KV Machines, Cobalt Units and Beam Quality: James Beck

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 55

KV machines, Cobalt units

and beam quality

James Beck
General design
50cm

Steel container
filled with lead

Co60 source
Isocentre
at 80cm
Controlling exposure
- Moving shutter
Shutters must have some
overlap to minimise risk
Beam on Beam off
Controlling exposure
- Moving shutter
Rotating design
Controlling exposure
- Moving source
Beam off Beam on

 Timer starts when


source begins to
move

 Exposure starts
when source is in
position

Difference = timer error


 must be measured regularly
 affects patient dose
 is needed to calculate exposure time
Radiation energy spectrum

Intensity

1 2
Energy (MeV)

 1.17MeV and 1.33MeV, emitted with almost equal


intensity
 Similar to the average energy from a 4MV x-ray
spectrum
Rate of decay

 Half life = 5.27 years


 = about 1% per month
 Treatment times get longer as the
source decays
 Source needs replacing at roughly 5
year intervals
Safety
 The source is always emitting radiation
- you can’t turn it off
 The treatment room is never at
background radiation levels
 Regular wipe tests are needed to
check that source remains totally
sealed.
Cost
 Installation cost is less than for a linac

…but…….

 Replacement source is expensive


 You have to pay for safe disposal of the
source on decommissioning
Penumbra

The larger size of the source means that the geometric


penumbra is much wider than for an x-ray machine or
linac.

source

collimators

patient

penumbra
Summary
• Advantages:
– Reliable
– Low maintenance costs
– Long half life
• Disadvantages:
– Storage /disposal of radioactive sources
• safety and cost implications
– Lower dose rates compared to linacs
– Energy restricted
– Large penumbra due to source size
– Ongoing cost of source replacement
Kilovoltage Machines

X-rays are produced whenever electrons are brought


suddenly to rest.
Key features of an X-ray tube
• Electrons produced by heated filament (the
cathode).

• Potential difference applied (in kilovolts or kV).

• Electrons accelerated towards target (the


anode) made of tungsten.

• Evacuated glass tube (old design) or metal


ceramic tube (smaller, lighter and less
breakable.)
Therapy X-ray tube
What happens in the target?

X-rays are produced by the interaction of


the electrons from the filament (cathode)
with the material of the target.
Bremmstrahlung
(braking radiation)
X-ray photon
Electrons passing
close to the nucleus lose
electron
some of their energy as they
slow down. This energy is
carried away as an X-ray nucleus
photon.

Occasionally an electron is stopped,


producing an X-ray photon of maximum
energy equal to the total energy of the
electron (kVp).
Characteristic Radiation
Electrons from the
cathode interact
with individual
electron
electrons in the
atom

An electron from the photo-


atom’s shells is electron
knocked out leaving
the atom ionised deflected
electron
X-ray
Electron from
L-shell drops
down to K- The vacancy in the
shell shell is quickly filled
by an electron from
another shell and an
X-ray is produced
X-ray Spectrum
The continuous
Characteristic spectrum contains all
radiation
energies from a
certain maximum
(kVp) downwards
whereas the
Continuous characteristic
Spectrum
spectrum is specific
to the atoms making
up the target.
Spatial distribution of X-rays
For 50-150kVp, X-rays are produced in all directions, but at higher energies emission is
concentrated more in a forward direction.

In practice, electrons undergo many collisions, changing direction many times before
coming to rest and penetrate beneath the surface of the target. X-rays produced at depth
in the target suffer attenuation as they emerge and this affects the uniformity of the
beam.
Heel Effect
X-rays produced along
θ
ray “c” will pass through
Electron
stream target more of the target than
“a” and “b” and so
undergoes greater
attenuation. This is
a particularly evident in
c
b diagnostic therapy to
produce a small focal
spot.
X-ray emission can be described in terms of:
X-ray emission can be described in terms of:

Quantity
• the intensity of the X-rays
X-ray emission can be described in terms of:

Quantity
• the intensity of the X-rays

Quality
• a measure of the penetration of the beam
• depends upon the energy spectrum
• a “hard” beam has more energetic photons
than a “soft” beam.
Effect of Target Material
Effect of Target Material
Continuous spectrum
Intensity α z
but shape of spectrum
is independent of
target material.
Line spectrum:
lines are characteristic
of target material.
At 80-150kV they
contribute approx. 10% of
the dose.
Effect of Applied Voltage
Effect of Applied Voltage

For the continuous spectrum, applied voltage affects:


• Maximum energy
• Position of peak intensity
• Total intensity (I) α kV2
Effect of tube current
Effect of tube current

Intensity α mA

Spectrum remains the same shape but the


greater the current the greater the number of
electrons released from the filament and
therefore the more radiation produced.
Effect of Voltage Waveform
Effect of Voltage Waveform

This can affect the intensity of the beam and the position of
the peak intensity.
Factor Effect on Effect on
Quality Quantity
Target material Continuous x Iαz
Characteristic 
Applied  I α kV2
Voltage
Tube Current x I α mA
Voltage  
Waveform
Added filtration  
Efficiency of X-ray production
• Increases with atomic number of target
• Increases with kV

Operating Percentage of Percentage of


Voltage Energy to Heat Energy to X-
rays
60kV 99.5% 0.5%
200kV 99% 1.0%
4MV 60% 40%
20MV 30% 70%
More about therapy tubes:
• Typical length – roughly twice as long as a diagnostic tube because
the higher kV. This is to avoid sparking between the electrodes.

