Engr
Engr
Engr
** Office hours are by appointment to maximize flexibility: please call or email to set a time **
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Development of techniques of moral analysis and their application to ethical problems encountered
by engineers, such as professional employee rights and whistle blowing; environmental issues;
ethical aspects of safety, risk and liability, and public welfare; conflicts of interest; emphasis on
developing the capacity for independent ethical analysis of real and hypothetical cases.
To achieve these outcomes and objectives, students are given the opportunity and encouragement
to participate actively in class discussions. Students are required to do a substantial amount of
writing in response to the material presented in the course. They are expected to write clearly and
concisely. Students will receive frequent feedback on their submissions, and they have access to a
suite of writing instruction lessons on eCampus.
REQUIRED TEXT: Charles E. Harris, Michael S. Pritchard, Ray W. James, Elaine Englehardt,
and Michael J. Rabins, Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 6th ed. (Boston: Cengage, 2017).
Electronic versions are acceptable.
Additional materials are available on the course website, which can be accessed through
eCampus at http://eCampus.tamu.edu. Select the Ethics and Engineering course.
STRUCTURE OF THE COURSE
For each lesson, students will complete a 25-minute online session and attend two meetings, a 75-
minute face-to-face (F2F) meeting, and a one-hour-fifty-minute recitation. These meetings will be
supplemented with other online content and readings delivered through eCampus.
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Laptops, cell phones, and other media devices, except those used as assistive technology, should
not be used in the F2F meetings. The use of prohibited devices may result in the student being
marked absent for the F2F meeting. The technology policy for each recitation is set by the TA.
GRADED COMPONENTS
Exams
There will be three exams. They may include multiple-choice, short answer, and essay questions.
The exams are cumulative.
Online Quizzes
Students will take graded quizzes as part of their online work. In the online sessions students will
be asked two kinds of questions. Knowledge Checks are ungraded questions that are interspersed
in each session. They are intended to prepare the student for the concluding Quiz, which is graded.
Students are responsible for completing these quizzes before the deadlines listed on the course
schedule. The lowest three quiz grades will be excluded from the calculation of this portion of the
course grade.
*** Note: for technical issues related to online content, email Mr. Ryan von Ness at [email protected]. ***
(Please allow two business days for a response)
In-class Presentation
Students will work in groups of four or five on an in-class presentation. Groups will be assigned
by TAs. Presentations must include visual aids. Students are expected to prepare their presentations
outside class. Each student in the group must give part of the presentation in class. More detailed
instructions will be provided during the semester.
Writing Assignments
Writing assignments are an opportunity for students to gain fluency with the theories, ideas, issues,
and cases presented in the class and to develop their own thoughts on these topics. Students will
write one Short Paper and one longer Essay. The Short Paper may be a short report or a longer
response over material covered in the class. The Short Paper should be between 750 and 1000
words in length. The Essay gives students the opportunity to develop a more extensive argument
over the material covered in the course. It must be at least 2000 words in length.
The Short Paper is worth 10% of the course grade. Students can revise the Short Paper. To earn a
better grade, the resubmission should be substantially better than the first submission and should
respond to relevant TA comments. It will be due a week after the paper has been returned to the
student. The maximum score that a revision can earn is 20 points above the grade given the initial
submission.
The Essay assignment consists of several parts. The first step is a submission of a short (250 word)
proposal. The second step is an Initial Submission of the paper, which is a full-length paper
completed to the best of the student’s abilities. It is worth 5% of the course grade. Students will
then participate in a Peer Review. Failure to provide substantive feedback to their peers will result
in a penalty of up to 10% on the grade for the initial submission. Students will then prepare a Final
Submission that responds to relevant comments from their peers and their TA. It is worth 20% of
the course grade. Students who do not submit a final submission or who submit a revision that is
not reasonably improved compared to the initial submission will receive a zero for the assignment.
Detailed requirements for the Short Paper and the Essay will be distributed via eCampus. All
papers must be submitted to the appropriate turnitin.com link on eCampus. Failure to submit your
essay to turnitin.com will result in a zero (0) for the assignment. Your TA may also require you to
turn in a hard copy (paper copy) of your essay. A standard penalty of five (5) percentage points
per day is assessed to papers submitted after the deadline, either electronically to turnitin.com or
the hard copy to the TA, though the penalty may be modified based on the TA’s discretion.
Students are encouraged to use the supplemental resources posted on eCampus to improve their
writing mechanics and the coherence, conciseness, and clarity of their papers.
GRADING
A 90% - 100%
B 80% - <90%
C 70% - <80%
D 60% - <70%
F <60%
This is a Writing Intensive (W) course. To pass this course, you must pass the writing component.
According to University guidelines, failure to earn an average of at least a D on the writing
assignments (Short Paper and the Essay) will result in a grade of F in the course, regardless of
other grades.
University rules concerning scholastic dishonesty will be rigorously enforced in this class.
Plagiarism is defined in the TAMU Student Rules as the “appropriation of another person’s ideas,
processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.” You should credit your use of
anyone else’s words, graphic images, or ideas using standard citation styles. Moreover, you may
not submit your own work from another course. Ignorance of the rules does not exclude any
member of the TAMU community from the requirements or the processes of the Honor System.
A single incident of cheating may lead to an F* in the class.
Submitting an assignment late is far better than plagiarizing. The standard penalty for late
submission is a 5% deduction (for the paper, not the course) for each day the paper is late.
GRADE COMPLAINTS
We are happy to discuss and possibly change grades provided two conditions are met. First, the
student must have waited at least 24 hours after he or she received the graded assignment. Take
this time to carefully review all the comments given by instructors. Second, the student must bring
a written statement that explains the discrepancy he or she sees between the quality of the work
and the grade it received. The appeal must be made within 7 days from the time the student received
the graded assignment.
Date Topic
Moral Theory
July 13 Utilitarianism
Microethics
July 20 TEPA, NSPE Code of Ethics, Engineering Societies (Short Paper due)
Macroethics