely consequences of
participating, producing either favorable or unfavorable attitudes toward discussions, b) what is normally expected during reflective discussions,
producing perceived social pressure, and c) factors that facilitate or impede their performance, producing perceptions about behavioural control.
Method: Fifteen groups of first-year undergraduate nursing students from two post-secondary educational institutions completed 12 weekly
clinical shifts (0700 to 1400 hours) in nursing home settings (8 to 10 students per group). Both institutions followed the same undergraduate
nursing curriculum. At the beginning of the study, eight clinical groups were randomly assigned to the intervention during post clinical discussions,
while seven clinical groups participated in the usual post-clinical discussions for the same length of time. After six weeks, the groups ‘crossed-over’
(switched).
All consenting students completed 3 questionnaires (Theory of Planned Behaviour Questionnaire, Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale II, and The
Positive & Negative Affect Questionnaire) at beginning and end of a 12-week semester plus a basic satisfaction rating of post-clinical discussions at
the end of the 12-week semester. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 23. The final analyzed sample consisted of 106 students, of whom 93
(87.7%) were female and who were primarily less than 20 years old (n=69, 65.1%).
Results: The independent t-tests showed that students who received the intervention (a period of rest combined with a repetitive, unrelated
distracting task with a light cognitive load) for 6 consecutive weeks and then stopped the intervention experienced a mean reduction in satisfaction
levels over that period. The students who participated in the usual post-clinical discussions for 6 weeks (without the intervention) and then began
the intervention showed greater satisfaction after another 6 weeks. The mean difference in the change scores between the two groups (x=.81) was
statistically significant (t=3.51, df=104, p=.001).
Conclusion: Nursing practice is characterized by increasing specialization and heightened use of technology; nursing students learn how to be
technologically proficient, accurate, and competent in psychomotor skills. In fact, most nursing students are preoccupied with technical skills and
knowledge. But equally important, students must learn how to become reflective practitioners in order to maintain a humanistic commitment to
attending to the concerns or feelings of others. They learn these skills during reflective debriefing discussions with their instructors, after clinical
practice. These types of discussions are designed to draw their attention to relevant information and help them understand their own and others
beliefs and experiences. Reflective processes, however, cannot be imposed by an instructor. This intervention was designed to ease the reflective
process, and may be of use to clinical instructors who wish to facilitate the development of reflective practitioners who are able to promote change
and enhance the quality of nursing care provided to patients.
References
Ajzen, I. (2003). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. 1-7. Retrieved from
http://people.umass.edu/aize/pd/tpb.measurement.pdf
Chernomas, W., & Shapiro, C. (2013). Stress, depression, and anxiety among undergraduate nursing students. International Journal of Nursing
Education Scholarship, 10(1), 255-266. Doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2012-0032
Cox Dzurec, L., Allchin, L., & Engler, A. (2007). First-year nursing students’ accounts of reasons for student depression. Journal of Nursing Education,
46(12), 545-551. Retrieved from http://www.healio.com/nursing/journals/jne
Dijksterhuis, A., & Meurs, T. (2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1),
135-146. Doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.04.007
Edwards, D., Burnard, P., Bennett, K., & Hebden, U. (2010). A longitudinal study of stress and self-esteem in student nurses. Nurse Education Today,
30(1), 78-84. Doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.06.008
Francis, J., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Walker, A. E., Grimshaw, J. M., Foy, R., Kaner, E. F. S., Smith, L. & Bonetti, D. (2004). Constructing
questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Retrieved from
http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/1735/
Jimenez, C., Navia-Osorio, P., & Diaz, C. (2010). Stress and health in novice and experienced nursing students. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(2),
442-455. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2648.2009.05183.x
Kim, K. (2003). Baccalaureate nursing students’ experiences of anxiety producing situations in the clinical setting. Contemporary Nurse, 14(2), 145-
155. Doi: 10.5172/conu.14.2.145
Sibbald, B., & Roberts, C. (1998). Understanding controlled trials: Crossover trials. British Medical Journal, 316(7146), 1719-1720. Retrieved from
http://www.bmj.com/
Wellek, S., & Blettner, M. (2012). On the proper use of the crossover design in clinical trials. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 109(15), 276-281.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0276
Contact
[email protected]
BSN Students’ Perceptions of Social Determinants of Health
Susan K. Lee, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Pamela Willson, PhD, RN, FNP-BC, CNE, FAANP, VHF, USA
Abstract
Scope: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Culture of Health call for improving population health to improve Social
Determinants of Health (SDOH). It is unclear if the components of SDOH are identified, assessed, and discussed within BSN
curriculum. Therefore, this longitudinal, qualitative study was designed to better understand a cohort of 100 BSN students'
perceptions of their role in identifying and addressing SDOH with their clients. The components of SDOH derive from exclusion,
exploitation, humiliation, and an unequal distribution of basic necessities, such as knowledge, food, property, services, and income.
When considering the impact of SDOH on the health of vulnerable populations, nursing education initiatives should be designed to
align with recommendations from the World Health Organization to address disparities. (Rozendo, Salas, & Cameron, 2017). There
may be a need for an increased focus on concepts of culture within nursing education programs to prepare future nurses for
culturally congruent practice that has the potential to reduce the negative impact of SDOH. Unfortunately, concepts related to SDOH
are not easily identified or tracked across nursing education curriculum (Diaz, Clarke, & Gatua, 2015). As faculty concerned with
addressing this potential curricular deficiency, the purpose of this study was to design an inquiry to explore Bachelor of Science in
Nursing (BSN) students' knowledge and perceptions of client care as they relate to SDOH. The aims were: 1) to explore students'
perceptions of SDOH upon entry into a BSN education program; and 2) to identify if an evolving awareness of social determinants
that adversely affect health were gained on a larger scale by program completion.
A literature review was conducted to identify the issues and trends of SDOH in nursing education. The themes identified were used as search terms
and included disparity, poverty, inequality, homelessness, nursing curriculum, nursing education, nursing faculty, and nursing students.
The literature and research is limited in identifying how SDOH are addressed in existing nursing curriculum. Therefore, to further explore SDOH and
their inclusion in nursing curriculum, undergraduate students were surveyed using a longitudinal, qualitative research design spanning the duration
of a specified cohorts’ nursing education program.
Significance: This study stemmed from a desire to better understand BSN students’ perceptions of SDOH; to explore whether students’ awareness
of SDOH increases over time; and to study the impact of knowledge gained while in a BSN education program that influences new nurses to
address SDOH in clients. There are educational advantages that result from this study. Beyond evaluating students, the findings from this study may
serve has an exemplar for turning Culture of Health questions into scholarly inquiries. The hope is that more educators become inspired to trace
students’ progress regarding characteristics described in the Culture of Health from program beginning to program end to gain insights that inform
curricular revisions.
Method/Description: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 90 of the 100 students volunteered to participate, signed the consent
form, and responded to the first survey. The first survey, which was designed to gain baseline data, consisted of three questions: 1) What social
determinants are you aware of that contribute to poor health? 2) What do you imagine is the nurse's responsibility, if any, to identify and address
change in social determinants of health for clients? and 3) What have you already done to change social determinants of health? The second survey
was administered during the last week of the final semester, prior to graduation. The first two questions were identical to survey one to establish
differences in perception of SDOH. An additional third question, “How has your perception of the nurse’s responsibility in addressing social
determinants that contribute to poor health changed over the last year?” assessed the students' reflections of change during their program of
study.
Evaluation Process/Findings: As a qualitative study, participants were asked to define “social determinants of health.” The results were analyzed
line-by-line by each of the researchers to identify common themes and categories. The researchers met to discuss findings, looking for common
themes and identifying differences. This process was similarly repeated after the data collection with the second survey. Researchers then
compared the findings between the data analyses of both surveys to determine when change in awareness occurred and if this change was related
to learning that occurred through the nursing education curriculum. The results from the data analysis suggest that a majority of the students
initially equated social conditions with lifestyle choices and individual behaviors, (e.g., smoking, lack of exercise, diet). This cohort of participants
indicated that the nurse’s responsibility was to educate and display characteristics like optimism, kindness, open-mindedness, and helpfulness.
Their prior activities to change SDOH focused on personal choices, rather than advocating for others, (e.g. moving to a new town, stopped
associating with bad influences).
By contrast, a small number of participants identified social determinants that contribute to poor health, such as poverty and lack of education. For
these participants, the nurse’s responsibility was believed to be patient advocacy, as in encouraging patient’s to further their education. Prior
activities of this cohort of participants included serving in the military, going to war, working with community outreach, volunteering, fund-raising,
donating money, and raising awareness with social events. These activities were found to influence an increased awareness of the impact of SDOH
and means to lessen the impact on patients.
Conclusion: This longitudinal/qualitative study explored BSN students' perceptions of SDOH. As participants’ responses evolve over time, a
narrower, more manageable definition of SDOH may be incorporated into nursing care and an expanded role in identifying and addressing SDOH
will emerge. Clinical student experiences should incorporate experiential activities that raise SDOH awareness. Through identifying and improving
nursing education, future nurses will be better equipped to answer the call to consider the impact of SDOH when providing quality, comprehensive
patient care. Within the auspices of advocating to improve the lives of client’s affected by SDOH, nurses may take a leadership role in policy
development to better healthcare on a larger scale.
References
Bell, M., & Buelow, J. (2014). Teaching strategies to work with vulnerable populations through a patient advocacy course. Nurse Educator 39(5),
236-240.
Braveman, P. (2014). What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Reports, Supplement 2, 129, 5-8.
Diaz, C., Clarke, P., & Gatua, M. (2015) Cultural competence in rural nursing education: Are we there yet? Nursing Education Perspectives 36(1), 22-
26
Jackson, D., Power, T., Sherwood, J., & Geia, L. (2013). Amazingly resilient indigenous people! Using transformative learning to facilitate positive
student engagement with sensitive material. Contemporary Nurse 46(1), 105-112.
Jones, M., & Smith, P. (2014). Population-focused nursing: Advocacy for vulnerable populations in an RN-BSN program. Public Health Nursing 31(5),
463-471
Mohammed, S., Cooke, C., Ezeonwu, M., & Stevens, C. (2014). Sowing the seeds of change: Social justice as praxis in undergraduate nursing
education. Journal of Nursing Education 53(9), 488-493.
Rozendo, C., Salas, A., & Cameron, B. (2017). A critical review of social and health inequalities in the nursing curriculum. Nurse Education Today 50,
62-71
Contact
[email protected]
Resilience and Professional Value Development in Baccalaureate Nursing Graduates
Tammy D. Barbé, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Background: Professional values are personal beliefs about the worth of concepts or behaviors in a discipline. These beliefs lead to
the development of standards from which to evaluate and act upon and are foundational to the practice of nursing. Education is
essential to professional value acquisition and it is expected that students’ values are modified and expanded during the educational
process.
Resilience is identified as the ability to successfully cope with or overcome adversity. Individuals with higher levels of resilience are more adaptable
to change than those less resilient. Nurses are often required to work in environments with inadequate staffing, critically ill patients, and need to
make rapid life-changing decisions. They interact daily with patients and caregivers in distress. These are but a few examples of why nursing
requires a high-degree of resilience.
While resilience has been studied in numerous clinical populations, little is known about resilience in nursing students (Thomas & Revell, 2016) or
the relationship between resilience and professional value acquisition. The purpose of this study was to investigate how resilience and professional
values in baccalaureate nursing students change from program entry to graduation.
Methods: A non-experimental, longitudinal design was used in this study. A convenience sample was obtained from one university in the Southeast
United States. Following IRB approval, the 14-item Resilience Scale (Wagnild, 2009), Nurses Professional Values Scale-Revised (Weis & Schank,
2009)), and demographic survey were administered to one cohort of baccalaureate nursing students (N=50) at three points in time: upon program
entry, at the end of junior year, and at graduation. Internal consistency reliability of the study instruments were acceptable. Cronbach’s alpha for
the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14) was .80 or greater and the Nurses Professional Values Scale (NPVS-R) was .89 or greater at each data point.
Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine whether there was a significant change over time in the study variables.
Results: The mean RS-14 score for entering baccalaureate nursing students was 83.38 (moderately high resilience) with a range of 38 (very low
resilience) to 98 (high resilience). While the mean resilience scale score increased at each data point, there was a significant change in scores at the
first and third collection periods. Resilience scores increased significantly (p = .02) from program entry to graduation. Students also entered the
program reporting strong professional values orientation with a mean NPVS-R score of 114.94. However, mean NPVS-R scores decreased at each
collection period and there was a significant (p > .01) decrease in NPVS-R scores from program entry to graduation. While the scores decreased as
students progressed in the program, the mean score of 109.26 was indicative of strong professional values orientation. Additionally, there were
significant (p ≤ .05) correlations between resilience and professional values orientation. At each data point, students who reported greater levels of
resilience also reported greater professional values orientation.
Conclusion: Overall, baccalaureate nursing students in this sample entered the nursing program reporting high levels of resilience and strong
professional values orientation. Resilience levels continued to increase throughout the program. While the professional value scores decreased as
students progressed in the program, students in this sample reported stronger professional value orientation at graduation than nurses and
nursing students examined in recent studies (Alfred et al., 2013; Brown, Lindell, Dolansky, & Garber, 2015; Fisher, 2014; Gallegos & Sortedahl,
2015; Lin et al., 2016). Higher levels of resilience and professional value orientation may help nursing students navigate the transition into the role
of a practicing nurse. Further research is needed to examine how resilience and professional value orientation impact nursing workforce retention.
References
Alfred, D., Yarbrough, S., Martin, P., Mink, J., Lin, Y., & Wang, L. S. (2013). Comparison of professional values of Taiwanese and United States
nursing students. Nursing Ethics, 20, 917-926. doi: 10.1177/0969733013484486
Brown, S. S., Lindell, D. F., Dolansky, M. A., & Garber, J. S. (2015). Nurses’ professional values and attitudes toward collaboration with physicians.
Nursing Ethics, 22, 205-216. doi: 10.1177/0969733014533233
Fisher, M. (2014). A comparison of professional value development among pre-licensure nursing students in associate degree, diploma, and
bachelor of science in nursing programs. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35, 37-42. doi: 10.5480/11-729.1
Gallegos, C., & Sortedahl, C. (2015). An exploration of professional values held by nurses at a large freestanding pediatric hospital. Pediatric
Nursing, 41, 187- 195.
Lin, Y., Li, J., Shieh, S., Kao, Ch., Lee, I., & Hung, S. (2016). Comparison of professional values between nursing students in Taiwan and China. Nursing
Ethics, 23, 223-230. doi: 10.1177/0969733014561912
Thomas, L. J., & Revell, S. H. (2016). Resilience in nursing students: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 36, 457-462.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2015.10.016
Wagnild, G. (2009). The resilience scale user’s guide for the US English version of the resilience scale and the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14).
Worden, MT: The Resilience Center.
Weis, D., & Schank, M. J. (2009). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Nurses Professional Values Scale-Revised. Journal of Nursing
Measurement, 17(3), 221-231.
Contact
[email protected]
Preparing Students to Become Extraordinary Nurses: Perspectives From Nurse Employers
Chad E. O'Lynn, PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, USA
Abstract
The guiding statements of many schools of nursing use superlatives to discuss the quality of their graduates and the anticipated impact their
graduates will have on healthcare. Although terms such as “excellent”, “extraordinary”, and “transformative” may prove to be inspirational and
motivational, such descriptors are poorly defined, and thus, difficult to measure. The ability to measure achievement of one’s mission and
demonstrate congruence with guiding statements are of utmost importance to the stakeholders of any school of nursing, particularly students,
boards of trustees, accreditors, and licensing bodies (Lewallen, 2017; Sauter, Gillespie, & Knepp, 2012).
XXX University uses the term “extraordinary” in its purpose and vision statements. In order to better understand this term and its potential impact
on curricula, operations, and evaluation processes, a team conducted a search of the literature for descriptions of extraordinary nurses. Very few
studies were located that examined what might constitute “extraordinary” in nursing and the potential impact these nurses have on other nurses,
the workplace, and patient outcomes. Lefton (2012) conducted a content analysis of extraordinary nursing behavioral descriptors collected from
2,195 DAISY award nomination applications. Lefton identified 22 behaviors associated with extraordinary nursing, most prevalent being those
pertaining to compassion, professionalism, positivity, and an energetic productivity. These behaviors may result in improved work environments
and patient outcomes (Burston & Stichler, 2010; Copanitsanou, Fotos, & Brokalaki, 2017; Stalpers, Van Der Linden, Kalijouw, & Schuurmans, 2017).
Lefton, however, did not include employers’ perspectives in her analysis. This poses a gap. Since employers constitute an essential community of
interest, their perspectives serve as vital input for schools of nursing as curricula are developed and revised to best prepare nursing graduates.
XXX University surveyed employers of its graduates with an online tool asking them to identify descriptors gathered from the literature that best
match their perceptions of extraordinary nurses. Completed surveys were received by 133 employers (nearly a 20% response rate) representing
public and private sectors across all organizational types (i.e., hospital, outpatient care, long-term care, home care, and academics). An exploratory
factor analysis yielded 9 factors that accounted for 72% of the variance of an initial conceptual model. These findings will be disseminated
elsewhere.
This presentation summarizes a collateral qualitative study which was conducted concurrently in order to expand on these findings. Specifically, the
objectives of the qualitative study were to discern patterns of descriptors of extraordinary nurses and the impact these nurses have on the work
environment and patient outcomes from the perspectives of employers. The study’s general aim was to use the findings to explore how curricula
and student assessment rubrics might facilitate and measure the preparation of extraordinary nurses.
Data were collected from open ended survey questions that solicited employers’ perspectives on a) how extraordinary nurses approach their care
and interactions with others differently than typical nurses, and b) how extraordinary nurses impacted others. Employers were also asked how
schools could better prepare extraordinary nurses. Data were analyzed using a content analysis approach to generate codes and synthesis themes
(Patton, 2002). When possible, constant comparison methods were used to examine subtle similarities and differences among respondents in
order to refine codes. Codes were then reviewed in light of the quantitative findings of the related study, the findings from Lefton (2012), and
general literature descriptions of nursing care.
Thirteen codes were generated from the descriptions of extraordinary nurse characteristics, from which three synthesis themes were discerned
that summarized patterns in these nurses: “The Pervasively Curious Critical Thinker”, “The Relentless Difference-Maker”, and “The Servant Leader”.
Six codes were generated from the descriptions of the impact these nurses have on others, from which one synthesis theme emerged: “At Ease, All
is Good”. Explanations and illustrations of these themes will be shared in this presentation. Employers also provided a varied list of actions schools
should take to prepare students to become extraordinary. A summary of these responses will also be provided.
Findings from the study provide faculty a mental picture of extraordinary nursing from which they can more holistically review expected student
behaviors and competencies in experiential learning activities. Furthermore, discussion of the findings with students may provide them a more
accessible understanding of the type of nursing practice to which they should aspire than might be provided by individual words or phrases. The
findings, however, represent only a first step in the study’s general aim to rethink curricula and performance measurement. The themes likely
describe nurses more typical of the proficient or expert-level nurse (Benner, 2001). Also, recommendations on how schools might better prepare
extraordinary nurses were concise and in need of deeper probing. A follow up study is currently underway using focus groups of nurse preceptors,
mentors, and coaches who work directly with new graduate nurses. This study will explore the themes further in order to identify how these
themes manifest in the new graduate.
References
Benner, P. (2001). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Burston, P. L., & Stichler, J. F. (2010). Nursing work environment and nurse caring: Relationship among motivational factors. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 68(7), 1589-1600.
Copanitsanou, P., Fotos, N., & Brokalaki, H. (2017). Effects of work environments on patient and nurse outcomes. British Journal of Nursing, 26(3),
172-176.
Lefton, C. (2012). Strengthening the workforce though meaningful recognition. Nursing Economics, 30(6), 331-355.
Lewallen, L. P. (2017). Developing a systematic program evaluation plan for a school of nursing. In M. H. Oermann (Ed.) A systematic approach to
assessment and evaluation of nursing programs (pp.45-57). Philadelphia: Wolters-Kluwer.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sauter, M. K., Gillespie, N. N., & Knepp, A. (2012). Educational program evaluation. In D. E. Billings & J. A. Halstead (Eds.), Teaching in nursing: A
guide for faculty (4th ed., pp. 503-549). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Stalpers, D., Van Der Linden, D., Kalijouw, M. J., & Schuurmans, M. J. (2017). Nurse-perceived quality of care in intensive care units and associations
with work environment characteristics: A multi-center survey study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(6), 1482-1490.
Contact
[email protected]
Strategies Associated With OSCE Simulation, Anxiety, and Clinical Competency in a Family Nurse
Practitioner Program
Joyce Miller, DNP, APRN, WHNP-BC, FNP-BC, USA
Joanna Guenther, PhD, RN, FNP-BC, CNE, USA
Sharon Cannon, EdD, RN, ANEF, USA
Carol Boswell, EdD, RN, CNE, ANEF, FAAN, USA
Sonya M. Ritchie, BSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Purpose: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are widely used in Advanced Practice Registered Nursing Graduate
Programs and are recognized as a reliable and valid method to assess clinical (Aronowitz, et al, 2017; Miller & Carr, 2016; Mitchell,
et. al, 2015). While the OSCE has generally been accepted by faculty members as a performance-based assessment, it is often poorly
accepted by students. Use of OSCE in undergraduate programs is well documented; its use in graduate programs is less documented.
For graduate students the use of OSCEs involves patient scenarios which require complex clinical reasoning skills, advanced practice
knowledge and skills, and interpersonal/communication skills. Successful completion requires proficiency in multiple areas, including
the ability to complete a thorough health assessment, advanced physical assessment skills, advanced pharmacology knowledge,
interpretation of diagnostic tests, diagnostic reasoning skills, establishment of an evidenced-based treatment plan, effective
teaching, and the ability to document the assessment and plan. Despite its acceptance as a reliable and valid clinical evaluative
method, the most frequently cited disadvantage of the OSCE is student anxiety and is known to produce higher levels of stress and
anxiety among students when compared to more traditional forms of testing. The aim of this project was to examine the differences
in student self-reported anxiety levels and clinical competencies for OSCE mastery as students progressed through the final three
semesters in a family nurse practitioner program.
Methods: The project examined three consecutive retrospective clinical reflection student assignments at 30 minutes prior, during, after, and
following debriefing to determine students’ self-perceived anxiety levels. In addition students assessed their self-perceived clinical competency.
The descriptive study utilized a convenience sample of 72 subjects including both males and females. Data was analyzed using SPSS and the
Friedman’s test that is a non-parametric test looping within groups to test differences in ranks of scores on 3+ related groups using nominal and
ordinal data. Through utilization of Benner’s Novice to Expert Theory (1982), our hypothesis was that student OSCE anxiety would decrease and
self-reported competency scores would increase each semester during their final year in a family nurse practitioner program.
Results: Through utilization of Benner’s Novice to Expert Theory (1982), our hypothesis that student OSCE anxiety would decrease and self-
reported competency scores would increase each semester during their final year in a family nurse practitioner program was on target.
Conclusion: Results from this study add to the body of reported evidence on self-perceived student OSCE anxiety and clinical competency. Through
dissemination of this project, faculty utilizing OSCEs as an evaluative process will have an understanding of student self-reported anxiety and
clinical competency to provide optimal learning opportunities.
References
Aronowitz, T., Aronowitz, S., Martin-Small, J., & Kim. B. (2017). Using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) as education in advanced
practice registered nursing education. Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(2), 119-125.
Benner, P. (1982). From Novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Prentice Hall Health: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Miller, B. &Carr, K. C. (2016). Integrating standardized patients and objective structured clinical examinations into a nurse practitioner curriculum.
Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 12(5), 201-210.
Mitchell, M. L., Henderson, A., Jeffrey, C., Nulty, D., Groves, M., Kelly, M., Knight, S. & Glover, Pauline. (2015). Application of best practice
guidelines for OSCEs: An Australian evaluation of their feasibility and value. Nursing Education Today, 1(7), 201-210.
Contact
[email protected]
Evaluating a Web-Based Educational Module Designed to Enhance Advanced Practice Nurse Preceptors’
Clinical Teaching Excellence
Sandra O'Brien, PhD, RN, CNE, CRNP-F, PHCNS-BC, USA
William O. Howie, DNP, MS, CRNA, CCRN, USA
Jeanne M. Moore, DNP, FNP-BC, USA
Abstract
Challenges for graduate level faculty overseeing clinical preceptors- There are challenges in providing appropriate education and
training for advanced practice nurse (APN) preceptors especially in a distance education program. These challenges include orienting
APN preceptors and ensuring APN quality clinical teaching.
Background: Student enrollment in advanced practice nursing programs is increasing and there is a corresponding increased need for graduate
clinical preceptors. Yet there is little agreement on how best to orient APN preceptors and how to ensure excellence in clinical teaching practices of
APN preceptors. Indeed, scant research has been published regarding advanced practice nursing (APN) preceptors in general (Donley, Flaherty,
Sarsfield, Burkhard, O’Brien, and Anderson, 2014). In a review of APN preceptor literature, several articles were located that presented educational
approaches and theories to enhance skill acquisition of the APN preceptor of nurse practitioner or other health care professional (Lucas and
Bischof, 2014; Witt, Colbert, and Kelly, 2013). Also, two recent descriptive studies related to APN preceptors were located. One study described
nurse anesthetist (CRNA) faculty characteristics (Merwin, Stern, and Jordan, 2008) and another described APN preceptors’ perceptions of benefits
and motivations related to precepting (Wiseman, 2013). Several additional studies of APN preceptors were conducted regarding nurse practitioner
students’ satisfaction with their preceptors (Hayes, 1998; Tanner, 2003) and a recent study investigated the congruence of perceptions of effective
clinical teaching between CRNA students and their preceptors (Smith, Swain and Penprase, 2011). However, no articles could be located that were
research reports measuring increased knowledge regarding clinical teaching skills of APN preceptor, specifically using web-based delivery of
educational modules. Also, no studies could be located that measured APN preceptor self-efficacy.
Studies of web-delivered content to assist preceptor clinical teaching skills acquisition in clinical nurse preceptors has shown promise. Larsen and
Zahner (2008) tested the efficacy of web-delivered educational content with public health nurse preceptors and established an increase in
knowledge immediately after the module and three months after the web-delivered content. However, perhaps due to low completion rate of
participants, the researchers were unable to establish an increase in preceptor self-efficacy. Therefore, a gap in the literature exists regarding APN
preceptor clinical teaching skills acquisition, particularly regarding deployment of web-delivered educational content, to achieve appropriate
education outcomes, including increased self-efficacy.
Purpose- To address the gap in the literature, this study’s aim was to measure the effectiveness of a web-delivered evidence-based educational
module to increase knowledge of clinical teaching strategies and self-efficacy of APN preceptors.
Design- To measure effectiveness, pre- and post-education module measurements were collected and comparisons made between treatment and
control groups. APN preceptors were divided into treatment (Educational module participants) and usual (standard) method groups. Educational
module group- For the Educational module group, web-based materials were deployed by embedding a link to a shared Google Drive in the
recruitment letter. Educational module participants also completed a Survey Monkey questionnaire prior to and immediately after completion of
the Educational Module. The same questionnaire was completed again at the end of the semester to determine whether there were longer term
educational gains. Links for the questionnaires were in the Google Drive materials. Although the Educational Module pilot testing demonstrated
that only one hour was needed to complete the materials, 1 CEU was offered to motivate time-burdened professionals to complete the module
and questionnaires. Standard methods group-The Standard methods preceptors completed a questionnaire, similar to the Educational module
group, at the beginning and end of the semester. It also included an open-ended item querying what techniques the preceptors use to develop
critical thinking skills in their APN students. Those in the Standard Methods groups were offered the opportunity to participate in the Educational
Module at the completion of the study. The data were analyzed to determine if there were statistically significant differences in outcome
measurements between the APN preceptor Educational Module and Standard methods groups.
The One Minute Preceptor clinical teaching strategy- The investigators, in a separate study, queried the APN preceptors to determine their
educational priorities. At least, 59% of the respondents identified their number one educational priority was education regarding development of
critical thinking skills in their APN students. To address this need, the investigators identified the One Minute preceptor (OMP) as an appropriate
clinical teaching strategy to assist APN preceptors to develop the desired teaching skills in their students. Evidence demonstrates the One Minute
Preceptor clinical teaching strategy is an appropriate strategy. Farrell and colleagues (2016, p. 278) state, “OMP prompts the teaching of higher
level concepts, facilitates the assessment of students’ knowledge and prompts the provision of feedback.” The OMP uses five microskills to assist
the APN to reach appropriate clinical decisions after an interaction with their patient. The five skills include 1) Get a Commitment, 2) Probe for
supporting evidence, 3) Teach general rules. 4) Reinforce what was right, and 5) Correct mistakes (Sarkin, 2017).
Web-based content delivery- A web-based design for content delivery was selected for this study as evidence supports that adult learners, including
nurses, are highly motivated to acquire relevant professional skills (Caputi, 2015; DeBourgh, 2003). Also, Computer Based Learning (CBL) is an
effective method to expand nursing knowledge (Dennison, 2011). Additionally, studies demonstrate busy professionals, express satisfaction with
self-paced learning (Caputi, 2015; Eaton-Spiva and Day, 2011).
Selected study findings- The results of the study demonstrated increased knowledge in participating preceptors regarding the One Minute
Preceptor clinical teaching strategy. Immediately after completion of the Educational Module, there was a 74.62% increase in One Minute
Preceptor Clinical teaching strategy knowledge scores. Also, after completion of the Education Module, 77.78% of the participating preceptors
indicated they were extremely likely to use the One Minute Preceptor clinical teaching strategy with their nurse practitioner students. Additionally,
the participating preceptors indicated they were favorably impressed with the Educational Module and its delivery. The APN preceptors who
participated in the Educational Module demonstrated sustained knowledge gains measured at the end of the semester. Finally, there were
comparisons on five key measurements between the control group of preceptors and the intervention preceptors, including preceptor self-efficacy
in their ability to develop critical thinking skills in nurse practitioner students.
Implications- Because of the study’s pre-and posttest control and comparison design, the findings may aid in filling an identified gap in the nursing
literature, especially at the graduate level. The results may guide master’s level faculty in planning educational opportunities for APN preceptors
and may be particularly useful for those programs offering distance formatted programs. A small number of preceptors voluntarily completed the
Educational module despite to offer of CEUs. In the future, other incentives should be considered to gain APN preceptor participation in
educational offerings.
References
Caputi, L. (Ed.) (2015). NLN certified educator review book: The official NLN guide to the CNE exam. Washington, DC: The National League for
Nursing.
DeBourgh, G.A. (2003). Predictors of student satisfaction in distance-delivered graduate nursing courses: What matters most? Journal of
Professional Nursing, 19(3), 149-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S8755-7223(03)00072-3
Dennison, H.A. (2011). Creating a computer-assisted learning module for the non-expert nephrology nurse. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 38(1), 41-
52. http://search.proquest.com/openview/58ec4b46c27b81144787a4e371308b8e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar
Donley, R., Flaherty, M.J., Sarsfield, E., Burkhard, A., O’Brien, S. & Anderson, K. (2014). Graduate clinical nurse preceptors: Implications for improved
intra-professional collaboration. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 19(3). DOI:10.3912/OJIN.Vol19No03PPT01.
Eaton-Spiva, L. & Day, A. Effectiveness of a computerized educational module on nurses’ knowledge and confidence level related to diabetes.
Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 27(6), 285-289. DOI: 10.1097/NND.0b013e3182371164
Farrell, S.E., Hopson, L.R., Wolff, M., Hemphill, R.R., & Santen, S. A. (2016). What’s the evidence: A review of the One-Minute Preceptor model of
clinical teaching and implications for teaching in the emergency department. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 51(3), 278-283.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.007
Hayes, E. (1998). Mentoring and self-efficacy for advanced nursing practice: A philosophical approach for nurse practitioner preceptors. Journal of
the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 10(2), 53-57. 10.1111/j.1745-7599.1998.tb00495.x
Larsen, R. & Zahner, S.J. (2011). The impact of web-delivered education on preceptor role self-efﬁcacy and knowledge in public health nurses.
Public Health Nursing, 28(4), 349-356. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00933.x
Lucas, D. & Bischof, J. (2014). Advancing nurse practitioner preceptor and student engagement in evidence-based practice at the point of care. The
Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 10(8), e25-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2014.06.005
Merwin, E., Stern, S., & Jordan, L.M. (2008). Clinical faculty: Major contributors to the education of new CRNAs- Part 2. AANA Journal, 73(3), 167-
171. PubMed ID 18567318
Sarkin, R. (2017). The One minute preceptor: Microskills of clinical teaching. Retrieved from http://www.im.org/p/cm/ld/fid=712
Smith, C., Swain, A., & Penprase, B. (2011). Congruence of perceived effective clinical teaching characteristics between students and preceptors of
nurse anesthesia program. AANA Journal, 79(4), S62-68. www.aana.com/aanajournalonline.aspx
Tanner, C.L., Pohl, J., Ward, S., and Dontje, K. (2003). Education of nurse practitioners in academic nurse-managed centers: student perspectives.
Journal of Professional Nursing, 19(6), 354-363. Doi 10.1016/S8755-7223(03)00132-7
Wiseman, R. (2013). Survey of advanced practice student clinical preceptors. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(5), 253-258. doi:10.3928/01484834-
20130319-03
Witt, J., Colbert, S., & Kelly, P.J. (2013). Training clinicians to be preceptors: An application of Kolb’s theory. The Journal of Nurse Practitioners, 9(3),
172-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2012.07.031
Contact
[email protected]
Interventions to Improve Nursing Student Attitudes About People With Mental Illness
Todd B. Hastings, PhD, USA
Abstract
Undergraduate nursing students possess negative feelings and discomfort in working with people who have mental illness. Nurse
educators have teaching goals supporting a good orientation for students to psychiatric nursing cultures. But nursing faculty are also
concerned about student attitudes about mental illness as well as knowledge and skills supporting patient-centered care. Student
engagement with individuals who suffer psychiatric problems improves their attitudes but is lengthy and typically cannot be
scheduled prior to students performing clinically in practicums at mental health treatment agencies. Nurse educators may better
support student socialization prior to clinical exposure with innovative and practical educationally-derived strategies to improve
their feelings about mental illness and associated treatment.
A growing body of evidence supports the value of engagement in support of improving college student attitudes about people with mental illness.
Recent research indicates select educationally-based brief strategies prior to clinical experiences helps improve nursing student feelings about
mental health. For the current study, a mixed-methods research design was used. Nursing students were exposed to content-oriented anti-stigma
strategies of a brief nature (approximately 30 minutes in duration). These included a video documentary of a person who suffered a lifetime of
mental illness and a live speaker articulating their own lived experience of mental illness provided to students prior to attending their mental
health nursing clinical experience. Professional (BSN) nursing students were surveyed with a valid and reliable tool (for quantitative measures) and
asked to describe their own impressions of mental illness before and after exposure to media and speaker interventions (for qualitative appraisal).
Descriptive, parametric and non-parametric statistical analysis (paired Student t Tests and Mann-Whitney U test) were used for analyze
quantitative data. Content analysis was conducted for data exploration. The completed analysis suggests the targeted educationally-based
interventions support significant improvement of nursing student attitudes and comfort relative to mental illness themes. Brief interventions
delivered prior to the start of scheduled clinical meetings may support improved student comfort and confidence to deliver good care while
improving perceptions of the overall clinical experience.
Nurse educators may use these results to design and implement immediate and useful approaches for: 1) Improving nursing student feelings about
people with mental illness and thereby decrease stigma and thereby improving the clinical experience for care delivery and student evaluation; 2)
Supporting advocacy and recovery of people with mental illness by enhancing nursing student perceptions about people with mental illness and
mental health care. The current study comprises a collaboration between nursing professors on two different campuses. Another study in process
includes a similar design but expanded to using psychology and social work undergraduate students on two campuses in comparison to nursing
students. This research supports clarification and modification of student attitudes about people with mental illness.
References
Gabbidon, J., Clement, S., van Nieuwenhuizen, A., Kassam, A., Brohan, E., Norman, I., & Thornicroft, G. (2013). Mental illness: Clinicians' attitudes
(MICA) Scale—Psychometric properties of a version for healthcare students and professionals. Psychiatry Research, 206(1), 81.
Happell, B., & Gough, K. (2007). Undergraduate nursing students' attitudes towards mental health nursing: Determining the influencing factors.
Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 25(1-2), 72-81 (this is seminal relative to body of work)
Happell, B., Platania-Phung, C., Harris, S., & Bradshaw, J. (2014). It's the anxiety: Facilitators and inhibitors to nursing students’ career interests in
mental health nursing. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 35(1), 50-57.
Hunter, L., Weber, T., Shattell, M., & Harris, B. A. (2015). Nursing students' attitudes about psychiatric mental health nursing. Issues in Mental
Health Nursing, 36(1), 29-34. doi:10.3109/01612840.2014.935901
Jansen, R., & Venter, I. (2015). Psychiatric nursing: An unpopular choice. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(2), 142-148.
Kosyluk, K. A., Al-Khouja, M., Bink, A., Buchholz, B., Ellefson, S., Fokuo, K., ... & Powell, K. (2016). Challenging the stigma of mental illness among
college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59(3), 325-331.
Poreddi, V., Thimmaiah, R., Chandra, R., & BadaMath, S. (2015). Bachelor of nursing students' attitude towards people with mental illness and
career choices in psychiatric nursing. an indian perspective. Investigacion & Educacion En Enfermeria, 33(1), 148-154 7p. Retrieved from
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109819078&site=ehost-live
Contact
[email protected]
Improving Nursing Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Mental Illness Using Standardized Patients
Debra A. Webster, EdD, RN-BC, CNE, USA
Amanda Willey, MS, RN,CM/DN, CCHP, USA
Abstract
Simulation in psychiatric mental health nursing education is gaining popularity as clinical placements continue to decline. All nurses
will encounter individuals with mental illness throughout their career, making the use of psychiatric mental health simulation
experiences pivotal in nursing education. Even among health care providers, there can be considerable stigma associated with
people with mental illness. According to Evans-Lacko et al., (2010) three constructs comprise the concept of stigma- knowledge
(ignorance), attitudes (prejudice), and behavior (discrimination). Consequently, in the education of new health professionals, it is
vital to address each of these constructs to improve knowledge, recognize bias and tackle intolerance.
Evidence that simulation provides valuable opportunities to master new information and improve behavior has been well documented. Simulation
has also been shown to improve therapeutic communication skills in psychiatric mental health nursing (Webster, 2014; Webster, 2013). However,
there is limited research on the use of simulation, more specifically the use of standardized patients (SPs), to influence and change attitudes
towards individuals living with mental illness. The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to determine the impact of simulation on nursing
students’ knowledge of and attitudes towards mental illness. Senior level baccalaureate students (n = 91) enrolled in a psychiatric nursing clinical
course at Salisbury University were introduced to varying mental health disorders via encounters with SPs in a simulated learning environment.
In addition to the SP experiences (SPEs), students were required to complete a toolkit prior to each experience. Each toolkit consisted of learning
objectives, reading assignments, a video vignette, and a post-simulation activity. The toolkit topics matched the SPE each week, providing students
with the necessary background information on each topic and then giving them an opportunity to use their new knowledge with a standardized
patient. Toolkit topics included therapeutic communication, management of hallucination and delusions, setting limits with manic clients, dementia
care, and management of addictions and withdraw.
Student knowledge of and attitudes on varying aspects of mental health were assessed at the beginning and end of the semester using the 12-item
mental health knowledge schedule (MAKS 10©) tool (Thornicroft, 2009). MAKS 10 © was developed to examines knowledge of and stigma related
to common psychiatric mental health disorders among the general public. The MAKS 10© contains 6 stigma-related mental health knowledge
items: help seeking, recognition, support, employment, treatment, and recovery, and 6 items that inquire about knowledge of mental illness
conditions. Items are rated using a 5-point Likert-type scale with options of agree strongly, agree slightly, neither agree nor disagree, disagree
slightly, and disagree strongly. A category of "don’t know" was also available. With acceptable internal consistency (.65) and test-retest reliability
(.71), and content reviewed by an international panels of experts, the MAKS 10© was selected for its ability to assess and track stigma-related
knowledge, its brevity, and ease of administration.
The first six items of the MAKS 10© assess attitudes towards people with mental illness. Respondents are asked to indicate on a 6-point scale, the
extent to which they agree or disagree with various statements about people with mental illness, e.g., “people with severe mental health problems
can fully recover” (Thorndike, 2009). The remaining six items assess knowledge of mental illness, e.g. whether respondents consider stress to be a
mental illness (Thorndike, 2009). At the end of the semester, completed questionnaires were scored and all data were entered in SPSS ver. 24 for
statistical analysis
Pre-test data were collected from 91 students, but only 65 completed the post-test. Consequently, all analyses were conducted using a final n of
65. A paired-samples t-test revealed a significant difference in overall MAKS 10© scores before simulations (M=46.95, SD=4.32) and after
simulations (M=49.12, SD=3.05); t (64) = -4.05, p < 0.01. These results suggest that experiences with standardized patients increase student
knowledge of mental health disorders and favorably influence attitudes towards individuals with mental illness. Specific items demonstrating the
greatest change were knowledge of medications for treatment, ability to give advice on mental health issues, and beliefs that those with mental
illnesses want to be employed.
The use of toolkit activities followed by SPEs has enabled nursing faculty to provide consistent clinical experiences for all students that focus on
building knowledge and changing attitudes. With growing competition for “live” clinical experiences, educators need alternative opportunities that
will provide equivalent outcomes. While data from this study must be interpreted cautiously, the findings are promising and lay the groundwork for
future investigation. Limitations include a small sample size and single site location. The study design cannot infer causality and other variables may
have contributed to the differences in pre-and post-test scores. For example, all students were concurrently enrolled in a psych/mental health
theory course where they studied the same mental health disorders that were embedded in the toolkits and SPEs. It is unclear how the exposure to
this content in multiple ways influenced the MAKS post-test scores. Additionally, the loss of nearly 1/3 of the data, from student absence on the
day of post-test data collection is of concern.
Further research is needed to continue exploring nursing students’ knowledge of mental illness and to determine instructional methods that can be
employed to change misconceptions that nursing students have regarding those living with mental illness. This presentation will provide an
overview of the study, results, and implications for nurse educators.
References
1. Evans-Lacko S1, Little K, Meltzer H, Rose D, Rhydderch D, Henderson C, Thornicroft G. (2010). Development and psychometric properties of the
Mental Health Knowledge Schedule. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(7), 440-8. DOI: 10.1177/070674371005500707.
2. Halter, M. J. (2014). Varcarolis’ Foundations of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing: A Clinical Approach. (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.
3. Thornicroft, G. (2009). Mental Health Knowledge Schedule. Health Service and Population ResearchDepartment, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s
College London.
4. Webster D. (2014). Using standardized patients to teach therapeutic communication in psychiatric nursing. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10(2),
e81-e86.
5. Webster D. (2013) Promoting therapeutic communication and patient-centered care usingstandardized patients. Journal of Nursing Education,
52(11), 645-648.
6. Webster D, Seldomridge L, Rockelli L. (2012). Making it real: Using standardized patients to bring case studies to life. Journal of Psychosocial
Nursing and Mental Health Services, 50(5), 36-41.
Contact
[email protected]
It's Good to Be Blue: A Nursing Study Abroad Blue Zone Experience in Sardinia, Italy
Jessica L. Naber, PhD, MSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: Blue Zones are areas of the world where, according to studies performed by National Geographic and other experts,
people live measurably longer, happier lives with lower rates of chronic disease and a higher quality of life than they do in the
United States. There are five identified Blue Zones, and there are nine common characteristics among these five locations, known as
the Power 9. These common characteristics include information pertaining to diet, exercise, relationships, and spirituality. Sardinia,
Italy was the first identified Blue Zone, and it has the greatest concentration of male centenarians in the world.
Methods: A nursing professor, along with 17 nursing students, traveled to Sardinia, Italy in May, 2017 to explore the culture, lifestyles, and
ultimately the Power 9 at work. In Sardinia, students visited and interviewed centenarians in their homes, visited local markets and stores, met
with longevity experts, visited a winery and olive oil mill, participated in a cooking class, and visited Blue Zone villages. They experienced typical
Sardinian celebrations, meals, and social activities. Students and the faculty member analyzed the collected data using a narrative thematic analysis
to determine connections to the Power 9 and overall lifestyle characteristics that aid in longevity.
Objectives: The overall aim of this visit was to research the Blue Zone and draw conclusions about the Power 9 characteristics by interviewing,
observing, and analyzing. Students immersed themselves in the Sardinian culture and brought back information to the local university community
and community as a whole. The plan is to implement Blue Zone ideals locally and potentially to implement the Blue Zone Project with the help of
the Blue Zone experts.
Conclusions: Visiting the Blue Zone in Sardinia was extremely valuable for nursing students in bringing health promotion ideals back to the
community and to patients in a variety of settings. Also, this was an important introduction to qualitative research techniques such as interviewing
and qualitative analysis.
References
Buettner, D. (2012). The Blue Zones: Nine lessons for living longer from the people who've lived the longest. National Geographic: Washington, D. C.
Buettner, D. (2017). Blue zones. Retrieved from https://bluezones.com/exploration/sardinia-italy/
Campbell, T. M., & Campbell, T. C. (2013). Plant-based diets for cardiovascular disease: A brief review. Integrative Medicine Alert,16(3), 37-41.
Pes, G. M., Tolu, F., Dore, M. P., Sechi, G. P., Errigo, A., Canelada, A., & Poulain, M. (2015). Male longevity in Sardinia, a review of historical sources
supporting a causal link with dietary factors. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(4), 411-418. doi:10.1038/ejcn.2014.230
Poulain, M., Herm, A., & Pes, G. (2013). The Blue Zones: Areas of exceptional longevity around the world. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research,
11, 87-108.
Contact
[email protected]
Perceptions of Significance Regarding Prenatal Care Among Multiparous Patients
Susan E. Wurzer Gustafson, EdD, MSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Pregnancy, with the inherent need for prenatal care, is a global condition. Research has demonstrated a positive relationship between maternal
adherence to prenatal care with associated maternal, fetal, and delivery outcomes of pregnancy. Non-adherence has been shown to increase risks
of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Despite the importance of care, maternal adherence to prenatal care is problematic, pervasive, and
persists without an identified etiology. Research to identify a causation for maternal nonadherence has focused upon groups of women with
shared traits or circumstance as a predisposing risk. The aim of this study was to identify how adherent multiparous patients perceive the
significance or value of prenatal care. Participants were recruited from a convenience sample as they presented to an obstetric practice in Upstate
New York, based inclusion criteria. Maternal multiparous patients who consented to participate, who were in the first trimester of pregnancy, and
who had not experienced a loss of pregnancy, were interviewed over an eleven week period. A qualitative semi-structured research study, utilizing
a directed content approach with the Health Belief Model as a theoretical base, indicated five themes with an overarching theme of Maternal Fetal
(M-F) attachment, as motivating cues to action in seeking care. The maternal patients in this study were all found to have established M-F
attachment, prompting them to seek care. Liitations of the study included a small sample size and homogenous sampling of those meeting criteria.
Understanding the importance of M-F attachment, and the way in which individual maternal needs may be met throughout pregnancy, has the
potential for improved practice aimed at increasing adherence rates. Further research is indicated to explore the multifactorial origins of
established M-F attachment, and ways to deliver patient centered-care in practice to meet the diverse and changing needs of maternal patients.
The ultimate goal for practice is to improve maternal adherence rates, subsequently affecting improved maternal, fetal, and delivery outcomes.
References
Alikari, V., and Zyga, S. (2014). Conceptual analysis of patient compliance in treatment Health Science Journal. Retrieved from
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/261287073_CONCEPTUAL_ANALYSIS_OF_PATIENT_COMPLIANCE_IN_TREATMENT
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2014). Retrieved from http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-
Departments/Deliveries-Before-39-Weeks/ACOG-Clinical-Guidelines
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2015). The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Overview and
leadership. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Retrieved from http://www.acog.org/ About-ACOG/Leadership-and-
Governance
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2010). The Affordable Care Act: What the health reform law means for ob-gyn.
ACOG. Retrieved from http://www.acog.org/-/media/Departments/Government-Relations-and-
Outreach/20101004TheAffordableCareAct.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20150315T1026310106
Almeida, M., Alencar, G., Novaes, M., Franca Jr., I., Franco de Siqueira, A., Campbell, O., Schoeps, D., & Rodrigues, L. (2007). Risk-factors for
antepartum fetal deaths in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Revista de Saude Publica. 41(1). DOI 10.1590/50034-891020070000100006
Alexander, GR. & Kotelchuck, M. (1996). Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: A comparison of indices. Public Health Reports. Retrieved from
American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). (2015). Prenatal. American Family Physician. Retrieved from
http://www.aafp.org/afp/topicModules/viewTopicModuletopicModuleId=25
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). (2009). AAP clinical report: The prenatal visit. American Academy of Pediatrics. Retrieved from
http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/AAP-Clinical-Report-The-Prenatal-Visit-.aspx
Aragon, S., Richardson, L., Lawrence, W., & Gesell. (2013). Nurses’ patient-
centeredness and perceptions of care among Medicaid patients in hospital obstetrical units. Nursing Research and Practice. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3762141/pdf/NRP 2013-563282.pdf
Ashraf-Ganjoei, T., Mirzaei, F., & Anari-Dokht, F., (2012). Relationship between prenatal care and the outcome of pregnancy in low-risk
pregnancies. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Retrieved from
http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=7638#.VDguou8tDIU
Atreja, A., Bellam, N., & Levy, S. (2005) Strategies to enhance patient adherence: Making it simple. Medscape. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1681370
Balaam, M., Akerjordet, K., Lyberg, A., Kaiser, B., Schoening, E., Fredriksen, A., Ensel A., Gouni, O., & Severinsson, E. (2013).A qualitative review of
migrant women's perceptions of their needs and experiences related to pregnancy and childbirth. Journal of Advanced Nursing. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0056267/
Baldwin, K., and Phillips, G. (2011). Voices along the journey: Midwives’ perceptions of implementing the centeringpregnancy model of prenatal
care. The Journal of Perinatal Education. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3210635/
Becker, M. (1974). The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Education Monographs. Volume 2, Number 4:324-473
Becker, M., Haefner, D., Kasl, S., Kirscht, J., Maiman, L., and Rosenstock, I. (1977). Selected psychosocial models and correlates of individual health-
related behaviors. Medical Care, 15, 27-46.
Brighton, A., D’Arcy, R., Kirtlye, S., & Kennedy, S. (2013). Perceptions of prenatal care and obstetrical care in Sub-Saharan Africa. International
Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23228816
CDC (2011). Healthy People 2020. Center for Disease Control. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2020.htm
Center for Disease Control (CDC). 2013. Healthy People 2020.Gov. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people.html
Center for Disease Control (CDC). 2014. Maternal, infant, and child health. HealthyPeople.Gov. Retrieved from
https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health/objectives
Chemung County.com. (2016). The official site of Chemung County Government: Public information and records home. Retrieved from
http://www.chemungco.com/index.asp?pageID=205
Cherry, K. (2015). Perception and the perceptual process. About Education. Retrieved from
http://psychology.about.com/od/sensationandperception/ss/perceptproc.htm
Conner, M. & Norman, P. (2001). (Eds.). Predicting Health Behaviour. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.4th Edition. Twin Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dako-Gryeke, P., Aikins, M., Aryeety, R., Mccough, L., & Adongo, P. (2013). The influence of Socio-cultural interpretations of pregnancy threats on
health-seeking behavior among pregnant women in urban Accra, Ghana. BioMed Central, Ltd. Retrieved from
http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2393-13-211.pdf
Drain, M. (2001). Quality improvement in patient care and the importance of patient perception. Journal of Ambulatory Care. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/pubmed/11307575
Fisher, J., Tran, T., La, B., Kriitmaa, K., Rosenthal, D., & Tran, T. (2010). Common perinatal mental disorders in northern Vietnam: Community
prevalence and health care use. Bulletin World Health Organization. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2947037/pdf/BLT.09.067066.pdf
Frohwirth, L., Moore, A., Maniaci, R. (2013). Perceptions of susceptibility to pregnancy among U.S. women obtaining abortions. Social Sciences &
Medicine Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/j.socscimed.2013.10.010.pdf
Haddrill, R., Jones, G., Mitchell, C., & Anumba, D. (2014). Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: A qualitative interview study. BMC
Pregnancy and Childbirth. Retrieved from
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/263206304_Understanding_delayed_access_to_antenatal_care_a_qualitative_interview_study
Hamdan-Mansour, A., Marmash, L., Alayyan R., & Hyarat, S. (2014). Difference in perception between nurses and patients related to patients’
health locus of control. International Journal of Nursing Practice. Retrieved from http://illiad.sjfc.edu/ pdf/154418.pdf
Heaman, M., Moffatt, M., Elliott, L., Sword, W., Helewa, M., Morris, H., Gregory, P., Tjaden, L., & Cook, C. (2014). Barriers, motivators, and
facilitators related to prenatal care utilization among inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada: A case-control study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth.
Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/227
Jin, L. & Wen, M. (2003). Infant birth weight, prenatal care and community socioeconomic characteristics in China. All Academics Research.
Retrieved from http://allacadmic.com/meta/p106915_index.html
Kirkham, C., Harris, S., & Grzybowski, S. (2005). Evidence-based prenatal care: Part I. general prenatal care and counseling issues. American Family
Physician. April; 71(7):1307-1316
Kongnyuy, E., Nana, P., Fomulu, N., Wiysonge, S., Kouam, L., Doh, A. (2007). Adverse perinatal outcomes of adolescent pregnancies in Cameroon.
Maternal Child Health Journal. 12:149-154 doi:10.1007/s10995-007-02357-y
Kornfield, S., Geller, P., & Epperson, C. N. (2014). Maternal fetal attachment, locus of control and adherence to STI/HIV prevention and prenatal
care promotion, behaviors in urban women. International Journal of gynecological, Obstetric, and Reproductive Medicine Research. Retrieved from
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4339816
Kumbani, L., Chirwa, E. Malata, A, Oland, J., & Bjun, G. (2012). Do Malawian women critically assess the quality of care? A qualitative study on
women’s perceptions of perinatal care at a district hospital in Malawi. Reproductive Health. Retrieved from http://www.Reproductive-
healthjournal.com/content/9/1/30
Lee, S., Ayers, S., & Holden, D. (2012). Risk perception of women during high risk pregnancy: A systematic review. Health, Risk, & Society. Retrieved
from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2012.701277
Madappa, T., & Sharma, S. (2010). Alterations in pulmonary physiology during pregnancy. Pulmonary Disease and Pregnancy. Retrieved from
http://emedicine. medscape.com
Massachusetts Health Quality Partners (2011). Perinatal Care Recommendations 2009/2010. Retrieved from
http://www.mhqp.org/guidlines/perinatalasp?nav=041200&viewPerinatal
NYSDOH. (2012). New York State Department of Health. Chemung County indicators For tracking public health priority areas. Retrieved from
http://www.health.ny.gov/prevention/prevention_agenda/indicators/county/chemung.htm
Okah, F. & Cai, J. (2014). Primiparous outcomes and future pregnancy health behaviors. American Journal of Health Behavior. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.38.2.17
Olds, D., Kitzman, H., Knudtson, M., Anson, E., Smith, J., Cole, R. (2014). Effect of home visiting nurses on maternal and child mortality: Results of a
2-decade follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. Retrieved from
Perinatal Care Recommendations 2009/2010, (2011). Massachusetts Health Quality partners. Retrieved from
http://www.mhqp.org/guidelines/Perinatal/perinatal/perinatal.asp?nav=041200&vie
Prathima, P. (2014). Compare knowledge on self-care management of pregnancy induced hypertension between primi gravid and multigravida.
Nitte University Journal of Health Sciences. Retrieved from http://nitte.edu.in/journal/September2014/10.pdf
Rosenstock, I., Strecher, V., & Becker, M. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education Quarterly, 15 (2): 175-183.
CCC 0195-8402/88/020175-09
Sangal, R., Srivastava R., Singh, M., Srivastava, D., & Huma Khan, M. (2012). Knowledge on components of ANC care & their utilization in women
attending ANC clinic at BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur. Journal of Advance Researches in Biological Sciences. Retrieved from
http://www.scopemed.org/fulltextpdf.php?mno=45060
Schaffer, M. & Mbibi, N. (2014). Public health nurse mentorship of pregnant and parenting adolescents. Public Health Nursing. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260147837_Public_Health_Nurse_Mentorship_of_Pregnant_and_Parenting_Adolescents
Sharifirad, G., Tol, A., Mohebi, S., Matlabi, M., Shahnazi, H., and Shahsiah. M. (2013). The effectiveness of nutrition education program based on
health belief model compared with traditional training. The Journal of Education and Health Promotion. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC 3778581/
Stark, M. (2001). Relationship of psychosocial tasks of pregnancy and attentional functioning in the third trimester. Research in Nursing and
2Health, 4, 194-202
Stark, M. (2006). Directed attention in normal and high-risk pregnancy. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, Volume 35, Number
2, 241-249
Steckler, A., McLeroy, K., Holtzman, D. (2010). Godfrey H. Hockbaum (1916-1999): From social psychology to health behavior and health education.
American Journal of Public Health. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2936994/pdf/1864.pdf
Tanner-Smith, E., Lipsey, M. (2012). Evaluation of the centering pregnancy programs in Tennessee. Vanderbilt University Peabody College.
Retrieved from
http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/research/pro/about_peabody_research/funded_projects/evaluation_of_the_centering_pregnancy_programs_i
n_tennessee_project_home.php
Tough, S., Siever, J., & Johnston, D. (2007). Retaining women in a prenatal care randomized controlled trial in Canada: Implications for program
planning. BMC Public Health. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC1939989/
United States Census Bureau. (2015). Quick facts Chemung County, NY. Retrieved from
http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/36015,3624229
World Health Organization (WHO). (2015). Social determinants of health. World Health Organization. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/
Ziyo, F., Matly, F., Mehemd, G., & Dofany, E. (2009). Relation between prenatal care and pregnancy outcome at Benghazi, Sudanese Journal of
Public Health. 4 (4). Retrieved from http://www.sjph.net.sd/vol4n4.htm
Contact
[email protected]
Faculty Perceptions of Online Teaching
Sally L. Richter, EdD, MSN, BSN, RN, USA
Abstract
The purpose of this presentation is to describe the results of a thematic analysis of narrative comments addressing faculty
perceptions of online teaching in a secondary data analysis. The infusion of technology into learning and teaching has occurred in all
aspects of education and has resulted in more online courses (Allen & Seaman, 2014; Frazer, Sullivan, Weatherspoon, & Hussey,
2017; Jacob & Vanderhoef, 2014). As the number of online courses increases, it is essential to understand faculty perceptions of
online teaching and the support that promotes their efficacy with online teaching. There is a gap in the literature of qualitative
studies which focus on faculty perceptions of online teaching (Frazer, Sullivan, Weatherspoon, & Hussey, 2017). Richter’s (2015)
original survey research study assessed perceptions of nurse educators’ online teaching efficacy and competency.
Richter (2015) reported self-assessed competency in the use of educational technologies as the best predictor of online teaching efficacy. Richter
also found that competency increased when online teaching efficacy increased (Richter, 2015). Faculty who have had the least experience with
online education perceive the most barriers to teaching online (Lloyd, Byrne, & McCoy, 2012). Findings from these studies support the need to
address teachers’ sense of online teaching efficacy through faculty support and development.
Open-ended questions were posed to solicit faculty opinions regarding their sense of efficacy and competency during the original study but were
not analyzed initially. The survey research questions that provided the data for a secondary data analysis are as follows:
• Do you have any overall comments about your ability to effectively locate, design, and use educational technology to
facilitate and evaluate student learning?
• Do you have any overall comments about your ability to use educational technologies to help students achieve program
outcomes?
• Do you have any overall comments about your ability to use educational technologies to effectively implement principles of
good teaching?
• Do you have any overall comments about your ability to create effective learning experiences in the online environment
using specific tools?
• Please feel free to type in any other comments related to your experiences or perceptions of teaching nursing courses
online.
A phenomenological-hermeneutic approach was used to determine the relationships and meanings embedded in the narrative comments to
uncover perceptions and identify themes in the nursing faculty members’ comments about teaching in an online environment. The text was read
and analyzed as a whole to become familiar with the content and context. The secondary data analysis of data from a faculty survey exploring
faculty perceptions of online teaching identified technology, time, and relationships as the most important issues for online teaching. These
findings are consistent with earlier studies reporting time related issues, social presence in virtual teaching, and institutional support (Frazer,
Sullivan, Weatherspoon, & Hussey, 2017; Lloyd, Byrne, & McCoy, 2012; Mastel-Smith, Post, & Lake, 2015). Based on findings of this study and
evidence from other studies, faculty view support such as an instructional designer, preparatory courses, allocation of time, and peer and/or
mentor support as valuable. The number of online nursing education programs will continue to grow. To accommodate this growth faculty require
support to learn and use new technology, recognition of the time involved with online teaching, and relationship through mentoring.
References
Allen, E. I., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Wellesley, MA.: Babson College/Sloan Foundation.
Frazer, C., Sullivan, D. H., Weatherspoon, D., & Hussey, L. (2017). Faculty perceptions of online teaching effectiveness and indicators of quality.
Nursing Research and Practice, 2017.doi:10.1155.2017.9374189
Jacob, S. R., & Vanderhoef, D. (2014). The influence of contemporary trends and issues on nursing education. Contemporary nursing: issues, trends,
& management (6th ed.). New York: Elsevier, 34-57.
Lloyd, S. A., Byrne, M. M., & McCoy, T. S. (2012). Faculty-perceived barriers of online education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 1-12.
Mastel-Smith, B., Post, J., & Lake, P. (2015) Online teaching: “are you there, and do you care?” Journal of Nursing Education, 54(3), 145–151.
Richter, S.L. (2015). Nurse educator self-assessed technology competence and online teaching efficacy: A pilot study (Doctoral dissertation).
University of West Georgia, Carrollton.
Contact
[email protected]
Culture of Curiosity: The Experienced Nurse Educator and Intellectual Curiosity in the Online Learning
Environment
Bedelia H. Russell, PhD, RN, MSN, CNE, USA
Abstract
The need for nurse educators to teach skills of inquiry in pre-licensure baccalaureate nursing programs has received increased
attention over the past six years. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2013) and the recommendations by the
Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2011), address the need for skills of inquiry as essential outcomes to be gained from a baccalaureate
nursing program. According to Merriam-Webster (2016), skills are defined as “the ability to use one’s knowledge effectively in
execution or performance” and the ability to “do something that comes from training, experience, or practice.” Inquiry is defined as
the “act of asking questions to gather or collect information” (Merriam-Webster, 2016). Within nursing practice, skills of inquiry
include the ability to make observations, classify them, and develop inferences or predictions as they relate to patient care.
Integrated skills of inquiry reflect the nurse’s ability to problem solve, interpret data, creatively or critically think, or clinically reason.
These essential skills of inquiry are inherent to the provision of safe patient care as described by the American Nurses Association
(ANA, 2012) Professional Nursing Practice Scope and Standards of Practice and should be an integral part of nursing education
learning environments.
The recommendations for nursing education reform by Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, and Day (2010), emphasize clinical reasoning and multiple ways
of thinking to promote a student’s ability to learn skills of inquiry. To optimize the student’s ability to learn skills of inquiry, nurse educators must
use learning strategies to engage students in the process of inquiry. Various active learning strategies such as problem-based learning, inquiry-
based learning, and appreciative inquiry, have been identified within nursing education as pedagogically sound approaches to promote student
inquiry (Adhikari, Tocher, Smith, Corcora, & MacArthur, 2014; Chan, 2013; Farid, Naz, Ali, & Feroz, 2012; Ling-Na, Qin, Ying-qing, Shao-yu, & Hui-
Ming, 2014; Spence, Garrick, & McKay, 2012; Yu, Zhang, Xu, Wu, & Wang, 2013). Inherent to the implementation and use of active learning
strategies is the nurse educator’s ability to engage student intellectual curiosity. Berlyne (1960) defined curiosity as a variable of motivation and
engagement of curiosity can result in exploratory behavior and a desire to acquire new knowledge. Engagement of intellectual curiosity promotes
development of skills of inquiry but the concept has not been investigated fully within the context of nursing education (xxxx, 2013). The findings
from a principle-based concept analysis on intellectual curiosity in nursing education suggested the situational context of the learning environment
and the nurse educator’s ability to model curiosity held a strong influence on engagement of student intellectual curiosity (xxxx, 2013).
The traditional, face-to-face, classroom and clinical learning environments have provided multiple opportunities for nurse educators to employ
various teaching strategies and pedagogies known to promote skills of inquiry (Chan, 2012; Chan, 2013). However, when researchers examined the
effectiveness of these active learning strategies, it was the relationship of the strategies to student critical thinking and clinical reasoning
investigated and not the student attribute of intellectual curiosity. Active learning strategies have also been empirically examined in the context of
the online learning environment (Carpenter, Theeke, & Smothers, 2013; Guzic et al., 2012; McClain, Biddle, & Carter, 2012). But these studies
focused on instructional strategy effectiveness, course redesign, or student satisfaction and not on skills of inquiry or student intellectual curiosity.
With the ever-shifting knowledge base of healthcare and evidence-based practice, it is important nursing programs produce graduates who are
flexible and intellectually curious to sustain continuous, lifelong learning and, ultimately, positively influence patient health outcomes.
Therefore, given that: it is essential nursing students gain skills of inquiry during their educational preparation; online learning has been proposed
as a solution to both the nursing and nurse faculty shortage (AACN, 2012); and intellectual curiosity as an isolated concept and phenomenon has
not been fully explored across the various contexts of nursing education learning environments; this study sought to better understand intellectual
curiosity in the context of the online learning environment and from the perspective of the experienced nurse educator.
Under the assumptions of philosopher Max van Manen (1990, 1997) and Martin Heidegger (1962), the purpose of this qualitative, hermeneutic
phenomenological study was to understand the lived experience of baccalaureate nursing student intellectual curiosity for the experienced nurse
educator teaching within the online learning environment. The research question was: What does intellectual curiosity mean to experienced nurse
educators teaching in the online environment? A total of eight participants from three different institutions of higher education in the southeastern
United States were interviewed through a socratic approach (Ironside, 2005). Diekelmann, Allen, and Tanner’s Steps for Data Analysis (1989) were
utilized for data analysis. Three constitutive patterns and seven relational themes emerged through the data analysis process with one hundred
and thirty-three key narrative text excerpts identified by the researcher and data analysis team to support the thematic and pattern analysis. The
five expressions of rigor for interpretive phenomenology, proposed by de Witt and Ploeg (2006), provided assurance of study transparency and
rigor of the process that yielded the study findings. The findings of the study revealed many shared practices and provided several implications for
nursing education. This study extends the discipline of nursing education with its emphasis on the faculty experience within the context of the
online learning environment.
References
Adhikari, R., Tocher, J., Smith, P., Corcoran, J., & MacArthur, J. (2014). A multi-disciplinary approach to medication safety and the implication for
nursing education and practice. Nurse Education Today, 34(2), 185-190. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.10.008
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2013). Essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Available at
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/ccne-accreditation/Standards-Amended-2013.pdf.
American Nurses Association. (2012). Professional Nursing Practice Scope and Standards. Accessed at
http://www.nursingworld.org/nursingstandards on June 13, 2017.
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: a call for radical transformation. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publications.
Berlyne, D.E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Carpenter, R., Theeke, L., & Smothers, A. (2013). Enhancing course grades and evaluations using distance education technologies. Nurse Educator,
38(3), 114-117. doi:10.1097/NNE.0b013e31828dc2d7
Chan, Z. (2012). Role-playing in the problem-based learning class. Nurse Education in Practice, 12(1), 21-27.
Chan, Z. (2013). Exploring creativity and critical thinking in traditional and innovative problem-based learning groups. Journal of Clinical Nursing,
22(15), 2298-2307. doi:10.1111/jocn.12186
de Witt, L., & Ploeg, J. (2006). Critical appraisal of rigour in interpretive phenomenological nursing research. Journal of advanced nursing,55(2), 215-
229.
Diekelmann, N., Allen, D., & Tanner, C. (1989). The NLN criteria for appraisal of baccalaureate programs: A critical hermeneutic analysis (Pub. No.
15-2253). New York: National League for Nursing.
Farid, F., Naz, Ali, S., & Feroz. (2012). Problem based learning in clinical nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education, 4(2), 14-16.
Guzic, B., McIlhenny, C., Knee, D., LeMoine, J., Wendekier, C., Demuth, B.., . . . Bapat, A. (2012). Distance learning and clinical simulation in senior
baccalaureate nursing education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(9), e459-67. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2011.04.005
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time (Macquarrie J. & Robinson E., trans), HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco, CA (original work published 1927).
Institute of Medicine. (2011). The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.
Ironside, P. (Ed.). (2005). Beyond method. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Ling-Na Kong, Qin, B., Ying-qing Zhou, Shao-yu Mou, & Hui-Ming Gao. (2014). The effectiveness of problem-based learning on development of
nursing students' critical thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(3), 458-469.
doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.06.009
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2016). http://www.merriam-webster.com/
McLain, N., Biddle, C., & Cotter, J. (2012). Anesthesia clinical performance outcomes: Does teaching method make a difference? AANA Journal,
80(4), S11-S16. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hch&AN=78332367&site=ehost-live
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience. New York: State University of New York.
van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). London, Ontario, Canada: Althouse
Press.
Russell, B. (2013). Intellectual curiosity: A principle-based concept analysis. Advances in Nursing Science, 36(2), 94-105.
Spence, D., Garrick, H., & McKay, M. (2012). Rebuilding the foundations: Major renovations to the mental health component of an undergraduate
nursing curriculum. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 21(5), 409-418. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0349.2011.00806.x
Yu, D., Zhang, Y., Xu, Y., Wu, J., & Wang, C. (2013). Improvement in critical thinking dispositions of undergraduate nursing students through
problem-based learning: A crossover-experimental study. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 574-581. doi:10.3928/01484834-20130924-02
Contact
[email protected]
A Basic Science Pre-Test to Assess Academic Risk of First Year Nursing Students
Mary Ellen Symanski, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Ondra Kielbasa, PhD, USA
Abstract
At a medium sized private university in the mid-Atlantic region, nursing and science faculty collaborated to improve nursing student
retention through development of a Science Pre-test for use with incoming students. This assessment test was designed to identify
students with deficiency in fundamental science knowledge so that intervention strategies could be initiated early for those
students.
According to sources cited by Harris, Rosenberg and O’Rourke (2014), the rate of attrition from associate and baccalaureate nursing programs may
be as high as 50% or even 85% for minority students. The Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) states an expected goal of at least
70% retention, or no more than 30% attrition (CCNE, 2013). Horkey (2015) cites National League for Nursing (NLN) data that indicate an average
first year attrition rate of 18% for pre-licensure nursing programs, with most attrition occurring within the first year. In the initial year of a nursing
curriculum, students may not even be counted within a nursing class cohort, however that first year serves as a gateway or barrier to nursing
studies. With increasing attention given to retention in nursing education, scholars and administrators seek explanations for the root causes of
retention and attrition, as well as evidence-based interventions to improve nursing program completion. Jeffreys’ (2015) Nursing Universal
Retention and Success model identifies multiple student profile characteristics that affect nursing student retention, including age, gender,
language, ethnicity, family educational background, work experience and prior educational experience. When considering prior educational
experience, prerequisite science course performance or basic science knowledge are frequently cited as correlates of nursing program completion
(Abele, Penprase & Ternes, 2011; Simon, McGinnis & Krauss, 2013). In a broader discussion of contemporary college student attrition and retention
in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) programs, scholars suggest high school preparation in math and science is lacking, and “low
proficiency in basic skills calls for the need to bridge high school and college science curricula” (Sithole, Chiyaka, Mupinga, Bucklein & Kibirige,
2016, p. 52.) In our nursing program, first year student attrition ranged from 30 to 35 per cent over the last three years, mainly for academic
reasons. Achievement of passing grades in science courses, particularly anatomy and physiology, represents the greatest challenge for these
students. Therefore, in conjunction with professional staff in our academic support service department, science and nursing faculty concluded that
a focus on improving success in the first anatomy and physiology course would be an appropriate initial step towards improving retention in the
nursing program.
We chose to assess the science knowledge of incoming students to gather additional information about student academic risk before the start of
the first semester of study. In our program’s experience, while students in incoming nursing classes all meet the same admission requirements,
there is much variability in level of high school preparation in science, as well as a wide range of study skill proficiency. While assistance in the form
of tutoring and supplemental instruction is available to all nursing students in the first-year science courses, many do not seek help until late in the
semester, when achieving a passing grade is not realistic. We sought to develop an objective measure to identify students most in need of
academic assistance in time to make a meaningful difference.
The 25-item Science Pre-test was developed by a panel of three science faculty who regularly teach the required anatomy and physiology courses.
This test was intended to measure background knowledge foundational to concepts addressed in the initial lessons of the first semester anatomy
and physiology course. Concepts addressed include characteristics of cells, basic genetic concepts and chemistry principles such as pH and
concentration. These topics are generally contained in high school science courses and are included in the beginning chapters of the required
anatomy and physiology textbook. For three consecutive years, the Science Pre-test was administered to students during the freshman orientation
period prior to the start of classes. Two hundred forty-six nursing students were among a larger group of health professions and science majors
who took the test. Early in the semester, learning support staff contacted students with a score of less than 50%, to encourage them to take
advantage of tutoring and supplemental instruction. Student participation in academic assistance services was on a voluntary basis.
The Science Pre-test was administered to 485 students over three years, including majors in nursing, occupational therapy, athletic training and
biology. The internal consistency as measured by Kuder-Richardson scores, ranged from 0.57 to 0.62, which is considered acceptable for a teacher-
made test (McGahee & Ball, 2009). For the nursing students (n= 246), the relationship between scores on the Science Pre-test, and spring, fall and
cumulative first year science course grade point average was investigated using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. There was a
moderate positive correlation between the Pre-test scores and science grades for fall semester (r = .406), spring semester (r = .379) and total year
(r = .416), p < .001.
Analysis of correlation between results of a Science Pre-test given to first year nursing students and college science grades shows a positive
relationship, supporting content validity of the Science Pre-test. This test has potential to be a valid, reliable, economical and efficient way to
screen students in an objective way, enabling early identification of those students more likely to need supplemental instruction, tutoring services
or other study skill development
References
Abele, C., Penprase, B., & Ternes, R. (2013). A closer look at academic probation and attrition: What courses are predictive of nursing
studentsuccess? Nurse Education Today, 33(3), 258-261. doi: http://dx.doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.017
Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (2013). Standards for accreditation of baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs. Retrieved from:
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/ccne-accreditation/Standards-Amended-2013.pdf
Harris, R. C., Rosenberg, L., & Grace O'Rourke, M. E. (2014). Addressing the challenges of nursing student attrition. Journal of Nursing Education,
53(1), 31-37. doi:10.3928/01484834-20131218-03
Horkey, E. (2015). It's not all academic: Nursing admissions and attrition in the united states. Nursing Reports, 5(1), 29-31. Retrieved from http://0-
search.ebscohost.com.alvin.iii.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=c8h&AN=112189408&scope=site
Jeffreys, M. R. (2015). Jeffreys's nursing universal retention and success model: Overview and action ideas for optimizing outcomes A–Z. Nurse
McGahee, T. W., & Ball, J. (2009). How to read and really use an item analysis. Nurse Educator, 34(4), 166-171.
doi:10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181aaba94
Simon, E. B., McGinniss, S. P., & Krauss, B. J. (2013). Predictor variables for NCLEX-RN readiness exam performance. Nursing Education Perspectives
(National League for Nursing), 34(1), 18-24. Retrieved from http://0-
search.ebscohost.com.alvin.iii.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=c8h&AN=104233822&scope=site
Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E. T., McCarthy, P., Mupinga, D. M., Bucklein, B. K., & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student attraction, persistence and retention in STEM
programs: Successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46-59. Retrieved from http://0-
search.ebscohost.com.alvin.iii.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1126801&scope=site
Contact
[email protected]
New Careers in Nursing: Pre-Entry Immersion Programs and Relationship to Graduation From Accelerated
Nursing Programs
E. Renee Cantwell, DNP, RN, CNE, CPHQ, USA
Margaret A. Avallone, DNP, RN, CCRN, USA
Abstract
For an individual with a bachelor’s degree in another field, the transition to a career in nursing through an accelerated nursing
program is challenging and is often more challenging for underrepresented minority students (Cantwell, Napierkowski, Gundersen,
& Naqvi, 2015). Although overall growth in nursing program graduates has increased by 141% in ten years (Buerhaus, Auerbach, &
Saiger, 2014), the nursing workforce remains predominantly White (75%) and female (93%) (United States Department of Health and
Human Services [USDHHS], 2013).
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) in collaboration with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) recognized Accelerated
Baccalaureate of Science in Nursing (ABSN) programs as an important alternative to the traditional four-year nursing degree. This partnership
resulted in The New Careers in Nursing (NCIN) program. The goals of NCIN were two-fold: help alleviate the nursing shortage and increase diversity
among nursing professionals. The NCIN program provided 3,506 scholarships to underrepresented minority or economically disadvantaged nursing
students attending 130 ABSN programs in the U.S. from 2008 to 2015 (DeWitty, Huerta & Downing, 2016).
Pre-Entry Immersion Programs (PIPs) have been developed to assist nursing students through the challenge of the ABSN or traditional
baccalaureate nursing programs (Cantwell et al., 2015; Condon et al, 2014; DeWitty et al, 2016; Loftin, Newman, Gilden, Bond, & Dumas, 2013;
Rosario-Sim, 2016) however there exists a lack of consensus regarding the utility of PIP programs and the structure that PIP programs should take.
To help answer these questions, data from New Careers in Nursing (NCIN) were analyzed to examine the relationship of Pre-Entry Immersion
Programs (PIPs) on student graduation. A total of 1,811 scholarship recipients participated in a PIP program; data from these 1,811 scholars was
used for the analysis. NCIN sites were required to offer a PIP course starting in the round three funding cycle. Nevertheless, some students did not
take advantage of this extra support. Also, not all students participated in every component recommended in the NCIN PIP toolkit.
The primary goal of the data analysis was to describe the differences in PIP participation compared to non-PIP participation in terms of
demographic groups, perceived helpfulness of the program and its components, and the relationship of the PIP program and its components on
graduation outcomes. Chi-Square tests were used to determine significant differences between nominal types of data. Two sample t-tests were
used for ordinal data.
To identify which components of the PIP positively related to student graduation, various PIP components were compared. Components selected
for analysis were those most commonly identified in the literature including time management, self-care strategies, study skills, Learning and Study
Strategies Inventory (LASSI), test taking skills and test success, leadership development, medical terminology, assessment of writing skills, and basic
mathematical skills.
Overall, the data suggests that participation in a PIP program may be associated with higher graduation rates for all students and also for Non-
white participant scholars. Graduation rate for PIP participants was 93.4% compared to 88.97% for non-PIP participants (p=0.009). Of Non-white
PIP participants, graduation rate was 92.45% compared to 87.29% (p=0.019. Withdrawal rates were also lower for PIP participants; 6.6% compared
to 11.3% (p=0.0092). This finding supports outcomes from other nursing programs offering PIP programs (Cantwell et al., 2015; Carter & Derouin,
2015; Condon, 2013; Degazon & Mancha, 2012; DeWitty et al., 2016; Rosario-Sim, 2016; Walker, 2016).
In analyzing the supportive relationship of PIP and its components, Non-white students found the various PIP components statistically more helpful
than White students (p=0.0001). No significant differences were found when accounting for economic status, however (p>1.0).
Though the PIP program was associated with higher graduation rates and lower withdrawal rates, no individual component of the PIP program in
particular was found to be associated with higher graduation rates. The most common components offered included time management, self-care
strategies, study skills, test-taking strategies, Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI), basic mathematical calculation, medical terminology,
and assessment of writing skills.
The results of the NCIN data and data from other studies in relation to PIP programs suggest that PIP programs may be an important part of
academic support for students enrolled in accelerated nursing programs. This study suggests that NCIN PIP program was associated with higher
graduation rates and a lower withdrawal rate for all students and also for Non-white students. The Self- care strategies component was found to be
a significant PIP component associated with higher graduation rates. Non-white students found the PIP program components to be significantly
more helpful compared to White students.
These early interventions may be important to student success and confidence. Increased diversity is needed in the nursing workforce in order to
provide culturally competent quality care. Interventions that support student retention are vital to not only minority students but all nursing
students. Schools working toward improving retention must consider the importance of PIP programs to help prevent attrition of minority students
and support the success of all students.
Generalizability may not be possible as PIP programs are not limited to accelerated programs, nor do all programs offer the same components or
topics. Additionally, nursing programs vary in size and student demographics. PIP programs also vary in length with some as short as two days and
others up to 10 weeks and outcomes were measured differently. Another limitation to generalizability is that NCIN scholars also received financial
support for the program making satisfaction and progression to graduation an easier pathway to success.
References
Buerhaus, P., Auerbach, D., & Staiger, D. (2014). The rapid growth of graduates from associate, baccalaureate, and graduate programs in nursing.
Nursing Economics, 32(6), 290-311.
Cantwell, E.R., Napierkowski, D., Gundersen, D.A., & Naqvi, Z. (2015). Nursing as an additional language and culture (NALC): Supporting student
success in a second-degree nursing program. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(2), 121-123. doi:10. 5480/12-1007.1
Carter, B.M., & Derouin, A. L. (2015). Strategies to address individual level social determinants of health designed to cultivate the next generation
of minority nurse leaders committed to health equity. Creative Nursing, 22(1), 11-16. doi: 10.1891/1078-4535.22.1.11
Condon, V., Morgan, C.J., Miller, E.W., Mamier, I., Zimmerman, G.J., & Mazhar, W. (2013). A program to enhance recruitment and retention of
disadvantaged and ethnically diverse baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 24(4), 397-407. doi:
10.1177/1043659613493437
Degazon, C.E., & Mancha, C. (2012) Changing the face of nursing: Reducing ethnic and racial disparities in health. Family and Community Health,
35(1):5-14. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3182385cf6
DeWitty, V.P., Huerta, C.G., & Downing, C.A. (2016). New careers in nursing: Optimizing diversity and student success for the future of nursing.
Journal of Professional Nursing, 32:S4-13, doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.03.011
Loftin, C., Newman, S.D., Gilden, G., Bond, M.L., & Dumas, B.P. (2013). Moving toward greater diversity in nursing education. Journal of
Transcultural Nursing, 24(4), 387-396. doi:10.1177/104365961348167
Rosario-Sim, M. (2015). An Evidence-based approach to support student success in an ABSN Program: W.I.N. Project. Presented at 26th
International Nursing Research Congress July 26, 2015 San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Walker, L.P. (2016) A Bridge to Success: A Nursing student success strategies improvement course. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(8),
10.3928/01484834-20160715-05
Contact
[email protected]
G 08 - Simulation Use to Enhance Patient Care
Enhancing Knowledgeand Retention of Infant Safe Sleep Practices With Simulation
Jennifer Lemoine, DNP, APRN, NNP-BC, USA
Roger D. Rholdon, DNP, APRN, CPNP-AC, USA
Tricia A. Templet, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC, FNP-C, CPEN, USA
Abstract
Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) continues to occur in the United States despite recommendations made by key
organizations' establishment of infant safe sleep practices based on best evidence. These recommendations have been well
publicized through a long standing national “Back to Sleep” campaign and in contemporary literature. In addition, traditional
educational tools, including videos, reading materials, webinars, etc., have been used to provide healthcare personnel, i.e. nursing
staff, with these evidenced-based recommendations. Yet, many nurses providing care for infants in the inpatient setting often allow
inappropriate caregiver behaviors to occur that do not align with a safe sleep environment. Education in the inpatient setting is a
critical and key opportunity for nurses to address learning needs of the caregiver. This situation gives the nurse the opportunity to
model appropriate behaviors, answer questions, and reinforce best practices. Understanding that nursing personnel are vital
members of the healthcare team to provide key education, it is imperative that nurses acquire the necessary skillset (cognitive,
behavioral, and psychomotor skills) to communicate effectively with caregivers and fellow staff members and to demonstrate infant
safe sleep practices in the inpatient setting. It is important that nursing students and new nursing graduates are equipped with the
knowledge and communication skills as well to interact with caregivers and other, often more experienced, members of the
healthcare team. Educating nursing students about infant safe sleep practices during their formal education and training may offer
an advantage as these students progress post licensure into the workplace. Simulation-based learning has emerged as an effective
method in healthcare and nursing education. This modality of teaching allows for the learner to demonstrate cognitive knowledge
and skills performance. The simulation environment gives the participant the opportunity to react in a real-time scenario using
critical thinking skills and it allows for the development of new and effective competencies in the healthcare environment. Also of
benefit, and a part of simulation, is the debriefing stage of simulation-based learning. This phase allows for the learner to expand
upon ideas and further enrich and reinforce appropriate and effective behaviors and knowledge. The purpose of this pilot study was
to evaluate the use of a simulation experience as an effective tool to teach nursing students about safe sleep practices and the
importance of establishing a safe sleep environment in the inpatient setting.
References
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2016). SIDS and other sleep-related infant deaths: Updated 2016 Recommendations for a Safe Infant Sleeping
Environment, Pediatrics 138 (5), 1-12.doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2938
Carrier, C. (2009). Back to sleep: A culture change to improve practice. Newborn & InfantNursing Review, 9, 163-168.
doi:10.1053/j.nainr.2009.07.006
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Sudden unexpected infant death and sudden infant death syndrome. Retrieved from
http://www.cdc.gov/sids/aboutsuidandsids.htm
Shaefer, S., Herman, S., Frank, S., Adkins, M., & Terhaar, M. (2010). Translating infant safe sleep evidence into nursing practice. Journal of Obstetric,
Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 39(6), 618-626. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01194.x
Mahoney, A., Hancock, L., Iorianni-Cimbak, A., & Curley, M. (2013). Using high-fidelity simulation to bridge clinical and classroom learning in
undergraduate pediatric nursing. Nurse Education Today, 33(6), 648-654. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.01.005
McMullen, S., Fioravanti, I., Brown, K., & Carey, M. (2016). Safe sleep for hospitalized infants. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 41(1),
43-50. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000205
Broussard, L., Myers, R., & Lemoine, J. (2009). Preparing pediatric nurses: The role of simulation-based learning. Issues in Comprehensive
PediatricNursing, 32(1), 4-15. doi:10.1080/01460860802610178
Todd, M., Manz, J., Hawkins, K., Parson, M., & Hercinger, M. (2008). The development of a quantitative evaluation tool for simulation in nursing
education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1), 1-17. doi:10.2202/1548-923X.1705
Contact
[email protected]
What Learning Do Students Transfer to Practice Following Simulation?A Qualitative Exploration
Robyn E. Nash, PhD, MHSc, BA, RN, RCNA, Australia
T. Harvey, MSN, Australia
Abstract
The use of high fidelity simulation (HFS) has quickly gained prominence as a key teaching and learning strategy in many health
professions, including nursing. High fidelity simulation, or HFS, is a relatively recent ‘high-tech’ innovation that involves sophisticated
computer-based mannequins driven by pre-designed scenarios that enable students to interact with the ‘patient’ as they would in a
real environment. A growing body of literature reports a range of learning outcomes gained through HFS (e.g. Gegenfurtner et al.,
2013; Boet et al., 2014). However, whilst it may be assumed that students will transfer what they have learned in an HFS context to
the real world of clinical practice, relatively little is known about the nature of such transfer, particularly in relation to complex
cognitive processes such as clinical reasoning, clinical judgement, ethical decision making etc. The question of what facilitates
transfer of learning from practice settings to the workplace is not new. However, with the rise of HFS as a key learning and teaching
strategy in health professional education, the ‘transfer problem’, as described in Baldwin and Ford’s seminal work (1988, p. 63) has
become an important question in this context.
Transfer of learning can be described as the process of ‘applying knowledge, experience, skills and competence learned in one situation to a new
situation’ (Eraut, 2004, p.212). When the new situation is similar to what has been previously experienced, the transfer process can be relatively
straightforward. However, when it’s less familiar and possibly more complicated, transfer becomes more challenging. Salomon and Perkins’ low
road/high road theory (1989) is a well-known transfer of learning theory. Low-road transfer refers to situations that are relatively similar to the
learning context which trigger well developed, semi-automatic responses, whereas high-road transfer relates to less familiar, more complex
situations, eg. clinical reasoning, which require mindful abstraction from what has been learned and a deliberate search for connections. With the
increasing scarcity and cost of clinical placements, HFS has emerged as a possible substitute for actual practice. Questions about the transferability
of knowledge and skills are therefore very important.
The study was undertaken in an Australian School of Nursing that offers a Bachelor of Nursing course. The HFS learning activities in this study were
undertaken utilising Laerdal’s 3G SimManTM which is a life-like mannequin with embedded software that can be remotely controlled by a
computer (located in a separate control room in this setting) to facilitate programmed scenarios that allow the operator to set physiological
parameters and respond to learners’ actions with changes in voice, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation and other physiological
indicators. The HFS session followed a 3-part process which included 1) preparation and briefing, 2) the simulation/observation session and 3)
debriefing. Students were briefed about the scenario, given a nursing handover and randomly placed into simulation or observer roles. The HFS
facilitator, an academic staff member, ran the simulation from a control room, and did not have contact (as a ‘teacher’) with students during the
simulation. Debriefing by the facilitator occurred as a whole group activity outside of the simulation room. The facilitator used a debriefing
framework, developed by the academic staff, which the facilitator had been trained to use. The scenario had been previously pilot tested with
minor revisions made as a result of the feedback received from students and academic staff.
Following ethical approval a series of focus groups was conducted with students who agreed to participate in the study (n=25). The focus group
discussions were conducted in the clinical facility where students were undertaking their scheduled placements following the SIM session. To
facilitate the discussions, 5 key questions were adapted from Baldwin and Ford (1988) and Kirwan and Birchall (2006). Thematic analysis was used
to identify patterns in the transcribed data yielded from the focus group discussions. Procedures adapted from Braun and Clark (2006)
were used to guide the analytic process.
Three key themes emerged from the analysis: But it's not the same on prac, Opportunities to apply what we've learned and Making better
connections. Whilst students identified several learning outcomes they believed had accrued from their participation in the SIM session, eg.
communication with patients, they found it very difficult to identify any learnings that they had actually transferred to the practice setting. When
prompted, some students indicated they had been ‘working on their documentation skills’ and ‘searching out the pumps’, but the predominant
view was a perceived ‘disconnect’ between SIM participation and clinical practice. Factors that students perceived to facilitate/inhibit learning
transfer to practice were identified.
An important limitation that should be noted was that this project did not have an observational component. Thus, there may have been
differences between what students perceived they were/weren't transferring and what was actually being transferred. Nonetheless, the findings
highlight that transfer of learning is not a straight forward process, particularly when real world practice is situated in settings that are dissimilar to
the HFS scenarios that have been experienced. This has important implications for curriculum development and the provision of learning support in
practice settings. The findings also raise new questions for research which have the potential to deepen our understanding of simulation practice
and enhance students’ application of their learning in the varied settings in which they practice.
References
Baldwin, T.T., & Ford, J.K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63-105.
Boet, S., Bould, M.D., Fung, L., Qosa, H., Perrier, L., Tavares, W., & Tricco, A.C. (2014). Transfer of learning and patient outcome in simulated crisis
resource management: A systematic review. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia = Journal Canadien d'Anesthésie, 61(6), 571-582.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Researchin Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Eraut, M. (2004). Transfer of knowledge between education and workplace settings. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller & A. Munro (Eds)., Workplace Learning
In Context (pp. 201-221). New York: Routledge.
Gegenfurtner, A., Veermans, K., & Vauras, M. (2013). Effects of computer support, collaboration, and time lag on performance self-efficacy and
transfer of training: A longitudinal meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 8(0), 75-89.
Kirwan, C., & Birchall, D. (2006). Transfer of learning from management developmentprogrammes: testing the Holton model. International Journal
of Training and Development, 10(4), 252-268.doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2006.00259.x
Salomon, G., & Perkins, D., N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist,
24(113), 142.
Contact
[email protected]
ePortfolios: Collect and Reflect as Students Transition Into Professional Practice
Deborah Ambrosio Mawhirter, EdD, RN, USA
Edmund J. Y. Pajarillo, PhD, RN-BC, CPHQ, NEA-BC, USA
Abstract
Nursing educators continue to integrate technology in teaching strategies to enhance and sustain learning and student engagement. Incorporating
the use of ePortfolios in nursing education is one such example. ePortfolios provide students with an organized structure to showcase their best
work and develop the skill of refection to bridge gaps between theory and practice (Karsten, 2017). Nursing students are able to demonstrate their
professional transformation via their ePortfolio as evidenced by a matrix of knowledge and competency skills that include improved oral and
written communication, critical thinking, creativity, innovation, research, interprofessional collaboration, evidence-based practice, primary and
critical care, information processing and management. Nursing students’ ePortfolios are viewed as an assembly of artifacts accumulated
throughout their education (Birks, Hartin, Woods, Emmanuel, & Hitchins, 2016). Other than being an effective tool for reflective learning,
ePortfolios are used to display students’ competence, knowledge, skill level, and values to prospective employers or when students decide to
pursue graduate educational degrees in the future to expand their marketability. Additionally, ePortfolios serve as a repository of students’ work,
memorializing highlights of their professional growth and development (Garrett, MacPhee, & Jackson, 2012).
Nursing students enter a baccalaureate program focusing solely on becoming a “nurse.” In our integrative curriculum, students begin to build their
ePortfolio in the semester just before completing all the general education prerequisites and when they begin to enroll in actual nursing courses
(Riden & Buckley, 2016). As students complete every semester, they add evidences of coursework into their ePortfolios where connections
between classroom and clinical learning are integrated into the real world using self-reflection. Pedagogical uses of ePortfolio include student–
centered learning, curricular appreciation and integration, collaboration, mindfulness, reflective thinking and synthesis (Green, Wyllie, & Jackson,
2013).
ePortfolios provide students the structure and opportunity to organize, reflect, and find meaning in their educational pursuit of a baccalaureate
degree in nursing. The purpose of this present study is to describe the effectiveness of integrative learning and its benefits to identifying student’s
self-awareness using their ePortfolios in terms of their respective transformation prior to beginning professional nursing practice.
Using a quantitative descriptive design, senior baccalaureate nursing students from an accredited nursing program were surveyed during their
senior semester with regards the use of ePortfolios relative to their learning and preparation to nursing practice. The instrument was designed
using the concepts of integrative and reflective learning as well as the structure and technological features of the ePortfolio. There is descriptive
evidence from the survey data that students found the structure and technological elements of the ePortfolio to be intuitive and straightforward.
Additionally, student-respondents admitted that the development and use of ePortfolios encouraged them to identify their strengths and
weaknesses, consequently helping them to draft development plans to further enhance their professional potential (Rosetti et al., 2012). From a
pedagogical perspective, 86 percent of the students responded that the ePortfolio helped them to reflect on their education, professional
accomplishments, and educational success. Students reported that self-reflection in the integrative curriculum was helpful in developing their
sense of identity as a nurse. Students also shared about feeling proud of their accomplishments and pleased with displaying their achievements in
the form of an ePortfolio. Less than 20 percent of students reported minor issues using the ePortfolio (Andrews & Cole, 2015), e.g. flexibility in the
ePortfolio design and preference for other forms of artifacts.
Overall, the development and use of ePortfolios enhanced students’ learning and preparation for professional practice was positive. Its structure
and technological aspects were weighed in by the students to be simple to learn and use, and included many benefits to assist them achieve
knowledge, skills and preparation to becoming future nurses. Reflective learning in an integrative curriculum provided support in developing their
critical thinking, evidence-based practice, mindfulness, positive attitudes and values towards nursing, other healthcare professionals and staff, and
most importantly, the patients they care for. This study generated evidence that the use of ePortfolio’s in baccalaureate nursing education
demonstrates best practice for reflective learning.
References
Andrews, T. & Cole, C. (2015). Two steps forward, one step back: The intricacies of engaging with eportfolios in nursing undergraduate education.
Nurse Education Today 35: 568 – 572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.011.
Birks, M., Hartin, P., Woods, C., Emmanuel, E., & Hitchins, M. (2016). Students' perceptions of the use of eportfolios in nursing and midwifery
education. Nurse Education in Practice 18: 46 – 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.003.
Garrett, B. M., MacPhee, M., & Jackson, C. (2013). Evaluation of an eportfolio for the assessment of clinical competence in a baccalaureate nursing
program. Nurse Education Today 33(10): 1207 - 1213. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.06.015.
Green, J., Wyllie, A., & Jackson, D. (2013). Electronic portfolios in nursing education: A review of the literature. Nurse Education in Practice 14(1): 4
- 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.08.011.
Karsten, K. (2012). Using ePortfolio to demonstrate competence in associate degree nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing 7: 23–26.
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.teln.2011.09.004.
Riden, H. & Buckley, C. (2016). First-year students favour ePortfolios. Nursing New Zealand 22(1). 14 – 15.
Rossetti J., Oldenburg, N., Fisher Robertson, J., Coyer, S. M., Koren, M. E., Peters, B., Musker, K. (2012). Creating a culture of evidence in nursing
education using student portfolios. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship 9(1). http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1515/1548-923X.2415.
Contact
[email protected]
G 10 - Impactful Educational Practices
Generating and Translating Evidence to Simultaneously Impact Nursing Education and Patient Care With
Undergraduate Research
Amanda Dupnick, SN, USA
J. Luke Akers, SN, USA
Andrew Bauer, SN, USA
Elisa Hillman, SN, USA
Lauren Kinker, SN, USA
Amy Hagedorn Wonder, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Undergraduate nursing programs often focus on using external evidence to inform decisions at the patient level, which is vitally
important to achieving the evidence-based practice (EBP) goals established by the Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2001) and
corresponding expectations set forth by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2008) and the Quality and Safety
Education for Nurses (QSEN; Cronenwett et al., 2007). However, to prepare undergraduate students to take an active role in driving
evidence-based change in practice, it is essential to give students an opportunity to be mentored in generating and translating
evidence to inform patient care at the systems level.
This presentation will focus on the outcomes and experiences associated with an undergraduate honors research program, as an innovative way
for academe and practice to collaboratively prepare students for EBP and promote quality improvement for patients at the same time. Students
will present how they expanded their EBP knowledge by identifying a clinical problem and then working collaboratively as a team, similar to a task
force in practice, to gather and analyze data. Further, students will share how they learned to evaluate results in context of the clinical setting and
external evidence, and develop implications by working collaboratively with peers, faculty, and practicing nurses. Students will present findings
from their research on perioperative hypothermia and associated complications, as they speak directly to the significance of practice problem and
the process of learning to use evidence to impact patient care at the systems level.
Perioperative hypothermia is an ongoing problem in practice, especially for female patients (Cunha Prado, 2015), older than 60 years of age
(Torossian et al., 2015), administered combined anesthesia (Cunha Prado, 2015), undergoing a total knee or hip replacement (Frisch, Pepper,
Rooney, & Silverton, 2017), and/or a longer stay in the operating room (Cunha Prado, 2015). The occurrence of perioperative hypothermia can
have a significant impact on patient recovery as this has been associated with serious complications such as coagulation dysfunction, delayed
recovery from anesthesia, impaired wound healing, and surgical site infection (Ying, et al., 2014).
Students will describe how results and corresponding implications of their study have informed policy change and education to impact patient care.
Finally, students will describe how the experience impacted their value for EBP. Faculty will present how to coordinate successful projects with one
or more honors students, focusing on topics in nursing education and practice. Further, faculty will discuss the many roles of the mentor in
facilitating a positive experience from conceptualization to dissemination of results. Guidelines, which promote consistent expectations for faculty
and students in relation to learning, research, dissemination, and support, will also be presented.
References
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/BaccEssentials08.pdf.
Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J. Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell, P.,…Warren, J. (2007). Quality and safety education for nurses. Nursing
Outlook, 55(3), 122-131.
Cunha Prado, C. B., Barichello, E., da Silva Pires, P., Haas, V. J., & Barbosa, M. H. (2015). Occurrence and factors associated with hypothermia during
elective abdominal surgery. Acta Paulista De Enfermagem, 28(5), 475-481.
Frisch, N. B., Pepper, A., Rooney, E., Silverton, C. (2017). Intraoperative hypothermia in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics,40(1), 56-63.
Institute of Medicine [IOM]. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press.
Contact
[email protected]
Incivility in Academic Environments: If You See Something, Say Something
Nancy C. Sharts-Hopko, PhD,RN, FAAN, ANEF, CNE, USA
Abstract
This presentation entails a review of current literature on incivility in academic environments, risk factors, effects, and strategies for its reduction.
The focus is at the broad institutional rather than disciplinary level., though the American Nurses Association developed a white paper on
workplace incivility and bullying in 2015.
Bullying is a focus of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention because it is associated with adverse health effects in victims. Incivility is
defined as a pattern of rude or discourteous behaviors. Bullying is a pattern of intentional, more frequent and intense, repetitive interactions
usually by one person against another, while mobbing is bullying that is perpetuated by a group in a particular limited environment. Bullying can
entail physical, verbal, or relational harm or property damage. Victims but also witnesses to bullying demonstrate adverse effects.
The occurrence of incivility, bullying and mobbing in academic environments can be traced back to the origins of modern universities 1000 years
ago. It has increased in recent years related to increased competition, decreased resources, and corporatization in academic environments.
The personal and organizational costs of a culture of incivility are demonstrable. Organizational risk factors have been identified in an extensive
body of research literature, and academic organizations are regarded to have high risk. This issue is integrally related to and cannot be considered
separately from discrimination and harassment. The process of tenure is a known factor, as is the hierarchical structure of academic organizations.
Faculty, staff, administrators, and students are both perpetrators and victims. Personal and institutional costs are great. Organizational strategies
for reducing the likelihood of incivility are described, and personal strategies are considered. The literature is conflicted on the benefits to
individuals of reporting. However, there is no good reason for organizational tolerance of incivility.
References
American Nurses Association (2015). Incivility, bullying, and workplace violence. Washington DC: ANA. Approved 7/22/2015.
Axtell, J (2016). Wisdom’s workshop: the rise of the modern university. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cassell, MA (2011). Bullying in academe: prevalent, significant, and incessant. Contemporary issues in Education Research, 4(5), 33-44.
CDC (2014). Facts about bullying. http://www.StopBullying.gov
Condon, BB (2015). Incivility as bullying in nursing education. Nursing Science Quarterly, 28(1), 21-26.
Holdcroft, B (2017). Student incivility, intimidation, and entitlement in academia. American Association of University Professors. Retrieved from
http://www.aaup.org
Hollis, LP (2015). Bully university? The cost of workplace bullying and employee disengagement in American higher education. SAGE Open, April-
June.
Keashly, L & Neuman, JH (2010). Faculty experiences with bullying in higher education: causes, consequences, and management. Administration
Theory & Praxis, 32(1), 48-70.
Lester, J (Ed) (2013). Workplace bullying in higher education. New York: Routledge.
Marraccini, ME, Weyandt, LL, & Rossi, JS (2015. College students’ perceptions of professor / instructor bullying: questionnaire development and
psychometric properties. Journal of American College Health, 63(8), 563-572.
Perry, A & Blincoe, S (2015). Bullies and victims in higher education: a mixed-methods approach. Journal of Bullying and Social Aggression, 1(1).
Twale, DJ & DeLuca, BM (2008). Faculty incivility: the rise of the academic bully culture and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Contact
[email protected]
Peer Training Using Cognitive Rehearsal to Improve Incivility Recognition and Response
Rebecca L. Turpin, PhD, USA
Toni S. Roberts, DNP, USA
Kimberly Joyce Hanna, PhD, MSN, RN, USA
Shelia Hurley, PhD, USA
Susan Clark, MSN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Nursing students must have effective education and practice opportunities to prepare for solving real world problems
to best prepare for entering professional practice. Incivility, lateral violence, and bullying behaviors are frequently endured as a “rite
of passage” for new nurses (Condon, 2015; Szutenbach, 2013). Lateral violence (also termed horizontal violence) includes uncivil
behaviors directed toward peers (Griffin, 2004; Roberts, 2015). It thus seems feasible that use of peer training may have benefit as
an early and necessary educational method (McKenna & French, 2011). Collegiality and teamwork are critical to patient safety
(Griffin, Bartholomew, & Robins, 2016), so there must be a professional responsibility to foster these accountabilities in nurses and
nursing students. As incivility may be covertly experienced in clinical settings, there are limited venues for reflective response
training. Educational experiences designed to promote incivility recognition and skilled response are essential (Clark, Ahten, & Macy,
2014) and cognitive rehearsal methods offer a simulation method to experientially practice critical responses when not under
duress.
A project was developed to increase nursing students’ awareness of incivility, provide communication techniques to respond appropriately, and
reinforce positive behaviors that promote a culture of safety. Effectiveness of a one-hour interactive and student peer-led civility training was
compared to a three-hour didactic/interactive training provided by a nursing incivility expert. Key components as espoused by Clark, Ahten, & Macy
(2014) including problem-based learning scenarios to foster experiential learning were included in the design. Use of cognitive rehearsal and
different level peer training were also design elements. First semester (sophomore) baccalaureate nursing (BSN) students and the final semester
(senior) students in upper division nursing at a public university in the southeastern United States served as participants.
Method: Two training methods were compared for effectiveness. The first method involved training provided by a nursing incivility expert
consisting of two-hour didactic followed by a one-hour interactive session using cognitive rehearsal.. This session was provided for senior BSN
students. The introduction of the training included a history of incivility among nurses and theoretical underpinnings. Using examples of
experienced incivility from students, the trainer encouraged students to form a response utilizing the prompting cards provided (Griffin, 2014). As
the students practiced, the trainer provided feedback to the students.
The second training method involved a one-hour peer training provided by the previously expert-trained seniors for sophomore students. Working
in teams, senior students conducted one-hour interactive training using cognitive rehearsal with prompting cards for the sophomore nursing
students. Prompting cards included 10 types of incivility experiences with suggested responses for pre-rehearsal. Incivility situations included
nonverbal innuendo, verbal affront, undermining activities, withholding information, sabotage, infighting, scapegoating, backstabbing, failure to
respect, and broken confidences.
Evaluation: Two surveys utilizing a 5-point Likert rating scale were administered to evaluate effectiveness of education based on Kirkpatrick’s Four-
Level Training Evaluation Model (Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2006). The first survey, containing six statements, was administered immediately
following each method of training session and assessed the first two levels of Kirkpatrick’s model (Level 1 - Reaction and Level 2 – Learning). A
second survey, containing five statements, was administered to both groups at the end of the semester to evaluate Kirkpatrick’s model (Level 3 -
Behavior and Level 4 –Results). Open-ended comments were also encouraged in a comment section.
Results:
Quantitative Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics were evaluated using both survey results to compare responses between groups on both survey
items (Table 1 and Table 2).
Table 1: Comparison of Satisfaction & Learning between Expert and Peer Training
Training... Kirkpatrick Level % Rating Senior Students % Rating Sophomore
(n=20) Students (n=58)
Was relevant to a student nurse 1 95% 97%
Was helpful in identifying uncivil behaviors 2 100% 98%
Enhanced their understanding of the effects of uncivil behavior 2 100% 98%
Helped in the realization of their role in promoting a culture of 2 90% 93%
civility
Provided skills to help respond to incivility 2 100% 93%
Made them more likely to appropriately respond to incivility as 2 75% 90%
a result of the training
Table 2: Comparison of Application & Results between Expert and Peer-Training
Training resulted in... Kirkpatrick Level % Rating Senior Students % Rating Sophomore
(n=31) Students (n=42)
More awareness of incivility/lateral violence in 3 90% 93%
personal/professional experiences
Practicing skills learned in training when incivility is anticipated 3 71% 71%
Using the skills learned in training to respond to incivility 3 58% 69%
Noticeable decline in incivility incidence in school of nursing this 4 55% 57%
semester over previous semesters
More positive attitude about importance of promoting civil 3 90% 93%
behavior and prevention of incivility/lateral violence
Inferential statistics using SPSS 22 were completed. To evaluate expert versus peer training on satisfaction/learning summed scores, an
independent-samples t-test was used. A significant difference in scores for peer training [M = 27.53, SD = 3.37] and expert training was found [M =
25.70, SD = 2.08; t(53.8) = 2.86, p = .006]. The magnitude of the differences was .096, between moderate (.06) and large (.14) effect size (Cohen,
1988), with peer training accounting for 9.6% of the variance.
To evaluate the potential influence of the expert versus peer training on application sum scores, again, an independent-samples t-test showed no
significant difference in scores for peer training [M = 20.69, SD = 3.31] and expert training [M = 19.55, SD = 3.48; t(77) = 1.43, p = .158]. These two
analyses indicate that peer training provided to sophomore students was potentially perceived as more satisfying with higher learning achieved
than the three-hour didactic/interactive training for seniors provided by an expert trainer, yet peer training was just as beneficial for application of
training.
Qualitative Data Analysis: Participants’ written comments qualitatively analyzed by the research team identified four consistent themes for both
groups: 1) interactive training; 2) role play; 3) incivility recognition; and 4) prepared responses. The participants enjoyed the interactive method
used to complete the training. Student statements regarding these themes are provided to illustrate themes further.
Discussion/Conclusions: Results of descriptive, inferential, and qualitative statistics support these two training methods for incivility. These findings
are consistent with the literature indicating that peer learning contributed to decreased anxiety (Kurtz, Lemley, & Alverson, 2010; McQuiston &
Hanna, 2015, Stone, Cooper, & Cant, 2013) and increased satisfaction (Stone, Cooper, & Cant, 2013). Peer trainers conveyed meaningfulness and
value of the training through comments such as, “We wish we had gotten this training when we were sophomores.” and “This training would really
have helped me when I was starting upper division.” Peer trainers were able to share real situations from their own clinical experiences, providing
guidance on how they wish they had resolved previous situations with the new knowledge they had achieved.
Peer bullying continues to be high at 48% (Carpenter, 2017), even with national data and stated key initiatives (ANA, 2014) for improving incivility.
Interactive peer training can be a powerful way to prepare nursing students to recognize and respond to incivility in the healthcare setting. Peer
training and cognitive rehearsal also affords other benefits such as leadership and confidence to the trainers and may have potential to establish a
zero tolerance model within a nursing program or healthcare community over time (ANA, 2015). Finally, perpetual peer training after initial expert
training may provide an expert system for civility training cost-effectively with the added benefit of self-perpetuating high quality student
outcomes.
Limitations: This study was confined to one nursing program in the southeast and needs to be replicated. Longitudinal study of program
perpetuation would be potentially beneficial in determining whether learning gains are sustained. The training methods were provided to two
different levels of students within a nursing program, therefore prior knowledge may have influenced learning or data results.
References
American Nurses Association (2014). Health Risk Appraisal – Executive Summary. Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/HRA-Executive-
Summary.
American Nurses Association Professional Issues Panel on Incivility, Bullying, and Workplace Violence. (2015). ANA position statement on incivility,
bullying, and workplace violence. Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/DocumentVault/Position-Statements/Practice/Position-
Statement-on-Incivility-Bullying-and-Workplace-Violence.pdf.
Carpenter, H. (2017). ANA’s Health Risk Appraisal: Three years later. American Nurse Today, 12(1), 15, Retrieved from
https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ant1-NPWE-1219.pdf.
Clark, C. M., Ahten, S. M. & Macy, R. (2014). Nursing graduates’ ability to address incivility: Kirkpatrick’s Level -3 Evaluation. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 10(8), 425-431. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.04.005.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Condon, B. B. (2015). Incivility as bullying in nursing education. Nursing Science Quarterly, 28(1), 21-26. doi: 10.1177/0894318414558617.
Griffin, M. (2004). Teaching cognitive rehearsal as a shield for lateral violence: An intervention for newly licensed nurses. Journal of Continuing
Education in Nursing, 35(6), 257-263.
Griffin, M., Bartholomew, K., & Robins, A. (2016). The dauntless nurse: Communications confidence builder. CreateSpace Independent Publishing
Platform.
Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later.
Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535-542. doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-02.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Kurtz, C. P., Lemley, C. S., & Alverson, E. M. (2010). The master student presenter: Peer teaching in the simulation lab. Nursing Education
McKenna, L., & French, J. (2011). A step ahead: Teaching undergraduate students to be peer teachers. Nurse Education in Practice, 11(2), 141-145.
doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2010.10.003.
McQuiston, L., & Hanna, K. (2015). Peer coaching: An overlooked resource. Nurse Educator, 40(2), 105-108. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000103.
Roberts, S. J. (2015). Lateral violence in nursing: A review of the past three decades. Nursing Science Quarterly, 28(1), 36-41.
doi:10.1177/0894318414558614.
Stone, R., Cooper, S., & Cant, R. (2013). The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review. International Scholarly
Research Notice: Nursing, 2013, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2013/930901.
Szutenbach, M. P. (2013). Bullying in nursing: Roots, rationales, and remedies, The Journal of Christian Nursing, 30(1), 16-23. doi:
10.1097/CNJ.0b013e31827df334.
Contact
[email protected]
Using a Disaster-Based Simulation With Senior Nursing Students to Impact Self-Efficacy in Clinical Decision-
Making
Jacqueline Savory, DNP, MSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Introduction/Background: Nursing programs are unable to meet the demands of the nursing shortage due to financial constraints,
lack of faculty, and limited clinical space. These issues result in the inability of programs to provide students with essential learning
opportunities to meet course outcomes, especially the development of clinical decision-making skills. There is a need for innovative
strategies to meet these demands. The literature shows that simulation is effective in promoting clinical decision- making, however,
the use of a disaster-based simulation to impact the skill was not examined in previous studies.
Research Objectives: The purpose of this project was to examine the impact on self-efficacy pre and post disaster simulation among senior nursing
students at a large nursing college.
Methods: The project design was a descriptive study with a quantitative, non-experimental, retrospective, and pre- and posttest design. A
retrospective methodology examined the data obtained from a quality improvement project. The target population included nursing students who
participated in the disaster simulation. The sample included N = 23 students who participated in the project: senior level students in their senior
course, Community Health Nursing. The majority of students were adult learners, different ethnicities, pursuing a second career in nursing, low-to-
middle income homes, and ranged from single parents to married. Some students brought prior experiences in healthcare to the program. These
experiences included Emergency Medical Technician, Licensed Professional Nurse, and Certified Nurse Assistant. Eligibility for inclusion included
first time enrollment in the Community Health Nursing course and no previous experience in healthcare as an Emergency Medical Technician
(EMT), Certified Nurse’s Aide (CNA), Patient Care Technician (PCT) or Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) working in a critical care setting such as the
Emergency Department or Intensive Care Unit. Students who were repeating the course and had previous experience in healthcare as an EMT,
CNA, PCT, or LPN in a critical care setting were excluded from the project. By surveying this population, this author identified the perception of the
students’ self-efficacy in decision- making after participation in the scenario. The goal was for the student to feel more empowered and self-
confident in their decision-making skills while caring for their patients. The General Nursing Self- Efficacy Scale consisting of a 5- point Likert Scale
was used to survey the students enrolled in the Community Health Nursing course and to collect data to determine the effect participation in this
simulation had on their self-efficacy. A proxy, the lab manager, administered the survey via an online link; she did not have any interaction with
students or impact on their grades. The pretest was administered two weeks prior to the simulation experience. The posttest was administered
two weeks after the simulation. Comparisons between pre- and post-simulation survey scores were made using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Results: Nine of the pre-simulation survey responses were “Uncertain” or “Strongly Agree,” which left little room for measurable improvement
following the simulation training. Statistical significance noted to Question 12 following training-“In a general patient context, when facing a
difficult case, I am certain I can make the right management decisions” (p=0.008). The intervention and study results indicate the significance of
utilizing a disaster-based scenario simulation to improve senior nursing students’ self-efficacy in making the correct management decision in
difficult situations. The experience which required them to make quick decisions and manage the care of injured patients, led them to feel more
empowered and confident in making the right decisions. The repetition of experiences contributes to the mastery of making clinical decisions so
when the graduate is presented with a similar case, he or she will be confident that they are making the right decisions for their patients.
Conclusions: The findings show that like traditional clinical experiences, simulation can be used in nursing education to give students adequate
experiences needed to foster self-efficacy in clinical decision-making skills. A disaster-based simulation can be used to improve the senior nursing
student’s self-efficacy in making the right management decisions in a critical situation.
References
Curl, E., Smith, S, Chisholm, L., McGee, L., & Das, K. (2016). Effectiveness of integrated simulation and clinical experiences compared to traditional
clinical experiences for nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(2), 72–77. doi:10.5480/15-1647
Dicle, A., & Ezeer, A. (2013). Examination of clinical decision making perceptions of nursing students. The New Educational Review, 13 (3), 132–142.
Retrieved from http://www.educationalrev.us.edu.pl/e33/a11.pdf
Dunn, K., Osbourne, C., & Link, H. (2014). High-Fidelity simulation and nursing student self-efficacy: Does training help the little engines know they
can? Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(6), 403–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/12-1041.1
Fletcher, L., Justice, S., & Rohrig, L. (2015). Designing a disaster. Journal of Trauma Nursing,22(1), 35–40. doi:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000098
Franklin, A., Gubrud-Howe, P., Sideras, S., & Lee, C. (2015). Effectiveness of simulation preparation on novice nurses’ competence and self-efficacy
in a multiple-patient simulation. Nursing Education Perspectives,36(5), 324–325. doi:10.5480/14-1546
Hart, P. L., Brannan, J. D., Long, J. M., Brooks, B. K., Maguire, M. R., Robley, L. R., & Kill, S. R. (2015). Using combined teaching modalities to enhance
nursing students’ recognition and response to clinical deterioration. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(3), 194–196. doi:10.5480/13-1083.1
Hassankhani, H., Aghdam, A., Rahmani, A., Mohammadpoorfard, Z. (2015). The relationship between learning motivation and self efficacy among
nursing students. Research and Development in Medical Education, 4(1), 97–101. doi:10.15171/rdme.2015.016
Hayden, J., Smiley, R., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P. (2014). The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal, randomized,
controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. The Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), S3.
http://www.journalofnursingregulation.com.
Philips, B. (2015). Clinical decision-making in last semester senior baccalaureate nursing students (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest
Dissertation and Theses. (Accession Order No. AAT 10006343).
Purling, A., & King, L. (2012). A literature review: graduate nurses’ preparedness for recognizing and responding to the deteriorating patient.
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 3451–3465. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04348.x.
Shelestak, D., Meyers, T., Jarzembak, J., & Bradley, E. (2015). A process to assess clinical decision-making during human patient simulation: A pilot
study. Nursing Education Perspective, 36(3), 185–187. doi:10.5480/13-1107.1.
Squillace, J., Williams, J., Wells, L., Chumley, B., & Berent, G. (2016). Interdisciplinary collaboration and training through a disaster simulation. New
Social Worker, 30–31.
Yiu, T., Cheung, S., & Siu, L. (2012). Application of Bandura’s self-efficacy theory to examining the choice of tactics in construction dispute
negotiation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(3), 331–340. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000403
Contact
[email protected]
The Effectiveness of Educational Training and Simulation on Readiness to Respond to a Traumatic Event
Riah Leigh Hoffman, PhD, RN, USA
Shannon Renee Dusack, MS, RN, USA
Johanna Elizabeth Boothby, DEd, MS, RN, USA
Lauren A. Succheralli, MS, RN, USA
Daniel Puhlman, PhD, USA
Abstract
Due to the growing number of mass shootings in the United States, students should be prepared for a catastrophic event such as a
mutiple victim mass shooting. Students need to be aware of the increased incidence of these tragic events and be ready to respond
to the aftermath if an event should occur. They require the necessary skills to respond accurately and rapidly to an emergency
situation when faced with a traumatic event. Exposure of individuals to education on proper responses and providing hands on
experience with a shooter scenario could decrease the morbidity and mortality of the victims awaiting emergency response.
Emergency situations, such as a mass shooting, can be mimicked using simulation. This presentation will discuss the use of a
collaborative educational video and a multiple standardized patient shooter simulation scenario (including victims and family
members) using theater students to enhance emergency preparedness for undergraduate nursing and family relations students. This
presentation will discuss the development of the educational video and standardized patient simulation to improve the student’s
learning experience. This presentation will display data from a mixed-method study on student perceptions of the educational video
and standardized shooter simulation and whether this training enhanced their readiness to respond to a multiple patient traumatic
event. The participants completed survey tools evaluating their perceived readiness to respond to a crisis event at three separate
intervals. The participants completed a survey tool including demographics and a quantitative readiness rating score at the
beginning of data collection. The participants viewed the educational video and then completed a survey with a quantitative
readiness rating and also completed qualitative questions regarding the impact of the educational video on his/her readiness to
respond to a crisis. The participants were then facilitated through the standardized patient simulation experience. The simulation
experience included multiple trauma and medical patients and their families in the aftermath of a community shooting. Participants
were expected to maintain safety, and provide care and support to the victims and families in the aftermath. Each participant then
completed a final survey after experiencing the standardized patient shooter simulation which included the quantitative readiness
rating and qualitative questions regarding readiness after the educational video and simulation experience. This presentation will
also provide an overview of the benefits of a training module using an educational video and a standardized patient simulation
scenario to educate emergency readiness to undergraduate nursing students.
References
Cohen, A., Azreal, D., & Miller, M. (2014). Are mass shootings on the rise? It depends how you count. Retrieved from: www.vox.com.
Duplechain, R. & Morris, R. (2014). School violence: Reported school shootings and making schools safer. Journal of Education, 135(2), 145-148.
Jorm, C., Roberts, C., Lim, R., Roper, J., Skinner, C., Robertson, J., . . . Osomanski, A. (2016). A large-scale mass casualty simulation to develop the
non-technical skills medical students require for collaborative teamwork.BMC Medical Education,16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-
0588-2
Kaplan, B. G., Connor, A., Ferranti, E. P., Holmes, L., & Spencer, L. (2012). Use of an emergency preparedness disaster simulation with
undergraduate nursing students.Public Health Nursing,29(1),44-51.
School violence on the rise. (2015).Retrieved from http://www.everytownresearch.org
Shannon, C. C. (2015). Using a simulated mass casualty incident to teach response readiness: A case study.Journal of Nursing Education,54(4), 215-
219. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20150318-05
Sideras, S., McKenzie, G., Noone, J., Markle, D., Frazier, M., & Sullivan, M. (2013). Making simulation come alive: Standardized patients in
undergraduate nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(4), 421-425.
Contact
[email protected]
Mentoring in Research Doctorate Nursing Programs and Students' Perceived Career Readiness
Paula V. Nersesian, PhD, MPH, RN, USA
Maan I. Cajita, PhD, RN, USA
Laura E. Starbird, MS, RN, USA
Scott Seung W. Choi, MA, BSN, RN, USA
Damali Wilson, MSN, PNP, USA
Christina Fleming, MA, MSN, CNM, USA
Melissa J. Kurtz, MSN, MA, RN, USA
Sarah L. Szanton, PhD, ANP, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Research doctorate nursing programs are expanding in an effort to double the number of doctoral-prepared nurses by
2020 (IOM, 2011). But, whether students are ready for their subsequent careers in nursing science is not clear. Faculty play a key
role in preparing students through advising and mentoring. However, there is little empirical evidence of the specific contributions of
mentoring to development of doctoral nursing students and their career readiness. Thus, the National Mentor Study identified
characteristics and practices of nursing PhD students and their advisors in the United States and examined associations between
mentoring relationships and career readiness.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide descriptive, cross-sectional study of PhD students using an electronic survey platform. Deans and Program
Directors of the 129 research-focused doctoral nursing programs identified by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) were
contacted and students from 64 schools responded, which yielded 380 PhD student study participants. They reported: 1) demographic, academic,
and mentee characteristics 2) mentor characteristics and practices 3) self-proficiency based on self-rating of 20 scientific skills and competencies 4)
synchronization between desired and actual advising style and 5) perceived career readiness. (Advisors were not invited to participate in the
survey.)
Mentee characteristics included participant reports of how they felt their advisor perceived them on motivation, organizational skills,
dependability, and openness to criticism. Mentoring characteristics included participant ratings of their advisors on being expert in their field,
accessible, approachable, supportive, and a good listener. Mentoring practices included participant reports of advisor practices related to scholarly
productivity, career planning, and emotional support. Desired and actual advising style was reported by students and degree of synchrony was
calculated. Perceived career readiness was a single item rating on a 1 to 100 scale.
The career readiness score was dichotomized and study participant characteristics were examined according to their career readiness classification.
We performed simple and multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship between career readiness and important indpendent
variables, adjusting for demographic and academic variables.
Results: Selected descriptive findings - About half of the participants (51%) planned to seek research and teaching positions post-graduation.
Eighty-one percent of student participants worked. The average work load of those students was 32 hours per week. Ninety percent of all
participants cared for dependents or had other responsibilities outside of school.
A minority of respondents (16%) knew of published guidelines on mentoring for their school and 60% were not sure if such guidelines existed.
Forty-five percent of students reported that their advisor fulfilled both advising and mentoring roles. At least 70% of student participants agreed or
strongly agreed that their advisor would rate them as having desirable mentee characteristics. And at least 64% of student participants agreed or
strongly agreed that their advisor had desirable mentor characteristics. There was a wider range of student participant ratings of their advisor on
mentoring practices (22-67%). For example, at the low end of the range, 22% of students agreed or strongly agreed that their advisor helped them
draft their curriculum vitae and at the high end of the range, 67% of student agreed or strongly agreed that their advisor discussed concerns about
their research. Twenty-seven percent of students reported synchrony between their desired advising style and the actual style of their advisors;
55% of students preferred a hands-on advisor and 7% desired a hands-off style. The mean perceived career readiness score was 70.5 22.7 (range:
0-100), and a majority of students (86.8%) had a score of at least 50.
Logistic regression findings - In simple (OR 1.31, p=0.001) and multiple logistic regression (OR 1.29, p=0.027), when advising style was in synchrony
with student advising preference, students had a greater likelihood to perceive that they were ready for their desired career. Self-proficiency was
also significantly associated with perceived career readiness in both simple (OR 1.07, p<0.001) and multiple logistic regression (OR 1.06, p<0.001);
wherein, the higher the self-proficiency score the more likely the students were to perceive that they were ready for their desired career.
Mentoring practices, student age, and how far along students were in their PhD program were all significantly associated with perceived career
readiness in simple logistic regression, but not in multiple logistic regression. However, because our sample was insufficiently powered to detect
these relationships, we are unable to say conclusively that the relationships do not exist.
Discussion: We found that while students rated themselves and their mentors highly for their mentoring relationship, there was uneven mentoring
on objective tasks. For example, our results suggest that they receive limited support with preparation for their job search, and more support in
monitoring progress, providing performance feedback, and discussing concerns about the student’s research.
As schools of nursing and funding mechanisms seek to shorten the duration of PhD programs, the goal of providing thorough mentoring for
students may be even more difficult to achieve. Developing research and teaching skills for research-focused faculty positions takes time. One
solution may be to discuss mentoring topics in groups, such as in required seminars for PhD students. After discussing the topic in a group, students
can seek more detailed discussion of specific topics with their advisor and/or mentor. Written guidance would also help students identify topics to
raise with their mentor proactively. Without guidance, mentoring interactions may focus on urgent matters instead of longer-term issues.
Our findings suggest a complex relationship between mentoring and career readiness for PhD nursing students. Synchrony between desired and
achieved advising style (i.e., hands-off and hands-on styles), and self-proficiency in scientific skills and competencies were shown to increase the
likelihood of career readiness. Mentoring practices, student age, and duration the student was in the program may also have an influence on career
readiness even though our study failed to demonstrate that these factors improve the odds of career readiness. These factors may, however,
influence the student's perception of the quality of the mentoring relationship. Other factors may also play a role, such as the degree to which
students work and fulfill responsibilities outside of their education. Mentoring that includes discussion of personal problems may help support
students with personal problems that result from these additional demands.
The 2001 IOM report calls for the preparation of many more doctoral-prepared nurses to fill the nurse faculty gap. Our study found a substantial
proportion of students plan to seek research and teaching positions in an academic setting. For those students to obtain positions, mentors will
need to address broad topics such as a strategy for their job search, and specific skills, such as curriculum vitae preparation and interviewing skills.
Implications: The findings support the importance of mentoring and thus, management decisions at the level of university or school of nursing
should consider basing enrollment targets on a mentor-to-student ratio that optimizes high quality mentoring. Considering mentoring in
management decisions could inform hiring plans, program growth targets, and budget projections.
Developing, disseminating, and promoting guidelines on mentoring could help faculty and students understand the importance, characteristics, and
practices of mentoring while simultaneously establishing mentoring norms for faculty and students.
Although the study only included participants from the United States, the findings may relate to the universal need for effective mentoring that is
important globally.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2015). New AACN Data Confirm Enrollment Surge in Schools of Nursing [Press release]. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/news/articles/2015/enrollment
Armstrong, D., McCurry, M., & Dluhy, N. (2017). Facilitating the transition of nurse clinician to nurse scientist: significance of entry PhD courses.
Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(1), 74-80. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.06.005
Delgado, C., & Mitchell, M. M. (2016). A Survey of Current Valued Academic Leadership Qualities in Nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives
(National League of Nursing), 37(1), 10-15. doi:10.5480/14-1496
Fang, D. (2016). Preliminary results of AACN doctoral student roster survey, 2016 [PDF document]. Retrieved from American Association of Colleges
of Nursing Web site: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Downloads/IDS/AACNRoster2016.pdf
Feldman, H. R., Greenberg, M. J., Jaffe-Ruiz, M., Kaufman, S. R., & Cignarale, S. (2015). Hitting the nursing faculty shortage head on: Strategies to
recruit, retain, and develop nursing faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(3), 170-178. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.01.007
Haggard, D. L., Dougherty, T. W., Turban, D. B., & Wilbanks, J. E. (2011). Who is a mentor? A review of evolving definitions and implications for
research. Journal of Management, 37(1), 280-304. doi: http://dx.doi.org.ezp.welch.jhmi.edu/10.1177/0149206310386227
Institute of Medicine. (2010). The Future of Nursing: Focus on Education. Retrieved from:
https://iom.nationalacademies.org/~/media/Files/Report Files/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing/Nursing Education 2010 Brief.pdf.
Nehls, N., Barber, G., & Rice, E. (2016). Pathways to the PhD in nursing: an analysis of similarities and differences. Journal of Professional Nursing,
32(3), 163-172. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.04.006
Raman, I. M. (2014). How to Be a Graduate Advisee. Neuron, 81(1), 9–11. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.030.
Ynalvez, R., Garza-Gongora, C., Ynalvez, M. A., & Hara, N. (2014). Research experiences and mentoring practices in selected East Asian graduate
programs: Predictors of research productivity among doctoral students in molecular biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(4),
305–322. doi:10.1002/bmb.20794.
Contact
[email protected]
Hybrid Teaching in Graduate Education: Optimizing Virtual Engagement to Enhance Contextual Learning in
Doctoral Students
An'Nita C. Moore-Hebron, DrNP, USA
Abstract
Hybrid learning, also referred to as blended or mixed-mode learning, is a technique that combines traditional face-to-face classroom
instruction with newer technology mediated teaching learning modalities (Alammary, Sheard, & Carbone, 2014). It has been utilized
in K-12 as well as institutions of higher education to provide a transformative educational experience that fosters deeper
understanding while promoting the acquisition of communication and information management competencies (Jamison, Kolmos, &
Holgaard, 2014; Sung, Hwang, & Chang, 2015). While hybrid learning is not a new concept, expanded use of teaching technology can
greatly enhance graduate nursing education (Potter, 2015). Use of hybrid learning strategies in doctoral education has not only
served as a transformative instructional approach, but also as a vehicle for enhancing contextual learning (Hsu, Hamilton, & Wang,
2014). By engaging in hybrid learning experiences students are able to meaningfully integrate course concepts into their
development as nurse leaders. In the changing landscape of academia, student consumers expect course experiences that are
flexible and individualized to learner characteristics. Hybrid teaching-learning strategies have emerged as a transformative modality
to provide both students and instructors with the opportunity to manipulate the time, space, and place during which learning occurs
while valuing the inherent nature of intrinsic student characteristics (Liu et al., 2016). As a result, enhanced contextual learning has
been realized by uniquely blending didactic instruction with virtual engagement.
The presentation will review how hybrid learning strategies have been utilized in doctoral courses with a particular focus on outcomes relative to
enhanced contextual learning. Additionally, adaptable strategies for graduate and undergraduate courses will be reviewed. The presentation shall
benefit both novice and experienced educators responsible for providing didactic instruction to undergraduate and graduate students. Program
administrators shall also benefit from strategies discussed as they seek to refine creative program offerings. After attendance, participants will be
provided with information about various hybrid frameworks as well as tangible implementation strategies to promote constructive learning.
References
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of
Educational Technology, 30(4).
Hsu, J., Hamilton, K., & Wang, J. (2014). Guided independent learning: A teaching and learning approach for adult learners. International Journal of
Innovation and Learning, 17(1), 111-133.
Jamison, A., Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2014). Hybrid learning: An integrative approach to engineering education. Journal of Engineering
Education, 103(2), 253-273.
Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., & Yan, W. (2016). The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: Systematic review and
meta-analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 18(1).
Potter, J. (2015). Applying a hybrid model: Can it enhance student learning outcomes? Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 17.
Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. S. (2015). An integrated contextual and web-based issue quest approach to improving students' learning
achievements, attitudes and critical thinking. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 299-311.
Contact
[email protected]
Democratizing NP Student Education: Promoting Student and Faculty Participation in Flipped Learning
Nancy Murphy, NP, PhD, USA
Gloria Jones, DNP, FNP-BC, USA
Caron Strong, DNP, RN, APRN, FNP-BC, CDE, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Nurse leaders have outlined the requirements for nurse educators to engage and assess students as they apply and
synthesize knowledge over time and across various clinical scenarios. Flipped learning is a method of student-centered learning that
holds much promise in addressing this mandate. Flipped learning involves instructors developing and providing content to the
students prior to class and then using class time for evaluation of knowledge, comprehension, application, and synthesis. There is
encouraging but limited evidence about flipped learning in nursing compared with other health care disciplines. A range of
challenges to flipped learning have been identified, however questions related to determining appropriate motivation and incentives
for students to come to class prepared have not been explicated. This study sought to inquire about this challenge in addition to
exploring student and faculty perspectives on flipped learning. In addition, student researchers working on the project explored the
perspectives and experiences of “minority” graduate nursing students related to flipped learning. Philosophies and practices of
emancipatory nursing along with Black feminist thought provided the conceptual frameworks for this research.
Method: The graduate nursing faculty of a family nurse practitioner program implemented flipped learning in research and clinical courses over
two semesters and then commenced an exploratory, insider action research study during the subsequent semesters, as the flipped learning
approach expanded into more courses. Faculty data included instructor observation, reflective journaling, debriefing sessions and dialogical
development of thematic findings. Student data on flipped learning was obtained from focus groups that was coded and analyzed using a critical
constructivist grounded theory methods approach. Using Doris Boutain’s, “Identity, Research, and Health Dialogic Interview Format,” student
researchers independently reflected on multiple aspects of their identity as “minority women”, in relationship to flipped learning, and then
compared and contrasted their reflections dialogically.
Findings: Faculty found the flipped learning approach to be a significant improvement over traditional lecturing, particularly as it provides
opportunity for continuous assessment and feedback. Faculty determined in class case studies – followed by brief multiple choice quizzes, with a
meaningful point value, encouraged students to come to class prepared. On the student front, overwhelming approval of the flipped method
prevailed. Students identified numerous advantages such as (1) flexibility and personalizing the learning experience related to lifestyle/roles, (2)
autonomy related to being in control of learning and improving time management, (3) competency related to building confidence and dispelling
myths of passivity, and (4) promoting student and instructor negotiation and preparation. Students strongly prefer both audio and slide content
material prior to class. Generative tensions related to authority and control of the courses surfaced. Flipped learning is supportive and culturally
congruent with a range of identities.
Discussion: Flipped learning is an action oriented approach to learning that holds potential for “democratizing” the classroom and democratic
professionalism. Graduate nursing faculty continue participatory practices of peer evaluation, debriefing, and, dialogue to share knowledge and
experience of flipped learning approaches so as to continue to evaluate and improve teaching and learning methods in the graduate nursing
program. Exploring “minority” identity in flipped learning and the relationship to nurse practitioner education, practice, social justice and health
equity will also be discussed.
References
Benner, P. (2015). Curricular and pedagogical implications for the Carnegie Study, Educating Nurses: A call for radical transformation. Asian Nursing
Research, 9(1), 1-6. doi:10.1016/j.anr.2015.02.001
Bergman, J., Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. International Society for Technology in Education: Eugene OR
Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for 'flipping out': A systematic review of the flipped classroom in
nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 38, 15-21. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.010
Boutain, D (2014). The identity, research, and health dialogic interview: Its significance for social justice oriented research. In P.N. Kagan, M. C.
Smith, & P. L. Chinn (Eds.), Philosophies and practices of emancipatory nursing: Social Justice as praxis (124-136). Routledge: New York & London
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Coughlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing action research in your own organization (4th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Critz, C. M., & Knight, D. (2013). Using the flipped classroom in graduate nursing education. Nurse Educator, 38(5), 210-213.
doi:10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182a0e56a
Flipped Learning Network (FLN). (2014). What is flipped learning? Retrieved from
http://flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/46/FLIP_handout_FNL_Web.pdf
Harrington, S. A., Vanden Bosch, M., Schoofs, N., Beel-Bates, C., & Anderson, K. (2015). Quantitative outcomes for nursing students in a flipped
classroom. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(3), 179-181 3p. doi:10.5480/13-1255
Hawks, S. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: Now or never? American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Journal, 82(4), 264-269.
Hessler, K. L. (2016). Nursing education: Flipping the classroom. The Nurse Practitioner, 41(2), 17-27. doi:10.1097/01.NPR.0000476373.04620.33
Hill Collins, P (2009). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge: New York.
Kagan, P. N., Smith, M. C., & Chinn, P. L. (2014). Philosophies and practices of emancipatory nursing: Social Justice as praxis. Routledge: New York .
Schneider, G. (2010). Democratizing the classroom: Sequencing discussions and assignments to promote student ownership of the course. Review
of Radical Political Economics, 42, 101-107. doi: 10.1177/0486613409357185
Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). What is the "dialogical method" of teaching? Journal of Education, 169(3), 11-33.
Thompson, J. L., Mallet-Boucher, M., McCloskey, C., Tamlyn, K., & Wilson, K. (2013). Educating nurses for the twenty-first century abilities-based
outcomes and assessing student learning in the context of democratic professionalism. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 10,
10.1515/ijnes-2013-0031. doi:10.1515/ijnes-2013-0031
Contact
[email protected]
Growing Your Own APRNs in Rural and Underserved Communities
Ingrid M. Johnson, DNP, MPP, USA
Abstract
Rural healthcare leaders are increasingly tasked with the responsibility of providing health access to 21% of the national population
with only 10% of the provider workforce (Sonenberg, Knepper, & Pulcini, 2015). Provider recruitment strategies offering loan
repayment have had some success in the short term, but are less impactful at creating a long-term retention rate, unless the
providers have an existing connection to either the community in which they are working or rural healthcare (Renner et al., 2010).
Responding to this data, a demonstration project and study has been created in Colorado to test a rural focused “grow your own”
advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) model. The model is designed to recruit RNs from inside rural communities to return to
school and become primary care providers within those communities upon graduation. The project offers stipend support with
assistance in the school application process, educational support, clinical and job placement assistance, and monthly coaching.
Additionally, communities are asked to provide matching funds to support the APRN students with a goal of creating a self-
sustaining model that will build a continuous pipeline of APRN providers. This strategy avoids the costly need to recruit and relocate
providers who have no ties to the community.
Thirty-six nurses from rural and underserved communities in Colorado who had opted to return to school and become APRN
providers in their communities were invited to participate in taking the Nursing Community APGAR Questionnaire, a validated
instrument used to measure rural nurse recruitment and retention. Thirty-four participated in the survey, which is a 94% response
rate. The survey indicated that rural nurses can be recruited from within their communities to become APRN providers when they
are given added support, including financial assistance, employer flexibility to return to school and certainty that policies will allow
them to practice at the top of their education and scope. An unexpected outcome of the study indicates that when APRN schools
collaborate with rural communities to create educational programs aimed at educating rural and underserved providers, local nurses
are very eager to participate. Building a cohort of rural nurses who may not have considered themselves candidates to become
APRNs in a traditional program, can be recruited and successfully complete school if educational institutions are willing to utilize
holistic admission techniques (Glazer et.al, 2016). Additionally, creating a hybrid educational process allowing rural nurses both face
to face didactic education in combination with distance learning can create an avenue for school admission for these nurses,
allowing them to generally stay in their communities while attending school. Doing so supports rural communities in building a local
provider workforce using local talent without the need to relocate outside providers to the area.The early outcomes of this model
suggest that with financial support, employer support and community/university collaboration, rural and underserved areas could
create an internal and sustainable pipeline of future providers to care in their communities.
References
Auerbach, D. I., Chen, P. G., Friedberg, M. W., Reid, R., Lau, C., Buerhaus, P., & Mehrotra, A. (2013). Nurse-managed health centers and patient-
centered medical homes could mitigate expected primary care physician shortage. Health Affairs, 11(32), 1933-1941.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0596
Baum, F., & Ziersch, A. (2003). Social capital. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 320-323.
Bigbee, J., & Mixon, D. (2013). Recruitment and retention of rural nursing students: a retrospective study. Rural and Remote Health, 1-10.
Blaauw, D., Erasmus, E., Pagaiya, N., Tangcharoensathein, V., Mullei, K., Mudhune, S., ... Lagarde, M. (2010). Policy interventions that attract nurses
to rural areas: a multicountry discrete choice experiment. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88, 350-356.
Bodenheimer, T., & Pham, H. H. (May, 2010). Primary care: Current problems and proposed solutions. Health Affairs, 29(5), 799-805.
Brown, J., Hart, A. M., & Burman, M. E. (2009, February). A day in the life of rural advanced practice nurses. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners,
108-113.
Collins, S. (2012, February). Primary care shortages: Strengthening this sector is urgently needed, now and in preparation for healthcare reform.
American Health Drug Benefits, 5(1), 40-47. Retrieved from www.AHDBonline.com
Colorado Health Institute. (2013). Colorado health access survey 20 high-level findings. Retrieved from
http://www.coloradohealthinstitute.org/data-repository/county
Colorado Health Institute. (2014). Colorado’s primary care workforce - A study of regional disparities. Retrieved from Retrieved from
http://www.coloradohealthinstitute.org/key-issues/detail/health-care-workforce/colorados-primary-care-workforce-a-study-of-regional-
disparities
Concerning prescriptive authority of advanced practice nurses, SB15-197 Colorado General Assembly § 12-38-103 (2015).
Concerning the prescriptive authority of advanced practice nurses, S. Res. SB15-197, Cong., Colorado General Assembly 1 (2015) (enacted).
D’Avolio, D. A., Strumpf, N. E., Feldman, J., & Rebholz, C. M. (2013, April). Barriers to primary care: Perceptions of older adults utilizing the ed for
nonurgent visits. Clinical Nursing Research, 22(4), 416-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1054773813485597
Federal Trade Commission. (March, 2014). Policy perspectives Competition and the regulation of advanced practice nurses. Retrieved from
www.ftc.gov/policy/reports/policy-reports/commission-and-staff-reports
Glasser, M., Peters, K., & MacDowell, M. (2006, Winter). Rural Illinois hospital chief executive officers’ perceptions of provider shortages and issues
in rural recruitment and retention. Journal of Rural Health, 22(1), 59-62.
Glazer, G., Clark, A., Bankston, K., Danek, J., Fair, M., & Michaels, J. (2016). Holistic admissions in nursing: We can do this [Entire issue]. Journal of
Professional Nursing, 32(4).
Gould, D. (2006). Locally targeted initiatives to recruit and retain nurses in England. Journal of Nursing Management, 255-261.
Health Resources and Services Administration Bureau of Health Professionals. (2013). Projecting the supply and demand for primary care
practitioners through 2020. Retrieved from
http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/supplydemand/usworkforce/primarycare/projectingprimarycare.pdf
IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press.
Issacs, S., & Jellinek, P. (2012). Accept no substitute: A report on scope of practice [Report]. The Physician’s Foundation: The Physician’s Foundation.
Lauder, W., Reel, S., Farmer, J., & Griggs, H. (2006). Social capital, rural nursing and rural nursing theory. Nursing Inquiry, 13(1), 73-79.
MacDowell, M., Glasser, M., Fitts, M., Fratzke, M., & Peters, K. (2009). Perspectives on rural health workforce issues: Illinois-Arkansas comparison.
The Journal of Rural Health, Spring, 135-140.
Morgan, P., Johnson, A., & Fraher, E. (March, 2015). Comparison of specialty distribution of nurse practitioners and physicians assistants in North
Carolina, 1997-2013. Retrieved from http://www.shepscenter.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/DataBrief-PAsNPs-Morgan-Mar2015-
FINAL.pdf
Moy, E., Chang, E., & Barrett, M. (November, 2013). Potentially preventable hospitalizations - 2001-2009. Retrieved from
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6203.pdf
Mullei, K., Mudhune, S., Wafula, J., Masamo, E., English, M., Goodman, C., ... Blaauw, D. (2010, July 2). Attracting and retaining health workers in
rural areas: investigating nurses’ views on rural posts and policy interventions. BMC Health Services Research, 10(1).
Newhouse, R. P., Stanik-Hutt, J., White, K. M., Johantgen, M., Bass, E. B., Zangaro, G., ... Weiner, J. P. (2011). Advanced practice nurse outcomes
1990-2008: A systematic review. Nursing Economics, 29(5), 1-22.
Olade, R. A. (2004). Strategic collaborative model for evidence-based nursing practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 60-68.
Prengaman, M. P., Bigbee, J. L., Baker, E., & Schmidtz, D. F. (2014). Development of the nursing community APGAR questionnaire (NCAQ): A rural
nurse recruitment and retention tool. Rural and Remote Health, 14(1-9).
Prengaman, M. V., & Bigbee, J. L. (2016). Nursing community APGAR questionnaire (NCAQ) project phase II. Boise State Unversity: Idaho Office of
Rural Health and Primary Care.
Renner, D. M., Westfall, J. M., Wilroy, L. A., & Ginde, A. A. (2010). The influence of loan repayment on rural healthcare provider recruitment and
retention in Colorado. Rural and Remote Health, 10.
Shannon, K. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2011). A study of predictive validity of physician assistant students’ reported practice site intent. The Journal of
Physician Assistant Education, 22(2), 29-32.
Sharp, D. B. (2010). Factors related to the recruitment and retention of nurse practitioners in rural areas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
University of Texas , El Paso.
Skinner, H. G., Coffey, R., Jones, J., Heslin, K. C., & Moy, E. (2016). The effects of multiple chronic conditions on hospitalization costs and utilization
for ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the United States: a nationlly respresentative cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research,
16(77), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1304-y
Sonenberg, A., Knepper, H., & Pulcini, J. (2015). Implementing the aca: The influence of nurse practitioner regulatory policy on workforce, access to
care, and primary care health outcomes. Poverty and Public Policy, 7(4), 337-356.
The Colorado Center for Nursing Excellence. (2015). Colorado’s future healthcare workforce and the role of advanced practice registered nurses.
Retrieved from http://coloradonursingcenter.org/aprn-report
United States Census Bureau. (2015). http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045216/08
Zheng, J., Li, J., Jiang, X., & Zhang, B. (2015, April 18). Sustaining health workforce recruitment and retention in township hospitals: a survey on 110
directors of township hospitals. Front Med, 9(2), 239-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1009/s11684-015-0292-0
Contact
[email protected]
Teaching Students to Administer Medications: Collaborative Supports Are Critical
Twyla A. Ens, MN, Canada
Abstract
Students administering medications make errors and near misses; rarely are published rates available (Cooper, 2014). Nurses are
expected to safely administer medications, but medication errors occur, and sometimes at alarming rates (Bush, Hueckel, Robinson,
Seelinger & Molloy, 2015). Medication administration is a routine part of a nurse’s responsibility, thus teaching strategies that
effectively prepare students for this task are essential. Nursing programs are content saturated, thus expanding the amount of time
dedicated to medications is often not feasible. This participatory action research study solicited students’ and instructors’ reflections
on factors that increased students’ learning and safety practices for medication administration. The impact of the clinical learning
environment for student nurses learning to administer medications is an area that needs to be further explored (Sulosaari, Kajander,
Hupli, Huupponeen & Leino-Kilpi, 2012).
Methods: This research was guided by the Participatory Action Research (PAR) methodology and explored (1) teaching methods that promote
student learning and safe medication administration, and (2) influences to student nurse medication errors and near misses. Student nurses and
clinical instructors from years three and four of a Bachelor of Nursing program participated in this study. We used a concurrent mixed methods
design, and collected data about safe medication administration and medication teaching and learning via questionnaires from students (n=77) and
instructors (n=11) as well as an instructor focus group (n=3). Analysis was conducted using Mann-Whitney U tests for quantitative results. Thematic
analysis and triangulation were used for qualitative findings.
Findings: Accounts of student and clinical instructor experiences in the clinical setting emphasized the significance of collaborative practice to safe
medication administration by student nurses. Instructor
Students and instructors rated the clinical nursing instructor as having the most positive influence on patient safety and student learning. Students
reported supportive instructors increased the chances of them asking for supervision and improved patient safety. Students found it helpful when
the instructor had clear expectations, quizzed students about the medications and tested their knowledge.
Peers: The students reported peers as the second most positive influence on learning and safety. Talking to a peer about medications provided
students an opportunity to think further about medications and to build their clinical reasoning and critical thinking. While clinical instructors
considered peer interactions positive, they did not rank peer learning as highly as the students themselves did.
Staff nurses: Participants reported that the staff nurses have a positive impact on student learning and patient safety. The staff nurses were aware
of contextual factors impacting medication requirements and helped the students to link concepts about the patient and the medication. While the
instructors rated the staff nurses highly, concerns were stated about student nurses learning unsafe shortcuts. Poor communication between the
student and the staff nurses was the leading cause of medication errors in the study.
Conclusion: Collaboration between the student and the instructor; the student and their peers; the student and the staff nurse; and the staff nurse
and the instructor are all important to optimize student learning about medications and to enhance patient safety. Elements of the clinical
environment that contribute to complexity for teachers and learners include noise, interruptions, communication challenges and time constraints.
Medication administration is cognitively complex for students because they must integrate a developing knowledge about medications, the
patient’s history, the patient’s current clinical situation and possibly changing condition and other factors to come to decisions about medications.
During collaboration, instructors, peers and staff nurses can be the guide a student needs to make the cognitive connections required for learning
for clinical decision making.
A lack of collaboration is associated with medication errors. If the student and the staff nurse have tension in their relationship resulting in poor
communication, medication errors are more likely (Valdez, Guzman, & Escolar-Chua, 2012). Students are more likely to report an error if they do
not fear a negative reaction from the clinical instructor (Gorgich, Barfroshan, Ghoreishi & Yaghoobi, 2016). Faculty development of supervision
skills can increase dialog among clinical instructors (Perry & Koharchik, 2014). Valdez et al. (2012) stated "while the emphasis on knowledge of
pharmacology and medication safety is essential, equal importance should be given to system failures that impact patient safety. Accordingly,
inter-professional partnership should be encouraged so that staff nurses, clinical instructors and other members of the health care team can
reinforce the link between theory and practice." (p. 225)
The close relationship with learning and patient safety demonstrates that improvement in student learning will have a direct benefit to patients in
the short and long term. One strategy for improvement is to build on the current successes of collaboration and to close the gaps in collaboration
that we have found leads to medication errors. Students utilize peers and staff nurses as important resources. Faculty members can build on these
relationships by developing teaching strategies that formally and intentionally promote peer to peer and student to nurse collaboration.
Transitioning the student from the clinical instructor as supervisor and educator to staff nurse or peer collaboration for medication administration
may improve learning and patient safety. Promoting purposeful collaboration for students will also help to build a collaborative skill set to bring
forward to future interprofessional practice opportunities.
References
Bush, P. A., Hueckel, R. M., Robinson, D., Seelinger, T. A., & Molloy, M. A. (2015). Cultivating a culture of medication safety in prelicensure nursing
students. Nurse educator, 40(4), 169-173. Doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000148
Cooper, E. (2014). Nursing student medication errors: A snapshot view from a school of nursing’s quality and safety officer. Journal of Nursing
Education, 53(3), S51-S54. doi:10.3928/01484834-20140211-03
Gorgich, E.A., Barfroshan, S., Ghoreishi, G. & Yaghoobi, M. (2016). Investigating the causes of medication errors and strategies to prevention of
them from nurses and nursing student viewpoint. Global Journal of Health Science, 8(8), 220-227. doi:10.5539/glhs.v8n8p220
Perry, N.N. & Koharchik, L.S. (2014). Impact of faculty development sessions to increase faculty competency with supervision of medication
administration in an associate degree program. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9, 37-42. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2013.09.002
Sulosaari, V., Kajander, S., Hupli, M., Huupponen, R. & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2012). Nurse students’ medication competence – An integrative review of the
associated factors. Nurse Education Today, 32, 399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.0616
Valdez, P., deGuzman, A. & Escolar-Chua, R. (2013). A structural equation modeling of the factors affecting student nurses’ medication errors.
Nurse Education Today,33(3), 222-228. doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.01.001
Contact
[email protected]
The Lived Experiences of Undergraduate Nursing Students Learning Drug Dosage Calculation
Marie-Bernard Lazare, PhD, MSEd, MSNEd, RN, USA
Abstract
Problem: Competence in dosage calculation represents a challenge that seems to be almost insurmountable for nurses as well as nursing students.
The lived experiences of nursing students learning drug dosage calculation have not been explored for description and interpretation.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to gain more insight about undergraduate nursing students’ lived experiences learning medication dosage
calculation.
Sample: The purposive sample consisted of 11 participants (N = 11), who were a group composed of 82% females (n = 9) and 18% males (n = 2).
They were at different levels of their nursing education from three universities’ nursing colleges located in South Florida.
Methods: A purposive sample was selected to investigate the following question: What are the lived experiences of undergraduate nursing
students studying medication dosage calculation? Data were collected through face-to-face semi-structured interviews, which the researcher
transcribed verbatim, and the participants reviewed for validation. The combined interpretive and descriptive method of van Manen guided the
characteristics of the thematic data analysis conducted to determine the findings.
Results: The related themes of signifying, repeating, analyzing, maintaining consistency, verifying, and the overarching theme of assuring safety
emerged as the essence of the participants’ lived world of learning drug dosage calculation.
Conclusions: This study contributed, to some extent, to filling the empirical gap identified in the literature review. These participants gave rich, in-
depth accounts of how they embodied drug dosage calculation in order to attain competence that they need to administer correct dosage of
medications to their patients.
Implications for Nursing Practice and Education: Several obstacles in nursing practice are of great concerns in the health care continuum. Access
and opportunities for clinical applications conducive to learning are quite challenging. This is mostly due to limited availability of clinical sites.
Participants in this study explained that the unit dose system and the computer system of documentation limit opportunities to apply what they
learned in the classroom and assignment activities. Encouraging students to verbalize their concerns with the dynamics of the clinical areas
facilitates nursing instructors to redirect student attention to what is appropriate. Creating opportunities for the students to practice calculating
drug dosage at various levels in the simulation classroom can supplement for what is missing in the clinical settings. Potential for drug dosage
errors is a reality that is preventable. The effects of such errors can be detrimental to patients, their families, health care facilities, health care
providers, and the community. Errors can lead to emotional anguish and costly malpractice lawsuits. Students need to learn the different factors in
the health care environments that can lead to confusion, which can impede their critical reasoning skills needed to accurately calculate dosage
problems. The clinical instructors play an important role in addressing the gaps observed between education and practice. To narrow the gap in the
medication administration process is to consistently reinforce in the clinical settings the safe medication practice learned in the classroom, and to
be creative in finding opportunities in the clinical settings for adequate knowledge application.
Implications for Nursing Research: Investigating the experiences of nursing students in learning medication dosage calculation has, in a small way,
contributed to the reduction of the paucity identified in current literature for this genre of research. Thus far, empirical studies conducted did not
investigate the phenomenon in the same contexts as this hermeneutic phenomenological study did. The findings of this study are representative of
the participants’ perspectives on learning drug dosage calculation. The researcher, by being immersed in the narratives of these nursing students,
was able to gain knowledge that can lead to other studies to further develop nursing as a science and an art. Research generates crucial empirical
evidence for the development of safe practice in a challenging patient care delivery system. Education of nursing students in learning drug dosage
calculation skills needs to be further explored to determine other possible factors influencing learning outcomes.
References
Angel, B. F., Duffey, M., & Belyea, M. (2000). An evidence-based project for evaluating strategies to improve knowledge acquisition and critical-
thinking performance in nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 219-28
Choo, J., Hutchinson, A., & Bucknall, T. (2010). Nurses' role in medication safety. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 853-861. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2834.2010.01164.x
Crawford, D. (2015). A comparison of nursing education perspectives on medication dosage calculation with practice expectations (Doctoral
dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation. (Order No. 3739164)
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Weeks, K. W., Sabin, M., Pontin, D., & Woolley, N. (2013). Safety in numbers: An introduction to the nurse education in practice series. Nurse
Education in Practice, 13, 4-10.
Wright, K. (2005). An exploration into the most effective way to teach drug calculation skills to nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 25, 430-
436.
Wright, K. (2006). Barriers to accurate drug calculations, Nursing Standard. 20, 41-45.
Wright, K. (2007). Student nurses need more than math to improve their drug calculating skills. Nurse Education Today, 27, 278-285.
Wright, K. (2008a). Can effective teaching and learning strategies help student nurses to retain drug calculation skills? Nurse Education Today, 28,
856-864.
Wright, K. (2008b). Drug calculations part 1: A critique of the formula used by nurses. Nursing Standard, 22, 40-42.
Wright, K. (2009). Developing methods for solving drug dosage calculations. British Journal of Nursing, 18, 685-689.
Wright, K. (2012). Student nurses' perceptions of how they learn drug calculation skills. Nurse Education Today, 32, 721-726.
Wright, K. (2013). The role of nurses in medicine administration errors. Nursing Standard, 27, 35-40.
Contact
[email protected]
A Comparison of Instructional Methods for an Undergraduate Nursing Health Assessment Course
Laura J. Markwick, DNP, USA
Tara L. Sacco, MSN, USA
Abstract
With the emphasis on the ability of nursing students to apply knowledge learned, new classroom designs are being implemented to
ensure student success. Traditional teaching modalities consisted of lecture and regurgitation of knowledge. Today, faculty are
implementing a flipped classroom design as a pedagogical tool to enhance learning through increased faculty and student
engagement (Paterson, 2017; Smith, 2017; Rotellar and Cain, 2016). Flipped designs have also been shown to promote higher-order
thought processes and reasoning skills in English as a second language students (Kim, Park, Jang, and Nam, 2017). Some studies have
shown no difference in student grades or level of student satisfaction with flipped classroom design vs traditional lecture based
design but suggest that intensity of the course has a factor (Whillier and Lystad, 2015). Students are often resistant to change from
traditional methods of instruction and sometimes find individual learning of content difficult without the face to face instructor
contact (Telford and Senior, 2017). An additional method to integrate technology use in a health assessment course is the use of
virtual patient technology which provides a comprehensive learning experience in a safe environment and engages students to
develop their assessment and documentation skills. The combination of flipped classroom design with virtual patient experience has
been shown to allow for a personalized learning experience that promoted higher-level learning in pharmacy students in a required
therapeutics class (Lichvar, Hedges, Benedict, and Donihi, 2016).
This study compared outcomes of three different teaching modalities in an undergraduate health assessment course. The modalities were as
follows: traditional lecture in a traditional classroom setting (traditional section); flipped class in a traditional classroom setting (flipped section);
and flipped class in a fully technology integrated classroom (flipped and integrated section). Course content was identical across the three sections.
In the traditional section, students completed preparatory readings followed by lectures in class and then completed a virtual patient module
assignments at home. In the flipped section, students completed preparatory reading and viewed content-based podcasts prior to class. In the
classroom, faculty reviewed key lecture elements and students completed the virtual patient module assignments individually during class time.
The flipped and integrated section used the flipped delivery method as described. In a technology integrated classroom, students worked
collaboratively in groups to complete the virtual patient module assignments together with the support of course faculty. At the completion of the
semester, comparisons were made between mean grades on each assignment and examination. Grading of the virtual patient module assignments
was completed by lab instructors associated with the course. Interrater reliability was ensured with training during orientation to this course prior
to the start of the semester. Examinations were graded via Pars Score® technology and completed by the course instructor of record. Standard
student course evaluations, which are de-identified in their report to course faculty, were compared to determine if there is difference between
the three sections.
This study used a convenience sample as the students were already enrolled in the respective sections of this required foundational course.
Teaching modality and room assignments were determined after the student enrollment period was completed. Following institutional review
board approval, informed consent was obtained from students wishing to participate by having their grades included in data analysis. Students who
did not consent to participate were excluded from the study. Consent was obtained by a co-investigator who did not have any teaching or grading
responsibilities in the course. Further, data was collected by this co-investigator to maintain participant anonymity to course faculty. Participation
or nonparticipation in this study in no way impacted their course grades or content delivery. Because end of semester standard course evaluations
are reported as aggregate data, there was no way to include or exclude student data and therefore all aggregate data was examined.
A total of 95 students participated in this study. Data from both the de-identified student database and course evaluations were analyzed
statistically using ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis comparison testing. Data analysis revealed significantly better outcomes on 10 of the 12 virtual patient
modules in the flipped and integrated classroom section compared to the two other teaching modalities (p < .05). Student performance across
groups on course examinations did not differ except for one unit examination favoring the flipped and integrated model. Of the summative
evaluations, no significant differences were found between groups for the final head to toe demonstration, final examination, and overall student
grades; those in the flipped and integrated model scored significantly higher on the comprehensive virtual patient module (p < .05). Qualitative
comments from student evaluations were analyzed for common themes.
In conclusion, the use of a flipped classroom design with an integrated model using a virtual patient supported student learning. It improved the
scores on virtual patient modules, which provided the students with a safe platform to practice their assessment, documentation, and critical
thinking skills. While most of the summative evaluations showed no significant difference, the comprehensive module did show significant
difference, which demonstrates the students’ ability to organize, perform, and document their complete history and physical exam. Limitations of
this study included the small sample size and the fact that the students were not allowed to self-select in which section they would participate.
Further study is recommended.
References
Kim, J., Park, H., Jang, M., & Nam, H. (2017). Exploring flipped classroom effects on second language learners' cognitive processing. Foreign
Language Annals, 50, 260-284. doi: 10.1111/flan.12260
Lichvar, A. B., Hedges, A., Benedict, N. J., & Donihi, A. C. (2016). Combination of a flipped classroom format and a virtual patient case to enhance
active learning in a required therapeutics course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(10), 1-8.
Paterson, J. (2017). Flipped classrooms turn teaching upside down. Principal Leadership, 17(8), 34-38
Rotellar, C., & Cain, J. (2016). Research, perspectives, and recommendations on implementing the flipped classroom. American Journal of
Pharmaceutical Education, 80(2), 1-9.
Smith, C. E. (2017). The flipped classroom: Benefits of student-led learning. Nursing, 47, 20-22. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000513620.19174.90
Telford, M., & Senior, E. (2017). Healthcare students’ experiences when integrating e-learning and flipped classroom instructional approaches.
British Journal of Nursing, 26(11), 617-622.
Whillier, S., & Lystad, R. P. (2015). No differences in grades or level of satisfaction in a flipped classroom for neuroanatomy. Journal of Chiropractic
Education, 29, 127-133. doi: 10.7899/JCE-14-28
Contact
[email protected]
Self-Efficacy of Health Assessment Skills for Nursing Students After a Comprehensive Health Assessment
Video Assignment
Michael D. Bumbach, PhD, MSN, ARNP, RN, FNP-BC, USA
Sandra Wolfe Citty, PhD, USA
Nancy Young, MSN, ARNP, CPNP-PC, CNE, USA
Allison Kathleen Peters, DNP, RN, CNOR, NEC, USA
Anita M. Stephen, MSN, CNL-BC, USA
Charlene A. Krueger, PhD, ARNP, USA
Abstract
Background: It has been long known that high self-efficacy is related to positive educational outcomes. For nursing it is important to
assess nursing students' perceived self-efficacy toward tasks essential to their future career. This task of producing efficacious
nursing students is daunting amidst the prolonged Nursing faculty shortage, of which, ther is no predicted end. Educational methods
based in evidence is important for best practices in the training of these new Nurses. This project aimed to assess undergraduate
nursing students' feelings of self-efficacy toward health assessment skills both before and after participation in a comprehensive
health assessment video assignment.
Methods: A survey that measured students' perceived self-efficacy toward health assessment skills was administered to a class of upper division,
undergraduate nursing students pre- and post-assignment. The cohort under study was in the first semester of their Bachelors nursing program.
The survey consisted of Likert-style questions with a range from 1 to 6. Univariate analysis and bivariate paired t-tests, based on the intrinsic
characteristic of the variables, were performed.
Results: All measures of students' perceived self-efficacy toward health assessment skills were significantly (p<.001) increased post-assignment.
The largest increase in perceived self-efficacy was with their ability to conduct a comprehensive health assessment for a given patient (Mean
Difference=2.24). Overall, the aggregated mean showed a significant (p<.001) increase in nursing students' perceived self-efficacy toward health
assessment skills.
Conclusion: The comprehensive health assessment video assignment increased nursing students' perceived self-efficacy toward health assessment
skills. This is important with the lingering Nursing faculty shortage, as methods for improved, evidence-based practices with increased efficiency
could prove worthwhile in the training of quality Nurses. The use of alternative educational methods will need further exploration with a focus on
evidence of best practice. Otherwise, the new Nurse will not be grounded on a solid foundation of proper methods as they enter the health care
workforce.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bulfone, G., Fida, R., Ghezzi, V., Macale, L., Sili, A., Alvaro, R., & Palese, A. (2016). Nursing Student Self-efficacy in Psychomotor Skills: Findings From
a Validation, Longitudinal, and Correlational Study. Nurse Educ, 41(6), E1-e6. doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000285
Carey, M. & Forsyth, A. (2017, February 9). Teaching tip sheet: Self-efficacy. American Psychological Association. Available at:
http://www.apa.org/pi/aids/resources/education/selfefficacy.aspx
Chan, J. Y. (2015). Using medical incidents to teach: effects of vicarious experience on nursing students' self-efficacy in performing urinary
catheterization. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(2), 80-86.
Nystrom, A., Palsson, Y., Hofsten, A., & Haggstrom, E. (2013). Nursing students' experiences of being video-recorded during examination in a fictive
emergency care situation. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 20, 540-548.
Wallace, S. (2013). The importance of holistic assessment – A nursing student perspective. Nuritinga, 12, 24-30.
Contact
[email protected]
What Grades Really Mean to Undergraduate, Graduate, and Doctoral Nursing Students: A
Phenomenological Study
Susan G. Poorman, PhD, RN, CNS-BC, ANEF, USA
Melissa L. Mastorovich, DNP, RN, BC, USA
Abstract
Many nurse educators have become increasingly concerned about students’ constant focus on grades. The accurate and fair
assessment of nursing students is essential for faculty at all levels of nursing education. According to the National League for Nursing
(NLN) assessment and evaluation of students is a core competency for all nurse faculty (2012). A recent study by Poorman and
Mastorovich (2014) found that evaluation was the most important aspect of a nurse educator’s position, yet enacting it was often
very difficult. O’Flynn, Magee and Clauson (2013) purport that inconsistent grading practices, students’ unrealistic expectations
about grades and grade inflation may contribute to these difficulties.
One of the largest studies on grade inflation was a retrospective study that spanned 70 years and included 1.5 million students in 135 colleges and
universities (Rojstaczer & Healy, 2012). They found the current average college grade is an A, which has increased 12% since 1988. Much has been
written about grade inflation and the failure to fail students in nursing education. (Donaldson & Gray, 2012; Elie, 2017; Paskausky & Simonelli,
2014; Prichard & Ward-Smith, 2017). Recently, Docharty and Dieckmann (2015) found that 43% of nursing faculty had assigned grades that were
higher than what was merited.
The gap between grade expectations and actual grades has also received attention in the educational literature. Garces-Ozanne and Sullivan (2014)
found that grade expectations were significantly different than actual grades received. They also found that when students received lower grades
than expected, they believed they were either graded unfairly or that they were “not good enough” (p. 96). Hossain and Tsigaris (2015) also found
an inverse relationship between grade expectations and actual grades received. However, they also found that expectations became closer to
reality as the student progressed through the program. In a study of 1,015 students enrolled in an anatomy and physiology class, 65.5%
overestimated their final grade with 29% overestimating by two to four letter grades (Sturgess, et al., 2016).
In contemporary society, grades matter. According to the National Association for College Admission Counseling grades were the most important
factors for freshman college admission (Clinedinst, Korangteng & Nicola, 2015). This was also true for transfer students. Further, a recent meta-
analysis revealed a positive correlation between high school Grade Point Average (GPA) and college success (Westrick, 2015). Similarly many
graduate and doctoral nursing programs require a certain GPA for admission. Grades can also affect self-esteem. Khan and Ramzan (2017) found
that in a sample of 150 undergraduates students, good grades were positively correlated with positive self-esteem. Further, they found that
authoritative parenting was linked to academic grades and permissive parenting was not. For students, parents and teachers, grades often take on
a personal significance and display a variety of emotions.
The educational literature is replete with strategies and research regarding how to evaluate and assign grades, the effects of grade inflation, and
the disconnect between student expectations and actual grades received. Yet, there is a paucity of empirical evidence about what those grades
mean to nursing students. Using a Heideggerian hermeneutical phenomenological approach, this study sought to illuminate and understand the
meaning of grades for students at the undergraduate (ADN and BSN), graduate (MSN) and doctoral (PhD and DNP) levels of nursing education.
Forty nursing students from 15 different nursing programs participated in this research. Human subject approval was acquired, and informed
consent was obtained. Unstructured, face to face interviews were conducted in which the students were asked: ‘Tell us about a time that stands
out to you when you graded. Now reflect on your story and describe what this experience meant to you.’ Interviews were taped and transcribed
verbatim. Hermeneutic analysis (Andrews et al., 2001; Ironside, 2005; Smythe et al., 2007) bears witness to how a person experiences something.
The researchers engaged in circles of understanding that deepened as the interview texts were read and analyzed. Through rigorous interpretation,
meaning, experiences, and judgments were conveyed. Data analysis revealed several themes. The themes: Needing an A and Struggling with
Average will be discussed during this presentation. Excerpts from the student stories will be read and interpretations of the narratives will be
shared.
Grade inflation, academic entitlement, incivility and grades are hotly debated topics among students, faculty and the general population. The
purpose of this presentation is not to valorize or demonize the use of grades in education. Rather, sharing these stories may initiate a much needed
discussion among nursing faculty and students about grading (McConlogue, 2012). According to the NLN (2012), evaluation strategies should
promote collegial dialogue and interaction among faculty, students and other professionals. The presenters will discuss how the students’ stories of
being graded has changed and inspired them. For students, grades are very powerful. Implications for nurse educators will be discussed.
Specifically faculty will be encouraged to open the dialogue about grades with their students. With ongoing dialogue about grades, not only will
teachers and students share the meaning of the grade experience, they can make a significant difference in student teacher relationships.
References
Andrews, C., Ironside, P.M., Nosek, C., Sims, S., Swenson, M., Yeomans, C. et al. (2001). Enacting narrative pedagogy: The lived experiences of
students and teachers. Nursing and Health Care Perspectives, 22(5), 252‐259.
Clinedinst, M., Koranteng, A. & Nicola, T. (2015). 2015 State of College Admission. Arlington, VA: National Association of College Admission
Counseling.
Docharty, A. & Dieckmann (2015). Is there evidence of failing to fail in our schools of nursing? Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(4), 226-231.
Donaldson, J.H. & Gray, M. (2012). Systematic review of grading practice: Is there evidence of grade inflation? Nurse Education in Practice, 12, 101-
114.
Elie, M. (2015). Grade inflation in nursing education: Proposed solutions for an ongoing problem. Nursing Forum, doi.10.1111/nuf.12152
Garces-Ozanne, A. & Sullivan, T. (2014). Expectations and reality: What you want is not always what you get. Australian Journal of Adult Learning,
54(2), 78-100.
Hossain, B. & Tsigaris, P. (2015). Are grade expectations rational? A classroom experiment. Education Economics, 23(2), 199-212.
Ironside, P.M. (2005) Working together, creating excellence: The experiences of nursing teachers, students, and clinicians. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 26(2), 78‐85.
Khan, A.A. & Ramzan, M. (2017). Role of parenting and self-esteem in promoting academic grades among undergraduate students. Journal of
Research in Social Sciences, 5(1), 37-41.
McConlogue, T. (2012) But is it fair? Developing students’ understanding of grading complex written work through peer assessment. Assessment
and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 113‐123.
National League for Nursing (2012). The scope of practice for academic nurse educators. New York: National League for Nursing.
O'Flynn‐Magee, K., Clauson, M. (2013) Uncovering nurse educator’s beliefs and values about grading academic papers: Guidelines for best
practices. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(9), 492‐499.
Paskausky, A. L. & Simonelli, M.C. (2014). Measuring grade inflation: A clinical grade discrepancy score. Nurse Education in Practice, 14, 374-379.
Poorman, S. G., & Mastorovich, M. L. (2014). Teacher Stories of Blame When Assigning a Failing Grade. International Journal Of Nursing Education
Scholarship, 11(1), 1-10. doi:10.1515/ijnes-2013-0081
Prichard, S.A. & Ward-Smith, P. (2017). A concept analysis of “Reluctance to fail.” Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 7(8), 80-85.
Rojstaczer, S. & Healy, C. (2012). Where A is ordinary: The evolution of American college and university grading, 1940-2009. Teachers College
Record, 114(7), 1-15.
Smythe, E.A., Ironside, P. M., Sims, S. L., Swenson, M.M. & Spence, D. G. (2008). Doing Heideggerian hermeneutic research: A discussion paper.
International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 1389-1397.
Sturges, D., Maurer, T.W., Allen, D., Gatch, D.B., & Shankar, P. (2016). Academic performance in human anatomy and physiology classes: A 2-year
study of academic motivation and grade expectation. Advances in Physiology Education, 40, 26-31. Doi:10.1152/advan.00091.2015.
Westrick, P.A. (2015). Differential grading: A meta-analysis of STEM and non-STEM fields, gender, and institutional admission selectivity. ACT
research report series 2015 (7).
Contact
[email protected]
Learning Psychomotor Skills Through Technology: Findings From a Phenomenological Study of
Undergraduate Nursing Students
Michael D. Aldridge, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Faye I. Hummel, PhD, RN, CTN-A, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Purpose: Nurse educators continue to seek the most effective methods to teach psychomotor skills to nursing students. Effective
skill performance can decrease costly medical errors and infections, thereby improving patient safety (Gonzalez & Sole, 2014; Taylor,
2012). Much of the recent research about skill acquisition involves simulation (Bowling, 2015; Cason et al., 2015) and deliberate
practice (Oermann, Molloy, & Vaughn, 2015). In order to develop effective teaching methods, it is also important to understand
students’ perceptions about how they learn nursing skills. Prior qualitative studies about skill acquisition have found common
themes, including the importance of peers, the role of positive support and teaching, and the necessity of practicing skills on real
people; however, in these studies technology did not emerge as a strong theme (Aldridge, 2017). The purpose of this presentation is
to discuss findings from a phenomenological study conducted with nursing students about their perceptions of learning
psychomotor skills including innovations of readily available technology to facilitate and enhance their learning and competency.
Methods: Descriptive phenomenology was used. A purposive sample of nine senior nursing students was recruited from a small
liberal arts university in the Southwest United States. Participants were interviewed using open-ended questions. Interviews were
designed to examine and explore how nursing students describe the process of learning nursing skills. Six themes emerged from the
voices of the students; however, this presentation will elaborate on three: “the umbrella of emotion,” “practice, practice, practice,”
and “learning through technology.”
Results: Student nurses experience an ever-present stream of emotions during the skills learning process. Emotions described
ranged from anxiety and inadequacy to confidence, fear and worry to relief, confusion and uncertainty to a sense of
accomplishment. Nursing students believed nursing skills were learned most effectively with repetitive practice several times in
short sessions. They described barriers to practicing psychomotor skills outside scheduled lab times. These emotions and the need
for frequent practice drove nursing students to develop innovative and efficient methods to learn skills. Nursing students’ stories
revealed the significant role technology played in how they learned skills. Technology was viewed as superior to other sources of
information, such as textbooks. Students incorporated innovative uses of readily available technology to enhance their skills
learning. Nursing students used smart phones and webcams to create learning materials to practice skill development in settings
outside the lab. Nursing students discussed their perceived limitations of professionally developed video learning materials. They
preferred self-made videos of their clinical instructor demonstrating a skill in the lab setting. Nursing students used webcams at
home when practicing for skills examinations by recording themselves performing a skill with subsequent self-evaluation of their
performance. This was reported as an effective strategy to detect errors in their performance, such as omitting steps or
contaminating the sterile field. In the clinical setting, nursing students used their smart phones to review skills videos, skills
checklists, and search for relevant patient information online. The smart phone became their mobile source of information.
Conclusions and Policy Implications for Educators: Results of this research showed nursing students report a wide range of
emotions in their learning and competency development of psychomotor nursing skills. Nursing students are innovative and
effortlessly use available technology to enhance their skill development and enhance opportunities for practice of new skills. Given
the presence of technology in nursing schools around the world, these findings have implications for nurse educators. Nursing
schools should develop policies around smartphone use in the clinical setting, including Internet use, confidentiality, and not taking
pictures. There is also little evidence that smartphones are a vector for bacteria in the clinical setting (Mark et al., 2014).
Research about how nursing students use technology to learn nursing skills is extremely limited. Given the pervasive nature of
technology among nursing students around the world, it is important for nurse educators to develop evidence about how to best
use technology to teach nursing skills. This study provides initial evidence about how current students are using technology when
learning nursing skills, and serves to guide future studies. Ultimately, teaching students how to perform skills well could make
healthcare systems safer and decrease costs as errors and infections are prevented.
References
Aldridge, M.D. (2017). Nursing students’ perceptions of learning psychomotor skills: A literature review. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 12, 21-
27. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2016.09.002
Bowling, A. M. (2015). The effect of simulation on skill performance: A need for change in pediatric nursing education. Journal of Pediatric Nursing,
30, 439-446. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2014.12.010
Cason, M. L., Gilbert, G. E., Schmoll, H. H., Dolinar, S. M., Anderson, J., Nickles, B. M., …Schaefer, J. J. (2015). Cooperative learning using simulation
to achieve mastery of nasogastric tube insertion. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(3 Supple), S47-S51. doi:10.3928/01484834-20150218-09
Gonzalez, L., & Sole, M. L. (2014). Urinary catheterization skills: One simulated checkoff is not enough. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 10, 455-460.
Mark, D., Leonard, C., Breen, H., Graydon, R., O-Gorman, C., & Kirk, S. (2014). Mobile phones in clinical practice: Reducing the risk of bacterial
contamination. The International Journal of Clinical Practice, 68, 1060-1064. doi:10.1111/ijcp.12448
Oermann, M. H., Molloy, M.A., & Vaughn, J. (2015). Use of deliberate practice in teaching nursing. Nurse Education Today, 35, 535-536.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.007
Taylor, J.T. (2012). Using low-fidelity simulation to maintain competency in central line care. JAVA, 17, 31-37. doi:10.2309/java.17-1-4
Contact
[email protected]
Designing an Innovative Recruitment Strategy While Navigating IRB Issues in Multisite Survey Research
Darrell Spurlock, PhD, RN, NEA-BC, ANEF, USA
Kristina Thomas Dreifuerst, PhD, RN, CNE, ANEF, USA
Angela McNelis, PhD, RN, FAAN, CNE,ANEF,, USA
Jessica Blakely, SN, USA
Abstract
Background.There are many lessons that can be learned and successful strategies shared which are particularly relevant for multi-
site, nursing education-focused survey research designs. Calls continue for big data studies to accelerate the generation of new
knowledge and accelerate translation of evidence for teaching practice (Broome, 2009; Broome, Ironside & Spurlock, 2012; DeVon,
Rice, Pickler, Krause-Parello, & Richmond, 2016) yet there is little to guide researchers through the challenges they may encounter.
We will explore lessons learned through conducting a large, national, complex survey study of family nurse practitioner (FNP) clinical
education practices to 1) inform other researchers about potential challenges they may encounter and strategies to overcome them
and 2) discuss solutions and best practices that can inform policy and interpretation at local institutions with a goal of reducing
barriers to conducting large scale survey research in nursing education.
Current Study. In early 2017, the authors began a national study of family nurse practitioner (FNP) clinical education practices using a complex,
national, cross-sectional survey approach. First the researchers created a sophisticated survey questionnaire to be completed by FNP students
currently enrolled in their final clinical education course and a parallel survey for NP faculty. Next, IRB review for research meeting exempt criteria
was sought and received from the PI’s home institution as well as both Co-PI’s institutions. In addition, an informational website dedicated to the
research study was published online and all IRB approval letters, study information sheets, and other relevant documentation was posted for the
public to see. The subject recruitment plan included recruiting up to 4,000 current FNP students and 1,000 FNP faculty from schools in all 50 states
in the US using electronically delivered surveys via Qualtrics®. To reach potential subjects, Deans and Directors from all schools offering eligible
programs were contacted by email to facilitate access to potential study participants. Despite a strong, evidence-based recruitment plan, several
roadblocks were encountered which fall into 2 main categories: 1) there was widespread variability in understanding of IRB regulations and what
they mean for survey researchers seeking access to potential student or faculty subjects, and 2) how the Federal Educational Privacy Rights and
Privacy Act (FERPA) permits (or does not permit) researcher access to certain limited kinds of information about students currently enrolled in
educational programs.
It is well-known that researchers conducting studies at the national level face significant barriers to recruitment and site access due to variations in
the local interpretation and implementation of IRB requirements in each institution. While protection of the privacy and confidentiality of human
subjects is essential and necessary, there is little evidence which suggests that repeated reviews by multiple Institutional Review Boards increases
research participant protection (Mealer et al., 2017). Moreover, most education-related survey research falls under the exempt category when
participant identity is not associated with survey responses. Many software programs used in large scale survey studies can provide additional
protections by anonymizing responses even when individually identifiable information (e.g., name, email address) is used to invite subjects to
participate in the study, further reducing concerns about privacy and confidentiality.
Methods. In the study discussed here, the study PIs initially made contact with the administrative contact (usually a dean or director) for each
school and provided all relevant documentation related to the study’s purposes, its IRB approval status, and a notice that the study was being
funded by a large grant from a well-known national nursing organization. Because of the strong response rates and relative overall efficiency
associated with direct, personalized email invitations to potential subjects, the research team’s preferred approach was for schools to provide a
very limited set of contact information for eligible students and faculty, comprised of name, email address, and for students only, their program of
enrollment (MSN, post-master’s certificate, etc.). We encountered two main issues which ultimately forced us to modify our procedures in several
regards.
Challenges with IRB. The first issue we encountered involved many schools’ requirements that we obtain additional local IRB approval before the
program administrator could invite students and faculty to participate in the study. Despite clear federal guidance from the US Office for Human
Research Protections (OHRP) that simply making potential subjects aware of research for which they may qualify and have an interest in
participating, such as by forwarding a study invitation email – or even permitting access to potential subjects directly, such as by providing contact
information for the potential subject – does not “engage” an institution in conducting the research, and therefore obviates the need for local IRB
approval, many schools indicated that by policy or just historical practice, the research team would need to obtain local IRB approval before the
school’s students or faculty could be invited to participate in our research. Because obtaining individual IRB approvals from potentially hundreds of
different sites is prohibitive, alternative approaches to gaining approval were developed, with some success and will be discussed in this session.
Challenges with FERPA. The second issue we encountered was that schools were generally hesitant, and in many cases completely unwilling, to
share a list of student and faculty contact information over concerns about compliance with FERPA guidelines for the privacy of student records.
While this appears to be a common interpretation, many faculty and administrative leaders are unaware that FERPA permits disclosure of certain
kinds of student information without additional student consent, so long as the school notifies students each year about what information may be
disclosed. The mechanism by which FERPA provides for this disclosure is through what it terms “directory information”, which is limited non-
confidential student information which may be released at the school’s discretion. Permitted disclosures of directory information typically include
information such as name, email address, date of admission, program of enrollment, etc. The “directory information” provision within FERPA is
what enables schools to provide searchable online directories of its students, to provide student contact information to job recruiters, and in
publishing academic awards lists like Dean’s lists. To overcome site concerns related to FERPA, several optional strategies were employed with
varied success and will be discussed during the session.
Overcoming barriers. Since gaining access to potential subjects proved more difficult than anticipated and the researchers had to develop and
implement several innovative strategies beyond email solicitation using students' school-issued email address. To be successful, we developed
innovative technology, social media and relationship-based solutions to reach potential participants. The use of technology and computer
programs designed for survey research and data management is not new, however, but the sophistication and options available now provide
researchers with opportunities to leverage recruitment in large studies for minimal costs. Likewise, the use of social media to access potential
research participants has been reported in recent years (Howerton Child, Mentes, Pavlish & Phillips, 2014; Kosinski et al., 2016) however there are
many issues to consider when thinking of using social media for recruitment, including, perhaps most importantly, verification of eligibility for
inclusion in the study. While these issues are not new or unique to this study (Mealer, Flynn, Ironside, & Spurlock, 2017), rarely are strategies for
addressing these issues shared between research teams. In this interactive session, the authors will not only share successful strategies but also the
knowledge and theory behind successful navigation of potential roadblocks.
References
Broome, M.E. (2009). Building the science for nursing education: Vision or improbable dream. Nursing Outlook, 57(4), 177-179.
Broome, M. E., Ironside, P. M., & McNelis, A. M. (2012). Research in nursing education: State of the science. Journal of Nursing Education,51(9),
521-524.
DeVon, H. A., Rice, M., Pickler, R. H., Krause-Parello, C. A., & Richmond, T. S. (2016). Setting nursing science priorities to meet contemporary health
care needs. Nursing Outlook,64(4), 399-401.
Howerton Child, R. J., Mentes, J. C., Pavlish, C., & Phillips, L. R. (2014). Using Facebook and participant information clips to recruit emergency nurses
for research. Nurse Researcher,21(6), 16-21. doi:10.7748/nr.21.6.16.e1246.
Ironside, P. M., & Spurlock, D. R. (2014). Getting serious about building nursing education science. The Journal of Nursing Education, 53(12), 667–
669. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20141118-10
Institutional Review Boards (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/19/2017-01058/federal-policy-for-the-
protection-of-human-subjects
Kosinski, M., Matz, S.C., Gosling, S.D., Popov, V., & Stillwell, D. (2016). Facebook as a research tool.Monitor on Psychology: Continuing Education
Corner, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/education/ce/facebook-research.pdf
Mealer, M., Flynn, L., Ironside, P., & Spurlock, D.R. (2017). Accelerating Multisite Research in nursing education: Navigating institutional review
board regulatory issues. Journal of Nursing Education,56(2), 65-68.
Smith, T. W. (2015). Resources for conducting cross-national survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly,79(Supp 1), 404-409.
U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). FERPA for school officials.U.S. Department of Education, Family Policy Compliance Office.Retrieved from
http://familypolicy.ed.gov/ferpa-school-officials
Contact
[email protected]
Empowering Students and Faculty to Close Research Knowledge Gaps
Milena P. Staykova, EdD, APRN, FNP-BC, USA
Daniele I. Staykov, SN, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this presentation is to share two course designs that helped faculty who are teaching research to close the
nursing research knowledge gap between students in two baccalaureate nursing tracks and from different generations. Traditional
and accelerated-track or 2ndbaccalaureate degree nursing students enter academic institutions with different knowledge
background. The traditional (TBSN) students who are novice to academic learning will need to master concepts that are often
abstract and challenging, especially when it pertains to research classes. Many of the TBSN students are attending college after a
high school graduation (generation Y, and Z); the others are non-traditional (minority, or first-time college attendee, generation X
and “Baby Boomers”) or professionals perusing different career. In comparison, the accelerated (ABSN) students have spent four
years in higher education, have already obtained a baccalaureate degree, and have been exposed to research terminology.
Therefore, the students in the accelerated tracks have a head start in learning about nursing research and Evidence-Based Practice.
The faculty teaching research courses often face the challenge to select learning objectives that will bridge the research learning gap
between traditional and accelerated-track nursing students. Nurses in the contemporary healthcare are expected to show
proficiency in using nursing research for best practice.
Methods: Comparative analysis of traditional (face-to-face classroom) and online environments based on external standardized testing. Design: 15-
week interactive and innovative lecture content, practice sessions, unit tests, and external standardized exam. The external standardized exam was
used as an independent, objective tool to measure the knowledge gap in both tracks.
Sample: 16 TBSN and 22 ABSN students. Both were exposed to the same lecture material and testing. The traditional classroom has included
creative practice sessions, poster presentation, and in-class active learning activities. The online class has included discussion forums, independent
practice, and video lectures and virtual presentation.
Results: The mean values of the external standardized testing grades were not statistically different for the two programs. ABSN µ=86.82, SD=4.37,
minimum value= 79.5, maximum value=94.5. For the TBSN µ=87.53, SD=4.49, minimum value=79, maximum value=95. The results suggested that
that both tracks have reached similar levels of knowledge despite the different educational background and knowledge acquisition related to
research concepts.
Conclusion: The results of this comparative analysis generate a significant, multinational impact on the ways of how faculty approach teaching
nursing research around the world for different educational backgrounds. TBSN students benefit from in-class face-to-face lecturing and hands on
activities. The ABSN students enjoy more independent learning and content with practical implications. The traditional classroom supports active
learning of abstract concepts and therefore, it is a helpful environment in closing the nursing research knowledge gap for the TBSN population. An
interesting conclusion of the comparative analysis is that the TBSN students had higher mean and maximum value in comparison with the ABSN
students. This conclusion supports the recommendation of teaching nursing research in a face-to-face classroom. The study conclusions have a
serious impact on nursing education science as it shows a beneficial way of teaching nursing education theory development pertinent to research.
References
Hsiu-Min, T., Ching-Yu, C., Chia-Hao, C., & Shwu-Ru, L. (2014). Preparing the future nurses for nursing research: A creative teaching strategy for RN-
to-BSN students. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 20(1), 25-31. DOI:10.1111/ijn.12119
Laapio, E., Salminen, L., & Koivula, M. (2014). Research utilization in the teaching of nursing: an assessment by the students. Hoitotiede, 26(1), 50-
62.
McCurry, M., & Martins, D. (2010). Teaching undergraduate nursing research: A comparison of traditional and innovative approaches for success
with millennial learners. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(5), 276-279. DOI:10.3928/01484834-20091217-02
Spironi, K. G. (2015). Research tip: Inquiry is the key. American Nurses Association. Sliver Spring, MD.
Whalen, K. J., & Zentz, S. E. (2015). Teaching systematic searching in a baccalaureate nursing research course. Worldviews on Evidence-Based
Nursing, 12(4), 246-248. DOI:10.1111/wvn.12090
Contact
[email protected]
The Power of the Internet in Students Learning
Indra Hershorin, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
New technology and the way in which it is used is revolutionizing health care and changing the practice of nurses. It also affects the
way nursing students are learning in the classroom. Technology plays a critical role in teaching and learning allowing students to
interact and share information with the instructor and with peers. Today, the Internet is widely used to facilitate research and
learning for health and medical information. The pervasiveness of the Internet makes obtaining, processing, and understanding
health information a critical competency area for nursing students. Robb and Shellenbarger (2014) suggested that faculty should
consider incorporating learning activities that help students develop the skills, knowledge, and confidence to locate and evaluate
information on the Internet.
A group assignment was created for students in an undergraduate nursing course. The purpose of the assignment was to provide students with
opportunities for accessing electronic health (eHealth) information and sharing of the information or resources in the classroom. The 30 students
enrolled in the course were assigned to one of eight groups. Students were required to conduct an online search and select an article that was
related to the topic assigned. They were provided with the CRAAP (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose) test to evaluate the
article/information selected. The assignment required students to build and eHealth wiki page on the course management system by providing a
description of the topic, overview of the article, create and attaching a word file of the article, and a link to the webpage. In addition, pictures and
YouTube videos to support the report were required. The eHealth reports were presented in the classroom. At the end of the semester a 5-item
questionnaire was given to evaluate the eHealth Report assignment.
Results of the questionnaire surveys were unanimously positive. Feedback from students suggested that the development of the eHealth Report
wiki allowed for creativity, collaboration and teamwork. There was evidence of sharing of information. All of the students (100%) communicated
that the assignment added to their skills, knowledge, and confidence in locating and evaluating information from the Internet. Ninety-seven (97%)
percent of the students found the assignment to be helpful in learning about the concepts. Only 80% of the students found the online format easy
to use. However, 100% of the students would recommend the eHealth assignment for future nursing students.
Using digital technologies such as wikis in the classroom and online search for healthcare information empowers students to take an active role in
their learning allowing them to gain a deeper understanding of the concepts. The Internet can provide extensive information on research, disease
conditions, health assessment, treatment options, and preventative measures and is a valuable tool that students can use when seeking important
information on healthcare related topics that may ultimately impact their practices as Registered Nurses.
References
Christian, E. (2003). Why do nurse educators need computers in the classrooms? Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 7(2). Retrieved from
http://ojni.org/7_2/christian.htm.
Robb, M., & Shellenbarger, T. (2014) Influential factors and perceptions of eHealth literacy among undergraduate college students. Online Journal
of Nursing Informatics 18(3).
Stellefson, M., Hanik, B., Chaney, J.D., & Tennat B. (2012). Analysis of eHealth search perspectives among female college students in the health
professions using Q methodology. Journal of Medical Internet Research 14(2) doi 10.2196/jmir.1969
Stephens-Lee, C., Lu, D., & Wilson, K. (2013) Preparing students for an electronic workplace. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 17(3). Retrieved
from http://ojni.org/issues/?p=2866
Zeibland, S., & Wyke, S. (2012). Health and illness in a connected world: How might sharing experiences on the internet affect people’s health? The
Milbank Quarterly 90(2), 219-249.
Hallila L.E., Zubaidi R. A., Ghamdi, N. A., Alexander, G. (2014). Nursing students’ use of Internet and computer for their education in the college of
nursing. International Journal of Nursing Clinical Practice 1(108) doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2014/108
Contact
[email protected]
Nursing Students’ Use of Social Media for Academicand Professional Purposes: A National Survey Report
Amanda J. Anderson, MSN, MPA, RN, CCRN, USA
Maureen Shawn Kennedy, MA, RN, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: The understanding of the use of social media for academic or professional purposes is sparse. Very little is known or reported in the
literature about nursing students’ engagement with social media as a scholarly resource. The pedagogy of nursing education is changing as more
academic settings are using social media platforms as a tool (Schmitt, Schmitt & Booth, 2012).
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine baseline data on engagement behaviors of nursing students pertaining to their use of social
media platforms to access academic and professional content.
The overall questions guiding the survey were developed specifically to capture nursing student report of social media use, including both personal
and academic/professional activities, and to explore how faculty or others support or foster the use of social media as well as reading/subscribing
to scholarly journals. These questions include:
1. What are students doing in the social media environment and print/internet resource world today?
2. What is faculty doing in relation to referring students to scholarly websites, online resources, and social media?
3. How do students use social media in general and internet resources related to their professor influence as well as personal
characteristics including age, geographic location, and personal education aspirations?
Methods: A web survey using SurveyMonkey® was emailed to a sample of approximately 3,400 students within the market contact list of the
publishing company of the American Journal of Nursing, Wolters Kluwer Health. Although not all students who participated in the survey
completed all questions, 662 responded, and 542 were complete representing a 19% return rate and 15% completion rate (which is comparable to
online surveys with large database distributions), with 97 additional web-based responses added to the total of 769 responses.
Results: Results include an analysis of student characteristics including age, educational setting, geographic location of program and educational
aspirations. Most students reported seeking their bachelor’s degree including BSN/BS/BA (35%), with 21% pursuing a master’s degree including
MSN/MS/MA. The sample was noticeably educated, with 12% already pursuing doctoral degrees. The sample was noticeably older (>50% over 40
years old), 33% of respondents are enrolled in an online program, 25% in an urban setting 22% a suburban setting and 20% rural area. The
academic goals of the respondents were: 35% want to eventually pursue a doctoral degree; 22% have their BSN but are stopping after their
master’s degree, 20% are getting their BSN and not going any further, and 3% are getting their diploma only.
The social platform most frequently used by all respondents for personal reasons was Facebook at 99% and LinkedIn for Academic/Professional
reasons at 85%, results also speak to the way students access social media platforms (hardware) and their baseline knowledge of
academic/professional content.
In addition to providing seminal baseline descriptive statistics on social media use in nursing students, significant findings include correlation of age
and social media usage, professor influences on student use of social media for academic/professional reasons the influence of educational setting,
student geographic location, and self-reported educational aspirations on professor influence.
Conclusions: This study serves as a seminal baseline of nursing student social media usage. With implications for both educators and publishers, the
results show that students use social media for academic and professional purposes, and as such, the venue poses a potential impact as an
educational tool.
Future research must include a deeper understanding of academic and professional content, and the mechanisms for ensuring its credibility and
value as educational tools. With this insight into why and how nursing students use social media and the insight that their academic and
professional use is directly influenced by professor input, educators have the ability to begin to explore this emerging medium for classroom
purposes.
References
Ashley, C. & Tuten, T. (2015). Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer
engagement. Psychology and Marketing, 32(1), 15-27. doi: 10.1002/mar.20761
Barry, J., & Hardiker, N. (2012). Advancing nursing practice through social media: A global perspective. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in
Nursing,17, np. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol17No03Man05
Dessart, L., Veloutsou, C., & Morgan-Thomas, A. (2015). Consumer engagement in online brand communities: A social media perspective. Journalof
Product & Brand Management, 24(1), pp. 28-42. doi: 10.1108/JPBM-06-2014-0635.
Ferguson, C. (2013). Editorial: It’s time for the nursing profession to leverage social media. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(4), 745-747. doi:
10.1111/jan.12036
Kim, W. & Vender, R. (2014). Use of Facebook as a tool for knowledge dissemination in dermatology. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and
Surgery,18(5), 341-344. doi: 10.2310/7750.2014.14022
Pew Research Center. (2017, January 12). Internet & American life project: Social media fact sheet. Retrieved from
http://www.pewinternet.org/factsheets/social-networking-fact-sheet/
Rainie, L., Funk, C., & Anderson, M. (2015, February 15). How scientists engage the public. Retrieved from
http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/02/15/how-scientists-engage-public/
Schmitt, T., Sims-Giddens, S. & Booth, R. (2012). Social media use in nursing education. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17(3), np. doi:
10.3912/OJIN.Vol17No03Man0
Ying, M. (2014). Characteristics of nurses who use social media. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 32(2), 64-72. doi:
10.1097/CIN.0000000000000033
Contact
[email protected]
Meaningful Factors in Nurse Transition for Newly Licensed Registered Nurses in Acute Care Settings
Beverly Dianne Rowland, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Nurse residency programs (NRPs) have been identified as a means to promote transitioning of new nurses into the professional nursing role.
Questions have arisen related to which elements within those programs are most meaningful to the development of new nurses. As the nursing
shortage drives the need for quick transition and development of nurses to meet workforce needs (Buerhaus, Auerbach, Staiger & Muench, 2013),
nursing must identify what factors are meaningful to nurses in their transition to practice. The Future of Nursing Report called for measurement of
nurse retention, nurse competency, and patient outcomes to determine outcomes related to the nursing workforce (IOM, 2011). Hospitals using
established programs for nurse transition had higher retention rates, fewer reported patient care errors, and fewer negative safety practices
(Spector et al., 2015). An NCSBN-sponsored study recently concluded that many elements exist in transition to practice, but identification of
specific elements or combinations of elements is needed to further the development of transition programs in the United States (Spector et al.,
2015).
The purpose of this multi-site study is to explicate meaning from the experiences of newly licensed registered nurses (NLRNs) who have just
completed NRPs in acute care settings. What factors within their new practice environment contributed to their growth and satisfaction in the
workplace? The research question was “What factors have meaning for NLRNs who have experienced transition to practice in nurse residency
programs in acute care settings?”
Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from six NLRNs from three different NRPs after completion of their nurse residency programs.
Using interpretative phenomenological analysis, themes and variations within those themes, were derived from the descriptive narratives provided
from participant interviews. Overarching themes identified from the narratives were Relationships, Reflection, Desire for Active Learning, Resources
and Organizational Infrastructure. Within the theme of Relationships, the subthemes of “Connectedness” and “Support” emerged from the data.
Another noted subtheme occurred within the discussion of Resources—“Access to Seasoned Nurses.”
Relationships were noted to be significant among the participants as they described the interactions with preceptors, mentors and other staff
within their workplace settings. Participants also described important relationships among the peer groups within the NRPs. The NLRNs derived a
sense of connectedness that enabled them to assimilate their new roles and become a part of the profession. The NLRNs also described a sense of
support that empowered them to gain competence and confidence in the new experiences. In situations which lacked the presence of
connectedness and support, the NLRNs described less positive experiences. Other studies have also demonstrated the importance of the preceptor
or mentor relationships (Spiva et al., 2013; Craig, Moscato & Moyce, 2012; Olson-Sitki, Wendler & Forbes, 2012).
Reflection was another factor deemed important to the NRP process by participants in the study. The NLRNs described struggles that they
encountered in each of their settings and how they were able to take these experiences back to the NRP classroom, sharing their feelings and
reflecting on the experiences that they had encountered in practice. Individualized reflection within their practice setting helped NLRNs to work
through the emotions and the problem-solving aspect of the situations that they experienced. Exploration of experiences with opportunities to
debrief and reflect on practice contribute to the development of nurses (Sherwood & Horton-Deutsch, 2012; Trepanier et al., 2012).
Participants in this study expressed a desire for active learning in the workplace and in the educational setting, as well. The NLRNs described some
of their best learning opportunities as those activities that occurred in simulated bedside scenarios, interactive case studies, and guided practice at
bedside with the preceptor. Many described similar active learning strategies within their nursing programs which they attributed to their
formation as a nurse. The opportunity to practice within a safe and non-judgmental environment contributed to the efficacy of these nurses as
they entered practice settings. In the NCSBN study, similar conclusions were noted about the importance of active learning (Spector et al., 2015).
The NLRNs also ascribed meaning to the quick access to resources. At times this was noted in the need for physical resources, such as blood
products or personal protective equipment. But more frequently the resources that they wanted were of an instructional nature—ready access to
policies and procedures or information about patient care. The most common discussion was that of access to seasoned nurses, who could provide
guidance and information quickly and decisively. Some of the nurses described situations in which the preceptor had limited experience and was
unable to provide the information needed. Some participants relayed stories of several new nurses on a unit with one preceptor with less than one
year of experience. Hospitals must ensure that nurses have adequate resources available to promote optimal care for patients and adequate
support for new nurses (Bratt, 2013).
A key theme that developed from the narratives of the participants was the need for organizational structure that supported the NRP. As noted by
Bratt (2013), the importance of top-down support for the NRP is non-negotiable. Administrative support within the hospital system is elemental.
Follow-up to ensure that roles within the NRP structure are fully developed and communicated is essential to the success of the programs (Spiva et
al., 2013). Ensuring that adequate staffing is in place to support the learning that must occur in the workplace begins with nurse administrators
(Blegan et al., 2015).
Findings of this study have implications for practice and education as the nursing profession strives to find ways to transform nurses in an effective
and efficient manner. Nurses within practice and academia must work collaboratively to further define the meaningful factors that contribute to
growth of NLRNs. Professional nursing must be proactive in developing the next generation of nurses to continue safe and effective practice.
References
Blegan, M.A., Spector, N., Ulrich, B.T., Lynn, M. R., Barnsteiner, J., & Silvestre, J. (2015). Preceptor support in hospital transition to practice
programs. Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(12), 642-649.
Bratt, M.M. (2013). Nurse residency program: Best practices for optimizing organizational success. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development,
28(2), 102-110.
Buerhaus, P.I., Auerbach, D.I., Staiger, D.O. & Muench, U. (2013). Projections of the long-term growth of the registered nurse workforce: A regional
analysis. Nursing Economics, 31(1), 13-17.
Craig, C., Moscato, S., & Moyce, S. (2012). New BSN perspectives on the transition to practice in changing economic times. Journal of Nursing
Administration, 42(4), 202-207.
Sherwood, G.D. & Horton-Deutsch, S. (2012). Reflective Practice: Transforming Education and Improving Outcomes. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta
Tau, International.
Institute of Medicine. (2010). Future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Retrieved from
http://www.thefutureofnursing.org/sites/default/files/Future%20of%20Nursing%20Report_0.pdf
Olson-Sitki, K., Wendler, M.C. & Forbes, G. (2012). Evaluating the impact of a nurse residency program for newly graduated nurses. Journal for
Nurses in Staff Development, 28(4), 156-162.
Spector, N., Blegan, M.A., Silvestre, J., Barnsteiner, J., Lynn, M.R., Ulrich, B. … & Alexander, M. (2015). Transition to practice study in hospital
settings. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(4), 24-38.
Spiva, L., Hart, P.L., Pruner, L., Johnson, D., Martin, K., Brakovich, B., McVay, F., & Mendoza, S.G. (2013). Hearing the voices of newly licensed RNs:
The transition to practice. American Journal of Nursing, 113(11), 24-32.
Trepanier, S., Early, S., Ulrich, B. & Cherry, B. (2012). New graduate residency program: A cost-benefit analysis based on turnover and contract labor
usage. Nursing Economics, 30(4), 207-214.
Contact
[email protected]
A Community Hospital’s Approach for Bridging Novice Nurses Into Clinical Practice
Cassandra M. Moore, MS, RN, CNE, CCRN, USA
Carolyn B. Wickes, MS, RN, CCRN, USA
Emily A. Coutts, BSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: A rural 350 bed community hospital has on-boarded over seventy new graduate nurses within the 2016 calendar year.
A high percentage of ADN prepared nurses are seeking employment in our demographic area, and within our organization which,
resulted in a partnership for recruiting nursing from the local community college.
There is an abundance of literature addressing clinical transition programs; with these resources available a small organization’s clinical education
team was able to align efforts creatively, efficiently, and effectively bridging new clinical nurses into practice.
Objective: Historically, an interdisciplinary program was in place titled “Graduate Nurse (GN) Sessions” which was coordinated by a sole educator.
In late 2016, a small sub-committee of Clinical Nurse Educators formed to reformat the sessions into a more holistic program based on Commission
of Collegiate Nursing Education’s (CCNE) Standards for Accreditation of Entry-to-Practice Nurse Residency Programs. Goals were set to align our
curriculum with the CCNE’s evidence-based curriculum in order to support novice nurses towards bridging to competent professional clinical
practice. The first step was to give the program a new title. “Bridge to Practice Series” was proposed and unanimously supported by Educational
Services. The new title, and program reformat welcomes any new nurse with less than one-year of clinical practice to participate. The goals of the
program include;
1. Provide educational support in the transition from entry-level clinical nurse to competent, professional nurse who provides
safe, quality patient care.
2. Introduce application of evidence-based practice in the clinical setting.
3. Develop clinical decision-making skills related to nursing practice.
4. Foster the development of professional growth for nurses with less than one year of clinical experience towards an
individualized career plan that promotes a life-long commitment to learning.
Method: Clinical Educators analyzed the curriculum and learning objectives of the previous program and aligned it with the CCNE Standards. There
were many gaps identified regarding concepts such as delegation, communication, business and finances in healthcare, and comfort care/ethical
principles. Several expert presenters within the organization all agreed to take part in the growth of newly graduated nurses.
The program’s curriculum was designed under a non-traditional framework with an emancipatory design. This design offers less structure on the
content which aligned with the fact that our Bridge to Practice Series has many interdisciplinary content experts to provide more reinforcement on
learning through discovery, dialogue, and clinical reflection. Emancipatory curriculums are grounded on phenomenology, feminist theories, and
social theories (Billings & Halstead, 2012)
The previous GN Session were very poorly attended, therefore with analysis of organizational culture, a new program structure was purposed.
Scheduling processes were adjusted among all of the inpatient departments of the hospital to ensure improved attendance. Communication
improvements were initiated with the leaders of the organization, and the participants within the program utilizing technology resources.
Newly graduated nurses experience the lowest level of confidence and satisfaction six months into their new professional role. Transition programs
such as the Bridge to Practice Series can ease these feelings and work to increase morale and satisfaction through support, knowledge, comradery
(Crimlisk, 2017). Adult Learning operates under the premise of principals that adult learners have more life experiences to relate learning to, adult
learners thrive off of autonomy and relevance of the content rather than the content itself, and adult learners often require rationale to the
learning opposed to learning empty content (Curran, 2014). Redesigning Bridge to Practice ensured that the content offered value to the
participant, repetition of core concepts bridging from Clinical Orientation, and allowed the participants to learn together while offering times to
decompress stresses and struggles (Crimlisk, 2017). Content is offered through multiple learning modalities with continuous evaluation and
revision; with intention to improve retention, engagement, and intellectual curiosity (Phillip et al., 2015).
Creative teaching strategies were embraced throughout the curriculum design. Case scenarios served as a tool to build retention of information in
order to make concepts more relatable to build critical thinking skills (Billings and Halstead, 2012). The Education Team built a patient named Tom
Bridge, he is threaded throughout every clinical session within the series with attempt to make the content more relatable. During every bi-weekly
session the participants arrive wondering “what is going to happen to Tom today?” Other teaching strategies include journal article reflection, skills
demonstration, simulation, and gaming.
Results: Permissions was requested and granted to utilize the Casey-Fink Graduate Nurse Experience Survey as means to measure participant
stressors, confidence in skills/procedures, and transition difficulties for new nurses (Crimlisk, 2017). A cross-sectional study by Goode, Lynn, and
McElroy (2013) compared ADN prepared nurses to BSN prepared with the Casey-Fink Experience Survey; and that ADN nurses where better
prepared with technical skills, whereas the BSN were better prepared with professional development and critical thinking (Cochran, 2017). Our
organization largely employs ADN prepared nurses, therefore aspects of critical thinking and professional development were a focus of the Bridge
to Practice curriculum.
The Bridge to Practice participants will complete the survey before they enter the program, mid-way, and after completion. Data will be collated in
order to assess trends, and evaluate the program according to the participants needs. Formative evaluation will occur with each session regarding
the learning environment, content expert, and applicability of the content. The series revolves every six months, as data is gathered and evaluated,
changes can be implemented prior to the next session offering.
Conclusion: The use of clinical transition programs and their outcomes has been researched extensively. The design of the Bridge to Practice Series
has offered several creative interpretations to implement clinical transition research.
Over-all the clinical transition program “Bridge to Practice” has become a huge success to novice nurses, and the organization as a whole. The
coordination and implementation of Tom Bridge into the curriculum has truly brought spirit to the program, and within the interdisciplinary
content experts working towards the professional development, and clinical competence of newly practicing nurses.
References
Billings, D. M., Halstead, J. A. (2012). Teaching in Nursing: A Guide for Faculty.
Cochran, C. (2017). Effectiveness and Best Practice of Nurse Residency Programs: A Literature Review. MEDSURG Nursing, 26(1), 53-63.
Crimlisk, J. T. (2017). Nurse Residency Program Designed for a Large Cohort of New Graduate Nurses: Implementation and Outcomes.MEDSURG
Nursing,26(2), 83-104.
Curran, M. K. (2014). Examination of the Teaching Styles of the Nursing Professional Development Specialist, Part I: Best Practices in Adult Learning
Theory, Curriculum Development, and Knowledge Transfer. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(5), 233-40.
Fink, R., Krugman, M., Casey, K., & Goode, C. (2008). The graduate nurse experience qualitative residency program outcomes. Journal of Nursing
Administration, 38(7), 341-348.
Goode, C., Lynn, M., & McElroy, D. (2013). Lessons learned from 10 years of research on a post-baccalaureate nurse residency program. Journal of
Nursing Administration, 43(2), 73-79.
Phillips, B. N., Turnbull, B.J., & He, F. X. (2015). Assessing the readiness for self-directed learning within the non-traditional nursing cohort. Nursing
Education Today, 35el-e7.
Contact
[email protected]
Re-Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Nurses’ Perception of Patient Rounding Scale
Kathleen L. Neville, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Hourly patient rounding has re-emerged as a standard practice initiative among nurses in acute care settings to promote safe,
quality care in health care delivery systems. Patient’s perception of excellence in care is based on the perceived availability and
visible presence of nurses. The practice of patient rounding has been associated with a decrease in call light use and falls, increased
patient satisfaction and safety, and quieter nursing units. While the conduct of patient rounding in hospital settings is increasingly
becoming standard practice internationally, continued controversy regarding its use in nursing exists, and importantly, nurses’
perceptions of this common practice have not been consistently measured. Due to the dearth of an available measure to determine
staff nurses’ perceived values, beliefs, and attitudes towards the practice of rounding, the Nurses’ Perception of Patient Rounding
Scale (Neville, 2010) was developed.
Using the newly developed instrument, the Nurse’s Perception of Patient Rounding Scale (NPPRS), the purpose of this study was to examine
whether the NPPRS continued to demonstrate strong psychometric properties when retested with additional investigations in multiple acute care
settings.
The NPPRS, a 42 item scale in 5 point likert format consists of three subscales and a total scale: Nurse benefits, patient benefits, and
communication. Initial psychometric support for the NPPRS was established through content validity and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. After IRB
approval at each institution, nurse participants completed the NPPRS with additional qualitative items geared toward identifying challenges,
barriers, and facilitators towards this increasingly mandatory practice.
The findings of this study through factor analyses support the three subscales. Results of the total NPPRS and the subscales of communication,
patient benefits, and nurse benefits indicated that nurses perceived rounding to be an important and valued practice, yet qualitative inquiry
revealed that nurses identified challenges to practice of rounding. Variability existed among acute care settings in terms of nurses’ perception of
benefits, whether the practice of rounding was more beneficial to nurses themselves or to patients; however nurses perceive the practice of
patient rounding as favorable and beneficial to patients and to themselves. Challenges to rounding reflected issues of documentation, nurse-
patient ratios, skill mix between ancillary support and nurses, and time management. Importantly, thematic analyses revealed that a mandated
rounding protocol minimized nurses’ professional autonomy in determining the frequency and duration of time spent with patients. Nurse
leadership, evident in the supportive presence of nurse leaders positively influenced staff nurses perceptions of patient rounding.
The implications for practice and research are as follows: Nurse leaders serve as important facilitators to successful patient rounding. Through
expert communication, nurse leaders can engage staff in discussion and exploration of controversial issues related to hourly rounding to enhance
the delivery of safe and quality patient care, as well as secure resources and facilitate the care delivery model.
In conclusion, the results provide substantial additional support for the reliability and validity of the NPPRS. While additional research is needed to
examine the controversial issues of rounding, and to further test the NPPRS for psychometric validation and future modification of the NPPRS, the
need also exists to investigate the perception of patient rounding in other care delivery systems beyond medical-surgical acute care settings.
References
Deitrick, L.M., Baker, K., Paxton, H, Flores, M., & Swavely, D. (2012). Hourly rounding challenges with implementation of an evidence-based
process. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 27(1), 13-19.
Dilessio, E., Magsalin, M., Neville, K., & Patten, C. (2010). Patient rounding to improve patient satisfaction.Nursing Management,41(12), 16-19.
Neville, K., DiBona, C., & Mahler. M. (2016). Validation of the Nurses’ Perception of the PatientRounding Scale: An exploratory study of the
influence of shift work on nurses’ perception of patient rounding.Orthopaedic Nursing,35(2), 1-9.
Neville, K., Lake, K., Paul, D., LeMunyon, D. & Whitmore, K. (2012). Nurses’ perceptionofpatient rounding, Journal of NursingAdministration,42(2),
83-88.
Neville, K. (2010). Copyright. The nurses’ perception of patient rounding scale (NPPRS). Unpublishedmanuscript.
Rondinelli, J., Ecker, M., Crawford, C., Seelinger, C., & Omery, A. (2012). Hourly rounding implementation: A multisite description of structures,
processes, and outcomes. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(6), 326-332.
Shepard, L. (2013). Stop going in circles! Break the barriers to hourly rounding. Nursing Management, 44(2), 13-15.
Contact
[email protected]
Promoting Safe Medication Administration Using Simulation
Bette A. Mariani, PhD, RN, ANEF, USA
Susan F. Paparella, MSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: Medical errors continue to soar in the United States (U.S.) and are now estimated to be the third leading cause of
death (Makary, 2016). Medication administration is a key nursing responsibility directly affecting the quality and safety of patient
care. However, there is evidence that students and newly graduated registered nurses have deficiencies in safe medication
administration (Sulosaari, Kajander, Hupli, Huupponen, & Leino-Kilpi, 2011; Wolf, Hicks, & Serembus, 2006) related to error
identification (Henneman et al., 2010; Whitehair, Provost, & Hurley, 2014), verifying essential steps of safe medication
administration (Elliott & Liu, 2010; Schneidereith, 2014), patient identification (Wolf et al., 2006), and medication calculation for
correct dose administration (Wolf et al., 2006; Zahara-Such, 2013). Furthermore, nursing students lack adequate clinical judgment,
including problem recognition and reporting of essential clinical data (Sherwood & Barnsteiner, 2012), to safely administer
medications.
Simulation is an evidence-based pedagogy that facilitates the learning of important aspects of safety and quality patient care
(Henneman et al., 2010; Jeffries et al., 2004; Sears, Goldsworthy & Goodman, 2010). In 2016 Zimmerman and House recommended
that simulation be used as a strategy to decrease medication errors.
Purpose: The purposes of this two-group pre-test/post-test study were to: 1) pilot test a new medication safety enhanced (MSE) simulation-based
learning experience (SBLE); 2) investigate the effect of an MSE program of simulation on nursing students’ knowledge of medication safety; 3)
investigate the effect of an MSE program of simulation on nursing students’ ability to safely administer medications; 4) investigate the effect of an
MSE program of simulation on nursing students’ perceptions and comfort level about patient safety; and 5) provide further psychometrics for the
Medication Safety Knowledge Assessment (MSKA), Medication Safety Critical Element Competency Checklist (MSCEC), and Healthcare
Professionals Patient Safety Assessment (HPPSA) tools.
Research Questions: The research questions guiding this study were: 1) What is the effect of an MSE program of simulation on
nursing students’ knowledge of medication safety; 2) What is the effect of an MSE program of simulation on nursing students’
competency in administering medications safely; and 3) What is the effect of an MSE program of simulation on nursing students’
perceptions and comfort regarding safe administration of medications?
Methods: Following institutional review board (IRB) approval, a convenience sample of junior level medical-surgical baccalaureate nursing students
(n = 86) at a mid-sized, mid-Atlantic, private Catholic university was recruited to participate in the study. Students were randomly assigned to 12
clinical groups at the beginning of the semester and participated in all SBLEs in their clinical group. Clinical groups, each composed of six to eight
students, were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group.
There were three SBLEs included in the medical-surgical course. The first SBLE was a medication skills lab for both the intervention and control
groups; the second SBLE was a two-patient medication administration SBLE for the intervention group only; and the third SBLE was a
gastrointestinal (GI) or a post-operative (post-op) hip replacement SBLE for both groups. The first and third SBLEs were previously validated by
experts and have been used for several years at the study school. The second SBLE was newly developed for this study. The control group
participated in only the first and third existing SBLEs with no modifications or enhancements. The intervention group participated in all three SBLEs
with medication safety enhanced (MSE) debriefings in the first and third SBLE, and also participated in the newly developed second SBLE
administering medications to two standardized patients.
Two new researcher-developed instruments were developed for use in this study: the Medication Safety Knowledge Assessment (MSKA), a 25-item
multiple-choice knowledge assessment, and the Medication Safety Critical Element Checklist (MSCEC), an 11-item critical element checklist. The
content of the instruments were validated by experts and the instruments underwent pilot testing for psychometrics prior to being used in this
study. The MSKA had a content validity index (CVI) of 0.94. A pass/fail cut score (< 21 = fail; ≥ 21 = pass) for the MSKA was determined using the
modified Angoff method. The MSCEC had a CVI of 0.92. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) for the MSCEC was > 0.9. Cronbach’s alpha reliabilities for the
MSCEC were 0.69 to 0.72, indicating acceptable reliability for a newly developed instrument.
Subjects were pre-tested for medication administration safety knowledge using the MSKA, and comfort and perceptions about patient safety using
the HPPSA prior to participating in the SBLEs, and post-tested for medication administration safety knowledge, and comfort and perceptions about
patient safety after completion of the last SBLE. Participants were also tested on competence in the skill of safe medication administration using
the MSCEC after completion of the last SBLE.
Results: The Medication Safety Knowledge Assessment (MSKA) was analyzed based on a Knowledge Pass/Fail cut score (< 21 = fail; ≥ 21 = pass).
Crosstabs and Chi-Square analyses were computed. For the pre-test, there was no statistically significant difference between intervention and
control groups demonstrating that the groups were homogenous prior to the intervention. For the post-test, a statistically significant difference
was found between the intervention and control groups (X2 = 5.13, df = 1, p = .02) with the intervention group having higher post-test pass rate
(57%) than the control group (28%).
The pre-posttest scores on the Health Professional Patient Safety Assessment (HPPSA) were analyzed using independent and paired t-tests. For
both the intervention and control group there were no statistically significant differences in pre-posttest scores on Part 1 and Part 3. However,
both groups had significantly higher Part 2 post-test scores (intervention group t = 3.96, p = .001 and control group t = 3.11, p = .004).
For the Medication Safety Critical Element (MSCEC) assessment, between group scores were compared using an independent t-test. The
intervention group scored significantly higher than the control group (t = 2.28; p = .028).
Discussion: The nursing literature is limited in discussion of both the psychomotor skill acquisition of administering medications (Ross, 2012) and
the knowledge and competency regarding safe medication practices. The findings of this study support that SBLE interventions can contribute to
student learning and performance related to medication administration and patient safety. These findings are consistent with existing literature
