Air Entra Nfoient of Mortar: RMC Walk
Air Entra Nfoient of Mortar: RMC Walk
Air Entra Nfoient of Mortar: RMC Walk
118
NEIL BENINGFIELD
RMC Mortars Limited ,
Holly House , 74 Upper Holly Walk, Royal Leamington Spa , Warwickshire , UK
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Mixing Time
For the most widely used generic type of air entrainment , that based on
vinsol resin , air content increases to a peak quite rap idly and then
119
Sand Grading: Graph 2 shows that fine sand loses air much more
rapidly than coarse when subjected to prolonged mixing.
In order to obtain the same air content however , for both mixes , much
more agent was required for the fine than for the coarse and so t he
comparison could not be made on the basis of identica l original mixes.
13
14 ?ine Sanà
12 A Coarse Sanà
12
~l d.b . 9.4
::::
~O
<::
*' 9 8
a d. b. 12.75
ô
7
a i6 24 32 2.0 i2 24 36 ela
TIME =N ,HNUTES TIME IN ,üNUTES
It had been suggested that the loss of air was caused by the mi x drying
but careful weighing of a mix, complete with mi xer bowl and blade for
accuracy , showed that only small amounts of water were lost. Restoring
accurately that loss did not restore the air contento
....
~
120
Mixes were therefore made using a soft oolitic material and a hard
siliceous sand, mixed for 30 minutes and the air content loss and grading
change measured . This showed a slightly greater increase in fines for the
oolite , as would be expected, but the air loss was in the same order for
each , as shown in Graph 3.
16
14
12
~
o\ x Silceous sand
\0 Ool ite
lO X
"-
"-
"-
"-
!O::
y
<:
3 "o
~ ",, ,
"- ,,
6
"
'""
4
o 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
,':ME :N :.1INUTES
This showed exactly the same characteristics of loss with time as the
untreated product containing clay and showed the clay not to be a
causative factor in the air loss. Graph 4 shows this with the clean sand
plotted together with an untreated contraI test for comparison.
Graph 4. The mixing time effect fo r sand 'IJi th the minus 75\JlTI fraction
16 removed.
~.
x control sand untreated
sand all:> 75~m
10
o:::
--;
<
~ 8
4
OL-____ ~ ___________________
a 12 ::'6 20 24 28
TIME IN MINUTES
It was seen that there was a re1ationship between cement content and
mixing time in two specific areas, the propagation phase and the loss
phase.
----------------------------- ...
122
Both the time to reach a maximum , i.e . the length of the pro pagation
ph as e and the total air gained increased with an increas e in cemen t
content o Indeed , at low cement contents there was of cours e a i r loss and
not ai r ga in.
36
32
O O . P.C
c:::
~ :6
""
':t:== ===
-----......... 33% O . P.C
50% O .P. C
ôô% O.P. C
O 3 16 2d 32 dO d8
TIME IN MINUTES
The final f actor affecting air loss with time that was invest i gated
was the initial air content o It was f oun d that the amount lost was in the
same o rd er at between 3 & 4 . 7% , for mixes of i nitial air contents that
varied widely from b etween 27% down to only 6% .
Mix Consistence
It is generally accepted in the fieId of Concrete Technology that air
content inc r eases with slump (consistence) (3 , 4,5,6) but some source s
qualify this statement by restricting it to a maximum slump of between 150
123
and 200mm (7,8,9 , 10) One source , the PCA (11) reports a decrease at very
high slumps.
33% op c
50% opc
õõ% :>pc
14% opc
6u
8 16 24 32 40 48
TI~~E [N 'lINUTES
Graph 3. ~he e! '~ ec~ of cemen~ concent fo r 0 . 1% AEA on cemenc ~eight .
The Author ' s work showed a gradual and slight reduction in air
content as consistence increased and this showed a linear relationship
with air loss directly proportional to increase in water contento
Temperature
An empirical relationship developed by RMC Mortars Limited is in agreement
with data reported by Hercules Inc (12) and is shown in Graph 7 .
