US District Court

Denver, CO

Complaint

Parties:

Rev. Ryan “Sasha” Gallagher

V.

National Security Agency

9800 Savage Rd. Bldg#ntb316gm Rm#3n057

Fort Meade, MD 20755-6272

Federal Bureau of Investigations

935 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Washington DC, 20535

Twitter

1355 Market Street. Suite 900.

San Francisco, CA 94103

Megyn Kelly

30 Rockefeller Plaza

New York, NY 10112

Joe Rogan

6650 S Torrey Pines Dr,

Las Vegas, NV 89118

American Atheists

225 Cristiani St.

Cranford, NJ 07016

Ryan Gallagher, Pro Se, hereby files this Complaint and makes these allegations based on
information and belief which are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity
for further investigation and discovery—against Defendants, National Security Agency (“NSA” or
“Defendant”) and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (“FBI” or “Defendant 2”). I ask that the
court consider the fact that I am not a lawyer, but am alleging violations of various rights, which
after discovery will be blatantly clear Cruz v. Beto 405 U.S. 319 (1972). This filing will meet the
standard of Prima Facie evidence, if not more.

I. Introduction
I was caught up in an NSA, or CIA Dragnet, and then a COINTELPRO was launched against me by the
Media, Politicians and Law Enforcement.

WikiMedia v. NSA, No. 15-2560 (4th Cir 2017)

Jewel v. NSA, No. 10-15616 (9th Cir 2011)

Hepting v. ATT, 09-16676 (9th Cir 2011)

Campbell v. Facebook, 13cv05996 (ND Cal 2017)

US v. Awadallah, 202 F Supp 2d 17 (SDNY 2002)

Andrade v. Chojnack, 65 F Supp 2d 431 (WD Tex 1999)

(Reputation)

In 2011-2012 the Plaintiff became a well known member of the Colorado Marijuana community via a
YouTube channel, blog and Social Media, and working for a Marijuana Dispensary as a Social Media
Manager. This was amplified during the 2012 Marijuana rally when the Plaintiff advertised the Rally to
thousands of Texans, who showed up to the rally in droves. At the 2012 rally many people knew who the
Plaintiff was, and people even wanted to take pictures with the Plaintiff. In late 2012 and into 2013 the
Plaintiff became a well known member of the Bitcoin community. This was when Bitcoin raised from $5
 each to over $1000 each. During this time websites like Vocativ even began to write Articles about the
Plaintiff.

http://www.vocativ.com/tech/bitcoin/bitcoin-u-s-a-digital-dollars-communities-might-be-coming-to-a-
town-near-you/

This Article even states “[Plaintiff] is at the vanguard of the bitcoin movement.”

Bud Lite then created a Town, called “Whatever USA”, copying me kind of, and used a
Character that looks kind of like me. Whoever was involved in the creation of that Town
may be witness to these events.

https://www.bizjournals.com/chicago/news/2014/06/03/energy-bbdo-remains-in-
background-as-bud-lights.html

During this time the Plaintiff’s YouTube channel teaching Hinduism, History, Botany, Religious Chemistry
and Ethnobotany, began to get more and more popular and eventually reached over 1,000,000 views,
which at the time had become easier and easier as the flow of views got heavier and heavier, and would
have many millions of views by now, which comes would have come with contractual offers if the
Defendants had not begun their offensive against him.

In 2014 the Plaintiff engaged in discussions with the New Black Panther Party, the Moorish Science
Temple and the Nu-Covenant Group. Within 8 months after these discussions began, the events in
Ferguson (known as the Ferguson Unrest) occurred, and these groups were considered to be “Outside
Agitators”. It is believed that during this time the Defendants began to investigate the Plaintiff in a way
reminiscent of Defendant 2’s well documented COINTELPRO operations. During this time the Plaintiff
 would regularly send emails to Congress members and Media outlets (I have a list of 3,000+ Politicians
and Journalists), at which time it is believed the investigation began to become more of an offensive
operation than an investigation, in way of Character Assassination, again reminiscent of Defendant 2’s
well documented COINTELPRO operations.

