Buku Manual Pelatihan - Res
Buku Manual Pelatihan - Res
Buku Manual Pelatihan - Res
www.centerforagroforestry.org
email: [email protected]
Funding for this work is via the United States Department of Agriculture North Central SARE with
Agreement Number H003044602 and NCR-SARE Project Number ENC12-129.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of
the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the USDA.
The University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry acknowledges the USDA National Agroforestry Center and
the Mid-America Agroforestry Working Group, for contributions to the text of this manual.
Portions of this material are also credited to the “Forest Landowner’s Guide to Evaluating and Choosing
a Natural Resource-Based Enterprise,” published by the Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering
Service (NRAES) Cooperative Extension program, Ithaca, New York. NRAES is an interdisciplinary, issue-
oriented program sponsored by cooperative extension of fourteen member land grant universities and is
housed at Cornell University. For more information, visit www.nraes.org.
Tom Isenhart, Iowa State University Rebecca Christoffel, Iowa State University
Leigh Ann Long, Iowa State University Larry Godsey, Missouri Valley College
Online:
• Association For Temperate Agroforestry: http://www.aftaweb.org/
• Beetz, A. 2011. Agroforestry: An Overview. National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service,
National Center for Appropriate Technology (ATTRA) IP155. http://www.agmrc.org/media/cms/
agrofor_A18CE08578D41.pdf
• Brant, G. 2011. +H: The Human Considerations in the Adoption of Agroforestry. Agroforestry
Note 43. USDA National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, NE. http://nac.unl.edu/documents/agro-
forestrynotes/an43g13.pdf
• Chesapeake Bay Forest Restoration Strategy, including Section 4 – Agroforestry: http://executi-
veorder.chesapeakebay.net/chesapeakeforestrestorationstrategy.pdf
• 1890 Agroforestry Consortium: http://www.csrees.usda.gov/nea/nre/in_focus/forests_
if_1890agro.html
• eXtension Forest Farming Community of Practice: http://www.extension.org/pages/62959/
forest-farming-community
• Green Lands/Blue Waters: http://www.leopold.iastate.edu/green-lands-blue-waters
• Center for Integrated Natural Resources and Agricultural Management: http://www.cinram.
umn.edu/
• Iowa State University Riparian Management Systems: http://www.buffer.forestry.iastate.edu/
• Mid-American Agroforestry Working Group: http://midamericanagroforestry.net/
• Midwest Cover Crops Council: http://www.mccc.msu.edu/
• The Center for Agroforestry, University of Missouri. http://www.centerforagroforestry.org/
• The Center for Subtropical Agroforestry, University of Florida. http://sfrc.ifas.ufl.edu/cstaf/
• USDA National Agroforestry Center: http://www.unl.edu/nac/
• U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2011. USDA Agroforestry Strategic Framework, FY 2011-2016.
Washington, DC. 35 p. http://www.usda.gov/documents/AFStratFrame_FINAL-lr_6-3-11.pdf.
• U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of Secretary. 2013. USDA policy for agroforestry. De-
partmental Regulation 1073-002. http://www.ocio.usda.gov/document/departmental-regula-
tion-1073-002
• World Agroforestry Centre: http://www.worldagroforestry.org/
B. Doing Your Inventory Tree height. This is also optional, and only re-
Locating your plots in the field. Following a ally useful for a timber inventory. Details on cal-
compass line is a vital skill when conducting culating height can be found in the guide “Con-
your vegetation inventory. It is beyond the scope ducting a Simple Timber Inventory,” https://
of this training manual to review compass work uextension.tennessee.edu/publications/Docu-
in detail but there are a couple of points to re- ments/PB1780.pdf
member:
- The right compass for the job. Ideally, you Condition of trees. Helpful in determining
should have a ‘ranger’ type with a mirror in the whether marketable non-timber products can
lid, gunsight sighting, liquid dampened needle, be harvested. Also helpful in assessing the pos-
and an adjustment for setting declination. sible function as a windbreak.
- Staying on track. With a little practice, staying
on your traverse line is not difficult. Hold the Crown closure. The degree of canopy closure
compass level, line up the arrow in the mirror will determine the conditions for raising or en-
face, sight on the farthest object you can pick hancing shade-loving species in the understory
out through the gunsight (e.g., recognizable tree,
rock, stump), and walk toward it. When you Non-tree Inventory
reach that landmark, sight again and find a new Begin your inventory by identifying and listing
object to focus on. all the harvestable non-tree species found in the
plot on your plot sheet. Include plants that pro-
Obtain a good guidebook to the plants of your vide good browse if you intend to graze the area.
area. Remember that quality can have a big
impact on the prices you receive for non-timber For each species, record the following:
forest products. That means you will have to Total number of plants for each species.
make judgment calls when doing your inventory. Where possible/feasible, count the number of
Information on product specifications—includ- individual plants of each species found in the
ing acceptable quality—can be found in Appen- plot. This will be easier on an open forest floor
You can add substantially to the list by looking As detailed in Chapter 9, Marketing Principles,
at Appendices 2 and 3 to see what other plants in identifying strengths and weaknesses, you
can be successfully grown on your site, and what will be focusing on factors that are internal to
products can be made from them. You want this your business. Opportunities and threats refer
list to be as extensive as possible, so you can to the external environment of your business.
consider the widest possible range of options. The plan you will develop will be shaped by
both internal and external factors; it will build
Your list can be refined by considering the on your strengths and minimizing the impacts
resources at your disposal (e.g., labor, buildings, of your weaknesses while in the same time be
equipment) at different times of the year. These responsive to the opportunities and threats your
factors will limit the crops and crop combina- environment offers.
tions you can grow. Finally, you can further
refine your list by revisiting the objectives you In the SWOT Analysis worksheet, summarize
have for your land, such as income diversifica- the internal strengths and weaknesses and the
tion, reduction of land taxes or environmental external opportunities and threats for your
protection. business as you identify them today. Consider all
aspects: natural, physical and human resources,
The list of ‘best bets’ you make in this part of marketing, operations, and finances.
your Workbook should include all the plants
that can grow on your land, and the products Step 12: Porter Five Forces Model
that can be derived. Make sure you include tim- The Five Forces Model (developed by Dr. Michael
ber products that can be made from trees you Porter of Harvard University) serves as a good
would plant as part of an agroforestry develop- framework for assessing different industries
ment. If you have done a timber inventory—in you would like to get in. The Five Forces Model
addition to the non-timber vegetation inventory identifies coordination and control aspects of
list those possible timber products as well. an industry and provides a guideline for under-
standing the resources and relationships needed
Along with Chapter 10 of the Training Manual, to be successful in a market. The model is pre-
the following steps will help you develop a sented in more detail in Chapter 9 – Marketing
marketing strategy, or marketing plan. Each step Principles. Using the information and examples
contains directions needed to complete corre- provided in Chapter 9, use the following ideas to
sponding sections in your Workbook. You should evaluate the chosen crops in the context of the
note that every part of every step might not ap- industry:
ply to your situation.
Identify Barriers to Entry
Identify suppliers/Bargaining power of
Step 11: SWOT Analysis suppliers
Having analyzed the current situation of your
Identifying Buyers/ Bargaining power of buyers
farm with respect to objectives and priorities,
Identify substitutes
personal resources, site assessment and veg-
Additional Resources
Handbook for Agroforestry Planning and Design. University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry.
2013. www.centerforagroforestry.org
Building a Sustainable Business: A Guide to Developing a Business Plan for Farms and Rural Busi-
nesses. Minnesota Institute for Sustainable Agriculture. 2003.
Warm-season forages
Warm-season perennial species grow most
during the summer months. Though warm-
season forages have a shorter growing season,
they are still very productive.
Success Story
Dan Shepherd Early spring, winter wheat in a young Chi-
nese chestnut orchard, Napton, Mo.
Shepherd Farms – Bluegrass hay and pecan alley
cropping practice, buffalo ranch and agritourism
business, Clifton Hill, Mo.
In Print:
Garrett, H.E. (editor) 2009. North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice (2nd
Edition). American Society of Agronomy. pp. 133-162. (Chapter 7)
3. What are advantages and drawbacks of utilizing narrow vs. wide alleyways?
4. Identify two management practices that are critical to maintaining tree growth over
time.