identifying that simulation can enhance safe medication practices of student nurses (Pauly-O’Neill, 2009; Radhakrishnan et al., 2007; Sears et al.,
2010; Zahara-Such, 2013).
While the results of this research are promising, replication of this study with different samples would improve the generalizability and provide
additional psychometrics for the newly developed instruments. Moreover, a longitudinal study design would help to identify if students retain the
knowledge and competence. Future research that studies the transfer of safe medication administration knowledge and skill from SBLEs to the
patient care setting is recommended to address a gap in the literature and an identified priority in nursing education research (Mariani & Doolen,
2016; NLN, 2016).
References
Elliott, M., & Liu, Y. (2010). The nine rights of medication administration: An overview. British Journal of Nursing, 19, 300-305.
Henneman, E. A., Roche, J. P., Fisher, D. L., Cunningham, H., Reilly, C. A., Nathanson, B. H., & Henneman, P. L. (2010). Error identification and
recovery by student nurses using human patient simulation: Opportunity to improve patient safety. Applied Nursing Research, 23, 11-21.
http://dx.doi.org:10.1016/j.apnr.2008.02.004
Jeffries, P. R., Moyer, R. C., Spunt, D., Childs, J., Feken, C., Decker, S., & Rogers, K. (2004). Designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations in
nursing education. NLN/ Laerdal National Study Group, Papers presented at the 10th Biennial North American Learning Resources Center
Conference, Spokane, WA.
Makary, M. (2016). Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ, (353) i2139 http://dx.doi.org:10.1136/bmj.i2139.
Mariani, B., & Doolen, J. (2016, January). Nursing simulation research: What are the perceived gaps? Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(1), 30-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.11.004.
National League for Nursing (NLN). (2016). NLN research priorities in nursing education: 2016-2019. Retrieved from
http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/professional-development-programs/nln-research-priorities-in-nursing-education-single-
pages.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Pauly-O’Neill, S. (2009). Beyond the five rights: Improving patient safety in pediatric medication administration through simulation. Clinical
Simulation in Nursing, 5(5), e181-e186. http://dx.doi.org:10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.059
Radhakrishnan, K., Roche, J. P., & Cunningham, H. (2007). Measuring clinical practice parameters with human patient simulation: A pilot study.
International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 4(1), Article 8.
Ross, J.G. (2012). Simulation and psychomotor skill acquisition. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8, e429-e435.
http://dx.doi.org:10.1016/j.ecns.2011.04.004
Schneidereith, T. A. (2014). Using simulations to identify nursing student behaviors: A longitudinal study of medication administration. Journal of
Nursing Education, 53, 89-92. http://dx.doi.org:10.3928/01484834-20140122-07
Sears, K., Goldsworthy, S., & Goodman, W.M. (2010). The relationship between simulation in nursing education and medication safety. Journal of
Nursing Education, 49, 52-55. http://dx.doi.org:10.3928/01484834-20090918-12
Sherwood, G., & Barnsteiner, J. (2012). Quality and safety in nursing: A competency approach to improving outcomes. United Kingdom: Wiley,
Blackwell & Sons.
Sulosaari, V., Kajander, S., Hupli, M., Huupponen, R., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2011). Nurse students’ medication competence – An integrative review of
the associated factors. Nurse Education Today, 32, 399-405.
Whitehair, L., Provost, S., & Hurley, J. (2014). Identification of prescribing errors by pre-registration student nurses: A cross-sectional observational
study utilizing a prescription medication quiz. Nurse Education Today, 34, 225-232. http://dx.doi.org:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.12.010
Wolf, Z. R., Hicks, R., & Serembus, J. F. (2006). Characteristics of medication errors made by students during the administration phase: A descriptive
study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 22(1), 39-51. http://dx.doi.org:10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.12.008
Zahara-Such, R. M. (2013). Improving medication calculations of nursing students through simulation: An integrative review. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 9, e379-e383. http://dx.doi.org:10.1016/j.ecns.2012.08.003
Zimmerman, D. M. & House, P. (2016). Medication safety: Simulation education for new RNs promises an excellent return on investment. Nursing
Economic$, 34(1), 49-51.
Contact
[email protected]
Faculty Helping Students Be Successful in Doctoral Education
Karen H. Morin, PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Background: Increasingly, students are pursing either a research or practice doctorate in nursing. While programs of study may vary,
students can encounter obstacles during their program of study that cause consternation for them and faculty teaching them. In
fact, faculty often struggle with how to facilitate student success when faced with competing faculty demands. The purpose of this
presentation is to review the literature on strategies to enhance student success. This work builds on work conducted in 2005.
Method: Literature [research and theoretical] for the past 10 years was reviewed using CINAHL, Medline, and Education databases.
Key words included doctoral student advising, mentoring doctoral students, success in doctoral programs. Dissertations and theses
were also accessed, as were seminal works. Reports of research were evaluated using the US. Preventive Services Task Force (1989).
Outcomes: 18 reports of research and 17 non-research publications were retrieved and reviewed. Findings indicate students need
help getting started in graduate school in ways that promote success such as comprehensive orientations; establishing connections
with people in the department and with the culture of the department; experiencing carefully-constructed advising and mentoring
relationships. Having well established advising policies and procedures contributes to student success and should address time
involvement, method of communication, response time, documentation of decisions, and role clarification. Programmatic strategies
include providing opportunities early immersion in research or practice, Weekly opportunities to interact with faculty, shared
congregating areas and programmatic flexibility are equally important. Most research reported employed qualitative or descriptive
methods.
Conclusion: The topic of doctoral student success continues to be discussed in the literature. Mentorship received the greatest
attention since the previous review of literature in 2005. There are evidence-based strategies available to enhance student success.
Faculty are encouraged to employ and continue to evaluate their effectiveness. Conducting multi-site intervention studies is one
strategy faculty may wish to consider.
References
Carpenter, S., Makhadmeh, N., & Thornton, L-J. (2015). Mentorship on the doctoral level: An examination of communication faculty mentors’ traits
and functions. Communication Education, 64, 366-384. Doi:10.1080/0364523.1041997
Gammel, J A., & Rutstein-Riley, A. (2016). A relational approach to mentoring women doctoral students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning,
147, 27-35. Doi:10;1002/tl.20196
Gardner, S. K. (2009). Conceptualizing success in doctoral education: Perspectives in seven disciplines. The Review of Higher Education, 32, 383-
406.
Graft, C. M., Augustine-Shaw, D., Fairbanks, A., & Adams-Wright, G. (2016). Advising doctoral students in education programs. NACADA, 36 (1), 54-
65. Doi: 10.12930/NACADA-15-013
Grant, C. M., & Ghee, S. (2015). Mentoring 101: Advancing African -American women faculty and doctoral student success in predominately White
institutions. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 28 (7), 759-785. Doi: 10.1080/09518398.2015.1036951
Jones, H. A., Perrin, P. B., Heller, M. B., Hailu, S., & Barnett, C. (2018). Black psychology graduate students’ lives matter: Using informal mentoring to
create an inclusive climate amidst national race-related events. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 49, 75-82.
Doi:10.1037/pro0000169
Hande, K., Beuscher, L., Allison, T., & Phillippi, J. (2017). Navigating DNP student needs. Faculty advising competencies and effective strategies for
development and support. Nurse Educator, 42 (3), 147-150. Doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000332
Hande, K., Christenbery, T., & Phillippi, J. (2017). Appreciative advising. An innovative approach to advising Doctor of Nursing practice students.
Nurse Educator, 42 (6), E1-E3. Doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000372
Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2017). Mentoring doctoral student online: Mentor strategies and challenges. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in
Learning, 25 (2), 202-222. Doi: 10.1080/13611267.2017.1326693
Lewinski, A. A., Mann, T., Flores, D., Vance, A., Bettger, J. P., & Hirschey, R. (2017). Partnership for development: A peer mentorship model for PhD
students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 33, 363-369. Doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.03.004
Lunsford, L (2012). Doctoral advising or mentoring? Effects on student outcomes. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20 (2), 251-270.
Doi: 10.1080/13611267.2012.678974
Stayhorn, T. L. (2015). Reframing academic advising for student success: From advisor to navigator. NACADA, 35 (1), 56-63. Doi: 10.12930/NACADA-
14-199
Welch, S. (2017). Virtual mentoring program within an online doctoral nursing education program: A phenomenological study. International Journal
of Nursing Education Scholarship. 20160049. Doi:10.1515/ijnes-2016-0049
Contact
[email protected]
A Motivational Profile of Nurses Who Pursue Doctoral Education
Tomekia Yvette Luckett, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
The need for nurses to pursue doctoral education is imperative to the professionalization of the discipline of nursing in light of the
changing healthcare environment. Presently, < 1% of the nursing workforce possesses a doctoral degree (“Transforming Nursing
Education,” 2016), albeit recommendations from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2010) admonish the need to increase the number
of doctoral-prepared nurses. The need to understand characteristics of nurses who seek doctoral education is critical in planning
long-term strategies for nursing education in the United States (US) (Kovner, Brewer, Katigbak, Djukic, & Fatehi, 2012). In
conjunction with describing characteristics of nurses pursuing doctoral education, this research describes the motivational
orientation and factors of registered nurses (RNs) pursuing doctoral education.
A nonexperimental descriptive design was utilized to examine concepts relating to motivational orientation of RNs pursuing doctoral education.
Participants were divided into two categories: (a) RNs seeking the Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree and (b) RNs pursuing the Doctor of Nursing
Practice (DNP) degree. A total of 173 RNs enrolled in either a Ph.D. or DNP program in the Gulf South region of the US comprised the final sample.
Binary logistic regression was utilized to analyze the motivational orientation. Results of the study indicated that participants self-identified with
the motivational orientation of intrinsic motivation-to know—reflective of a self-determined motivational orientation. The second highest self-
reported motivational orientation was extrinsic motivation-identified which further reflected a self-determined motivational orientation. Positive
correlates included geographical locale, age, and race.
Namely, the odds of nonwhites as compared to whites were 1.857 times greater for enrollment in a Ph.D. course of study. Further
results reflected the odds of someone residing in a rural area as compared to an urban area were 0.532 times less in a Ph.D.
program. The odds of being in a Ph.D. program are 1.759 times greater for a 40-year-old as compared to a 39-year-old. By identifying
the motivational orientation of RNs engaged in doctoral study, nurse administrators, policymakers, and educational institutions must
seek innovative means to recruit RNs with a self-determined motivational orientation.
References
Abraham, P., Gohan, L. & Pfrimmer, D. (2015). Retaining master and DNP registered nurses in direct patient care: Utilizing nurses to the fullest
extent of their education. Nurse Leader, 70-74.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2001, March). Translating research into practice (TRIP)-II: Fact sheet. Retrieved from
http://archive.ahrq.gov/research /findings/factsheets/translating/tripfac/trip2fac.html
Aiken, L.H., Clarke,S.P., Cheung,R.B., Sloane,D.M., & Silber,J.H. (2003). Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. Journal of
the American Medical Association. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.12.1617
Altmann, T. (2012). Nurses' attitudes toward continuing formal education: A comparison by level of education and geography. Nursing Education
Perspectives,33(2), 80-84.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2014). Nursing shortage fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-
relations/NrsgShortageFS.pdf
American Nurses Association. (2014, August). Nursing workforce 2014: Growth, salaries, education, demographics, and trends. Retrieved from
http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessional Nursing/workforce/Fast-Facts-2014-Nursing-Workforce.pdf
Bahn, D. (2007). Orientation of nurses towards formal and informal learning: Motives and perceptions. Nurse Education Today, 27, 723-730.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2006.10.006
Ballmann, J. M., & Mueller, J. J. (2008). Using self-determination theory to describe the academic motivation of allied health professional-level
college students. Journal of Allied Health, 37, 90-96.
Berlin, L. E., & Sechrist, K. R. (2002). The shortage of doctorally prepared nursing faculty: A dire situation. Nursing Outlook, 50(2), 50-56. doi:
10.1067/mno.2002.124270
Bolles, R. (1967). Theory of motivation. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Brown, M., & Crabtree, K. (2013). The development of practice scholarship in DNP programs: A paradigm shift. Journal of Professional Nursing,
29(6), 330-337. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10/1016/j.profnurs.2013.08.00
Burns, N., & Grove,S. (2007).Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice(4thed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.
Byrne, D., Mayo,R., & Rosner,C. (2014, October). What internal motivators
drive RNs to pursue a BSN? Nursing, 22-24. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000453707.43199.ea.
Carter, M. (2013). The evolution of doctoral education in nursing. In S. DeNisco & A. Barker (Eds.), Advanced practice nursing: Evolving roles for the
transformation of the profession (2nded., pp.27-35). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
Clarke, S. (2011). The future of nursing workforce research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(6), 487-488.
Clunie, S. (2006). The current trend and importance of postgraduate education for nurses. Nursing Journal Northland Polytechnic, 10, 18-23.
Cohen, S. (2011). Doctoral persistence and doctoral program completion among nurses. Nursing Forum,46(2), 64-70.
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(4thed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dashboard Secondary Indicators - Campaign for Action | Campaign for Action. (2016, July 28). Retrieved from
http://campaignforaction.org/resource/dashboard-secondary-indicators/
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York, NY: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Flaste, R. (1995). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. New York, NY: Penguins Books.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive
psychology. Research Psychology, 27, 23-40.
Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York, NY: Wiley.
Drennan, J. (2012). Master’s in nursing degrees: An evaluation of management and leadership outcomes using a retrospective pre-test design.
Journal of Nursing Management, 20, 102-112.
Edwardson, S. R. (2004). Matching standards and needs in doctoral education in
nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing, 20(1), 40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2003.12.006
Emerson, R. J., & Records, K. (2005). Nursing: Profession in peril. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(1), 9-15. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.11.008
HRSA.
Field, A.P. (2005).Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll(2nded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Harlow, H. F. (1953). Mice, monkeys, men and motives. Psychological Review, 60, 23-32.
Health Resources and Services Administration. (2014). The future of the nursing workforce: National and state-level projections 2012-2025.
Retrieved from http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/supplydemand/nursing/workforceprojections/nursingprojections.pdf
Institute of Medicine. (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Jarvis, P. (2005). Lifelong education and its relevance to nursing. Nurse Education Today. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2005.09.005
Kovner, C., Brewer, C., Katigbak, C., Djukic, M., & Fatehi, F. (2012). Charting the course nurses' achievement of higher education levels. Journal of
Professional Nursing, 28(6), 333-343. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. profnurs.2012.04.021
Levett-Jones, T.L. (2005). Self-directed learning: Implications and limitations for undergraduate nursing education.Nurse Education Today,25(5),
363-368. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2005.03.003
Long, K.A. (2004). Preparing nurses for the 21st century: Reenvisioning nursing education and practice Journal of Professional Nursing.
doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.02.002
MacLeod, R. (1957). Impact of diet on behavior. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 5, 107-108.
Megginson, L. (2008). RN-BSN education: 21st-century barriers and incentives. Journal of Nursing Management,16, 47-55.
Member directory. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.aacn.nche.edu/students/nursing-program-search
Murphy, M., Staffileno, B., & Carlson, E. (2015). Collaboration among DNP and Ph.D. prepared nurses: Opportunity to drive positive change. Journal
of Professional Nursing, 1-7. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.03.001
Nehls, N., Barber,G., & Rice,E. (2015). Pathways to the Ph.D. in nursing: An analysis of similarities and differences. Journal of Professional Nursing,
1-10. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.04.006
Nurses by the numbers. (2015). Nursing News, 39(2). Retrieved from
http://libproxy.wmcarey.edu:2058/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012955341&site=nrc-live
Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer
Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Potempa, K., Redman, R., & Anderson, C. (2008). Capacity for the advancement of nursing science issues and challenges. Journal of Professional
Nursing, 24(6), 329-336.
Raines, C., & Taglaireni, M. (2008). Career pathways in nursing: Entry points and academic progression. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(3).
doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol13No03Man01
Richardson, R. (2011). Motivational orientations of registered nurses who pursue an advanced education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Robb, W. (2005). Ph.D., DNSc, ND: The ABCs of nursing doctoral degrees. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing,24(2), 89-96.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.
American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sarver, W., Cichra, N., & Kline, M. (2015). Perceived benefits, motivators, and barriers to advancing education: Removing barriers to improve
success. Nursing Education Perspectives,36(3), 153-156.
Shen, Q., Peltzer, J., Teel, C., & Pierce, J. (2015). The initiative to move toward a more highly educated nursing workforce: Findings from the Kansas
registered nurse workforce survey. Journal of Professional Nursing, 1-12. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.04.003
Sherman, R., Chiang-Hanisko, L., & Koszalinski, R. (2013). The aging nursing workforce: A global challenge. Journal of Nursing Management, 21(7),
899-902.
Smeltzer, S., Sharts-Hopko, N., Cantrell, M., Heverly, M., Wise, N., Jenkinson, A., Nthenge, S. (2014). Challenges to research productivity of doctoral
program nursing faculty. Nursing Outlook, 268-274.
Smith, T. (2010). A policy perspective on the entry into practice issue. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15.
Snavely, T. (2016). A brief economic analysis of the looming nursing shortage in the United States. Nursing Economics,34(2), 98-100.
Squires, A., Kovner, C., Faridaben, F., & Chyun, D. (2013). Assessing nursing student intent for Ph.D. study. Nurse Education Today, 34, 1405-1410.
Staiger, D.O., Auerbach, D.I., & Buerhaus, P.I. (2012). Registered nurse labor supply and the recession: Are we in a bubble? New England Journal of
Medicine,366(16), 1463-1465. doi:10.1056/nejmp1200641
Transforming nursing education. (2016, May 19). Retrieved from http://campaignforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Campaign-
Dashboard-5-19-16.pdf
Udlis, K., & Mancuso, J., (2015). Perceptions of the role of the doctor of nursing practice-prepared nurse: Clarity or confusion. Journal of
Professional Nursing, 1-10.
Uhlig, C., Seitz, B., Eter, N., Promesberger, J., & Busse, H. (2014). Efficiencies of internet-based digital and paper-based scientific surveys and the
estimated costs and time for different-sized cohorts. PLOS One,9(10), 1-11.
Vallerand, R., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and a motivational style as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of
Personality,60(3), 599-620.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic,
extrinsic, and a motivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003-1017. doi: 10.1177/0013164492052004025
Warren, J. I., & Mills, M. E. (2009). Motivating registered nurses to return for an advanced degree. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,
40(5), 200-207. doi:10.3928/00220124-20090422-01
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333.
Wilkes, L., & Mohan, S., (2008). Nurses in the clinical area: Relevance of a Ph.D. Collegian, 15, 135-141.
Wright, K.B. (2005). Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire
authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x
Zerwekh, J., & Claborn, J. (2009). Nursing today: Transition and trends(6thed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.
Zimmerman, D., Miner, D., & Zittel, B. (2010). Advancing the education of nurses: A call for action. Journal of Nursing Administration, 40(12), 529-
533.
Contact
[email protected]
Effective Teaching as Perceived by Baccalaureate Nursing Students and Nursing Faculty
Kelley Noll, Ph.D., RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
The number of students applying for admission to nursing schools is steadily increasing. According to the American Association of
Colleges of Nursing (AACN) (2016a) of the 713 generic baccalaureate nursing programs in the United States (U.S.) and its territories
that reported data for 2016-2017, there were 50,598 applications meeting admission criteria but were not offered admission (AACN,
2016a). This is a 40% increase in the number of qualified applications turned away since 2010 (AACN, 2016a). Due to the increase
number of applications, nursing schools are attempting to accommodate more students into their programs. In order to effectively
educate more students though, it is necessary to have a sufficient number of nurse faculty. This same report states that of the 208
schools reporting reasons for not admitting all qualified applications, 55.8% were due to the insufficient number of faculty (AACN,
2016a, p. 92). In a separate report specifically regarding faculty vacancies, of the 821 schools that responded, 56.2% had faculty
vacancies and 16.2% did not have vacancies but needed additional faculty (AACN, 2016b). 15.2% of the vacancies were specifically
for nurse educators in baccalaureate nursing programs (AACN, 2016b).
Nursing applications numbers are increasing rapidly however the number of faculty available to educate students has not seen the same rapid
growth. The increased age of nursing faculty indicates there will be a surge in retirement of nurse educators in the next 5-10 years. The retirement
of these educators could negatively affect the success of nursing programs. However, as the NLN (2005) urged educators to reflective on the
effectiveness of their practices, it is also necessary for graduate nursing programs to evaluate their programs and their ability to produce a nurse
educator with at least some qualities inherent of effective teaching. Entering the nurse educator workforce with knowledge of content, personality
traits, and classroom management skills helpful to effective teaching is important to success of nursing programs and as new faculty nurse numbers
increase soon.
Literature related to nursing education and effective teaching was not as robust concerning effective teaching in the didactic setting. Literature is
available more widely regarding to effective teaching in the clinical setting (hospital, outpatient health, community health). While the
qualities/behaviors necessary for effective teaching in the clinical setting are most likely similar, the context of practical experience and student-
teacher ratio adds a layer of complexity quite different than the didactic setting. National organizations such as the NLN and AACN provide
standards from which nursing programs should frame their education while providing best-practices for educating nursing students. However, even
the NLN sought help from nurse educators to evaluate the effectiveness of their teaching with the urge to use strategies such a collaboration,
mutual trust, respect, equality, and accepted differences (NLN, 2005). To date, there has been no research using the Teacher Behavior Checklist
regarding effective teaching in nursing education. The few studies available show findings with similarities such as: student-centered, knowledge of
content, continued learning to stay current, variety of pedagogical practices, certain personal qualities, and continual feedback (Gardner, 2014;
Hicks & Butkus, 2011; Pratt et al., 2007; Schaefer & Zygmont, 2003; Stein, et al., 2011). Pedagogical practices used by nursing educators are
commonly adapted from research of other disciplines indicating a need for further research to create and disseminate practices specific to nursing
education. Personal qualities of nurse educators identified of effective teaching pertain to integrity, professionalism, humor, enthusiasm,
motivation, trust, care and appreciation (Gardner 2014; Hicks & Butkus, 2011; Pratt et al., 2007; Crookes et al., 2013; Stein et al., 2011).
This study aimed to determine baccalaureate nursing student and nursing faculty views of effective teaching. Using the Teacher Behavior Checklist,
a psychometrically sound tool, participants were sent an email containing a link to an online survey (Keeley, Smith, & Buskist, 2006). Baccalaureate
nursing students (n=353) and nursing faculty (n=26) were sent the email with a response rate of 25.2% (n=89) and 69.2% (n=18) respectively.
Participants were asked to rank order the top 10 qualities and associated behaviors they perceived as effective to nursing education.
Results of the study found students and faculty agreed on five of the top 10 behaviors identified: (a) knowledgeable about subject matter, (b)
approachable/personable, (c) enthusiastic about teaching and about topic, (d) effective communicator, and (e) realistic expectations of
students/fair testing and grading. Students and faculty agreed on four of the top 5 qualities/behaviors excluding realistic expectations of
students/fair testing and grading. Faculty completed their top 10 identifying: (a) creative and interesting, (b) promotes critical
thinking/intellectually stimulating, (c) presents current information, (d) confident, and (e) respectful. Students completed their top 10 identifying:
(a) understanding, (b) happy/positive attitude/humorous (c) encourages and cares for students, (d) flexible/open-minded, and (e) strives to be a
better teacher. Statistical differences were found in four qualities/behaviors ranked in the top 10: (1) creative and interesting; (2) present current
information; (3) promote critical thinking/intellectually stimulating; and (4) understanding.
The findings in this study show strong agreement with previous studies completed using the TBC. In comparison to findings in the original study
using the TBC, students agreed on nine of the top 10 qualities/behaviors identified of effective teaching. Faculty agreed on eight of the top 10
qualities/behaviors identified of effective teaching compared to original findings. The results of this study indicate generalizability of TBC use across
disciplines and its ability to identify effective qualities/behaviors inherent of master teachers. Further research is needed across several institutions
with baccalaureate nursing programs as well as comparison of baccalaureate programs views of effective teaching to that of associate degree
nursing programs.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2016a). 2016-2017 Enrollment and graduations in baccalaureate and graduate programs in
nursing. Washington DC: American Association of Colleges of Nursing.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2016b). Special survey on vacant faculty positions for academic year 2016-2017. Retrieved
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/leading-initiatives/research-data/vacancy16.pdf
Buskist, W., Sikorski, J., Buckley, T., & Saville, B. K. (2002). Elements of master teaching. In S. F. Davis & W. Buskist (Eds.), The teaching of
psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 27-39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Epting, L. K., Zinn, T. E., Buskist, C., & Buskist, W. (2004). Student perspectives on the distinction between ideal and typical teachers. Teaching of
Psychology, 31(3), 181-183.
Groccia, J. E. (2012). A model for understanding university teaching and learning. In J. E. Groccia, M. A. T. Alsudairi, & W. Buskist (Eds.). Handbook
of college and university teaching: A global perspective (p. 2-13). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Hicks, N. A. & Butkus, S. E. (2011). Knowledge development for master teachers. The Journal of Theory Construction & Testing, 15(2), 32-35.
Keeley, J. W., Ismail, E. & Buskist, W. (2016). Excellent teachers’ perspectives on excellent teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 43(3), 175-179.
doi:10.1177/0098628316649307
Keeley, J., Smith, D., & Buskist, W. (2006). The teacher behaviors checklist: Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of
Psychology, 33(2), 84-91. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3302_1
NLN (2005).
Schaeffer, G., Epting, K., Zinn, T., & Buskist, W. (2003). Student and faculty perceptions of effective teaching: A successful replication. Teaching of
Psychology, 30(2) 133-136.
Stein et al.
Therrell, J. A. & Dunneback, S. K. (2015). Millennial perspectives and priorities. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(5), 49-63.
doi:10.14434/josotl.v15i5.19068
Contact
[email protected]
Improving Learning Outcomes With Podcasting
Joanne McDermott, PhD, USA
Abstract
Nursing Education Faculty need to utilize a variety of evidence based teaching strategies to meet the diverse learning styles of
students, as well as address the social, cultural and historical influences that can impact learning outcomes. This mixed method
research studied supplemental podcasts as a teaching strategy in an Accelerated Bachelor’s of Science in Nursing (ABSN) degree
program. Podcasts utilize devices and technologies that provide mobile learning, anytime, anywhere.
Purpose: There is a need to determine the impact of the mobile media revolution on instructional design and learning effectiveness (Maag, 2006, p.
483). There is a limited amount of research related to podcasting in nursing education, and this study adds to the body of research on mobile
learning. It has been purported that incorporating podcasting follows best practice by providing learning materials to suit individual students’
learning styles” (Walmsley et al., 2009, p. 159). Informing the nursing education community of the efficacy of podcasting through dissemination of
findings can promote podcasting as a viable, effective tool in support of student centered learning. There are many advantages to educators and
students from research on assessment of learning outcomes derived from the integration of instructional design and advanced technology.
Background: Students enrolled in ABSN degree programs often experience high levels of stress while in a rigorous, time compressed program
(Meyer, Hoover, & Maposa, 2006; Penprase & Koczara, 2009; Utley-Smith et al., 2007). Podcasts utilizes the devices and technologies that surround
students, “in an attempt to empower and enrich their learning, wherever and whoever they are” (Stead, 2005, p.3). Podcasts take “the learning to
the learners when they have time to learn” (Stoten, 2007, p. 57).
Preparation for the NCLEXRN® is a critical component of a nursing curriculum. Many nursing programs utilize products and services from providers
of technology-based educational, curriculum and assessment solutions for program evaluation. These materials are purported to facilitate nursing
students in passing the NCLEXRN®. Review of data obtained from this type of testing is a reliable and valid means of measuring learning outcomes,
as the materials and exams have been statistically analyzed, and have regional and national recognized benchmarking. Utilizing podcasts as a
supplemental resource in review of assessment exam concepts has potential to improve learning outcomes.
Listening, as a primary method in the learning process, predates written forms of communication. As adult learners, ABSN students may benefit
from flexibility within educational programs and creative teaching methods. Educational podcasts can be distributed on course management
systems, instructor websites, and public video websites such as YouTube, which allows students to interact with content at their convenience.
Theoretical Framework: There has been a plethora of literature and reports on the gap between theory, research and practice. There needs to be
intentional application of theory to practice guiding teaching and learning strategies. Theory supports addressing social, cultural, and emotional
aspects that intertwine with the process of learning. Vygotsky’s Cultural Historical Activity Theory anchors podcasting to the underlying socio-
cultural milieu of time constraints, stressors of multiple roles, and rigor of nursing curriculum.
Research Questions: What is the effect of a supplemental podcast as a learning strategy on ABSN program students’ ATI test scores?
HO: There is no difference in ABSN students’ ATI test scores between students who have listened to supplemental podcast as a learning strategy
and those that have not accessed the supplemental podcasts.
Ha: There is a difference in ABSN students’ ATI test scores between students who have listened to a supplemental podcast as a learning strategy
and those that have not accessed the supplemental podcast.
How do students in an ABSN program perceive the value of learning through listening to podcasts?
Method: Sample of convenience consisting of Accelerated Bachelor’s of Science in Nursing (ABSN) degree program students enrolled concurrently
in Nursing Research and Maternal-Newborn Nursing courses. (N= 30). Internal IRB approval was received, and informed consent was obtained from
students. Participation was voluntary. Prior to a required end of course assessment exam, students were provided a podcast reviewing key points
from their review book. Test scores were compared between the students that listened to the podcast and those that did not through statistical
analysis, ANOVA. Survey post ATI exam consisting of a 5 point Likert scale on perceptions of podcasting as a learning tool.
Findings: An analysis of variance statistically significant at p ≤ .05 level, F(1, 29) = 8.462, p = 0.007. Reject the null hypothesis and accept the
alternative hypothesis.
Cohen’s d calculated for effect size in this study is d =1.09. Statistical literature reports many educational researchers identify effect sizes ≥ 0.20 to
0.25 as important related to academic achievement (Duriak, 2009; Valentine & Cooper, 2003). Survey demonstrated that 78% felt the podcasts
increased their understanding of the course concepts.
Discussion: There are many pedagogical benefits to the use of podcasting as a teaching strategy. Some students prefer learning through listening; it
can be motivating for students who do not like reading. Students can review difficult concepts, prepare for exams, and engage in reflective learning
(Smith & McDonald, 2013). Research has shown that retention and the ability to apply concepts are “supported by intentional podcast
segmentation” (Abate, 2013). Students can meet their individual learning needs with unlimited opportunities to review the podcasted materials
(McSwiggan & Campbell, 2017). A single instructor with minimal institutional support can easily implement the use of these new technologies.
Instructors may benefit from recording repetitive explanations, descriptions, illustrations and connection of concepts. The spoken word can
influence a learner’s cognition, adding clarity, meaning, and motivation by conveying a sense of the person creating those words.
Conclusion: Including podcasting as a teaching strategy is supported by evidence, experience and supports students’ sociocultural milieu. Students
have reported enjoying listening to the podcasts, some reporting listening “over and over,” requesting more podcasts added to their courses
(Dudas, 2012, p. 476). Faculty’s use of podcasts has a growing base of evidence and experience, and values students’ needs. As more faculty are
presented with the benefits of these tools for student learning, there can be greater incorporation into professional practice (Mostyn, Jenkinson,
McCormick, Meade & Lynn, 2013).
References
Abate, K. (2013). The effect of podcast lectures on nursing students’ knowledge retention and application. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(3),
182-185.
Dudas, K. (2012). Podcast and unfolding case study to promote active learning. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(8), 476. doi: 10.3928/01484834-
20120719-02.
Duriak, J. (2009). How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(9), 917-928.
Maag, M. (2006). iPod, uPod? An emerging mobile learning tool in nursing education and students’ satisfaction. Proceedings of the 23rd annual
Ascilite conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology?
McSwiggan, L. & Campbell, M. (2017). Can podcasts for assessment guidance and feedback promote self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing
students? A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 49, 115–121.
Meyer, G., Hoover, K.G., & Maposa, S. (2006). A profile of accelerated BSN graduates. Journal of Nursing Education, 45, 324-327.
Mostyn, A., Jenkinson, C., McCormick, D., Meade, O., & Lymn, J. (2013). An exploration of student experiences of using biology podcasts in nursing
training. BMC Medical Education, 13(12). Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/13/12
Penprase, B. & Koczara, S. (2009). Understanding the experiences of accelerated second-degree nursing students and graduates: A review of the
literature. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 40(2), 74-78.
Smith, C. & McDonald, K. (2013). The flipped classroom for professional development: Part II. Making podcasts and videos. Journal of Continuing
Education in Nursing, 44(11), 486- 487. doi:10.3928/00220124-20131025-93
Stead, G. (2005). Moving mobile into the mainstream. MLearn 2005: 4th World Conference on mLearning. Retrieved from
http://www.mlearn.org.za/CD/papers/Stead.pdf
Stoten, S. (2007). Using podcasts for nursing education. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 38(2), 56-57.
Utley-Smith, Q., Phillips, B., & Turner, K. (2007). Avoiding socialization pitfalls in accelerated second-degree nursing education: The returning-to-
school syndrome model. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(9), 423-426.
Valentine, J. C. & Cooper, H. (2003). Effect size substantive interpretation guidelines: Issues in the interpretation of effect sizes. Washington, DC:
What Works Clearinghouse.
Walmsley, A.D., Lambe, C.S., Perry, D.G., & Hill, K.B. (2009). Podcasts – an adjunct to the teaching of dentistry. British Dental Journal, 206(3), 157-
160.
Contact
[email protected]
Education/Training in End-of-Life Care for Certified Nursing Assistants in Long-Term Care
Mansura Malik, DNP, FNP-BC, USA
Abstract
Background: The growth in the numbers of older adults in the United States warrants appropriately prepared health care providers
at all levels that will be able to care for this population effectively. First line caregivers such as Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)
need education and training in end of life care so that they can provide high quality care for residents and families in the long term
care (LTC) setting. The inadequate education of CNAs as the first line caregivers of residents in LTC facilities as they face the
challenges of end of life is a concern. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to improve the education and training of
CNAs caring for residents in a LTC facility at the end of life.
Methods: CNAs were recruited from a long term care facility in Western New York to attend an educational intervention consisting of six 45 minute
sessions on various topics selected by the researchers using the curriculum from Core Curriculum for the Hospice and Palliative Nursing Assistant.
Pretests and posttests were given to assess changes in knowledge and a satisfaction survey was used for the CNAs to identify additional learning
needs.
Results: Nineteen CNAs completed the six education and training sessions. Data analysis revealed a significant increase in knowledge for the
participants. CNAs were also able to identify additional learning needs.
Conclusions: Significant improvement in knowledge was seen after attendance by CNAs at the educational intervention. CNAs working in LTC
facilities need education and training in end of life care so that they can provide appropriate and effective care to residents and their families.
Education and training for CNAs led to increased knowledge of end of life care and desire for more educational opportunities. Increased knowledge
translates into improved care provided to residents and their families in the LTC setting. CNAs in this quality improvement project were able to
apply the knowledge and training they had received to their daily tasks at work. This was a successful educational program for the CNAs who
participated. All CNAs should have education and training on end of life care so that these caregivers are better prepared to care for the growing
elderly population. CNAs should be considered valued partners with all health care providers, educated and prepared for their significant
involvement in all aspects of resident and family care at the end of life.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2016). End of Life Nursing Education Consortium (ELNEC). Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/elnec/about/fact-sheet
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). The State of Aging and Health in America 2013. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services.
Certified Nursing Assistant Program. (2015). CNA Training Sessions. Retrieved from
http://oaces.net/programs/careertechnicaleducation/certified-nursing-assistant-program/
CNA Certification. (2015). An introduction to CNA certification. Retrieved from http://www.cnaclasses.org/cna-certification/
Ersek, M., Grant, M. M., & Kraybill, B. M. (2005). Enhancing end of life care in nursing homes: Palliative care educational resource team (PERT)
program. Journal of Palliative Care, 8, 3, 556-566.
Ersek, M., Kraybill, B. M., & Hansberry, J. (2000). Assessing the educational needs and concerns of nursing home staff regarding end of life care.
Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 26, 10, 16-26.
John A. Hartford Foundation. (2016). End of life and serious illness: A John A. Hartford Foundation change agents issue brief. Retrieved from
http://www.jhartfound.org/blog/end-of-life-and-serious-illness-a-john-a-hartford-foundation-change-agents-issue-brief/
Leclerc, B., Lessard, S., Bechennec, C., Gal, E., Benoit, S., & Bellerose, L. (2014). Attitudes toward death, dying, end of life palliative care, and
interdisciplinary practice in long term care workers. Journal of American Medical Directors Association, 15, 207-213.
Pappas, C. (2013). The adult learning theory-andragogy-of Malcolm Knowles. Retrieved from http://elearningindustry.com/the-adult-learning-
theory-andragogy-of-malcolm-knowles.
Percival, J. & Johnson, M. (2013). End of life care in nursing and care homes. Nursing Times, 109, 20-23.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2014). Long term care: What are the issues? http://www.rwjf.org/healthpolicy.
Sutermaster, D. J. (2015). Core Curriculum for the Hospice & Palliative Nursing Assistant (3rd ed.). Pittsburg, PA: Hospice & Palliative Nurses
Association.
Wen, A., Gatchell, G., Tachibana, Y., Tin, M. M., Bell, C., Koijane, J., Zeri, K., & Masaki, K. IMPRESS project. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 38, 10,
20-25.
Contact
[email protected]
Examining Nursing Student Stress in an End-of-Life Care Simulation: Grade Level and Simulated Patient Type
Michelle Lynne Allen, EdD, MSN, RN, CCRN, CNE, CHSE, USA
Abstract
Brief Review of the Literature: The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2016) recommends incorporating end-of life care
into undergraduate nursing curricula. This recommendation is supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and has been
placed in the National Licensure Examination Detailed Test Plan (Kopp & Hanson, 2012). Traditionally, nursing education has not
provided nursing students with exposure to end-of-life care (Gillan, Parameter, Van der Riet, & Jeong, 2013; Kwekeeboom, Vah, &
Eland, 2005). As such, newly graduated nurses have reported dissatisfaction with their preparation (Kwekeboom et al., 2005). Newly
graduated nurses have experienced anxiety and uncertainty when caring for a dying patient; these feelings have served as the
catalyst for nearly 20% of nurses to leave the profession within their first year (Gillan et al., 2013; MacKusik & Minkic, 2010).
Purpose: The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to examine the relationship between undergraduate nursing students’
stress before and after participating in an end-of-life care simulation, using either simulated patient type: a high-fidelity mannequin
or a standardized patient. The comparison between physiological and psychological stress, grade level, and patient simulators
occurred due to little research into their effects on students (Aliner, Hunt, Gordon, & Harwood, 2006). Psychological stress was
examined utilizing Spielberger’s State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Scale, Form Y-1; whereas physiological stress was examined
utilizing heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. Furthermore, grade level was differentiated between junior
and senior level nursing students in a baccalaureate program.
Research Questions:
• Among undergraduate nursing students participating in an end-of-life care simulation, is the relationship between simulated
patient type and psychological stress moderated by grade level?
• Among undergraduate nursing students participating in an end-of-life care simulation, is the relationship between simulated
patient type and physiological stress moderated by grade level?
Intervention: Prior to conducting the research, IRB approval was obtained. The 159 participants were randomized into participating
or observing care for either of the two simulated patient types, standardized patient or high-fidelity mannequin. A theater student
served as the standardized patient. Before and after participating in the simulation, participants had to fill out the STAI Form Y-1,
take their partner’s heart rate, and obtain blood pressure per automated noninvasive blood pressure cuff on the left wrist. All
findings were documented.
Statistical Analysis - The research occurred in the Fall semester of 2016 and incorporated 57 junior and 102 senior level
undergraduate nursing students. For the junior level students, 32 had the high fidelity mannequin and 25 had the standardized
patient for their simulation. Whereas for the senior level students, 47 had the high-fidelity mannequin and 55 had the standardized
patient as the simulated patient.
The research utilized two-way ANOVAs to examine the relationship between grade level and simulated patient type on both
psychological stress and physiological stress. There were no statistically significant interaction effects between patient type and
grade level on psychological stress (F(1,155)=0.411, p=0.52). There were no statistically significant main effects by grade level on
psychological stress (F(1,155)-1.347, p=0.248); nor were there statistically significant main effects by grade level on psychological
stress (F(1, 155)-1.247, p=0.248). However, junior students had higher mean scores (M=28.50, SD=38.09) than senior students
(M=21.08, SD=31.45). It is worth noting that simulated patient type impacted psychological stress at the trend level (F(1, 155)=3.137,
p=0.08). The results showed a very small effect size (ƞ²=0.02). Greater psychological stress, for both grade levels, occurred when
care was given to the high-fidelity mannequin simulated patient (M- 29.55, SD-38.41), than with the standardized patient simulated
patient (M=18.00, SD=28.19).
Physiological stress was measured by heart rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure. For heart rate, there was no statistically
significant interaction effect by patient type and grade level (F(1, 155)-0.530, p=0.47). Also, there were no statistically significant
main effects when examining the relationship between patent type on percentage change in heart rate (F(1, 155)=0.000, p=0.47)
and grade level on percentage change in heart rate (F(1, 155)=0.025, p=0.88). However, junior nursing students experienced greater
percentage change in heart rate (M-4.11, SD=15.54) than senior students (M=3.80, SD=12.33. The junior students experienced the
greatest physiological stress when the simulated patient type was the standardized patient (M=5.05, SD=20.24). For systolic blood
pressure, there was no statistically significant interaction effects between patient type and grade level on percentage change in
systolic blood pressure (F(1, 155)=0.369, p=0.54). Also, there were no statistically significant main effects by grade level on
percentage change in systolic blood pressure (F(1, 155=0.010, p=0.92) or by patient type on percentage change in systolic blood
pressure (F(1, 155)=-.528, p=0.47).
The greatest amount of physiological stress, when measured by systolic blood pressure, occurred in senior nursing students when
the simulated patient type was the high-fidelity mannequin (M=3.11, SD=15.88). There was no statistically significant interaction
effect between patient type and grade level on physiological stress, as measured by percentage change in diastolic blood pressure
(F(1, 155)=0.339, p=0.56).
Furthermore, there was no statistically significant main effect by grade level on percentage change in diastolic blood pressure (F(1,
155)=0.562, p-0.46) or patient type on diastolic blood pressure (F=1, 155)=1.190, p-0.28. The greatest change in diastolic blood
pressure occurred when the high-fidelity mannequin was utilized with the senior nursing students (M-5.54, SD=12.80).
Overall, both grade levels appeared to experience greater psychological stress, as measured by percentage change in STAI Form Y-1
with the high-fidelity mannequin. In addition, both grade levels appeared to experience greater physiological stress, as measured by
percentage change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, when the simulated patient type involved the high-fidelity mannequin.
However, the exception occurred at the junior level with percentage change in heart rate as the greater physiological stress occurred
with the standardized patient.
Findings in Relation to the Literature: Previous research has not examined the effects of grade level on undergraduate nursing
students’ stress when participating in an end-of-life care simulation with either a high-fidelity mannequin or standardized patient.
Ramasama Venkatsalu, Kellher, and Hua Shao (2015) found that first year nursing students preferred learning end-of-life care in the
laboratory setting rather than the didactic portion of a course. Nursing educators are in a position to provide lessons by
incorporating simulations, such as end-of-life care, that cause measureable stress.
By understanding which patient type causes greater amounts of stress, nursing educators can base curricula on the holistic needs of
the learner. While this research occurred at one site, it opens the door for further research into nursing student stress in an end-of-
life care simulation and its effect of grade level. This research found that 31.4% of the sample size has been diagnosed with anxiety,
which is consistent with previous research. Chen, Chen, Sung, Hsieh, Lee, and Chang (2015) found that 32.6% of 625 nursing
students experienced depressive symptoms, including anxiety at a community college. Such statistics cannot be ignored when
making curricular decisions.
References
Alinier, G., Hunt, B., Gordon, R., & Harwood, C. (2006). Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate
nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54(3), 359-369. http://dx.doi.org.library.aurora.edu/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03810.x
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2016). ELNEC fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/elnec/about/fact-sheet
Chen, C. J., Chen, Y. C., Sung, H. C., Hsieh, T. C., Lee, M. S., & Chang, C. Y. (2015, October). The prevalence and related factors of depressive
symptoms among junior college nursing students: a cross sectional study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(8), 590-598.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12252
Gillan, P. C., Parameter, G., Van der Riet, P. J., & Jeong, S. (2013, November). The experience of end of life care simulation at a rural Australian
university. Nurse Education Today, 33(11), 1435-1439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.015
Kopp, W., & Hanson, M. A. (2012). High-fidelity and gaming simulations enhance nursing education in end-of-life care. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 8(3), e97-e102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017.jecns.2010.07.005
Kwekkeboom, K. L., Vahl, C., & Eland, J. (2005, April). Companionship and education: A nursing student experience in palliative care. Journal of
Nursing Education, 44(4), 169-176. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com.flagship.luc.edu/
MacKusik, C. I., & Minick, P. (2010, November/December). Why are nurses leaving? Findings from an initial qualitative study on nursing attrition.
MEDSURG Nursing, 19(6), 335-340. Retrieved from http://amsn.inurse.com/sites/default/files/documents/practice-resources/healthy-work-
environment/resources/MSNJ_MacKusick_19_06.pdf
Ramsama Vekataslu, M., Kellher, M., & Hua Shao, C. (2015, April). Reported clinical outcomes of high-fidelity simulation versus classroom-based
end-of-life care education. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 21(4), 179-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2015.21.4.179
Contact
[email protected]
Fidelity Testing of an HIV Prevention Intervention: An Opportunity to Enhance Nursing Students’ Research
Experience
Ellen R. Long-Middleton, PhD, RN, FNP, FNAP, USA
Abstract
Background and Significance. In the United States, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) continues to be a leading cause of
death of young adults. Both adolescent and adult women are disproportionately at risk for heterosexual transmission of Human
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection in comparison to men. Heterosexual contact accounts for 85% of HIV infection in adolescent
females compared to 3% in adolescent males. Women in general may be vulnerable to heterosexual transmission of HIV related to
their often unequal status in relationships, as gendered power relationships between men and women may affect a woman’s ability
to take steps to reduce risk for infection. This appears particularly relevant to adolescent young women, and underscores the need
to design interventions that provide for the opportunity to listen to their perspectives about how power may construct and
constrain their choices in sexual decision-making.
There is a need for proven HIV prevention intervention studies in general, and specifically interventions that are geared toward adolescent young
women to reduce heterosexually mediated HIV infection. Given this need, there are calls to replicate best evidence interventions and to further
investigate effective, evidence-based interventions that are adapted, translated, or disseminated for the adolescent population. Notwithstanding
disparities in socioeconomic status and insurance coverage, 91% of children ages 6-17 have a usual source of health care in which they receive
primary care services. Therefore, an opportunity exists to reach adolescent young women and adapt proven HIV prevention interventions to their
needs in primary care settings.
Motivational interviewing (MI) and behavioral skills building (BSB) are modes of behavioral intervention that have proven to be efficacious and are
dynamic and flexible enough to address cultural inclusiveness and sensitivity, as well as adolescent and adult developmental differences. MI and
BSB HIV prevention interventions reduce and delay sexual intercourse, increase condom use, decrease number of sexual partners, and decrease
sexually transmitted infections.
Strengths of MI and BSB approaches include the dynamic and flexible nature of these methods that lend to the ability to tailor interventions to
individual needs. Conversely, the fluidity of the methods poses a threat to intervention fidelity, the degree to which an intervention is delivered as
intended. To address this threat, fidelity testing is imperative.
Fidelity testing can be aided by the incorporation of nursing students into the research team. Notwithstanding the importance of providing sound
methodology in the development of behavioral interventions, engaging students in hands-on participation with faculty in research endeavors may
motivate students to pursue a research career. Given the nursing faculty and nurse scientist shortage, it is important to foster the next generation
of nurse researchers through active engagement in the research process.
To these ends, there were three objectives:
1) Establish fidelity for an MI-BSB HIV prevention intervention
2) Determine training needs of health care providers delivering the HIV prevention intervention
3) Enhance nursing students’ research experience
Methods. As part of a larger study investigating the feasibility of incorporating an MI-BSB intervention into primary care practice, three nurse
practitioner graduate students were employed as research assistants to determine the training needs of primary care providers in delivering a
behavioral HIV prevention intervention. Education for the intervention was provided to the research assistants in seven sessions, 3 hours in length.
The interactive training sessions consisted of didactic information, discussion, and clinical simulation and included the topics of HIV and sexually
transmitted infections, motivational interviewing, and behavioral skills building.
The Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) Coding Instrument and the Behaviour Changing Counseling Index (BECCI) were used to
measure the fidelity of the intervention, with training needs determined by fidelity testing results. The structure, process, and outcomes of
incorporating nursing students into the research team members were measured.
Results. Use of the MITI and BECCA were both instructive and evaluative of motivational interviewing and behavioral skills building techniques,
with training needs determined by an iterative process of fidelity testing that guided training session content. Fifteen hours of training was needed
to attain fidelity in the delivery of the MI-BSB intervention. Students reported an enhanced understanding and interest in the research process,
increased knowledge and skill development related to research methods, and saw the research experience as relevant to clinical practice. The
faculty member observed students actively engaging in the research process, developing teamwork skills, and expressing enjoyment of the
experience.
Conclusions. Intensive MI-BSB training was needed to achieve fidelity of the HIV prevention intervention. Nursing students were incorporated
effectively into the research team with clear benefits for both students and faculty.
References
Amin, A. (2015). Addressing gender inequalities to improve the sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing of women living with HIV. J Int AIDS
Soc, 18(Suppl 5), 20302. doi:10.7448/ias.18.6.20302
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016a). HIV Mortality (through 2013). Retrieved from Atlanta, GA:
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/slideSets/index.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016b). HIV Surveillance in Women (2015). Retrieved from Atlanta, GA:
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/slideSets/index.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016c). HIV Surveillance Adolescents and Young Adults (through 2014). Retrieved from Atlanta, GA:
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/slideSets/index.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016d). HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis Project: Compendium of Evidence-Based Interventions
and Best Practices for HIV Prevention. Atlanta, GA: CDC Retrieved from
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/research/interventionresearch/compendium/rr/index.html.
Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. America's Children: Key National Indicators of Well-Being, 2015. Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office; 2015.
Johnson, B. T., Michie, S., & Snyder, L. B. (2014). Effects of behavioral intervention content on HIV prevention outcomes: a meta-review of meta-
analyses. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: JAIDS, 66 Suppl 3, S259-270. doi:10.1097/qai.0000000000000235
Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Hawkins, J., . . . Zaza, S. (2016). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States,
2015. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries, 65(6), 1-174.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing Helping People Change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Morrison-Beedy, D., Jones, S. H., Xia, Y., Tu, X., Crean, H. F., & Carey, M. P. (2013). Reducing sexual risk behavior in adolescent girls: results from a
randomized controlled trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 314-321.
Contact
[email protected]
"Headache Tools to Stay in School”: An Educational Guide for Nurses and Students With Headache
Lori Lazdowsky, BSN, RN, USA
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a significant push towards increased inclusion of students with chronic illness or complicated
symptomology in mainstream schools (Jackson, 2013). This reentry process is often complicated by transition barriers and
challenges, including absences due to illness and doctors’ visits, and difficulties with classroom accommodations (Jackson, 2013).
Collaboration between the student, their family, school officials, and health care professionals is necessary to ensure a smooth
transition back to school, with school nurses at the forefront of implementing those health care accommodations within school
premises. Many chronically ill students have legally enforced school accommodations that require the school nurse’s regular and
substantial involvement, but this involvement is also necessary and valuable in cases without Individualized Education Plans (Pufpaff
et al., 2015). Thus, school nurses’ roles and responsibilities have evolved significantly to accommodate these students and their
individualized education plans, with increased expectations to evaluate, treat, and manage new and complicated cases previously
managed outside of school.
One such chronic illness is pediatric headache, including diagnoses of new daily persistent headache, tension-type headache, and migraine. A
review and analysis of recent literature found that 60% of children and adolescents are prone to episodic or acute headaches (Abu-Arafeh et al.,
2010), with that percentage increasing upon the including of chronic headaches. School nurses must be proficient in a variety of health care related
skills in order to most effectively address chronic and acute headaches. Assessing headaches through collecting the student’s headache history and
pertinent health information and performing a thorough physical exam comprise the fundamentals of the school nurses’ practice. Specifically,
school nurses must provide brief, yet adequate assessment and treatment, and determine when to encourage a child to remain in school versus
dismissing the child early (American Nursing Association, 2010). As school nurses work in educational rather than medical settings, their care of
pediatric headache should prioritize reducing students with headache’s school failure and absenteeism.
Compared to providers in health settings with full access to colleagues and a medical team on site, the semi-autonomous nature of the school
nurse, serving students and families in a uniquely isolated clinical context often necessitates independent development of methods of assessment
and treatment (Smith and Firmin, 2009). Clinical guidelines must be delivered directly to school nurses in ways that acknowledge and account for
their unique needs and resources. There are too few resources available to school nurses with information on providing efficient and effective care
to students with headache.
Based on our review of available headache resources for school nurses, we developed a two-armed study addressing the necessity,
implementation, and favorability of an educational tool designed for school nurses in supporting the complex needs of headache patients. Through
the development and installment of a tailored, evidence-based educational tool available to school nurses, this study seeks to bridge the gap
between the schools and medical and psychological care provided by outside providers by facilitating school nurses’ delivery of effective and
efficient care.
To fill this need, we created a clinical practice and educational guide for school nurses treating pediatric headache, “Headache Tools to Stay in
School: An Educational Collaboration and Tool for School Nurses and their Students with Headaches, Migraines, and Concussions ©.” This tool was
developed by the nurses, neurologists, psychologists, researchers, and clinical support staff at a tertiary headache clinic in a large, urban northeast
pediatric hospital, and includes sections on (1) lifestyle factors that may contribute to the presentation of headache; (2) checklists of suggested
treatment plans and accommodations for managing students’ headaches in school settings; (3) cautionary advice on when a child should seek
further care; (4) medication overview charts to be used for education and reference; and (5) additional lists of apps, books, equipment, and
websites for pain management and relaxation resources for students, parents, and school administrators. The guide contains documents intended
for use by the school nurse as well as handouts and documents that can be used to facilitate collaboration between the school nurse, the student,
the student’s family, and outside healthcare providers.
The guide was implemented and evaluated over a three-month trial period by 31 school nurses. The participating school nurses gave the guide an
overall rating of 4.46 out of 5, and nearly 2 out of every 3 respondents “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the guide was helpful to their
understanding and practice of managing headaches. These results may indicate the guide’s potential for successful dissemination and
implementation by other school nurses. Qualitative feedback was also collected and was instrumental in the updated version of the guide,
presented in this presentation.
The results of this study reinforce the need for more readily accessible and comprehensive EBP guidelines, like “Headache Tools to Stay in School,”
to be available to school nurses. As greater numbers of children with complex medical conditions, including chronic pain conditions such as chronic
pediatric headache, are attempting to reintegrate into typical school settings, school personnel must be properly prepared to handle the physical
and psychological challenges that may arise. Continued dissemination of this guide may improve students’ headache management under the
informed care of school nurses, and may encourage the development of more evidence-based guides across a multitude of medical conditions.
References
1. Abu-Arafeh, I., Razak, S., Sivaraman, B., & Graham, C. (2010). Prevalence of headache and migraine in children and adolescents: a
systematic review of population‐based studies. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology,52(12), 1088-1097.
2. American Nurses Association. (2010). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.
3. Jackson, M. (2013). The special educational needs of adolescents living with chronic illness: a literature review. International Journal of
Inclusive Education,17(6), 543-554.
4. Pufpaff, L. A., Mcintosh, C. E., Thomas, C., Elam, M., & Irwin, M. K. (2015). Meeting the health care needs of students with severe
disabilities in the school setting: collaboration between school nurses and special education teachers. Psychology in the Schools,52(7),
683-701.
5. Smith, S. G., & Firmin, M. W. (2009). School nurse perspectives of challenges and how they perceive success in their professional nursing
roles. The Journal of School Nursing,25(2), 152-162.
Contact
[email protected]
Mentoring Online Students: Developing and Testing a Mentorship Model for the Capstone Practicum
Marilyn Klakovich, DNSc, RN, NEA-BC, USA
Abstract
Purpose: Students completing a master’s in nursing degree in my online program are required to complete a practicum project
working with a master’s prepared mentor. During the practicum, students implement a scholarly project to meet an educational
need or administrate a project in a facility, such as the workplace, or in the community. Given that students have no face-to-face
contact with faculty who supervise the capstone practicum course, effective mentors are critical to student success. The purpose of
this presentation is to describe the collaborative process used to develop, implement, and evaluate a mentorship model to guide
both students and mentors in their critical roles during the online capstone practicum project.
Methods: The practicum course is divided into two parts. During part A, students develop a self-directed learning agreement. In part B, students
report on their projects and submit all evidence of fulfillment of their learning agreement. The model was initially developed through a qualitative
study that included content analysis of student reports (n=263 representing 28 part A classes) of characteristics of effective mentors and then Part
B student confirmation of the identified categories. I organized the major categories of characteristics of effective mentors into a pyramid-shaped
mentorship model for online program practicum experiences. The base or foundation of the pyramid was comprised of mentor characteristics
including background, experience, and education. The central core of the pyramid was formed by mentor qualities and ways the mentor interacts
with the mentee (resourceful, inspires and challenges, caring relationship). I presented this model at an international conference and dialogue with
the audience suggested the need to refine the model.
Consistent with the collaborative approach used for initial development, to allow for student collaboration in model refinement, I posted the
model and supporting materials in five (n=65) practicum B classes for student input. Based on their recommendations, I reorganized the mentor
qualities and characteristics within the pyramid. They believed that the bottom of the pyramid that includes the two cornerstones is the foundation
of the model. Thus, the two cornerstones are now nursing knowledge and nursing experience, for without these two key elements, there is not a
profession known as nursing. Interconnected between the two cornerstones, in the middle and a very important part of the foundation is caring.
The core of the model is now Resourceful with the apex being Inspire and challenge. Professional ladder categories (educator, clinician, researcher,
manager) support the base and the core of the model. Once these changes were made, I posted the model in four (n = 52) practicum B classes and
students confirmed that this model represented their positive experience with their mentor.
The model was again shared at an international conference two years after the first presentation. Student quotes indicated that the pyramid
structure was too rigid to capture the essence of mentorship. Other images shared and discussed were a tree, lighthouse, and rainbow. I have
continued to gather information (17 "A" n=221; 21 "B" n=207). The tree model is the one that most students connect with although there is
interest in further exploring the lighthouse image. Students find that the image that resonates with them assists them to communicate about the
model more clearly with their mentors (Scogin, 2016).
Since refinement, I implemented the model by presenting it to students in the first practicum course. Students are encouraged to use the model as
they select their mentors and form working relationships. When students check in at required times during their 6-month project, I ask them about
the use of the model and whether it helps or hinders. Their narrative responses are analyzed as well as data about frequency of use (Frahm, et al.,
2013).
Results: Students in part A of the practicum have been using the model to help them select an appropriate mentor for their project experience.
Additionally, they have been sharing the model with their mentors and using it to establish a relationship and determine the best ways that they
can work together throughout the project. Students and mentors report that this provides clarity on how to work together, and gives them
additional ideas for creative approaches to use. They find that the model facilitates reciprocal communication between the mentor and mentee
(Sherman & Camilli, 2014). Since using this model, I have had fewer students report negative mentoring experiences during practicum check-ins or
in part B.
Conclusion: Mentors play a critical role in guiding, supporting and challenging students to grow personally and professionally throughout the
practicum experience, culminating in attainment of a master’s degree in nursing. This refined mentorship model that is specific to a practicum
conducted in the context of an online program facilitates appropriate selection of mentors and suggests ways that mentors and mentees can work
effectively together.
References
Frahm, K.A., Alsac-Seitz, B., Mescia, N., Brown, L.M., Hyer, K., Liburd, D., ...Troutman, A. (2013). Florida Public Health Training Center: Evidence-
based online mentor program. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 61,175–182. DOI: 10.1080/07377363.2013.836849
Scogin, S.C. (2016). Identifying the factors leading to success: How an innovative science curriculum cultivates student motivation. Journal of
Science and Educational Technology, 2, 375–393. DOI 10.1007/s10956-015-9600-6
Sherman, S., & Camilli, G. (Spring, 2014). Evaluation of an online mentoring program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 107-119.
Contact
[email protected]
University of Connecticut Major and Mentor: Nursing Mentoring Program
Carrie Morgan Eaton, RNC-OB, C-EFM, CHSE, USA
Annette T. Maruca, PhD, MS, RN-BC, CNE, USA
Jamie Rivera, MSN, RN, CPN, RN, CPN, USA
Abstract
Undergraduate nursing education programs are challenging and inherently stressful. In fact, Cameron, et al. (2011) reported that
over half of nursing school students debated dropping out. When academic institutions lose students to attrition it exacerbates the
looming nursing shortage. To add to this dilemma, the American Association of Colleges of Nurses (2014) reports that by 2022, there
will be a need for 3.44 million nurses in the United States, yet the demand and supply remain imbalanced. These statistics
demonstrate the importance of developing programs to support and retain undergraduate nursing students to degree completion.
With these facts in hand, our institution chose to enhance the positive dynamics of peer mentorship within the undergraduate
nursing learning community as a gateway to student success and retention.
An innovative mentorship course was developed specifically for freshmen undergraduate students residing in a dedicated nursing learning
community at a large academic institution. The mentorship course was developed by a graduate assistant assigned to the nursing learning
community in collaboration with a faculty member and the director of pre-licensure nursing programs. This articulated, undergraduate course was
built on the premise of Benner’s (2001) novice (undergraduate students) to expert (dedicated graduate assistant and faculty member) model which
conveys that through experience mentors progress to higher levels of performance. The course was offered to second semester freshmen students
in the nursing learning community as a path towards leadership through mentorship. Ten students out of forty freshmen nursing learning
community residents expressed interest in investing in their leadership potential by becoming student mentors for the upcoming freshmen. Eight
students enrolled in the course. Two students withdrew due to scheduling conflicts. Six students completed the hybrid 1-credit curriculum and will
be mentors with assigned freshmen mentees in the nursing learning community throughout the 2017-2018 academic year.
The course, titled “Major and MentoR:Nursing Student Mentorship” was developed in an effort to help students understand how they
conceptualize mentorship and be better prepared for and able to articulate the reciprocal and collaborate learning relationship between mentor
and mentee. Mentors must be willing to share things about themselves both positive and negative in order to build trust and connection with
mentees. In an effort to facilitate self-discovery among the enrolled students the graduate assistant created a private course blog with biweekly
assignments focused on the ways in each student uniquely transitioned to college and how the presence of a mentor would have aided them in the
process. The students convened in class every other week for one hour with the graduate assistant and a faculty member who specializes in mental
health nursing. During class sessions the blog posts were highlighted in a PowerPoint presentation and reviewed in detail to assist students in
visualizing their leadership potential through mentoring others.
Faculty and student interaction, both formal and informal, are noted as key elements to students’ ability to conceptualize leadership (Dunn, Odom,
Moore, & Rotter, 2016). The same graduate assistant in the classroom maintained a weekly presence in the nursing learning community space in
the evenings approximately 10 hours per week. This unique graduate assistant assignment encouraged the idea that faculty and student
interaction, both informal and formal, are noted as key elements to students’ ability to conceptualize leadership (Dunn, Odom, Moore, & Rotter,
2016). The goal is to continue this program with the ongoing presence of a graduate assistant in the nursing learning community to support the
newly established mentors and encourage their journey from novice to expert mentor and future nursing leader. Becoming a mentor is often an
essential step in a nurse’s leadership development. The mentors are prepared to reciprocate a supportive presence to the new students within the
nursing learning community. Helping students discover their untapped potential as mentors will only enhance their personal and professional
success.
Research has shown campus living and learning communities foster a successful transition to academic life by providing curricular structure,
meaningful relationships, sustained interactions, engagement, and deeper learning experiences. Living and learning communities have been known
to cultivate strong academic and social connections as well as community and a sense of belonging (Spanierman, et al, 2013). Mentoring holds the
potential to be a rewarding experience for all involved. A research study is intended in the fall of 2018 in order to draw on the students’
experiences and provide a deeper understanding of how their participation in the mentorship course and subsequent role as mentors in the
nursing learning community has influenced their personal and professional growth as well as their leadership capabilities.
References
AACN: Nursing Shortage Fact Sheet. (2014.). Retried June 1, 2017, from https://www.advantagern.com/hospitals/aacn-nursing-shortae-fact-sheet.
Benner, P. (2001). From novice to expert. Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Cameron, J., Roxburgh, M., Taylor, J., Lauder, W. (2011). An integrative literature review of student retention in programmes of nursing and
midwifery education: why do students stay? J. Clin. Nurs. 20, 1372–1382.
Dunn, Odom, Moore, & Rotter (2016). Leadership mindsets of first-year undergraduate students: An assessment of a leadership-themed living
learning community. Journal of Leadership Education. Vol. 15(3). DOI:1012806/V15/I3/R6.
Spanierman, Lisa B., Soble, Jason R., Mayfield, Jennifer B., Neville, Helen A., Aber, Mark, Khuri, Lydia,& De La Rosa, Belinda. (2013). Living learning
communities and students' sense of community and belonging.Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice,50(3), 308-325.
Contact
[email protected]
Does a Modified TeamSTEPPS® Online Educational Intervention Change Nursing Students’ Attitudes?
Teresa A. Gaston, DNP, USA
Abstract
Are RN to BSN students prepared for today’s challenging healthcare environment? There is a great need to better educate nursing
students on teamwork and patient safety because they will play a vital role as they transition to bachelor prepared nursing
professionals. Students need to learn the value of teamwork (NACNEP, 2015), and often have limited exposure to such. Ineffective
teamwork and poor communication in healthcare have contributed to many patient medical errors (Kohn et al., 1999; TJC, 2015).
There are many initiatives that support these necessary components for clinical practice such as The Essentials of a Baccalaureate
Education (AACN, 2008) which includes Scholarship of EBP and Interprofessional Communication and Collaboration. The Quality and
Safety Education in Nursing (QSEN) Institute has developed and promoted Teamwork and Collaboration, Safety, and EBP as key
competencies (2014). The Future of Nursing Report issued by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2010, stressed the need for nurses
to achieve competency in the areas of teamwork, communication, leadership, and EBP. Yearly, The Joint Commission (2015)
produces the National Patient Safety Goals and the area of communication is the most frequent goal due to its contribution to
patient medical errors. With many of these educational initiatives only occurring during the past decade, the attitudes and
knowledge of nursing students regarding teamwork, communication, and patient safety have not been well studied yet. Therefore,
exploring an innovative, evidence-based teamwork and communication program for online RN to BSN students is overdue.
Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety, otherwise called TeamSTEPPS® (King et al., 2008) is an evidence based
practice, patient safety program created for the healthcare setting. Originally, this was based upon several decades of safety and teamwork
research originating from both the airline industry and US military. Following a joint venture in 2006, the Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality (AHRQ) and the Department of Defense tailored the program for all healthcare professionals in the clinical setting and have paved the way
as leaders in the patient safety movement (King et al). TeamSTEPPS® promotes the use of standardized communication tools including five key
competencies: communication, leadership, team structure, mutual support, and situation monitoring that are necessary for improved patient care
outcomes (King et al.). Currently, there are training modules available for acute care, office based care, long term care, and dental care (AHRQ,
2016), however not for the academic setting for students. The purpose of this pilot study is to implement a modified TeamSTEPPS® educational
intervention to measure nursing students’ attitudes regarding patient safety and teamwork.
There are many studies in the literature supporting the positive outcomes of the TeamSTEPPS® programs in the clinical setting, however whether it
can be applied to nursing students in the academic setting has a small amount of growing evidence. The following databases CINAHL, Medline, and
PubMed were searched using key words “TeamSTEPPS®, attitudes, and nursing students” with limited results. In one study by Goliat et al (2013),
they integrated TeamSTEPPS® into an undergraduate nursing curricula and demonstrated improvement in nursing student attitudes. In addition, an
article by Meier et al (2012) studied medical students only and they created an entire course based upon TeamSTEPPS®. A similar study (Baker &
Durham, 2013) incorporated TeamSTEPPS® into an Interprofessional Education course for nursing, medical, and pharmacy students. Several other
research studies included a mixed group of healthcare students (Brock et al., 2013; Caylor et al., 2015; Jernigan et al., 2016; Sweigart et al., 2016)
and demonstrated improved student attitudes following a TeamSTEPPS® intervention in some of the key competencies.
This exploratory, pilot study utilizes a pre/post survey design with a convenience sample of online RN to BSN students from one university with a
sample size of 11 pre and 7 post. All students received an email explaining the project. Participation is both voluntary and anonymous. A modified
TeamSTEPPS® program educational intervention was developed and made available to participants through an online link. Electronic surveys were
sent via email using an approved university survey application, data was entered into SPSS, then analyzed using descriptive and non-parametric
statistics. The 30-item TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Attitude Questionnaire (T-TAQ) self-reported survey (AHRQ, 2014) was used to assess nursing
students’ attitudes about teamwork. The tool is a free, open source resource with 5 subscales correlating to the five competencies of the program
available from http://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/teamattitude.html. As a certified Master Trainer in
TeamSTEPPS®, I customized the TeamSTEPPS® program materials available online at www.ahrq.gov. Students received a hyperlink to access the
educational training including select videos, instructor voice over, and audiovisual slides. This step is necessary because the traditional educational
intervention is a face to face full day workshop intended for practicing healthcare workers. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for
this project.
The positive results of this pilot study will be used to inform the RN to BSN program whether to integrate the TeamSTEPPS® program into the
undergraduate nursing curriculum. In addition, buy-in by nursing faculty has been obtained based upon these results that demonstrate teaching
nursing students’ teamwork concepts can positively influence their attitudes. By bringing TeamSTEPPS® to online RN to BSN students, their
attitudes may influence their current clinical practice in the healthcare environment, thus the immediate potential to positively impact direct
patient care outcomes is highly plausible.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2014). TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (T-TAQ). (2014). Rockville, MD. Retrieved
http://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/teamattitude.html
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2008). The essentials of a baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice.
Washington, DC. Retrieved http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/BaccEssentials08.pdf
Baker, M., & Durham, C. (2013). Interprofessional education: A survey of student’s collaborative competency outcomes. Journal of Nursing
Education, 52(12), 713-718.
Brock, D., Abu-Rish, E., Chia-Ru, C., Hammer, D., Wilson, S., Vorvick, L., …Zierler, B. (2013). Interprofessional education in team communication:
Working together to improve patient safety. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22(5), 414-423.
Caylor, S., Aebersold, M., Lapham, J., & Carlson, E. (2015). The use of virtual simulation and a modified TeamSTEPPS® training for multiprofessional
education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11, 163-171.
Goliat, K., Sharpnack, O., Nadugab, e., Vajer, J., & Trosclair, M. (2013). Using TeamSTEPPS resources to enhance teamwork attitudes in
baccalaureate nursing students. Western Journal Nursing Research, 35(9), 1239-1240.
Institute of Medicine (IOM): National Academy of Sciences. (2010). The Future of Nursing Report: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Retrieved
http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2010/The-Future-of-
Nursing/Nursing%20Education%202010%20Brief.pdf
Jernigan, S., Magee, C., Graham, E., Johnston, K., Zaudke, J., & Shrader, S. (2016). Student outcomes associated with an Interprofessional program
incorporating TeamSTEPPS. Journal of Allied Health, 45(2), 101-108.
King, H., Battles, J., Baker, D., Alonso, A., Salas, E., Webster, J., Toomey, L., & Salisbury, M. (2008). TeamSTEPPS: Team Strategies and Tools to
Enhance Performance and Patient Safety. In: Henriksen, K., Battles, J., Keyes, M., Grady, M., editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and
Alternative Approaches. Rockville, MD: AHRQ.
Kohn, L, Corrigan J, Donaldson M. (1999). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press.
Meier, A., Boehler, M., McDowell, C., Schwind, C., Markwell, S., Roberts, N., & Sanfey, H. (2012). A surgical simulation curriculum for senior medical
students based on TeamSTEPPS. Archives of Surgery, 147(8), 761-766.
National Advisory Council on Nurse Education & Practice (NACNEP). (2015). Incorporating Interprofessional education and practice into nursing.
Retrieved http://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/bhpradvisory/nacnep/Reports/thirteenthreport.
Sweigart, L., Umoren, R., Scott, P., Carlton, K., Jones, J., Truman, B., & Gossett, E. (2016). Virtual TeamSTEPPS simulations produce teamwork
attitude changes among health professions students. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(1), 31-35.
The Joint Commission. (2015). 2016 National Patient Safety Goals: Hospitals. Retrieved
https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/2016_NPSG_HAP_ER.pdf.
The Joint Commission (TJC). (2015). Sentinel event data: root causes by event type 2004-2Q2014. Retrieved
http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/Root_Causes_by_Event_Type_2004-2Q_2014.pdf
QSEN Institute. (2014). Case Western Reserve University. QSEN Competencies. Retrieved http://qsen.org/competencies/
Contact
[email protected]
One Concept at a Time: Using VoiceThread to Engage Students in Learning Nursing Research
MaryKay Maley, DNP, APN, FNP-C, RN-BC, USA
Abstract
Heightening students’ excitement of Nursing Research has always been a challenge. Limited articles and studies (Phillips, 2014; Tsai,
Cheng, Chang, & Liou, 2014; Strickland, Gray, & Hill, 2012) have attempted to introduce creative ways to motivate student learning
in regards to this subject. However, most of these studies involve gaming as a means to learning, which may not be conducive to the
non-traditional or adult learner.One innovative online method that has positively changed nursing research in an RN-BSN online
program is the use of VoiceThread. VoiceThread is a video-chat technological tool, which helps establish a continual faculty presence
in an online classroom environment. Students can hear and see faculty relay information online while responding back using video
chat, all in an asynchronous matter. The literature supports the use of VoiceThread for enhancing educational learning on all
educational levels and within multiple disciplines (Donnelly, Kverno, Belcher, Ledebur & Gerson, 2016; Chan, & Pallapu, 2012; Salas,
2012; Brunvand, & Byrd, 2011; ). By applying VoiceThread, a purchased online plugin that can be adapted through Blackboard, a
research vocabulary review was created called ‘Concept of the Day’. This instructional method follows the simple principles of
language learning- see the word, hear the word, and visualize its meaning (Mai, Ngoc, & Tuan, 2013).In addition to the usual way of
teaching research, via Powerpoint lectures, videos, correlated assignments, etc., each morning students are presented with an e-
mail that links them into a VoiceThread containing the research word of the day. Students can visualize a term, hear the
pronunciation of term, and be given a quick 3-minute or less audio and visual description of the research concept to enhance
comprehension of terminology. Not only does this engage the online student daily; but also, offers students the ability to ask direct
questions immediately of the faculty regarding the concept, and within a reasonable amount of time, have instructor feedback.
“Concept of the Day” also, provides students the ability to listen to research terminology on their own time, as well as return to
learn to the term as many times as needed throughout the course. Overall students’ feedback was extremely positive with this
teaching methodology. Summative evaluation shows that students have a better grasp of research concepts when compared to
prior quarters/semesters using other methods of pedagogy. As for versatility, the implication of employing ‘concept of the day’ is
not limited to teaching nursing research; nor is the format strictly adherent to using VoiceThread. Nurse educators can extend the
‘concept of the day’ to other online courses. In addition, if VoiceThread is not available, other formats of distribution such as
Podcasts or simple PowerPoints can adapt the principles of ‘concept of the day’ to enhance the learning curve. As we move forward
in the academic realm, online learning will be the mainstay of education. Incorporating creative strategies, such as 'concept of the
day' and technologies such as VoiceThread, are needed to promote an active and engaging learning experience for our student.
References
Brunvand, S., & Byrd, S. (2011). Using VoiceThread to promote learning engagement and success for all students. Teaching Exceptional Children.
43(4), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991104300403
Chan, M., & Pallapu, P. (2012). An exploratory study on the use of VoiceThread in a business policy course. Journal of Online Learning andTeaching.
8(3), 223. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol8no3/chan_0912.htm
Donnelly, M. K., Kverno, K. S., Belcher, A. E., Ledebur, L. R., & Gerson, L. D. (2016). Applications of VoiceThread technology in graduate nursing
education. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(11), 655. doi:10.3928/01484834- 20161011-09
Gillis, A., Luthin, K., Parette, H. P., & Blum, C. (2012). Using VoiceThread to create meaningful receptive and expressive learning activities for young
children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(4), 203. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0521-1
Mai, L. H., Ngoc, L. T. B., & Tuan, L. T. (2013). Teaching English through principles of instructed language learning. Theory and Practice in Language
Studies.3(4), 605. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.4.605-611
Phillips, R. M. (2014). Creative classroom strategies for teaching nursing research. Nurse Educator. 39(4), 199-201.
doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000052
Salas, A. (2012). VOICETHREAD: Culture enhances language learning in higher education. The Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education, 22(22), 8.
Strickland, K., Gray, C., & Hill, G. (2012). The use of podcasts to enhance research-teaching linkages in undergraduate nursing students. Nurse
Education in Practice, 12(4), 210. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2012.01.006
Tsai, H., Cheng, C., Chang, C., & Liou, S. (2014). Preparing the future nurses for nursing research: A creative teaching strategy for RN-to-BSN
students: Teaching strategy for research course. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 20(1), 25-31. doi:10.1111/ijn.12119
Contact
[email protected]
Using the Teach-Back Method in Patient Education to Improve HCAHPS Scores
Andrea Marie Centrella-Nigro, DNP, RN, USA
Abstract
Teach-back is an educational technique which involves patients and /or primary learners in the teaching process and asks patients to
restate information as it has been taught to them (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ], 2015). National Quality
Forum (NQF) has recommended using teach-back methodology as one of its 34 endorsed methods of safe practice for healthcare
professionals (NQF, 2010). Much information that is taught in healthcare settings is complicated and it has been estimated that up
to 80% of material is not able to be recalled immediately after a teaching session.
Teach-back has been shown to be an effective method of patient teaching. Patients with heart failure (HF) can recall discharge information better
when the teach-back method is utilized (White, Garbez, Carroll, Brinker & Howie-Esquivel, 2013). Peter et al. (2015) demonstrated significant
improvement in HF readmissions utilizing the teach-back method of teaching in their discharge process. In a recent study of HF patients, utilizing
the teach-back method reduced 30 day HF readmission rates from 18% - 13% (Haney & Shephard, 2014). In a systematic review of nine studies,
Dantic (2014) found that the technique of teach-back in the education of COPD patients resulted in a significant proportion of correct use of
inhalers. Using teach-back as a discharge teaching methodology for total joint patients demonstrated a decrease in 30 day readmissions by 36%
(Green, Dearmon & Taggart, 2015).
In a pilot educational program for nurses to improve their patient teaching strategies, Fidak, Ventura and Green (2014) conclude that formally
educating nurses in the technique of teach-back results in improved knowledge retention of nurses and increased utilization of material taught.
However, they also recommend that more research is needed to evaluate the use of teach-back on patient outcomes and satisfaction.
Although these cited studies have demonstrated improvement in retention of knowledge of health care related information, there remains a gap in
the literature regarding the effect of using this approach in raising patient satisfaction scores as measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of
Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores in the areas of patient education. Do patients perceive that nurses are “always” communicating
and teaching them the information they need regarding
Design - A quasi-experimental design was utilized for this study. Two similar medical units were chosen; one as the intervention group and one as
the control. These two units were chosen as they have a similar acuity level, admission and discharge rates and staffing ratios.
Sample - The intervention group consisted of all the permanently assigned nurses on a designated nursing unit (N=24). The one hour teaching
intervention was presented as an educational requirement for the intervention unit and each nurse was paid for the extra hour and awarded one
contact hour. The control group consisted of the permanently assigned nurses on another similar medical unit (N= 30). The nurses on this unit were
blinded to the intervention in which the experimental unit nurses participated. Nurses on the control unit continued to apply the standard of care
to their patients using their usual method of teaching patients and families.
Instruments - The pre-posttest consists of 6 multiple choice questions (3 multiple choice and 3 true-false) and 3 opened ended, short answers
regarding their knowledge attitudes and beliefs of the teach-back method.
The open-ended questions addressed the current use of teach-back in their nursing practice as well as their perceptions of the technique and if the
technique should be a mandatory part of a nurse’s practice. One example of the 3 open ended questions is: What are your thoughts about the
technique of “teach-back”? State any positive or negative comments.
Content validity of the pre-posttest was established by several expert nurse educators. It was estimated that the 9 item test took 5-7 minutes to
complete.
Procedure - Those in the intervention group signed consent, and took the pretest. Immediately following the pretest administration, a teaching
session on the educational technique of “teach-back” was held. Six different teaching sessions were held in late November and December 2014
over a four week period to accommodate all the direct care nurses on various shifts and was done by the same educator to ensure greater
consistency. This one hour teaching session used various modalities including lecture, role play, discussion and videos. Each nurse participant took
the same test one month after the teach-back technique was introduced. This lapse in time period was planned to capture any changes in
perceptions by nurses as well as to determine an increase in their knowledge of “teach-back”. The tests were coded using the nurse’s employee ID
number to allow for anonymity. Since the education documentation in the patient record did not include the use of teach-back, nurses on the
intervention unit were instructed to document specifically regarding using the technique of teach-back in their patient education sessions. The
nurse educator on the intervention group where the intervention was located monitored the documentation through regular audits of charts
throughout 2015.
After the teaching intervention was implemented by the nurse educator to all permanently, regularly scheduled nursing staff on the intervention
unit, 12 months
of HCAHPS data (January 2015- December 2015) were collected from both the intervention and control group units. This data was compared to the
previous 6 months of HCAHPS scores (July 2014- December 2014). Nurses from both units were not given information about the analysis of these
scores so as to prevent biasing the results. Specifically, seven scores from HCAHPS were collected and analyzed which were applicable to discharge
teaching topics.
Data Analysis - Quantitative analysis was done for multiple choice answers on the pre and posttest. Paired t-tests were used to analyze the
difference in scores in the pretests and posttests of “Teach-Back” using SPSS version 18. Independent t-tests were used to test a difference
between the intervention and control groups for significant differences in HCAHPS scores for the pre-intervention (July-December 2014) and post
intervention time periods (January-December 2015). Qualitative thematic analysis was done on the open-ended questions.
A significant improvement in the knowledge scores in the pretest-posttest was found using paired t-tests (p=.002). For seven HCAHPS statements
related to patient teaching , only one demonstrated significant improvement in the intervention group during one quarter (three months) after
teach-back was initiated p=.025. This question was “Tell you what new medicine was for”. A positive trending of scores was noted in the
intervention group however, some positive scores were also noted in the control group.
Qualitative analysis of nurses’ comments demonstrated strong support for teach-back in the posttest. The common theme among the 24 nurse
respondents was one of support for the use of teach-back in nursing practice. Nurses gave some specific examples when teach-back was used in
his/her practice which included psychomotor skills such as the correct use of inhalers and self-administration of insulin and cognitive learning
specifically dealing with follow-up care after discharge. An increased use of teach-back and positive support for using the teaching technique were
expressed more in the post test when compared with the pretest. This finding was expected as a majority of nurses had expressed that they had
very little knowledge of the teach-back technique prior to the teaching intervention. Nurses supported having teach-back as a mandatory part of
their practice but with the caveat of needing more time allotted in their busy schedules in which to do patient and family teaching. In answer to the
open-ended question, “Do you think the use of ‘teach-back should be mandatory and consistently applied to patient education? Why or why not?”
one nurse stated “realistically time would be a big factor, though it is very useful”. The question arises regarding how much education is being
provided to patients based on the many needs of patients and time constraints of direct care nurses.
Conclusions - The t-score (p=.025) shows there is a significant improvement on the question, ‘Tell you what new medicine was for’ on HCAHPS
scores for the intervention unit. There was a positive trending in some of the other scores related to discharge teaching although not statistically
significant. The qualitative responses of the nurses in the intervention group demonstrated support for the use of teach-back as an evaluation of
taught material. Although nurses recognized the value of using teach-back in their patient education, the perceived lack of time emerged as a
theme from the open-ended statements. Patient and family education can be accomplished in a variety of ways through written materials, videos
embedded into the intranet system that patients can access in addition to the one to one explanations provided by members of the healthcare
team including nurses. More research needs to be done to measure the outcomes of nurses’ knowledge and the use of teach-back in patient
education. Patient and family education continues to challenge nurses in healthcare settings and teach-back is one technique that may improve
outcomes, particularly patient satisfaction.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015) Use the teach-back method: tool #5. Retrieved from:
http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/tools/literacy-toolkit/healthlittoolkit2-tool5.html.
Dantic, D. E. (2014). A critical review of the effectiveness of ‘teach-back’ technique in teaching COPD patients self-management using respiratory
inhalers. Health Education Journal, 73(1):41-50.
Green, U.R., Dearmon, V. & Taggart, H. (2015). Improving transition of care for veterans after total joint replacement. Orthopaedic Nursing, 34(2):
79-88.
Haney, M. & Shepherd, J. (2014). Can teach-back reduce hospital readmissions? American Nurse Today, 9(3): 50-51.
National Quality Forum. (2010). Safe practices for better healthcare: 2010 update. Retrieved from:
https://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2010/04/Safe_Practices_for_Better_Healthcare_%E2%80%93_2010_Update.aspx:
Peter, D., Robinson, P., Jordan, M., Lawrence, S., Casey, K.J. & Salas-Lopez, D. (2015). Reducing readmissions using teach-back. Journal of Nursing
Administration, 45(1): 35-42.
White, M., Garbez, R., Carroll, M., Brinker, E. & Howie-Esquivel, J. (2013). Is “teach-back” associated with knowledge retention and hospital
readmission in hospitalized heart failure patients? Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 28(2): 137-146.
Contact
[email protected]
Improving Patient Self-Efficacy by Incorporating Patient Teaching by Registered Nursing Students in Primary
Care
Patti A. Sparling, DNP, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Primary care needs to meet the health care needs of a growing population seeking care. A shortage of primary care providers makes
scheduling primary care services difficult for patients in underserved areas. Office visits attempt to provide complex care in a short period of time
to accomodate more patients. Chronic disease is expensive to treat. When patients have difficulty understanding the plan of treatment,
exacerbation of symtpoms can occur. Some patients use urgent care and emergency room services when primay care is not available. Integrating
nursing intervention into primary care to enhance available services offers an expanded team of caregivers and improves patient self-efficacy. This
project utilizes registered nursing students to interact with patients by presenting educational information about chronic disease.
Methods: Patients with chronic disease seeking care in a primary care clinic participated in a pilot study to evaluate changes in self-efficacy after
education about their chronic disease. Thirty-nine adult patients participated. The Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale was
used. Registered nursing students participated as patient educators, developed teaching tools and presented chronic disease teaching to patients
in the study. The student experience was evaluated using the Student Evaluation of Clinical Education Environment inventory.
Results: A paired t-test was used to evaluate the pre- and post-test patient results. Findings were statistically significant with p=0.000, showing an
improvement in patient self-efficacy following the intervention. The student survey also showed a positive learning experience for the students
with p=0.000.
Discussion: Enhanced education empowers patients. Socializing student nurses in primary care was shown to be a valuable experience. Continued
evaluation and enhancement of primary care services must be done to meet the growing health care demands of our nation.
Keywords: primary care, self-efficacy, student nurses, self-care, patient education
References
Auerbach, D., Chen, P., Friedberg, M., Reid, R., Lau, C., Buerhaus, P. L., & Mehrotra, A. (2013, November). Nurse-Managed Health Centers and
Patient-Centered Medical Homes Could Mitigate Expected Primary Care Physician Shortage. Health Affairs, 1933-1941.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (2004). Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means. Health Education & Behavior, 143-164.
Bonnel, W., & Smith, K. V. (2014). Proposaol Writing for Nursing Capstones and Clinical Projects. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2015, October 16). Retrieved from Centers for Disease Contron and Prevention:
http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/index.htm
Cogan, J. (2011). The Affordable Care Act's Preventive Services Mandate: Breaking Down the Barriers to Nationwide Access to Preventive Services.
Public Health Reform, 355-365.
Collins, S. (2012). Primary Care Shortages: Strengthening This Sector Is Urgently Needed, Now and in Preparation for Healthcare Reform. American
Health & Drug Benefits, 40-47.
Coventry, P., Lovell, K., Dickens, C., Bower, P., Chew-Graham, C., McElvenry, D., ...Gask, L. (2015). Integrated primary care for patients with mental
and physical multioridity: cluster randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for patients with depression comorbid with diabetes or
cardiovascular disease. The BMJ, 1-12.
Doggrell, S. A. (2010). Adherence to Medicines in the Older-Aged with Chronic Conditions. Drugs & Aging, 239-254.
Erdem, E., Prada, S. I., & Haffer, S. C. (2013). Medicare Payments: How Much Do Chronic Conditions Matter? Medicare & Medicaid Research
Review, 3.
Funk, K., & Davis, M. (2015). Enhancing the Role of the Nurse in Primary Care: The RN "Co-Visit" Model. Journal of General Internam Medicine,
1871-1873.
Hubble, M. (2016). Using SPSS: The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. MHS670 Biostatistics. Cullowhee, NC.
Katz, D., McCoy, K., & Vaughan-Sarrazin, M. (2015). Does Greater Continuity of Veterans Administration Primary Care Reduce Emergency
Department Visits and Hospitalization in Older Veterans? JAGS, 2510-2518.
Kotter, J. (2012). Leading Change. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.
Mackey, S., Hatcher, D., Happell, B., & Cleary, M. (2013). Primary health care as a philosophical and practical framework for nursing education:
Rhetoric or reality? Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 79-84.
NCBON. (2014, January). RN Scope of Practice - Clarification. Retrieved from NCBON: https://www.ncbon.com/myfiles/downloads/position-
statements-decision-trees/rn-position-statement.pdf
Obama, B. (2016). United States Health Care Reform Progress to Date and Next Steps. JAMA, 525-531.
Pumar, M., Gray, C. R., Walsh, J. R., Yang, I. A., Rolls, T. A., & Ward, D. L. (2014). anxiety and depression - Important psychological comorbidities of
COPD. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 1615-1631.
QuickFacts Jackson County, North Carolina. (2014). Retrieved from United States Census Bureau:
http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/37099
Sand-Jecklin, K. (2000). Evaluating the Student Clinical Learning Environment: Development and Validation of the SECEE Inventory. Southern Online
Journal of Nursing Research, 1-15.
Sand-Jecklin, K. (2003). Student Evaluation of clinical Learning Envionment.
Shaw, R., McDuffie, J., Hendrix, C., Edie, A., Lindsey-Davis, L., Nagi, A., ...Williams, J. (2014). Effects of Nurse-Managed Protocols in the Outpatient
Management of Adults Wtih Chronic Conditions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 113-121.
Stanford Medical School. (2016). Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale. Retrieved from Stanford Patient Education Research
Center: http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/research/secd6.html
Stanford School of Medicine. (2016). Research Instruments Developed, Adapted or Used by the Stanford Patient Education Research Center.
Retrieved from Stanford Medicine: http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/research/
Sullivan, E., Ibrahim, Z., Ellner, A., & Giesen, L. (2016). Management Lessons for High-Functioning Primary Care Teams. Journal of Healthcare
Management, 449-466.
Trehearne, B., Fishman, P., & Lin, E. H. (2014). Role of the Nurse in Chronic Illness Management: Making the Medical Home More Effective. Nursing
Economic$, 32(4), 178-184.
US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (n.d.). Primary Care Provider. Retrieved from HealthCare.gov:
https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/primary-care-provider/
Valente, G. S., Cortez, E. A., Cavalcanti, A. C., Marins, F. S., Cosme, N., & Goncalves, L. C. (2014, September). Nursing Mentoring in Primary Care:
Building Skills from Practice. Journal of Nursing, 3047-3058.
Werner, R., Canamucio, A., Marcus, S., & Terwiesch, C. (2014). Primary Care Access and Emergency Room Use Among Older Veterans. Journal of
General Internal Medicine, S689-S694.
Zwarenstein, M., Goldman, J., & Reeves, S. (2009). Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice
and healthcare outcomes. The Cochrane Collaboration, 1-33.
Contact
[email protected]
Using Evidenced-Based Simulations to Enhance Care of Vulnerable Populations
Glenise McKenzie, PhD, RN, USA
Joanne Noone, PhD, RN, CNE, FNP, USA
Abstract
Negative attitudes and discriminatory behaviors of nurses and other health-care professionals towards individuals with health disparities are
prevalent and are associated with serious adverse consequences to the health, quality of care, and quality of life. Simulations can provide valuable
learning opportunities to develop students’ awareness, knowledge and skills in working with vulnerable populations. Learning opportunities that
facilitate an understanding of the lived experience of clients has the potential to change attitudes (Byrne, Platania-Phung, Happell, Harris, &
Bradshaw, 2015). Additionally, authentic learning experiences can facilitate students’ understanding of the trajectory of client experience and their
associated response to client situations, thus improving clinical practice (Kelly, Berragan, Husebø, & Orr, 2016). Increasingly, experiential learning
experiences through simulation are being recommended to teach students about the structural inequities and lived experiences of vulnerable
populations, including the poor (Reid & Evanson, 2016), the mentally ill, (Byrne, Platania-Phung, Happell, Harris, & Bradshaw, 2015) and victims of
domestic violence (Adelman, Rosenberg, & Hobart, 2015). The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the results of two multi-site research
studies that focused on simulations with vulnerable populations: a poverty simulation and mental health simulation of care of a client with
schizophrenia. Poverty is one of the social determinants of health. In order to deliver patient-centered care, it is important for nurses to have an
understanding of the impact of poverty on health-related decisions (Reid & Evanson, 2016). Clients with mental illness experience health disparities
in part due to the negative attitudes by health care providers and associated stigma associated with the disease. Simulation has great potential to
provide learning opportunities to enhance student understanding of stigma, social justice, and health disparities (Mawji & Lind, 2013).
The purpose of this presentation is to describe lessons learned from two multi-site studies of simulation based learning activities. Both studies
were completed in undergraduate nursing programs and focused on improving understanding of and attitudes toward individuals experiencing
stigma and health disparities. Study 1 compared changes in attitudes and understanding of students who completed a three-hour poverty
simulation with a control group of students who did not complete the simulation. Five cohorts of 178 junior baccalaureate nursing students (each
from a different nursing program) enrolled in a populations course participated in the study; two of the cohorts participated in the poverty
simulation and three did not. A 21-item The Attitudes Towards Poverty Short Form (ATP-S) questionnaire was administered at the beginning of the
course and at the end. The ATP-S A has a global score of a range of 21- 105 obtained by summing the item scores; higher scores indicate more
positive attitudes towards poverty. Three subscales have been identified: Personal deficiency, stigma, and structural perspective. Assessment of
students’ beliefs about the link between poverty and health were also collected. Controlling for pretest group differences, posttest means for the
experimental group (78.73) were 3.5 points higher than for the control group (75.72), which was significant at .007. Changes in posttest scores was
attributed for the experimental group to growth in structural perspective subscales. There was a significant association between the simulation and
participants’ beliefs about the link between poverty and health due to living conditions (a structural perspective) rather than behavior, drifting into
poverty, or no link (chi square = 14.1, p=.003).
Study 2, also a multi-site study, explored the impact of a simulation on attitudes and behaviors towards individuals with schizophrenia. . The
purpose of this study was to determine if students who participated in the simulated learning activity would demonstrate a) greater knowledge
about mental health problems; b) reduced negative attitudes towards individuals with schizophrenia; c) greater empathy; and d) greater behavioral
intent to interact with clients with mental illness as compared to those who experience traditional mental health didactic and clinical learning
experiences. This multi-site study used a quasi-experimental comparison of treatment and control groups of 145 students enrolled in a chronic
illness course in their second year of undergraduate nursing education. The control group were exposed to traditional didactic classroom and
practicum experiences. The treatment group additionally experienced a simulation which included individual simulated auditory hallucinations
followed by a standardized patient interaction of a client with schizophrenia. Variables measured included empathy, attitudes about schizophrenia,
fear and behavior intentions. An analysis of covariance model was used to test for differences between groups; the moderating effect of
experience with people with mental illness was also examined. The intervention group showed significantly lower negative emotional perceptions,
with greater difference for participants with less experience at baseline. Changes in empathy were not significant. The moderating effect of level of
experience was evident for student report of decreased fear and increased intent to interact.
Ongoing translation of educational practices aimed at preparing nurses to improve outcomes for vulnerable populations remains critical in our
current healthcare environment. Nurses in all practice areas are likely to interact with individuals with mental illness or those living in poverty.
Facilitating learning opportunities through evidence-based simulations to improve nursing attitudes and behaviors towards people experiencing
stigma can enhance the quality of care and quality of life of those populations.
References
Adelman, M., Rosenberg, R.E. & Hobart, M. (2015). Simulations and social empathy: Domestic violence education in the new millennium. Violence
against Women, 22(12) 1451–1462.
Byrne, L., Platania-Phung, C., Happell, B., Harris, S., & Bradshaw, J. (2015). Changing nursing studentattitudes to consumer participation in mental
health services: A survey study of traditional and lived experience-led education. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 35(9), 704–712.
Kelly, M.A., Berragan, E., Husebø, S.E., & Orr, F. (2016). Simulation in nursing education—International perspectives and contemporary scope of
practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48 (3), 312–321.
Mawji, A. & Lind, C. (2013). Imogene: A simulation innovation to teach community health nursing Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9 (11), e513-e519.
Reid, C.A.& Evanson, T.A. (2016). Using simulation to teach about poverty in nursing education: A review of the literature. Journal of Professional
Nursing, 32 (2), 130-140.
Contact
[email protected]
The Effect of the Poverty Simulation on BSN Student Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes
Julie B. Meaux, PhD, USA
Pamela Ashcraft, PhD, USA
Abstract
Background and Significance- An estimated 14.5 % of people in the United States lived below the poverty line in 2014 (United States
Census Bureau, 2015). In Arkansas, overall poverty rates are estimated at 18.5%, and are as high as 26% for families with young
children. It is important to educate and sensitize nursing students to the realities of living in poverty, as well as to the impact poverty
has on health and health-related decisions. High-fidelity simulation is one teaching strategy being used to help nursing students
acquire knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to provide culturally competent patient-centered care (Patterson, & Hulton,
2012). The purpose of this research was to test the effectiveness of a high-fidelity simulation activity – the Poverty Simulation
(Missouri Association for Community Action, 2011) – on knowledge, skills, and attitudes of poverty and poor people, of junior level
nursing students enrolled in a pre-licensure BSN program.
Methods - For this mixed-method study, a total of 67 pre-licensure nursing students completed the Attitudes toward Poverty and Poor People
survey (short form) at the beginning of the spring semester. The 21-item Likert scale has established validity and reliability (Yun & Weaver, 2010)
and was used to determine pre-intervention knowledge and attitudes. Eight weeks later, the Poverty Simulation was conducted. The simulation
took place in a large open room with 16 tables representing various community agencies set up around the perimeter and 11 clusters of
tables/chairs set up in the center of the room representing families and individuals. Student participants assumed the role of individuals in low-
income families. Family scenarios helped participants decide how to seek services and support, obtain financial assistance, and determine how to
spend their money. The task of each “family” was to provide for basic necessities for one month, which was represented by four 15-minute time
periods. The entire activity, including simulation and debriefing, lasted approximately 3 hours. A total of sixty-five students participated in the
simulation activity. Immediately following the simulation activity, students again completed the Attitudes toward Poverty and Poor People survey
(short form). Differences between baseline and post-simulation scores were analyzed. In addition, student participants submitted post-intervention
reflections on the Poverty Simulation experience that were analyzed using qualitative methods that included coding, identification of common
themes, and constant comparison.
Results – A total of 65 pre- and post-survey pairs were included in the final analysis. Participants had a mean age of 21.86 years, were
predominantly white (86.2%), and most identified themselves as “Christian” (96.9%). The majority of participants (89.6%) described their families
of origin as financially “somewhat secure” to “very secure” with the remaining 10.7% indicating “somewhat insecure” to “very insecure”. Fourteen
(21.5%) participants indicated that their families had received public assistance.
The Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used to analyze survey data. Z scores were statistically significant (p < .05) for 12 of the 21 items; indicating a
shift toward more understanding and sensitivity toward the challenges faced by those living in poverty. Qualitative analysis suggested that the
Poverty Simulation was “an eye opening experience” that helped students gain “insight” and “awareness”. Students described feelings ranging
from “helplessness” and “sadness” to “guilt” and “frustration” as they worked through the simulation scenarios.
Conclusions – The results of this research suggests that the high-fidelity poverty simulation is an effective teaching strategy and is useful in
improving BSN student attitudes toward poverty and poor people. While the generalizability of these findings are limited due to the relative
homogeneity of the sample and the single site, the findings are consistent with a previous studies (Clarke, Sedlacek, & Watson, 2016; Patterson, &
Hulton, 2012; Yang, Woomer, Agbemenu, & Williams, 2014) that found participation in the poverty simulation led to greater empathy for the
experiences of those living with limited resources. In addition, participants indicated that the simulation really helped them to understand the
importance of knowing what community resources are available. Use of the high-fidelity poverty simulation has the potential to have a positive
impact on culturally competent care of BSN students.
References
Clarke, C., Sedlacek, R. K., & Watson, S. B. (2016). Impact of a simulation exercise on pharmacy student attitude toward poverty. American journal
of pharmaceutical education, 80(2), 1-7.
Missouri Association for Community Action (2011). Community action poverty simulation. Retrieved October 10, 2016, from:
http://www.povertysimulation.net/
Patterson, N., & Hulton, L. J. (2012). Enhancing nursing students' understanding of poverty through simulation. Public Health Nursing, 29(2), 143-
151.
United States Census Bureau. (2015). Retrieved October 10, 2016 from: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2016/demo/p60-256.html.
Yang, K., Woomer, G. R., Agbemenu, K., & Williams, L. (2014). Relate better and judge less: Poverty simulation promoting culturally competent care
in community health nursing. Nurse Education in Practice, 14,680-685.
Yun, S., & Weaver, R. D. (2010). Development and validation of a short form of the attitude toward poverty scale. Advances in Social Work, 11(2),
174-187.
Contact
[email protected]
A Model for Sustaining NCLEX® Success
Patricia Sullivan Conklin, MSN, RN, USA
Leonita Hannon Cutright, MSN, RN, USA
Susan T. Sanders, DNP, RN, NEA-BC, USA
Abstract
Schools of nursing are charged with educating the next generation of nurses who demonstrate the knowledge and clinical reasoning
skills to become licensed and safe practitioners in the increasingly complex health care system. First time National Council Licensure
Exam (NCLEX®) success is a key measurement, which holds schools of nursing accountable for strong preparation of their graduates.
High failure rates may create a perception of lack of commitment to the ethical responsibility schools of nursing share for student
success. State Boards of Nursing and accrediting bodies may impose sanctions on schools who do not meet benchmark goals for
NCLEX® pass rates established by these organizations.
Recognizing this, coupled with concerns about a decline in their school’s 2010 pass rate to 74.75% the authors created an individualized NCLEX®
study process. This process is known as the Kaplan Learning Integrated Course (KLIC) and is based on the integrated testing and content review
product used in the authors’ institution. The purpose of KLIC is to achieve NCLEX® pass rates equal to or greater than the national average. This
paper will describe the evolution of this process which was incorporated into the curriculum and resulted in first time pass rates 5.41-11.5% above
the national Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) NCLEX® average for four consecutive years. Institutional Review Board approval was sought for
this retrospective review and granted as an exempt study through the authors’ institution.
Anticipating the increase of one logit to the 2013 passing standard, the authors conducted a literature review to explore characteristics of students
who were at risk for NCLEX® failure. Factors such as (a) English as a second language (ESL) (Hansen & Beaver, 2012; O’Neill, Marks & Liu, 2006;
Woo, Wendt & Liu, 2009); (b) lag time, defined as delaying NCLEX® 26-33 days after a student completes the nursing program (Eich & O’Neill, 2007;
Stone & Woodberry, 2006; Woo et al., 2009); (c) course failure defined as out of sequence students (OOS) (Frith, Sewell & Clark, 2005; Pennington
& Spurlock, 2010); and (d) low scores on content readiness integrated testing (Sanders & Irwin, 2014) were all found to contribute to low first time
pass rates.
Five major themes of interventional strategies that demonstrate positive outcomes on NCLEX® success were evident throughout the literature
search: (a) use of nationally recognized standardized testing; (b) use of a review course format; (c) anxiety control; (d) remediation; (e) faculty
mentoring.
KLIC is a hybrid pedagogy of synchronous and asynchronous learning centralized into the electronic management learning system of the university.
Components of KLIC include web links to the NCLEX® prep resources available through the integrated product, NCSBN, and the Virginia State Board
of Nursing.
KLIC was implemented with all students graduating in the spring, 2013. Seven at risk students who were either OOS or ESL were invited to
participate in an individual study progress analysis. Five of the seven students, 71.42% in this pilot process, were successful in passing NCLEX® on
the first attempt. The overall class first time success rate was 91.38% for this 2013 cohort of students.
At risk students were further expanded with the Fall, 2013 cohort to include students who achieved < 55th percentile on the Assessment test. While
focus on at risk students was a priority, all students in each cohort were provided access to individual faculty support and guidance. Cumulative
pass rates reflect a 95% success for all first time test-takers from the authors’ institution. Although the 5% who failed were identified as at risk, this
only represents 8.3% of the total at risk population.
Since KLIC was introduced, graduates have achieved a sustained pass rate 5.41%-11.5% greater than the national BSN average for four consecutive
years. This preparation process incorporates the tools for students to provide concurrent review of the entire curriculum content and integrated
threads. The benchmark for NCLEX® pass rates established by the Program, Quality and Evaluation committee of the School of Nursing have been
met consistently after the implementation of KLIC.
More study is warranted with cohorts of varying demographics and needs. Collaboration with other schools of nursing to replicate and validate this
process has been initiated to provide greater evidence of its effectiveness with a less homogenous group of students.
References
Carr, S.M. (2011). NCLEX-RN Pass rate peril: One school’s journey through curriculum revision, standardized testing, and attitudinal change. Nursing
Carrick, J.A. (2011). Student achievement and NCLEX success: Problems that persist. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 78-83.
Corrigan-Magaldi, M., Colalillo, G. & Molloy, J. (2014) Faculty-facilitated remediation: A model to transform at-risk students. Nurse Educator, 39(4),
155-157.
Culleiton, A. (2009) Remediation: A closer look in an educational context. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, (4), 22-27.
Eich, M. & O’Neill, T. (2007). NCLEX delay pass rate study. NCLEX Psychometric Research Brief. Retrieved from NCSBN.
https://www.ncsbn.org/delaystudy2006.pdf
Frith, K., Sewell, J., & Clark D. (2005). Best practices in NCLEX-R readiness preparation for baccalaureate student success. Computer, Informatics,
Nursing, 23(6), 322-329.
Hansen, E. & Beaver, S. (2012) Faculty support for ESL nursing students: Action plan for success. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(4) 246-250.
Hyland, J.R. (2012). Building on the evidence: Interventions promoting NCLEX success. Open Journal of Nursing. 2(2012), 231-
238.http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2012.23036
Irwin, B.J., Arnoldussen, B., Burckhardt, J.A., Dobish, B., Finesilver, C., Gardner, P., …Redemske, M. (Eds.). (2016). NCLEX-RN content review guide.
(4thed). New York, NY: Kaplan, Inc.
Kaplan, Inc. (2017). NCLEX Resources. Kaplan Nursing. Retrieved from https://nit.kaplan.com/home
Lavin, J., & Rosario-Sim, M. (2013). Understanding the NCLEX: How to increase success on the revised 2013 examination. Nursing Education
McDowell, B. (2008). KATTS: A framework for maximizing NCLEX-RN performance. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(4) 183-186.
National Council of State Boards of Nursing, (2017). Setting the NCLEX passing standards. https://www.ncsbn.org/2630.htm
O’Neill, T., Marks, C., & Liu W. (2006). Assessing the impact of English as a second language status on licensure examination. Retrieved from NCSBN.
http://www.ncsbn.org/ESL_Licensure.pdf
Pennington, T. D., & Spurlock, D. (2010). A systematic review of the effectiveness of remediation interventions to improve NCLEX-RN pass rates.
Journal of Nursing Education, 49(9), 485-492. doi:10.3928/01484834-20100630-05
Sanders, S.T. & Irwin, B.J., (2014). Kaplan nursing integrated testing program faculty manual: Statistical analysis results (11th ed.). New York: Kaplan
Stone, S., & Woodbery, P. (2006). A guide to NCLEX-RN success. NSNA Imprint, 53(1) 21.
Woo, A., Wendt, A., & Liu, W. (2009). NCLEX pass rates: An investigation into the effect of lag time and retake attempts. JONA’S Healthcare Law,
Ethics, and Regulation, 11(1), 23-26.
Contact
[email protected]
Effectiveness of an Adaptive Quizzing System to Improve Nursing Students’ Learning
E'Loria Simon-Campbell, PhD, USA
Julia Phelan, PhD, USA
Abstract
Background: Nursing school graduates must pass the NCLEX-RN before they become a practicing nurse and NCLEX-RN pass rates
have emerged an indicator of program quality for state boards of nursing and the nursing schools’ community of interest (Holstein,
Zangrilli, & Tahoa, 2006). The first time pass rate score of nursing programs are important to both students and nursing programs. If
students are not successful on the NCLEX-RN they are unable to pursue their chosen career resulting in loss of income and potential
impact on self-esteem (Frith, Sewell, & and Clark, 2006). For nursing programs, low NCLEX pass rates have an adverse effect on
enrollment, accreditation, funding, and faculty recruitment and retention. Strategies for increasing NCLEX-RN pass rates range from
modifying admission criteria, altering the number of times students can retake courses once in the program, and implementing
remediation and progression policies. End of Program - High stakes testing uses a signal assessment/testing score as a means
determining a student’s readiness for the NLCEX-RN Exam and may be used to prevent a student from graduating (Spurlock,
2006[EC1] ). The implementation of high stakes testing has not been shown to be effective in improving education program quality
and could hinder the ability to address the actual causes of low NCLEX-RN pass rate (Spurlock, 2013).
The National League of Nursing’s Presidential Task Force on High stakes testing developed the Fair Testing Guidelines for Nursing Education in
order to examine the use of testing as a graduation requirement in nursing programs. These guidelines note the importance of evaluation methods
to support student learning and to improve and evaluate teaching and program effectiveness (NLN, 2012). Moselbee and Benton (2016) encourage
the move from high stakes testing to comprehensive competency, which supports improvements to both nursing curriculum and faculty
development in an effort to reduce the stress of high stakes testing among nursing students and produce positive student outcomes (diagnostic
standardized exam scores, NCLEX first time pass rates, student retention, and student satisfaction).
Purpose: The current study focused on the implementation of a strategy which combines ongoing learning and remediation in a more personalized
approach to out-of-class studying involving digital learning materials. Basic online assessment tools have been used and studied with an eye to
determining how they can best be utilized in out-of-class environments. Online quizzing systems are a way of efficiently providing the potential
benefits of in class formative assessment, but in an easier to administer and monitor environment.
Method: In this study, we explored the impact of the implementation of an adaptive quizzing system (AQS) during the final semester of a BSN
program on nursing students’ performance. The AQS provide students an environment in which they can effectively and efficiently practice and
learn nursing skills and concepts over time as well as to prepare for exams (like the NCLEX). It allows students to practice and learn in a low-stakes,
authentic environment to help prepare for higher-stakes exams (e.g., NCLEX-RN). This type of practice can also be invaluable to populations such as
EL (English learner) or LEP (limited English proficient) students as well as those requiring extra support in content mastery and test-taking
strategies.
The project was a retrospective study conducted at a baccalaureate school of nursing in the southeast United States. The study implemented a
retrospective descriptive and correlational design to explore the relationship between usage and mastery measured in the AQS, course outcome
data, standardized testing (ATI) scores, and NCLEX outcomes. Retrospective data were collected from 36 senior-level nursing students.
Results: Students answered an average of 574 quiz questions and had an overall average quizzing mastery level of 3.48 (max = 8). Students took an
average of 5.94 practice exams and had an overall exam mastery level of 6.62. There was a strong, positive correlation between the number of AQS
questions a student answered and overall mastery level. Thus, we see as students answer more questions, their mastery of the course material
increases accordingly. All students in the group passed the NCLEX-RN (on the first or second attempt). In the most recent two prior years before the
AQS was implemented, the NCLEX-RN pass rates at the study school were 73.91% (2014) and 88.06% (2015). The 2016 study cohort had a 100%
pass rate (88.9% passed on their first attempt).
Surveys: Students were given the opportunity to complete three online surveys. Of the 36 eligible students 25 responded to Survey 1, 21 to Survey
2, and 20 to Survey 3. Twenty students responded to all three survey measures (a 55.5% response rate).
Survey 1: The first set of questions asked students to respond to statements about their motivations and study habits. The most important
motivations for students were improving skills and understanding course work. Most highly rated goals were to learn and master new skills. Less
important to students were items relating to comparisons to other students. The second set of questions focused on learning and study practices
and attitudes. The most highly ranked item in the set was related to students finding relationships between what they are learning and already
know (M = 4.28). Several items related to difficulties students may have studying. The third set of questions focused on study habits in general. The
most highly ranked general study habits chosen by students to be most true of them, were when studying they tried to determine which concepts
they did not understand well (M = 3.96), and they tried to relate new material to what they already knew (M = 3.96). The lowest ranked study
habits relate to the underlying concept of retrieval practice. Students were less likely to study by writing summaries of the main ideas they had
learned, or making up questions to focus reading.
Survey 2: Students provided survey-feedback on their usage and opinions on the AQS. Of the 21/36 students who responded, the majority
indicated that use of the AQS improved their performance in the course. The majority of students also indicated that the AQS was helpful in
preparing for exams, getting feedback on strengths and weaknesses, increased knowledge of course concepts as well as preparing for the NCLEX.
Survey 3: This survey asked students to report on their NCLEX experience and was verified with data obtained by the school. Twenty students
responded to the third student survey. Summary results are presented below. Students reported taking the NCLEX between May 25th and June
14th, 2016. Eighteen students (90%) reported passing the NCLEX and two students reported not-passing. Students reported answering an average
of 123.95 NCLEX questions (SD = 75.29) with a range from 75-265. Nine students reported answering 75 questions and four students reported
answering 265.
Conclusion: The findings of this descriptive retrospective analyses were consistent with the findings from another baccalaureate nursing program
also located in Southeast Texas. Both studies support the utilization of adaptive quizzing as a learning strategy for nursing students both during and
after nursing school and indicate that as students actively study and learn in the system, their mastery of course content increases. Data from the
AQS provide information and insight was beneficial to all stakeholders. The AQS provide students an environment in which they can effectively and
efficiently practice and learn nursing skills and concepts over time as well as to prepare for exams (like the NCLEX). It allows students to practice
and learn in a low-stakes, authentic environment to help prepare for higher-stakes exams (e.g.,NCLEX-RN). The AQS is an effective powerful tool for
formative assessment and remediation, providing instructors with meaningful data that reveals student misconceptions and areas of weakness.
This provides invaluable time for faculty to evaluate both the learners’ understanding of content, critical thinking skills, and test taking ability.
References
Frith, K. H., Sewell, J. P., & Clark, D. J. (2006). Best practices in NCLEX‐RN readiness preparation for baccalaureate student success. CIN: Computers,
Informatics, Nursing, 24, 46S-53S.
Holstein, B. L., Zangrilli, B. F., & Taboas, P. (2006). Standardized testing tools to support quality educational outcomes. Quality Management in
Health Care, 15(4), 300–308
Molesbee, C. P., & Benton, B. (2016). A move away from high-stakes testing toward comprehensive competency. Teaching and Learning in Nursing,
11(1), 4-7. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2015.10.003
National League for Nursing (2012, February). The fair testing imperative in nursing education. A living document from the National League for
Nursing. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/about/nln-vision-series-%28position-statements%29/nlnvision_4.pdf
Spurlock, D. J. (2006). Do no harm: progression policies and high-stakes testing in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(8), 297−302.
Spurlock, D., Jr. (2013). The promise and peril of high-stakes tests in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 4(1), 4. dio:
https://dio.org/10.1016/s2155-8256(15)30172-1
Sullivan, D. (2014). A concept analysis of “High-Stakes Testing”. Nurse Educator, 39(2), 72−76. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000021
Contact
[email protected]
An Educational Intervention to Enhance Nurse Practitioner Role Transition in the First Year of Practice
Angela R. Thompson, DNP, FNP-C, CDE, BC-ADM, USA
Abstract
Role transition is a natural process that occurs when the registered nurse (RN) pursues additional education and training in
preparation to become a nurse practitioner (NP). This role transition is complex with multiple yet distinct phases, beginning with
entrance into the educational program and continuing as long as two years’ post-graduation (Brown & Olshansky, 1997; Cusson &
Viggiano, 2002; Heitz, Steiner, & Burman, 2004). The journey of practicing from the “side of the bed to the head of the bed” (Cusson
& Viggiano, 2002, p. 21) generates anxiety, insecurity, and increased stress in the graduate, ultimately causing role confusion and
disruption in role identity, thereby leading to a longer adjustment period. Graduate NPs feel an unreasonably high expectation to be
clinically competent immediately after graduation in order to have “mastered” the new role of the practicing NP (Cusson & Viggiano,
2002). Moreover, graduate NPs tend to blame themselves for experiencing these emotions and internalize these feelings, further
exacerbating the sense of isolation and incompetence (Hill & Sawatzky, 2011). A compounding factor is the employer and new NPs
expectation that they “hit the ground running” (Brown & Olshansky, 1997). This pressure combined with insufficient opportunities
during the NP program for socialization results in graduate NPs feeling like “imposters” (Hill & Sawatzky, 2011).
There are a few qualitative and cross-sectional studies that have investigated strategies to facilitate the role transition of NP
graduates. Nonetheless, current findings support formal orientation programs, informal and formal mentoring, as well as
professional networking and socialization activities as positive influences on NP role transition (Bahouth & Esposito-Herr, 2009;
Barnes, 2015; Cusson & Strange, 2008; Duke, 2010; Fleming & Carberry, 2011; Hart & Macnee, 2007). To date, there are no
published quantitative studies that evaluate outcomes of role transition programs on graduate NP transition to practice. There is a
gap in knowledge regarding strategies to support professional NP role transition during this critical time period. Therefore, purpose
of this study is to investigate whether an evidence-based role transition webinar provided to graduate NPs would result in improved
integration into practice.
The study design is a non-randomized, pretest-posttest, single-group study utilizing a convenience sample. The target population
consists of nurse practitioners within the first year of practice willing to participate in the study. The Nurse Practitioner Role
Transition Survey (NPRTS) was used to measure the role transition of the study participants. The NPRST is a 16-item survey with a 5-
point Likert scale consisting of three components: Developing Comfort and Building Competence, Understanding of the Role by
Others, and Collegial Support. The response options are: (1) Strongly disagree, (2) Disagree, (3) Neither disagree or agree, (4) Agree,
and (5) Strongly agree. The potential range of scores is 16 to 80, with higher scores equating to a more successful transition. The
content reliability and validity for measuring NP role transition with the 16-item NPRTS of this study population was 0.77 using
Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency.
The intervention was a recorded evidence-based webinar on NP role transition components across the spectrum, with Brown and Olshansky (1998)
Limbo to Legitimacy serving as the theoretical foundation. The webinar is divided into four sections that mirror the NP role transitional phases
identified in this model. The webinar provides education on the issues known to impact role transition within the first year of practice including
nurse practitioner transitional phases, the regulatory issues of licensure, certification, prescriptive authority; role conflict resolution strategies;
organizational components of practice such as privileges, practice agreements, and credentialing; as well as business management concepts like
billing and coding.
Participants were recruited through email invitation utilizing the Coalition of Advanced Practice Nurses of Indiana (CAPNI) membership list-serve
and Nurse Practitioner program directors for the state of Indiana and the surrounding Midwest. Participants engaged in the webinar one to three
weeks after the pre-survey and two to three months before taking the post-survey.
A total of 30 participants completed all components of the study. The mean pre-survey score was 54.72 at a 95% confidence interval
with a standard deviation of 6.7, a slightly negative skew, and positive kurtosis indicating a slightly above average degree of
confidence in NP role transition prior to participation in the educational intervention. The study participants were exclusively female
(100%), 90% white, with 75% being in the age range of 31-59. Only 7.5% of participates graduated within three months of
participation, (45%) graduated 4-6 months prior to participation, and 15% graduated within 7-9 months. Over 60% had 6-15 years
RN experience before entering their NP program. The highest program participation was from Indiana University Purdue University
of Indianapolis (25%), followed by Indiana Wesleyan (15%), and Indiana State University (7.5%). Over 25% of participants were from
NP programs in Ohio and Illinois.
The lowest mean scores for participants were in the areas of NP program preparation (=3.10/5), understanding of the NP role by the
public (=2.73/5), and ease of transition from nurse to NP (=3.06/5). The highest mean scores were being treated as a professional by
colleagues (=4.32/5), understanding of the NP role with nurse colleagues (=3.90/5), and having the skills to deal with NP role
transition (=3.70/5). There was no statistically significant difference observed regarding years practicing as RN (P=0.731), time from
program completion (p=0.145), or NP program (p=0.888), and NPRTS scores.
There was a positive association seen between age range of the participant and higher NPRTS scores in the post-test (p<0.000). This
is the first study to demonstrate that there are possibly age-related differences in NP role transition, indicating perhaps more life
experience equates to improved coping skills and in general enhances NP role adjustment.
The educational webinar was shown to have a statistically significantly positive influence on the participant’s reported perceptions
of NP role transition as it relates to confidence (item 6) (P <0.019) and smooth transition (item 7) (p <0.026), but not on the NPRTS
comparison scores as a whole (pre-survey u= 54.7/80, post-survey u=54.0667, P= 0.616).
Several indicators showed improvement in mean scores after completion of the webinar including comfort level with patients, skills
to deal with role transition, and the requirement of less time for responsibilities. Improvements in these factors have important
practical applications to NP practice since facilitators of NP role transition can lead to shorter and possibly less complicated
adjustment period. And although it is unknown if the improvement is directly associated with the educational intervention, it is
encouraging nonetheless and warrants further investigation to understand the significance fully.
The most problematic barrier identified with this study is the timing of the study implementation to the time of NP graduation. Due
to the study implementation being in the fall, almost half of the study participants (47.5%) had graduated the previous December, or
more than nine months prior to the study launch. Another 45% graduated 4-6 months preceding the study in May. Unfortunately,
7.5% of the study participants graduated within three months of program implementation when the webinar content would have
been most applicable. As a result, over half of the study participants were outside of this ideal window of opportunity and may not
have benefited as much from participation.
In conclusion, it has been recognized that NP students devote most of their energy during their NP program to the clinical aspects of
NP practice, leaving little time for professional NP role development (Hamric & Hanson, 2003). This phenomenon contributes to a
slower and more difficult NP role transition (Duke, 2010; Hart & Macnee, 2007; Latham & Fahey, 2006). Having practical and
assessable educational interventions to optimize NP role transition can result in positive affirmation of the NP role and should help
to solidify NPs contributions to healthcare to consumers and other healthcare providers. Determining the factors that contribute to
the success of NP role transition, including optimal timing would be prudent. Therefore, steps need to be taken to facilitate
successful transition so that graduates can transform into effective providers as soon as possible.
References
Bahouth, M. N., & Esposito-Herr, M. B. (2009, January-March). Orientation program for hospital-based nurse practitioners. Advanced Critical Care,
20(1), 82-90.
Barnes, H. (2015, February). Exploring the factors that influence nurse practitioners’ role transition. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 11(2), 178-
183.
Barnes, H. (2015, July). Nurse practitioner role transition: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 50, 137-146. http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1111/nuf.12078
Brown, M., & Olshansky, E. (1997, Jan/Feb). From limbo to legitimacy: A theoretical model of the transition to the primary care nurse practitioner
role. Nursing Research, 46(1), 46-51.
Brown, M., & Olshansky, E. (1998, July). Becoming a primary care nurse practitioner: Challenges of the initial year of practice. The Nurse
Practitioner, 23, 46-64.
Cusson, R. M. (2015). Development and testing of a scale to measure nurse practitioner role transition (Paper 661). Retrieved from University of
Connecticut: http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/661/
Cusson, R. M., & Strange, S. N. (2008, October-December). Neonatal nurse practitioner role transition: The process of reattaining expert status.
Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 22(4), 329-337.
Cusson, R. M., & Viggiano, N. M. (2002, March). Transition to the neonatal nurse practitioner role: making the change from the side of the bed to
the head of the bed. Neonatal Network, 21(2), 21-28. Retrieved from ncbi.nlm.gov/pubmed/11923997
Duke, C. (2010). The lived experience of the nurse practitioner graduates' transition to hospital-based practice (Doctoral dissertation, East Carolina
University). Retrieved from http://thescholarship.ecu.edu/bitstream/handle/10342/2934/Duke_ecu_0600D_10225.pdf
Fleming, E., & Carberry, M. (2011). Steering a course towards advanced nurse practitioner: A critical care perspective. British Association of Critical
Care Nurses, 16(2), 67-76.
Hamric, A. B., & Hanson, C. M. (2003, Sept-Oct). Educating advanced practice nurses for practice reality. Journal of Professional Nursing, 19, 262-
268. Retrieved from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14613065
Hart, A. M., & Macnee, C. L. (2007, January). How well nurse practitioners prepared for practice: Results of a 2004 questionnaire study. Journal of
American Academy of Nurse Practitioner, 19, 35-42. Retrieved from ncbi.nlm.nih/gov/pubmed/17214866
Heitz, L. J., Steiner, S. H., & Burman, M. E. (2004, September). RN to FNP: A qualitative study of role transition. Journal of Nursing Education, 43(9),
416-420.
Hill, L. A., & Sawatzky, J. V. (2011, May-June). Transitioning into the nurse practitioner role through mentorship. Journal of Professional Nursing,
27(3), 161-167.
Latham, C. L., & Fahey, L. J. (2006). Novice to expert advanced practice nurse role transition: Guided student self-reflection. Journal of Nursing
Education, 45(1), 46-48.
MacLellan, L., Levett-Jones, T., & Higgens, I. (2015, July). Nurse practitioner role transition: A concept analysis. Journal of the American Association
of Nurse Practitioners, 27, 389-397.
Poronsky, C. B. (2012, November). A literature review of mentoring for RN-to-FNP transition. Journal of Nursing Education, 51, 623-631.
http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.3928/01484834-20120914-03
Poronsky, C. (2013, November/December). Exploring the transition from registered nurse to family nurse practitioner. Journal of Professional
Nursing, 29(6), 350-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.011
Contact
[email protected]
Minimizing Transition Shock: Preparing Graduates for the Real World
Judy E. Duchscher, PhD, Canada
Abstract
The preparation for, and integration of professional graduates into the dynamic climate of the contemporary workplace today
continues to challenge institutions of higher education and employers as well as administrators and labour policy makers across
North America. The education of our contemporary workforce is a dynamic process that seeks to balance advanced professional
concepts and ideals with work-role realities. The unavoidable space that exists between the educational ideal and the practice
reality can be alarming and exhausting for the new graduate. The author (Duchscher, 2007) presents her model of Transition Shock
© in which changing roles, relationships, responsibilities, and knowledge become critical catalysts in the development of a new
graduates’ evolving professional identity during the initial 12 months of their practice. Two critical issues that feed into the
experience of transition shock will be emphasized. Firstly, professional nursing practice is NOT as simple as the application of theory
to ‘text book’ clinical events. Rather, the development of proficient practice habits results from: 1) the subtle integration of theory
into varied practice experiences, 2) the maturation of one’s political, economic, organizational, cultural and socio-developmental
insight, 3) the know-how that comes with collaboratively consulting with other nurses and healthcare professionals during the
course of a day, and 4) the expertise that settles in as one both observes and participates in practice over time. Secondly, the
transition shock experience is not an isolated professional experience. The response to a major change like the initial integration into
a professional role affects the whole of the nurse: it is intellectual, physical, social, cultural, developmental, spiritual, emotional, and
economic. While it is commonly accepted that there will be an adjustment when making a significant change in one’s life such as the
initial integration into professional practice, what is often underestimated is the degree of pervasiveness of this experience.
Duchscher brings over 16 years of research, innovation and direct experience in the area of new graduate professional role
transition. With over 80 international presentations to multiple disciplines and 10 years as the CEO of a large Canadian non-profit
organization that has served to support, sustain and develop leadership capacity in new professional nursing graduates, the author
offers insights for educators on how to prepare professionals in a way that minimizes the stress they experience as they navigate
this new context, while maximizing their early career clinical and professional contributions. Optimizing a smooth professional role
transition for our graduates not only maximizes their effectiveness as representatives of a professional discipline, but offers them to
our communities as ambassadors of higher education and champions of social responsibility within the work world.
References
Blegen, M.A., Spector, N., Ulrich, B.T., Lynn, M.R., Barnsteiner, J., & Silvestre, J. (2015). Preceptor support in hospital transition to practice
programs. Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(12): 642–649.
Duchscher, J.E.B. (2012). From Surviving to Thriving: Navigating the First Year of Professional NursingPractice (2nd Ed). Calgary, AB: Nursing the
Future.
Dyess, S. and Parker, C.B. (2012). Transition support for the newly licensed nurse: a programme that made a difference. Journal of Nursing
Management, 20, 615–623.
Rhéaume, A., Clément, M., LeBel, N., RN, & Robichaud, K. (2011). Workplace Experiences of New Graduate Nurses. Nursing Leadership, 24 (2), 80-
98.
Rush, K.L., Adamack, M., Gordon, J., Lilly, M., & Janke, R. (2013). Best practices of formal new graduate nurse transition programs: An integrative
review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(3): 345–356.
Spence Laschinger, H. K., Cummings, G., Leiter, M., Wong, C., MacPhee, M., Ritchie, J., Wolff, A., Regan, S., Rheaume-Bruning, A., Jeffs, L., Young-
Ritchie, C., Grinspun, D., Gurnham, M. E., Foster, B., Huckstep, S., Ruffolo, M., Shamian, J., Burkoski, V., Wood, K., & Read, E. (2016). Starting out: A
time-lagged study of new graduate nurses’ transition to practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 57: 82-95. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.005
Contact
[email protected]
The Transition From Military Nurse to Nurse Faculty
Katie A. Chargualaf, PhD, RN, CMSRN, USA
Brenda Elliott, PhD, RN, USA
Barbara J. Patterson, PhD, RN, ANEF, USA
Abstract
Background: There is a global shortage of qualified nurse faculty which is expected to worsen as faculty age and retire. Analysis of
data collected from The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Annual Survey of Baccalaureate and Graduate Programs
in Nursing (2006-2015) indicates that nearly one third of all nurse faculty are projected to retire within the next 10 years (Fang &
Kesten, 2017).
In academic year 2015-2016, the AACN reported that there are 1,328 vacant full-time nurse faculty positions comprising 7% of total budgeted full-
time positions nationally (AACN, 2016). The sequela of this shortage resulted in 68,938 qualified applicants being denied admission into nursing
programs for reasons including the faculty shortage (AACN, 2015). Despite ongoing efforts to recruit and retain faculty to fill these vacancies,
experts caution that nursing schools must prepare for faculty departure (Fang & Kesten, 2017).
Recruitment of retiring or separating military nurses is a viable solution to this problem. Collectively, military nurses are a uniquely qualified and
diverse pool of professional nurses from which to recruit for faculty positions. Lake, Allen, and Armstrong (2016) have argued that these nurses
have a sustained work ethic and skill set which makes them strong candidates for nurse faculty positions.
Literature Review: The transition from clinical practice to academia is often described as challenging. The motivation to teach often stems from a
desire to share knowledge and experience to positively influence future nurses. The work-role transition from clinical practice to academia requires
nurses to learn new norms and values and in doing so form a new educator identity (Duffy, 2013). Yet, feelings of stress and fear are often reported
in the period between shedding the clinician identity and constructing the new educator identity (Weidman, 2013). A meta-synthesis by Murray,
Stanley, and Wright (2014) revealed that this shift in identity is a universal theme across qualitative studies investigating clinical to academic
transitions.
Although previously considered clinical experts, a lack experience and academic preparation in teaching results in a lack of appreciation of role
responsibilities and feelings of unpreparedness for new nurse educators (McDermid, Peters, Daly, & Jackson, 2013). The complexity of the nurse
educator role which includes expectations of teaching, advising, scholarship, and committee membership is surprising to new faculty (McDermid et
al., 2013). Schoening’s (2013) Nurse Educator Transition Model recognizes a state of disorientation created when new educators return to a novice
position. Across studies, nurse educators acknowledge other sources of stress during transition. These include working to fit into the academic
culture (Grassley & Lambe, 2015), not knowing what to expect (Weidman, 2013), a lack of guidance regarding teaching and evaluation practices
(Weidman, 2013), role ambiguity (Cranford, 2013), decreased confidence in teaching abilities (Murray et al., 2014), workload (Cranford, 2013), and
time management (McDermid et al., 2013).
Transitioning from military to civilian life can be complex as Veterans leave a culture, career, and social supports behind (Anderson & Goodman,
2014). While there are numerous studies investigating the role transition from clinical practice to academia, there are no published studies, which
could be located, that investigated this same phenomenon from the military nurse perspective. The role transition for these nurses is not known
nor what factors impact a successful or failed transition.Therefore, understanding the military nurse officers’ transition experience from clinical
practice in a military setting to nurse educator in a civilian environment may be valuable to schools of nursing and the students they will
teach.Further, the results could inform efforts to recruit future military nurse officers into the educator role as a means of reducing the nurse
faculty shortage.
Aim: The aim of this qualitative descriptive study was to describe the transition from military nurse to nurse faculty.
Methods: Purposeful and snowball sampling were employed to recruit nurse veterans who transitioned from military service into academia and
who were employed in the faculty role in an accredited nursing program in the United States for at least one year. Thirteen individual, semi-
structured interviews were conducted between August and October 2016. Content and thematic analysis yielded three themes and nine
subthemes. Ten of the 13 total participants validated the findings.
Results: The participants in this study described the transition to the nurse faculty role as a challenging one. A general lack of understanding and a
full appreciation of the nurse faculty role responsibilities contributed to feelings of frustration and stress.
The transition required an acknowledgement of the reality of the academic culture that differed significantly from the military culture. The
participants had to overcome misperceptions of veterans and military service, learn to translate skills learned in the military into a language
understood by civilian employers, acknowledge a change from a collectivist to individualist mentality, and appreciate differences in patterns of
communication. As these differences became apparent the participants took active measures to bridge perceived gaps in knowledge and skills. The
steep learning curve and learning to balance the demands of the role required participants to tap into leadership skills garnered during military
service. The participants perceived these leadership skills to be instrumental to a successful transition. As the new faculty began to evolve in the
faculty role and witness the fruit of their labor, a new academic identity formed.
Conclusions: Significant cultural and leadership differences between the military and academia created unforeseen challenges for the nurse
veterans. Leadership skills, developed during military service, helped participants adjust to the nature of academia and were perceived as vital to a
successful transition. Recognizing this transition and the strengths these nurses offer provides evidence for establishing collaborative relationships
between schools of nursing and military organizations in addition to focused orientation programs to increase recruitment and retention of these
nurse faculty.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2016). Special survey on vacant faculty positions for academic year 2015-2016. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/leading-initiatives/research-data/vacancy15.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2015). Nursing faculty shortage fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-
Anderson, M., & Goodman, J. (2014). From military to civilian life: Applications of Schlosserg’s model for Veterans in transition. Career Planning and
Adult Development Journal, 30, 40-51.
Cranford, J. (2013). Bridging the gap: Clinical practice nursing and the effect of role strain on successful role transition and intent to stay in
academia. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 10, 1 – 7. doi:10.1515/ijnes-2012-0018
Duffy, R. (2013). Nurse to educator? Academic roles and the formation of personal academic identities. Nurse Education Today, 33, 620-624. doi:
10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.020
Fang, D. & Kesten, K. (in press). Retirements and succession of nursing faculty in 2016-2025. Nursing Outlook. Retrieved from
http://www.nursingoutlook.org/article/S0029-6554(16)30314-1/references
Grassley, J., & Lambe, A. (2015). Easing the transition from clinician to nurse educator: An integrative review. Journal of Nursing Education, 54, 361-
366. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150617-01
Lake, D., Allen, P., & Armstrong, M. (2016). Former military nurse officers: One answer to the faculty shortage? [Editorial]. Journal of Nursing
Education, 55, 243-244. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20160414-01
McDermid, F., Peters, K., Daly, J., & Jackson, D. (2013). ‘I thought I was just going to teach:’ Stories of new nurse academics on transitioning from
sessional teaching to continuing academic positions. Contemporary Nurse, 45, 46 – 55.
Murray, C., Stanley, M., & Wright, S. (2014). The transition from clinician to academic in nursing and allied health: A qualitative meta-synthesis.
Nurse Education Today, 34, 389 – 395. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.010
Schoening, A. (2013). From bedside to classroom: The nurse educator transition model. Nursing Education Research, 34, 167 – 172.
Weidman, N. (2013). The lived experience of the transition of the clinical nurse expert to novice nurse educator. Teaching and Learning in Nursing,
8, 102-109. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2013.04.006
Contact
[email protected]
Empowering the Nurse Entrepreneur in Business and Work/Life Balance
Marla J. Vannucci, PhD, USA
Sharon Weinstein, MS, BSN, RN, CRNI-R, FACW, FAAN, CSP, USA
Abstract
Nurse entrepreneurship is a growing trend in healthcare. Nurse entrepreneurs fill gaps in the current healthcare delivery system by
supporting the development of targeted products and services, enhanced technology, software, and safety systems. As more nurses
move beyond the bedside to explore entrepreneurship, it is important to identify best practices and the skill sets that are
transferable from direct caregiving to business leadership. It is also important to learn about how nurses have shifted perspective to
make the transition. The current state of healthcare in the United States and the climate of healthcare reform have led nurse
entrepreneurs to focus on alternative models of care to provide patients and clients with a higher quality of life at more affordable
prices and often with quicker access. Recent trends include steeply rising costs, changes in healthcare reimbursement, increased
competition, an aging population, an increase in chronic illness, the advance and integration of technology, and increased
population diversity (Guo, 2009). There has been a call to develop “creative, innovative, and entrepreneurial” approaches to fill the
gaps in care to address these issues and others (Darbyshire, 2014, p. 9). Many of these trends have shifted our healthcare focus from
an acute care model to one of prevention and detection. Historically, the structure of the healthcare system and academic and
clinical training programs have in large part not supported the development of nurse leadership competencies necessary for success
in entrepreneurship. Per the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) Initiative on the Future of Nursing (2011), nurses are not generally
provided with education or socialization related to administrative and leadership skills and roles in their academic programs. This
IOM report suggests that nurses must not only access education to develop competencies outside of their clinical expertise, such as
attending business classes, but that they must also shift their perspective on their professional roles. In the absence of formal
education, training, or institutional support, nurse entrepreneurs typically have had to develop their own knowledge base and best
practices. Additionally, although many nurses have turned to entrepreneurship as a vehicle to prevent burnout (Podlesni, 2013),
financial demands often require nurse business owners to continue to hold part- or full-time organizational positions. At the same
time, the unique challenges of the entrepreneurial context, such as having to fulfill multiple professional roles, may also present
obstacles to maintaining self-care practices that would prevent burnout. Some research has suggested that control over one’s work
is a mediator in the stress/self-employment relationship (Hessels, Reitveld & van der Zwan, 2016). This presentation will discuss
results of an exploratory study that aimed to better understand the experiences and challenges of nurse entrepreneurs. Nurse
entrepreneurs (n = 44) reported on their transitions from employment to entrepreneurship, key motivators in the decision to start a
business, and the challenges they face as entrepreneurs in the healthcare field. Additionally, participants completed the 33-item
Mindful Self-Care Scale – Short (Cook-Cottone & Guyker, 2016), which measured their self-care activities and behaviors in 6
domains: Physical Care, Supportive Relationships, Mindful Awareness, Self-Compassion and Purpose, Mindful Relaxation, and
Supportive Structure. Nurse entrepreneurs reported higher rates of self-care practices than a normed community sample, and age
was positively correlated with higher rates of self-care practices. Nurse entrepreneurs reported that factors related to psychological
empowerment, such as meaning/purpose, having an impact, need for growth, and getting to make decisions, were more critical
motivators in the decision to start a business than factors associated with structural empowerment, such as financial gain and job or
organizational constraints. Some work/life balance challenges, such as juggling multiple roles in a business, balancing one’s own
needs with those of others, time management, and addressing both family and business needs were associated with fewer self-care
behaviors. Participants highlighted the need for business knowledge and the difficulty in accessing this knowledge. The biggest
challenges to future success identified, such as implementing a marketing strategy, networking, and accessing mentorship, were all
related to relying on connections with others. Implications of this study for nurse education and training will be discussed.
Additionally, practice implications will be discussed, including benefits to nurse entrepreneurs, potential nurse entrepreneurs, and
others in the healthcare delivery system.
References
Cook-Cottone, C. P. & Guyker, W. (2016, revised manuscript submitted for review). The Mindful Self-Care Scale: Mindful self-care as a tool to
promote physical, emotional, and cognitive well-being.
Darbyshire, P. (2014). An idea whose time has come: Nursing entrepreneurialism. Whitireai Nursing and Health Journal, 21, 9-14. Retrieved from:
http://philipdarbyshire.com.au/media/Entrepreneurial-nursing-article-published.pdf
Guo, K.L. (2009). Core competencies of the entrepreneurial leader in health care organizations. Health Care Management, 28(1), 19-29. doi:
10.1097/hcm.0b013e318196de5c
Hessels, J., Rietveld, C.A., & van der Zwan, P. (2016). Self-employment and work-related stress: The mediating role of job control and job demand.
Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 178-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.007
IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2011. The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Podlesni, M.D. (2013). UNconventional nurse: Going from burnout to bliss!, (n.p.): Author.
Contact
[email protected]
Poster Presentations
Nursing Specialty and Primary Ambulatory Care Education
Kirsten S. Garza, BSN, RN, USA
Elizabeth A. Sieber, BSN, RN, USA
Wing Man Eva Chau, BSN, RN, USA
Samantha Elise Noblejas, BSN, RN, USA
Sarah Hope Kagan, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Current trends in healthcare delivery underscore the imperative to better prepare nurses for practice in a variety of ambulatory
settings. Early hospital discharge, reduction in readmissions, and other healthcare transitions with inherent financial and logistical
pressures suggest the need to prioritize ambulatory practice in nursing education (Fortier, et al., 2015). Nurses play a vital role in
ambulatory care, actualizing initiatives to prevent readmission to hospitals and providing knowledge and skills to support the needs
of an increasingly complex patient population, requiring wider range of procedures and treatments than ever before (Fortier, et al.,
2015; Haas & Swan, 2014). As ambulatory settings have continued to grow over the past forty years, demand for nurses in these
practice areas is increasingly evident (American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing, 2012). Wojnar and Whelan (2016) state in
their synthesis of prelicensure education that previous research shows that “the role of registered nurses in a variety of community-
based primary care settings will grow rapidly in the near future, contributing to the quality of care and improved population health,”
which in turn, would save money for health systems (pg. 223).
Balancing growth in ambulatory settings are workforce constraints and limitations in education. Some ambulatory practices report having
“difficulty recruiting registered nurses that possess adequate training in managing acute and chronic conditions in ambulatory care settings” when
working to expand the registered nurse role in the primary care environment (Ladden, et al., 2013). Despite available positions in these settings,
most nursing students learn clinical practice primarily in acute care settings rather than in ambulatory and community settings. Focusing largely on
acute care practice limits both competence and career development for generalist nurses (Fortier, et al., 2015). Wojnar and Whelan (2016), note “it
is unclear to what extent nursing schools” have moved to having a greater ambulatory and community emphasis within their curriculums (pg. 223).
Workforce preparation and capacity lack alignment with healthcare delivery.
This survey methods study aimed primarily to describe perceived exposure to specialty, primary, and ambulatory care among current
undergraduate nursing students in the United States. Describing the extent to which clinical placement affect where these students plan to work
was the secondary aim. These student-focused aims are part of a larger project which also survey pre-licensure program directors about the extent
to which their curricula include content on ambulatory and other community healthcare delivery settings. An investigator designed survey that
included XX demographic questions and YY content questions was the only measure used. After receiving IRB approval, nursing students currently
pursuing a baccalaureate or associate degree from accredited nursing schools in the United States were invited to participate. Recruitment
strategies for contacting eligible participants includes personal contacts, nursing social media groups, the National Student Nurses Association
(NSNA) listserv, and emails to the Deans and Program Directors of nursing schools found on the membership list on the National League for Nursing
(NLN) website. Access to the survey was online through Qualtrics which was also used to store data securely and anonymously. Analysis included
descriptive measures and evaluation of statistical significance using chi-square goodness of fit test and chi-square test for independence.
A total of 811 nursing students across the country, representing 47 out of the 50 United States and the District of Columbia. Of those participating,
62.75% of students reported having greater than 30 clinical sessions in hospital settings. Only 0.9% of students reported no clinical sessions in the
hospital. Conversely, 20 to 58% of students had no clinical sessions in other settings listed including ambulatory and primary care centers. With
clinical sessions defined in this survey as approximately 6-8 hours in length, many students experienced over 240 hours of hospital practice while at
the same time many are receiving no experience in other settings. Furthermore, 88.8% of students indicated an aim to work in a hospital setting
after graduation with 82.5% of students prioritizing that setting as their first choice for work in five to ten years. When compared to the estimated
61% of nurses who work in inpatient acute care settings today, the difference is clinically significant (𝜒𝜒²= 261.78; P<0.001), representing dissonance
between the realities of healthcare and nursing students’ expectations.
Across nursing programs these expectations varied somewhat with 95.2% of students from 4-year BSN programs want to work in a hospital setting
after graduation as compared to 79.4% from 2-year ADN programs (𝜒𝜒²= 4.227; P= 0.039) and 71.1% from RN to BSN programs (𝜒𝜒²= 1.98; P= 0.159).
Additionally, 4-year nursing programs have a higher percentage of students who have greater than 30 clinical sessions in the hospital. Of 4-year
BSN nursing students, 69.8% have 30 or more clinical sessions in a hospital as compared to 2-year ADN with 54.8% and RN to BSN programs with
36.1% (𝜒𝜒² 9.87; P= 0.007). The number of hospital clinical sessions is related to nursing students expectations of future practice setting via a chi
square test for independence, the two variables is significantly associated (𝜒𝜒²=13.855, P<0.001).
Clinical rotations and other educational experiences help shape nursing students’ clinical and critical thinking skills, professionalism, and
perspectives on their careers. Our findings corroborate a small but growing body of literature that speaks to the demand for nursing students to be
educated more broadly, understanding patient education, continuity of care, transitions in care, and chronic disease management as they extend
well beyond the walls of the hospital. Additionally, our findings support the American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing’s stance on curriculum
transformation. As Wojnar and Whelan (2016) assert “new curricula and practice models will be required from nursing schools and colleges across
the nation to prepare future nurses to function in primary and/or ambulatory care practice and ultimately serve as change management and
transitional care leaders.” Our findings thus inform future curriculum development and clinical placement design to ensure that the future nursing
workforce is better prepared to improve the health of the populations they serve.
References
American Academy of Ambulatory Care Nursing (AAACN). (2012). American academy of ambulatory care nursing position statement: The role of
the registered nurse in ambulatory care. Nursing Economics, 30(4), 233-239.
Fortier, M. E., Fountain, D. M., Vargas, M., Heelan-Fancher, L., Perron, T., Hinic, K., & Swan, B. A. (2015). Health care in the community: Developing
academic/practice partnerships for care coordination and managing transitions. Nursing Economics, 33(3), 167-75, 181.
Haas, S. A., & Swan, B. A. (2014). Developing the value proposition for registered nurse care coordination and transition management role in
ambulatory care settings. Nursing Economics, 32(2), 70-79.
Ladden, M. D., Bodenheimer, T., Fishman, N. W., Flinter, M., Hsu, C., Parchman, M., & Wagner, E. H. (2013). The emerging primary care workforce:
preliminary observations from the primary care team: learning from effective ambulatory practices project. Academic Medicine, 88(12), 1830-1834.
Wojnar, D. M., & Whelan, E. M. (2016). Preparing nursing students for enhanced roles in primary care: The current state of prelicensure and RN-to-
BSN education. Nursing Outlook, 65(2), 222-232.
Contact
[email protected]
The Integration of Mobile Technology Through Microblogging and Apps Into Nursing Curricula
Shelly Porter Smith, DNP, USA
Sara Hallowell, DNP, USA
Abstract
Purpose: This poster demonstrates the integration of mobile technologies into both undergraduate and graduate level nursing
curricula.
Background: In the age of eHealth, nurse educators face increasing responsibility to integrate technology into their curricula. Clinicians are
expected to be technologically savvy. Development of professional skills that promote the successful integration of technology into nursing care is
essential. Technology is impacting nursing education and nursing schools must adapt their learning environments to ensure the use of mobile
devices improves patient care (Doyle, Garrett & Currie, 2014). The term, “technology,” encompasses a broad range of platforms and devices and
requires a breadth of knowledge, skills and abilities to achieve proficiency. Mobile technology incorporates the use of handheld devices for
applications and networked communication (O’Connor & Andrews, 2015).This technology is reshaping clinical education by enhancing knowledge
and skills, improving decision making ability, and increasing productivity and confidence (O’Connor and Andrews, 2015).
The integration of such technology aligns with the evolving theoretical framework of networked participatory scholarship. Conceptualized by
Veletsianos and Kimmons (2011), networked participatory scholarship is, “the emergent practice of scholars use of participatory technologies and
online social networks to share, reflect upon, critique, improve, validate and further their scholarship” (p. 768). Networked scholarship meets
Boyer’s goal of broadening scholarship by fostering connection, collaboration and curations between people as opposed to institutions (Stewart,
2015).
Description: Microblogging focuses on the creation of concise nuggets of information. One of the most popular microblog platforms is the social
media application, Twitter. Twitter microblogs, known as “Tweets”, are limited to 140 characters and can be liked, retweeted and shared
throughout one’s network. Tweets can be categorized using hastags (#). Research demonstrates that integrating Twitter in the classroom can
increase student participation/engagement, create a social presence in online courses, fosters in class and out of class discussions and develops
writing skills (McAruthr & Bostedo-Conway, 2012; Ferrenstein, 2010b; Harris, 2010; Dunlap & Lowenthal, 2009).
The use of apps (applications) has increased significantly in the clinical and non clinical environment. An app is software that is self contained that
can run through a web browser. Using mobile technology, such as apps, to look up information at the bedside rather than leave the patient’s room
to find it was found to improve the quality of patient care and enhance patient safety (Johansson, Petersson & Nilsson, 2013; Koeniger-Donohue,
2008). Nursing students were found to have improved decision-making capacity and increased confidence while using mobile technology
(O’Connor & Andrews, 2015).
Methods: The integration of mobile technology in the online graduate level curriculum is achieved through microblogging. Students create a
dedicated Twitter account for the purpose of learning and interacting with faculty and fellow students. To mitigate risk, students sign a social
media contract that outlines expectations of professional language and privacy protection. Microblogging assignments are threaded throughout
the didactic coursework in the program allowing students to refine microblogging skills that support them in maintaining collegial peer
relationships beyond the online classroom and to develop a professional social media presence.
The integration of iPad’s™ into an undergraduate nursing curriculum opened the door to many uses of this mobile technology. Faculty research and
select apps(applications) and for student use in specific courses; students download the required apps and gain familiarity with their contents/use
during class time and through independent exploration. Students also bring their iPad’s™ into the clinical environment to access tools to assist in
caring for patients. They utilize different apps to access drug and disease information, develop concept maps in post clinical and to teach their
patients about diseases and medications. Students build proficiency in patient education apps while patients are exposed to reliable resources to
access upon discharge.
Students’ use of microblogging and apps fosters networked learning and increases exposure to resources outside of their personal domains
through experiential learning. The experience fosters the development of professional mobile technology skills that can later be transferred to their
clinical practice.
Educational Outcomes: The integration of mobile technology into both curricula demonstrates initial success with student results ongoing. Both
programs are using surveys to assess student learning. Concepts being measured include social scholarship, ability to produce ehealth information
for public consumption and the ability to connect with colleagues and patients outside of traditional settings.
Discussion: This discussion demonstrates the successful integration of mobile technologies into both undergraduate and graduate nursing curricula.
Measuring learning outcomes associated with the use of mobile technologies is challenging. The growing field of social analytics may prove
beneficial in overcoming this challenge. Barriers to full integration of mobile technologies into curricula include limited faculty fluency in technology
skills and the rapid evolution of such technologies. This requires continuous reexamination of best practice by teaching faculty.
References
Doyle, G.J., Garrett, B., & Currie, L.M. (2014). Integrating mobile devices into nursing curricula: opportunities for implementation using Roger’s
Diffusion of Innovation Model. Nurse Education Today, 34, 775-782.
Johansson, P.E., Petersson, G.I., & Nilsson, G.C. (2013). Nursing students’ experience of using a personal digital assistant (PDA) in clinical practice—
An intervention study. Nurse Education Today, 33, 1246-1251.
McArthur, J. & Bostedo-Conway, K. (2012). Exploring the relationship between student-instructor interaction on Twitter and student perceptions of
teacher behaviors. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 286-292.
O’Connor, S. & Andrews, T. (2015). Mobile technology and its use in clinical nursing education: A literature review. Journal of Nursing Education,
54(3), 137-144. doi:10.3928/01484834-20150218-01
Stephens, T. & Gunther, M. (2016). Twitter, millennials, and nursing education research. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(1), 23-27.
Stewart, B. (2015). In abundance: Networked participatory practices as scholarship. The international review of research in open and distributed
learning. http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2158
Veletsianos, G. & Kimmons, R. (2011). Networked participatory scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital
scholarship in online networks. Computers & education, 58, 766-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.001
Contact
[email protected]
Exploring Associate Degree Nursing Faculty’s Experiences Teaching Electronic Health Record Systems Use via
Qualitative Survey
Helene D. Winstanley, PhD, USA
Abstract
The dramatic proliferation and integration of electronic health record systems (EHRS) influence nursing practice. The Future of
Nursing (Institute of Medicine (IOM), 2010, 2011) reports are just one indicator of the transformation occurring in healthcare and its
impact on nursing education. Nurse educators are entreated to prepare students who can successfully practice in this
technologically-rich, information laden environment (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2008; National League for
Nursing, 2008, 2015).
The Institute of Medicine reports define EHRS as “An EHR system encompasses (1) longitudinal collection of electronic health information for and
about persons, (2) electronic access to person- and population-level information by authorized users, (3) provision of knowledge and decision
support systems, and (4) support for efficient processes for health care delivery (IOM, 2004, p. 4).” As multipurpose tools in health care that vary
across a spectrum of functionalities, EHRS require a spectrum of user skills (Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER), 2009).
Effective utilization of EHRS is one component of the essential competencies identified for nursing practice (Barnsteiner et al., 2013; Healthcare
Information and Management Systems Society, 2016; Lyle-Edrosolo & Waxman, 2016).
Several studies from the literature show that nursing faculty face many challenges, including the lack of sufficient education or experience, to teach
EHRS use and broader informatics concepts (De Gagne, Bisanar, Makowski, & Neumann, 2012; Hunter, McGonigle, & Hebda, 2013; IOM, 2011).
Little is known about nurse educators’ current preparedness to educate students about EHRS use.
This study utilized a qualitative survey to gain understanding of Associate Degree nursing faculty’s experiences, perspectives, challenges and
strategies related to teaching students to use EHRS. A convenience sample of Associate Degree nursing faculty who teach EHRS use was solicited
from a Council of Associated Degree Nursing in New York State membership meeting and faculty development conference. Survey and qualitative
interviews were completed. This presentation reports the survey results. The nine item qualitative survey, developed from the literature, was
completed by 25 educators. Surveys were analyzed using content analysis in an iterative approach.
Preliminary survey results show common themes in Associate Degree nursing faculty’s experiences related to teaching EHRS use. Facilitators and
strategies included: Teaching is facilitated by the computer literacy of students and faculty, consistent use of EHRS, and availability of a ‘user-
friendly’ academic version of an EHRS. Skill development for EHRS focused primarily on practical skills (such as navigation, finding patient
information, and basic nursing documentation). Simulation offers opportunities to integrate teaching EHRS use. Challenges included: Associate
Degree nursing faculty are challenged by limited academic resources, time and access constraints, lack of uniformity of EHRS vendor products,
adequate training, and confidence in their ability to teach EHRS use. There is inconsistent use of EHRS across the curricula and variations in use
across settings such as classroom, laboratory, simulation, and clinical learning environments. Emergent themes offer teaching strategies, highlight
some of the challenges that faculty face, and identify areas where education, faculty development, and resources may be beneficial to facilitate
Associate Degree nursing faculty’s ability to teach EHRS use.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice [Publication
Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/order-form/baccalaureate-essentials
Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., McGuinn, K., Chappell, K., & Swartwout, E. (2013). Diffusing QSEN competencies across schools of nursing: The
AACN/RWJF faculty development institutes. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(2), 68-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.12.003
De Gagne, J. C., Bisanar, W. A., Makowski, J. T., & Neumann, J. L. (2012). Integrating informatics into the BSN curriculum: A review of the literature.
Nurse Education Today, 32(6), 675-682. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.09.003
Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). (2016). The TIGER Initiative. Retrieved from
http://www.himss.org/professional-development/tiger-initiative
Hunter, K., McGonigle, D., & Hebda, T. (2013). The integration of informatics content in baccalaureate and graduate nursing education: a status
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2004). Patient safety: Achieving a new standard for care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2010). The Future of nursing: Focus on education. Retrieved from
http://iom.nationalacademies.org/Reports/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing-Leading-Change-Advancing-Health/Report-Brief-Education.aspx
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Lyle-Edrosolo, G., & Waxman, K. T. (2016). Aligning healthcare safety and quality competencies: Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN),
The Joint Commission, and American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) Magnet® Standards Crosswalk. Nurse Leader, 14(1), 70-75 76p.
doi:10.1016/j.mnl.2015.08.005
National League for Nursing. (2008). Preparing the next generation of nurses to practice in a technology-rich environment: an informatics agenda
[Position Statement]. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/PositionSTatements/informatics_052808.pdf
National League for Nursing. (2015). A vision for the changing faculty role: Preparing students for the technological world of health care [Vision
statement]. Retrieved from https://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/about/nln-vision-series-(position-statements)/a-vision-for-the-changing-
faculty-role-preparing-students-for-the-technological-world-of-health-care.pdf?sfvrsn=0
Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER). (2009). TIGER Informatics Competencies Collaborative (TICC) final report. Retrieved
from http://tigercompetencies.pbworks.com/f/TICC_Final.pdf
Contact
[email protected]
An Interprofessional Initiative to Increase SBIRT Competencies in the Health Sciences
Beverly Baliko, PhD, RN, PMHNP-BC, USA
Shilpa Srinivasan, MD, USA
Melissa Reitmeier, PhD, USA
Aidyn Iachini, PhD, USA
Abstract
The purpose of this presentation is to describe the nursing arm of an initiative to increase healthcare provider competence and confidence in
identification and management of substance use disorders by integrating an evidence-based Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral to Treatment
(SBIRT) curriculum into health professions training programs at a large Southeastern university. Trainees included graduate nursing, social work,
and rehabilitation counseling students and medical residents. The training was supported by a 3-year Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration completed in 2016. The success of the initiative led to additional funding which has allowed the training to continue. These training
efforts are consistent with global and national objectives to reduce the social and health burdens associated with harmful levels of alcohol
consumption and drug abuse.
Drug and alcohol abuse is a pervasive public health problem with multiple adverse medical, legal and psychosocial consequences. Across the globe,
an estimated 16% of drinkers age 15 and older engage in heavy episodic alcohol use and nearly 6% of all deaths are related to alcohol consumption
(World Health Organization [WHO], 2014). Alcohol is noted to be a component cause of more than 200 ICD-10 disease and injury coded conditions
(WHO, 2014). In the United States, excessive alcohol use was responsible for approximately 1 in 10 deaths of adults aged 20-64 years between
2006-2010 (Stahre, Roeber, Kanny, Brewer, & Zhang, 2014), including 31% of driving fatalities (US Department of Transportation, 2017). An
estimated 1 in 6 adults binge drinks at least 4 times per month (Kanny, Liu, Brewer, & Lu, 2013). Although most are not alcohol dependent, misuse
of alcohol has numerous immediate and long-term health risks, including eventual dependence. The economic costs of excessive alcohol use in the
United States exceeded $249 million in one year alone (Sacks, Gonzales, Bouchery, Tomedi, & Brewer, 2015). Use of legal and illegal drugs adds to
the global burden of substance abuse. Worldwide, approximately 5% of individuals aged 15-64 years engage in illicit drug use (United Nations
Office on Drugs and Crime, 2017). In the United States, opiod-related fatalities are growing at alarming rates, with a reported 33,000 deaths in 2015
(Centers for Disease Control, 2017). Nearly half of these involved the misuse of prescription drugs.
Early identification and management of individuals at risk for substance-related problems, with referral to specialty treatment services when
necessary, improve health outcomes and use of available resources. Unfortunately, only 1 in 6 individuals report speaking with a healthcare
provider about their substance use (Centers for Disease Control, 2014). Because most health professional training provides minimal instruction in
assessment and treatment of substance use disorders, few providers enter practice prepared to address this need. Universal screening in SBIRT
allows providers to assess levels of risk among individuals who report substance use and respond accordingly with reinforcement, education, brief
focused awareness-raising conversations to elicit change, or referral to higher levels of care, if appropriate.
To increase student and resident readiness to provide comprehensive patient care, faculty in nursing, medicine, social work, and rehabilitation
counseling collaborated to customize the evidence-based SAMHSA SBIRT curriculum for implementation into their respective programs. Training
was conducted using 6 online modules that included multimedia didactic instruction on substance use, motivational interviewing techniques, the
SBIRT model, skills demonstration vignettes, and resources such as screening tools and patient teaching aids. After working through the modules at
their own pace, students demonstrated competency through a standardized role play with faculty. Knowledge about substance use and
intervention, confidence in screen for and manage substance use, and attitudes about substance abuse intervention were assessed before and
after SBIRT training.
For nursing, SBIRT training was incorporated as an assignment into the advanced health assessment course required for nurse practitioner (NP)
students. This strategy allowed faculty to access students within all of the specialty programs and provided students with a tool that they could
utilize in their upcoming clinical courses. Because the didactic portions of the NP courses are delivered online, it was not feasible to require
students to come to campus for skills demonstrations; therefore, students had the option to meet with faculty face-to-face or virtually. The
completed grant supported the training of 251 NP students, and the current grant is projected to reach a similar number. About one-third of the
nursing cohort reported little or no training or experience working with patients with alcohol and drug problems. After completion of the
curriculum, knowledge scores increased from 76% (pre) to 95% (post). Confidence improved in ability to screen for alcohol and drug problems, in
ability to discuss substance use, and in ability to assess readiness for change. Students experienced an increase in perceptions of understanding of
substance abuse, and decreases in perceptions that addressing substance use issues was too time consuming or might be poorly received by
patients. All changes were significant at p=.001 level, except for attitudes related to time constraints (p =.05). There were no differences noted in
outcomes between students who performed skills demonstrations virtually compared to those who completed face-to-face demonstrations. Nurse
practitioner students achieved the highest overall post-training knowledge scores, and confidence and attitudes outcomes were comparable to
those of other disciplines. Satisfaction surveys revealed that students found the content easy to understand and relevant to their clinical
experiences and future practice. Anecdotally, many students noted that motivational interviewing techniques were similarly applicable to practice
when other lifestyle modifications were indicated.
This interprofessional initiative has proved to be an effective model in the academic arena. Next steps for nursing include engaging additional
faculty/preceptors to ensure curriculum sustainability and provide ongoing support for SBIRT skills development throughout clinical rotations.
Additionally, students will be followed at select points during the remainder of their program of study to assess whether SBIRT skills have been
successfully implemented in their interactions with patients in their clinical settings.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014, January). CDC Vital Signs: Alcohol screening and counseling. Retrieved June 12, 2017 from
https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/alcohol-screening-counseling/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016, December). Opiod overdose. Retrieved June 12, 2017 from
https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/index.html
Kanny, D., Lieu, Y., Brewer, R.D., & Lu, H. (2013). Binge drinking – United States, 2011. MMWR Suppl. 2013;62(suppl 3):77–80. Retrieved June 12,
2017 from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6203a13.htm?s_cid=su6203a13_w
Sacks, J.J., Gonzales, K.R., Bouchery, E.E., Tomedi, L.E., & Brewer, R.D. (2015). 2010 National and State Costs of Excessive Alcohol Consumption.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(5), 73-9
Stahre, M., Roeber, J., Kanny, D., Brewer, R.D., & Zhang, X. (2014). Contribution of excessive alcohol consumption to deaths and years of potential
life lost in the United States. Preventing Chronic Disease, 11:130293.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2017). World Drug Report 2015. Retrieved June 14, 2017 from http://www.unodc.org/wdr2015/.
U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2015). Traffic Safety Facts 2014 data: alcohol-impaired driving.
Washington, D.C.: N.H.T.S.A .
World Health Organization (2014). Global status report on alcohol and health – 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Contact
[email protected]
Tele-Education as a Support Tool in Mental Health, Education, and Nursing
Diogo Jacintho Barbosa, Brazil
Abstract
Introduction: Since the emergence of the Internet, the speed of information flow has increased considerably on a global scale, and
both economic and interpersonal relations have been constantly undergoing reformulations and changes, no longer being seen only
as a face-to-face relationship. Thus, social networks over the internet have become the largest vehicle of communication between
individuals, since the beginning of the XXI century. [1] Social networks can also be seen as a means of non-formal education, as they
contribute to teaching and learning. This is the context in which distance education in health operates, contributing to building a
collaborative network of communication and establishing links between participants and exchanges of experience based on the
reality of each individual. Concurrent with the increased use of social networking over the internet, the number of people using
psychoactive drugs has also increased throughout society and in all social classes. This increase in consumption can be evidenced by
the frequency with which we can observe the large number of users on the streets of Brazil. In 2010, the Census conducted by the
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) pointed out that 1.2% (2.3 million) of Brazil’s population uses or may have
already used crack cocaine. Dependence on psychoactive substances is considered a chronic disease because it often stays with
these individuals for life. Faced with these facts, this study aimed to evaluate the use of distance education as a support tool in
combating the use of psychoactive drugs.
Methods: This is a descriptive literature survey, in which it was decided to search for articles in national and international journals from 2000 to
2014, available in the PubMed® database. The following MeSH terms were used: “Telehealth;” “Drug addiction;” “Social Networks.” We selected all
articles published in Portuguese and English involving the drug user population, and data collection was carried out through social networks over
the internet or by phone. Literature review articles were excluded.
Data analysis and results: The analysis was performed according to year of publication, type of research, data collection instrument used and
expected results. Eight articles on the use of social networks as a support tool in combating the abuse of psychoactive drugs were found. Of these,
six were selected which fit the criteria. Results: The results showed that the first publications on the subject occurred in the United States starting
in 2006. It was observed that none of the articles used data collection based on social networks over the internet, such as through Facebook®. No
research performed on the topic in Brazil was found. Regarding the type of drug, three articles (50%) talked about alcohol abuse, two (33.3%)
about tobacco use, and one (16.7%) about opioid use.
In 83.3% of the articles surveyed, five articles used the phone as a data collection mechanism and only one (16.7%) was based on data collection via
internet (e-mail).
In the studies analyzed, we can see that in none of the items surveyed were online social networks used as a data collection mechanism, and
intervention by phone brought improved treatment for most patients with alcohol dependence. Only in one of the articles was there no specific
positive effect identified from intervention via social networks. In articles related to tobacco use, the intervention was successful for a 24-week
period on average. Meanwhile, the intervention with opioid users showed positive results when followed by medication.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that distance education can be a powerful mechanism to support reduction or cessation of use of psychoactive
drugs, especially if used in conjunction with conventional therapy. Due to the internet becoming the biggest vehicle currently available for
information dissemination, this favors social networks (via the internet) establishing themselves as a powerful means of dissemination, and being
used as mechanisms of distance education in health, to contribute to reducing psychoactive drug abuse and enhancing individual well-being.
References
[1] Blankers, M., Koeter, M. W., & Schippers, G. M. (June 13, 2011). Internet therapy versus internet self-help versus no treatment for problematic
alcohol use: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol., pp. 330-41.
[2] Carreras, J. M., Maldonado, A. B., Quesada, L. M., Sánchez, S. B., Puerta, I. N., & Sánchez, A. L. (March 17, 2012). Telephone-based smoking
cessation. Predictors of success. Med Clin (Barc)., pp. 242-5.
[3] Heckman, T. G., Heckman, B. D., Anderson, T., Lovejoy, T. I., Mohr, D., & Sutton, M. (November 17, 2013). Supportive-expressive and coping
group teletherapies for HIV-infected older adults: a randomized clinical trial. AIDS Behav., pp. 3034-44.
[4] McKay, J. R., Van Horn, D., Oslin, D. W., Ivey, M., Drapkin, M. L., & Coviello, D. M. (October 2011). Extended telephone-based continuing care for
alcohol dependence: 24-month outcomes and subgroup analyses. Addiction, pp. 1760-9.
[5] Pechmann, C., Pan, L., Delucchi, K., Lakon, C. M., & Prochaska, J. J. (Feruary 23, 2015). Development of a Twitter-based intervention for smoking
cessation that encourages high-quality social media interactions via automessages. J Med Internet Res.
[6] Ruetsch, C., Tkacz, J., McPhenson, T. L., & Cacciola, J. (Maio de 2012). The effect of telephonic patient support on treatment for opioid
dependence: outcomes at one year follow-up. Addict Behav., pp. 686-9.
[7] Van Horn, D. H., Rennert, L., Lynch, K. G., & McKay, J. R. (October 23, 2014). Social network correlates of participation in telephone continuing
care for alcohol dependence. Am J Addict, pp. 447-52.
[8] Vidrine, D. J., Arduino, R. C., & Gritz, E. R. (December 8, 2006). Impact of a cell phone intervention on mediating mechanisms of smoking
cessation in individuals living with HIV/AIDS. PubMed, pp. 103-8.
Contact
[email protected]
Comparison of Face-to-Face and Distance Education Modalities in Delivering Therapeutic Crisis Management
Skills Content
Jennifer Graber, EdD, MSN, BSN, APRN, CS, BC, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare effectiveness and student satisfaction of distance education versus face-to-face
interaction in delivering therapeutic crisis management skills content to Associate Degree Nursing (ADN) Students as measured by
test scores, overall grade point average (GPA), class grade, and student satisfaction survey results. One group of students was taught
via face-to-face interaction in the traditional classroom setting with case studies and group work. The other group of students was
taught via distance education with the same instructor presentation followed by the same case studies and distance education
group work. This researcher believed that test scores would be higher in the distance education setting because the students would
have to take the time to read and respond to discussion board questions. Personal experience led to this hypothesis because
students have verbalized in the past that they enjoy a distance education environment where students can set the pace. No
difference between the two separate groups or enhanced performance by those who receive instruction through distance education
could indicate that distance education is an effective teaching modality for therapeutic crisis management.
Methods: The study was a quasi-experimental, post-hoc causal comparative, two group post-test only design. There were two conditions: face-to-
face classroom delivery of course content and distance education with online course content. The study was designed to compare effectiveness of
distance education and face-to-face interaction through reviewing test grades, overall GPA, and class grades. Additionally students were asked to
rate their satisfaction of the different modalities.
Institutional Review Board approval was received from two agencies involved in the research study. Participation for the study was voluntary.
Students’ agreement to participate in the study was obtained through volunteer signatures. Consent was obtained from all volunteers prior to the
study through the Student Consent Form. Students who had completed the third semester psychiatric mental-health nursing course were invited to
participate in the survey. Students were not asked to complete the survey until they had completed all work associated with the course.
Test score data was collected from test questions related specifically to the therapeutic crisis management content. Test questions were part of a
larger exam. Test questions were validated with data analysis including Point Biserial and content validity. Question analysis was gathered from
ParScore©, a test analysis computer software program. Content validity was established through the use of questions on previous tests during
previous years with data from previous statistical analyses. Overall GPA and class grades were gathered from student records. Surveys of student
satisfaction were developed by the researcher, peer reviewed by two faculty members and were piloted with a cohort of 65 students. No formal
validity measure (Cornbach alpha) have been reported for prior uses of these measures.
An independent samples t-test was employed to identify therapeutic crisis management test performance differences between students in face-to-
face interaction and distance education sections. A t-test was also performed to assess differences in test grades, course grades and GPAs of
students who were in their preferred setting and those who were not. Type I errors were controlled for by using SPSS software.
A quantitative analysis regarding satisfaction was performed with a series of questions on a researcher-developed survey. For categorical responses
on the questionnaire, such as age, gender, ethnicity, learning styles, and satisfaction counts and percentages are presented. All tests were
conducted at a significance level of 0.05. The primary hypothesis was to investigate differences between test scores, overall GPA, and class grade of
students who were taught therapeutic crisis management techniques via face-to-face interaction and those who were taught through a distance
education format.
Results: There were 110 participants who were eligible and agreed to participate in the study. There were 63 participants in the distance education
group and 47 participants in the face-to-face interaction group. The majority of participants were 18 to 29 years of age (59.1%, n=65), female
(84.5%, n=93), and Caucasian (79.1%, n=87). The age distribution of the remainder of the participants was as follows; 23.6% (n=126) categorized
themselves as between the ages of 30 to 39, 17.3% (n=19) categorized themselves as between the ages of 40-59. There were 15.5% (n=17) male
participants. The ethnicity of the other participants was 9.1% (n= 10) African American, 5.5% (n=6) Hispanic, 2.7% (n=3) Asian, and 3.6% (n=4)
classified themselves as Other Ethnicity. The majority of the participants, 42.7%, (n=47) categorized themselves as visual and auditory learners,
32.7% (n=36) categorized themselves as tactile and visual learners, 24.5% (n=27) categorized themselves as other style learners.
The first research hypothesis was to investigate if there were differences between test scores, overall GPA, and class grades of students who were
taught therapeutic crisis management techniques via face-to-face interaction and those who were taught through a distance education format. A
series of Independent Samples t-tests, with an alpha .05, were performed to assess the mean difference between the section of the course as the
dependent variable and test grade, overall GPA, and class grade as the independent variables. Data were characterized for their distributional
characteristics using descriptive and graphical methods where they were tested for equal variance and passed. Where the assumptions for the t-
test were not met data was transformed to reduce skewness and number of outliers, and improve the normality and linearity of any residuals.
Analysis was performed using SPSS.
The mean test grade was 82.1 out of 100, SD=5.88 for the distance education group and 82.8, SD=5.20 for the face-to-face interaction group. No
statistically significant difference was noted between test grades (t58=.704; DF=108, p=.483). The overall mean GPA for the distance education
group was 3.1 compared to 3.0 for the face-to face interaction group. This difference also was not statistically significant (t58=.765; DF=108,
p=.446). The mean class grade was 82.4, SD=4.23 for the distance education group and 82.8, SD=4.34 for the face-to-face interaction group. This
difference in class grades was not statistically significant (t58=.429; DF=108, p=.668).
The second research question was to investigate if there were differences in nursing student satisfaction between distance education and face-to-
face interaction when learning therapeutic crisis management techniques. The same methods listed above were used to assess the distributional
characteristics for each of the variables of interest. The satisfaction scores were taken from a Likert scale with twenty-eight total points possible. A
higher score is indicative of less satisfaction while a lower score is more indicative of higher satisfaction. Total satisfaction scores were grouped into
three separate categories; one to nine points indicated satisfaction, ten to nineteen points indicated neutral, and twenty to twenty-eight points
indicated not satisfied. Overall satisfaction score means were 9.3, SD=3.63 for the distance education group and 8.6, SD=2.48 for the face-to-face
interaction group. This difference was not statistically significant (t58=1.12; DF=108, p=.264).There were no significantly statistical differences
(t58=.169; DF=108, p=.87).
Overall, there were 67% of the students who were in the preferred section and 39% who were not in the preferred section. The mean test grade
was 82.8, SD=4.38 for the students who were in the preferred section and 82.2, SD=7.16 for the group that was not in the preferred section. No
statistically significant difference was noted between test grades (t58=.478; DF=104, p=.634). The overall mean GPA for the group that was in the
preferred section was 3.1, SD= .353 compared to 3.0, SD=.414 for the group that was not in the preferred section. This difference was not
statistically significant (t58=.646; DF=104, p=.520). The mean class grade was 82.8, SD=3.99 for the group that was in the preferred section and
82.3, SD=4.80 for the group that was not in the preferred section. This difference in class grades was not statistically significant (t58=2.68; DF=104,
p=.563).
Conclusion: Nursing schools have had to develop ways to handle faculty and space shortages. Distance education must be an option for nursing
schools facing today’s difficult challenges. No difference between the face-to-face and distance education group could indicate that distance
learning is an effective teaching modality when compared to face-to-face interaction. Despite the limitation of the size of the study large
differences between groups (large effects size) would have been detected if present.
It is important to note that student preference for a particular teaching modality did not impact the overall test grade. Difference in overall GPA
and overall course grade were also not statistically significant. There were also no statistically significant differences of overall satisfaction between
students who were and those who were not in their preferred section. This may suggest that providing both face-to-face interaction and distance
education sections will not adversely affect student outcomes for the course.
Neither research question was supported by the data from the study. No differences were found between test scores of students who were taught
therapeutic crisis management techniques via face-to-face interaction and those who were taught through a distance education format. No
differences in the degree of nursing student satisfaction between distance education and face-to-face interaction when learning therapeutic crisis
management techniques was found either.
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child
Development, 67, 1206-1222.
Barnes, K., Marateo, R.C., & Pixy Ferris, S. (2007). Teaching and learning with the net generation. Innovate, 3(4). Retrieved from
http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view+article&id+382
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2007). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Education Technology,
39(5), 775-786.
Bonduce, J., & Quigley, B. (2011). Florence’s candle: educating the millennial nursing student. Nursing Forum, 46(3), 157-159.
Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of
Tinto’s theory. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 569-590.
Callery, P. (1990). Moral learning in nursing education: A discussion of the usefulness of cognitive-developmental and social learning theories.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15, 324-328.
Cheng, C. Liou, S., Hsu, T., Pan, M., Lie, H., Change, C. (2014). Preparing nursing students to be competent for future professional practice: Applying
the team-based learning-teaching strategy. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30(4), 347-356.
Hodges, C.B. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: A review of the literature and directions for research.
Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3-4), 7-25.
Jones, G.H. (2017). Mental health student nurses’ satisfaction with problem-based learning: A qualitative study. Journal of Mental Health Training,
Education & Practice, 12(2), 77-89.
Knowles, M.S., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2011). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource
Development. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Korhonen, V. (2004). Contextual orientation patterns as describing adults’ personal approach to learning in a web-based learning environment.
Studies in Continuing Education, 26(1), 99-116.
Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Hayek, J. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions and
recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lehmann, K., & Chamberlin, L. (2009). Making the move to Elearning: Putting your course online. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Education.
Lohrmann, D.K. (2011). Thinking of a change: health education for the 2020 generation. American Journal of Health Education, 42. Retrieved from
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/
Manochehri, N., & Young, L.I. (2006). The impact of student learning styles with web-based learning or instructor-based learning on student
knowledge and satisfaction. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 73(3), 313-316.
McDermott, R.J. (2011). Health education circa 2035 – A commentary. American Journal of Health Education, 42(1), 2-3.
McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovations in education and teaching International, 45 (3), 263-269.
Niles, P. (2011). Meeting the needs of the 21st century student. Community & Junior College Libraries, 17(2), 47-51.
Pardue, K.T., & Morgan, P. (2008). Millennials considered: A new generation, new approaches, and implications for nursing education. Nurse
Popkess, A.M., & McDaniel, A. (2011). Are nursing students engaged in learning? A secondary analysis of data from the national survey of student
engagement. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 89-94.
Reilly, P. (2012). Understanding and teaching generation Y. English Teaching Forum, 1, 2-11.
Skiba, D.J. (2005). The Millennials: Have they arrived at your school of nursing? Nursing Education Perspectives, 25(6), 370-371.
Tam, M. (2014). Intergenerational service learning between the old and young: What, why and how. Educational Gerontology, 40(6), 401-413.
Tanner, C.A. (2006). Changing times, evolving issues: The faculty shortage, accelerated programs, and simulation. Journal of Nursing Education,
45(3), 99-100.
Tomey, A.M., & Alligood, M.R. (2002). Nursing theorists and their work. St. Louis, MI: Mosby.
Weston, M.J. (2006). Integrating generational perspectives in nursing. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2). doi:
10.3912/OJIN.Vol11No02Man01.
White, C., Bradley, E., Martindale, J., Roy, P., Patel, K., Yoon, M., & Worden, M.K. (2014). Why are medical students ‘checking out’ of active learning
in new curriculum? Medical Education, 48, 315-324.
Wilson, M., & Gerber, L.E. (2008). How generational theory can improve teaching: Strategies for working with the “millennials.” Currents in
Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 29-44.
Contact
[email protected]
Effectiveness of Active Learning Strategies: Student and Faculty Perceptions of Flipped Classrooms and
Team-Based Learning
Carol J. Bett, PhD, MA, RN, USA
Theresa Cooper, MSN, MBA, RN, USA
Abstract
Nursing education is in the midst of a paradigmatic shift from a traditional, content driven model to one that supports student
engagement in the learning process through active teaching strategies. The traditional lecture methodology has proven inadequate
to address issues such as content overload, technological advances, an increasingly complex health care environment, and the
persistent gap between educational preparedness and clinical practice. Additional challenges include changing student
demographics, an exponential increase in new knowledge, and the importance of contextualizing information which raise important
questions about the adequacy of traditional teaching approaches. Benner and colleagues (2010) encourage nursing faculty to shift
the focus of education from decontextualized knowledge to teaching for a sense of salience. Innovative teaching strategies such as
flipped or blended classrooms, scrambled instructional methods, and team-based learning approaches are becoming widely
implemented to support a learner centered educational pedagogy. However, the student role change from passive to active learner
does not occur without a sense of anxiety associated with the perception of an increased workload and unsettled classroom
environments (Rotellar & Cain, 2016). Faculty also may express concerns about content not being covered, a lack of experience with
techniques, student dissatisfaction and poor exam scores.
The purpose of this poster presentation is to explore faculty and student perception of the effectiveness of active learning strategies in didactic
courses that previously delivered content using a traditional lecture format. Using a quasi-experimental design, a convenience sample of second
semester BSN students at a Midwestern university will be asked to complete a 14-item questionnaire on their perception of the effectiveness of
active learning strategies, engagement in the learning process and retention of information. The questionnaire will also include 3 open-ended
questions on what the student liked, disliked or would change about the teaching methodology. Faculty members who are using innovative
teaching strategies in their courses will be asked to complete a questionnaire on the influence of innovative teaching methodologies on student
engagement, satisfaction, and performance outcomes.
References
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. Stanford, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L. & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal
of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597-599.
Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning
strategies. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49.
Rotellar, C. & Cain, J. (2016). Research, perspectives, and recommendation on implementing the Flipped Classroom. American Journal
of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(2), 1-9.
Schlairet, M. S., Green, R., & Benton, M. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: Strategies for an undergraduate nursing course. Nurse Educator, 39(6),
321-325.
Contact
[email protected]
Integration and Leveling of Nutritional Principles in Traditional ASN Nursing Curricula
Candace Pierce, MSN, RN, CNE, USA
Robyn Caldwell, DNP, USA
Abstract
Nutrition is an integral part of health promotion, disease prevention and treatment across the lifespan (Buxton & Davies, 2013).
Research indicates that nutritional education is lacking in pre-licensure nursing programs (Stotts, Englert, Crocker, Bennum, and
Hoppe, 1987). Most pre-licensure programs require a prerequisite nutrition class, which provides only basic information with little
clinical integration (Buxton & Davies, 2013).
Fragmented nursing concepts such as nutrition influence the learner’s ability to formulate linkages between theory and clinical practice (McGrath,
2015). Fragmentation occurs in traditional nursing curricula where content overlaps but fails to demonstrate appropriate leveling (McGrath, 2015).
Research indicates that this problem persists into clinical practice, where most nurses were found to be deficient in basic nutritional knowledge
(Buxton & Davies, 2013).
Fragmentation is avoided when content is integrated into the nursing curricula, as in competency based nursing education. However, many nursing
schools continue to embrace a traditional curriculum. Nutritional content may be integrated into this type of curriculum as well. The following
represents a sample of nutritional content with appropriate leveling in an ASN curriculum:
Core Nursing Course Bloom’s Taxonomy Student learning Outcome Teaching Strategy
(Didactic/Clinical)
Fundamentals Remember 1. Examines personal dietary intake and 1. Dietary Recall and self-reflection
Comprehend nutrient content 2. Develops appropriate meal plan
2. Identify components required to meet based on dietary recall and self-
optimal nutritional standards evaluation.
3. Identify appropriate nutritional support 3. Skills demonstration of
for optimal patient outcomes nutritional support modalities;
determine safe and effective
feeding of diverse patients
Adult Health I Application 1. Assesses influence of disease on nutrient 1. Disease specific concept maps
absorption 2. Examine patient laboratory data
2. Identifies diagnostic tests which identify for discrepancies.
nutrient deficiencies 3. Formulate an appropriate
teaching plan
Adult Health II Analysis 1. Analyze patient data and develop 1. Comprehensive nutritional
nutritional plan based on disease processes assessment
2. Interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure 2. Ensure appropriate patient
optimal patient outcomes consults
3. Demonstrates evidence based principles 3. Providing patient specific
in nutritional education nutritional teaching
Appropriate nutrition is one of the most important long-term determinants of health. Nutrition is an integral component of all nursing programs.
Leveling content is important to ensure progression of knowledge, which ultimately influences safe and effective care in nursing practice.
References
Buxton, C., & Davies, A. (2013). Nutritional knowledge levels of nursing students in a tertiary institution: Lessons for curriculum planning. Nurse
Education in Practice, 13, 355-360.
McGrath, B. (2015). The development of a concept-based learning approach as part of an integrative nursing curriculum. Nursing and Health
Journal, 22, 11-17.
Stotts N., Englert D, Crocker K., Bennum N., Hoppe M. (1987). Nutrition education in schools of nursing in the United States, part II: the status of
nutrition education in schools of nursing. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 11, 406–411.
Contact
[email protected]
Faculty Reported Essentials of Quality Online Teaching
Tracia M. Forman, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Background: Enrollment numbers in higher education online coursework have continued to grow while overall higher education enrollment has
declined (Allen, Seaman, Poulin, & Straut, 2016). The inability to directly observe teaching in online courses has created the need for an alternate
method of distinguishing quality online course offerings for both university administrators and students alike (Boysen, Kelly, Raesly, & Casner,
2014). Frequently, the quality of an online course is measured by the use of an established rubric, such as the Quality Matters (QM) rubric. These
rubrics allow for objective determination about the quality of an online course’s design as measured against pre-established standards. The 2014
QM higher education rubric measures eight standards paralleling quality instructional design principles (Quality Matters, 2017). It is important to
note, rubrics such as the QM rubric, do not allow for the measurement of quality online instruction provided to the students enrolled in the course
per se. The evaluation focus of these rubrics is on the course design rather than the teaching (Pina & Bohn, 2014). An excellent online course is the
result of quality instructional design in combination with the delivery of quality teaching. Student learning outcomes will be primarily impacted by
the quality of teaching provided by the online instructor (Frazer, Sullivan, Weatherspoon, & Hussey, 2017). There is a need for more research about
how to measure the delivery of quality online instruction in higher education courses.
Purpose: Quality instructional design and quality course instruction are dissimilar concepts and as a result should be measured differently. Many
higher education courses, taught solely online, are taught by faculty who did not participate in the development of said courses (Lowenthal, Bauer,
& Chen, 2015). As a result of decades of research, seven principles of good teaching practices for use in higher education instruction have been
widely recognized (Chickering & Gamson, 1987). Historically, these established principles of quality face-to-face teaching have served as the
framework for quality online teaching (Shelton & Hayne, 2017). The premise is these known principles of quality instruction in the face-to-face
classroom can also be used to evaluate the quality of teaching provided in the online classroom. Crews and Wilkinson (2015) surveyed faculty
teaching online and asked them to correlate the QM rubric standards to Chickering and Gamson’s principles of good teaching. The results of their
research indicated further exploration about how online course design influenced quality online teaching. More defined criteria to objectively
measure quality online instruction in higher education course offerings are needed to facilitate faculty self-reflection on needed course
improvements and to further define online teaching for peer review purposes. This purpose of this pilot study is to increase understanding about
what constitutes quality online teaching as perceived by faculty teaching online.
Methods: The research design planned for this study is retrospective, qualitative data analysis. A purposive sampling method will be used to seek
the perceptions of faculty teaching online. The participants will be asked to expand upon principles considered as essential for quality online
instruction in order to objectively gather information. This information will be sought through open-ended, fill-in-the-blank questions within the
anonymous, researcher created, online survey deployed to all institutional faculty currently teaching online courses is to objectively gather
information determining how the established principles of quality teaching are incorporated into the online classroom. This proposed research will
be guided by the following research question:
1. How are Chickering and Gamson’s (1987) principles of good teaching reflected in online instruction as perceived by higher education
faculty with online teaching experience?
Results: Survey data will be retrospectively analyzed using qualitative content analysis (QCA). Qualitative content analysis is a research technique
that provides new insights, increases researcher’s understanding of a particular phenomenon, or informs practical actions (Krippendorff, 2013;
Schreier, 2012).
Conclusion: The results of this planned research will have implications for educational institutions offering online courses. Students, faculty, and
administrators should all benefit from information about how to better evaluate the quality of online teaching. Results gleaned from this study will
seek to correlate the connection between known principles of good teaching practice and quality instruction in online courses. Additionally, this
research will report further principles, deemed to be essential for quality online instruction, as perceived by faculty with online teaching
experience.
References
Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from
https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/read/online-report-card-tracking-online-education-united-states-2015/
Boysen, Kelly, Raesly, & Casner, (2014). The (mis)interpretation of teaching evaluation by college faculty and administrators. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(6), 641-656. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.860950
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. University of North Carolina Charlotte,
Center for Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://teaching.uncc.edu/best-practice/education-philosophy/seven-principles
Crews, T. B., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Online quality course design vs. quality teaching: Aligning Quality Matters standards to principle of good
teaching. The Journal of Research in Business Education, 57(1), 47-63.
Frazer, C., Sullivan, D. H., Weatherspoon, D., & Hussey, L. (2017). Faculty perceptions of online teaching effectiveness and indicators of quality.
Nursing Research and Practice, 2017, 1-6. doi:10.1155/2017/9374189
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Lowenthal, P. Bauer, C., & Chen, K. (2015). Student perception on online learning: An analysis of online course evaluations. American Journal of
Distance Education, 29, 85-97. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2015.1023621
Pina, A. A., & Bohn, L. (2014). Assessing online faculty: More than student surveys and design rubrics. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education,
15(3), 25-34.
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Shelton, L. R. & Hayne, A. N. (2017). Developing an instrument for evidence-based peer review of faculty online teaching. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 38(3). 157-158. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000130
Quality Matters. (2017) Course Design Rubric Standards. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa-resources/rubric-standards/higher-ed-
rubric
Contact
[email protected]
Assessment of Understanding of Foundational Genomic Concepts Among RN-to-BSN Nursing Students
Lisa B. Aiello, PhD, RN, AOCNS, APN-C, USA
Abstract
The advancement of genetic science and technology has transformed health care (Daack-Hirsch et al., 2013). Genomics is now being
integrated across the health care continuum at the point of care in areas such as risk assessment, prevention, screening, diagnosis,
treatment, prognosis, and personalized medicine (Calzone, et.al., 2012; Calzone & Jenkins, 2012; Clark, Adamian, & Taylor, 2013). All
health care providers need to integrate genetics and genomics into their practice in order to provide holistic care to patients. Nurses
are the largest health care profession, with 2.9 million registered nurses (RNs) active in 2012 (Health Resources and Services
Administration [HRSA], 2013) and a projection of 3.5 million in 2025 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, HRSA, National
Center for Health Workforce Analysis, 2014). Nurses practice in all health care settings, and continue to be rated as the most honest
and ethical professionals (Riffkin, 2014). Nurses need to be at the forefront of integration of genomics into clinical practice.
However, despite educational initiatives, nurses have limited knowledge and have shown minimal integration of genetics-genomics
competencies into nursing practice.
The development of the Essential Nursing Competencies in Genetics/Genomics in 2006, which were updated with outcome indicators in 2008
(Consensus Panel on Genetic/Genomic Nursing Competencies, 2009), provided nursing with a framework for identifying the educational needs of
nurses. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) used these competencies to support their recommendation for the inclusion of
genetics and genomics into nursing curriculum (AACN, 2008; Jenkins & Calzone, 2012). Educational programs and curricula guidelines have been
developed to assist in the integration of genetics and genomics into baccalaureate nursing curricula (Calzone, et al., 2013a; Calzone & Jenkins,
2012; Jenkins & Calzone, 2014) Genetics has been included in undergraduate curriculum via both stand-alone genetics courses, and integration
across the curriculum. Many studies have addressed genetic and genomic knowledge gaps, integration of competencies into practice, and
educational needs of nursing students, practicing nurses, and nurse educators (Calzone, et al., 2012; Calzone, et al., 2013b; Calzone, et al, 2014;
Coleman, et al., 2014; Scanlon & Fibson, 1995). Recent research has included the use of nursing’s first concept inventory (The Genomic Nursing
Concept Inventory (GNCI ©) to evaluate meaningful learning of genetic concepts, as well as common misconceptions (McCabe, Ward, & Ricciardi,
2016; Ward, French, et al., 2016; Ward, Haberman, & Barbos-Leiker, 2014; Ward, Purath, & Barbosa-Leiker, 2016). Ausubel’s Assimilation Theory
suggests meaningful learning is a better approach to understanding difficult concepts, as opposed to rote learning (Ausubel, et al., 1978).
Meaningful learning occurs when new knowledge is anchored with pre-existing knowledge in a person’s cognitive structure. The majority of studies
identified that nurses with a higher level of education, and nurses who had taken a genetics course since licensure had increased knowledge and
increased integration of genetic competencies into practice. However, many of these studies did not include RN to BSN students. Scant research is
available to assess the genetics knowledge of the practicing RN enrolled in a BSN completion program. The educational barriers include nursing
faculty with a weak understanding of foundational genetics and a lack of practicing nurses’ knowledge (Jenkins & Calzone, 2014; Read & Ward,
2016). Research has indicated some progress in the acquisition of genetic-genomic knowledge by nurses, but much work still needs to occur.
The Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory (GNCI©) was developed to evaluate nurses’ and nursing students’ understanding of foundational genetic-
genomic concepts, or genetic-genomic literacy (Ward, Haberman, & Barbosa-Leiker, 2014). The purpose of this descriptive research was to identify
the current genetic-genomic knowledge and misconceptions of RN to BSN students as measured by the Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory
(GNCI©) (Ward, Haberman, & Barbos-Leiker, 2014). The participants were registered nurses enrolled in or recently graduated from an online RN to
BSN completion program in a large, urban university in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. A cross-sectional design was used and
provided access to students at varied levels of progression within the program, in various stages of development (Houser, 2015). This design
allowed the researcher to analyze differences among participants across the continuum of their program, compare these differences against the
GNCI© score, and provide more generalizable results. The differences evaluated included age, sex, educational program at attainment of licensure,
and past genetic education.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing
practice. Washington D.C.: Author.
Ausubel, D.P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Calzone, K.A. & Jenkins, J. (2012). Genomics education in nursing in the United States. In G. A. Pepper, & K.J. Wysocki (Eds). Annual Review of
Nursing Research, Volume 29: Genetics. (pp. 151- 172). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Calzone, K.A., Jenkins, J., Bakos, A.D., Cashion, A.K., Donaldson, N., Feero, W.G., ...Webb, J.A. (2013a). A blueprint for genomic nursing
science. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 45(1), 96-104.
Calzone, K. A., Jenkins, J., Culp, S., Bonham, V.L., Jr., & Badzek, L. (2013b). National nursing workforce survey of nursing attitudes, knowledge and
practice in genomics. Personalized Medicine, 10(7), 719-728.
Calzone, K. A., Jenkins, J., Culp, S., Caskey, S., & Badzek, L. (2014). Introducing a new competency into nursing practice. Journal of Nursing
Regulation, 5(1), 40-47.
Calzone, K.A., Jenkins, J., Yates, J., Cusack, G., Wallen, G.R., Liewehr, D.J., ...McBride, C. (2012). Survey of nursing integration of genomics into
nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 44(4), 428-436.
Clark, A.E., Adamian, M., & Taylor, J. Y. (2013). An overview of epigenetics in nursing. Nursing Clinics of North America, 48(4), 649-659.
Coleman, B., Calzone, K. A., Jenkins, J., Paniagua, C., Rivera, R., Hong O.S., . . . Bonham, V. (2014). Multi-ethnic minority nurses’ knowledge and
practice of genetics and genomics. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 46(4), 235-244.
Consensus Panel on Genetic/Genomic Nursing Competencies. (2009). Essentials of genetic and genomic nursing: Competencies, curricula
guidelines, and outcome indicators (2nd Ed.). Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.
Daack-Hirsch, S., Jackson, B., Belchez, C.A., Elder, B., Hurley, R., Kerr, P., & Nissen, M.K. (2013). Integrating genetics and genomics into nursing
curricula: You can do it too! Nursing Clinics of North America, 48(4), 661-669
Health Resources and Services Administration. (2013). The U.S. nursing workforce: Trends in supply and education. Retrieved at
http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/reports/nursingworkforce/nursingworkforcefullreport.pdf
Houser, J. (2015). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Jenkins, J. & Calzone, K.A. (2012). Are nursing faculty ready to integrate genomic content into curricula? Nurse educator, 37(1), 25-29.
Jenkins, J. & Calzone, K. A. (2014) Genomics nursing faculty champion initiative. Nurse Educator, 39(1), 8-13.
McCabe, M., Ward, L.D., & Ricciardi, C. (2016). Web-based assessment of genomic knowledge among practicing nurses: A validation study. The
Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(4), 189-196.
Read, C.Y., & Ward, L.D. (2016). Faculty performance on the genomic nursing concept inventory. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(1), 5-13.
Riffkin, R. (2014). Americans rate nurses highest on honesty, ethical standards. Retrieved at http://www.gallup.com/poll/180260/americans-rate-
nurses-highest-honesty-ethical-standards.aspx
Scanlon, C., & Fibson, W. (1995). Managing genetic information: Implications for nursing practice. Washington DC: American Nurses Association.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, and National Center for Health Workforce Analysis.
(2014). The future of the nursing workforce: National- and state-level projections, 2012-2025. Rockville, Maryland. Retrieved at
http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/supplydemand/nursing/workforceprojections/nursingprojections.pdf
Ward, L.D., French, B. F., Barbosa-Leiker, C., & Iverson, A. E. F. (2016). Application of exploratory factor analysis and item response theory to
validate the genomic nursing concept inventory. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(1), 9-17.
Ward, L.D., Haberman, M., & Barbosa-Leiker, C. (2014). Development and psychometric evaluation of the genomic nursing concept
inventory. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(9), 511-518.
Ward, L.D., Purath, J., & Barbosa-Leiker, C. (2016). Assessment of genomic literacy among baccalaureate nursing students in the United States: A
feasibility study. Nurse Educator, 41(6), 313-318.
Contact
[email protected]
Augmented Reality: Using the Microsoft HoloLens® to Promote Student Success
Helina Hilfiker Hoyt, MS, USA
Michael Gates, PhD, USA
Sean Hauze, MEd, USA
Abstract
Background: Simulation is a widely accepted educational strategy used to create realistic patient care opportunities for nursing students in a safe
learning environment (National League for Nursing, 2015). Further, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) landmark study
exploring the role and outcomes of simulation in pre-licensure nursing education across the United States, concluded that simulation can be used
as a substitute for up to fifty percent of traditional clinical experiences when delivered in a way that is evidence based (Hayden, Smiley, Alexander,
Kardong-Edgren & Jeffries, 2014). Currently, multiple modes of simulation are being used in various educational contexts to allow nursing students
to apply theory into practice including the use of computers, low-to-high fidelity manikins, task trainers, standardized simulated patients, and
standardized human patients. Unfortunately, many of the modalities used within simulation are expensive and not quantifiable in terms of return
on investment. Newer technologies such as augmented reality (i.e., Microsoft Hololens ®) may be an answer to this dilemma. Augmented reality
devices provide a computer-generated reality through the use of specialized ear and eyewear, which allow a student or group of students to
experience a variety of visual and auditory stimulation. Overall, augmented reality devices are less expensive than traditional high-fidelity
simulators, can be used anywhere and are technologically advanced (INACSL Standards Committee, 2016). However, its use has not been fully
explored for reliability and validity within baccalaureate nursing education.
Purpose: The focus of this study will be to determine whether the use of a Virtual Standardized Patient delivered with the Microsoft Hololens ® can
improve the knowledge, skill, and confidence of nursing students with regards to nursing assessment and intervention in a low-frequency, high-
stakes scenario.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study will utilize the virtual standardized patient scenario for anaphylaxis, which is a low-frequency, high-stakes
scenario developed by Microsoft Hololens ® as its augmented reality education treatment. The study sample will include over 150 pre-licensure
medical-surgical students at the sophomore, junior, and senior-level at a large school of nursing on the West Coast. In addition, approximately 20
Registered Nurse-Bachelor of Science students at the university’s satellite campus will also participate in the study. After the theory for caring for a
patient who is experiencing anaphylaxis has been reviewed in the classroom during the Fall 2017 semester, students will be randomly assigned to
one of the following groups: 1). Full Dose-students who individually experience the anaphylaxis scenario utilizing the Microsoft Hololens ®
technology, 2). Partial Dose-students watch a video of taped Microsft Hololens anaphylaxis experience from the student’s perspective, or 3).
Control-students work through a written anaphylaxis case study. Following the experience, each student will have their knowledge regarding
anaphylaxis, their nursing skill related to caring for a patient experiencing anaphylaxis, and their self efficacy (confidence caring for a patient with
anaphylaxis) assessed using validated instruments. Analyses of variance will be conducted to examine differences among and between study
groups. In addition, focus groups will be conducted to allow students to provide feedback on their experience with the Microsoft Hololens ®.
Implications for practice: According to the National League for Nursing (2015), nursing faculty should become experts in simulation. The NLN
further denotes that nurse educators should strategically integrate simulation into curriculum with concrete connections to student learning
outcomes. The debate exists regarding what technology is best, how the technology can be fully integrated to produce measurable student
learning outcomes, and what is the right combination of simulation versus real-life clinical experience. This study helps bridge the gaps identified by
the NLN. Newer technologies such as augmented reality (i.e., Microsoft Hololens ®) have the potential to transform nursing education. The
technologies are less expensive than previous modalities, are mobile, and can provide a safe environment for students to improve knowledge, skill,
and confidence with nursing assessment and proactive intervention in a low-frequency, high-stakes scenario. This study will provide quantitative
and qualitative data not currently found in the literature regarding the reliability and validity of using an augmented reality virtual standardized
patient simulation experience in nursing education. This data can be used by policy makers, educators, students, and clinical partners to better
provide evidence-based teaching methodologies that prepare student nurses and licensed nurses to have the knowledge, skill and confidence in
caring for low-frequency, high-stakes scenarios that can’t otherwise be practiced in real life.
References
Adams Becker, S., Cummings, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall, Giesenger, C., & Ananthanarayana, V. (2017). NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher
Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2015). Advancing healthcare transformation: A new era for academic nursing. Washington,
DC: American Association of Colleges of Nursing.
Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational
objectives. New York: Longman.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 119-215.
Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert, excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Hayden, J.K., Smiley, R.A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P.R. (2014). Supplement: The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A
5(2), C1-S64.
HealthImpact. (2016). Nursing Education Plan White Paper and Recommendations for California. Oakland, CA.
Jeffries, P.R., Dreifuerst, K.T., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Hayden, J. (2015). Faculty development when initiating simulation programs: Lessons learned
from the National Simulation Study. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(4), 17-23.
Jeffries, P. R., & Rogers, K. J. (2012). Theoretical framework for simulation design. In P. R. Jeffries (Ed.), Simulation in nursing education: From
conceptualization to evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 25-42). New York: National League for Nursing.
INACSL Standards Committee (2016). INACSL standards of best practice: Simulation SM Simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(S), S5-
S12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.005.
INACSL Standards Committee (2016, December). INACSL standards of best practice: Simulation SM Simulation glossary. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 12(S), S39-S47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.012.
Institute of Medicine. (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Knowles, M.S., Elwood, F.H., & Swanson, R.A. (Ed.). (2014). The Adult Learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource
development. (8th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Moro, C., Stromberga, Z., Raikos, A., & Stirling, A. (2017). The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical
anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education.
National League for Nursing (2015). A vision for teaching with simulation: A living document from the National League for Nursing NLN Board of
Governors. http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/about/nln-vision-series-(position-statements)/vision-statement-a-vision-for-teaching-
with-simulation.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Skiba, D.J. (2016). On the horizon: trends, challenges, and educational technologies in higher education.” Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(3),
183-185.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction. 4(4). 295-312.
Contact
[email protected]
WIL CONNECT: Connected Learning for Nursing and Allied Health Professionals via a Mobile App
Robyn E. Nash, PhD, MHSc, BA, RN, RCNA, Australia
Abstract
Mobile technology has been described as ‘a way to transform learning. It is a catalyst for creating impactful change in the current
system and crucial to student development in the areas of critical-thinking and collaborative learning…..skills that are needed in a
globally competitive economy’ (West, 2013, p. 14). Whilst understandings of mobile learning and m-learning are still evolving,
Crompton (2013) defines m-learning as ‘learning across multiple contexts, through social and content interactions, using personal
electronic devices’ (p. 3). Not surprisingly the popularity of mobile technology and internet usage are making mobile devices an
important tool for m-learning and impacting on the ways in which traditional courseware is being delivered in higher education. M-
learning allows students to learn independently regardless of time and place facilitated by the arrays of mobile devices and wireless
Internet (Tan, Ooi, Sim & Phusavat, 2012).
Perhaps one of the most important educational affordances offered by mobile technology is the opportunity that it provides in terms of enabling
connected learning. Connected learning can be described as a pedagogical approach that ‘seeks to integrate three spheres of learning that are
often disconnected - personal interest, peer relationships, and academic achievement’ (Mizuko et al., 2013, p. 63). This enables the learner to
uniquely integrate personal connections, in-class and out-of-class experiences, collaborations, and resources of all kinds resulting in a deeper
learning experience that better addresses learners’ specific needs. Importantly, connected learning requires not just the acquisition of knowledge
but also an understanding of how to use connections to ask questions, find answers and develop competencies (Educause, 2013).
These rapidly emerging trends offer exciting possibilities which have the potential to enrich the educational experience of nursing and allied health
professional students, particularly within the clinical practice context. Unlike classroom learning, students in the clinical setting frequently have to
contend with situations that are unplanned, complex, multidisciplinary in nature and needing to be dealt with quickly on the basis of incomplete
information (Yorke, 2011). These and other factors complicate the realisation of integrative educational experiences and, potentially, the quality of
learning outcomes achieved by students. Given the potential of mobile technologies to enable connected learning outcomes, our question is
whether, and in what way/s, an m-Learning solution designed to facilitate interprofessional student collaboration during clinical practicums might
complement the supervisory guidance being received and enhance the overall quality of student learning.
This presentation reports on our work in progress to develop a mobile app designed to provide a real-time means by which students from nursing
and allied health disciplines can meaningfully connect with each other during the course of a clinical placement in order to share insights, pose
questions, receive feedback and reflect on their learning. The app’s conceptual design draws upon four principles of connected learning: accessible
learning experiences which allow participation in different ways, are linked to participatory and experiential activities, centred around shared
interests which create a ‘need to know’, and provide a means by which learners can share their work, knowledge and skills with others (Mizuko et
al. 2013). It includes a social networking strategy for students to introduce themselves to other members of the peer-based community,
conversation triggers to stimulate dialogue amongst the community and opportunities for the real-time sharing of thoughts, questions, ideas,
suggestions, insights etc. regarding their experiences in the various clinical settings in which they were placed.
Twenty two undergraduate students from the disciplines of nursing, social work and nutrition and dietetics volunteered to participate in the pilot
which was conducted in late 2016/early 2017. A short briefing session about the aims of the project and how to use the app were provided to
students prior to the commencement of the pilot. Evaluative feedback was collected using a purpose-built online survey and a face-to-face focus
group discussion. Basic statistical procedures were used to analyse the quantitative data, and thematic analysis was used to identify and analyse
patterns in the qualitative data yielded from the focus group discussion (Braun & Clark, 2006). Quantitative and qualitative data indicate that
students valued the opportunity to connect with their multidisciplinary peers during the course of a clinical practicum in the workplace. However,
content analysis of their online dialogue (Miles & Huberman, 1994), and commentary during the focus group discussion, highlight several issues
which have important practical and curriculum implications for their engagement with the app and consequent realisation of learning benefits.
Outcomes from the pilot are being used to refine the initial prototype app for testing on a wider scale in the latter part of 2017.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Connected Learning Alliance. (2017). What is connected learning? Accessed from https://clalliance.org/
Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of m-learning: Toward learner-centered education. In Z.L. Berge & L.Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of
Mobile Learning (pp. 3-14). New York, NY: Routledge.
Educause. (2013). 7 things you should know about connected learning. Accessed from https://library.educause.edu/resources/2013/5/7-things-
you-should-know-about-connected-learning
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mizuko, I., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., Watkins. S. (2013). Connected Learning: An
Agenda for Research and Design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Tan, G-W., Ooi, K-B., Sim, J-J. & Phusavat, K. (2012). Determinants of mobile learning adoption: An empirical analysis. Journal of Computer
Information Systems, 52(3), 82-91.
West, D. M. (2013). Mobile Learning: Transforming Education, Engaging Students, and Improving Outcomes. Centre for Technology Innovation at
Brookings. Accessed from https://www.brookings.edu/research/mobile-learning-transforming-education-engaging-students-and-improving-
outcomes/
Yorke, M. (2011). Work-engaged learning: toward a paradigm shift in assessment. Quality in Higher Education, 17(1), 117-130.
Contact
[email protected]
Influencing Factors of NCLEX-RN© Pass Rates Among Nursing Students
Teresa Nikstaitis, DNP, RN, CCRN, USA
Hyunjeong Park, PhD, RN, USA
Hayley D. Mark, PhD, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Nursing education programs have evolved overtime to prepare registered nurses. The National Council Licensure Examination
Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN) pass rate is an important measure of quality in nursing education programs. Previous research has
shown that various factors influence pass rates. The purpose of this mixed methods study is to investigate factors influencing NCLEX-
RN pass rates at one baccalaureate nursing program. The first phase of this study used the student record of those who graduated
between 2013-2016. The data includes preadmission information and Health Education Systems Incorporated (HESI) scores, which
were administered during the program. The preadmission data included: main vs. satellite campus location, accepted from the initial
applicant pool or wait list, first vs. second baccalaureate degree, native or transfer student, Test of Essential Academic Skills (TEAS)
score, prerequisite grade point average (GPA), overall preadmission GPA, and English as a first language. HESI scores on fundamental
health, med-surg, pediatric, and the exit exam were included as potential predictors of NCLEX-RN pass rates. Data was analyzed
using logistic regression. The initial analysis indicated students with a higher prerequisite GPA (β= 1.367, p<.05) and English as the
first language (β= .988, p<.05) were successful in passing NCLEX-RN. Students with a higher med-surg, HESI exam (β=.004, p<.05),
and exit HESI exam (β= .006, p<.05) were also successful at passing the NCLEX-RN. The second phase included a survey with 12 semi-
structured questions using the online survey tool, Survey Monkey©. Emails containing the online survey tool were sent between the
spring 2015 and fall 2016 semesters to 355 recent nursing baccalaureate program graduates. Of this number, 170 (47.8%) emails
were opened and 4.9% bounced because the email address was incorrect. The survey emails were sent to the students at four
different points in time, approximately a week apart, using their school and personal email addresses. The response rate is 28.7%
based on the first round emails sent. However, when exluding emails that were not opened and bounced, the response rate
increased to 60%. The majority of respondents graduated between spring and fall of 2016. Approximately half way through the
survey administration, internal funding was secured and $10.00 gift cards were offered to improve response rates. A total of 26 gift
cards were sent to respondents. Survey questions included “How did you prepare for the NCLEX-RN exam”, “Did anything happen
during the exam that influenced your performance?” and “Why do you think you passed/didn’t pass the exam on the first try?”
Several common themes emerged from the results as for reasons of passing the NCLEX-RN on the first try: taking a review course,
aggressive use of practice questions, and studying. The most common perception for not passing the NCLEX-RN on the first attempt
was anxiety. The results from the second phase of study presented a description of what the students’ perspectives are prior to and
after taking the NCLEX-RN exam. The results of this study can be utilized to develop strategies in nursing programs to support
students as they prepare to take the NCLEX-RN exam and to be successful when taking the NCLEX-RN exam. In conclusion, there are
many factors influencing NCLEX-RN pass rates and they should be considered as the cornerstone of nursing programs.
References
Bennett, M., Bormann, L., Lovan, S., & Cobb, B. (2016). Preadmission Predictors of Student Success in a Baccalaureate of Science in Nursing
Program. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 711-18. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(16)32315-8
Kaddoura, M. A., Flint, E. P., Van Dyke, O., Yang, Q., & Chiang, L. (2017). Academic and Demographic Predictors of NCLEX-RN Pass Rates in First- and
Second-Degree Accelerated BSN Programs. Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(3), 229. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.09.005
Koestler, D. (2015). Improving NCLEX-RN first-time pass rates with a balanced curriculum. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(1), 55-57.
doi:10.5480/11-591.1
March, K. S., & Ambrose, J. M. (2010). Rx for NCLEX-RN Success: Reflections on Development of an Effective Preparation Process for Senior
Baccalaureate Students. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League For Nursing), 31(4), 230-232.
Contact
[email protected]
Managing the Panic: High-Fidelity Simulation Prior to the First Clinical Experience of Undergraduate Nurses
Sarah Jane Craig, PhD, MSN, RN, CCNS, CCRN, USA
Jennifer C. Kastello, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: Transitioning from the classroom to the clinical setting can be both exciting and anxiety-provoking for undergraduate
nursing students. Nursing educators are tasked with ensuring that students are prepared to integrate and apply newly acquired
nursing knowledge into the clinical setting. This preparation often centers on proficiency in nursing skills and didactic course-work,
but rarely addresses the anxiety associated with applying nursing knowledge and skills in an authentic clinical setting with “real”
patients. Use of multiple clinical simulation experiences that focus on bolstering student confidence in professional communication
and fundamental nursing skills may reduce student anxiety prior to their first clinical experience. In a recent study, Ross and Carney
(2017) found that undergraduate students who completed one clinical simulation scenario prior to entering the clinical setting
significantly reduced student anxiety and increased self-confidence related to clinical decision making. The purpose of this study is to
build on the previous study (Ross & Carney, 2017) by examining the effect of multiple clinical simulation experiences on the anxiety
associated with clinical-decision making processes among second year baccalaureate nursing students prior to their first clinical
experience.
Method: This replication study is a descriptive pre-test and post-test design conducted at a large public university in the mid-Atlantic area of the
United States. Participants were a convenience sample of second year undergraduate students (N=88) enrolled in a fundamentals clinical course in
a four year baccalaureate nursing program. Three 4-hour clinical simulations were designed for small groups of 7-8 participants and included core
nursing objectives such as communication, professionalism, physical assessment, nursing process, and skills application. Course faculty designed
three new simulations based on these objectives. To assess anxiety and self-confidence, the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Nursing
Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision-Making Scale were administered before and after each of the three clinical simulations. The
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from the site prior to beginning the study.
Preliminary Results: This study will be conducted during the 2017-2018 academic year for all BSN students in their fundamentals of nursing course
prior to their first clinical experience. Anecdotal evidence from past fundamentals simulations as well as past simulation research studies from the
healthcare literature suggest that conducting the outlined simulations prior to entering the clinical setting will decrease student anxiety and
improve self-confidence with clinical decision-making for this population of nursing students.
Conclusions: Evidence from the literature suggest that the initial transition into the clinical setting can be negatively impacted by increased levels
of anxiety experienced by undergraduate nursing students. Data from past fundamental clinical course evaluations at this institution suggest that
students experience high levels of anxiety that may impede their application of knowledge and emerging critical thinking skills during their first
clinical experience. Bridging didactic and clinical courses with authentic simulation experiences creates opportunities for integration and
application of fundamental skills in a safe, low-stakes environment and may decrease student anxiety to enhance the clinical learning experience.
References
Bambini, D., Washburn, J. & Perkins, R. (2009). Outcomes of clinical simulation for novice nursing students: communication, confidence and clinical
judgement. Nursing Education Research, 30 (2), 79-82.
Norman, J. (2012). A systematic review of the literature on simulation in nursing education. Association of Black Nursing Faculty Journal, Spring
2012, 24-28.
Ross, J. & Carney, H. (2017). The effect of formative capstone simulation scenarios on novice nursing students' anxiety and self-confidence related
to initial clinical practicum. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(3), 116-120.
Yoo, M. & Park, J. (2017). Effect of case-based learning on the development of graduate nurses’ problem-solving ability. Nurse Education Today, 34,
47-51.
Yuan, H., Williams, B. & Fang, J. (2012). The contribution of high-fidelity simulation to nursing students' confidence and competence: a systematic
review. International Nursing Review, 59, 26-33.
Contact
[email protected]
Educating Critical Care Nurses on Moral Distress: Building a Sustainable Solution Through Online Continuing
Education
Patrizia Fitzgerald, MSN, CHSE, USA
Abstract
Nurses are the largest group of healthcare providers in the United States (U.S.) and a shortage of 500,000 nurses in the U.S. is
predicted to occur by 2025 1. Unsafe staffing, high turnover rates, and decreased quality of patient care are some of the well
documented side effects that occur when there is a shortage of nurses in the workplace. Moral Distress has been reported as a
leading factor of nurse resignation and poor patient outcomes2. Moral distress is the ethical concern that arises when an individual
knows the right thing to do but is inhibited to do so because of an authoritative power or policy. Moral distress affects nurses’
physical and psychological health, job satisfaction, and intent to leave their positions 3.
According to the American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN) “moral distress is experienced by one in three nurses and studies show that
among 750 nurses, nearly 50% had acted against their consciences in providing care to terminally ill patients” 4. The effect of moral distress on
nurses can be extensive. Nurses report experiencing the effects of moral distress ranging from physical and psychological symptoms such as
depression, fear, and anger, to resignation from their positions and from the profession 5,6,3,7. Patients and their families may experience the impact
of nurses’ moral distress through decreased quality of care, nursing ambivalence to meet patient care needs, delayed treatments, and prolonged
hospitalization 8,3. Patient care situations that have been found to cause moral distress involve inadequate nurse-physician communications,
continued life support even though it is not in the best interest of the patient, and false hope and prolonged treatments given to patients 9,10.
Moral distress also influences the healthcare environment through financial losses as a result of decreased nurse staffing levels and recruitment
efforts, poor retention of nurses, and patient safety issues 11. Work environment issues contributing to moral distress are inadequate staffing and
training to provide care, and lack of autonomy in the work environment 9,10. The effects of moral distress seriously impact health care delivery and
nurses, the direct providers of care.
While there is a plethora of research defining moral distress, how it occurs, and how it is measured, there is little evidence to support interventions
that are effective in mitigating moral distress in nurses. Creating and implementing programs to identify and reduce moral distress are key actions
to promoting a healthy work environment 12,13. Teaching the American Association of Critical Care Nurse’s (AACN) 4 A’s To Rise Above Moral
Distress program is one approach to reduce moral distress, increase awareness, and manage morally distressing patient care situations in nursing.
The purpose of this quality improvement project is two fold: (1) evaluate CCU nurses’ acceptability of an online learning program on moral distress,
and (2) evaluate a change in moral distress frequency and intensity experienced by direct care critical care nurses at one academic medical center
one month after implementing an online continuing education program based on the AACN’s 4 A’s model. The plan for the project is to adapt the
didactic portion of the AACN 4 A’s evidence based program into a narrated, online learning module. Modules will be uploaded into the Medical
Center’s online learning management system (LMS). Modules posted in the LMS will help to ensure the CCU nurses’ ease of accessibility to the 4A’s
educational program. Critical care nurses will be recruited to participate in the first session of the project which includes an online pre-test survey
using the Moral Distress Scale-Revised (MDS-R) and viewing the onlne modules. This initial session of the project will provide data for establishing a
baseline frequency and intensity of moral distress of the nurses who participate. One-month post intervention of viewing the 4A’s program, the
second session of the project will be conducted. Participants will return to complete an online post-test using the MDS-R to re-measure moral
distress and an Acceptability Questionnaire to evaluate the nurses’ acceptance of the online learning modules. If the results of this project indicate
that a proactive intervention can reduce the impact of moral distress on this unit, then the 4A’s online continuing education module may be
expanded to other hospital units as part of annual competency training, new orientation and nurse residency programs.
References
1De Villers, M. J., & DeVon, H. A. (2013). Moral distress and avoidance behavior in nurses working in critical care and noncritical care units. Nursing
Ethics, 20(5), 589-603. doi:10.1177/096973301245288221
2Burston, A. & Tuckett, A. (2013). Moral distress in nursing: Contributing factors, outcomes and interventions. Nursing Ethics, 20(3). Retrieved from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23275458
3Wiegand, D. L., & Funk, M. (2012). Consequences of clinical situations that cause critical care nurses to experience moral distress. Nursing Ethics,
19(4), 479-487. doi:10.1177/096973301142934222

