Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 25K views

    Letter To State Attorney 16.05.2018

    Uploaded by

    Branko Brkic
    1. The letter acknowledges receipt of correspondence from Ms Fridah Mokgale regarding disciplinary proceedings against Commissioner Tom Moyane. 2. It notes concern that the contents have been leaked to the media again. 3. It informs that instructions have been received to proceed with a court application challenging the unfair process that requires evidence only by affidavit except in limited circumstances.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Letter To State Attorney 16.05.2018

    Uploaded by

    Branko Brkic
    25K views2 pages
    1. The letter acknowledges receipt of correspondence from Ms Fridah Mokgale regarding disciplinary proceedings against Commissioner Tom Moyane. 2. It notes concern that the contents have been leaked to the media again. 3. It informs that instructions have been received to proceed with a court application challenging the unfair process that requires evidence only by affidavit except in limited circumstances.

    Original Description:

    Letter to State Attorney 16.05.2018

    Original Title

    Letter to State Attorney 16.05.2018

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. The letter acknowledges receipt of correspondence from Ms Fridah Mokgale regarding disciplinary proceedings against Commissioner Tom Moyane. 2. It notes concern that the contents have been leaked to the media again. 3. It informs that instructions have been received to proceed with a court application challenging the unfair process that requires evidence only by affidavit except in limited circumstances.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    25K views2 pages

    Letter To State Attorney 16.05.2018

    Uploaded by

    Branko Brkic
    1. The letter acknowledges receipt of correspondence from Ms Fridah Mokgale regarding disciplinary proceedings against Commissioner Tom Moyane. 2. It notes concern that the contents have been leaked to the media again. 3. It informs that instructions have been received to proceed with a court application challenging the unfair process that requires evidence only by affidavit except in limited circumstances.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Ms Fridah Mokgale 1st Floor

    83 Central Street
    Senior Assistant State Attorney Houghton
    Office of The State Attorney 2198
    Salu Building 1508 PO Box 55045
    Northlands 2116
    316 Thabo Sehume Street Tel: +27 11 483-2387/483-0476
    Pretoria Fax: +27 11 728 - 0145
    Direct e-mail: [email protected]
    Email: [email protected]

    Cc: Mr Issac Chowe


    The State Attorney
    Pretoria
    Email: [email protected]

    Your Ref: 1507/2018/Z53


    Our Ref: Mr. ET Mabuza
    Date: Wednesday, May 16, 2018

    Dear Madam,

    Disciplinary proceedings of Commissioner Tom Moyane

    1. We acknowledge receipt of your letter dated 15 May 2018.

    2. We note with concern that once again the contents have been leaked or furnished
    to the media.

    3. In view of your response we have now received formal instructions to proceed with
    an application principally in respect of the blatantly unfair process which you insist
    will be followed, whereby evidence must be presented by affidavit and only as an
    exception (subject to the discretion of the Presiding Officer), may oral evidence be
    led. This is plainly unlawful and irrational. Full details will be contained in the court
    papers which will be served upon you as soon as they are concluded.

    4. In the meantime we wish to bring to your attention the recent exchange of


    correspondence between ourselves and the Presiding Officer, Justice Kate
    O’Regan regarding the demand for her recusal. It beggars belief how the

    Eric T Mabuza B.Proc (Unin) LLB (Wits)


    Page 2

    President, out of all available options, appointed a person who is so clearly


    conflicted as a member of Corruption Watch, a body which has adopted an openly
    hostile and unfair public posture against our client. This is yet another disregard
    for fairness and a rule of law. Our letter to the Presiding Officer regarding her non-
    suitability has been copied to you.

    5. Should the Presiding Officer recuse herself as demanded by our client, then please
    furnish us with confirmation thereof and the name of her replacement. Should she,
    on the other hand, refuse to recuse herself then the question of her suitability to
    preside will form part of the forthcoming court application. Her response, either
    way, is expected on Friday 18 May 2018.

    6. Please confirm that the court papers may be served on the State Attorney, Pretoria,
    and if so which person we need to contact in connection therewith.

    Yours faithfully

    MABUZA ATTORNEYS

    You might also like