Tabletalk Magazine, January 2008
Tabletalk Magazine, January 2008
Tabletalk Magazine, January 2008
0 0
C. S.
LEWIS
1898–1963
c o r a M d e o Living before the face of God
A M i nd Capt ivated by G od
B Y B U R K P A R S O N S
I have journeyed through the land of Narnia. Nearly ten years ago, I had the
privilege to stay at Rathvinden House, located in the beautiful rolling-green
countryside of County Carlow, Ireland. At that time, the Rathvinden estate was
owned and operated by Douglas Gresham, the stepson of C.S. Lewis.
Late one afternoon, as I was walking on the grounds of the estate with a
friend, we came across a lush, green pasture that was
The Lord took simply breathtaking. As we stood atop that pasture
captive the mind and beheld its majesty, one of our hosts turned to us
and said, “We call this the land of Narnia.” It was as if
of C.S. Lewis, we had entered a different world. And knowing that
and Lewis, in we were not too far from Lewis’ birthplace, I felt as if
turn, captivated I had entered the very world of C.S. Lewis himself.
Although he was not a professed Calvinist, Lewis
the minds of was indeed a professed Christian, and his professed
Christians. atheism the Lord sovereignly overcame by taking
him from his own dark, atheistic world, where it
is always winter but never Christmas, and placing him in the world of Jesus
Christ, who is on the move to destroy every stronghold, argument, and lofty
opinion raised against God so that we might take every thought captive to obey
Christ and live coram Deo, before His face and in His realm, forever.
By His grace, the Lord took captive the mind of C.S. Lewis, and Lewis, in
turn, captivated the minds of Christians throughout the world as he penned
words such as these: “If you read history you will find that the Christians who
did most for the present world were precisely those who thought most of the
next. It is since Christians have largely ceased to think of the other world that
they have become so ineffective in this.”
Burk Parsons is editor of Tabletalk magazine and minister of
congregational life at Saint Andrew’s Chapel in Sanford, Florida.
Tabletalk (USPS 009-013) is published monthly by Ligonier Ministries, Inc., 400 Technology Park, Lake Mary, FL 32746. Annual subscription price (12 issues): $20.00.
Periodicals postage paid at Lake Mary, FL, and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Ligonier Ministries, 400 Technology
Park, Lake Mary, FL 32746-6229. Unless noted, all Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version. Copyright © 2001 by Crossway
Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND CIRCULATION: Required by Title
39 United States Code 3685. Title of publication: Tabletalk. Publication no.: 009013. Date of filing: 10/19/07. Frequency of issue: monthly. No. of issues published
annually: 12. Annual subscription price: $20/yr. USA; $30/yr. foreign. Location of known office of publication: 400 Technology Park, Lake Mary, Seminole Co., FL
32746-6229. Mailing address of headquarters: 400 Technology Park, Lake Mary, FL 32746-6229. Publisher: Ligonier Ministries. Executive Editor: R.C. Sproul. Owner:
Ligonier Ministries, a nonprofit educational organization. Known bondholders, mortgagees, and other security holders owning or holding 1 percent or more of total
amount of bonds, mortgages, or other securities: none. The purpose, function, and nonprofit status of this organization and the exempt status for federal income
tax purposes has not changed during the preceding 12 months. Total no. of copies printed (net press run): average/last year: 73,000; last issue: 70,000. Paid/
requested circulation: 1) Sales through dealers and carriers, street vendors, and counter sales: average/last year: 2,249; last issue: 2,268; 2) Mail subscription: average/
last year: 52,482; last issue: 53,258. Free distribution by mail, carrier, or other means: average/last year: 3,817; last issue: 2,985. Total nonrequested distribution
August last year 2,603, last issue 3,063. Total distribution: average/last year: 61,151; last issue: 61,574. Copies not distributed: average/last year: 11,849; last
issue: 8,426. Total: average/last year: 73,000; last issue: 70,000. I certify that the statements made by me above are correct and complete. — Burk Parsons, editor
tab leta l k
IN THIS ISSUE
contents
{ THE L I F E A N D W O R K O F C.S . L E W I S }
J A N U A R Y 2008
F E A T U R E S VO LU M E 32 | N U M BER 1
4
DA I LY S T U D I E S
23 Into the Word
28 Good News for All Nations
The Weight of Glory By Robert Rothwell
RIGHT NOW COUNTS FOREVER 37 Jesus’ Family Tree
BY R.C. SPROUL By Joel R. Beeke
48 Jesus’ Childhood
By Jerry Bridges
55 What about Repentance?
By Tom Ascol
C O L U M N S
64 Pastor’s Perspective
By Alistair Begg
10 Surprised by Joy
BY SINCLAIR B. FERGUSON 68 Pro Ecclesia: For the Church
By Michael S. Horton
70 Generation to Generation
14
God in the Dock
By Harry L. Reeder III
74 Tolle Lege: Take Up and Read
By Keith A. Mathison
80 Seek Ye First
BY ROGER NICOLE By R.C. Sproul Jr.
82 Truth and Consequences
By Gene Edward Veith
18
The Chronicles of Narnia
ON THE COVER
C.S. (Clive Staples) Lewis by Wolf Suschitzky (1959).
Used by permission of The Marion E. Wade Center,
Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois
BY LELAND RYKEN
The Weight
of Glory
The Significance of C.S. Lewis
BRITISH WRITER C.S. LEWIS (1950) JOHN CHILLINGWORTH / STRINGER, HULTON ARCHIVE / GETTY IMAGES
rigHT noW counTS ForeVer THe WeigHT oF glory r.c. Sproul
he was able to hammer out a solid literary expert, C.S. Lewis remained
intellectual foundation for his own a layman theologically speaking.
faith. C.S. Lewis had no interest in a Indeed, he was a well-read and stud-
mystical leap of faith devoid of ratio- ied layman, but he did not benefit
nal scrutiny. He abhorred those who from the skills of technical training
would leave their minds in the park- in theology. Some of his theological
ing lot when they went into church. musings will indicate a certain lack of
He was convinced that Christianity technical understanding, for which
was at heart rational and defensible he may certainly be excused. His
with sound argumentation. His work book Mere Christianity has been the
showed a marriage of art and science, single most important volume of pop-
a marriage of reason and creative ular apologetics that the Christian
imagination that was unparalleled. world witnessed in the twentieth
His gift of creative writing was century. Again, in his incomparable
At Ligonier Ministries, our passion is to declare the majestic and holy character
of God to as many people as possible. We want to see the culture flooded with
Partnership Program is the most crucial support system we have in our ministry.
The donations of ministry partners are truly the backbone of our work. Please
consider how you can join with us through prayer and regular financial support,
which enables us to reach the world with the message of God’s holiness. To
JOY GRESHAM AND C.S. LEWIS(1958) © MICHAEL PETRO COLLECTION, UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE / SCOTLAND
N The Student
ovember 22, 1963, the date
of President Ken nedy ’s
assassination, was also the
day C.S. Lewis died. Seven years
earlier he had thus described death:
C live Staples Lewis (“Jack” to
his friends) was born on 29
November 1898 in Belfast, Northern
“The term is over: the holidays have Ireland, the second son of Albert
begun. The dream is ended: this is Lewis, a promising attorney and his
the morning.” The metaphor inher- wife, Florence (“Flora”), daughter
ent in these words is striking. It of an Anglican clergyman and one
comes from the world of students of the earliest female graduates (in
and pupils, but only a teacher would Mathematics and Logic) from what
employ it as a metaphor for death. is now Queen’s University, Belfast.
The words (from The Last Battle) She was probably the sharper of the
bring down the curtain — or perhaps parents, although “Jack” did not
better, close the wardrobe door — on inherit her mathematical gifts. Were
Lewis’ Chronicles of Narnia. But it not for a military service waiver
they also open a window into who from the Oxford University math-
C.S. Lewis really was. ematics entrance examination his
TTaabb ll ee tt aa ll kk JJ aa nn uu aa rr y 2 00 00 88 11 11
Suprised by Joy Sinclair Ferguson
of this was probably in inverse pro- other writer who seems to be closer,
portion to the growth of his reputa- or more continually close, to the Spirit
tion as a popular Christian writer (the of Christ Himself.” Certainly anyone
adjective “popular” being as damning who has read MacDonald’s fantasies
as “Christian”). such as Phantastes and Lilith will
Yet by any measure Lewis was soon realize the source of many ideas
an outstanding scholar. His best that might otherwise be thought of
known academic works include a as uniquely Lewisian. MacDonald,
study of the literature of the Middle it should be noted, was deeply influ-
Ages, The Allegory of Love (1936), enced by the world of Romanticism,
and his scintillating monograph on and this impacted his view of the
John Milton’s epic poem A Preface Gospel. Lewis on the other hand
to Paradise Lost (1942). The emi- employed his imaginative genius
nence of his scholarship led to an in the cause of a more mainstream
invitation to write the volume on orthodox, if not consistently evangeli-
English Literature in the Sixteenth cal, Christianity.