4American Association of Critical Care Nurses (2008). Moral distress: Position statement. Retrieved from:
http://www.aacn.org/wd/practice/docs/moral_distress.pdf
5Choe, K., Kang, Y., & Park, Y. (2015). Moral distress in critical care nurses: A phenomenological study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(7), 1684-
1693.doi:10.1111/jan.1263
6Karanikola, M. N., Albarran, J. W., Drigo, E., Giannakopoulou, M., Kalafati, M., Mpouzika, M., & ... Papathanassoglou, E. D. (2014). Moral distress,
autonomy and nurse-physician collaboration among intensive care unit nurses in Italy. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(4), 472-484.
doi:10.1111/jonm.12046
7Wilson, M. A., Goettemoeller, D. M., Bevan, N. A., & McCord, J. M. (2013). Moral distress: levels, coping and preferred interventions in critical care
and transitional care nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(9/10), 1455-1466. doi:10.1111/jocn.12128
8Armellino, D., Quinn Griffin, M., & Fitzpatrick, J. (2010). Structural empowerment and patient safety culture among registered nurses working in
adult critical care units. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(7), 796-803. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010. 01130.x
9Corley, M.C. (2002). Nurse moral distress: A proposed theory and research agenda. Nursing Ethics 9(6), 636-650.
10Epstein, E.G., & Delgado, S. (Sept 30, 2010). Understanding and addressing moral distress. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. Retrieved
from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/737893
11American Association of Critical Care Nurses (2016). Healthy work environment initiative. Retrieved from:
http://www.aacn.org/wd/hwe/content/hwehome.pcms?menu=hwe
12American Association of Critical Care Nurses (2004). 4A’s to rise above moral distress. Retrieved from:
http://www.aacn.org/wd/practice/content/ethicmoral.pcms?menu=practice
13Rushton, C. (2006). Defining and addressing moral distress. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 17(2),161-168.
Contact
[email protected]
Strategies Teaching Interdisciplinary Collaborative Practice and Education at a Nurse Managed Clinic in
Underserved Communities
Patricia L. Humbles, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Nursing faculty utilize Interprofessional Collaborative Practice and Education (IPCP/IPE) to integrate multiple competencies into
healthcare profession programs providing a platform for faculty development and leadership skills among students. The Institute of
Medicine (IOM, 2015) called for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice (IPCP) and Interprofessional Education (IPE) as a model for
improving quality healthcare while decreasing costs. Interprofessional education in community settings has been isolated from
practice and curricula often lack relevant content and guidelines for implementation. Integrating evidence based practice (EBP) as a
problem solving approach within an IPE educational format in community settings has been minimally described. Eight disciplines
that included Nursing, Healthcare Administration, Clinical Laboratory Science, Data Analysis, Clinical Affairs, Informatics Specialists,
Integrative Health, and Public Health and students from each of these disciplines participated in a grant funded project to develop
protocols for a nurse managed clinic in Watts, a medically underserved community in Los Angeles, California. Faculty and RN/BSN
students participated in twelve online synchronous IPCP/IPE workshops consisting of three phases. The first Phase or the Didactic
component was the organizing framework providing the foundation for all health professions curricula is based on the principles of
collaboration, increasing diversity and mutual human-environmental processes. The second phase or the Simulation component
supported the collaboration and interprofessional team training utilizing interactive video scenarios. In Phase 3, the Clinical
component, students were assigned to the Project to gain hands on experience in meeting the needs of diverse patient populations
under the supervision of the Project Manager, Project Coordinator and Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs). The objectives for the RN-
BSN students were to 1) develop a patient-centered diabetes disease management tool, 2) create a tool to establish a continuum of
self-management assessment, and 3) provide culturally and linguistically sensitive diabetic management interventions to reduce the
morbidity and mortality rates. Unique opportunities exist in utilizing IPE/IPCP to integrate multiple competencies into healthcare
profession programs that will prepare graduates to navigate successfully the complex, healthcare landscape throughout their
careers. This presentation reflects on the development of protocols providing suggestions for future interprofessional collaborative
practices.
References
Bonvissuto, K. (2013). How the house call may be the future of medicine. Accessed January 30, 2014 at
http://medicaleconomics.modernmedicine.com/medical-economics/news/how-house-call-may-be-future-medicine
California Department of Public Health. (2013). County Health Status Profiles 2013. Retrieved from http://www.cdph.ca.gov
David, M. (2013). Zoom’s Full Featured UME Videoconferencing Platform Exceeds Expectations. Telepresence Options, retrieved from,
http://www.telepresenceoptions.com/2013/01/zooms_full_featured_ume_videoc/
Department of Health. (2015). Whole Systems Demonstrators: An Overview of Telecare and Telehealth. National Health Services. Retrieved from
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http:/www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/dig
italasset/dh_100947.pdf
Ely, T. L. (2015). Nurse-Managed Clinics: Barriers and Benefits Toward Financial Sustainability when Integrating Primary Care and Mental Health.
Nursing Economic. (33) 4: 193-202.
Hudson, C., Sanders, M., & Pepper, C. (2013). Interprofessional education and pre licensure baccalaureate nursing students. Nurse Educator, 39(2),
76–80.
Hughes, J. (2016). Virtual Diabetes Management. Diabetes Self-Management. Retrieved from
http://www.diabetesselfmanagement.com/diabetes-resources/tools-tech/virtual-diabetes-management/?print=0
Institute of Medicine. (2013a). Establishing transdisciplinary professionalism for improving health outcomes: Workshop summary. Washington, DC:
The National Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine. (2013b). Interprofessional education for collaboration: Learning how to improve health from interprofessional models across
the continuum of education to practice: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). (2015). Measuring the impact of interprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). (2012). Primary Care and Public Health: Exploring Integration to Improve Population Health. Washington, DC: The
National Academies Press.
Aviles, S., Petkovic, M., Zannone, N. (2012). Impact of ICT on Home Healthcare. International Federation for Information Processing, 386: 111-122.
Woods, V. D., King, J. N., Hanna, M. S., Murray, C. (2012). “We Ain’t Crazy! Just Coping With a Crazy System: Pathways into the Black Population for
Eliminating Mental Health Disparities. California Reducing Disparities Project (CRDP).
World Health Organization. (2013a). Interprofessional collaborative practice in primary health care: Nursing and midwifery perspectives: Six case
studies. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/observer13/en
World Health Organization. (2013b). Nursing and midwifery progress report 2008–2012. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from
http://www.who.int/hrh/nursing_midwifery/progress_report/en
World Health Organization. (2013c). Transforming and scaling up health professionals’ education and training: WHO Guidelines 2013. Geneva,
Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/transf_scaling_hpet/en
Contact
[email protected]
Games, Frames, and Decision-Making: A Multimodal Approach to Teaching Delegation to Prelicensure
Nursing Students
Sharon Hendrix, DNP, FNP-BC, USA
Heather Robbins, DNP, MBA, RN, USA
Patricia Elizabeth Davies Hall, DNP, APRN, WHNP-C, USA
Robingale A. Panepinto, DNP, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: Responsible delegation is a critical clinical learning outcome for pre-licensure nursing students in most developed
countries. Rationale and methods for professionally responsible delegation skills are taught near the end of formal nursing
education, as students begin care of multiple patients and when more complex care is required. Teaching delegation skills includes
the five rights of delegation, authority of the RN role, developing clinical reasoning skills, and identifying leadership strategies.
Millennial nursing students, born after 1980, are comfortable with the use of high level electronic devices as part of their daily
learning style that can aid in development of critical thinking. Electronic gaming with pre-programmed questions on nursing
delegation roles and responsibility leverages this inherent level of comfort for classroom teaching with a smartphone “App”
(application). Faculty guided review of aggregated App responses engages students in active debriefing for clarification and
comprehension of duties that can safely be delegated to an unlicensed assistive personnel.
Small group learning activities augment lecture content to allow safe decision making practice, and to adopt varying team roles in a
simulation setting. Students practice prioritization through clinical simulation and role playing scenarios, develop leadership skills,
and build insight through small group exercises. Case-based learning and role play encourages critical thinking that allows students
to consider appropriate transfer of care, while retaining nursing authority, as the basis for delegation. Delegation of less critical
nursing duties to a delegatee, whether unlicensed assistive personnel (UAP) or student peers, by the nursing student improves
patient care through better student time management and prioritization of care for multiple patients. Delegating patient care
according to accepted standard of care and agency policy, the student nurse must understand the role of unlicensed assistive
personnel (UAP) to assure consistently safe patient care. Delegating appropriate tasks and procedures requires clear
communication, and follow up with the UAP on assigned work is an expected responsibility of the nursing student as delegator.
Students who learn to use delegation effectively are better able to focus on more complex patient care, medication administration
and patient teaching, while self-reflection on role transformation identifies personal readiness for assuming appropriate delegation
responsibilities essential to safe patient care.
Purpose: The purpose of this educational intervention is to teach pre-licensure nursing students the delegation process through
implementation of multi-media, multi-method approaches in the classroom and clinical setting. The nursing process is multifaceted
and includes delegation as an essential attribute of the developing professional nurse. Clinical application of nursing delegation
among all members of the healthcare team optimizes safety in patient care and positive patient outcomes.
Objectives: Classroom and seminar breakout sessions to instruct pre-licensure students the delegation process using multi-method
approach strategies to include:
PPT content presentation: Audiovisual method with didactic explanation/content to provide a fundamental introduction of
delegation concepts.
Kahoots game: Information Technology interactive games to apply fundamental delegation concepts to clinical situations.
Interactive gaming promotes social learning and deeper pedigogical impact through use of questions
Case studies: Break out sessions to provide critical thinking opportunities and peer collaboration exercise.
Debriefing: Provide safe environment for debrief and reflection session.
Instructional Activity Description: The multimedia delegation learning experience utilized various educational modalities to
disseminate fundamental nursing delegation information to pre-licensure students. The 2-hour activity was conducted prior to
students entering a capstone clinical experience during their last semester. Learning occurred in both large and small classroom
settings. Students were exposed to delegation material thru a presentation, Kahoot! questions, case studies, and debriefing. Details
regarding content and activities utilized to engage students during the 2-hour period included: PowerPoint Presentation of
fundamental information pertaining to delegation delivered in large group setting (20 minutes); Kahoot! Interactive Game of
multiple choice questions delivered via online game to reinforce delegation information from presentation (15 minutes); Case
Studies working within assigned clinical groups and guided by clinical faculty, students examined cases studies and applied newly
learned delegation information (45 minutes); and Debriefing in large group summary of activities employing specific debriefing
questions to promote meaningful reflection about delegation (30 minutes).
Outcome Expectation: Utilization of the four instructional and interactive components will increase student knowledge, skills and
attitudes necessary for role transition to active clinical leadership. Following this session, in a three week clinical capstone
experience students will create reasonable patient assignments using complex client health situations and will demonstrate
appropriate delegation of patient care responsibilities to other senior level pre-licensure nursing students, in the context of potential
urgent or rapidly changing client health situations. Peer evaluation of both leader and care giver responsibilities will ensure open
and meaningful communication among student leaders and their nursing student team members.
Implications/Recommendations for Nursing Education: This instructional methodology increases pre-licensure student learning of
the delegation process prior to entry into a robust medical/surgical capstone clinical experience. Educators aim to increase
understanding of the student nurse leader’s role through authoritative delegation of tasks and maintaining accountability for the
success of the delegation process. Components of delegation include the delegator, delegatee, and the task to be accomplished
through the four teaching methods: PPT, Kahoot! Game play, Case studies, and Debriefing.
References
Farley, H., Murphy, A., Johnson, C., Carter, B., Lane, M., Midgley, W.,… Koronios, A. (2015). How do students use their mobile devices to support
learning? A case study from an Australian regional university. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(14), 1–13. doi: 10.5334/jime.ar
Ferguson, C., Davidson, P., Scott, P., Jackson, D., Hickman, L. (2015). Augmented reality, virtual reality and gaming: An integral part of nursing.
Contemporary Nurse, 51(1), 1-4. doi:10.1080/10376178.2015.1130360
Jenkins, B., Joyner, J. (2013). Preparation, roles, and perceived effectiveness of unlicensed assistive personnel. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 4(3),
33-40. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30128-9
Koharchik, L., Caputi, L., Robb, M., & Culleiton A. (2015). Fostering clinical reasoning in nursing students. American Journal of Nursing, 115(1), 58-
61. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000459638.68657.9b
Kumaran, S., Carney, M. (2014). Role transition from student nurse to staff nurse: Facilitating the transition period. Nurse Education in Practice,
14(6), 605-614. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2014.06.002
Magnusson, C., Allan, H., Horton, K., Johnson, M., Evans, K., Ball, E. (2017). An analysis of delegation styles among newly qualified nurses. Nursing
Standard, 31(25), 46-53. doi:10.7748/ns.2017.e978 0
McCurry, M.K., Hunter Revell, S.M. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of personal response system technology on millennial student
learning. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(8), 471-475. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20110531-01
Monaco, M., Martin, M. (2007). The millennial student: A new generation of learners. Athletic Training Education Journal, 2(2), 42-46. Retrieved
from http://natajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.4085/1947-380X-2.2.42
Mueller, C., Vogelsmeier, A. (2013). Effective delegation: Understanding responsibility, authority, and accountability. Journal of Nursing Regulation,
4(3), 20-25. doi: 10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30126-5
National League for Nursing, (2015). A vision for the changing faculty role: Preparing students for the technological world of health care. Retrieved
from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/about/nln-vision-series-%28position-statements%29/nlnvision_8.pdf?sfvrsn=4
Nowell, L. (2016). Delegate, collaborate, or consult? A capstone simulation for senior nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(1) doi:
10.5480/13-1174
Papathanasiou, I., Kleisiaris, C., Fradelos, E., Kakou, K., Kourkouta, L. (2014). Critical thinking: The development of an essential skill for nursing
students. Acta Informatica Medica, 22(4), 283-286. doi:10.5455/aim.2014.22.283-286
Sedgwick, M., Awosoga, O., Grigg L., Durnin, J. (2016). A quantitative study exploring undergraduate nursing students’ perception of their critical
thinking and clinical decision making ability while using apps at the point of care. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(10), 1-7.
doi:10.5430/jnep.v6n10p1
Contact
[email protected]
Diabetic Retina Exam at Onsite Work Health Clinic Utilizing Telehealth Technology
Ruth R. Gibson, FNP-C, USA
Abstract
PROBLEM: Diabetes is the primary cause of new cases of blindness in American adults. An October 2016 study by Fisher et al., with
339,646 diabetic patients, found that 57% did not complete recommended annual eye screening with one barrier cited as patient’s
time constraints.
PURPOSE: This project evaluates the change in completion percentage of annual diabetic retina screenings using an inexpensive smartphone retina
camera in an urban family practice. 58.7% is the goal defined by HealthyPeople 2020 Midcourse Review released in 2016 for annual diabetic retina
screening. The study practice had a completion rate of 34% in May 2017.
EBP QUESTIONS: Will implementing the nurse practitioner lead smartphone retinal screening protocol increase completion rates of diabetic retina
screening? Do patients complete annual eye or retina specialist referrals at a higher rate if a retina scan result is not normal? Can a nurse
practitioner providing a convenient retina scan change a patient’s self-efficacy and empowerment?
METHODS: This project study uses a quasi-experimental design convenience sample with a pretest and posttest survey, The Diabetes
Empowerment Scale, developed by in 2000 and revised to an 8 question short version in 2003. The telehealth intervention is the D-EYE smartphone
ophthalmoscope. Subjects are current diabetic patients, over 18 years old, who had selected the center as their primary care. Recruitment occurs
over 3 months with a short explanation of the study, consent, survey and retina scan completion. The nurse practitioner contacts the patient and
initiates a referral. Four weeks post referral the patient will be contacted to validate the follow-up and complete the post survey.
OUTCOMES: It is anticipated that post study results will demonstrate retina screening percentage increase exceed the HealthyPeople 2020 goal of
58.7%. Poor retina screening results will result in higher numbers of completed eye specialty referrals. Patients who have lower empowerment
survey scores will have higher empowerment scores post intervention.
SIGNIFICANCE: This project empowers the nurse practitioner with an affordable telehealth tool to bridge the gap in diabetic patients completing
their annual retina scan. Utilization of telehealth increases completion of diabetic retina screening. Early identification of conditions that cause
blindness in this high-risk population leads to timely referrals to eye specialist and early intervention. Patients identify self-efficacy through early
knowledge while reducing the barrier of convenience to screening. Employers, families and patients have reduced financial and emotional stress
related to the sequela of blindness if diabetic retinopathy is not caught early enough to treat. Exceeding the goal of 58.7% from HealthyPeople
2020 by screening 100% of the population and incorporating eye screens in to family practice as easily as blood pressure evaluations.
References
Anderson, R.M., Funnell, M.M., Fitzgerald, J.T., & Marrero, D.G. (2000). The diabetes empowerment scale: a measure of psychosocial self-efficacy.
Diabetes Care, 23(6), 739-743. Retrieved from http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/23/6/739
Anderson, R.M., Fitzgerald, J.T., Gruppen, L.D., Funnell, M.M. & Oh, M.S. (2003). The diabetes empowerment scale-short form (DES-SF). Diabetes
Care, 26(5), 1641-1642. Retrieved from http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/26/5/1641.2.long
D-EYE Srl. (2016). D-eye smartphone-based retinal screening system (Brochure). Retrieved from https://www.d-
eyecare.com/articms/admin/upAllegati/4/1459939780.pdf?newW
Fisher, M. D., Rajput, Y., Gu, T., Singer, J. R., Marshall, A. R., Ryu, S., … MacLean, C (2016). Evaluating Adherence to Dilated Eye Examination
Recommendations Among Patients with Diabetes, Combined with Patient and Provider Perspectives. American Health & Drug Benefits, 9(7), 385–
393. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5123647/
National Center for Health Statistics. (2016). Chapter 8: diabetes. Healthy people 2020 Midcourse review. Retrieved from Hyattsville, MD: Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention website: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hpdata2020/HP2020MCR-C08-Diabetes.pdf
Contact
[email protected]
Investigating the Impact of a Video Response Discussion on Student Engagement in an Online Course
Kay Swartzwelder, PhD, USA
Jackie Murphy, MSN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: The social learning theorists of the past, such as Vygotsky and Bandura identified the importance of social influence on
the learning process. The majority of today’s learners are considered part of the Millennials (Net Generation) and utilize technology
on a daily basis (Sherman & Lynn, 2009). As we continue to strive to improve engagement in the online course room, it is important
to identify the most effective ways to enhance learning. The discussion board has been used in online courses as a way for students
to interact with their peers. This research proposes that there may be a more effective way to engage the online learner.
Objective: Compare student engagement/interactivity in two different types of assignments (Video versus standard Discussion Board).
Problem Statement: Faculty are often frustrated because the teaching strategies of the past are no longer effective with the Net Generation.
Emerging technologies need to be investigated for effectiveness in promoting student engagement and interactivity in the online course. The
traditional discussion board provides a flat, one dimensional format for students to interact with their peers. Richey and Klein (2007) discussed the
ongoing interest in research related to technology-enhanced learning environments. Could research support the idea that technology enhanced
learning may increase student engagement? Could an assignment using video responses rather that the flat, one sided discussion boards improve
student engagement? According to Richey and Klein, it is important to clarify the process by which people learn, typically through interactions with
instructional technologies and other learners (2007).
Theoretical Framework: Social learning theory discusses the importance of learning naturally in conversations with others rather than in
regimented, pre-packaged segments (Batson, 2009). Bandura (1977) described social learning theory as how people learn from one another,
Brunner (1964) believed that learning cannot occur in isolation. Vygotsky (1978) held the belief that learning cannot be understood outside the
social concept of learning. In 2003, Bender concurred stating that working together in the course room enhanced learning by allowing students to
question and share meaning with other learners. The common theme among these theorists is the belief that students do not learn in isolation,
therefore instructional strategies that allow for social engagement may enhance the learning environment.
Sims and Koszalka, stated that social engagement/interactivity is critical to the overall effectiveness of the online learning experience. Students
need to be able to communicate with their peers, both in writing and verbally. It is essential that that faculty participate in the learning process, but
gradually decrease the amount of support given to students (Candela, 2016). It takes creativity in an online environment to ensure that students
are given ample opportunities to collaborate with one another and reflect on their work. To overcome barriers, teachers must view the integration
of new technologies as a vehicle to improve learner outcomes (Lawrence & Lentle-Keenan, 2013). While faculty believe video response will provide
a more engaging learning environment, there has been little research on the topic.
Purpose Statement: The purpose of this quasi-experimental study is to determine the effect on student engagement when a video discussion is
utilized instead of the traditional discussion board.
Research Question: Could an assignment using video responses rather that the flat, one sided Discussion boards improve student engagement?
Hypothesis: For the purpose of this research study, the hypothesis was; The use of a video response assignment compared to a standard
discussion board forum will increase students’ perception of engagement/interactivity in the online course.
Methodology: A convenience sample was used of those students already enrolled in an online course. The students were adult nursing students
enrolled in the master’s program. There were 160 students enrolled in the course (multiple sections). The duration of the subject’s participation in
the study was 10 weeks. The study completed in winter quarter 2017.
All students enrolled in the course completed discussions in two different formats, with two imbedded video response exercises and two standard
Discussion Boards. A survey measuring student perception was sent to all students who consented to be part of the study during the last week of
the course using Qualtrics. The survey also contained some descriptive data of experience with online learning, ESL student, and age.
The data was collected by using the COLLES survey. The COLLES survey is designed to measure students’ preferred or ideal experience with online
learning. The questions are grouped into six categories. The first four questions focus on relevance, Questions five through eight focus on
reflection, Questions nine through 12 on interactivity, Questions 13 through 16 on instructor support, Questions 17 through 20 on peer support,
and Questions 21 through 24 on interpretation. For the purpose of this study, the focus was on data collected from questions 9-12 on interactivity
and questions 17 through 20 on peer support. The data were analyzed using paired sample t tests to determine statistical differences.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
Batson, T. (2009). Why is Web 2.0 important to higher education? Campus Technology. Retrieved from
http://campustechnology.com/Articles/2009.
Bender, T. (2003). Discussion-based online teaching to enhance student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Brunner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American psychologist, 19, 1-15.
Candela, L. (2016). Theoretical foundations of teaching and learning. In D.M. Billings & J.A. Halstead (Eds.), Teaching in nursing. A guide for faculty
(5th ed.) (pp. 211 – 229). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Lawrence, B., & Lentle-Keenan, S. (2013). Teaching beliefs and practice, institutional context, and the uptake of Web-based technology. Distance
Education, 34(1), 4-20.
Richey, R. & Klein, J.D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sims, R. & Koszalka, T.A. (2008). Competencies for the new-age instructional designer. In Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., van Merriënboer, J., &
Driscoll, M.P. (Eds.). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Sherman, R. O. & Lynn, C. E. (2009). Teaching the Net set. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(7), 359-360.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Contact
[email protected]
Incorporation of Community Health Virtual Simulation Into a Capstone Population Focused Project: A Pilot
Study
Karen Camargo, PhD, USA
Abstract
The integration and use of simulation in online nursing education is continually growing and evolving. Nurses who usually select an
online education do so for its flexibility as well as the ability to continue to work while in school (Breen & Jones, 2015). A new online
RN to BSN nursing program was developed to support the continuation of local Associate degree (ADN) prepared nurses in their
professional education. A learner-centered approach requires nursing faculty to carefully identify appropriate teaching strategies to
meet the learning needs of the Associate degree (ADN) prepared nurse. Associate degree prepared Registered Nurses bring basic
nursing knowledge as well as a variety of clinical skills however, community health is not addressed (Thomas, 2016). The use of
simulation and student outcomes are related (Tate, 2009) yet, research regarding the use of a virtual simulation environment has
not been fully substantiated (Aebersold & Tschannen, 2014). Nursing students enrolled in an RN to BSN online nursing program have
shopped around for the online nursing program that best fits their personal needs. The RN to BSN nursing student can be local and
close by or as in many online nursing programs the students are scattered throughout the state as well as the nation which poses a
challenge for nursing faculty to come up with creative learning opportunities. With the ever growing shortage of clinical sites, the
search for alternative means and realistic learning opportunities are needed. One such option is the use of Virtual or 3 D simulation.
Virtual simulation offers experiential learning and the opportunity to learn in a realistic environment. RN to BSN nursing students
and faculty can access the simulated 3D environment at any time and from anywhere. Online nursing students and nursing faculty
alike can interact, communicate and collaborate and at the same time, nursing faculty can review and keep track of the online
nursing students’ progress as well as their leadership skills (Breen, 2014).
References
Aebersold, M. & Tscannen, D. (2013). Simulation in nursing practice: The impact on patient care. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18(2),
Manuscript 6. Doi: 10.3912/OJIN.vol18No02Man06
Breen, H. & Jones, M. (2015). Experiential Learning: Using Virtual Simulation in an Online RN-BSN Program. The Journal of Continuing Education in
Nursing, 46(1), 25-33 doi:10.3928/00220124-20141120-02
Breen, H. (2015). Assessing Online Collaborative Discourse. Nursing Forum 50(4), 218-227 doi: 10.1111/nur.12091
Tate, M.L. (2009). Assessment and Chinese students in New Zealand: The impact of perceptions on assessment types on the study habits and
motivation of Chinese undergraduate students in a New Zealand University.
Contact
[email protected]
Cultivating a Culture of Resilience: A Nursing Leadership Initiative
Deirdre O'Flaherty, DNP, RN, NE-BC, APRN-BC, ONC, USA
Joyce J. Fitzpatrick, PhD, RN, FAAN, USA
Mary Joy Garcia-Dia, DNP, RN, USA
Tatiana Arreglado, MSN, RN, USA
Jean Dinapoli, DNP, USA
Abstract
Nurse leaders and managers can use resilience as a theoretical framework in creating and planning staff development programs as the profession
addresses nurses’ satisfaction, engagement, adverse workplace environments, and recruitment and retention challenges.
The goals of this presentation are to: Describe resilience and its relationship to empowering nurses personally and professionally. Identify nurses’
resilience and analyze ways to build resilience through targeted interventions and tools. Share research findings that have contributed to the
development of a resilience building mobile application.
Resilience is a concept that has been applied to research and practice in nearly every possible area of life and academia from science to sociology,
psychology, nursing and medicine. Nursing has been a focus for studies and interventions that foster resilience in the workplace. Once
characteristics that exemplify resilience have been identified resilience can be learned or developed. Nursing literature has noted the impact of
resilience in clinical settings correlating the level of professional competence (Gillespie, et al 2007) work engagement (Othman, et al, 2013; Jackson
et al., 2007) and the benefit of resilience training programs to reduce PTSD in the workplace (Mealer, Jones, & Moss, 2012).
Responses from a recently conducted survey of professional nursing participants determined resilience score using the 14-item Resilience Scale,
which has a reliability ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 alpha coefficients. Initial factor analysis indicates that “acceptance of self and life” and “personal
competence” reflects the theoretical definition of resilience (Wagnild and Young, 1993). The scale’s construct validity positively correlates with
optimism, morale, self-efficacy, self-reported health, health promoting behaviors, forgiveness, self-esteem, sense of coherence, effective coping,
and life-satisfaction. Inversely, the construct is related with depression, stress and anxiety, hopelessness, loneliness somatization, and healthcare
visits.
Nursing management, leadership and educators can facilitate resilience in the workplace through strategies that create work-life balance assist in
critical reflection to problem solve and build resolutions to help guide in future situations and use a shared or professional governance model.
Active participation of nurses through mentorship workshops for critical thinking,mobile applications, debriefing, journaling, empowering staff and
leaders that foster professional and caring environments contribute to building hardiness and aids in the development and strengthening of
personal resilience.
References
Connor K. & Davidson J. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety,
18, 76–82.
Gillespie, B. M., Chaboyer, W., Wallis, M., & Grimbeek, P. (2007). Resilience in the operating room: Developing and testing resilience
model. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 59(4),
Jackson, D., Firtko, A., & Edenborough, M. (2007). Personal resilience as a strategy forsurviving and thriving in the face of workplace adversity: A
literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60 , 1-9. 427-438. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04340.x
Othman, N., Ghazali, Z., and Ahmad, S. (2013). Resilience and work engagement: A stitch to nursing care quality. Journal of Global Management,
6(1), 40-48.
Mealer, M., Jones, J., & Moss, M. (2012). A qualitative study of resilience and posttraumatic stress disorder in the United States ICU
nurses. Intensive Care Med, 38, 1445-1451. DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2600-6
Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (2011). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Werner and Smith (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Sage Press.
Windle. G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21 (2), 152-69.
Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health Quality Life Outcomes, 9(8), 2–18,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-8.
Zeidner, M. & Endler, N. S. (Eds). (1996). Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications. New York: Wiley.
Garcia-Dia, M.J., DiNapoli, J.M, Garcia-Ona, L., Jakubowski, R., O’Flaherty, D. (2013). Concept Analysis: Resilience Archives of Psychiatric Nursing.
27, 264-270.
Garcia-Dia, M.J., O’Flaherty, D. Nursing Concept Analysis Applications to Research and Practice, Resilience a Concept Analysis p. 251-268, Springer
Publishing Company April 2016
DiNapoli, J.M., Garcia-Dia, M.J., O’Flaherty, D. (2014). Theory of Empowerment. Theories Guiding Nursing Research and Practice: Making Nursing
Knowledge Development Explicit. p. 251-268, Springer Publishing Company.
DiNapoli, J, M., O’Flaherty, D., Musil,C,. Clavelle, J., Fitzpatrick, J, J. The Relationship of Clinical Nurses’ Structural Empowerment and Engagement
on Their Unit Journal of Nursing Administration (2016)46, 2-p95-100
Contact
[email protected]
Script Concordance Model and Think Aloud Approach to Facilitate Clinical Reasoning in Baccalaureate
Nursing Students
Mary Tedesco-Schneck, PhD, MSN, USA
Abstract
Summary: Nurses are required to assess and interpret patient information to implement interventions that optimize patient
outcomes (Institute of Medicine, 2003). This process of assessment, interpretation, intervention, and ultimately evaluation is guided
by nurses’ ability to identify salience. Salience has been described as the ability to recognize important areas of focus and change in
a clinical situation (Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, & Day, 2010). The ability to interpret these assessments and plan interventions in the
context of salience constitutes clinical reasoning (Levett-Jones, et al., 2010; Simmons, 2010). Effective clinical reasoning has been
associated with improved patient outcomes (Liou, et al., 2015).
Healthcare professionals agree clinical reasoning is a complex process which requires specific knowledge and the ability to understand the clinical
situation in order to act (Fournier, Demeester, & Charlin, 2008; Furze, Gale, Black, Cochran, & Jensen, 2015). Clinical situations often do not unfold
in a clear cut linear fashion for which standard recipes for interventions can be applied. Human beings are complex and health and illness is
influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic variables (Deschenes, Charlin, Gagnon, & Goudreau, 2011). Nurses must assess and consider these variables in
a clinical situation, draw on evidence-based knowledge, identify salience, and then act. Clinical situations are dynamic hence, ongoing evaluation to
alter interventions accordingly is also required (Charlin, Roy, Brailovsky, & Goulet, 2000).
In nursing education, opportunities for faculty to facilitate students’ clinical reasoning exist in simulated and actual clinical settings and in the
classroom. Acquisition of clinical reasoning is an ongoing process refined at each academic level (freshman, sophomore, junior, senior) and
continues to develop over a lifetime of professional practice (Charlin, Roy, Brailovsky, & Goulet, 2000; Tanner, 2006). Faculty provide varied
learning experiences that foster clinical reasoning in each of these settings (simulation, actual clinical, and classroom) and rigor increases as nursing
students progress to each academic level.
Simulation is an active teaching strategy that immerses students in life-like clinical experiences with manikins or standardized patients (Jeffries,
2012). It has been reported that clinical reasoning is enhanced with simulation because it provides students with the opportunity to integrate
theory and practice in a safe simulated clinical environment (National League for Nursing, 2015). Time spent by students in actual clinical settings
such as hospitals and long-term care facilities also provide opportunities to foster clinical reasoning (Harmon & Thompson, 2015).
In the actual clinical setting, the Outcome Present State Test Model (OPT) has been used as a teaching tool to guide students through the clinical
reasoning process. Students utilize the OPT to identify key issues related to the patient’s health and illness state and formulate desired outcomes.
Interventions are developed to achieve these desired outcomes. Over time with repeated patient encounters students utilizing OPT have been
reported to improve their clinical reasoning skills (Bartlett, et al., 2008; Bland, et al., 2009; Kuiper, 2013).
It is in the classroom however, where students are often introduced to evidence-based knowledge and practices foundational to clinical reasoning
later applied in simulated and actual clinical settings. Teaching strategies to facilitate clinical reasoning in the classroom include collaborative
learning activities, focused reflection, concept mapping, case studies, and role playing. However, assessment of students’ actual acquisition of
clinical reasoning as a result of these teaching strategies is difficult to determine as reliable and valid tools are lacking (Dawson, Comer, Kossick, &
Neubrander, 2014; Deschenes, Charlin, Gagnon, & Goudreau, 2011).
Script Concordance Test (SCT) is an evaluation method to assess clinical reasoning under conditions of uncertainty (Charlin, Brailovsky, Leduc, &
Blouin, 1998). It has been predominantly used in medical education but has demonstrated success in physical therapy, pharmacy, optometry,
dentistry, and veterinary medicine (Dufour, et al., 2012; Faucher, Dufour-Guindon, Lapointe, Gagnon, & Charlin, 2016). There are only two reports
of use of SCT in nursing (Dawson, Comer, Kossick, & Neubrander, 2014; Deschenes, Charlin, Gagnon, & Goudreau, 2011).
SCT is based on script theory developed by two cognitive psychologists, Roger Shank and Robert Abelson (1977). Script theory posits higher level
thinking skills originate from cognitive scripts, knowledge, and previous experiences (Shank & Abelson, 1977). According to script theory,
individuals create mental scripts from pre-established knowledge and repeated past experiences which guide their actions (Dawson, Comer, Kosick,
& Neubrander, 2014; Deschenes, Charlin, Gagnon, & Goundreau, 2011; Shank & Abelson, 1977).
A SCT is a case-based written examination (Charlin, Roy, Brailovsky, & Goulet, 2000). A short clinical scenario is presented. For each scenario, there
are three columns; (a) the first column is a possible plausible hypothesis based on the scenario, (b) the second column contains new information,
and (c) the third column requires the student to select an option about the significance of the information presented in the second column in
relation to the hypothesis. These options are presented on a five-point Likert scale (Wilson, Pike, & Humbert, 2014).
Script Concordance Test uses a “panel-based aggregate scoring method” (Gagnon, Lubarsky, Lambert, & Charlin, 2011, p. 601). Scores for each
question on the SCT are based on the responses by a panel of experts. For each question, the answer most frequently selected by a panel of
experts is designated as the modal answer and is assigned the highest score. Partial credit is assigned proportionally for other options selected by
some of the expert panel (Lubarsky, Dory, Duggan, Gagnon, & Charlin, 2013). How closely students’ answers match with those of the expert panel
reflects concordance (Deschenes, Charlin, Gagnon, & Goudreau, 2011).
Although there are references in the literature that SCT has potential to be an effective teaching/learning tool, it has been predominately used for
testing (Faucher, Dufour-Guindon, Lapointe, Gagnon, & Charlin, 2016). It has been suggested by adding the Think Aloud approach a richer
understand of students’ clinical reasoning may be ascertained (Power, Lemay, & Cook, 2017). In the Think Aloud approach students verbalize the
thought process that led to their conclusion (Banning, 2010; Lee & Ryan-Wenger, 1997). Power, Lemay, & Cook (2017) applied the concept of the
Think Aloud approach by having students write the rationale for answers selected for each SCT test item.
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the Script Concordance Test method coupled with the Think Aloud approach as a
teaching/learning strategy to facilitate clinical reasoning in first semester senior-level baccalaureate nursing students.
Research Question: Does use of the Script Concordance Test model in conjunction with the Think Aloud approach as a teaching/learning strategy
facilitate clinical reasoning in first semester senior-level baccalaureate nursing students enrolled in a pediatric course?
What are first semester senior-level baccalaureate nursing students’ perceptions of the Script Concordance Test model in conjunction with the
Think Aloud approach as a teaching/learning strategy to facilitate clinical reasoning?
Hypotheses: Use of the Script Concordance Test model in conjunction with the Think Aloud approach as a teaching/learning strategy in first
semester senior-level baccalaureate nursing students improves clinical reasoning as measured by the Script Concordance Test model.
Methods: This study is a quasi-experimental design which will be executed in the Fall 2017 and Spring 2018 semesters. The class activity for 7
weeks out of a 14-week semester will include use of the Script Concordance Test Model in conjunction with the Think Aloud approach as a
teaching/learning strategy.
Students will be asked to complete a paper/pencil Script Concordance Test and provide written rationale for answers selected for each test item
consistent with the Think Aloud approach. The test is not included in the course grade as it is being utilized as a teaching/learning strategy. After
completing the test, class discussion regarding the content will ensue.
Data regarding students’ perceptions of the Script Concordance Test model in conjunction with the Think Aloud approach as a teaching/learning
strategy to facilitate clinical reasoning will be administered anonymously at the end of the semester using Qualtric. Demographics are optional and
will be requested anonymously as the last component of the survey using Qualtrics. Demographics will include age and gender.
In accordance with recommended guidelines for development of the Script Concordance Test (Lubarsky, Dory, Duggan, Gagnon, & Charlin, 2013) 10
expert pediatric nurses with > 3 years of experience will anonymously take the test in order for the Principle Investigator to develop scoring for
each test question.
Data analysis will be based on aggregate scores over the 7-week period to determine if clinical reasoning has improved. Inductive thematical
analysis of written response to each test question will be conducted.
References
American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: ANA.
Banning, M. (2008). The think aloud approach as an educational tool to develop and assess clinical reasoning in undergraduate students. Nurse
Education Today, 28(1), 8-14.
Bartlett, R., Bland, A., Rossen, E., Kautz, D, Benfield, S., & Carnevale, T. (2008). Evaluation of the Outcome-Present State Test Model as a way to
teach clinical reasoning. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(8), 337-344.
Bland, A., Rossen, E., Bartlett, R., Kautz, D., Carnevale, T., & Benfield, S. (2009). Implementation and testing of the OPT Model as a teaching
strategy in an undergraduate psychiatric nursing course. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(10), 14-21.
Charlin, B., Brailovsky, C., Leduc, C, & Blouin, D. (1998). The diagnostic script questionnaire: A new tool to assess a specific dimension of clinical
competence. Medical Teacher, 20(6), 567-571.
Charlin, B., Roy, L., Brailovsky, C., & Goulet, F. (2000). The script concordance test: A tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teaching and Learning
in Medicine, 12(4), 189-195.
Dawson, T., Comer, L., Kosick, M.A., & Neubrander, J. (2014). Can script concordance testing be used in nursing education to accurately assess
clinical reasoning skills? Journal of Nursing Education, 53(5), 281-286.
Deschenes, M.F., Charlin, B., Gagnon, R., & Goundreau, J. (2011). Use of script concordance test to assess development of clinical reasoning in
nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(7), 381-387.
Dufour, S., Latour, S., Chicoine, Y., Fecteau, G., Forget, S., Moreau, J., & Trepanier, A. (2012) Use of the script concordance approach to evaluate
clinical reasoning in food-ruminant practitioners. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 39(3), 267–275.
Faucher, C., Dufour-Guindon, M., Lapointe, G., Gagnon, R., & Charlin, B. (2016). Assessing clinical reasoning in optometry using the script
concordance test. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 99(3), 280-286.
Fournier, J.P., Demeester, A., & Charlin, B. (2008). Script concordance test: Guidelines for construction. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision
Making, 8, 18-25.
Furze, J., Gale, J.R., Black, L., Cochran, T.M., & Jensen, G.M. (2015). Clinical reasoning: Development of a grading rubric for student assessment.
Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 29(3), 34-45.
Gagnon, R., Lubarsky, S., Lambert, C., & Charlin, B. (2011). Optimization of answer keys for script concordance testing: Should we exclude deviant
panelists, deviant responses, or neither? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(5), 601-608.
Harmon, M.M. & Thompson, C.T. (2015). Clinical reasoning in pre-licensure nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 10(2), 63-70.
Institute of Medicine. (2003). Patient safety: Achieving a new standard for care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Jeffries, P.R. (2012). Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: NLN.
Kuiper, R. A. (2013). Integration of innovative clinical reasoning pedagogies into a baccalaureate nursing curriculum. Creative Nursing, 19(3), 128-
139.
Lee, J.E. & Ryan-Wenger, N. (1997). The “think aloud” seminar for teaching clinical reasoning: A case study of a child with pharyngitis. Journal of
Pediatric Healthcare,11(3), 101-110.
Levett-Jones, T., Hoffman, K., Dempsey, J., Jeong, S.Y.S., Noble, D., Norton, C.A. … Hickey, N. (2010). The ‘five rights’ of clinical reasoning: An
educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically ‘at risk’ patients. Nurse Education Today, 30(6), 515-520.
Liou, S.R., Liu, H.C., Tsai, Y.H., Lin, Y.C., Chang, C.H., & Cheng, C.Y. (2015). The development and psychometric testing of a theory-based instrument
to evaluate nurses’ perception of clinical reasoning competence. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(3), 707-717.
Lubarsky, S., Dory, V., Duggan, P., Gagnon, R., & Charlin, B. (2013). Script concordance testing: From theory to practice: AMEE guide and
No.75. Medical Teacher, 35(3), 184-193.
National League of Nursing. (2015). A vision for teaching with simulation: A living document from the National League for Nursing. Vision Series:
Transforming Nursing Education Leading the Call to Reform, 1-8.
Power, A., Lemay, J.F., & Cooke, S. (2017). Justify your answer: The role of written think aloud in script concordance testing. Teaching and
Learning in Medicine, 29(1), 59-67.
Shank, R. & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum
Associates.
Simmons, B. (2010). Clinical reasoning: Concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66 (5), 1151-1158.
Tanner, C.A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204-211.
Wilson, A.B., Pike, G.R., & Humbert, A.J. (2014) Analyzing script concordance test scoring methods and items by difficulty and type. Teaching and
Learning in Medicine, 26(2), 135-145.
Contact
[email protected]
Active Learning: A Concept Analysis
Nicole Elena Smith, MS, RN, CNE, CHSE, USA
Abstract
Active learning within nursing education is becoming increasingly important as leaders and accrediting bodies such as the Carnegie
Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, National League for Nursing, and American Association of Colleges of Nursing call on
educators to include innovative pedagogy in their classrooms. The traditional classroom teaching method, also known as lecturing, is
not the most effective teaching method with new generation learners (Kroning, 2014). Active learning is an umbrella term with
numerous strategies. The most cited active learning strategy within the nursing discipline within the past five years is simulation.
Page (1990) examined historical and contemporary perspectives of active learning and noted that while the names and labels of active learning
have changed and evolved, the basic concept has remained the same throughout the twentieth century. However, there is no universal definition
of the concept active learning as it applies to pedagogy. Therefore, the author conducted a concept analysis of the term active learning using the
criteria delineated by Walker and Avant (2011).
The words active and learning in this two-word concept analysis were examined separately and in tandem. All uses of each term were considered
for inclusion in the operational definition. However, active learning was explored in terms of teaching and learning in a formalized institutional
setting to reach an operational definition for use in nursing education.
Following the method delineated by Walker and Avant (2011), the author identified defining attributes of the concept. Defining attributes of active
learning include: student centered learning; teaching without the predominant use of lecture; and communicative dialogue to reveal active
(psychological and or physical) thinking by the learner. The author also developed model, borderline, and contrary cases for the concept following
criteria from Walker and Avant (2011).
Antecedents and consequences of the concept were identified separately pertaining to the teacher and the learner. Antecedents for the teacher
include: preparation of active student-centered learning activity and understand role as facilitator of learning. Consequences for the teacher
include: loss of control over the learning environment and satisfaction with student engagement in the learning process. Antecedents for the
learner include: willingness to be an active participant in the learning process and direct his or her own learning. The learner must also understand
their role as director of learning. Consequences for the learner include: stimulates critical thinking and improves knowledge retention.
The author identified empirical referents as a means of measuring the defining characteristics or attributes (Walker & Avant, 2011). Within the
discipline of nursing education, there is a lack of rigorous, well-designed research on the use and effectiveness of active learning methods (Waltz,
Jenkins, & Han, 2014). The author expanded the search for empirical referents outside the nursing discipline for a more comprehensive analysis of
the concept. The existence of active learning can be demonstrated in multiple ways as evidenced by the various strategies such as simulation,
gaming, case studies, and problem-based learning. However, it is imperative the student be an active participant in the learning process and direct
his or her own learning. Active participation can be recognized by student engagement via communicative dialogue within any active learning
strategy. Active learning can be further facilitated by the teacher through pre-class activities or in-class activities that encourage active thinking by
the learner (Keegan et al., 2016; Prince, 2004).
Active learning can be recognized when teachers encourage and witness students engage in communicative dialogue, think out loud, or even
physically work through psychomotor learning activities. Learning that is student-centered may be recognized through focus on the students’ gaps
in knowledge identified through socratic questioning. Socratic questioning involves probing questions from the teacher with the goal of analyzing
and recognizing an individual’s thinking (Rowles & Russo, 2009). This in turn promotes active thinking.
The need for a shift in pedagogical practices from traditional lecture to active learning is not new to education. However, the nursing discipline has
only recently begun to recognize and promote strategies for its use (Waltz et al., 2014). While general education literature has used the concept
term as early as the 1700s, disparate evidence of concept utilization within nursing education still remains. Likewise, a universal definition for
active learning has yet to be published for use across disciplines and in educational settings.
Active learning as an umbrella term includes multiple strategies. With the proliferation of emerging pedagogies, the concept will continue to
evolve. This concept analysis demonstrated that active learning has specific defining attributes. While many active learning strategies may include
one or more of these attributes, a true or model case of active learning must include all of the defining attributes.
The author suggests an operational definition for the concept to be used within nursing education as: teacher facilitated, student-centered learning
that reveals psychological or physical thinking by the learner; teaching without the predominant use of lecture. Nurse educators and researchers
can use this definition of the concept along with the antecedents and consequences to evaluate current practice. This definition may also be useful
as educators work towards developing a more robust body of knowledge.
Leaders in nursing education have challenged educators over the past decade to implement active learning strategies into classrooms. It is
imperative nurse educators begin to thoughtfully plan learning activities for didactic instruction to enhance student learning and critical thinking
(Kroning, 2014). Similarly, Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, and Day (2010) called for a radical transformation of nursing education and noted the current
approach (traditional lecture) is not the best approach to nursing education. Boyer (1990) noted that “great teachers . . . stimulate active, not
passive learning” (p. 24). However, nursing education must begin to develop definitions of the concept active learning with the goal of theory
development.
Ultimately, further research is needed to determine the concept’s empirical referents within the nursing discipline. Active learning may appear
different based on the nursing subject matter. To build upon this concept analysis, the examination of thinking in relation to learning would be
useful based on the author’s defining attributes of the concept. With further refinement of the concept, nurse theorists may begin to develop an
active learning theory to guide nurse educators in the application of the concept. Further refinement of the concept’s essence will aid in the
advancement of the discipline of nursing education.
References
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Retrieved from https://depts.washington.edu/gs630/Spring/Boyer.pdf
Keegan, R. D., Oliver, M. C., Stanfill, T. J., Stevens, K. V., Brown, G. R., Ebinger, M., & Gay, J. M. (2016). Use of a mobile device simulation as a pre-
class active learning exercise. Journal of Nursing Education, 55, 56-59. doi:10.3928/01484834-20151214-14
Kroning, M. (2014). The importance of integrating active learning in education. Nurse Education in Practice, 14, 447-448.
doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2014.06.001
Page, M. (1990). Active learning: Historical and contemporary perspectives (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov
(ED338389)
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223-231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-
9830.2004.tb00809.x
Rowles, C. J., & Russo, B. L. (2009). Strategies to promote critical thinking and active learning. In D. M. Billings & J. A. Halstead (Eds.), Teaching in
nursing: A guide for faculty (pp. 238-261). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.
Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. O. (2011). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Waltz, C. F., Jenkins, L. S., & Han, N. (2014). The use and effectiveness of active learning methods in nursing and health professions education: A
literature review. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35, 392-400. doi:10.5480/13-1168
Contact
[email protected]
Developing Critical Thinkers Through the Use of A.V.I.D. Discussions
Maria Young, PhD, USA
Abstract
For schools of nursing a common essential outcome for their programs is the ability to develop critical thinkers. The need for critical thinkers in the
current healthcare environment cannot be overstated (Kramer, 1993), with some identifying, the need being essential to decreasing errors of
judgment that can lead to patient death (IOM, 2004). In 2015, the National League for Nursing (NLN) identified the technique of debriefing as a
strategy that has the potential to foster critical reflection further asserting that critical reflection is central to being critical. In the 2015 call to action
the NLN declared the need to integrate debriefing across nursing curriculum for its potential to transform nursing education. Prior to NLN’s call to
action the act of debriefing or engaging in critical reflection was predominantly used in simulation though clinical nurse educators would employ a
type of debriefing strategy in their post-clinical discussions. Within the context of clinical learning, traditionally students and faculty engaged in face
to face discussions with the intended outcome being that students engaged in critical reflection. The purpose of these post-clinical discussions was
to permit students to reflect upon their day engaging in an exchange of ideas between themselves and faculty (Gaberson & Oermann, 2010). The
concern for nurse educators however are issues of student fatigue, time constraints at end of day, lack of available clinical space to conduct face to
face debriefings, and student’s own need for more time to process their clinical experience as barriers to full student participation in the reflection
process (Neumeier & Small, 2014). The purpose of this study was to explore the use of active, varied, interesting, and open-ended discussion
(A.V.I.D) questions (Pollack, 2017) as a debriefing method in an online environment in order to improve the critical reflection process and develop
the skills and habits of the mind of critical thinking as defined by Scheffer and Rubenfeld (2000). By implementing post-clinical discussions online
(Mahoney, Marfurt, daCunha, & Engebretson, 2005; Moran, 2005), it was anticipated that the identified concerns of a more traditional post-clinical
format would disappear leaving room for improved student engagement in the debriefing process thus leading to increased critical reflection and
critical thinking. Findings indicated that while students were satisfied with an online format, their ability to demonstrate increased skills or habits of
the mind related to critical thinking remained essentially unchanged. Further research needs to be implemented using the A.V.I.D method with
increased attention to integrating the skills and habits of the mind of critical thinking when developing discussion questions in order to more fully
evaluate the method’s ability to provide a meaningful learning experience for the student.
References
Brookfield, S. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
IOM. (2004). Keeping patients safe: Transforming the work environment of nurses. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Gaberson, K.B. & Oermann, M.H. (2010). Clinical Teaching Strategies in Nursing. (3rd Ed.). New York, N.Y.: Springer Publishing Company.
Kramer, M.K. (1993). Concept clarification and critical thinking: integrated processes. Journal of Nursing Education, 32(9), 406-414.
Mahoney, J., Marfurt, S., daCunha, M., & Engebretson, J. (2005). Design and evaluation of an online teaching strategy in an undergraduate
psychiatric nursing course. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 19, 264-272.
Moran, R. (2005). Enriching clinical learning experiences in community health nursing through the use of discussion boards. International Journal of
Nursing Education Scholarship, 2, 1-13.
National League for Nursing. (2015). VISIONSERIES TRANSFORMING NURSING EDUCATION LEADING THE CALL TO REFORM. Debriefing across the
curriculum: A living document from the National League for Nursing in collaboration with the International Nursing Association for Clinical
Simulation and Learning (INACSL). Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/about/nln-vision-series-(position-statements)/nln-
vision-debriefing-across-the-curriculum.pdf?sfvrsn=0
Neumeier, M. & Small, S. (2014). Moving the discussion online: Asynchronous discussion for Clinical post-conference in a baccalaureate nursing
program. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 9(1 & 2).
Pollack, M. (2017). Designing and managing engaging discussions in online courses. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 6(1), 76-80.
Scheffer, B.K. & Rubenfeld, M.G. (2000). A concensus statement on critical thinking in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 39(6), 352-359.
Contact
[email protected]
An Integrative Approach to the Implementation of a Veteran to BSN Pathway
Jene' M. Hurlbut, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Imelda R. Revuelto, MSEd, USA
Abstract
The Veteran to BSN Pathway targets barriers that prevent veterans from transitioning into the nursing profession and accessing
education. This includes: developing programs that target the unique needs of veterans; exploring innovative educational models to
award academic credit for prior military health career experiences and training; improving employment opportunities for veterans
through high demand careers; and addressing the growing national demand for BSN prepared registered nurses.
It has been estimated that over the next five years, approximately 1.5 million service members will separate from the military and will be returning
to college and looking for employment (Snyder, Wick, Skillman, & Frogner, 2016). Moreover, it has been suggested that one of the top degrees
sought out by veterans is a nursing degree. This is due to interest in the healthcare field and the overall demand for nurses within the job market
(http://www.bestcollegesonline.org/top-degrees-for-veterans/). After notification of award, the necessary approvals needed to be obtained, as
well as the complete development of the VBSN infrastructure that included: approval by the State Board of Nursing, the admission process, the
awarding of credits, the development of curriculum to support the VBSN pathway, and the development of collaborations and partnerships with
internal and external constituents to ensure sustainability.
The VBSN pathway developed processes that allows qualified veterans the opportunity to test out of designated courses based on demonstration
of course competencies. These courses include: fundamentals of nursing didactic, pharmacology, and health assessment. An additional component
of this grant was to provide faculty and staff with workshops that addressed the physical, emotional, and environmental issues affecting veterans in
order to minimize barriers to their transition into the nursing profession. The goal of these workshops were to facilitate the development of a
culture of respect for veterans returning to the University setting. Overall, the VBSN pathway has been successful in reducing barriers and providing
needed supports to ensure the success of the veterans when returning for their Bachelor of Science nursing degree.
References
2015 Veterans civic health index. (2015). Retrieved from https://gotyour6.org/wp-content/.../2015/08/Veterans-Civic-Health-Index-2015.pdf
Allen, P., Armstrong, M., Saladiner, J., Hamilton, M., & Conard, P. (2014, November/December). Opportunities, hurdles, solutions, and approaches
to transition military veteran’s into professional nursing programs. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30(6), 474-480.
http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.03.007
D’Aoust, R., Rossiter, A., & Clochesy, J. (2016). Supporting medic’s and corpsmen’s move into professional nursing. Nursing Education Today, 1-5.
http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.019
Donovan, J. (2014, May 15). Why we should celebrate and support student veterans [Blog post]. Retrieved from
http://blog.online.colostate.edu/blog/value-of-education/why-we-should-celebrate-and-support-veteran
Gonzalez, C., & Elliot, M. (2013). Student veterans speak up: A focus group study [focus group study]. Retrieved from
http://www.unr.edu/.../021313-Focus-Group-Report.pdf
Griffin, K., & Gilbert, C. (2012). Easing the transition from combat to classroom, preserving America’s investment in higher education for military
veterans through institutional assessment. Retrieved from www.americanprogress.org
Snyder, C., Wick, K., Skillman, S., & Frogner, B. (2016, May). Pathways for military veterans. Center for Health Workforce Studies University of
Washington, 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/Retrieved from The best colleges top schools and degree programs. Retrieved from:
http://www.bestcollegesonline.org/top-degrees-for-veterans/
Contact
[email protected]
Procedure for Cannulating a Dialysis Access: Using the ASSURE Model and Gagne's Events of Instructions
Pandora Goode, PhD, DNP, FNP-C, CNE, USA
Abstract
Little evidence exists to guide dialysis nurse educators in the selection of the most appropriate type of instructional technologies to use when
teaching hemodialysis staff cannulation skills, yet there is a need for staff to demonstrate safe performance of skills prior to performing them in
hemodialysis settings. The cannulation of a dialysis access is a required mastery skill in the hemodialysis setting, because dialysis accesses is the
mean by which hemodialysis treatments are accomplished. Dialysis accesses allows hemodialysis staff the ability to access the patient’s blood.
Injuries and infections of dialysis accesses are extremely common therefore, it is vital that dialysis nurse educators identify effective and efficient
teaching methods to be used in teaching cannulation skills. The learning activities are designed to facilitate discussion, demonstration, problem
solving, role playing, and critical thinking among the learners.
In order for learners to move from a lower level order of thinking to a higher-level order of thinking successfully, learners must follow an orderly
systematic approach. The ASSURE model is a six-step instructional model that incorporates Roberts Gagne's 9 Events of instruction when
presenting or delivering any form of educational content to novice or expert learners. The ASSURE model and Robert Gagne’s 9 Events of
Instruction design provides a systematic way to present content. The ASSURE model was utilized to effectively integrate the use of technology and
media to enhance students learning. The ASSURE model is an effective teaching model that could be applied within the core curriculum for nursing
staff. The ASSURE model will allow nurse educators to conduct detailed assessments staffs’ ability to perform cannulation techniques safely and
correctly, and organized their thinking processes. In this article, I will discuss the basic principles of the ASSURE model and Gagne's 9 Events of
Instruction and its value when teaching the procedure for cannulating a vascular access using the ASSURE model and Robert Gagne's 9 events of
instruction.
References
Bagdasarian, N., Heung, M., & Malani, P. N. (2012). Infectious complications of dialysis access devices. Infectious Disease Clinics, 26(1), 127-141.
Brouwer, D. J. (2011). Cannulation camp: Basic needle cannulation training for dialysis staff. Dialysis and Transplantation, 40(10), 434-439. dOI:
10.1002/dat.20622
Deaver, K. (2010). Preventing infections in hemodialysis fistula and graft vascular accesses. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 37(5), 503-506.
Hudson, S., & MacDonald, M. (2010). Hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula self-cannulation: Moving theory to practice in developing patient-teaching
resources. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 24(6), 304-312.
Machowska, A., Alscher, M. D., Vanga, S. R., Koch, M., Aarup, M., Quresi, A. R., ….Lindholm, B. (201). Dialysis access, infections, and hospitalisations
in unplanned dialysis start patients: results from the Options study. International Journal of Artificial Organs, 40 (2), 48-59.
Schoch, M., & Smith, V. (2012). Advanced vascular access workshop for dialysis nurses: a hree-year review. Renal Society of Australasia Journal,
8(2), 89-93.
Shepshelovich, D., Yelin, D., Bach, L. O., Halevy, N., Ziv, Y., Green, H., …. Rozen-Zyi, B. (2017). Chills during hemodialysis: Prediction and prevalence
of bacterial infections-A retrospective cohort study. American Journal of Medicine, 130(4), 477-481.
Contact
[email protected]
The Effect of Virtual Clinical Simulation Debriefing on Clinical Decision Making
Tamara Jessica Brown, MSN, RN-BC, PCCN, CMSRN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Background/Significance: New graduate nurses providing competent and safe patient care, yet recent evidence supports that such graduates with
even up to three years of clinical experience are unprepared to think like nurses. In general, simulation-based education has emerged as an
innovative method of providing nursing students with opportunities to acquire essential knowledge, skills, and attitudes which are necessary for
the development of clinical judgment competence. There is an increasing amount of evidence that demonstrates the relationship between
simulation debriefing and improved nursing student clinical (Sabei & Lasater, 2016).
Specifically, virtual simulation clinical education has emerged as an innovative strategy that has the potential to improve clinical reasoning by
providing experiential learning in a virtual. However, such studies of virtual simulation often do not mention or include a debriefing session as a
part of its intervention. The literature finds that there is a widespread lack of consistent methodological approaches for debriefing practice and
unclear descriptions of debriefing in simulation-based education studies completed particularly on virtual clinical simulation, discussions of
debriefing are entirely absent (National League of Nursing, 2015).
Scope: This study will expound on previous research of the use of debriefing during simulation. It will add to the literature by explaining the effect
of debriefing on virtual simulation learning outcomes, specifically clinical decision making.
Research Question and Hypothesis: The research question this study will seek to answer is: How does the presence or absence of debriefing a
virtual simulation influence the clinical decision making scores of undergraduate nursing students?
It is hypothesized that undergraduate nursing students who attend a debriefing session following virtual simulation will have higher clinical decision
making scores than those who do not. The Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HRST) will be used to operationalize the dependent variable of clinical
decision making
Purpose: The objective of this study is to test David Kolb’s (1984) theory of experiential learning that learner reflection through debriefing is related
to improved clinical decision making in undergraduate nursing students who utilize virtual clinical simulation as a learning strategy.
Method/Outcome Measures: The researcher has selected a true experimental design. Subjects will be undergraduate nursing students who are
enrolled in a medical surgical course with a required virtual clinical simulation assignment component. Once subjects are recruited, half of a single
semester’s medical-surgical courses that include participants of equivalent numbers will be deemed either the experimental group (with an
assigned debriefing session) or control group (without an assigned debriefing session) by using a random number generator. Both groups will be
administered the HRST before being assigned virtual clinical simulation assignments. However, only the experimental group will receive the
treatment of a debriefing session.
The HSRT overall reasoning skills score focuses on the strengths or weaknesses of the student’s ability to make reflective, reasoned judgments
about what to believe or what to do. The overall internal consistency of the tool is reported to be 0.81. The overall reliability coefficient is
reportedly 0.81 (Insight Assessment, 2015).
Findings: This research study is currently in progress and is anticipated to be completed by June of 2018.
References
DeGagne, J.C., Oh, J., Kang, J., Vorderstrasse, A.A., & Johnson, C.M. (2013). Virtual worlds in nursing education: A synthesis of the literature. Journal
Insight Assessment. (2015). Health sciences reasoning test user manual. San Jose, CA: The California Academic Press.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
National League of Nursing. (2015). Debriefing accosss the curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/about/nln-vision-
series-(position-statements)/nln-vision-debriefing-across-the-curriculum.pdf?sfvrsn=0
Sabei, S.D. & Lasater, K. (2016). Simulation debriefing for clinical judgment development: A concept analysis. Nurse Education Today, 45, 42-47.
Contact
[email protected]
The Use of Collaborative Testing to Promote Nursing Students Team Decision Making and Success
Sherri H. Marlow, DNP, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Today’s learner is one that expects active learning activities that have a meaningful purpose and contribute to their
educational goals. The previous educational experience for many of today’s learners focused on small group work with active
teambuilding activities (Duane & Satre, 2014). Active learning is a strategy that is student-centered and student driven with faculty
facilitation. Active learning strategies are shown to increase the learner’s comprehension and retention of complex concepts (Rivaz,
Momennasab & Shokrollati, 2015; Duane & Satre, 2014; Eastridge, 2014).
The nursing profession requires a high degree of collaboration between nurses and amongst other healthcare discipline members (Duan & Satre,
2014). Active learning strategies within a nursing curriculum are an essential strategy to promote the nursing student’s future ability to successfully
assimilate into the profession, to develop critical thinking skills, and to learn effective communication skills with the healthcare team. Collaborative
testing is an active learning strategy supported in the literature with promoting learning, critical thinking skills, and conflict resolution skills
(Cortright, Collins, Rodenbauh, & DiCarlo, 2013; Centrella-Nigro, 2012).
Collaborative testing is an active learning strategy which requires the student to actively share perspectives and negotiate towards a shared
decision. Collaborative testing is defined as a small group of students who work together in completing a course test (Eastridge, 2014). Students
who participate in collaborative testing have reported increased confidence with group decision making (Rivaz et al, 2015; Eastridge, 2014; Duane
& Satre, 2014; Parsons & Teel, 2013). Student course satisfaction was also found to be significantly increased when collaborative testing is used as
a learning strategy (Centralla-Nigro, 2012).
Body: One concern expressed by nursing faculty is collaborative testing resulting in grade inflation which may negatively impact outcomes for a
nursing program (Duane & Satre, 2014). While the literature review supports the value collaborative testing offers to learning, the impact on
student program retention in a nursing educational program and nursing program outcomes for pass rate on the National Counsel Licensure Exam
for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN) is limited. The purpose of this retrospective study is to identify the impact collaborative testing has on retaining a
nursing student in an educational program. A secondary aim is to determine if those nursing students retained due to collaborative testing points
are successful on the NCLEX-RN on the first attempt. The following research questions guided this two-year retrospective study:
1. Do students who pass an individual nursing course due to collaborative testing points have the same or similar graduation rate as nursing
students who passed an individual nursing course without collaborative testing points?
2. Do students who pass an individual nursing course due to collaborative testing points have the same or similar first time NCLEX- RN pass rate as
nursing students who passed all courses without collaborative testing points?
This retrospective study reviewed final course grades books that offered collaborative testing for the calendar years of 2010 and 2011. The
graduation status and NCLEX-RN data is known for all nursing students during the study frame with a total of 266 nursing student educational
records reviewed. During the retrospective analysis, 16 nursing students passed a nursing course due to the addition of collaborative testing points
to their individual test grades. The impact of collaborative testing resulted in one nursing student passing two nursing courses due to the addition
of collaborative testing points. A total of 14 nursing students of the 16 nursing students who passed a nursing course due to collaborative testing
successfully graduated from the nursing program.
The nursing program on-time graduation rate is determined if the nursing student admitted to the nursing program completes the program within
3 years (150% time frame). The overall nursing program on-time graduation rate for 2010 and 2011 was 81% and 85% respectively. Nursing
students who were retained due to collaborative testing have a similar on-time graduation rate of 81% with 13 of the 16 students graduating within
the 150% time frame. One nursing student retained due to collaborative testing did graduate from the nursing program but exceeded the 150%
timeframe.
The overall NCLEX-RN first time pass rate for the nursing program for 2010 and 2011 was 97% for both years. The first time NCLEX-RN pass rate for
the 14 nursing students who were retained in the nursing program due to collaborative testing is 93% with 13 nursing students passing the NCLEX-
RN exam on the first attempt. The nursing student who was not successful on the first attempt delayed taking the NCLEX-RN exam more than six
months from the time of graduation. The delay in taking the NCLEX-RN exam for the first time is a confounding factor to consider for the nursing
student who was not successful.
Conclusion: While this study found that 16 nursing students passed a course due to the points received from collaborative testing, the terminal
nursing program outcomes for graduation rate and first time NCLEX-RN pass rates for those retained due to collaborative testing points are
comparable to the overall nursing program outcomes. Thus, the collaborative testing points did not adversely impact nursing program outcomes
for graduation rate and NCLEX-RN pass rates. Additionally, the study findings support that nursing students were able to make better collaborative
team decisions versus independent decisions based upon the mean tests scores for the collaborative tests were statistically increased with all 76
tests reviewed in comparison to the individual test mean scores.
Collaborative testing can be applied differently within a nursing curriculum. Nursing faculty should consider how to apply collaborative testing as a
learning strategy that nursing students and nursing faculty find meaningful and purposeful. Ongoing data collection regarding the impact
collaborative testing has on nursing student outcomes should continue as a part of the nursing program regular review for curriculum currency and
curriculum rigor. Overall, this study found collaborative testing to be an effective learning strategy to promote nursing student learning needs and
nursing program outcomes.
References
Centralla-Nigro, A. (2012). Collaborative testing as posttest review. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(5), 340-341.
Cotright, R., Collns, H., Rodenbaugh, D.& DiCarlos, S. (2013). Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative group testing.
Advances in Physiology Education, 27(3), 102-108.
Duane, B. & Satre, M. (2014). Utilizing constructivism learning theory in collaborative testing as a creative strategy to promote essential nursing
skills. Nurse Education Today, 34, 31-34.
Eastridge, J. (2014). Use of collaborative testing to promote nursing student success. Nurse Educator, 39(1), 4-5
Parson, S. & Teel, K. (2013). Double testing: A student perspective. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(37), 127-128.
Rivaz, M. Momennasab, M., & Shokrolatii, P. (2015). Effect of collaborative testing on learning and retention of course content in nursing students.
Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 3(4), 178-182.
Contact
[email protected]
Low Literacy Breast Cancer Educational Module: A Collaborative Project
Amy G. Holley, BSN, USA
Abstract
Background: The purpose of the study was to create low literacy educational materials for breast cancer patients on the topic of
cancer staging. Low health literacy is an epidemic within the United States with only 12% of American’s considered proficient in
health literacy. After reviewing current literature concerning health literacy, a low literacy script was written and an educational
video was created with the help of three senior Associate Degree Nursing students from a local community college. Healthcare
providers were asked to review the video and take a short qualtrics survey supplying their opinion on the video’s quality.
Methods: This project used data from the qualtrics survey to determine the usefulness of the educational video on cancer staging. The survey
included a variety of questions and explored the relevance of the video. Participants were healthcare providers and invited via email with links to
the video and the qualtrics survey provided. All data was collected anonymously. Dorothea Orem’s Self Care Deficit Theory was used as the
Theoretical framework for this study. The educational video was created with the concept of self care and the patient in mind. The video script was
based on the American Cancer Society’s information but written at a fourth grade reading level to accommodate patients with low health literacy.
Literacy tools including the Flesch Reading Ease score, the Gunning Fog, the SMOG index, and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade level were used to
determine reading level of the script. Senior Associate Degree of Nursing students assisted in the making of the video. A role play exercise was used
in the video to enhance learning. Filming took place in the Nursing Simulation Lab.
Results: The creation of an educational video with a low literacy script for teaching breast cancer patients about the staging process was the result
of this study. Limited feedback was received, however the video was scored as high in quality and of appropriate length. Even though the
information was seen as relevant, results suggested it was unlikely the video would be shared with colleagues. Further feedback is needed and
should be acquired with a larger population pool. Collaboration, a Quality and Safety Education for Nurses competency was demonstrated through
professional modeling and mentoring of students.
References
Alpert, J., Desens, L., Krist, A., Aycock, R., and Kreps, G. (2017. Measuring health literacy levels of a patient portal using the CDC’s clear
communication index. Health Promotion Practice, 18(1). Doi: 10.1177/1524839916643703
Bittner, A., Jonietz, A., Bittner, J., Beickert, L., and Harendza, S. (2015). Translating medical documents into plain language enhances communication
skills in medical students-A pilot study. Patient Education and Counseling, 98. Doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.024
Bouton, M., Shirah, G., Nordora, J., Pond, E., Hsu, C., Klemens, A., Martinez, M., Komenaka, I. (2012). Implementation of educational video
improves patient understanding of basic breast cancer concepts in an undereducated county hospital population. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 105.
Doi: 10.1002/jso.22046
BreastCancer.org. (2017). U.S. breast cancer statistics. Retrieved from http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics
Cox, N., Bowmer, C., and Ring, A. (2010). Health literacy and the provision of information to women with breast cancer. Clinical Oncology, 23. Doi:
10.1016/j.clon.2010.11.010
Halbach, S., Ernstmann, N., Kowalski, C., Pfaff, H., Pfortner, T., Wesselmann, S., and Enders, A. (2016). Unmet information needs and limited health
literacy in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients over the course of cancer treatment. Patient Education and Counseling, 99. Doi:
10.1016/j.pec.2016.06.028
Halverson, J., Martinez-Donate, A., Trentham-Dietz, A., Walsh, M., Strickland, J., Palta, M., Smith, P., Cleary, J. (2013). Health literacy and urbanicity
among cancer patients. The Journal of Rural Health, 29. Doi: 10.1111/jrh.12018
Hart, T., Blacker, S., Panjwani, A., Torbit, L., and Evans, M. (2014). Development of multimedia informational tools for breast cancer patients with
low levels of health literacy. Patient Education and Counseling, 98. Doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.015
Koay, K., Schofield, P., and Jefford, M. (2012). Importance of health literacy in oncology. Clinical Oncology, 8. Doi: 10.1111/j.1743-
7563.2012.01522.x
Komenaka, I., Nodora, J., Hsu, C., Martinez, M., Gandhi, S., Bouton, M., Klemens, A., Wikholm, L., and Weiss, B. (2015). Association of health literacy
with adherence to screening mammography guidelines. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 125(4). Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000708
Malloy-Weir, L., Charles, C., Gafni, A., and Entwistle, V. (2015). Empirical relationships between health literacy and treatment decision making: A
scoping review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 98. Doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.004
Matsuyama, R., Wilson-Genderson, M., Kuhn, L., Moghanaki, D., Vachhani, H., and Paasche-Orlow, M. (2010). Education level, not health literacy,
associated with information needs for patients with cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 85. Doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.022
Mayo Clinic. (2017). Lymph node groups in women. Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/breast-
cancer/multimedia/tumor-size/img-20006260
National Partnership for Women & Families. 2009. Health Literacy & Plain Language Overview. Retrieved from
http://go.nationalpartnership.org/site/DocServer/Health_Literacy_Overview.pdf?docID=5621
Nursing Theories. (2012). Dorothea Orem’s self-care theory. Retrieved from
http://currentnursing.com/nursing_theory/self_care_deficit_theory.html
Obeidat, r., Finnell, D., and Lally, R. (2011). Decision aids for surgical treatment of early stage breast cancer: A narrative review of the literature.
Patient Education and Counseling, 85. Doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.019
Perrenoud, B., Velonaki, V., Bodemann, P., and Ramelet, A. (2015). JBI Database of systematic reviews & implementation reports, 13(10). Doi:
10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304
Petiprin, A. (2016). Self care deficit theory. Retrieved from http://www.nursing-theory.org/theories-and-models/orem-self-care-deficit-
theory.php
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). What is health literacy? Retrieved from
https://health.gov/communication/literacy/quickguide/factsbasic.htm
U.S. Department of Transportation. 2012. How to engage low-literacy and limited-english-proficiency populations in transportation decision
making. Retrieved from https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/publications/low_limited/
Walters Kluwer. (2017). Retrieved from https://s0www.utdlab.com/contents/image?imageKey=PI/77184
Wilson, L. (2011). Developing low-literacy health education materials for women. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 36(4). Doi:
10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182183bbd
Contact
[email protected]
Reflection of Professional Nursing Growth Through E-Portfolio
Tanya L. Smith, MSN, RN, USA
Abstract
With a current curriculum update, the faculty at a Midwestern Bachelor’s of Nursing Program requested a professional development
assessment to provide students the opportunity to reflect upon their nursing program growth and development. The purpose of the
e-portfolio is to provide a vehicle for compilation of the students’ best work and reflection throughout their nursing education.
Portfolios in higher education have been around for decades. Portfolios are an efficient way for students to collect their highest quality work for
display and presentation. With technology advancement, moving the portfolio to an electronic means has provided ease and accessibility. E-
portfolios in nursing provides a framework for students’ reflection and self-assessment (Andrews & Cole, 2015). An e-portfolio is a transferable
product students can use during their nursing program and further in their nursing careers. Due to the ease of internet accessibility, students can
use their finalized e-portfolio for future professional nursing applications and professional advancement. Use of the e-portfolio in the BSN nursing
program adds to the students’ development of technology skills and creativity, while creating a useful product for future use.
The student’s e-portfolio is developed throughout the semester in the Professional Development 2 course at the third semester of the BSN
program. Students are shown several types of e-portfolio systems and are able to choose the software that fits best with their technology abilities.
Within the e-portfolio, students create a professional nursing resume and choose several items from their previous nursing program semesters to
display. Students write self-assessment reflections about each of the artifacts, including an introduction and a pledge to nursing summary. As the
students write reflections of their experiences, they are encouraged to contemplate nursing program outcomes, concepts, and QSEN
competencies. As a building assignment, students submit their individual item reflections to the course management system for peer review. Self-
assessment, student reflection, and peer evaluation are effective means of feedback with technology (Bonnel & Smith, 2010). Students present
their final product in an oral presentation in front of the class at the end of the course. The oral presentation allows the students to share their
stories of significant events in their program to date. Students are able to reflect upon and share their successes through the nursing program.
Observation of others’ presentations builds development of their own oral presentation ability (DeGrez, Valcke, & Roozen, 2014). Building self-
confidence through presentations allows the student to think optimistically and persevere through difficulties (Lundberg, 2008).
This poster presentation provides nurse educators worldwide an alternative assessment of students’ growth throughout their program. E-portfolio
use provides educators a route for program outcome assessment. The e-portfolio documents the students’ journey through the curriculum and
whether program outcomes were met (Ryan, 2011). In the coming academic year, students’ reactions to the e-portfolio assignment will be
collected through an IRB approved survey. Adjustments to the e-portfolio process will be made based on survey analysis. The e-portfolio
assignment serves as a tool to collect self-reflection and future goals. The value of the e-portfolio lies in the nature of the process rather than the
product (Webb et al., 2003). E-portfolio development contributes to students’ personal and professional growth through critical analysis of the
contents.
References
Andrews, T. & Cole, C. (2015). Two steps forwards, one step back: The intricacies of engaging with eportfolios in nursing undergraduate education.
Nurse Education Today, 35, 568-572.
Bonnel, W. & Smith, K. (2010). Teaching technologies in nursing and the health professions. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2014). The differential impact of observational learning and practice-based learning on the development of
oral presentation skills in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 256-271.
Lundberg, K. (2008). Promoting self-confidence in clinical nursing students. Nurse Educator, 33(2), 86-89.
Ryan, M. (2011). Evaluating portfolio use as a tool for assessment and professional development in graduate nursing education. Journal of
Professional Nursing, 27(2), 84-91.
Webb, C. Endacott, R., Gray, M., Jasper, M., McAMullan, & Scholes, J. (2003). Evaluating portfolio assessment systems: what are the appropriate
criteria? Nurse Education Today, 23(8), 600-609.
Contact
[email protected]
Emotional Strain: A Concept Analysis for Nursing
Catherine A. Stubin, RN, CCRN, USA
Abstract
The term emotional strain is frequently referenced in the literature as experienced by employees in the context of job demands,
caregivers when providing for loved ones with physical illness, and individuals undergoing trauma such as infertility and natural
disasters. Although used in healthcare literature, the concept of emotional strain is seldom defined as a distinct concept and often
embedded in the context of stress and strain. This concept has not been clearly articulated, is ill-defined, and remains unclear.
The Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Complete, ProQuest Central, PubMed, Business Source Elite, and PsycINFO
were accessed, and articles from the English-language literature published from 1980 through 2016 were obtained. No concept analyses of
emotional strain in nursing were found. Key words included emotional strain, strain, nursing, concept analysis, and stress. Inclusion of articles in
the review was based on relevancy of content regarding background, definition, use, defining attributes, and consequences of emotional strain. For
this concept analysis, a total of 48 articles were included.
Emotional strain is defined and used within the context of numerous disciplines, with business, psychology, education, and nursing as the major
areas researched. Nursing is a stressful profession with emotional strain an increasing problem among professional nurses. In nursing education,
Arieli (2013) identified emotional challenges such as patient suffering and death, and a lack of preparation for shocking patient situations, when
studying nursing student experiences in clinical placements. Arieli (2013) highlighted difficulty in balancing home and college demands, time
pressure, financial concerns, feelings of distance from faculty and staff, and feelings of unpreparedness and incompetence as nursing student stress
factors. Additionally, Arieli (2013) affirmed that students are at risk for developing emotional strains such as anger, ambivalence, tension, disgust,
frustration, fear, and discomfort. The lack of emotional coping skills in students was found to exacerbate emotional strain.
In nursing practice, continuous time pressure, work overload, mental and emotional load, stressors related to death of patients, staffing, sub-
optimal relationships with peers, conflicts with supervisory and medical staff, difficulties with patients and families, and bullying were reported to
be frequent sources of emotional strain (Gevers, Van Erven, de Jonge, Maas, & de Jong, 2010; Potash, Ho, Chan, Wang, & Cheng, 2014). Continuous
stress at work, lack of autonomy, and high expectations of oneself are causing nurses emotional strain (Rauschenbach & Hertel, 2011).
An emotionally demanding situation may cause a nurse to have a low stress tolerance to subsequent stressful situations. Emotional reactions such
as irritation, tension, anger, fear, anxiety, and apathy were measures of acute emotional strain in nursing (Potter et al., 2010; Rauschenbach &
Hertel, 2011). In nursing professionals, emotional strain mediates maladaptive consequences to health and well-being, potentially causing
detachment, disengagement, absenteeism, somatic illness, coronary artery disease, alcoholism, burnout, abandonment of the profession, and
suicide attempts (Gevers et al., 2010; Potter et al., 2010; Rauschenbach & Hertel, 2011).
For the most part, nurses represent a workforce with high motivation and dedication. However, such fine attributes cannot be expected to offset
the erosive effects of enduring, indefinite work stress. Exposure to acute critical incidents is anticipated as a core requirement of the nursing
profession; however, experiencing the chronically draining nature of emotional demands and other organizational factors is not (Tuckey &
Hayward, 2011). It is crucial, in these days of increasing patient acuity, nursing shortages, declining enrollments in schools of nursing, and an aging
nurse population, to recognize the impact of emotional strain on nurses. Few nursing degree programs include stress management courses, which
have the potential to affect long-term career retention. The provision of effective stress management training for undergraduate nursing students
in managing the stresses they are likely to encounter could be an important requirement for avoiding long-term maladaptive effects of emotional
strain in nursing (Holstad, Korek, Rigotti, & Mohr, 2014; van den Tooren, de Jonge, & Dormann, 2012). Furthermore, clinical instructors need to be
educated about the importance of preparing students for stressful and shocking patient experiences (Arieli, 2013).
The author reports an examination of the concept of emotional strain using Walker and Avant’s (2011) eight step method of analysis. Defining
attributes, antecedents, and consequences of emotional strain are proposed based on a comprehensive review of multi-disciplinary perspectives.
This analysis adopts a dynamic definition of emotional strain that may serve to encourage communication, promote reflection, and enhance
concept understanding. Emotional strain in nursing needs to be recognized as a key factor in the delivery of safe patient care. The definition
contributes significantly to the development of nursing knowledge and provides direction for future nursing research, as well as enhances efforts to
serve nurses and students affected by emotional strain.
References
Arieli, D. (2013). Emotional work and diversity in clinical placements of nursing students. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 45(2), 192-201.
doi:10.1111/jnu.12020
Gevers, J., Van Erven, P., de Jonge, J., Maas, M., & de Jong, J. (2010). Effect of acute and chronic job demands on effective individual teamwork
behaviour in medical emergencies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(7), 1573-1583. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05314.x
Holstad, T. J., Korek, S., Rigotti, T., & Mohr, G. (2014). The relation between transformational leadership and follower emotional strain: The
moderating role of professional ambition. Leadership, 10(3), 269-288. doi:10.1177/1742715013476083
Potash, J. S., Ho, A. H., Chan, F., Wang, X. L., & Cheng, C. (2014). Can art therapy reduce death anxiety and burnout in end-of-life care workers? A
quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 20(5), 233-240. doi:10.12968/ijpn.2014.20.5.233
Potter, P., Deshields, T., Divanbeigi, J., Berger, J., Min, D., Cipriano, D., Norris, L., & Olsen, S. (2010). Compassion fatigue and burnout: Prevalence
among oncology nurses. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 14(5), 56-62. doi:10.1188/10.cjon.e56-e62
Rauschenbach, C., & Hertel, G. (2011). Age differences in strain and emotional reactivity to stressors in professional careers. Stress and
Health, 27(2), 48-60. doi:10.1002/smi.1335
Tuckey, M. R., & Hayward, R. (2011). Global and occupation-specific emotional resources as buffers against the emotional demands of fire-
fighting. Applied Psychology, 60(1), 1-23. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00424.x
van den Tooren, M., de Jonge, J., & Dormann, C. (2012). A matter of match? An experiment on choosing specific job resources in different
demanding work situations. International Journal of Stress Management, 19(4), 311-332. doi:10.1037/a0030110
Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (2011). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Contact
[email protected]
A Pilot Study of Student Nurses’ Self-Efficacy in Performing Venipuncture
Christine M. Nebocat, MS, MLS (ASCP)CM, CHES, USA
Abstract
Phlebotomy training is currently not included in undergraduate nursing programs in Long Island, New York. After graduating, nurses
are often expected to perform venipuncture on patients in the field. Without adequate clinical practice, there is potential for
phlebotomy-related complications such as inappropriate sample collection, self-inflicted injuries, and undue harm to patients. The
level of self-efficacy correlates with a student’s perception of how capable he or she is in accomplishing a task. Individuals with
increased self-efficacy are more likely to succeed in the field. In this study, undergraduate nursing students from a local Long Island
college were separated into two groups using random stratified sampling. This sampling method ensured an equal number of
sophomore, junior, and senior students in each group. The activity was developed to determine if a hands-on phlebotomy training
seminar would improve phlebotomy self-efficacy. The intervention group received a 3-hour seminar that included a lecture and
hands-on learning component, prior to practicing venipuncture on an artificial arm. The comparison group were only able to view a
brief demonstration of venipuncture on an artificial arm. Both groups were given the opportunity to perform phlebotomy on the
artificial arm. After the activity, the students completed a Phlebotomy Self-Efficacy Scale (PSES). The scores of the PSES from the two
groups of students were compared. There was a significant difference in PSES scores between the comparison group and the
intervention group. The intervention group, who attended the full 3-hour hands-on seminar, had higher self-efficacy scores than
those in the comparison group, who did not have the full training. These findings support the inclusion of a hands-on phlebotomy
training to improve levels of self-efficacy in nursing students. Academic grade level, prior employment in the medical field, and
clinical hours were also compared to the PSES scores. There were no significant findings in comparing these factors to the scores in
either group separately, or combined. This was likely due to the fact that regardless of academic year, prior employment, or number
of clinical hours, the students were still not being exposed to phlebotomy. Therefore, the level of self-efficacy was not affected by
any one of these factors. This study highlights a gap in the undergraduate nursing curricula. Any hands-on clinical experiences that
will improve self-efficacy, and is practiced in the field of nursing, should be incorporated into nursing curricula for the benefit of all
patients.
References
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
(Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998). Retrieved from
https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1994EHB.pdf
Bölenius, K., Brulin, C., & Graneheim, U. H. (2014). Personnel's experiences of phlebotomy practices after participating in an educational
intervention programme. Nursing Research & Practice, 2014, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/538704
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Stop sticks campaign. Retrieved from
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/stopsticks/sharpsinjuries.html
Curl, E. D., Smith, S., Chisholm, L. A., McGee, L. A., & Das, K. (2016). Effectiveness of integrated simulation and clinical experiences compared to
traditional clinical experiences for nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(2), 72-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/15-1647
Fujii, C. (2014). Comparison of skill in novice nurses before and after venipuncture simulation practice. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice,
4(5), 16-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v4n5p16
Kimhi, E., Reishtein, J. L., Cohen, M., Friger, M., Hurvitz, N., & Avraham, R. (2016). Impact of simulation and clinical experience on self-efficacy in
nursing students: Intervention study. Nurse Educator, 41(1), E1-E4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000194
Nebocat, C. M. (2016). Inclusion of phlebotomy training in Long Island programs’ nursing curricula (Unpublished research). A.T. Still University,
Kirksville, MO.
Townsend, L., & Scanlan, J. M. (2011). Self-efficacy related to student nurses in the clinical setting: A concept analysis. International Journal of
Nursing Education Scholarship, 8(1), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.2223
Contact
[email protected]
Using Simulation Technology to Validate Competency
Kate J. Williams-Ashman, DNP, MSN-Ed., RN-BC, USA
Kavita Radhakrishnan, PhD, RN, MSEE, USA
Abstract
Background: The Institute of Medicine, 2010 report recommends that nurses continue their education with ongoing competency
assessment and validation in order to ensure safe quality care in a rapidly changing and diverse healthcare environment. Historically
nursing competency has been measured by annual skills fair focused on evaluating clinical skills, not abilities or understanding of the
science behind the skills. Competency is defined as not only capabilities, but also the achievement of desired outcomes, with
measurements reflecting nursing abilities beyond technical skills. Simulation is embraced as a component of continuing education
and an effective means of systematically validating competencies in a controlled environment.
State of the Science: Human Patient Simulation provides the opportunity for participants to react to high risk situations without any risk to patient
safety. The use of a validated rubric with established inter-rater reliability and simulation is increasing being used by healthcare organizations for
validating nurses competency in the collection and interpretation of data, clinical judgement, clinical reasoning, and communication which are
essential to patient safety.
Statement of Purpose: Conduct competency assessment within a high fidelity human simulated environment for the nurses at a 25 bed critical
access medical center, using a validated and reliable measurement tool. Informatics
Solution: Human Patient Simulation is widely used in nursing academia, and provides an effective means of systematically
validating competencies in a controlled environment.
Methods and Procedure:
Step 1: A needs assessment tool will be used to identify competency needs.
Step 2: Development of simulation scenario(s) by educators with expertize in simulation scenario development and adult medical surgical nursing.
The scenarios will include identified skills while allowing for assessment of patient, interpreting of patient data and managing the patient. The
scenario will include multiple mini-scenarios which will allow for the staff to progress in meeting the complexity of the competencies being
measured. The simulation scenario content will be assessed for clarity and validity by a panel of experts who are knowledgeable in adult medical
surgical nursing for more that two years.
Step 3: pilot testing of scenario will be performed with a medical surgical nurses who are not participating in the study, in order to ascertain
construct validity. Efficiency measure will be established by determining the amount of time required to complete simulation scenario; which will
be used to determine the time that will be required by each participant to complete the simulated activity.
Step 4: The Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (C-CEI®) will be used to assess participants’ response. C-CEI is a validated quantitative
evaluation tool used to evaluate participants' performance in a clinical simulated environment; and focuses on 23 general nursing behaviors
divided into four categories: assessment, communication, clinical judgement, and patient safety. A panel of nurse educators will use the C-CEI to
determine what is expected as performance criteria for each of the 23 general behaviors based on the simulation scenario, using the C-CEI
discussion worksheet provided by the creators of the tool. A consensus will be reached on the required passing score used to determine
competency.
Step 5: The clinical educators who will serve as validators will receive online training for using the C-CEI tool from the Creighton College of Nursing
website on how to use the tool. Inter-reliability will be achieved by having the validators watch two simulation exercise videos: one with no error in
performance and the other with performance errors. Inter-rater reliability will be assessed using the Kappa statistic and percentage agreement
among raters with an acceptable level of agreement set at 80%.
Step 6: Approximately one month prior to the competency assessment scheduled events, participants will be notified of the schedule (Jones,
Carson, and Mancini, 2002). On the day of the event, participants will be given an orientation to the simulation room, the equipment, and the high
fidelity patient simulator. Trained instructors will conduct the simulation by following strict guidelines for sequence of events and responses. Each
participant will be given the same time frame to accomplish as many steps as possible. The participants will be informed that they will have the
defined time and instructed to complete as much of the care of the patient as possible. The validator will independently score each participant.
Debriefing will be conducted as an opportunity for participants to reflect on actions and take corrective on any key element missed during the
simulation exercise.
Step 7: Statistical analysis will be conducted on the data to evaluate the effectiveness of using simulation to measure the nurses level of
competency. The participants’ feedback of their satisfaction and perception of the method will also be evaluated using a survey questionnaire. This
survey questionnaire is administered annually to assess staff’s satisfaction with the competency assessment process and methods. The survey
questionnaire has no established validity and reliability scores, thus results from the survey questionnaire will not form a part of the publication,
but as a pilot testing for the tool to establish content and validity.
SWOT Analysis of Use of Simulation Technology for Competency Assessment.
As simulation becomes a viable and desirable option in the evaluation of dimensions of competencies such as critical thinking, interpersonal skills
and technical skills, the purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and treats to using simulation
technology for evaluation of clinical competency.
Strengths
1. The literature is robust in reporting positive faculty and student perspectives related to implementation of simulation and
its impact on outcomes in nursing education.
2. There are published simulation scenario and evaluation tools developed and designed to require the nurse to demonstrate
critical and reflective skills.
3. Simulated experience for continued competency assessment which resembles an actual event that requires the practitioner
to make critical decisions while demonstrating discipline specific competencies without jeopardizing patient safety.
4. Another benefit of using simulation is that the exercise can be videotaped, allowing multiple evaluators the opportunity to
analyze the practitioner’s proficiency
5. Debriefing as part of simulation exercises may offer the opportunity for valuable reflective learning and clarification of
content and concepts provided during the simulation scenario.
Weaknesses
1. Lack of research to support strong simulation evaluation rubric measurements to ensure reliability and validity of
simulation evaluation tools. Simulation evaluation tools have been studied in a controlled simulation environment, however
no published study of a larger random control study to test for validity and inter-rater reliability.
2. Simulation is also not standard across nursing programs and tools developed cannot capture completely the effectiveness
of simulation when it is measuring differing variations of implementation of simulation.
3. The cost and time commitments in the development of scoring methods, the selection and design of simulation
experiences.
4. Simulation does not completely capture reality; thus the need to validate if proficiencies demonstrated in the simulated
environment are, in fact, present in the patient care setting.
Opportunity
1. If simulation scenarios were standardized in nursing programs, it would be a platform for more standardized studies and
measurement tools for evaluation
2. The use of standardize simulation scenarios for evaluation research exploits the strength of having a consistent subject for
observers to evaluate, which will provide control over source of variability between what is evaluated by each observer
3. 3. Research is needed to identify characteristics of health professionals who are at higher risk for failing to demonstrate
ongoing clinical competency
Threats to Implementation
1. 1. Cost and time commitment of the endeavor of the development and testing of simulation scenarios; training and
establishing inter-rater reliability of evaluation tool
2. 2. Identifying and recruiting educators with experience in developing simulation scenarios as the design of the scenario will
require participant to demonstrate critical and reflective thinking through evaluation, communication, interdisciplinary
collaboration, and skill performance.
Ethical Consideration:
Participants will be informed of purpose of project.
• Fidelity maintained by using validators not assigned to facility.