The Plaintiff then began watching TYT, and Fox News, using the TYT Chat Box to get new people to come
to his blog, YouTube channel, and other pages. The plaintiff then started the War on Christmas, the
“Waging a Real War on Christmas” threads which can be found on various websites, document a lot of
this Case.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/waging-a-real-war-on-christmas-synchronized-hyperspace-event-s-h-
e.849234/

http://www.occultforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36807

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/waging-a-real-war-on-christmas-synchronized-
hyperspace-event-s-h-e.380374/

I also began telling people to about how Journalists use Twitter, and that you can make Journalists say
things by Tweeting at them. An example would be Eric Bolling, one time I Tweeted at him while he was
on “The Five” on Fox News, and told him to call Chicago, “Chiraq”, and not 5 minutes later he did it.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/the-24-hour-twitter-based-news-cycle.905636/

(All of the Journalists I named got promoted because I named them)

And I said Kirsten Powder should be President, and the Media paid much more attention to her, after my
post and after my spreading of the idea that she should be president

https://www.rollitup.org/t/kirsten-powers-for-president.817516/

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/kirsten-powers-for-president.345116/

And I joined the Joe Rogan forum around this time, and began watching his podcast live and commenting
on it live on YouTube, and it was very obvious that he was reading my posts on his forum and live
comments. And his group began to Troll me, and attack me online. He has since taken the forum down,
after 18 years of existence, to cover up what they did to me.

https://www.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/7wqvfp/after_18_years_joe_rogans_official_message_b
oard/

Around this time, 2014, I was also on a YouTube show called “Atheist Analysis”, with Steve Tillman (he
was one of the hosts, but not the main host, but I don't remember the main Host's name now since so
much has happened). Steve Tillman lives in Indiana and is in a wheelchair, and I was on a show he was
on. The show was connected to America Atheist, and David Silverman (President of American Atheist)
was a guest on that show and other shows around it, such as “Meeting of the Minds” with Christopher
Maute, and New Covenant Group with an older group of Atheists that was friends with these ones. On
Atheist Analysis I was the Token Religious Person, a Hindu Shaivte, and I would talk about Ancient
Egyptian Religion. I believe that Atheist Analysis, and American Atheist, are part of the COINTELPRO.
They seemed to have gotten very angry after I left the show because I did not like the direction it was
going with a new member called “The Neo-Atheist”). One of the American Atheist associates may have
even “SWATed” me initiating this whole problem if it was not some kind of Dragnet.

Here is an example of the reach of my words on that show, this theory Presented by WIRED Magazine is
my Theory, and they twisted it and made it an “Accident” of the Egyptians. But you will not find anyone
else on the internet or elsewhere espousing this theory, it is my personal theory and WIRED used it and
twisted it after watching me on Atheist Analysis.

https://www.wired.com/2014/07/fantastically-wrong-dung-beetle-worship/

Here was where I first posted the Theory

https://www.rollitup.org/t/i-think-i-know-who-taught-the-egyptians-construction.810951/

Megyn Kelly then said “Fuck” on TV, and I created a video and the #Fuckabee on my Twitter account
@Rudraaaaaaaaa. My YouTube channel has since been taken down, possibly at the suggestion of Law
Enforcement, but there is a video on my YouTube channel that I can prove to the Court once Gallagher v
Youtube, 1:18cv01694 is complete. #Fuckabee became a massive hashtag, and 4-5 years later it is still
used at least once a day on Twitter, if not more.

https://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/20831687#20831687

This image was

created by TBS, and
the American Dad
Writer Seth McFarlan,
based on my Hashtag.
Here is an example of part of my Email list of Journos and Politicians, this is my Steemit Account (this was
posted later, but I can prove I used the list earlier, and I can show the emails I sent to Congress people)

https://steemit.com/steem/@marsresident/how-you-can-help-get-steem-in-the-news-simply-using-
your-email

As an example of the effectiveness and reach of my email list, here is an article Reuters wrote and CNBC
copied after my emails went out, and CNBC has since taken down. These were literally written just after
that article I posted on Steemit