Century (1954) in the prestigious Lewis’ name is virtually synony-
AUTHOR AND CAMBRIDGE DON C.S. LEWIS (1958) © BURT GLINN, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND / MAGNMUN PHOTOS
I
n modern English the words apol- His first contribution to apologet-
ogy and apologize indicate regret ics was entitled The Problem of Pain,
because some statement or action published in October 1940 as part of
was offensive and wrong. This is not The Christian Challenge Series (it was
the case for “apologetics” in theol- reprinted ten times by 1943). He dealt
ogy, for that discipline is intended to there forthrightly with the question:
manifest “a point of view is right.” It is “If God is almighty and supremely
intended for those who differ in order loving, why does He permit pain in
to win them over, or for those who this universe?” He showed how pain
agree in order to confirm them in the is inevitable for real persons wher-
truth for which the apologist testifies. ever sin exists. Who could imagine
It is in this sense that C.S. Lewis what a frightful world it should be
is recognized as an “apologist,” for if sin could grow without restraint?
a number of his works are intended C.S. Lewis proceeds in his analysis in
to manifest the adequacy of the an orderly and lucid manner, dealing
Christian outlook over against a “nat- with this difficult subject in a way that
uralist” position, which asserts that a lay person can readily understand.
the universe is simply a great material From time to time, he has striking
mass functioning in terms of its own comments that remain unforgettable,
mechanism or laws without any pos- like the following: “A man can no
sible intervention from the outside
and specifically without a creative
or governing power of a mind. C.S.
Lewis was very well prepared for this
Lewis can cast a critical
task because until late in his twenties evaluation of many…motives
he was a devotee of atheism without
any reference to Jesus Christ and was that are f lourishing under
twenty-nine years old before being
converted and embracing a Christian
the umbrella of Christianity.
world-and-life view. Thus, he was
more knowledgeable than many
Christian apologists who know the
views that they dispute only from the more diminish God’s glory by refus-
outside. He also experienced person- ing to worship Him than a lunatic
ally the gravity of the problems that can put out the sun by scribbling the
the atheist has to face and the way in word “darkness” on the walls of his
which such problems may force a per- cell” (p. 41). From 1941–44, he deliv-
son of integrity to look beyond athe- ered a series of thirty-three broadcast
ism for a suitable philosophical and talks whose titles describe well their
religious outlook. C.S. Lewis wrote contents:
about his own experience in 1933 in an
autobiographical volume entitled The 1941: Right and Wrong as a Clue to the
Pilgrim’s Regress, in the manner of Meaning of the Universe (5 talks)
John Bunyan, and again in Surprised 1942: What Christians Believe (5 talks)
by Joy (1955). 1943: Christian Behaviors (12 talks)
1944: Beyond Personality; or, First Steps scholarly studies in early English
in the Doctrine of the Trinity literature, his wit and discern-
(11 talks) ment surface on every page as some
of the following quotations evidence:
First published separately in “We have won many a soul
three volumes, these lectures were through pleasure. All the same, it is
gathered together under the title [God’s] invention, not ours. He made
Mere Christianity and often repub- the pleasure: all our research so far
lished. The term mere in this title has not enabled us to produce one”
means “pure,” as it did in old English. (p. 41).
The emphasis is to deal with major “A moderate religion is as good
views largely common to all denomi- for us as no religion at all — and more
nations in Christendom. amusing” (p. 43).
In 1943, The Screwtape Letters “It does not matter how small the
We c a n a p p r e c i a t e…h i s e a r ne s t ne s s , h i s
g a p s i n h i s r e a s o n i ng, h i s t h o r ough
appeared, and this is probably C.S. sins are, provided that their cumula-
Lewis’ most popular writing. Here tive effect is to edge the man away
we have a course by correspon- from the Light and into the Nothing.
dence in which a master demon, Murder is no better than cards if
Screwtape, instructs Wormwood, a cards can do the trick. Indeed, the
novice in the art of tempting human safest road to Hell is the gradual one”
beings and preventing on their part (p. 56).
a true allegiance to God and the “A good many Christian politi-
Gospel. This gives an opportunity cal writers think that Christianity
to look on the Christian claims from began going wrong and departing
below, so to speak, not with some from the doctrine of its Founder, at a
artificial adornments provided by very early stage. Now, this idea must
self-deceitfulness or charit y in be used by us to encourage again the
considering others, but with a kind conception of a historical Jesus to be
of cynical realism that penetrates found by clearing away later ‘accre-
into the actual motives that people tions and perversions’ and then be
ordinarily attempt to hide. C.S. contrasted with the whole Christian
Lewis can cast a critical evaluation tradition. In the last generation we
of many moves and motives that are promoted the construction of such
flourishing under the umbrella of a ‘historical Jesus’ on liberal and
genuine Christianity. With sharp ‘humanitarian’ lines; we are now
discernment and superb control putting forward a new ‘historical
of language, gained perhaps in his Jesus’ on Marxian, catastrophic, and
m e t ic u l ou s c a r e n o t t o l e av e a ny
c o m m it m e nt t o H o ly S c r ip t u r e….
T
B Y L E L A N D R Y K E N
O
the Magician’s nephew: the creation ne level of Christian meaning in
and how evil entered Narnia
the Narnian Chronicles is the
the Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe: moral vision embodied in the sto-
the crucifixion and resurrection ries. It is the story of a great, cosmic
Prince caspian: restoration of the true struggle between good and evil — and
religion after a corruption the need of every creature to choose
between them. The vision of the sto-
the Horse and His Boy: the calling and ries corresponds to Lewis’ view of the
conversion of a heathen world itself, which in one of his essays
the voyage of the dawn treader: he described as a universe in which
the spiritual life (especially in Reepicheep) “there is no neutral ground” and in
the silver chair: the continued war against
which “every square inch, every split
the powers of darkness second, is claimed by God and coun-
terclaimed by Satan.”
the Last Battle: the coming of the Antichrist In addition to this moral vision, the
(the Ape), the end of the world, and the last Narnian stories embody a theological
judgment vision. At the heart of that vision is
the figure of Aslan, who represents
Christ. Thus the qualities attributed
half before his death, he said that there to Aslan, the acts that he performs,
is “a deeper meaning behind” the sur- the ways in which he relates to char-
face details of the stories. acters in the stories and the charac-
The key to the religious meanings ters to him, the devotion that he elic-
of the Narnian stories is the figure of its from those who believe in him and
Aslan. When at age forty Lewis decided follow him — all these are an implied
to try to make a story out of his mental picture of the Christian life. We will
Book s by C. S. L e w i s
Mere Christianity
BY C.S. LEWIS
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3 O R V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
J a n u a r y 20 08
i N to t h e wo R d
d a i l y B i b l e s t u d i e s
1
MattHeW 5:17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish
the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them
but to fulfill them” (v. 17).
Take the time to look over Matthew in preparation for our study this year. Find FOR FURTHER STUDY:
LEvITICUS 26:44–45
one passage that you have not spent much time examining. Meditate on that MATTHEW 4; 12:15–21;
text today and ask the Lord to help you focus on His message. Commit yourself 28:16–20
again to lead the life of discipleship to which our Savior has called you, a life LUkE 5:27–32
that you can live by grace through the power of the Holy Spirit (Gal. 5:16). THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
Thank Him for His transforming work in your life. GENESIS 1–2
MATTHEW 1
3
J a n u a r y
I t is not difficult to understand the reasons why Matthew and John were
the most widely quoted gospels among the early church fathers. John, for
example, writes some of the boldest words about Jesus’ divinity in the New
Testament. Matthew emphasizes Jesus’ teaching ministry, and sections like
the Sermon on the Mount (chap. 5–7) were widely memorized early on in the life
of the church. In fact, Matthew was read aloud more often than even the gospel
of John in the years immediately following the death of the last apostle.
