Molecular Diagnostics
Molecular Diagnostics
Molecular Diagnostics
History
The field of molecular biology grew in the late twentieth century, as did its clinical application.
In 1980, Yuet Wai Kan et al. suggested a prenatal genetic test for Thalassemia that did not rely
upon DNA sequencing—then in its infancy—but on restriction enzymes that cut DNA where
they recognised specific short sequences, creating different lengths of DNA strand depending on
which allele (genetic variation) the fetus possessed.[5] In the 1980s, the phrase was used in the
names of companies such as Molecular Diagnostics Incorporated[6] and Bethseda Research
Laboraties Molecular Diagnostics.[7][8]
During the 1990s, the identification of newly discovered genes and new techniques for DNA
sequencing led to the appearance of a distinct field of molecular and genomic laboratory
medicine; in 1995, the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) was formed to give it
structure. In 1999, the AMP co-founded The Journal of Medical Diagnostics.[9] Informa
Healthcare launched Expert Reviews in Medical Diagnostics in 2001.[1] From 2002 onwards,
the HapMap Project aggregated information on the one-letter genetic differences that recur in the
human population—the single nucleotide polymorphisms—and their relationship with
disease.[2](ch 37) In 2012, molecular diagnostic techniques for Thalassemia use genetic
hybridization tests to identify the specific single nucleotide polymorphism causing an
individual's disease.[10]
As the commercial application of molecular diagnostics has become more important, so has the
debate about patenting of the genetic discoveries at its heart. In 1998, the European
Union's Directive 98/44/ECclarified that patents on DNA sequences were allowable.[11] In 2010
in the US, AMP sued Myriad Genetics to challenge the latter's patents regarding two
genes, BRCA1, BRCA2, which are associated with breast cancer. In 2013, the U.S. Supreme
Court partially agreed, ruling that a naturally occurring gene sequence could not be patented
Techniques
Development from research tools
The industrialisation of molecular biology assay tools has made it practical to use them in
clinics.[2](foreword) Miniaturisation into a single handheld device can bring medical diagnostics into
the clinic and into the office or home.[2](foreword) The clinical laboratory requires high standards of
reliability; diagnostics may require accreditation or fall under medical device regulations.[14] As
of 2011, some US clinical laboratories nevertheless used assays sold for "research use only".[15]
Laboratory processes need to adhere to regulations, for example Clinical Laboratory
Improvement Amendments, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Good
Laboratory Practice, and Food and Drug Administration specifications in the United
States. Laboratory Information Management Systems help by tracking these
processes.[16] Regulation applies to both staff and supplies. As of 2012, twelve US states require
molecular pathologists to be licensed; several boards such as the American Board of Medical
Genetics and the American Board of Pathology certify technologists, supervisors, and laboratory
directors.[17]
Automation and sample barcoding maximise throughput and reduce the possibility of error or
contamination during manual handling and results reporting. Single devices to do the assay from
beginning to end are now available.[14]
Assays
Molecular diagnostics uses in vitro biological assays such as PCR-ELISA or Fluorescence in situ
hybridization.[18][19] The assay detects a molecule, often in low concentrations, that is a marker of
disease or risk in a sample taken from a patient. Preservation of the sample before analysis is
critical. Manual handling should be minimised.[20] The fragile RNA molecule poses certain
challenges. As part of the cellular process of expressing genes as proteins, it offers a measure of
gene expression but it is vulnerable to hydrolysis and breakdown by ever-present RNAse
enzymes. Samples can be snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen or incubated in preservation agents.[2](ch
39)
Because molecular diagnostics methods can detect sensitive markers, these tests are less
intrusive than a traditional biopsy. For example, because cell-free nucleic acids exist in
human plasma, a simple blood sample can be enough to sample genetic information from
tumours, transplants or an unborn fetus.[2](ch 45) Many, but not all, molecular diagnostics methods
based on nucleic acids detection use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to vastly increase the
number of nucleic acid molecules, thereby amplifying the target sequence(s) in the patient
sample.[2](foreword) The detection of the marker might use real time PCR, direct sequencing,[2](ch
17)
or microarray chips—prefabricated chips that test many markers at once.[2](ch 24) The same
principle applies to the proteome and the genome. High-throughput protein arrays can
use complementary DNA or antibodies to bind and hence can detect many different proteins in
parallel.[21]
Applications
Prenatal
Conventional prenatal tests for chromosomal abnormalities such as Down Syndrome rely on
analysing the number and appearance of the chromosomes—the karyotype. Molecular
diagnostics tests such as microarray comparative genomic hybridisation test a sample of DNA
instead, and because of cell-free DNA in plasma, could be less invasive, but as of 2013 it is still
an adjunct to the conventional tests.[22]
Treatment[edit]
Some of a patient's single nucleotide polymorphisms—slight differences in their DNA—can help
predict how quickly they will metabolise particular drugs; this is
called pharmacogenomics.[23] For example, the enzyme CYP2C19 metabolises several drugs,
such as the anti-clotting agent Clopidogrel, into their active forms. Some patients possess
polymorphisms in specific places on the 2C19 gene that make poor metabolisers of those drugs;
physicians can test for these polymorphisms and find out whether the drugs will be fully
effective for that patient.[24] Advances in molecular biology have helped show that some
syndromes that were previously classed as a single disease are actually multiple subtypes with
entirely different causes and treatments. Molecular diagnostics can help diagnose the subtype—
for example of infections and cancers—or the genetic analysis of a disease with an inherited
component, such as Silver-Russell syndrome.[1][25]
Infectious disease
Molecular diagnostics are used to identify infectious diseases such
as chlamydia,[26] influenza virus[27] and tuberculosis;[28] or specific strains such as H1N1
virus.[29] Genetic identification can be swift; for example a loop-mediated isothermal
amplification test diagnoses the malaria parasite and is rugged enough for developing
countries.[30] But despite these advances in genome analysis, in 2013 infections are still more
often identified by other means—their proteome, bacteriophage,
or chromatographic profile.[31] Molecular diagnostics are also used to understand the specific
strain of the pathogen—for example by detecting which drug resistance genes it possesses—and
hence which therapies to avoid.[31]
Disease risk management
A patient's genome may include an inherited or random mutation which affects the probability of
developing a disease in the future.[23] For example, Lynch syndrome is a genetic disease that
predisposes patients to colorectal and other cancers; early detection can lead to close monitoring
that improves the patient's chances of a good outcome.[32]Cardiovascular risk is indicated by
biological markers and screening can measure the risk that a child will be born with a genetic
disease such as Cystic fibrosis.[33] Genetic testing is ethically complex: patients may not want the
stress of knowing their risk.[34] In countries without universal healthcare, a known risk may raise
insurance premiums.[35]
Cancer
Cancer is a change in the cellular processes that cause a tumour to grow out of
control.[23] Cancerous cells sometimes have mutations in oncogenes, such
as KRAS and CTNNB1 (β-catenin).[36] Analysing the molecular signature of cancerous cells—
the DNA and its levels of expression via messenger RNA—enables physicians to characterise
the cancer and to choose the best therapy for their patients.[23] As of 2010, assays that incorporate
an array of antibodies against specific protein marker molecules are an emerging technology;
there are hopes for these multiplex assays that could measure many markers at once.[37] Other
potential future biomarkers include micro RNA molecules, which cancerous cells express more
of than healthy ones