Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 166 views

    Mathcad - Grout Connection HSE Rules

    Uploaded by

    Rayodc
    This document provides calculations to check the adequacy of a grout connection between a pile and sleeve. It includes the geometry of the pile, sleeve, and shear keys as well as material properties. A series of checks are performed on dimensions and load ratios. The final check determines the connection is not adequate as chk is not equal to 9.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Mathcad - Grout Connection HSE Rules

    Uploaded by

    Rayodc
    166 views3 pages
    This document provides calculations to check the adequacy of a grout connection between a pile and sleeve. It includes the geometry of the pile, sleeve, and shear keys as well as material properties. A series of checks are performed on dimensions and load ratios. The final check determines the connection is not adequate as chk is not equal to 9.

    Original Description:

    Mathcad - Grout Connection HSE Rules

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides calculations to check the adequacy of a grout connection between a pile and sleeve. It includes the geometry of the pile, sleeve, and shear keys as well as material properties. A series of checks are performed on dimensions and load ratios. The final check determines the connection is not adequate as chk is not equal to 9.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    166 views3 pages

    Mathcad - Grout Connection HSE Rules

    Uploaded by

    Rayodc
    This document provides calculations to check the adequacy of a grout connection between a pile and sleeve. It includes the geometry of the pile, sleeve, and shear keys as well as material properties. A series of checks are performed on dimensions and load ratios. The final check determines the connection is not adequate as chk is not equal to 9.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 3
    At a glance
    Powered by AI
    The document appears to be calculating the design interface transfer stresses and bond strength of a grouted pile connection under operational and survival load conditions.

    The design interface transfer stresses for operational and survival load conditions are being calculated based on parameters like pile diameter, thickness, length, load etc.

    A number of parameters like Ds/Ts ratio, Dp/Tp ratio, Dg/Tg ratio, shear key geometry, bond strength etc. are being checked against specified limits.

    GROUT CONNECTION

    6 6
    MN  1  10  N MPa  1  10  Pa chk  0
    NOTE : 1. The method of this calculation is based on HSE: "Offshore Technology Report 2001/016,
    Pile/Sleeve Connections", 2002.

    2. Geometries with D/t below the lower bound may conservatively be designed using the lower bound
    D/t values in the calculations. Not valid for Helical shear keys

    Fop  0kN Max. operating load Fsurv  7200kN Max. survival load
    (30965 kN) (36323 kN)
    Dp  2000 mm Pile diameter tp  50 mm Pile thickness

    Ds  2200 mm Sleeve diameter ts  50 mm Sleeve thickness

    h  8  mm Shear key height w  16 mm Shear key width

    L  6000 mm Nominal grouted connection length

    s  300  mm Shear key spacing

    fcu  50 Characteristic cube strength [MPa]

    m  18 Steel-grout elastic modular ratio

    SF op  6 Required safety factor operational

    SF surv  4.5 Required safety factor survival

    Calculations:

    Dg  Ds  2  ts Outside diameter of grout annulus Dg  2100 mm

    Dg  Dp
    tg  Thickness of grout annulus tg  50 mm
    2

    Fop
    τop  Design interface transfer stress τop  0  MPa
    π Dp  L operational condition

    Fsurv
    τsurv  Design interface transfer stress τsurv  0.191  MPa
    π Dp  L survival condition

    1 1
      Dg   Dp Ds 
    K  m     
      tg   tp ts
     Stiffness factor K  0.013

    Doc.No.A3171/210 Rev.A Page H.1-2


    GROUT CONNECTION

    h
    Cs  1.0 if  0.005
    s
    h
    0.6 if  0.005 Cs  1
    s

    L
    CL  1.0 if 2
    Dp

    1.0  0.05  L  2 if 2  L  4


     D 
      p  Dp

    0.9  0.025   L  4 if 4  L  8


     D 
      p  Dp

    0.8  0.025   L  8 if 8  L  12


     D 
      p  Dp

    L
    0.7 if  12 CL  0.95
    Dp
    1

    fbuc  K CL  9  Cs  1100   fcu 


    h 2 N N
    Characteristic bond strength fbuc  3 
     s
    mm
    2
    mm
    2

    τop SF op τsurv SF surv


    UCop  UCop  0 UCsurv  UCsurv  0.25
    fbuc fbuc

     Ds  Ds
    chk  if  45   140 chk  1 0  44 following HSE it should be chk  0
     ts
     ts >50, however no problems are
    expected with the compact
     Dp  Dp Ds/Ts ratio.
    chk  if  24   40 chk  1 0  40 chk  1
     tp
     tp

     Dg  Dg
    chk  if  10   45 chk  1 0  42 chk  2
     tg
     tg

    chk  if   2 chk  1 0


    L L
    3 chk  3
     Dp  Dp

    chk  if  0.0   0.006 chk  1 0


    h h 3
     4  10 chk  4
     Dp
     Dp

     Dp 
    chk  if  0   8 chk  1 0 Dp chk  5
     s   6.667
    s

    chk  if  0.0   0.04 chk  1 0


    h
    h chk  6
     s   0.027
    s

    Doc.No.A3171/210 Rev.A Page H.1-3


    GROUT CONNECTION

    chk  if  1.5   3 chk  1 0


    w w
    2 chk  7
     h  h


    chk  if UCop  1.0  UCsurv  1.0 chk  1 0  chk  8

    CONNECTION  if ( chk = 9 "OK" "FALSE" ) CONNECTION  "FALSE"

    Doc.No.A3171/210 Rev.A Page H.1-4

    You might also like