Matthew’s gospel is placed first in the New Testament canon largely because
of its clear connection to the Old Testament. Certainly, the apostles all wanted
to show how Christ and His church fulfill God’s promises to Israel. However,
the first evangelist (another title for a gospel writer) alone begins with Jesus’
genealogy, putting Him in the context of God’s plan of redemption and tying
Him, through His forefathers, to the Old Testament promises.
Notably, Matthew shows in 1:1–17 that Jesus is a direct descendant of David
and therefore the Messiah. Yet Matthew makes other important theological
points in his presentation of the historical data. For example, genealogies in
the ancient world did not normally include women, but Tamar, Rahab, Ruth,
and Uriah’s wife (Bathsheba) are found in Matthew’s ancestry of Jesus (vv.
3, 5–6). All of these women were Gentiles or married to a Gentile: Tamar and
Rahab were Canaanites (Gen. 38; Josh. 2), Ruth was a Moabitess (Ruth 1:4), and
Bathsheba’s first husband was a Hittite (2 Sam. 11). These names could have
been omitted, but Matthew includes them to show us that God’s family in Christ
is comprised of faithful Jews and Gentiles.
Moreover, Rahab’s inclusion in Jesus’ lineage despite her past in harlotry
reminds us of God’s grace. Indeed, the Savior has relatives with a more wicked
past than Rahab (Manasseh, for instance; 2 Chron. 33:1–20; Matt. 1:10), but
these sinners, because they turned from their evil, were not cut off from God’s
covenant blessings. Jesus, Matthew Henry comments, “takes even great
sinners, at their repentance, into the nearest relation to himself.”
Not every ancestor of Jesus trusted in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. FOR FURTHER STUDY:
2 SAMUEL 12
Still, the Lord’s grace overcame what could be called “impossible” odds in 1 CHroNICLES 2:1–14
working through the sinful sons of David to bring about our salvation. This LUkE 3:23–38
grace seeks out even the most wicked person and calls God’s chosen to repen- ACTS 9:1–31
tance, even if they are as vile as Manasseh or as lost as Rahab. Our status as THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
Christ’s brothers and sisters (Heb. 2:11) comes only by such almighty grace. GENESIS 6–7
MATTHEW 3–4
2 26 6 tt aa bb ll ee ttaallkk JJ aa nnuuaarryy 2 20 00 08 8
fourteen Generations Friday
4
J a n u a r y
J esus’ ancestry is traced back through David all the way to Adam in Luke
3:23–38. However, Luke’s listing of David’s sons is almost entirely different
than the one recorded in Matthew 1:1–17. Two different scenarios can explain
this discrepancy.
First, Luke may actually be giving us Mary’s genealogy without mentioning
her name since it was not acceptable back then to include women in such lists.
Luke’s birth narrative highlights Mary, and Joseph is called Jesus’ “supposed”
father (3:23). Matthew, on the other hand, gives us Joseph’s ancestry.
Or, Matthew could have recorded the throne succession while Luke gives
the actual, physical parentage of Jesus. David’s throne passed from father to
son starting with Solomon (1 Kings 1:28–31). Under levirate marriage laws,
a Davidite whose physical forefathers were not heirs to the throne could be
adopted into the royal line if the heir by way of natural descent died childless
(Deut. 25:5–10). Matthew 1:12, for example, tells us Zerubbabel was Shealtiel’s
son even though he was Shealtiel’s nephew (1 Chron. 3:17–19). Perhaps Shealtiel
died without having a son and Zerubbabel was adopted as the royal heir due to a
levirate marriage. Maybe the right to David’s throne by way of Solomon finally
came to Joseph through such marriages even though Jesus’ actual physical
ancestor was Solomon’s brother, Nathan (Luke 3:31).
Matthew 1:17 notes that three sets of fourteen generations separate Abraham
and the birth of Jesus Christ — a span of about five hundred years versus the two
thousand years that really intervened. It is common for biblical writers to omit
names in ancestry lists (“the father of” can refer to a remote ancestor), and the
evangelist’s focus on “fourteen” is likely intended as an aid for memorization.
Letters were used in place of numerals in the first century, with the Hebrew
consonants daleth (d) and waw (w) representing four and six, respectively.
David is spelled dwd in Hebrew consonants, which is equivalent to the
number fourteen (four plus six plus four). Thus, Matthew’s focus on fourteen
generations also emphasizes Jesus’ kingly role as the Son of David.
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
Philosophy & Apologetic s
Dealing with
Difficult Problems
BY R . C . S P RO U L
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
Monday
J a n u a r y
An Angel Visits Joseph
7 MattHeW 1:18–21 “She will bear a son, and you shall call his
name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins” (v. 21).
In mercy, Joseph did not call for the Law’s harshest penalties on the wife he FOR FURTHER STUDY:
LAMENTATIoNS 3:58
thought unfaithful (Deut. 22:13–21). Depending on the offense and its circum- HoSEA 13:4
stances, while the church is always called to discipline, it is not always required LUkE 1:26–38, 46–56
to exact the harshest penalty. Applying God’s Word rightly involves much HEBrEWS 1:1–4
prayer. Matthew Henry wrote: “Were there more of deliberation in our censures THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
and judgments, there would be more of a mercy and moderation in them.” GENESIS 17–19
MATTHEW 7
MattHeW 1:22–25 “This took place to fulfill what the Lord had
spoken by the prophet:‘Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear
a son, and they shall call his name ‘Immanuel’” (vv. 22–23). 8
L iberals have long scrutinized Matthew 1:22–23 and the passage it quotes,
Isaiah 7:14, leading them to deny the virgin birth. They say that since Isaiah
uses almah, a Hebrew term literally translated as “maiden,” he is not affirming
the virgin birth. This argument has no merit, for almah almost always refers
to a young woman who is also a virgin. Also, the Septuagint, an ancient Greek
translation of the Old Testament, understands that Isaiah is talking about a
virgin as it renders almah with parthenos, the normal Greek word for “virgin.”
We wholeheartedly affirm the virgin birth of Jesus based on today’s passage
and Luke 1:26–38. But let us note that Matthew may not be reading Isaiah as has
been often supposed. When we look at the word “fulfill” in Matthew 1:22–23,
we tend to think Isaiah saw into the future and made a prediction that could
only come true for Mary. However, Isaiah 7:14 would then have no meaning to
its original readers, Israelites living centuries before Jesus.
The context of Isaiah 7:14 explains why Matthew cites this verse. When
Ahaz reigned in Judah, Syria and Israel threatened to invade Judah if he would
not join them against the Assyrian empire (v. 1). Yet this threat actually tempted
Ahaz to seek aid from Assyria against these foes. God promised him protection
if he did not join with Assyria, telling the king to ask for a sign to confirm His
pledge (vv. 2–11). But Ahaz did not trust the Lord and would not ask for a sign.
God gave Ahaz a sign anyway — a sign of cursing, not blessing! A child’s birth
would signify that God would use Assyria to judge faithless Judah (vv. 12–25).
By natural means, Isaiah and his wife — formerly the virgin maiden — would
produce Maher-shalal-hash-baz (8:1–4), a sign of God’s curse on those who
trusted in an alliance with Assyria. (vv. 5–22). And as the prophet warned, Ahaz
would be humiliated in his deal with the Assyrian Empire (2 Chron. 28).
If this curse foretold by Isaiah came to pass, how can we escape the curse if
we do not trust God when the sign is the very Son of God, born of a virgin? Just as
Isaiah’s son signified a curse on Judah’s unbelief, so too does Jesus’ miraculous
birth signify disaster for those who do not submit to God’s royal Son.
9
J a n u a r y
MattHeW 2:1–6 “Where is he who has been born king of the Jews?
For we saw his star when it rose and have come
to worship him” (v. 2).
S oon after the sign of God’s blessing or curse is born (Matt. 1:22–25), another
sign appears to tell the world the Messiah has come. “Wise men from the
east” come to Jerusalem because they have seen a great star in the heavens, a
portent that to them signifies the birth of the king of the Jews (Matt. 2:1–2). These
magi must think this birth is good news, for they want to find and honor Him.
However, there are some who do not rejoice when the magi come calling.
In today’s passage we read of Herod the king who is troubled by the rumors
that a new king has been born (v. 3). It is the year 4 B.C. or so, and Herod, known
as “Herod the Great” by historians, is serving as the client ruler over Roman-
controlled Palestine. A skilled politician and capable ruler who loves power,
he holds this position because he has wrangled himself into the good graces
of Rome and not because his Jewish subjects want him on the throne. In
fact, despite his monumental restoration of the Temple, he is detested by the
populace largely due to his oppressive taxation. The fact that he also descends
on his father’s side from Edom, the ancient enemy of Israel, does not help
matters. Herod constantly fears the loss of his authority, and thus, for him, the
birth of a new king is not a happy occasion.