Graph 7 ~he ~ela~~onship af tem pera~ ure ~o sne amount of air e n t~ained .
.-----
2
~ mp iri~a l ~~la~lonsnip
TEMPERATURE °C
OL-____ ~ ____ ~ ____ ~ ____ ~ ____ ~ ____ ~ ____ ~
~8 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
...
124
There are grounds for treating the relationship between AEA addition
and air content as linear for constant cement content o At modest air
contents it is commonplace so to do as a convenience when marketing or
usi n g the admi x ture ; thus the common re l iance on admixtu r e dosage
expressed as a percenta ge of the cement content o
l30 ~
40
~4%
? / 33% OPC
OPC
x
< 20
~
10
O
2 4 6 8 10 12 l4
AMOUNT OF ..l,EA AS % OF CEMENT .I/EIGHT
The cements used were all from the same works, they were not
subjected to laboratory grinding and were therefore in every respect
ordinary production cements . Graph 9 shows that increase in cement
fineness depressed the amount of air entrained and that this effect held
for widely varying air contents .
This data shows that increasing the cement specific surface from 280
to 440m 2 /kg reduced the air content by a virtually constant amount, 2.4%
on average , regardless of the amount actually present.
Graph 9. ~he effect of cement fineness 8n air con~ent for 5 dif[erent AEA
le11el s .
20
____ 0 .2% AEA
"------------- O. 0 16%"EA
lã
12 ~ 0 . J1% ."EA
•.:r:;
<
~
3
:].004% AEA
-----
õi'.
4
0 . 002% AEA
o
280 320 360 400 440
CEMENT SIZE AS S?ECIFIC SURFACE m' Ik g
CEMENT CHEMISTRY
Although Chatterji (19) reported that white cement produced the same
air content as Portland cement , his materiais varied in specific surface
thus making a comparison of less value , in the writer's view.
L
126
TABL::: 2
Comoarison of Lhe composi tion of th e , ,h i te c ement and th e RHPC.
CEMENT TYPE
?ROPSRTY
'I/HITE RHPC TYE'ICAL OPC ( FOR
CE MENT COMPARISON ONLY )
5PSC:FIC SüRFACE
(mlk g ) 430 .136 365
5iO, 24 20 20
CaO 69 63 64
50, 1 .9 3.4 2.3
C, S 80 :59 59
C, S 9 13 ~4
C1 .-\ 4 10 10
C.1 AF 1 6 .6 S.3
Na, O 0 .2 O. S 0.7
Grap h 10. The effecc o f c hange in cemenc com posi tion on a ir co ntento
20
x '"hi te c emenc
16
::lHPC
12
,...,
< 8
*-
4
O
,J04 , 008 , 0 12 ,016 .020
AEA% DF TOTAL ORY ~T .
~raph ~l. The effec~ OI sana ~ar~~cle size 8n air concent :or single sized
sand.
30
20
<
~o
Graph 12 shows fur ther work on th is topic and it is seen that the
co arser sand can attain much higher air co ntents than the fin e compar i son .
/, 36
24
iTlffi sanà
20
15
:::
<
I
I 150 11m sand
o L -__________ ~ ____________
. 02 . 0 4 . 06 . 08 0 .1 . 12
% AEA ON !OTAL JRY ~T .
0lIlIIII
128
There are two classes of effect of the air . These being the effect on the
plastic or wet properties of the mortar and the hardened or dry
properties. Each is considered hereafter.
Thus the maximum is imposed, not by the plastic properties but by the
hardened ones.
Thus small air contents can provide excellent freeze thaw resistance
provided that their bubble spacing factor is sufficiently low. This will
be so for low air contents, if the bubbles are of very small size and this
approach is not practicable with the current air entraining agent
technology; the bubbles are much larger than desired for this purpose to
be fulfilled .
REFERENCES
6. Bartel , F.F. Air content and unit weight . ASTM STP 169B
' Significance of Tests & Properties of Concrete & Concrete
Making MateriaIs ', Chapter 10, pp . 122 - 131.