• Remediation will be provided, and outcome not tied to work performance
Conclusion: Effective competency validation method requires a dynamic process dependent of the skills or behavior to be assessed, or the
practice setting, and the expertise of the staff member. High fidelity human simulators and assessment rubrics have demonstrated efficacy in
assessing nurses’ ability to conduct patient assessment, clinical judgment, clinical reasoning, communication and patient safety.
References
Allen, P., Lauchen, K., Bridges, R.A., Francis-Johnson, P., McBride, S.G., & Olivarez, A. (2008). Evaluating continuing competency: A challenge for
nursing. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39(2).
Adamson, K.A., and Kardong-Edgren, S. (2012). A method and resources for assessing the reliability of simulation evaluation instruments. Nursing
Education Perspectives; 33(5).
Blackhall, L.J., Erickson, J., Brashers, V., Owen, J. and Thomas, S. (2013). Development and validation of a collaborative behaviors objective
assessment tool for end of life communication. Journal of Palliative Medicine: 17(1), pg 68-74.
Bradley, D, & Huseman, S. (2003). Validating competency at the bedside. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 19 (4), 165-173.
Cummings, C., (2014). Evaluating clinical simulation. Nursing Forum, 50(2).
Davis, T., Thong, H., Keslsey, A., and Makin, G. (2012). Categorizing pediatric prescribing errors by junior doctors through prescribing competency
assessment: does assessment reflect actual practice. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology: 69, 1163-1166.
Decker, S., Sportsman, S., Pueta, L., and Billings, L. (2008). The evolution of simulation and its contribution to competency. The Journal of
Continuing Education in Nursing; 39(2).
Decker, S., Utterback, V.A., Thomas, M.b., Mitchell, M., and Sportsman, S. (2011). Assessing continued competency through simulation: A call for
strident action. Nursing Education Perspectives; 32(2).
Gabs, D.M. (2004). The future vision of simulation in healthcare. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13 (1).
Garnett, S., Weiss, Josie, and Windland-Brown, J.E. (2015). Simulation design: Engaging large groups of nurse practitioner students. Journal of
Nursing Education: 54(9), 525-530.
Hirokawa, R.Y., Daub, K., Lovell, E., Smith, S., Davis, A., and Beck, C. (2012). Using a human patient simulator to study the relationship between
communication and nursing students' team performance. Journal of Nursing Education: 51 (11), 647-651.
IOM, 2010. Future of Nursing: Leading change, advancing practice. Retrieved 6/9/2016 from http://campaignforaction.org/resource/future-
nursing-iom-report/ (Links to an external site.)
Ironside, P.M. (2008). Safeguarding patients through continuing competency. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39, 92-94.
Ji Young, K. and Eun Jung, K. (2015). Effects of simulation on nursing students' knowledge, clinical reasoning, and self confidence: A quasi-
experimental study. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing: 27 (5), 604-611.
Jones, T., Cason, C.L., and Mancini, M.E (2002). Evaluating nurse competency: Evidence of validity for skills re-credentialing program. Journal of
Professional Nursing: 18 (1), pg22-28.
Lammers, R.L.; Byrwa, M.J. Fales, W.D., and Hale, R. A. (2009). Simulation-based assessment of paramedic pediatric resuscitation skills. Pre-Hospital
Emergency Care, 13: pg345-356.
Lasater, K. (2006). Clinical judgement development: using a simulation to create an assessment rubric. Journal of Nursing Education: 46 (11), pg496-
503.
Levine, J. & Johnson, J. (2014). An organizational competency validation strategy for registered nurses. Journal for Nurses in Professional
Development 30 (2).
National Council of State Boards of Nursing (2005). Meeting the Ongoing Challenge of Continued Competence. Retrieved
https://www.ncsbn.org/Continued_Comp_Paper_TestingServices.pdf
Paik Page, M. (2014). Methods of evaluating simulation experiences in nursing programs: An integrative review. Virginia Henderson Global Nursing
e-Repository, retrieved from http://www.nursinglibrary.org/vhl/handle/10755/346805
Radhakrishnan, K., Roche, J.P. & Cunninghamm, H. (2007). Measuring clinical practice parameters with human patient simulation: A pilot study.
International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 4 (1).
Rizzolo, M.A., Kardong-Edgren, S., oermann, M.H., and Jefferies. P.R. (2015). The national league for nursing project to explore the use of
simulation for high-stakes assessment: Process, outcomes and recommendations. Nursing Education Perspectives; 36(5), pg. 299-303.
Shin, H., Shim, K., Lee, Y. and Quinn, L. (2014). Validation of a new assessment tool for a pediatric nursing simulation module. Journal of Nursing
Education: 53(11), pg 623-629
Tawalbeh, L.I. and Tubaishat, A. (2013). Effect of simulation on knowledge of advanced cardiac life support, knowledge retention, and confidence
of nursing students in Jordan. Journal of Nursing Education: 53(1), 38-44.
The Joint Commission (2016). Comprehensive accreditation manual.
Whelan, L. (2006). Competency assessment of nursing staff. Orthopedic Nursing, 25, 198-202.
Wright, D. (2005). The ultimate guide to competency assessment in healthcare, 3rd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Creative Healthcare Management.
Contact
[email protected]
Exploring the Writing Perceptions of Former Baccalaureate Nursing Students
Kaynabess R. Freda, EdD, MS, USA
Abstract
A student’s ability to learn how to communicate through writing is crucial in nursing, and, furthermore, it is important that students
understand how to write effectively in the discipline of nursing in order to properly document patient care, create or revise policies,
design educational materials, and/or publish guidelines or research. Nursing faculty often find students ill-prepared to write clearly
and effectively. While the writings on students’ academic performance in a nursing program are considerable, the literature on their
perceptions of writing in the program is limited. Perception relates to the students’ opinions on the topic based on their experiences
or prior knowledge. This study explored former students’ perceptions of writing in the discipline of nursing and their experiences
writing in nursing practice upon graduation.
The purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore baccalaureate students’ perceptions of writing in the discipline of nursing. The study
also explored baccalaureate nursing graduates’ experiences with writing as practicing nurses. Furthermore, the study examined the influence of
nursing curriculum and nursing instruction on students’ perceptions of writing. The phenomenon being studied was the writing experiences of
nursing graduates of a university on the Eastern Shore of Maryland who are currently in nursing practice. After data were collected by way of
questionnaires, focus groups, and open-ended questions, and transcribed and analyzed, five themes emerged from the findings: preparedness,
prioritization, support, expectations, and functionality. These themes were supported and, at times, contradicted by the literature applicable to this
topic. Additionally, these themes were guided and supported by the conceptual framework of the study, which contained the three theories: adult
learning theory, transformational learning theory, and self-perception theory. The findings of this study hold implications for both nursing
education and nursing practice. Lastly, future studies related to this topic should be generated based upon the limitations of this study and areas
for further research.
In conclusion, the findings of this study may offer support to instructors in nursing by offering them some insight into the students’ perceptions of
writing in order to address them properly. Certain perceptions may alter students’ academic performance in practicing nursing and affect the ways
in which instructors need to teach. As this study and the literature suggests, written communication skills are important for nursing practice, and,
through researching the lived writing experiences of these participants, more light has been shed on the role writing plays in the discipline of
nursing as well as the perceptions of those holding the pen.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2016). Baccalaureate nursing programs. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-
resources/bsn-article
Bowman, M., & Addyman, B. (2014). Academic reflective writing: A study to examine its usefulness. British Journal of Nursing, 23(6), 304-309.
Latham, C. L., & Ahern, N. (2013). Professional writing in nursing education: Creating an academic-community writing center. Journal of Nursing
Education, 52(11), 615-620. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20131014-02
MacLemale, L. (2016). The importance of technical writing in nursing students. Retrieved from http://classroom.synonym.com/importance-
technical-writing-nursing-students-1265.html
Wu, L., Betts, V. T., Jacob, S., Nollan, J., & Norris, T. (2012). Making meaningful connections: Evaluating an embedded librarian pilot project to
improve nursing scholarly writing. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 323-326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-
5050.101.4.016
Contact
[email protected]
The Relationship Between Nursing Student Test-Taking Motivation and the Exit Examination Score
Lorraine Coalmer, PhD, ACNS-BC, CCRN, CNE, USA
Abstract
A primary objective of nursing programs includes nursing student first-time success on the NCLEX-RN®. As the nursing shortage continues, it is
essential to have qualified nursing graduates pass the NCLEX-RN®. One approach nursing programs have chosen to assist with identifying nursing
students’ probability of success on the NCLEX-RN® includes the administration of an exit examination. This exit examination which is part of a
standardized comprehensive assessment and review program, is an examination that mimics the NCLEX-RN® blueprint. Although this examination
is predictive of NCLEX-RN® probability of success, it does not identify whether nursing students were motivated to do well on this test.
Furthermore, no studies have been conducted to examine if nursing students were motivated while taking this examination.
Studies reveal that test-taking motivation has a role in test performance. When higher levels of test-taking motivation were identified, higher
scores on standardized examinations were more likely to occur (Cole & Bergin, 2005; Liu, Bridgeman, & Adler, 2012; Tella, 2007; Wise & De Mars,
2005). Thus, this correlational study investigated if a relationship between nursing students’ test-taking motivation and exit examination score
exists.
A quantitative, descriptive correlational design was used in four nursing programs to assess nursing students’ test-taking motivation when taking
the exit examination. This study used a 10-item questionnaire to examine the motivational concepts of effort and importance on the exit
examination. Data were collected from four cohorts of nursing students required to take an exit examination at the end of their nursing programs
(n=150). The numerical data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis.
Using a Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) and strongly agree (5), the study revealed that a moderate correlation existed between
nursing students’ Total Motivation Score and exit examination score (r=.311, n=150, p<.001). Further statistical analysis revealed that nursing
students’ perceived effort on the exit examination moderately correlated with higher exit examination scores (r=.350, n=150, p<.001). A small
correlation was revealed between nursing students’ perception of the importance of the exit examination and their exit examination score (r=.198,
n=150, p =.015).
The study’s findings emphasize the role that test-taking motivation plays in identifying preparedness for the NCLEX-RN®. The implications of this
study may be used by nurse educators when determining whether a student should be encouraged to complete remediation before taking the
NCLEX-RN®. Future studies should examine specifica motivational factors that influence test-taking motivation in nursing students.
References
Alameida, M., Prive, A., Davis, H., Landry, L., Renwanz-Boyle, A., & Dunham, M. (2011). Predicting NCLEX-RN success in a diverse student
population. The Journal of Nursing Education, 50(5), 261-267. doi:10.3928/01484834-20110228-01
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2015). State profile: Ohio. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/government-
affairs/resources/Ohio1.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2012). Nursing shortage. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/fact-
sheets/nursing-shortage
American Educational Research Association (AERA) (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Retrieved from
https://law.resource.org/pub/us/cfr/ibr/001/aera.standards.1999.pdf
Assessment Technologies Institute® (ATI®). (n.d.). Comprehensive Assessment and Review Program (CARP). Retrieved from:
https://atitesting.com/Solutions/DuringNursingSchool/ComprehensiveAssessmentAndReviewProgram.aspx
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychology Review,64, 359-372.
Barry, C. L., Horst, S., Finney, S. J., Brown, A. R., & Kopp, J. P. (2010). Do examinees have similar test-taking effort? A high-stakes question for low-
stakes testing. International Journal of Testing, 10(4), 342-363.
Billings, D.M., & Halstead, J.A. (2009). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty. (3rd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.
Breslawski, S. (2011). Factors influencing business student motivation on low-stakes assessment exams. American Journal of Educational Studies,
4(1), 61-75.
Burgess, C. A., Reimer-Kirkham, S., & Astle, B. (2014). Motivation and international clinical placements: Shifting nursing students to a global
citizenship perspective. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 11(1), 1-8. doi:10.1515/ijnes-2013-0056
Carr, S.M. (2011). NCLEX-RN pass rate peril: One school’s journey through curriculum revision, standardized testing, and attitudinal change. Nursing
Education Perspectives. 32, 384-388.
Cole, J.S., & Osterlind, S.J. (2008). Investigating differences between low-and high-stakes test performance on a general education exam. The
Journal of General Education, 57(2), 119-130.
Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE). (2013). Standards for accreditation of Baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs.
Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/ccne-accreditation/Standards-Amended-2013.pdf
Hayden, M. (2011). Standardized quantitative learning assessments and high stakes testing: Throwing learning down the assessment drain.
Philosophy of Education Yearbook, 177-185.
Halstead, J.A. (2013). The NLN's fair testing imperative and implications for faculty development. Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(2), 72-72.
Langford, R., & Young, A. (2013). Predicting NCLEX-RN success with the HESI exit exam: Eighth validity study. Journal of Professional Nursing,
29(Supplement 1), S5-S9. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.06.007
Lauer, M. E., & Yoho, M. J. (2013). HESI Exams: Consequences and remediation. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(Supplement 1), S22-S27.
doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.01.001
McDonald, M.E. (2013). The nurse educator’s guide to assessing learning outcomes. (3rd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (2013a). NCSBN Board of Directors (BOD) Voted to raise the passing standard for the NCLEX-RN
examination at its meeting on Dec. 17, 2012. Retrieved from https://www.ncsbn.org/4220.htm
National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (2013b). NCLEXR examination candidate bulletin. Retrieved from
https://www.ncsbn.org/2013_NCLEX_Candidate_Bulletin.pdf
National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). (2015). Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT). Retrieved from
https://www.ncsbn.org/cps/rde/xchg/ncsbn/hs.xsl/1216.htm
National League for Nursing (NLN). (2013). Annual survey of schools of nursing, Fall 2012. Retrieved from
http://www.nln.org/research/slides/index.htm
Ohio Board of Nursing (2015). 2015 Registered Nurse: Ohio workforce data summary report. Retrieved
http://www.nursing.ohio.gov/PDFS/Workforce/2015RN/RN%20Workforce%202015%20FINAL.pdf
Sundre, D. L. (2000). Motivation scale background and scoring guide. Retrieved from
http://www.jmu.edu/assessment/resources/resource_files/sos_scoring_guide.pdf
Trofino, R.M. (2013). Relationship of associate degree nursing program criteria with NCLEX- RN® success: What are the best predictors in a nursing
program of passing the NCLEX-RN® the first time? Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 8, 4–12.
Yeom, Y. J. (2013). An investigation of predictors of NCLEX-RN® outcomes among nursing content standardized tests. Nursing Education Today,
33(12), 1523-1528.
Zweighaft, E. L. (2013). Impact of HESI specialty exams: The ninth HESI exit exam validity study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(Supplement 1),
S10-S16. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.06.011
Contact
[email protected]
AEDs in Faith-Based Communities
Dana Walker, DNP, RN, USA
Abstract
Early defibrillation by using an automated external defibrillator (AED) improves patient outcomes for persons experiencing a sudden cardiac event
in the community setting. The purpose of this project was to work with the faith community’s safety committee to plan, implement, and evaluate
education on the use and maintenance of the AED in the faith community setting. The long-term goal of this project was to promote safety for
individuals attending church functions who might experience a sudden cardiac event. Kotter’s eight steps to lead change along with the American
Heart Association’s (AHA) AED Implementing an AED Program booklet provided the framework to plan and implement a maintainable AED program
in a faith-based community. The faith community’s safety committee agreed to oversee the AED education and maintenance project. Ongoing
meetings with the safety committee chair and other faith community members provided a way to get input about how to implement change in the
current faith community practice regarding the AED. The safety committee agreed to support this project by participating in education and making
policy updates to the AED maintenance plan to require monthly checks of the equipment using a checklist recommended by the AHA. The safety
committee communicated with church leaders to gain support for obtaining medical control as required by state laws. It was found that all safety
committee members are trained in basic life support (BLS) including the use of an AED. The plan included extending an opportunity for faith
community members to participate in AED education. Over 30 participants were provided a 3 minute AED education video to view on their
personal device, and then the participants participated in a 15 minute hands-on skills opportunity followed by a question and answer session.
Participants were asked to complete an evaluation of the AED education and the results showed the education improved confidence and the
participants reported being more likely to use the AED in case of a sudden cardiac event due to their increased confidence the education provided.
As a result of this project, the safety committee members will maintain current BLS certification, have a written policy for monthly AED equipment
maintenance using a checklist, view an AED demonstration video every 6 months, and help increase awareness by supporting an annual AED
awareness campaign in February during American Heart month. The safety committee was instrumental in obtaining a local physician to oversee
the AED education and maintenance program as required by state laws.
References
American Heart Association. (2016). Automated external defibrillator implementing an aed program. Retrieved from
http://cpr.heart.org/AHAECC/CPRAndECC/Programs/AEDImplementation/UCM_473198_AED-Implementation.jsp
Baker, C., Loade, C., & Crone, D. (2015). Awareness of automated external defibrillators in the community: A local study. British Journal of Cardiac
Nursing, 10, 444-451.
Ferratini, M., Moraschi, A., Ripamonti, V., Giannuzzi, P., Lorito, F., De Luca, G., …De Maria, R. (2010). Cardiac death prevention by automated
defibrillators in churches: Rationale and design of the church trial. American Heart Journal, 159, 170-175.
Gilchrist, J. (2012). Public access to defibrillation (PAD): Implementing a church program. Journal of Christian Nursing, 29, 110-112.
doi:10.1097/CNJ.0b013e318246e2d3
Greif, R., Lockey, A. S., Conaghan, P., Lippert, A., De Vries, W., & Monsieurs, K. G. (2015). European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation
2015 section 10. Education and implementation of resuscitation. Resuscitation, 95, 288-301. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.032
Contact
[email protected]
Exploring the Experiences of DNP-Prepared Nurses Enrolled in a DNP-to-PhD Pathway Program
Aaron Michael Sebach, DNP, MBA, AGACNP-BC, FNP-BC, CEN, CPEN, USA
Kristy Chunta, PhD, RN, ACNS, BC, USA
Abstract
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) reports that less than one percent of nurses in the United States hold a doctoral degree in nursing
(2010). Increasing complexities of the healthcare system prompted a recommendation from the IOM to double the number of
nurses with a doctoral degree by 2020 (2010). Currently two terminal degrees in nursing have been identified by the American
Association of Colleges of Nursing. The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is a clinically focused practice doctorate whereas the Doctor
of Philosophy (PhD) is a research oriented doctorate. Deciding which degree to pursue can be difficult for many nurses, particularly
for nurse educators. Both the AACN and the National League for Nurses (NLN) have published position statements supporting
doctoral preparation for nurse educators (AACN, 2010; AACN, 2015b; Dreifuerst et al., 2016; NLN, 2013).
Advancement of nursing science and research requires collaboration amongst DNP and PhD-prepared nurses. A small subset of nurse educators
have earned both a DNP and PhD, uniquely prepared as expert clinicians and scientists, and are poised to lead innovations in collaborative practice.
The AACN recognizes the importance of the dual-role and has identified DNP/PhD combination programs and DNP to PhD pathway programs
(AACN, 2015a). Nursing schools nationwide have responded appropriately offering DNP/PhD combination programs and DNP to PhD programs
(AACN, 2015a). Despite this growing trend, there is a dearth of literature examining DNP to PhD programs.
DNP-prepared nurses are prepared at the highest level of nursing practice and are equipped with the requisite skills to bridge the gap between
research and practice. Yet, within the nursing profession, research and practice are inherently disconnected. There is an immediate need for DNP
and PhD-prepared nurses to collaborate to educate futures nurses, conduct original research, and disseminate findings to improve outcomes across
the continuum. Nurses with both DNP and PhD degrees are uniquely prepared and are invaluable members of the healthcare community.
Recognizing the IOM’s mandate to double the number of doctorally prepared nurses by 2020, this phenomenon must be studied now.
There is a dearth of literature examining DNP/PhD combination and DNP to PhD programs. As these programs continue to expand, nurse educators
are in need of both qualitative and quantitative evidence to guide curricular decisions and to facilitate innovative collaborative practice. The results
of this descriptive phenomenological study will offer several benefits to the nursing profession. Understanding the lived experience of DNP to PhD
students will identify potential barriers that can be minimized by employers and schools of nursing to facilitate enrollment in pathway programs.
Additionally, recognizing the inherent differences between DNP and PhD programs from the student perspective will strengthen current DNP to
PhD programs by identifying course content that overlaps as well as areas where additional coursework is necessary. Future career goals of DNP to
PhD students will also enhance DNP to PhD curricula and will highlight the necessity of pathway programs nationwide. Finally, this study will
support future research related to the AACN pathways to PhD education, particularly DNP to PhD pathway programs and DNP/PhD combination
programs.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2015a). Leading excellence and innovation in academic nursing: Annual report 2015. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/AnnualReport15.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2004). Position statement on the practice doctorate in nursing. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/DNPpositionstatement.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2015b). The doctor of nursing practice: Current issues and clarifying recommendations. Retrieved
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/aacn-publications/white-papers/DNP-Implementation-TF-Report-8-15.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2006). The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/dnp/Essentials.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2010). The research-focused doctoral program in nursing: Pathways to excellence. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/PhDPosition.pdf
Bednash, G., Breslin, E. T., Kirschling, J. M., & Rosseter, R. J. (2014). PhD or DNP: Planning for doctoral nursing education. Nursing science quarterly,
27(4), 296-301. doi: 10.1177/0894318414546415.
Bellini, S., McCauley, P., & Cusson, R. M. (2012). The doctor of nursing practice graduate as faculty member. Nursing Clinics of North America, 47,
547-556. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2012.07.004.
de Chesnay, M. (2015). Nursing research using phenomenology: Qualitative designs and methods in nursing. New York, NY: Springer.
Dreifuerst, K. T., McNelis, A. M., Weaver, M. T., Boome, M. E., Draucker, C. B., & Fedko, A. S. (2016). Exploring the pursuit of doctoral education by
nurses seeking or intending to stay in faculty roles. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(3), 202-212. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.014.
Fang, D. & Bednash, G. C. (2014). Identifying barriers and facilitators to future nurse faculty careers for DNP students. Journal of Professional
Nursing, Accepted Manuscript, 1-33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.05.008
Institute of Medicine. (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Retrieved from
http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing-Leading-Change-Advancing-Health.aspx
Murphy, M. P., Staffileno, B. A., & Carlson, E. (2015). Collaboration among DNP- and PhD-prepared nurses: Opportunity to drive positive change.
Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(5), 388-394. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.03.001
National League for Nursing. (2013). A vision for doctoral preparation for nurse educators: A living document from the National League for Nursing.
Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/about/nln-vision-series-(position-statements)/nlnvision_6.pdf
Nicholes, R. H. & Dyer, J. (2012). Is eligibility for tenure possible for the doctor of nursing practice-prepared faculty? Journal of Professional Nursing,
28(1), 13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.10.001
Oermann, M. H., Lynn, M. R., & Agger, C. A. (2016). Hiring intention of directors of nursing programs related to DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty and
roles of faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(3), 173-179. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.06.010
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.
Ramsburg, L. & Childress, R. (2012). An initial investigation of the applicability of the Dreyfus skill acquisition model to the professional
development of nurse educators. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(5), 312-316.
Sanders, C. (2003). Application of Colaizzi’s method: Interpretation of an auditable decision trail by a novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse
Journal, 14(3), 292-302.
Sebastian, J. G., & White, D. C. (2013). Doctor of nursing practice programs: Opportunities for faculty development. Journal of Nursing Education,
52(8), 453-461. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20130722-02.
Staffileno, B. A., Murphy, M. P., & Carlson, E. (2016). Overcoming the tension: Building effective DNP-PhD faculty teams. Journal of Professional
nursing, 0(0), 1-7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.012
Udlis, K. A. & Mancuso, J. M. (2015). Perceptions of the role of the doctor of nursing practice-prepared nurse: Clarity or confusion. Journal of
Professional Nursing, 31(4), 274-283. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.01.004
Ward-Smith, P., Peterson, J. A., & Kimble, S. (2014). Student nurse perception of doctoral graduate programs. Journal of Nursing Education and
Practice, 4(5), 36-41. doi: 10.5430/jnep.v4n5p36
Contact
[email protected]
Will Bi-Monthly Telephone Contact Help Compliance to Improve Exercise Regimen in Obese Type 2
Diabetes?
James Todd, DNP, RN, USA
Abstract
Diabetes is a compelling and complex disease with a high morbidity and mortality rate. The cost associated with this disease, financially and
physically, is substantial. Diabetes affects 25.8 million people (8.3%) of the population in the United States, and data from the National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey showed that more than one-third (34.9%) of adults were obese (Centers for Disease Control [CDC], 2013). The Center
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that 8.3 percent or 25.8 million people in the U.S. are obese and 9.3 percent or 29.1 million have
diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is a chronic health condition that has also been called adult-onset or non-insulin dependent diabetes. Although an
individual living with type 2 diabetes is most likely a life-long condition, it can be controlled by losing weight, adhering to a healthy diet and exercise
regimen. Studies have shown that participating in physical activity 20 to 30 minutes at least every 48 hours can play a role in the control of a
diabetic individual’s hemoglobin A1C by increasing the efficiency of insulin in the body which allows more insulin to enter the cells and decrease
blood glucose levels. Physical activity/exercise is a fundamental component of self-management in diabetes care. The purpose of this project is to
identify if bi-monthly telephone contact will help motivate obese individuals who have type 2 diabetes to be more compliant with an exercise
regimen. The pilot study consisted of bi-monthly (twice monthly) telephone contact with type 2 diabetics who are obese. The sample size of
participants included 20 individuals ranging 19 to 78 years of age. The study included two males and 18 females. The findings of this study suggest
that type 2 obese diabetics are more physically active and compliant in an exercise regimen when contacted twice a month by telephone calls.
Study participants reported being motivated to be more physically active through telephone contact and a having an overall sense of well-being
after exercising.
References
American Diabetes Association. (2014). Standards of medical care in diabetes---2014. Diabetes Care, 37, S14-S80.
Centers for Disease Control. (2012a). Diabetes report card 2012. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/diabetesreportcard.pdf
Centers for Disease Control. (2012b). Trends in adult receiving a recommendation for exercise or other physical activity from a physician or other
health professional. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db86.pdf
Centers for Disease Control. (2013). Adult obesity facts. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/statereport14.htm
International Diabetes Federation. (2013). Diabetes: facts and figures. Retrieved from http://www.idf.org/worlddiabetesday/toolkit/gp/facts-
figures
Contact
[email protected]
Competition-Based Learning (CBL) in Nursing Education
Basma Alyazeedi, MSN, BSN, RN, PNP, USA
Diane C. Berry, PhD, MSN, BSN, RN, ANP-BC, FAANP, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Background: Competition-Based Learning (CBL) is a new innovative and promising method of learning. Researchers with an
information technology background defined CBL, based on project-based learning, as “a constructivist approach to learning in which
competition is used as stimulus for the maximization of the Indented Learning Outcomes (ILOs) specified in a given course or
curriculum, while team members participate in a project under a controlled environment” (Issa, Hussain, & Al-Bahadili, 2015, p.5).
Similarly, researchers with an engineering background described CBL as project-based learning that involves teams of students in an
open-ended assignment who are accounted for the performance of the resulting case during final project testing (Carroll, 2013). The
two definitions are based on project-based learning, which is a method of learning that allow learners to acquire knowledge through
the application of projects that are real and pertinent to the topic being studied (Dehdashti, Mehralizadeh, & Kashani, 2013).
CBL has not been defined in nursing or medical education. However, the competition concept has been tested in multiple medical education
studies, and the results were promising. Lei et al. (2016) found that the addition of a competition component in a problem/case-based learning
(PCBL) was an effective learning approach in teaching about the course of severe infection to medical students. They reported that students in the
team-based competition group compared to a control group were more active in the case discussion, in referring to case-related articles, attending
clinical group-consultation, and performing better in the case analysis final examination (Lei et al., 2016). Another study indicated that introducing
collaboration and structured competition in a hematology/oncology fellowship program resulted in improvement in attendance, participation, and
engagement in learning (Makhoul et al., 2016). Also, a randomized controlled trial indicated that team-based competition had increased resident
physicians level of engagement and participation in an online educational course (Scales et al., 2016). Therefore, adding a competition component
in the medical education learning process was a successful strategy in promoting learning outcomes through enhancing students’ motivation and
active learning.
Problem-based learning in the nursing education, parallel to project-based learning in information technology and engineering education, is shown
to be an effective method of learning. It enhances collaborative, active, and self-directed learning (Mayner, Gillham, & Sansoni, 2013; Spiers et al.,
2014). Some researchers consider it as a synonym to project-based learning (Pilcher, 2014). Problem-based learning is a student-centered learning
approach where students define the problem and establish learning objectives required to develop their understanding of the problem (Bassir,
Sadr-Eshkevari, Amirikhorheh, & Karimbux, 2014). Therefore, CBL definition in the nursing education could potentially be based on problem-based
learning.
It is important to consider only symbolic and non-significant rewards to winning a classroom competition. Meaningful rewards to winning a
competition such as grades or monetary prizes would result in negative consequences such as shifting the outcome value from learning to winning
and failing the learning process (Shindler, 2008; Sternberg & Baalsrud-Hauge, 2015).
Significance: Competition-based learning that involves a group of teams would promote collaborative learning and enhance students’ motivation
and active learning (Lei et al., 2016; Makhoul et al., 2016). In collaborative learning, teams of students work together in a self-directed manner to
achieve a common goal and create a sense of responsibility toward the team (Makhoul et al., 2016). The collaborative learning combined with
enhanced motivation to learn enforce team-work spirit among students, promote engagement and self-directed leaning, emphasize share of
knowledge among the group members, and stimulate students’ creativity and innovation to achieve better learning outcomes. These outcomes
ultimately result in an effective learning process and potentially sustained learning outcomes.
Applying Competition-Based Learning in the Nursing Education: Application of CBL in the nursing education is unclear. The following is a
suggested approach of applying the CBL in the nursing courses.
Context. Since grades should not be involved in a winning outcome, CBL may be applied in tutorials, where students are prepared for real course
exams. Students may earn grades for participation or attendance in the tutorials but not for winning.
Group formation. The instructor asks the students to divide themselves into groups. The instructor may determine the size of the group according
to what he or she thinks is better serving the competition success. The number of students in each group should be even. Giving the students the
autonomy to form their teams promotes satisfaction, self-confidence, decision-making skills, and harmony among the team members, which
eventually maximize the collaborative and innovative learning. If lower achieving students remain to form a group and discrepancies in the
academic level were noted among the teams, there should be no worries as CBL aims to promote learning motivation and desire to improve the
academic level.
Competition. The competition is done during the course tutorials classes. Multiple competitions will be conducted according to the determined
course tutorials classes. The competition should cover the course contents taught in the preceding period. During the contest, all teams are asked
to analyze a specific problem or case and answer some related questions. Alternatively, simulation cases could be asked, and the whole group
participates in solving the case through simulation.
Evaluation. At the end of each competition, points are accumulated toward the team according to the questions answered right and instructor’s
evaluation. There is no elimination of any members or groups. Final points are announced at the end of all course tutorials, and the winning team is
the one that accumulates the larger number of points. No grades should be involved.
References
Bassir, S. H., Sadr-Eshkevari, P., Amirikhorheh, S., & Karimbux, N. Y. (2014). Problem-based learning in dental education: a systematic review of the
literature. J Dent Educ, 78(1), 98-109.
Carroll, C. (2013). Competition based learning in the classroom. age, 23, 1.
Dehdashti, A., Mehralizadeh, S., & Kashani, M. M. (2013). Incorporation of project-based learning into an occupational health course. J Occup
Health, 55(3), 125-131.
Issa, G., Hussain, S. M., & Al-Bahadili, H. (2015). Competition-Based Learning: A Model for the Integration of Competitions with Project-Based
Learning using Open Source LMS Open Source Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 968-980): IGI Global.
Lei, J. H., Guo, Y. J., Chen, Z., Qiu, Y. Y., Gong, G. Z., & He, Y. (2016). Problem/case-based learning with competition introduced in severe infection
education: an exploratory study. Springerplus, 5(1), 1821. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3532-3
Makhoul, I., Motwani, P., Schafer, L., Arnaoutakis, K., Mahmoud, F., Safar, M., . . . Thrush, C. (2016). Integrating Collaborative Learning and
Competition in a Hematology/Oncology Training Program. J Cancer Educ. doi:10.1007/s13187-016-1095-1
Mayner, L., Gillham, D., & Sansoni, J. (2013). Anatomy and physiology for nursing students: is problem-based learning effective? Prof Inferm, 66(3),
182-186. doi:10.7429/pi.2013.663182
Pilcher, J. (2014). Problem-based learning in the NICU. Neonatal Netw, 33(4), 221-224. doi:10.1891/0730-0832.33.4.221
Scales, C. D., Jr., Moin, T., Fink, A., Berry, S. H., Afsar-Manesh, N., Mangione, C. M., & Kerfoot, B. P. (2016). A randomized, controlled trial of team-
based competition to increase learner participation in quality-improvement education. Int J Qual Health Care, 28(2), 227-232.
doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzw008
Shindler, J. (2008). Examining the use of competition in the classroom. Transformative Classroom Management.
Spiers, J. A., Williams, B., Gibson, B., Kabotoff, W., McIlwraith, D., Sculley, A., & Richard, E. (2014). Graduate nurses' learning trajectories and
experiences of problem based learning: a focused ethnography study. Int J Nurs Stud, 51(11), 1462-1471. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.03.002
Sternberg, H., & Baalsrud-Hauge, J. (2015). Does competition with monetary prize improve student learning?–An exploratory study on extrinsic
motivation. Paper presented at the Lunds universitets utvecklingskonferens, 2015.
Contact
[email protected]
Guidelines for Development and Implementation of the DNP Scholarly Project
Jennifer J. Coleman, PhD, RN, CNE, COI, USA
John D. Lundeen, EdD, RN, CNE, COI, USA
Gretchen S. McDaniel, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Problem: The culmination of academic programs of study that lead to the doctor of nursing practice (DNP) degree is the scholarly
project. Doctoral curricula in schools of nursing typically include a series of courses designed to facilitate development,
implementation, and dissemination of the project. DNP projects focus on clinical practice changes that impact health outcomes.
Planning, implementation, and evaluation are three components that must be addressed (AACN, 2015). The project is an evidence-
based practice (EBP) approach to problem solving. While the DNP project is not a research endeavor, attention to available research
is essential. The goal is the translation of current research into practice for the purpose of improving quality of care (Shirey et al.,
2011). It is also important that projects reflect DNP graduates’ achievement of required skills for advanced practice. The structural
basis for demonstration of the advanced knowledge and skills consistent with a practice-focused doctorate is provided with the
Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice (DNP Essentials) (AACN, 2006)
Background: The DNP faculty at a school of nursing at a small, private, liberal arts university admitted its first cohort of students with a bachelor of
science in nursing (BSN). Faculty recognized that the BSN to DNP student may have minimal experience with leadership and organizational
processes and may be considered a novice with regard to the expected leadership role of a doctoral scholar. Novice behaviors are likely rule-
governed and may be limited to only one aspect of a situation (Benner, 2001). Focused direction is needed to assist the baccalaureate prepared
nurse to alter thinking processes in a manner that facilitates effective use of available knowledge to impact patient health outcomes. Multiple ways
of thinking encourage students to take ownership and to seek opportunities to influence practice situations (Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, & Day,
2010). Expansion of a novice’s way of thinking can be accomplished by providing guidelines and expert assistance (Dreyfus, 2004) in situations that
are unfamiliar or beyond one’s level of experience. Benner (2001) discussed the importance of coaching and providing assistance as an important
aspect of teaching students and patients.
Schools of nursing that offer the BSN to DNP have reported that assistance on how to develop guidelines for the scholarly project is needed
(Auerbach et al., 2014). In addition, the concern that current doctoral faculty may be unfamiliar with the EBP process as opposed to the research
process has also been reported (Zelenikova, Beach, Ren, Wolff, & Sherwood, 2014). Therefore, concise guidelines to assist students and faculty in
the process of project development are critical.
Purpose: The purpose of this presentation is to discuss our school’s revision of the guidelines for the DNP project. Revisions reflect current
recommendations from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN, 2015). Updated terminology and clarification of the scope of the
project are included in the revised guidelines. Attention to achievement of the DNP Essentials (AACN, 2006) is also evident as a required outcome.
Methodology: After students complete the core doctoral curriculum and specialty courses, two courses comprise the proposal and implementation
phases of the DNP project. Faculty developed a separate rubric for each phase to guide students through the process. The first course is the project
proposal; and the revised guidelines detail development of the topic, identification of project framework, review of literature, and description of
the plan for intervention. The rubric for the second course provides structure for project implementation, evaluation, and dissemination.
The revised SQUIRE guidelines provide the foundation for project proposal writing and for the implementation and dissemination phases. The
conciseness and clarity of the items in SQUIRE 2.0 (Ogrinc et al., 2015) are consistent with the aims of our revised DNP project guidelines.
Consistent with SQUIRE 2.0, each rubric provides detailed, step-by-step directions for each component of the project.
Results: The revised guidelines are currently in use for the first time. DNP projects will be implemented and evaluated during spring semester of
2018, and comments in relation to usability and appropriateness of the revised guidelines will be solicited. Faculty and student comments will be
reviewed for needed adjustments before any subsequent use of the guidelines.
Significance to nursing: Translation of evidence into practice is dependent upon the clinician’s ability to effectively demonstrate multiple ways of
thinking in relation to clinical practice. Clear guidelines during the DNP project process support the development of robust projects that impact
nursing practice and health outcomes.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2006). The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. Washington, DC: Author
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2015). The doctor of nursing practice: Current issues and clarifying recommendations. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/aacn-publications/white-papers/DNP-Implementation-TF-Report-8-15.pdf
Auerbach, D. I., Martsolf, G., Pearson, M. L., Taylor, E. A., Zaydman, M., Muchow, A., … Dower, C. (2014). The DNP by 2015: A study of the
institutional, political, and professional issues that facilitate or impede establishing a post-baccalaureate doctor of nursing practice program. Santa
Monica, CA: Rand Health. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/dnp/DNP-Study.pdf
Benner, P. (2001). The teaching-coaching function. In From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice (Commemorative
edition, pp. 77-94). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). A new approach to nursing education. In Educating nurses: A call for radical formation, pp.
81-91. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Dreyfus, S. E. (2004). The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of science, technology & society, 24, 177-181. DOI:
10.1177/0270467604264992
Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2015). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting
Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46, 501-507.
Shirey, M. R., Hauck, S. L., Embree, J. L., Kinner, T. J., Schaar, G. L., Phillips, L. A., … McCool, I. A. (2011). Showcasing differences between quality
improvement, evidence-based practice, and research. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 42, 57-68.
Zelenikova, R., Beach, M., Ren, D., Wolff, E., & Sherwood, P. (2014). Faculty perception of the effectiveness of EBP courses for graduate nursing
students. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11, 401-413.
Contact
[email protected]
Interprofessional Educational Collaboration Between Graduate Outpatient Pharmacy and BSN Community
Health Nursing Students
Valerie C. Sauda, MSN, RN-BC, MGSF, USA
Frank McGrady, PharmD, BCPS, USA
Abstract
Interprofessional educational opportunities for undergraduate nursing students as well as graduate pharmacy students are an
essential focus of curriculum development work at the university. As described by Frank, Chen, and Bhutta (2010), professional
education is in need of further interprofessional reform and the authors encourage educators to look at transformative learning and
interdependency between healthcare disciplines to help engage students in the healthcare problems of the twenty first century. A
primary issue in interprofessional care involves medication practices and collaboration for medication safety in the outpatient care
setting. The National Academies of Science, Medicine and Engineering as outlined in the report, Preventing Medication Errors (2007)
as well as the medication safety work on community pharmacy medication safety completed by Institute of Safe Medication
Practices (2017) continue to stress the importance of medication safety in all practice settings, including community based practices
and patient homes. In academic settings, the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN, 2007) competencies highlight the
importance of teamwork and collaboration for patient safety in nursing education as does the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy
Education (ACPE) standards for accreditation and competencies in pharmacy schools. The interprofessional education work
developed by Wilbur, Hasnani-Samnani, and Kelly (2015) demonstrated success in interprofessional education between pharmacy
and undergraduate nursing students in medication case study simulations related to management of diabetic ketoacidosis across the
continuum of care. With the learning goals to increase student exposure to interprofessional education and to enhance patient
medication and medication safety knowledge and skills of students, faculty from the School of Nursing and School of Pharmacy
partnered to develop a semester long experiential learning project using simulation, case studies, and focused discussion to enhance
patient medication safety through collaboration and teamwork within the ambulatory care pharmacy (RX511 and RX512) and
community health nursing (NU412) courses.
The semester long pilot project was undertaken to engage students in collaborative interprofessional learning using small group work. The
teamwork and communication framework developed through the TeamStepps program (AHRQ, 2017) assisted students to practice addressing
issues of medication safety in community based settings. Teams had access to online drug handbooks and pharmacy resources during the activities.
After the presentation of a complex case and completion of the medication safety activities, teams worked together to build community focused
plans for implementation of medication safety and medication practices unique to community based practice. The three (3) hour sessions were
held on campus with community based pharmacy rotations for the pharmacy students to enhance the student experience as well as community
health home care or other community site rotation experiences for nursing students. Through careful selection of real-world cases susceptible to
medication error as well as cases which demand collaboration between nursing and pharmacy students in community settings, students were
engaged in guided discussion and problem solving with the final group assessment focused on performance based evaluation of the creation of
plans to address the patient medication safety needs. Overall, student learning outcomes were assessed using a classroom assessment to check
understanding in the areas of medication safety, teamwork, communication, and collaboration. Further summative assessment was developed in
each individual course to assess the learning outcomes linked back to the context of the interprofessional experience.
References
Aspden, P. (2007). Preventing medication errors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
American Council for Pharmacy Education. (n.d.). Accreditation standards. Retrieved June 12, 2017, from https://www.acpe-accredit.org/
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015, August 11). About TeamSTEPPS. Retrieved June 9, 2017, from
https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/about-teamstepps/index.html
Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell, P., Warren, J. (2007). Quality and safety education for nurses. Nursing
Outlook, 55(3), 122-131. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006
Frank J, Chen L, Bhutta Z, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent
world. The Lancet, 2010; 376:1923-1958.
Institute of Safe Medication Practices. (n.d.). Community Pharmacy Medication Safety Tools and Resources. Retrieved June 9, 2017, from
http://www.ismp.org/Tools/communitySafetyProgram.asp
Wilbur, K., Hasnani-Samnani, Z., & Kelly, I. (2015). Interprofessional Education Activity Among Undergraduate Nursing and Pharmacy Students in
the Middle East.Nurse Educator, 40(4), 163-164. doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000135
Contact
[email protected]
Refusing to Let the Dust Settle: Creative Evaluation of a Concept-Based Curriculum
Jeannette M. Kates, PhD, GNP-BC, RN, USA
Mary E. Hanson-Zalot, EdD, MSN, RN, AOCN, USA
Julia M. Ward, PhD, RN, USA
Jamie Marie Smith, MSN, RN, CCRN, USA
Valerie Ann Clary-Muronda, MSN (Ed), RN, USA
Abstract
Concept-based curricula are being implemented in nursing education as a means to shift the emphasis from content to an emphasis
on concepts and conceptual learning (Giddens & Brady, 2007). This paradigm shift requires concomitant changes in how faculty
teaches and how students learn. In concept-based curricula, teachers use student-centered learning activities, such as cases,
questions, or problems to engage students in active learning (Giddens, Caputi, & Rodgers, 2015). In the summer of 2016, a College of
Nursing in an academic health science institution in the northeast region of the United States began the implementation of an
undergraduate concept-based curriculum. A workgroup was formed and charged by the faculty at large with developing and
executing an evaluation plan of the concept-based curriculum. The purpose of this poster is to describe the development of a
concept-based curriculum evaluation plan and the results of preliminary data from the evaluation. The National League for Nursing’s
(2016) Hallmarks of Excellence served as guiding principles and existing literature regarding curriculum evaluation served as a
framework to approach this work (Giddens & Morton, 2010; Oermann, 2017). The workgroup specified a threefold purpose: identify
gaps in content, identify and reduce redundancies in concepts, and ensure that concepts and exemplars are arranged from simple to
complex. Next, each member of the workgroup was tasked with submission of summative and formative assessment questions. The
mutually agreed upon questions that guided this inquiry were (a) do faculty and students systematically evaluate the impact of
innovative teaching and curriculum approaches on student learning, student satisfaction, and other student-centered outcomes
(summative and formative); (b) to what extent does each clinical experience help students develop their ability to provide evidence-
based care to patients, families, and communities experiencing a wide range of health problems (summative and formative); (c) are
teacher-made tests aligned with the NCLEX-RN blueprint (formative); (d) are curricular concepts and exemplars following the
principle of simple to complex (formative); (e) do correlations between numeric course grades and nationally-recognized
standardized assessment raw scores support that such assessments are placed appropriately throughout plan of study (formative);
(f) how are students adapting to, within one course, different faculty, different learning strategies, and different class preparation
(summative and formative); (g) how is faculty integrating active learning strategies utilized across the curriculum (summative and
formative); and (h) is there any change in traditional program indicators of success when comparing the concept-based curriculum in
terms of graduation rate, NCLEX-RN performance, and employer satisfaction (summative). For each question, specific outcome
metrics were identified, time frames for assessment were established, and workgroup champions were identified. Data collection
methods included (a) student course evaluations, (b) faculty summative evaluation, (c) stakeholder surveys, (d) concept assessment,
(e) student and faculty focus groups, (f) standardized test scores, (g) graduation rate, and (h) NCLEX-RN pass rate. The concept-based
curriculum was implemented in the prelicensure program that includes a traditional, upper division track and an accelerated,
second-degree track. Each track admits students once a year, with the accelerated track starting in May and the traditional track
starting in August. The accelerated students complete four quarters of nursing course work over a 12 month period; whereas, the
traditional students complete four semesters of course work over a two year period. The data collection included all four quarters of
nursing coursework for the accelerated students and the first two semesters of the traditional students. A variety of methods, such
as descriptive statistics, correlational analysis, and qualitative content analysis, were used. At the end of one academic year, the
workgroup has generated several deliverables, thus far, including (a) a curriculum assessment and evaluation plan for three years,
(b) a revised concept/exemplar map, (c) an initial analysis of standardized test scores as compared with final numeric course grades
earned by students, (d) a revision of pharmacology course content, (e) clinical and didactic scheduling recommendations, and (f)
faculty feedback regarding active learning strategies and textbook resources. Next steps for ongoing evaluation include collection of
data regarding student satisfaction with concept-based learning, active learning strategies, and varying faculty approaches to
teaching. Additionally, clinical preparation for employment should be evaluated, including graduate and employer feedback. Finally,
ongoing evaluation of questions that have already been addressed is important given that the traditional students have not yet
completed a full-cycle of the concept-based curriculum. The development of this concept-based curriculum evaluation plan and its
preliminary results are significant to this College of Nursing, as well as other nurse educators. In addition to developing a three-year
curriculum assessment and evaluation plan, this work provided data that contributed to evidence-based revisions of this curriculum.
This curriculum evaluation plan will be a useful guide to nurse educators who are implementing concept-based curricula and
beginning the process of curriculum evaluation.
References
Giddens, J.F., & Brady, D. (2007). Rescuing nursing education from content saturation: A case for a concept-based curriculum. Journal of Nursing
Education, 46(2), 123-124.
Giddens, J.F., Caputi, L., & Rodgers, B. (2015). Mastering concept-based teaching. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Giddens, J.F., & Morton, N. (2010). Report card: An evaluation of a concept-based curriculum. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(6), 372-377.
National League for Nursing. (2016). Hallmarks of excellence. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/professional-development-programs/teaching-
resources/hallmarks-of-excellence
Oermann, M.H. (Ed.). (2017). A systematic approach to assessment and evaluation in nursing programs. Washington, DC: National League for
Nursing.
Contact
[email protected]
Assessing Acuity Adaptable Staff About Their Perceptions of Current Fall Prevention Practices
Jennifer L. Kitchens, MSN, RN, ACNS-BC, CVRN, USA
Teresa Hazlett, BSN, RN, CMSRN, USA
Jennifer L. Embree, DNP, RN, NE-BC, CCNS, ., USA
Janet S. Fulton, PhD, RN, ACNS-BC, ANEF, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to assess the perceptions of Acuity Adaptable staff nurses’ and care technicians fall
prevention practices. The ultimate goal of the project was to understand barriers and suggestions about current fall prevention practices.
Significance: The average cost of an inpatient fall with injury at the facility is $44,000. Falls with injury increase cost and length of hospital stay and
may produce serious harm to patients. Preventing inpatient falls is a critical aspect of patient safety. The number of falls on the Acuity Adaptable
Units was not significantly reduced in the past year, and further reduction in falls was needed. In 2016, the average raw numbers of falls per month
were 10.58, and 2017 year to date average raw number of falls per month is 9.8. One potential solution to identifying ways to further reduce falls
was to survey staff for their perceptions about current fall prevention practices. Understanding staff perceptions and involving staff in the quality
improvement process may lead to prevention solutions and actionable items to reduce falls.
Methods: An 8-item voluntary survey developed by the authors was administered to Acuity Adaptable Staff to assess their perceptions of fall
prevention practices. Survey items addressed barriers, suggestions, concerns, and having the necessary fall prevention tools available.
Findings: Out of 233 eligible nursing staff, 60 registered nurses (RNs) completed the survey. Day shift staff RNs (n=22/37%) and Night Shift staff RNs
(n=38/63%) participated with registered nurses representing 98% (n=59), and 12 eligible care techs 2% (n=1). Eighty-five percent were full time
(n=51), ten percent part time (n=6), and five percent from the nursing float pool(n=3). Identified barriers to fall prevention were primarily related
to patient non-compliance, lack of patient perception that they are a fall risk, confusion/medical condition, and the nursing staff not getting to the
patient in time to prevent the fall. Concerns from surveyed staff included that bed alarms or other interventions were not consistently utilized,
especially by non-nursing departments, fall risk assessment tool not accurately scored, and lack of staff communication that the patient is a high
fall risk. Comments were made that staff felt the “Call Don’t Fall” sign and the chair alarm were effective interventions. Staff suggestions included
additional interventions: implementing a gait belt, therapy activities, lap belts, pre-made packets of safety precautions (fall sign, yellow non-slip
footwear and armband), shower mats, and additional staff and patient fall prevention education.
Conclusions: By surveying the staff, valuable information was gained about staff perception of fall prevention practices on the Acuity Adaptable
Units. Other healthcare organizations could survey staff about their perceptions of effective fall prevention practices.
Implications: Staff should be involved in evaluating the fall prevention interventions and processes. Future plans to decrease falls on this unit
includes implementing identified prevention solutions and actionable items to reduce falls based on the staff survey results.
References
Ambutas, S., Lamb, K. V., & Quigley, P. (2017). Fall reduction and injury prevention toolkit: implementation on two medical-surgical units. Med
Surg Nursing, 26(3), 175-179 and 197.
Bergen, G., Stevens, M. R., Burns, E. R. (2014). Falls and fall injuries among adults aged >65 years - United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
Report 2016;65:993-998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585.mmwr.mm6537a2
Dupree, E., Fritz-Campiz, F., Musheno, D. (2014). A new approach to preventing falls with injuries. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 29(2), 99-102.
Higaonna, M., Enobi, M., & Nakamure, S. (2017). Develpment of an evidence-based fall risk assessment tool and evaluation of interrater reliability
and the nurses' perceptions of the tool's clarity and usability. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 14(2), 146-160.
Wilson, D. S., Montie, M., Conlin, P., Reynolds, M., Ripley, R., Titler, M. G. (2016). Nurses perceptions of implementing fall prevention
interventions to mitigate patient specific fall risk factors. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 38(8), 1012-1034.
Contact
[email protected]
Nurse-Leader Rounds
Angela Babaev, DNP, USA
Abstract
Nurse leaders are faced with various challenges, one of which is to assure an excellent experience for hospitalized patients and their loved ones.
Even though health care leaders recognize the patient’s experience as the highest priority, many are struggling to balance the factors that impact
this experience while providing exceptional care. A high priority of healthcare administrators is ensuring positive patient experiences during their
hospital stay. Nursing leaders are in a position to foster changes necessary to impact patient experience proactively. To assure consistency and
quality in the delivery of care, nurse leader rounding (NLR) was created. It is a systematic process recommended as a best practice according to
Baker and McGowan (2010). Seeing patients daily, during morning rounds by a doctor or nurse, has been part of traditional medical practice since
its existence as a profession. During rounding, healthcare providers gather information while speaking to the patient directly. They assess the
patient in real time, develop a trusting relationship, listen to what patients have to say about the care being provided, and are immediately
available to address any concerns raised by the patient by conveying all the necessary orders to anyone responsible to follow up with patient
needs. Nurse leader rounds work in a similar manner. It is a process that allows nurse leaders to connect to patients, reinforce care, verify nursing
behaviors, gain real-time response, achieve instantaneous service recovery, recognize staff, follow up to assure all patients needs are met, and
develop a trusting relationship. NLR is a proactive approach to the delivery of care (Baker & McGowan, 2010).
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a healthcare reform that was passed by Congress in 2010 with the primary goal to provide quality care based on
best practices and proven outcomes (CMS, 2014). The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining guidelines for hospitals to receive governmental healthcare reimbursement (CMS, 2014). The new reimbursement system links
healthcare compensation directly to quality care, and pay for performance, also called a Value Based Purchasing initiative. A standardized
questionnaire named Hospital Consumer Assessment Health Care Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) was created by CMS to measure outcomes and
patients’ perception of care delivered the measurement of which is reflected in patient satisfaction. This survey was implemented in 2006 and
designed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to query recently discharged hospital inpatients with 27 essential questions
divided into specific domains of care (communication and care from nurses, response of hospital staff, medication management, pain
management, discharge information, transitions of care) (CMS, 2014). This tool is believed to accurately assess the primary drivers of adult
inpatient satisfaction scores and is designed to provide a standard and objective comparison of a hospital performance relative to other hospitals
(Merlino, 2014). The CMS program rewards acute care hospitals with incentive payments based on the quality of care provided, how closely best
clinical practices are followed, and how well hospitals enhance inpatients experience (Merlino, 2014). Therefore, any effort to improve scores
would be welcomed by hospital administrators.
A key challenge for hospitals is how to improve patient satisfaction by using HCAHPS questions as a source of patient feedback and to use as a
guide for nurse leaders to translate it into actionable items in order to change the care delivered. NLR permits more personalized patient care plan
and provides a thorough understanding of potential patient concerns. One to one patient feedback during NLR allows for individual interaction and
visual assessment of the patients’ perception of care, which can only increase the benefits of the purpose for HCAHPS surveying. Accounting for
patient preferences involves matching the questions to the individual; which requires asking the right questions as part of a whole plan of care and
the discharge planning process. The nurse leader’s ability to bridge patient feedback into tactical action using NLR as an organizational strategy
provides the capability to move an organization forward from reactivity to proactivity (Studer, Robinson, & Cook, 2010).
Regardless of the organization, all nurse leaders promote and practice open, two-way communication between patients and providers to clarify
treatment goals and actions to accomplish them. Additionally, the nurse leader/manager “is responsible for ensuring not only patient care is given
but also it is given in the most effective and efficient manner possible” (Tappen, R., et al., 2004, p. 6).
The purpose of the study was to explore if there was an impact of NLR on patient satisfaction. According to Tappen, Weiss & Whitehead manager
or nurse leader is defined as a person capable to stimulate from employee “creativity, consistent excellent productivity, and maximum potential
contribution toward continuous improvement of process, product, and service” (1992, p. 276). Nurse leaders may include unit nurse managers,
supervisors, department directors, nurse education managers, or clinical nurse managers of a unit or division within a health care organization.
Definitions:
Nurse Leader (NL): is defined as a person capable to stimulate from employee “creativity, consistent excellent productivity, and maximum potential
contribution toward continuous improvement of process, product, and service” (Tappen, Weiss & Whitehead 1992, p. 276).
Effective nursing rounds (ENR): ENR is defined as the ability of a leader to move staff in accordance with the mission and goals to proactively
ensure the delivery of safe, high quality care and identify improvement opportunities (Studer et al., 2010).
Nurse leaders (NL): NL include unit nurse managers, supervisors, department directors, nurse education managers, or clinical nurse managers of a
unit or division within a health care organization (Studer et al., 2010).
Nurse leader rounds (NLR): NLR is a process that allows nurse leaders to connect to patients, reinforce care, verify nursing behaviors, gain real-time
response, achieve instantaneous service recovery, recognize staff, follow up to assure all patients needs are met, and develop a trusting
relationship. (Baker & McGowan, 2010).
Patient Satisfaction (PS): is patient’s perception of care reflected by patient satisfaction scores collected using HCAHPS and is directly related to the
quality of nursing care patients receive (Studer et al., 2010)
Rounds involve direct observation, assessment and evaluation of patient, staff, unit functioning, clinical environment and global view of patient
status (Studer et al., 2010).
References
Baker, S. J., & McGowan, N. (2010). Rounding for outcomes: An evidence-based tool to improve nurse retention, patient safety, and quality of care.
Journal of Emergency Nursing, 36(2), 162-164. doi: 10,1016/j.jen.2009.11.015
Blakley, D., Kroth, M., & Gregson, J. (2011). The impact of nurse rounding on patient satisfaction in a medical-surgical hospital unit. MedSurg
Nursing, 20(6), 327-332.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, (2014). Hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems. Retrieved from:
http://www.hcahpsonline.org
Hutchings, M., Ward, P., & Bloodworth, K. (2013). ‘Caring around the clock’: A new approach to intentional rounding. Nursing Management, 20(5),
24-30.
Keith, J., Doucette, J., Zimbro, K., & Woolwine, D. (2015). Making an impact. Can a training program for leaders improve HCAHPS scores. Nursing
Management, 46(3), 20-27. doi-1097/01.NUMA.0000459093.40988.78
Merlino, J. (2014). HCAHPS survey results: Impact of severity of illness on hospitals' performance on HCAHPS survey results. Patient Experience
Journal, 1(2), 9-17.
Morton, J. (2014). Improving the patient experience through nurse leader rounds. Patient Experience Journal, 1(2), 53-61.
Setia, N. & Meade, C. (2009). Bundling the value of discharge telephone calls and leader rounding. Journal of Nursing Administration, 39(3), 138-
141.
Smith, C. (2015). Exemplary leadership. How style and culture predict organizational outcomes. Nursing Management, 46(3), 47-51. doi-
10.1097/01.NUMA.0000456659.17651.c0
Studer, Q., Robinson, B. C., & Cook, K. (2010). The HCAHPS handbook: Hardwire your hospital for pay-for-performance success. Gulf Breeze, FL: Fire
Starter Publishing.
Studer Q., Robinson Group of Senior Nursing & Physician Leaders (2010). The nurse leader handbook: The art and science of nurse leadership. Gulf
Breeze, FL: Fire Starter Publishing.
Tappen, R., M., Weiss, S. A., & Whitehead, D. K. (2004). Essentials of nursing leadership and management (3rd ed., passim). Philadelphia, PA: F. A.
Davis Company.
Thompson, P. (2008). Key challenges facing American nurse leaders. Journal of Nursing Management, (16)8, 912-914. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-
2834.2008.00951.x
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2014). The Affordable Care Act, section by section. Retrieved from:
http://www.hhs.gov/healthcare/rights/law/index.html
Volland, J., & Fryda, S. (2015). Transforming care transitions. Nursing Management, 46(1) 24-29. doi-10.1097/01.NUMA0000459101.17224.c3
Winter, M., & Tjiong, L. (2015). Does purposeful leader rounding make a difference? Nursing Management 46(2), 26-32. doi-
10.1097/01.NUMA.0000460034.25697.06
Contact
[email protected]
The Medical Student Collaborative: An Innovative Model to Improve Interprofessional Collaboration,
Communication, and Patient Care
Holly Lynn Losurdo, MSN, RN, CCRN, CNE, USA
Heather Joy Cook, BSN, RN, CCRN, SCRN, USA
Michelle Sweet, MD, USA
Christine S. Tsai, MD, USA
Brittany Wells, BSN, RN, CCRN, USA
Jonathan K. Shipley, BSN, RN, CCRN, USA
Shonda Morrow, JD, MS, RN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) supports interprofessional collaboration and education (ICE) to strengthen
efficiency and performance of healthcare teams resulting in improved outcomes for patients, team members, and organizations
(2010). This recommendation has been validated by studies demonstrating the benefits of ICE including improved role definition,
identification of factors influencing the team environment, improved attitudes of team members, and improved communication
(Aase, Hansen, & Aase, 2014; Park, Hawkins, Hamlin, & Hawkins, 2014; Shafran, Richardson, & Bonita, 2015). The Medical Student
Collaborative began in 2016 after medical faculty approached the hospital’s critical care outreach team with a desire to expose
fourth year medical students to high acuity situations. Initial feedback from medical students participating in the Collaborative
indicated benefits extending beyond the program’s intent. These incidental observations reflected the value of ICE as identified by
the WHO and the studies cited. Consequently, the Collaborative has evolved to encompass both the care of high acuity patients and
phenomena pertaining to interdisciplinary teamwork.
Project Description & Goals: The critical care outreach team is composed of highly skilled, experienced critical care nurses who possess keen
operational knowledge and are empowered to practice to the full extent of their license. They provide critical care consultation, emergency
response, staff education, and advocacy to 14 acute care units in a 697 bed academic medical center. This dynamic environment requires the
critical care outreach nurse to autonomously triage and expedite multiple requests during a given shift. The nurses’ breadth and depth of critical
care experience, accompanied by their operational expertise and exuberance for teaching, rendered them opportune partners in this Collaborative.
Fourth year medical students are scheduled to work with a critical care outreach nurse for a single seven hour shift from 1700 to 0000 when the
team receives its highest volume of calls. Collaborative objectives are clearly written and shared among all participants to provide direction and
justification for the experience (Woermann, Weltsch, Kunz, Stricker, & Guttormsen, 2016). Revised objectives based on feedback from early
participants include: enhance critical thinking and confidence in the recognition and management of decompensating patients; collaborate in
interdisciplinary planning and facilitation of patient care; engage in interdisciplinary opportunities for teaching/learning to improve patient and
nurse outcomes; gain experience obtaining arterial blood specimens and establishing intravenous access in patients with compromised vasculature
utilizing ultrasound guidance as needed.
The vision for this Collaborative is to provide an exemplar framework for healthcare and education systems to work together in actualizing ICE thus
addressing the WHO’s call to action (WHO, 2010).
Process: The medical student performs proactive rounding and surveillance with the critical care outreach nurse and responds to all emergencies
and requests for consultation, procedural assistance, and staff education needs. Throughout the shift, the medical student and nurse engage in
purposeful debriefing regarding the patients they encounter and discuss interdisciplinary experiences pertaining to communication, flow of patient
care, and role clarification. Students have the opportunity to ask numerous questions ranging from patient management during a crisis situation to
educational preparation of an acute care bedside nurse. The Collaborative experience further affords medical students the opportunity to establish
intravenous access and obtain arterial blood specimens utilizing ultrasound guidance. During periods of downtime, the critical care outreach nurse
reviews evidence-based unfolding case studies with the student that address interdisciplinary management of unstable, decompensating patients.
Following their experience with the critical care outreach nurse, medical students are asked to complete an electronic, anonymous survey.
Questions are answered using a numerical rating scale and with open response. Data collection began in May, 2017 and is ongoing with each
monthly cohort of medical students. Since the Medical Student Collaborative began in 2016, critical care outreach nurses and medical students
have shared over 500 hours of ICE.
Outcomes: Preliminary survey results indicate working with the critical care outreach nurse increases medical students’ confidence in the
recognition and management of decompensating patients while offering a better understanding of interdisciplinary communication as it pertains to
the continuum of care. Medical students report the experience was worth their time and it improved their understanding of how collaborative
teaching/learning experiences impact nurse and patient outcomes. They further indicate the experience increased their knowledge in establishing
intravenous access and obtaining arterial blood specimens. Individual comments include, “it helped me understand the responsibilities of nurses
and the functions of different ancillary staff in the hospital. I think it was a tremendous experience in fostering interdisciplinary understanding;”
“…it made me feel less timid to ask RNs about various thoughts/questions I have in the future. Specifically, I found it encouraging that my interest
in learning how to gain IV access, perform blood draws, learn how to care for port sites, learn how the monitors work in the room, and learn how
to position the bed for a code would be well-received;” and “I wish there were more sessions/opportunities for medical students to be involved
with learning about the day-to-day lives/activities of RNs. It would be helpful to see exactly what happens when we place orders in [the computer]
and then things are ‘magically’ completed (e.g. blood draws, accessing a port, initiating tube feeds, initiating IVF, etc.”
Conclusion: The outcomes of the Medical Student Collaborative demonstrate alignment with the core competencies defined by the
Interprofessional Education Collaborative (2016). Students speak of experiencing a respectful environment that facilitates interdisciplinary
understanding and delivery of patient-centered care. Through increased understanding of the nurse’s role, students identify how their
communication and actions directly affect patient care. Although the original intent of the Collaborative involved managing patients in high acuity
situations, the findings of this Collaborative thus far suggest that ICE facilitates effective clinical care in high acuity situations by establishing a
trusting environment that allows for open communication and interdisciplinary understanding. As the Collaborative continues to evolve it is
necessary to identify objective measures pertaining to short and long-term effects of ICE on patient, nurse, and medical student outcomes.
References
Aase, I., Hansen, B. S., & Aase, K. (2014). Norwegian nursing and medical students’ perception of interprofessional teamwork: A qualitative study.
BMC Medical Education, 14(170), 1-9.
Brown, S.S., Lindell, D.F., Dolansky, M.A., & Garber, J.S. (2015). Nurses’ professional values and attitudes toward collaboration with physicians.
Nursing Ethics, 22(2), 205-216.
Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2016). Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington, DC:
Interprofessional Education Collaborative.
Park, J., Hawkins, M., Hamlin, E., Hawkins, W., & Bamdas, J.M. (2014). Developing positive attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration among
students in the health care professions. Educational Gerontology, 40, 894-908.
Radoff, K., Natch, A., McConaughey, E., Salstrom, J., Schelling, K., & Seger, S. (2015). Midwives in medical student and resident education and the
development of the medical education caucus toolkit. Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health, 60(3), 304-312.
Shafran, D.M., Richardson, L., & Bonta, M. (2015). A novel interprofessional shadowing initiative for senior medical students. Medical Teacher, 37,
86-89.
Woermann, U., Weltsch, L., Kunz, A., Stricker, D., & Guttormsen, S. (2016). Attitude towards and readiness for interprofessional education and
nursing students of Bern. GMS Journal of Medical Education, 33(5), 1-20.
World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Retrieved from
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70185/1/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf?ua=1
Zwarenstein, M., Rice, K., Gotlib-Conn, L., Kenaszchukc, C., Reeves, S. (2013). Disengaged: A qualitative study of communication and collaboration
between physicians and other professions on general internal medicine wards. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 494. Doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-
13-494
Contact
[email protected]
Utilizing Standardized Patients and High-Fidelity Simulation to Promote Interdisciplinary Communication
Mary A. Grady, DNP, RN, CNE, CHSE, USA
Nanci M. Berman, MSN, RN, USA
Dawn E. Sgro, BSE, USA
Abstract
Changes in health care practices, patient outcomes, and advances in technology have brought about a radical need for restructuring
health care education. Individuals entering health careers today have been involved in the digital age since infancy. Traditional
teaching methods need to be augmented with today’s technology to accommodate the learning styles of this generation. Students
need to be taught in a way that will prepare them to perform in the changing health care environment.
Miscommunication has been linked to medical errors and in trauma situations these errors have an increased risk of becoming fatal. It is imperative
for patient safety that effective team communication occurs. Paramedic and nursing students alike require the ability to perform during stressful
situations from both the medical and psychological aspect of care.
Professors from the areas of Nursing and Emergency Medical Services hosted an interdisciplinary mass causality training exercise. The college
partnered with high school students who have identified interest in health professions, a local fire department and a local towing company to
create a realistic automobile accident with over 20 patients exhibiting multiple traumatic injuries. The simulation began when a driver, distracted
by texting, missed a stop sign and drove into a busy intersection, hitting several pedestrians and other motor vehicles in the process. Over 50
Paramedic and Nursing students participated in the exercise utilizing disaster management skills.
The event created an ongoing collaboration between disciplines at the college, and bridged the gap between practice and education through use of
simulation (high fidelity simulators and scripted patients), while offering innovative ways to teach our next generation of health care responders.
The interdisciplinary approach to education will be invaluable to the students and faculty as they gained knowledge of each discipline.
This study utilized standardized patients and high fidelity simulation to promote knowledge, skills, and attitudes of team structure, leadership,
situation monitoring, mutual support, and communication in a controlled setting during a disaster.
QSEN was used as a framework for the study which focused on teamwork/collaboration, patient-centered care, and safety. A test retest format
was performed utilizing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2017) TeamSTEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire along with a
post-simulation reflection paper identifying themes of participants’ attitudes.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (April 2017). Teamwork attitudes questionnaire[Questionnaire]. Retrieved from
https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/reference/teamattitude.html
Dolansky, M. A., & Moore, S. M. (2013, September). Quality and safety education for nursing (QSEN): The key is systems thinking. The Online
Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No03Man01
McCabe, D. E., Gilmartin, M. J., & Goldsamt, L. A. (2016, March 30). Student self-confidence with clinical nursing competencies in a high-dose
simulation clinical teaching model. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(8), 52-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n8p52
Raley, J., Meenakshi, R., Dent, D., Willis, R., Lawson, K., & Duzinski, S. (2017, January/February). The role of communication during trauma
activations: Investigating the need for team and leader communication training. Journal of Surgical Education, 74(1), 173-179.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.06.001
Shin, S., Park, J. H., & Kim, J. H. (2015, January). Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: Meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today,
35(1), 176-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009
Twenge, J. M. (2014). Generation me. New York, NY: Atria.
Wloszczak-Szubzda, A., Jarosz, M. J., & Goniewicz, M. (2013). Professional communication competencies of paramedics - practical and educational
perspectives. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 20(2), 366-372. Retrieved from http://www.aaem.pl/Professional-
communication-competences-of-paramedics-practical-and-educational-perspectives,71944,0,2.html
Contact
[email protected]
Pedagogical Strategy for Teaching Innovation and Business Concepts to Graduate Nursing Students
Elizabeth Moran Fitzgerald, EdD, MS, BSN, USA
David P. Hrabe, PhD, RN, USA
Daniel Weberg, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this descriptive study was to obtain student feedback on a newly designed class assignment in a graduate
nursing course. The research questions were:
1. How well did ILPA assist graduate nursing students in developing critical thinking and innovation skills?
2. How well did ILPA assist graduate nursing students in ethical decision-making and problem solving?
3. How well did ILPA assist graduate nursing students in developing their “soft” leadership skills?
4. How well did ILPA assist graduate nursing students in learning about innovation and business concepts relevant to their
current and future practice?
Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study used a 14-item online survey administered via Qualtrics after students have
completed ILPA. The Institutional Review Board at the researchers’ university approved the study.
Sample: Students from three sections of OSU College of Nursing’s N7403 Innovation Leadership in Advanced Nursing Practice were invited to
participate in the Qualtrics survey via class announcements in Canvas and email
Measurement/Instrumentation: The co-investigators developed the short survey displayed in Appendix A to obtain student responses to ILPA. No
validity or reliability data was available for this new instrument.
Qualtrics Survey Software was used to design an online survey. Qualtrics Survey is a hosted solution supported centrally at OSU by OCIO giving
administrators total control over the survey environment. Only OSU authenticated users can log in to create surveys or view the responses.
Additionally, the users can be assigned to roles so users can be authenticated for viewing or modifying survey questions or viewing the responses.
The Qualtrics system is secure and HIPAA/FERPA compliant approved.
Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics (e.g., mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency and percentage for categorical
variables) were our main analytic strategy to summarize sample characteristics and the distribution of the responses to each of the five point Likert
scale survey questions. We used bivariate tests (e.g., correlation coefficient and row mean score difference test) to examine the association
between survey responses and subject characteristics. Mean plots and bar charts will used to visually illustrate the study results. Cronbach’s alpha
will be used to test the reliability of the instrument.
References
American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: http://www.Nursesbooks.org.
de Freitas, S. & Routledge, H. (2013, November). Designing leadership and soft skills in educational games: The e-leadership and soft skills
educational games design model (ELESS). British Journal of Educational Technology, 44 (6), 951-968. Doi: 10.1111/bjet.1203-
Demarco, M., Lesser, E., & O’Driscoll, T. (2007). Leadership in a distributed world: Lessons from online gaming. IBM institute for Business Value.
Epstein, B., & Turner, M. (2015). Nursing code of ethics: Its value, its history. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 20(5). Retrieved from
http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-20-2015/No2-May-
2015/The-Nursing-Code-of-Ethics-Its-Value-Its-History.html.
Gilbertson, A., Morreim, P., Skelly, FC., & Stevenson, A. (2006, October 23). 10-minute leadership lessons. Presented at the National Conference of
the National Association of Extension 4-H Agents, Milwaukee, WI. Retrieved from:
https://wvde.state.wv.us/insite/files/Leadership%20Lessons.pdf
Lisk, T.C., Kaplancali, U.T., & RIggio, R.E. (2012). Leadership in Multiplayer Online Gaming Environments. Simulation & Gaming, 43(1), 133-
149. DOI: 10.1177/1046878110391975
Lynch, C. L., Wolcott, S.K., & Huber, G. E. (2001). Steps for Better Thinking: A Developmental Problem Solving Process [On-line]. Retrieved from:
http://www.WolcottLynch.com
Weberg, D., Braaten,J., & Geinas, L. (2013, April). Enhancing innovation skills: VHA Nursing leaders use creative approaches to inspire future
thinking. Nurse Leader, 11 (2), 32-35, 40. DOI: http://ex.doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2012.12.008
Contact
[email protected]
Implementation and Evaluation of a Journal Club for Acuity Adaptable Units
Jennifer L. Kitchens, MSN, RN, ACNS-BC, CVRN, USA
Margie A. Hull, MEd, MNS, LDE, ACNS-BC, CDE, RN, USA
Janet S. Fulton, PhD, RN, ACNS-BC, ANEF, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Background: Creating and sustaining a practice environment based on research and evidence is an essential requirement for
achieving Magnet, a designation signifying a highly professional nursing clinical setting awarded by the American Nurses
Credentialing Center. One strategy for bringing research to the bedside is Journal Club. Journal clubs have been shown to be an
effective, interactive strategy for increasing nurses’ knowledge of research and evidence. Journal clubs also provide opportunities for
experienced nurses to mentor newer nurses in a comfortable, informal setting. The Journal Club can be individualized to meet
unit/setting interests, making it a flexible format for contemporary and cutting-edge evidence for addressing current problems and
exploring new initiatives. There has been an ongoing evaluation of the Journal Club to determine its effectiveness over time. The
purpose was to implement and evaluate a Journal Club for general medical-surgical units.
Methods: Journal Club is held monthly at the same time and location with reminder notices and the feature article disseminated 1- month prior.
Facilitated by two Clinical Nurse Specialists, topics are determined by practice priorities and staff recommendations. The Journal Club is
implemented by: surveying for best time; maintaining consistent time and location; advertising; and inviting guest speakers. Guest discussants
provide provocative and in-depth discussion of a selected article. CNE credits are provided to nurses. The literature-based objectives of the Journal
Club were evaluated using a 15 - item survey administered to participants and two open-ended questions.
Results: Within the past 24 months, mean attendance per meeting was 7, range was 3 to 10. A total of 6/6 available participants completed the
survey. A 4-point Likert Scale was used with: 1= strongly disagree; 4= strongly agree (higher scores equaling higher satisfaction). The mean
satisfaction score was 3.7/4. For item 5, “I feel my overall knowledge about EBP/research has increased by attending Journal Clubs” the mean score
was 3.7/4. For the open-ended question, “Why do you choose to attend Journal Club?” the responses were: “great educational delivery model”; “I
love this way of learning”; it helps me to provide the best care for my patients” “the people and knowledge obtained”; and “to learn and keep
updated knowledge”. For the open-ended question, “What do you like about the Journal Club?” the response was “the topics are in just the right
time for the clinical uses which is very instrumental”.
Conclusions: Results indicate nurses’ satisfaction with Journal Club, and an increased attainment of overall knowledge about EBP/Research. The
effectiveness of Journal Clubs on supporting evidence-based clinical decision making is not clearly evident. A different approach is needed to
evaluate the impact of a Journal Club on use of EBP/Research in clinical practice.
References
Gardner Jr., K., Kanaskie, M.L., Knehans, A.C., Salisbury, S., Doeheny, K.K., & Schirm, V. (2016). Implementing and sustaining evidence-based
practice through a nursing journal club. Applied Nursing Research, 31, 139-145.
Laaksonen, C., Paltta, H., von Schwartz, M., YIA∏nen, M., Soini, T. (2013). Journal club as a method for nurses and nursing students’ collaborative
learning: a descriptive study. Health Science Journal, 7 (4), 285-292.
Nguyen, T.N.M., & Wilson, A. (2016). Hospital readiness for undertaking evidence-based practice: A survey. Nursing & Health Sciences, 18 (4),
465-472.
Tinkham, M.R. (2014). The value of research councils and journal clubs. AORN Journal, 100 (2), 206-209.
Wiggy, Z. (2012). Journal clubs can improve nurse involvement and patient care. AORN Connections, 96 (2), C5.
Contact
[email protected]
Partnering to Increase the BSN Prepared Workforce
Suzanne E. Zentz, DNP, RN, CNE, USA
Christina Cavinder, USA
Abstract
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2010) recommends 80% of the nursing workforce be prepared at the baccalaureate level by 2020.
To accomplish this goal, the IOM endorses partnerships between academic nurse leaders and employers. The Tricouncil of Nursing
(2010) further supports participation of employers in this initiative and stresses the inclusion of financial and professional incentives.
Researchers have identified multiple barriers for nurses returning to complete their baccalaureate degrees. These barriers include
(a) lack of time due to family commitments and work, (b) cost of secondary education, (c) fears related to returning to school, and
(d) concern about technological changes in academia (Conner & Thielemann, 2013; Duffy et al., 2014; Sportmann & Allen, 2011).
Academic leaders and employers must address these barriers in collaboration to move the nursing workforce towards completion of
this goal.
In early 2016, nurse administrators from a local healthcare system approached nursing faculty from an established nursing program
to begin a collaboration aimed at facilitating BSN completion of their nurses. Since degree status of RNs employed within the
healthcare system had not be tracked, their percentage of BSN prepared nurses within the system was unknown. Thus, a needs
survey was developed that included demographic information, preferences, and perceived barriers to degree completion. The
survey was distributed via the hospital email system to all registered nurses employed by the healthcare system (N=887). Two
hundred eighty-six nurses completed the survey for a response rate of 32%. Demographic data revealed that the average nurse was
female (91.6%), more than 40 years of age, and white (94.4%) with more than 15 years experience as a nurse. Only 45% of nurses
were prepared at the BSN level or higher. The majority of nurses (51.7%) completed their associate degree in nursing more than ten
years ago. Additionally, 58.5% of nurses stated they had a moderate to very strong interest in completing a BSN degree. Top barriers
identified by nurses included cost, time commitment, family responsibilities, and work schedule. Using these data as a basis, an RN-
BSN completion program was designed.
Survey data emphasized that a fair amount of nurses within the system were older and had been out of school for a number of
years. Comments from the survey reinforced that many were fearful of going back to school due to limited exposure to computers
and online formats. With these factors in mind, support components that included implementing preparatory classes prior to
beginning the program, assigning a designated program advisor, providing onsite classes, and using a cohort model where students
progress with the support of peers were included. Due to their eligibility for tuition reimbursement benefits, fulltime working nurses
were the target audience for the program; therefore, the program design includes a part time plan of study with two classes per
term over an 18 month period. A hybrid class format with alternating face to face onsite classes and online coursework was adopted
as it offers increased flexibility in scheduling, but also provides students with opportunities for interactions with peers and faculty.
Recruitment of nurses began in spring of 2016 for the fall 2017 cohort. Multiple general information sessions, transcript reviews, an
application open house, and participation in the hospital’s education fair resulted in attracting over 60 prospective RN-BSN students.
Since completion of prerequisite courses prior to beginning the cohort is desirable, early identification of additional prospective
students is essential as time may be needed for them to complete prerequisite coursework. This aspect of early identification and
planning for cohort entry has proven to be a major challenge as much time and energy must be used to continually track student
progress prior to entry into the cohort.
Currently, admission of the first cohort is underway. Creation of a revenue model revealed that a modest group of eight students
could be self-sustaining, thus this is the target number of participants for the initial cohort. Continual collaboration between nursing
faculty and nurse administrators has been essential in recruiting the initial cohort. Also, the university admissions department and
healthcare system’s human resources department have provided crucial support.
Evaluation of the program will be accomplished through tracking of student retention and program completion. Participants will also
complete exit surveys addressing effectiveness of preparatory classes, program advisor, plan of study, class format, and program
cost. Data derived from these sources will be used to revise the program as indicated.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2012). AACN-AONE task force on academic-practice partnerships. Guiding priniciples. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/leading-initiatives/academic-practice-partnerships/GuidingPrinciples.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2015). Creating a more highly qualified nursing workforce. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/fact-sheets/nursing-workforce
Conner, N. E., & Thielemann, P. A. (2013). RN-BSN completion programs: Equipping nurses for the future. Nursing Outlook, 61, 458-465. doi:
10.1016/j.outlook.2013.03.003
Duffy, M. T., Friesen, M. A., Speroni, K. G., Swengros, D., Shanks, L. A., Waiter, P. A., & Sheridan, M. J. (2014). BSN completion barriers, challenges,
incentives, and strategies. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 44(4), 232-236, doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000054
Sportsman, S., & Allen, P. (2011). Transitioning associate degree in nursing students to the bachelor of science in nursing and beyond: A mandate
for academic partnerships. Journal of Professional Nursing 27(6), e20-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.08.004
Tri-council for Nursing. (2010). Educational advancement of registered nurses: A consensus position. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/educationresources/TricouncilEdStatement.pdf
Contact
[email protected]
Differences in Debriefing Practices in Nursing Education: Instructor-Led and Peer-Led
Jessica L. Bower, USA
Abstract
Simulation is utilized in many trades to provide a safe learning environment. Healthcare has adopted simulation training as a safe
learning tool to allow students to practice skills and prepare for situations in the clinical setting. Simulation has been shown to be
effective in eliciting problem-solving skills, critical-thinking skills, and team collaboration. Debriefing is one of the most important
learning practices and takes place after the simulation is completed to stimulate further learning and reflection for the participant to
gather feedback on their performance. The piece of simulation education that appears to be lacking is the research in debriefing
techniques. The clinical significance is that, in nursing and in all of academia, all activities must be geared toward optimizing student
learning outcomes (SLOs). Since the incorporation of simulation into nursing education is a relatively new practice, there isn’t ample
evidence that supports whether one debriefing method is more effective than another. There has been some research that explores
instructor-led debriefing but there is inadequate information about peer-led debriefing (Waznonis, 2016, Dufrene, 2013). A small
amount of research supports that peer-led reflection engages students in their own learning process and instills a sense of
responsibility in knowledge acquisition (Spiller, 2012). Purpose: This project will explore the differences in debriefing between
instructor-led and peer-led techniques. Method: A group of students will participate in a simulation scenario and then debrief with
an instructor and then the same group will participate in another scenario and debrief through a peer-led group discussion. There
will be a total of 30 students in the course who will be asked to participate and the students will take part in the simulation scenarios
one day a week in groups of five to six students. The data collection will take place over five to six weeks. Results: Satisfaction with
debriefing will be evaluated using the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) questionnaire. The results will be
calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Conclusions: to be determined later. Projected completion date of this project is August
2017.
References
Brett-Fleegler, M., Rudolph, J., Eppich, W., Monuteaux, M., Fleegler, E., Cheng, A., & Simon, R. (2012). Debriefing assessment for simulation in
healthcare: Development and psychometric properties. Simul Healthc. Oct 2012; 7 (5): 288-294. PMID: 22902606.
Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Grant, V., Sherbino, J., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D.A. (2014). Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Medical Education, 48, 657-666.
Dreifuerst, K.T. (2009). The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: A concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 109-114.
Dreifuerst, K.T. (2012). Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. Journal of Nursing
Education, 51(6), 326-333.
Dufrene, C. (2013). Testing the effectiveness of peer facilitated debriefing following high fidelity simulation (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Texas Woman’s University.
Dufrene, C., & Young, A. (2013). Successful debriefing - best methods to achieve positive learning outcomes: A literature review. Nurse Ed Today,
34 (2014), 372-376.
Fey, M.K. & Jenkins, L.S. (2015). Debriefing practices in nursing education programs: Results from a national study. Nursing Education Perspectives,
36(6), 361-366.
Forneris, S.G., Neal, D.O., Tiffany, J., Kuehn, M.B., Meyer, H.M., Blazovich, L.M., Holland, A.E., & Smerillo, M. (2015). Enhancing clinical reasoning
through simulation debriefing: A multi-site study. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(6), 304-310.
Grant, J.S., Dawkins, D., Molhook, L., Keltner, N.L., & Vance, D.E. (2014). Comparing the effectiveness of video-assisted oral debriefing and oral
debriefing alone on behaviors by undergraduate nursing students during high-fidelity simulation. Nurse Education in Practice, 14, 479-484.
Hayden, J.K., Smiley, R.A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P.R. (2014). Supplement: The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A
5(2), C1-S64.
Lopreiato, J. O. (Ed.), Downing, D., Gammon, W., Lioce, L., Sittner, B., Slot, V., Spain, A. E. (Associate Eds.), and the Terminology & Concepts Working
Group. (2016). Healthcare Simulation Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.ssih.org/dictionary
International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. (2013). Standards of best practice: Simulation. Retrieved from
http://www.inacsl.org/files/journal/Complete%202013%20Standards.pdf
Mariani, B., Cantrell, M.A., & Meakim, C. (2014). Nurse educators’ perceptions about structured debriefing in clinical simulation. Nursing
McCallum, J. (2007). The debate in favour of using simulation education in pre-registration adult nursing. Nurse Educ Today 27(8):825-31.
Merriam-Webster (n.d.). Instructor. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/instructor
Merriam-Webster (n.d.). Peer. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/peer
Musselwhite, C. & Plouffe, T. (2010). Four ways to know whether you are ready for a change. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from
https://hbr.org/2010/06/four-ways-to-know-whether-you
National League for Nursing (2015). News release: NLN/Jeffries simulation theory monograph | Vol. 3 Innovations Series. Retrieved from
http://www.nln.org/newsroom/news-releases/news-release/2015/09/21/meet-the-authors-at-education-summit-in-las-vegas-sept.-30-oct.-2
National League for Nursing. 2015. Simulation design template. Adapted from Child, Sepples, Chambers (2007). Designing simulations for nursing
education. In P.R. Jeffries (Ed.) Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation (p 42-58).Washington, DC: National League
for Nursing.
Newman, R. (2009). How Sullenberger really saved US Airways Flight 1549. US News & World Report, February 3, 2009. Retrieved from
http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/flowchart/2009/02/03/how-sullenberger-really-saved-us-airways-flight-1549
Paige, J.T., Arora, S., Fernandez, G., & Seymour, N. (2015). Debriefing 101: training faculty to promote learning in simulation- based training. The
American Journal of Surgery, 209, 126-131.
Simon R, Raemer DB, Rudolph JW. Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH)© – Student Version, Long Form. Center for Medical
Simulation, Boston, Massachusetts. https://harvardmedsim.org/_media/DASH.SV.Long.2010.Final.pdf. 2010.
Spiller, D. (2012). Assessment matters: Self assessment & peer assessment. Teaching Development: Wāhanga Whakapakari Ako. New Zealand.
Waznonis, A.R. (2014). Methods and evaluations for simulation debriefing in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(8), 459-465.
Waznonis, A. R. (2016). Faculty descriptions of simulation debriefing in traditional baccalaureate nursing programs. Nursing Education
Perspectives, 37(5) 262-267.
Contact
[email protected]
Enhancing Quality of Life of Cancer Survivors: Incorporating Survivorship Care Plan in Nursing Education
Reyzel Anne Altre, SN, USA
Fang-yu Chou, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: This number of cancer survivors is expected to rise to up to 18 million by 2022. The large number of cancer survivors
and the long periods of survivorship pose challenge to the current health system in advancing quality transition care (McCabe et al.,
2013). Cancer survivors are at higher risk for morbidity and premature mortality associated directly to the cancer itself, pre-existing
morbidities, and to exposure to therapy. During the transition from active treatment to post-treatment care, cancer survivors may
be left lacking the knowledge, resources, or skills that are necessary to manage the long-term effects of their disease and treatment
(Hauken et al., 2015; Irwin et al., 2011). In order to reduce the challenges of cancer survivorship, the Institute of Medicine (IOM)
recommends the use of survivorship care plan (SCP). SCP can help coordinate clinicians to manage long-term survivorship care (Salz
et al., 2012). Nurses are on the front line of patient care and promoting health and disease prevention are their top priorities. It is of
utmost importance that nurses who provide survivorship care enhance their knowledge and skills and advocate for and identify new
ways to meet the needs of survivors as these are crucial in the care, research, and program development (Grant et al., 2012).
Purpose: The purpose of this project is to propose an evidence-based educational plan to incorporate the concept and framework of
the Survivorship Care Plan in the nursing education curriculum. Method: A literature review was conducted that supported the use
of survivorship care plans and tailored education along with the creation of a multidisciplinary team that will help ensure
maintenance of the plan in the healthcare organization. The concept and framework of Survivorship Care Plan, elements of SCP, and
current evidence-based practice of survivorship care plan will be introduced in the nursing courses. We propose these contents are
incorporated in the Medical-Surgical Nursing courses for undergraduate nursing students and in the Advanced Pathophysiology
courses for graduate nursing students. The educational strategies will include a brief lecture, review of best practices, and discussion
with a case study. We aim to implement the educational plan in 2018. Evaluation: Evaluation method will include a quiz and a
clinical observation journal. Implication: Over the past several decades the number of cancer survivors has increased considerably as
a result of improved early detection of first malignancies and effective therapies (McCabe et al., 2013). Cancer survivorship care has
emerged as a significant component of oncology care. A quality transition care can optimize the quality of life of cancer survivors. It
is imperative to incorporate the concept and current evidence of Survivorship Care Plan in the early stage of nursing education so we
can prepare the future nursing workforce in cancer care.
References
Grant, M., Economou, D., Ferrell, B., & Uman, G. (2012). Educating health care professionals to provide institutional changes in cancer survivorship
care. Journal of Cancer Education, 27(2), 226-232. doi:10.1007/s13187-012-0314-7
Hauken, M. A., Holsen, I., Fismen, E., & Larsen, T. M. B. (2015). Working toward a good life as a cancer survivor: a longitudinal study on positive
health outcomes of a rehabilitation program for young adult cancer survivors. Cancer nursing, 38(1), 3. Doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000138
Irwin, M., Klemp, J. R., Glennon, C., & Frazier, L. M. (2011). Oncology nurses’ perspectives on the state of cancer survivorship care: Current practice
and barriers to implementation. In Oncology nursing forum (Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. E11-E19). doi:10.1188/11.ONF
McCabe, M. S., Bhatia, S., Oeffinger, K. C., Reaman, G. H., Tyne, C., Wollins, D. S., … Hudson, M. M. (2013). American Society of Clinical Oncology
statement: achieving high-quality cancer survivorship care. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(5), 631-640. Doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.6854
Salz, T., Oeffinger, K. C., McCabe, M. S., Layne, T. M., & Bach, P. B. (2012). Survivorship care plans in research and practice. CA: a cancer journal for
clinicians, 62(2), 101-117. Doi: 10.3322/caac.20142
Contact
[email protected]
Grounded Theory Study of Family Happiness Among People Who Live in Urban Community in Bangkok
Wilai Napa, PhD, Thailand
Abstract
The happiness is important aspiration of all human-being. Accordingly, the happiness indicator strikes researchers to investigate how
it impacts heath or enhance people to maintain their happiness. United Nation reported that Thailand was rank 36 of 156 countries
by happiness index. In addition, the Department of Mental Health, Thailand surveyed among people aged 15 and more, found that
25-59 years was more happiness than others group. The previous study found that habitat, age, education predicted the happiness.
Also, the spending time together, caring to each other, relationships, and family satisfaction predict the family happiness among the
adolescent to old group. Nevertheless, the gap to fill that how family relationship or interaction relating to family happiness are still
vague. Therefore, this study aimed at exploring the family happiness process by applying grounded theory based upon family
members’ perspectives. After granting IRB from Faculty Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, the researchers asked permission from
participants who live in Urban Community near Ramathibodi Hospital to participate in research. This community located at center of
Bangkok, Thailand and the dwellers mostly received universal coverage for health expenditure. The participants included 13 family
members and were interviewed about 30 minutes-1 hours. The researchers used Strauss and Corbin method for the data analysis
and this simultaneously occurred when collecting data until achieving data saturation. The researcher team discussion to gain
agreement for categories emerging from the data. Then the categories and sub-categories were bring to participants to gain
credibility as member checking.
The results shown the participants described the meaning of family happiness was to live together, care to each other, and not to have money
problem. Accordingly, the core category reflecting family happiness named living together without money problem explain how family members be
happy. This consists of four stages: 1) being close connection, 2) caring to each other, 3) being steady of finance, and 4) sense of community
integration. These occurred along with coping the participants used when faced stress situation. Stage 1, the participants described that the family
members were close connection by spending time together and talking friendly to each other. They also expressed that martial relationship is
important to maintain good connection among them. They necessarily made a good conversation such as not argument one another for good
family atmosphere. This might indicate that the family relationship and atmosphere are significant in family happiness in the first stage. The caring
to each other found in the second stage. The participants mostly described that the family members have to share physical and emotional strain,
understand other’s situation, and replacing other’s duty as a family member. The participants expressed that they help one another to take care of
sick member, give encouragement if need. Furthermore, they protect dangers for family members especially, teaching their children to protect
themselves from drug abuse.
In third stage, being steady of finance: the participants said that the family happiness depended on how they balance between income and
expense. The majority of participants were low-middle class of social economic status. Moreover, they prioritized the financial problem that
influence the family happiness. They described that it was necessarily to manage money to balance each month by saving money and planning
ahead for future expenditure. In the fourth stage, sense of community integration: the participants expressed that they conformed themselves to
fit in the community by giving souvenir to neighbors, joining social activities, and giving suggestion to key persons in the community. Consequently,
the participants acquainted to each other. Sometimes they asked for help from neighbors. These two stages of family happiness might indicate the
social determinant factor influencing family happiness.
In conclusion, the family happiness was dynamic process that can be up and down magnitude of happiness. It was not stable based upon the
coping methods the family members used. The participants mostly used adaptive copping to deal with stress when over time. The first-two stage
represent the family relationship, atmosphere, and caring among family members that can impact on family happiness. Another two stages reflect
social determinant factors that also invade in family happiness. Understanding of the family happiness process can assist to develop intervention to
enhance people living with family gaining optimal happiness as possible. Accordingly this can guide nurses to develop nursing practice curriculum
for family nurse practitioner.
References
Department of Mental Health, Thailand. (2013). Surveying of Thais happiness. -. Retrieved 2, May, 2016
Gray, R. S., Chamratrithirong, A, Pattaravanich, U., & Prasartkul, P. (2013). Happiness among adolescent students in Thailand: family and non-family
factors. Social Indicators Research, 110(-), 703-719.
Helliwell, J. F. & Wang, S. (2013). World happiness: trends, explanations and distribution. World happiness report. Retrieved 2, May, 2016
Kramanon, R., & Gray, R.S. (2015). Differentials in happiness among the young old, the middle old and the very old in Thailand. Journal of
Population and Social Studies, 23(2), 180-192.
Senasu, K. & Singhapakdi, A. (2014). Happiness in Thailand: the effects of family, health and job satisfaction, and the moderating role of gender. In -
(Ed.), No.76. -: JICA Research Institute.
Contact
[email protected]
A Collaboration Challenge: Improving Processes for Immersion Experiences in BSN Programs
Lisa E. Guthrie, MSN, RN-BC, CMSRN, USA
Abstract
The culmination of the BSN nursing student’s clinical experience is the immersion experience. In a Midwestern region of the US, the numbers of
student placements for immersion experiences has been growing to meet the demand for nurses. Each of these students requires a preceptor. An
established cooperative group of nursing school and clinical site representatives determined to collaborate to find more preceptors. The group
identified a task force of their peers with equal representation from schools and clinical sites. This Task Force developed ground rules of respect
and transparency as they deliberated their purpose and plans.
Preliminary meetings were focused on identifying the barriers experienced by both the schools and the clinical sites in finding preceptors. Three
areas were identified within the realm of influence of this group:
1. The scheduling process: coordinating the preceptor and student schedules