Herod moves immediately to determine where this child might be, and
he turns for this information to the chief priests (the high priest, former high
priests, and other priests of note) and the scribes (lawyers skilled in the Mosaic
law and the oral traditions, v. 4). The Messiah’s birthplace is easily located;
according to the Scriptures it must be in the city of Bethlehem (vv. 5–6). A
paraphrase of Micah 5:2 and 2 Samuel 5:2 is the proof-text for this location cited
to the king. As King David’s hometown (1 Sam. 16:1–13), Bethlehem is the fitting
place for his greater Son’s entry into the world.
Note especially the differing reactions to the Christ child’s birth. Foreigners
to the covenant with Israel are those most excited to see the Messiah, but Herod,
one who has blood ties to this covenant, refuses to receive him gladly. This irony
will be oft-repeated during the life of Jesus (Matt. 27:41–43, 54).
The wise men are likely from Babylon and have had to take a long and arduous FOR FURTHER STUDY:
rUTH 4
journey to find Jesus. Matthew Henry draws this application from this event: 2 CHroNICLES 10
“Those who truly desire to know Christ, and find him, will not regard pains MATTHEW 19:16–30
or perils in seeking after him.” What has it cost you to follow Jesus? Consider joHN 7:42
whether your devotion has cost you friends, family, income, or reputation, THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
and if not, consider how eagerly you seek after Him. GENESIS 23–24
MATTHEW 9
10
MattHeW 2:7–10 “When they saw the star,
they rejoiced exceedingly with great joy” (v. 10).
11
MattHeW 2:11–12 “Opening their treasures,
they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh” (v. 11b).
If our Lord at times seems “crazy” or “foolish” to the world because of His life FOR FURTHER STUDY:
HoSEA 2:14–23
and message (Mark 3:20–21), we can expect the world to feel the same about 1 CorINTHIANS 4
us when we are true to Him. Unfortunately, too many Christians miss this point
THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
and adopt positions or techniques that they believe will make Jesus “more GENESIS 27–28
attractive” to the unbeliever. Who or what in your life is pressuring you to MATTHEW 10:26–42
FOR THE WEEKEND :
“change” the Savior and His message? Pray that you would be faithful to Him. GENESIS 29–33
MATTHEW 11
36 table talk January 2008
f o r t h e w e e k e n d o f J an u ary 1 2 – 1 3
Je s u s’ Fa m i ly Tr e e
B Y J o e l R . B e e k e
14
J a n u a r y
MattHeW 2:13–15 “This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken
by the prophet,‘Out of Egypt I called my son’” (v. 15b).
S cripture is clear that God is the architect of history. Time does not march
forward by means of chance, nor is it an endless, repetitive cycle. Instead,
history’s flow is linear and marches toward a goal. History at times can seem to
repeat itself, but even such instances are ordained by the Lord for His purposes.
Consider Joseph, adopted father of the Christ. Like his namesake, a notable
old covenant saint, he receives dreams from heaven (Gen. 37:5–11; Matt. 1:20).
Moreover, the first Joseph took his clan to Egypt to save their lives (Gen. 45–46)
just as the second Joseph goes there to keep his family safe (Matt. 2:13–15a).
This tie between the history of Jacob’s sons (the Israelites) and the history
of Jesus is the key to interpreting today’s passage rightly. The evangelist writes
that Jesus’ flight into the land of the Nile and return to Palestine fulfills a
prophecy recorded in Hosea 11:1 (Matt. 2:15b). What, then, does he mean?
Remember that the fulfillment of biblical prophecy is more than just one-to-
one correspondence between prediction and realization. Hosea, in the passage
Matthew cites, was not even predicting anything. The nation of Israel is God’s
son in Hosea 11, which retells the nation’s history from exodus (v. 1) to idolatry
(vv. 2–4) to exile (vv. 5–7), and finally to deliverance from its sin and enemies
(vv. 8–11). Matthew surely knows this to be the case and is not twisting the Old
Testament passage to make it about Jesus as opposed to the Israelites.
“Fulfill” means to “fill up to overflowing.” A later person or event fulfills
a prior person or event when what is later fills up, or completes the purpose
of what came earlier. In this fulfillment, the later person or event engulfs
what came before and becomes its truest and fullest expression. Our Creator
redeemed His son Israel from Egypt to be His light to the world (Isa. 42:6),
but this son failed to complete his mission. Jesus also flees to Egypt and then
returns, showing us that our Savior recapitulates, or repeats, the story of Israel
and is a second opportunity for the Father’s intent to be realized. He is the true
Israel, the true Son of God who will endure what His people endured and yet
will be faithful to His Father and accomplish His purpose for the nation.
A pproximately one million Jews live in Egypt under Roman rule, making it
an excellent place for Jesus’ family to hide during Herod’s reign (Matt. 2:13–
15). This sanctuary is necessary, the angel has told Joseph, because of Herod’s
desire to kill the Christ child. He does not want to bend his knee to the Messiah,
despite what he has said to the magi (v. 8). Unfortunately, Matthew Henry
comments, “the greatest wickedness often conceals itself under a mask of piety.”
Today’s passage describes Herod’s attempt to eliminate the One who has
legitimate claim to his throne. In order to cover all of his bases and ensure
that Jesus is eliminated, Herod orders the slaughter of every boy ages two and
younger in Bethlehem and its surrounding region (v. 16). Herod derives this
age span by adding the time since the star’s first appearance (and hence, Jesus’
birth, v. 7) and a window of a few extra months.
Bethlehem’s population is small, and twenty or fewer children are killed
under Herod’s purge. This horrible act is in line with the same cruelty and
paranoia that drove the evil king to kill a brother-in-law, wife, and three sons
when he thought they might take his throne. Herod will also arrange to have the
most beloved men in Palestine killed after he dies to guarantee that someone
will mourn at the time of his death, though this order will not be carried out.
As with Jesus’ flight into Egypt, Herod’s killing of Bethlehem’s toddlers
fulfills prophecy. Matthew 2:18 quotes from Jeremiah 31:15, a passage describing
how the mothers of Israel (personified here in Rachel, matriarch of the nation)
mourned when their children, the tribes of Israel, were carried into exile.
However, the rest of Jeremiah’s chapter is hopeful, predicting a day when God
will rescue His people from exile and inaugurate a new covenant. In quoting
this passage, Matthew tells us two things. First, in Matthew’s day the people
are still enduring the suffering of exile even though they are living in their own
land. Second, this exile will end with Jesus. The tears of Bethlehem’s mothers
over their murdered children fill up and end the suffering of exile because the
One who will bring in the new covenant has arrived.
Herod is one example of all those who have tried to destroy the Christ and FOR FURTHER STUDY:
EXodUS 1:8–22
His people. Though this evil king did much harm, he was in the end unable to 1 SAMUEL 18:6–16
thwart the plans of the Father for His Son. We too can be sure that even when oBAdIAH 10–18
the church suffers persecution at home and abroad, God’s kingdom will never rEvELATIoN 12
be overcome. Pray today for believers who are suffering for their faith that they THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
will remember the Lord’s victory and stand firm for His Gospel. GENESIS 36–37
MATTHEW 13:1–23
Book s by C. S. L e w i s
A Grief Observed
BY C.S. LEWIS
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3 O R V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
R E C O M M E N D E D R E S O U R C E S
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
D a i l y B i b l e St u d y
Dust to Glory, NT
Apostles’ Creed BY R . C . S P RO U L
BY R . C . S P RO U L
Dr. Sproul has long regarded Dust to
Nearly two thousand years later, the Glory as one of the most important Bible
Apostles’ Creed remains one of the study tools he has ever produced. In 27
most important confessions of biblical messages, he provides an overview of the
orthodoxy produced by the church. This entire New Testament, examining major
series provides an expositon of this events and persons, thereby laying a
creed, explaining what phrases like “He foundation for deeper biblical study.
descended into hell” and “I believe in the
DUS01DCNT Z 9 DVDS Z $108
holy catholic church” mean.