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-currency-steem/digital-currency-steem-soars-to-more-than-150-
million-in-value-in-two-weeks-idUSKCN0ZS2MF

https://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/12/reuters-america-digital-currency-steem-soars-to-more-than-150-
mln-in-value-in-2-weeks.html

(Loss of Reputation)

After the events in Ferguson the Plaintiff’s YouTube account was shut down, as well as Social Media
accounts. It was 6 months or longer that some of them were shut down and the YouTube account was
never reactivated. During this time the Plaintiff began to suspect something was strange, and began to
suspect that the previously stated operations were occurring. It seemed that during this time the
Defendants also began to spread rumors throughout the Bitcoin community, as the Plaintiff began to be
trolled and was eventually pushed out of the Bitcoin community.

(Screen Shots of perceived NSA Trolls Posts will be provided to the Court if needed but can be found in
the following link)

Here is the Website, my account is “FinShaggy” and after the COINTELPRO attack, I was banned from the
Website, and was never given a reason by the Site's Owner.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216139.0
 This article explains how the Defendants do this, the information was released in the Snowden
revelations.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks

“The discovery that the US military is developing false online personalities –

known to users of social media as "sock puppets" – could also encourage other
governments, private companies and non-government organisations to do the
same.

The Centcom contract stipulates that each fake online persona must have a
convincing background, history and supporting details, and that up to 50 US-
based controllers should be able to operate false identities from their
workstations "without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries".”

https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ec5_1427349169

It is believed that at this time, the Defendants were sharing information about their COINTELPRO like
attack with the media, but in a way that made the Plaintiff seem like a criminal or even a possible “lone
wolf” that could snap at any moment. It is also believed that during this time they began to use his
electronic devices to spy on him, as outlined in the Snowden revelations and WikiLeaks Vault 7
revelations. This operation reached so far as to even make it impossible for the Plaintiff to get a job, and
in 2016 the Plaintiff was forced to resort to moving into a Homeless shelter.

In September 2016 the Plaintiff decided, after the Edward Snowden movie was released, to submit a
FOIA/ECPA request to the NSA, which was rejected in December. And according to the NSA the request
was rejected due to investigatory reasons, and the Plaintiff was given the option to appeal. On March
10th 2017 the Plaintiff initiated appeal, and contacted the Inspector General. During the course of this
investigation alluded to by the Defendant no Agents from either Defendant Agencies attempted to
personally contact the Plaintiff for questioning, and did not attempt to raid the Plaintiff, showing that it is
purely malicious in nature.

During the Trump/Hillary Election, Plaintiff was watching TV when on AM Joy a guest stated “My culture
is a Dominant Culture, if you allow them to come in, you will have Taco Trucks, every Corner”. I changed
that to #TacoTrucksOnEveryCorner, and began spreading it on Facebook and Google+, then Twitter, and I
began retweeting everyone who said it on Twitter and it became a huge part of the 2016 Election Cycle
and is still popular today. I am the creator of #TacoTrucksOnEveryCorner, but AM Joy and the Guest she
had have taken credit for it.
 https://plus.google.com/103614823721232858992/posts/FXzJWP7KLcw

https://plus.google.com/103614823721232858992/posts/cyYZmkVyMmC

https://plus.google.com/103614823721232858992/posts/2TUKer3V94k

https://plus.google.com/103614823721232858992/posts/N8BgV5cWbxy

Them taking credit for it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taco_trucks_on_every_corner

In Spring of 2018, Akon stole the Idea to Create Cryptocurrency Towns after I was financially ruined by
the Intelligence Community and Media.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/25/africa/akon-launch-crypto-city-senegal/index.html

I believe that the Intelligence Community also has Media members comparing me to the Annapolis
Shooter, and I believe that Megyn Kelly's words about me over the years has a lot to do with that, and
are having them spread that to anyone who asks about me. I tweet at the Media every day to let them
know about the Case I am building against them for what they have done to me, and they are using my
openness and bluntness to pretend I am a violent individual.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/crime/bs-md-ramos-search-20180628-story.html

Evidece of this is that the Media Completely ignores me now, I can show where they used to respond to
me every once in a while, but now they have obviously told each other to stop replying to me. Twitter
has also been Shadow Banning me, possibly at the suggestion of Media Members, Politicians, Law
Enforcement, or all 3.