2. Faculty involvement
3. The evaluation tool for the immersion experience
The problems identified in these three areas are summarized below:

SCHEDULING: Issues with scheduling were separated into three groups: school issues, student issues, and preceptor/clinical site issues
The school determined the numbers of hours required, the timeframe within which the hours must be completed, and the scheduling of conflicting
classes/events. Each of these impacted the scheduling process. The student issues included conflicts in their schedule from a variety of activities,
anxiety related to communication, and the pressure of scheduling all their shifts. The clinical site and preceptors were required to work around the
school’s schedule, meeting the clinical hours required by each school. The preceptor was in high demand both for students and new hires. The
preceptor work schedules were often created up to eight weeks before being contacted by the student.
FACULTY: Faculty involvement varied among the schools represented. There was not a standard of engagement or of numbers of site visits
required during the immersion experience. The communication with the students and preceptors both in quality and quantity was also varied.
Some schools provided very structured plans for faculty while others did not. The evaluation involvement by the faculty and preceptor was also not
standardized among the schools.
EVALUATION: Each school provided their objectives and written instructions to the preceptor based upon their approved curriculum. Again, these
were not standardized, having between 5 and 14 objectives which the preceptor and student were expected to meet. The instructions given the
preceptors came from the faculty, the school, and/or the students.
The Task Force presented their recommendations in phases. Report out was given firstly to the larger collaborative group. Once approved, the
recommendations were placed before the executive clinical leader group and the executive educational leader group for approval. Each of the
recommendations were approved and were then implemented as a trial at a large academic medical center.
The recommendations included standardization in all three areas:
SCHEDULING: Once sites were approved, the student would contact the preceptor with the expectation of following the preceptor’s schedule.
Conflicts in the student’s schedule were first reviewed by the school then if necessary, the school would request an additional preceptor. This
eliminated students and faculty soliciting preceptors, and attempting to accommodate the student’s schedule rather than the preceptor’s
schedule. If a conflict arose because of a preceptor absence, the clinical site would locate a substitute preceptor.
FACULTY: Faculty attended an orientation to the clinical setting, its policies and procedures related to student immersion experiences, and to the
tools/ guidelines developed with associated expectations. Faculty contact information was collected and provided directly to the clinical site and
the preceptor. Expectations to engage the preceptor, student, and preceptor-student dyad during rounds a minimum of 1-2 times/40-50 hours of
clinical were made clear.
EVALUATION: An evaluation tool was created, based upon the BSN Essentials (2008) listing four goals with supporting competency statements. A
Likert scale was developed using a DASI scale: Dependent-Assisted-Supervised-Independent.
These processes will be implemented city-wide this fall and evaluations collected from students, faculty and preceptors. Evaluations from the pilot
are still being processed and will inform the work going forward, in a continuous improvement process.
References
• American Associatin of Colleges of Nursing (2008b). Revision of the essentials of baccalaureate educatin for professional nursing practice.
Washington, DC: Author.
• NLN releases A vision for interprofessional collaboration in education and practice. (2016). Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(1), 58. doi:
http://dx.doi.org.proxy.library.umkc.edu/10.1097/01.NEP.0000476111.94472.a6
• Gaines, B. C., & Spencer, A. G. (2013). Developing the Oregon Consortium for Nursing Education: The Back Story. Journal of professional
nursing, 29(4), 197-202.
• Hallin, K., & Danielson, E. (2009). Being a personal preceptor for nursing students: Registered Nurses' experiences before and after
introduction of a preceptor model. Journal of advanced nursing, 65(1), 161.
• Hilli, Y., Melender, H.-L., Salmu, M., & Jonsen, E. (2014). Being a preceptor. Nurse education today, 34(12), 1420.
Contact
[email protected]
Benefits of Collaborative Practice Partnership: A Capstone Experience in the Perioperative Settings
Deborah Ambrosio Mawhirter, EdD, RN, USA
Theresa M. Criscitelli, EdD, RN, CNOR, USA
Abstract
The nursing practice workforce in the United States is changing and projections are predicting little to no growth over the next decade. This creates
challenges when trying to recruit nurses to specialized practice setting, but it becomes especially difficult when recruiting specialty areas such as in
the operating room. Most baccalaureate nursing education programs have little exposure to the perioperative area. As nursing leaders
collaborated, an innovative educational program was developed between a College of Nursing and a Magnet Hospital to serve as an academic-
service partnership to provide a potential workforce for this practice setting. The program allows students to work in a complex and technologically
advanced area, gain familiarity in the operating room culture, acquire knowledge, critical thinking skills, and gaining confidence to transition into
the role of the perioperative nurse.
The internship program provides student growth opportunity to determine if the student is a good-fit for the Perioperative environment yielding
institutional cost saving related to orientation. This academic-service partnership, based upon a curriculum and objectives have been replicated
over the past two years with 21 students. Each student paired with an expert clinician in the operating room. Goals are clearly set forth and
monitored through reflective logs and competencies. Using a rubric, evaluations were completed by the student, preceptor, and faculty member.
This triad formatively evaluated the experience and formative feedback was provided throughout the semester.
This unique 200 hour Perioperative internship demonstrated the shared vision and collaborative relationship between academia and practice. A
formalize relationship has been developed to meet the students’ educational needs and the practice setting needs leading to employment and
admittance into an OR fellowship for graduate nurses. This program has yielded successful hiring and retention of new graduate nurses entering
the Perioperative fellowship program with an approximate institutional orientation cost saving of greater than 100,000 dollars.
As partners, the college and hospital are committed to developing the potential of each student nurse to benefit the nursing profession and
provide nursing excellence. There is a harmonious sharing of knowledge, a culture of trust between partners, working collaboratively to develop
and implement the program in order to educate future nurses with a smooth transition in the perioperative area.
References
Ball, K., Doyle, D., & Oocumma, N. I. (2015). Nursing shortages in the OR: Solutions for new models of education. AORN Journal, 101(1), 115-136.
Byrd, D., Mullen, L., Renfro, D., & Harris, T. A. (2015). Implementing a perioperative RN training program for recent graduates. AORN Journal,
102(3), 236-240.
Chappy, S., Madigan, P. D., Doyle, D. S., Conradt, L. A., & Tapio, N. C. (2016). Preparing the next generation of perioperative nurses.AORN Journal,
103(1), 104.e1- 104.e7.
Gorgone, P. D., Arsenault, L., Milliman-Richard, Y. J., & Lajoie, D. L. (2016). Development of a new graduate perioperative nursing program at an
urban pediatric institution. AORN Journal, 104(1), 23-29.
Penprase, B., Monahan, J., Poly-Droulard, L., & Prechowski, S. (2016). Student immersion in perioperative nursing. AORN Journal, 103(2), 189-197.
Contact
[email protected]
The Future of Nursing Education: Multidisciplinary Community-Engaged Research for Undergraduate
Nursing Students
Jessica A. Devido, PhD, CPNP, USA
Cathleen J. Appelt, PhD, USA
Andrew T. Simpson, PhD, USA
Nicole A. Szalla, BSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: An aging population, coupled with increased demands for access to care, are taxing the US healthcare system and
helping to create shortages of health professionals, including Registered Nurses (RNs) (American Association of Colleges of Nursing
[AACN], 2017; Jurascheck, Zhang, Ranganathan, & Lin, 2012). Further exacerbating the problem, the number of nursing faculty
anticipated to retire is expected to rapidly increase in the next decade (AACN, 2017).
The Institute of Medicine has found that nursing schools need to double the number of individuals who are doctorally prepared to create an
adequate pipeline of RNs (Institute of Medicine [IOM], 2010). In order to meet the growing need for doctorally prepared nursing faculty, nurses
must be encouraged and supported to pursue the PhD. Programs aimed at increasing interest, preparation, and experience in nursing research
have facilitated increased interest in graduate programs (Burkhart & Hall, 2015) and an increased number of undergraduate nursing students go on
to pursue doctoral education (Mentes, Cadogan, Woods, & Phillips, 2015). However, undergraduate nursing students often find the components of
research taught in traditional classes difficult and hard to grasp (Niven, Roy, Schaefer, Gasquoine, & Ward, 2013).
Hands-on research experiences can give undergraduate nursing students an opportunity to engage in interdisciplinary learning opportunities
(Slattery et al., 2016). For example, an interdisciplinary undergraduate program in health promotion research that included mentors and mentees
from both the biological and social sciences demonstrated high levels of student engagement and positive attitudes about interdisciplinary
approaches (Misra et al., 2008). To our knowledge, no such multidisciplinary program has been developed with nursing students while also taking a
community-engaged approach. Community-engaged research and learning, when combined with nursing education and practice, can provide
additional benefits to nursing students. Students are able to encounter important relevant topics they might not have had the opportunity to
experience in other clinical settings including: cultural-relevance, social justice issues, and community partnerships (Francis-Baldesari & Williamson,
2008). By exposing undergraduate nursing students to social science and historical methodologies, we hope to encourage undergraduate nursing
students to approach communities in new ways with increased sensitivity for historical and cultural barriers that may shape disparate health
outcomes.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the student experience and educational impacts of a year-long multidisciplinary mentored
community-engaged research experience on undergraduate nursing students’ learning, professional development, cultural sensitivity, and career
goals.
Specific Aims:
1) To explore students’ overall experiences with the community-engaged research process.
2) To assess ways in which their involvement in community-engaged research and the community affected the ways in which they think about
individual health and the broader social context in which it is shaped.
3) To assess how exposure to multidisciplinary, community-engaged research at the bachelor’s level may have encouraged the students to pursue
graduate study in nursing.
4) To explore whether diversifying the research experience to include community engagement and and multidisciplinary mentoring increases,
among BSN graduates, cultural sensitivity and/or a desire to work in underserved communities.
Design: This is a qualitative, exploratory study design, based on semi-structured interviews conducted with undergraduate nursing students.
Student participants were involved in a year-long multidisciplinary mentored research experience based in a local African-American community.
Mentored research experience: The sample includes seven third-year, undergraduate BSN students, former students of the first author, who
expressed interest in involvement in maternal-child health research projects. The students participated in a mentored research experience with
two community-engaged research projects focused on maternal-child health over the course of one year. The students were trained in social
science research methods including semi-structured interviewing and survey data collection. The students were then involved in every stage of the
project including: initiating the informed consent process with participants, conducting qualitative interviews, collecting survey data, analyzing
data, and dissemination of results through presentation of research findings in poster format at two conferences. Therefore, the students were
introduced to a community-engaged multidisciplinary project. In addition to being involved in the research process, they also spent time in the
local community and were able to see firsthand how health and health inequities are manifested, providing them with an opportunity to see the
social determinants of health at work.
Methods: Data collection will include a brief interviewer-administered questionnaire to assess sociodemograhic information. Individual interviews
using a semi-structured interview guide will be used to explore student’s experiences, attitudes, and future career goals. A trained graduate
student will collect and de-identify data for the investigators. The interviews will be digitally recorded. Verbatim transcription of audio recordings
will be conducted by members of the research team.
Planned Analyses: Participant’s responses to the brief questionnaire will be entered into a spreadsheet and summarized. A constant comparative
method (Strauss & Corbin, 1990) will be used to identify emergent themes relevant to students’ overall experiences and their conceptions
regarding social determinants of health (Aims One and Two). Qualitative content analysis (Elo & Kynga, 2008) will be used to assess students’
responses regarding future educational goals and desired practice settings (Aims Three and Four). This work is in progress. Data collection and
analyses are anticipated to be completed by October, 2017.
Implications for Education: Results may help future efforts to foster student engagement in research and increase nursing student interest in
pursuing doctoral degrees. Participation in multidisciplinary community-engaged research experiences may have the potential to stimulate interest
in graduate nursing program enrollment. Encouraging students to approach communities in new ways with increased sensitivity for historical and
cultural barriers that may shape divergent health outcomes is critical. This approach may be an important and effective strategy for improved
patient care, reduction of health disparities via culturally sensitive care, and increase numbers of nursing faculty to keep up with demand.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2017). Nursing faculty shortage. Retrieved from: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/fact-
sheets/nursing-faculty-shortage
Burkhart, P., & Hall, L. (2015). Developing the next generation of nurse scientists. Nurse Educator, 40(3), 160-162.
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
Francis-Baldesari, C., & Williamson, D. (2008). Integration of nursing education, practice, and research through community partnerships: A case
study. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(4), E1-E10.
Institute of Medicine. (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. National Academies Press, Washington DC. Retrieved from
http://thefutureofnursing.org
Jurascheck, S., Zhang, X., Ranganathan, V., & Lin, V. (2012). United States registered nurse workforce report card and shortage forecast. American
Journal of Medical Quality, 27(3), 241-249.
Mentes, J., Cadogn, M., Woods, L., & Philllips, L. (2015). Evaluation of the nurses caring for older adults young scholars program. Gerontologist,
55(Suppl 1), S165-S173.
Misra, S., Harvey, R., Stokols, D., Pine, K., Fuqua, J., Shokair, S., & Whiteley, J. (2008). Evaluating an interdisciplinary undergraduate training
program in health promotion research. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 36(4), 358-365.
Niven, E., Roy, D., Schaefer, B., Gasquoine, S., & Ward, F. (2013). Making research real: Embedding a longitudinal study in a taught research course
for undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 33(1), 64-68.
Slattery, M., Logan, B., Mudge, B., Secore, K., von Reyn, L., & Maue, R. (2016). An Undergraduate research fellowship program to prepare nursing
students for future workforce roles. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(6), 412-420.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded Theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Contact
[email protected]
Doctoral Nursing Graduates Lived Experience of a Virtual Mentoring Program and Building Upon the
Mentoring
Susan Welch, EdD, RN, CCRN, CNE, USA
Susan Clement, MSN, USA
Abstract
Faculty mentoring of doctoral nursing students is at a critical juncture, as a lack of mentors and experienced researchers exist to
assist the next generation of doctorally prepared nurse educators (Lach et al., 2013; Lasater et al., 2014; Maritz & Roets, 2013; Rand
& Pajarillo, 2015; Welch, 2017). This lack of mentors and experienced researchers is due to the increased number of experienced
nurse educators retiring and a decreased number of nurses pursuing graduate and doctoral degrees in nursing education (Lach et al.,
2013; Lasater et al., 2014; Maritz & Roets, 2013; Rand & Pajarillo, 2015; Welch, 2017). This shortfall of researchers to prepare the
next generation of nurse education, nationally as well as at “home institutions,” is happening simultaneously with the growth of
doctoral programs in nursing, resulting in an increased demand on a limited number of nurse researchers and mentors (Lach et al.,
2013; Maritz & Roets, 2013; Welch, 2017).
The future research of doctorally prepared nurse educators is one of the most important factors that will affect the production of nursing
education knowledge (Maritz & Roets, 2013; Welch, 2017). Therefore, a renewed and robust focus on mentoring within doctoral nursing education
is needed to support not only doctorally prepared nurse educators but also the quality of future research in nursing education. This renewed and
robust approach to mentoring in doctoral nursing education may include virtual mentoring. Virtual mentoring is a structured relationship between
an experienced and novice individual in which the mentoring takes place through the utilization of technology as a means to add value to the lives
of those involved (Clement, 2014; Maritz & Roets, 2013; Welch, 2017).
Research regarding virtual mentoring has primarily been done in disciplines outside of nursing while a dearth of virtual mentoring research findings
exists in nursing education (Maritz & Roets, 2013; Nowell, White, Mrklas, & Norris, 2015; Rand & Pajarillo, 2015; Welch, 2017). Especially, in
relation to the virtual mentoring support offered to doctoral nursing students (Lasater, 2014; Maritz & Roets, 2013; Welch, 2017), and how
graduates build upon the mentoring experience. Therefore, there is a need for future research on the lived experiences of doctoral nursing
graduates who participated within a virtual mentoring program and how the graduates build upon the mentoring experience. The purpose of this
study is to explore the lived experiences of doctoral nursing graduates who participated within a virtual mentoring program.
The doctoral graduate’s lived experience of participating in a virtual mentoring program is one way to explore the virtual mentoring environment.
Mentoring doctoral nursing students is an important aspect to assist in their development as future scholars (Lach et al., 2013: Maritz & Roets,
2013). With the lack of mentors and researchers at home institutions to assist the next generation of doctorally prepared nurse educators (Lach, et
al. 2013; Maritz & Roets, 2013; Rand & Pajarillo, 2015), virtual mentoring may assist in the creation of a more robust mentoring environment.
Therefore, to investigate the doctoral graduate experience may assist in providing insight regarding their experiences within a formal virtual
mentoring program.
A descriptive phenomenological plan using Husserl’s (1970) approach will guide this research as this approach is an appropriate methodology to
illustrate virtual mentoring as a lived experience in a subjective manner. The study will be conducted utilizing a doctoral nursing education program
in nursing education at a university in the southeastern portion of the United States. Graduates who have participated within a virtual mentoring
program will be invited to participate in this study. Methodological rigor will be obtained by following established guidelines of Lincoln and Guba
(1985) and data analysis for the study will follow Colaizzi’s (1978) phenomenological framework to establish the essential meaning of each
participants’ experiences.
The goal of this study is to gain insight from doctoral graduates of a nursing education program and their lived experiences within a virtual
mentoring program as well as how mentoring has assisted their professional lives and the mentoring of others. Previous research has addressed
only the lived experience as a current doctoral student of a virtual mentoring program. Furthermore, a regional Virtual Mentoring Consortium for
Doctoral Nursing Education (VMC-DNE) could be established with a group of doctoral programs based upon the findings of this research to
influence the development of further virtual mentoring programs in doctoral nursing education. The VMC-DNE could serve as a national model for
other stakeholders with similar research and mentoring goals for their doctoral nursing students.
References
Clement, S. (2014). The use of virtual mentoring in nursing education. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 18(2).
Colaizzi, P. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives
for psychology (pp. 48-71). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations (J. N. Findlay, Trans.). New York, NY: Humanities Press.
Lach, H., Hertz, J., Pomeroy, S., Resnick, B., & Buckwalter, K. (2013). The challenges and benefits of distance mentoring. Journal of Professional
Nursing, 29(1), 39-48.
Lasater, K., Young, P., Mitchell, C., Delahoyde, T., Nick, J., & Siktberg, L. (2014). Connecting in distance mentoring: Communication practices that
work. Nurse Education Today, 34, 501-506.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Maritz, J. & Roets, L. (2013). A virtual appreciative coaching and mentoring programme to support novice nurse researchers in Africa. African
Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation, and Dance, (Supplement 1), 80-92.
Nowell, L., White, D., Mrklas, K., and Norris, J. (2015). Mentorship in nursing academia: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 4(16), 1-9
Rand, M. & Pajarillo, E. (2015). A robust social and professional connection between master educator and Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) student
instructor: Virtual mentoring and preceptorship via distance education. Nurse Education Today, 35, 696-699.
Welch, S. (2017). Virtual Mentoring Program within an Online Doctoral Nursing Education Program: A Phenomenological Study, International
Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 14(1), 128-130.
Contact
[email protected]
Readiness to Integrate Evidence-Based Practice: What Is the Nurse Educators' Role?
Jeannie Couper, PhD, RN-BC, CNE, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Evidenced-based practice (EBP), identified by the ANA (2010) as a standard of professional nursing practice and by the
IOM as a core competency for all healthcare providers (Greiner & Knebel, 2003), remains an integral component of clinical nursing
practice involving the utilization of the best available evidence in problem-solving and clinical decision-making concerning patient
care (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015). A recent multifaceted single-site study explored parents' perceptions of care, infant
outcomes, and nurses' perceptions of the organizational culture and readiness to integrate EBP in a 56-bed level III NICU. This poster
focuses on the nurses' perceptions of the organizational culture and readiness to integrate EBP over time. Aims of this portion of
study included gaining a deeper understanding of nurses' perspectives and ways to improve clinical nursing practices in the NICU.
Review of Literature: Before an evidenced-based clinical practice change can be implemented, it is important to identify strengths and barriers
within the system (Melnyk, Fineout-Overholt, & Mays, 2008). In a correlational study, Gale and Schaffer (2009) examined the nurses' perceptions of
influencing factors and barriers of EBP integration. The barriers identified most frequently by this sample of nurses and managers (n = 92) were
insufficient time, lack of staff, and not having the required equipment or supplies whereas the top three reasons to adopt evidenced-based changes
in clinical practice included personal interest in the practice change, personal valuing of the evidence, and avoiding risk of negative patient
consequences (Gale & Shaffer, 2009). Additionally, unlike the managers, a greater percentage of the staff nurses identified limitations within the
practice setting and inability to access information regarding EBP as barriers to the integration of EBP. Analysis of the open-ended responses
revealed both the staff and the managers agreed on several issues: too many changes at the same time, the Joint Commission or state mandated
requirements viewed as negative motivators, and the absence of resources all perceived as major barriers to successful implementation of practice
changes (Gale & Shaffer, 2009).
In a correlational study involving a small group of healthcare professionals (n = 58), Melnyk, Fineout-Overholt, Giggleman, and Cruz (2010) utilized
the OCRSIEP scale (Cronbach's α = .92) in an effort to examine relationships between cognitive beliefs, EBP, its implementation, organizational
culture, cohesion, and job satisfaction. Statistically significant relationships were found between the perceived organizational culture and readiness
to integrate EBP (M = 79.76, SD 14.93; range 42-116) and EBP beliefs as well as EBP implementation. These healthcare professionals implemented
EBP into their nursing care to a greater extent and had stronger positive beliefs about the value of EBP (Melnyk et al., 2010).
Hauck, Winsett, & Kuric (2012) assessed nurses' belief of the importance of EBP, how frequently EBP was incorporated in their daily nursing
practice, and the nurses' perception of organizational readiness to integrate EBP after the implementation of an EBP strategic plan. Organizational
culture and readiness were measured on the Organizational Culture & Unit Readiness for Integration of Evidence-based Practice Survey (OCRSIEP
adapted to met their needs. Hauck et al. scored items as 3 scales: items 1-14 and 16 (referred to as OCRS-C, Cronbach α 0.81- 0.92) measured
culture of the organization. Item s 15 and 17 addressed providers as EBP champions and decision makers; item 18 measured the organizations
readiness to integrate EBP, and item 19 measured the organization's movement towards EBP. Although there were no statistically significant
differences noted in the nurses' characteristics over time, there were significant gains made over time in the nurses' perceptions of the importance
of EBP, their perceptions of the organizational readiness, the frequency of EBP integrated into clinical practice as well as movement towards EBP
(Hauck et al., 2012).
In a scoping review of the literature focused predominantly in nursing and addressing organizational barriers to the implementation of EBP (49
articles), Williams, Perillo, and Brown (2015) identified five broad major organizational barriers. Most frequently reported was workload which
included issues of staffing, patient acuity levels, increases in patient-based tasks, and staff identifying 'no time' to participate in EBP activities cited
in 38 of the 49 articles. The absence of management support of EBP activities (cited in 37 of the 49 articles) was reported nearly as often as
workload. A lack of resources particularly in terms of easy accessibility from the patient care areas was cited in 28 of the 49 articles; this also
included issues of how to access and interpret the empirical evidence. The fourth barrier identified was lack of authority to change practices (in 22
articles). Staff often did not feel their voice was valued nor did they have power to make changes which may positively impact patient outcomes.
Lastly, workplace culture resistant to change was identified in 14 articles where rigid, inflexible workplaces discouraged innovation and thinking
outside the box. A disconnect between staff professional goals and the organizational goals were also cited here. All of these barriers impact staff's
ability to use EBP or explore ways to implement EBP.
Saunders and Vehviläinen-Julkunen (2016) reviewed 37articles to determine factors supporting nurses' readiness to implement EBP and
competencies. The authors reported that overall the nurses were familiar with EBP concepts although inconsistencies were noted in their
interpretation; education was also associated with familiarity. The majority of nurses had favorable attitudes and beliefs towards EBP, yet rarely
took part in EBP activities citing the nurses wanted additional education and skills to successfully incorporate EBP in their clinical practice (Saunders
& Vehviläinen-Julkunen, 2016).
Studies highlight the importance for an organizational culture supportive of EBP with adequate resources including staff support, adequate staffing,
time, easy accessibility to resources and information regarding EBP, an understanding of nursing research and working knowledge of EBP to
successfully retrieving, understand the research, critique and synthesize empirical evidence. A strong relationship between perceived
organizational culture and readiness to integrate EBP was clearly identified (Melnyk et al., 2010). "System-wide implementation of EBP occurs
when the evidence is strong, the context is receptive to change, and the change process is facilitated through a supportive infrastructure" (Fineout-
Overholt & Melnyk, 2005, p.28).
Method: The OCRSIEP-UNIT is intended to measure nurses' perceptions of organizational culture within the NICU and their readiness to integrate
EBP. Approximately 100 NICU nurses were invited to participate in the online study. The survey remained available to staff for approximately 5
weeks during each collection period (at the onset, at 6 months, and 12 months.) Staff were provided a hyperlink to access the study from their
personal or work computers. No identifying information was collected. The OCRSIEP-UNIT consists of 25 different scored items within 19
substantive items. Three rating scales are used including a 5-point rating scale ranging from "not at all" to "very much" or "not ready" to "past
ready and onto action" while questions related to frequencies ranged from "none" to "100%." The OCRSIEP-UNIT generates a total score ranging
from 25 to 125; scores closer to 125 reflect greater organizational readiness for or movement towards a culture of EBP (Melnyk et al. 2010). A mid-
mark score of 75 indicates the need for an intervention to further develop the culture to embrace EBP. Higher individual item scores indicate
greater degrees of perceived readiness to integrate EBP into their clinical nursing practice.
Results: Responses rates varied between collection periods of baseline, 6 months, and 12 months (36, 51, 24 respectively). Although overall scores
increased steadily over time, there were wide variations in the nurses' perception scores (M=78.54 at onset, range 36-122; M=81.37 at 6 months,
range 54-118; M= 85.42 at 12 months, range 54-111). Similarly, individual mean scores increased over time for both rating the NICU's readiness to
implement EBP (3, 3.35, 3.46 respectively) and movement in NICU towards an EBP culture (3.05, 3.28, 3.46 respectively).
Conclusion: The wide range of nurses' perceptions of the organizational culture and their readiness to integrate EBP at each collection period
requires further investigation as to possible barriers and perhaps need for further education. So what is the nurse educators' role? The significance
to the future of nursing cannot be underscored. It is essential that nurse educators recognize the implications of this study and incorporate various
strategies in the clinical practicum as well as classroom activities to facilitate a deeper understanding of how to integrate EBP into clinical practice.
Strategies such as teaching how to evaluate the level of the evidence and formulate a PICO question (Levin & Chang, 2014), journal clubs (Gardner,
Kanaskie, Knehans, Salisbury, Doheny, & Schirm, 2016), participation in research activities (Ayoola, Adams, Kamp, Zandee, Feenstra, & Doornbos,
2017), and redesigning courses to effectively increase students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards EBP (Ruzafa-Martínez, López-Iborra,
Barranco, & Ramos-Morcillo, 2016) may enhance the learner's ability to successfully implement EBP and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
References
Hauck, S., Winsett, R. P., & Kuric, J. (2012). Leadership facilitation strategies to establish evidenced-based practice in an acute care hospital. Journal
of Advanced Nursing, 69(3), 664- 667. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06053.x
Melnyk, B.M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA:
Wothers Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt E., & Mays, M. Z. (2008). The evidence-based practice beliefs and implementation scales: Psychometric properties
of two new instruments. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 5(4), 208–216.
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Giggleman, M., Cruz, R. (2010). Correlates among cognitive beliefs, EBP, implementation, organizational
culture, cohesion and job satisfaction in evidenced-based practice mentors from a community hospital system. Nursing Outlook, 58(6), 301 - 308.
doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.06.002
Williams, B., Perillo, S., & Brown, T. (2015). What are the factors of organisational culture in health care settings that act as barriers to the
implementation of evidence-based practice? A scoping review. Nurse Education Today,35(2), e34 - e41. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.012
Contact
[email protected]
Social Isolation and Emotional Loneliness in Older Adults With Congestive Heart Failure
Mary Ellen Cafiero, CCRN, GNP, USA
Abstract
Social isolation as described in the epidemiological literature focuses on demographic and personal data such as: marital status,
employment, religion and education. The psychological work is focused to a much greater extent on Maslow and Erickson's
constructs and the human need to feel connected or belong. Peplau's research on the antecedents of emotional loneliness has
added to this content and includes: termination (end of a close relationship), separation (apart form loved ones), status change (role
change), developmental (quality of relationships), demographics (work/home environment and personality).
The impact of social interaction or relationships becomes more important than numbers or mere superficial ties. Someone can be living with a
partner and yet still feel isolated due to internal conflict or change in self image. Over extended periods, loneliness develops as well as persistent
alterations in immune system function and stress response. A discrepancy often occurs between an individual's perceived versus actual supportive
relationships. it is also important to make the distinction between maladaptive isolation and healing time alone. Adjustment periods to
environmental change, role identification or life phase/situation may require concentrated thinking and limited social contact in so that negative
thinking is not perpetuated
Studies from the literature show a definitive link between social isolation, disease progression and increased morbidity. This is particularly the case
with the older adults population diagnosed with heart failure. Depression frequently accompanies comorbidities such as CHF, but is not readily
identified in many situarions since disease trajectories are similar in both. Health care providers/teams should assess symptoms which may be seen
in both diagnoses and treat based on evidence based protocol. Common symptoms associated with CHF include: fatigue, low energy levels,
appetite change, peripheral edema, cognitive impairment and decreased motivation. Symptoms of depression include: sad affect, loss of
interest/appetite, low energy , fatigue, sleep disturbance and cognitive impairment. Overlapping signs and symptoms can make differentiation
between clinical problems difficult to determine.
References
Aldred, H., Gott, M. & Gariballa, S. (2005). Advanced heart failure: impact in older patients and informal carers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49(2),
226-124.
Freeland, K. & Carney, R. (2000). Heart failure in the elderly. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 16(3), 1-10.
Friedman, E., Thomas, S., Liu, F., Morton, P., Chapa, D., Gottlieb, S. 92006). Relationship of depression, anxiety and social isolation to chronic heart
failure outpatient mortality. American Heart Journal, 152(5), 940-947.
Hawkley, L & Cacioppo, J. (2002). Loneliness and pathways to disease. Brain, Behavior and Immunity, 17, 98-105.
Murberg, T. & Bru, E. (2001). Social relationships and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 51,
521-527.
Perlman, D. & Peplau, L. (1981). Chapter 2 Toward a social psychology of loneliness in Personal Relationships in Disorders. London Academic Press
Thomas, S., Chapa, D. Friedman, E., Durden, C., Ross, A., Lee, M. lee, H. (2008). Depression in patients with heart failure. Critical Care Nurse, 28(2),
40-55.
Yu, D., Lee, D., Kwong, A., Thompson, D. & Woo, J. (2007). Living with chronic heart failure: a review of qualitative studies of older people. Journal
of Advanced Nursing, 61
Contact
[email protected]
The Evidence-Based Practice Fulcrum: Balancing Leadership and Emotional Intelligence in Nursing and
Interprofessional Education
Pamela Allyn Di Vito-Thomas, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Lori Beth Wagner, USA
Terence Hodges, DHSc, MEd, CHES, USA
Sheri S. Streitmatter, MSNEd, USA
Abstract
To date, literature is emerging regarding leadership and emotional intelligence (EI) within interprofessional education (IPE). Likewise, a strategic
revolution has awakened throughout healthcare organizations as evidenced based, patient-centered care has received new prominence that
requires effective leadership concomitant with the essential attribute of emotional intelligence (EI) (Edbor & Singh, 2016; Paren, 2015; & Tyler,
2015). Nursing education and other IPE programs are beginning to work collaboratively to address this revolution by preparing emotionally
competent leaders who are capable of developing a professional reflective practice. Factors found to facilitate and influence leadership
development include attitude, motivation, failures, intentions, individual self-reflection, and emotional intelligence (Resnick, 2016; Galuska, 2014;
& Gallagher-Ford, 2014). And, the sense of self-confidence will be on the rise as EI-infused leaders will seek to; identify their own skills, strengths,
weaknesses, and clarify their own values and priorities in setting high standards (Cox 2017). Grande (2017) concurs that leadership and EI
characteristics accurately garner emotions in self and others; promotes the use of emotions to facilitate reasoning; provides an understanding of
emotions in self and others; and serves to manage emotions in self and others. Also, there is a growing recognition that EI-infused leadership is a
vital quality that must be cultivated in organizational support across organizational levels. Combining EI-infused leadership development with
organizational strategies within this evolving healthcare climate contributes to the implementation of an evidence-based practice (EBP). The
support of advance practice roles is essential in minimizing barriers, and maintaining a level of engagement throughout the EBP implementation
process (Aarons et al 2017; & Patterson, Mason, & Duncan, 2017). Moreover, EI positively impacts clinical nurses and other interprofessional
practitioners both personally and professionally. The EI-infused leadership roles enhance patient safety, outcomes, and efficient work processes
(Grande, 2017). Notably, the critical impact at the point of service by clinical leaders who demonstrate emotional intelligence challenge ineffective
work processes, and inspire others to act (Gatson Grindel, (2016). Recently, Mayer, Oosthuizen, & Surtee (2017) found that deeper insights into the
EI of South African women leaders was associated with effective leadership qualities, creativity,and innovation. And, that emotional intelligence
serves as an important source for women leaders to increase leadership qualities, as well as empathetic communication within the challenges of
Higher Education workplaces. In addition, Rivero & von Feigenblatt, (2016) set forth a high priority challenge for universities/colleges to expand
their curricula to better prepare future corporate leaders with the inclusion of EI initiatives for both undergraduate and graduate curricula.
Responding to the challenge, nursing and other IPE educators are readily integrating curriculum to consider EI-related competencies to build self-
awareness and professionalism among students (Haight et al, 2017). The overarching academic and clinical practice goal is to generate or improve
EI-infused leadership among nursing and other inter-professional practitioners for the future of evidenced-based, patient-centered care
throughout global healthcare systems (Prufeta, 2017; & Wang, 2016).
References
Aarons, G., Ehrhart, M., Moullin, J., Torres, E., Green, A. (2017). Testing the leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI)
intervention in substance abuse treatment: a cluster randomized trial study protocol. Implementation Science, 12, 1-11.
Cox, s. (2017). How does your emotional intelligence measure up? Nursing Management, 48(1), 56-56.
Edbor, A., Singh, P. (2016). The role of emotional intelligence on personality. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(1), 71-75.
Gatson Grindel, C. (2016). Clinical Leadership: A Call to Action. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(1), 9-16.
Gallagher-Ford, L. (2014). Implementing and sustaining EBP in real-world healthcare settings: Transformational evidence-based leadership:
Redesigning traditional roles to promote and sustain a culture of EBP. Worldviews on Evidence-based Nursing, 11(2), 140 -142.
Galuska, L. (2014). Enabling leadership: unleashing creativity, adaptation, and learning in an organization. Nurse Leader, 12(2), 34-38.
Grande, D. (2017). Embracing emotional intelligence for healthy leadership. American Nurse Today, 12(5), 39-39.
Haight, R., Kolar, C., Nelson, M., Fierke, K., Sucher, B., Janke, K. (2017). Assessing Emotionally Intelligent Leadership in Pharmacy Students.
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(2), 1-9.
Presenter: Paren, J. (2015, Oct). Introduction to Selected Aspects of Leadership. Proceedings of the Multidisciplinary Academic Conference. MAC
Praque Consulting s.r.o.
Patterson, M., Duncan, P., Mason, T. (2017). Enhancing a Culture of Inquiry. Journal of Nursing Administration, 47(3), 154-158.
Prufeta, P. (2017). Emotional Intelligence of Nurse Managers. Journal of Nursing Administration 47(3), 134-139.
Resnick, V. (2016; Emotional Intelligence in Coaching: Challenging the World through a Gestalt Perspective. Gestalt Review, 20(3), 302-309.
Rivero, O., von Feigenblatt, O. (2016). New Normal Initiatives Prompts U.S. Business Schools to Enhance Curricula. Journal of Alternative
Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 7(3), 423-432.
Tyler, L. (2015). Emotional intelligence: Not just for leaders. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 72(21), 1849-1849.
Wang, Y. (2016). Effects of emotional intelligence and self-leadership on student’s coping with stress. Social Behavior & Personality: an
International Journal, 44(5), 853-864.
Contact
[email protected]
Using Photo Journaling to Develop Affective Outcomes in Nursing Education
Marylyn Kajs-Wyllie, APRN, MSN, USA
Star Mitchell, PhD, RN, CCRN, USA
Abstract
Background: Ways of knowing may be approached from various epistemological paradigms. Where the realist may define knowing
as a cognitive function, the non-realist will expand ways of knowing to include the affective components of feelings and socially
constructed meanings (Garrett & Cutting, 2014). Developing and utilizing strategies and methods that give awareness to feelings and
meaning to experiences of nursing students which enhance affective learning has been difficult in curriculums necessitating large
amounts of cognitive knowledge (Ondrejka, 2014). Based on the well documented qualitative technique of Photo Voice that
(Woodgate et al, 2017). Photo journaling provides faculty and students an opportunity to bridge cognitive aspects of clinical
experiences with the affective.
Method: Eighteen nursing students were given a photo journal assignment as part of a service learning study abroad experience in Nicaragua.
Each day of the ten-day trip, students were provided a prompt that required them to take a photograph and journal about their chosen picture.
(Gilliland et al, 2016) These prompts were verbally announced at the beginning of the day and were chosen to enhance self-awareness. Examples
include; Submit a picture that reflects how you are feeling and title it. Write and reflect on your expectations and hopes for this trip. A second
example is: Submit a picture that reminds you of your family and your own community and title it. Write and reflect on what is at stake for these
patients, their families, and their community. Two weeks following the return from the trip students submitted their photo journals in electronic
form. Focus groups were utilized to explore the students experience and the effect of the photo journal on their affective learning.
Findings: Our experience and student’s feedback confirm that photo journaling provided a learning activity that actively engaged the students in
self-reflected affective learning. One students summed it up noting, you had to go deeper and see what was really going on and that the picture
could communicate until you could find the words.
Conclusion: Student produced meaningful photographs during clinical experiences that are combined with journaling exercises develop personal
awareness of caring as student come to know more about themselves through self-exploration and communication.
References
Garrett, B. & Cutting, R. (2015). Ways of knowing: Realism, non-realism, nominalism and a typology revisited with a counter perspective for nursing
science. Nursing Inquiry, 22(2), 95-105.
Gilliland, I., Attridge, R. T., Attridge, R. L., Maize, D. F., & McNeill, J. (2016). Building cultural sensitivity and interprofessional collaboration through a
study abroad experience. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(1), 45-48.
Hannes, K., & Parylo, O. (2014). Let's play it safe: Ethical considerations form participants in a photovoice research project. International Journal of
Qualitative Methods, 13, 255-274.
Ondrejka, D. (2014). Affective teaching in nursing: connecting to feelings, values, and inner awareness. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Woodgate, R. L., Zurba, M., & Tennent, P. (2017). Worth a thousand words? Advantages, challenges and opportunities in working with Photovoice
as a qualitative research method with youth and their families. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1), 126-148.
Contact
[email protected]
Assessing the Need for a Multidisciplinary Patient and Family Education Pediatrics Inpatient Rehabilitation
Setting
Diane H. Carey, MNS, USA
Melissa Shemek, MSN, RNC-NICU, USA
Arleen Ott, BSN, RN, CPN, WCC, USA
Alyssa Tiedemann, MSN, RN, USA
Lisa Moffa, MSN, RN, CPN, WCC, USA
Marcella Stanzione, MSN, RN, CPN, USA
Katie Walsh, MSW, LCSW, USA
Abstract
Patient and family education is a critical component of successfully managing the complex pediatric patient. The literature reveals that a
comprehensive patient/parent education program, beginning upon admission, enhances staff engagement and can transform care at the bedside.
Further, providing early access to multi-modal education and emotional support decreases the anxiety of parents at the time of discharge when
they find themselves thrust into the new role of medical caregiver. Despite the tremendous need for research and best-practice models in this
area, there is a gap in the literature describing comprehensive education programs implemented prior to discharge for medically fragile children
living with complex disorders.
Due to a number of converging factors (including discharge delays, patient/family satisfaction, standard of care, best practices, and transformative
bedside care) our pediatric acute rehab facility began to identify the need for a formal education program. To better identify specific and
quantifiable needs, an ad hoc multi-disciplinary committee (nursing, child life, respiratory therapy, social work), with the support of nursing
leadership, implemented a qualitative and quantitative assessment of education and support. We surveyed all staff nurses, nursing assistants,
parents, and other allied disciplines (child life and respiratory therapy) to determine perceived education and support needs, learning preferences,
teaching styles, and other related factors. Review of existing educational materials was also part of the assessment. Results across all stakeholders
overwhelmingly favored early access to multi-disciplinary, multi-modal education for patients and parents. As expected, learning and teaching
styles varied considerably. Further, review of existing educational materials revealed an area in significant need of revamping and consideration.
Findings were presented to nursing management and other members of the leadership team and the committee was given permission to create a
pilot program.
The objective of the pilot education and support program (beginning Q2 2017) is to focus on the most common topics of education including NG
placement, medication administration and trach/vent care on the inpatient infant and toddler unit. The goals of the pilot program are to 1)
decrease length of stay, 2) improve patient/family satisfaction and other measurable outcomes and 3) create a standardized process for
parent/patient education that can be applied to other education needs. Upon completion of the 6 month pilot, the program parameters will be
expanded to include other educational topics needed for self-management at discharge (including wound care and self-catheterization) and
broadened to address the school-age/adolescent population.
References
None.
Contact
[email protected]
Effectiveness of Using the Peanut Ball to Shorten the First and Second Stage of Labor
Catherine Rose Bell, MSN, RN, BC-C, USA
Abstract
In 2011, one in three women in the United States gave birth by cesarean delivery (The American Congress of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists, 2015). During the laboring process, it is a common occurrence for women to remain immobile (Zwelling, 2010).
Obstetrical interventions such as, fetal monitoring, oxytocin inductions, and epidural anesthesia can interfere with a patient’s
mobility and position changes (Zwelling, 2010). When laboring mothers remain immobile, it decreases the fetus’ ability to flex,
engage into the pelvis, rotate into position and descend (Zwelling, 2010). Studies have found that women who were positioned in
upright positions as compared to women who remained in flat or recumbent positions benefited with a shorter first stage of labor
by an average of 66.48 minutes (Zwelling, 2010).
One of the most common reasons for a cesarean section is "arrest of labor" also known as failure to progress or midpelvic arrest. It is
estimated that between 2002 and 2008, 10% of first-time mothers had cesarean sections for failure to progress (Boyle, Reddy et al.
2013). Of that 10 %, 40% had cesarean sections before they had even reached 5 cm dilation (Boyle, Reddy et al. 2013). Safely
reducing the rate of primary cesarean sections will require different approaches (The American Congress of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists, 2015). The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) suggests increasing a women’s access to
nonmedical interventions during labor (The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2015).
Most birthing balls can facilitate a more normal labor progression for ambulatory laboring women. However, when a patient is
immobile, due to medical circumstances, initiating the use of a peanut ball might promote positive labor outcomes as well as
hopefully reduce the duration of the delivery process. This double birth ball, connected in the middle mimicking a large peanut, is
low-risk and a low-cost nursing intervention (Tussey et al., 2015). A randomized, controlled study was conducted to determine
whether the use of a “peanut ball” decreased the length of labor and increased the rate of vaginal birth (Tussey et al., 2015). Using
the peanut ball promotes spinal flexion, thus increasing the utero-spinal angle (Tussey et al., 2015). This widening of the pelvic
diameter subsequently assists in facilitating occiput posterior rotation to a more favorable position for delivery (Tussey et al., 2015).
Since there is a lack of evidence-based research on this new intervention the use of the peanut ball affirms the need for further
research.
References
Boyle, A., Reddy , U., Candy , H., Huang, C., Diggers, R., & Laughon, S. (2013, July ). Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstetrics and
Gynecology, 122(1), 33-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182952242
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2015). http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Obstetric-Care-Consensus-

Series/Safe-Prevention-of-the-Primary-Cesarean-Delivery
Tussy, C., Botsios, E., Gerkin, R., Richard, D., Kelly , L., Gamaz, J., & Mensik , J. (2015). Reducing length of labor and cesarean surgery rate using a
peanut ball for women laboring with an epidural. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 24(1), 16-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.24.1.16
Zwelling, E. (2010, March/April). Overcoming the Challenges: Maternal Movement and Positioning to Facilitate Labor Progress. The American
Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing
Contact
[email protected]
Associate-to-Bachelor's (ATB) Option: A Collaborative Practice Model
Laura M. Schenk, MS, RN, USA
Elizabeth P. Crusse, MS, MA, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) release a report titled “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health” in 2010 which made a
key recommendation related to the educational preparation of nurses. This recommendation called for an increase in the proportion
of baccalaureate-prepared nurses to 80% by the year 2020 (“The future of nursing,” 2011). As a result of this report, much work has
been done within the nursing community to achieve this goal. Current literature presents examples of initiatives that identify
barriers to academic progression (Goode et al., 2016; Jones & Close, 2015; Masters, 2015) and provide clear examples of models
that promote seamless academic progression (Peltzer, Teel, Cline, & Cromwell, 2016; Perfetto, 2015; Sarver, Cichra, & Kline, 2015;
Zittel, Moss, O’Sullivan, & Siek, 2016). Current progress from the IOM’s latest report “Assessing Progress on the Institute of Medicine
Report: The Future of Nursing” indicates that the proportion of nurses with a baccalaureate degree increased from 49% to 51%
between 2010 and 2014 (“Assessing progress,” 2016). Continued creative efforts are needed. A University has partnered with two
Community Colleges within the North East region of Maryland to initiate a collaborative practice model which supports the
academic progression of Associate degree nurses. The Associate-to-Bachelor’s (ATB) Option was established with the common goals
of (a) providing multiple pathways to a Bachelor of Science in nursing (BSN) degree, (b) providing guided mentorship and support at
the University and Community College, and (c) decreasing existing barriers to academic progression.
A degree completion curriculum with three available entry points is the foundation for the ATB Option. The curriculum strategically provides
multiple pathways for nursing students to complete a BSN. Students are awarded 60 credits for completed Associate degree nursing (ADN) courses
and 30 credits for current RN licensure. These combined 90 credits are applied to the total 120 credits required for the BSN degree. Therefore, the
majority of credits for the degree are taken at the Community College. The remaining 30 credits of BSN courses are completed at the University.
Additional prerequisite courses are minimal, and include a General Chemistry with a lab and Nutrition. These two courses, if not already taken,
usually amount to a total of 7 additional credits outside of the requirements for the ADN program. University courses are taught in a convenient
location and format to increase accessibility. The University utilizes a satellite campus which is situated directly across the street and within 20
minutes driving distance from each Community College, respectively. In addition, course delivery throughout the ATB Option is a mixture of
traditional face-to-face, hybrid, and online. Students are also eligible to apply for financial aid due to established consortium agreements. Lastly,
the curriculum is configured to be the same for all degree completion options that are offered to students (ATB and RN to BS) which allows greater
flexibility.
Students may join the degree completion options through multiple entry points. The first is “ATB 1.0” which is characterized by concurrent BSN
coursework that is started in the first semester of the ADN program. The second is “ATB 2.0” which utilizes the same concurrent BSN coursework,
with the exception that it is started in the summer after the first or second semester of the ADN program. “ATB 2.0” also gives an opportunity to
LPN to RN transition students to apply. The third opportunity students have is to start BSN coursework after they graduate from the ADN program
with the “RN to BS” program. Students interested in this can apply for contingent acceptance prior to passing the NCLEX-RN examination during
their last semester of the pre-licensure program.
An overriding principle of this collaborative practice model is to provide guided mentorship and support for students at both the University and
Community Colleges. Each academic institution has a designated mentor. The “Degree Completion Coordinator” serves as a resource at the
University and the “Academic Progression Coordinator” serves at the Community Colleges. The Academic Progression Coordinator functions in a
dual role with time shared at both Community Colleges. Each representative is a liaison for students, faculty, and staff. Collaboration between the
institutions is crucial as it results in shared resources, enhanced communication, shared data, and mutual support.
Data is continuously being collected and analyzed throughout this ongoing initiative. It is expected that the results will support a decrease in the
existing barriers to academic progression. The measured data that is expected to support this goal includes enrollment, retention rates, attrition
rates, and projections for all of the degree completion options. Current preliminary data shows increasing enrollment, high retention rates, very
low attrition rates, and significant projections for completion of advanced degrees. Qualitative data is also being collected to determine if this
initiative supports an increase in the knowledge, support, and options available to Associate degree nursing students looking to progress
educationally.
The collaborative practice model presented is supporting progress toward the IOM goal. Collaboration is not only the key to success, it is essential.
An effective partnership between Universities and Community Colleges can expand available resources and decrease barriers within the
communities served. This continued project and resulting data will show the overall impact within this targeted region of the United States. Initial
data is supportive and project completion data could have significant implications for the nursing profession.
References
Assessing progress on the Institute of Medicine report the future of nursing. (2016). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Goode, C. J., Preheim, G. J., Bonini, S., Case, N. K., VanderMeer, J., Ianneli, G. (2016). The integrated pathway: An innovative collaborative model to
increase the proportion of baccalaureate-prepared nurses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37 (2).
Jones, D., Close, L. (2015). California collaborative model for nursing education: Building a higher-educated nursing workforce. NURSING
ECONOMIC$, 33 (6).
Masters, K. (2015). Implementation of a generic baccalaureate concurrent enrollment program: Increasing the percentage of nurses prepared at
the baccalaureate level. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36 (3).
Perfetto, L.M. (2015). Facilitating educational advancement of RNs to the baccalaureate: What are they telling us? Nursing Education Perspectives,
36 (1).
Peltzer, J. N., Teel, C. S., Cline, J., Cromwell, G. (2016). Navigating the path of academic progression: A qualitative descriptive study of associate
degree nursing faculty, public health nurses, and school nurses. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 11 (2).
Sarver, W., Cichra, N., Kline, M. (2015). Perceived benefits, motivators, and barriers to advancing nurse education: Removing barriers to improve
success. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36 (3).
The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. (2011). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Zittel, B., Moss, E., O'Sullivan, A., & Siek, T. (2016). Registered nurses as professionals. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 21(3).
Contact
[email protected]
Enhancing Skills in Behavioral Health Management
Margaret J. Reilly, DNS, USA
Abstract
With the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Medicaid has become the largest insurer in the U.S. Annual NYS Medicaid funding is
approximately $50 billion. In NYS in 2013 there were 5.79 million Medicaid recipients. In 2014, the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS) approved New York’s $8.25 billion Medicaid Redesign Team (MRT) waiver amendment. The goal of New
York’s federal waiver, the Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) program, is to reduce avoidable hospital use by 25%
through transforming the healthcare delivery system and also the way that health care is paid for. To receive funding NYS DSRIP
required Medicaid providers and community-based organizations to form integrated delivery networks called Performing Provider
Systems (PPSs). Behavioral Health (BH) is at the core of health care reform in NYS. In DSRIP, BH encompasses both mental health and
substance use disorders. Medicaid members diagnosed with BH conditions account for 21% of Medicaid members but 60% of the
total cost of care.
Integrating BH into primary care involves transforming the healthcare delivery system and will also require transforming the healthcare workforce.
Yet access to care for patients with behavioral health issues has become more limited due to safety concerns especially for students in Nursing
Programs.
One approach that can expose healthcare professionals to management of patients with behavioral health issues is Simulation. The NCSBN
National Simulation Study: A Longitudinal, Randomized, Controlled Study Replacing Clinical Hours with Simulation in Pre-licensure Nursing
Education (2014) noted that there were no differences between the use of 10%, 25%, and 50% of simulation and clinical experiences. Transforming
the healthcare delivery system to address the growing need for behavioral health services requires new approaches to workforce development.
One approach that can expose students and healthcare professionals to management of patients with behavioral health issues is Simulation. This
project describes one innovative teaching approach utilizing a collaborative effort in Simulation with Nursing and Applied Theater programs to
develop an educational strategy to promote development of knowledge, skills and attitudes in management of behavioral health issues.
References
Bishop TF, Seirup JK, Pincus HA, Ross JS (2016) Population of U.S. Practicing Psychiatrists Declined, 2003-13, Which May Help Explain Poor Access to
Mental Health Care, Health Affairs (Millwood). 1;35[7]:1271-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1643.
Castner, J., Wu, YW, Mehrok, N., Gadre, A., Hewner, S. (2015). Frequent emergency department utilization and behavioral health diagnoses.
Nursing Research 64(1): 3 - 12. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000065
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2015). Behavioral health trends in the United States: Results from the 2014 National Survey on
Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. SMA 15-4927, NSDUH Series H-50). Retrieved from http://www.samhsa.gov/data/
Clay, R. (2013) Mental health issues in college on the rise. American Psychological Association, 44 (11), p 54.
Croghan TW, Brown JD. Integrating Mental Health Treatment Into the Patient Centered Medical Home. (Prepared by Mathematica Policy Research
under Contract No. HHSA290200900019I TO2.) AHRQ Publication No. 10-0084-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. June
2010.
Contact
[email protected]
Nurse Faculty Enhancing Best Practices in the Clinical Setting
Phygenia Nimoh, MSN, USA
Abstract
Nursing clinical teaching is a valued and essential part of nursing education (Roberts & Glod, 2013) and, the clinical learning environment is central
to nursing education (Madhavanpraphakaran, Shukri & Balachandran, 2014). Nurse preceptors play a significant role in the clinical education of
nursing students and preceptorship is an effective approach to clinical education, assisting students to develop competence and confidence
(Madhavanpraphakaran et al., 2014). Preceptors provide direct clinical instruction to students and nurse faculty support preceptors (Dahlke et al.,
2016). But, preceptors may not have the necessary knowledge and skills to provide care based on best evidence (Ciliska et al., 2011).
Students have noted differences in what they learned at school and how a procedure is performed in real health care settings (Adelman-Mullally,
Mulder, McCarter-Spalding, Hagler, Gaberson et al., 2013). Faculty members working with preceptors act as educational resource
(Madhavanpraphakaran et al., 2014). Clinical faculty may observe unequal implementation and administrative support for evidence-based practice
(EBP) among units and across settings in a health care organization (Hagler, Mays, Stillwell, Kastenbaum, Brooks et al., 2012). They need to play a
significant role in nursing practice by collaborating with staff nurses and nurse preceptors to provide an optimal learning experience for
undergraduate students (McClure & Black, 2013) and, to ensure nursing care is based on best practices.
Clinical faculty can demonstrate leadership skills through collaboration with the staff. Clinical faculty collaborating with nursing staff will enhance
student learning and, satisfaction of both staff and students (Adelman-Mullally, et al., 2013). They have the potential to transform nursing units
(Adelman-Mullally et al., 2013) by collaborating with staff nurses to ensure safe and quality nursing care. Clinical faculty can challenge the status
quo in the clinical setting by providing information and suggestions about new evidence for change in nursing practice (Adelman-Mullally et al.,
2013). Nursing students are expected to learn and provide evidence based care, they need to be guided by clinicians who believe in and implement
EBP (Hagler, et al., 2012). It is necessary to expand nurse faculty roles in the clinical setting to address nursing care that are not congruent with
current best practices in health care institutions.
References
Adelman- Mullally, T., Mulder, C. K., McCarter-Spalding, D. E., Hagler, D. A., Gaberson, K. B., et al. (2013). The clinical nurse educator as leader.
Nurse Education in Practice, 13 (1) 29-34. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com.caldwell
Ciliska, D., Dicenso, A., Melnyk. B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Stetler, C. B. & Cullen, L. (2011). Models to guide implementation of evidence-based
practice. In B. M. Melnyk & E. Fineout-Overholt, (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (pp. 241-275).
Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Dahlke, S., O’Connor, M., Hannesson, T., & Cheetham, K. (2016). Understanding clinical nursing education: An exploratory study. Nurse Education in
Practice, 17, 145-152. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com.caldwell.idm.oclc.org
Hagler, D., Mays, M. Z., Stillwell, S. B., Kastenbaum, B., Brooks, R. et al. (2012). Preparing clinical preceptors to support nursing students in
evidence-based Practice. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 43 (11), 502-508. Retrieved from
https://search.proquest.com.caldwell.idm.oclc.org
Madhavanpraphakaran, G. K., Shukri, R. K., Balachandran, S. (2014). Preceptor’s perceptions of clinical nursing education. The Journal of
Continuing Education in Nursing, 45 (1), 28-34. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.caldwell.idm.oclc.org
McClure, E., & Black, L. (2013). The role of the clinical preceptor: An integrative Literature Review. Journal of Nursing Education, 52 (6), 335-341.
Roberts, S J., & Glod, C. (2013). Faculty roles: dilemmas for the future of nursing education. Nursing Forum, 48 (2) 99-105.
Contact
[email protected]
Pathways to Progress: Academic Support for Students in Nursing Education Programs
Mary Wombwell, EdD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics ( 2015) projects needs of the RN workforce over the next decade to increase 16% by 2024. Nursing
education programs are working to meet the needs of society and are addressing factors contributing to student success in nursing
programs. Academic Support Programs (ASP) not only influence program retention and enrollment but have the potential to address
the ongoing nursing shortage. The literature supports the advantages of ASP and identifies a variety of factors and strategies for
success which include: counselling, tutoring, mentoring and coaching activities. Freeman & All (2017) identified that students may
not comprehend the challenges associated with nursing education programs and as a result are not able to recognize their learning
needs in sufficient time to achieve academic success in a course. When nursing educators teach students how to learn, the students
acquire new strategies to be successful. Beauvais et al (2014) identifies that classroom techniques empower students and may result
in academic success. The intent of this presentation is to demonstrate that teaching/learning practices which reinforce student
success have the potential to promote retention in nursing programs.
This poster presents the approach of a comprehensive ASP used at a university and provides preliminary outcome data supporting student role
development for success. The presentation describes a strategy offered by a university to students who repeated a nursing course due to a failing
course grade. Students register for a 3 credit course: Pathways to Progress and take this course concurrently while they repeat the failed nursing
course. The Pathways to Progress course reinforces, guides and supports the student to acquire and apply academic skills, strategies to increase
confidence levels, study skills and test takings skills. This poster will present course and program outcomes, retention rates, graduation rates &
NCLEX outcomes in the student population who failed one nursing course. Outcomes demonstrate the value of additional academic support
programs to impact student success and retention.
References
Beauvais, A.M., Stewart, J.G., Denisco, S., Beauvais, J. (2014). Factors related to academic success among nursing students: A descriptive
correlational research study. Nurse Education Today, 34, 918-923.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 Edition, Registered Nurses, on the Internet
Retrieved March, 27, 2017 https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/registered-nurses.htm
Freeman, J.C. and All, A. (2017). Academic Support Programs Utilized for Nursing Students at Risk for Academic Failure: A Review of the
Literature. Nursing Education Perspectives, 38(2), 69-74.
Contact
[email protected]
LGBTQ Cultural Competency for Nurses
Tyler Traister, MSN, RN-BC, CNE, CTN-A, OCN, USA
Abstract
The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people has recently become a national health priority. The
National Institute of Health (NIH) declared LGBTQ communities a health disparity population in October of 2016 (NIH, 2016). Many
advances in policy (same-sex marriage, visitation rights, etc.) and societal shifts have allowed for increased visibility of this
community in our society, but has healthcare and nursing kept up? In 2011, then Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham-Clinton
discussed how LGBT rights are human rights and that health advocates, researchers, and practitioners engage in a "more proactive
role in bridging health disparity among the "invisible minority" (Lim et al, 2013, p. 198)". The National Institutes of Health designated
the LGBTQ community as a "health disparity population" for research, citing provider knowledge and attitudes as one of the key
areas needing further research.
Within nursing curricula and research, heterosexual bias still exists that diminishes LGBTQ nursing care. From 2005 to 2009, only eight out of 5,000
nursing articles where published that focused on LGBTQ health issues (Strong & Folse, 2015). The Department of Health and Human Services found
that the LGBTQ population is at an increased risk of suicide, depression, HIV infection, sexually transmitted diseases, obesity, and alcohol and drug
abuse (Traynor, 2016). What further exacerbates these health disparities is that LGBTQ patients also face minority stress – "stress that is
experienced by individuals from stigmatized social categories as a result of inferior social status (Strong & Folse, 2015, p. 45)". One of the largest
barriers to culturally congruent LGBTQ care is the lack of knowledge on LGBTQ people and possible negative attitudes among nurses and providers
(Strong & Folse, 2015).
The purpose of this study is to establish a baseline understanding of the knowledge and attitude of registered nurses about LGBTQ people as well
as measure the impact of a newly designed educational intervention on their knowledge and attitudes.
The research questions guiding this project are 1) what is are the existing levels of knowledge and attitude that inpatient registered nurses have
about the LGBTQ community and 2) what is the impact newly designed LGBTQ focused educational intervention on inpatient registered nurses’
knowledge and attitudes?
The design of this study is modelled after the original research of Strong et al. It is a descriptive correlational study with a cross-sectional design
with pretest/posttest methodology. The design allows for exploration of various variables of demographics and the pre/post test scores on the
knowledge and attitudes of LGBT people and health. Variables examined look at their encounters with LGBT people, previous education on LGBT
health, age, education level, and nursing experience.
Participants in the study will be informed that their participation is completely voluntary and that they may withdraw at any time as well as
confidentiality of their responses. The only perceived benefits for the participants are to broaden their knowledge about LGBTQ and their care of
the LGBTQ patient. There are no associated risks with the study other than the potential for moral conflict with the subject data.
The knowledge and attitudes of the registered nurses will be measured utilizing three validated tools – the modified Attitudes Toward Lesbians and
Gay Men (ATLG) scale, the Attitudes Toward Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Patients (ATLGBTP) scale, and the Knowledge of Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual, and Transgender People KLGBT questionnaire.
Descriptive statistics will be utilized to analyze the demographics of the study participants (mean, standard deviation, and range).
The mean scores of the pretest/posttest will be analyze through a t-test for comparison of the dependent variable and independent and through
the use of ANOVA for more than three independent variables.
References
Adams, M. (2016). An intersectional approach to services and care for LGBT elders. Journal of the American Society on Aging, 40(2), 94-100.
Brown, C & Mayer, D. (2015). Are we doing enough to address the cancer care needs of the LGBT community? Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing,
19(3), 242- 245.
Burkhalter, J., Margolies, L., Sigurdsson, H., Walland, J., Radix, A., Rice, D., Buchting, F., ... Maingi, S. (2016). The national LGBT Cancer Action Plan: a
white paper of the 2014 national summit on cancer in the LGBT communities. LGBT Health, 3(1), 19-31.
Callahan, E., Hazarian, S. Yarborough, M., & Sanchez, J. (2014). Eliminating LGBTIQQ health disparities: the associated roles of electronic health
records and institutional culture. Hastings Center Report, 48-52.
Carabez, R., Pellegrini, M., Mankovitz, A., Eliason, M., Ciano, M., & Scott, M. (2015). "Never in all my years…": Nurses’ education about LGBT health.
Carabez, R., Pellegrini, M., Mankovitz, A., Eliason M, & Dariotis, W. (2014). Nursing students’ perceptions of their knowledge of lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender issues: effectiveness of a multi-purpose assignment in a public health nursing class. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(1),
50-53.
Culley, L. & Haigh, C. (2016). Board editorial: LGBT equality and nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21(3), 155-158.
Fenway Institute. (2015). Improving the health care of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: understanding and eliminating health
disparities.
Fish, J. & Evans, D. (2016). Promoting cultural competency in nursing care of LGBT patients. Journal of Research in Nursing, 21(3), 159-162.
Foglia, M. & Goldsen, K. (2014) Health disparities among LGBT older adults and the role of nonconscious bias. Hastings Centers Report, 44(5), 40-
44.
GMLA. (2015). Guidelines for care of LGBT patients. Retrieved from:
http://glma.org/_data/n_0001/resources/live/GLMA%20guidelines%202006%20FINAL.pdf
Gendron, T., Maddux, S., Krinsky, L., White, J., Lockeman, K., Metcalfe, Y., & Aggarwal, S. (2013). Cultural competence training for healthcare
professionals working with LGBT older adults. Educational Gerontology, 39, 454-463.
The Joint Commission (2014). Advancing effective communication, cultural competence, and patient- and family-centered care for the lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender community. Retrieved from: https://www.jointcommission.org/lgbt/
Haas, A., Rodgers, P., & Herman, J. (2014) Suicide attempts among transgender and gender nonconforming adults: findings of the national
transgender discrimination survey. Retrieved from: http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/AFSP-Williams-Suicide-Report-
Final.pdf
Johnson, M., Smyer, T., & Yucha, C. (2012) Methodological quality of quantitative lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender nursing research from
2000 to 2010. Advances in Nursing Science, 35(2) 154-165.
Johnson, M. & Memeth, L. (2014) Addressing health disparities of lesbian and bisexual women: a ground theory study. Women’s Health Issues,
26(4), 635-640.
Kamen, C., Smith-Stoner, M., Heckler, C., Flannery M. & Margolies, L. (2015). Social support, self-rated health, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender identity disclosure to cancer care providers. Oncology Nursing Forum, 42(1), 44- 51.
Kirkpatrick, M., Esterhuizen, P., Jesse, E., & Brown, S. (2015). Improving self-directed learning/intercultural competencies: breaking the silence.
Koltzbaugh, R. & Spencer, G. (2015) Cues-to-action in initiating lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender-related policies among magnet hospital chief
nursing officers: a demographic assessment. Advances in Nursing Science, 38(2), 110-120.
Lim, F. & Borski, D. (2015). Defusing bigotry at the bedside. Issues in Nursing, 45(10), 40- 44.
Lim, F., Brown, D., & Kim, S. (2014). Addressing health care disparities in the Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations: a review of best
practices. The American Journal of Nursing, 114(6), 24-34.
Lim, F., Johnson, M., & Eliason, M. (2015). A national survey of faculty knowledge, experience, and readiness for teaching lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender health in baccalaureate nursing programs. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(4), 144-152.
Linscott, B. & Krinsky, L. (2016) Engaging underserved populations: outreach to LGBT elders of color. Journal of The American Society on Aging,
40(2), 34-37.
Margolies, L. (2014). The psychosocial needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender patients with cancer. Oncology Essentials, 18(4), 462-464.
Moone, R., Croghan, C., & Olson, A. (2016) Why and how providers must build culturally competence, welcoming practices to serve LGBT elders.
Journal of the American Society on Aging, 40(2), 73-77.
Powell, T. & Foglia, M. (2014) The time is now: bioethics and LGBT issues. Hastings Center Report, 44(5), 2-3.
Rondahl, G., Innala, S., & Carlsson, M. (2006). Heterosexual assumptions in verbal and non-verbal communication in nursing. Issues and Innovations
in Nursing Practice, 56(4), 373-381.
Rondahl, G. (2010). Heteronormativity in health care education programs. Nurse Education Today, 31, 345-349.
Sabin, J., Riskind, R., & Nosek, B. (2015). Health care providers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward lesbian women and gay men. American Journal
of Public Health, 105(9), 1831-1841.
Singer, R. (2015) LGBTQ focused education: can inclusion be taught? International Journal of Childbirth Education, 30(2), 17-19.
Strong, K. (2013). Assessing undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes, and cultural competence in caring for LGBT patients. Digital
Commons @ IWU, 1-40.
Wood, S., Vanhook, P., & Philipsen, N. (2016) Health disparities among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals. The Maryland
Nurse News and Journal, 10-12.
Contact
[email protected]
NICU Nurses and Families Partnering to Provide Family-Centered Care
Candy Bruton, MSN, RNC-NIC, USA
Jennifer Meckley, BSN, RNC-NIC, USA
Lori A. Nelson, BSN, RNC-NIC, USA
Abstract
The aim of this evidence based practice (EBP) project was to determine how implementing the seven neuroprotective core measures
of family centered developmental care will impact the satisfaction of the NICU nurses through new knowledge, skills and families
through partnering with care compared to traditional care. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on
Hospital Care and Institute for Family Centered Care policy statement made in 2003 family centered care is a method in which
medical care is grounded in the principle that optimal health outcomes are accomplished when patients’ family members participate
in an active role in contributing emotional, social and developmental support (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2003).
In order to accomplish this, NICU nurses needed a firm understanding of the developmental problems associated with the high risk and the
premature infant. It was critical that this group of caregivers understands the fundamentals of neurosensory growth of these infants. It is also vital
that they understand how the intrauterine environment protects the infant from being exposed to the fluctuation of an unstable extrauterine
environment.
The Phillip’s Neonatal Integrative Developmental Care Model was the model that we used for implementation. The seven neuroprotective core
measure for family-centered developmental care identified are: the healing environment, partnering with families, positioning and handling,
minimizing stress and pain, safeguarding sleep, protecting skin and optimizing nutrition. This model is represented by the lotus flower. In the
center, the first core measure is healing environment. Each of the remaining six core measures are depicted as overlapping petals to display the
integrative nature of developmental care (Altimier & Phillips, 2013) (Phillips, 2015).
The goal of the unit was to empower families by partnering with them to develop proper skills in caring for their infant (Westrup, 2007) positively
impacting their stress level, comfort level and confidence as well as increasing family satisfaction (Cooper, Gooding, Gallagher, Sternesky, Ledsky &
Berns, 2007). The goals of the NICU nurses were to gain new knowledge, skills and increased nurse satisfaction by providing developmental care
using the seven core measures of neuroprotective family centered care for every infant every time (Cardin, Rens, Stewart, Danner-Bowman,
McCarley & Kopsas, 2015).
The NICU staff was educated on the “Seven Core Measures of Family-Centered Developmental Care” by providing educational materials and hands
on training with a developmental care specialist. After completion of the training the neuroprotective interventions were implemented on every
NICU infant. Parents were give verbal and printed information and educated on the meaning of family centered care.
Conclusion from pre and post surveys that were collected from our NICU nurses showed an increase in knowledge of the appropriate care and
potential benefits of these interventions. Pre and post Press-Ganey reports were collected from parents and results showed an increase in
satisfaction over most categories. Also the results from parents during discharge phone calls surveys showed NICU families had a strong satisfaction
with the partnering of care and the level of family centered care their infant received.With these results it is essential for NICU nurses to provide
developmental care using the seven core measures of neuroprotective family centered care as the standard of care for every infant and family that
walks through the NICU doors (McGrath, Samra, Kenner, 2011).
References
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) committee on hospital care and institute for family centered care policy statement: family centered care
and the pediatrician’s role (2003). Pediatrics,112(3), 691-696.
Altimier, L., & Phillips, R. M. (2013). The neonatal integrative model: seven neuroprotective core measures for family-centered developmental care.
Newborn & Infant Nursing Reviews, 13(1), 9-22 14p. doi:10.1053/j.nainr.2012.12.002
Cardin A, Rens L, Stewart S, Danner-Bowman K, McCarley R, Kopsas R. (2015). Article: Neuroprotective core measures 1–7: A developmental care
journey: Transformations in NICU design and caregiving attitudes. Newborn & Infant Nursing Reviews 15(3):132-141.
Cooper, L., Gooding, J., Gallagher, J., Sternesky, L., Ledsky, R., & Berns, S. (2007). Impact of a family-centered care initiative on NICU care, staff and
families. Journal Of Perinatology, 27S32-7.
McGrath, J., M., Samra, H., A., Kenner, C. (2011). Familiy-center developmental care practices and research: What will the next century bring? The
Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 25(2): 165-170. doi:10.1097/JPN.0b013e3182a6706
Phillips, R. M. (2015). Neuroprotection in the NICU. Newborn & Infant Nursing Reviews, 15(3), 80-81 2p. doi:10.1053/j.nainr.2015.06.003
Westrup, B. (2007). Newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program (NIDCAP) — Family-centered developmentally
supportive care. Early Human Development, 83443-449. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.03.006
Contact
[email protected]
Integrating Palliative Care Services With Heart Failure Management
Lauren Renee Ellicott, MS, RN-BC, ACCNS-AG, USA
Abstract
Numerous end stage heart failure patients go without experiencing the full affect and benefits of receiving palliative care. There is
unfortunately a lack of palliative care initiative and utilization within the HF provider and patient population (Jorgenson et al., 2016).
Currently, there are gaps in the literature evolving palliative care management with HF specific criteria. Healthcare provider
knowledge of disease specific palliative care other than oncology is inadequate (Uppal & Rushton, 2014). There is a clear need for
guidance regarding best practice care for heart failure patients.
Heart failure is a multifaceted clinical condition originating from an impairment of the function and structure of the ventricular filling or ejection of
blood throughout the body (Yancy et al., 2016). Approximately 5.7 million Americans have congestive heart failure (Mozaffarian, et at., 2016). The
Heart Failure Fact Sheet (2015) emphasized the annual cost of treating HF is $32 billion. Symptom burdens of end stage heart failure include
shortness of breath, chest pain, claudication, fatigue, skin breakdown due to swelling and impaired perfusion, depression, anxiety, activity
intolerance, cachexia, and sleep breathing disorders (Johnson, 2007). Quality of life for patients with heart failure becomes reduced with the
progression of the disease (George & Leasure, 2016). Advanced HF is the measurable indication of extensive heart disease with severe limitations
of heart failure symptoms (Advanced Heart Failure, 2015). The complexity of heart failure makes trajectory and prognosis very difficult to
determine (Uppal & Rushton, 2014). The unknown trajectory for heart failure makes timing for palliative care referrals unpredictable for providers
(Ziehm et al., 2016).
The purpose of palliative care is to improve quality of life for patients as well as caregivers and family members who deal with difficulties
surrounding chronic illnesses by providing preventative measures and liberation from suffering (WHO, 2012). The goal of palliative care is to assist
with improving the quality of life for patients with chronic complex illnesses (Fasoline & Phillips, 2016). Palliative care targets symptom
management and easing chronic disease burdens (Hemani & Letizia, 2008). The standards of palliative care symptom management include: (a) the
implementation of a holistic assessment; to identify the cause, (b) the utilization of optimizing pharmacologic elements, (c) reversal of what is
reversible, and (c) the incorporation of palliative care within any other symptoms (Johnson, 2007). Palliative care services are also available to the
patient and family any time of the day (Seow et al., 2014). The rationale for implementing these services with Advanced HF patients is to improve
satisfaction and quality of life.
There are many issues inhibiting the initiation of HF specific palliative care services for end stage heart failure patients (Kavalieratos et al., 2014).
Healthcare providers lack the proper education and training for understanding and handling palliative care appropriately (Namasivayam & Barnett,
2016). This creates misperception as well as miscommunication between the healthcare provider, the patient, and the family (Ziehm et al., 2016).
Palliative care is oftentimes mistakenly associated with a terminal prognosis (Ziehm et al., 2016). Healthcare providers own the responsibility of
acknowledging knowledge gaps and overcoming these barriers in order to allow for heart failure therapies to work congruently together with
palliative care management for better care (George & Leasure, 2016).
The purpose of this project is to increase heart failure specific palliative care referrals in the outpatient setting. Furthering provider education with
heart failure specific palliative care models and palliative care integration methods will also be covered in order to support the delivery of palliative
care to advanced HF patients for a more comprehensive patient centered care service. Building trust while boosting the support of healthcare
providers is necessary in order to integrate palliative care services with heart failure management (George & Leasure, 2016).
Oftentimes, providers are faced with the difficult decision of introducing palliative care to the patients with reduced ejection fractions who
constantly experience worsening shortness of breath, end stage renal functioning, unresponsiveness to diuretic therapy, activity intolerance,
increased fatigue, and repeat readmissions to the hospital (Muhandiramge et al., 2015). Support from the palliative team could optimize heart
failure care, chronic symptom burdens, communication between provider and patient, readmission rates, cost of care, accessibility to care, and
improve overall quality of life and satisfaction for heart failure patients.
Correlational research will be used to discover the relationship between pre- and post-educational intervention and palliative care referral
initiation. In order to measure the advanced practice nurses knowledge and awareness with initiating palliative care referrals, the amount of
palliative care referrals initiated before and after the educational intervention will be recorded.
References
Advanced Heart Failure. (2015, April 06). Retrieved March 19, 2017, from http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/HeartFailure/Advanced-
Heart-Failure_UCM_441925_Article.jsp#.WM63UhiZMcg
Fasolino, T., & Phillips, M. (2016). Utilizing risk readmission assessment tool for nonhospice palliative care consults in heart failure patients. Journal
of Palliative Medicine, 19(10), 1098-1101. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0228
George, S., & Leasure, A. R. (2016). Application of transformational leadership principles in the development and integration of palliative care
within an advanced heart failure program. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing: DCCN, 35(2), 59-65. doi:10.1097/DCC.0000000000000166
Heart Failure Fact Sheet: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2015). Retrieved February 28, 2017.
http://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fs_heart_failure.htm (last accessed February 28, 2017).
Hemani, S., & Letizia, M. (2008). Providing palliative care in end-stage heart failure. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing, 10(2), 100-105.
Jorgenson, A., Sidebottom, A. C., Richards, H., & Kirven, J. (2016). A description of inpatient palliative care actions for patients with acute heart
failure. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine, 33(9), 863-870. doi:10.1177/1049909115593064
Johnson, M. J. (2007). Management of end stage cardiac failure. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 83(980), 395–401.
http://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2006.055723
Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E. J., Go, A. S., Arnett, D. K., Blaha, M. J., Cushman, M., &
Mackey, R. H. (2016). Executive summary: Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: A report from the American Heart Association.
Circulation, 133(4), 447-454. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366
Namasivayam, P., & Barnett, T. (2016). Providing palliative care in a rehabilitation setting: a staff needs assessment. Journal of The Australasian
Rehabilitation Nurses' Association (JARNA), 19(2), 8-14.
Seow, H., Dhaliwal, G., Fassbender, K., Rangrej, J., Brazil, K., & Fainsinger, R. (2016). The effect of community-based specialist palliative care teams
on place of care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 19(1), 16-21. doi:10.1089/jpm.2015.0063
Uppal, S., & Rushton, C. A. (2014). The challenge of palliative care in heart failure. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing, 9(2), 90-95.
World Health Organization (2012). National Cancer Control Programmes: Policies and Managerial Guidelines. http://tinyurl.com/m4ltq3v (accessed
28 February 2017)
Yancy, C. W., Jessup, M., Bozkurt, B., Butler, J., Casey, D. J., Colvin, M. M., &Westlake, C. (2016). 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused update on new
pharmacological therapy for heart failure: an update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the
American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart failure society of America.
Circulation, 134(13), e282-e293. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000435
Ziehm, J., Farin, E., Seibel, K., Becker, G., & Köberich, S. (2016). Health care professionals' attitudes regarding palliative care for patients with
chronic heart failure: an interview study. BMC Palliative Care, 151-8. doi:10.1186/s12904-016-0149-9
Contact
[email protected]
Interprofessional Collaborative Approach for Improving Situation Awareness Using Simulation in a Nursing
Residency Program
Jill Van Der Like, DNP, MSN, RNC, USA
Steven Kass, PhD, USA
Christopher O. Downing, PhD, USA
Kahla Davis, BA, USA
Cynthia Smith-Peters, DNP, USA
Steve Vodanovich, PhD, USA
Abstract
More than 250,000 people die in the United States each year due to medical errors, which constitutes the third leading cause of
death, ranking behind only heart disease and cancer (Makary & Daniel, 2016). In a hospital setting, nurses can detect errors early
and initiate actions to prevent negative consequences for patients (Aiken, Clarke, Cheung, Sloane, & Silber, 2003). Nurses who are
situationally aware understand why a patient’s condition may be changing and can anticipate what is likely to happen next, allowing
them to react quickly and appropriately when something goes wrong (Cohen, 2013). Therefore, training nurses to improve their
situation awareness (SA) could be the most valuable strategy in reducing deaths and other costs associated with medical errors.
However, the opportunity to learn and practice SA is noticeably missing from undergraduate nursing curricula (McKenna et al.,
2014). O’Meara et al. (2015) and Williams, Quested, and Cooper (2013) noted that high-level SA is crucial for nursing graduates who
will be required to make potentially life-saving decisions in complex, unpredictable, and demanding situations.
SA is defined as an individual’s cognitive capacity to perceive components in his/her surroundings, comprehend the ensuing information, and utilize
the acquired facts to forecast future events (Wright, Teakman, & Endsley, 2004). Maintaining SA is an essential skill in medical settings that can be
developed over time to improve patient care and ensure patient safety. Although human factors research pertaining to SA has been dominated by
military and industry applications, Farnan (2016) noted that SA would “undoubtedly” improve the quality and safety of patient care by reducing
errors. For instance, Schulz et al. (2016) found errors in SA were responsible for 81.5% of the cases from the German Anesthesia critical incident
reporting system.
The results of Schulz et al. (2016) show much research is needed in the medical field pertaining to SA in order to improve patient care and safety.
The present SA training involves a hands-on, dynamic training process that utilizes a realistic scenario that requires nurses to use their expertise to:
1) recognize key situational elements (e.g., a patient presenting symptoms of a stroke) at a particular time and place, 2) understand/interpret this
information to rule out alternative causes of the symptoms, and 3) predict future events based on the acquired patient information, despite
distractions. This scenario-based SA training and subsequent practice in situation assessment can serve as an effective weapon for nurses to
combat medical errors.
The participants were ten nurses with less than two years of work experience employed at a local hospital. The nurses participated in a single-day
educational session that lasted for approximately six hours. During the training session, the nurses completed two simulation scenarios, received a
lecture on situation awareness, participated in group discussions, and received mindfulness training. The nurses completed two 12-15 minute
scenarios in a simulated hospital setting (one at the beginning of the educational session and one at the end of the session) to measure their SA
during patient care.
At the start of the educational session, the nurses entered individually to begin care for the simulated patient in a simulated hospital room. They
interacted with a patient, an “intelligent manikin,” which was programmed to exhibit vital signs and symptoms of a patient suffering from a femur
fracture that transitioned into a stroke (simulation scenario A). At three points during the exercise, the simulation was stopped and the nurse
participants were verbally questioned with their responses being recorded about the current situation to assess their current levels of SA.
Specifically, without the information visible to them, the participants were asked to recall the latest patient vital signs (e.g., blood pressure,
temperature, heart rate), the current state of the patient (e.g., stable, deteriorating), and what will likely happen to the patient if the trend
continues (e.g., will become dehydrated, will need pain medications, cardiac arrest). After the nursing simulation session, the nurse participants
were debriefed regarding their performance.
After completion of the simulation exercise, the nurses attended a workshop on SA that included various hands-on activites to help demonstrate
key concepts and strategies. For example, brief videos were shown depicting a nurse actor demonstrating either good or poor SA while caring for a
patient. Following each video, the participants engaged in a group discussion about the actor’s performance in the video by answering questions
pertaining to SA. The questions were designed to foster discussion among the participants (e.g., “What information does the nurse have about the
patient’s condition?” and “What should the nurse be doing next?”). Toward the end of the workshop, the nurses were instructed on breathing
exercises designed to increase mindfulness and concentration skills.
The program concluded with a second exercise in the nursing simulation lab. The nurses attended to the “intelligent manikin” patient programmed
to exhibit vital signs and symptoms of pneumonia that transitioned into sepsis (simulation scenario B). Following the same procedures as
Simulation Scenario A, the simulation was paused at three time points and the participants were verbally questioned about the current situation to
assess their current levels of SA. The participants were debriefed regarding their performance and dismissed from the training.
In addition to post training participant survey data, the training will be evaluated using a pre-post design comparing SA maintenance skills at the
start of the workshop (scenario A) to that at the end of the workshop (scenario B). Data will be analyzed using a non-parametric test of mean
differences. It is anticipated that the training will increase the SA of nurses, which will equip them to act optimally when caring for patients in
various medical situations.
References
Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Cheung, R. B., Sloane, D. M., & Silber, J. H. (2003). Education levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. JAMA,
290(12), 1617-1623.
Cohen, N. L. (2013). Using the ABCs of situational awareness for patient safety. Nursing2013, 43(4), 64-65.
Farnan, J. M. (2016). Situational awareness and patient safety. Patient Safety Network. Retrieved on December 15, 2016 from
https://psnet.ahrq.gov/webmm/case/372/situationalawareness-and-patient-safety
Makary, M. A., & Daniel, M. (2016). Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ, 353, i2139.
McKenna, L., Missen, K., Cooper, S., Bogossian, F., Bucknall, T., & Cant, R. (2014). Situation awareness in undergraduate nursing student managing
simulated patient deterioration. Nurse Education Today, 34(6), 27-31.
O’Meara, P., Munro, G., Williams, B., Cooper, S., Bogossian, F., Ross, L., Sparkes, L., Browning, M., & McClounan, M. (2015). Developing situation
awareness amongst nursing and paramedicine students utilizing eye tracking technology and video debriefing techniques: A proof of concept
paper. International Emergency Nursing, 23(2), 94-99.
Schulz, C. M., Krautheim, V., Hackemann, A., Kreuzer, M., Kochs, E. F., & Wagner, K. J. (2016). Situation awareness errors in anesthesia and critical
care in 200 cases of a critical incident reporting system. BMC Anesthesiology, 16(4), 1-10.
Williams, B., Quested, A., & Cooper, S. (2013). Can eye-tracking technology improve situational awareness in paramedic clinical education? Open
Access Emergency Medicine, 5, 23-28.
Wright, M., Taekman, J., & Endsley, M. (2004). Objective measures of situation awareness in a simulated medical environment. Quality & Safety in
Health Care, 13(Suppl 1), i65–i71.
Contact
[email protected]
Student Perceptions Regarding Collaborative Intraprofessional Nursing Education
Tracy P. George, DNP, RN, APRN-BC, CNE, USA
Claire DeCristofaro, MD, USA
Pamela F. Murphy, PhD, MBA, USA
Julia M. Hucks, MN, APRN-BC, CNE, USA
Abstract
The purpose of this project is to determine student perceptions regarding collaborative learning activities between undergraduate
and graduate nursing students. Teamwork is an important factor in the provision of high-quality health care. Peer-assisted learning
(PAL) is an intraprofessional, active-learning approach in which higher-level students act as teachers to lower-level students
(Williams & Reddy, 2016). Near-peer teaching is a subset of PAL, in which the peer teachers are at least one year more advanced
than the learners (Aba Alkhail, 2015). An important aspect of this project is the lack of existing published research focusing on
collaboration between undergraduate and graduate nursing students.
There are positive benefits to near-peer teaching for both levels of students. According to McKenna and Williams (2017), students identified with
the near-peer teachers, gained increased understanding of the course requirements, had decreased anxiety about clinical expectations, and
learned how to manage difficult situations. Students also gained role models through their involvement with the near-peer teachers (Nelson et al.,
2013). The near-peer teachers reported improvements in their teaching skills, knowledge, and clinical skills through this experience, while the
lower-level students received helpful feedback on clinical skills in a supportive learning environment. (Khaw & Raw, 2016; deMenezes & Premnath,
2016).
There is a lack of research on collaboration between undergraduate and graduate nursing students, although some studies have been published on
near-peer teaching in nursing education. In one study, second-year nursing students were utilized for the health assessment head-to-toe physical
examinations by first-semester students, with positive feedback received for both groups of students (Bryant, 2017). In the simulation laboratory,
senior level students have been used successfully as facilitators for junior level students (Dumas, Hollerbach, Stuart, & Duffy, 2015). Students also
provided positive feedback about a simulation experience using higher-level nursing students as patients for first semester nursing students (Owen
& Ward-Smith, 2014).
In our program, the online MSN graduate students in the Patient Education and Advocacy course currently create low-literacy pamphlets for
community agencies. Typically, topics focus on chronic disease diagnosis and management, including lifestyle changes and other areas of
importance for patient education. Leadership on the choice of topics in this project will be bottom-up drawn from the needs of the targeted
populations. Our first-year residential undergraduate BSN students in the Population-Focused Nursing and Healthcare Policy course complete
community assessments as part of their required learning activities. In a planned collaboration, the community assessments of the residential
undergraduate BSN students will be utilized by the online graduate MSN students to create low-literacy pamphlets. These will meet the needs of
the specific populations served by six community health care agencies, including free clinics, community health centers, and a public school district.
Students working on this project will be geographically dispersed over five rural southeastern counties in underserved medical areas. These
pamphlets will also be utilized during teaching sessions, staffed mainly by undergraduate nursing students, at the community agencies. Both before
and after the project, demographic information and survey data will be obtained from both the undergraduate and graduate nursing students to
assess their perceptions about intraprofessional collaborative educational activities. The planned survey instrument was adapted from Robben et
al. (2012).
This project will help achieve the student learning outcome goals for two different nursing program levels. In addition, the use of the created
pamphlets will help meet the educational needs of the community and support health equity in these underserved populations. A unique aspect of
this research project is the intraprofessional collaborative nature of the learning activities across both program levels and educational settings.
References
Aba Alkhail, B. (2015). Near-peer-assisted learning (NPAL) in undergraduate medical students and their perception of having medical interns as
their near peer teacher. Medical Teacher, 37(sup1), S33-S39.
Bryant, S. G. (2017). Keeping it in the program: Second year nursing students as stand-in patients for first year head-to-toe assessment check-offs.
de Menezes, S., & Premnath, D. (2016). Near-peer education: A novel teaching program. International Journal Of Medical Education, 7,160-167.
doi:10.5116/ijme.5738.3c28
Dumas, B. P., Hollerbach, A. D., Stuart, G. W., & Duffy, N. D. (2015). Expanding simulation capacity: Senior-level students as teachers. Journal of
Khaw, C., & Raw, L. (2016). The outcomes and acceptability of near-peer teaching among medical students in clinical skills. International Journal Of
Medical Education, 7,188-194. doi:10.5116/ijme.5749.7b8b
McKenna, L., & Williams, B. (2017). The hidden curriculum in near-peer learning: An exploratory qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 5077-81.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.010
Nelson, A. J., Nelson, S. V., Linn, A. J., Raw, L. E., Kildea, H. B., & Tonkin, A. L. (2013). Tomorrow's educators€‰…€‰today? Implementing near-peer
teaching for medical students. Medical Teacher, 35(2), 156-159. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.737961
Owen, A. M., & Ward-Smith, P. (2014). Collaborative learning in nursing simulation: Near-peer teaching using standardized patients. Journal of
Robben, S., Perry, M., van Nieuwenhuijzen, L., van Achterberg, T., Rikkert, M. O., Schers, H., ... & Melis, R. (2012). Impact of interprofessional
education on collaboration attitudes, skills, and behavior among primary care professionals. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health
Professions, 32(3), 196-204.
Williams, B., & Reddy, P. (2016). Does peer-assisted learning improve academic performance? A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 4223-29.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.024
Contact
[email protected]
Sexual Expression of Nursing Home Residents
Rodolfo A. Aguilar, MD, RN, USA
Abstract
Purpose: Living longer, baby boomers will need specialized care offered by nursing homes to manage chronic conditions. This review explores the
knowledge, attitudes, and experiences towards older people’s sexuality and sexual expression in nursing homes – an important area of research to
meet the needs of this emerging population.
Design: A primary search of the CINAHL and Pubmed databases and secondary inclusion of cited references covering the period January 2000 to
November 2016 identified 12 relevant studies.
Methods: Using the PRISMA flow diagram of the screening process, data were extracted, summarized, compared, and risk of bias was assessed
focusing on ethical considerations, sample size and sampling methods, validity and reliability of data collection instruments, participation,
cooperation and response rate.
Findings: Research on the matter of sexuality and sexual expression in nursing homes is unexpectedly scant. The existing research demonstrates an
overall disconnect between what residents want and the existing policies for sexual expression in nursing homes. Overall, sexual expression in
older adults is recognized as a basic need that should be supported. Positive attitudes towards sexuality in nursing homes were correlated with a
higher level of knowledge about older adults’ sexuality. In addition, positive predictors of attitudes towards sexuality in nursing homes were found
to be: age, level of education, and years of experience. Barriers to addressing sexuality in the elderly are the lack of privacy and staff discomfort,
which together represent common causes for loneliness and lack of intimacy in nursing homes.
Conclusions: Nursing research and practice need to shift their focus towards individual needs of nursing home residents to accommodate their
values and expectations. Current policies regarding sexual expression in nursing homes need revision to satisfy the needs of baby boomers.
Clinical Relevance: Care providers must include a thorough assessment of sexual health of older adults living in nursing homes in the routine
practice, and include sexual health in the treatment plan.
Keywords: attitudes, gerontology, geriatrics, institutionalized, intimacy, knowledge, long-term care, nursing home, older age, older people,
resident, sexual expression, sexual health, sexual rights, sexuality. demonstrated an overall disconnect between what residents want and the
existing policies for sexual expression in nursing homes.
References
Aizenberg, D., Weizman, A., & Barak, Y. (2002). Attitudes toward sexuality among nursing home residents. Sexuality & Disability, 20(3), 185-189.
doi: 10.1023/A:1021445832294
American Hospital Association. (2007). When I’m 64: How baby boomers will change health care. Retrieved from
https://www.healthdesign.org/sites/default/files/news/How%20Boomers%20Will%20Change%20Health%20Care.pdf
Bauer, M., McAuliffe, L., Nay, R., & Chenco, C. (2013). Sexuality in older adults: Effect of an education intervention on attitudes and beliefs of
residential aged care staff. Educational Gerontology, 39(2), 82-91. doi:10.1080/03601277.2012.682953
Bonds-Raacke, J. M., & Raacke, J. (2011). Examining the relationship between degree of religiousness and attitudes toward elderly sexual activity in
undergraduate college students. College Student Journal, 45(1), 134-142.
Bouman, W. P., Arcelus, J., & Benbow, S. M. (2007). Nottingham Study of Sexuality and Ageing (NoSSA II). Attitudes of care staff regarding sexuality
and residents: A in residential and nursing homes. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22(1), 45-61. doi:10.1080/14681990600637630
Di Napoli, E. A., Breland, G. L., & Allen, R. S. (2013). Staff knowledge and perceptions of sexuality and dementia of older adults in nursing homes.
Journal of Aging & Health, 25(7), 1087-1105. doi:10.1177/0898264313494802
Gilmer, M. J., Meyer, A., Davidson, J., & Koziol-McLain, J. (2010). Staff beliefs about sexuality in aged residential care. Nursing Praxis in New Zealand
Inc, 26(3), 17-24.
Gott, M., & Hinchliff, S. (2003). How important is sex in later life? The views of older people. Social Science & Medicine, 56(8), 1617-1628.
doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00180-6
Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary
sources. BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition), 331(7524), 1064-1065. doi:10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68
Hinrichs, K. M., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2010). Staff perceptions of same-gender sexual contacts in long-term care facilities. Journal of Homosexuality,
57(6), 776-789. doi:10.1080/00918369.2010.485877
Lester, P. E., Kohen, I., Stefanacci, R. G., & Feuerman, M. (2016). Sex in nursing homes: A survey of nursing home policies governing resident sexual
activity. Journal of The American Medical Directors Association, 17(1), 71-74. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.08.013
Liberati, A., Altman, D., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P., Ioannidis, J., & ... Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic
reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 339(7716),
b2700. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
Mahieu, L., Anckaert, L., & Gastmans, C. (2014). Intimacy and sexuality in institutionalized dementia care: Clinical-Ethical considerations. Health
Care Analysis, 22(4), 1-20. doi:10.1007/s10728-014-0287-2
Mahieu, L., de Casterlé, B. D., Acke, J., Vandermarliere, H., Van Elssen, K., Fieuws, S., & Gastmans, C. (2016). Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes
toward aged sexuality in Flemish nursing homes. Nursing Ethics, 23(6), 605-623. doi:10.1177/0969733015580813
Mahieu, L., & Gastmans, C. (2015). Older residents’ perspectives on aged sexuality in institutionalized elderly care: A systematic literature review.
International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(12), 1891-1905. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.07.007
Mahieu, L. & Gastmans, C. (2012). Sexuality in institutionalized elderly persons: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature.
International Psychogeriatrics, 24(3), 346-357. doi:10.1017/S1041610211001542
Makimoto, K., Kang, H. S., Yamakawa, M., & Konno, R. (2015). An integrated literature review on sexuality of elderly nursing home residents with
dementia. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21 Suppl 280-90. doi:10.1111/ijn.12317
Mroczek, B., Kurpas, D., Gronowska, M., Kotwas, A., & Karakiewicz, B. (2013). Psychosexual needs and sexual behaviors of nursing care home
residents. Archives of Gerontology & Geriatrics, 57(1), 32-38. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2013.02.003
Pirhonen, J. (2015). Dignity and the capabilities approach in long-term care for older people. Nursing Philosophy, 16(1), 29-39.
doi:10.1111/nup.12057
Roelofs, T. M., Luijkx, K. G., & Embregts, P. M. (2015). Intimacy and sexuality of nursing home residents with dementia: a systematic review.
International Psychogeriatrics, 27(3), 367-384. doi:10.1017/S1041610214002373
Stein, G., Beckerman, N., & Sherman, P. (2010). Lesbian and gay elders and long-term care: Identifying the unique psychosocial perspectives and
challenges. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 53(5), 421-435. doi:10.1080/01634372.2010.496478
Tarzia, L., Bauer, M., Fetherstonhaugh, D., & Nay, R. (2013). Interviewing older people in residential aged care about sexuality: Difficulties and
challenges. Sexuality and Disability, 31(4), 361-371. doi:10.1007/s11195-013-9297-5
Teeri, S., Välimäki, M., Katajisto, J., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2007a). Maintaining the integrity of older patients in long-term institutions: relatives'
perceptions. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(5), 918-927. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01741.x
Teeri, S., Välimäki, M., Katajisto, J., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2007b). Nurses perceptions of older patients integrity in long-term institutions. Scandinavian
Journal of Caring Sciences, 21(4), 490-499. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00499.x
Teeri, S., Välimäki, M., Katajisto, J., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2008). Maintenance of patients' integrity in long-term institutional care. Nursing Ethics, 15(4),
523-535. doi:10.1177/0969733008090523
Walker, B. L., & Harrington, D. (2002). Effects of staff training on staff knowledge and attitudes about sexuality. Educational Gerontology, 28(8),
639-654. doi:10.1080/03601270290081452
Ward, R., Vass, A. A., Aggarwal, N., Garfield, C., & Cybyk, B. (2005). A kiss is still a kiss? The construction of sexuality in dementia care. Dementia:
The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 4(1), 49-72. doi:10.1177/1471301205049190
White, C. B. (1982a). Sexual interest, attitudes, knowledge, and sexual history in relation to sexual behavior in the institutionalized aged. Archives of
Sexual Behavior, 11(1), 11-21. doi:10.1007/BF01541362
White, C. B. (1982b). A scale for the assessment of attitudes and knowledge regarding sexuality in the aged. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11(6), 491-
502. doi:10.1007/BF01542474
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2648.2005.03621.x
World Health Organization [WHO]. (2006). Defining sexual health. Report of a technical consultation on sexual health 28–31 January 2002, Geneva.
Retrieved from http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/sexual_health/defining_sexual_health.pdf
Yelland, E., & Hosier, A. (2015). Public attitudes toward sexual expression in long-term care: Does context matter? Journal of Applied Gerontology:
The Official Journal of The Southern Gerontological Society, doi: 10.1177/0733464815602113
Contact
[email protected]
The Lived Experience of Jordanian Nursing Students in Jordan
Brenda Moore, PhD, RN-BC, CNE, USA
Abstract
Individuals studying nursing in the United States (U.S.) come from many countries and multiple ethnicities. Nursing faculty in the U.S., being
predominantly Caucasian, frequently encounter students that are culturally different from themselves. Faculty may not be cognizant of cultural
variances and therefore may be ill-prepared to mentor, encourage and guide these diverse students. The proposed research intends to explore the
experience of being a nursing student in the Middle East, specifically nursing students in Jordan. The study is significant because understanding the
lived experience of nursing students in Jordan may provide educators an insight into the lives, potential challenges and social influences
experienced by Middle Eastern nursing students studying in the U.S.
A clear gap in this area of research is noted. There are only four indentified studies related to Middle Eastern nursing students. Of the four studies
two included undergraduate students and two assessed graduate students. The authors identified challenges related to loneliness, finances, social
customs and values. None of the identified studies were current or described the lived experience of Middle Eastern or Jordanian undergraduate
nursing students in the context of Jordan (Abu-Saad & Kayser-Jones, 1982; DeLuca, 2005; McDermott-Levy, 2011).
The participants will be in their final semester/s of an undergraduate baccalaureate nursing program while attending the University of Jordan in
Amman, Jordan. Six months have been funded for the researcher to teach in the school of nursing and complete data collection. Two methods will
be used to collect data from the participants; semi-structured focus groups and personal narratives. Eight questions will guide both the focus group
and personal narrative. The eight questions include:
1. What is it like to be a nursing student?

