Int J Physiother.

Vol 3(3), 286-290, June (2016) ISSN: 2348 - 8336

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
IJPHY EFFECTIVENESS OF MANUAL TRACTION AND OTHER
PHYSIOTHERAPY TREATMENT IN THE MANAGEMENT OF
PAINFUL CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY
¹Kanwal Khan
¹Samreen Yasmeen ²Farhan
Ishaque ³Ferkhanda Imdad
⁴Wakash Lal
⁵Saeed Ahmed Sheikh
⁶Narendar Kumar
⁷Shireen Khanzada

ABSTRACT
Background: Cervical radiculopathy, generally entitle as pinching of the nerves which causes severe shooting pain which mostly pass through the shoulder.
Along with it causes muscle weakness and numbness into the arm and hand. In majority of the cases, cervical radiculopathy responds well to conservative mode of
treatments which incorporate physical therapy with medical man- agement. The aim of this study is to uncover the effective and evidence based conservative
treatment of cervical radiculopathy.
Method: Randomized controlled trial study conducted from January 2014 to December 2014. Participants were recruited from physiotherapy OPDs of tertiary
care hospitals. A total number of, 100 subjects with a ratio of 50 men and 50 women were recruited between the ages of 25 and 55 years with unilateral cervical
radiculopathy. Control group received combination of conventional AROM exercises and modalities including TENS and superficial thermotherapy as a treatment
while experimental group received manual cervical traction and combination of conventional AROM exercises, modalities including TENS and superficial
thermo- therapy. For both groups, treatment was designed for two weeks (6 sessions/ week). Improvement in symptoms was assessed by evaluation of both
groups on the basis of visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: After 2 weeks of treatment, patients with neck pain showed marked decreased in pain as compared with the control group (P<.001).For pre and post level a
paired sample t-test was used and the results with p-value less than 0.05 were considered as sig- nificant. Mean difference of 0.94 (VAS) with a significant p-value
(P<0.01) was obtained shows the respective improvements in the numeric pain scale scores.
Conclusion: Manual cervical traction when used with conventional AROM exercises and modalities were effective methods for decreasing pain in cervical
radiculopathy. Recent literature supports such protocols involving multiple interventions. Results of this study also supported the treatment options in
cervical radiculopathy in a multimodal approach.
Keywords: Cervical Radiculopathy, Manual Cervical Traction, Multimodal Approach, Pain.

Received 05th April 2016, revised 01st May 2016, accepted 22nd May 2016

10.15621/ijphy/2016/v3i3/100829

www.ijphy.org

¹Lecturer, Ziauddin College of Physiotherapy, Karachi, Pakistan ³Senior lecturer,

Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dow University of Health CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
⁴Senior lecture, Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dow University ²Farhan Ishaque
of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan
⁵Senior lecture, Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dow University Assistant Professor,
of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan Institute of Physical Medicine and
⁶Physiotherapist, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, Karachi Rehabilitation,
74800, Pakistan
⁷Physiotherapist, Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dow University
Dow University of Health Sciences,
of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200, Pakistan. Karachi 74200, Pakistan.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International License. Attribution-
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