My Fans tell me sometimes that they literally have to look for my posts, they do not show up in their
feeds. The loss of Reputation has damaged my Fandom, but I still have a very loyal following.

II. Venue and Jurisdiction

NRA v. Cuomo, 1:2018cv00566

Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 US 333 (1966)

28 USC S 1442
Title II Rule 3
 Klayman v. Obama, (D. DC 2013)

ACE v. FCC, 451 F3d 226 (DC Cir 2006)

Byrd v. Aaron's, No. 14-3050 (3rd Cir 2015)

Carpenter v. US, 585 US _ (2018)

Steve Jackson Games v. US Secret Service, 36 F3d 457 (5 th Cir 1994)

Joffe v. Google (9th Cir 2013)

In Re: Google, No. 15-15858 (9th Cir 2017)

III. First Cause of Action: Violations of the

Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)
and the 4th Amendment, and Corruption in the
Defendant Agencies
ECPA Case law
Steve Jackson Games, Incorporated, et al. v. Secret Service, et al., 36 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. 1994)
Microsoft Corp. v. United States, No. 14-2985 (2d Cir. 2017)

4th Amendment Case Law

Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
Soldal v. Cook County 506 U.S. 56 (1992)
United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012)
Florida v. Jardines 569 U.S. ___ (2013)

There is no immunity for investigative activities Buckley v. Fitzsimmons 509 U.S. 259 (1993)

Government Agencies may not reveal private information during investigations Watkins v. United States,
354 U.S. 178 (1957)

Defendant is known to spy on the citizens on the United States

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr6304/text
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/06/12/heres-everything-we-know-about-prism-to-date/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_(surveillance_program)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/08/fbi-changes-privacy-rules-accessing-nsa-prism-data
http://www.vocativ.com/295204/nsa-prism/
http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/nsa-prism.htm

Defendant and Defendant 2 both have the capability to turn cell phones and other devices into spying
devices Riley v. California 573 U.S. ___ (2014); United States v. United States Dist. Ct. 407 U.S. 297 (1972)
 https://wikileaks.org/ciav7p1/
Defendant and Defendant 2 both have the capability to spy through walls using FLIR technology Kyllo v. United
States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)

http://www.flir.com/home/
Warrants can be retrieved and acted on illegally (Overbroad warrants, Malicious Warrants, etc), and
those acting on them are liable for doing so Messerschmidt, et al. v. Millender, et al. 565 U.S. ___ (2012)

Defendant and Defendant 2 are both known to abuse their capabilities and retrieve illegal warrants to do so

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/02/23/court-invalidates-cell-phone-warrant-
as-overbroad/

http://archive.wired.com/politics/law/news/2007/07/exigentinvestigation

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/418/323/case.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Kurtz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Mayfield

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_invocations_of_the_Patriot_Act

https://www.aclu.org/news/fbi-audit-exposes-widespread-abuse-patriot-act-powers

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/james-whitey-bulgers-capture-could-cause-trouble-inside-the-
fbi/2011/06/24/AGis2cjH_story.html

http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/30/politics/what-happens-if-the-patriot-act-provisions-expire/

http://highered.mheducation.com/sites/0072564938/student_view0/chapter4/chapter_outline.html

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse_of_process

Government Agents must be held to a higher standard than other citizens due to the fact that they are acting
under Color of Law Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Color of Law
The act of a state officer, regardless of whether or not the act is within the limits of his or her
authority, is considered an act under color of law if the officer purports to be conducting
himself or herself in the course of official duties. Under the civil rights act of 1871 (42 U.S.C.A.
Section 1983), color of law is synonymous with State Action, which is conduct by an officer
that bears a sufficiently close nexus to a state so that the action is treated as though it is by
the state.

Types of Police misconduct include false confession, false arrest, false evidence, false imprisonment,
 intimidation, police brutality, police corruption, racial profiling, surveillance abuse, witness tampering, and off-
duty misconduct.