DUS01CCNT Z 9 CDS Z $66
APO06CC Z 4 CDS Z (REG. $31) $24.80 DUS01UNT Z STUDY GUIDE Z $15
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
R E C O M M E N D E D R E S O U R C E S
Book s for Ch i ld r e n
The Lightlings
BY R . C . S P RO U L
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3 O R V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
the move to Nazareth Wednesday
J a n u a r y
16
MattHeW 2:19–2 “He went and lived in a city called Nazareth, that
what was spoken by the prophets might be fulfilled:
‘He shall be called a Nazarene’” (v. 23).
A s we finish our study of Matthew 2, note how the evangelist has taught us
about God’s providence. First, we should see that Herod’s hatred of Jesus
and slaughter of the young boys in Bethlehem (vv. 16–18) parallel Pharaoh’s
attempt to kill Moses (Ex. 1:8–2:10). Moses was the mediator of the old covenant,
and in ordaining the circumstances of the birth of Christ to be so similar to
Moses’ birth, our Father has prepared His people to receive Jesus as a new and
greater Moses, the mediator of a new and better covenant (Heb. 7:22).
Secondly, the dreams of warning that Joseph and the magi experience (Matt.
2:12–13, 19–20, 22) show that God has sovereignly overruled man’s attempt to
destroy His Son. Herod’s attempt to kill Jesus has been unsuccessful. In fact, it
is Herod who dies (in 4 B.C., dating the Savior’s birth therefore between 6 and 4
B.C.), enabling Joseph and his family to return to Palestine (v. 21).
After learning that Archelaus is ruling in Judea, Joseph takes Jesus and
Mary to Nazareth in Galilee (v. 22). This is wise, for Archelaus can be as ruthless
as his father Herod and might very well be a threat to Jesus.
Matthew tells us the move to Nazareth fulfills prophecy, and yet verse
23 does not quote the Old Testament directly. The use of “prophets” and not
“prophet” helps explains why this is so. Jerome, a famous biblical scholar from
the early church, said Matthew, “in speaking of the prophets in general…has
shown that he has not taken the specific words but rather the sense from the
Scriptures” (Commentary on Matthew 1.2.23). The evangelist is giving us a
general teaching about the Messiah found throughout the Old Testament.
In Jesus’ day, Nazareth is considered a backwater village from which
nothing good can come (John 1:46). To be from Nazareth brings scorn and
ridicule, and many people question Jesus’ validity because of His hometown
(7:40–44). However, there are many passages in Scripture that tell us the
Messiah will be despised and afflicted (Isa. 53:1–3; Dan. 9:26a). Many would
find reason for hating our Savior once they learn He is a Nazarene, and so in
settling in Nazareth, Jesus begins to fulfill His work as Messiah.
F ollowing Christ’s move to Galilee, Matthew does not give any further
details of Jesus’ childhood. Instead, he picks up the story of his gospel three
decades after Jesus returns from Egypt, as we learn elsewhere that He is about
thirty when He begins His ministry (Luke 3:23). The events of Matthew 3 take
place around A.d. 27, and Joseph has probably already passed on, as none of the
other gospels mention him during Jesus’ adult life. In all likelihood, Joseph has
been gone for awhile, with the responsibility to support the family resting on
Jesus and His brothers, that is, until His itinerant preaching begins.
Today’s passage depicts John the Baptist’s ministry in the “wilderness of
Judea” (v. 1), a region covering the Jordan valley just north and west of the Dead
Sea. His message is well-received by the Jews in Palestine, and crowds from
all of Judea receive his baptism (vv. 5–6). Importantly, in John’s day the voice
of prophecy has been silent for 400 years according to various extra-canonical
writings. When John ministers in the wilderness wearing camel’s hair, the
people associate him with Elijah, who acted similarly (1 Kings 19; 2 Kings 1:7–8),
and consider John a prophet (Matt. 21:23–27). Through John the people realize
that God is speaking to them again.
In 3:3, Matthew again says prophecy is fulfilled at the coming of Jesus and
cites Isaiah 40:3. The meaning of this passage for Isaiah’s original audience
shows us how John fulfills it. Isaiah 40 is about the restoration promised to
the exiled Israelites after they repent. A highway for God will be built, and the
people will travel back to their land in glory (v. 3). The exiles longed for this
day, but the promise of glory did not occur when they returned to Palestine, for
the nation as a whole did not repent. In a real sense, life in exile away from the
Lord’s blessing continued even though many of the people had returned. John
is the ultimate realization of Isaiah 40:3 because he sets the stage for the Lord’s
favor to come to the exiles. Jesus is the way through which God’s blessing comes
to His people (John 14:6), and in heralding His coming, John is the road that
leads the nation to blessing and thus to God in Christ.
John the Baptist was the primary herald of Christ in his day, but the task of FOR FURTHER STUDY:
dEUT. 30:1–10
bearing witness to the Savior was not laid solely upon him. Jesus Himself MALACHI 4:5
commissioned first the apostles, and secondly, the entire church to testify to the LUkE 3:1–6
grace of God manifest in His life, death, and resurrection. Our witness will only 1 TIMoTHY 2:5
be effective if, as with John, the surrounding culture sees that the church THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
is different. Is your manner of life different than that of an unbeliever’s? GENESIS 41
MATTHEW 14:1–21
18
MattHeW 3:4–6 “Then Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region
about the Jordan were going out to him, and they were baptized by
him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins” (vv. 5–6).
J ohn the Baptist heralds the king and His kingdom. Today, we will look at
notions of the kingdom current in his day and the baptism John administers in
preparation for its coming. According to Matthew, John says that “the kingdom
of heaven is at hand” (v. 2). Of note is the phrase “the kingdom of heaven,” the
preferred name for the kingdom in the first gospel. In a few instances, Matthew
uses “the kingdom of God,” which is favored in the other Gospels. These phrases
are synonymous, and Matthew’s use of heaven is probably nothing more than
a stylistic variance — a decision to use a different word that gives a slightly
different emphasis. In this case, heaven points us to a kingdom not of this world.
The ancient Jews knew God was sovereign over all creation even if many did
not submit to Him (Jer. 10:6–10). The kingdom of heaven refers not to the reality
of this reign, but to its universal acknowledgment, especially as administered
through God’s chosen regent. Beginning with Abraham, who was promised
kings as sons (Gen. 17:5–6), Scripture looks to the day in which all nations
bow to Yahweh and willingly serve the Son of David, through whom the Lord
exercises His dominion most visibly (Amos 9:11–15; Zech. 14:16). Different ideas
as to how the kingdom will come are present in Judaism in the first century
A.d. One popular view longs for a Messiah who will be a military ruler, thereby
kicking Rome out of the Promised Land and setting Israel over all the nations.
Though John the Baptist knows the kingdom is at hand, it seems he is
unclear as to the exact manner in which it will come (Matt. 11:1–19). However,
John does understand that the Jews in his day are not ready for the kingdom. In
the first century, Gentile “sinners” are washed with water when they convert to
Judaism, but Jews are rarely, if ever, baptized for the confession and forgiveness
of sins (3:5–6). As John preaches in Judea, he calls upon even the covenant
people of God to repent of their transgressions. He understands their lack of
contrition is causing their troubles and knows that being a Jew outwardly is not
enough to secure for oneself a place in the kingdom (vv. 7–10). Needless to say,
John’s message is unpopular with those who find security in their ethnicity.
Jesus’ Childhood
B Y J e rry B r i d g e s
21 MattHeW 3:7–10 “ But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees
coming for the baptism, he said to them,‘...Who warned you to flee from
the wrath to come? Bear fruit in keeping with repentance’” (vv. 7–8).
A fter centuries of silence, the covenant Lord spoke to His people again through
John the Baptist. Beginning around 27 A.d., John prepared the way for the
Messiah to inaugurate God’s kingdom, calling Israel to repentance because the
nation as a whole had not shown contrition for the sins that led to exile from
Palestine. In John’s day, the people were not ready for the kingdom to come.
John’s call is laid on all of us throughout the Bible. “Repentance” is the
English translation of the Greek term metanoia, which literally means “change
of mind.” Repentance expresses sorrow for the ways in which we have offended
God (Ps. 51:4), but it is also much more. Repentance is a change of mind and
actions wherein we cease our approval of wickedness and justification of bad
behavior. It is foremost a decisive reorientation of one’s life away from the self
and toward the Lord. This does not mean we repent only once at the start of
the Christian life and then go our merry way, for confession of sin is needed
until life’s end (1 John 1:8–9). But this subsequent repentance flows from and
confirms the initial act wherein we realize our desperate state, admit our need
of pardon, and come to Jesus in a childlike manner (Matt. 19:13–15).