Int J Physiother 2016; 3(3) Page |286

INTRODUCTION neck pain at their major work place especially in some of the professions
Radiculopathy of cervical spine is malfunction of nerve root of the like computer personnel, health care pro- fessionals.
cervical spine which is frequently seen in the physical therapy clinic. In cervical spine, different structures can cause neuroprex- ia at root level.
The seventh (C7; 60%) and sixth (C6; 25%) cervical nerve roots are In the sub axial vertebrae, every moving segment is comprises of
the most commonly affected. The core muscles of the spine are around five joint formations for example two facet joints and two neuro
weakened due to the sedentary life style, lack of daily exercises and con- central joints with the intervertebral disk between the two segments and
tinuously increasing physical and mental stress level that altered body the nerve roots exit laterally. As far as the lower lumbar spinal nerve exits
mechanics and causes muscular instability. The symptoms of cervical below the level of the subsequent pedicle. Con- sequently, the disc
radiculopathy are triggered by additional stress on this weakened herniation of L3-L4 will constrict the root of L4, not the leaving root
structures [1, 2, 3]. L3 [11].
An epidemiologic survey of a population based study showed the The several schemes of classification, duration are conceiv- ably the
annual aged – adjusted incidence of radicu- lopathy to be 83 per superlative interpreter of result. It is evident that the treatment of short
100,000 persons. The consequences of cervical pain due to alteration in time period is much more effective in prognosis than prolong time
physical, psychological and socioeconomic status are usually under period for pain manage- ment [12, 13, 14]. The relationship existing
valued. The cervical discomfort or soreness is the 4th primary source of between the prolong period of cervical pain and poor outcome is con-
years leading to disability, as per ranked by a study in 2010 by Global stant in the results of a cohort studies [15, 16, 17] .The rea- sons behind the
Burden of Disease³. It was also explored in this study that around half of poor prognosis are included as older age, female gender, psychosocial
all the participants suffer from a clinically significant cervical soreness circumstances, and radicular symptoms[18, 19].
during their life duration [4]. The effect of manual cervical traction on pain was primar- ily studied in
Cervical radiculopathy is usually allied with numerous other this study. Manual traction is effective in re- lieving pain due to cervical
complications including headache, radicular pain, and numbness and raduculopathy [21]. In 75% of cases, cervical radiculopathy is treated
different dermatomal complains. The most of the epidemiological conservatively and is based on rehabilitation process. The rehabilitation
research studies notify annu- al prevalence between 15% and 50%. The pro- grams are many-sided and involve a number of physical methods
middle aged fe- males show much higher frequency of neck pain [3, 4, 5, 6]. of different efficacy [20].
The reasons related to the advancement and progression of cervical The motivation for the cervical traction is the increase of intervertebral
tenderness overlie substantially with other muscu- lo-skeletal pathologies joint space and realignment of spinal mus- cles is assumed to be the most
3,4,5,6
. Cervical pain can be classified as mechanical, neuropathic and important of the proposed mechanisms by which traction could be
radiating pain from the heart or other vascular conditions. Pain in facet successful [21].
joints, dis- kogenic pain and myofacial pain are the examples of me- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS ) wide- ly imolemented
chanical pain. Neurological pain represents a pain which primarily to cure pain [24]. It is hypothesised that low rate TENS is assumed for the
resulting from any damage or pathology related to the peripheral nervous production of encephalin & endorphins. Pain relief has a quick onset &
system. The pain arising from the herniated disc, osteophytes and spinal literatre shows that stimulation is useful for the extended periods of time
stenosis is one of the most familiar illustrations of peripheral radiculopathy [22].
[7].
METHODOLOGY
The other causes which are related with cervical pain and which partly
Study Design and sampling:
cover other rheumatologic disorders are he- reditarily, psychological
factors (example hopelessness, nervousness, poor managing ability etc.), An experimental study was conducted in physiotherapy OPDs of
sleep disorder, smoking and inactive life style. The outcomes of different tertiary care hospitals of Karachi, 100 subjects in- cluding 50 men and 50
epidemiological surveys have frequently but not constant- ly establish a women were recruited with diagno- sis of cervical radiculopathy. Simple
constructive relation among the cervical and shoulder pain [8, 9]. random sampling was conducted into two groups 1) control group n=
50 with mean age of 38.08 + 8.5 years 2) experimental group n= 50 with
Prevalence of neck pain in obese individuals compared with non –
mean age of 38 + 9 years. Methodology of block randomization was
overweight people are may be due to elevated sys- temic inflammation,
implemented to maintain the number of patients same in each group. All
decrease muscle strength, augmented involuntary stress, ground reaction
patients were treated for two weeks to complete the 12 physical
force, additional psy- chological problems and larger number of
therapy ses- sions. The control group was treated with a combination of
impairments as- sociated with kinesophobia [9, 10]. People may
conventional AROM exercises and modalities including TENS and
experience cervical soreness or stiffness following any traumatic ce-
superficial thermotherapy. The experimental group was treated with the
rebral injury, whiplash damage, numerous sports induced trauma as well.
protocol as the control group
Some studies indicate higher prevalence of