Others include:
1. Noble Cause corruption, where an officer believes that a good outcome justifies his bad behavior.
2. Selective Enforcement, allowing friends, family and other officers to break the law.
3. Abuse of Power, using the badge to get in to places you would otherwise not be invited or allowed,
discounts, etc.
4. Police Perjury, blatant lying under oath and/or to other authorities to cover wrongdoing.
5. Violation by Officers of police procedural policy.
Laws intended to protect against abuse of authority include the 4th Amendment to the Constitution, which
prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures; the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which includes due
process and equal protection clauses; the Civil Rights Act of 1871; and the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Noble Cause corruption:

Corruption caused by the adherence to a teleological ethical system (ex: By their fruits you shall know them;
pulling over anyone with larger rims on their car), suggesting that the person "will utilize unethical, and
sometimes illegal, means to obtain a desired result," a result which appears to benefit the greater good.

Flast V Cohen

https://epic.org/privacy/ecpa/
Individuals who violate ECPA face up to five years in prison and fines up to $250,000. Victims are also entitled
to bring civil suits and recover actual damages, in addition to punitive damages and attorney's fees, for
violations.

https://epic.org/privacy/laws/privacy_act.html
http://www.jurist.org/hotline/2014/01/khaliah-barnes-privacy-act.php

IV. Second Cause of Action: Character

Assassination
National Security/Privacy Balance Case Law
Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper 571 U.S. ___ (2014)

The Government is not allowed to engage in these kinds of actions United States v. Guest 383 U.S. 745
(1966)

The accuser must be named. He/she may be an officer or a third party, but some positively identifiable person
(human being) must accuse; some certain person must take responsibility for the making of the accusation, not
an agency or an institution. This is the only valid means by which a citizen may begin to face his accuser. Also,
the injured party (corpus delicti) must make the accusation. Hearsay evidence may not be provided. Anyone
else testifying that they heard that another party was injured does not qualify as direct evidence.

The accusation must be made under penalty of perjury. If perjury cannot reach the accuser, there is no
accusation. Otherwise, anyone may accuse another falsely without risk.

False accusation may also arise in part from the conduct of the accused, particularly where
the accused engages in behaviors consistent with having committed the suspected
 wrongdoing, either unconsciously or for purposes of appearing guilty. Additionally, once a false
accusation has been made -- particularly an emotionally laden one -- normal human emotional
responses to being falsely accused (such as fear, anger, or denial of the accusation) may be
interpreted as evidence of guilt.

Defendant 2’s Modus Operandi:

Hanrahan v. Hampton 446 U.S. 754 (1980)
https://vault.fbi.gov/cointel-pro
https://genius.com/Federal-bureau-of-investigation-marcus-garvey-neutralization-memo-
annotated
https://genius.com/Federal-bureau-of-investigation-hoover-memo-on-black-panthers-
breakfast-for-children-program-annotated
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/14/us/fbi-and-mlk/
http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1978/03/10/page/1/article/fbi-memo-use-mob-against-dick-
gregory
http://chicago68.com/fbi51468.html
https://vault.fbi.gov/Martin%20Luther%20King,%20Jr./Martin%20Luther%20King,%20Jr.
%20Part%201%20of%202

Defendant and Defendant 2’s Motive:

Fear of “The Ferguson Effect”
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/12/us/fbi-james-comey-homicide-increase-ferguson-effect/
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/10/the-fbi-directors-troubling-comments-on-
the-ferguson-effect/412351/
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/12/us/comey-ferguson-effect-police-videos-fbi.html?_r=0
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-james-comey-police-ferguson-effect-
20151117-story.html
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/13/ferguson-effect-james-comey-fbi-
policing
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/FBI-james-comey-ferguson-effect-
murder/2016/05/12/id/728510/

No. 05-14-01175-CR
CHRISTOPHER GERALD PRICE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F13-58588-J
http://cases.justia.com/texas/fifth-court-of-appeals/2016-05-14-01175-cr.pdf?ts=1453457687