6. Removing what percent or more of the tree’s foliage can have a serious impact on the
growth of the tree?
7. How do you determine how far apart to plant trees in a tree line and how far apart to
plant the tree rows? Is there such a thing as a wrong distance, such as too far apart or too
close together?
1. What factors affect the width between your rows? Landowner goals and objectives, desired
crops, uses for trees, and width of existing crop production equipment all impact between and
within row widths.
2. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages to alley cropping? Advantages:
Short-term cash flow, trees benefit from crop fertilization, sun crops compete with weeds,
reduce runoff, form of windbreaks, and provide increased economic diversity and long-term
payoff. Disadvantages- Tree rows are obstacles for cultivation, provide competition for sunlight,
moisture, and nutrients, and require more intensive management. Herbicide drift from crops
may damage trees. Sun crops will need to be exchanged for more shade tolerant crops over
time.
3. What are advantages and drawbacks of utilizing narrow vs. wide alleyways? Narrow al-
leys with more tree rows permit greater production of trees and shrubs per acre of land putting
an emphasis on the value of the woody crop. Narrower alleys will also become shaded within
just a few years forcing a shift from sun to shade loving crops. Wide alleys permit sun loving
crops to be grown for many years and are often more compatible with farm equipment
4. Identify two management practices that are critical to maintaining tree growth over
time. Ongoing weed control around the base of the trees, using herbicides, mulch, fabric bar-
riers or living mulches is absolutely essential for rapid tree growth and establishment. As the
trees age and grow, thinning out crowded trees within the row will enable the trees to maintain
maximum growth rates over the long haul.
5. Why is root pruning performed on tree/shrub species in alley cropping? Tree roots can be
pruned (severed) or “trained” to reduce competition for water and nutrients.
6. Removing what percent or more of the tree’s foliage can have a serious impact on the
growth of the tree? Removing over 40% of the crown of the tree will reduce its growth.
7. How do you determine how far apart to plant trees in a tree line and how far apart to
plant the tree rows? Is there such a thing as a wrong distance, such as too far apart or too
close together? (See question #1) Depending on the emphasis of nut or wood production,
and what kinds of crops are planned on, the width of the alleys must be adjusted to meet these
plans. Wood production is compatible with narrow rows and multiple rows; nut production
requires single rows and wide spacing between trees.
A “wrong” distance would be any planting configuration that does not meet the landowners
short-, medium- and long-term objectives resulting is lower production from desired crops
or reduced tree growth or poor tree form. Row-to-row distance also must match with existing
equipment.
Multiple Row
Desirable characteristics of an
• Enhanced erosion control
agroforestry tree species
• Better growth of trees for timber
• Marketable. This includes both the wood
itself and other products such as nuts or • Improved wildlife value
fruit, which would provide another source • Greater diversification of farm products
of income.
• Compatible with the companion crops
or forage you choose. Some trees pro-
duce growth-inhibiting chemicals which
may effect what you can grow.
• High quality.
• Fast growing or of such a high value
that a species of medium growth rate is
acceptable.
• Deep-rooted so the trees do not com-
pete with the crops or forage for mois-
ture.
• Have rapidly decomposing foliage.
• Be properly matched to the site. Site
An aerial view of the Horticulture and Agroforestry
tolerant, suited to either a wet or dry site. Research Center shows a silvopasture research area pat-
• The leaves should produce a light, tern. Double rows of tree plantings are shown on the left;
rather than a heavy shade. This will be triple rows are on the right. Multiple rows provide large
especially important as the trees mature volumes of wood without overly sacrificing forage produc-
tion.
and the canopy closes. The lighter the
shade that is produced, the longer you
can grow crops or forages.
Differences exist between the results that can
• Capable of producing the products you
be expected from each tree arrangement.
desire.
Landowner objectives will determine the best
Factor 2: Forage
Closer tree spacings may be designed for for-
ages which are more shade tolerant, keeping in
mind equipment requirements. However, most
forages need a minimum of 50 percent light,
so plan to manage tree densities to produce A single row of pine and fencing allows for man-
adequate light for forage growth. aged paddock grazing based on forage response to
grazing.
2. Seed immediately after site preparation Annual rye and timothy grass grow well in shaded envi-
(light fire or disking, and necessary soil amend- ronments, as shown here under 8-year-old walnut grown
ments like lime or fertilizer) to give domestic between rows of pine.
forage the jump on native competitors.
Forage growth and interaction
3. Lay out pastures and fencing for rotational
The forage component of a silvopastoral prac-
grazing.
tice can be either competitive or complimenta-
ry with your trees. Your management decisions
4. Install water supply to meet livestock re-
will influence which way the practice develops.
quirements.
As the select forage begins to develop and fill
an area, it may be beneficial for tree growth to
eliminate the forage that would otherwise grow
directly adjacent to the tree. It is desirable to
use a weed mat, herbicide or some other form
of control to eliminate grass growing within
two to three feet of seedlings for up to five
years. Tree growth will greatly benefit.
Course
http://www.silvopasture.org/
Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJsKmBbtw7Q and http://centerforagroforestry.org/pubs/vid-
eomain.php
Silvopasture
Cornell Univ.: http://www2.dnr.cornell.edu/ext/info/pubs/MapleAgrofor/Silvopasturing3-3-2011.pdf
USDA NRCS: Information Sheet http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrc-
s144p2_010420.pdf
Garrett, H.E. (editor) 2009. North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice (2nd
Edition). American Society of Agronomy. pp. 105-132. (Chapter 6)
Garrett, H.E., M.S. Kerley, K.P. Ladyman, W.D. Ladyman, L.D. Godsey, J.W. VanSambeek and D. K. Brau-
er. 2004. Hardwood silvopasture management in North America. Agroforestry Systems 61: 21-33.
USDA National Agroforestry Center: http://nac.unl.edu/silvopasture.htm
Fike, J. H., Buergler, A. L., Burger, J. A., and Kallenbach, R. L. 2004. Considerations for establishing and
managing silvopastures. Online. Forage and Grazinglands. doi:10.1094/FG-2004-1209-01-RV. http://
www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/fg/review/2004/silvo/
University of Florida: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fr145 and http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fr139
Mississippi State Univ.: http://msucares.com/crops/forages/newsletters/09/4.pdf
Grazing Systems
University of Missouri Extension (Grazing and Watering): http://muextension.missouri.edu/ex-
plorepdf/envqual/EQ0379.pdf http://muextension.missouri.edu/explorepdf/envqual/eq0380.pdf
National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service - ATTRA :
Managed Grazing around Riparian Areas: https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/summaries/summary.
php?pub=116
https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/livestock/pasture.html
https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/summaries/summary.php?pub=245
https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/summaries/summary.php?pub=249
https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/summaries/summary.php?pub=244
1. Identify the top three landowner objectives related to creating a silvopasture practice
i.
ii.
iii.
3. What cost-share or incentive programs are available to assist with the silvopasture prac-
tice (don’t forget to include assistance that might be available to establish managed grazing
systems or watering systems)?
i.
ii.
iii.
4. Do you have any major concerns related to integrating the silvopasture practice with the
current farm layout (such as access and movement of the livestock)?
5. Are there any conservation agencies or groups that could assist in designing integrated
habitat that works with your current farming practices?
i.
ii.
iii.
6. What are the two primary ways that livestock can damage trees? And, is there a plan in
place to minimize damage should it occur?
i.
ii.
7. What are the four factors that go into planning alley widths for the silvopasture practice?
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
8. What other considerations are needed to reach the landowner objectives identified in
question #1?
1. Identify the top three landowner objectives related to creating a silvopasture practice Increase acre-
age available for grazing, Better production from paddocks, Reduced stress on livestock for increased
productivity
2. What are the three interactive components to consider in design of a successful silvopasture prac-
tice? Forage, Livestock, Trees
3. What cost-share or incentive programs are available to assist with the silvopasture practice (don’t
forget to include assistance that might be available to establish managed grazing systems or watering
systems)? EQIP, SWCD Watering, USDA Rotational Grazing/Fence and Watering Systems
4. Do you have any major concerns related to integrating the silvopasture practice with the current
farm layout (such as access and movement of the livestock)? Limiting access to streams and providing
alternative watering systems. Protection of young, newly established trees.