Int J Physiother 2016; 3(3) Page |287

along with additional manual cervical traction. Patients were trained RESULTS
skillfully to execute all the exercises daily, 25 repetitions each two times The study allocated total 100 patients to determine the ef- fectiveness of
in a day. TENS as a pain reliev- ing modality was given to both groups for the manual cervical traction versus conven- tional AROM exercises and
20 minutes with intensity as desired by patients on constant mode. Inter- modalities in cervical radicu- lopathy. Out of 100 samples 50 were in
mittent manual cervical traction by towel method was giv- en for 20 control group while 50 were in Experimental group. Male to female
minutes with 10 seconds traction period and 5 second rest, as it is ratio in both study group were same. Mean age and standard devi- ation in
evidence based and effective treatment time for vertebral separation [26]. experimental group was 38 ± 9 years, 58% patients were more than 35 years
Different Studies have shown that the maximum mean vertebral old in both study groups. 32% in control were extremity affected from
separation oc- curs at 20 min without the exacerbation of patient's symp- left while in exper- imental group it was 38%. In experimental group
toms[23].In both groups, neck pain was measured using visual analogue 44% of patients showed severe level of pain before treatment and 100%
scale (VAS) before and after completing all 12 treatment sessions. The improved to mild level of pain in the same group after the treatment.
duration of study was one year. All the participants were regular patients
who signed an informed approval/consent form approved by the internal The mean and standard deviation of pain scores of patients in
Experimental group at pre and post stage. It was found that at pre stage
ethical committee of that particular tertiary care hospital.
pain was 6.94 ± 1.57 and after the treat- ment, at post level it was 1.68 ±
Inclusion criteria: 0.57, from pre to post level mean pain score significantly get down about
The participants were recruited on the basis of diagnosis as cervical 5.26 point, p value was found less than 0.01 using paired sample t-test
radiculopathy referred by neuro-physician per- ceiving pain rating that showed that mean pain score in at pre and post level were not same.
according to VAS (1 to 10). Patients having unilateral upper-extremity It was found that in control group mean pain score after the treatment
pain, numbness or par- esthesia along with 3 or 4 clinical test positive was 6.06 ± 1.63, while in the group of Ex- perimental mean pain score
including spurling test, upper-limb tension test (ULTT), distraction test, after the treatment was 1.68
and having ipsilateral cervical rotation greater than 60o. ±0.58, a significant p-value (P<0.01) was obtained using independent
Exclusion criteria: sample t-test that concludes that mean pain score after the treatment in
Patients with the other pathologies, like tumor, fracture, pregnancy, both groups were not same and patients in Experimental group significantly
rheumatoid arthritis, trauma, osteoporosis, vertigo by any cause, patients have less pain score after the treatment as compare to the patients in con-
with bilateral upper limb ra- diculopathy and prolonged steroid use were trol group.
excluded from participating. Graph 1: Pain score at pre and post stages in both groups Pain Score
Data Analysis:
comparison in both study Groups
Treatment scores were compared by using SPSS version 21. Statistics were
calculated in the form of frequencies, per- centages, Paired sample T test
and Independent T test.
Mean and standard deviations were reported for the vari- ables
quantitative in nature, like age, pain Scores before the treatment and pain
score after the treatment in both con- trol and experimental study group.
Count with percentag- es were given for the gender age group, extremity
affected and level of pain before the treatment and after the treat- ment
reported by the patients in control and experimental group. To compare
the mean differences of pain scores in control and experimental group at
pre and post treatment level a paired sample t-test was used and the results Graph2: Mean of post pain scores in both groups PostPain
with p-value less than 0.05 were considered as significant. Pain scores at
Score comparison inboth studyGroups
pre and post treatment level were also tested after taking the confounding
effect of age groups and gender us- ing paired sample test in both study
groups, independent sample t-test was used to see the mean differences in
the post pain score of the patients of control and Experimental group .Bar
charts are used to display the graphical repre- sentation of mean scores
and other basic characteristics of data.

