N W U K EU B P S: Otice To Stakeholders
N W U K EU B P S: Otice To Stakeholders
N W U K EU B P S: Otice To Stakeholders
NOTICE TO STAKEHOLDERS
The United Kingdom submitted on 29 March 2017 the notification of its intention to
withdraw from the Union pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. This
means that, unless a ratified withdrawal agreement1 establishes another date, all Union
primary and secondary law will cease to apply to the United Kingdom from 30 March
2019, 00:00h (CET) ('the withdrawal date').2 The United Kingdom will then become a
'third country'.3
Preparing for the withdrawal is not just a matter for EU and national authorities but also
for private parties.
1
Negotiations are ongoing with the United Kingdom with a view to reaching a withdrawal agreement.
2
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union, the European
Council, in agreement with the United Kingdom, may unanimously decide that the Treaties cease to
apply at a later date.
3
A third country is a country not member of the EU.
4
OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338.
5
OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1.
payment services in the internal market (PSD)6 will no longer apply to the United
Kingdom. This has in particular the following consequences:
1. AUTHORISATIONS
6
OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35.
7
See Article 8(1) CRD as well as Annex I of the CRD. Several activities listed in Annex I CRD are also
covered by Directive 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and
of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments (MiFID II/MIFIR). This notice is
without prejudice to any consideration on the framework for investment services and stakeholders
should also refer to the "Notice to Stakeholders – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom and EU rules in
the field of MIFID investment services and activities".
8
Articles 1, 2 and Annex I of Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
9
Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on the
taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions.
10
Articles 39 of Directive 2013/36/EU and 11(9) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
11
Articles 17 of Directive 2013/36/EU and 19(5) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
12
Article 47 of Directive 2013/36/EU, Article 15 Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and
of the Council of 16 April 2014 on deposit guarantee schemes (DGSD), Article 1(1)(a) of Directive
(EU) 2015/2366, and 8 Directive 2009/110/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16
September 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic
money institutions.
13
Articles 1(1), 11(1) and 37(1) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
14
Articles 18(c) of Directive 2013/36/EU and 13(c) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
2
of the authorisation granted to the entities of which they are an integral legal part. This
includes compliance with regard to their programme of operations and structural
organisation15 and the requirement that the effective exercise of supervisory functions
is not prevented by difficulties involved in the enforcement of the laws, regulations or
administrative provisions of the third country.16 The services covered by the scope of
the authorisation, including services provided by any branches of the authorised entity
located in a third country, will continue to be subject to the supervisory powers of the
competent authority which has granted the authorisation, including in particular the
power to restrict or limit the business, operations or network of institutions or to
request the divestment of activities that pose excessive risks to the soundness of an
institution.17 The services provided by these branches will as well be subject to the
relevant requirements which are set out in the EU legal framework.18
Arrangements which may affect the ability of entities authorised in the EU to have an
autonomous risk management and control framework, and sufficient operational
resilience, including trading and hedging capabilities, in crisis will have to be
assessed19 by the competent authority which has granted the authorisation. The
assessment will e.g. consider whether, as of the withdrawal date, entities authorised by
a competent authority in the EU are allowed to continue to rely on outsourcing20 or
supervisory arrangements21, exemptions from the application of large exposures22 or
risk mitigation requirements23 involving counterparties established in the United
Kingdom – including parent institutions or other institutions of the same group.
15
Articles 10 of Directive 2013/36/EU and 11(4) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
16
Article 11(8) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
17
Article 104(1)(e) of Directive 2013/36/EU and 11(5) of Directive (EU) 2015/2366.
18
See "Notice to Stakeholders – Withdrawal of the United Kingdom and EU rules in the field of MiFID
investment services and activities".
19
This may imply the need to submit new applications for the respective treatments.
20
Article 11(8) and 19 of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 and article 8 of Directive 2009/110/EC.
21
Articles 127 of Directive 2013/36/EU; Articles 1(1)(44), 7 and 32 of Directive 2014/59/EU of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery
and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms.
22
Articles 400(2)(c) of Directive 2013/36/EU, Articles 12 and 19 of Directive 2014/59/EU, and Article
5(1)(a)(i) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 of 21 October 2014 supplementing
Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante
contributions to resolution financing arrangements.
23
Article 11 Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012
on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (EMIR).
24
See e.g. Articles 107, 114, 115, 116, 132, 142, 143(1), 151(4) and (9), 283, 312(2), 363 of Regulation
(EU) No 575/2013.
3
prudential treatment referred to in the CRD.25 Similarly, in the resolution framework,
as of the withdrawal date, the assessment of the eligibility of liabilities for the
minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities may be affected for those
liabilities issued under UK law.26
3. CONTRACTS
Contract continuity for relationships between parties established in the Union and in
the United Kingdom will be affected by the loss of the single passport, as this will
impair the ability of UK based entities to continue performing certain obligations and
activities and ensure service continuity with regard to contracts concluded before the
withdrawal date. As of the withdrawal date, the EU rules on conflicts of laws and
jurisdictions will no longer apply to the United Kingdom. Where contracts27 are
governed by the law of the United Kingdom, or contain a choice of law or an
agreement in favour of the jurisdiction of a court in the United Kingdom, parties to
those contracts should carefully assess the impact of the withdrawal of the United
Kingdom on the validity and enforceability of those contracts and mitigate any risks,
including any risks to their clients.
European Commission
Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets
Union
25
See Articles 107, 114, 115, 116 and 142 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
26
See Articles 45 and 55 of Directive 2014/59/EU. See also Opinion of the European Banking Authority
on issues related to the departure of the United Kingdom from the European Union
(EBA/OP/2017/12), Part IV Resolution and deposit guarantee schemes, page 16 and ff.
27
E.g. contracts supporting issuances of eligible liabilities under Article 55 of Directive 2014/59/EU.