5. Are there any conservation agencies or groups that could assist in designing integrated habitat that
works with your current farming practices? USDA NRCS, MDC, MU Extension
6. What are the two primary ways that livestock can damage trees? And, is there a plan in place to
minimize damage should it occur? Trampling, Browsing, Use single strand of electric fence spaced 3 feet
from seedlings.
7. What are the four factors that go into planning alley widths for the silvopasture practice? Equipment
size, Forage, Changes through time, Thinning and Pruning
8. What other considerations are needed in order to reach the landowner objectives identified in ques-
tion # 1? Create a good activities schedule that outlines the process of implementing forest thinning, fenc-
ing, forage establishment, creating watering access, etc…
On non-recreational or non-incised streams, Zones 1 and 2 are often combined, and management becomes more
closely aligned to that of Zone 2 alone. In each of the zones it is important to recognize the role that buffer health
plays in maintaining function. Healthy and actively growing vegetation provides the best capture and utilization of
problem NPS nutrients and chemicals prior to their entering waterways.
In areas with frequent flooding, trees and flood waters can be extensive and counter -pro-
shrubs should also be less densely planted ductive to the function of the buffer system.
so a ground cover of grasses and forbs can be It is therefore important to maintain a woody
established. Where the trees and/or shrubs plant spacing that allows enough sunlight to
completely shade the soil, surface erosion from reach the soil to support a grass/forb cover.
be Required
Specific Considerations for Stability: Rock rip-rap. Rocks anchored to the toe of the
Stream Bank Structures stream bank. This type of stabilization is useful
In some cases, erosion caused by runoff and/or in areas of severe undercutting. Size of the rock
sloughing of stream banks is too excessive to be is directly related to stream size, and the vol-
stabilized by a Forested Riparian Buffer alone. ume and velocity of water flow. Larger streams
Therefore, to quickly stop erosion, it may be with increased water volume and velocity will
necessary to use stream bank bioengineering. require larger rock. A mixture of rock sizes is
This is an expensive and intensive practice and often appropriate to provide a surface with
is only appropriate for specific trouble spots. minimal openings that allow water to move
through turbulently. In no case should large
Geotextile fabrics. Fabrics of jute, coconut, or In-stream structures. Where channel incision
other fibers may be used in conjunction with is still actively occurring and stream banks are
any of the living structures. This fiber mat will unstable, or where there is a lack of in-stream
hold soil in place while the live plant material habitat, rock structures, such as boulder weirs
becomes established. The fabric can be held in can be constructed. These structures are con-
place with stakes and/or placed in the trench structed of properly sized rock and are no more
with fascines and covered with a shallow layer than 1.5 to 2 ft high at their center. They are
of soil. usually constructed with a slight V in the center
to direct flow down the center of the channel.
Live post and stakes. By using dormant plant They have an upstream rock apron with a 4:1
material, stream banks can be quickly stabi- slope and a down-stream apron with a 20:1
lized. Dormant material (cuttings) of a few slope. These aprons reduce the turbulence of
selected tree and shrub species (particularly the water, while allowing enough to improve
willows) will quickly develop root structures oxygenation of the water. These structures are
below ground and produce live shoots above. usually used in series, allowing the pool of the
Stakes of one-half inch diameter and larger downstream weir to back up to the apron of the
are driven into an eroding bank. The longer upstream weir. This placement reduces channel
the stake, the better stability that is provided bed erosion. Providing pools that are 1.5 to 2
because the more roots will sprout along the ft deep reduces the critical bank height at low
stem. Lengths may range from 2 to 3 feet for flow, thus reducing bank erosion. (See Figure 3,
stakes, and up to 10 feet for posts. Installa- page 8).
Improved wildlife habitat, such as ducks and quail, are Decorative woody florals and craft products.
another benefit of riparian buffers.
Decorative woody florals can be planted in
Zone 2 of a riparian forest buffer for additional
income. This category includes any woody
Market Opportunities with plant species that has a colorful or unusually
Upland and Riparian Forest shaped stem, bud, flower, fruit or leaf. Common
Buffers examples include pussy and curly willows and
Many products grown in the buffer have red- and yellow-stemmed dogwoods. These
monetary value in addition to their functional plants, and many others, are regularly used in
conservation benefits. A trip to a local florist or the floral industry to add height and breadth,
craft store will give you an idea of the diverse enhance line and form, and add a splash of
Learn more about decorative woody florals Timber trees. Planting trees in Zone 2 of your
through research conducted by the Univer- riparian buffer for a future timber harvest
sity of Nebraska Extension Forestry Program, requires a management plan and patience,
including a list of additional species of woody but can be very profitable over the long-term.
plants commonly used in the floral industry In Missouri, when the market is right, Silver
and retail and wholesale nursery stock sources Maple brings almost as much as oak species
online at http:// snrs.unl.edu/forestry/woody_ (price per board feet).
florals.htm.
Integrating riparian buffers into your current
land use practices can maintain the integrity of
stream channels, reduce the impact of upland
Market Opportunities sources of pollution, generate income and op-
timize performance for environmental protec-
Examples of ‘mar- Timeframe to reach tion and economic production. With thoughtful
ketable’ products market potential consideration to site characteristics, landowner
Floral and craft Beginning approximately 2
goals, species selection and environmental and
products years after establishment, wildlife benefits, riparian buffers provide an
and if done correctly (i.e. additional source of sustainable production
plants re-sprout), continu- with multiple conservation benefits.
ing for many years
Berries and nuts From 2 to 15 years, de-
pending on the crop
Financial Resources
There are many agencies offering programs
Biomass 3 to 20 year rotation, mar- that can be used to establish and maintain
ket dependent agroforestry practices on private land. One of
the most significant of these agencies is the
Timber trees In most cases, 40+ years USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA), through the
various elements of the Conservation Reserve
Program. Each of these programs is designed
Berries and nursery stock. Various species of to take environmentally sensitive and highly
edible berries, including elderberries, black- erodible land out of production by offering a
berries and raspberries, can be grown in the soil rental payment, a cost-share for the estab-
shrub zone of a riparian buffer for additional lishment of various conservation practices and
income. Markets for fresh berries can be found other financial incentives to landowners who
by contacting local farmers’ markets, grocers offer to set aside their land.
and specialty health food stores.
The Conservation Reserve Program Continu-
Harvesting nut crops. Planting nut-bearing ous Sign-up (CRPCS) program offers direct
species including pecan, hazelnut, and black benefits to landowners establishing a forested
walnut in Zone 2 can provide income from nut riparian buffer. CRPCS is a voluntary program
In Print
Schultz, R.C., T.M. Isenhart, J.P Colletti, W.W. Simpkins, R.P. Udawatta, and P.L. Schultz. 2009. Riparian
and Upland Buffer Practices. Chapter 8 In: H.E. Garrett, (Ed.) North American Agroforestry: An inte-
grated Science and Practice, 2nd Ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
University Resources
The University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry -- www.centerforagroforestry.org
Iowa State University Extension (See publications list for “Stewards of our Streams” series on riparian
buffers.) www.extension.iastate.edu/
Healthy Land, Healthy Water: Riparian Management Systems (A resource web site from the
Iowa State Agroecology Issue Team of the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture)
www.buffer.forestry.iastate.edu/
Science-based Trials of Rowcrops Integrated with Prairies (STRIPs) (Research involving upland native
grass buffers at Iowa State University) http://www.nrem.iastate.edu/research/STRIPs/
The University of Nebraska Forestry Extension (Resources about decorative woody florals and other
specialty forest products) http://ncdc.unl.edu/woodyfloral.shtml
State-Based Resources
Missouri Department of Natural Resources (Perform a search for “buffers” to see current bulletins and
information.) www.dnr.mo.gov /
Missouri Department of Conservation (Find the Resource Forester for your county through this online
listing.) mdc.mo.gov
Grow Native! (A native plant marketing and education program of the Missouri Prairie Foundation,
established to increase the demand, use of native plants in the Lower Midwest) www.grownative.org
Federal Resources
USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) (Search for “buffers” to find research projects and publica-
tions) www.ars.usda.gov
Natural Resources Conservation Service (Use subject search to view nationwide guides and publica-
tions on riparian buffers.) www.nrcs.usda.gov/
The USDA National Agroforestry Center -- www.unl.edu/nac/
Non-Profit Organizations
Trees Forever (An organization dedicated to natural resources stewardship and addressing the chal-
lenges facing communities and the environment, including water quality.)
www.treesforever.org/
Five Practices of Agroforestry DVD: Produced by the University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry
Includes the basics of establishing a riparian buffer practice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HDnyV1ViHw
“Stewards of our Streams: Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.” For more information visit www.exten-
sion.iastate.edu. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1626C.pdf
1. Why are warm season grasses viewed as an essential component of a well-designed ripar-
ian forest buffer?