Int J Physiother 2016; 3(3) Page |288

DISCUSSION trol group.
Limited studies were conducted to check out the out- comes after CONCLUSION
cervical traction. On the other hand some of the studies gave statistically Hence it is concluded that cervical radiculopathy is a severe painful and
significant conclusions but the concrete clinical implications of these hurting pathology causing muscular weakness and sensory alterations in
outcomes are not apparent. There are certain studies which are unilateral or bilateral upper ex- tremities. We observed a diversity of
conducted on protocols of new devices for the application of cervical treatment techniques in comprehensive literature review with
traction but the evidences for the effectiveness of these de- vices and insignificant con- sequences. The results of this study support such
techniques need to be studied further. This study showed marked decrease protocols involving multiple interventions that is cervical traction is more
in pain intensity after treatment in experimental group as they required less useful when it is combined with conventional active range of motion
treatment ses- sions than control group. exercises and modalities in painful cervi- cal radiculopathy.
Subhash C. R et al, conducted a study in which they found the same RECOMMENDATIONS
results showing the efficacy of TENS, neck ex- ercises and intermittent
This is a limited study only focused on pain measure- ment through
cervical traction. They also con- cluded that exercises and intermittent
numeric pain rating scale and the further outcomes can be measured by
cervical traction is efficient in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy
using different assessment parameters like neck disability index, upper
and must have a considerable position in the management of cervical
limb muscle power or strength improvement. Multidimensional physi-
radiculopathy [24].
cal therapeutic strategies like mechanical cervical traction, deep neck flexor
Another study conducted by Umar et al, explored the ef- fectiveness of strengthening exercises, muscle energy technique, cervical manipulation
cervical traction combined with core mus- cle strengthening exercises in can also be recommend- ed to evaluate the results in patient with cervical
cervical radiculopathy. They concluded that multimodal approach radicu- lopathy.
combined with cer- vical traction and core muscle strengthening
exercises produces more positive results in managing pain than a REFERENCE
single intervention [25]. On the other hand the findings of our study [1] Young IA, Michener LA, Cleland JA, Aguilera AJ, Sny- der AR.
suggested that manual cervical traction tech- nique with superficial Manual Therapy, Exercise, and Taction for patients with Cervical
heating pads with TENS was found best and effective in relieving pain Radiculopathy. Phys Ther. 2009 July;89(7):632-42.
and restoring patient’s functions of activates of daily living with [2] Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT.
significant im- provement in symptoms bearing good patient outcomes. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A popu- lation based
The key factor in conducting this study was not only to see efficacy of study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. J Neurol.
cervical traction in painful radiculopathy but also to set statistical 1994 Apr; 117(Pt2):325–35.
evidences in new treatment standards with keeping combination [3] Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in
therapy in mind. the world population: A systematic critical review of the literature.
The results of our study is also supported by Dibyend- unarayan et al, Eur Spine J. 2006 Aug; 15(6): 834–48
they measured the effectiveness of mechan- ical cervical traction on [4] Holm LW, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Hogg-Johnson S, Cote P,
patients with unilateral mechanical neck pain. They concluded that even Hogg-Johnson G . The Burden and Determi- nants of Neck Pain
though convention- al therapy is affected but they recommended in Whiplash-Associated Disorders. After Traffic Collisions. Eur
mechanical cervical traction as better physical therapy intervention to Spine J. 2008 Apr; 17(Suppl 1): 52–9
manage mechanical neck pain [26]. [5] Strine TW, Hootman JM. US national prevalence and correlates of
low back and neck pain among adults. Ar- thritis Rheum. 2007
A case series on geriatric population conducted by Steven May;57(4):656-65
W. Forbush et al. measured the effects of multimodal con- servative [6] Tampin B, Briffa NK, Goucke R, Slater H. Identification of
approach in patients with degenerative cervical radiculopathy. They neuropathic pain in patients with neck/upper limb pain:
studied 10 patients in which inter- mittent cervical traction was used Application of a grading system and screening tools. Pain. 2013
with manual therapy (HVLA thrust) of the upper thoracic and Aug; 154(12): 2813–22
cervical spine and deep cervical flexor strengthening exercises for 6 to [7] Anderberg L, Annertz M, Rydholm U, Brandt L, Save- land H.
12 sessions over a period of 3 to 6 weeks. They concluded that Selective diagnostic nerve root block for the evaluation of
intervention resulted in substantial improvement in numeric pain rating radicular pain in the multilevel degener- ated cervical spine. Eur
scale and neck disability index (NDI) [27]. Spine J. 2006; 15(6): 794–801.
The present study showed that pain and unilateral symp- toms had [8] Vasseljen O, Woodhouse A, Bjorngaard JH, Leivseth L. Natural
reduced in intensity after treatment in experi- mental group with course of acute neck and low back pain in the general population: the
improved cervical range of motion and they required less treatment HUNT study. Pain. 2013 Aug; 154(8): 1237–44.
sessions as compared to con- [9] Vos CJ, Verhagen AP, Passchier J, Koes BW. Clinical