John Calvin comments on today’s passage, saying, “Repentance is an inward
matter, which has its seat in the heart and soul, but afterwards yields its fruits
in a change of life.” It is not enough to profess sorrow for transgression; we
have not truly turned from sin if our lives are unchanged (Isa. 29:13–14; James
2:14–26). Scripture does not teach that sinless perfection is possible before we
are glorified, nor does it deny that some sins are harder to overcome than others.
What it does say is that those who are truly repentant do what they can to “resist
the devil” (James 4:7) and flee temptation. They also look for others to help
them bear their burdens, to hold them accountable and help them find strength
when they are weak (Gal. 6:1–2). The truly repentant lapse into sin on occasion,
but they always return to the narrow path of righteousness. True converts will
not find their assurance in denominational membership (Matt. 3:9–10) or in a
past act of devotion. They find it in a justified life of repentance and faith.
One of the more neglected tools that can help us grow in our holiness is the FOR FURTHER STUDY:
2 CHroNICLES 7:14
confession of sins one to another (James 5:16). It can be difficult to admit to EZrA 9:1–10:4
other people that we have sinned, but loving brothers and sisters in Christ can 2 CorINTHIANS 7:10
help assure us of His forgiveness and help us overcome persistent temptations. rEvELATIoN 2:1–7
Without being involved in the lives of other believers we will not find these THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
opportunities. Take the initiative and be a part of the lives of other Christians. GEN. 50–EXodUS 1
MATTHEW 15:29–16:4
t at ab bl le et ta al lk kJ Ja an nu ua ar ry y 2200 00 88 5 51 1
Wednesday
J a n u a r y
one with his People
J ohn the Baptist has labored to prepare a way for the Messiah (Matt. 3:1–12)
and is finally granted an audience with the Christ Himself. In today’s
passage, Jesus comes to John for baptism (vv. 13–17).
This encounter is not the first time the two meet. As relatives (Luke 1:26–66),
they undoubtedly spent time with each other while growing up. John certainly
knows Jesus’ purity, which, along with his prophetic insight into the identity of
Jesus, explains his reluctance to baptize Him (Matt. 3:13–14).
To baptize Jesus for the same reason John baptizes the people would be
wrong, our Lord has no need to repent (1 Peter 2:22). But Jesus is not baptized
“with water for repentance” (Matt. 3:11) as His people are. He is baptized to
fulfill “all righteousness” (v. 15). Dr. R.C. Sproul has said this means that Jesus
must obey all of the laws God has given to Israel, including John’s baptism. John
Calvin wrote that Christ is baptized to “render full obedience to the Father.”
Thus, “to fulfill all righteousness” means that Jesus has to obey the
overarching saving plans and purposes of God. Thousands of years before
Christ’s earthly ministry, the Father called His “son,” the people of Israel, out
of Egypt (Hos. 11:1) and gave them His Law to show them the way of life (Lev.
18:5). God punished His son as He promised when Israel failed to be the Lord’s
obedient servant (Deut. 28:15–68), but the fullness of His wrath never fell on the
people, though they suffered severely for their sins. Isaiah predicted a day when
Israel would be God’s servant and pay for transgression (52:13–53:12).
Due to our fallenness, our Father knew His people could never themselves
be His servant and pay fully for iniquity. So He placed a king over His people
to identify with them as their representative and succeed where they failed. In
place of Israel, David’s line would be God’s son and servant (Ps. 2:7).
Because of sin, no fallen son of David could fulfill this vocation. Therefore,
Jesus comes as God’s perfect Son and servant. In receiving baptism like they
do, He identifies Himself with His people. God calls Jesus His Son (Matt. 3:17),
showing us that He is accepted as faithful Israel, servant of the Most High.
In His baptism, our Lord confirmed His willingness to identify with the plight of FOR FURTHER STUDY:
2 SAMUEL 7
His people, a willingness first displayed when He became incarnate (see also PSALM 78:67–72
Heb. 2:14–18). We who live under the new covenant experience the awesome LUkE 3:21–22
benefit of knowing that God came down to our own level to identify with us PHILIPPIANS 2:5–11
and help us in our trials. If you lack strength this day, consider Jesus who is THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
uniquely able to fortify you because He too suffered on this earth. EXodUS 5–6
MATTHEW 17
GalatIOnS 4:4–5 “When the fullness of time had come, God sent
forth his Son, born of a woman, born under the law” (v. 4).
24
O ur study this month has dealt mainly with the miraculous birth of the
Savior in Bethlehem. This Messiah, we have seen, comes in fulfillment of
the Old Testament promises. In the interest of looking at the biblical prophecies
about Jesus more closely, we will take a short break from Matthew and follow
Dr. R.C. Sproul’s teaching series Coming of the Messiah as our guide.
Across the United States this day, many college students are sitting under
professors hostile to the New Testament. Parallels are often drawn between
Greek myths of dying and rising gods and the biblical account as proof that the
Scriptures are just another work of mythology. Unfortunately, young people are
too often unprepared for this onslaught and begin to doubt the Christian faith.
However, as those familiar with ancient literature well know, these
similarities are superficial. The Greeks made no real attempt to defend their
myths as historical while the Bible grounds itself in real space and time. Luke 2,
for example, locates the birth of Jesus during the reign of Caesar Augustus and
the governorship of Quirinius, both of whom were real people. The evangelist
assumes that we will take his account at face value — that Jesus was a real person
who lived in space and time. Scripture is also clear that God became incarnate in
the person of Christ Jesus (John 1:14). Ancient Greeks abhorred this idea because
they believed the physical body to be corrupt, unlike the spiritual realm. Many
other such differences between the Bible and pagan thought could be cited.
We must not miss the emphasis Scripture places on history. God’s Word is
clear that the events it describes actually occurred, and even tells us our faith
is in vain if events like the resurrection of Jesus never happened (1 Cor. 15:14).
Yet, Scripture does not give us every detail concerning what happened between
the time of Adam and the apostles; it often omits pedantic figures and details (as
was common in those days) in order to relay God’s plan of redemption (2 Kings
20:20–21). When time was “full,” when all things were perfectly ready, the most
significant event of all took place — Jesus was born (Gal. 4:4–5). Tomorrow we
will begin to study what the Old Testament says about this fullness of time.
S ince the early days of the church, scholars and theologians have found in
Genesis the first announcement of the coming Messiah. Today’s passage
gives us what is called the protevangelium — the “first gospel.”
The context of this passage is well-known to most of us. Having thumbed
their noses at God by eating the forbidden fruit in the garden of Eden, Adam
and Eve find themselves alienated from their Creator (Gen. 3:1–13). Before He
pronounces His righteous judgment upon them, however, the Lord curses the
tempter. The serpent will crawl upon the ground and lick the dust. He will
bruise the heel of the woman’s offspring or, in other translations, “her seed,”
and her seed will bruise the serpent’s head (vv. 14–15).
This pronouncement has cosmic significance. The serpent in this passage
is no ordinary reptile, he is Satan, the adversary of God and His people (Rom.
16:20; Rev. 12:9). The Lord pledges to put enmity between the serpent and the
woman’s seed (Gen. 3:15). This conflict is God-initiated and perpetuated. It has
a visible reminder in snakes who lick the dust of defeat, but the one whose head
will be bruised — the one who will suffer a crushing blow — is the Devil himself.
It is the identity of the woman’s seed that tells us this passage is messianic.
Grammatically, “seed” is a collective singular and can refer to a whole group
of people. The woman’s seed cannot be every child of Eve because Scripture
calls God’s human enemies “the children of the Devil” (John 8:39–47), thereby
identifying some people as the serpent’s seed. If the Lord’s enemies are the seed
of the serpent, then His friends among mankind must be the victorious woman’s
seed. These will suffer bruising from the evil one before bruising his head. God’s
people will suffer, but they will win in the end (for example, Ex. 1, 14).
However, even the friends of the Almighty cannot defeat Satan themselves.
They need a representative to fight on their behalf. We have seen that this One is
King Jesus, who as the Son of David defeated Satan on the cross for our sake. He
is the seed of the woman par excellence who suffered the worst bruising of all so
that He might crush the Devil (Col. 2:13–15).