2. Due to the effectiveness of warm season grasses at slowing the movement of water headed
towards streams and waterways, sediments accumulate at the up slope side of the buffer.
Is this a problem in the long run and can it be managed?
3. If I manage my grass/shrub/tree buffer for the first 3 to 5 years and it has become well es-
tablished, can it be left alone to take care of itself from that point?
4. As their name implies, warm season grasses do not begin active growth until late spring.
However, fertilizers and other soil amendments are applied early in the spring.
Also, while crops are being planted and getting established, the soil is relatively unprotected
from rainfall and prone to serious erosion. Given this situation, how effective are warm sea-
son grasses as buffers?
6. What cost share programs are available to help offset the costs of RFB establishment?
1. Why are warm season grasses viewed as an essential component of a well-designed riparian
forest buffer? Warm season grasses are typically stiff-stemmed clump grasses. Once established,
warm season grasses roots penetrate deeply into the root zone. These two attributes contribute two
essential functions to the buffer. First, the stiff stems hold up against water movement and forces
water to slow down as it moves through the grasses. Second, coupled with the well-developed deep
root profile and well aerated soil, flowing water will have adequate residence time to percolate into
the soil. Sediments and phosphate fall out of solution, soluble nutrients enter the root zone, while
atrazine can be detoxified by plant roots and microorganisms.
2. Due to the effectiveness of warm season grasses at slowing the movement of water headed
towards streams and waterways, sediments accumulate at the up slope side of the buffer. Is
this a problem in the long run and can it be managed? Yes, this can become a problem if the
warm season grass buffer is not managed. Riparian forest buffers are living filters, and like all filters,
they need to be “cleaned” periodically to function properly. In the case of a RFB, cleaning refers to
periodic maintenance.
3. If I manage my grass/shrub/tree buffer for the first 3 to 5 years and it has become well es-
tablished, can it be left alone to take care of itself from that point? RFBs must be managed on a
continued basis to maximize their buffer function. To maintain active growth and out-compete fes-
cue and other invasive woody species, warm season grasses and forbs must be burned periodically.
Trees must be thinned periodically to maintain active growth rates and not stagnate. Similarly, many
shrubs selected for RFBs must be coppiced (cut back close to the ground) to maintain vigorous root
and shoot growth.
4. As their name implies, warm season grasses do not begin active growth until late spring.
However, fertilizers and other soil amendments are applied early in the spring. Also, while
crops are being planted and getting established, the soil is relatively unprotected from rain-
fall and prone to serious erosion. Given this situation, how effective are warm season grasses
as buffers? For a buffer to be truly effective, warm season grasses are an essential component. The
above stated problem is their biggest weakness. Therefore, warm season grasses need to be used
in combination with both cool season grasses and woody perennials for a RFB to be effective on a
year-round basis. Cool season grasses begin growth early in the spring, and even though they are
relatively shallow rooted and lack stiff stems (so that water will knock them down and flow right over
the top) they are active and a first line of defense against water, soil and nutrient movement early is
the growing season. Combined with shrubs and trees, some of which also become active early in the
growing season (e.g., willow species), RFBs are fully functional.
5. How wide should my buffer be? The general rule of thumb is that wider is better. However, that
is a very broad generalization. Buffer width depends on many factors including the purpose(s) for
the buffer, the associated cropping pattern and related conservation practices being employed
upslope, the specific soil and slope conditions, and whether or not government cost share programs
are involved which require certain minimum widths. Buffers may be designed for bank stability,
aquatic habitat protection and improvement, sediment control, removal of soluble nutrients from
adjacent crop fields, flood control or wildlife habitat. To stabilize streambanks and protect aquatic
habitat, effective buffers can vary from 30 to 90 feet wide. For sediment and flood control or to im-
prove wildlife habitat, buffers must be wider, ranging from 60 feet to well beyond 150 ft.
6. What cost share programs are available to help offset the costs of RFB establishment?
USDA FSA offers a variety of cost share programs including the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP),
Conservation Reserve Program Continuous Sign-up (CRPCS), and the Conservation Reserve En-
hancement Program (CREP). Each of these programs contains approved practices that support RFB
establishment. Further details on cost share programs are found in the UMCA Publication “Funding
Incentives for Agroforestry in Missouri” (changes to these programs may occur after passage of a
new Farm Bill).
Windbreaks Defined
A windbreak is any barrier (natural or ar-
tificial) that reduces troublesome winds by
creating a wind shadow to the leeward (down-
This guide is intended to help you design and wind) side. Its major function is to reduce the
manage the interactive agroforestry practice of velocity of the wind. A windbreak must be 2.5
windbreaks. Properly applied on a landscape, a feet or higher to have a significant effect. The
windbreak can enhance and diversify farm kinds of materials that can be used for a wind-
income opportunities, improve the environ- break include trees, shrubs, tall perennial or
ment and create wildlife habitat. By develop- annual plants (e.g., switchgrass or sunflowers)
Fig. 1. Wind speed reduction to the lee of windbreaks with Fig. 2. Windbreak Design Options.
different densities.
Design Tips
• Windbreaks should con-
sist of at least one to three
rows of conifer and decidu-
ous species.
• Two to three rows of
trees can provide an ideal 60
percent windbreak density
(or 40 percent porosity) for
odor control.
• Shrubs are generally
planted in the outside or
inside rows, followed by co-
nifers with deciduous hard-
woods towards the middle
Design Tips
• Windbreaks can be given a more natural
look and still provide excellent wildlife
habitat and wind protection. Quail find excellent habitat in field windbreaks.
• Connecting Habitats - Where appropriate,
select the windbreak site that connects to a
larger habitat block such as a river corridor,
woodlot, wetland, woody draw, or similar
area.
• Herbaceous Cover - Consider planting or
leaving herbaceous vegetation such as a
mixture of grasses and legumes, standing
grain, or crop residues as a border (20 to
50 feet wide) along the edges of the wind-
break. If grasses or legumes are used, they
should be separated from the new tree
planting to avoid competition. This strip
Illinois
Illinois Windbreak Manual – Illinois Department of Conservation, Extension and NRCS: http://web.extension.
illinois.edu/forestry/iwm_complete.pdf
Essential Elements for Windbreak Design – University of Illinois Extension: web.extension.illinois.edu/cfiv/
homeowners/081208.html
Iowa
Planning Farmstead Windbreaks - Iowa State Extension
www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1716.pdf
Farmstead Windbreaks: Establishment, Care and Maintenance - Iowa State Extension
www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1717.pdf
Minnesota
Field Windbreaks – Minnesota Department of Agriculture Conservation Funding Guide
www.mda.state.mn.us/protecting/conservation/practices/fieldwindbreak.aspx
Windbreaks and Living Snow Fences – University of Minnesota Extension: www.myminnesotawoods.umn.
edu/2009/01/windbreaks-and-living-snow-fences/
Missouri
Planning Tree Windbreaks in Missouri – University of Missouri Extension extension.missouri.edu/explorepdf/
agguides/forestry/g05900.pdf
Windbreaks: Agroforestry Practice – University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry: http://www.
centerforagroforestry.org/practices/wb.php
Using Windbreaks to Reduce Odors Associated with Livestock Production Facilities – USDA NRCS-MO – IS-
MO380: www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs144p2_010805.pdf
Nebraska
Windbreak Design – University of Nebraska Extension NEBGuide G1304: http://nfs.unl.edu/documents/wind-
breakdesign.pdf
In Print:
Brandle, J.R., L. Hodges, J. Tyndall, and R.A. Sudmeyer. 2009. IN: North American Agroforestry: An Integrated
Science and Practice (H.E. Garrett, Editor). 2nd Edition. Agronomy Society of America, Madison, WI. Pp. 75-105
Brandle, J.R., L. Hodges, and B. Wight. 2000. IN: North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Prac-
tice (H.E. Garrett, W.J. Rietveld and R.F. Fisher, ed’s.). Agronomy Society of America, Madison, WI. pp. 79-118.