Int J Physiother 2016; 3(3) Page |289

 course and prognostic factors in acute neck pain: An inception rtälje Study Group. Neck/shoulder disorders in a general
cohort study in general practice. Pain Med. 2008 July- population. Natural course and influence of physical exercise; A 5-
Aug;9(5):572–80. year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul ;30(13):E363-8.
[10] Vincent, H.K., Adams, M.C., Vincent, K.R., and Hur- ley, R.W. [19] Carstensen, T.B. The influence of psychosocial factors on recovery
Musculoskeletal pain, fear avoidance behav- iors, and functional following acute whiplash trauma. Dan Med J. 2012; 59:
decline in obesity: potential inter- ventions to manage pain and B4560.
maintain function. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013; 38: 481–489. [20] A.Jellad, Z. Ben Salah, S. Boudokhane, H. Migaou,
[11] Christensen JO and Knardahl S. Time-course of occu- pational I. Bahri , N. Rejeb. The value of intermittent cervi- cal traction
psychological and social factors as predictors of new-onset and in recent cervical radiculopathy.Volume 52(9) 2009, Pages 638 -
persistent neck pain: a three-wave prospective study over 4 years. 652.
Pain. 2014 July; 155(7): 1262–71. [21] David.G.Boreinstein, chronic neck pain: How to ap- proach
[12] May, S., Gardiner, E., Young, S., and Klaber-Moffett, J. Predictor treatment, current madecine group, 2007, 11: 436-439
variables for a positive long-term function- al outcome in patients [22] Kääriä, S., Laaksonen, M., Rahkonen, O., Lahelma, E., and Leino-
with acute and chronic neck and back pain treated with a Arjas, P. Risk factors of chronic neck pain: a prospective study
McKenzie approach: a secondary analysis. J Man Manip Ther. among middle-aged employees. Eur J Pain. 2012; 16: 911–920.
2008; 16: 155– 160. [23] Colachis SC, Strohm BR. A study of tractive forces and angle of
[13] Royuela, A., Kovacs, F.M., Campillo, C., Casamitjana, M., Muriel, pull on vertebral interspaces in the cervi- cal psine. Arch Phys Med
A., and Abraira, V. Predicting outcomes of neuroreflexotherapy Rehabil 1965; 46: 820.
in patients with subacute or chronic neck or low back pain. [24] Subhash chandra rai, ajith s., k.r. bhagavan, deepak pinto. Cervical
Spine J. 2014; 14: 1588–1600. traction reduces pain and disability in patients with unilateral
[14] Peterson, C., Bolton, J., and Humphreys, B.K. Pre- dictors of cervical radiculopathy. IJCRR. 2013; 5(7): 33-40.
outcome in neck pain patients undergoing chiropractic care: [25] Muhammad Umar,Aamer Naeem, Mazhar Badshah, Imran
comparison of acute and chronic patients. Chiropr Man Therap. Amjad.effectiveness of cervical traction com- bined with core
2012; 20: 27. muscle strengthening exercises in cervical radiculopathy. Journal
[15] Enthoven, P., Skargren, E., Carstensen, J., and Oberg, of Public Health and Biological Sciences Vol. 1, No. 4 Oct –
B. Predictive factors for 1-year and 5-year outcome for disability Dec 2012, p.115-120 ISSN 2305-8668.
in a working population of patients with low back pain treated in [26] Bid Dibyendunarayan; Ramalingam A Thangamani, Bhatt Jahnvi
primary care. Pain. 2006; 122: 137–144. A; Rathod Prerna N; Tandel, Krupali V. The effects of mechanical
[16] Wilkens, P., Scheel, I.B., Grundnes, O., Hellum, C., and cervical traction on patients with unilateral mechanical neck pain,
Storheim, K. Prognostic factors of prolonged disability in Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy 8.3
patients with chronic low back pain and lumbar degeneration in (Jul- Sep 2014): 97-103.
primary care: a cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38: [27] Steven W. Forbush, Terry Cox, Eric Wilson. Treat- ment of
65–74. patients with degenerative cervical radicu- lopathy using a
[17] Kleinstueck, F.S., Fekete, T., Jeszenszky, D. et al. The outcome of multimodal conservative approach in a geriatric population: A
decompression surgery for lumbar her- niated disc is influenced case series, Journal of Or- thopedics & Sports Physical Therapy,
by the level of concomitant preoperative low back pain. Eur 2011 Volume: 41 Issue: 10 Pages: 723–733.
Spine J. 2011; 20: 1166–1173.
[18] Pernold G, Mortimer M, Wiktorin C, Tornqvist EW, Vingard E.
Musculoskeletal Intervention Center-Nor-

Citation
Khan, K., Yasmeen, S., Ishaque, F., Imdad, F., Lal, W., Sheikh, S., . . . Khanzada, S. (2016). EFFECTIVENESS OF MANUALTRACTION
AND OTHER PHYSIOTHERAPY TREATMENT INTHE MANAGEMENT OF PAINFUL
CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY. International Journal of Physiotherapy, 3(3), 286-290.

Int J Physiother 2016; 3(3) Page |290