Proverbs 21:31 tells us that “the victory belongs to the LORD.” Jesus defeated FOR FURTHER STUDY:
dEUT. 20:1–4
death, sin, and the evil one on the cross and now shares with us the benefits of rEvELATIoN 19:11–21
His conquest. No problem of ours is too formidable for the Lord. There is no sin
THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
that we cannot overcome if we are in Him. There is no enemy of ours that can EXodUS 11–12
finally defeat us. Be encouraged today that our Savior has won a great victory, MATTHEW 18:21–35
FOR THE WEEKEND :
and, therefore, we who are in Him need not worry about tomorrow. EXodUS 13–16
MATTHEW 19:1–15
54 table talk January 2008
f o r t h e w e e k e n d o f J an u ary 2 6 – 2 7
“crying in the wilderness” calling 5:32). From the very dawn of the New
people to “prepare the way of the Testament age, repentance has been
Lord” (Matt. 3:3; 11:14; 17:11–12). an integral part of the Gospel message.
John preached a very simple The West m i n ster Shor ter
and clear message: “Repent, for the Catechism sum ma rizes what
kingdom of heaven is at hand” (3:2). the Bible means by repentance:
That message was no more popular in “Repentance unto life is a saving
his day than it is in ours, yet our need grace, whereby a sinner out of a
of it is as urgent now as it was then. true sense of his sin, and appre-
Repentance has fallen on hard hension of the mercy of God in
times in many sectors of Christian- Christ, doth, with grief and hatred
ity in the West. Between Rome’s of his sin, turn from it unto God,
mischaracterization of it as penance with full purpose of, and endeavor
and some Dispensationalists’ denial after, new obedience” (Q. 87).
of its place in Gospel preaching, it is When John preached repentance
possible to attend church regularly he was calling his hearers to turn
and never hear a biblical message on away from sin and to turn toward
repentance. God in Jesus Christ. With the
That certainly was not the case coming of Christ into the world,
for those who gathered to hear John He could proclaim with confidence
preach in the wilderness. Neither that God’s kingdom is present. In
was that the experience of those fact, the presence of that kingdom
who heard Jesus (Matt. 4:17; Luke on earth is the reason that John
ISaIaH 7:14 “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign.
Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son,
and shall call his name Immanuel” (v. 14). 28
T oday we return to Isaiah 7:14, a passage we examined several weeks ago
because Matthew cites it in the birth narrative of the Savior (1:23). Since
Isaiah’s text has inspired so much controversy, we will look at its fulfillment
again from a slightly different angle in order to understand it better.
That Jesus was supernaturally conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the
Virgin Mary has always been a defining tenet of Christianity. The virgin birth
appears in every major creed and confession, and it sets our Lord apart from all
of Israel’s prophets, indeed, from every person that has ever lived.
Yet when many church leaders began to embrace the naturalism increasingly
prevalent at the beginning of the twentieth century, they repudiated the
virgin birth as an essential truth. Even today some believe the virgin birth is
impossible even if they accept other aspects of the Christian faith. However,
as J. Gresham Machen wrote, picking and choosing which parts of Scripture
to believe is the first step toward a wholesale rejection of orthodoxy. “The
overwhelming majority of those who reject the virgin birth reject also the whole
supernatural content of the New Testament, and make of the ‘resurrection’ just
what the word ‘resurrection’ most emphatically did not mean — a permanence
of the influence of Jesus or a mere spiritual existence of Jesus beyond the grave”
(Christianity and Liberalism, p. 108).
Our study of Isaiah 7:14 a few weeks ago demonstrated that the passage had
been fulfilled in the time of Isaiah (with the birth of his son), yet it was realized
in a greater way in the birth of Jesus, God’s Son. Jesus is thus a sign that God
will bless all those who follow Him and curse all those who reject His way. And
clearly, the New Testament teaches that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit
in Mary, who at the time of conception had not yet known a man sexually (Luke
1:34). To reject the virgin birth is to reject God’s testimony and incur His curse.
The virgin birth is essential to the Christian faith. It clearly reveals Jesus as
the Son of David to whom the prophets looked as the king of God’s supernatural
kingdom (Ps. 110; Dan. 7:13–14).
W ithout a doubt, King David ushered in a golden age during the old
covenant period (1 Chron. 18:14). This humble son of Jesse transformed
Israel from a confederacy of tribes into a major power (2 Sam. 5), a remarkable
achievement given the size of the country and the threats it faced as a place of
strategic importance. He who controlled Palestine, a land bridge connecting
Africa, Europe, and Asia, controlled commerce in the ancient Near East.
During the reign of David’s son Solomon, things began falling apart as the
king was led into idolatry (1 Kings 11). Eventually the kingdom was divided in
two (12:16–20) and suffered, for the most part, under the reign of incompetent,
godless, and foolish rulers. World powers including Assyria, Babylon, and Persia
conquered the land and became the de facto kings of Palestine. Understandably,
the people longed for a return to the golden age, a return of a king like David
who would bring in an era of peace, justice, and security. This longing would be
fulfilled in the Messiah, the “anointed one” (Amos 9:11–15).
Today’s passage is a prophecy regarding what was to come after the Assyrian
invasion of Israel and Judah. God’s people are told that they will not suffer under
judgment forever; He will send a deliverer, a Son of David beyond compare.
This child will one day have the government “upon his shoulder” (Isa.
9:6). Anyone in leadership knows what a burden that can be. Good leaders
understand the responsibility of taking care of their followers. Yet this child
will shoulder this office well. He will also be an “Everlasting Father,” an image
that tells us the Son of David will not look out for His own interests alone.
Rather, like any good father, He will put the needs of His children first and work
for their benefit. We have every reason to be confident that He will succeed, for
He is also “Wonderful Counselor.” The Hebrew term for counselor is the same
term used of the king’s most trusted advisor. This Son of David has no need for
counsel. As wisdom incarnate (1 Cor. 1:24), He is His own advisor.
We know this Son of David is Christ Jesus Himself, the “Mighty God,” the
warrior who has defeated all the powers of death and hell (Rev. 1:1–18).
Jesus is the “Prince of Peace” for all those who come to Him on His terms. FOR FURTHER STUDY:
EXodUS 15:3
Sometimes, however, we find that we are not at peace with those who refuse 1 CHroNICLES 27:32
to follow Him. This is because the Prince of Peace bears a sword — love and joHN 1:1–18
obedience to Him is unacceptable to those who hate Him, and they will often be HEBrEWS 13:20–21
hostile to us (Matt. 10:34–39). When this happens, we must hold to the truth THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
and never compromise it for the sake of a peace that cannot last. EXodUS 20–22
MATTHEW 20:1–16
30
MICaH 5:1–6 “He shall stand and shepherd his flock
in the strength of the LORD, in the majesty of
the name of the LORD his God” (v. 4a).
T he final prophecy we will examine in our brief study of the Old Testament
teachings about the Messiah is Micah 5:1–6, a passage cited in part by
Matthew in 2:6 of his gospel. A more thorough reading of Micah’s word to Israel
than we undertook when we looked at Matthew 2:6 will help us better grasp the
significance of our Savior’s birthplace.
As always, we begin with the original context of the prophecy in order to
interpret the text rightly. Micah prophesied during the second half of the eighth
century and the first decade of the seventh century B.C., a time of great moral
decline in the history of Judah and Israel. The poor were oppressed and some
priests were sexually promiscuous. Because of such debauchery, God sent Micah
to prosecute the covenant, that is, to convict His people of their violations. During
this period, the people were told that the covenant curses would fall on them,
finally culminating in exile to Assyria and Babylon (Lev. 26:27–33; Micah 4:10).
However, this was not the prophet’s final word. Though judgment would fall,
Micah in today’s passage says a ruler born in Bethlehem will redeem a faithful
remnant (Micah 5:2, 7). As we have already seen, Bethlehem is the city from
which David hailed (1 Sam. 16:1–13), which informs us that Micah is talking
about a Davidic king. The Messiah will come to lead the people out of exile and
back to their land where they will be sheltered from their foes.
King Jesus was born in Bethlehem while His people suffered under the
hands of occupiers. Aside from being David’s birthplace, Bethlehem in Hebrew
means “house of bread,” providing a fitting place for the Bread from heaven to
become incarnate (John 6:22–59). Micah’s prophesy of the king also speaks of
Him having an origin “from old” and “from ancient days” (5:2). This hints at His
divinity, a truth more clearly revealed in the New Testament (John 1:1–18).
Bethlehem was tiny and seemingly insignificant (Mic. 5:2). Yet, the Lord
chose to reveal His glory and salvation in this village, not a mighty city (Luke
2:1–20). Needless to say, this is right in line with His character. He loves to fulfill
His purposes through those things man has forsaken (1 Cor. 1:18–31).