Brandle, J.R., D.L. Hintz and J.W. Sturrock. 1988. Windbreak Technology. IN: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Envi-
ronment, 22/23. Elsevier Science Publishers. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 598 pp
2. How far from the windbreak will crops benefit with increased yields?
3. Compare and contrast the uses for single-row and multiple-row windbreaks.
4. When considering whether to use single or multiple row windbreaks, what factors
should be considered?
5. When deciding between deciduous and coniferous species, what factors will also be
used when writing out the management plan?
6. Putting in a windbreak will cause a farmer to take acres out of production. How can you
persuade a farmer that putting a windbreak in will be beneficial in the long run?
7. What financial assistance programs are being funded through state or federal programs
to help landowners with the cost of putting windbreaks up on their property?
8. A number of features must be analyzed prior to the placement of a windbreak. List four
of these features.
1. What are the advantages of windbreaks for cattle, soil and crops?
Properly designed windbreaks have been shown to increase crop yield for a wide variety of
crops. Decreases in wind speed protect downwind crops, decreasing evapotranspiration and
increasing water use efficiency. Decreasing wind speed enhanced soil stability and is the primary
basis for the installation of windbreaks dating back to the Dust Bowl of the 1930’s. During the
winter, cattle use energy to keep warm, increasing their feed requirement. Windbreaks moder-
ate winter temperature extremes, reducing cold stress. Windbreaks also improve calving success
rates.
2. How far from the windbreak will crops benefit with increased yields?
The rule of thumb is that crop yields are improved out to 10-15H.
3. Compare and contrast the uses for single-row and multiple-row windbreaks.
Single-row deciduous windbreaks are designed to improve snow distribution across a crop field
to improve moisture for early season crop growth. They are also used surrounding orchards to
still the air and improve pollination and/or speed up crop maturation. They may also be used as
a visual screen along roads. Other windbreak applications depend on multiple-rows of decidu-
ous and coniferous trees and shrubs, combined and configured for specific purposes (i.e., crop
production, animal protection, snow fences).
4. When considering whether to use single or multiple row windbreaks, what factors
should be considered?
The purpose of the windbreak dictates the design.
5. When deciding between deciduous and coniferous species, what factors will also be
used when writing out the management plan?
Both conifers and deciduous trees bring different attributes to the function of the windbreak.
Deciduous trees are more porous to wind movement, and are less effective in slowing wind
speeds. Conversely, deciduous windbreaks reduce wind velocity further downwind. Conifers
provide much more wind blockage, critical to protect cattle from wind and snow and roads and
buildings from snow buildup.
6. Putting in a windbreak will cause a farmer to take acres out of production. How can you
persuade a farmer that putting a windbreak in will be beneficial in the long run?
A realistic assessment of the farmers’ goals and objectives, coupled with a similar assessment of
the entire farm and cropping system, will lead to the diagnosis that may include establishment
of windbreaks. Evidence of windblown soil erosion and associated crop damage, need for cattle
protection or protection of buildings and roads, may all lead to this diagnosis. Once the diagno-
sis includes windbreaks, the next step is to explore cost share programs that may help to offset
establishment costs. Visits to other landowners that have functioning windbreaks, will be very
effective in addressing farmer concerns.
7. What cost share programs are being funded through state or federal programs to help
landowners with the cost of putting windbreaks up on their property?
EQIP and CCRP both provide cost share for windbreak installation. (see “Funding Incentives for
Agroforestry in Missouri” for a thorough discussion of available cost share programs).
8. A number of features must be analyzed prior to the placement of a windbreak. List four
of these features.
Height, density, orientation, length, width, uniformity, cross sectional shape.
Challenges
• Informal or immature markets
• Variable yield
• Limited information available on how to
produce crops
• Volatile markets for some products
• Some crops attractive to poachers
Woods Grown Woods grown, also known as forest gardening, is most intensive. In
addition to potential thinning of the forest overstory, it often involves
clearing undesirable vegetation in the understory and other practices
that are more closely related to agronomy (e.g., tillage, fertilization,
weeding, and control of disease, insects, and wildlife). Due to costs
associated with input levels, forest gardening can be costly and time
consuming but can render large NTFP yield.
Wild-Simulated Wild-simulated is the cultivation of NTFPs in natural growing environ-
ments. A natural growing environment can deliver products similar in
appearance and quality to plants naturally growing in the wild. Rather
than administer intensive agronomic practices, wild simulated for-
est farmers use minimally invasive techniques to expose the soil, and
plant seeds or plants. Fertilizers and pesticides are rarely used. Despite
potential decreases in total yields, wild simulated products often have
higher priced markets when compared to those that are more inten-
sively cultivated.
Managed Wild Population Managed wild populations involves working with plants or fungus
that already exist. The forest canopy may be modified to favor growth
of desirable NTFPs. Understory plants that are competing with the de-
sired species may be removed. Annual harvests might not be possible.
Inputs are very low and yields vary depending on the species and how
often it is harvested.
Wild-Harvest or Wild-harvesting is the harvesting of NTFPs growing naturally in the
Wild-Craft forest. It is not generally considered forest farming because active
management is not involved. There are no inputs and no risks. There
are sustainable wild-harvest methods that can be followed to ensure
future harvests.
Each forest farming method has advantages as well as potential drawbacks in terms of time and money, which also varies
by crop. For example, woods grown ginseng may result in a greater yield when compared to wild-simulated but per weight
value may be lower. Successful forest farmers have a good sense of available markets and NTFP prices and match method
and product to maximize revenue.
is actually a diseased willow with cankered forest floor and possible canopy management
stems, often are carved and polished by crafts- to create appropriate growing conditions.
men to create beautiful walking sticks and Small diameter hardwoods that are removed
other items. Smooth sumac, hickory, and aspen for timber stand improvement, for instance,
saplings are also converted to walking sticks may be used as logs for mushroom production.
and mass marketed. Burls are carved and In general, forest farming methods range from
turned into bowls. These value-added “art ob- minimal to intensive, which varies depend-
jects” often sell for up to $100 or more. ing on the products being produced but often
relates to tradeoffs between time and money.
Forest Farming Methods
Management requirements differ based on the There are three recognized methods of forest
NTFPs being farmed. For example, medicinal farming: woods grown (sometimes referred
herb production often involves cultivating the to as forest gardening), wild-simulated and
Medicinal NTFPs: Ginseng, goldenseal, black cohosh, bloodroot, mayapple, wild ginger, Oregon-
grape, false unicorn (fairywand), ginkgo, skullcap, slippery elm, wild yam, Bethroot, Culver’s root
(black root), blue cohosh, boneset, lady’s slipper, passionflower, partridge berry, hawthorne, pink-
root, (indian pink), spikenard, stargrass (devil’s bit), stoneroot, Virginia snakeroot, yellow indigo, and
yellow root.
Floral/Decorative NTFPs: Grape vines for wreaths; burls for carving; , bark, pine needles, wood
splints, kudzu, various stems, and bark for baskets; , fall colored leaves and Spanish moss for decora-
tions; cuttings from conifers for wreaths, roping, and garlands; salal, pussywillows, ferns, beargrass,
and galax for floral greens for use in arrangements; and pine straw for landscaping mulch.
Edible NTFPs: Mushrooms including shiitake, oyster, reishi, morels, maitake, native truffles, and
lion’s mane; nuts including pecans, black walnuts; fruits and berries including gooseberries and
blackberries, crab apples, elderberries, paw paws, and blueberries; vegetables including fiddle
heads, ramps, bean salad (rosy twisted stalk), bear grass spiderwort, branch lettuce, burdock, dan-
delion, dock, miner’s lettuce, nettles, poke sallet, sweet salad (Solomon’s seal), upland cress (creasy
greens), and watercress; syrups including sugar maple and birch; and honey.
