Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 54 views

    Rubrics For Group Presentation (VMGO)

    Uploaded by

    Charmaine Bermudo Bramida
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating group presentations with criteria including content, delivery/presentation, collaboration/teamwork, and creativity. It rates presentations on a scale of 2 to 5 in each category, with descriptors of what constitutes a score of 2, 3, 4, or 5. For example, a score of 5 in content means the "presentation was evidently relevant to the topic given" and included "more than 5 relevant statements."

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubrics For Group Presentation (VMGO)

    Uploaded by

    Charmaine Bermudo Bramida
    54 views1 page
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating group presentations with criteria including content, delivery/presentation, collaboration/teamwork, and creativity. It rates presentations on a scale of 2 to 5 in each category, with descriptors of what constitutes a score of 2, 3, 4, or 5. For example, a score of 5 in content means the "presentation was evidently relevant to the topic given" and included "more than 5 relevant statements."

    Original Description:

    Rubrics for class presentation of VMGO

    Original Title

    Rubrics for Group Presentation (VMGO)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric for evaluating group presentations with criteria including content, delivery/presentation, collaboration/teamwork, and creativity. It rates presentations on a scale of 2 to 5 in each category, with descriptors of what constitutes a score of 2, 3, 4, or 5. For example, a score of 5 in content means the "presentation was evidently relevant to the topic given" and included "more than 5 relevant statements."

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    54 views1 page

    Rubrics For Group Presentation (VMGO)

    Uploaded by

    Charmaine Bermudo Bramida
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating group presentations with criteria including content, delivery/presentation, collaboration/teamwork, and creativity. It rates presentations on a scale of 2 to 5 in each category, with descriptors of what constitutes a score of 2, 3, 4, or 5. For example, a score of 5 in content means the "presentation was evidently relevant to the topic given" and included "more than 5 relevant statements."

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Republic of the Philippines

    LEYTE NORMAL UNIVERSITY


    Tacloban City

    RUBRICS: Group Presentation (VMGO)

    GROUP: _____________________ SUBJECT: __________________________________ SCHEDULE: ___________________ DATE: __________________

    CRITERIA 2 – Poor 3 – Fair 4 – Good 5 – Excellent SCORE


    Presentation had moments
    Presentation had a good Presentation was evidently
    where relevance to the topic
    Presentation contained little connection to the topic. relevant to the topic given.
    Content was present but students
    to no relevancy to the topic Students were able to give 4- More than 5 relevant
    were only able to give 2-3
    5 relevant statements. statements were given.
    relevant statements.
    Presenters were not Presenters were
    Presenters were all very
    Presenters were unconfident consistent with the level of occasionally confident with
    confident in delivery and they
    Delivery/ and demonstrated little confidence/ preparedness their presentation however
    did an excellent job of
    Presentation evidence of planning prior to they showed the classroom the presentation was not as
    engaging the class.
    presentation. but had some strong engaging as it could have
    Preparation is very evident.
    moments. been for the class.
    The teammates worked from
    The teammates never The teammates sometimes The teammates always
    others’ ideas most of the
    worked from others’ ideas. It worked from others’ ideas. worked from others’ ideas. It
    Collaboration/ time. And it seems like every
    seems as though only a few However it seems as though was evident that all of the
    Team Work did some work, but some
    people worked on the certain people did not do as group members contributed
    people are carrying the
    presentation. much work as others. equally to the presentation.
    presentation.
    The presentation had
    The presentation lacked The presentation was very
    There were minimal signs of creative ideas but could have
    Creativity creativity and had little creative, well prepared and
    creativity or preparation. been much stronger with
    evidence of preparation easy to follow.
    better preparation.

    TOTAL :

    MS. CHARMAINE B. BRAMIDA


    Instructor

    You might also like