Scribd
Upload
37 views1 page

Facts:: National Union of Bank Employees V. Philnabank Employees ASSOCIATION, GR No.174287, 2013-08-12

Uploaded by

Nyla

NUBE-PEC filed a petition against PEMA claiming it should be the sole bargaining agent for PNB employees after PNB transformed from a government to a private bank. Previously, PEMA represented PNB's government employees. However, after PNB's change in corporate status, NUBE-PEC argued it became the appropriate representation as it is a labor federation for private banking unions. A dispute arose between the two unions on who should negotiate on behalf of PNB employees after the bank's privatization.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt

Facts:: National Union of Bank Employees V. Philnabank Employees ASSOCIATION, GR No.174287, 2013-08-12

Uploaded by

Nyla
37 views1 page
NUBE-PEC filed a petition against PEMA claiming it should be the sole bargaining agent for PNB employees after PNB transformed from a government to a private bank. Previously, PEMA represented PNB's government employees. However, after PNB's change in corporate status, NUBE-PEC argued it became the appropriate representation as it is a labor federation for private banking unions. A dispute arose between the two unions on who should negotiate on behalf of PNB employees after the bank's privatization.

Original Description:

sample 5

Original Title

sample 5

Copyright

© © All Rights Reserved

Available Formats

DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

NUBE-PEC filed a petition against PEMA claiming it should be the sole bargaining agent for PNB employees after PNB transformed from a government to a private bank. Previously, PEMA represented PNB's government employees. However, after PNB's change in corporate status, NUBE-PEC argued it became the appropriate representation as it is a labor federation for private banking unions. A dispute arose between the two unions on who should negotiate on behalf of PNB employees after the bank's privatization.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
37 views1 page

Facts:: National Union of Bank Employees V. Philnabank Employees ASSOCIATION, GR No.174287, 2013-08-12

Uploaded by

Nyla
NUBE-PEC filed a petition against PEMA claiming it should be the sole bargaining agent for PNB employees after PNB transformed from a government to a private bank. Previously, PEMA represented PNB's government employees. However, after PNB's change in corporate status, NUBE-PEC argued it became the appropriate representation as it is a labor federation for private banking unions. A dispute arose between the two unions on who should negotiate on behalf of PNB employees after the bank's privatization.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

NATIONAL UNION OF BANK EMPLOYEES v.

PHILNABANK EMPLOYEES
ASSOCIATION, GR No.174287, 2013-08-12
Facts:
Respondent Philippine National Bank (PNB) used to be a government-owned and
controlled banking institution
Its rank-and-file employees, being government personnel, were represented for collective
negotiation by the Philnabank Employees Association (PEMA), a public sector union.
the Securities and Exchange Commission approved PNB's new Articles of Incorporation
and By-laws and its changed status as a private corporation.
PEMA affiliated with petitioner National Union of Bank Employees (NUBE), which is a labor
federation composed of unions in... the banking industry, adopting the name NUBE-PNB
Employees Chapter (NUBE-PEC).
Later, NUBE-PEC was certified as the sole and exclusive bargaining agent of the PNB
rank-and-file employees. A collective bargaining agreement (CBA) was subsequently
signed between NUBE-PEC and PNB

You might also like