Woodland Wildflower NTFPs: Spring ephemerals to be sold as potted plants including celandine
poppy, wild geranium, bluebells, Jack-in-the Pulpit, mayapple, and trillium.
Specialty Woods NTFPs: Fine woods for making musical instruments and decorative bowls and
plates including curly maple, black walnut, Appalachian red spruce, and eastern red cedar.
Biomass Plants: Willow and poplar grown as short rotation crops; and waste products from timber
including sawdust, wood chips, bark, stumps, and branches.
Timber By-products: High quality sawlogs, low quality trees, firewood, and woody residues for
energy production.
4) Decide on a production method and opera- Markets for forest farmed products vary, but
tional investments; and often are direct to consumer and via local
5) Thoroughly investigate technical resources stores, cooperatives, or farmers markets. How-
and engage technical experts. ever, in some cases, larger-scale markets are
available. For example, shiitake, matsutake,
Sources of expertise on growing and producing morel, and chanterelle mushrooms, as well as
NTFPs can be obtained online from Coopera- truffles, may be sold in small volumes at farm-
tive Extension’s Forest Farming Community of ers’ markets or to gourmet restaurants, or in
Practice (http://www.extension.org/forest_ larger volumes to distributors for resale in re-
farming) and in County Extension offices, State gional markets. Markets for decorative prod-
Land Grant Universities, the Natural Resources ucts like grape vine wreaths often are in urban
Conservation Service, the USDA Forest Service, areas and may be very seasonal. Decorative
State Forestry and Conservation Agencies, and products may be sold through cooperatives
Internet sources (see Additional Resources or to local buyers. Non-local buyers may also
section). be reached through the Internet. However, by
Success Stories
Ozark Forest Mushrooms, Timber, Mo.
One of the Midwest’s most significant
demonstrations of a successful forest
farming practice is Ozark Forest Mushrooms
near Timber, MO. Dan Hellmuth and Nicola
MacPherson established the specialty
mushroom operation in 1990 on what was
then a timber operation, and together with
Forestry Consultation
UMCA DVD
Visit www.centerforagroforestry.org or the University of Missouri Extension web page at http://ex-
tension.missouri.edu/explore/agguides/agroforestry/index.htm to purchase.
Forest Farming video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssFQXgGbwTE
In Print
Chamberlain, J.L., D. Mitchell, T. Brigham, T. Hobby, L. Zabek, and J. Davis. 2009. Forest Farming Prac-
tices. IN: North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice. 2nd Edition. (H.E. Garrett,
editor). Agronomy Society of America, Madison, WI. pp. 219-255.
Persons, W.S. and J.M. Davis. 2007. Growing and marketing ginseng, goldenseal, and other wood-
i. _______________________________________________________
ii. _______________________________________________________
iii. _______________________________________________________
i. _______________________________________________________
ii. _______________________________________________________
iii. _______________________________________________________
iv. _______________________________________________________
3. What are the four methods of integrating forest farming with wooded environments?
Which are the highest input and cost and which are the lowest?
i. _______________________________________________________
ii. _______________________________________________________
iii. _______________________________________________________
iv. _______________________________________________________
ii. _______________________________________________________
iii. _______________________________________________________
5. Identify how the landowner can reach their objectives while producing the desired
crops.
3. What are the four methods of integrating forest farming with wooded environments?
Which are the highest input and cost and which are the lowest?
i. Woods grown – highest input and costs
ii. Wild- Simulated
iii. Managed wild
iv. Wild-harvested – lowest input and costs
5. Identify how the landowner can reach their objectives while producing the desired
crops.
First identify certain wooded areas that may be more appropriate than others for growing the
desired crop. Choose a northerly aspect and well drained site for ginseng production. There can
be a bit more flexibility on the mushroom site (but, place it where access is good). And, are there
sites that are best for just producing timber (soils, aspect, slope position)? Select crop trees to
create appropriate shade levels. Thin. Plant ginseng by planned method. Inoculate mushroom
logs in an identified area.
Summary of benefits
Aesthetic – Wildlife provide music to our ears
and beauty to our eyes
Wildlife benefits in your Social – Wildlife help in providing a sense
agroforestry operation of place and attract families, photographers,
Regardless of what a landowner does on their birdwatchers, hunters and anglers
land, including nothing, there are both posi- Ecological – Wildlife, such as amphibians,
tive and negative effects on wildlife. Many of indicate high-quality habitat that provides
our current agricultural practices, particularly clean water and unpolluted soil. Some wild-
those associated with larger farms and the life species provide soil aeration services, such
associated increase in size of equipment, has as moles, while other wildlife species disperse
drastically reduced the quality and quantity seeds, such as birds and mammals.
of available wildlife habitat. Agroforestry Economic - Wildlife can provide you with an
practices offer an opportunity to both provide economic return when you open your land to
benefits to wildlife as well as quality timber others for birdwatching, hunting, guiding or
production. Many landowners view wildlife as agritourism. Indirectly, pollinators provide bil-
an important by-product of their land manage- lions of dollars worth of pollinating services,
ment activities, particularly wood production. while bats provide billions of dollars in insect
Agroforestry practices which include a diver- “pest” control.
Types of hunting leases are variable. In the In an annual or multi-year lease, a landowner
past, many landowners provided non-fee ac- enters into an agreement with a hunt club or
cess with an informal verbal permission agreed a group of friends willing to share the cost of
to by a handshake. This may still be useful for having long-term access to a hunting spot. An
managing nuisance populations, particularly if advantage to this sort of arrangement is that be
you don’t want to invest the time or energy or the establishment of a long-term relationship
simply are not interested in fee hunting. How- with the land, the hunters may start to develop
ever, agreements are becoming rare. They are a sense of stewardship for the property and
most often still found in rural or rural-small may ask to help conduct or participate in wild-
town areas where hunters are more aware of life habitat management activities.
farm-related issues and concerns. Another non-
monetary hunting lease is an exchange of ser- A broker or outfitter lease involves a middle
vices, whereby a landowner allows hunting in man that rents all of the hunting rights from
exchange for a service such as the monitoring a landowner and then subleases to individual
of land for trespassers or helping with farming hunters by species or season. This alleviates a
operations. These arrangements can be either lot of the work by a landowner, who then only
formal or informal. has to interact with one individual on all hunt-
ing related issues.
There are four general categories of fee
hunting: Regardless of the flavor of hunting arrange-
1) daily lease; ment that you enter into, one of the most
2) short-term or season lease; important concerns for most landowners has
3) annual or multi-year lease; and to do with liability. Most landowners fear being
sued or held liable for injuries sustained by
4) broker or outfitter lease.
hunters or others while on the land. The degree
of landowner liability differs by the status of
A daily lease is often used when there is a rela-
the visitor or use, with trespassers being af-
tively short hunting season and when a number
forded the least protection and invited visitors,
of hunters can be accommodated on a small
the most. A qualified lawyer and an insurance
parcel of land. Most commonly, game species
agent should be consulted before you enter
include pen-reared birds or mourning doves.
into any hunting lease agreement or purchase
This sort of lease is intensive for a landowner
liability insurance.
to manage, requiring a greater intensity of
References
Anonymous. 2008. Silvopasture: an agroforestry practice. USDA, National Agroforestry Center.
Anonymous. 2005. Working trees for wildlife. USDA, National Agroforestry Center.
Millspaugh, J.J., J.H. Schulz, T.W. Mong, D. Burhans, W.D. Walter, R. Bredesen, R.D. Pritchert, and D. C. Dey. 2009.
Agroforestry wildlife Benefits, Chapter 11. In: Garrett, H.E. (Ed). North American Agroforestry: An Integrated
Science and Practice. 2nd Edition. Agronomy Society of America, Madison, Wis.
Robinson, J. 2005. Silvopasture and eastern wild turkey. USDA National Agroforestry Center, AF Note, #28.
Researching and selecting The most common marketing strategy for farm-
target markets ers producing agroforestry products is product
differentiation to appeal to a focused group of
Customers differ in their values, needs, wants,
consumers (the target market). Farmers have
believes and incentives to purchase. Product
the opportunity to implement many creative
oriented businesses, who find a product they
marketing ideas to differentiate their products
can produce and try to sell it without first
and services in response to the needs of their
looking at customers’ needs, risk developing a
product that won’t sell. Instead, most success-
ful businesses are customer oriented—they
design marketing strategies around the needs
of their customers.