2. Why do you want to be a nurse?
3. What are your challenges?
4. How is your family involved in your nursing education?
5. How are nurses viewed in your community?
6. What will it be like to be a nurse working in the hospital or clinic?
7. What else do you think is important for me to know about being a nursing student?
8. What do you think it is like to be a nursing student and a nurse in the U.S.?
Demographic information including age, gender, GPA, dependents, employment status, first generation college status and marital status will be
collected from each participant. Qualitative data analysis will be conducted using Hycner’s Explication Process.
This research will be beneficial to nursing education for several reasons. Nursing educators will have an opportunity to increase their understanding
of the needs and challenges of Middle Eastern nursing students. Faculty will have a chance to expand their understanding of Middle Eastern
traditions. Educators’ may discover a new found appreciation for Middle Eastern nursing students and finally this research may help to allay fears
and anxiety related to the Middle Eastern culture.
References
Abu-Saad, H., & Kayser-Jones, J. (1982). Middle Eastern nursing students in the United States. Journal of Nursing Education, 21, 22-25. Retrieved
from https://eds-b-ebscohost-com.libproxy.hbu.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=3d4f9198-8cb5-40c1-8a69-
45df851d29a7%40sessionmgr101&vid=2&hid=120
DeLuca, E. K. (2005). Crossing cultures: The lived experience of Jordanian graduate students in nursing: A qualitative study. International Journal of
Nursing Studies, 42, 657-663. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org.libproxy.hbu.edu/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.017
Groenewald, T. (2004). A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2-26. Retrieved from
https://sites.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/3_1/pdf/groenewald.pdf
McDermott-Levy, R. (2011). Going alone: The lived experience of female Arab-Muslim nursing students living and studying in the United States.
Nursing Outlook, 266-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2011.02.006.
Contact
[email protected]
Nursing Mentorship: Clinical Coaching and Shared Leadership
Vincenza Coughlin, MS, RNC-MNN, CNE, CLC, USA
Abstract
Purpose (What): The Obstetric Nursing Mentorship Program at NYU Langone Medical Center was initiated to assist in the transition
of newly hired staff into the professional role. The mentor-mentee relationship fosters an environment that reduces anxiety,
promotes staff satisfaction, enhances clinical performance, and improves the quality of patient care.
Relevance/Significance (Why): Conversations between the 25 newly hired staff and more senior nurses suggested a need for clinical coaching.
Research indicates that teamwork between nurses is essential for best practices in the clinical setting. Novice nurses historically lack confidence,
efficiency of time management, and competency in performing with high acuity. In order to facilitate the new hires’ transition into the professional
RN role, research supports the strategy of mentoring.
Strategy and Implementation (How): Staff nurses with four or more years of obstetric experience were encouraged to enlist as mentors. The
mentees were given a list of the volunteering mentors, were asked to rank their top three choices, and matched accordingly. The purpose of
ranking is to encourage a mentee to choose someone they feel comfortable with, who may or not have been a preceptor. Mentor-Mentee dyad
interactions were promoted through professional formal and informal meetings and personal communication. A kick-off event including night and
day shift was held to promote communication and a team-building environment. A handbook was developed to assist in the framework of the
program and guide the mentorship pairs throughout the process.
Evaluation/Outcomes (So what): As per mentee feedback via a pre-survey and Likert scale, the program was agreed to be beneficial in the areas
of: work experience, support system, self-confidence, teamwork, knowledge and skills, and intra-professional communication. The pre-survey will
be distributed in three month intervals, concluding at one year of participation.
Implications for Practice (And now): Goals aim at enhancing team building, staff engagement, shared leadership, healthy work environment and
professional development.
References
Clarke, P. N., & Fawcett, J. (2014). Life as a mentor. Nursing Science Quarterly, 27(3), 213–215. doi: 10.1177/0894318414534492
Ebright, P. R. (2010). The complex work of RNs: Implications for healthy work environments. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15(1). doi
10.3912/OJIN.Vol15No01Man04
Fox, K. C. (2010). Mentor program boosts new nurses’ satisfaction and lowers turnover rate. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 41(7),
311-316. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20100401-04
Green, J., & Jackson, D. (2014). Mentoring: Some cautionary notes for the nursing profession. Contemporary Nurse, 47 (1-2), 79–87. doi:
10.5172/conu.2013.3528
Jokelainen, M., Turunen, H., Tossaainen, K., Jamookeeah, D., & Coco, K. (2011). A systematic review of mentoring nursing students in clinical place-
ments. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20, 2854–2856.
Kim, S. C., Oliveri, D., Riingen, M., Taylor, B., Rankin, L. (2013). Randomized control trial of graduate-to-undergraduate student mentoring program.
Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(6), 43-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.04.003
Contact
[email protected]
Faculty Perceptions of the Impact of Service Learning on Nursing Students
Catherine Y. Read, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: Service-learning experiences (SLEs) have become increasingly common in nursing education as schools strive to provide
socially relevant curricula that improve students’ cultural competence and prepare them to confront and challenge existing health
disparities. In an early study (Ivory, 1997), the researcher’s expectation that college students would return from an SLE feeling
excited and personally satisfied was upended. Instead, most students in that qualitative study reported a variety of social and
psychological difficulties that the researcher labeled “re-entry crisis.” Problems included difficulty explaining their feelings about the
experience, strained interpersonal relationships, feelings of uncertainty, and academic dysfunction. Subsequent studies illustrate the
impact of nursing student participation in an SLE, many of which frame the narratives in a more positive light. For example,
Adamshick and August-Brady (2012) interviewed participants in an SLE to Honduras about their impressions of the experience. The
themes that emerged included appreciation for life and family, the need to simplify one’s own life, and a sharper vision of what is
truly important. Despite many rich narratives, there is a paucity of aggregate data about the characteristics of SLEs offered in US
nursing programs and their impact on students. The purpose of this study was to examine that impact as reported by faculty trip
leaders.
Methods: The instrument for this exploratory, descriptive study was developed by the researcher and administered online using Qualtrics® after
approval by the university’s institutional review board. Participants were recruited through a survey link emailed to approximately 1600 deans or
directors of accredited US nursing schools, who were asked to forward it to faculty who oversee SLEs. Frequencies were tabulated using SPSS
(v.24).
Results: The sample consisted of 77 nursing faculty from 32 US states who provided complete data (58% of the 133 who opened the link).
Respondents were primarily female (97%), white (86%), and over the age of 50 (72%). Most faculty (75%) were affiliated with BSN programs and
accompanied the students to the SLE (47% for the entire time, 31% part of the time). Twenty-three percent of the SLEs were located outside of the
US with the majority of those being in the Caribbean, South America, or Central America; 55% were in local communities and 18% were within
commuting distance. The table summarizes the results of survey items related to faculty perception of the impact of the SLE on the student
participants:
Faculty opinions about how often students report or demonstrate the following after returning home from SLE (n and percent of total 77, ranked
in order of frequency)
Impact Often Sometimes Rarely Never No response
Being “changed” by the SLE 53 (69%) 19 (25%) 1 (1%) 0 4 (5%)
A change in assumptions and stereotypes held prior to 55 (71%) 17 (22%) 1 (1%) 0 4 (5%)
the SLE
Being more likely to advocate for the vulnerable and 51 (66%) 20 (26%) 2 (3%) 0 4 (5%)
underserved in the future
Feeling overwhelmed with lack of resources available to 32 (42%) 31 (40%) 8 (10%) 1 (1%) 5 (7%)
host community
Feeling overwhelmed with the needs of the host 27 (35%) 35 (46%) 10 (13%) 1 (1%) 4 (5%)
community
Feelings of guilt about abundance of resources at home 22 (29%) 32 (42%) 15 (20%) 4 (5%) 4 (5%)
Feeling that family and friends can’t understand the 8 (10%) 27 (35%) 27 (35%) 11 (14%) 4 (5%)
impact of the SLE
Feeling difficulty returning to home community/culture 13 (17%) 19 (25%) 30 (39%) 11 (14%) 4 (5%)
Feeling that the SLE impact is difficult to explain 12 (16%) 19 (25%) 34 (44%) 8 (10%) 4 (5%)
Feeling alienated by home community/culture 4 (5%) 22 (29%) 32 (42%) 14 (18%) 5 (7%)
Conclusion: Faculty involved with SLEs believe that students are changed by the experience. Assumptions and stereotypes are altered and students
are seen as more likely to advocate for the vulnerable and underserved after they return. Other common feelings, although slightly less frequently
reported, relate to noting the disparities in resources between home and the host community. Sometimes students feel that it is difficult to explain
the impact of the SLE to others. Less often, students feel alienated by their home community or culture when they return home. In general, SLEs
have a positive impact because they open students’ eyes to new cultural norms and increase the probability that they will practice nursing with
more cultural insight. However, whether the impact results in sustained behavior change or whether negative feelings of being overwhelmed,
guilty, and misunderstood linger is unknown and worthy of future research.
References
Adamshick, P., & August-Brady, M. (2012). Reclaiming the essence of nursing: The meaning of an immersion experience in Honduras for RN to
Bachelor of Science students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 28(3), 190-198.
Curtin, A. J., Martins, D. C., & Schwartz‐Barcott, D. (2015). A mixed methods evaluation of an international service learning program in the
Dominican Republic. Public Health Nursing, 32(1), 58-67.
Ivory, B. T. (1997). The Re-entry crisis of students returning to campus following a volunteer alternative break experience: A developmental
opportunity. College Student Affairs Journal, 16(2), 104-112.
Kohlbry, P.W. (2016). The impact of international service-learning on nursing students’ cultural competency. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(3),
303-311.
Long, T. (2014). Influence of international service-learning on nursing student self-efficacy toward cultural competence. Journal of Nursing
Education, 53(8), 474-478.
Sanders, K. M. (2016). The impact of immersion on perceived caring in undergraduate nursing students. International Journal of Caring
Sciences, 9(3), 801-809.
Taylor, S. L., & Leffers, J. M. (2016). Integrative review of service-learning assessment in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(4),
194-200.
Contact
[email protected]
Clinical Practice for Novice Nursing Students: Shorter Clinical Day or Longer Clinical Day?
Akiko Kobayashi, PhD, RN, USA
Penny Bacon, MSN, APRN, FNP, BC, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical education is an essential component of nursing curriculum. For the novice nursing students (NSs), length of
clinical day may affect their learning ability due to their high anxiety levels (Bayoumi, Elbasuny, Mofereh, Assiri & Al fesal, 2012, Sun,
Long, Tseng, Huang, You & Chiang, 2016, Kobayashi, unpublished data 2017) caused by the stressors associated with a new clinical
environment and limited knowledge of pathophysiology. At the same time, their enthusiasm to participate in every clinical learning
opportunity on real patients is very high and short clinical days may not satisfy their clinical expectations. The quality of nursing
students’ clinical learning experiences on any clinical shift depends on various factors, such as opportunity of skills acquisition and
the relationships with nursing staff at the facility (Danner, 2014; Rossen & Fegan, 2009). Numerous advantages were found in one
longer clinical day regarding opportunities for application of skills compared to two shorter clinical days. The longer hours provided
students the opportunity to practice an increased number and variety of skills (Reising, Fickenscher, & Satrom, 2017) and students
were more organized during a 12-hour shift as they were able to provide patient care throughout the day (Rossen and Fegan, 2009).
Also, Tobar, Wall, Parsh, and Sampson (2007) discovered that students were able to enhance their learning experience and
participate in shift reports at the end of a longer clinical day. At the same time, students experienced the dread of long hours, fear of
making errors, and the overall constant stress of the clinical environment leading to higher level of fatigue in longer clinical hours
(Wallace, Bourke, Tormoehlen, & Poe-Greskamp, 2015). Overall, there is limited available evidence in evaluating the effects of two
shorter clinical days and one longer clinical day on student learning outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify effects of
different length of clinical hours on NSs’ learning outcome in acquiring nursing skills and developing professional relationships.
Methods and Material: Forty NSs in their first clinical rotation in Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) program at Biola University, La Mirada,
California were invited to the study to examine skills learning opportunities and the students’ overall experiences of having both shorter and longer
clinical days in one rotation. They have completed four semesters of general education required for BSN program and just begun learning basic
nursing skills and pathophysiology in their fifth semester of BSN program. The expected learning outcome of the first clinical rotation is for NSs to
demonstrate fundamental nursing skills, critical thinking, and clinical reasoning to enhance patients’ health outcomes and quality of life, by
developing nursing care plans and applying theoretical content in the clinical setting. The novice NSs were divided into four groups. There were ten
students with one clinical instructor in each group and four groups were placed on four different units in an urban community hospital. Each group
stayed on the same unit throughout the rotation. Students were assigned to the same patients when available on two consecutive shorter clinical
days and assigned to different patients on each longer clinical day. The clinical days were composed of two 6-hour clinical days per week for three
weeks, then one 8.5-hour clinical day per week for the following five weeks, excluding pre and post conferences. At the end of each clinical day,
students were asked to identify skills that they performed during the day. A Student T test was used to compare the mean numbers of skills
performed in shorter clinical days to the ones in longer clinical days. On the last clinical day of the first rotation, students were also asked to
describe benefits of shorter clinical days and longer clinical days. These qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.
Results: Forty NSs in their first clinical rotation participated throughout the study. The skills performed significantly more in longer clinical days
than in shorter days were glucometer use, taking input and output, and performing physical assessments (P=0.014, 0.015, 0.043, respectively). The
skills such as patient teaching /discharge teaching, insulin administration, dressing change, oral medication administration, and subcutaneous or
intramuscular injections did not show significant differences but there was a trend of more opportunities to perform these skills in longer clinical
days. Bed bath/general hygiene, linen change, passing trays, observing a specific procedure, and receiving a new admission did not show any
difference. For benefits of two shorter clinical days per week stated by NSs, there were two major themes related to the two shorter consecutive
days of clinical experiences: less anxiety on the second consecutive day, and ability to provide continuity of care when NSs had the same patients
on the second day. For the benefits of longer clinical days, students’ comments were more variable. Major themes that emerged focused on
forming relationships with nursing staff and ability to see the progression of their patients’ status. Students stated more opportunity to develop
collegial relationships with nursing staff, aiding NSs to experience additional learning opportunities, and better able to observe transitions of
patients’ conditions over time. In addition, many students stated higher perceptions in their ability to provide more holistic care with enhanced
opportunities to form relationship with patients and the family members. Overall, 26 out of 40 students recommended the longer clinical day
during the first clinical rotation, three recommended the shorter clinical days, and 11 recommended a hybrid of both. Students reported that the
benefit of a hybrid, or equally utilizing both, was providing students with a helpful transition from shorter days to longer days, as the clinical
practices for the rest of the nursing program consist of only longer clinical days.
Discussion: The study was conducted to investigate the differences in the exposure and application of skills content of clinical experiences
comparing a shorter clinical day to a longer day among novice NSs. As hypothesized, the data analyses indicated that more skills were performed
on longer clinical days and better relationships were developed with nursing staff, patients and their family members. Students were more
concerned about holistic care for their patients during longer clinical days, whereas they were more focused on the skill performance on shorter
clinical days. Considering the high anxiety levels of novice NSs in the first rotation, they expressed less fear and anxiety on the consecutive second
clinical day. Anecdotal data indicated that the students and clinical faculty members supported a hybrid clinical schedule combining both shorter
days at the beginning and longer days thereafter during the first clinical rotation. Clinical scheduling involves the availability of space in facilities
that receive NSs. When there is an opportunity where hybrid clinical schedule may be permissible, it is recommended to first introduce novice NSs
to two shorter days per week and provide an eventual transition to longer clinical practice as they gain more experience even within the first
clinical rotation for better outcome of clinical learning.
References
Bayoumi, M. M., Elbasuny, M. M., Mofereh, A. M., Assiri, M. A., & Al fesal, A. H. (2012). Evaluating Nursing Students' Anxiety and Depression during
Initial Clinical Experience. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(6), 277-281. doi: 10.5923/j.ijpbs.20120206.12
Danner, M. (2014). Comparison of 1 long versus 2 shorter clinical days on clinical learning outcomes of nursing students. Nurse Educator, 39(6),280-
284.
Reising, D. L., Fickenscher, R., & Satrom, A. (2017). Comparison of Differing Clinical Schedules for Nursing Students. Nurse Educator, 42(1), 8-13.
doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000286
Rossen, B., & Fegan, M. (2009). Quick reads. Eight- or twelve-hour shifts: what nursing students prefer. Nursing Education Perspectives (National
League For Nursing), 30(1), 40-43.
Sun, F. K., Long, A., Tseng, Y. S., Huang, H. M., You, J. H., & Chiang, C. Y. (2016). Undergraduate Student Nurses' Lived Experiences of Anxiety During
Their First Clinical Practicum: A Phenomenological Study. Nurse Education Today, 37: 21-26 6p.
Tobar, K., Wall, D., Parsh, B., & Sampson, J. (2007). Use of 12-hour clinical shifts in nursing education: Faculty, staff, and student response. Nurse
Educator, 32(5), 190-191.
Wallace, L., Bourke, M. P., Tormoehlen, L. J., & Poe-Greskamp, M. V. (2015). Perceptions of Clinical Stress in Baccalaureate Nursing Students.
International Journal Of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 1-8. doi:10.1515/ijnes-2014-0056
Contact
[email protected]
Use of Electronic Clinical Tracking System for Documenting Competency Achievement in a DNP Program
Kaitlin DeMaagd, DNP, USA
Dianne E. Slager, DNP, FNP, BC, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Current practice in graduate professional program matriculation tends to rely on preceptor and faculty perceptions of
clinical performance or project completion (Starosta, et al., 2017, Englander et al, 2013), as well as on meeting clinical hour
requirements in specific clinical areas (Halles, Biesecker, Brennan, Newland & Haber, 2011). The most recent Evaluation of Nurse
Practitioner Programs (2016) strongly suggests the addition of competency achievement to student and programmatic evaluations.
There has been a good deal of support for monitoring competencies, with the caveat that it adds a dimension of complexity due in
part to a dearth of common taxonomy and uniform mechanisms of measurement (Clabo, 2017).
Premise: Recently, the American Academy of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) formed an ad hoc work group to address competency-based education for
doctoral-prepared advanced practice nurses’(APRN). The work group was formed with representatives from over two dozen advanced practice
nursing credentialing and scholarship organizations to explore current practices and issues surrounding competency based clinical education
(AACN, 2016). This workgroup recognized the critical foundation laid by APRN leaders initially in 2006 and most recently updated in 2017(NONPF,
2017). The resulting white paper calls for development of competencies appropriate to all of the four APRN roles. Further, it issued a call for
development of a standardized assessment tool invoking formative and summative evaluation using a common taxonomy framework to identify
measurable progression of APRN competencies (AACN, 2016).
Goal development in graduate nurses increases self-awareness and encourages improvement of clinical learning experiences across student and
later, in professional practice (McMillan, Bell Benson, et al, 2007). This project describes use of an electronic clinical tracking system (ECTS) to help
DNP students to determine deficit areas, identify and then to document clinical goals related to competencies. Faculty used this assignment to
promote reflection on competency attainment related to clinical experiences with overall goal of progression of independence and responsibility in
clinical patient encounters (Price, Tschannen & Caylor, 2013). It was found that use of ECTS also facilitates collection of data salient to clinical
encounters in a logical manner using the nursing process (McNelis, Horton-Deutsch, & Friesth, 2012). Students were able to use an ECTS to set
specific learning goals to meet competencies and to validate clinical experiences in a demonstrable way for faculty. Faculty use the ECTS search and
reporting functions to determine and document frequency and complexity of clinical visits to confirm preceptor reporting to help determine
mastery of competencies. Integration of ECTS into documentation of clinical hours and monitoring of competency attainment helps students meet
technology competencies (Johnson & Bushey, 2011).
Conclusion: As nursing and other practice disciplines continue to move to competency metrics, increased standardization and effectiveness will be
needed (AACN, 2016). We need to continue to empower our students at all levels of learning to take responsibility for their academic and
professional learning as methods for competency achievement are explored (Babenko-Mould, et al., 2012). Development and monitoring of
personal learning goals using NONPF competencies incorporated an ECTS as one tool to scaffold learning across a clinical course to build
accountability and confidence in DNP students (Joy, Berner & Tarrant, 2012). Use of ECTS in this small scale project demonstrated utility as a
potential measurement tool for competency documentation.
References
1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2016). Criteria for evaluation of nurse practitioner programs (5th ed.). Washington DC: Author.
2. Branstetter, M. L., Smith, L. S., & Brooks, A. F. Evidence-based use of electronic clinical tracking systems in advanced practice registered nurse
education: An integrative review. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 32(7), 312-319. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000069.
3. Claybo, L. M. L. (2017). Competency based doctoral education for APRNs. [Online lecture & power point slides]. Retrieved from
https://www.aacn.nche.edu/webinars/info-page?sessionaltcd=WF17_06_07.
4.Eller, L.S., Lev, E. L. & Feurer, A. (2014). Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 34(5),
815-820. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.020.
5. Johnson,D. M., & Bushey, T. I. (2011). Integrating the academic electronic health record into nursing curriculum: Preparing student nurses in
practice. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 29(3),133-137. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3182121ed8.
6. Joy, L., Berner, B., & Tarrant, D. (2012). Evaluating the implementation of an online clinical log system for family nurse practitioner students.
Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 30(1), 29-36. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e31822b889b.
7. McNelis, A. M., Horton-Deutsch, S., & Friesth, B. (2012). Improving quality and safety in graduate education using an electronic student tracking
system. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 26(5), 358-364. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2012.06.006.
8. Thomas, A. T., Crabtree, M. K., Delaney, K., Dumas, M., Kleinpell, R….Wolf, A. (2017). Nurse practioner core competencies content. The National
Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties, Retrieved from
http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.nonpf.org/resource/resmgr/competencies/2017_NPCoreComps_with_Curric.pdf.
9. Price, D., Tschannen, D., & Caylor, S. (2013). Integrated learning through student goal development. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(9), 525-
528. doi: 10.3928/014834-20130819-03.
10. Smith, L. S., & Branstetter, M. L. (2016). A formative program evaluation of electronic clinical tracking system documentation to meet national
core competencies. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 34(9), 393-400. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000254.
11. Starosts, K., Davis, S.L., Kenney, R. M., Peters, M., To, L., & Kalus, J. S. (2017). Creating objective and measurable postgraduate year 1 residency
graduate requirements. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacists, 74, 389-396. doi: 10.2146/aljhp160138.
Contact
[email protected]
Study Abroad Program With Dynamics of Collaborative Research: A Case of Two Universities
Sylvia Mupepi, PhD, USA
Nancy Schoofs, PhD, USA
Abstract
A bilateral agreement for collaborative academic work exists between the two universities making it possible for the Kirkhof College
of Nursing (GVSU) and School of Nursing and Midwifery (UCC) to establish a partnership for study abroad activities in public health
nursing and collaborative research. The collaborative endeavor began in 2008 when an undergraduate nursing student from GVSU
studied for a semester at UCC. While at UCC she skyped with a group of GVSU OBGYN students on public health issues exchanging
knowledge. The interest for establishment of a formal program was ignited. This was followed up by faculty exchange visits between
the two nursing education institutions in 2008, 2009 and 2010. In 2010 three GVSU faculty members spent two weeks at UCC
viewing the physical campus, meeting with UCC nursing faculty, visiting clinical sites, accommodations, and communication and
transportation systems, and laying the groundwork for a partnership.
In 2013, the first twelve GVSU undergraduate students from the traditional and second degree BSN programs spent two weeks at UCC over their
spring break and the week afterwards. Two UCC faculty members collaborated with two GVSU faculty to organize learning activities which included
healthcare delivery and categories of healthcare providers in Ghana and similarities and differences in healthcare delivery and nursing programs
(UCC and GVSU). Students explored the role played by the Student Nurses Association and how they might interact and make it possible to work
side by side. They eventually conducted health screening across the lifespan working with community leaders who mobilized their community
members. UCC and GVSU students and faculty teamed together to conduct home visits to follow up immobile seniors, prenatal mothers and
vaccination defaulters. The lead author has strengthened the relationship between the two schools by completing a one year Fulbright Scholarship
at UCC in 2013-2014 helping to develop their MSN program and continuing to train host country onsite faculty and clinical preceptors for both UCC
and GVSU programs. The lead author has supervised some MSN theses leading to the beginning of collaborative research with one of the UCC
coauthors. Since 2015 the lead author returns to UCC each summer to work with graduate students and mentoring some faculty thereby
maintaining the relationship with nursing faculty, partners and community workers. This has had a great impact of experience on students and
faculty’s personal, academic, life skills, and competencies regarding their roles on world perspectives and transcultural nursing.
It has now been five years of ongoing partnership between GVSU and UCC. Along the way, students from the GVSU RN-BSN and DNP programs
have also been added to the mix of students going to UCC. Each year the process of GVSU training and organization improves. The next endeavor
involves UCC students coming to GVSU.
References
None.
Contact
[email protected]
Implementing Clinical Accommodations for Students With Physical Disabilities in Nursing Education
Erin Horkey, MSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Faculty effectiveness is central to the advancement of nursing education and the preparation of nursing program graduates who are
prepared for today’s fast pace clinical environment (Barksdale et al., 2011; Kring, Ramseur, & Parnell, 2013). The promotion of
quality teaching and learning practices from faculty require the use of evidence-based research outcomes that address learner
preparation (National League for Nursing, 2016). Regulatory changes in higher education have increased access to nursing education
for students with disabilities. However, a long standing tendency of excluding students with disabilities from nursing education has
left many nursing faculty without the knowledge and expertise needed to appropriately accommodate students with disabilities
(Dupler et al., 2012; May, 2014; Newsham, 2008; Smith, 2012). Therefore, research was conducted to determine how nursing faculty
can facilitate the success of students with disabilities once they are admitted into a nursing education program. The study examined
best practices for faculty working with students with physical disabilities in a clinical nursing course. Currently, a knowledge deficit
exists amongst nursing faculty on how to effectively implement accommodations for students with disabilities (Marks & Ailey, 2012;
May, 2014; Newsham, 2008). Furthermore, no evidence-based guidelines for accommodation implementation can be found in the
nursing literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to uncover the process by which faculty made reasonable academic
accommodations for nursing students with physical disabilities within the clinical setting of a pre-licensure nursing education course.
The results of this study are significant to nursing education because the number of students with disabilities perusing degrees in higher education
is steadily increasing and more students with disabilities are likely to enter nursing education programs in the near future. However, many nursing
faculty report a lack of knowledge on how to appropriately and effectively accommodate students with disabilities, especially in the clinical setting
(Aaberg, 2012; May, 2014; Meloy & Gambescia, 2014). While a small number of students with disabilities have matriculated through nursing
programs, a gap in the literature exists explaining how faculty use reasonable academic accommodations with these students. This knowledge gap
prevents the widespread adoption of successful accommodation practices across nursing education programs, thereby limiting the acceptance and
matriculation of students with disabilities. The anticipated increase of students with disabilities in nursing education necessitates that nursing
faculty identify a consistent and feasible process for inclusion. Understanding the process by which reasonable academic accommodations are
made is the first step to creating inclusive learning environments in nursing education.
Constructivist grounded theory method, as explained by Charmaz (2014), was used to answer the research question: What is the process by which
faculty make reasonable academic accommodations for pre-licensure nursing students with physical disabilities, specifically orthopedic
impairments, in the clinical setting of a nursing education program? Nursing faculty were interviewed about their experiences providing
accommodations for students with physical disabilities in a clinical nursing course. Faculty were recruited from schools of nursing across the
Midwestern United States and self-selected into the study. Individual interviews were conducted with initial participant using a virtual platform.
The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Research transcripts were coded using constant comparative methods and
categories and subcategories of results were revealed. Theoretical sampling with additional participants was used to further develop, enhance, and
ensure the accuracy of developed categories (Charmaz, 2014). Research results will be discussed using participant narratives as supporting detail as
well as future research needs based upon study results.
References
Aaberg, V. A. (2012). A path to greater inclusivity through understanding implicit attitudes toward disability. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(9),
505-509.
Barksdale, D., Woodley, L., Page, J., Bernhardt, J., Kowlowitz, V., & Oermann, M., (2011). Faculty development: Doing more with less. The Journal of
Continuing Education in Nursing, 42(12), 537-544. doi:10.3928/00220124-20110301-01
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Dupler, A. E., Allen, C., Maheady, D. C., Fleming, S. E., & Allen, M. (2012). Leveling the playing field for nursing students with disabilities:
Implications of the amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Nursing Education, 51(3), 140-144.
Kring, D. L., Ramseur, N., & Parnell, E. (2013). How effective are hospital adjunct clinical instructors? Nursing Education Perspectives, 34(1), 34-36.
Marks, B. & Ailey, S. (2012). White paper on inclusion of students with disabilities in nursing educational programs for the California committee on
employment for people with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/Student-Disabilities-White-Paper.pdf
May, K. A. (2014). Nursing faculty knowledge of the Americans with disabilities act. Nurse Educator, 39(5), 241-245.
Meloy, F., & Gambescia, S. F. (2014). Guidelines for response to student requests for academic considerations. Support versus enabling. Nurse
Educator, 39(3), 138-142.
National League for Nursing. (2016). NLN research priorities in nursing education 2016-1019. Retrieved from: http://www.nln.org/professional-
development-programs/research/research-priorities-in-nursing-education
Newsham, K. R. (2008). Disability law and health care education. Journal of Allied Health, 37(2), 110-115.
Smith, M. (2012). Technical standards versus essential functions: Developing Disability-Friendly Policies for Nursing Programs, NOND FAQ
Resources. NOND, Chicago, IL.
Contact
[email protected]
Development and Pilot Testing of a Multidimensional Learning Environment Survey for Nursing Students
Margaret (Betsy) Babb Kennedy, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Mary Ann Jessee, PhD, MSN, RN, USA
Mavis N. Schorn, PhD, MSN, MS, BSN, RN, CNM, USA
Karen A. Hande, DNP, RN, ANP-BC, CNE, USA
Mary S. Dietrich, PhD, USA
Regina Russell, MA, USA
Abstract
Background & Significance: The learning environment has a major role in determining nursing students' academic inspiration,
learning, and achievement. Student perception of the learning environment is widely accepted as a significant influence on student
outcomes. While there are options for assessing selected components of learning environments for nursing students such as the
clinilal learning environment. There are existing instruments that assess nursing student perceptions of selected environmental
components, such as the cinical leanring environment, yet the learning environment encompasses more than physical setting,
facilities, or technology. The social, cultural, relational, digital/virtual, and academic aspects of learning environments also provide
contexts for processes that shape student learning, success, and professional identity formation. Student experiences also create a
personal learning environment. Complex and dynamic interactions among all components create the learning environment for
students. While faculty cannot control every aspect of the learning environment, knowledge of student perceptions can guide
understanding experiences and facilitate opportunities to address issues.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe pilot development and testing of a multidimensional learning environment survey to explore
student perceptions of multiple learning environment dimensions. The presentation will report pilot and subsequent psychometric testing as well
as mixed-method data analysis results.
Methods: Development of the Learning Environment Survey began as an interdisciplinary effort to understand perceptions of, experiences and
satisfaction with the shared learning environment of medical students, resident physicians, and nursing students at one academic medical center
during the previous year. The learning environment was operationalized as the curriculum, including implementation, faculty, and setting, including
classroom, clinical and incorporation of technology. The survey was differentiated from specific course and faculty evaluations. Key areas for
evaluation were selected for aligning data points from resident and medical student surveys, and items either developed by the researchers or
adapted with permission from similar existing instruments for use with nursing students. Instrument items address such overarching domains as
curriculum, professional behaviors and supportiveness of faculty and clinical preceptors, wellness (school/life balance), diversity and inclusion,
moral distress, integration of technology, additional development and learning opportunities, handling concerns, and feedback and evaluation.
Anonymous survey items include 5 point Likert-type questions and open-ended questions for mixed-method analysis. Participants were asked not
to use specific names in narrative descriptions experiences. Basic demographic information is also collected.
Results: After institutional review board approval, content validity was established with a panel of 5 faculty experts and 5 students. Expert item-
content validity index (I-CVI) for items was 0.60-1.0, scale-content validity was 0.80 to 1.0, and scale-content validity index/average (S-CVI-Ave) was
.94. Student I-CVI was 0.20-1.0, S-CVI was 0.77-1.0, and S-CVI-Ave was 0.92. Minor word changes were made to the low scoring items based on
expert and student feedback for understanding. The instrument was then piloted with 27 pre-licensure, accelerated, second degree students.
Internal consistency of scores from the major conceptual domains of the survey (e.g., Environment, Culture, Work-Life, Diversity) were promising
(Cronbach’s alpha >= 0.70).
Implications: Survey results can enable faculty reflection and engagement with issues that impact nursing student learning outcomes. Next steps
will include further psychometric testing of the instrument with deployment to a larger sample, which includes all nursing students at one
institution, across academic programs for more robust psychometric testing. Future directions may include development of a conceptual
framework, as well as multi-institutional, and ultimately national distribution of the Learning Environment Survey. While medical education and
accreditation require frequent surveys and reviews of benchmark, comparative data across institutions, opportunities for data collection regarding
the learning environment across similar academic nursing programs do not currently exist. Such information could assist nursing schools in
understanding their unique climate and culture, as well as provide valuable aggregate data for comparing overall climates and cultures of nursing
education among types and levels of institutions. National data will provide an opportunity to identify and address issues critical to the future of
nursing education and the well being of nursing students.
References
Benbassat, J. (2013). Undesirable features of the medical learning environment: A narrative review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences
Education, Theory & Practice, 18(3), 527-536.
Boor, K., Scheele, F., van der Vleuten, C. P., Scherpbier, A. J., Teunissen, P. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2007). Psychometric properties of an instrument to
measure the clinical learning environment. Medical Educator, 41(1), 92-99.
Brown, T., et al. (2011). Practice education learning environments: the mismatch between perceived and preferred expectations of undergraduate
health science students. Nurse Education Today, 31(8), 22-28.
Bynum, W. E. & Lindeman, B. (2016). Caught in the Middle: A resident perspective on influences from the learning environment that perpetuate
mistreatment. Academic Medicine, 91(3), 301-304.
Colbert-Getz, J. M., Kim, S., Goode, V. H., Shochet, R. B., & Wright, S. M. (2014). Assessing medical students' and residents' perceptions of the
learning environment: exploring validity evidence for the interpretation of scores from existing tools. Academic Medicine, 89(12), 1687-1693.
Flott, E. A. & Linden, L. (2016). The clinical learning environment in nursing education: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(3), 501-
513.
Henderson, A., Cooke, M., Creedy, D. K. & Walker, R. (2012). Nursing students' perceptions of learning in practice environments: a review. Nurse
Henderson, A., Twentyman, M., Heel, A., & Lloyd, B. (2006). Students' perception of the psycho-social clinical learning environment: an evaluation
of placement models. Nurse Education Today, 26 (7), 564-571.
Nishioka, V., Coe, M., Hanita, M., & Moscato, S. (2014). Dedicated education unit: Student perspectives. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35, 301-
307.
O’Mara, L., McDonald, J., Gillespie, M., Brown, H., & Miles, L. (2014). Challenging clinical learning environments: Experiences of undergraduate
nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 14, 208-213.
Roff, S. (2005). The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM)--a generic instrument for measuring students' perceptions of
undergraduate health professions curricula. Medical Teacher, 27(4), 322-325.
Soemantri, D., Herrera, C., Riquelme, A. (2010). Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: A systematic review. Medical
Teacher, 32(12), 947-952.
Whittle, S. R., Whelan, B., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. G. (2007). DREEM and beyond: Studies of the educational environment as a means for its
enhancement. Education for Health, 20(1), 7.
Contact
[email protected]
Factors Related to Learning-Support Competencies of Junior Faculty at Nursing Universities
Yoshiko Doi, PhD, RN, Japan
Yasuko Hosoda, PhD, RN, Japan
Abstract
Background: Competency development for university faculty has become a key priority ever since such faculty development became obligatory. A
review of documentation (Davis et al., 2005; Guy, et al., 2010；Poindexter,2013) on overseas nursing faculty competencies found differences in
each nation's nursing education system and in the social roles played by nursing faculty; thus, the application of competency items used for
overseas nursing faculty in Japan was thought to be problematic. As a result, the Nursing Faculty Competencies Self-Assessment Scale (NFCSAS)
was created in 2015 with the aim of measuring the competencies of faculty at nursing universities (Doi & Hosoda, 2016). The NFCSAS is comprised
of core learning-support competencies, as well as research performance competencies, social contributions competencies, and organizational
operation competencies. The NFCSAS has adequate internal consistency and stability, as well as construct and criterion-related validity (Doi &
Hosoda, 2016).
Purpose: This study clarified factors related to the learning-support competencies of junior faculty at nursing universities to obtain suggestions for
the effective faculty development of junior faculty.
Methods: From July to October 2015, a postal-mail questionnaire survey was conducted with 162 junior faculty members (assistant professors,
under the age of 39, with less than three years’ experience as nursing university faculty) in Japan. This survey consisted of the NFCSAS (82 items),
the Metacognition Scale for Adults (28 items) (Abe & Ida, 2010), the Mentoring Scale (48 items) (Ono, 2000), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (16
items) (Sakano et al., 1986), and questions regarding personal background. Covariance structure analysis was used to analyze the data. Data
analysis was performed using IBM® SPSS® Amos Version 23. This study was performed with the approval of the Osaka Prefecture University Nursing
Research Ethics Committee, Japan (application number 25-64). Participants received a request to participate in the study, which included
information on the purpose of the study, a summary of the survey, a statement that participation was entirely voluntary, and explanations
regarding how the study’s results would be published and how the confidentiality of personally identifiable information would be maintained.
Results: Valid responses (53.1% response rate) were received from 86 junior faculty participants (18 males, 20.9%; 68 females, 79.1％). Fourteen
participants were in their 20s (16.3%), and 72 were in their 30s (83.7%). Mean years of experience as university faculty was 1.3 ± 0.8 years. As for
highest education achieved, 2 participants (2.3%) had completed doctoral courses, 73 (84.9%) had completed master’s courses, and 11 (12.8%) had
completed undergraduate courses. As for the academic degree obtained (multiple responses permitted), 2 participants (2.3%) had doctoral
degrees, 75 (87.2%) had master's degrees, and 60 (69.8%) had bachelor's degrees. As for type of affiliated university of the junior faculty, 23
participants (26.7%) were at national universities, 27 (31.4%) attended public universities, and 36 (41.9%) attended private universities.
Mentoring, metacognition, age, and years of faculty experience had effects on the learning-support competencies of junior faculty. Further, a
covariance structure model for yielding self-efficacy effects was set and used for analysis. The results showed the significance of the path
coefficients from mentoring, metacognition, and years of faculty experience to learning-support competencies, and from learning-support
competencies to self-efficacy. Nevertheless, as the path coefficient from age to learning-support competencies was not significant, this was
deleted, and the data were reanalyzed. As a result, the goodness-of-fit of the model was within tolerance, with GFI = 0.916, AGFI = 0.845, CFI =
0.982, RMSEA = 0.060. The standardized estimate values of the path coefficient from mentoring, metacognition, and years of faculty experience to
learning-support competencies were, respectively, 0.307, 0.614, and 0.135, and the standardized estimate value of the path coefficient from
learning-support competencies to self-efficacy was 0.682; thus, all were significant. The coefficients of determination were learning-support
competencies: 0.589 and self-efficacy: 0.100.
Conclusion: The present study made it clear that mentoring, metacognition, and years of faculty experience had effects on the learning-support
competencies of junior faculty, and that these also contribute to self-efficacy. Thus, suggestions for the promotion of effective faculty development
for junior faculty were obtained.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP25463376.
References
Abe, M., & Ida, M. (2010). An Attempt to Construct the Adults' Metacognition Scale: Based on Metacognitive Awareness Inventory, The journal of
psychology Rissho University, 1, 23-34. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11266/5041
Davis, D., Stullenbarger, E., Dearman, C., & Kelley, J.A. (2005). Proposed nurse educator competencies: Development and validation of a model,
Nursing Outlook, 53, 206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2005.01.006
Doi, Y., & Hosoda, Y. (2016). Examining the Nursing Faculty Competencies Self-Assessment Scale’s Reliability and Validity. The 4th China Japan
Korea Nursing Conference Abstract 147.
Guy, J., Taylor, C., Roden, J., Blundell, J., & Tolhurst, G. (2010). Reframing the Australian nurse teacher competencies: do they reflect the 'REAL'
world of nurse teacher practice? Nurse Education Today, 31(3), 231-237. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.025
Ono, K. (2000). On the Validity and Reliability of the Mentoring Scale, Asia University management review, 35(1/2), 1-20.
Poindexter, K. (2013). Novice nurse educator entry-level competency to teach: a national study, The Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 59-66.
doi: 10.3928/01484834-20130913-04.
Sakano, Y., Tohjoh, M., Fukui, I., & Komatsu, C. (1986). The general self-efficacy scale (GSES): KOKORO NET CO., LTD, Tokyo.
Contact
[email protected]
Bridge the Diversity Gap by Collaborating, Mentoring, and Coaching
Amanda D. Quintana, DNP, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this presentation is to share outcomes from the HRSA Nursing Workforce Diversity project awarded to the Colorado
Center for Nursing Excellence (Center) in 2015. This project focused on four main areas; 1) Mentoring, 2) Emerging Nursing Faculty Support, 3)
Transition to Practice in Critical Care, and 4) Family Support Partnership. Mentoring, coaching and collaboration were key foci that ensured success
in all areas of this project. The goals, strategies, and outcomes of this project will be shared along with recommendations for continued work to
increase nursing diversity in order to meet the needs of the rapidly growing diversified patient population. There is a huge disparity between the
number of diverse patients and the amount of diverse nursing workforce. Lessons learned and pearls gained will be discussed to explore future
methods for bridging this gap. This presentation will focus mostly on the mentoring program as it relates most closely to this audience.
Methods: After a significant amount of building relationships, networking and forming partnerships, a structured 2-day Mentor Training Institute
(MTI) was planned and developed to train ethnically and racially diverse, experienced clinical nurses with varying levels of nursing education and
specialty area expertise. Mentors and Mentees were recruited from both health care systems and undergraduate nursing schools, respectively,
across Colorado through collaborative measures. Once mentors are trained and paired with nursing student mentees, structured professional
coaching is provided monthly for 1 year to enhance and reinforce concepts learned. Mentoring relationship is 1 year in length. A comprehensive list
of on-line and local resources was compiled to address social determinants of education to mitigate any potential challenges that may impede
student success. Collaborative partners were established and comprehensive assessment plans were completed to determine effectiveness of the
program.
Results: Analysis is currently in progress and will be complete by the time of this presentation. Based on preliminary data, we can infer that our
programs were successful and worth replicating. In 2 years, >60 ethnically/racially diverse mentors were trained. Over 70 undergraduate students
have been successfully mentored. Resources utilized by mentees helped them be successful. Mentors rated their training as effective to very
effective in helping them learn mentoring skills and increase mentoring confidence levels. Mentors verbalize appreciation of coaching which has
helped them stay focused, present and motivated. Mentees validated this by rating mentor support as moderate to extremely supportive.
Collaboration was key to success. NCLEX pass rate to date is 100%.
Implications: This work has brought nursing education and clinical service industries together to increase nursing diversity in the state. Both groups
have come together at our Annual Diversity Summits to explore strategies to increase diversity. Holistic review and admissions into nursing schools
has been explored and has been implemented in 2 nursing schools as a result of this work and other Colorado schools are planning to follow suit.
Cultural awareness and competency training is also forthcoming. Additionally, many mentees who completed the program are now paying it
forward as mentors while others are continuing their higher education as a result of their experiences. These actions will increase diversity in
Colorado to bridge the diverse patient and nursing workforce gap.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (October 2016). Nursing Faculty: A spotlight on Diversity, Policy Brief. Retrieved on February 13, 2017
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/government-affairs/Diversity-Spotlight.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (March 2016). State Profile; Colorado. Retrieved on February 13, 2017 from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/government-affairs/resources/Colorado1.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (October 2016). The Changing Landscape: Nursing Student Diversity on the Rise Policy Brief. Retrieved
on February 13, 2017 from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/government-affairs/Student-Diversity-FS.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (March 2015). Fact Sheet: Enhancing Diversity in the Nursing Workforce. Retrieved on February 13,
2017 from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/diversityFS.pdf
Campaign for Action. Increasing Diversity in Nursing. Retrieved on February 14, 2017 from http://campaignforaction.org/issue/increasing-
diversity-in-nursing/
Institute of Medicine Report in Brief (December 2015). Assessing Progress on the Institute of Medicine Report The Future of Nursing. Retrieved on
February 13, 2017 from http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2015/AssessingFON_releaseslides/Nursing-
Report-in-brief.pdf
National Council of State Boards of Nursing (2015). National Nursing Workforce Study. Retrieved on February 13, 2017 from
https://www.ncsbn.org/workforce.htm
National League of Nursing. NLN Center for Diversity and Global Initiatives. Retrieved on February 13, 2017 from http://www.nln.org/centers-for-
nursing-education/nln-center-for-diversity-and-global-initiatives
NLN Vision Series (February 2016). Achieving Diversity and Meaningful Inclusion in Nursing Education: A living Document from the National League
for Nursing. Retrieved on February 14, 2017 from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/about/vision-statement-achieving-
diversity.pdf?sfvrsn=2
US Census Bureau (2015). American Community Survey: American Fact Finder. Retrieved on February 13, 2017 from
https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
Vaida, B. (2016). Charting Nursing’s Future The Changing Face of Nursing: Creating a Workforce for an Increasingly Diverse Nation. Retrieved on
February 13, 2017 from http://campaignforaction.org/resource/charting-nursings-future-changing-face-nursing/.
Contact
[email protected]
Start With What They Know: Student Perceptions of Self-Efficacy in Community Health Nursing
Angela Lane, DNP, USA
Ruby Dunlap, EdD, USA
Abstract
Constructivist learning theory states that learners integrate or build upon prior knowledge including formal and informal learning
experiences. Related to Constructivist Learning Theory is Bandura (1977) Self-Efficacy Theory which describes learners’ confidence in
their ability to successfully perform in a role is related to knowledge acquired from prior learning. This pilot study seeks to develop
insight into evaluating how students perceive and justify their ability to perform in specific community health nursing roles before a
senior level community health nursing course and after the course in a baccalaureate nursing program of study. Prior to beginning
the course students complete a pre-course survey instrument. For the pre-course instrument students base responses on prior
knowledge. This prior knowledge includes formal education in arts and sciences, nursing courses prior to their senior year, as well as
life experiences. The survey instrument was developed by experienced community health nurses using roles a first-year nurse might
realistically encounter. The instrument has ten items, five pairings of Likert scale and short answer questions. Pre and post course
surveys were collected over a calendar year from students in a baccalaureate community health nursing course. For the post-course
survey, responses include all prior knowledge in addition to the course specific learning. Course specific learning and concurrent
nursing course learning includes both didactic and experiential learning opportunities. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis
will be conducted on the data which has been archived from the 2016 calendar year in aggregate form. This pilot study seeks to
describe how well the instrument measures the change in students’ perception of self-efficacy in selected community health nursing
roles before and after the course. The study also seeks to identify what prior and new knowledge students reference as the
justification for their perceived self-efficacy. Based on conclusions supported by the data analysis, revisions to the instrument as well
as the course will be considered.
References
Bandura A. (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 84(2):191-215.
Brandon, A. F. and All, A.C. (2010) Constructivism theory analysis and application to curricula. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(2): 89-92.
Duane, B.T. and Satre, M.E. (2014). Utilizing constructivism learning theory in collaborative testing as a creative strategy to promote essential
nursing skills. Nurse Education Today 34: 31-34. From: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.005
Hagemeier, N.E., Hess, R., Hagen, K.S., and Sorah, E.L. (2014). Impact of an interprofessional communication course on nursing, medical and
pharmacy students’ communication skill self-efficacy beliefs. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 78(10): 1-10.
Howardson, G.N. and Behrend, T.S. (2015), The relative importance of specific self-efficacy sources in pretraining self-efficacy beliefs. International
Journal of Training and Development, 19(4): 233-252. Doi: 10.1111/ijtd.12060
Vygotsky, L.S., (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yoder, S. (2014) Constructivist theory and use from a 21st century perspective. Journal of Applied Learning Technology, 4(3): 12-20.
Contact
[email protected]
Using the Triangulated OSCE to Assess Student Performance in Simulation
Heather Johnson, DNP, FNP-BC, FAANP, USA
Catherine G. Ling, PhD, FNP-BC, FAANP, USA
Andrea Fuller, DNP, FNP-BC, USA
Laura Taylor, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Simulation is widely used in health education to improve interviewing and clinical skills. The Objective Structured Clinical
Examination (OSCE) is a method of assessing clinical competence by rotating students through a variety of standardized patient (SP)
scenarios or skills stations. There are at present no widely circulated gold standard evaluation methods for OSCE performance.
Variability in psychometric properties, vague instructions for participants, inconsistency in SP responses, poorly defined outcomes
and a mismatch between intent of the evaluation and type of data collected are long-standing critiques of OSCEs. Directly observed
simulation encounters are labor intensive represent a significant strain on faculty time. Challenges associated with inter-rater
reliability and outcomes can be minimized by adopting a standardized checklist. The checklist itself must be closely examined as it
can steer the faculty observer to an evaluation of skills performance over clinical synthesis or decision making. The purpose of this
presentation is to provide a description of how two programs collaborated to develop an evaluation procedure to provide a more
complete perspective of APRN student performance in OSCE. Faculty determined that 3 data points were required: faculty
observation, student experience and SP feedback. A standardized checklist rubric, tailored to each case and developmental year,
was developed for use by faculty. The student experience captured the essential information gathered by the student during the
encounter. The final data point was the Essential Elements of Communication rubric completed by SPs following an encounter. The
triangulated approach had high inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. The project demonstrated that tailored rubrics,
evaluation of student experience and SP feedback are strongly associated with demonstration (or lack of) clinical skills progression
and provided a means of developing tailored goals and remediation plans for students who performed below expectations. At a
higher level, students who were struggling clinically were identified much earlier in the program, allowing for more intensive
instruction and remediation. The observation form has given uniformity to feedback and been a positive training instrument
regarding expectations of student performance. The OSCE evaluation method is flexible enough to meet different stages of learning,
formative, summative and high stakes assessment.
References
Aronowitz, T., Aronowitz, S., Mardin-Small, J., & Kim, B. (2017). Using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) as Education in Advanced
Practice Registered Nursing Education. J Prof Nurs, 33(2), 119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.06.003
Casey, P. M., Goepfert, A. R., Espey, E. L., Hammoud, M. M., Kaczmarczyk, J. M., Katz, N. T., ...Obstetrics Undergraduate Medical Education,
Committee. (2009). To the point: reviews in medical education--the Objective Structured Clinical Examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 200(1), 25-34.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.878
Dong, T., LaRochelle, J. S., Durning, S. J., Saguil, A., Swygert, K., & Artino, A. R., Jr. (2015). Longitudinal effects of medical students' communication
skills on future performance. Mil Med, 180(4 Suppl), 24-30. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00565
Lejonqvist, G. B., Eriksson, K., & Meretoja, R. (2016). Evaluating clinical competence during nursing education: A comprehensive integrative
literature review. Int J Nurs Pract, 22(2), 142-151. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12406
Rushforth, H. E. (2007). Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): review of literature and implications for nursing education. Nurse Educ
Today, 27(5), 481-490. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.009
Schleicher, I., Leitner, K., Juenger, J., Moeltner, A., Ruesseler, M., Bender, B., ...Kreuder, J. G. (2017). Examiner effect on the objective structured
clinical exam - a study at five medical schools. BMC Med Educ, 17(1), 71. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0908-1
Schleicher, I., Leitner, K., Juenger, J., Moeltner, A., Ruesseler, M., Bender, B., ...Kreuder, J. G. (2017). Does quantity ensure quality? Standardized
OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluation of practical skills at different medical faculties. Ann Anat. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006
Contact
[email protected]
Updating and Refining a Measure for Moral Distress: Introducing the MDS-2017
Phyllis Brown Whitehead, PhD, APRN/CNS, ACHPN, RN-BC, USA
Elizabeth G. Epstein, PhD, RN, USA
Ann B. Hamric, PhD, RN, FAAN, USA
Abstract
Background: Initially identified in nursing, moral distress is now understood to be a serious problem in other healthcare disciplines
such as medicine, respiratory therapy, and social work (Allen et al., 2013; Aultman & Wurzel, 2014; Hamric & Blackhall, 2007;
Schwenzer & Wang, 2006; Whitehead et al., 2015). For clinicians at the bedside, moral distress can have negative implications such
as burnout, (Meltzer & Huckabay, 2004; Rushton et al., 2015) and intent to leave a position, (Allen et al., 2013; Hamric & Blackhall,
2007; Hamric et al., 2012; Trautmann, Epstein, Rovnyak, & Snyder, 2015; Whitehead et al., 2015). As active work in this field
continues to explore the impact of moral distress on providers and organizations, identify effective interventions to resolve morally
distressing clinical situations, and describe the association between moral distress and patient care quality, valid and reliable
instruments to measure moral distress are critical. In 2001, Corley introduced the Moral Distress Scale (MDS), a 38-item scale
designed for nurses in critical care settings. In 2012, Hamric and colleagues shortened and revised the MDS to be applicable to all
health professions and acute care clinical settings (Hamric et al., 2012). While the instrument has demonstrated good reliability,
several studies in the past 5 years have indicated that there are additional important root causes not captured by the current MDS-
R. Additionally, it has been suggested that the 6 versions of the MDS-R (adult and pediatric versions for physicians, nurses, and other
providers) could be condensed to one standard instrument. Thus, the purpose of this project is to update the MDS-R and to
psychometrically test the new version, the MDS-2017.
Method: We undertook a multi-step process to revise and update the MDS-R. First, we have received 20 MDS-R datasets from principal
investigators which, when combined, yielded a dataset of over 4,300 respondents. We are analyzing this large dataset to determine which of the
current 21 items are most and least often indicated as significant causes of moral distress. From this analysis, we will identify items that should be
deleted. Second, an exploratory factor analysis is currently underway to determine whether the current MDS-R has an underlying factor structure.
Concurrent with this statistical analysis, we reviewed the literature and identified 15 recent publications in which additional causes of moral
distress were found or proposed. From these articles, we extracted potential new causes and compared them to the items on the current MDS-R.
Finally, the current MDS-R provides space for respondents to insert additional causes of moral distress. We have reviewed and evaluated additional
causes listed by respondents in eight different studies to determine whether they constitute new items that should be represented in the MDS-
2017. Once a final MDS-2017 has been constructed, we will test the instrument, with IRB approval, at 2 academic medical centers.
Results: Based upon the review of articles, evaluation of respondent comments, and statistical analyses, the current MDS-R items are being refined
and updated for accuracy, clarity, and relevance. Thus far, five items are proposed to be eliminated, twelve items refined, and 11-13 items added.
IRB approval is being obtained to test the MDS-2017. The proposed MDS-2017 and preliminary results of the testing phase will be presented at this
conference.
Discussion: Identifying specific sources of moral distress is imperative to better target interventions to mitigate moral distress within institutions.
The significant relationship between moral distress and leaving a position is well documented and supports the importance of minimizing moral
distress to improve staff retention. The updated MDS-2017 will include the most contemporary understanding of the root causes of moral distress.
If testing yields a psychometrically stable instrument, the MDS-2017 should replace the MDS-R.
References
Allen, R., Judkins-Cohn, T., deVelasco, R., Forges, E., Lee, R., Clark, L., & Procunier, M. (2013). Moral distress among healthcare professionals at a
health system. JONA’s Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation, 15(3), 111-181.
Aultman, J., & Wurzel, R. (2014). Recognizing and alleviating moral distress among obstetrics and gynecology residents. Journal of Graduate
Medical Education, 6(3), 457-462.
Corley, M. C. (1995). Moral distress of critical care nurses. American Journal of Critical Care, 4(4), 280-285.
Corley, M. C., Minick, P., Elswick, R. K., & Jacobs, M. (2005). Nurse moral distress and ethical work environment. Nursing Ethics, 12(4), 381-390.
Hamric, A. B., & Blackhall, L. J. (2007). Nurse-physician perspectives on the care of dying patients in intensive care units: Collaboration, moral
distress, and ethical climate. Critical Care Medicine, 35(2), 422-429.
Hamric, A. B., Borchers, C. T., & Epstein, E. G. (2012). Development and testing of an instrument to measure moral distress in healthcare
professionals. AJOB Primary Research, 3(2), 1-9.
Meltzer, L. S., & Huckabay, L. M. (2004). Critical care nurses' perceptions of futile care and its effect on burnout. American Journal of Critical Care,
13(3), 202-208.
Rushton, C. H., Batcheller, J., Schroeder, K., & Donohue, P. (2015). Burnout and resilience among nurses practicing in high-intensity settings.
American Journal of Critical Care, 24(5), 412-419.
Schwenzer, K., & Wang, L. (2006). Assessing moral distress in respiratory care practitioners. Critical Care Medicine, 34(12), 2967-2973.
Trautmann, J., Epstein, E., Rovnyak, V., & Snyder, A. (2015). Relationships among moral distress, level of practice independence, and intent to leave
of nurse practitioners in emergency departments: Results from a national survey. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 37(2), 134.
Whitehead, P., Herbertson, R. K., Hamric, A. B., Epstein, E. G., & Fisher, J. M. (2015). Moral distress among healthcare professionals: Report of an
institution-wide survey. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(2), 117-125.
Contact
[email protected]
Perceptions of DNP-Prepared Nurse Educators on Their Preparation for the Faculty Role
Mary Ann Burke, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Jeannie R. Harper, PhD, RN, USA
D. Michele Ellis, PhD, RN, USA
Emily Eiswirth, , DNP, APRN, ANP-BC, FNP-C, USA
Kim B. Brannagan, PhD, MSN, MBA, BS (Ed), RN, USA
Abstract
The nursing faculty shortage in the United States is clearly documented (AACN, 2015). This critical shortage is far-reaching, with the
lack of qualified nurse educators impacting the number of students that schools of nursing can admit. Doctorally-prepared nurses
can help address this shortage, but these educators may need support in the faculty role because their education is not have
prepared them for the expectations of academia, depending on the content of the program they attended. The purpose of this
research study is to explore doctorally-prepared nurse educators’ perception of their confidence in their preparedness for the
faculty role. The researchers are seeking to identify challenges in the academic role faced by doctorally-prepared faculty members.
The research questions are: Do faculty with a doctoral degree feel prepared to teach in a School of Nursing? What challenges do
doctorally-prepared faculty face in the faculty role?
Preparation for the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) role focuses on application and practice. The Doctoral of Philosophy (PhD) degree prepares
nurse scientists to conduct research and discover new knowledge in nursing (AACN, 2010; Melnyk, 2013). Both degrees do not necessarily prepare
nurses to teach nursing, since nursing education courses are not typically included in nursing degrees unless the program has an emphasis on
nursing education (Dreifuerst et al., 2016). In preparing DNP graduates for roles in practice and application of research findings, DNP programs do
not focus heavily on developing and conducting research. Instead, the focus is on translating existing research into practice. The result is that DNP-
prepared graduates moving into faculty roles may have less experience in conducting original research, which is an expectation in most academic
settings (Nicholes & Dyer, 2012; Smeltzer et al, 2015). DNP faculty are necessary to teach DNP students and to guide their future practice; however,
the question of scholarship expectations continues to be a barrier to successful assumption of the faculty role. Some schools are divided on
whether DNP-prepared faculty are prepared to teach nursing, but most agree that they are not prepared for the research expectations in
academia, particularly in universities and Carnegie Level I Research institutions (Agger, Oermann & Lynn, 2014; Oermann, Lynn & Agger, 2016). The
literature demonstrates that much is still unknown about the perception of doctorally-prepared faculty members on their confidence in teaching
and the challenges they face. The current study builds upon the limited research into this topic by asking doctorally-prepared faculty members to
reflect on their career in academia and the impact of their doctoral degree program on their preparation for the faculty role.
A link to a researcher-developed questionnaire will be sent to nursing faculty in CCNE-accredited schools of nursing in seven states in the southern
U.S. Data will be analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings from the study should be completed by early Spring 2018.
References
Agger, C.A., Oermann, M.H. & Lynn, M.R. (2014). Hiring and incorporating Doctor of Nursing Practice-prepared nurse faculty into academic nursing
programs. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(8), 439-446. Doi: 10.3928/01484834-201140724-03
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2010). The research-focused doctoral program in nursing, Pathways to excellence. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/PhDPosition.pdf
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2015). The doctor of nursing practice: Current issues and clarifying recommendations. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/aacn-publications/white-papers/DNP-Implementation-TF-Report-8-15.pdf
Dreifuerst, K.T., McNelis, A.M., Weaver, M.T., Broome, M.E., Draucker, C.B. & Fedko, A.S. (2016). Exploring the pursuit of doctoral education by
nurses seeking or intending to stay in faculty roles. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(3), 202-212. Doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.014
Melnyk, B. M. (2013). Distinguishing the preparation and roles of Doctor of Philosophy and Doctor of Nursing Practice graduates: National
implications for academic curricula and health care systems. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(8), 442-448. Doi: 10.3928/01484834-20130719-01
Nicholes, R.H. & Dyer, J. (2012). Is eligibility for tenure possible for the doctor of nursing practice-prepared faculty? Journal of Professional Nursing,
29(1), 13-17. Doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.10.001.
Oermann, M.H., Lynn, M. R., & Agger, C.A. (2016). Hiring intentions of directors of nursing programs related to DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty and
roles of faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(3), 173-177. Doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.06.010
Smeltzer, S.C., Sharts-Hopko, N.C., Cantrell, M.A., Heverly, M.A., Nthenge, S. & Jenkinson, A. (2015). A profile of U.S. nursing faculty in research-
and practice-focused doctoral education. -profiles faculty teaching in DNP and PhD programs. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(2), 178-185.
Doi:10.1111/jnu.12123
Contact
[email protected]
Does a Community Health Simulation Enhance Student Learning More Than the Traditional Windshield
Survey Approach?
Elaine J. Foster, PhD, MSN, BSN, RN, USA
Bruce F. Petrie, PhD, USA
Karen R. Whitham, EdD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
American Sentinel University has developed a community health simulation entitled Sentinel City. From the comfort and safety of
their own homes or offices, students participate in a simulated community health practice experience commonly known as the
“Windshield Survey.” Students board a virtual city bus and assess the cityscape using a guided community health practice
assignment. Students observe and report on key health characteristics while being transported on the bus or walking through
diverse neighborhoods, assess ease of access to city amenities, perceived safety, availability of healthcare, access to transportation
and various factors that support or detract from the residents’ overall health. Potential community health problems are identified
and discussed through structured learning experiences. In this study three questions were asked:
Question #1: Does a windshield survey using the Sentinel City Bus lead to greater student mastery of the concepts vs. a traditional windshield
survey? This question will be answered by comparing sections of students who completed the windshield survey using the Sentinel City Bus
(experimental group) or using the traditional method – either driving or walking around a selected community (control group). Both groups of
students will complete pre- and post-tests. The questions on the pre- and post-tests are the same, so an analysis of the data will show value added
in terms of Windshield Survey knowledge, comfort, and concept mastery, as well as any differences that emerge between the Experimental and
Control groups. An added benefit for the Experimental Group is that the researcher can analyze the time spent and locations viewed and correlate
those data to grade(s) obtained in the Windshield Survey content – i.e. do students who get better grades perform differently in the Windshield
Survey than students who get poorer grades?
Question #2: Does a windshield survey using the Sentinel City Bus lead to greater student satisfaction of the experience vs. a traditional windshield
survey? This question will be answered by comparing sections of students who complete the windshield survey using the Sentinel City Bus
(experimental group) or using the traditional method – either driving or walking around a selected community (control group). Analysis of end of
course student surveys will show any student satisfaction differences that emerge between the experimental and control groups.
Question #3: Does a windshield survey using the Sentinel City Bus lead to greater faculty control of the concepts to be mastered by students vs. a
traditional windshield survey? This question will be answered by faculty completing end of course faculty surveys that include questions addressing
course development and/or preparation, assignment grading, discussion question preparation and grading, interacting with students, course
content, etc. Analysis of the data will show any differences in perception of control of the windshield survey concepts between the faculty teaching
the Experimental and the Control groups.
In the United States, there are over 650 schools of nursing at public and private institutions, with the vast majority having a windshield survey built
into their curriculum. It is hypothesized that data from this study will show that students and faculty find the Sentinel City simulation experience to
be a very positive one. Assessment analysis will also indicate that the simulation experience also has a very positive effect on student academic
experiences. The Sentinel City Bus is a new tool that is being used in higher education to enhance student critical thinking, communication skills,
and knowledge acquisition, and shows great promise in the enhancement of student learning.
References
1 Curl, E. D., Smith, S., Chisholm, L. A., McGee, L. A., & Das, K. (2016). Effectiveness of integrated simulation and clinical experiences compared to
traditional clinical experiences for nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 37(2), 72-77
2 Hayden, J., Smiley, R., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P. (2014). The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal, randomized,
controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in pre-licensure nursing education, Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), S3-S64.
3 Jeffries, P. (2015). Reflections on clinical simulation: the past, present, and future. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(5), 278-279.
4 Jeffries, P., Rodgers, B., & Adamson, K. (2015). NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory: Brief narrative description. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(5),
292-293.
5 Richardson, H., Goldsamt, L. A., Simmons, J., Gilmartin, M., & Jeffries, P. R. (2014). Increasing faculty capacity: Findings from an evaluation of
simulation clinical teaching. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(5), 308-314.
Contact
[email protected]
Mind Over Matter: Educating Nursing Students on the Art and Skill of Mindfulness
Michelle Lynne Allen, EdD, MSN, RN, CCRN, CNE, CHSE, USA
Miriam Ojaghi, EdD, USA
Abstract
Learning Objectives:
1. Upon completion of the mindfulness learning experience, the learner will be able to identify three methods of mindfulness
training.
2. Upon completion of the mindfulness learning experience, the learner will be able to demonstrate and apply three methods
of mindfulness training.
Research Question:
1. Is there a statistically significant difference between self-perceived stress levels in undergraduate junior nursing students
before and after participating in mindfulness education?
Theoretical Framework:
Dorothea Orem’s Self-Care Deficit
Background on Mindfulness in Healthcare: Mindfulness is increasingly being utilized in healthcare settings to alleviate pain,
decrease stress, and enhance quality of life for patients (Hardison & Roll, 2016). Currently, mindfulness training has not been fully
integrated in the health and wellness education of health care providers, despite being the recommended coping tool for nurses
(Hunter, 2016). Nurses are at a great risk of experiencing high degrees of stress leading to burnout and have difficulty coping
(Adriaenssens, De Gucht & Maes, 2015). Approximately 20% of newly graduated nurses leave the profession within the first year as a
result of not caring for their own “self-care deficit,” which necessitates education in nursing school about how to care for oneself
(Blair, 2014).
Narrative of the Project: In one undergraduate, junior nursing course, 107 nursing students were trained by a Koru mindfulness
expert on the principles of mindfulness. Koru mindfulness is specifically mindfulness geared towards the college-aged population
(The Center for Koru Mindfulness, 2017). The purpose of the quality improvement project was to examine whether incorporating
mindfulness training within a nursing foundations curriculum to be beneficial or not. The students were provided a questionnaire
created by the researchers, including comparing pre and post-intervention stress scores using a Likert scale and areas for student
feedback to describe their stress. The nursing students stress were asked to rank their stress levels in a similar fashion to the 0-10
pain scale. Students were informed the questionnaires were anonymous and to answer honestly. The students were taught
foundational principles of mindfulness and meditation. In addition, the nursing students practiced three mindfulness techniques:
“whole body scan,” “labeling,” and “leaves in river.” The response rate for the survey was 80.3%.
Limitations: One nursing class in one university in suburban Chicago utilized mindfulness training, thus limiting generalizability.
Conclusion: On average, the 86 students reported their stress decreased by 36.4% after participating in the mindfulness
intervention. Statistical power was achieved as the sample size of 86 exceeded the minimum sample size of 54 as determined by
G*Power (Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, & Buchner, 2007). The descriptive data found that the average score pre-participation was 6.02
points (SD=2.21) and the post-participation score was 3.92 points (SD=2.10). No outliers were identified through the use of a box
plot. Normality of data was identified using a Normal Q-Q Plot. The mindfulness training decreased nursing students’ perceived
stress by 2.10 points (95% CI, 1.80 to 2.41). A matched-pairs t-test was utilized and found a statistically significant decrease in self-
perceived stress levels after the undergraduate junior nursing students participated in mindfulness training t(85)=13.72, p=0.000,
d=0.98. Participants appeared to have less stress after completing the mindfulness training exercises. In addition, the most common
feedback received from students was: “I feel less stressed,” “I like it; it helped me out of a stressful state,” “It taught me how to
focus on what I can control in my life,” and “I will focus on my breathing more in times of stress,” “Learned I need to be present in
the now.”
Implications: Stress can negatively impact nursing students’ academic performance and risk patient safety (Mills, Carter, Rudd,
Claxton & O’Brien, 2016). As such, nursing students need to learn strategies for self-care during times of high stress. Mindfulness
training offers the nursing students an easy way to care for their mind, body, and spirit with the goal of preventing negative
consequences of stress. Mindfulness has a place in preparation of future nurses. While initial research utilizing the researcher’s tool
demonstrates statistical significance, further reliability and validity testing are warranted and will be conducted using a group of
junior nursing students at a different institution.
References
Adriaenssens, J., De Gucht, V. A., & Maes, S. (2015, Februrary). Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emergency nurses: A systematic review
of 25 years of research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(2), 649-661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.11.004
Blair, M. (2014). Nearly one in five new nurses leave first job within a year, according to survey of newly-licensed registered nurses. Retrieved from
http://www.rwjf.org/en/library/articles-and-news/2014/09/nearly-one-in-five-new-nurses-leave-first-job-within-a-year--acc.html
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power (Version 3.1.9.2) [Computer software]. Retrieved from
http://www.gpower.hhu.de/en.html
Hardison, M. E., & Roll, S. C. (2016, May/June). Mindfulness interventions in physical rehabilitation: A scoping review. American Journal of
Occupational Therapy, 70(3), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2016.018069
Hunter, L. (2016, April). Making time and space: the impact of mindfulness training on nursing and midwifery practice. A critical interpretative
synthesis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(7-8), 918-929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13164
Mills, B., Carter, O., Rudd, C., Claxton, L., & O’Brien, R. (2016, October). An experimental investigation into the extent social evaluation anxiety
impairs performance in simulation-based learning environments amongst final-year undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 45(),
9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.06.006
The Center for Koru Mindfulness. (2017). Koru mindfulness. Retrieved from http://korumindfulness.org/
Contact
[email protected]
Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Vietnamese Clinical Learning Environment Inventory With
Nursing Students
Joanne Ramsbotham, PhD, MN, RN, Australia
Ann Bonner, PhD, MA, BAPSc (Nurs), RN, MACN, Australia
Thi Thuy Ha Dinh, PhD, Australia
Hue Thi Truong, MS, Viet Nam
Abstract
Introduction / background: Reliable tools that collect the perceptions of nursing students are essential to evaluate new nursing
curricula and to inform improvements to learning and teaching strategies. This study was conducted in Vietnam where nursing is
undergoing substantial change as the government moves nursing towards a baccalaureate degree educated, independent and self-
governing profession (Chapman et al., 2012; Harvey et al., 2013). Change has been facilitated within a national government strategy
to improve the health workforce and the health of the Vietnamese population (Nguyen & Chang, 2014). Within these developments,
competency-based curriculum for Bachelor of Nursing courses has been implemented in several Vietnamese universities with
mentoring by Australian nursing academic staff. As there are no Vietnamese language instruments which evaluate the quality of the
Vietnamese clinical education environment, translation, adaptation and testing of an existing English language tool was undertaken.
The modified Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI) (Newton et al., 2010) is an English language instrument for evaluating nursing
students’ perspectives of clinical education environments. It contains of 42 items in six subscales and is rated using a Likert scale. The CLEI was
modified and tested by Newton et al. (2010) from a prior version developed by Chan (2002).
This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Vietnamese language version of the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (V-
CLEI) in a sample of undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing students. The content validity of the revised V-CLEI was also examined with an expert panel
of 21 Vietnamese nurse teachers and recent nurse graduates.
Literature: The clinical health care environment is where nursing students typically integrate prior theoretical knowledge and skills learned at
university with experiences of real people and health care situations to develop competence (Flott & Linden, 2016). Nursing students are usually
adults and as such self -regulate much of their learning within these experiences. Thus their perceptions of how the clinical environment supported
or was a barrier to their learning is relevant and has been to linked with attainment of learning outcomes (Bisholt etal., 2014; Kristofferzon, et
al.,2013; Newton etal., 2010).
There are no existing validated Vietnamese language instruments identified with which the Vietnamese nursing clinical education environment
could be evaluated therefore the V-CLEI (Truong, 2015; Newton etal, 2010) was selected. This Vietnamese language version had previously been
translated and content validity testing undertaken with an expert panel however the psychometric properties of the inventory had not been
tested. In instrument translation, the cultural subtleties of language and fine nuances of meaning cannot be assumed to be stable and use of
rigorous translation methods is an essential step in validation of a new language version of an instrument (Sousa & Rojjanasrirat, 2011).
Methods: A convenience sample of 1023 undergraduate nursing students from five universities and colleges across Vietnam completed
demographic questions and the V-CLEI following a clinical practice placement. To perform factor analysis, the sample was randomly split into two
subsamples named A (n = 511) and B (n = 512) respectively. The groups which were equivalent in term of age, gender, year of study and V-CLEI
score. Exploratory factor analysis (principle axis factoring, varimax rotation, and eigenvalues ≥1, item loading was supressed by 0.4) was performed
in group A, then the EFA results were cross-validated in group B using Cronbach alpha and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The clarity and
relevance of the modified instrument was judged by a group of experienced nurse teachers (n = 21) using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = strongly
disagree 4 = strongly agree). Content Validity Indices (CVI) were calculated for the modified scale.
Results: The average age of the sample (n=1023) was 21 years and were predominately female (75%). Students were spread across second (52 %),
third (37%) and fourth (12%) year of their courses. The proportion of respondents in each year was varied as three locations offered a three-year
degree and two a four-year degree. The EFA produced a five-factor solution that explained 41.03% of the variance consisting of 25 items. When
testing the EFA results in subsample B, the modification indices suggested a good model fit (CMIN/DF = 2.35, CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.05 [90% CI
0.046, 0.057], PCLOSE=0.33). The five new subscales were labelled and Cronbach alpha coefficients computed as: i) Student’s Learning (α=0.69), ii)
Satisfaction with Clinical Experience (α=0.74), iii) Student and Teacher Interaction (α=0.76), iv) Student Centeredness and Learning (α=0.74), and v)
Support for Learning (α=0.63). Finally, an expert panel (n=21) reviewed the 25 items for content-validly revealing on overall acceptable scale level
instrument (average CVI = 0.98).
Discussion: This study robustly translated the CLEI although congruency with another culture cannot be assumed. Psychometric testing with a large
multi-site sample enabled us to establish which items ought to be retained in the V-CLEI. As the five-factor model only explains 41.03% of the
variance, it is likely that there are latent constructs in the Vietnamese clinical environment that are not represented. The health care context in
Vietnam is very different to that in western contexts where the CLEI was developed and previously tested, and is characterised by overcrowding,
high nursing care workload (25 patients per nurse is the norm) and high clinical teacher workload (40-50 students per nurse teacher). Concepts in
the original CLEI and V-CLEI items representing forces that enable individual learning and value innovation and variety in teaching behaviours may
not be applicable to Vietnamese nursing students’ perceptions of their experiences or to the Vietnamese clinical environment. Further testing and
refinement is recommended to enable informed improvements in undergraduate nurse education provision and help equip future Vietnamese
nurse graduates to function at levels comparable with other Asian countries such as Thailand or the Philippines.
References
Bisholt, B., Ohlsson, U., Engstrom, A., Johansson, A. & Gustafsson, M. (2014). Nursing students’ assessment of the learning environment in different
clinical settings. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(3), 304-310.
Chan, D. (2002). Development of the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: using the theoretical framework of learning environment studies to
assess nursing students’’ perceptions of the hospital as a learning environment. The Journal of Nursing Education, 41(2), 69-75.
Chapman, H., Lewis, P.A., Osborne, Y., & Gray, G. (2012). The Vietnam teaching fellowship program: an action research approach to building
capacity for leading and sustaining curriculum change. Nurse Education Today 32 (3), 315–319.
Flott , E. & Linden, L. (2016). The clinical learning environment in education: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(3), 501-513.
Harvey, T., Calleja, P. & Phan Thi, D. (2013). Improving access to quality clinical nurse teaching: a partnership between Australia and Vietnam,
Nursing Education Today, 33, 671-676.
Kristofferzon, M., Mårtensson, G., Mamhidir, A. & Löfmark, A. (2013). Nursing students' perceptions of clinical supervision: The contributions of
preceptors, head preceptors and clinical lecturers. Nurse Education. Today, 33 (10), pp. 1252–1257
Newton, J., Ockerby, C. & Cross, W. (2010). Clinical Learning Environment Inventory: factor analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing , 66(6) 1371-
1381.
Nguyen, T. & Cheng, T. (2014) Vietnam’s health care system emphasizes prevention and pursues universal coverage. Health Affairs (Project Hope),
33(11) 2057-2063. doi 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1141
Sousa, V. & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a
clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268-274.
Truong, T. (2015) Vietnamese nursing students’ perceptions of their clinical learning environment: a cross sectional survey, Masters Dissertation,
Queensland University of Technology: Australia.
Contact
[email protected]
Establishing Evidence-Based Faculty Development Strategies to Enhance Implementation of IPE in Nursing
Louise Racine, PhD, RN, Canada
Hope Bilinski, PhD, RN, Canada
Abstract
Background: Over the past 15 years, the literature on interprofessional education (IPE) has exploded in the field of healthcare
disciplines. The rise of interest in interprofessional practice and education is shared by health educators in Canada, the United
Kingdom, the United States and countries of the European Union (Lewy, 2010). This drive towards interprofessional education
cannot be isolated from political and financial factors that affect Western economies (Barr et al., 2011). Literature Review: The
needs to address health issues arising from globalization, demographic aging, higher prevalence of chronic illnesses, and rising
healthcare costs may create the needs for interprofessional education (Barr et al., 2011; Lewy, 2010). In their article Pfaff et al.
(2013) underline the intersecting influences of organizational and individual factors in shaping interprofessional education in higher
education organizations. Despite inconclusive evidence between the main elements of interprofessional education and its
effectiveness (Reeves et al., 2013), IPE is seen increasingly as an effective way to prepare students of health discipline for future
practice in collaborative health care settings. For instance, some authors report that IPE can help collaboration and clinical decision
making (Lapkin et al., 2013), enhance quality of care (Wilcock et al., 2009), and increased patient safety (Anderson et al., 2009;
Kyrkjebø et al., 2006). IPE seems to be desirable in health programs, yet some individual and organizational barriers may impede its
implementation. Interprofessional education implies a reorganization of the structures within curricula and courses delivery. In
alignment with previous studies describing the benefits of IPE (D’Amour & Oandasan, 2005; Barrett et al., 2007; Lash et al., 2014;
Lawlis et a., 2014; Lapkin et al., 2013; Paul et al., 2014; Robben et al., 2012), Pfaff et al. (2013) recommend that facilitators and
barriers to IPE be addressed at the individual, and organizational levels as these systems must work in synergy rather than in
opposition to one another. Although IPE is promoted in higher education strategic plans, the translation of these institutional
objectives into faculty’s active engagement deserves further examination. Objectives of the study: The objectives of the study were
to explore and understand faculty members’ perceptions of knowledge, beliefs, barriers, and needs related to interprofessional
education. Research Questions: A cross-sectional survey incorporating closed and a few open-ended qualitative questions was our
choice to explore the following research questions: 1) What are the needs of faculty about implementing interprofessional
education in their teaching? 2) What are the facilitators and barriers to implementing IPE? 3) What is the level of readiness of faculty
members to implement IPE in their teaching? Methodology: With ethics approval, an online survey (National Interprofessional
Competency Framework of the Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative, 2010; McFayden, Maclaren, & Webster, 2007) was
administered to a sample of convenience across four geographical sites. The survey was conducted from June to August 2013 with a
recall two weeks after sending the online invitation. Issues of anonymity and confidentiality were addressed. Twenty faculty out of
53 participated in the survey for a response rate of 35%. The survey was composed of 68 items derived from validated and reliable
instruments such as the National Competency Framework and the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS). Data Analysis:
Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and non-parametric correlation analyses were used to explore correlations between age, years of
practice, the level of education, years of teaching, and knowledge and readiness for IPE. Results: Results indicates a willingness of
implementing IPE within teaching and learning activities. However, the readiness to implement IPE is slowed due to lack of time, lack
of knowledge, low self- esteem among faculty members, and teaching workload. Conceptual confusion on IPE, time, and logistics
were seen as major barriers. Implications for nursing education: Results also suggest that lack of knowledge about the pedagogical
underpinnings of IPE and collaborative teaching affect faculty's level of readiness. Results indicate that individual and organizational
challenges remain critical issues to address if nursing is to fully implement IPE in nursing and allied health sciences. Conclusion: A
successful and sustainable implementation of IPE requires addressing the lack of knowledge and skills through evidence-based
faculty development educational activities.
References
Barr, H., & Low, H. (2013). Introducing IPE. Fareham, UK: Centre for the Advancement of IPE.
Barr, H., Helme, M., & D’Avray, L. (2011). Occasional paper No. 12: Developing IPE in health and social care courses in the United Kingdom. London,
UK: King’s College.
Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative. (2010). A national interprofessional competency framework. Retrieved from
http://www.cihc.ca/files/CIHC_IPCompetencies_Feb1210.pdf
Côté, G., Lauzon, C., & Kyd-Strickland, B. (2008). Environmental scan of interprofessional collaborative practice initiatives. Journal of
Interprofessional Care, 22(5), 449-460.
D’Amour, D., & Oandasan, I. (2005). Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and IPE: An emerging concept. Journal of
Interprofessional Care, 19(Supp 1), 8-20.
Hart, C. (2015). The elephant in the room: Nursing and nursing power on an interprofessional team. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,
46(8), 349-355.
Kyrkjebø, J.M., Brattebø, G., & Smith-Strøm, H. (2006). Improving patient safety by using interprofessional simulation training in health professional
education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 20(5), 507-516.
Lapkin, S., Levett-Jones, T., & Gilligan, C. (2013). A systematic review of the effectiveness of IPE in health professional programs. Nurse Education
Today, 33(2), 90-102.
Lash, D.B., Barnett, M.J., Parekh, N., Shieh, A., Louie, M.G., & Tang Terrill, T. L. (2014). Perceived benefits and challenges of IPE-based on a
multidisciplinary faculty member survey. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 78(10), 180. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4315202/
Lawlis, T. R., Anson, J., & Greenfield, D. (2014). Barriers and enablers that influence sustainable IPE: A literature review. Journal of Interprofessional
Care, 28(4), 305-310.
Lewy, L. (2010). The complexities of interprofessional learning/working: Has the agenda lost its way? Health Education Journal, 69(1), 4-12.
McFadyen, A. K., Maclaren, W. M., & Webster, V. S. (2007). The interdisciplinary education perception scale (IEPS): An alternative remodeled sub-
scale structure and its reliability. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(4), 433–443.
Paul, P., Olson, J.K., Sadowski, C., Parker, B., & Alook, A. (2014). Interprofessional simulation learning with nursing and pharmacy students: A
qualitative study. Qualitative Advancement in Nursing Education, 1(1), 1-6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17483/2368-6669.1011
Pfaff, K., Baxter, P., Jack, S., & Ploeg, J. (2013). An integrative review of the factors influencing new graduate nurse engagement in interprofessional
collaboration. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(1), 4-20.
Reeves, S., Perrier, L., Goldman, J., Freeth, D., & Zwarenstein, M. (2013). IPE: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update).
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3. Retrieved from http://www.thecochranelibrary.com/view/0/index.html
Robben, S., Perry, M., van Nieuwenhuijzen, L., van Achterberg, T., Rikkert, M.O., Schers, H., … Melis, R. (2012). Impact of IPE on collaboration
attitudes, skills, and behavior among primary care professionals. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 32(3), 196-204.
Wilcock, P.M., Janes, G., & Chambers, A. (2009). Health care improvement and continuing IPE: Continuing interprofessional development to
improve patient outcomes. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 29(2), 84-90.
Contact
[email protected]
Putting Nursing Students at the Helm of Health Literacy
Joy Gioconda Borrero, USA
Abstract
Abstract: Effective communication is a foundation of high-quality, patient-centered health care. Understanding health literacy is an essential
attribute that health care professionals need to possess in order to promote effective partnerships with patients and their significant others.
Nurses, especially, need to be involved in addressing the epidemic problem of low health literacy in the United States because they are responsible
for the majority of patient, caregiver and community health education and communication. Nurses play a key role in providing health care
information to individuals, families and groups in a variety of settings and therefore should be educated about the essentials of health literacy, its
prevalence in society and its relationship to health outcomes. There are currently no standards for including health literacy training in the
undergraduate nursing curriculum. A review of the current literature on health literacy shows no formal recommendations for how, where or how
to include this topic in pre-licensure education. The research demonstrates that a gap in nursing education existts, but there has been relatively
little research on health literacy and recommendation for nursing education. Results of the pilot study and actual study will be presented.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a Health Literacy Module (HeLM) on health literacy knowledge, attitudes and
skills of pre-licensure nursing students using a pretest and posttest approach in order to raise awareness, build the skills and improve knowledge of
health literacy and the impact on patient outcomes.
Method: Pre-licensure baccalaureate nursing students (n=180) were invited to participate in this quasi-experimental study. Students completed the
health literacy questionnaire: The Health Literacy Knowledge and Experience Survey (HL-KES) as both a pretest and a post test. The classroom
sessions included the researcher designed components of the HeLM which included a power point presentation, videos, active learning strategies
and what to include in a patient education health literacy "toolkit".
Findings: It is the hope of the researcher that the findings will support the inclusion of a practical approach to incorporating health literacy
education into the nursing curriculum.
References
Dickens, C., Lambert, B.L., Cromwell, T. & Piano, M.R. (2013). Nurse overestimation of patient’s health literacy. Journal of Health Communication
18, 62-69.
Hartman, E. (2014). Nurses lack skills to teach: Increasing undergraduate nursing skills related to patient education (Doctoral dissertation).
Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3611783).
Heinrich, C. (2012). Health literacy: the sixth vital sign. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 24(4), 218-223.
Institute of Medicine (2004). Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Retrieved from http://www.iom.edu/Reporsts/2004/Health
Knowles, M., Holton, E.F., & Swanson, R.A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th
ed). New York: Routledge,Taylor & Francis Group.
Lambert, M., Luke, J., Downey, B., Crengle, S., Kelaher, M. & Reid, S. (2014). Health literacy: health professionals’ understandings and their
perceptions of barriers that Indigenous patients encounter. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 614- 615.
Macabasco-O’Connell, A., & Fry-Bowers, E. K. (2013). Knowledge and perceptions of health literacy among nursing professionals. Journal of Health
Communication, 16:295-307.
McCleary-Jones, V. (2012). Assessing nursing students’ knowledge of health literacy. NurseEducator, 37 (5), 214-217.
McCleary-Jones, V. (2016). A systematic review of the literature on health literacy in nursing education. Nurse Educator, 41(2), 93-97.
National Council of State Boards of Nursing (2016). http://www.ncsbn.org
Parnell, T.A. (2015). Health literacy in nursing: Providing person-centered care. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Partnership for Clear Health Communication (PCHC). (2008). What is health literacy? Retrieved from
http://www.npsf.org/pchc/healthliteracy.php
Richey, M.C. (2012). Registered nurses’ perceptions of health literacy and its effect on patient self-efficacy and patient healthcare decisions.
(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3545855).
Scott, S.A. (2016) Health literacy education in baccalaureate nursing programs in the United States. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(3), 153-158.
Sherwood, G. & Zomorodi, M. (2014). A new mindset for quality and safety: The QSEN competencies redefine nurses’ roles in practice. Nephrology
Nursing Journal, 41(1), 15-22.
Shieh, C. Belcher, A.E. & Habermann, B. (2013). Experiences of nursing students in caring for patients with behaviors suggestive of low health
literacy: a qualitative analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(2), 75-85.
Speros, C. I. (2011). Promoting health literacy: A nursing imperative. Nursing Clinics of North America, 4, 321-333.
Torres, R. & Nichols, J. (2014). Health literacy knowledge and experiences of associate degree nursing students: A pedagogical study. Teaching and
Learning in Nursing, 9, 84-92.
Universal Precautions for Health Communications. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://shop.medicalegalconcepts.com/Universal-Precautions-for-
Health-Communication
Zanchetta, M., Taher, Y., Fredericks, S., Waddell, J., Fine, C., & Sales, R. (2013). Undergraduate nursing students integrating health literacy in clinical
settings. Nurse Education Today, 33, 1026-1023.
Contact
[email protected]
A Baccalaureate Community Health Nursing Course Grounded in Nightingale’s Environmental Action Theory
of Nursing Practice
Susan Calhoun, DNP, USA
Abstract
Community Health Nursing (CHN) has evolved from the era of Nightingale to the time of the Affordable Care Act. It has come from
Wald’s public health nursing in the 1800s to in-patient hospital care in the 1900s and now back to community-based care. Today,
there is a greater demand for health care provided in the community. As CHN practice and education continue to evolve, it is
important that theory guides them. The lack of research in Community Health Nursing education is significant, as research is
necessary to promote evidence-based nursing education and practice. Nightingale’s environmental theory is an excellent theory to
frame nursing education in CHN. With its emphasis on the effect of the five points of light, water, air, cleanliness, and drainage on
patients’ health, her theory could guide research and nursing education. These points are the major focus of “Notes on Nursing”
(1860). Even though these points were written in the mid-19th century, their ideas are still relevant. Ever enduring, Nightingale’s
Environmental Adaptation Theory of Nursing Practice (NEATNP) is applicable to today’s CHN practice. Since Nightingale’s era, nurse
educators have recognized the importance of teaching students about the environmental influences on health and illness, but her
theory has not been identified as providing the framework for a CHN course. Nightingale’s theory, with its emphasis on
environmental effects on health, could guide CHN, and teaching her theory’s points in CHN courses could better prepare future
nurses to provide care. The purpose of this study was to learn nursing students’ perceptions of using the Nightingale Environmental
Adaptation Theory of Nursing Practice (NEATNP) in their community health nursing education experience, and how this helped them
to understand the importance of theory in practice. The objective of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate a
baccalaureate level CHN course grounded in the Nightingale Environmental Adaptation of Nursing Practice. This was a first time pilot
study exploring the results of students’ perceptions regarding the development of a CHN course grounded in the NEATNP. The
researcher has developed and implemented the CHN course, including didactic and clinical instruction. The course was followed by
an evaluation, a descriptive qualitative study design using focus groups for data collection. The Classic Analysis Strategy method,
used for data analysis, revealed that the baccalaureate students had positive perceptions of this CHN course. They concurred that
Nightingale is an appropriate theorist to guide a Community Health Nursing course, sharing that it was a good reminder of her
theory and was a more holistic approach. A suggestion for the course in the future was to start teaching the NEATNP in the Nursing
Fundamentals course and carry it throughout the curriculum. Their positive perceptions and the enthusiasm demonstrated in the
focus groups confirmed the researcher’s belief that there is a need for theory, specifically the NEATNP, in baccalaureate nursing
education. All of these results support the researcher’s assumptions that pertain to the connection between theory and CHN, the
importance of CHN education, and NEATNP:
1. Community health nursing is an emerging and valid specialty, requiring a unique and specialized skill set.
2. Theory based education produces competence and confidence in students.
3. Nursing is both an art and science, dependent on compassion and common logic, and the utilizations of research
(Selanders, 2005).
1. Community health nursing education is optimized when based on research and grounded in a theoretical
framework.
2. Nightingale’s theory with its emphasis on the environment is well connected to CHN, where the goal of the nurse is
to create an environment where a person can heal.
3. Understanding its historical antecedents, which include Nightingale and her theory, enhances current nursing
education.
4. Nightingale’s essential concepts are salient, and CHN education programs would benefit from applying
Nightingale’s theory to their clinical praxis.
The findings of this study contribute to the body of research regarding utilizing theory in a baccalaureate-nursing course, and provides a starting
point for future research. Repeating this study in other schools of nursing is warranted to provide more generalizability. These studies should be
conducted at a variety of baccalaureate level schools of nursing, which would also increase generalizability. For example, it could be repeated at a
school of nursing located in a city, or one located in other part of the country. A future study relating to the use of the NEATNP in a Fundamentals
of Nursing course would provide greater insight into the use of theory in nursing education. This could take place at the same school of nursing as
this study to provide data to compare with these results. It also should be conducted at other schools in cities or other parts of the country to
increase generalizability.
References
CDC: (2015) Fast stats. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/home-health-care.htm
Haraldseid, C., Friberg, F., & Aase, K. (2016). How can student contribute? A qualitative study of active student involvement in development of
technological learning material for clinical skills training. BMC Nursing, 15(2), 1-10. doi: 10.11186/s12912-016—125-y
Hegge, M. (2013). Nightingale’s environmental theory. Nursing Science Quarterly, 26(3), 211-219.
Koffi, K. & Fawcett, J. (2016). The two nursing disciplinary scientific revolutions: Florence Nightingale and Martha E. Rogers. Nursing Science
Quarterly, 29(3). 247-250. doi: 10.1177/0894318416648782
Krueger, R. & Casey, M. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lee, G., Clark, A. & Thompson, D. (2013). Florence Nightingale – Never more relevant than today. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69, 245–246.
doi:10.1111/jan.12021
Leffers, J., McDermott-Levy, R., Smith, C., & Sattler, B. (2014). Nursing education’s response to the 1995 Institute of Medicine report: Nursing,
health and the environment. Nursing Forum 49(4). 214-224.
Life Nurses. (2012). Community health nursing. Retrieved from http://www.lifenurses.com/community-health-nursing/
Luthy, K., Beckstrand, R., & Callister, L. (2012). Improving the community nursing experiences of nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education and
Practice, 3(4), 12-20.
Marshall, P., & Shelton, R. (2012). Preparing nursing students to be community health practitioners. British Journal of Community Nursing, 17(12),
622-629.
Maskelll, P., Somerville, M., & Mathews, A. (2015). Supporting careers: A learning resource for community nurses. British Journal of Community
Nursing 20(7), 335-337.
McMenamin, P. (2013). Nursing jobs outlook and trends: Six questions with Peter McMenamin, PhD. Retrieved from
http://nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/CertificationandAccreditation/Career-Center/Resources/Nursing-Jobs-Outlook-and-Trends.html
Nightingale, F. (1860). Notes on nursing: What it is, and what it is not. New York: Dover.
Pagnucci, N., Carnevale, F., Bagnaso, A., Tolotti, A, Cadorin, L., & Sasso, L. (2015). A cross-sectional study of pedagogical strategies in nursing
education: Opportunities and constraints toward using effective pedagogy. BMC Medical Education 15(138), 1-12. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0411-
5
Zboroswky, T. (2014). The legacy of Florence Nightingale’s environmental theory: Nursing research focusing on the impact of healthcare
environments. Health Environments Research & Design Journal 7(4), 19-34.
Contact
[email protected]
"Healthy Skin" Program for Family Caregivers of People With Chronic Disease
Daniela Díaz Agudelo, SN, Colombia
Abstract
At present, according to the World Health Organization, ECNTs continue to increase worldwide and are the leading cause of death
and premature disability in the vast majority of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, representing more than 3, 9 million
deaths annually, of the total deaths in the entire region. It is therefore one of the main challenges to be addressed in the health
sector for development in the 21st century (WHO, 2015).
The experience of a chronic illness situation for families is related to socioeconomic, emotional and spiritual factors that together have a great
impact on the lives of the people involved (Ortiz et al., 2006). This is the reason why an increase in the volume of people offering care, formal or
informal. Stober (1998) points out that in the last two decades there has been a growth in the number of families who decide to take on the
responsibility of caring for their relatives with chronic diseases. Taking this task of being a caregiver means that you have to change your lifestyle in
social and family life. The care provided will require a lot of time, due to complications or exacerbations typical of the underlying pathology. Some
of these complications are due to ignorance of interventions to prevent them from their caregivers (Martín, 2016).
The appearance of pressure ulcers is considered one of the complications commonly presented by people with chronic diseases. In addition to this,
there is inexperience or lack of knowledge of Family Caregivers, which favors the appearance of these ulcers (Carbajal, 2015). These lesions
represent a serious health problem, so a key element in the prevention of pressure ulcers includes two health managers: the nursing professional
and family caregivers (López and Martínez, 2011).
The objective of this work will be to design and implement a "Healthy Skin" program aimed at caregivers that contributes to the knowledge of the
instrumental support in the skin care, to promote a better care of the chronic patients in their home, Of the ulcers By pressure.
The methodology to be used for the elaboration of the program is participatory, constituted by 3 phases: Phases 1 and 2 are developed in the
period from August to September of 2017 and phase 3 will be developed in the period of October to November of 2017, in A Hospitalization service
in the city of Barranquilla / Colombia.
Phase I will identify the needs expressed by family caregivers based on an evaluation format.
In Phase II the design of the "Healthy Skin" program will be carried out, supported by the evaluation of knowledge and skills previously addressed
to family caregivers.
Phase III will implement the "Healthy Skin" education program for the family caregiver group and evaluate satisfaction to identify concerns or
difficulties that have arisen in program management and then be subject to the necessary changes and adjustments.
The statistical analysis will be carried out using the statistical package SPSS, version 22. It is planned to perform the analysis in two phases: a
descriptive analysis phase and an inferential analysis phase.
Family caregivers are expected to be aware of all actions that can prevent the onset of pressure ulcers while maintaining the integrity of the skin of
people with chronic illnesses. In addition, reduce the economic costs in the inputs and materials to treat them.
References
Organización Mundial de la Salud [Internet]. Enfermedades no transmisibles (2015) [Citado 14 jun 2017]. Disponible en:
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs355/es/
Ortiz, L. B., De Camargo, L. B., Ingrid, P. F., Afanador, N. P., & Herrera, B. S. (2006). Habilidad de cuidadores familiares de personas con enfermedad
crónica. Mirada internacional. Aquichan, 6(1).
Stober (1998). Efectividad de una intervención de consejería para ayudar a cuidadores familiares de parientes crónicamente enfermos. J Psychosoc
Nurs Men, 36(8), 26-32.
Martín Campano, S. (2016). Programa de educación para la salud: aumentar conocimientos y habilidades sobre las úlceras por presión en los
cuidadores principales de pacientes en domicilios de Sabadell.
Carbajal Rixe, J. M. (2015). Efectividad de un programa educativo en el nivel de conocimiento del cuidador primario en la prevención de las úlceras
por presión en los servicios de medicina de un hospital nacional.
López, R. M., & Martínez, D. P. (2011). Valoración de los conocimientos del cuidador principal sobre úlceras de presión. Enfermería Global, 10(4).
Contact
[email protected]
Student Opportunity for Success (S.O.S.): An Academic Recovery Program
Debora Coombs, MSN, CNE, USA
Abstract
The premise of the proposed poster presentation is to inform educators on the need to decrease attrition and increase retention of
nursing students by instituting a program that promotes successful academic achievement. The program offers faculty guidance and
support to nursing students, in a variety of methods, to accomplish their goal of successful completion of a Practical Nursing
program. Nursing student attrition is a persistent problem worldwide and promotion of a positive educational outcome benefits the
profession of nursing and the patients that nurses care for (Jeffreys, 2014). The approach to the supportive academic program
begins by identifying a student that demonstrates low academic achievement. Retention in a nursing program can be impacted by
many factors including stressful external personal factors, finances, and being unprepared for the rigors of the academic program
(Mooring, 2016). In the recovery program, faculty will alert the student when a score on any type of test or written assignment falls
below an 80%. Faculty will assist the student to recognize issues that may be interfering with understanding theory concepts. It is
the student’s responsibility to begin self-identification of learning difficulties so the faculty can better assist the student. The next
step is to collaboratively develop a plan with the student that will guide the student to academic success. Continual monitoring of
the student’s progress will take place until the student demonstrates three consistent tests or written assignments with scores of
80% or better. If the student is unable to achieve a 75% by the end of the course the student will dismissed from the program.
Student progression to graduation is imperative to enable the student to take the licensure exam, and begin working in the
healthcare field. With aging populations and increasing demands in the healthcare arena, increasing not only the number of
students enrolled in a nursing program, but also those who make it to completion is an urgent need. The goal of early intervention
strategies is retention and successful progression with a profession integration of faculty engagement (Shellenbarger, 2016).
According to Lizzio & Wilson (2013) retention and success are drastically reduced with an early faculty intervention of academic
recovery methods, especially in those students who may not seek out support on their own. The impact of attrition has a far-
reaching impact on the lives of nursing students. Successful completion of a nursing degree will allow a greater income, greater job
opportunities, and provide a benefit to the surrounding communities by providing the workforce with a qualified healthcare
provider (Wray, Aspland, & Barrett, 2014). Initiating an environment of coaching and guidance, a collaborative approach can be
taken to develop of comprehensive plan of action for the struggling student. Looking at individual learning styles, promoting the use
of technology, and offering supplemental learning resources, can aid in the persistence and progression of the student. As nurse
educators, we must take on the responsibility to implement initiatives that will help our students achieve their goals, to be
competent and skilled in the profession, and to demonstrate self-efficacy in their ability to succeed with determination and
motivation.
References
Education Today, 35(3), 425. oi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.11.004
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2013). Early intervention to support the academic recovery of first-year students at risk of non-continuation. Innovations in
Education & Teaching International, 50(2), 109-120.
Pitt, V., Powis, D., Levett-Jones, T., & Hunter, S. (2012). Factors influencing nursing students' academic and clinical performance and attrition: An
integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 32(8), 903-913. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.011
Mooring, Q. E. (2016). Recruitment, advising, and retention programs — Challenges and solutions to the international problem of poor nursing
student retention: A narrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 40, 204-208. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.003
Shellenbarger, T., & Hoffman, R. (2016). Advising 101: Lessons in advising for nursing student success. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 11, 92-
100. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2016.01.006
Wray, J., Aspland, J., & Barrett, D. (2014). Choosing to stay: looking at retention from a different perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 39(9),
1700-1714. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.806461
Contact
[email protected]
Design and Evaluation of a Simulation-Based Assessment Instrument to Identify Performance Gaps in
Graduate Nurses
Vanessa M. Schott, MSN, BS, USA
Matthew Lineberry, PhD, USA
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this exploratory mixed-methods action research study is to understand if and how nursing school
training, observation, and direct experiences with blood administration impact comfort level of procedure performance; to develop
a simulation-based assessment instrument; use the assessment to evaluate its effectiveness in improving nurse residents’
confidence; identify actual and perceived performance gaps graduate nurses have performing blood administration procedures
independently; and offer recommendations for curriculum changes in pre-licensure, nurse residency, and hospital orientation
training to improve nursing practice and hopefully patient outcomes.
Background: The United States is suffering from a shortage of more than 500,000 nurses and the shortage will only intensify over the next ten years
(American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2014). New graduates are one of the resources expected to fill vacancies within the nursing shortage
(Goode, Lynn, McElroy, Bednash, & Murray, 2013). However, there is a discrepancy between evaluations of new graduate readiness. Benner et al.
determined that new nurses are underprepared for the challenges of patient care (2010). Ninety percent of undergraduate nursing education
leaders feel new graduate nurses are prepared to practice; yet 90% of hospital nurse administrators disagree (AL-Dossary, Kitsantas, & Maddox,
2014). During self-assessment of readiness to practice, graduate nurses participating in nurse residency programs routinely rank ‘blood product
administration/transfusion’ in the top three skills/procedures they feel uncomfortable performing independently (Lynn, 2014). Yet little is
published regarding specifics within the procedure that prove to be more or perceived to be more difficult.
Research Objectives:
Specific aims of the study are to investigate the following Research Questions:
1. Do nursing school training, observation, and direct experience of blood administration relate to self-reported level of
comfort in graduate nurses?
2. What essential steps are required in a blood administration assessment instrument to define proper performance,
according to nurse experts at the study site?
3. What aspect(s) of a blood administration simulation-based assessment do graduate nurses perform incorrectly as
determined by study site experts?
4. How accurate are graduate nurses’ self-ratings of ability to perform blood administration procedures compared to nurse
expert ratings?
5. Is there a relationship between blood administration assessment instrument results and graduate nurses’ self-confidence in
performing the procedure independently?
6. How effective is the blood administration simulation-based assessment in providing graduate nurses helpful self-
assessment of skill performance?
Methods: This research study is a mixed-methods, multiphase educational needs assessment of up to 250 single site nurse residents for survey
recruitment; up to 50 nurse residents for focus group recruitment; and up to 8 nurse experts for interviews during Phase I of the study. During
Phases II and III, the same nurse experts will be used as in Phase I. Phase III will be a new sample of participants with a minimum of 30 nurse
residents from the same study site.
Inclusion criteria – Participants will be:
1. Phase I – Nurse residents, for whom are recently graduated from nursing school and have variable experience with blood
administration in their clinical practice yet blood administration procedures are part of their performance requirements;
and
2. Phase III – New sample of nurse residents, for whom are newly graduated from nursing school and have variable experience
with blood administration in their clinical practice yet blood administration procedures are part of their performance
requirements BUT did not participate in Phase I; and
3. Phases I, II, and III – Nurse experts from patient care units with high blood administration rates and the infusion specialist
for the study site.
Conclusions: Anticipated results from this study include a thorough assessment instrument to guide self-reflection of graduate nurse performance
gaps with blood administration procedures, recommendations for timing and improvements in instructional design of blood administration training
in nursing school curriculum as well as identify nurse residency curriculum expansion opportunities.
Implications: To impact the nursing profession through the improvement of education, transition to practice, and ultimately patient outcomes.
References
AL-Dossary, R., Kitsantas, P., & Maddox, P. J. (2014). The impact of residency programs on new nurse graduates’ clinical decision-making and
leadership skills: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 34(6),1024–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.10.006
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2014, April 24). Nursing Shortage. Retrieved June 23, 2016, from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-
relations/fact-sheets/nursing-shortage
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating Nurses: A Call for Radical Transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; The
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Retrieved from http://archive.carnegiefoundation.org/elibrary/educating-nurses-
highlights
Goode, C. J., Lynn, M. R., McElroy, D., Bednash, G. D., & Murray, B. (2013). Lessons Learned From 10 Years of Research on a Post-Baccalaureate
Nurse Residency Program: JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 43(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e31827f205c
Lynn, M. R. (2014). UHC/AACN Nurse Residency Program: 2014 Outcomes Report.
Contact
[email protected]
Examining Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Culture of Health in Nursing Curricula: A Delphi Study
Ashley S. Davis, MNSc, USA
Patricia Scott, DNP, USA
Debra A. Jeffs, PhD, RN, BC, USA
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research study is to examine the current state of integration of culture of health into academic nursing
education at all education levels in one mid-south state. The study also aims to assess the perceived barriers, facilitators and
readiness by deans and directors of schools of nursing about incorporating the concepts within the Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation “Culture of Health” Framework into the curriculum.
Methods: All schools of nursing deans, chairs and directors within the state were eligible to participate in this study. Members of the state Action
Coalition/Center for Nursing serving as representatives on the Culture of Health team presented an introduction about culture of health and the
Delphi study at the biannual schools of nursing leadership meeting in February 2017. Following submission to the university institution review
board, the study team identified deans and directors of schools of nursing to participate in the study. The nine deans and directors in Phase 1 of the
Delphi study represent various nursing education levels including practical nursing, associate degree, baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs
from various geographic areas around the state. The study team conducted phone calls to these participants in March and April using the following
questions to guide the interviews.
1. What are your thoughts about integrating social determinants of health and culture of health concepts into the nursing
curriculum? Is this something you are already doing in your school and if so, talk about the kinds of components or activities
that are taking place.
2. Why do you think learning about social determinants and culture of health is important for nursing students?
3. What do you think are the barriers to integrating the concepts into the curriculum?
4. What do you think are the facilitators to integrating the concepts into the curriculum?
Results: Thematic analysis of the Phase 1 participants’ responses revealed themes, subthemes and specific exemplars. Emerging themes were
“Perceived importance of integrating culture of health (COH), population health (PH), and social determinants of health (SDH) into the curriculum”;
“Current status regarding the integration of COH, PH and SDH into nursing curricula across the state”; Examples of how COH, PH, and SDH are
currently being integrated into curricula across the state”; “Perceived barriers of implementing COH, PH, and SDH into the current curriculum”;
“Perceived facilitators to implementing COH, PH and SDH into the curriculum”; and “Resources need to implement COH into the curriculum.” From
the themes, an electronic survey of closed- and open-ended items was created for Phase 2 of the study to validate findings of Phase 1 with those
participants. The anonymous electronic survey is underway at this time.
After analysis of Phase 2 findings, an additional electronic survey will be created and distributed to all deans and directors of all nursing education
programs of all educational levels in the state by the end of the summer. This survey and analysis will comprise Phase 3 of the Delphi study.
Implications: All findings will be shared with the state’s nursing school leaders at the fall 2016 biannual meeting of the deans and directors. The
overarching goal is enabling schools of nursing leadership in culture of health integration in their respective nursing programs. Specific resources
for integration can be created and shared among education programs.
References
Bouchaud, M., Swan, B. A., Gerolamo, A., Black, K., Alexander, K., Bellot, J., Egger, S. (2016). Accelerating design and transforming baccalaureate
nursing education to foster a culture of health.
Chandra, A., Miller, C. E., Acosta, J. D., Weilant, S., Trujillo, M., & Plough, A. (2016). Drivers Of Health As A Shared Value: Mindset, Expectations,
Sense Of Community, And Civic Engagement. Health Affairs, 35(11), 1959-1963.
Martsolf, G., Sloan, J., & Villarruel, A. M. (2017). Nurse-Designed Care Models.
Plough, A., & Chandra, A. (2015). From vision to action: measures to mobilize a culture of health. Princeton (NJ): Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Plough, A. L. (2014). Building a culture of health. Am J Prev Med, 47(5), S388-S390.
Weil, A. R. (2016). Building A Culture Of Health. Health Affairs, 35(11), 1953-1958.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2016). Public Health 3.0: a call to action to create a 21st century public health infrastructure:
Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.
Contact
[email protected]
Feasibility and Learning Outcomes Associated With Preparing Nursing Students for Simulation Using Virtual
Gaming Simulations
Marian Luctkar-Flude, PhD, MScN, RN, Canada
Jane Tyerman, PhD, RN, Canada
Deborah Tregunno, PhD, RN, Canada
Tammie McParland, PhD, RN, Canada
Laurie Peachey, MSc, RN, Canada
Michelle Lalonde, PhD, RN, Canada
Rylan Egan, PhD, Canada
Lillian Chumbley, MSc, Canada
Laura Collins, MSc, Canada
Margaret Verkuyl, MN, NP-PhC, Canada
Paula Mastrilli, PhD, RN, Canada
Abstract
Background: Simulation-based education for health professionals and students is consistently associated with better knowledge,
skills and behavioral outcomes (Cook et al., 2011); however, high costs of the technology, support staff and faculty time, have been a
key criticism (Ker & Hogg, 2010, pp. 61-71). Thus, there is a need to explore efficient, innovative approaches to deliver quality
simulation-based learning for nursing students. The simulation experience involves three distinct phases: preparation, participation
and debriefing (Husebo et al., 2012). Pre-simulation preparation is a critical phase consisting of application of materials required by
learners in advance of the scenario to optimize their learning during the simulation (Tyerman et al., 2016). Pre-simulation activities
include readings, lectures, skills practice, quizzes, and self-assessments; however, in our experience, learners may fail to adequately
prepare for simulation when given traditional pre-simulation preparation activities. Although approaches to scenario development
and debriefing are widely reported, the literature describing pre-simulation preparation activities is just emerging. Preliminary
results of a systematic review of the literature suggest that alternate pre-simulation preparation activities improve learning
outcomes more than traditional approaches (Luctkar-Flude et al., 2016).
Virtual serious games or virtual gaming simulations are games accessed by computer for the purpose of education or training rather than
entertainment (Verkuyl et al., 2016). Virtual games can be used to supplement learning that occurs in the classroom and simulation lab (Cant &
Cooper, 2014). Nursing students reported high satisfaction and immersion when using a virtual game designed to develop pediatric skills (Verkuyl
et al., 2016). Thus we propose that virtual simulation games used for pre-simulation preparation will prove to be more engaging to learners,
resulting in better preparation and improved performance during live simulations. Accordingly, we will examine the feasibility and impact of virtual
simulation games for pre-simulation preparation for nursing students.
Research question: What is the impact of traditional pre-simulation preparation versus blended delivery that includes virtual simulation games on
nursing students’ ability to achieve learning outcomes?
Methods: A multi-site, prospective, randomized controlled observational design is used in this study. The current project builds on a well-
established provincial collaboration of nursing leaders in clinical simulation teaching and learning, and will demonstrate how collaboration across
multiple university programs supports the scaling up of the research findings to help ensure all nursing students across the province have access to
the same high-quality simulation-based learning opportunities.
Simulation Scenarios: This study will use four simulation scenarios developed through a previous collaborative grant (Egan et al., 2014); each
scenario has validated clinical and learning outcomes and has a customized assessment rubric which has been tested for reliability. Rubrics are
based on the principles of self-regulated learning. The scenarios involve complex, deteriorating patient care situations: 1) elderly urosepsis; 2)
respiratory distress; 3) diabetic ketoacidosis; and 4) de-escalation of a violent patient. The proposed virtual gaming pre-simulation materials require
students to view a nursing situation, filmed from the perspective of the nurse. At regular intervals students are required to select one of three or
four potential nursing actions. The selected response will then play out for good or for bad such that students observe the expected consequences
of their clinical decision-making. Students may replay the scenarios as many times as they wish, and select different actions each time and observe
the associated outcomes. Two of the four scenarios will be implemented at each of the four sites, with each scenario implemented at two sites.
Sample: In total, 160 fourth year nursing students, from four Ontario University Schools of Nursing will be recruited to participate (i.e. 40 per site).
At each site, students will be randomized into two groups: Group 1 will receive the revised simulation scenarios, which include virtual pre-
simulation preparation, and Group 2 will receive the traditional approach to simulation, with a written scenario and “paper and pencil” questions
that need to be answered prior to beginning the scenario. At the end of data collection, the virtual pre-simulation preparatory virtual materials will
be available for the students in the control group (i.e. Group 2). Each learner will participate in two of the four scenarios.
Measurement: Data from the learning outcomes rubric and a clinical knowledge test will be used to evaluate nursing students’ ability to achieve
learning outcomes. Use of the customized learning outcomes rubric based, which is based on self-regulated learning (SRL) theory, allows student
self-assessment at multiple points in time during the simulation. In the current study, students’ self-assessments will be used to judge: 1) success
on preparation for the simulation; 2) success during the simulation; and, 3) after post- simulation debriefing in order to identification remedial
learning requirements. Further, by examining the difference between instructor assessment scores and students’ self-assessments, we can develop
an index of students understanding of course criteria. Because the rubrics describe qualities that demonstrate student competency of varying
levels (i.e., descriptors not a check list), we will also use a written test to assess detailed clinical knowledge associated with each scenario (e.g.
medications, laboratory values etc.).
Results: The four proposed virtual simulation games are currently under development. Usability testing will be completed prior to implementation
at the four sites. Two sets of repeated measures analysis will be performed within and between experimental and control groups with data
collected at three time points: end of pre-simulation preparation; end of simulation; and, end of the post-simulation debriefing. First, to assess the
extent to which the virtual simulation enhanced the students’ learning outcomes, the student self-assessment of learning outcomes will be
compared within and between experimental and control groups. In addition, the instructor assessment of learning outcomes will be compared to
student assessments. Second, to assess the impact of the virtual simulation on improved clinical knowledge, knowledge scores for the experimental
group will be compared to the traditional group. Process data will also be collected to evaluate feasibility, and qualitative feedback will enhance
understanding of the value and limitations of using the virtual simulation games for pre-simulation preparation.
Conclusions: The key anticipated innovations and contributions of this project include: (1) the design and implementation of an online virtual pre-
simulation preparation module; and (2) the expanded use of learning outcomes and clinical knowledge assessments for student evaluation. The
advantages to using virtual games for pre-simulation could include the promotion of self-regulated learning, enhanced preparation for simulation
teaching and learning encounter, enhanced knowledge with a potential decrease in student anxiety, improved clinical performance and job
preparedness. Additionally, we anticipate that standardized pre-simulation preparations will reduce faculty preparation time and student
assessment time, and may decrease instructional time in the simulation laboratory. Over the longer-term, the systems and processes put in place
through these innovations will enhance our ability to continue to develop high-quality clinical simulations.
Global Implications: Once completed, the virtual simulations will be available online, providing access to high-quality simulations to nurse
educators worldwide, including those teaching in settings that lack the resources to develop or provide simulation-based learning.
References
Cant, R.P., & Cooper, S.J. (2014). Simulation in the internet age: The place of web-based simulation in nursing education. An integrative review.
Nurse Education Today, 34, 1435-1442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.001
Cook, D.A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J.H., Wang, A.T.,…Hamstra, S.J. (2012). Technology-enhanced simulation for health
professionals’ education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 306, 978-88. Doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182614f95
Egan, R., Luctkar-Flude, M., Sears, K., Medves, J., Justinich, D., Tregunno, D. (2014, June). Enhancing Registered Nurse job readiness through
constructive alignment and standardization in simulation design. Podium presentation at the 34th Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher
Education Conference: Transforming our Learning Experiences, Kingston, Ontario.
Husebo, S.E., Fribert, F., Soreide, E., & Rystedt, H. (2012). Instructional problems in briefings: How to prepare nursing students for simulation-based
cardiopulmonary resuscitation training. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(7), e307-e318.
Ker, J., & Hogg, G. (2010). Cost effective simulation. In: K. Walsh (Ed.), Cost effectiveness in medical education (pp. 61-71). Oxon: Radcliffe.
Luctkar-Flude, M., Tyerman, J., Graham, L., & Coffey, S. (2016, May). Pre-simulation preparation and briefing practices for healthcare professionals:
Preliminary results of a systematic review. Podium presentation at the Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing 2016 Canadian Nursing
Education Conference: Expanding Horizons in Nursing Education, Toronto, Ontario.
Tyerman, J., Luctkar-Flude, M., Graham, L., Coffey, S., & Olsen-Lynch, E. (2016). Pre-simulation preparation and briefing practices for healthcare
professionals and students: a systematic review protocol. Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports,
14(8), 80-89. Doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003055
Verkuyl, M., Atack, L., Mastrilli, P., & Romaniuk, D. (2016). Virtual gaming to develop students’ pediatric nursing skills: A usability test. Nurse
Contact
[email protected]
Validation of the Lasater Clinical Judgement Rubric and Predictors of Clinical Nursing Judgement in
Simulation
Mary Ann Shinnick, PhD, ACNP, CHSE, USA
Cristina Cabrera-Mino, BS, USA
Abstract
Background. Appropriate clinical judgement is an expectation of safe nursing care (Lasater, 2007). The Lasater Clinical Judgement
Rubric (LCJR) is frequently used in clinical judgement assessment in education (Adamson, Gubrud, Sideras, & Lasater, 2012) but
there are few clinical studies to illustrate its validity or to identify predictors of higher clinical judgement scores, including the impact
of stress on clinical judgement, a common issue in clinical practice and simulation (Bauer et al., 2016; Bong, Lightdale, Fredette, &
Weinstock, 2010; Gore, Hunt, Parker, & Raines, 2011; Gouin et al., 2017). Methods. Using a prospective, two-group comparative and
correlational design, we studied Expert Nurses (ICU nurses of at least 5 years; n = 15) and Novice Nurses (senior prelicensure
students; n = 13) participating in a single simulation to evaluate the validity (ability to discriminate between the groups) and
predictors of clinical judgement on the LCJR. Statistical analysis included t-tests and linear regression. Covariates were age, years of
nursing experience, prior simulation experience, LCJR scores and of pupil dilation (measure of stress via eye tracker, SMI, Germany)
during specific nursing procedures (pupil change from baseline during elevating head of bed, looking at monitor, applying oxygen).
Covariates with a p value of < 0.05 in the bivariate analyses were entered into a Linear Regression with the LCJR score as the
dependent variable. Results. There were significant differences in the LCJR between groups, with Expert Nurses having higher scores
(22.60 ± 3.18) in comparison to the Novice Nurses (15.38 ± 4.31) p < 0.01. On the regression, only years of RN experience was an
independent predictor of clinical judgement (F (1, 23) = 10.078, p = 0.004). The overall model fit was R2 = 0.305. Conclusions. This
study verifies the validity of the LCJR to differentiate clinical judgement. However, unexpectedly, stress did not show a dramatic
impact on clinical judgement, only number of RN years. These findings have important implications for the progression of novice to
expert nurse: psychological stress was not a significant hindrance or advantage for clinical performance. This study supports the
belief that even between expert nurses (ICU nurses), years of experience still significantly affects nursing clinical judgement.
References
Adamson, K. A., Gubrud, P., Sideras, S., & Lasater, K. (2012). Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: three
approaches. J Nurs Educ, 51(2), 66-73. doi:10.3928/01484834-20111130-03
Bauer, C., Rimmele, T., Duclos, A., Prieto, N., Cejka, J. C., Carry, P. Y., ...Lehot, J. J. (2016). Anxiety and stress among anaesthesiology and critical care
residents during high-fidelity simulation sessions. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 35(6), 407-416. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2016.01.004
Bong, C. L., Lightdale, J. R., Fredette, M. E., & Weinstock, P. (2010). Effects of simulation versus traditional tutorial-based training on physiologic
stress levels among clinicians: a pilot study. Simul Healthc, 5(5), 272-278. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e98b29
Gore, T., Hunt, C. W., Parker, F., & Raines, K. H. (2011). The Effects of Simulated Clinical Experiences on Anxiety: Nursing Students' Perspectives.
Clinical Simulation In Nursing, 7(5), e175-e180. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2010.02.001
Gouin, A., Damm, C., Wood, G., Cartier, S., Borel, M., Villette-Baron, K., ...Dureuil, B. (2017). Evolution of stress in anaesthesia registrars with
repeated simulated courses: An observational study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 36(1), 21-26. doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2016.02.008
Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical judgment development: using simulation to create an assessment rubric. J Nurs Educ, 46(11), 496-503.
Contact
[email protected]
Weaning Inconsistencies in Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) and Modified Scoring
Jacqueline A. Legg, BSN, USA
Abstract
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome has been recognized for years; however, a nationwide increase in opioid exposed newborns has drastically changed
the face of neonatal nursing and healthcare (Bagley, 2014; Toila, 2015). While many different scoring tools and treatment options have been
developed and implemented worldwide, there are still significant inconsistencies across the board on how to safely and effectively wean these
newborns and decrease their length of stay (LOS) (McQueen, 2016). With this increased patient population we have viewed traditional scoring
tools including Finnegan and spoken with other experts in this field including Yale. The benefit of the family being with the infant is emphasized as
well as improving nursing interventions that reduce overall anxiety for both infant and family and decrease the LOS (Abbett, 2012). In reviewing the
literature our goal was and is to decrease exposure to opiates on the developing brain as well as creating a readiness to wean scale.
Based on our current statistics we have shown that through supportive comfort measures we are able to minimize the physiologic effects of
withdraw including but not limited to the effects of central and autonomic nervous system dysfunction (MacMullen, 2014). As we have learned
from other experts in this field having a collaborative group to standardize patient care policies decreases health care utilization, increases family
satisfaction, decreases newborn exposure to opiates, and overall provides improved outcomes (Patrick, 2016). This two group comparison study
will determine if this tool is making a difference in our length of stay positively or negatively as well as allow us to comfortably and safely wean our
patients. As we continue to review the literature we will review inter-rater reliability and have local and national experts assess this modified
scoring tool. In addition we will continue to ensure the parents understand they are the primary treatment in their infant’s care as outlined in our
NAS Parent Contract and their expectations while in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).
With current changes in practice and implementation of our NAS protocol our length of stay has drastically decreased. Pre-NAS protocol for all
babies LOS 41.5 days and post-NAS protocol LOS 22.6 days (46% reduction), all term babies pre-NAS protocol LOS 50.4 days, post-NAS protocol 22.8
days (56% reduction), single substance exposed term pre-NAS protocol 54.2 days and post-NAS protocol 19.6 days (64% reduction) and multi
substance exposed term pre-NAS protocol 47.7 days and post-NAS protocol 27.8 days (42% reduction). Impact on LOS of babies relative to
percentage of baby’s hospital stay that mother provides comfort measures 0% at 22.3 days (only 3 babies), </=25% at 29.6 days, </=50% at 28.8
days, </75% at 24.6 days, and >75% at 17.8 days. In addition our clonidine and morphine exposure has decreased exponentially with Clonidine
exposure pre-NAS protocol 44.3 days and post-NAS protocol at 18.9 days and morphine exposure pre-NAS protocol 30.3 days and post-NAS
protocol 17.2 days. With our continued multi-center and multi-disciplinary quality improvement collaborative we continue to decrease our length
of stay, decrease opioid exposure, and effectively include these families as their infant’s primary treatment.
Keywords: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome, Opioid Exposed Newborns, The Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System
References
Abbett H, Greenwood S. Nursing Infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome: Time to change practice: Journal of Neo Nurs 2012; 18: 194-197
Bagley SM, Wachman EM, Holland E, Brogly SB. Review of the assessment and management of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Addict Sci Clin Pract
2014; 9-19
MacMullen NJ, Dulski LA, Blobaum P. Evidence-based interventions for Neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pediatr Nurs 2014; 40: 165-172, 203
McQueen K, Murphy-Oikonen J. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2016; 2468-79
Patrick SW, Schumacher RE, Horbar JD, et al. Improving care for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Pediatrics 2016; 137: 1-8
Tolia VN, Patrick SW, Bennett MM, et al. Increasing incidence of the neonatal abstinence syndrome in U.S. neonatal ICUs. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:
2118-2126
Contact
[email protected]
Fostering Acceptance of Sexual Identity and Expression of the LGBT Community in the Classroom
Jennifer A. Specht, PhD, USA
Abstract
An exploration of the pedagogical practices and perceptions of nursing faculty related to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
(LGBT)-related content serves to bolster an understanding of how faculty can support students’ acceptance of sexual identity and
expression. This investigation includes a qualitative aspect focused on understanding the practices of nursing faculty related to the
integration of LGBT content in the undergraduate curriculum. A quantitative aspect measuring nursing faculty attitudes and/or
perceptions related to the LGBT community will further strengthen understanding. The purpose of the proposed study is to
determine current nursing faculty attitudes and practices related to integrating LGBT-related content into their courses. The data
gleaned from this study can positively impact educational practice and policy by identifying opportunities and barriers to the
inclusion of LGBT-related content into nursing courses. Developing effective strategies for the integration of this content can
enhance learner preparation related to their acceptance of LGBT individuals.
Including the LGBT-community and their specific health concerns in the larger discussion and thread surrounding cultural awareness and sensitivity
is essential to prevent this population from suffering unnecessary health disparities. Although there is a plethora of cultural sensitivity and diversity
literature related to many culturally specific patient populations (Huey, Tilley, Jones, & Smith, 2014; Truong, Paradies, & Priest, 2014; Tucker,
Arthur, Roncoroni, Wall, & Sanchez, 2013), the literature specific to the inclusion of the LGBT community is still developing. There is also a body of
literature to support cultural competence as a key curricular standard for nursing education (Mareno, & Hart, 2014), but the typical view of cultural
competency is not inclusive of the LGBT community. Although cultural competency is a core curricular element in undergraduate and graduate
nursing curricula (Mareno, & Hart), it is usually focused on ethnic and racial cultural competence. There is an emerging body of literature related to
the LGBT individuals, but most relevant literature focuses on the long-term care needs of the aging LGBT individual (Fredriksen-Goldsen, Hoy-Ellis,
Goldsen, Emlet, & Hooyman,2014) and their unique needs (Coulter, Kenst, Bowen, & Scout, 2014). Recently, there has been an emersion of nursing
literature focusing on sexual health and sexual rights (Rew, Thurman, & McDonald, 2017), and nursing education (Echezona-Johnson, 2017).
Additionally, LGBT-related literature is more prominent in disciplines outside of nursing. There is a gap in the nursing literature related to
pedagogical practices that could enhance the acceptance of sexual identity and expression in nursing education.
Nursing faculty have a unique ability to foster the acceptance of sexual identity and expression through purposeful and inclusive approaches to
teaching sensitivity towards LGBT individuals. Effective pedagogical practices which increase cultural sensitivity, inclusive of the LGBT community,
could increase students’ self-awareness of their potential biases and their knowledge related to this population. This awareness can help students
to understand their perceptions of the LGBT community and shift their paradigms related to the importance of acceptance of sexual identity and
expression when caring for this population. This shift, as well as an increase in knowledge related to LGBT individuals, can positively influence the
effectiveness and quality of care for LGBT patients. Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes related to patient populations can affect their quality of care
(Deasey, Kable, & Jeong, 2014), so increasing awareness in nursing students related to the LGBT community has the potential to positively impact
patient care. There is growing evidence that culturally insensitive care contributes health disparities (Tucker, Arthur, Roncoroni, Wall, & Sanchez,
2013), which is especially concerning given the unique needs of some LGBT individuals.
References
Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards a developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. Michael Paige, (Ed.), Education for the Intercultural
Experience. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
Bennett, M. J. (2011). A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. Retrieved from
http://www.idrinstitute.org/allegati/IDRI_t_Pubblicazioni/47/FILE_Documento_Bennett_ DMIS_12pp_quotes_rev_2011.pdf
Coulter, R. W.€‰S., Kenst, K. S., Bowen, D. J., & Scout. (2014). Research funded by the National Institutes of Health on the health of lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender populations. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e105-e112.doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301501
Deasey, D., Kable, A., & Jeong, S. (2014). Influence of nurses' knowledge of ageing and attitudes towards older people on therapeutic interactions in
emergency care: A literature review. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 33, 229–236. doi:10.1111/ajag.12169
Echezona-Johnson, C. (2017). Evaluation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender knowledge in basic obstetrical nursing education. Nursing
Education Perspectives, 38(3). 138-142.
Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., Hoy-Ellis, C. P., Goldsen, J., Emlet, C. A., & Hooyman, N. R. (2014). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) aging:
The role of gerontological social work. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 57(2-4). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2014.890690
Huey, S. J., Tilley, J. L., Jones, E. O., & Smith, C. A. (2014). The contribution of cultural competence to evidence-based care for ethnically diverse
populations. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 305-338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813- 153729
Ibrahim, S. A. W., & Qalawa, S. A. (2016). Relationship between faculty staff professionalism and nursing students’ values. Journal of Nursing
Education and Practice, 6(9), 38-45. 6 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n9p38
Ma, F., Li, J., Liang, H., Bai, Y., & Song, J. (2014). Baccalaureate nursing students’ perspectives on learning about caring in China: A qualitative
descriptive study. BioMed Central Medical Education, 14(42). doe: http://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-42
Mareno, N., & Hart, P. L. (2014). Cultural competency among nurses with undergraduate and graduate degrees: Implications for nursing education.
Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(2), 83–88. doi: 10.5480/12-834.1
Minnesota Department of Health (April 24, 2014). Circles of Sexuality. Retrieved from
http://www.health.state.mn.us/topics/sexualhealth/circlesofsexuality.pdf
Rew, L. Thurman, W., & McDonald, K. (2017). A review and critique of Advances in Nursing Science articles that focus on sexual health and sexual
rights: A call to leadership and policy development. Advances in Nursing Science, 40(1), 64-84.
Truong, M., Paradies, Y., & Priest, N. (2014). Interventions to improve cultural competency in healthcare: A systematic review of reviews. BioMed
Central Medical Education, 14(99). doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-99
Tucker, C. M., Arthur, T. M., Roncoroni, J., Wall, W., & Sanchez, J. (2013). Patient-centered, culturally sensitive health care. American Journal of
Lifestyle Medicine, 9(1), 63 – 77. doi: 10.1177/1559827613498065
Contact
[email protected]
Psychometric Testing of the Presence of Nursing Scale in a Magnet Hospital
Rebecca L. Turpin, PhD, USA
Abstract
Nursing presence capability is a unique professional skill of practicing nurses. Nursing presence is an interpersonally-experienced
phenomenon in which a nurse chooses to expend him/herself on the behalf of a unique patient. The resulting provision of specific
types of nursing care (physical, mental, psychological, spiritual, and social) is based on the deep understanding of individual patient
need derived during the nurse and patient interaction. Interactional quality of nursing communication skill may be diminishing due
to technological advances which have decreased human-to-human direct communication.
Better understanding of this phenomenon along with methods of measurement is needed to be able to teach nurses and future nursing students
this skill. Nursing presence has traditionally been deemed a phenomenon that is elusive to full understanding and measurement due to its mystical
quality. Multiple concept analyses have illuminated pre-conditions, attributes and outcomes of nursing presence, however only three instruments
have been developed to measure nursing presence.
The Measurement of Presence Scale (MOPS) (Hines, 1991) and its derivative visual analog scale (MOPVAS) (Foust, 1998) both measured nursing
presence from a nurse perspective with no subsequent research. Initial factor analysis resulted in nine subscales for MOPS that varied when the
MOPS was retested in the second study. The Presence of Nursing Scale (PONS) was recently developed to measure nursing presence from the
patient’s perspective in three U.S. acute care institutions (Hansbrough, 2011; Kostovich, 2002; Kostovich, 2012). Psychometric testing of PONS
using exploratory factor analysis had not been reported at the time of this study.
This report documents research conducted in a large southeastern academic medical center using the PONS-Revised. A sample of 122 hospitalized,
adult inpatients from ten acute-care nursing units were surveyed to conduct the first psychometric testing of this revised instrument using
exploratory factor analyses. Seven research questions were explored to evaluate potential correlations between the PONS-R, patient satisfaction,
nursing unit-specific workforce factors and patient demographic factors. Historic and concurrent patient satisfaction data using four nursing
sensitive measures of the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) standardized instrument were compared
with PONS-R. Nursing unit-specific workforce factors including average nurse experiential level, registered nurse age, academic preparation levels
of unit nursing workforce, and registered nurse turnover were compared with PONS-R.
Results: Internal consistency reliability of the PONS-R was established with the highest to date internal consistency rating (r = .974) for related
instruments. Test-retest reliability was established with a sample of 21 patients 48 hours after initial test with both parametric and non-parametric
analyses (Pearson’ r = .791, and Spearman’s rho = .872, both statistically significant at the .01 level). Construct validity was evaluated with
comparison of PONS-R summed scores to nurse HCAHPS measures with Pearson’s r = .736 and correlation highly significant at the .01 level.
Divergent validity was verified by evaluating a small sample of thirteen from the unit with historically poorest performance on nursing HCAHPS
measures. A statistically significant negative difference was found in both HCAHPS historical average score and patient-specific average HCAHPS
score based on independent t-tests between divergent sample and remaining sample. The magnitude of the differences was large (eta squared =
.92) indicating a very large effect size (historical nurse HCAHPS) and between moderate and large effect size (eta squared = .11) for concurrent
nurse HCAHPS. A statistically significant negative difference was likewise found on PONS-R summed scores between the divergent unit sample and
the remaining sample with poor performance unit [M=93.75, SD=16.47] and remaining units [M=108.59, SD=15.46; t(112)= -3.12, p=.002]. The
magnitude of the differences was moderate (eta squared = .08).
Exploratory factor analysis revealed one solid factor using eigenvalues over one following Varimax rotation and parallel analysis indicating the
PONS-R instrument was measuring one concept. Using Oblimin rotation with two factors forced revealed a weak secondary factor in which items
were centered on the concept of intimacy (physical and emotional closeness, and spirituality, suggesting the need for inclusion of additional items
and a larger sample size to further psychometrically develop the instrument.
Correlations were found between PONS-R and unit-workforce factors which were not anticipated:: Average RN experience level to PONS-R: r= -.185
(negataive correlation significant at the .05 level). Average RN age to PONS-R: r = -.218 (negative correlation). Percentage of Associate degree
nurses to PONS-R: r = -.212, positive correlation, statistically significant at the .05 level. Percentage of Bachelor's degree nurses to PONS-R: r = -
.212, negative correlation, statistically significant at the .05 level. Percentable of Master's degree nurses to PONS-R: r = -.-77, minimal negative
correlation, not significant. Annual RN turnover rate to PONS-R: r = -.048, minimal negative correlation. No statistically significant correlations were
found for PONS-R in relation to patient demographics including age, race/ethnic background, gender, state of residence, state region, household
annual income, or employment status. Finally, no statistically significant correlations were found between nursing presence and patient-specific
variables such as estimated number of RN that provided care, nor the length of stay on the units.
References
Foust, C. (1998). Refinement of the measurement of presence scale. (Order No. 9916239, Texas Woman's University). ProQuest Dissertations and
Theses, 118 p. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304488057?accountid=28833. (304488057).
Hansbrough, W. (2011). Examining nursing presence in the acute care setting as an indicator of patient satisfaction with nursing care. (Order No.
3475617, University of San Diego). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 132 p. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/892725770?accountid=28833. (892725770).
Hines, D. R. (1991). The development of the measurement of presence scale. (Order No. 9203067, Texas Woman's University). ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses, 148 p. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/303970144?accountid=28833. (303970144).
Kostovich, C. (2002). Development of a scale to measure nursing presence. (Order No. 3039289, Loyola University of Chicago). ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses, 139 p. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/305586866?accountid=28833. (305586866).
Kostovich, C. (2012). Development and psychometric assessment of the Presence of Nursing Scale. Nursing Science Quarterly, 25(2), 167-175.
Contact
[email protected]
Opportunities and Barriers to Building EBP Skills in the Clinical Setting via Mobile Technology
Christina K. Lam, PhD, RN, USA
Carolyn F. Schubert, MLIS, USA
Catherine A. Brown, MSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a professional expectation for health care providers today. Nursing faculty create
curriculum for the didactic and clinical environments that facilitate student learning in the EBP process. Mobile technology, a more
recent variable in the educational environment, is one tool in the educator’s toolkit for achieving this educational goal. This project
looks at how two processes, curriculum mapping and research on BSN student usage of iPads in clinical education, helped with
evaluating EBP curriculum in a BSN program and informing strategies for course revisions.
Literature Review: The AACN’s BSN Essentials (2008) defines Scholarship for EBP as a key component of undergraduate curriculum. However, in
their investigation about the state of nursing education, Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, & Day’s (2010) found that “graduates continue to leave their
educational experience with negative attitudes toward research along with perceptions that EBP takes too much time and cannot be realistically
implemented in real-world clinical practice settings” (Melnyk et al., 2012 , p. 415). Review and evaluation of the BSN curriculum is critical in
preparing graduate nurses prepared for practice in an ever-changing healthcare system (Oermann, 2017).
The curriculum encompasses much more than a structure of courses, and is a dynamic interaction between students, faculty, experiences, content,
and program outcomes (Oermann, 2017). Curriculum evaluation also reaches beyond traditional measurements of pass rates or course evaluations,
and should critically assess whether the program prepares graduates that can practice in a contemporary healthcare system that is ever-changing
and saturated with technology.
Mobile technology has held the interest of nurses for a long time as a possible solution to bridge EBP into real-world practice. In practice, mobile
devices improve clinical workflows for documenting patient care electronically, and increasing access to clinical resources (Weston & Roberts,
2013). In education research, these devices have been beneficial since they “[provide students] with easily accessible, current evidence-based
facts” (Raman, 2015, p.664).
Despite this history, there are some persistent barriers that continue to hinder the integration of mobile technologies into clinical education
stemming from both the faculty and the students themselves. Studies find that faculty are often not role-modeling the use of devices in clinical
education. Sometimes this is associated with a lack of faculty development and training on the devices prior to implementation; some faculty also
just have negative attitudes towards mobile technology in clinical care (Raman, 2015; Lamarche, Park, Fraser, Rich, & MacKenzie, 2016; O’Connor &
Andrews, 2015; Rubenstein & Schubert, 2017). The policies about mobile technology usage at health care facilities also interferes with use in the
clinical setting (Lamarche, Park, Fraser, Rich, & MacKenzie, 2016).
The faculty-related challenges with implementation of mobile technologies in clinical education matches many of the same barriers found with
establishing EBP in clinical settings. Kajermo et al. (2010) systematically reviewed over 63 studies using the BARRIERS scale and aggregated
information to identify persistent barriers. Fifty-three studies ranked the issues based on response frequency. From those rankings, the Setting
Barriers and Limitations category is the biggest barrier to EBP followed by Presentation and Accessibility of the Research.
Methods: This research was conducted within a traditional BSN program that is part of a School of Nursing offering BSN, MSN, and DNP programs.
The BSN program is an upper-division admission program, admitting cohorts of 90 students twice a year, and is offered over four semesters of
study. The SON master plan of evaluation outlines the frequency of curricular review and evaluation which is completed every two years.
The curricular framework is founded on Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory, and the Environments of Care model (Ervin, Bickes, & Schim,
2006). There are seven student learning outcomes (SLO) that all graduates must be able to demonstrate upon completion of the program. Of
significance to this study is the scholarship SLO. The scholarship SLO describes that students will contribute to excellence in nursing practice by
identifying and critiquing research evidence and integrating it with clinical practice, client preference, cost-benefit, and existing resources.
Throughout the curriculum review and evaluation process the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee (UGCC) maps the AACN BSN Essentials and
the Program SLOs to the course objectives. The map also includes detailed descriptions of the course content, student learning activities and
strategies, and the teaching learning environment. The BSN program uses a variety of quantitative formative and summative evaluation tools. The
UGCC consists of BSN program faculty who review course maps and relevant outcomes for each course and provide a peer critique of each course.
The course faculty meet with the UGCC to discuss course strengths, weaknesses, challenges, and go over key findings. Feedback and
recommendations for improvement or change are documented and provided to faculty for integration into courses.
In order to explore the student perspective, the Health Sciences and Nursing Librarian designed and conducted a sequential, mixed methods study.
The research was approved by the organization’s Institutional Review Board #16-0106. Participants were recruited from the second semester
course roster (n=90); two cohorts were involved to control for cohort differences. The first phase of research was a survey that gathered basic
demographic information, years of experience with using mobile technologies, clinical course placement, and list of resources used. The survey also
adapted Pryse, McDaniel, & Schafer’s (2014) EBP Work Environment Scale in order to gauge student perceptions about how clinicians at their
placements valued EBP, demonstrated EBP behavior, and provided access to research evidence. Interviewees were recruited from survey
responses for the second phase of the project, student interviews. The qualitative methodology allowed for follow up discussion related to specific
survey responses. Faculty participated in piloting the survey and in-depth interview guide.
Findings: One-hundred eighteen students participated in the survey and 12 students in the follow up interviews. Students had varying patterns of
use for their iPad across the three different clinical courses. Overall, a majority of students (54%) did not use their iPad in clinical coursework.
Students were least likely to use the iPad in Women’s Health course (9%) and most likely to use it in their Clinical Applications II (Medical Surgical)
course (34%). Follow up interviews found that the presence and availability of computers in facilities, limitations of the academic EHR for
documentation, perceptions of distraction, and concerns of theft were the major reasons preventing iPad adoption.
Consistent across cohorts and clinical courses, students mostly agreed that they had access to relevant research (86%) and that the organizations
valued EBP (87%). However, several students disagreed (12%) or were neutral (26%) about whether they had access to databases. Instead, the
most frequently used resource was Google. Many also disagreed (15%) or were neutral (22%) about whether nurses discussed research at their
clinical locations. In the follow-up interviews with the students, the researcher found that students were aware of the term EBP due to mentions of
the phrase but the reality was fuzzy. Students often conflated EBP with research:
“normally it is something that I or a nurse… see as a problem or something that they think might correlate and so they run an experiment”
“I would say…that its got to be like any scientific study, so its got to be something that can be repeated”
Students also indicated that they lacked understanding of how they would do it outside of the educational environment.
“I never thought about it as creating EBP as a nurse. I didn’t know if like just nurse researchers did that or if like any nurse can like contribute to
forming or creating literature and that sort of thing”
Concurrently, the UGCC found that although scholarship is a SLO that is linked to each course through a focused objective, comprehensive content
mapping did not identify clear course activities, readings, lectures, or assessments in first and second semester courses. In addition, there was a not
clear link between course content and the new mobile technology integrated into the program. The UGCC made recommendations for individual
course revision to better demonstrate student competency with the scholarship SLO.
Integrating Evidence into Educational Practice - In response to the UGCC course feedback, nursing faculty revised a foundations course with a more
explicit connection and set of activities related to EBP. The librarian consulted on the content development for the course based upon the student
responses from the research project. The EBP Competencies for Practicing Registered Nurses were reviewed to guide lesson planning (Melynk et
al., 2014). The nursing faculty and librarian focused on establishing a broad definition of EBP in the course and addressing only three of the
foundational competencies in order to match EBP better with the student’s level of development. These competencies also mirrored the areas of
the nursing care process, another topic in the course. Based on this, the in-class lecture and discussion then aimed to help students walk through
these competencies using clinical expertise they were developing that semester, particularly around health assessment and pulmonary hygiene.
The new content module was piloted during the 2016-2017 academic year and further revisions are ongoing. In addition the librarian has provided
a continuing education seminar on EBP instruction across the curriculum.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/BaccEssentials08.pdf
Benner, P. E., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ervin, N.E., Bickes, J.T., & Schim, S.M. (2006). Environments of care: A curriculum model for preparing a new generation of nurses. Jounral of
Kajermo, K.N., Boström, A., Thompson, D.S., Hutchinson, A.M., Estabrooks, C.A., & Wallin, L. (2010). The BARRIERS scale -- the barriers to research
utilization scale: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 5(1) doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-32
Lamarche, K., Park, C., Fraser, S., Rich, M., & MacKenzie, S. (2016). In the palm of your hand: Normalizing the use of mobile technology for nurse
practitioner education and clinical practice. Nursing Leadership, 29(3), 121-132. doi:10.12927/cjnl.2016.24898
Melynk, B.M. & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2012). The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(9), 410-
417. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182664e0a
Melnyk, B.M., Gallagher-Ford, L., Long, L.E., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2014). The establishment of evidence-based practice competencies for
practicing registered nurses and advanced practice nurses in real-world clinical settings: Proficiencies to improve healthcare quality, reliability,
patient outcomes, and costs. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(1), 5-15. doi:10.1111/wvn.12021
O’Connor, S. & Andrews, T. (2015). Mobile technology and its use in clinical nursing education: a literature review. Journal of Nursing Education
54(3), 137-144. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150218-01
Oermann, M.H. (Ed). (2017). A systematic approach to assessment and evaluation of nursing programs. Washington, DC: National League for
Nursing.
Pryse, Y., McDaniel, A., & Schafer, J. (2014). Psychometric analysis of two new scales: The evidence-based practice nursing leadership and work
environment scales. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(4), 240-247. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12045
Raman, J. (2015). Mobile technology in nursing education: where do we go from here? A review of the literature. Nurse Education Today 35 (2015),
663-672. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.018.
Rubenstein, C. & Schubert, C. (2017). Student and faculty perceptions of iPad integration in a prelicensure program. Nurse Educator 42(2), 85-90.
doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000293
Weston, M. & Roberts, D. (2013). The influence of quality improvement efforts on patient outcomes and nursing work: a perspective from chief
nursing officers at three large health systems. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 18(3), 1-12.
Contact
[email protected]
Self-Awareness of Civility Among Nursing Faculty in Creating a Positive Learning Environment
Malliga Jambulingam, PhD, RN, USA
Michele Harrell, MSN, MPA, CCRN, RN, USA
Brenda Smith-Nettles, DNP, ACNP, USA
Valerie Wright, MSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Students learn most effectively in environments that facilitate learning by encouraging and supporting them. Unpredictable,
unstructured and overwhelming classroom environments can leave students with feelings of vulnerability and anxiety and ultimately
contribute to poor learning outcomes. Faculty members bear responsibility for being positive role models and creating positive
learning environments where students feel safe in engaging an open of ideas. Although self-awareness of the faculty is the strongest
predictor of overall success of the students’ learning in the classroom, no research has systematically examined the faculty’s self-
awareness of civil behavior. This study will explore nurse faculty's awareness of their civil behaviors and their impact on creating a
positive learning environment.
The objective of the study is to examine nurse faculty’s awareness of their civil behaviors in creating a positive learning environment
An exploratory descriptive research design utilizing an online web-based survey as a means of exploring the perceptions of nurse-faculty of their
civil behaviors in the classroom in creating a Positive Learning Environment (PLE). Data will be collected using the demographic questionnaire and
“Civility Index for Faculty”, self-report questionnaire consisting of 20 items on nurse faculty’s civil behaviors in creating a PLE.
Descriptive statistics will be conducted to describe the demographic variables and total score of civility. Correlations between demographic
variables (age, education, years of nursing experience, years in teaching nursing students); and tests of differences across demographic variables
(ethnicity and education) and their awareness of civil behavior in the classroom in creating a PLE.
Findings will reveal how the level of awareness of nursing faculty with regard to civil behaviors in order to create a PLE
We anticipate that this study will provide invaluable information, raise awareness among nurse faculty and determine strengths and to create
opportunities for engaging civil behaviors in order to create and enhance a PLE for students.
References
Clark, C. (2017). Creating & sustaining civility in nursing education. (2nd. Ed). Sigma Theta Tau International. ISBN: 9781945157080.
Clark, C. M. (2009). Faculty field guide for promoting student civility in the classroom, Nurse Educator, 34(5), 194-197.
Education Corner. (2017). Strategies for building a productive and positive learning environment. 1(1).
National League for Nursing. (2012). Ethical Principles of Nursing Education. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/default-
document-library/ethical-principles-for-nursing-education-final-final-010312.pdf?sfvrsn=2
Contact
[email protected]
Accelerated Nursing Students Perception of Factors Influencing Retention
Shevellanie E. Lott, PhD, USA
Abstract
The Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2011), set a goal to increase the percentage of the current nursing workforce holding a Bachelor of
Science degree (BSN) to 80% by the year 2020. With the increased emphasis on preparing nurses at the baccalaureate and post-
baccalaureate levels, the accelerated degree program is an innovative approach to nursing education, which is gaining momentum
for non-nursing graduates (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, [AANC], 2014). Designed to build on previous learning
experiences, accelerated nursing programs provide a way for individuals with undergraduate degrees in other disciplines to
transition into nursing (AACN, 2014). Students admitted to accelerated nursing programs meet rigorous admission criteria; despite
the rigor, the attrition rates remain unacceptably high (Rouse & Rooda, 2010).
Accelerated nursing programs have demonstrated an ability to increase the number of nurses entering the workforce. What is glaringly omitted
from statistics about these programs is the rate of attrition. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) and the National League for
Nursing (NLN) are authorities on the state of nursing education programs in the U.S. Yet, these foremost authorities currently provide data on
graduation rates only. A review of the literature reveals attrition rates are often speculated or unsubstantiated by data. However, when reported,
data explaining the current state of attrition or retention in schools of nursing across the country is inconsistent (Lindsey, 2009; Meyer, Hoover,
Maposa, 2006; Seldomridge & DiBartolo, 2005; Suplee & Glasgow, 2008). Reports indicate attrition rates internationally are as high as 27.6%
(Buchan & Seccombe, 2011, Willis, 2015).
A new trend has emerged at a historically Black college and university (HBCU) located in the southeast region of the United States; a significantly
large number of students failed or withdrew from major nursing courses (Adult Health Nursing – II) in the terminal semester of the program. The
attrition rates for this course from 2012 to 2014 were 22.7%, 9.1%, and 27.1%, respectively. Informally, many of these students verbalized family
stressors (i.e., moving, military deployment, or change in duty station, death of a family member, childcare, and family responsibilities), work
responsibilities, and test anxiety as the major issues hindering their academic success (Lott, S., 2016, p. 12).
Regrettably, not every student admitted to a nursing program will complete the program in the allotted timeframe. Therefore, academic success
and retention of nursing students is paramount to meet the need for a more qualified nursing workforce.
The author set out to explore students’ perception of the factors, which influence their retention given the multifaceted and demanding nature of
attending nursing school while maintaining balance within a family. The specific aims of this research were to identify accelerated nursing students’
perception of the restrictiveness or supportiveness of factors, determine the influence of academic variables and the correlation of demographic
characteristics on retention.
Eighty-nine students enrolled in two accelerated/second-degree nursing programs identified the perceived factors, which influenced their
retention. The Nursing Undergraduate Retention and Success (NURS) model was the conceptual framework that guided the research and the
Student Perception Appraisal – Revised (SPA-R) was used to measure variables.
Self-reporting methodology was utilized to describe students’ perception of the most influential, restrictive, and supportive variables. Accelerated
nursing students’ perceived transportation, family, and friend support as the greatest influencers of retention. The study neither substantiate
students who perceived academic variables as greatly supportive would have lower grades, nor did it support the notion that underrepresented
minorities in nursing would find environmental variables more restrictive of retention. Participants noted professional integration and socialization
were neither supportive or restrictive of retention. Thus, strategies have been introduced to support students while matriculating and to ensure
socialization and integration into the profession.
References
American Association of College of Nursing (AACN, 2014, January 24). Accelerated Baccalaureate and master’s degree in nursing fact
sheet. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/AccelProgsGlance.pdf
Buchan, J., & Seccombe, I. (2011). A decisive decade: A decisive decade the UK nursing labour market review. Retrieved from
https://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/405483/LMR2011_FINAL.pdf.
Jeffreys, M.R. (2012). Nursing student retention: Understanding the process and making a difference (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Springer Publishing
Co.
Lindsey, P. (2009). Starting an accelerated baccalaureate nursing program: Challenges and opportunities for creative educational
innovations. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(5), 279–281.
Loftin, C., Newman, S.D., Dumas, B.P., Gilden, G., & Bond, M.L. (2012). Perceived barriers to success for minority nursing students: An integrative
review. International Scholarly Research Network Nursing. doi: 10.5402/2012/806543.
Lott, S. (2017). Accelerated baccalaureate nursing students’ perception of variables influencing their retention. (Doctoral Dissertation) Retrieved
from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. (10164431).
Lower, J. (2012). Civility starts with you. American Nurse Today, 7(5), 21-22.
Meyer, G.A., Hoover, K.G., & Maposa, S. (2006). A profile of accelerated BSN graduates, 2004. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(8), 324-327.
Reeve, K.L., Shumaker, C.J., Yearwood, E.L., Crowell, N.A., & Riley, J.B. (2013). Perceived stress and social support in undergraduate nursing
students' education experiences. Nurse Education Today, 33(4), 419-424.
Seldomridge, L.A., & DiBartolo, M.C. (2005). A profile of accelerated second bachelor’s degree nursing students, Nurse Educator, 30, 65-68.
Suplee, P. D., & Glasgow, M. E. (2008). Curriculum innovation in an accelerated BSN program: The ACE model. International Journal of Nursing
Scholarship, 5(1), 1–13.
Willis, G. (2015). Shape of caring review. Health Education England. Retrieved from https://hee.nhs.uk/2015/03/12/the-shape-of-caring-review-
report-published/
Contact
[email protected]
Predictors of Work Engagement Among Doctorally-Prepared Nursing Faculty
Emily J. Sheff, MS, RN, CMSRN, FNP-BC, USA
Abstract
The shortage of nursing faculty has prompted research to look at ways we can recruit and retain nursing faculty members and
concepts such as the work engagement of nursing faculty are one such way we can do so. The existing research creates a strong
knowledge base to understand work engagement, and to understand the organizational effects work engagement can have in
academic environments. Work engagement is measured by the vigor, absorption and dedication one has to their job. The construct
has not been studied in full-time nursing faculty, and there is clear need to do so. A growing body of research supports the study of
work engagement within individual occupations and roles as researchers have found that different occupations and roles within
experience different types of job demands and job resources (Rothmann, 2005). Additionally, it has been shown that the work
engagement of faculty at a university may have a direct influence on student retention (McDonald, 2015). It is essential that we
retain our quality nursing faculty, and the study of work engagement is one way we can address the issue.
Work engagement has been shown to decrease turnover, increase organizational commitment and increase career satisfaction (Bakker, Demerouti
& Schaufeli, 2003; Bakker, Demerouti & Schaufeli, 2005). In addition, work engagement among faculty has been shown to have a positive
correlation to student outcomes (Mancz, 2013; Sokolov, 2017; Parker et al, 2012). It is essential for nursing administration to understand the
predictors of work engagement in nursing faculty so that they can then develop and implement strategies that will encourage the retention of
valued faculty members. A study is proposed can help provide the foundation necessary for future outcomes-based research, and the economic
impact of engaged nursing faculty. In addition, it can hopefully provide support for the allocation of funding and support to include work
engagement in quality improvement projects, education based research and the evidence-based support for inclusion into education policies, CCNE
accreditation standards and AACN position statements.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2017). Nursing Faculty Shortage. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/fact-
sheets/nursing-faculty-shortage on June 1, 2017.
Bakker A.B., Schaufeli W.B., Leiter M.P. & Taris T.W. (2008) Position paper. Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health
psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200.
Bakker, A.B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.
Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M.C. (2005). Job Resources Buffer the Impact of Job Demands on Burnout. Journal of Occupational
and Organizational Psychology, 10(2):170-80.
Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. & Schaufeli, W.B. (2003). Dual processes at work in a call centre: An application of the Job Demands-Resources
model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 393-417.
Barkhuizen, N., Rothmann, S., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Burnout and work engagement of academics in higher education institutions: Effects
of dispositional optimism. Stress and Health, 30(4), 322–332. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2520
Brady, M.S. (2010). Healthy nursing academic environments. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15(1).
Candela, L., Gutierrez, A. P., & Keating, S. (2012). A national survey examining the professional work life of today's nursing faculty. Nurse
Education Today. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.10.004.
Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (2013). Standards for Accreditation of Baccalaureate and Graduate Nursing Programs. Washington,
DC: CCNE.
Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (2009). Achieving Excellence in Accreditation: The First 10 Years of CCNE. Washington, DC: CCNE.
Demerouti E., Bakker A.B., Nachreiner F. & Schaufeli W.B. (2001) The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86,
499–512.
Gazza, E. A. (2009). The experience of being a full-time nursing faculty in a baccalaureate nursing education program. Journal of Professional
Nursing, 25, 218–226.
Hakanen, J.J, Bakker, A.B., & Schaufeli, W.B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43: 495-513.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: Author.
Keegan, S. (2016). The psychology of fear in organizations: How to transform anxiety into well-being, productivity and innovation. Philadelpha, PA:
Kogan Page.
National League for Nursing (2005). The healthful work environment tool kit©. New York:NLN. Retrieved on June 9, 2017 from
http://www.nln.org/facultydevelopment/HealthfulWorkEnvironment/index.htm.
National League for Nursing. (2006). Mentoring of nurse faculty. Position statement. New York: NLN. Retrieved on June 9, 2017
from http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/PositionStatements/mentoring_3_21_06.pdf.
National League for Nursing (2008). Mentoring of Nurse Faculty Tool Kit. New York: NLN. Retrieved on June 9, 2017 from
http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/recognition-programs/toolkit.pdf?sfvrsn=4.
Parker, P. D., Martin, A. J., Colmar, S., & Liem, G. A. (2012). Teachers’ workplace well-being: Exploring a process model of goal orientation, coping
behavior, engagement, and burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 503-513. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.001.
Runhaar, R., Sanders, K. & Konermann, J. (2013). Teachers’ work engagement: considering interaction with pupils and human resources practices
as job resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43 (10), 2017-2030. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12155.
Schaufeli, W. & Bakker, A. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multisample study. Journal
of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.
Wollard, K., & Shuck, B. (2011). Antecedents to employee engagement: A structured review of the literature. Advances in Developing
Human Resources, 13(4), 429-446. doi:10.01177/1523422311431220.
Yeh, C.W. (2012). Relationships among service climate, psychological contract, work engagement and service performance. Journal of Air
Transport Management, 25: 67-70. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.08.011.
Contact
[email protected]
Standardized Patient Simulation as an Active Learning Strategy in Oncology Symptom Management: A Pilot
Study
Sherry A. Burrell, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Background and Significance: More people are surviving cancer and living with the long-term and late effects of the disease and its
treatments. Consequently, nurses in all healthcare settings will provide care for patients with or surviving cancer (Komprood, 2013).
The management of symptoms related to cancer and its treatments is a core role of the oncology nurse (Brown, 2015). Poorly
managed cancer-related symptoms have been associated with negative clinical outcomes, such as a decline in functional status,
poor quality of life, and even reduced overall survival (Dodd et al., 2010; Franceschini et al., 2013; Ryu et al., 2010). New nurses do
not have the specialized knowledge or skills required to effectively care for cancer patients (Kuhrik et al., 2008) as oncology content
taught in undergraduate nursing curricula is often limited to ensuring minimal safety standards necessary for entry to practice
(Simmers, 2014). Consequently, it is a major challenge for nurse educators today to prepare baccalaureate nursing students with the
evidence-based knowledge and skills required to effectively manage the complexities of symptom management in oncology clinical
practice.
The use of simulation, as an active teaching strategy, has been found to be effective in enhancing the development of Registered Nurses’
knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed to provide high-level, holistic, evidence-based nursing care to cancer patients and their families (Komprood,
2013; Simmers, 2014). One type of simulation is Standardized Patient (SP) simulation. SP simulation involves the use of trained actors to portray
the patient in a simulation-based learning activity, thus allowing students to practice communication and psychomotor skills in a simulated clinical
environment (Gliva-McConvey, n.d.). SP simulations allow students to practice addressing sensitive patient issues in a safe environment (Becker et
al., 2006). SP simulations have been successfully implemented in medical education to support student learning of communication techniques and
to provide students with an opportunity to practice conveying bad news to oncology patients (Eid, Petty, Hutchins, & Thompason, 2009; Kiluk,
Dessureault, & Quinn, 2012). However, no researchers have examined the effectiveness of SP simulation in assisting undergraduate nursing
students in applying knowledge and skills learned in the classroom to oncology symptom management practice.
Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness of SP simulation, as an active learning strategy, in enhancing senior
baccalaureate nursing students’ ability to connect evidence-based knowledge and skills gained in theory learning sessions to oncology symptom
management practice.
Research Questions: 1.What is the effect of SP simulation, as an active learning strategy, on senior baccalaureate nursing students’ a) competence;
b) confidence; and c) knowledge related to evidence-based, oncology symptom management? 2. What are senior baccalaureate nursing students’
a) perceptions of and b) satisfaction and self-confidence in SP simulation, as an active learning strategy, to apply evidence-based, oncology
symptom management knowledge and skills?
Methods: A longitudinal, mixed-methods design was used to conduct this pilot study at a mid-sized Catholic university in the northeastern United
States. The pilot study was conducted during the spring semester of 2017 with a cohort of senior baccalaureate nursing students enrolled in a
seven week seminar in evidence-based, oncology symptom management. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this pilot study.
The overall goal for the development of the SP simulation was for students to apply evidence-based assessment, counseling, and education
knowledge and skills learned in the theory learning sessions in a simulated outpatient oncology setting. Two 20-minute SP simulation scenarios
were developed: 1) chemotherapy in colorectal cancer, and 2) radiation therapy in breast cancer. Students participated in each SP simulation
scenario in groups of 4 to 5 as either a Registered Nurse or observer. Each simulation was followed by a 40-minute debriefing session using the
Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (DML) approach (Dreifuerst, 2012). Both SP simulation scenarios underwent two person expert review for both
oncology content and simulation pedagogy prior to implementation.
Data collection occurred at three study time points: T1) pre-learning sessions, T2) pre-SP simulations, and T3) post-SP simulations. A 24-item,
researcher-developed instrument was used to measure students’ knowledge, confidence, and self-reported competence in oncology symptom
management at all three study time points (T1-T3). The National League for Nursing’s (NLN’s) Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning
Tool (Jeffries & Rizzolo, 2006) was used to measure student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning with the SP simulations at T3. Nine
researcher-developed questions (4 open-ended and 5 Likert-style questions) were used to gain further insight into students’ satisfaction with and
perceptions of the SP simulations at T3. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance
(RM-ANOVA) with post-hoc pair-wise comparisons of mean differences adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction.
Qualitative responses to open-ended questions were analyzed for themes using conventional content analysis.
Results: For this pilot study, the sample consisted of one section of senior seminar students (N=9). All students were female with a mean age of
21.0 years old. The majority of students were White (77.8%) and Non-Hispanic / Non-Latino (88.9%). There was a statistically significant increase in
student’s self-perceived competence over time [F(2,16) = 23.21, p < 0.001] with mean post-SP simulation competence scores (T3) demonstrating a
significant increase from pre-learning session (T1) (p = 0.001) and pre-SP simulation (T2) (p = 0.003). Similarly, there was a statistically significant
increase in student’s confidence over time [F(1.2, 9.8) = 18.27, p = 0.001] with post-SP simulation student confidence scores (T3) demonstrating a
significant increase from pre-learning session (T1) levels (p = 0.001) and pre-simulation (T2) levels (p = 0.002). Student mean knowledge scores
increased over time; however differences in these scores did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.345). Students reported a high-level of
satisfaction (M= 23.40 + 2.07 [20-25]) and confidence (M= 36.20 + 3.56 [32-40]) in learning with the SP simulations. Analysis of open-ended
responses resulted in three qualitative themes: realistic application, enjoyable and helpful, and suggestions for improvement.
Discussion: Findings from this pilot study provide preliminary evidence that SP simulation may enhance student self-perceived competence and
confidence related to evidence-based oncology symptom management. Findings also suggest that SP simulation increased students’ satisfaction
with and confidence in learning in this population. Thus, SP simulation holds promise as an active teaching strategy to enhance undergraduate
student learning of evidence-based, oncology symptom management knowledge and skills. Although, it must be noted that due to the small and
homogeneous sample, the findings from this pilot study must be interpreted with caution. Further research is warranted to definitively determine
the effect of SP simulation on senior baccalaureate nursing students’ ability to apply evidence-based knowledge and skills gained in theory learning
sessions to oncology symptom management practice.
References
Brown, C. G. (2015). A Guide to Oncology Symptom Management (2ndedition). Pittsburg, Pennsylvania: Oncology Nursing Society.
Becker, K. L., Rose, L. E., Berg, J. B., Park, H., & Shatzer, J. H. (2006). The teaching effectiveness of standardized patients. Journal
Dreifuerst, K.T. (2012). Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. Journal of
Nursing Education, 51, 326-333.
Dodd, M. J., Cho, M. H., Cooper, B. A., & Miaskowski, C. (2010). The effect of symptom clusters on functional status and quality of life in women
withbreast cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 14(2), 101-110.
Eid, A., Petty, M., Hutchins, L., & Thompson, R. (2009). ‘Breaking bad news:’ Standardized patient intervention improves communication skills for
hematology-oncology fellows and advanced practice nurses. Journal of Cancer Education, 24(2), 154-159.
Franceschini, J., Jardim, J. R., Fernandes, A. L., Jamnik, S.,& Santoro, I. L. (2013). Relationship between the magnitude of symptoms and the quality
of life: a cluster analysis of lung cancer patients in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol, 39(1), 23-31.
Gliva-McConvey, G. (n.d.). About ASPE. Retrieved from:
http://www.aspeducators.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=31:about-aspe-overview&catid=20:site-content&Itemid=113
Jeffries, P. R., & Rizzolo, M. A. (2006). Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults
and children: A national, multi-site, multi-method study. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
Kiluk, J. V., Dessureault, S., & Quinn, G. (2012). Teaching medical students how to break bad news with standardized patients. Journal of
Cancer Education, 27, 277-280.
Komprood, S. R. (2013). Nursing student attitudes towards oncology nursing: An evidence-based literature review. Clinical Journal of
Oncology Nursing, 17(1), E21-28.
Kuhrik, N. S., Kuhrik, M., Rimkus, C. F., Tecu, N. J., & Woodhouse, J. A. (2008). Using human simulation in the oncology clinical practice setting.
The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39(8), 345-355.
Ryu, E., Kim, K., Cho, M. S., Kwon, I. G., Kim, H. S., & Fu, M. R. (2010). Symptom clusters and quality of life in Korean patients with hepatocellular
carcinoma. Cancer Nursing, 33(1), 3-10.
Simmers, P. C. (2014). Simulation as a learning tool in the oncology setting. Journal of Advanced Practice Oncology, 5(3), 217-23.
Contact
[email protected]
Identifying Student Nurses’ Barriers to Research Participation
Kofi Bonnie, DNP, MSc, BSc(Hons), RPN, Canada
Talaena Marven, SN, Canada
Meagan Lauer, BKin, SN, Canada
Simone Snyders, BSPN, Canada
Abstract
Background: Evidence-informed practice is vital to safe nursing care; hence there is a significant need for more nurses and nursing
students to be involved in the generation of such evidence. During the literature review, it was noted that there is a paucity of
studies on the challenges and barriers to student nurses’ research participation. The purpose of this study was to determine the
challenges to research involvement faced by student nurses in the Bachelor of Science in Psychiatric Nursing (BSPN) and Bachelor of
Nursing (BSN) programs at a community college in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Method: For this study, 360 nursing students from the BSPN and BSN programs were recruited using purposive sampling. All student nurses within
the community college were eligible to participate; the only exclusion criteria were the final semester of preceptorship students as they were not
accessible on campus during the period of data collection. Consenting research participants were given a 15 item questionnaire to complete.
Quantitative and qualitative data was collected. Quantitative results were analyzed using Microsoft Excel, SPSS and qualitative responses were
analyzed for themes.
Results: In total, 360 student nurses participated with 43% (156) from the BSPN and 57% (204) from the BSN program. Most of the participants
identified as female 83% (299), with only 17% (57) identifying as male. Participants were mostly between ages 19-45. The most common challenge
that was identified for both the BSN and BSPN programs was a lack of time (m=4.34 ± 0.92). The other two commonly identified barriers were not
enough incentives (m=3.50 ± 1.20) and lack of integration into the curriculum (m=3.39 ± 1.22). Common themes from qualitative responses
reiterated that time, incentives, support and knowledge about participation in research were challenges faced by nursing students in regard to
research participation.
Implications: A similar report from Bäck-Pettersson, Jensen, Kylén, Sernert, and Hermansson, (2013) found that that more should be done to
identify barriers and challenges to nursing students’ research participation. Identification of barriers that nursing students face will contribute to
the body of knowledge aimed at equipping pre-registration or student nurses with the information and skill necessary for research participation
and provision of evidence-based care. It will also allow for further research into strategies for overcoming barriers to increase students’ research
participation. Finally, these findings can be used to inform the development of curriculum to encourage and support nursing students’ participation
in research and other scholarly activities.
References
Bäck-Pettersson, S., Jensen, K. P., Kylén, S., Sernert, N., & Hermansson, E. (2013). Nurses' experiences of participation in a research and
development programme. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(7/8), 1103-1111. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04297.x
Devi, V., Ramnarayan, K., Abraham R., R., Pallath, V., Kamath, A., & Kodidela, S. (2015). Short-term outcomes of a program developed to inculcate
research essentials in undergraduate medical students. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 61(3), 163-168. doi:10.4103/0022-3859.159315
Henoch I., Jakobsson Ung, E., Ozanne, A., Falk, H., Falk, K., Kenne Sarenmalm, E., & ... Fridh, I. (2014). Nursing students' experiences of involvement
in clinical research: An exploratory study. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(2), 188-194. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2013.07.009
Shannon, C. (2014). Community-based health and schools of nursing: Supporting health promotion and research. Public Health Nursing, 31(1), 69-
78 doi:10.1111/phn.12061
Thomson, P., Smith, A., & Annesley, S. (2014). Exploration of the effects of peer teaching of research on students in an undergraduate nursing
programme. Journal of Research in Nursing, 19(5), 415-430. doi:10.1177/1744987113519444
Contact
[email protected]
An Educational Method to Enable Nursing Students to Develop the Skills Needed for Clinical Reasoning
Cynthia D. Booher, PhD, USA
Abstract
One of the challenges in nursing education is the need to enable students to internalize the skills needed to implement the thought
processes of critical thinking and clinical reasoning. The research of Patricia Benner has been instrumental in explaining the need to
improve the critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills of newly licensed registered nurses. Dr. Benner’s research has changed the
focus of nursing to include these skills in the education process. The
study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a classroom educational method designed to help students improve these skills. The
ex post facto study was conducted at one Southern community college with students enrolled in an Associate Degree nursing
program. The study used the nursing educational theory of Patricia Benner and the general educational theory of constructivist
educational theory as a theoretical base. Archived data was collected from the results of two cohorts of nursing students based on
their performance on two separate administrations of the Assessment Technologies Institute (ATI) critical thinking examination. The
data was analyzed using central tendency statistics, a paired sample t-test to determine the differences between ATI scores for each
group and an independent sample t-test to determine the differences in the change in ATI scores for the two groups.
The results of the investigation indicate that the education method was effective in assisting students to improve the cognitive skills
needed for clinical reasoning. The cohort that used the method had significant increase in the ATI critical thinking examination
scores from the initial administration to the second administration. It was interesting to note that the most growth occurred with
those students who struggled with the critical thinking process at the beginning of their education. It was also noted that there was
no significant change in the scores for the cohort of students who did not use the educational method. This was the case even
though both cohorts had the same curriculum, resources, faculty, and facilities.
The conclusions from the research were that the method should be researched further to identify if similar results would be
obtained if a different curriculum were involved and with Baccalaureate programs to compare results. Research could be conducted
to determine the growth of specific cognitive skills related to clinical reasoning. It is also suggested that qualitative research be
initiated related to the method. In general, this research suggested that the method was effective and would be appropriate for
implementation in nursing education programs.
References
Adeniran, R. K., & Smith - Glasgow, M. E. (2010). Creating and promoting a positive learning environment among culturally diverse nurses and
students. Creative Nursing, 16(2), 53-58. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com.library.capella.edu
Andersson, N., Klang, B., & Petersson, G. (2012). Differences in clinical reasoning among nurses working in highly specialized pediatric care. Journal
of Clinical Nursing, 21, 870-879. doiL10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03935.x
Atkinson, K., Ajjawi, P., & Cooling, N. (2011). Promoting clinical reasoning in general practice trainees: Role of the clinical teacher. The Clinical
Teacher, 8(2), 176-180.
Banning, M. (2008). The think aloud approach as an educational tool to develop and assess clinical reasoning in undergraduate students. Nurse
Benner, P. (2011). Formation in professional education: An examination of the relationship between theories of meaning and theories of the self.
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 36, 342 - 353. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr030
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2005). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA : Jossey Bass.
Benner, P., & Tanner, C. (1987). Clinical judgment: How expert nurses use intuition. American Journal of Nursing, 87(1), 23-31.
Boyd, R. D., & Myers, J. G. (1988). Transformative education. International Journal of Lifelong Learning, 7(4), 261-284.
Buckingham, C. D. (2000). Classifying clinical decision making: A unifying approach. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 981-989.
doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01565.x
Cappelletti, A., Engel, J. K., & Prentice, D. (2014). Systematic review of clinical judgment and reasoning in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education,
53(8), 453-458. doi:10.3928/01484834-20140724-01
Connell, J. (2011). Adult learners and universities. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 4(16), 93-122.
Dirks, J. (2008). Adult learning and the emotional self. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Facione, N. C., & Facione, P. A. (2008). Critical thinking and clinical judgement. Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning in the Health Sciences: A
Teaching Anthology. Milbrae, CA: The California Academic Press
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction: The Delphi report.
Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.
Glaser, E. M. (1942). AN EXPERIMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL THINKING (Order No. 0156200). Available from ProQuest Dissertations &
Theses Full Text. (301860805). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/301860805?accountid
Glynn, D. M. (2012). Clinical judgment development using structured classroom reflective practice: A qualitative study. Journal of Nursing
Education, 51, 134-139. doi:10.3928/01484834-20120127-06
Higgs, J., & Jones, M. (Eds.).(1995). Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions. Jordan Hill, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
Jansen, C., Cammock, P., & Conner, L. (2010). Schools as learning communities? Leadership through appreciative inquiry. John Ben Shepperd
Journal of Practical Leadership, 5(1), 120-139. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10092/5313
Jones, J. (1988). Clinical reasoning in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 13(2), 185 - 192. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1988.tb01407.x
Judd, J. (2005). Strategies used by nurses for decision - making in the pediatric orthopedic setting. Journal of Orthopedic Nursing, 9(3), 166-171.
Kaddoura, M. A. (2011). Critical thinking skills of nursing students in lecture - based teaching and case - based learning. International Journal for the
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 1-18.
Kaddoura, M. (2013). New graduate nurses’ perceived definition of critical thinking during their first nursing experience. Educational Research
Quarterly, 36(3), 3-21. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1412593277?accountid=458
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgement and choice. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.9.697
Krupat, E, Sprague, J. M., Wolpaw, D., Haidet, P., Hatem, D., & O’Brian, B. (2011). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Ability, disposition or
both. Medical Education, 45, 625-635. doi:10.1111/j.1365-292010.03910x
Kuiper, R., & Pesut, D. (2004). Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: Self - regulated learning theory.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(4), 381-391.
Lasater, K. (2007). High-fidelity simulation and the development of clinical judgment: Students’ experiences. Journal of Nursing Education, 46, 269-
276.
Lasater,K., & Nielsen, A. (2009). The influence of concept-based learning activities on students’ clinical judgment development. Journal of Nursing
Education, 48, 441-446. doi:10.3928/01484834-20090518-04
Levett-Jones, T., Hoffman, K., Dempsey, Y., Jeong, S., Noble, D., Norton, C., Roche, J. & Hickey, N. (2010). The “five rights” of clinical reasoning: an
educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically “at risk” patients. Nurse Education Today, 30(6), 515-520.
Lyons, E. (2008). Examining the effects of problem-based learning on and NCLEX-RN scores on the critical thinking skills of associate degree nursing
students in a southeastern community college. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1), 1-17.
Marchigiano, G., Eduljee, N., & Harvey, K. (2010). Developing critical thinking skills from clinical assignments: A pilot study on nursing students’ self
- reported perceptions. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(1), 143-152. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01191.x
McAllistor, M. (2012). STAR: A transformative learning framework for nurse educators. Journal of Transformative Education, 9(42), 42-58.
doi:10.1177/1541344611426010
Mezirow, J., (1997). Transformative learning: theory to practice. New Directions for Adult Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.
Mulnix, J. W. (2012). Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 465 - 479. doi:10.1111/j.1469-
5812.2010.00675.x
Nielsen, A. (2009). Concept-based learning activities using the clinical judgment model as a foundation for clinical learning. The Journal of Nursing
Education, 48(6), 350.
Norman, G. (2005). Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Medical Education, 39,(4), 418-427. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2929.2005.02127.x
Price, B. (2011). Improving clinical reasoning in children’s nursing through narrative analysis. Nursing Children and Young People, 23(6), 28-34.
Ramezani-Badr, F., Nasrabadi, A. N., Yekta, Z. P., & Taleghani, F. (2009). Strategies and criteria for clinical decision making in critical care nurses: A
qualitative study. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 41, 351-358.
Round, A. (2001). Introduction to clinical reasoning. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(2), 109-117.
Simmons, B. (2010). Clinical reasoning: Concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1151 - 1158. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05262.x
Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45, 204-211.
Thompson, C., Bucknall, T., Estabrookes, C. A., Hutchinson, A., Fraser, K., de Vos, R., & Saunders, J. (2009). Nurses’ critical event risk assessments: A
judgment analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 601-612. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02191.x
Torre, D., Daley, B., Sebastian, J., & Elnicki, M. (2006). Overview of current learning theories for medical educators. The American Journal of
Medicine, 110(10), 903-907. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.06.037
Vacek, J. (2009). Using a conceptual approach with a concept map of psychosis as an exemplar to promote critical thinking. Journal of Nursing
Education, 48(1), 49-53.
Wagensteen, S., Johansson, I. S., Bjorkstrom, M. E., & Nordstrom, G. (2011). Research utilization and critical thinking among newly graduated
nurses: Predictors for research use. A quantitative cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(17/18), 2436-2447. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-
2702.2010.03629.x
Weber, S. (2005). Promoting critical thinking in students. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 17(6), 205-206. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/212884770?accountid=458
Whitehead, T. D. (2006). Comparison of native versus nonnative English-speaking nurses of critical thinking assessments at entry and exit. Nursing
Administration Quarterly, 30(3), 285-290.
Yang, H., & Thompson, C. (2011). The effects of clinical experience on nurses’ critical event risk assessment judgements in paper based and high
fidelity simulated conditions: A comparative judgement analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48, 429-437.
doi:10.1016/jijnurstu.2010.09.010
Yildrim, B., & Ozsoy, S. A. (2011). Nursing student the critical thinking development of the critical thinking education. Journal of Society for
Development of New Net Environment in B & H, 5(4), 846-856.
Contact
[email protected]
Factors Influencing Information Literacy Self-Efficacy of Prelicensure Baccalaureate Nursing Students
Meagan L. White, MSN, RNC, USA
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Nurses must be adept at navigating vast amounts of information in today’s technology-rich care environment. As
hospitals seek to improve quality of care and information sharing among patients and care providers, information and
communication technologies (ICTs) dominate the healthcare landscape. Despite efficiencies in delivering patient care afforded by
ICTs, the threat of overlooking vital information due to an overload of digitized data is now a reality for nurses. The rapid
proliferation of information sources available to healthcare professionals has led to the identification of information literacy (IL) as
essential to the provision of safe, quality patient care. In turn, scholars are calling for the restructuring of nursing education to
incorporate IL skills necessary for utilization of research associated with evidence-based care.
The assimilation of IL into the nursing curriculum provides students with the basic knowledge to apply skills for evidence-based practice (EBP) that
are required to improve the quality of care in complex nursing. The American Library Association (ALA) defines IL as “the ability to recognize when
information is needed and have the ability to locate, evaluate, and effectively use the needed information” (ALA, 1989, para 3). According to the
ALA’s (2000) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, an information literate individual demonstrates competency in a
five-step process: (1) determine the extent of information needed; (2) access information effectively and efficiently; (3) evaluate information and
its sources critically; (4) use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose; and (5) understand the economic, legal, and social issues
surrounding information use Fundamental to engagement in EBP, IL competencies ensure nurses have proper skills in the collection, analysis,
evaluation, and utilization of data, information, and resources. As the keystone of EBP, IL encompasses skills necessary for the discovery, analysis,
and use of the best research evidence.
BACKGROUND/SIGNIFICANCE: IL skills are threaded throughout the nursing process as the nurse must be able to determine what information
is needed, find information based on the resources available, appraise the information while determining the validity of the source, apply the
information to practice, and evaluate improvements from the application of information. Thus, IL competencies are fundamental to nursing and
EBP. The components of IL also directly align with those of the literature review process, as research utilization requires the ability to retrieve and
evaluate scholarly articles from a variety of sources. Both processes involve the ability to identify when information is needed, formulate a question
or problem based on evidence from research or data collected, critique the validity and reliability of information sources, and synthesize
information to generate knowledge or answers addressing the identified question(s) or problem(s).
Despite the link between IL skills and EBP, a report from the National League for Nursing ([NLN], 2008) indicated that only 40% of nursing programs
surveyed had specific IL requirements for graduation. Although competency standards provide direction for the development of information
literate graduates, higher education continues to lag in incorporating IL competencies into nursing curricula. However, it is imperative that nursing
students demonstrate the ability to apply published research effectively in their practice to assure the provision of quality, safe, patient-centered
care as they transition into practice. Therefore, IL education in nursing programs must focus on the ability to identify pertinent publications from
multiple sources of information, analyze the validity of the information, synthesize information from various sources to develop new knowledge,
and transfer this knowledge into practice.
A limited number of empirical studies have examined IL educational strategies but with small sample sizes, other health disciplines, associate-
degree students, or with a focus on EBP as a whole rather than IL competency. In addition studies specific to pre-licensure nursing students focus
on measures of computer literacy or technological competence. Recent studies published on IL skills of nursing students failed to incorporate the
accepted ALA standards and competencies and were limited to researcher-developed instruments without reported reliability and validity
measures. As no specific theories, competencies, or frameworks were used to guide these research studies, their findings may not have helped to
build on a broader understanding of IL within the context of nursing education. Therefore an important research opportunity exists to enhance IL
skills of nursing students to help them develop a repertoire of IL skills, enhance the quality of teaching and learning, and foster the needed skills for
clinical practice and lifelong learning.
The science of nursing education needs empirical research to assess IL skills of students and inform the development of evidence-based strategies
to promote IL competency development (NLN, 2008). Today’s millennial students, skillful at navigating technologies with high levels of computer
self-efficacy, may use technology daily in a social context but be unfamiliar with sources of information and/or how to use information sources for
professional nursing practice. Knowledge of demographic and educational factors associated with higher IL levels would enable faculty to identify
students at risk for having low IL skills and to direct resources toward curricular improvements. Moreover, describing the development of IL
competency is imperative to its wider acceptance of importance in nursing education and insurance of student success and readiness for practice.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this proposed study with pre-licensure baccalaureate nursing students is three-fold: 1) describe pre-licensure
baccalaureate senior nursing students’ IL self-efficacy levels utilizing the valid and reliable Information Literacy Self-Efficacy (ILSES) tool; 2) analyze
the relationship between demographic factors, educational strategies, and IL self-efficacy; 3) provide a rich description of educational strategies
employed by nursing programs across the United States aimed at achieving IL competency. Roger’s Diffusion of Innovations provides the
theoretical framework for this study. Mixed methodology is appropriate for the purpose of this study which aims to expand upon previous
quantitative research studies regarding student factors influence IL self-efficacy while also exploring lesser known IL educational strategies
employed by pre-licensure baccalaureate programs through qualitative analysis. The mixed method design will ensure that factors impacting the
development of IL self-efficacy of nursing students are examined through a variety of lenses.
The Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale (ILSES), a valid and reliable 28-item measure, has been used in several studies in higher education
outside of the nursing discipline to operationalize tasks of the ALA’s competency standards. The ILSES, developed by Kurbanoğlu, Akkoyunlu, and
Umay (2006) is the only self-efficacy measure of IL competency to adopt the ALA’s definition and competency standards, as evidenced in the
structure and content of the survey. Two scholarly works, a study by Stokes and Urquhart (2011) and dissertation by Wendekier (2015), utilize the
ILSES with pre-licensure nursing students to operationalize tasks of the ALA’s competency standards. With an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91, the
ILSES contains 28-items requiring participants to rate confidence and competence in conducting IL tasks with higher scores indicating increased
perception of IL self-efficacy. As ILSES has been utilized repeatedly in other disciplines of higher education and has established reliability and
validity with nursing students, the survey tool will be utilized in this proposed study.
METHODS/DATA ANALYSIS: This study will use a sample of pre-licensure baccalaureate nursing programs across the United States. The
researcher will recruit a stratified sample of senior nursing students from pre-licensure schools of nursing (SON) across the northeast, central,
western, and southern geographical regions of the United States. The study population will be comprised of at least one pre-licensure
baccalaureate SON from each of the four identified geographical regions. Criteria for SON participation include those programs in the U.S. offering
a pre-licensure baccalaureate nursing degree accredited by either of the two national accreditation bodies, the Accreditation Commission for
Education in Nursing (ACEN) and/or the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE). Students will be invited to participate in the study via
an emailed Qualtrics link which will include the ILSES followed by demographic questions. As well one faculty member from each SON will be
invited to participate in a taped interview using a data collection tool with open-ended qualitative interview questions developed by the
researcher.
Quantitative data review will include univariate or descriptive analysis using frequency distributions, measures of central tendency, and calculated
variability with data collected from the ILSES. The sample will be described using descriptive statistics and analysis of ILSES results will occur
through mean scores and standard deviations on the overall scale and question items. A hierarchical multiple regression model will then be used to
assess the ability of each independent variable to act as a predictor of IL self-efficacy scores using the ILSES tool. Qualitative data analysis will occur
through directed content analysis strategies outlined by Hickey and Kipping (1996). Content analysis is a research method that has come into wide
use in current health studies. Three distinct approaches to content analysis exist: conventional, summative, or directive; the latter will be used in
this study to guide qualitative data analysis as it provides a method to validate or extend a theoretical framework or theory. The directed approach
to content analysis will be used to support and extend existing research on IL educational interventions.
References
American Library Association. (1989). Presidential committee on information literacy: Final report. [Document ID: 126315]. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/presidential.cfm
American Library Association. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/index.cfm
Geçer, A. K. (2012). An examination of studying approaches and information literacy self-efficacy perceptions of prospective teachers. Eurasian
Journal of Educational Research, (49), 151–172.
Hickey, G., & Kipping, C. (1996). Issues in research. A multi-stage approach to the coding of data from open-ended questions. Nurse Researcher, 4,
81-91.
National League for Nursing. (2008a, May 29). NLN board of governors urges better preparation of nursing workforce to practice in 21st-century,
technology-rich health care environment. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/newsreleases/informatics_release_052908.htm
Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Stokes, P., & Urquhart, C. (2011). Profiling information behavior of nursing students, Part 1: Quantitative findings. Journal of Documentation, 67(6),
908–932. doi:10.1108/00220411111183528
Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform. (2012). Informatics competencies for every practicing nurse: Recommendations from the TIGER
Collaborative. Retrieved from http://www.tigersummit.com/uploads/3.Tiger.Report_Competencies_final.pdf
Tuncer, M. (2013). An analysis on the effect of computer self-efficacy over scientific research self-efficacy and information literacy self-efficacy.
Educational Research and Reviews, 81(1), 33–40. doi:10.5897/ERR12.122
Wendekier, C. (2015). Information literacy: Correlation of self-efficacy and proficiency (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University of
Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA.
Contact
[email protected]
A Multiple Case Study of Associate Degree Nursing Student Experiences on NCLEX-RN© Preparation
Soosannamma Joseph, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
A major challenge in the nursing education system is to assist nursing students to be successful in the program and on the National Council of
Licensing Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN). Nursing schools have a critical responsibility for contributing to the nation’s need for
more qualified nurses in order to reduce the impact of the nursing shortage, and maintaining first-time NCLEX-RN pass rate at or above the national
average. The AACN reports show that as the Baby Boomers age and retire, the need for more health care and professional nurses increases in the
US (AACN, 2014). In order to meet the increasing demand for professional registered nurses, nursing educators in the nursing school are
responsible to enroll and educate sufficient students to be successful on the NCLEX-RN. A hospital-based nursing school in the northeastern region
of the US has experienced a decline in NCLEX-RN pass rates since 2008. The reason for the low pass rate from 2008 to 2013 was unclear. The
accreditation status of the school was in jeopardy as the accreditor agency evaluated the school’s first-time pass rate in 2013. The reason for the
low pass rate from 2008 to 2013 was unclear. A study conducted by Chen and Lo (2015) on student satisfaction, affirmed the importance of
studying the student experiences for better program accountability. Charalampous and Kokkinos (2014) supported that since the education focuses
on students, their perspectives are fundamental aspects for program effectiveness. To understand student self-regulated behaviors, learning
approaches and other factors that impact their academic outcomes, the student perspectives on learning and preparing for NCLEX-RN were
explored.
The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study was to explore nursing student experiences on NCLEX-RN including learning styles and
approaches. Liew, Sidhu, and Barua (2015) stated that the learning approaches and styles in individual students vary and their learning needs are
different from one to other. There have been studies regarding learning styles among nursing students to improve the teaching styles and the
curriculum (AlKhasawneh, 2013; Andreou, Papastavrou, & Merkouris, 2014). However, studies conducted on learning styles used by nursing
students in preparation for NCLEX-RN are scarce. Kolb’s experiential learning theory was the framework for the study to predict the preferred
learning style for nursing students in preparation to NCLEX-RN. Kolb proposed in ELT that “Learning is the process whereby knowledge is created
through the transformation of experience” (Kolb, 1984, p. 38). Kolb’s ELT has four learning styles including diverger, assimilator, converger and
accommodator where “the diverger learns through concrete experience, the assimilator uses reflection and observation, the converger utilizes
abstract conceptualization, and the accommodator learns through activities” (Poore & Cullen, 2014, p. 245).
In reviewing studies that used Kolb's learning styles, the most regularly revealed learning styles for nursing students were accommodator and
diverger (Fleming, 2008; Hallin, 2014; Kolb, 2000). Kolb (1984) emphasized students identify their preferred learning style so that they can progress
as an effective learner. Since the diverger learns through concrete experience and the assimilator uses reflection and observation, these styles
cannot be excluded fully from nursing students’ learning process. Therefore, this study also focused on identifying the preferred learning styles
used by nursing graduates to prepare for NCLEX-RN in-depth and find out whether the findings are in agreement with theory propositions or
contrast (Aneshensel, 2012; Baškarada, 2014). A purposive sampling method was used to recruit participants. Interviews were concluded when
saturation of data was achieved. The final sample for the study was nine nursing graduates as three cases defined by the year of graduation from
2011 to 2013. Kolb’s experiential learning theory was the framework for the study and Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (LSI) was used to explore
learning styles.
Eight major themes were emerged from the study: (a) a study plan is an important learning approach for NCLEX-RN; (b) constant practice of NCLEX-
RN style questions and answers is a helpful learning approach; (c) note taking and summarizing is an effective learning approach for NCLEX-RN; (d)
staying focused is a learning approach for NCLEX-RN preparation; (e) commitment to study is crucial while preparing for NCLEX-RN; (f) students
need to watch and think (Assimilating) while learning for NCLEX-RN; (g) students learn by doing and thinking (Converging ) for NCLEX-RN and (h)
students learn by feeling and watching (Diverging) while preparing for NCLEX-RN.
As an implication to theory, the results extended Kolb’s ELT by revealing that some nursing students learn by watching, when others learn by doing,
feeling or thinking. This study results confirmed that the nursing graduates gain knowledge by watching, thinking, feeling and doing and transform
that knowledge in to new knowledge mostly by thinking during NCLEX-RN preparation. The study finding also support that the most preferred
learning style for nursing students during NCLEX-RN preparation was assimilating or watching and thinking style. The recommendations for practice
included (a) support nursing students to take a deeper learning approach, (b) plan mandatory study strategy seminars, (c) establish a NCLEX-RN
review center, (d) include higher cognitive level questions on the course examinations, (e) support the student after graduation by extending the
NCLEX-RN review center, and (f) identify student preferred learning styles. Recommendations for future research included (a) a quantitative
correlational study to examine the major themes, (b) a mixed method study to explore nursing students learning styles and NCLEX-RN outcome,
and (c) a quantitative comparative study of student learning approaches, learning styles and NCLEX-RN outcomes in multiple nursing programs.
References
AlKhasawneh, E. (2013). Using VARK to assess changes in learning preferences of nursing students at a public university in Jordan: Implications for
teaching. Nurse Education Today, 33, 1546-1549. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.12.017
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2014). Nursing shortage fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-
relations/fact-sheets/nursing-shortage
Andreou, C., Papastavrou, E., & Merkouris, A. (2014). Learning styles and critical thinking relationship in baccalaureate nursing education: A
systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 34(3), 362-371.doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.004
Aneshensel, C. S. (2012). Theory-based data analysis for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Baškarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1-25. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2559424
Charalampous, K., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2014). Students’ big three personality traits, perceptions of teacher interpersonal behavior, and mathematics
achievement: An application of the model of reciprocal causation. Communication Education, 63(3), 235-258. doi:10.1080/03634523.014.917688
Chen, H., & Lo, H. (2015). Nursing student satisfaction with an associate nursing program. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(1), 27-33.
doi:10.5480/13-1268
Fleming, N.D. (2008). VARK. A guide to learning styles. The VARK questionnaire. Retrieved from http://www.vark-
learn.com/english/page.asp?p=questionnaire
Hallin, K. (2014). Nursing students at a university — A study about learning style preferences. Nurse Education Today, 34(12), 1443-1449.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.001
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D. A. (2000). Facilitator's guide to learning. Boston, MA: Hay/McBer.
Liew, S., Sidhu, J., & Barua, A. (2015). The relationship between learning preferences (styles and approaches) and learning outcomes among pre-
clinical undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 15, 44. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0327-0
Poore, J. A., Cullen, D. L. (2014). Featured article: Simulation-based interprofessional education guided by Kolb’s experiential learning theory.
Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 241-247. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.01.004
Contact
[email protected]
Servant Leadership in a Baccalaureate Nursing Program: A Case Study
Jennifer K. Chicca, MS, RN, USA
Nancy J. Frank, MSN, RN, CNE, USA
Jenna E. Hagy, MSN, RNC-NIC, USA
Abstract
Background: All nurses are leaders every day (Anderson, 2016; Fahlberg & Toomey, 2016). The immediate need for complex skills,
including leadership skills, challenges entry-level nursing professionals who have limited leadership experience (Tropello & DeFazio,
2014). Despite the many challenges they face, entry-level practitioners must master leadership skills to succeed (Anderson, 2016;
Fahlberg & Toomey, 2016). Nurses enjoy benefits of leadership including: increased care coordination, quality, safety, and outcomes
(Anderson, 2016; Fahlberg & Toomey, 2016; Tropello & DeFazio, 2014). Thus, leadership development is an important and essential
element in entry-level, specifically baccalaureate, nursing programs. The principles of Greenleaf’s Servant Leadership Theory (1977),
such as service to others, mirror the vital leadership skills needed by nurses; thus, it is an ideal framework to study leadership
development in baccalaureate nursing programs (American Association of Critical-Care Nurses [AACN], 2016; Anderson, 2016;
Fahlberg & Toomey, 2016; Fields, Thompson, & Hawkins, 2015; Robert K. Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership [RGCSL], 2016).
Greenleaf (1977) based his Servant Leadership Theory on the premise that leaders first serve, then decide to lead. Greenleaf
asserted the focus on others’ needs and sharing of power by the leader increases performance and personal development of the
people being led (RGCSL, 2016; Spears, 2010). Principles and characteristics important to servant leadership include, for example:
service to others, holistic approach to work, listening, empathy, caring, trust, altruism, and empowerment. Despite formal
recognition of Greenleaf’s Servant Leadership Theory over 40 years ago, incorporating servant leadership principles into
baccalaureate nursing education is not well studied (Anderson, 2016; RGCSL, 2016, Tropello & DeFazio, 2014). Available literature
focuses on defining theory ideals, with a few studies examining how servant leadership is measured, demonstrated in practice, or
used in education (Anderson, 2016; Neill & Saunders, 2008; O’Brien, 2011; Tropello & DeFazio, 2014; van Dierendonck, 2011). Most
empirical evidence focuses on individual and organizational outcomes of servant leadership; for example, servant leaders tend to
have followers with increased satisfaction, commitment, and performance (Hanse, Harlin, Jarebrant, Ulin, & Winkel, 2016; Sturm,
2009; van Dierendonck, 2011; Yancer, 2012). Research is limited on how to develop servant leadership skills. Anderson (2016) and
Tropello and DeFazio (2014) note the limited study on servant leadership in baccalaureate nursing education, despite the urgent
need for these skills. Examining a case of a baccalaureate nursing program, through the lens of Greenleaf’s Servant Leadership
Theory, can provide understanding of leadership development into entry-level programs.
Methods: Thus, the purpose of this case study was to describe how a baccalaureate nursing program (unit of analysis) incorporates the principles
of Greenleaf’s Servant Leadership Theory. The study was constructed around two propositions (1) the baccalaureate nursing program intentionally
promotes service to others, holistic approach to work, sense of community, and sharing of power in decision making when teaching nursing,
including leadership, skills and (2) the baccalaureate nursing program encourages character attributes, such as listening, empathy, and healing, that
are consistent with Greenleaf’s Servant Leadership Theory. Case study methodology was selected to understand the theory in a contemporary,
real-world context (Yin, 2014). This study was appropriate as case study research since experimental control was not possible or needed (Yin,
2014). Multiple sources of data were sought to increase study rigor and allow a comprehensive understanding of the case (Yin, 2014). Additional
strategies to ensure study quality and rigor included: triangulation, peer-debriefing, documented audit-trail, detailed study protocol, thick
descriptions, pattern matching, and use of theory to structure the study (Houghton, Casey, Shaw, & Murphy, 2013; Yin, 2014). The study was
conducted in a private, Christian college in the eastern United States. In this baccalaureate nursing program, there are approximately 200 enrolled
students and 10 full-time faculty employed. The study’s site clearly prioritizes servant leadership principles; thus, it was determined an ideal case to
examine (Yin, 2014). Data sources included (1) review of the nursing program website, student handbook, course catalog, program description, and
relevant course syllabi, (2) alumni survey data, and (3) faculty semi-structured interviews. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained before
data collection commenced. Fifteen nursing program recent alumni (i.e., 2015 and 2016 graduates) surveys were completed and three faculty
completed the semi-structured interviews. Systematic data analysis followed an inductive approach. Data were analyzed and evaluated for
empirically-found patterns (themes) and compared to study propositions.
Results: Empirically-found themes included: service to others, holistic approach, building community, compassionate care, humility,
empowerment, professionalism, and lifelong learning. Pattern matching revealed discovered themes were consistent with study propositions, thus
with key principles and characteristics outlined in Greenleaf’s Servant Leadership Theory.
Discussion: Both study propositions were supported. To avoid bias and present a high-quality study, alternate explanations for the empirically-
found themes were also considered (Yin, 2014). Both the Christian paradigm and the Transformational Leadership Theory can be considered rivals
in this case study. First, since the nursing program is part of a Christian college, the possibility exists that the emphasis on service, humility, and
building community results from the religious affiliation (i.e., the Christian paradigm). Many of the principles encouraged by servant leadership are
also promoted by Christian theology (Robinson, 2009). However, as Robinson (2009) asserts, many other religious and nonreligious traditions
promote service and other principles of service leadership. Therefore, although the program may attribute its emphasis on servant leadership to
faith, the two are not necessarily dependent on one another. Next, as Transformational Leadership Theory premises, such as: leaders inspiring
followers, role-modeling expectations, and encouraging intellectual pursuits, match some of the case’s empirically-found themes, this theory must
also be considered as a rival (van Dierendonck, Stam, Boersma, de Windt, & Alkema, 2014). However, servant leadership differs in its prioritization
of meeting others’ needs and, thus, best fits with the nursing program. Available literature focus on individual and organizational outcomes of
servant leadership; however, studies are limited in providing insight on how to develop these essential skills (Anderson, 2016; Hanse et al., 2016;
Sturm, 2009; Tropello & DeFazio, 2014; van Dierendonck, 2011; Yancer, 2012). This study serves as a foundation and provides insight into the
important, complex process of leadership development in entry-level nursing programs (Yin, 2014). As all nurses lead every day, it is vital that
leadership skills are introduced early in such programs. Greenleaf’s Servant Leadership Theory could be considered a framework in designing
curricula to promote leadership skill and in meeting baccalaureate essentials outlined by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2008).
Servant nurse leaders “speak up, volunteer, advocate,” and listen “not because [they] want power or prestige, but because [they] care” (Fahlberg &
Toomey, 2016, p. 50). Nurse servant leaders get involved in (1) “initiatives around safety, quality, staffing,” (2) “mentoring new nurses or nursing
students,” and (3) “helping others get their work done” (Fahlberg & Toomey, 2016, p. 50; Savel & Munro, 2017). They not only listen and advocate
for patients, families, and coworkers, but also empower those they serve (Fahlberg & Toomey, 2016). In these sentiments, one can see the
connection to the study’s empirically-found themes. Nurse servant leaders can help realize the servant leadership individual and organizational
outcomes (i.e., benefits) emphasized in current literature. Deliberate and comprehensive integration of leadership development, ingrained in the
culture of nursing programs, could support successes. Benefits of skilled leadership include improved care coordination, quality, safety, and
outcomes. Training entry-level practitioners, in baccalaureate nursing programs, to be skilled leaders can help realization of these benefits.
References
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/BaccEssentials08.pdf
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses [AACN]. (2016). The philosophy of servant leadership. AACN Bold Voices, 8(11), 18. Retrieved from
https://www.aacn.org/journalassets/Bold%20Voices/8/11/BV%2011_16.pdf
Anderson, D. (2016). Servant leadership, emotional intelligence: Essential for baccalaureate nursing students. Creative Nursing, 22(3), 176-180. doi:
10.1891/1078-4535.22.3.176
Fahlberg, B., & Toomey, R. (2016). Servant leadership: A model for emerging nurse leaders. Nursing 2016, 46(10), 49-52. doi:
10.1097/01.NURSE.0000494644.77680.2a
Fields, J. W., Thompson, K. C., & Hawkins, J. R. (2015). Servant leadership: Teaching the helping professional. Journal of Leadership Education, 14(4),
92-105. doi: 1012806/V14/I4/R2
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
Hanse, J. J., Harlin, U., Jarebrant, C., Ulin, K., & Winkel, J. (2016). The impact of servant leadership dimensions on leader-member exchange among
health care professionals. Journal of Nursing Management, 24, 228-234. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12304
Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2013). Rigour in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher, 20(4), 12-17.
Neill, M. W., & Saunders, N. S. (2008). Servant leadership: Enhancing quality of care and staff satisfaction. The Journal of Nursing Administration,
38(9), 395-400.
O’Brien, M. E. (2011). Servant leadership in nursing: Spirituality and practice in contemporary health care. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
Robert K. Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership [RGCSL]. (2016). What is servant leadership? Retrieved from https://www.greenleaf.org/what-
is-servant-leadership/
Robinson, F. P. (2009). Servant teaching: The power and promise for nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship,
6(1), 1-15. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1699
Spears, L. C. (2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. The Journal of Virtues and Leadership, 1(1),
25-30. Retrieved from http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/jvl/vol1_iss1/home.htm
Sturm, B. A. (2009). Principles of servant-leadership in community health nursing: Management issues and behaviors discovered in ethnographic
research. Home Health Management & Practice, 21(2), 82-89. doi: 10.1177/1084822308318187
Tropello, P. D., & DeFazio, J. (2014). Servant leadership in nursing administration and academia shaping future generations of nurses and
interdisciplinary team providers to transform healthcare delivery. Nurse Leader, 12(6), 59-61, 66. doi: 10.1016/j.mnl.2014.09.010
van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228-1261. doi:
10.1177/0149206310380462
van Dierendonck, D., Stam, D., Boersma, P., de Windt, N., & Alkema, J. (2014). Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking
servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 544-562. doi:
10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.014
Yancer, D. A. (2012). Betrayed trust: Healing a broken hospital through servant leadership. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 63-80. doi:
10.1097/NAQ.0b013e31823b458b
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Contact
[email protected]
The Impact of Supplemented Simulation on Student Competence
Aimee A. Woda, PhD, RN-BC, USA
Abstract
An emerging nursing education trend is to substitute a portion of traditional clinical learning experiences with simulation as a means
to optimize student competency and decision-making skills. Nursing programs encounter constant demands to provide quality
education in an increasingly complex healthcare system. Driven by these complexities including cost, limited training facilities, and
limited nursing faculty, one College of Nursing implemented a revised adult health nursing clinical curriculum to better prepare
nursing students for current and future practice.
The best method of incorporating simulation into nursing curricula has yet to be determined. Previous studies found no difference in student
performance (Meyer et al., 2011; Schlairet & Fenster, 2012, Hansen & Bratt, 2017), clinical judgment (Meyer et al., 2011), critical thinking (Schlairet
& Fenster, 2012) or self-perception of clinical decision making (Woda, Gruenke, Alt-Gehrman, & Hansen, 2016) based on the sequence or timing of
simulations during the semester. Results from the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) National Simulation Study support using
high-quality simulation experiences to substitute up to 50% of traditional clinical hours experiences (Hayden, Smiley, Alexander, Kardong-Edgren, &
Jeffries, 2014) but gives no guidance on the impact of simulation used for supplementation learning.
Substituting traditional clinical learning experiences with simulation means that students use simulation to meet their required clinical hours. This
can include low, mid, or high fidelity simulations. In contrast, supplemented simulation provides additional student simulation learning time with
no change to the hours met with traditional clinical experiences. In a supplemented model, time caring for human patients in the healthcare setting
is not decreased but instead, additional learning opportunities are provided using simulation. Prior to this study, little was known about the impact
of supplementing traditional clinical learning experiences with simulation versus substituting one for the other, on learner outcomes, and
ultimately patient care.
The purpose of this study was to explore the differences in clinical competence between two different cohorts of senior baccalaureate nursing
students in their final semester of a traditional pre-licensure program in the United States (n=71). A quasi-experimental design was used to
compare students who had substituted their traditional hospital-based medical-surgical clinical experiences with simulation (Cohort 1, n=35) with a
group of students who had robust supplementation of simulation in addition to their traditional adult health (medical-surgical nursing) clinical
experiences (Cohort 2, n=36).
Both cohorts were evaluated in a simulation at the completion of their pre-licensure program. To evaluate participants on behaviors that
demonstrate clinical competence, a modified version of the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI) was used (Hayden, Keegan,
Kardon-Egren, and Smiley, 2014). The CCEI measures four areas of competency: assessment, communication, clinical judgment, and patient safety.
Participants are evaluated on whether they consistently perform an important nursing behavior, and given a numerical score based on the CCEI
tool. Cronbach’s alpha levels for this tool have been reported to range from .97-.98 (Hayden, Keegan, et al., 2014); for this study sample the CCEI α
= .78.
Demographic characteristics between the two cohorts were non-significant except for employment in healthcare. Cohort 2 had statistically
significantly more participants who were employed as a certified nursing assistant or nurse intern/extern (p < .01). However, when controlling for
work experience, it was not a predictor of clinical competence. Cohort 2 had significantly higher CCEI total scale scores when compared to Cohort 1
(p < .01). Further analysis of the subscale scores of the CCEI revealed that only the assessment subscale was significantly higher among Cohort 2
participants (p < .01).
Cohort 2 also had higher mean scores than Cohort 1 on the remaining subscales (communication, clinical judgement, and patient safety). Under the
subscale of communication participants were rated on their ability to gather assessment data prior to calling the health care provider. Once contact
was made with the provider, the participant needed to relay pertinent information using SBAR (situation, background, assessment, and
recommendation). Assessing clinical judgement tested the participants’ ability to interpret subjective and objective data and prioritize the
abnormal assessment findings. In this simulation, the priority focus was on the respiratory system, requiring the participant to provide the
appropriate nursing interventions (elevate the head of the bed, and apply oxygen etc.). The area of patient safety tested safe medication
administration. Participants in Cohort 2 identified the patient, utilized the 5 rights of medication administration, managed the equipment, and
performed the procedure correctly more often the Cohort 1.
Although more research is needed in this area, the findings demonstrated that when simulation was used as a supplement to traditional clinical
experiences, participants had higher assessment scores.
References
Hansen, J. & Bratt, M. (2017). Effect of sequence of simulated and clinical practicum learning experiences on clinical competency of nursing
students. Nurse Educator. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000364.
Hayden, J.K., Smiley, R.A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S. & Jeffries, P.R. (2014). The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal,
randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2), C1-S64.
Meyer, M., Connors, H., Hou, Q., & Byron, G. (2011). The effects of simulation on clinical performance: A junior nursing student clinical comparison
study. Society for Simulation in Health care, 6(5), 269-277. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318223a048.
Schlairet, M., & Fenster, M. (2012). Dose and sequence of simulation and direct care experiences among beginning nursing students: A pilot study.
Journal of Nursing Education, 51(12), 668-675. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20121005-03.
Woda, A., Gruenke, T., Alt-Gehrman, P., & Hansen, J. (2016). Nursing Student Perceptions Regarding Simulation Experience Sequencing. Journal of
Nursing Education, 55 (9), 528-532. doi 10.3928/01484834-201608 16-07.
Contact
[email protected]
Informing Andragogy: Voices of Graduates From Accelerated, Second-Degree Programs in Nursing
Concerning Faculty Teaching Practices
Mary E. Hanson-Zalot, EdD, MSN, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Contemporary higher education and healthcare landscapes support the need to investigate evidence based teaching strategies that
prompt success among accelerated, second-degree prelicensure student nurses. The current socio-political-economic context
impacting nursing curriculum is comprised of legislative action in the form of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)
(2010), recommendations from the Consensus Report generated by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of
Nursing at the Institute of Medicine (IOM, 2011), and the pervasive culture of assessment of student learning outcomes in higher
education linked to accreditation standards. Nurse educators preparing students to deliver person-centered care to patients,
families, communities and populations must enhance learning environments to meet the needs of veteran learners (Finch, 2012)
who will comprise the future nursing workforce. Outcomes of student learning cannot be improved if nurse educators fail to
examine the processes of education employed to develop learners (Banta, Jones & Black, 2009). Accelerated, second degree
prelicensure students represent seasoned learners who enter schools of nursing for a myriad of reasons, all ultimately aimed at
earning a bachelor’s degree to qualify them for writing the licensure examination. This study was designed to examine this cohorts’
perceptions of the andragogical practices employed by faculty that prepared students best to begin practice as entry-level
professional nurses. The study further sought to identify the ways in which andragogical practices used by faculty incorporated the
students’ prior learning and life experiences as the student accrued knowledge of the art and science of nursing. Through interviews
with 24 participants six themes were derived from the data. They included: (a) range of experience and perception, (b) the context
of knowledge, (c) checking in versus checking out, (d) it’s not just about strategy: The influence of passion and connection, (e)
practice in action, and (f) program demands as preparation for career demands. Through analysis of these findings, it was learned
that although faculty implementation of teaching strategies does influence learning and the ability of the graduate to engage in
clinical reasoning once working as a professional nurse, elements external to strategy also influence the experience of learning. Two
significant findings of this study were that faculty attributes of passion and expert knowledge hold prime importance for a student
and that student exposure to program plans of study designs of accelerated, second-degree programs facilitate transition to the
professional practice role. This research adds to the existing body of literature related to the education of accelerated, second-
degree prelicensure baccalaureate students. Findings of this study can be used to inform faculty about best practices for teaching
this particular cohort of students who seek nursing as an alternate career and assist with construction of innovative curricular
designs to meet the needs of this unique group.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2014). AACN finds slow enrollment growth at schools of nursing. Retrieved from American Association
of Colleges of Nursing website: http://www.aacn.nche.edu/news/articles/2014/slow-enrollment.
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Carnegie/Jossey-Bass.
Bridges, R.A., Holden-Huchton, P., & Armstrong, M.L. (2013). Transition to nursing practice of accelerated second-degree baccalaureate students
using clinical coaches. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(5), 225-229. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20130301-74
Cangelosi, P.R. (2013). Teaching experiences of second degree accelerated baccalaureate nursing faculty. International Journal of Nursing Education
Scholarship, 10(1), 275-281. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2013-0043
Hickey, M.T. (2009). Preceptor perceptions of new graduate nurse readiness for practice. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 25(1), 35-41.
doi:10.1097/NND.0b013e318194b5bb
H.R. 3962, 111th Congress, 1st session. (2009) (enacted).
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Payne, L.K. (2013). Comparison of students' perceptions of educational environment in traditional vs. accelerated second degree BSN programs.
Nurse Education Today, 33(11), 1388-1392. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.003
Payne, L.K., & Mullen, P. (2014). Outcome measures for traditional and accelerated nursing graduates: An integrative literature review. Nursing
Education Perspectives, 35, 238-243. doi: 10.5480/12-1008.1
Contact
[email protected]
Relationship Between Compassion Fatigue and Health Promotion Behavior Practicing in Long-Term Care
Sylvia Ylagan-Perlas, MSN, USA
Abstract
Objective: To examine the relationship between compassion fatigue and health promotion behaviors in nursing personnel practicing
in a long term care setting.
Background: In long term care settings, nurses now face the unique challenges and stressors of caring for clients with higher acuity than previous
years. Compassion fatigue is recognized as a negative outcome of caring for individuals and is frequently experienced by nursing personnel.
Moderate to high levels of compassion fatigue have been identified in acute care settings (ACS) with far less research conducted in long term care
centers.
• Compassion fatigue is composed of traumatic events, burnout and job-related stress;
• it co-exists with burnout which affects individuals in caregiving roles (Joinson, 1992).
• Secondary traumatic stress and burnout are other terms relative to compassion fatigue.
• Exhaustion, frustration, anger and depression are common with burnout and secondary traumatic stress is a negative
feeling directed by fear and work-related stress (Stamm, 2002). Stamm and Figley (2010) suggest that secondary traumatic
stress and burnout together contribute to an increased risk of compassion fatigue. When compassion fatigue manifests, the
physical and mental well-being of nurses is compromised (Sheppard, 2014).
Method and Design: A non-experimental, descriptive correlational design using a convenience sample of 61 subjects consisting of registered
nurses, licensed practical nurses and certified nursing assistants practicing at Parker at McCarrick in Somerset, New Jersey participated in this
study. Subjects completed a demographic data sheet, the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II), and the Professional Quality of Life Scale
(ProQOL).
Findings: There was no relationship between compassion fatigue and the total health promotion score as well as any of HPLP II subscales. However,
compassion satisfaction revealed a moderate to high relationship to total health promotion (r = .47, p <.001), as well as spiritual growth (r = .45,
p<.001), and interpersonal relations (r = .56, p<.001).
Conclusion: Further research needs to be conducted to determine how factors such as consistency of patient care, staff relationships, and work
environment influence or prohibit the development of compassion fatigue in long term care settings. Additional research to explore differences in
compassion fatigue based on patient care settings is warranted. Programs should be developed and evaluated to measure interventions to sustain
or support compassion satisfaction in work settings for nursing personnel practicing in the long term care settings.
References
Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2014). Introduction to Nursing Research. Incorporating Evidence-Based Practice (3 Ed.). Texas Tech University Health
Science Center, Texas: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Cherry, B., Ashcraft, A., & Owen, D. (2007). Perception of Job Satisfaction and the Regulatory Environment among Nurses’ Aides and Charge Nurse
in Long -Term Care. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.10161/l.gerinurse.2007.01.015
Coetzee, S., & Klopper, H. (2010). Compassion Fatigue with Nursing Practice: A Concept Analysis. PubMed, 237-. Retrieved from
http://www.ncbi.nlm.noh.gov/pubmed
Figley, C. (2007). The Art and Science of Caring for Others without Forgetting Self-Care. Retrieved from http://www.giftfromwithin.org
Joinson, C. (1992, April). Coping with Compassion Fatigue. Nursing, 116-121. Retrieved from http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost
Murphy, B. (2014). Exploring Holistic Foundations for Alleviating and Understanding Compassion Fatigue. American Holistic Nursing Association, 6-
9. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
Neville, K., & Cole, D. (2013). The Relationships among Health Promotion Behaviors, Compassion Fatigue, Burnout and Compassion Satisfaction in
Nurses Practicing in a Community Medical Center. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 43(6), 348-354.
Sabo, B. (2011). Reflecting on the Concept of Compassion Fatigue. Online Journal Issues in Nursing. Retrieved from http://www.medscape.com
Sacco, T., Ciurzynski, S., Elizabeth, M., & Ingersoll, G. (2015, August). Compassion Satisfaction and Compassion Fatigue among Critical Care Nurse.
Critical Care Nurse, 35(4), 32-42.
Sheppard, K. (2014). Compassion Fatigue among Registered Nurses. Connecting Theory and Research. Applied Nursing Research, 28(1), 57-59.
Contact
[email protected]
Authentic Learning in Healthcare Education: A Systemic Review
JuHee Lee, PhD, APRN, RN, Korea, Republic of (South)
JuYeon Bae, MSN, RN, Korea, Republic of (South)
MoonKi Choi, PhD, RN, Korea, Republic of (South)
Abstract
Background: Clinical environments are more complex, rapidly changing and increase in the number of patients with advanced
diseases. A higher level of clinical performance competencies such as clinical reasoning, problem solving in healthcare provider is
demanded. To satisfy these needs, educational learning methods were changed to bridge the knowledge to practice gap. That is,
scientific curricula based on authentic environment were needed.
Methods: This is a systematic review to examine the effects of learning outcome on authentic learning method. This study was
performed according to the systematic reviews guideline. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE
complete, PsycINFO, CINAHL (Cumulative Index for Nursing Allied Health Literature) with Full Text, Korean database including the
KoreaMed databases up to June 2016. The searching keywords were “nur*,” “medical,” “dentist,” “pharmacist,” “students,”
“healthcare personnel,” “authentic,” and “learning,” with single search terms or in combination with Boolean and wildcard. For the
other eligible studies, we were identified by retrieving the cited reference lists from selected studies and major Korean academic
journals, including the Asian Nursing Research, Journal of the Korean Academy of Nursing, Korean Society of Adult Nursing, the
Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (a) research papers
documenting randomized controlled trials (RCT) or control group designs targeting healthcare providers such as nurses, doctors,
dentists, and students; (b) research that used authentic learning methods (i.e., no lectures) for intervention. (c) the studies were
published in English or Korean language. (d) target population was an undergraduate students. We excluded a study using languages
other than English and Korean. In addition, grey literature, not peer-reviewed paper such as academic report and dissertation was
also excluded. Selecting of studies were conducted based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent authors who review
the titles and abstracts and were screened for selected data, and researchers reviewed the full-text of original articles. Discrepancies
or conflicts between researchers were resolved by discussion until reaching agreement.
Results: Following the primary search, 1,259 studies were found by reviewing searching the databases; 878 studies remained after
redundant literature was eliminated. Upon reviewing various titles and abstracts, 766 studies were excluded. The 112 studies that
satisfied each of the selection standards were identified. The 99 studies excluded as follows; 64 studies were non RCT, 21 studies
were master or doctoral thesis, 6 studies non authentic learning, and 8 studies non undergraduate students. The thirteen studies
selected for systemic review. Three studies were nursing education, eight were conducted within the medical education, one was
nutrition and one study was conducted psychology students. Two studies were published in 2006; three of them were published in
each of 2009, 2014, 2017, two studies were published 2011, two of them were 2012, two were 2015, and two articles were
published 2016. Of the thirteen studies selected studies, three studies used to problem-based learning (PBL), two were used virtual
simulation authentic learning method, two used DVD and standardized patient (SP), two used e-learning, one used mobile learning,
one used authentic assess pedagogy, one used three-dimensional (3D) digital animation and one article used to case-based learning.
Regarding the research design employed by the studies, five used randomized controlled trials, while eight used a quasi-
experimental design as control group. Final selected studies represented that authentic learning undergraduate students fostered
performance skills (46%), knowledge (38%), satisfaction, comprehensive competency, problem solving, communication (15%) and
other competency (e.g., learning motivation, critical thinking, critical judgment). In case of PBL, web-based or video assisted PBL was
more effective authentic learning effect than traditional PBL.
Conclusion: This research represented that authentic teaching and learning methods were generally effective at enhancing learners’ cognitive,
psychomotor, affective domain of competency. Especially, technology combined such as a web-based or e-learning eliminated academic boundary
for education. It provided more collaborative and constructive learning experiences for learners. As a result, authentic leaning contributed positive
effect to interprofessional education for healthcare provider.
References
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational technology research and
development, 48(3), 23-48.
Hoyek, N., Collet, C., Rienzo, F., Almeida, M., & Guillot, A. (2014). Effectiveness of three‐dimensional digital animation in teaching human anatomy
in an authentic classroom context. Anatomical sciences education, 7(6), 430-437.
National League for Nursing. (2016). Innovations in Nursing Education: Building the Future of Nursing (vol. 3). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Stacey, G., McGarry, J., Aubeeluck, A., Bull, H., Simpson, C., Sheppard, F., & Thompson, S. (2014). An integrated educational model for graduate
entry nursing cirriculum design. Nurse education today, 34(1), 145-149.
Velan, G. M., Goergen, S. K., Grimm, J., & Shulruf, B. (2015). Impact of Interactive e-Learning Modules on Appropriateness of Imaging Referrals: A
Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 12(11), 1207-1214.
Contact
[email protected]
ESL versus Non-ESL Nursing Students' Perceptions of Staff Nurse Incivility
Judith G. Ruvalcaba, EdD, USA
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Incivility is a problem that exists in nursing education and practice and one that has serious repercussions. Clark and Springer’s
(2010) defined incivility as "rude or disruptive behaviors, which often result in physiological or psychological distress for people involved, and if left
unaddressed, may progress to a threatening situation" (p. 320). Incivility is known by other terms such as bullying, mobbing, lateral or horizontal
violence, and relational aggression hostility (Croft & Cash, 2012; Decker & Shellenbarger, 2012; Dellasega, 2009; Goldberg, Beitz, Wieland, & Levine,
2013). The relationship that student nurses develop with staff nurses have a significant impact on their learning and sense of belonging. Incivility
toward nursing students by staff nurses has been reported as contributing to students' negative experiences in the clinical environment and the
disruption of the teaching-learning environment (Anthony et al., 2014; Clark & Springer, 2007; Marchiondo, Marchiondo, & Lasiter, 2009).
However, these studies do not include students who are English as Second Language (ESL). ESL students may struggle to meet the challenges
presented their nursing education program due to differences in their culture and language. As the numbers of ESL students enrolled in nursing
education program increase nationally, it is important to study whether culture and language have an impact on their perceptions of incivility. The
purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference between English as Second Language (ESL) and non-ESL nursing students’
perceptions of staff nurse incivility.
METHOD: A three part survey was distributed to nursing students who were members of the National Student Nurses Association. A final sample of
975 survey cases was analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 software.
RESULTS: Results demonstrated exclusionary behaviors and total incivility scores were statistically different between ESL and non-ESL students.
However, the effect size of both findings were extremely low (little practical difference). A significant multivariate result was found in the four
scales between the two types of ESL students. Univariate analysis found a significant difference on vertical collectivism which indicates that ESL
students had a higher mean and identified themselves more with a vertical collectivism orientation than non-ESL students. However, the effect size
of the significant finding was extremely low. Time in program, age, and gender were found best predictors of perceptions of incivility.
CONCLUSION: This study attempted to explore ESL versus non-ESL nursing students’ perceptions of staff nurse incivility. There was no practical
difference in ESL and non-ESL student’s perceptions of staff nurse incivility. However, time in program, age, and gender were characteristics that
may help predict which students are more likely to encounter and/or perceive staff nurse incivility. The results of this study clearly point out that
although incivility in the clinical setting is an occurrence, the students in this study did not perceive staff nurse incivility to the extent as previously
reported in the literature.
Key words: incivility, ESL nursing student, perception
References
Anthony, M., Yasik, J., MacDonald, D. A., & Marshall, K. A. (2014). Development and validation of a tool to measure incivility in clinical nursing
education. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30(1), 48-55. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.12.011
Clark, C.M. & Springer, P.S. (2010). Academic nurse leader’s role in fostering a culture of civility in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education,
49(6), 319-325. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20100224-01
Clark, C.M. & Springer, P.S. (2007). Incivility in nursing education: A descriptive study of definitions and prevalence. Journal of Nursing Education,
46(1), 7-14. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17302094
Croft, R.K. & Cash, P.A. (2012). Deconstructing contributing factors to bullying and lateral violence in nursing using a postcolonial feminist lens.
Contemporary Nurse, 42(2), 226-242. doi: 10.5172/conu.2012.42.2.226.
Decker, J.L. & Shellenbarger, T. (2012). Strategies for nursing faculty to promote a healthy work environment for nursing students. Teaching and
Learning in Nursing, 7, 56-61. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2010.12.001
Dellasega, C. (2009). Bullying among nurses. American Journal of Nursing, 109 (1), 52-58. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000344039.11651.08
Goldberg, E., Beitz, J., Wieland, D., & Levine, C. (2013). Social bullying in nursing academia. Nurse Educator, 38(5), 191-7. doi:
10.1097/NNE.0b013e3182a0e5a0
Marchiondo, K., Marchiondo, L.A., & Lasiter, S. (2009). Faculty incivility: Effects on program satisfaction of BSN students. Journal of Nursing
Education, 49(11), 608-614. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20100524-05.
Contact
[email protected]
Development of a Nurse Preceptor Program
Jamie Chatzipoulios, MSN, RN, USA
Monica Flowers, DNP, ARNP, FNP-BC, USA
Denise Nash, MSN, ARNP, ANP-BC, USA
Abstract
Nursing clinical instruction and evaluation is vital to developing registered nurses (RN) into practice. Nurse preceptors play an
important role in pre-licensure nursing programs, residency programs, transition to practice (TTP)programs, and with newly hired
veteran nurses on the unit they will work (O’Connor, 2015). A nurse preceptor “guides students to apply theory to practice and
function as a role model in a final clinical immersion course” (Sharpnack, Moon, & Waite, 2014, p.254).
Schools of nursing depend on preceptors to assist in the education and training of nursing students. Yet faculty often struggle with placing students
in various healthcare settings due to the lack of trained and available preceptors. Developing and educating preceptors is a vital part of the process.
There is a need to build a preceptor program at healthcare institutions.
This article attempts to (1) identify the essential components of a preceptor program by reviewing the literature and (2) suggest an evidence-based
preceptor program of value. A literature review was conducted on the role of the preceptor, preceptor training, and preceptor programs in order
to make evidence-based recommendations to a large health care facility that was lacking any type of formal process for selection, training,
education, and development of nurse preceptors. Subsequent research on outcomes and lessons learned once preceptor program is implemented
is suggested and planned.
Benefits of preceptors - Nurse preceptors are jewels to both undergraduate faculty and healthcare institutions. They are the ones who train the
nursing students and new nurses. The preceptor aids in the “development of professional identity and socialization into the discipline” (Trede,
Sutton, & Bernoth, 2016, p.271). Preceptors guide safe practice, accomplish connectedness, create positive learning experiences and relationships,
deliver feedback, and “consult with supportive colleagues for advice and guidance” (Trede et al., 2016, p.271). The one-to-one relationship
between an experienced nurse and nursing student (or novice nurse) assist the transition into the workforce (Valizadeh, Borimnejad, Rahmani,
Gholizadeh, & Shahbazi, 2016). An effective preceptor is not only instrumental in molding the new nurse in the institutions mission and vision but
can lead a new nurse to higher levels of job satisfaction, work effectiveness, better quality of care, and patient outcomes (Watkins, Hart, &
Moreno, 2016). They can improve the retention rate of new nurses “anywhere from 15% to 37%” (Watkins et al., 2016, p.37).
Preceptor challenges - Preceptors experience many challenges when an effective nurse preceptor program does not exist. Some of those
challenges include “workload pressures, insufficient time, restricted communication with other preceptors, lack of structure, lack of clear protocols,
lack of appreciation, poor preparation for the role, and insufficient formalized training” (Trede et al., 2015, p. 272). Workplace structure, workplace
cultures, managers, peers, and other healthcare professionals influence preceptors. The workplace-learning environment shapes the supervision
practices (Valizadeh et al., 2016).
Benefits of preceptor program - A preceptor program creates a supportive workplace, provides role clarity with clear expectations of the preceptor
role and responsibilities (Trede et al., 2016). Preceptor education assists in the development of critical thinking of new graduate nurses (Schuelke &
Barnason, 2017). Having a preceptor program can create a workplace environment conducive to learning and success. It can provide improved
“sufficient work hours, collaboration, reciprocity, policy and organizational support, critical and constructive feedback” (Trede et al., 2016, p.272).
Additionally, academic partnerships “can be effective in reducing healthcare costs, improving patient outcomes, and improving quality and safety,
in patient care” (Sharpnack et al., 2014, p.255). The benefits of such a program are numerous. The rewards far outweigh the challenges of
developing nurse preceptors and sustaining them.
Need for preceptor program - With competition from so many nursing programs seeking clinical sites and numerous nurses entering the healthcare
industry, it becomes imperative to have a nurse preceptor program in place. There is much in the published literature and books on preceptor’s
roles and responsibilities. Fewer references are available in the literature on how to start a preceptor program and program components.
Following a presentation to all key stakeholders, it is imperative to draft a policy to detail a clear and consistent process of preceptor identification,
preceptor selection, role clarification, and role expectations to reduce the stress and confusion amongst preceptors.
Preceptor selection - The literature suggests nurse educators and nurse managers survey and identify potential preceptors based on Commission
on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE)(2015) standards: BSN degree or higher, good interpersonal skills, culturally sensitive, “clinically competent,
enthusiasm for teaching, provides guidance for problem-solving and clinical judgment, gives positive and negative feedback in a constructive
manner, empathetic towards learners, promotes autonomy when appropriate, passionate about nursing” (Mohide et al., 2012, p.25). Additional
criteria include full-time employment at the time of recruitment, minimum three years of work experience, and intermediate level in clinical
competency (Kang, Chiu, Lin, & Chang, 2016). The highest rating RN’s are then selected to be preceptors (a five point rating scale with 1 being the
lowest and 5 being the highest). The nurse educator then observes the nurse demonstrating a complete head-to-toe assessment. The preceptor
completes a self-assessment like the Nyberg Caring Assessment Scale (1990) (Cotter & Dienemann, 2016). The manager then confirms that the
candidate has a positive annual performance appraisal. The preceptor name, results of head-to-toe assessment, and self-assessment score aid the
chief nurse administrator in the final selection.
Curriculum format, content and interval - Assessing the needs of the preceptors and identifying the topics that should be included in the curriculum
and the preferred form of instruction, is ideal and guarantee success of the preceptors in their role. Foy, Carlson, and White (2013) created a survey
tool entitled “RN Preceptor Learning Needs Assessment” which is useful to assess what topics, format, and when in the educational process the
preceptor desires to learn the educational content. Following the survey results, the remaining content is delivered at intervals and in formats
tailored to the results of the learning needs assessment specific to the institution (Cotter & Dienemann, 2016). For those institutions that prefer a
consistent preceptor program, the following are recommended.
Format - The educational format for training preceptors initially starts with a live educational session 4-6 hours in duration. However, having
preceptors come-in on a scheduled day off or getting off the unit creates challenges of having preceptors attend live educational training sessions
(Sharpnack et al., 2014). Therefore, blended learning sessions with the use of technology would be more convenient and are recommended for
follow-up classes (Cotter & Dienemann, 2016; Schuelke & Barnason, 2017). After the initial 4-6 hour introduction session, 5 online modules would
be required before being assigned a preceptee. Providing compensation for this time of learning improves outcome (Sharpnack et al., 2014).
Content - Top ranked curriculum topics identified by preceptors include feedback, roles and responsibilities, adult learning styles and principles,
prioritizing, time management, evaluation, communication and conflict, teamwork, patient centered care, culture of safety, evidence-based
practice (EBP), clinical resource, and critical thinking (Foy et al., 2013; Sharpnack et al., 2014; Windey , Guthrie., Sullo, Lawrence, Weeks, & Chapa,
2015; Wu, Enskar, Heng, Pua, & Wang, 2016). The introductory 4-6 hour live session includes an overview of nursing theories, preceptor roles &
responsibilities, prioritization/time-management, and preceptee evaluation. The follow-up 5-online modules include: Module 1) communication,
conflict management, and teamwork. Module 2) culture of safety, patient and family centered care, and quality improvement/assessment. Module
3) Evidence based practice (EBP). Module 4) clinical resources, policies, information technology. Module 5) clinical judgment, clinical reasoning, and
critical thinking.
Interval - New preceptors should be allowed to enroll in the class when they feel ready and given 12 months to complete all requirements (Cotter &
Dienemann, 2016; Foy et al., 2013). Once the coursework is complete, the preceptor is ready to be assigned. Established preceptors, will be
“grandfathered-in” and given 12-months to complete requirements while continuing to precept current students and/or nurses. In addition, the
establishment and adherence to quarterly discussion sessions with preceptor and faculty to reflect on learning and application are recommended
(Cotter & Dienemann, 2016). Furthermore, yearly evaluations of preceptors and identification of new potential preceptors by the nurse managers,
educators, faculty and nursing administration benefit the program along with evaluation of program outcomes.
Rewards to preceptors - Rewards to preceptors are vital to the success of the program. Lack of external incentives and recognition can lead to
disappointment, dissatisfaction, and attrition among preceptors (Valizadeh et al., 2016). Financial or education incentives for preceptors can exist
in the form of tuition reimbursement, continuing education hours, merit-based bonus, or clinical promotion based on annual performance
appraisal (Cotter & Dienemann, 2016; Jackson,2001; Sharpnack et al., 2014; Valizadeh et al., 2016). In addition, preceptors would benefit from
personal roster preferences in scheduling taken into account, support from nurses working on the floor, not placed as charge, and a reduced
workload while training, for example not to have the same patient assignment as non-preceptors (Valizadeh et al., 2016). It is imperative for nurse
managers and nurse educators to compensate time or support release time for educational needs, provide access to free education resources, and
provide further development opportunities (Valizadeh et al., 2016).
References
Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE). (2015). Standards for accreditation of entry-to-practice nurse residency programs. Retrieved
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/ccne-accreditation/CCNE-Entry-to-Practice-Residency-Standards-2015.pdf
Cotter, E. & Dienemann, J. (2016). Professional development of preceptors improves nurse outcomes. Journal for Nurses in Profesional
Development, 32(4), 192-197.
Dwyer, P.A. & Hunter Revell, S.M. (2016). Multilevel influences on new graduate nurse transition. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development,
32(3), 112-121.
Foy, D., Carlson, M., & White, A. (2013). RN preceptor learning needs assessment. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 29(2), 64-69.
Jackson, M. (2001). A preceptor incentive program: Rewarding staff nurses for mentorship. American Journal of Nursing, 101(6), 24A-24E.
Kang, C., Chiu, H., Lin, Y., & Chang, W. (2016). Development of a situational initation training program for preceptors to retain new graduate nurses:
Process and initial outcomes. Nurse Education Today, 37(2016), 75-82.
Mohide, E. A., Geradrdi, O., Norman, D., Cavalieri, V., McKey, C.A., Jennings, B., Akhtar-Danesh, N., & Seidlitz, W. (2012). Selecting nurse
preceptors: What qualities and characteristics should be considered? Retrieved from
http://www.nursinglibrary.org/vhl/bitstream/10755/243307/1/Mohide_E.+Ann_51271.pdf
O'Connor, A.B. (2015). Clinical Instruction and Evaluation: A Teaching Resource. Burlington: Jones & Barlett Learning.
Schuelke, S. & Barnason, S. (2017). Interventions used by nurse preceptors to develop critical thinking of new graduate nurses. Journal for Nurses in
Professional Development, 31(1), E1-E7.
Sharpnack, P.A., Moon, H.M., & Waite, P. (2014). Closing the practice gap. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 30(5), 254-260.
Trede, F., Sutton, K., & Bernoth, M. (2016). Conceptualisation and perceptions of the nurse preceptor's role: A scopig review. Nurse Education
Today, 36(2016), 268-274.
Valizadeh, S., Borimnejad, L., Rahmani, A., Gholizadeh, L., & Shahbazi, S. (2016). Challenges of the preceptors working with new nurses: A
phenomenological research study. Nure Education Today, 44(2016), 92-97.
Watkins, C., Hart, P.L., & Mareno, N. (2016). The effect of preceptor role effectiveness on newly licensed registered nurses' perceived psychological
empowerment and professional autonomy. Nurse Education in Practice, 17(2016), 36-42.
Windey, M., Guthrie., K., Sullo, E., Lawrence, C., Weeks, D., & Chapa, D. (2015). A systematic review on interventions supporting preceptor
development. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 31(6), 312-323.
Wu, X.V., Enskar, K., Heng, D.G.N., Pua, L.H., & Wang, W. (2016). The perspectives of preceptors regarding clinical assessment for undergraduate
nursing students. International nursing review, 63(3), 473-481.
Ziebert, C., Klingbeil, C., Schmitt, C.A., Stonek, A.V., Totka, J.P., Stelter, A., & Schiffman, R.F. (2016). Lesson learned: Newly hired nurses perspectives
on transition into practice. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(5), E1-E8.
Contact
[email protected]
How to Best Educate Nursing Adjunct Clinical Faculty
Kim M. Bro, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Part-time faculty grew 72.5 percent since 2002, more than 58 percent of baccalaureate and higher degree programs reported hiring
faculty as their primary plan to fill needed full-time positions due to the nurse faculty shortage and increasing student enrollments
(American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN], 2012a; AACN, 2017; NLN, 2010). Nursing Adjunct Clinical Faculty (NACF) are
expert clinicians, but may lack formal education to their educator role (Lewallen, 2002). Knowing how to prepare NACF for clinical
teaching is necessary to ensure students are prepared to provide safe quality care as students and as novice nurses. Helping NACF
assimilate to their educator role will benefit the students they teach and the nursing programs themselves.
The need for seamless academic progression from nursing school into practice is imperative. Nursing programs need a knowledge base from which
to develop learning and mentoring experiences for their NACF. They will provide quality learning experiences for their students if NACF have been
effectively oriented to their role (Ard & Valiga, 2009). Healthcare delivery and the nursing profession are changing dramatically due to consumer
demand for cost-effective quality care, and an evidence-grounded profession (AACN, 2012b). The demand for registered nurses is expected to grow
by 40 percent between 2000 and 2020 and if the current trends continue there will be a 29 percent shortage by 2020 (King, 2002). New nurses will
need to be better prepared after graduation for higher acuity patients and higher workloads due to the nursing shortage.
Surprisingly there is an absence of research on NACF, specifically with how best to educate them to their teaching role. The researcher of this study
interviewed twelve NACF with no less than one semester and no more than four semesters teaching experience. The researcher asked NACF how
they best learn or what would be helpful to them to assimilate into their new educator role. van Manen’s hermeneutic phenomenological design
approach was used. The goal was to explore or uncover descriptions of a particular experience and the meanings, the phenomenon or human
experience of being a novice NACF.
Four themes (frustration, training, mentorship and desire to teach) and eight subthemes (unknown expectations, role struggle, shadowing, grading,
feedback, professional resource, lifelong learning and educate future nurses) were identified after the researcher analyzed the data. The constant
comparison method was used and the data was broken down into segments and expressions were grouped and labeled. The most predominant
theme of frustration was experienced by 8 of the 12 participants related to their adjunct clinical faculty experience. Unknown expectations and role
struggle were subthemes of frustration. Unknown expectations included how to grade student assignments; believing students were more
prepared for clinical than they were; last minute clinical site changes; no formal orientation to their clinical faculty role; and receiving no direction
throughout their clinical rotation by a course coordinator. NACF struggled in their teaching role because they wanted to help students learn but felt
they weren’t given the tools they needed to be successful in their role. Nine out of 12 participants overwhelmingly discussed their need to know
how to conduct a clinical. Ten participants reported that they are visual learners and would like to have had hands on clinical training to ensure
their success as a clinical educator. Seven out of 12 participants shared that shadowing another clinical faculty prior to the start of their clinical
would have been the most helpful in learning how to conduct a clinical; including what to do with the students in the clinical area; and how to
conduct a pre and post conference. Eight out of 12 participants agreed that receiving help with grading clinical write-ups would have helped them
be proficient with grading.
In addition to shadowing clinical instructors and getting help with grading, participants wanted feedback. This feedback may be given through
mentorship. One participant described a mentoring relationship but all other participants did not describe a desire to have a mentoring
relationship. They wanted someone to go to if they had questions “a point of contact” and someone to check on them at the beginning of their
clinical rotation, not throughout their rotation, until they knew what their expectations were as clinical faculty. Participants wanted feedback
throughout their teaching assignment from either clinical faculty or course coordinators. Six out of 12 participants accepted an adjunct clinical
faculty position because they believed it would be interesting and an educational role for them. Lifelong learning and wanting to educate future
nurse were subthemes of Desire to Teach.
The contributions of the researcher’s study to nursing education included: Students may not be prepared upon graduation to provide quality and
safe care; Adjunct clinical faculty were frustrated in their teaching role due to the lack of preparation from their nursing school employers; and
adjunct faculty shared what would be helpful to them for their success in their teaching role. The contribution to professional practice included:
Prepared clinical faculty are needed to help students make connections from education to practice; According to the participants responses to
questions the quality of students’ clinical rotations may be absent; New nurses will be better prepared; and employers and patients will benefit.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (AACN). (2012a). New AACN data show an enrollment surge in baccalaureate and graduate programs
amid calls for more highly educated nurses. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/news/articles/2012/enrollment-data
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (AACN). (2012b). Hallmarks of the professional nursing practice environment. Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/white-papers/hallmarks-practice-environment
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (AACN). (2017). Special survey on vacant faculty positions for academic year2016-2017. Retrieved
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/leading-initiatives/research-data/vacancy16.pdf
Ard, N., & Valiga, T.M. (2009). Clinical nursing education: Current reflections. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
King, R. K. (2002). Health professions workforce shortages before the Senate Committee on health, education, labor and pensions. Retrieved
from http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t020715.html
Lewallen, L. P. (2002). Using your clinical expertise in nursing education. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 16(5), 242-246.
National League for Nursing. (NLN). (2010). 2010 NLN nurse educator shortage face sheet. Retrieved from
http://www.nln.org/governmentaffairs/pdf/nursefacultyshortage.pdf
Contact
[email protected]
SNAPS+: Peer-to-Peer and Academic Support in Developing Clinical Skills
Martin Christensen, PhD, Australia
Sherree Gray, SN, Australia
Matthew Wheat, SN, Australia
Judy Craft, PhD, Australia
Abstract
Background: Peer-to-peer teaching is seen as a learning partnership between nursing students. In many respects it promotes a shift
in responsibility and commitment of learning squarely on the students (White, Rowland, Pesis-Katz, 2012). Moreover, adopting a
peer learning approach offers peer tutors a better appreciation of the difficulties experienced by their fellow students more so than
their teachers and are therefore better placed to offer more succinct and tailored learning opportunities (Ravanipour, Bahreini,
Ravanipour, 2015; Carey, Kent, Latour, 2016). Where these learning opportunities take place is often down to the discretion of peer
tutors and as to what capacity their role takes in supporting other students. For example, a number of studies and systematic
reviews have identified that the clinical environment is predominately where learning and support takes place with senior nursing
students mentoring and buddying more junior colleagues (Palsson, Martensson, Swenne, et al., 2017; Stenberg, Carlson, 2015;
Stone, Cooper, Cant, 2013; Owen, Wars-Smith, 2014).
The outcomes associated with peer learning are well recognised – enhanced critical thinking, an enriched sense of self-determination, empowered
learning, and improved collaboration (Palsson, Martensson, Swenne, et al., 2017; Stone, Cooper, Cant, 2013). However, what is less evident is the
relationship between peer tutors and nursing academic staff in supporting nursing student learning especially in teaching the clinical skills
component of the bachelor of nursing degree.
Clinical Skills Labs: Sessions within the clinical skills lab were largely conducted according to student need, therefore the students were the drivers
as to what it was they wanted to learn. These were conducted once a week for two hours per week throughout the thirteen week semester period.
For the first years this was revisiting and enhancing their skills around taking vital signs observations such as blood pressure and pulse. The second
years were concerned with injection technique and the setting up of intravenous fluid infusions and the constitution of drugs such as antibiotics.
The role of the student peer teachers was to support learning by demonstrating the skill to the nursing students at a basic task level. The role of the
nursing academic was to reinforce the skill at a more advanced level for example medico-legal aspects of the skill being undertaken, the application
of physical assessment skills and the nuances of practice.
Aim: The aim of the project is to evaluate the effectives of a collaborative approach to student learning using peer-t-peer teaching in conjunction a
nursing academic within the clinical skills labs.
Method: Nursing students currently enrolled in an undergraduate bachelor of nursing programme (n=390) at a regional university campus were
invited to attend peer-to-peer teaching of clinical skills over a one semester period. Of this sample a total of 41 first (n=14) and second (n=27) year
nursing students attend these sessions. At completion of the labs the attending students were then asked to complete a nine item Likert scale
(strongly agree to strongly disagree) and four opened ended questions of their experience of peer-to-peer teaching. The Likert scale posed
statements such as “the peer-to-peer skills sessions have boasted my confidence in performing nursing skills; having an academic present with the
peer tutors is good in helping me to understand and apply my nursing skills; I feel encouraged to actively participate within the peer-to-peer skills
sessions”. These were offset with some negative responses so as not to cast the SNAPS programme as a complete success. These negative
statements include: “I feel the student peers do not have enough clinical experience to be effective; the peer-to-peer learning should be just that
peer-to-peer, a nursing academic should not be present. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate and analyse the student responses. In line with
institutional policy as this was an evaluation of teaching practice ethics approval was waived for this study.
Results: There were two main drivers students attended the SNAPS sessions: for the first years it was because they had assessment due on their
ability to undertake and interpret vital signs observation and for the second years it was because they were about to go out into clinical placement.
That said the students were in favour of the peer-to-peer learning as a whole with 80% (n=33) strongly agreeing with the statement peer-to-peer
learning boast my confidence and 83% (n=34) strongly agreeing that they felt encouraged to participate. Responses associated with the academic
being present were also very favourable with 90% (n=37) feeling that having an academic present help them to understand and apply the skills
more effectively. Using deductive content analysis three themes were identified from the open-ended questions: feeling grateful, feeling confident
and identified skills deficit.
Conclusion: Peer-to-peer learning has been shown to improve confidence in those that attend. This project certainly demonstrated that with the
added advantage that students’ felt able to be more inclusive in. Having and academic present also boasted confidence inasmuch that the peer
tutors also had opportunities to learn from an experienced registered nurse as well as those students who attended to practice their skills.
Limitations: It is readily accepted that the sample size was small (11%) given the total cohort number. However, we contend that as the SNAPS
sessions were voluntary we were pleased with the number that attended. We were also disappointed that no third year nursing student attended
and we put this down to the fact that they were not on clinical placement during this semester and therefore the necessity of practicing or
enhancing their skills was not a priority. However, because of the popularity of the SNAPS sessions we are looking at running in the next academic
semester so as to capture all three years simply because they will all be going out into clinical placement at some point during this time.
Implications for Nursing Education: It is evident from this project that peer-to-peer learning supports teaching of the clinical skills to a certain
specified level; this level is often focused on skills mastery at an elementary level. The inclusion of a nursing academic supports application and
integration of these skills by using clinical experience and constructive alignment strategies that supports deeper learning. The benefits to this
approach ensure that the student feels comfortable and feels less pressure to perform in a safe environment. However, while the benefits are
clear, this approach is resource intensive inasmuch that it requires an academic to present during specified times. In addition the skills sessions
have to revolve around the peer tutors own clinical placement schedule as well as attending to their own study.
References
1. White, P., Rowland, A.B., Pesis-Katz, I., (2012). Peer-led team learning in a graduate level nursing course. Journal of Nursing Education.
51(8); 471-475.
2. Ravanipour, M., Bahreini, M., Ravanipour, M., (2015). Exploring nursing students’ experiences of peer learning in clinical practice. Journal
of Education and Health Promotion. 4(1); 46-52.
3. Carey, M.C., Kent, B., Latour, J.M., (2016). The role of peer assisted learning in enhancing the learning of undergraduate nursing students
in clinical practice: a qualitative systematic review protocol. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 14(7); 117-
123.
4. Palsson, Y., Martensson, G., Swenne, C.L., Adel, E., Engstrom, M., (2017). A peer learning intervention for nursing students in clinical
practice education: a quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today. 51(1); 81-87.
5. Stenberg, M., Carlson, E., (2015). Swedish student nurses perception of peer learning as an educational model during clinical practice in a
hospital setting. BMC Nursing. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0098-2.
6. Stone, R., Cooper, S., Cant, R., (2013). The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review. ISRN Nursing.
doi: 10.1155/2013/930901.
7. Owen, A.M., Wars-Smith, P., (2014). Collaborative learning in nursing simulation: near-peer teaching using standardised patients. Journal
of Nurse Education. 53(3); 170-173.
Contact
[email protected]
Negative Attitude and Anxiety Toward Aging in Students From a Nursing School in Saltillo, Mexico
Irving Arnoldo Viera-Villanueva, BSN, RN, Mexico
Abstract
Justification: Nursing is one of the professions that have a greater contact with patients, therefore, measuring the attitudes of
students and nursing professionals is important, since with these is the deal that will be given to the patient, having negative
repercussions such as: Aggravate their illness, psychological traumas and in case of the positive effects would be improvement in
shorter time, effectiveness of treatments, good emotional and psychological development of the patient, depending on how
expressed to said.
Purpose: To identify negative attitudes and anxiety levels towards aging and their relationship with socio-demographic variables and co-existence
with the elderly, in undergraduate students at the Public Nursing School in Mexico’s northeast.
Methodology: Correlational-Descriptive Design with proportional fixing by gender of 150 undergraduate students, in a Public Nursing School in
Mexico’s northeast. This sample had an associated reliability of 95% and an error of 5%, based on the calculation of infinite populations. The
instruments that were applied were: socio-demographic format, co-existence with the elderly format and questionnaire about attitudes towards
aging, and Anxiety Scale towards aging; which shows an acceptable reliability (Cronbach Alpha= 0.845 and 0.794).
Results: Through statistical tests it was found that Attitudes towards aging had a mean of 40.2 with an standard deviation (SD) of 8.89, for the
variable anxiety had a mean of 39 and a SD of 8.29 (both fluctuate between the range of 21 and 63), where, to a higher punctuation, greater
presence of negative attitudes and higher anxiety level. In this research, a medium positive correlation was found between attitudes towards aging
and anxiety towards aging (r=0.535; p<0.05).
Conclusions: Based on the results found, it can be concluded that negative attitudes and anxiety levels towards aging are present in nursing
students, and that such results need to be considered when making Study Plans.
Target audience: The target audiences of this presentation are: nursing researchers and students, teacher nurses interested in the improvement of
the aging perception and the co-relation with the socio-dempgraphic variables.
References
Yen-Chun Lin, Chi-JaneWang, Jing-Jy Wang. Effects of a gerotranscendence educational program on gerotranscendence recognition, attitude
towards aging and behavioral intention towards the elderly in long-term care facilities: A quasi-experimental study. Revista: Elsevier [Internet]
2015 [consultado 26 Octubre 2016] Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691715003378
Campos BMA, Salgado GE. Percepción sobre la tercera edad en estudiantes de primer nivel de la Facultad de Psicología de ULACIT y su relación con
el desarrollo de competencias Profesionales para el trabajo con Adultos Mayores. Revista Rhombus [Internet] 2013 [Consultado 20 Abril 2014];
101(1):1–30. Disponible en: http://www.ulacit.ac.cr/files/careers/104_percepcion_de_estudiantes_sobre_tercera_edad.pdf
Effectiveness of Supervised Intergenerational Service Learning in Long-term Care Facilities on the Attitudes, Self-transcendence, and Caring
Behaviors Among Nursing Students: A Quasiexperimental Study. Educ Gerontol [Internet] 2013 [Consultada 20 Marzo 2015]; 39(9):655–668.
Disponible en: DOI: 10.1080/03601277.2012.73415
Serrani-Azcurra DJL. La ansiedad ante el envejecimiento como mediador de actitudes ageístas en estudiantes de Psicología. Revista de Educación y
Desarrollo [Internet] 2012 [Consultado 20 Marzo 2012]; 22:5–12. Disponible en:
http://www.cucs.udg.mx/revistas/edu_desarrollo/anteriores/22/022_Serrani.pdf
Huei-Lih H, Hsiu-Hung W, Huey-Shyan L., Sánchez PC. Estereotipos negativos hacia la vejez y su relación con variables sociodemográficas,
psicosociales y psicológicas [tesis doctoral]. Málaga: Universidad de Málaga. [Internet] 2004 [consultado 15 febrero 2014]; Disponible en:
http://www.biblioteca.uma.es/bbldoc/tesisuma/16704046.pdf
Lasher KP, Faulkender PJ. Measurement of aging anxiety: Development of the anxiety about aging scale. Int J Aging Hum Dev. Ene 1993; 37(4): 247–
259
Contact
[email protected]
Examination of Graduate Faculty Online Teaching Needs to Create a Center for Scholarship in
Teaching/Learning
Rosemary L. Hoffmann, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
The expansion of online web enhanced programs within the last decade requires faculty to develop needed skills not only in
teaching strategies but also the use of technology and the principles of the adult learner as it relates to a web enhanced
environment. According to the 2013 Sloan Consortium (http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/grade-change-2013) over
7 million higher education students are enrolled in at least one online course. This number is expected to grow because students
find the flexibility a key determinant for enrollment.
Converting a face to face course to an online web enhanced format requires an understanding of adult learning theory, principles of effective web
based instruction and an understanding of generational differences in students (Chickering and Gamson, 1987; Hoffmann, Dudjak, 2012). Our
university, which is a major research intensive university, embarked in 2009 to offer graduate nursing programs both “onsite” and “online.” Over
the next several years we expanded our ‘online” program offerings to include two MSN areas of concentration, six different nurse practitioner
concentration for DNP completion, two post masters CNS options, health system executive leadership DNP, CRNA and just recently an RN-MSN
option program. This growth in online program offerings emphasized the importance of scholarship in teaching and learning (Clinefelter, 2012).
Thus in 2017 the School of Nursing created a Center for Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (CSToL) to improve student learning through scholarly
inquiry. The mission of the CSToL aims to improve student learning at all levels, including community learners through scholarly inquiry. This begins
by establishing a school-wide baseline of current practices, informing faculty of effective practices documented in the literature, and encouraging
self- reflection on teaching approaches.
In order to grasp a better understanding of the faculty needs related to online web enhanced instruction it was imperative to survey all faculty who
are currently or will be responsible for developing, and delivering a web enhanced course. According to Elliott, Rhoades, Jackson, Kearney, and
Mandernach (2015), flexibility and diversity in faculty development programs is essential in order to accommodate the disparate needs of faculty.
They recommend a needs assessment to help guide faculty development and support online teaching.
The following two research questions guided the needs assessment: 1) What are the current online teaching strategies utilized by graduate nursing
faculty to deliver online web enhanced courses at the SoN and 2) What are future faculty development needs related to online web-enhanced
instruction? A review of the literature related to faculty needs, teaching learning strategies and technology utilized in web enhanced courses was
obtained through MedLine, OVID, and Pub Med. Since no specific tool included the breadth and depth of the current faculty needs an investigator
developed survey was created. Face validity was obtained from three faculty who have taught web enhanced courses for greater than eight years
and two instructional designers at the University’s Center for Teaching and Learning. The instructional designers are directly involved in online web
enhanced course development and have extensive research in adult learning theory and teaching strategies. The final survey included four
demographic questions and 15 questions related to teaching/learning in a web enhanced format, use of technology, online teaching tools, hybrid
instruction methodology, and other aspects of faculty development such as e-advising, online office hours and future faculty development
initiatives. The survey was administered via RedCap to 27 PhD or DNP graduate faculty in spring 2017 (Harris, Taylor, Thielke, Payne,Gonzales, &
Conde, 2009). This presentation will discuss the results obtained and implications for practice. Analyses of data will inform a white paper to
elucidate current practices in online education method currently implemented in the School and establish a roadmap for the future including
future faculty development forums, best practices in online instruction and scholarly inquiry.
References
Allen, IE & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and
Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541571.pdf
Chickering, A. and Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven Principles of Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. Faculty Inventory. Racine: Johnson
Foundation.
Clinefelter, D. (2012). Best practices in online faculty development. The Learning House Inc. http://www.learninghouse.com/wp-
content/uploads/2012/10/Best-Practices-for-Online-Faculty-Development_Web_Final.pdf
Elliott, M., Jackson, CM. & Mandernach, J. (2015). Professional development: Designing initiatives to meet the needs of online faculty. The Journal
of Educators Online. 12(1). 160-168
Frazer C, Sullivan DH, Weatherspoon D, Hussey L. Faculty perceptions of online teaching effectiveness and indicators of quality. Nursing Research
and Practice. 2017;2017:9374189. doi:10.1155/2017/9374189.
Harris, P.A., Taylor R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzales, N. & Conde, J.G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap): A metadata-driven
methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377-381.
Hoffmann, RL. & Dudjak, LA. (2012). From onsite to online: Lessons learned from faculty pioneers. Journal of Professional Nursing. 28(4). 255-258.
Reilly, JR.& Ralston-Berg. P. (2012). Faculty development for e-learning: A multi-campus community of practice (COP) approach. Journal of
Asynchronous Learning Network. 16(2). 99-110.
Contact
[email protected]
Health Policy Institute (HPI): Capitol Hill Experiential Learning to Gain Political Astuteness
Melody K. Eaton, PhD, MBA, BSN, RN, CNE, USA
Linda J. Hulton, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Introduction and Background: It is imperative that nursing graduates understand, and can collaboratively advocate for health policy that benefits
patients, families, and communities. Evidence suggests a historical disparity between health care providers’ attitudes and experiences with health
policy advocacy. Physicians’ perceptions of the importance of their role in political advocacy indicates that though 91.6% specified that political
involvement was important, only 25% were politically active (Gruen, Campbell, & Blumenthal, 2006). Among nutritionists only seven percent
reported being highly active in the policymaking process, while 44% declared no involvement (Boardley, Fox, & Robinson, 1999).
Nurses also exhibited poor enthusiasm and understanding regarding the political health policymaking process (Boswell, Cannon, & Miller, 2005).
Salvador’s (2010) study of 347 Registered Nurses indicated that while 73.5% had participated in up to two health policy-related activities, 26.5 %
reported no participation at all. More importantly, 68.8% reported receiving no health policy education. Of those Registered Nurses who had
received health policy education, 66.7% rated it as poor (Salvador, 2010). Primomo’s (2007) definition of political astuteness is an “awareness and
understanding of legislative and policy processes, and political skills” (p. 260). To quantify graduate students’ political astuteness, an adapted
Clark’s (1984) Political Astuteness Inventory (PAI) was employed in a health policy course, as well as among students attending a state legislative
day. Both studies found significant improvement in political astuteness scores following experiential learning events focused on health policy
advocacy (Primomo, 2007; Primomo & Bjorling, 2013).
Capitol Hill Experiential Learning: In August, 2016, five James Madison University Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students attended the School of
Nursing’s first Health Policy Institute (HPI) in Washington D. C., and in May, 2017, seven DNP students attended the second HPI on Capitol Hill,
spending one intensive interprofessional week living and working on Capitol Hill as part of their practicum experience. They were each assigned a
mentor at the federal policymaking level. Students worked for Senator Kaine’s office, completed assignments for Congresswoman Comstock’s
office, worked with the American Nurses Association, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, the Institute for Public Health Innovation,
the National Alliance to End Homelessness, and American Association of Home Health and Hospice public policy divisions. The second HPI occurred
during a historical week with students witnessing the passage of the House Health Care Repeal/Replace Plan (American Health Care Act, AHCA),
Sally Yates’ testimony, and FBI Director Comey’s firing.
During both HPIs students met essential health policy components for their doctoral education and provided reflective narratives linked to DNP
policy focused American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) Essentials. During the 2016 HPI One student assigned to work with the American
Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) on Title VIII funding reported, “I personally was amazed at the level of recognition and respect that the
AACN receives on Capitol Hill. I realize that this is the result of years of hard work and policy promotion, but they have been able to prove through
evidence that these workforce development programs have paid off. The public has supported nursing efforts even through budget cuts and other
services requesting appropriations.” Another student expressed, “this was the most beneficial and life changing experience….the highlight of my
entire DNP program”. One 2017 HPI student really summed up the experience, “I feel through my work and experiences here at the Health Policy
Institute, I have become competent in the process of health care policy and advocating for healthcare on a federal level. I came into this experience
feeling intimidated and unsure, but I am leaving with confidence and the motivation to do more as a nurse to advocate health policy, not only in
my local community, but for all Americans”. All participating students self-reported an increase in knowledge and comfort level related to
healthcare political advocacy. Additionally, policymaker feedback related to the students' level of participation was positive.
Meeting AACN Essentials (AACN, 2006): Analyze the environment and process of policy making at the federal level within the context of health
policy.
Critically analyze health policy proposals, health policies, and related issues from the perspective of consumers, nursing, other health professions,
and other stakeholders in policy and public forums.
Influence policy makers through active participation at the federal level to improve health care delivery and outcomes.
Educate others, including policy makers at all levels, regarding nursing, health policy, and patient care outcomes
Conclusion and Implications: Health care professionals have often lacked the knowledge, experience, and /or underestimated their ability to
educate legislators on the value of healthcare, health care professionals, and healthcare-based need for policy change. Implementing
interprofessional experiential experiences to improve political astuteness may prove to enhance health care professional’s likelihood of influencing
policy change in the future.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2006). Essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice. Retrieved
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/dnp/Essentials.pdf.
Boardley, D., Fox, C., & Robinson, L. (1999). Public policy involvement of nutrition professionals. Journal of Nutrition Education, 31(5), 248-254.
Boswell, C., Cannon, S. and Miller, J. (2005). Nurses’ political involvement: responsibility versus privilege. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(1),5-8.
doi:org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.11.005
Clark PE. (1984). Political astuteness inventory. In: Clark MJD, ed. Community Nursing: Health Care for Today and Tomorrow. Reston, VA: Appleton
and Lange; 168-189.
Clark MJ (2008). Political astuteness inventory by PE Clark 1984. Community Assessment Reference Guide for Community Health Nursing. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 1-2.
Gruen, R. L., Campbell, E. G., & Blumenthal, D. (2006). Public roles of US physicians’ community participation, political involvement, and collective
advocacy. JAMA, 296(20), 2467-2475.
Primomo, J. (2007). Changes in political astuteness after a health systems and policy course. Nurse Educator, 32(6), 260–264.
Primomo, J., & Bjorling, E. (2013). Changes in political astuteness following nurse legislative day. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 14(2), 97-108.
doi:10.1177/1527154413485901
Salvador, Diane (2010). Registered nurse’s perceptions and practices related to health policy. (Doctoral dissertation.) Retrieved from The University
of Toledo Digital Repository, Paper 961.
Contact
[email protected]
Teaching Q Methodology to Baccalaureate Nursing Students
Desiree Hensel, PhD, RN, PCNS-BC, CNE, USA
Debbie Judge, DNP, USA
Angela Opsahl, DNP, USA
Abstract
Background: There is a growing professional emphasize on providing patient-centered care, but teaching patient-centered research
methods in nursing curricula is far from routine. Q methodology is a philosophical framework and set of techniques used to
systematically study subjective attitudes, beliefs, and opinions in a way that minimizes researcher bias. Participants actively make
their preferences known through a sorting process; then by-person factor analysis is used to find groups with shared viewpoints. Q
methodology can be used for research, quality improvement, and program evaluation; but few nurses have a basic understanding of
this mixed-method design. The purpose of this project is to describe the implementation and evaluation of a one-day class in a
baccalaureate nursing research course created to increase students’ awareness of Q methodology.
Methods: Following a brief overview, students actively engaged in a mock Q study by generating opinion statements, known as a concourse, about
their K-12 substance abuse education. Then students performed a Q sort and entered data into a web-based program. After reviewing the steps of
data analysis, examples of undergraduate honor student Q methodology studies were shared with the group. Content was reinforced as students
applied Q methodological principles and techniques to evaluate the class. The project was classified by the university Institutional Review Board as
non-human subjects research. Students provided written responses to four evaluations questions regarding impressions of the class and the
method to populate the concourse. The following week, students sorted their level of agreement with 35 subjective statements on a +4 to -4 grid.
Anonymous data were analyzed with PQ Method software using centroid factor analysis and varimax rotation.
Results: Thirty-three sorts resulted in a four-factor final solution that explained 45% of the variance: General Confusion (N=6), Seeing Usefulness
(N=3), Valuing Practice (N=8), and Ambivalence to Research (N=11). The most favorable attitudes were found among the Seeing Usefulness group
who perceived that Q methodology was a good way to do patient-centered research and find opinions. Overall, the interactive format (1, 1, 3, 4)
and participating in the step-by-step mock study (0, 2, 4, 2) were positive aspects of the class. Perceiving that the session would have better with
prior knowledge (4, 0, 3, 3) and that there was too much to learn in one session (3, -2, 0, 4) represented areas for improvement.
Conclusion: This was the first study to explore outcomes from teaching Q methodology to undergraduate nursing students. The findings reinforce
the best teaching and learning practices of exposing students to content prior to class and using active learning strategies. What this study adds to
the literature is that teaching undergraduate students about Q methodology can generate interest in alternative approaches for studying
subjectivity in nursing practice. More research is needed to understand optimal content exposure.
References
Hensel, D. (2016a). Using Q methodology to assess learning outcomes following the implementation for a concept-based curriculum. Nurse
Educator, doi: 10.1097/NNE. 0000000000000357
Hensel, D. (2016b). Q-Methodology: An alternative design for undergraduate nursing honors research. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(11), 659-
662.
Ramlo, S. E. (2015). Q methodology as a tool for program assessment. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 27(3), 207.
Ramlo, S. (2016). Mixed method lessons learned from 80 years of Q methodology. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(1), 28-45.
Contact
[email protected]
The Use of a Skills Simulation Boot Camp to Increase Self-Confidence in Prelicensure BSN Students
Catherine A. Hiler, DNP, USA
Deidra S. Pennington, MSN, USA
Abstract
To determine the overall impact of an orientation skills boot camp on the confidence of nursing students to perform skills, the
research team designed a study based on a quasi-experimental pre- and post-design. The faculty research team attained
organizational Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval at the small, private, health sciences college and the large tertiary care
parent organization associated with the college. Ninety-two senior year nursing students in the Bachelor of Science in Nursing senior
1 clinical course were eligible to participate. Students submitted pre- and post-surveys electronically via Blackboard Learning
Management System. The orientation skills boot camp included rotations through the following stations: Physical assessment, post-
surgical abdominal wound with sterile dressing change, chest tube and tracheostomy care, insertion of intravenous catheter and
nasogastric tube, and administration of intravenous medications. The measurement tool selected for use was the National League
for Nursing (NLN, 2005) Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning, 13-item instrument. NLN grants permission to use this
tool for non-commercial use (NLN, 2005). By using a 5-point Likert scale, the tool measures student satisfaction and self-confidence
in learning (NLN, 2005). A description of the tool includes reliability testing using Cronbach’s alpha: satisfaction = 0.94; self-
confidence = 0.87 (NLN, 2005). The tool was adapted for this study to include questions measuring student confidence on the
individual skills performed at the stations. This ongoing study incorporates results over a period of 3 non-consecutive clinical
semesters. Results from the first two semesters compare mean scores from the student surveys and show an increase in confidence
on the post-surveys. Fifty additional students will complete the boot camp study during fall 2017. Results from the three semesters
will be compared by paired t-testing and completed for the conference poster.
Simulation in nursing provides a safe environment to develop judgment and hone skills essential for practice (Robinson & Dearmon, 2013; Liaw,
2011). The use of simulation allows students the opportunity to apply concepts and skills learned within the nursing curriculum (Robinson &
Dearmon, 2013). Additionally, the simulated environment provides a nonthreatening milieu for application of clinical judgment without the risk of
actual patient harm (Robinson & Dearmon, 2013). It is suggested that simulated learning environments are a modern-approach to learning and are
preferred over the traditional classroom by students who are accustomed to technology (Bland, Topping, and Wood, 2011; Harder, 2010; Robinson
& Dearmon, 2013). The NLN fully supports a myriad of simulation strategies for use within nursing programs and endorses that these experiences
may substitute for up to 50% of clinical hours (Rutherford-Hemming, Lioce, Kardong-Edgren, Jeffries, & Sittner, 2016). According to the Virginia
Board of Nursing (2013), nursing education programs may incorporate up to 20% of total clinical hours as simulation experiences.
Medical education frequently utilizes clinical boot camps for resident training but the use of this strategy with nursing education is sparse (Yaylaci
& Kitapcioglu, 2015). Hogewood, Smith, Etheridge, and Britt (2015) wrote about the development and implementation of an OB/PEDS Boot Camp
for nursing students including a description of the different educational stations employed, however this article did not incorporate a study of its
effectiveness. Few studies link simulation interventions to specific clinical skills, however Valizadeh, Amini, Fathi-Azar, Ghiasvandian, and
Akbarzadeh (2013) report an increase in student confidence to perform peripheral venous catheterization on pediatric patients. This team utilized a
group-based simulation where the students practiced catheter insertion on infant manikins, role playing, and critical thinking application of a
written scenario.
Liaw and colleagues (2012) show an increase in student confidence to perform skills after participating in a simulation-based learning experience
(Liaw, Scherpbier, Rethans & Lainin-Yobas, 2012). Kimhi et al. (2016) found that simulation education increased confidence in nursing students
regardless of whether the intervention occurred prior to or after a student’s clinical experience. Dearmon et al. (2013) revealed that by
incorporating a 2-day simulation-based orientation for beginning nursing students, confidence as well as knowledge increased. Additionally, the
team found that students reported a decrease in anxiety, contributed to the non-threatening practice environment and learning about instructor
expectations. Thomas and Mackey (2012) relayed that when student confidence was elevated they were more apt to perform skills and reach their
clinical objectives. Simulation is most effective in the more advanced student due to their higher knowledge level of theory, potentially impacting
their clinical decision-making (Thomas and Mackey, 2012).
Utilizing the NLN Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning tool, Lewis and Ciak (2011) found positive results for self-confidence and
satisfaction, as well as an increase in knowledge following a pediatric and obstetric simulation experience. Working under the auspices of the NLN,
Jeffries developed the Nursing Education Simulation Framework (NESF) (Schlairet, 2011). The NESF cites self-confidence as one of the crucial
student outcomes of simulation along with learning, skill performance, satisfaction, and critical thinking (Schlairet, 2011).
The influence of simulation on nursing student’s self-confidence to perform specific skills and the use of orientation boot camps in student nurse
education warrants further study. Literature supports and validates the incorporation of simulation-based experiences into nursing education
programs with support at a national and state level. This study is of benefit to healthcare organizations as they plan orientation programs for nurse
graduates as well as simulation-based training for new skills and technologies. The concepts of this study will assist the implementation of
evidence-based practice into the clinical setting and benefit nursing praxis.
References
Bland, A. J., Topping, A., & Wood, B. (2011). A concept analysis of simulation as a learning stategy in the education of undergraduate nursing
students. Nurse Education Today, 31(2011), 664-670.
Dearmon, V., Graves, R. J., Hayden, S., Mulekar, M. S., Lawrence, S. M., Jones, L., . . . Farmer, J. E. (2013). Effectiveness of simulation-based
orientation of baccalaureate nursing students preparing for their first clinical experience. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(1), 29-38.
Harder, N. (2010). Use of simulation in teaching and learning in health sciences: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(1), 23-28.
Hogewood, C., Smith, T., Etheridge, S., & Britt, S. (2015). Clinical boot camp: An innovative simulation experience to prepare nursing students for
obstetric and pediatric clinicals. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(6), 410-411.
Kimhi, E., Reishtein, J. L., Cohen, M., Fridger, M., Hurvitx, N., & Avraham, R. (2016). Impact of simulation and clinical experience on self-efficacy in
nursing students. Nurse Educator, 41(1), E1-E4.
Lewis, D. Y. & Ciak, A. D. (2011). The impact of a simulation lab experience for nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(4), 256-258.
Liaw, S.Y., Scherpbier, A., Rethans, J.J. & Klainin-Yobas, P. (2012). Assessment for simulation learning outcomes: A comparison of knowledge and
self-reported confidence with observed clinical performance. Nurse Education Today, 32(6), 35-39.
National League for Nursing (2005). Student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/professional-
development-programs/research/tools-and-instruments/descriptions-of-available-instruments
Robinson, B. & Dearmon, V. (2013). Evidence-based nursing education: Effective use of instructional design and simulated learning environments
to enhance knowledge transfer in undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(4), 203-209.
Rutherford-Hemmin, T., Lioce, L, Kardong-Edgren, S., Jeffries, P. R., & Sittner, B. (2016). After the National Council of State Boards of nursing
simulation study—recommendations and next steps. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, 2-7.
Schlairet, M. C. (2011). Simulation in an undergraduate nursing curriculum: Implementation and impact evaluation. Journal of Nursing Education,
50(10), 561-568.
Thomas, C. & and Mackey, E. (2012). Influence of a clinical simulation elective on baccalaureate nursing student clinical confidence. Journal of
Valizadeh, L., Amini, A., Fathi-Azar, E., Ghiasvandian, S., & Akbarzadeh, B. (2013). The effect of simulation teaching on baccalaureate nursing
students’ self-confidence related to peripheral venous catheterization in children: A randomized trial. Journal of Caring Sciences, 2(2), 157-164.
Virginia Board of Nursing. (2013). The use of simulation in nursing education. Retrieved from the Virginia Board of Nursing website:
https://www.dhp.virginia.gov/nursing/nursing_guidelines.htm
Yaylaci, S., & Kitapcioglu, D. (2015). Five-day simulated boot camp helps prepare medical students for transition to internship emergency medicine
rotation. The Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine, 14, 49-50.
Contact
[email protected]
Do I Stay or Do I Go Now?” Exploring Moral Distress in Operating Room Nurses
Kathleen Zavotsky, PhD, USA
Cheryl Prall, MSN, USA
Jorge Gomez Diaz, MSN, USA
Debra Laurie, MSN, USA
Cynthia Douyon-Marconi, MS, USA
Jennifer Pirozzi, BSN, USA
Abstract
Background: Operating room nursing is a highly charged profession and like most specialties is faced with life and death decisions to ethical
dilemmas. Moral distress is a concept that has been explored in various different nursing specialties. The research shows that moral distress can
impact practice negatively such as contributing to burnout, mental and physical illness, as well as premature abandoning of the profession. The
concept of moral distress has never been studied in operating room nurses and since this specialty practices in an ever changing challenging
environment it is worthy of exploration.
Methods: A quantitative, voluntary electronic survey design study utilizing the Moral Distress Score Revised (MDS-R) (Hamric) and the COPE
inventory (Carver) was conducted at a multi-campus hospital system in the northeast. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the
data.
Results: Three hundred operating nurses were invited to participate in the study, which yielded a 20% response rate (N=61). Overall the total MDS-
R was low, but when separated for those nurses who have either left a position due to moral distress or were considering leaving now was almost
triple. The amount of moral distress was also found to be lower when the nurses reported using positive coping mechanisms and had a practice
environment that was considered positive.
Implications: Moral distress is present in operating room nurses and positive coping mechanisms and a healthy work environment may be able to
help mitigate the negative impact. The amount of overall moral distress can influence retention and overall health and well-being in operating
room nurses. With the looming shortage of specialty nurses especially operating room nurses in acute care, this study can assist leaders in creating
a positive work environment. Ultimately retaining experienced operating room nurses has both a financial implication along with postive patient
outcomes.
References
Brazil, K., Kassalainen, S., Ploeg, J., & Marshall, D. (2010). Moral distress experienced by health care professionals who provide home-based
palliative care. Social Science & Medicine (71).,1687-1691.
Carver, C. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
4(1), 92-100.
Carver, C., Scheier, M. & Weintraub, J.K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 56(2), 267-283.
Corley, M., Elswick, R., Gorman, M., & Clor, T. (2001). Development and evaluation of a moral distress scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(2).
250-256.
Culver, J., Arena, P., Antoni, M. & Carver, C. (2002). Coping and distress among women under treatment for early stage breast cancer. Psycho-
Oncology, 11,495-504.
Elpern, E., Covert, B. & Kleinpell, R. (2005). Moral distress of staff nurses in a medical intensive care unit. American Journal of Critical Care, 14, 523-
530.
Ganz, F.D. (2012). Tend and befriend in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Nurse, 32(3), 25-33.
Garrard, J. (2011). Health Sciences Literature Review Made Easy: The Matrix Method, 3rd edition. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Hamric, A., & Blackhall, L. (2007). Nurse-physician perspectives on the care of dying patients in intensive care units: collaboration, moral distress
and ethical climate. Critical Care Medicine, 35(2), 422-429.
Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing practice: the ethical issues. Toronto: Prentice-Hall.
McAndrew, N., Leske, J., & Garcia, A. (2011) Influence of Moral Distress on the professional practice environment during prognostic conflict in
critical care. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 18(4),221-230.
McCarthy, J. & Deady, R. (2008). Moral distress reconsidered. Nursing Ethics, 15, 254-262.
Ohnishi, K., Ohgushi, Y., Nakano, M., Fujii, H., Tanaka, H., Kitaoka, K., Nakahara, J. & Narita, Y. (2010). Moral distress experienced by psychiatric
nurses in Japan. Nursing Ethics, 17(6), 726-740.
Pauly, B., Varcoe, C., Storch, J., & Newton, L. (2009). Registered nurses’ perceptions of moral distress and ethical climate. Nursing Ethics, 16(5), 561-
573.
Pavlish, C,, Brown-Saltzman, K., Hersh, M., Shirk, M., & Rounkle, A.M. (2011). Nursing priorities, actions, and regrets for ethical situations in clinical
practice. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 43(4), 385-395.
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C.T. (2012). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins.
Range, L.,& Rotherham, A. (2010). Moral distress among nursing and non-nursing students. Nursing Ethics, 17(2), 225-232.
Rice, E., Rady, M., Hamrick, A., Verheijde, J., & Pendergast, C. (2007). Determinants of moral distress in medical and surgical nurses at an acute
tertiary care hospital. Journal of nursing management, 16, 360-373.
Radzvin, L .(2011). Moral distress in certified registered nurse anesthetists: implications for nursing practice. American Association of Nurse
Anesthetists Journal, 79(1),39-45.
Raines, M. (1994). Psychological variables in nurses ethical decision making: the relationships among moral reasoning, coping style, and ethics
stress. Los Angeles: University of California.
Sabin-Farrell, R. & Turpin, G. (2003). Vicarious traumatization: implications for mental health of health workers. Clinical Psychology, 23, 449-480.
Contact
[email protected]
Applying the Theory of the Dynamic Nurse-Patient Relationship to Develop Communication Skills for Nurses
Cynthia A. Gaudet, PhD, RN, CNE, USA
Maeve Howett, PhD, APRN, CPNP, CNE, USA
Abstract
The value of interpersonal communication and the communication skills of the nurse cannot be underestimated. While working with
nursing students, this author found that the bedside computer distracted them from their patients as their attention was diverted to
the computer. The purpose of Orlando’s Theory of the Dynamic Nurse-Patient Relationship was to identify the strategies for
teaching nursing students how to apply effective nursing practice, including communication. There are three major concepts
associated with the theory: the patient’s behavior, the nurse’s reaction to the behavior, and the nurse’s subsequent action.
To put the theory into practice, the nurse derives the patient’s need for assistance based on observation and patient behaviors, including a need
for help or need for improvement. Patients who are cognitively or physically impaired are not able to express their needs. The nurse determines
the need for help through observation of the patient’s behavior, such as observing restlessness or an adverse change in vital signs. Although some
patients may experience little trepidation in expressing their needs, other patients may need encouragement to articulate their problem. Nurses,
while performing a functional task such as a physical assessment, will initiate communication with the patient, which in turn may lead to identifying
a patient’s need. The nurse’s reaction occurs internally, within the nurse. The nurse’s reaction consists of three components that occur in the
sequence of perception, thought, and feeling. The reaction is generated through the nurse’s perception of the patient’s behavior.
The theory is expressed in simple language that breaks down the communication between the nurse and the patient into two primary categories,
automatic and deliberative action. When a deliberative action takes place, the patient’s immediate need is met after validation and discussion
between the nurse and the patient. An automatic action is explained as an action that is carried out without any discussion or input from the
patient. If the nurse uses a deliberative approach and validates the patient’s distress or unmet need, a helpful, trusting relationship is established.
This work proposes a model that affords a visual demonstration of Orlando’s Theory of the Dynamic Nurse-Patient Relationship that
can act as a framework to support the examination of patient interactions with both nurses and student nurses.
References
Joint Commission. (2010). Advancing Effective Communication, Cultural Competence,and Patient-and-Family Centered Care: A Roadmap for
Hospitals. The Joint Commission Retrieved from http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/aroadmapforhospitalsfinalversion727.pdf.
Meleis, A. I. (2007). Theoretical Nursing Development & Progress (4th ed.).Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams, & Wilkins
Orlando, I. J. (1990). The Dynamic Nurse-Patient Relationship Function, Process, and Principles. New York: National League for Nursing. (original
work published in 1961)
Strauss, B. (2013). A patient perception of the nurse-patient relationship when nurses utilize an electronic health record within a hospital setting.
CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 31(12), 596-604. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000014
Tobiano, G., Marshall, A., Bucknall, T., Chaboyer, W. (2016). Activities patients and nurses undertake to promote patient participation. Journal of
Nursing Scholarship. 48(4), 362-370. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12219
Contact
[email protected]
Relationship Between Incident Occurrences and Feeling States of Nurses in a Surgical Ward
Yu Fujimoto, MSN, Japan
Natsuko Seto, PhD, Japan
Yasuko Shimizu, PhD, Japan
Abstract
Background: Reducing adverse workplace incidents is an area of high priority in healthcare; however, between 1,100 and 1,200 of
these incidents occur annually, with no decreases noted over the past 4 years, in Japan. Current measures are therefore ineffective
in reducing workplace incidents. This may be because of an inability to distinguish between incidents caused by physical states and
those that are considered “careless mistakes.” Emotional states are an example of physical conditions that differ from nurses’ usual
status. By clarifying the relationships between adverse incidents and emotional states, we may be better able to take effective
measures to reduce or eliminate these incidents.
Aim: We seek to clarify the relationship between workplace incidents and continuous emotional states of nurses. We also aim to obtain
suggestions for preventing these incidents by clarifying these relationships.
Method: We targeted nurses who work day and night shifts in a hospital ward between February 1 and 26, 2016. All subjects provided written
informed consent for participation. Nurses were given a handheld monitoring unit and were asked to input their subjective emotional states during
the morning and evening staff meetings via a 6-level face scale. Here, 6 indicated a “very good” mood and 1 indicated a “very bad” mood. We then
obtained incident reports from the hospital. We divided the input scores into three working shifts indicating day, night, and both shifts, and
compiled a total of 5 items; at the start of work and at the end of work, at both the start and end of work, change over work, and change over
work: absolute value. We analyzed the compiled scores and incident-related reports using a Wilcoxon test and descriptive statistics. Statistical
significance was determined by P < 0.05.
Result: Twenty-eight nurses (experiment participation rate: 97%) participated in this study. The total number of incidents that occurred during the
experimental period was 14, of which 8 occurred during the day shift (57%) and 6 occurred during the night shift (43%). In this research, regardless
of type or level, any incident that occurred was considered a single incident. Nurses who had experienced incidents at least once during the
experiment were assigned to the Incident Group, and nurses who did not experience incidents assigned to the No Incident Group.
There was a significant association for change over work: absolute value for the nurses’ individual scores and incident occurrences. The Incident
Group score was 1.25 points [0.88, 1.80], and the No Incident Group score was 0.75 [0.54, 1.00] (p = 0.018). The Incident Group therefore
demonstrated larger change over work: absolute amount scores than did the No Incident Group. Increased incident occurrences were associated
with greater changes in emotional state values, regardless of whether these were in a positive or negative direction. In addition, there was no
significant association between emotional state score for either group and incident occurrence. There was no significant association between
individual ratings of emotional state and incident occurrence, for each nurse.
Discussion: Since the change over work: absolute value score of the Incident Group were significantly larger than that of the No Incident Group, we
determined that the fluctuation in emotional states was more closely related to incident occurrence than the direction of change (for example,
going from a bad to a good mood, or vice versa). Further, since the emotional states of individual, rather than groups of, nurses related to incident
occurrences, the emotional state of each individual nurse was more important when considering relationships to workplace incidents.
There was a significant relationship between the emotional state of the nurse and the occurrence of workplace incidents. By evaluating nurses’
emotional states, it may be possible to reduce these occurrences.
References
Amano. H., Sakai. T., & Sakai. J. (2009). Analysis of the Relationship between Medical Accidents and Mood States of Nurses. Job Stress Res. 16. 257-
263.
Hashimoto. K. (1988). Safety ergonomics (4th ed.). Tokyo; Japan Industrial Safety & Health Association
Hayashi. C. (2009), Psychology of the nurse immediately after the accident and incident - Analyzing the psychological state seen by years of
experience. Papers of Japanese Nursing Association, Nursing Synthesis. 40. 354-356
Japan Council for Quality Health Care. (2015). Business for Medical accident information gathering etc. 2014 annual report. Retrieved January 21,
2017, from http://www.med-safe.jp/pdf/year_report_2014.pdf
Japanese Nursing Association. (n.d.). Standard text for medical safety promotion. Retrieved January 21, 2017, from
https://www.nurse.or.jp/nursing/practice/anzen/pdf/text.pdf
Kawamura. H. (2003). Error map by 11,000 case incident Complete book (1st ed.). Tokyo; Igaku-Shoin.
Lin. P., Chen. C., Pan. S., Chen. Y., Pan. C., Hung. H., & Wu M. (2015). The association between rotating shift work and increased occupational stress
in nurses. Journal of Occupational Health. 57. 307-315.
Nishimura. Y. (2007). Relation between psychological situation at the time of medical accident occurrence and years of nursing experience. Papers
of Japanese Nursing Association, Nursing Management. 38. 395-397.
Sakai. T., Sakai. J., & Amano. H, (2010). Research on the Relationship between the Occurrences Tendencies of Mistakes in Medical Care, and
Personality Traits due to Nurse's Age and Years of Experience. The Japanese journal of medical instrumentation, 80. 6. 607-613.
Contact
[email protected]
The Process of Adapting SafeMedicate© (Medication Dosage Calculation Skills Software) for Use in Brazil
Samia Valeria Ozorio Dutra, MSN, RN, USA
John M. Clochesy, PhD, MS, USA
Abstract
Failures in the medication-use processes significantly contribute to the reduction of patient safety. A Drug Information Centre in
Brazil reports that most errors are related to prescribing, preparing, and administering medications (Dos Santos, Winkler, Dos
Santos, & Martinbiancho, 2015). A study comparing the educational practices and perspectives related to the medication dosage
calculation skills of providers reports that most academic educators in nursing, clinical educators in nursing and clinical nurses agree
that dosage calculation skills are important for safe medication administration (Crawford, 2016). Students using safeMedicate
achieve significant improvements in the construction of conceptual and calculation competence in medication dosage calculation
problem-solving (MDC-PS) in both UK and USA programmes. The safeMedicate experimental research highlights how authentic
environments are more able to support all cognitive learning styles in mathematics (Weeks, Clochesy, Hutton, & Moseley, 2013)
than traditional didactic methods of education. The dissertation aims to adapt and evaluate Authentic World Medication Dosage
Calculation software for use in Brazil. The dissertation will be carried out in two phases: (1) adaptation and (2) preliminary
evaluation. It uses a formative research approach which is a kind of developmental research or action research which improves
instructional-design theory (model), practices, and processes, guided by the adapted model of the Participatory and Iterative Process
Framework for Language Adaptation (PIPFLA) (Maríñez-Lora et al., 2016). It consists of an 11-step process which follows and assures
the theoretical base used for safeMedicate development as well as the theoretical base guidelines for the language adaptation
process. The safeMedicate program methodology is rooted in Piagetian psychology as it is useful to look closely at the ways in which
the individual builds particular mathematical ideas or concepts (Kolb, 2014). SafeMedicate experimental research highlights how
authentic environments are more able to support all cognitive learning styles in mathematics (Weeks, Clochesy, Hutton, & Moseley,
2013) than traditional didactic methods of education by offering opportunities to tailor and expand mathematical skills through
mental computation, arithmetic, geometry/visual, and algebra (Weeks et al., 2013). Language adaptation generally includes more
than a simple word-for-word translation. It is an interpretation of meaning. This moves translation beyond grammatical rules and
writing conventions to an interpretation informed by socio-cultural and contextual factors. In order to inform and guide the
language adaptation process, it is required to use a combined emic (within-culture/insider’s perspective) and etic (similarities across
cultures/outsider’s perspective) (Maríñez-Lora, Boustani, del Busto, & Leone, 2016). Translation and back translation have been
common steps in adaptation processes. However, the back translation benefit of providing information about semantic and
conceptual equivalence has been questioned in the translation science. Moreover, the International Medical Interpreters
Association does not recommend back-translation. The argument is that comparison of an original source text and a back-translated
source provide only limited and potentially misleading insight into the quality of the target language text. This happens because
many adaptations made by the translator which perfectly convey the meaning of the original are lost in the back translation giving
the appearance of an inaccurate rendition (Harkness, 2013). It is recommended that instead of looking at two source language texts,
it is much better in practical and theoretical terms to focus attention on first producing the best possible translation and then
directly evaluate the translation produced in the target language, rather than indirectly through back translation (Harkness, 2013).
Although studies incorporate systematic approaches of language adaptation process in various degrees, the source is not often cited
(Maríñez-Lora et al., 2016). As such, a strength of this process is the transparent nature in which safeMedicate will be adapted. In
order to strength methodology, the adaptation results will be based on the triangulation of three methods (focus groups, interview,
and face validity surveys) and considers the evaluation methods used to prepare language adaptations which are Informativeness,
Source Language Discrepancy, Security, and Practicality (Maríñez-Lora et al., 2016). In addition, it will be used journaling. Journaling
helps to gain a more in-depth perspective beyond the initial understanding of the research question. By identifying and documenting
motivations, interests, and perspectives initially and throughout the research process, the principal investigator consciously compare
the final interpretation with what first expected to find, building trustworthiness of the data. The focus groups are a language
adaptation team and panel of experts whose group meetings will occur through synchronous communications (skype conference
calls) according to members’ availability, which will be recorded. A poll will be made to discover when most are available. After the
meeting, data will be synthetized and a cross-checking of recommendations will be performed. The language adaptation team will
merge two translations from the source language version to target language (English-Portuguese). Afterwards, the panel of experts
will provide feedback of adaptations necessary, following a cycle of re-adaptations until the panel reaches consensus. Later, a face
validity survey will be presented to the target group (nursing students and professionals seeking an update) as an opportunity to
reflect and evaluate implementation of the instructional-design as a whole. The recruitment strategy will occur through snowballing
sampling method. The partners for safeMedicate adaptation will be selected according to their role in the process. For the language
adaptation team, the inclusion criteria is the fluency in English and Portuguese. For the panel of experts, it will be included only
nursing professionals that have been in the job market for four years performing as professors, supervisor of nursing students
and/or clinical nurse. The student panel will be draw from a list of the names indicated by the panel of experts: each expert will
indicate three students and one professional nurse. The 18 students and 6 nurses will be invited to the student panel. The three first
students and one professional nurse who commits to participate will be allowed access to the safeMedicate Brazilian version. To
explore the evaluation of safeMedicate and identify the adaptations necessary in the software for use in Brazil, transcripts from the
group conference calls will be subjected to content analysis. The primary investigator and a second coder will first independently
code the transcript of the first conference call. The second coder is a doctoral nursing professor trained in qualitative research. Both
will identify and sort the statements referred to the research question (which are the adaptations necessary in safeMedicate for use
in Brazil?). Further corroboration of the themes and domains will be done using ATLAS/6 ti software. Inter-rater reliability will be
calculated through ATLAS/6 ti software. Descriptive statistics will be used to analyze and report the face validity survey data,
calculating frequencies, measures of central tendency, and standard deviations. The results provide evidence to support future
language adaptations. The transparent nature in which safeMedicate will be adapted allows future researchers to follow a detailed
systematic language adaptation process, using the strength of qualitative and quantitative approaches.
References
Dos Santos, L., Winkler, N., Dos Santos, M. A., & Martinbiancho, J. K. (2015). Description of medication errors detected at a drug information centre
in Southern Brazil. Pharmacy practice, 13(1), 524.
Crawford, D. (2016). A Comparison of Nursing Educational Practices Related to Medication Dosage Calculation With Practice Expectations. Paper
presented at the STTI/NLN Nursing Education Research Conference.
Weeks, K. W., Clochesy, J. M., Hutton, B. M., & Moseley, L. (2013). Safety in numbers 4: the relationship between exposure to authentic and
didactic environments and nursing students' learning of medication dosage calculation problem solving knowledge and skills. Nurse education in
practice, 13(2), e43-e54.
Maríñez-Lora, A. M., Boustani, M., del Busto, C. T., & Leone, C. (2016). A Framework for Translating an Evidence-Based Intervention from English to
Spanish. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 38(1), 117-133.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development: FT press.
Harkness. (2013). VIII. Translation. Cross-Cultural Survey Guidelines. Retrieved from http://ccsg.isr.umich.edu/translation.cfm#r14
Contact
[email protected]
An Explanatory Case Study That Includes Evidence-Based Practice in a Hospital Setting
Cathy M. DeChance, PhD, USA
Abstract
Healthcare organizations implement evidence-based instruments and integrate the instrument within the electronic health record
with the aim of reducing patient harm while improving patient outcomes and standardizing procedures (Abraham, 2011; Kelley,
Brandon & Docherty, 2011;Miake-Lye, Hempel, Ganz, & Shekelle, 2013; Stausmire & Ulrich, 2015). The Morse Fall Risk Scale is one
such instrument that healthcare organizations use to identify a patient is a risk to fall (Morse, 2009). Once a patient is identified as a
fall risk, specific interventions can be used that will assist in keeping the patient from falling (Yates & Creech, 2012). When
inconsistencies exist within the process of implementing these instruments patient harm may occur (Lakish, Tschannen, Lee, 2012).
Evidence-based patient assessment instruments, such as the Morse Fall Risk Scale, are reliable and valid assessments when used as designed
(Beaumont & Russell, 2012). Understanding the process nurses use when implementing the Morse Fall Risk Scale is important for preventing falls.
This single explanatory case study used the components of high reliability theory to examine how medical-surgical staff nurses implement an
evidence-based fall risk assessment instrument. Data was collected from an evidence-based belief survey (Melnyk, Fineout-Overholt, & Mays,
2008), observations of medical surgical nurses in practice, interviews with a subset of observed nurses, interviews with organizational leaders, staff
and leader education records, and a review of the organizational policy and patient electronic health records. The collected quantitative and
qualitative data was first analyzed separately and then triangulated (Almutairi, A., Gardner, & McCarthy; Yin, 2014), matching empirical patterns to
propositional statements (Sarker & Lee, 2003) to explain the nurse’s process for implementing the Morse Fall Risk Scale. The elements of the high
reliability theory explained the majority of the data, however new concepts emerged, including management role, forces impeding high reliability,
nurses managing roles, judgment, and other considerations.
References
Abraham, S. (2011). Fall prevention conceptual framework. The Health Care Manager, 30(2), 179-184.
Almutairi, A., Gardner, G. & McCarthy, A. (2014). Practical guidance for the use of a pattern-matching technique in case-study research: A case
presentation. Nursing and Health Sciences, 16, 239-244.
Beaumont, K., & Russell, J. (2012). Standardising for reliability: the contribution of scales and checklists. Nursing Standard, 26(34), 35-39.
Kelley, T. F., Brandon, D. H., & Docherty, S. L. (2011). Electronic nursing documentation as a strategy to improve quality of patient care. Journal of
Nursing Scholarship, 43(2), 154-162. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01397.x
Lakish, B., Tschannen, D., Lee, K. H., (2012). Missed nursing care, staffing, and patient falls. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 27(1), 6-12.
Melnyk, B., Fineout-Overholt, E., & Mays, M. (2008). The evidence-based practice beliefs and implementation scales: Psychometric properties of
two new instruments. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 5(4), 208-216.
Morse, J. (2009). Preventing patient falls (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Miake-Lye, I. M., Hempel, S., Ganz, D. A., & Shekelle, P. G. (2013). Inpatient fall prevention programs as a patient safety strategy. Annals of Internal
Medicine, 15, 390-396.
Sarker, S., & Lee, A. (2003). Using a case study to test the role of three social enablers in ERP implementation. Information & Management, 40, 813-
829.
Stausmire, J. M., & Ulrich, C. (2015). Making it meaningful: Finding quality improvement projects worthy of your time, effort, and expertise...second
of a 4-part quality improvement. Critical Care Nurse, 35(6), 57-62 6p. doi:10.4037/ccn2015232
Yates, K., & Creech, R., (2012). Acute care patient falls: Evaluation of a revised fall prevention program following comparative analysis of psychiatric
and medical patient falls. Applied Nursing Research, 25(2), 68-74.
Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Contact
[email protected]
The Impact of Structured Research Curriculum in Undergraduate Nursing Programs
Claire Lindsay Slote, SN, USA
Catherine Marie Mazenko, SN, USA
Abstract
Across the country, undergraduate students are increasingly getting first-hand independent research experience in the bachelor’s
degree curriculum. Many schools have established programs for students to become involved in the scientific research community
as early as their freshman year (Eagan, et al, 2013). These programs give students a chance to learn about inquiry design and
approach, execution, and writing. This allows students to understand their place in the discovery and implementation process
(Beckham, Simmons, Stovall, Farre, 2015). Most of these programs have been established for students of the natural sciences, but
there are less opportunities for nursing students. Although nursing and the natural sciences are not identical, they are inherently
connected. The practice of nursing is the ability to apply scientific knowledge and research to real-life clinical situations.
There is a distinct lack of dedicated undergraduate BSN curriculum for research-based courses in public universities around the country. While
many schools have honors programs that offer independent nursing research opportunities to their students, honors programs represent only a
small fraction of the undergraduate nursing student population. Out of 16 public schools surveyed in Texas, only 10 had a required research course
for undergraduate BSN students. Around other regions of the country, the picture was similar. Out of 22 degree plans analyzed from schools in
regions of the country such as the West Coast, East Coast, and South, only 17 had required research courses.
Although many BSN nursing programs are lacking dedicated research content, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing lists “scholarship for
evidence-based practice” as the third essential in their list (AACN, 2008). This document delineates how professional nursing practice involves the
process of identifying problems, interpreting and implementing evidence based practices to solve the problem, and evaluation of effectiveness of
the implemented practices. It stands to reason that taking more focused nursing research courses would boost a nurse’s ability to complete this
process in their clinical careers. Since evidence-based practice is derived from research studies, it is important that a nurse is able to understand
underlying research methods and analysis when reading or hearing about new evidence-based practice that may be of interest to them.
Several studies shows that understanding and implementing evidence-based practice is a fundamental element of being an effective medical
professional (Mackey, Bassendowski, 2016). Unfortunately, multiple studies have revealed that many nurses are intimidated by the research
behind evidence-based practice. Many nurses state that they are unsure how to interpret statistical jargon and incorporate findings into their own
patient care, as well as how they perceive scholarly articles to be too complex to appreciate (Rojjanasrirtat, Rice, 2017). Many are turned off by a
lack of comprehension in the research process, and an inability to see results and determine their significance and validity (Keib, Cailor, Kiersma,
Chen, 2017).
There are a limited number of studies that have shown improvements in nurses’ attitudes towards evidence-based practice after completing a
research course. One such study concluded in 2017 that research is “an effective way to improve students confidence and perceptions of EBP” in
undergraduate nursing students (Keib et al, 2017). Another determined that research in BSN degree educational settings provides for better
theoretical practical applications of research findings (Ayoola, Adams, Kamp, Zandee, Feenstra, Doornsbos, 2016).
There is not enough literature to determine whether a push for more dedication to independent nursing research projects in undergraduate BSN
programs could lead to better outcomes at the bedside. Further evidence would need to be collected to determine the answer these three
fundamental research questions: Does there need to be a nationwide emphasis on implementing nursing research curriculum in undergraduate
baccalaureate programs? Do nursing students who complete independent research courses demonstrate better clinical outcomes than students
who do not have these programs? Do nursing research courses required in undergraduate baccalaureate programs include independent research
education or only introduction to existing nursing research? Analyzing data specific to these research questions could be valuable in improving
attitudes towards evidence-based practice after graduation.
References
Eagen Jr., M. K., Hurtado, S., Chang, M. J., Garcia, G. A., Herrera, F. A., and Garibay, J. C. (2013). Making a difference in science education: The
impact of undergraduate research programs. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 683-713. doi: 10.3102/0002831213482038.
Beckham, J. T., Simmons, S. L., Stovall, G. M., and Farre, J. (2015). Chapter 10: The freshman research initiative as a model for addressing shortages
and disparities in STEM engagement. Directions for Mathematics Research Experience for Undergraduates. Retrieved from:
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=SVsGCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA181&dq=freshman+research+initiative&ots=rIuyY40C7h&sig=
HQ3pt2bxD5pz5C2rJyiRC58e2w0#v=onepage&q=freshman%20research%20initiative&f=false.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2008. The essentials of baccalaureate education of professional nursing practice. Retrieved from:
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/BaccEssentials08.pdf.
Mackey, A., and Bassendowski, S. (2017). The history of evidence-based practice in nursing education and practice. Journal of Professional Nursing,
33(1), 51-55. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.05.009.
Rojjanasrirat, W., and Rice, J. (2017). Evidence-based practice knowledge, attitudes, and practice of online graduate nursing students. Nursing
Education Today, 53, 48-53. Retrieved from: http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/science/article/pii/S0260691717300746.
Keib, C. N., Cailor, S. M., Kiersma, M. E., and Chen, A. M. H. (2017). Changes in nursing students’ perceptions of research and evidence-based
practice after completing a research course. Nurse Education Today, 54, 37-43. Retrieved from:
http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/science/article/pii/S026069171730076X.
Ayoola, A. B., Adams, Y. J., Kamp, K. J., Zandee, G. L., Feenstra, C., and Doornbos, M. M. (2017). Promoting the future of nursing by increasing zest
for research in undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(2), 126-132. Retrieved from:
http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/science/article/pii/S8755722316301260.
Contact
[email protected]
Knowledge Surveys in Nursing Education: Nursing Students’ Perceptions of Their Knowledge and Clinical
Skill Abilities
Mary DeGrote Goering, PhD, RN-BC, USA
Abstract
Knowledge surveys have been used for educational assessment to measure cognitive knowledge, assess student confidence and
perceptions of knowledge, identify content areas that need further development, and provide students a guide for study. The
purpose of this study was to discover and examine pre-licensure nursing students’ perceptions of their own knowledge (and
expectations) regarding their clinical abilities and, to evaluate the effectiveness of knowledge surveys as an educational tool for
increasing students’ knowledge and clinical skill(s). The conceptual framework selected for this research study was derived from
Lave and Wegner’s (1991) seminal work, which contributed to the understanding of situated learning through a focus upon the act
of learning and its relationship with the social and cultural contexts where such learning occurs.
I developed the pre- and post- knowledge surveys based upon the work of Wirth and Perkins (2005) and Jarzemsky, McCarthy and
Ellis (2010) for use with professional, pre-licensure nursing students. In addition I created a demographic survey, a clinical simulation
performance evaluation and finally, I created evaluation items for this study, I used an experimental, randomized pre-test, post-test
design and, participants received didactic learning materials and participated in a high fidelity simulation specifically focused upon
end-of-life care.
Using non-parametric tests using chi square (with Phi or Cramer’s V) as well as the t-test for paired samples, I evaluated whether or
not the use of a knowledge survey increased knowledge and clinical skill/ability. The participants reported a perception of
improvement in their knowledge and clinical skill/abilities; they overwhelmingly overestimated their knowledge; they over/under
estimated their abilities to perform clinical skills; and their perceptions did not reflect actual ability to safely demonstrate clinical
skills/abilities. These findings may be consistent with the Dunning-Kruger effect. This effect is found when low performing students
over-estimate their ability and high performing students’ under-estimate or have an accurate perception of their ability. I also used
non-parametric tests, including chi square test (with the McNemar test and Phi correlational coefficient) to evaluate whether there
was a relationship between student perceptions and their cognitive knowledge and clinical skills/abilities. It was difficult to
determine whether the student’s perceptions of their knowledge and clinical skill/ability were strongly or directly related to their
actual ability and, student’s perceptions of their knowledge and clinical skill/ability were more strongly and positively related to their
actual clinical ability during a simulation.
There are several strengths and limitations of this study. The strengths included: there are no published studies in nursing regarding
the use of a knowledge survey; the literature does not reveal any discipline that has assessed behavioral components using a
knowledge survey and this study introduces a behavioral component; there is the potential to expand a knowledge survey across an
entire semester of a nursing course rather than focus upon a single area of content; and, finally, the incorporation of the QSEN
competencies illustrates how profession-specific competencies can be incorporated into a knowledge survey. The limitations of this
study included the fact that this was a pilot study; the sample size was small; the use of on-line surveys may affect student accuracy;
the lack of debriefing items in the surveys; the lack of diversity of participants, the use of non-parametric statistics; and the difficulty
of ensuring that participants did not talk with one another and influence the findings of the study.
There are a number of directions for future research and nursing education practice. The directions for research include: planning
ahead when creating a knowledge survey in order to ensure the validity/reliability of items; planning to control for bias by using
participants not known to the researcher; exposing students to the concept and function of knowledge surveys prior to conducting a
research study; providing a thorough description of the knowledge survey with students prior to recruitment; administering the
knowledge survey in class rather than on-line; consider offering extra credit or a small incentive for students to participate in
knowledge survey research; collect data from a knowledge survey that is administered over several semesters; and lastly, categorize
the skill of participants into levels of high, mid and low.
There are several ways in which the use of knowledge surveys can impact nursing education practice. For instance, it may be helpful to explain to
students the goal of using knowledge surveys and how the use of such surveys can improve metacognition. In addition, educators should be
mindful of the possibility of the Dunning-Kruger effect; closely monitor student activities in the clinical setting; provide timely and accurate
feedback to improve metacognition; recognize students may not accurately self and/or peer evaluations for simulations; and finally, encourage the
practice of reflective judgement.
References
Jarzemsky, P., McCarthy, J., & Ellis, N. (2010). Incorporating quality and safety education for nurses competencies in simulation scenario design.
Nurse Educator, 35(2). 90-92. doi:10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181d52f67
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-
assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
Lave, J., & Wegner, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Paige, J. B., & Daley, B. J. (2009). Situated cognition: A learning framework to support and guide high-fidelity simulation. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 5(3), e96-e103. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2009.03.120
Wirth, K. R., & Perkins, D. (2005). Knowledge surveys: An indispensable course design and assessment tool. Innovations in the Scholarship of
Teaching and Learning. 1-12. Retrieved from: http://www.macalester.edu/geology/wirth/wirthperkinsKS.pdf.
Contact
[email protected]
Utilizing Simulation and Experiential Learning to Make Onboarding Newly Hired Nursing Staff Fun and
Engaging
Lillian Donnelly, MSN, OCN, USA
Abstract
Evidence has shown that simulation is a useful tool in teaching because it provides a safe and engaging environment for learning (Norman, 2012). A
key component of adult learning is active participation in the learning process which results in increased engagement in and effectiveness of the
learning process (Reime et al., 2017).
The National League of Nursing has advocated for the use of simulation as a teaching methodology in nursing education for many years. Simulation
can take many forms from complicated scenarios with high fidelity mannequins to the straightforward teaching of psychomotor skills. Simulation
provides a safe environment for situated cognition (learning in context) for newly hired nursing staff, away from call bells and away from the stress
of the hospital floor (NLN, 2015). In this environment they are free to make mistakes, ask questions, become familiar with technology, and learn
the skills needed for safe and competent practice. During simulation newly hired nursing staff become more competent with clinical skills and
develop the self-efficacy and confidence that facilitates their transition to a new workplace with new technology (Lamers, Janisse, Brown, Butler, &
Watson, 2013).
The training and retention of newly hired nursing staff poses challenges to all nurse educators. One way to address the challenges is to incorporate
experiential learning via simulation in the onboarding process and completion conference for all newly hired nursing staff (Everett-Thomas, Valdes,
Fitzpatrick, & Birnback, 2015).
A high proportion of newly hired nursing staff on the medical-surgical units is new graduate nurses with no nursing experience or nurses with no
acute care nursing experience. Thus this new nursing staff is unfamiliar with the acute care environment, and /or related technology. Studies
indicate that 35% to 60% of new graduate nurses quit in the first year of nursing due to discontent, inadequate support, and insufficient training
(Hommes, 2014).
All newly hired nursing staff is required to attend an onboarding experience with a nurse educator before they can begin orientation on their units
with their preceptors. The new hires also attend a completion conference at the end of the orientation process to ensure that all competencies are
completed. To increase the confidence and competence of newly hired nursing staff the standardized use of simulation during the onboarding
process and completion conference was implemented.
Previously an unoccupied room on one of the med-surg units was used for the orientation process including the completion conference. The
barriers and challenges of this practice were: the lack of availability during high census periods, the ringing of call lights, the noise, and distractions
of the unit activity, visibility to patients and families, absence of necessary technical equipment and lack of continuity of environment. The
unoccupied rooms on the unit did not provide an appropriate or effective atmosphere for the learning process. Therefore the onboarding
experience and completion conference are now conducted in the simulation lab to improve the confidence, self-efficacy, technical skills and safe
nursing practice of the newly hired nursing staff.
The theoretical model used for this project was Bandura’s theory of Self Efficacy, as it supports practices to increase confidence, self-efficacy, and
behavior changes necessary to enhance competency and safe practice in clinical skills ("Nursing theory ( SET)," 2012).
Simulation provides an arena for individualized attention during the learning process. It also offers an environment for addressing diversity in
learning needs and styles with the ability for individualized student instruction (Lamers et al., 2013).
All newly hired nursing staff is provided with an evaluation questionnaire that is composed of eight questions using a visual analog scale and
distributed via paper or computer formats. The instrument was developed by the nurse educator and reviewed by four content specialists. The
questionnaire assesses the outcome of using simulation in the onboarding process and the completion conference by evaluating: self-confidence of
staff, competency in clinical/technical skills, satisfaction with the simulation experience, and staff perception of preparation for safe nursing
practice.
The data being collected reveals that newly hired nursing staff is satisfied with the use of simulation during the onboarding process and the
completion conference. “Going to the simulation lab was the best part of the onboarding process.” “Using the ceiling lifts was helpful.” “Now I
know how to use the PCA with confidence.” All newly hired nursing staff reported increased confidence in competency of clinical and technical
skills after the simulation experience. All of the newly hired nursing staff felt that they were well prepared with the skills necessary for safe nursing
practice.
Our experience of utilizing simulation in the onboarding experience demonstrates its value as a tool in developing nurses that are confident,
competent, and capable of exemplary nursing practice. New formats for incorporating simulation in the onboarding process and completion
conference are being explored for the future.
References
Everett-Thomas, R., Valdes, G. R., Fitzpatrick, M., & Birnback, D. J. (2015). Using simulation technology to identify gaps between education and
practice among new graduate nurses. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46(1), 34-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20141122-
01
Hommes, T. (2014, March/April). Implementation of simulation to improve staff nurse education. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development,
30(2), 66-69.
Lamers, K., Janisse, L., Brown, G., Butler, C., & Watson, B. (2013, May). Collaborative hospital orientation: Simulation as a teaching strategy. Nursing
Leadership, 26(), 61-69. http://dx.doi.org/doi10.12927/cjnl.201323323
National League of Nursing. (2015). A vision for teaching with simulationA living document from the National League for Nursing NLN Board of
Governors. Retrieved from http://nln.org/docs/default-source/about/nln-vision-series-(position-statements)/vision-statement-a-vision-for-
teaching-with-simulation.pdf?sfvrsn=2
National League of Nursing. (2016). NLN research priorities in nursing education 2016-2019. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/professional-
development-programs/research/research-priorities-in-nursing-education
Norman, J. (2012, Spring). Systematic review of the literature on simulation in nursing education. The ABNF Journal, 23(2), 24-28.
Reime, M. H., Johnsgaard, T., Kvam, F. I., Aarflot, M., Engeberg, J. M., Breivik, M., & Brattebo, G. (2017). Learning by viewing versus learning by
doing: A comparative study of observer and participant experiences during an interprofessional simulation training. Journal of Interprofessional
Care, 31(1), 51-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820.20161233390
Self efficacy theory7( SET) Albert Bandura. (2012). Retrieved from http://currentnursing.com/theory/self_efficacy_theory.html
Contact
[email protected]
Nursing Student Experiences of Clinical Data Use in Clinical Rotations
Marcia R. Straughn, MS, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Focus of Inquiry: Clinical rotations are an integral part of nursing education. During clinical rotations, nursing students are expected
to use clinical data to engage in the clinical judgment learning process by gathering, analyzing, and synthesizing clinical data to
provide quality patient care (Tanner, 2006). Prior to the implementation of EHRs, a patient’s clinical data were documented in paper
charts, but the implementation of EHRs in recent years may have changed the way that students interact with and use clinical data
(Baillie, Chadwick, Mann, & Brooke-Read, 2012; Tippen, 2014). Various challenges in interacting with clinical data may exist due to
issues such as various designs of different EHRs per facility, various facility policies, security concerns and restrictions regarding
student use of EHRs, and little experience with EHRs in nursing classes or simulation labs may consequently hinder nursing students’
development of clinical judgment (Baillie et al., 2012; Baillie, Chadwick, Mann, & Brooke-Read, 2013; Tippen, 2014). These
challenges may consequently hinder nursing students’ development of clinical judgment. It is important to ensure that nursing
students develop clinical judgment (Schoessler et al., 2012) and information literacy (Gugerty & Delaney, 2009) so that newly
licensed graduate nurses are prepared to provide safe patient care (Benner, Sutphen, Leonard, & Day, 2009). Various stakeholders in
nursing education such as the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), the National League for Nursing, the Quality and
Safety Education for Nurses project, and the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform Initiative have issued position
statements or regulations to emphasize nursing students’ competencies in using clinical data (AACN, 2008; Cronenwett et al., 2007;
Gugerty & Delaney, 2009; Schoessler et al., 2012). Existing research is focused on nursing students’ experiences of EHRs and the
barriers and benefits of using EHRs rather than the phenomenon of nursing student experiences with clinical data use in clinical
rotations. Foley (2011) compared positive behavior intention toward using an EHR upon entry into practice between nursing
students who were exposed to EHRs and students who primarily used paper-based charting. A mixed methods study explored
midwifery and nursing student experiences with EHRs in practice including the amount of EHR exposure, perceived preparedness to
use EHRs, and perceived advantages and barriers to using EHRs in the clinical rotations of midwifery and nursing students in the
United Kingdom (Baillie et al., 2012; Baillie et al., 2013; Brooke-Read, Baillie, Mann, & Chadwick, 2012). Mahon, Nickitas, and Nokes
(2012) explored the challenges of transition to EHRs from the perspective of clinical nursing faculty and found concerns regarding
facility policies and restrictions regarding the security of patient information and student access of clinical data. The findings from
this study will contribute to a gap in the literature regarding nursing student experiences of clinical data use in clinical rotations. A
deep understanding of nursing student experiences with clinical data use in clinical rotations is preliminary to ensuring an adequate
clinical judgment learning process and to developing teaching strategies to enhance clinical nursing education. Nursing education
programs may use these findings to assist in planning and decision making about preparation for clinical rotations, types of
placements, or adjunctive activities to support students in clinical data use during clinical rotations.
Purpose Statement/Research Question: The purpose of this study is to describe the experiences of undergraduate nursing students with using
clinical data in clinical rotations. The research question is “What are the experiences of nursing students with using clinical data in clinical
rotations?” Clinical rotation refers to “practice in an inpatient, ambulatory care, or community setting where the student provides care to patients
under the guidance of an instructor or preceptor” (Alexander et al., 2015, p. 40).
Philosophical Framework: This study will use the philosophical framework of phenomenology, which is the study of experience as perceived by
each individual within the context of the world (Sokolowski, 2000). Through the phenomenological approach, human experiences are a valid means
by which to develop knowledge about the world (Sokolowski, 2000). The phenomenological tenet of intentionality means that human
consciousness is directed towards an outward object and cannot exist apart from this outward object; similarly, an object is only perceived through
consciousness and does not exist without intentionality (Husserl, 1913/1982). This philosophical assumption allows for first person experiences, as
consciousness intentionally interacting with the object, to represent the phenomenon of interest (Sokolowski, 2000). Descriptive phenomenology
engages with subjective, human experience as a valid means to develop knowledge (Spiegelberg, 1971). In Tanner’s (2006) Clinical Judgment
Model, clinical data is regarded as a component of contextual material needed for clinical judgment and includes information such as health history
and assessment data. Another component of Tanner’s (2006) model is the process of analyzing and clustering clinical data and comparing a
patient’s expected responses to the actual situation represented by the clinical data. In this study, Tanner’s (2006) Clinical Judgment Model does
not serve as a theoretical framework; rather, the model assisted with the synthesis of background information and helped to identify the problem.
Methodology - Phenomenology as Methodology: Phenomenology serves as both a philosophy and a qualitative research methodology in which
individual experiences are studied (Creswell, 2013). This philosophical lens supports the assumption that nursing students themselves are the
experts on nursing student experiences with using clinical data in clinical rotations. Phenomenology as a methodology requires that the researcher
align the methods of data collection, analysis, and reporting of findings with phenomenological assumptions (Colaizzi, 1978). The exploration of a
human phenomenon also requires the suspension of all preconceived judgments in order to allow the phenomenon to emerge (Husserl,
1913/1982). The researcher will engage in ongoing bracketing of preconceived knowledge, expectations, assumptions, and expected findings to
allow the phenomenon to emerge from the analytical process.
Participants and Sampling: This study will use purposive sampling, which is governed by the focus of the phenomenon and “purposely seeks both
typical and divergent data to maximize the range of information obtained about the context” (Erlandson, Harris, Skipper, & Allen, 1993, p. 148).
Participants for this study will be junior or senior level nursing students in a baccalaureate program who have completed at least one semester of a
clinical course in which they participated in clinical rotations. There are no exclusion criteria for participation in the study. The clinical rotation
settings will be inclusive of multiple types of clinical sites represented in participant experiences such as inpatient acute care medical surgical
hospitals, inpatient mental health facilities, community settings, ambulatory settings, and long-term care. The inclusion of participants with
experiences in a variety of types of clinical rotations and the absence of exclusion criteria will assist in maximizing the collection of diverse data in
the study. After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 18 participants were recruited from the two major metropolitan campuses of a
baccalaureate nursing program at a public university. Each participant will receive a $20 gift card after completing the interview.
Data Collection: Data was collected through the use of in-depth interview, which took place in a private location at a time and place mutually
agreeable to both researcher and participant. In-depth interviewing is appropriate for this study because the focus on the experiences of the
participants is integrally tied to the philosophical assumptions of phenomenology; that is, that the descriptions of participant experience can reveal
the phenomenon of interest (Wimpenny & Gass, 2000). Each participant completed one interview with an estimated time of 45-60 minutes. In
phenomenological research, the researcher is the instrument. The researcher must ensure that all aspects of the study are conducted according to
the philosophical perspective of phenomenology.
Treatment of Data - Data Analysis: This descriptive phenomenological study will use Colaizzi’s seven step method of analysis. After data
organization, the first step is to transcribe the recorded interviews verbatim and thoroughly read each transcribed interview. Second, important
statements that directly address the phenomenon are extracted. The third step is to create a reconstruction of the previously extracted important
statements into general, representative statements, and the fourth step requires a grouping of the reformulated statements into thematic clusters.
The fifth and sixth steps include the development of an exhaustive description of the phenomenon and a subsequent development of a statement
of identification of the phenomenon. Lastly, participants review the findings, and changes that result from the review process are integrated into
the final research report (Colaizzi, 1978).
Scientific Rigor: Scientific rigor will be developed through evidence of trustworthiness, which includes the four components of credibility,
dependability, confirmability, and transferability (Lincoln & Guba, 2005). Credibility, dependability, and confirmability will be established through
the use of reflexive journaling to provide insight, assist with ongoing bracketing, and assist in methodological decisions. Field notes will be used
during the entire research process to provide a clear audit trail regarding analytical decisions. Dissertation committee debriefing will be utilized
alongside field notes to support authenticity and promote the researcher’s objectivity (Polit & Beck, 2012). Lastly, the use of participant review and
feedback on the detailed description of the phenomenon that is developed from the analysis will promote authenticity of the research (Colaizzi,
1978; Lincoln and Guba, 2005).
References
Alexander, M., Durham, C. F., Hooper, J. I., Jeffries, P. R., Goldman, N., Kardong-Edgren, S., ...Tillman, C. (2015). NCSBN simulation guidelines for
prelicensure nursing programs. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 6(3), 39-42.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008, October 20). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice [pdf
document]. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/BaccEssentials08.pdf
Baillie, L., Chadwick, S., Mann, R., & Brooke-Read, M. (2012). Students' experiences of electronic health records in practice. British Journal of
Nursing, 21(21), 1262-1269.
Baillie, L., Chadwick, S., Mann, R., & Brooke-Read, M. (2013). A survey of student nurses' and midwives' experiences of learning to use electronic
health record systems in practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(5), 437-441. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2012.10.003
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2009). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Brooke-Read, M., Baillie, L., Mann, R., & Chadwick, S. (2012). Electronic health records in maternity: The student experience. British Journal of
Midwifery, 20(6), 440-445.
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological
alternatives for psychology (pp. 48-71). New York: Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell, P., ...Warren, J. (2007). Quality and safety education for nurses.
Nursing Outlook, 55(3), 122-131.
Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry. A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Publications.
Foley, S. (2011). The effect of a learning environment using an electronic health record (EHR) on undergraduate nursing students' behaviorial
intention to use an EHR. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3483701)
Gugerty, B., & Delaney, C. (2009). TIGER informatics competencies collaborative final Report [pdf document]. Retrieved from
http://tigercompetencies.pbworks.com/f/TICC_Final.pdf
Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (Vol. 1) (F. Kersten, Trans.). The Hague:
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. (Original work published 1913)
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (2005). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Mahon, P., Nickitas, D., & Nokes, K. (2010). Faculty perceptions of student documentation skills during the transition from paper-based to
electronic health records systems. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(11), 615-621. doi:10.3928/01484834-20100524-06
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters
Kluwer Health / Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Spiegelberg, H. (1971). The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction (2nd ed.). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schoessler, M., Brady, M., Engelmann, L., Larson, J., Perkins, I., & Shultz, C. (2012). Nursing judgment: Educating nurses to make decisions in
practice. Nursing Education Perspectives (National League for Nursing), 33(6), 422.
Tanner, C.A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45, 204-211.
Tippen, M. P. (2014). How the electronic medical record has changed clinical nursing education. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 29(3), 193-194.
doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2013.12.003
Wimpenny, P., & Gass, J. (2000). Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: Is there a difference?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6),
1485-1492. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01431.x
Contact
[email protected]
Effects of an Evidence-Based Approach to Recruit and Retain Underrepresented/Disadvantaged Students in
a BSN Program
Paula Klemm, PhD, RN, USA
Ka Wansi Newton-Freeman, MSN, FNP-C, USA
Abstract
Background/Significance: The demand for culturally competent healthcare services in Delaware continues to rise, while its supply of culturally and
ethnically diverse nurses remains stagnant. The growing inequality between the diversity of the residents and the healthcare workforce will worsen
as Delaware’s minority population surpasses its present level (30%). Delaware’s African Americans and Latinos bear the brunt of health inequality
("Delaware primary care health needs assessment 2015", 2016). Most residents of the state live in medically underserved areas (MUA) or are
designated as medically underserved populations (MUP). Likewise, much of the state’s three counties are designated as a health professional
shortage area (HPSA)("Delaware 2010 MUAs and MUPs", 2010). Nursing education programs in Delaware are not producing sufficient numbers of
minority nurses to create a critical mass that will reflect the racial/ethnic makeup of the state. Efforts to recruit and retain nursing students from
diverse backgrounds is critical to ensure culturally and linguistically competent patient care.
A Nursing Workforce Diversity grant funded by the Health Services Resources Administration (HRSA) enabled the University of Delaware School of
Nursing (UDSON) to develop a comprehensive evidence-based program of recruitment and retention focused on minority and
underrepresented/disadvantaged undergraduate nursing students. The program utilized evidence-based interventions to address the structural
and intermediary social determinants of health (SDH)(Metcalfe & Neubrander, 2016), with the overarching goal of increasing the diversity of the
nursing workforce in Delaware.
The evidence indicates that financial needs, academic needs, social and emotional support, peer support, mentoring, and community partnerships
are important aspects of recruiting and maintaining minority and underrepresented/disadvantaged nursing students (Berumen, Zerquera, & Smith,
2015; Dapremont, 2011; Degazon & Mancha, 2012; Ferrell, DeCrane, Edwards, Foli, & Tennant, 2016; "Healthy People 2020: Social Determinants of
Health," ; Love, 2010; Nnedu, 2009; Tinto, 2006; Voss, Mathews, Fossen, Scott, & Schaefer, 2015; Wong, Seago, Keane, & Grumbach, 2008).
Purpose: Two goals of the evidence-based program described here focus on the effects of recruitment and retention of minority, and
underrepresented/disadvantaged students over the course of three years.
Method: The University of Delaware School of Nursing conducted a 3-year evidence-based and comprehensive program to enhance nursing
workforce diversity that was anchored in the Social Determinants of Health (SDH) Framework between July 1, 2014 and June 1, 2017. The program
was conceived with a conscious awareness that diversity can only be fully cultivated when the highest levels of power and leadership at the
university actively articulate and demonstrate articulate support (Levy, Heissel, Richeson, & Adam, 2016). Evidence-based features included: 1)
financial support; 2) academic support; 3) social and emotional support; 4) peer support; 5) mentoring; and 6) community experiences in medically
underserved areas (MUAs) and with medically underserved populations (MUPs).
Sample: Thirty-one undergraduate minority and/or underrepresented/disadvantaged nursing students (9 juniors, 9 sophomores, 11 freshmen) at
the University of Delaware.
Procedure: Students from minority and/or underrepresented/disadvantaged backgrounds were recruited by the grant team as freshmen in the fall
of 2014 (n=9), 2015 (n=9), and 2016 (n=11). Qualified students were interviewed by grant staff and offers to participate in the program were made
to 29 students. Participants completed an initial survey to identify personal, family, and financial strengths and challenges. The results were used to
develop individualized support for participants. These included: 1) financial support (scholarships, monthly stipends); 2) academic support
(Retention Coordinator/advisor; one-on-one and group tutoring; nursing specific study skills; test-taking skills, note-taking skills, time management,
organizational skills; writing support through the university writing center); 3) social and emotional support (social and cultural events targeted to
participants) 4) peer support through the university counseling center and a peer mentoring program); 5) professional development (individualized
professional development strategies, resume writing, job search skills); 6) leadership experiences (Student Nurses Organization and Minority
Student Nurses Organization; 7) experience in MUAs and/or MUPs (e.g. partnerships with agencies that serve rural or underserved areas in the
state).
Analysis: Data included information on retention rates; use and evaluation of program support resources, satisfaction with the program (e.g.
financial support, academic advising, tutoring, university Writing Center, leadership opportunities, participation in cultural events), and GPA.
Results: Twenty-seven of 29 participants remain in the program (93.10%). One student decided to pursue a different major and a second student
left the program for personal and financial reasons. All students achieved at least the minimum GPA to remain in the nursing program. Academic
advisement by, and individual meetings with, the Retention Coordinator were highly valued by participants. Financial support ranked high with
program participants, as did referrals to other support services (e.g., one-on-one and group tutoring, monthly group meetings of program
participants, emotional and social support from the Retention Coordinator and peers, professional and leadership opportunities in the Student
Nurses Organization and Minority Student Nurses Organization) community service (e.g., blood pressure screening; recruitment at area high
schools). Participants currently hold leadership positions in the Student Nurses and Minority Nurses Organizations and one participant is an officer
in the Men in Nursing program in the school of nursing. The participants provided input on aspects of the program which they did not find helpful.
These included group counseling/support sessions, inconvenient group meeting times, and a desire for more community outreach. Overall
satisfaction with the program over the course of the three years was 4.96 (0=lowest score; 5=highest score).
Discussion: As seen in the literature, financial and academic support were highly valued by participants and were the primary reasons that many
gave for their success in the nursing program. The Retention Coordinator (also was also the academic advisor for all participants) was referred to in
glowing terms for helping the participants with academic, financial, and personal issues. We believe that dedicating one individual to advise all of
the program participants is essential to successful retention. Participants were very active in community organizations that served minority
populations. For example, several participated in a church based organization which provided education and outreach to people with HIV/AIDS.
Others were active in the Delaware Preconception Peer Education program which focused on outreach to minority high school students. Still others
were active in Lori’s Hands (Delaware-based non-profit providing community-based services for chronically ill, and predominantly underserved/low
income, seniors).
Conclusion: This evidence-based approach was successful in recruiting and retaining minority and underrepresented/disadvantaged nursing
students over the course of the three years of the program.
References
Berumen, J., Zerquera, D., & Smith, J. (2015). More than access: The role of support services in the transitional experiences of underrepresented
students in a statewide access program. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 45(1), 27-44.
Dapremont, J. (2011). Success in nursing school: Black nursing students' perception of peers, family, and faculty. Journal of Nursing Education,
50(5), 254-260.
Degazon, C., & Mancha, C. (2012). Changing the face of nursing: Reducing ethnic and racial disparities in health. Family & Community Health, 35(1),
5-14. doi:10.1097/FCH.0b013e3182385cf6
Delaware 2010 MUAs and MUPs. (2010). Retrieved from http://dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dph/hsm/files/mua_2010.pdf
Delaware primary care health needs assessment 2015. (2016). Retrieved from
http://www.dhss.delaware.gov/dph/hsm/files/depchealthneedsassessment2015.pdf
Ferrell, D., DeCrane, S., Edwards, N., Foli, K., & Tennant, K. (2016). Minority undergraduate nursing student success. Journal of Cultural Diversity,
23(1), 3-11.
Healthy People 2020: Social Determinants of Health. Retrieved from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/social-
determinants-of-health
Levy, D., Heissel, J., Richeson, J., & Adam, E. (2016). Psychological and biological responses to race-based social stress as pathways to disparities in
educational outcomes. American Psychologist, 71(6), 455-473.
Love, K. (2010). The lived experience of socialization among African American nursing students in a predominantly white university Journal of
Transcultural Nursing, 21(4), 342-350.
Metcalfe, S., & Neubrander, J. (2016). Social determinants and educational barriers to successful admission to nursing programs for minority and
rural students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32(5), 377-382. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.01.010
Nnedu, C. (2009). Recruiting and retaining minorities in nursing education The ABNF Journal, 20(4), 93-96.
Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 8(1),
1-19.
Voss, H., Mathews, L., Fossen, T., Scott, G., & Schaefer, M. (2015). Community-academic partnerships: Developing a service-learning framework.
Journal of Professional Nursing, 31(5), 395-401. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.03.008
Wong, S., Seago, J., Keane, D., & Grumbach, K. (2008). College students' perceptions of their experiences: What do minority students think? Journal
Contact
[email protected]
Enhancing Student Nurses’ Multiple Patient Medication Administration Skills Using an Electronic Barcode
System
Nicole Custer, PhD, RN, CCRN-K, USA
Kristy Chunta, PhD, RN, ACNS, BC, USA
Abstract
Background: Technology is increasingly being used at the patient bedside to improve patient safety and streamline nurses’ workload.
Nurses represent the greatest number of direct healthcare providers and are recognized as the “last line of defense” in preventing
medication errors in healthcare settings. Currently, a majority of healthcare settings have implemented electronic medication
administration record (eMAR) systems using barcode medication administration (BCMA). While nursing students may be introduced
to eMAR technology during clinical experiences, many report feeling unprepared to use these systems safely and proficiently
(Weeks, Clochesy, Hutton, & Moseley, 2013). Preparing student nurses to use eMAR and BCMA technology prior to engaging in off
campus clinical rotations will increase their familiarity with the electronic barcode medication administration process upon entering
practice.
Significance: Safe and accurate medication administration is a major concern in health care today (Harris, Pittiglio, Newton, & Moore, 2014). Pre-
licensure nursing students are expected to provide safe care to a group of clients, including medication administration and prioritization of nursing
care and skills (Aggar & Dawson, 2014). Medication administration constitutes part of the education of undergraduate nursing students, and the
aim of undergraduate preparation is for students to gain an understanding of medications and how to safely administer them (Sulosaari, Kajander,
Hupli, Huupponen, & Leino-Kilpi, 2012; Schneidereith, 2014). The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) recognizes as students
become more experienced, increasingly complex clinical learning opportunities should be selected to prepare students for entry-level practice
(2008). This can be accomplished by providing students opportunities to assimilate to the registered nurse role, including multiple patient
medication administration, with multiple patient assignments in the clinical setting as well as in the simulation laboratory.
Justification of the Study: Nursing students are typically introduced to eMAR/BCMA technology during off campus clinical experiences.
Unfortunately, each clinical site may use a different type of eMAR, potentially creating confusion and frustration as students are faced with a
medication administration learning curve each time they enter a different facility. Utilizing eMAR/BCMA technology for on campus clinical
experiences and simulations may benefit students in multiple ways. First, students can be exposed to eMAR/BCMA technology earlier in the
curriculum. Next, students can become proficient with medication administration using one type of eMAR/BCMA system prior to starting off
campus clinical experiences. This would provide students with more opportunities to safely administer medications using advanced technology.
Lastly, adding this technology to simulation will increase the “real-ness” of medication administration during simulated clinical experiences. To
date, little research has explored the use of technology and simulation to help undergraduate students improve their multiple patient medication
administration skills.
Purpose: This poster presentation outlines the process of implementing and evaluating the use of an eMAR/BMCA system for use with senior
students engaging in multiple patient medication administration.
Methods/Evaluation: Senior nursing students in a nursing management course that focuses on care of multiple patients will individually complete a
faculty-developed multiple patient medication simulation using an electronic barcoding system and an eMAR; once at the beginning of the
semester and once again at the end of the semester. Students will be evaluated on their ability to prioritize medications, correctly administer
medications to simulated patients, and their use of critical reasoning skills using a faculty-developed rubric after each simulated experience.
Additionally, students' self-efficacy with multiple patient medication administration will be assessed by completion of the General Self-Efficacy
(GSE) scale after each individual simulation. Students’ mean scores will be compared to determine the impact of eMAR/BMCA technology on
undergraduate students’ self-efficacy and critical reasoning skills in administering medications to multiple patients in a simulated environment.
Last, students will complete a narrative self-reflection describing how the multiple patient medication administration simulations with barcode
technology helped to prepare them for clinical experiences with multiple patients.
Implications for Practice: Little research has explored how undergraduate nursing students prepare for and critically reason though multiple patient
medication administration. Using technology to simulate multiple patient medication administration may help senior nursing students prepare for
multiple patient medication administration as well assisting them to assimilate into the role of the registered nurse. The results of this study may
also assist nurse educators in developing multiple patient medication administration simulation scenarios using technology.
References
Aggar, C., & Dawson, S. (2014). Evaluation of student nurses' perception of preparedness for oral medication administration in clinical practice: A
collaborative study. Nurse Education Today, 34, 899-903. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.01.015
Author
Harris, M. A., Pittiglio, L., Newton, S. E., & Moore, G. (2014). Using simulation to improve the medication administration skills of undergraduate
nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(1), 26-29. doi: 10.5480/11-552.1
Orbaek, J. Gaard, M. Fabricius, P., Rikke, L. S., & Moller, T. (2015). Patient safety and technology-driven medication - A qualitative study on how
graduate nursing students navigate through complex medication administration. Nursing Education in Practice, 15, 203-211. doi:
10.1016.nepr.2014.11.015
Schneidereith, T. A. (2014). Using simulations to identify nursing student behaviors: A longitudinal study of medication administration. Journal of
Nursing Education, 53(2), 89-92. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140122-07
Sulosaari, V., Kajander, S., Hupli, M., Huupponen, R., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2012). Nurse students’ medication competence – An integrative review of
the associated factors. Nurse Education Today, 32, 399-405.
Weeks, K.W., Clochesy, J.M., Hutton, B.M., & Moseley, L. (2013). Safety in numbers 4: The relationship between exposure to authentic and didactic
environments and nursing students' learning of medication dosage calculation problem solving knowledge and skills. Nurse Education in Practice,
13, 43-54.
Contact
[email protected]
E-Learning Modules: Promoting Success for Prenursing Students
Lynn Greenleaf Brown, DNP, RN-BC, CNE, USA
Gina Briscoe, DNP, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
The nursing shortage and rising attrition rates in nursing schools have serious implications for healthcare. To be successful in nursing
courses, students must possess and routinely practice a wide range of self-regulated learning skills. E-learning modules were created
to equip prenursing students with evidence-based techniques to facilitate learning. Three cohorts consisting of 163 participants
completed the E-learning modules. Principles of self-regulated learning guided the design of the five modules that include videos,
reading materials, and a quiz. The modules’ content covers self-assessment, organization, time management, reading and note
taking, successful study skills, and test-taking strategies. Content in the first module guides students to reflect on prior learning,
academic factors, personal and environmental factors, cognition, and metacognition. The second module focuses on managing
oneself through use of organization, stress, and time management techniques. The goal of the third module is for students to
engage in deep processing and metacognition while reading. The fourth module concentrates on successful study skills to induce
optimal learning. The fifth module relates to test strategies and post-test reflection. The advantages of self-regulated E-learning
modules include: (a) students can complete the modules at a convenient pace and schedule; (b) students can study materials again;
and (c) faculty can advise students with specific challenges to review appropriate modules. Nurse educators are obligated to not only
teach subject matter, but also assist students to become proficient life-long learners. For example, faculty can pose questions to
guide reading, assign manageable reading assignments, and model reading sections of the textbook or a case study utilizing a
reading framework. Creating self-regulated E-learning modules for prenursing students to address academic skills is only one
proactive intervention that can be implemented by nurse educators to improve student retention and success. This poster describes
the learning modules, the framework of self-regulated learning, student feedback, and implications for nurse educators.
References
Adamson, E., & Dewar, B. (2015). Compassionate care: Student nurses’ learning through reflection and use of story. Nurse Education in Practice,
15, 155-161.
Al-Dorssary, R., Kitsantas, P., & Maddox, P. J. (2014). The impact of residency programs on new nurse graduates’ clinical decision-making and
leadership skills: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 34, 1024-1028.
Ambrose, S.A., Bridges, M.W., Dipietro, M., Lovett, M.C., & Norman, M.K. (2010). How do students become self-directed learners? In How learning
works: 7 research-based principles for smart teaching, 188-216. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, J., & Marshall, B.L. (2008). A historically black university’s baccalaureate enrollment and success tactics for registered nurses. Journal of
Professional Nursing, 24, 21-29.
Chew, S. (2011). Cognitive principles of effective teaching. Retrieved from https://www.samford.edu/employee/faculty/cognitive-principles-of-
effective-teaching
Dinsmore, D., Alexander, P., & Loughlin, S. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated Learning.
Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391-409.
Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Cai, V. (2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and
Individual Differences, 19, 499-505.
George, L.E., Locasto, L.W., Pyo, K. A., & Cline, T.W. (2017). Effect of the dedicated education unit on nursing student self-efficacy: A quasi-
experimental research study. Nurse Education in Practice, 23, 48-53.
Jeffreys, M. R. (2012). Cultural values and beliefs, self-efficacy, and motivation: Important considerations. In Nursing student retention:
Understanding the process and making a difference (2nd Ed.), 55-73. New York, NY: Springer.
McCormick, R. (2006). Learning how to learn: A view from the LHTL project England. In Learning how to learn network meeting report. Retrieved
from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242715655_Learning_to_Learn_What_is_it_and_can_it_be_measured
Newton, S. E., & Moore, G. (2009). Use of aptitude to understand nursing student attrition and readiness for the National Council Examination-
Registered Nurse. Journal of Professional Nursing Education, 47, 273-278.
Quance, M. A. (2016). Nursing students’ perception of anecdotal notes as formative feedback. International Journal of Nursing Education
Scholarship, 13, 1-11.
Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Contact
[email protected]
Comparisons of Cooperative Teams While Using the Haptic Intravenous Simulator
Lenora McWilliams, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate differences among teams of cooperative leaners while using a haptic intravenous simulator. Results from this
study will provide additional information regarding the generalizability of the use of cooperative learning teams of nursing students
who are learning the principles of IV insertion using a haptic intravenous simulator.
Background: Nursing students need opportunity to learn, practice and perform safe and effective intravenous insertion. Patients may experience
harmful effects such as pain, infiltration, or infection if this complex skill is performed incorrectly. Haptic IV simulators teach the principles of IV
insertion and allow students opportunity to practice safe and effective intravenous insertion while developing proficiency. Haptic IV simulators
provide tactile feedback including palpation of a vein and resistance during venipuncture. As each student works through the simulation, the haptic
IV simulator calculates a performance score (interval data: range 0 -100 points) based on critical and non-critical errors made during the simulation.
Cooperative learning, based on social interdependence theory, is an active learning strategy where teams of students work together in order to
complete a task or goal. The basic elements of cooperative learning are: positive interdependence, promotive interaction, individual and group
accountability, social skills and group processing.
Methods: A posttest only experimental research design was used with a convenience sample of 110 nursing students in an accelerated second
degree registered nurse (2DRN) program in a southeast Texas university. Nursing students were first randomized into an assignment (A, B or C)
which determined who was to attempt their simulation first, second or third and then randomized again into an IV team composed of each of the
three different assignment. IV teams determine when to complete their IV simulation. On the day of their IV simulation, each team member was
given an envelope with a letter on the outside. This letter represented their sequencing order, A (first), B (second) or C (third) learner. Each
envelope contained a unique username/password in order to access the simulator, and procedural information. Procedural information included a
description of how each member was to log in and out of the simulator using their unique username and password and sequencing pattern. After
reviewing procedural information, the primary investigator presented information on how the team members were to work together until all
members completed the task (positive interdependence), they were encouraged to support one another while making suggestions, collaborating or
discussing (promotive interactions) how to solve the task. The task was for each team member to earn a passing performance score of an 85 or
better on the IV simulator. The PI followed a checklist and script to ensure each team received the same information and that the team members
were following the procedural information.
Results: Initial performance scores and number of attempts to earn a passing performance score will be analyzed using an ANOVA.
References
Cason, M. L., Gilbert, G. E., Schmoll, H. H., Dolinar, S. M., Anderson, J., Nickles, B. M., …Schaefer, J. J. (2015). Cooperative learning using simulation
to achieve mastery of nasogastric tube insertion. Journal of Nursing Education, 54 (3, Suppl.), S47-S51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-
20150218-09
Everly, M.C. 2013. Are students' impressions of improved learning through active learning methods reflected by improved test scores? Nurse
Jung, E-Y., Park, D.K., Lee, Y.H., Jo, H.S., Lim, Y.S., & Park, R.W. (2012). Evaluation of practical exercises using an intravenous simulator incorporating
virtual reality and haptics device technologies. Nurse Education Today, 32(4), 458-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.012
Lin, Z-C. (2013). Comparisons of technology-based cooperative learning with technology-based individual learning in enhancing fundamental
nursing proficiency. Nurse Education Today, 33, 546-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.12.006
McWilliams, L. A., Malecha, A., Langford, R., Clutter, P. (2017). Comparisons of cooperative based versus independent learning while using a haptic
intravenous simulator. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(4), 154-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.12.008
Reinhardt, A. C., Mullins, I. L., De Blieck, C. & Schultz, P. (2012). IV insertion simulation: Confidence, skill, and performance. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 8, e157-e167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.09.001
Contact
[email protected]
Critical Thinking and Decision-Making Skills of Nursing Students Basis for Designing Instructional Strategies
Joylyn Llamado Mejilla, MAN, Philippines
Abstract
Recognizing the important role of critical thinking and decision making skills in the field of nursing, these two essential competencies
were integrated in nursing education and practice to provide safe, effective, and efficient nursing care to their clients. Nurse
educators are facing great challenges in finding out the best way to teach these skills. Reforms and innovations in instructional
strategies must address the enhancement of these competencies for better patient outcomes. New and better teaching and learning
strategies to equip the students with the highest level of critical thinking and decision making skills will be the focus of this study.
This descriptive-correlational research study aimed to describe the level of critical thinking and the type of decision making skills of senior nursing
students. The result of the study was the basis for designing instructional strategies in teaching a major nursing course that will enhance the
development of critical thinking and decision making skills among senior nursing students.
Participants of the study were 241 Level IV students currently enrolled from the 10 leading colleges and universities of Nursing in Region-4A
commonly known as CALABARZON. The schools were selected based on the results of four Nurse Licensure Examinations from November 2014 to
June 2016. All Level IV students were included because of the decrease number of nursing enrolees in each of the selected school.
The CEU-Lopez Critical Thinking Test and Nursing Decision Making Instrument were utilized to measure critical thinking and decision making skills
respectively. The tools were adopted with the approval of the authors. The five aspects of critical thinking skills such as deduction, credibility,
assumptions, induction and meaning and the six stages of critical thinking development were included in the assessment of the level of critical
thinking skills. The types of decision making skills were analytical, intuitive or flexible (using both types).
In describing the profile of the nursing students to age, sex and grades in Nursing Care Management (NCM) courses as well as the level of critical
thinking skills of nursing students and type of decision making skills, frequency percentage, weighted mean, and standard deviation were utilized.
In determining correlations between the NCM grades, level of critical thinking skills and type of decision making Pearson-r was used. In determining
differences in the level of critical thinking skills and type of decision making skills of nursing students when grouped according to age and sex, T-test
and ANOVA were used.
Majority of the nursing students are 19 years old and female. The average mean grade in all Nursing Care Management (NCM) is satisfactory with a
mean grade of 2.31. NCM 100 (Fundamental of Nursing Practice) ranks first and is verbally interpreted as very satisfactory. All other NCM grades
are satisfactory.
Among the five aspects of critical thinking skills, nursing students are highest in assumption with a mean score of 6.87 and lowest in induction with
a mean score of 3.60. While in the stages of critical thinking development, 34 % of the nursing students are in the practicing stage and 30.7% in the
beginning stage of critical thinking skills.
The type of clinical decision making skills commonly used by 54.8% of the nursing students is flexible and 44.8% is analytical.
There is significant negative low correlation between NCM 100 grades and deduction, credibility and induction. There is significant negative
moderate correlation between NCM 100 grades and meaning and there is positive moderate correlation between NCM 100 grades and the stages
of critical thinking development. There is significant negative low correlation between NCM 101 grades and deduction and meaning while there is
significant positive low correlation between NCM 101 grades and induction and stages of critical thinking development. There is significant
negative low correlation between NCM 102 grades and induction, meaning, and stages of critical thinking development. There is significant
negative low correlation between NCM 103 grades and induction and meaning while there is significant positive low correlation between NCM
103 grades and stages of critical thinking development. There is significant negative low correlation between NCM 104 grades and meaning. There
is significant negative low correlation between NCM 105 grades and induction and meaning while there is significant positive low correlation
between NCM 105 grades and the stages of critical thinking development.
There is significant negative low correlation between the average NCM grades and deduction, induction, and meaning while there is significant
positive low correlation between the average NCM grades and the stages of critical thinking development.
There is no significant difference in the five aspects of critical thinking skills, stages of critical thinking development, and types of clinical
decision making skills of nursing students when grouped according to age. There is significant difference in the induction and types of decision
making skills of nursing students when grouped according to sex.
It is concluded that critical thinking skills of the nursing students are related in their NCM grades. The types of clinical decision making skills are not
related to the NCM grades of nursing students.
The use of more meaningful and highly engaging teaching and learning strategies must focus on improving the grades of students in their NCM
courses especially on medical and surgical concepts. Sex as one factor that influences the development of induction and types of decision making
skills must be considered in designing instructional strategies in teaching major courses in the nursing program.
It is recommended that the use of teaching and learning strategies in nursing must be chosen appropriately by the teachers to ensure greater
impact on critical thinking and decision making skills this may include but not limited to the use of case study, case problem, case report, research
case, and case scenario, concept mapping and the use of high fidelity simulation.
References
Azizi-Fini, I. Hajibagheri, A. & Adib-Hajbaghery, M. (2015). Critical thinking skills in nursing students: a Comparison between Freshmen and Senior
students. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2015 March; 4(1):e25721.
Ghazivakilf, Z. Norouzi Nia, R., Panahi, F. Karimi, M. Gholsorkhi, H. and Ahmadi, Z. (2014). The role of Critical Thinking Skills and learning styles of
university students in their academic performance. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. Vol 2 No 3.
Ho, S. Koo, YL. Ismail, S. Hing, HL. Widad, O. Chung, HT. Nabishah, M. Liu, CY & Ho, C. (2013). Clinical Decision Making ability of Nursing Students in
a Tertiary Hospital. Med and Health 2013; 8(2):73-80.
Papathanasiou, I. Kleisiaris, C. Fradelos, E. Kakou, K. and Kourkouta. L. (2014). Critical Thinking: The development of an essential skill for nursing
students. Acta Inform Med. 2014. Aug 22 (4): 283-286.
Salustiano, R. (2013). Correlation Analysis of Performance in College Admission Test, Nursing Aptitude Test, General Weighted Average and Nurse
Licensure Examination of Nursing Graduates. Arellano University Graduate School Journal, Vol 11, No 1.
Contact
[email protected]
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) Educational Strategies to Enhance Graduate/Undergraduate Nursing
Comprehension of Pathophysiology
Millie A. Hepburn, PhD, RN, USA
Karen A. Myrick, DNP, USA
Christopher M. Hakala, PhD, USA
Paul P. Pasquaretta, PhD, USA
Jeffrey E. Foy, PhD, USA
Rhea M. Sanford, PhD, RN, USA
Abstract
Background. Although much has been written about the value of the ‘flipped classroom’ and 'blended learning' as they pertain to
active participation in learning activities, much of today’s didactic classroom learning in nursing education is deeply rooted in
traditional passive techniques (Owsten,York & Murtha, 2013; Thai, De Wever & Valcke, 2017; Zacharis, 2015). The use of consistent
writing prompts in the discussion of varied problems and topics can serve to expand the breadth and depth of learning, and are used
in many university settings and schools (Baepler, Walker & Driessen, 2014). The concept of 'writing to learn' has been shown to
improve understanding and performance in a variety of settings, such as engineering (Goldberg, Rich & Masnick, 2014) and human
physiology (Bunker & Schnieder, 2015) to expand content knowledge. Given the time constraints involved in the delivery of complex,
content rich education in nursing, passive didactic learning represents a missed opportunity for undergraduate nursing students or
graduate doctoral students to engage in scholarly writing as a mechanism to enhance learning.
Method. In a university setting, when writing prompts are used in concert with culturally sensitive patient oriented problem scenarios related to
complex pathophysiology, nursing students have been shown to more able to integrate application knowledge related to the discipline of nursing.
Despite classrooms ranging in size from 28-141 students, randomly assigned student groups of 4-5 were assigned to address four general writing
prompts that were further articulated so as to be related to pathophysiology concepts. These prompts are as follows: 1. Identify the relevant
information and uncertainties, 2. Explore the interpretations and connections, 3. Prioritize alternatives and implement conclusions, and 4.
Integrate, monitor and refine strategies to re-address the problem. Students are asssigned to a patient oriented scenario that represents
application of classroom related pathophysiology content. These case scenarios also include human factors related to diseases and conditions, such
as health care access, concerns about loss of employment, or other social or economic challenges. In the context of small group dynamics and
delegation, students self assign to various sections of the assignment for completion, and then review their own writing, as well as their peers in
the group in advance of submission of their written work and in-class oral group presentation. Although students are not allowed to present using
powerpoint, they will often use other strategies to improve education to the class.
Although the WAC strategy was initiated in graduate pathophysiology, the opportunity for further development was realized at the senior, then
junior level undergraduate medical surgical nursing classes. The writing prompts facilitate student writing that engages the human effect of
pathophysiology, and necessitates the review of inter-professional literature. Through an exploration of culture, context, resource availability,
health policy and health disparities, students consistently report that they are able to retain knowledge in a context that promotes effective
nursing practice. Group presentation of material provides an opportunity to engage an additional touch point of knowledge just prior to unit or
comprehensive exams.
Outcomes. Faculty have identified that the students engaged quickly and deeply within the Writing across curriculum group assignments. Student
group presentations consistently reflect high levels of scholarship, depth of writing and innovative connections of the core pathophysiology content
to societal concerns, such as access to healthcare, processes involved in treatment and policy related to available treatment. Students report in
course evaluations that the use of the WAC strategy has deepened their knowledge of course content while providing the opportunity for
reflection and attentiveness to the humanistic and holistic nature of problems associated with various diseases and conditions. Through active and
engaged learning, students report the ability to synthesize and construct new knowledge, while concurrently reinforcing course content during the
group presentations in preparation for examinations and patient care. Regardless of level of student, the presentations have reflected scholarly
investment, and have been of consistently high quality. Two faculty members are assigned to grade both written work and oral presentations using
a developed rubric that was shared with students at time of assignment.
Conclusion. Multiple touch points of content rich information fosters a deep understanding of course content. Use of Writing across the
Curriculum (WAC) strategies have been shown to enhance learning in several university settings. Use of WAC in schools of nursing offers an ability
to apply complex and comprehensive pathophysiology knowledge to patient oriented problems faced by nurses in a variety of clinical settings and
across multiple levels of undergraduate and graduate nursing education.
Next steps. 1. Evaluate the relationship of the WAC strategy in undergraduate and graduate education to effective scholarly writing within
comprehensive capstone projects, 2. Evaluate the effect of WAC strategy on performance in licensure exams such as the NCLEX and nurse
practitioner examinations.
References
Baepler, P., Walker, J., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping and efficiency in active learning classrooms, Computers and
Education, 78, 227-236.
Bunker, A. & Schnieder, J. (2015). Writing across the curriculum in a human physiology class t build upon and expand content knowledge, €‚Athens
Journal of Education, 2(4), 331-343.
Goldberg, S, Rich, JA & Masnick, A.(2014) 121 ASEE Annual conference and
exposition, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=writing+across+the+curriculum+with+prompts+graduate+student&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%
2C7&as_ylo=2013 retrieved on February 21, 2017.
McLaughlin, J., Roth, M., Glatt, D., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. Griffin, L., Esserman, D. & Mumper, R. (2014). The Flipped Classroom: A
course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school, Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236-243.
Staples, S. Egbert, J, Biber, Gray, B. (2016). Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of
study, discipline and genre, Written Communication, 33(2), 149-183.
Thai, T., De Wever B. & Valcke M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the
best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback, Computers & Education 107, 113-126.
Contact
[email protected]
The Effects of Early Adoption of Academic Electronic Health Records System: A Pilot Outcome Study
Joohyun Chung, PhD, MStat, RN, USA
Teresa Reynolds, MS, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
The Electronic Health Records System (EHRs) provides a great set of functionalities as a form of health information technology
(Fareed, Bazzoli, Farnsworth Mick, & Harless, 2015). Nearly all reported hospitals (97%) possessed a certified EHR technology in 2014
(ONC, 2015). The wide adoption of electronic health records systems has led the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to emphasize the use of
informatics as a core competency required of all health care professions (Institute of Medicine [IOM], 2010). However, the nursing
profession has been slow to incorporate information technology into formal nursing education and practice (Meyer, Stenberger, &
Toscos, 2011; Pobocik, 2014; The TIGER Initiative).
Several studies show that nursing students are not comfortable using healthcare technology, and nurses in practice are not comfortable using EHRs
(Fetter, 2009; Kelley, Brandon, & Docherty, 2011). About three quarters of nurses reported spending at least 50% of their time using the EHRs,
which means less time for patient care (Johnson, et al., 2008). Another recent study reported that bedside nurses spend 4 hours per day
documenting using EHRs (Penoyer, et al., 2014). The high number of hours spent using EHRs may be associated with non-user-friendly systems or
nurses’ lack of competence with the electronic systems. It is imperative that the nursing students are able to use EHRs in their education so that
they will be more prepared to enter the profession with strong technology skills for nursing documentation (Meyer, et al., 2011; Chung & Cho,
2017).
In 2016, the academic EHRs was adopted to Accelerated bachelor of Science (ABS) Program (N=9) at one university in the Eastern United States. In
this study, the intentions of this study are two folds: (1) to examine the faculty’s and students’ perceptions of introducing academic EHRs system
for teaching/learning nursing documentation and (2) to assess the outcomes of academic EHRs on changes in nursing students’ readiness of nursing
documentation outcomes.
With this pilot study, a quantitative research design with supportive qualitative research will be used: (1) A qualitative descriptive research design
will be applied to gather the information on both faculty and students’ perceptions of academic EHRs in terms of nursing documentation and (2) A
two-group quasi-experimental pre/post design will be used to assess changes in nursing students’ readiness of nursing documentation. For
qualitative data, a purposive sample of faculty (5-7 nursing faculty) will be invited for the interview. The inclusion criteria for faculty are to teach
undergraduate nursing courses in Accelerated bachelor of Science (ABS) Program. All ABS students (N=9) will invited for the focus group discussion.
For quantitative data, a convenience sample of BSN nursing students (including ABS nursing students) at one university in the Eastern United States
will be invited. Student participants for quantitative data will be evaluated their readiness of the nursing documentation about patients using
Docucare. “Pre-worksheet” will be given to students. Using Docucare, students will be asked to review the patient information. Pre-worksheet has
two parts: (1) Roots and (2) Impression: (1) Roots: background & physiology, subjective findings, objective findings, recent lab results, and
medications, and (2) Impression: A: What are the issues with this patient and P: What are your priorities when you enter the room, what your plan
is. Students will conceptualize the patient information through the Docucare and students will be required to fill out the Pre-worksheet. Two
evaluating nursing faculty will independently evaluate the Pre-worksheet for readiness of the nursing documentation and critical thinking through
Docucare system.
For qualitative data, all interviews will be transcribed verbatim for analysis. The two researchers will be independently coded. The transcribed text
will be carefully read and thematic segments will be identified. Data segments will be grouped based on commonalities. For quantitative data,
changes in the accuracy of the students’ nursing documentation and communication ability will be assessed by comparing two groups. Specifically,
the regression discontinuity method will be used, in order to overcome the statistical problem of endogeneity of an explanatory variable in
observational data.
These findings will be very helpful to prepare students for the future of health information technology. Paper-based instruction may not be
sufficient for teaching electronic nursing documentation. Faculty and nursing students should be familiar with EHRs, but also to teach/learn how to
use academic EHRs meaningfully. Meaningful adoption of academic electronic health record systems will help in building the undergraduate
nursing students’ competence in nursing documentation with electronic health record systems and improve patient care.
References
Chung, J., & Cho, I. (2017). The need for academic electronic health record systems in nurse education. Nurse Educ Today, 54, 83-88.
doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.018
Fareed, N., Bazzoli, G.J., Farnworth Mick, S.S., & Harless, D.W. (2015). The influence of institutional pressures on hospital electronic health record
presence. Social Science & Medicine. 133, 28-35.
Fetter, M. S. (2009). Curriculum strategies to improve baccalaureate nursing information technology outcomes. J Nurs Educ, 48(2), 78-85.
Institute of Medicine. (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Retrieved from
http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12956&page=R1
Johnson, K., Valdez, R. S., Casper, G. R., Kossman, S. P., Carayon, P., Or, C. K., et al. (2008). Experiences of technology integration in home care
nursing. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 389-393.
Kelley, T. F., Brandon, D. H., & Docherty, S. L. (2011). Electronic nursing documentation as a strategy to improve quality of patient care. J Nurs
Scholarsh, 43(2), 154-162.
Meyer, L., Stenberger, C., & Toscos, T. (2011). How to implement the electronic health record in undergraduate nurse education. American Nurse
Today, 6(5).
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). (2015). Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S.
Non-Federal Acute Care hospitals. Retrieved from https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/data-brief/2014HospitalAdoptionDataBrief.pdf
Penoyer, D. A., Cortelyou-Ward, K. H., Noblin, A. M., Bullard, T., Talbert, S., Wilson, J., et al. (2014). Use of electronic health record documentation
by healthcare workers in an acute care hospital system. J Healthc Manag, 59(2), 130-144.
The TIGER Initiative. Informatics Competencies for Every Practicing Nurse: Recommendations from the TIGER Collaborative. Retrieved May 1, 2014
Contact
[email protected]
Improving Clinical Competence and Skills Acquisition by Student Nurses: Bridging the Preparation to
Practice Gap
Llynne C. Kiernan, DNP, MSN, RN-BC, USA
Abstract
Objective: As the need for more nurses increases due to healthcare reform, nursing schools must train and graduate students to
avoid the long term possibility of a nursing shortage. Changes in nursing education and training can help novice nurses (newly
graduated with less than a year of clinical experience) understand and mitigate error rates (Hickerson, Taylor, & Terhaar, 2016). The
implication is to improve patient care and reduce medical errors by improving the preparation of nursing students for their role in
the clinical setting by formalizing the process of skills acquisition and to foster critical thinking.
Innovative simulation technology can be used to assess nursing students’ competence and confidence in clinical skill acquisition and
documentation of those skills on a skills checklist. Feedback on student performance is an important aspect of deliberate practice and facilitates
the development of clinical practice habits. Nursing students who are exposed to a deliberate practice program in a simulation laboratory will be
competent and confident in safely performing those skills in the patient care setting.
Background: Today’s highly demanding healthcare environment requires effective use of critical thinking and motor skills in complex care
situations to achieve optimum patient outcomes. A major practice implication is to advocate for a culture of patient safety as the third leading
cause of death in hospitals is medical errors. Bridging the gap between nursing student and graduated nurse requires faculty to foster clinical
competence and confidence to promote positive patient outcomes and avoid medical error. One method of evaluation that nursing faculty can use
to assess student competency is simulation technology (Willhaus, Burleson, Palaganas, & Jeffries, 2014).
Baccalaureate nursing programs across the country have benchmarks established to ensure that programs are consistent in providing high-quality
education and clinical experiences sufficient to produce competent and safe professional nurses. Novice nurses are involved in medical errors with
poor patient outcomes. Patient falls, medication errors, and near-miss situations with adverse outcomes were identified as the primary types of
errors committed by novice nurses (Hickerson et al., 2016). The function of nursing education is to develop knowledgeable nurses capable of
providing safe, highly competent, and skilled patient care.
Significance: The third leading cause of death in the United States (U.S.) is preventable medical errors in hospitals with heart disease and cancer
occupying the first and second positions respectively (Perez, 2016). In 1999, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) published To Err is Human: Building a
Safer Health System that alerted healthcare professionals to the true scope of medical errors and quality problems. Since the IOM report on quality
and medical errors, healthcare providers, the public, and federal and state governments are seeking answers as to why medical errors are so
prevalent (Nickitas, Middaugh, & Aries, 2016). The impact of medical mistakes on segments of the U.S. patient population according to the
Department of Health and Human Services report in 2010 estimated that 180,000 Medicare patients die every year from preventable adverse
events that occur in hospitals (National Quality Forum, 2015).
A new paradigm in health care is focusing on clinical education to improve safe conditions with positive patient outcomes (Failla &
McCauley, 2014). According to Clapper and Kardong-Edgren (2012) a national survey reported clinical faculty spends 69% of their
valuable work time observing nursing students demonstrating clinical nursing skills. Nurse educators need to prepare students to
enter the complex healthcare environment with the skills and knowledge required to provide safe patient care (Sparacino, 2015).
Experienced nurse educators know that students who have not had enough practice experience in the simulation laboratory or real
clinical setting will not be able to perform a specific skill competently and proficiently every time (Clapper & Kardong-Edgren, 2012).
In the seminal work by Benner, Sutphen, Leonard and Day (2010) they assert that transformation of nursing education is necessary
in response to the changing needs of the patient population and complexities of nursing practice. Novice nurses must enter the
profession qualified to provide safe and effective care applying nursing knowledge from natural physical and biological sciences as
well as the social sciences and humanities.
Methods: The project framework will be a quality improvement pretest-posttest design using the Clinical Competency
Questionnaire, educational sessions, faculty demonstrations of clinical skills, repeat demonstrations by nursing students using
deliberate practice, and documentation of student demonstrations of skills on a skills checklist.
Participants: First semester junior baccalaureate nursing students.
Results: The project will result in improved student self-report of competence and confidence in clinical skill acquisition via deliberate practice and
documentation of those skills on a checklist.
Discussion: The concept of deliberate practice is the process of practicing specific skills repetitively with immediate feedback resulting in improved
skill performance in a controlled setting (Motola, Devine, Chung, Sullivan & Issenberg, 2013). Clinical skill acquisition requires nursing students to
spend time in the simulation laboratory to practice clinical skills repetitively and receive immediate feedback from faculty to reflect upon
(Oermann, 2011). Deliberate practice is a focused approach aimed at a well-defined goal not just mindless repetition of a task (Duvivier et al.,
2011). Duvivier et al. (2011) as well as Oermann et al. (2011) agree that the practical implementations of deliberate practice principles are based
on; repetitive performance of intended cognitive or psychomotor skills, rigorous skills assessment, specific feedback and improved skills
performance. Deliberate practice is not only for novices, nor does it require the examiner to have more technical skills, but are keen observers and
skilled at providing immediate feedback (Motola et al., 2013). Findings from this project will support the ongoing measurement of nursing students’
clinical skills and their perceived competence and confidence in those skills. The project will demonstrate the use of simulation technology as an
effective means of improving clinical competency and confidence, which will ultimately improve patient outcomes.
References
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses a call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Bensfield, L., Olech, M., & Horsley, T. (2012). Simulation for high-stakes evaluation in nursing. Nurse Educator, 37(2), 71-77.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e31822461b8c
Clapper, T., & Kardong-Edgren, S. (2012). Using deliberate practice and simulation to improvenursing skills. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8(3),
e109-e113. doi:10.101016/j.ecns.2010.12.001
Duvivier, R., van Dalen, J., Muijtjens, A., Moulaert, V., van der Vleuten, C., & Scherpbier, A. (2011). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition
of clinical skills. BioMed Central Medical Education, 11(101), 1-7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-101
Failla, K. R., & McCauley, K. (2014). Interprofessional simulation: a concept analysis. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10(11), 574-580.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.07.006
Hickerson, K., Taylor, L., & Terhaar, M. (2016). The preparation-practice gap: An integrative Literature review. Journal of Continuing Education in
Nursing, 47(1), 17-23. doi:10.3928/00220124-20151230-06
Lynn, M. C., & Twigg, R. D. (2011). A new approach to clinical remediation. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(3), 172-175.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20101230-12
Motola, I., Devine, L., Chung, H., Sullivan, J., & Issenberg, S. B. (2013). Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. Medical
Teacher, 35, e1511-e1530. doi: 10.3109/01421159X.2013.818632
National Quality Forum (2015). Patient safety measures. Retrieved from http://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/Safe_Practices_2010.aspx
Nickitas, D., Middaugh, D. & Aries, N. (2016). Policy and politics for nurses and other health professionals: Advocacy and action, (2nd ed.) Burlington,
MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Oermann, M. H. (2011). Toward evidenced-based nursing education: deliberate practice and motor skill learning. Journal of Nursing Education,
50(2), 63-65. doi:10.3928/01484834-20110120-01
Oermann, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., Odom-Maryon, T., Hallmark, B., Hurd, D., Roders, N., …Smart, D. (2011). Deliberate practice of motor skills in
nursing education: cpr as an exemplar. Nursing Education Perspective, 32(5), 311-315.
Perez, K. (2016). The human and economic costs of medical errors. Retrieved from https://www.hfma.org/Content.aspx?id=48695
Sparacino, L. (2015). Faculty’s role in assisting new graduate nurses’ adjustment to practice. International Journal of Nursing, 2(2), 37-46. doi:
10.15640/ijn.v2n2a5
Willhaus, J., Burleson, G., Palaganas, J., & Jeffries, P. (2014). Authoring simulation for high stakes student evaluation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing,
10(4), e177-e182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.11.006
Contact
[email protected]
View and Do Simulation Method: Small Group Learning Experiences for Large Cohort RN Residencies
Marrice A. King, MSN, RN-BC, CNOR, USA
Shelby Lash, MSN, RN, USA
Abstract
Background: Baptist Health South Florida has markedly increased the number of nurses it on-boards into its American Nurses
Credentialing Center (ANCC), accredited new graduate and transitional residency program. This influx of nurses has created
challenges for the Patient Care Simulation Lab resources including space, time, and faculty. The “View and Do” method of simulation
is an innovative educational tool providing small group experiences for large groups of learners. It is intended to increase the
number of simulated experiences, while maintaining efficiency and effectiveness of the learning experience.
Purpose: Traditionally, simulation is conducted with small groups that has proven to be time consuming, labor intensive, and cost prohibitive. The
“View” and “Do” method of simulation is an innovative educational tool providing small group experiences for large groups of learners. It is
intended to increase the number of simulated experiences, while maintaining efficiency and effectiveness of the learning experience. The purpose
of this study was to evaluate differences in the satisfaction and self-confidence of large cohorts of resident nurses participating as either “viewers”
or “doers” during simulated learning experiences.
Method: A cross-sectional, observational study design was utilized with a convenience sample of registered nurses hired into the Baptist Health
South Florida New Graduate or Transitional Residency program with a total of 63 participants. The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in
Learning instrument developed by the National League for Nursing, consisting of 13 questions using a five-point Likert scale (1= Strongly Disagree,
5= Strongly agree), was utilized to measure the satisfaction and self-confidence in learning of the participants.
Results: A paired-samples t-test was conducted to evaluate the impact of “view” and “do” on the participants Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in
learning. There was no statistically significant difference in Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in learning total scores between “View” (M = 57.46, SD
= 10.3) and “Do” (M = 57.67, SD = 7.4), t (62) = -.199, p = .83
Conclusion: The results are comparable to the original “View and Do” study conducted by Clark and Hammond (2015) indicating that this method
of simulation is a viable education tool for providing simulation experiences to large groups of nurse resident’s. The “View” and “Do” simulation
method will increase opportunities for learning and practicing in a controlled environment, while preparing residents for a safe transition to
practice.
References
Clark, S. (2015, June). Viewing or doing: Effective high fidelity simulation for large groups. Poster session presented at the Annual Conference of the
International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning, Atlanta, GA.
Eppich, W., & Cheng, A. (2015). Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS). Development and rational for a blended
approach to health care simulation debriefing. Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 10(2), 106-115. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000072
Glenn, K. A., & McKinney, E. M. (2015). Running simulation for large groups is a team sport. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(2), 108-109.
doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.08.007
Hooper, B., Shaw, L., & Zamzam, R. (2015). Implementing high-fidelity simulations with large groups of nursing students. Nurse Educator, 40(2), 87-
90. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000101
Jeffries, P. R., & Rizzolo, M. A. (2006). Designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults
and children: A national, multi-site –method study. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.
Levett-Jones, T., Andersen, P., Reid-Searl, K., Guinea, S., McAllister, M., Lapkin, S., Niddrie, M. (2015). Tag team simulation: An innovative approach
for promoting active engagement of participants and observers during group simulations. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(5), 345-352.
doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2015.03.014
NLN SIRC Simulation Innovation Resource Center. (2004). [NLN/Laerdal Research Study Instruments]. Student satisfaction and self-confidence in
learning [Instrument]. Available from http://sirc.nln.org/mod/page/view.php?id=88
Norman, J., Thompson, S., & Missildine, K. (2013). The 2-minute drills: Incorporating simulation into a large lecture format. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 9(10), e433-436. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2012.08.004
Rochester, S. K. (2012). Providing simulation experiences for large cohorts of 1st year nursing students: Evaluating quality and impact. Collegian,
19(3), 117-124.
Tosterud, R., Hall-Lord, M. L., Petzall, K., & Hedelin, B. (2014). Debriefing in simulation conducted in small and large groups – nursing students’
experiences. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 4(9), 173-182. doi:10.5430/jnep.v4n9p173.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Center for Health Workforce Analysis.
(2014). The future of the nursing workforce: National- and state-level projections, 2012-2025. Rockville, MD.
Contact
[email protected]
An Assessment of Errors and Near-Misses From Prelicensure Nursing Students
Megan Wolfe, DNP, FNP, RN, RD, CMSRN, CNE, USA
Abstract
Background: Approximately one-half of new nurses with less than one year of experience who were involved in adverse patient
events identified that their formal education preparation was a causal factor in their error (Saintsing, Gibson & Pennington, 2011).
An examination of quality and safety measures of a current hospital based associate degree nursing (ADN) educational program
provided data regarding errors committed by prelicensure students. Tracking and analysis of frequency and type of student clinical
errors provided for identification of similarities and an opportunity for system evaluation and improvements.
Objectives: To identify the number, types and categories of Student Opportunity for Improvement (SOFI) reports generated by a hospital based
ADN program over a four-year period from July 30th 2012 through July 30th 2016 and to compare the reports by academic term, the student’s
previous healthcare experience, and student age.
Methods: A twenty-four month retrospective comparative design was utilized, in a private, non-profit 2-year ADN program in the northeastern
region of the United States with an enrollment of approximately 300 students. The target population was all enrolled prelicensure nursing students
between the ages of 18 and 60 who have had a SOFI report filed. A convenience sample was utilized. Students who were dismissed from the
program due to either academic or clinical failures but who have had at least one SOFI filed were included in the study population. The number and
types of SOFI reports generated with the previously discussed demographic variables were measured.
Results: A total of 266 SOFI forms were examined. One-hundred five SOFI reports were associated with the first two semesters of the program
while 161 SOFI reports were associated with semesters 3 and 4. Students that had prior healthcare experience completed 25% of the SOFI forms,
and 64.3% of the SOFI forms were associated with students 30 years of age or older. Fifty-one SOFI reports were constructed after an
Evening/Weekend curricular change as compared to 30 SOFI reports prior to the change. All differences were statistically significant at an alpha
level of 0.05.
Conclusions: The challenge associated with nursing education is building an educational foundation and the promotion of an appropriate culture
wherein students can learn from their mistakes and near-misses while the errors/near-misses are caught before they reach the patient. A broader
and increased knowledge base regarding the clinical errors and near-misses that are conducted by pre-licensure RN students can only assist faculty
with regard to the more thorough preparation of these future providers.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (n.d.) The Six Domains of Health Care Quality. Retrieved January 30, 2016, from
https://cahps.ahrq.gov/consumer-reporting/talkingquality/create/sixdomains.html
Bush, P. A., Hueckel, R. M., Robinson, D., Seelinger, T. A., & Molloy, M. A. (2015). Cultivating a culture of medication safety in pre-licensure nursing
students. Nurse Educator, 40(4), 169-173.
Disch, J., & Barnsteiner, J. (2014). Developing a reporting and tracking tool for nursing student errors and near misses. Journal of Nursing
Regulation, 5(1), 4-10.
Institute of Medicine (IOM) (1999). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Saintsing, D., Gibson, L. M., & Pennington, A. W. (2011). The novice nurse and clinical decision‐making: How to avoid errors. Journal of Nursing
Management, 19(3), 354-359.
Contact
[email protected]
Impact of Hybrid Teaching on Prelicensure Baccalaureate Nursing Students
Jennifer Bialk, MSN, USA
Georganne Poole, MSN, USA
Jean Madden, MSN, USA
Barbera Radford, MS, USA
Leslie S. Reifel, MSN, USA
Victoria S. Brioso-Ang, MSN, USA
Abstract
Introduction: The demand for professional baccalaureate-educated nurses (BSN) is increasing (“Employment of New Nurse
Graduates,” 2016). What prelicensure nursing program characteristics are associated with students passing the National Council
Licensure Examination (NCLEX) (“NCSBN NCLEX & Other Exams,” 2017)? Is there some combination of student characteristics or
clinical and didactic outcomes that will predict which students will successfully pass the NCLEX? Do teaching methods or students’
use of technology influence NCLEX scores? A previous Sentara College of Health Science’s project identified that student
characteristics are important in understanding why BSN students succeed (Banks, C et al., 2013). Further research emphasizes the
need for RNs within our own health system has increased from 40% to 80% in the past 4 years (Downs & Taylor, 2016).
The initial aims of this study were threefold: (1) to test whether there were associations between student characteristics and NCLEX pass/fail rates;
(2) to test whether there was an association between academic performance in didactic and clinical courses; and (3) to test whether scores in both
didactic and clinical courses were significant predictors of NCLEX success. The nursing program adopted hybrid teaching and classroom technology
after data collection began. High fidelity clinical simulations were also developed at this time. These changes also may have affected our findings.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of data collected within the nursing program at Sentara College of Health Sciences between Fall 2012 and
Spring 2015. Data was examined for the 253 nursing students who were enrolled and graduated during this time period. Student characteristics
(race, age, gender, marital status, military experience, VA eligibility, and scholarship), as well as clinical and didactic course performance were
examined. Student data was protected as required by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.
Results: Aim 1: Chi-square tests were performed to test differences in NCLEX. There were no statistically significant differences in NCLEX pass/fail
rates based on student characteristics (race, age, gender, marital status, military experience, VA eligible, and scholarship).
Aim 2: A bivariate correlation showed a statistically significant positive association between average didactic and clinical scores. Specifically, higher
scores in didactic classes were associated with higher scores in clinical classes, r =.545, p <.001, R2 = .297.
Aim 3: Binary logistic regression was used to test hypotheses that scores in both didactic and clinical courses were significant predictors of NCLEX
success. When included separately in the model, the average didactic variable was a significant predictor of NCLEX pass/fail (OR = 1.21, 95% CI
[1.03 1.43], with 6% NCLEX variance explained); while the average clinical variable was not a significant predictor of NCLEX pass/fail (OR = 1.10, 95%
CI [.88 1.38], with less than 1% NCLEX variance explained).
Post-hoc exploratory analyses of each course individually: Higher final numeric grade in the course, NUR 410 Adult Nursing II was statistically
significantly associated with greater likelihood of passing the NCLEX, OR = 1.36, 95% CI [1.09 1.70]. Finally, although the course, NUR 315
Fundamentals of Nursing Practice final numeric grades were not statistically significantly associated with NCLEX pass/fail rate, performance in NUR
315 correlated to 9.4% of NCLEX success, which may be relevant.
Conclusion: What accounted for the differences in NUR 410 Adult Nursing II from other nursing courses and why did it correlate to NCLEX success?
To answer this question, a comparison was made of our first-attempt NCLEX pass rates to state and national rates for the time period of 2012 to
2015. In 2012, our first-time pass rate was 96.3% (Virginia Board of Nursing, 2017) compared with 90.4 % for the state of Virginia and 90.34%
nationally (National Council of State Boards of Nursing, 2015). In 2013, there were many changes to the NCLEX examination and our rate dropped
to 83% (Virginia Board of Nursing, 2017), compared to 83.1% for state and 83.04% nationally (National Council of State Boards of Nursing, 2015).
As a result, many changes were made in our classrooms. The School of Nursing adopted hybrid teaching. Hybrid teaching mixes a variety of
teaching techniques, learning styles and delivery methods (Linder, K, 2017). In our nursing program, didactic content is delivered online via lecture
capture. The didactic content is reviewed and applied during face-to-face classroom time. Depending on the course, up to 49% of the didactic
material can be delivered online. Additionally, classroom technology (lecture capture videos, Assessment Technology Institute modules, One-Link
learning modules, games, polling, blogs, discussion boards, webcams and smartphones for recording student videos, computer-based concept
mapping, Quizlet, WebQuest and voice-over PowerPoint) was also adopted. High fidelity simulations were developed and added to clinical courses.
These actions seem to have delivered results because in 2014, our pass rate was 93.33% (Virginia Board of Nursing, 2017), compared to 82.9% for
the state and 81.78% for the nation (National Council of State Boards of Nursing, 2015). In 2015, our pass rate was 96.9% (Virginia Board of
Nursing, 2017) compared to 87% for the state of Virginia and 84.53% nationally (National Council of State Boards of Nursing, 2016). These results
confirmed our pass rates were improving.
When examining the results of our courses, Nursing Fundamentals and Adult Nursing II correlated with student success on NCLEX. Nursing
Fundamentals reinforces lecture capture concepts with classroom activities, ATI modules and Sentara Healthcare online One-Link modules.
Students learn the nursing process in this course and practice application of this process. Adult Nursing II reinforces lecture capture videos with
multiple case studies requiring critical thinking and application during the face-to-face classroom time. This is supported by NCLEX-style questions
and use of ATI modules which reinforces the learning. In conclusion, while grades in Adult Nursing II appear to correlate to passing NCLEX, the
changes in teaching methods and increased use of technology may have also influenced these positive results.
References
Badir, A, Zeybekoğlu, Z., Karacay, P., Göktepe, N., Topcu, S., Yalcin, B., Kebapci, A., Oban, G. (2015, March/April) Using high-fidelity simulation as a
learning strategy in an undergraduate intensive care course. Nurse Educator, 40 (2), E1-E6.
Banks, C, Brenner, M, Brioso-Ang, V, Ferguson, R, Gehosky, K, Poole, G, Radford, B, Roberts, M (2013, May). Predictors of academic success among
pre-licensure baccalaureate nursing students. Poster session presented at: Sentara Research Symposium; 2013 May 17; Chesapeake, VA
Dankbaar, M. (2016, December). Serious games and blended learning; effects on performance and motivation in medical education. Perspectives in
Medical Education, 6, 58-60. doi: 10.1007/s40037-016-0320-2
Downs, P, Taylor, A (2016, April). Considerations for students returning to school for BSN or higher. Sentara Nurse. Retrieved from
https://wavenet.sentara.com/sites/SearchCenter/Pages/ContentResults.aspxConsiderations%20for%20Students%20Returning%20to%20 Scho
ol%20for%20BSN%20or%20Higher
Employment of new nurse graduates and employer preferences for baccalaureate-prepared nurses (2016, November). Retrieved from
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/leading-initiatives/research-data/employment16.pdf
Forbes, H., Oprescu, F, Downer, T., Phillips, N., McTier, L., Lord, B., Barr, N., Alla, K., Bright, P., Dayton, J., Simbag, V. Visser, I. (2016, March). Use of
videos to support teaching and learning of clinical skills in nursing education: A review. Nurse Education Today, 42, 53-56. doi:
10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.010
Hanson, J. (2015, September). Surveying the experiences and perceptions of undergraduate nursing students of a flipped classroom approach to
increase understanding of drug science and its application to clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 16, 79-85. doi:
10.1016/j.nepr.2015.09.001
Linder, K (2017, March). Fundamentals of hybrid teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 149, 11-18. doi: 10.1002/tl
National Council of State Boards of Nursing [NCSBN] (2015, July). 2012 and 2013 nurse licensee volume and NCLEX examination statistics. NCSBN
Research Brief, 61, 38
National Council of State Boards of Nursing [NCSBN] (2015, July). 2012 and 2013 nurse licensee volume and NCLEX examination statistics. NCSBN
Research Brief, 61, 75
National Council of State Boards of Nursing [NCSBN] (2015, July). 2014 nurse licensee volume and NCLEX examination statistics. NCSBN Research
Brief, 64, 27
National Council of State Boards of Nursing [NCSBN] (2016, May). 2015 nurse licensee volume and NCLEX examination statistics. NCSBN Research
Brief, 68, 18
NCSBN NCLEX & other exams (2017, 17 May). Retrieved from https://www.ncsbn.org/nclex.htm
Posey, L, Pintz, C. (2016, October). Transitioning a bachelor of science in nursing program to blended learning: Successes, challenges & outcomes.
Nurse Education in Practice, XXX, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.10.006
Sweeney, M., Kirwan, A. Kelly, M., Corbally, M., O Neill, S., Kirwan, M., Hourican, S., Matthews, A., Hussey, P. (2016, May). Transition to blended
learning: Experiences from the first year of our blended learning bachelor of nursing studies programme. Contemporary Nurse, 52(5), 612-624. doi:
10.1080/10376178.2016.1197781
Virginia. Department of Health Professions. (n.d.) NCLEX pass rates for baccalaureate degree nursing education programs. Retrieved from
https://www.dhp.virginia.gov/nursing_edprogs.htm
Contact
[email protected]
Using Virtual Patient Simulation in Substitution of Traditional Clinical Hours in Undergraduate Nursing
Francisco Jimenez, PhD, MA, USA
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, undergraduate nursing education has been facing numerous challenges as the demand for nurses
continues to increase. The shortage of nursing faculty in addition to increased student enrollment has put a greater burden on the
limited resources available in most programs (Cobbett & Snelgrove-Clarke, 2016; Foronda, Godsall, & Trybulski, 2013; Foronda &
Bauman, 2014; Laure, Pepin, & Allard, 2015). There is also a shortage of the clinical placements necessary to provide students with
the education and experience necessary to become a competent and autonomous professional nurse (Cobbett & Snelgrove-Clarke,
2016; Foronda et al., 2013, 2014; Khalaila, 2014, Laure et al., 2015). Given these persistent challenges, many nursing programs have
started to substitute students’ traditional hours with some form of simulation. The National Council for State Boards of Nursing
Simulation Study provided evidence that substituting high-quality simulation experiences for traditional clinical hours results in
comparable educational outcomes in undergraduate nursing clinical courses (Hayden, Smiley, Alexander, Kardong-Edgren, & Jeffries,
2014).
In nursing education, simulation is usually defined as the most accurate possible representation of a care situation and can be categorized relative
to its degree of clinical fidelity: high, intermediate, or low (Laure et al., 2015). Virtual patient simulations are considered to be high-fidelity
simulations because they are “extremely realistic and provide a high level of interactivity and realism for the learner” (Meakim, Boese, & Decker,
2013, p.6). Virtual patient simulations have been found to be comparable or superior to other high-fidelity traditional simulation methods due to a
variety of reasons. In an integrative review of 12 studies published between 2008 and 2015, Duff, Miller, and Bruce (2016) found that virtual
patients and simulated scenarios were comparable or superior to traditional simulation methods for teaching diagnostic reasoning and assessment
skills in terms of increased student learning, satisfaction, and engagement.
The purpose of this study was to investigate how pre- (BSN) and post-licensure (RN-BSN) nursing faculty are using virtual patient simulations to
replace traditional clinical hours, and to describe the role that various integration use cases may play in improving the preparation of students as
more nursing schools decide to adopt this technology into their curriculum.
Methods: Participants. Of the entire population of faculty using the Health Assessment Digital Clinical ExperienceTM (DCE) during the 2017 spring
and summer semesters, 185 faculty responded to an online evaluation survey administered at the end of their health assessment course. The final
sample for the quantitative portion of the study were 78 undergraduate faculty (47 BSN and 31 RN-BSN) in 56 nursing schools across the United
States who indicated use of the DCE in lieu of traditional clinical hours on the survey. In addition, follow-up semi-structured interviews were
conducted with 10 faculty from that group (5 BSN and 5 RN-BSN).
Materials. The DCE is an online, asynchronous virtual patient clinical simulation that provides an immersive experience designed to improve
students’ assessment skills and clinical reasoning through the examination of virtual patients. Across different assignments, students can practice
taking a detailed health history, perform physical assessments in single-system exams, and conduct focused exams to rule out causes of a virtual
patient’s chief complaint. After each assignment, students complete post-exam activities where they can apply content knowledge as well as self-
reflect on their performance. When students submit their assignment to their instructor, they receive a score and immediate feedback on several
aspects of their performance, including subjective data collection, objective data collection, and on their ability to identify opportunities to engage
in therapeutic communication. These performance assessment instruments have been previously validated for nursing accuracy and learning value
by several subject-matter experts.
Measures. The researchers developed a 32-item survey to assess how undergraduate faculty used the DCE in lieu of traditional clinical hours in
their health assessment courses. Specifically, the survey explored different topics ranging from how they used each of the assignments in class
(e.g., as part of the lecture led by instructor or as classroom group activity led by students) to how they used it to assess student performance (i.e.,
open practice, formative pass/fail or lab pass, summative with letter grade, or test). The survey included two closed-ended questions directed to
the use of the DCE as a replacement of traditional clinical hours: “Did the time students spent in the DCE replaced any portion of their required
traditional clinical hours?” (response categories: Yes/No), and “What portion of your courses required clinical hours were met by the DCE?”
(response categories: 10% or less, between 11% and 25%, between 26% and 50%, more than 50%). The survey also included included
demographics and teaching background questions (i.e., gender, race/ethnicity, years of teaching experience, length of DCE use, course modality,
and number of students taught). Semi-structured interviews included open-ended questions about how faculty were using the DCE to replace
traditional clinical hours in their courses: “How does your institution fulfill the remainder of the clinical hours requirement?”, What drove you to
the decision to use the DCE (or simulation in general) to satisfy clinical hours requirements?”, and “What reasons would an institution have to not
use the DCE (or simulation in general) to fulfill clinical hours requirements?”.
Procedure. Each participating faculty received a link to the online survey instruments shortly after they course ended. The researchers directly
reached out to those interested in participating in the semi-structured interviews.
Analysis. The data included in this study employed both quantitative and qualitative elements in a mixed-model design (Johnson & Onwuegbuzie,
2004). We used descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis to compare BSN and RN-BSN faculty responses on the survey. Responses to the open-
ended interview questions were first coded for distinct concepts and themes in each faculty group separately. Then, responses were counted
within each of the identified themes to obtain frequencies of occurrence.
Results: Quantitative results. The majority of the participating BSN faculty taught health assessment face-to-face (88%), while the
majority of the RN-BSN faculty taught health assessment online (69%). Compared to BSN faculty, RN-BSN faculty who teach online
are significantly more likely to spend replace more hours of traditional clinical time with the DCE. RN-BSN faculty are also more likely
to use the DCE in a more formative manner, while BSN faculty in a more summative manner.
Qualitative results. The main themes emerging among responses from BSN faculty were: 1) DCE helps maximize resources in light of
shortage of sites and personnel, 2) DCE provides a safe practice environment for students to practice, and 3) DCE provides
meaningful learning outcomes compared to traditional clinical hours. The main themes emerging among responses from RN-BSN
faculty were: 1) DCE replaces minimum interaction hours with a preceptor, 2) DCE provides meaningful learning outcomes compared
to traditional clinical hours, and 3) DCE allows students to practice skills and run emergency scenarios.
Conclusion and implications for nurse educators: In light of persistent shortages of clinical placements and faculty, undergraduate
nursing programs are in an increasing need of a variety of simulation modalities to achieve their learning objectives assessment
outcomes. Virtual patient simulations present a flexible and standardized option for faculty when it comes to replace traditional
clinical hours. This study found that faculty teaching both learning populations find that virtual patient simulations provide
meaningful learning outcomes compared to traditional clinical hours. This study also found that BSN and RN-BSN faculty may have
different needs for replacing traditional clinical hours with virtual patient simulations (safe practice environment vs. replacing
minimum interaction with preceptors), and that RN-BSN faculty teaching online health assessment courses are more likely to use
virtual patient simulation in lieu of clinical hours in a formative manner. The findings of this study can be used to add additional
evidence to case for using virtual patients in nursing education, but more importantly, it can be used to help faculty better frame the
design, use, and value of virtual patients for their different student populations.
References
1. Cobbett, S., & Snelgrove-Clarke, E. (2016). Virtual versus face-to-face clinical simulation in relation to student knowledge, anxiety, and
self-confidence in maternal-newborn nursing: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Education Today, 45, 179-184.
2. Duff, E., Miller, L., & Bruce, J. (2016). Online virtual simulation and diagnostic reasoning: A scoping review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing,
12(9), 377-384.
3. Foronda, C., & Bauman, E. B. (2014). Strategies to incorporate virtual simulation in nurse education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10(8),
412-418.
4. Foronda, C., Godsall, L., & Trybulski, J. (2013). Virtual clinical simulation: the state of the science. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(8), 279-
286.
5. Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., Jeffries, P. R. (2014). The NCSBN National Simulation Study: A longitudinal,
randomized controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation,
5(2), 1–64.
6. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J., (2004, October). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come.
Educational Researcher, 33, 14-26.
7. Khalaila, R. (2014). Simulation in nursing education: an evaluation of students' outcomes at their first clinical practice combined with
simulations. Nurse education today, 34(2), 252-258.
8. Larue, C., Pepin, J., & Allard, É. (2015). Simulation in preparation or substitution for clinical placement: A systematic review of the
literature. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 5(9), 132-140.
9. Meakim, C., Boese, T., Decker, S., Franklin, A. E., Gloe, D., Lioce, L., Sando, C. R., & Borum, J. C. (2013). Standards of best practice:
Simulation standard I: Terminology. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6(9), S3-S11.
Contact
[email protected]
Post-Simulation Reflections: A Qualitative Review After Implementation of Video Debriefing Changes
Gunnar W. Larson, DNP, USA
Abstract
Background: Simulation is being used in nursing education to substitute for traditional clinical experiences (Curl, Smith, Chisholm,
McGee, & Das, 2016). The best use of video as an adjunct to debriefing remains a question (Cheng et al., 2016; Grant, Dawkins,
Molhook, Keltner, & Vance, 2014; Reed, Andrews, & Ravert, 2013; Rossignol, 2017). Reflection is regarded as formal constituent of
the learning process (Cheng, Eppich, Grant, Sherbino, Zendejas, & Cook, 2014; Forneris et al., 2015; Kolb & Kolb, 2005; Schön, 1987).
A four-hour patient deterioration simulation has evolved over several years at a small mid-western College of Nursing. Two faculty, with several
years of experience facilitating simulations, alternated facilitation of the simulation with second semester juniors. Students came in pairs having
prior access to readings and a patient chart. Prebriefing and debriefing were loosely scripted. Students would observe as the peer cared for a high
fidelity simulation patient. One student started with the patient and after completing a psychomotor skill related to a deterioration, reported off to
the other student. After report, the first student observes while the patient undergoes further deterioration and another psychomotor skill.
Debriefing included some video review of student experience. This generally consisted of fast forwarding through the experience with occasional
focal points and then concentrating on the two skills embedded in the simulation. As part of the experience, students were required to write a
reflection paper answering four questions within 48 hours.
Until recently, the intentional implementation of the INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM was neglected at this institution. One of the
faculty is newly certified as a Healthcare Simulation educator and the patient deterioration simulation has been revised to reflect the INACSL
Standards of Best Practice: Simulation. The certified faculty member is now the only facilitator of the simulation. Because the adjunct use of video
during debriefing is still uncertain, it has been removed from the debriefing process. However, the first cohort in the revised simulation will be
provided the opportunity to review some video of their experience before writing a reflection paper answering the same four questions.
Purpose: To explore nursing students' perceptions of reviewing video of themselves in a simulated experience.
Design: A qualitative descriptive research approach will be applied.
Method: A pilot study will randomize the new cohort of students into two groups. After the debriefing session, students will have 2 hours to review
their video and 48 hours to write their reflection. One group will be given access to their entire simulation experience and the other group will be
given access to the psychomotor skill embedded in the simulation. The reflective documentation written after the patient deterioration simulation
will be subjected to qualitative content analysis for salient themes.
Significance: The pilot study will begin a larger study of video debriefing methods. There is a small window of opportunity to utilize data already
gathered to examine student responses unstructured by current tools. This may provide some insight to further inform the larger study.
References
Cheng, A., Eppich, W., Grant, V., Sherbino, J., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D.A. (2014). Debriefing for technology-enhanced simulation: A systematic
review and meta-analysis. Medical Education, 48(7), 657–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.12432
Cheng, A., Grant, V., Robinson, T., Catena, H., Lachapelle, K., Kim, J., … Eppich, W. (2016). The promoting excellence and reflective learning in
simulation (PEARLS) approach to health care debriefing: A faculty development guide. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(10), 419-428.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.05.002
Curl, E.D., Smith, S., Chisholm, L.A., McGee, L.A., & Das, K. (2016). Effectiveness of Integrated Simulation and Clinical Experiences Compared to
Traditional Clinical Experiences for Nursing Students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 37(2), 72-77. doi:10.5480/15-1647
Forneris, S.G., Neal, D.O., Tiffany, J., Kuehn, M.B., Meyer, H.M., Blazovich, L.M., & Smerillo, M. (2015). Enhancing clinical reasoning through
simulation debriefing: a multisite study. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36,(5), 304–310. doi:10.5480/15-1672
Grant, J.S., Dawkins, D., Molhook, L., Keltner, N.L., & Vance, D.E. (2014). Comparing the effectiveness of video-assisted oral debriefing and oral
debriefing alone on behaviors by undergraduate nursing students during high-fidelity simulation. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(5), 479-484.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.05.003
Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy Of Management
Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.
Reed, S. J., Andrews, C. M., & Ravert, P. (2013). Debriefing simulations: Comparison of debriefing with video and debriefing alone. Clinical
Simulation in Nursing, 9(12), e585-e591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.05.007
Rossignol, M. (2017). Effects of video-assisted debriefing compared with standard oral debriefing. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(4), 145-153.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.12.001.
Schön, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Contact
[email protected]
The Global Nursing Education Study in an Online Graduate Course: Phase I
Diana K. Bond, PhD, MSN, RN-BC, CNE, USA
Carol E. Winters, PhD, MSN, BA, RN, CNE, USA
Abstract
The purpose of the Global Nursing Education Study is to develop an increased global perspective about nursing education with
online Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) degree students in the Nursing Education (NE) concentration using virtual video-recorded
interviews with nurses or nursing faculty members from other countries. Phase I involved the creation of the videos. The researchers
will implement phase II in 2018 and will compare the effects of the interviews to traditional readings among students in our MSN-NE
concentration at one southeastern public university in the United States. We anticipate that one of the long-term effects of the
study will be that our graduates will develop a more global perspective that will be translated into their teaching of nursing students,
staff, patients, and families from other countries and cultures.
The increasing global population of the United States means that nurses need to be able to provide appropriate care for patients and families from
all areas of the world. Additionally, the increasing global changes in health have the potential to affect persons who reside anywhere in the world.
MSN-NE students are registered nurses (RN) who have returned to graduate school via distance/online technology to learn how to become nurse
educators. Upon graduation, our students are often employed as nurse educators in community colleges, universities, or as educators in hospitals
or other community settings where they teach students, patients and families, or staff members. Having an increased global perspective will enable
our students to be better prepared to teach these leaners.
Included within the 2011 American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) “Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing” document was the
statement that an essential core outcome was to “Apply advanced knowledge of the effects of global environmental, individual and population
characteristics to the design, implementation, and evaluation of care” (p.28). To meet this standard, one of the strategies in our NE courses was to
assign students to complete the educational modules at the “Think Cultural Health” web page (Office of Minority Health, 2012). While this was
helpful to our students, we felt that a different strategy that more closely aligned global perspectives with our NE course objectives was needed.
Identifying strategies to teach global nursing across all curricula is important (Wilson et al., 2012). Wilson et al. (2012) identified essential global
health competencies for undergraduate nursing students and stated that more work was needed to clarify competencies at the graduate level. In a
systematic review of studies of strategies to teach a global perspective, Gallagher and Polanin (2015) found only four of the 25 studies included
graduate students. None of the studies were MSN students in an NE concentration in an online environment. The most common teaching
strategies found by Gallagher and Polanin (2015) were lecture, simulation, role play, and immersion experiences. Dawson, Gakumo, Phillips and
Wilson (2016) stated the most common teaching strategies were service learning, immersion courses, stand-alone and integrated courses,
technology, or other partnerships. Strickland, Adamson, McInally, Titanen, and Metcalfe (2013) more fully described their teaching strategy for a
pilot that included undergraduate and graduate students in the online environment as an alternative to an overseas immersion experience.
Students were from two European countries and a university in the United States. The students collaborated online to compare the health, social
perspectives, and nursing roles in other countries. The researchers found that the students were satisfied with the online platform and their
learning increased. In the online platform, more students were able to engage with their international colleagues than through an immersion
strategy.
The theoretical basis for the study is the theory of cultural care and sunrise model by Leininger (1995). We will report on phase I of the study and
the lessons we learned. Some of the lessons learned included finding an easy to use virtual software platform and creating interview questions
based on the theoretical framework and the NE course objectives. Nurses and nursing faculty from Nigeria, England, Finland, Canada, Philippines,
and Puerto Rico were interviewed separately by the researchers and asked about their experiences as nursing faculty members, or if not faculty, a
reflection from when they were nursing students in their native country. The following questions were asked:
• How is or was your undergraduate nursing curriculum organized and what clinical experiences do your students have or did
you have?
• What do you think are the major health and socio-political factors that impact or impacted undergraduate nursing education
in your native country?
• What do you foresee for the future in nursing education in your native country?
• How does one become a nursing faculty member or educator in your native country? Are there other roles for nurse
educators, such as in hospitals or communities? Is there a particular degree or curriculum that faculty or nurse educators
must have?
• Tell us about your class of undergraduate nursing students related to background, culture, etc.
• Tell us about the types of patients nursing students care for or should be prepared to care for upon graduation in your native
country.
• How does or did the background of your classmates, students, or patients impact your teaching or learning? Has it changed?
Do you foresee there will be changes and if so, how?
• How do you teach or did you learn about the culture of patients and their families?
• What are the ways that you evaluate students’ learning or that you were evaluated as a nursing student? Do you think this
will change and if so, how?
• How do or was the effectiveness of your native nursing program assessed? Is or was this dictated by external and/or internal
forces? Is there an accreditation agency or agencies for nursing education programs or universities in your native country?
We will include an overview of phase II in the poster session, which includes how testing of the strategy will be accomplished after Institutional
Review Board approval. The research aims of this quasi-experimental study will be that MSN-NE concentration students in the treatment group will
be able to better:
• Describe the health and socio-political factors that impact nursing education in other countries;
• Assess the impact of having multi-cultural learners in nursing courses;
• Explore the teaching and evaluation strategies used in nursing education in other countries; and
• Appreciate the changes in nursing education affected by globalization.
Phase II of the study will include treatment group and non-treatment groups in the online course entitled, Education Concepts, Theories, and
Strategies in Nursing. We expect to have a total of 20-25 students in each of the treatment or non-treatment groups. Students will be randomly
assigned to either treatment or non-treatment group, with 6-8 students in one of several small group discussions. Students will be asked to
compare the experiences of educators from either viewing the interviews (treatment) or their readings (non-treatment) and discuss them.
Prior to implementation of the activity, the students will receive an anonymous online survey to rate their agreement with the following four
statements below (1 Strongly Disagree to 5 Strongly Agree):
1. I can describe the health and socio-political factors that impact nursing education in other countries.
2. I can assess the impact of having multi-cultural learners in nursing courses.
3. I know teaching and evaluation strategies used in nursing education in other countries.
4. I appreciate the changes in nursing education affected by globalization.
After implementation of the treatment and non-treatment, students will be asked again to rate their agreement to the above statements and will
also be asked the following open-ended questions in the online survey:
1. What was the most surprising thing that you learned? (Please elaborate)
2. Please fully describe how you see yourself using the information you learned as a nurse educator$
3. Do you recommend the continuation of this activity?
(Choose from yes, no, undecided.) (Please explain your answer.)