31 MattHeW 4:1 “Then Jesus was led up by the Spirit into the wilderness
to be tempted by the devil” (v. 1).
T he Messiah who would defeat the Devil (1 John 3:8b) and bring back God’s
people from exile came to Israel around 4 B.C. As the prophets foretold, Jesus
was the Son of David, had a miraculous birth, and was opposed by many of His
own brethren (Matt. 1–2). Despite this opposition, Jesus still identified Himself
with His people and confirmed His ministry through His baptism (chap. 3).
Today, we return to Matthew’s gospel and begin our study of chapter 4,
which describes Jesus’ testing in the wilderness. Before we look at His testing
in detail, we must first place this event in its historical and theological context
in order to understand clearly what occurred when Satan tempted the Christ.
The Westminster Confession of Faith, chapter 7, says God made a “covenant
of works” with the first human being. In Eden, the Lord ordered Adam to refrain
from eating the forbidden fruit (Gen. 2:15–17). Since his failure to comply with
this demand plunged mankind into eternal death (Rom. 5:12–14), we know that
his perseverance would have meant eternal life for him and for us.
But our gracious God did not destroy mankind. Neither did He change His
demands. He established a covenant of grace wherein He would send a new
Adam to satisfy the covenant of works and restore favor to His people. Parallels
between Israel and the first man tell us the nation was, in a sense, called to be the
new Adam. Israel and Adam both had to be fruitful and multiply (1:27–28; 35:11).
Moreover, like Adam, Israel was told that perfect obedience to the covenant
law would bring life (Lev. 18:5), a reminder that the covenant of works was still
binding. Still, the Mosaic covenant actually falls under the covenant of grace. Its
sacrifices for sin tell the people of Israel that their failure is inevitable and that
they must wait for another to fulfill the covenant of works on their behalf.
Israel went through the Red Sea into the desert where God tested their
loyalty for forty years (Ex. 14; Deut. 8:1–2). Jesus was similarly tested for forty
days after passing through baptism’s waters into the wild (Matt. 3:13–4:2).
Such similarities reveal Jesus as the new Israel and thus, the last Adam. Christ
succeeded where Adam and Israel failed, and He will restore all things.
Matthew Henry captures the significance of the temptation of Jesus, FOR FURTHER STUDY:
GENESIS 3
commenting on today’s passage that “the offspring of the woman suffers, HoSEA 6
being tempted, and so has his heel bruised, but the serpent is quite baffled in MArk 1:12–13
his temptations, and so has his head crushed.” Though we look to our Lord as 1 Cor. 15:42–49
a model for overcoming temptation, let us remember it is His success, not ours, THE BIBLE IN A YEAR :
that enables us to stand before God. Worship Him for this amazing grace! EXodUS 26–28
MATTHEW 21
Walking as He Walked
BY JOEL R. BEEKE
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3 O R V I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
R E C O M M E N D E D R E S O U R C E S
There has been an unfortunate tendency This commentary examines the book of Romans
in the modern church to downplay the in a verse-by-verse manner, explaining its many
importance of the intellect in the Christian important theological and practical teachings.
life. Join the countless others who have GOS03BH Z HARDCOVER, 256 PAGES Z $20
discovered through the use of this series how
to strive toward loving the Lord our God with
all of our minds (Matt. 22:37). What’s in the Bible?
CHR10CC Z 4 CDS Z (REG. $31) $24.80 TEACHING SERI ES BY R .C . S P RO U L
A N D RO B E RT WO L G E M U T H
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
From the Ligonier Catalog
The Dark Side of Islam demonstrates that God’s Word provides clear
TEACHING SER I ES BOOK BY R .C .
teaching and lays foundational ethical principles
S P RO U L A N D A B D U L SA L E E B
for the Christian life.
CHR07CC Z 5 CD Z (REG. $38) $30.40
Dr. Sproul enters
into dialogue with
a former Muslim, Guilt and Forgiveness
Abdul Saleeb. They TEACHING SERI ES BY R .C . S P RO U L
discuss some of the
issues that led to the Most people do not need to be taught how to
disaster on Septem- feel guilt, but forgiveness is a learned experi-
ber 11, 2001, and the war on terror. This work ence. God’s Word declares us sinners, and only
is intended to dispel popular misconceptions when we experience grace do we deal effec-
about Islam and expose Christians to the truth tively with guilt and experience real freedom.
about the teaching of Mohammed and Islam. GUI01CC Z 2 CDS Z $17
DAR01CC Z 2 CDS Z $17
DAR01BH Z HARDCOVER, 92 PAGES Z $15 Altogether Lovely
BOOK B Y J O N AT H A N E D WA R D S
When You Rise Up Arguably one of the greatest theologians that
BOOK BY R .C . S P RO U L J R . America has ever
produced, Jonathan
Dr. Sproul Jr.’s unique approach to homeschool-
Edwards combined a
ing maintains that education is simply another
rigorous mind with a
word for discipleship. The goal of parents of
deep love for Jesus
homeschoolers should be to see their children
Christ. Altogether
bear fruit, grow in grace, and become more
Lovely presents several
like Christ.
sermons preached by
WHE07BP Z PAPERBACK, 104 PAGES Z $10 Edwards on the loveli-
ness of Jesus Christ.
Christian Ethics Sermons include “God the Best Portion of the
Christian,” “The Excellency of Jesus Christ,” and
TEACHING SER I ES BY R .C . S P RO U L
“Christ Exalted.” They all emphasize the beauty
This series explains that it is our duty, as of salvation in Christ our Lord.
ambassadors of Christ, to uphold Christian ALT01BH Z HARDCOVER, 231 PAGES Z $24
ethics as they relate to the culture in which we
live. As he addresses topics such as relativism,
pacifism, situational ethics, and others, he
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E v I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
P A S t O R ’ S P e R S P e C t I V e
Pa i n: G od ’s Megaphone
B Y A L I S T A I R B E G G
Heart Aflame
B Y J O H N C A LV I N
John Calvin’s biblical commentaries reflect both
deep theological insight and the warmth of a pastor
concerned for his flock’s growth. Heart Aflame provides
a year’s worth of rewarding daily meditations from
Calvin’s commentary on the Psalms.
HEA06BP Z PAPERBACK, 366 PAGES Z $15
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
Devotionals
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E v I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
P R O e C C L e S I A 0 F O R t H e C H u R C H
Ma rket i ng t he Chu rc h
B Y M I C H A E L S. H O R T O N
t a b l e t al k J a n u ar y 2 0 0 8 71
R E C O M M E N D E D R E S O U R C E S
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
From Our Contributor s This Month
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E v I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
T O L L E L E G E T A K E U P A N D R E A D
Volume 2 covers chapters 9–22, and Volume 3 TRU10BH Z VOLUME 1–3 SET Z $69
T O P L A C E A N O R D E R , P L E A S E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 4 3 5 - 4 3 4 3
New to Our Catalog
Simple Gifts
BY SAINT ANDREW’S
STRINGS
F O R A D D I T I O N A L R E S O U R C E S , P L E A S E v I S I T W W W . L I G O N I E R . O R G
m i n i s t r y f o c u s
Over 6,000 people joined us at the annual Ligonier Ministries’ National Conference in
Orlando last year. Dr. Steven J. Lawson, senior pastor of Christ Fellowship Baptist Church,
introduced Dr. Sproul on the opening day. Dr. Sproul, Dr. Lawson, and other prominent pastors
and theologians will be speaking on Evangelism According to Jesus at this year’s conference.
Guests include noted speaker Joni Eareckson Tada, founder of Joni and Friends.
S e e k y e F I R S t
I n k l i ng of Wonde r
B Y R . C . S P R O U L J R .
t a b l e t al k J a n u ar y 2 0 0 8 81
t R u t H & C O n S e Q u e n C e S
t a b l e t al k J a n u ar y 2 0 0 8 83
| 800-435-4343 or WWW.LIGONIER.ORG | Next Month: The Prophetic Books of the Old Testament
2008 LIG ONIER MINISTRIES
N A T I O N A L C O N F E R E N C E
S I N C L A I R F E R G U S O N, S T E V E N J. L AW S O N,
J O H N M A C A R T H U R , C . J. M A H A N EY,
R .C. SPROUL, R .C. SPROUL JR ., AND
J O N I E A R E C K S O N TA D A
M A R C H 1 3 – 1 5 O R L A N D O , F L A .