Publications
• Gold, M.A., M.M. Cernusca and L.D. Godsey. 2009. Agroforestry product markets and marketing. Chapter
11. In: Garrett, H.E. (ed). North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice. 2nd Edition.
Agronomy Society of America, Madison, WI.
• Cernusca M.M., M.A. Gold and L.D. Godsey 2012. Using the Porter model to analyze the U.S. elderberry
industry. Agroforestry Systems 86(3):365-377.
• Gold, M.A., M.M. Cernusca and L.D. Godsey. 2008. A competitive market analysis of the U.S. shiitake mush-
room marketplace. HortTechnology 18(3): 489-499.
• Gold, M.A., M.M. Cernusca and L.D. Godsey. 2006. Competitive Market Analysis: Chestnut Producers. Hort-
Technology, 16(2):360-369.
• Gold, M.A., L.D. Godsey and M.M. Cernusca. 2005. Competitive market analysis of Eastern red cedar. For-
est Products Journal 55(12):58-65.
Literature Cited
Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The
Free Press. 396 pp.
1. According to Michael Porter, there are five forces that influence how an industry is struc-
tured. What are they?
2. What are the main marketing strategies that you need to develop for each target mar-
ket?
1. According to Michael Porter, there are five forces that influence how an industry or a
business is structured. What are they?
2. What are the main marketing strategies that you need to develop for each target mar-
ket?
Summary
Agroforestry is a set of land-use practices that
interlaces production and stewardship. From an
economic standpoint, agroforestry can increase
production diversity by integrating a wide
range of commodity and alternative products. In
order to monitor and analyze the economic pa-
rameters of an agroforestry practice, landown-
ers may need to adopt some form of economic
budgeting. Because of the impact of long estab-
lishment periods and long periods where no
economic returns are generated, a combination
of enterprise budgeting and cash flow budget-
ing is recommended in order to fully capture
the short- and long-term revenue potentials.
Variable cash costs can be grouped into four categories, what are they?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Two types of budgets are recommended for the economic analysis of agroforestry practices,
what are they?
1.
2.
What are the four sections of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) that can affect agroforestry
adopters?
1.
2.
3.
4.
Variable cash costs can be grouped into four categories, what are they?
1. Establishment
2. Maintenance
3. Harvesting
4. Marketing
Two types of budgets are recommended for the economic analysis of agroforestry practices,
what are they?
1. Enterprise budget
2. Cash flow budget
What are the four sections of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) that can affect agroforestry
adopters?
A fixed cost is a cost that is associated with the ownership of resources. Fixed costs must be paid regard-
less of what activity is conducted on the property. Variable costs are costs associated with the productive
use of resources. Variable costs are the costs that are used when comparing the economics of competing
resource-use options.
Planting design and management of an agroforestry practice depends on existing site conditions
and the goals of the landowner (you may also refer to the section on each specific practice for more
information on design considerations). Trees can be planted in single or multiple rows, on contours
or in groups. Consider the products you wish to produce, any conservation or wildlife benefits de-
sired, on-farm equipment and the needs of companion crops when planning the planting design.
As trees require some maintenance, management requirements may influence the planting design.
Some important management considerations are:
• Weed control can reduce competition for moisture, nutrients and, in some cases, for light. Op-
tions for weed control include the use of herbicides, mulches (including living mulches such as
many clovers, and fabric mulches) and cultivation. To gain the best growth from newly estab-
lished trees, weed control should be maintained for a minimum of 3 years, and often for as
many as 5 years.
• Timely fertilization may be necessary for high-yielding fruit and nut production. In fruit and nut
production, having certain nutrients available to the tree at the appropriate time of year is often
essential for flower and nut set. For timber production, the cost of fertilization is usually not
recovered over the time it takes for a timber tree to reach maturity.
• Pruning allows room for equipment to pass below the branches and can be used to promote
the production of desired products such as timber. Pruning is also a useful tool in management
of fruit and nut trees. Through proper pruning, the shape of the crown and its density can be
managed to facilitate and improve a trees productivity.
• Timely thinnings promote good tree growth by reducing competition for water, light and nutri-
ents. As trees mature they grow to occupy more of the space where they are being managed.
As crowns of adjacent trees begin to touch or overlap, this is also a general indicator that their
root systems are overlapping. When trees touch or overlap, competition for light, moisture and
nutrients between adjacent trees may become a factor limiting tree growth. At this point, thin-
ning can be beneficial.
• Grafting primarily applies to fruit and nut production. By grafting scion wood to a tree you are
assured that the fruit or nut produced has the potential to exhibit the exact same characteristics
as the adult tree from which the scion came. However, this does not always occur, since mois-
ture, nutrients and management also play a significant role in fruit and nut development. Yet,
it is the best way to ensure success. Spread planting over several years to limit the number of
trees that will require grafting in a single year.
Online:
• USDA NRCS Plant Database – http://www.plants.usda.gov/
• Plant Resource Guide: Materials and Management – http://www.centerforagroforestry.org/
pubs/training/appendix6.pdf
• University of Connecticut Plant Database of Trees, Shrubs and Vines – http://www.hort.uconn.
edu/plants/a/a.html
• Grow Native – http://www.grownative.org/
• Native Plant Information – http://www.grownative.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=plants.main
• Silvics of North American Trees – http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/silvics_manual/table_of_
contents.htm
• MDC Private Lands Division – http://www.mdc.mo.gov/landown
• Missouri Flora Database – http://www.missouriplants.com/
• Arkansas Home and Garden Plant Database – http://www.arhomeandgarden.org/planto-
ftheweek/archivesa_d.htm
• Grasses of Iowa – http://www.eeob.iastate.edu/research/iowagrasses/speciescn-nat.html
• Kansas Wildflowers and Grasses – http://www.lib.ksu.edu/wildflower/
• USDA Forest Service Plant Database – http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/
• The Right Tree Handbook - Minnesota Power – http://www.mnpower.com/treebook/
Online:
• For a number of publications on specific forages and grasses, visit:
http://muextension.missouri.edu/explore/agguides/crops/#Forages
• Plant Resource Guide: Materials and Management – http://www.centerforagroforestry.org/
pubs/training/appendix6.pdf
• Establishing Forages – http://muextension.missouri.edu/explore/agguides/crops/g04650.htm
• Seeding Rates, Dates and Depths for Common Missouri Forages – http://muextension.missouri.
edu/explore/agguides/crops/g04652.htm
• USDA NRCS Plant Database – http://www.plants.usda.gov/
• University of Connecticut Plant Database of Trees, Shrubs and Vines – http://www.hort.uconn.
edu/plants/a/a.html
• Grow Native – http://www.grownative.org/
• Native Plant Information – http://www.grownative.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=plants.main
• Silvics of North American Trees – http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/silvics_manual/table_of_
contents.htm
• MDC Private Lands Division – http://www.mdc.mo.gov/landown
• Missouri Flora Database – http://www.missouriplants.com/
• Arkansas Home and Garden Plant Database – http://www.arhomeandgarden.org/planto-
ftheweek/archivesa_d.htm
• Grasses of Iowa – http://www.eeob.iastate.edu/research/iowagrasses/speciescn-nat.html
• Kansas Wildflowers and Grasses – http://www.lib.ksu.edu/wildflower/
• USDA Forest Service Plant Database – http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/
• The Right Tree Handbook - Minnesota Power – http://www.mnpower.com/treebook/
Your timber is worth whatever you and the The sealed bid sale is recommended most of-
buyer agree to. Many factors influence the price ten for private woodland owners. This process
of standing trees. These include: informs potential buyers about the timber sale.
These buyers are allowed a length of time (usu-
• Tree species. Wood from some species is ally 4 to 6 weeks) to inspect the sale and sub-
more valuable than wood from other spe- mit bids. Each bidder is allowed to make only
cies. one bid and late bids are always rejected. Bids
• Tree size. Large trees will have more vol- are then opened at a specified time and place,
ume and clear wood than smaller trees. and the successful buyer is selected. If no bids
• Tree quality. Trees with fewer defects (e.g., meet your minimum requirements, you have
branch scars, decay, imbedded wire) have the right to refuse all bids. No further price
higher quality, more valuable wood. negotiations should take place after a buyer
• Volume of sale. Large volume sales will has been selected and unsuccessful bidders
bring a higher per unit price than small notified that the timber was sold. A blank Bid
volume sales. Solicitation is available from a MDC forester.