4. What changes do you recommend in the activity? (Please explain as thoroughly as possible)
Descriptive statistical analysis will be performed comparing responses of the treatment group to the non-treatment group to each of the individual
questions using measures of central tendency. T-tests will be conducted to analyze for differences in the ratings of students between the treatment
and non-treatment groups after the implementation of the activities and between the pre and post surveys. Content analysis will be used for the
open-ended responses.
This is a study of an online strategy to meet the guidelines of the AACN for graduate students and to increase the global perspectives of MSN-NE
students. It involves 1) phase I - the creation of virtual video-recorded interviews with nurses and nursing faculty members from other countries,
and 2) phase II - the testing of interviews (treatment) to readings (non-treatment). Rather than the ideal, but unrealistic ability to provide an
immersion experience for all NE students, we are confident that this online strategy, in which all NE students can participate, will demonstrate
merit in increasing their global perspectives.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2011, March 21). The essentials of master’s education in nursing. Retrieved from:
http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/MastersEssentials11.pdf
Dawson, M., Gakumo, A., Phillips, J., & Wilson, L. (2016). Process for mapping global health competencies in undergraduate and graduate nursing
curricula. Nurse Educator, 41(1), 37-40. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000199
Gallagher, R. W., & Polanin, J. R. (2015). A meta-analysis of educational interventions designed to enhance cultural competence in professional
nurses and nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 35, 333-340. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.10.021
Leininger, M. (1995). Teaching transcultural nursing in undergraduate and graduate programs. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 6, 10– 26. doi: org
/10. 1 1 7 7 / 104365969500600203
Office of Minority Health. (2012) Culturally competent nursing care: The cornerstone of caring. Retrieved from
https://ccnm.thinkculturalhealth.hhs.gov/
Strickland, K., Adamson, E., McInally, W., Tittanen, H., & Metcalfe, S. (2013). Developing global citizenship online: An authentic alternative to
overseas clinical placement. Nurse Education Today, 33, 1160-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.11.016
Wilson, L., Harper, D. C., Tami-Maury, I., Zarate, R., Salas, S., Farley, J., ...Ventura, C. (2012). Global health competencies for nurses in the Americas.
Journal of Professional Nursing, 28 (4), 213–222. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.11.021
Contact
[email protected]
The Effects of Competency on the Nursing Careers of Novice Nurses
Yasuko Hosoda, PhD, RN, Japan
Yayoi Nagano, RN, Japan
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to clarify the effects that competency has on the nursing careers of novice nurses.
Background: Research related to competency is growing in the fields of education, psychology, humanities and social sciences, and curricula with
competency at their core are being implemented in many countries. Competency is also indispensable in the field of nursing (Axley, 2008). Various
studies have examined the concept of competency and methods for evaluating it (Cowan et al., 2005; Fullerton et al., 2011; Hosoda et al., 2011;
Scott Tilley, 2008). Benner et al. (2009) also indicated that the knowledge of nursing practice is relational and contextual, and the skill of
involvement therefore cannot be acquired without experiential learning. It takes three years for novice nurses to acquire the skills required.
Currently, there are workplace adaptation problems, which result in low job retention and attempts by personnel to independently take action for
the sake of their own nursing careers; however, they are unsure as to which action to take. Therefore, understanding the impact that novice
nurses’ competency has on their nursing career is considered insightful for supporting nursing career development for them.
Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 1,016 novice nurses (registered nurses with less than 3 years’ experience) at 60
hospitals, each with 500 standard patient beds in Japan. The questionnaires were anonymous, and participation in the study was voluntary. The
survey covered the basic attributes of the respondents; the Nursing Competency Scale (Hosoda et al., 2016), which consists of the subscales of
“organization commitment,” “cooperative relationship building,“ “agonic power orientation,” “flexibility,” “goal achievement orientation,”
“leadership,” and “professional practice;” and the Nursing Career Assessment Scale (Ishii et al., 2005), consisting of the subscales of
“implementation and pursuit of quality nursing,” “development and adjustment of interpersonal relationships,” “self-capability development,” and
“accumulation of diverse experiences.” Potential participants were given a written explanation of the purpose and methodology of the research
and were guaranteed anonymity. Ethics approval was granted by the Ethical Review Board for Nursing Research of Osaka Prefecture University. In
the analysis, the subscales were observed variables, and a multiple indicator model was created to indicate the effects of “Nursing Competency” on
“Nursing Career” indicating the relationship between latent variables. A covariance structure analysis was conducted using IBM® SPSS® Amos.
Outcomes: There were 458 valid responses (45.1%); 431 were from female staff (94.1%) and 27 from male staff (5.9%). The average age was 24.1 ±
SD 2.9 years, and average duration of experience in nursing work was 1.9 ± SD 0.7 years. The results of the covariance structure analysis showed
that the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of the initial model’s fit index was greater than .1; so, based on the revised indices, a
correlation was found between the error variables for “organization commitment” and “goal achievement orientation,” which were observed
variables for competency. The results of this consideration showed that the transition from “Nursing Competency” to “Nursing Career” had a path
coefficient of .70 and a determination coefficient of .49. The fit indices for the hypothetical model were goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = .916, adjusted
goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) = .868, comparative fit index (CFI) =.950, and RMSEA = .096. All of the path coefficients were significant (P < .05).
Implications: The findings suggested that competency has an impact on the nursing careers of novice nurses. Since competency is also related to
ability and action characteristics in nursing practice, acquiring competency increases the assigned workload, thereby resulting in changes in the
roles and work content of staff. This is believed to help develop their nursing careers. This means that training aimed at developing competency is
necessary for the development of staff’s nursing careers. For mid-career nurses, factors such as nursing career stagnation predominate (Morishima
et al., 2014) and circumstances can prevent the acquisition of competency among novice nurses (Goudreau et al., 2015). Therefore, consideration
of an educational program aimed at improving competency is especially important during the initial stages of a nurse’s career, when the
educational needs are particularly important.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20592505.
References
Axley, L. (2008) Competency: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum. 43(4), 214-222.
Benner, P., Tanner, C. A., & Chesla, C. A. (2009) Expertise in Nursing Practice: Caring, Clinical Judgment & Ethics (2nd ed.), Springer Publishing
Company, LLC, New York.
Cowan, D. T., Norman, I., & Coopamah, V. P. (2005) Competence in nursing practice: A controversial concept-A focused review of literature. Nurse
Fullerton, J. T., Ghérissi, A., Johnson, P. G., & Thompson, J. B. (2011) Competence and competency: Core concepts for international midwifery
practice. International Journal of Childbirth, 1(1), 4-12. DOI:10.1891/2156-5287.1.1.4
Goudreau, J., Pepin, J., Larue, C., Dubois, S., Descôteaux, R., Lavoie, P., & Dumout, K. (2015) A competency-based approach to nurses’ continuing
education for clinical reasoning and leadership through reflective practice in a care situation. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(6), 572-578. DOI:
10.1016/i.nepr.2015.10.013
Hosoda, Y., Hoshi, K., Ishii, K., & Fujiwara, C. (2011) Competency of mid-career nurses as viewed from the perspective of institutional nurse
educators. Journal of the School of Nursing, Osaka Prefecture University, 17(1), 37-44. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10466/11606
Hosoda, Y., Ishii, K., Fujiwara, C. (2016) Components of competency for mid-career and novice nurses and their relationship with the nurses’ needs.
Osaka Prefecture University Journal of nursing, 22(1), 21-33. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10466/14846
Ishii, K., Fujiwara, C., Hoshi, K., Takaya, Y., Kawakami, T., Nishimura, A., Hayashida, U., Hikosou, M., Nio, K., Koga, C., & Iwami, K. (2005)
Development of the Nursing Career Assessment Scale and to Evaluate its Reliability and Validity. Journal of Japanese Society of Nursing Research,
28(2), 21-31. DOI: 10.15065/jjsnr.20050201002
Scott Tilley, D. D. (2008) Competency in nursing: A concept analysis. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39(2), 58-64. DOI:
10.3928/00220124-20080201-12
Morishima, M., Ito, A., & Kanbe, M. (2014) Characteristics of nurses' career development in job career, self-efficacy and time perspective. Bulletin
of Kio University, 11(1), 19-27.
Contact
[email protected]
Evaluating the Level of Cultural Competence in Undergraduate Nursing Students Using Standardized
Patients in Simulation
Deborah Byrne, PhD, USA
Abstract
Purpose: Health disparities are a growing concern in the United States. In order to reduce the incidence of health disparities, it is imperative that
nurses deliver culturally competent care. Leading bodies of nursing have included appropriate cultural care in their accreditation standards.
However, there is no consensus in the literature about effective ways to integrate cultural competence into the curricula of bachelor of science in
nursing programs. Simulation is an effective teaching tool that allows students to practice nursing skills in a controlled environment. Simulation
using standardized patients (SPs) allows a systematic cultural assessment that is consistent for each student.
Methods: This research study used quasi-experimental mixed-method design to evaluate the level of cultural competence in undergraduate
nursing students. A convenience, non-random sample of sophomore level undergraduate nursing students participated. The control group received
a specifically designed lecture on cultural competence. The intervention group received both the lecture and a specifically designed simulation
using SPs from diverse backgrounds. Both groups received the pretest at the beginning of the semester. The control group received the posttest
two weeks after the lecture and the intervention group received it two weeks after simulation. Control group participants received the simulation
at a later time. The simulation consisted of a mini-nutritional assessment, physical assessment, and brief health history with SPs from diverse
backgrounds. Study Measures: The Inventory Assessing the Process for Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals – Student Version
(IAPCC-SV) tool developed by Campinha-Bacote was used for pretest and posttest in both groups. Several open ended questions were also used to
gather qualitative data. Theoretical Framework: Campinha-Bacote’s conceptual model was integrated in the class lecture and simulation and
guided this research.
Results: Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the mean of the control group and intervention group pretest and posttest. There were 38
participants in this study. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with repeated measures showed a statistical significance for time effect (pretest v.
posttest) F (1,36) = 48.819, p <. 001and large effect size (partial eta squared = .576). However, the interaction between the control and intervention
groups was not statistically significant: F (1,36) = .077, p = .782. In addition, a between-groups F test showed the group effect was not significant: F
(1,36)=. 117, p = .73. Open-ended questions revealed students felt it helped with communication skills.
Implications: Consequently, further nursing education research is needed in the area of using SPs as an effective teaching strategy to evaluate
cultural competence in undergraduate nursing students.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008). Tool kit for resources for cultural competent education for baccalaureate nurses. Retrieved
from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/toolkit.pdf
Brennan, A., & Cotter, V. (2008). Student perceptions of cultural competence content in the curriculum. Journal of Professional Nursing, 24(3), 155-
160.
Caffrey, R. A., Neander, W., Markle, D., & Stewart, B. (2005). Improving the cultural competence of nursing students: Results of integrating cultural
content in the curriculum and an international immersion experience. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(5), 234-240.
Calvillo, E., Clark, L., Ballantyne, J. E., Pacquiao, D., Purnell, L. D., & Villarruel, A. M. (2009). Cultural competence in baccalaureate nursing education.
Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 20, 137-145
Campinha-Bacote, J. (1999). A model and instrument for addressing cultural competence in health care. The Journal of Nursing Education, 38(5),
203-207.
Campinha-Bacote, J. (2007). The Process of Cultural Competence in the Delivery of Healthcare Services: The Journey Continues (5th ed.). OH:
Transcultural C.A.R.E.
Campinha-Bacote, J. (2002). The process in the delivery of healthcare services: A model of care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13(3), 181-184.
Grossman, S., Mager, D., Opheim, H. M., & Torbjornsen, A. (2012). A bi-national simulation study to improve cultural awareness in nursing
students. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 8, 341-346.
Chen, H. (2012 [Jh1]). The impact of service-learning on students' cultural competence. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 7(2), p. 67.
International Nursing Association of Clinical Simulation and Learning [Jh2] (INACSL) Board of Directors. (2013). Standards for best practice:
Simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(6), Suppl, Sii-Siii.
International Nursing Association of Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standards Committee. (2015 [Jh3]). INASCL Standards of Best
Practice: SimulationSM Simulation Glossary. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12, S39-S47.
Jeffreys, M. R., & Dogan, E. (2012). Evaluating the influence of cultural competence education on students’ transcultural self-efficacy perceptions.
Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 23(2), 188-197.
Jeffreys, M. R, & Dogan, E. (2013). Evaluating cultural competence in the clinical practicum. Nursing Education Research, 34(2), 88-94.
Kardong-Edgren, S., & Campihna-Bacote, J. (2008). Cultural competence of graduating US bachelor of science nursing students. Contemporary
Nurse, 28(1-2), 37-44.
Kardong-Edgren, S., Cason, C. L., Brennan, A. W., Reifsnider, E., Hummel, F., Mancini, M., & Griffin, C. (2010). Cultural competence of graduating
BSN nursing students. Nursing Education Perspective, 31(5).
Kim-Godwin, Y. S., Livsey, K., Ezzell, D., & Highsmith, C. (2013). Home visit simulation using a standardized patient. Clinical Simulation in Nursing,
9(2), pp. e55-e61.
Krainovich-Miller, B., Yost, J. M., Norman, R. G., Auerhahn, C., Dobal, M., Rosedale, M., Moffa, C. (2008). Measuring the cultural awareness of
nursing students. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 19(3), 250-258.
Kratzke, C., & Bertolo, M. (2013). Enhancing students’ cultural competence using cross-cultural experiential learning. Journal of Cultural Diversity,
20(3), 107-111.
Leininger, M. M., & McFarland, M. R. (2002). Transcultural nursing: Concepts, theories, research and practice (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill,
Medical Pub. Division.
National League of Nursing. (2009). A commitment to diversity in nursing and nursing education. Retrieved from
http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/reflection_dialogue/refl_dial_3.htm
Ndiwane, A., Koul, O., & Theroux, R. (2014). Using standardized patients to teach and evaluate the cultural competence of graduate nursing
students. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10, 87-94.
Noble, A., Nuszen, E., Rom, M., & Noble, L. M. (2014). The effect of a cultural competence educational intervention for first-year nursing students in
Israel. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 25(1), 87-94.
ORoberts, S., Warda, M., Garbutt, S., & Curry, K. (2014). The use of high-fidelity simulation to teach cultural competence in the nursing curriculum.
Sargent, S. E., Sedlak, C. A., & Martsolf, D. S. (2005). Cultural competence among nursing students and faculty. Nurse Education Today, 25.
Transcultural C.A.R.E. Associates (2014). Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence among Healthcare Professionals – Student
Version (IAPCC-SV). Retrieved from http://www.tranculturalcare.net/
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). American community survey. Available at http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/2009_release/
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2010). Healthy People 2020. Washington, DC.
Available at http://www.healthypeople.gov.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2013). Health Disparity and Inequality Report, Available at
https://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/chdireport.html.
Contact
[email protected]
The Effect of Root Cause Analysis on Safe Medication Administration
Kristi Sanborn Miller, MSN, USA
Abstract
In 2000, the Institute of Medicine published a landmark report on the devastating effects of medical errors. The IOM report of 7,000
deaths per year from adverse drug events averages out to 583 deaths per month, 134 deaths per week, and 19 deaths per day
(Kohn, 2000). Other reports have placed that number much higher, with the consensus that harm from medical error is
underreported (Makary & Daniel, 2016). Researchers have proposed that death from medical error may rank as the third leading
cause of death. Since the original report, strategies to reduce harm from medical error have been widespread and have included the
institution of a Just Culture, adoption of the tenants of High Reliability Organizations, and the use of Root Cause Analysis to examine
the root causes of sentinel events to design solutions that will prevent reoccurrence.
Harm from medication error, reported to be the most common error in health care (Aspden, Wolcott, Bootman, & Cronenwett,
2007; Kohn, 2001), is estimated to affect 1.5 million patients per year in the United States alone. Some estimate that more than one
medication error a day occurs for each hospitalized patient (Aspden et al., 2007; Bates, 2007). Not all errors cause harm, however,
the estimated 400,000 adverse events that do occur, result in more than $3.5 billion in additional medical costs (Aspden et al.,
2007). Extended hospital stays multiply the financial cost. Patients who suffer harm from medication error may remain hospitalized
for 8 to 12 days longer than patients who do not experience harm. These added days mean their hospital stays cost $16,000 to
$24,000 more (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ], 2015).
Nurses are at the frontline of medication administration, and are in a prime position to prevent harm from medication error. More
than 40% of a nursing shift is spent administering medications (Elganzouri, Standish, & Androwich, 2009). Nurses may be responsible
for between 26% and 38% of medication errors (Bates, 2007; Leape et al., 2002). Self-reported medication errors made by nurses
that resulted in patient death included wrong dose (40.9%), wrong drug (16%) and wrong administration route (9.5%) (Hughes,
2008). Nursing education has traditionally relied on the use of the 5 rights to prevent medication error (Potter et a;., 2013), a
strategy that is at the “sharp end of care” (Reason, 1990). Strategies at the sharp end of care rely on individual characteristics and
responsibility. Nurses have identified that carelessly failing to follow the five rights and nursing incompetence are major causes for
making an error (Jones & Treiber, 2010). When sharp end strategies fail, the individual is blamed, but little is done to prevent future
incidents of harm. The modern patient safety movement is moving away from an environment of “blame and shame”. Healthcare
institutions are encouraged to utilize strategies from systems theory (the blunt end of care) to prevent harm from error (Institute for
Safe Medication Practice [ISMP], 2017).
Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is an error analysis tool used to train health care staff to identify systems factors that lead to error and
suggest solutions to prevent similar errors from causing harm in the future (VA Center for National Patient Safety, 2017; The Joint
Commission, 2017; Wachter, 2012). . Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a tool successfully used by aviation, nuclear power and chemical
engineering industries to reduce harm from error (Carroll et al., 2002; Shapell, 2001). The Patient Risk Detection Theory (PRDT;
Despins, Scott-Cawiezell, & Rouder, 2010) states that nurse training is a factor that has the potential to reduce harm to patients.
Educational strategies have a great deal of research support for reduction of harm to patients (Benner et al., 2002; Miller, Haddad &
Phillips, 2016). The Joint Commission mandated use of Root Cause Analysis (RCA) for all sentinel events in 1997, and many states
have mandated its use for major safety events as well (Association for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ], 2017). Despite the
widespread us of RCA, there is little evidence to support it’s efficacy (National Patient Safety Foundation [NPSF], 2016). RCA has
been criticized due to lack of standardization, the lack of implementation by trained professionals, and a lack of follow-up and
aggregation of data (Hettinger et.al, 2013; Peerally, 2016). No one has studied the use of RCA training as an intervention to increase
nurses’ ability to administer medications safely.
This study is being done as dissertation research at East Tennessee State University. The study hypothesizes that participation in RCA, as compared
to the usual safe medication administration education will increase knowledge of safe medication administration and improve scores on a measure
of just culture. After consent and randomization, senior level nursing students take a pre-test, survey and demographics questionnaire. Students
then participate in an online, interactive video of RCA or the usual education, followed by a post-test and a 30-day post-test and survey. Descriptive
and analytic statistics will be used to analyze results (final goal for recruitment is n=90 for sufficient power for the study).
Data collection for this project has involved the use of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap, 2017). REDCap is a secure web application for
building and managing online surveys and databases. While REDCap can be used to collect virtually any type of data, and is specifically geared to
support online or offline data capture for research studies and operations. The REDCap Consortium, a support network of collaborators, is
composed of thousands of active institutional partners in over one hundred countries who utilize and support REDCap in various ways. This study
will present the design and implementation of an online, randomized controlled trial of a nursing educational intervention using the REDCap data
collection tool.
References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015). Patient safety primers: Systems approach. Retrieved from
http://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer.aspx? primerID=21
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2017). Root Cause Analysis. Retrieved from https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/10/root-cause-
analysis
Aspden, P., Wolcott, J., Bootman, L. & Cronenwett, L. (Eds.). (2007). Preventing medication errors: Quality chasm Series/Committee on identifying
and preventing medication errors, Health Care Services Board, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Bates, D. W. (2007). Preventing medication errors: A summary. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 64(14), S3-S9.
doi:10.2146/ajhp070190
Benner, P., Sheets, V., Uris, P., Mallocj, K., Schwed, K., & Jamison, D. (2002). Individual, practice and system causes of errors in nursing: A taxonomy.
The Journal of Nursing Administration, 32(10), 509-523.
Bravo, K. P. (2014). Revision and Psychometric Testing of the Safe Administration of Medications Scale. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
3581552.
Carroll, J. S., Rudolph, J. W., & Hatakenaka, S. (2002). Lessons learned from non-medical industries: root cause analysis as a culture change at a
chemical plant. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 11, 266-269.
Elganzouri, E. S., Standish, C. A., & Androwich, I. (2009). Medication administration time study (MATS). Journal of Nursing Administration, 39(5),
204-210.
Hettinger, Z. , Fairbanks, R. J., Hedge, F., Rackoff, A. S., Wreathall, J., Lewis, V. L., Bisante, A. M., & Wears, R. L. (2013). An evidence-based toolkit for
the development of effective and sustainable root cause analysis system safety solutions. American Society for Healthcare Risk Management, 33(2),
11-20. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21122
Hughes, R. G. (ed.). (2008). Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. Prepared with support from the Robert Wood
Johnson foundation. (No. 08-0043). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Institute for Safe Medication Practices. (2017). Medication safety tools & resources. Retrieved from http://www.ismp.org/.
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. (2017). Framework for Conducting a Root Cause Analysis and Action Plan.
Retrieved from: https://www.jointcommission.org/framework_for_conducting_a_root_cause_analysis_and_action_plan/
Jones, J. H., & Treiber, L. (2010). When the 5 rights go wrong: Medication errors from the nursing perspective. Journal of Nursing Care Quality,
25(3), 240-247.
Kohn, L., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. (2000). (Editors). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Landrigan, C. P., Parry, G. J., Bones, C. B., Hackbarth, A. D., Phil, M., Goldmann, D. A. & Sharek, P. J. (2010). Temporal trends in rates of patient harm
resulting from medical care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363(22), 2124-2134.
Leape, L., Epstein, A. M., & Hamel, M. B. (2002). A series on patient safety. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(4), 501-508
Makary, M.A. & Daniel, M. 2016. Medical error – the third leading cause of death in the US. British Medical Journal, 353, i2139
Makary, M.A. & Daniel, M. 2016. Medical error – the third leading cause of death in the US. British Medical Journal, 353, i2139
Miller, K., Haddad, L., Phillips, K. (2016). Educational Strategies for Reducing Medication Errors Committed By Student Nurses: A Literature
Review. International Journal of Health Sciences Education. 3.
National Patient Safety Foundation. (2015). RCA2: Improving Root Cause Analyses and Actions to Prevent Harm. Boston, MA: National Patient Safety
Foundation; 2015.
Peerally, M. F., Carr, S., Waring, J., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2016). The problem with root cause analysis. British Medical Journal of Quality and Safety,
26(5), 417-422. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005511.
Potter, P. A., Perry, A. G., Stockert, P., & Hall, A. (2013). Fundamentals of nursing (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.
Research Electronic Data Capture. (2017) REDCap. Retrieved from https://www.project-redcap.org/
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shappell, S. A. & Wiegmann, D. A. (2001). Unraveling the mystery of general aviation controlled flight into terrain accidents using HFACS. 11th
International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.594.6927&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Sexton, J., Martin, M., Tersigni, A., Pryor, D., Hendrich, A., Thomas, E, Holzmueller, C., Knight, A., Wu, Y. & Pronovost, P. (2006). Teamwork in the
operating room: Frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel. Anesthesiology, 105, 877-874.
VA National Center for Patient Safety. (2017). Root Cause Analysis. Retrieved from: https://www.patientsafety.va.gov/media/rca.asp
Wachter, R. M. (2012). Understanding patient safety. 2nd ed. China: McGraw Hill.
Weick, K. E. & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006). Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention. Organization Science, 17(4), 514-524.
Contact
[email protected]