Recently, the Texas Supreme Court clarified that an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim is
considered a "gap-filler" claim and cannot be used "'to circumvent the limitations placed on the
recovery of mental anguish damages under more established tort doctrines.'" Creditwatch, Inc. v.
Jackson, 157 S.W.3d 814, 816, 818 (Tex. 2005) (quoting Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Zeltwanger, 144
S.W.3d 438, 447 (Tex. 2004)). The tort's purpose is "'to supplement existing forms of recovery by
providing a cause of action for egregious conduct' that might otherwise go unremedied." Zeltwanger,
144 S.W.3d at 447 (quoting Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Johnson, 985 S.W.2d 62, 68 (Tex.
1998)). In Zeltwanger, the Court stated: "Where the gravamen of a plaintiff's complaint is
really another tort, intentional infliction of emotional distress should not be available." Id. Among the
cases cited as authority for this statement, the Texas Supreme Court referenced a Washington
Supreme Court assault case that held damages for emotional distress could be awarded as part of
the assault damages. Zeltwanger, 144 S.W.3d at 448 (citing Rice v. Janovich, 742 P.2d 1230, 1238
(Wash. 1987)).

V. Third Cause of Action: Violations of

International Treaties

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc
A/810 at 71 (1948).

Article 12

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, G.A. res. 2200A (XXI),
21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 999 U.N.T.S. 171,
entered into force Mar. 23, 1976.

Article 17

Special Rapporteur on Privacy

https://www.google.com/url?
sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwiUv4fBgd_SAhVE4IM
KHaoWB1sQFggoMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ohchr.org%2FDocuments%2FIssues%2FPrivacy%2FA-
HRC-31-64.doc&usg=AFQjCNHYwGVmdH7luFsx87x-
Zv8kggoHLw&sig2=TrzwF3omqk5YMQZsKlkoJg&bvm=bv.149760088,d.amc

VI. Claim
Loss of Reputation, Intellectual Property loss, and Mental Anguish.

Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)

Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District, 439 U.S. 410, (1979)
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131 (1988)
Los Angeles County v. Humphries, 562 U.S. 29 (2010)
Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980)

Mental Anguish
S. Tex. Freightliner, Inc. v. Muniz, 288 S.W.3d 123 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 2009)

So. Exp. Co. v. Byers, 240 U. S. 612; McCarthy v. Boston El. R. 112 N. E. 235; Rowan v.
Western U. Tel. Co. 149 Fed. 550. Relle' v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 55 Tex. 308,
40 Am. Rep. 805. So. Pac. v. Hetzer, 1359 -Fed. 272; Stafford v. Tel. Co. 73 Fed. 273;
W. U. Tel. Co. v. Wood, 57 Fed. 471. W. U. Tel. Co. v. Bryant, 46 N, E. 358; W. U. Tel.
Co. v. Kibble, 115 S. W. 643; W. U. Tel. Co. v. Henly, 54 N. E. 77; Lee v. W. U. Tel. Co.,
113 S. W. 55; W. U. Tel. Co. v. Steinbergen, 54 S. W. 829. Green v. Shoemaker Co., 73
Atl. 688.

42 U.S. Code § 1983

42 U.S. Code § 1981

18 U.S. Code § 242

28 U.S. Code § 2671

28 U.S. Code § 2675

28 U.S. Code § 2679

18 U.S. Code § 2510

18 U.S. Code § 2511

VII. Prayer for Relief

Whereby the Plaintiff Prays the Court, Award the Plaintiff up to $250,000.00 in punitive damages for
each violation of the ECPA, as outlined in the act. As well as compensation for Loss of Reputation and for
putting the Plaintiff in a position of Mental Anguish in the amount of $5,000,000.00; and initiate a RICO
case against the corrupt Agencies, Agents and Journalists after causing them to release records of the
 events outlined in this Case. And Cause Twitter to end all Shadow Banning Against me for my Religious
Speech.

(I have been attempting to get Evidence to add as Exhibits from the NSA for over 2 years now, and there
is a Federal Case open in which I am trying to get the NSA to release all files related to this, but I have not
mentioned this yet because I don't want to sound like a Conspiracy Theorist. Gallagher v. NSA,
1:2018cv01525, I am also requesting FBI records, Gallagher v. Wray, 1:18cv01697, these cases may need
to be Consolidated as the other 2 were literally only started to prove this one)