You are invited to bid on timber located as follows: in the NW 1/4, Section 23, Township 25 North,
Range 14 West, Timber County, Missouri. The timber is located five miles south of Oak Grove on Route
AB.
For additional information or for directions on how to see the timber, contact: Forrest Farmer, Oak
Grove, Missouri; telephone 573/555-1234.
DESCRIPTION:
Approximately 160 acres of mixed oak timber. The trees to be cut are marked with a fresh orange
paint spot at breast height and on the stump. About 1,600 trees are marked. Bids are to be made on a
lump sum basis.
BID INSTRUCTIONS:
After the bid is completed, return it to:
BIDDER: TELEPHONE:
ADDRESS: SIGNATURE:
AMOUNT OF BID:
Joe Logger of Big Cedar, Missouri, herein after called the Purchaser, agrees to purchase from Forrest
Farmer of Oak Grove, Missouri, herein after called the Seller, the designated timber specified below:
WITNESSETH:
ARTICLE I. The Seller hereby agrees to sell to the Purchaser, subject to the terms listed below, all of the
timber specified below, on a certain tract owned by the Seller, located in NW 1/4, Section 23, Town-
ship 25 North, Range 14 West, County of Timber, State of Missouri, located on 160 acres, more or less.
ARTICLE III. The Purchaser further agrees to cut and remove said timber in strict accordance with the
following conditions:
1. To waive all claims to the above described trees unless they are cut and removed on or before De-
cember 31, 1999.
2. To do all in his power to prevent and suppress forest fires on or threatening the sale area.
3. To protect from unnecessary injury young growth and other trees not designated for cutting.
4. To repair damage caused by logging to fences, bridges, roads, trails, or other improvements dam-
aged beyond ordinary wear and tear.
5. To allow the owner to cut and remove any portion of a tree left on the ground by the Purchaser
after he has removed his products.
ARTICLE V. It is mutually understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. All timber included in this agreement shall remain the property of the Seller, and shall not be re-
moved until paid for in full.
2. In case of a dispute over the terms of this contract, we agree to accept the decision of an arbitration
board of three selected persons as final. Each of the contracting parties will select one person and the
third will be the State Forester or his chosen representative.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF _________________
COUNTY OF_________________
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, at my office in
______________________, the day and year first above written.
My Commission as Notary
Public Expires _______________.
________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Reduce costs of
current farm or
forest operations
Increase short-term
income while
awaiting long-term
timber income
Tax advantages
Increase grazing
opportunities
Increase wildlife
opportunities
Undertake
environmental
improvements
Access to govern-
mental programs
and cost-share
Other
9. Other
Team Member 2
Team Member 3
Hired Labor
Total Hours
Available
Enterprise 2
Enterprise 3
2. Recreation
4. Grazing Livestock
(type)
5. Timber Production
6. Non-Timber
Production
7. Wildlife Areas
8. Green Belts
9. Other
Natural resources
Forest. Who can help? You may want to contact a state forester to assist you with the in-
ventory and evaluation of your forest resources. He or she can advise you on the procedure
for developing a forest stewardship plan. In some states, a state forester can help you pre-
pare a forest stewardship plan. In all states, they can provide names of private consultant
foresters to assist with a timber sale or assess the potential of your forest under different
management options.
Have you or has a past owner sold timber to a commercial timber harvester?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
How many acres of forest could a commercial operator potentially harvest during the next
five years?______
Within the next five years, what is the estimated income from a commercial timber
harvest(s) that is compatible with your forest stewardship objectives?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Wildlife
Who can help? State wildlife biologists have limited time but may be able to visit and
discuss options. Leasing the hunting rights is an option that could generate income to pay
taxes or more. Investigate educational materials on hunting options and discuss them with
your extension wildlife specialist. Also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
What type of habitat improvements could be made to attract the wildlife you are interested
in introducing to the property (timber harvesting, food plots, tree planting, etc.)?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Do neighbors or other local residents now hunt on the property, with or without permis-
sion? _________________________________________
Do existing hunters pay you for the right to hunt on the property? _________
If yes, how much are you paid a year? _________
List any unique wildlife habitats or species on your property (e.g., forest ponds, wetlands,
old forests, caves).
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Who can help? For assistance with evaluating your water resources, you may want to con-
tact your local cooperative extension office. An extension agent should be able to direct you
to a water-quality specialist in your area.
Barn 1
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Barn 2
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Other
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
List rental cost and location of any available public or private structures or facilities that
you can use for your enterprise (e.g., kitchen, storage facility, or processing facility).
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Are limbs and other wood from a recent timber harvest currently available for use? ________
What is the type and quantity of this material (e.g., cords of firewood that it would produce
and number and species of vines)?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Labor
Potential labor
sources
outside team
Financial resources
How much startup money can you raise by using personal or family resources? ________
Where will the startup money come from (e.g. personal savings, family member, farm
credit, bank, cooperative)?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Is there a grant program that could provide some startup money? _____________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Computer skills
Production skills
Sales ability
Other
(list skill)
Scale
Orientation
Development Area
Indicator Plants
8. Frost pockets.
In combination, the terrain relief and aspect create a lay of the land that often will enhance the
opportunities for a successful agroforestry practice. By listing unique land features you will be
better able to place practices and plant species to the landscape to best ensure their survival and
growth. For example, slope is very important in relation to the moisture available for plant growth.
In general, north-facing slopes will have better moisture than south-facing slopes that are typically
drier.
Tree Inventory
Tree species Percentage of Age Height Crown Density
each (opt’l) (opt’l) closure (trees/ha)
(%age)
Non-Timber Inventory
Harvestable Total # of Cover (%) Harvestable Size of plants Info on plants
species plants (ea. spe- (ea. species) vs. non (%) outside plots
cies)
1. Forest Farming
2. Alley Cropping
3. Silvopasture
4. Riparian Forest
Buffers
5. Windbreaks
6. Associated Practices
(e.g., Poplar plantations)
2. List the family members or team members who want to be actively involved. Describe each
person’s responsibilities.
3. Specify how much time each week you and your teammates will have available to spend on
your new enterprise.
4. How much money can each team member provide now to initiate the enterprise?
5. Check the responses that best characterize your business goals during the next 3 to 5 years
for your current enterprise. Answer any follow-up questions.
6. The following information will help you determine your financial goals for any current or
new enterprise. List the yearly income (you and your family or teammates) expect from the
sources listed below:
TOTAL
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
It is also very useful to consider which Government (State and Federal) Programs are available to
provide funding incentives for a broad range of agroforestry activities, from practice establishment
through value-added and product marketing.
What will be your major production tasks, such as planting, harvesting, building, advertising, sales
and maintenance? Describe the tasks according to the month they should occur. Also indicate which
months you expect to receive income.
Month Task
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Total
*Rated on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being least compatible and 10 being most compatible
Meets financial 9 9 5 10 9
goals
Uses underused 4 9 8 6 8
physical resources
Uses management/ 8 6 5 3 6
labor resources
Potential market 10 5 9 10 6
exists
Uses farm, forest 9 9 3 7 5
byproducts
Family financial 10 8 10 4 8
resources avail.
TOTAL 69 62 54 59 55
*Rated on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being least compatible and 10 being most compatible
Weaknesses Threats
Substitutes
Competitors
Product
Customer 1. 2. 3.
Segment
Geographic
Demographic
Psychographic
Needs/
Preferences
Photocopy the table below if you are assessing more than one development area.
Product
Customer 1. 2. 3.
Segment
Message
Tools
Frequency
Cost
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Crop Plant:
Agroforestry practice
(best produced in)
Where produced
(in development area)
Crop Plant:
Compatible livestock
(animal and useful
interaction)
Post-harvest
requirements (e.g.,
storage, drying)
Product(s) on market
Profit potential
Crop Plant:
Volume (potential
production)
Grade standards in
market
Value-added
opportunities
Other