NERC2018 CPeB

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NERC2018 CPeB

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

NERC2018 CPeB

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NURSING EDUCATION

ENHANCED ABSTRACTS OF ORAL AND POSTER

WASHINGTON, DC | APRIL 19-21, 2018

The Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing (Sigma) is a

Sigma Theta Tau International

To request a review copy for course adoption, email [email protected] or call

PDF ISBN: 9781948057288

A poster presentation is the presentation of research information by an individual or representatives

A symposium is a presentation coordinated by an organizer similar to a panel discussion and contains

Format for Citing Papers

Cynthia Clark, PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN, USA

National Study on Faculty-to-Faculty Incivility

MIXED METHODS STUDY: 588 Nursing Faculty from 40 States

Most frequently occurring uncivil faculty behaviors:

Top factors that contribute to faculty incivility

Level of confidence in addressing incivility, and ways to address the problem.

Qualitative Findings (8 Themes)

Discuss best practices to foster civility and healthy work environments

Bette A. Mariani, PhD, RN, ANEF, USA

Jennifer Wilson, DNP, RN, CPN, USA

Anne M. Krouse, PhD, MBA, RN-BC, RN-BC, USA

Kimberly Thompson, MLS, USA

Kim Alexander Noble, PhD, RN, ACCNS-AG, CPAN, USA

Angela McNelis, PhD, RN, FAAN, CNE, ANEF, USA

Darrell Spurlock, Jr., PhD, RN, NEA-BC, ANEF, USA

Darrell Spurlock, Jr., PhD, RN, NEA-BC, ANEF, USA

Barbara J. Patterson, PhD, RN, ANEF, USA

Karen H. Morin, PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN, USA

Melissa A. Stec, DNP, CNM, APRN, FACNM, FANN, USA

Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

19(4), 479-487. doi:10.1177/096973301142934222

• Fidelity maintained by using validators not assigned to facility.

1. The scheduling process: coordinating the preceptor and student schedules

The problems identified in these three areas are summarized below:

The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2015). http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Obstetric-Care-Consensus-

1. What is it like to be a nursing student?

(Choose from yes, no, undecided.) (Please explain your answer.)

You might also like