• Cooling – the tube current is ~1/10 of that of a diagnostic tube but is


run for a much longer time (in order to deliver a useful dose in a few
minutes). The target is embedded in Cu (a good conductor of heat)
which can then be further cooled by the circulation of oil.

• Focal spot size – much bigger than diagnostic focal spot which must
be small to give good image definition.

• Target angle – chosen to give the most uniform beam.

• Typical SSD - usually around 50cm which is a compromise


between adequate output (better at short SSD) and sufficient
penetration (better at longer SSD).
Desirable effect of filtration
Beam Filtration
Effects of filtration:
• Beam hardening
• Reduced intensity

Requirements of a filter
• Greater attenuation of lower energy radiation
• Acceptable balance between beam hardening
and reduced intensity
• No absorption edge in the useful range
Essential requirements of a suitable filter
In the energy range to be filtered, the linear attenuation coefficient*
decreases with increasing energy. This means that, of the three
attenuation processes, the photoelectric effect dominates.

*The linear attenuation coefficient represents the probability per unit


thickness that any one photon will interact.
Another way of looking at this…
Of the 3 attenuation processes: 1
3

Attenuation due to PE is proportional to  E 

1
CE is proportional to  
E

While PP only occurs above 1.02MeV

So the photoelectric effect must dominate.


Photoelectric effect also varies with z3 and so filter
material should have a high atomic number.
Desirable effect of Effect achieved in
filtration: practice:
• The filter must not be too thin as the thickness
must be uniform, with no possible pinhole.
However, a filter that is too thick may reduce the
intensity of the beam excessively – this problem
must be balanced against the beam hardening
achieved.

• In the useful energy range, an “absorption edge”


should be avoided. It could have an undesirable
effect.
• Absorption edges exist because bound electrons have
discrete energies.
• As photon energy
increases, attenuation
by P.E. decreases
according to
 Z3

E3
until the binding energy (Ek) of the electron shell is
reached. At this energy the P.E. absorption leaps to a
higher value and then decreases again as the energy is
increased.
The effect of an absorption edge in the useful
energy range
Composite filters
Another problem involving the photo-electric effect
is the production of characteristic radiation.
When this is significant, the filter can be backed
with another material to absorb it.

E.g. Tin produces characteristic radiation at 29keV. A copper backing


will absorb this but produces its own characteristic radiation at 9keV. A
further backing of Aluminium will remove this – it’s own
characteristic radiation is of such a low energy that it is removed by air.
Composite filters contd.
• E.g.
Summary of Suitable Filters
30 – 120kV Aluminium

100 – 250kV Copper + backing

200 – 600kV Tin + backing

600kV – 2MV Lead + backing

Above 2MV none


Added filtration
Name kV Treatment Filtration
Depth
Orthovoltage 150-400 A few cm Cu+Al
X-rays or Sn, Cu
+Al
Superficial 50-150 ~5mm Al
X-rays (perhaps Cu)

Grenz Rays 10-20 very plastic


superficial
Specifying beam quality
Why?
• To be able to predict the penetrative
characteristics of the beam.
• For dosimetry purposes. Dosimetry protocols
and data from standard laboratories are
specified in terms of energy.
• For machine purchasing
• Use with QC checks
• Intercomparisons / clinical studies between
different centres.
• The radiation quality cannot be solely described
by the KV used to generate the electrons. It is
standard practice to define it instead in terms of
the Half Value Layer (or thickness) HVL i.e. the
thickness of a specified absorber which reduces
the beam intensity to half its original value.

• This parameter describes the ability of the beam


to penetrate a material and hence is linked to a
clinically significant parameter.
shielding
treatment beam
detector

x-ray
source

sheets of
absorber

Intensity Log (Intensity)

100

50

HVL Thickness Thickness


The HVL is obtained by measurement of an
absorption curve using the specified material.

The ratio of the first to second HVL is termed the


homogeneity index and is 1 for a mono-energetic
beam and less than 1 for heterogeneous beams.

i.e. for mono-energetic beams


second HVL= first HVL
for a spectrum of energies
second HVL > first HVL
An important consideration when measuring HVL is the use of good
geometry and the reduction of scattered radiation. When a broad beam
is incident on sheets of attenuating material there will be additional
scattered radiation as well as the primary radiation.

Narrow beam geometry Broad beam geometry

absorbing
material
shielding
absorbing
material

detector only measures transmitted scatter radiation from the metal


radiation and hence correct HVL reaches detector and affects HVL
measurement
The use of broad beam as opposed to narrow beam geometry falsely
results in a more penetrating beam, the amount of which depends on
the field size.
Intensity

100

50
broad beam

narrow beam

HVL Thickness of material

Thus the use of broad beam geometry will result in an incorrect


measurement of HVL.
HVL is related to the attenuation coefficient of the beam by:

I  I 0 e  t

0.693

HVL
NB 1 HVL reduce intensity by a factor of (2)1 = 2
2 HVLs reduce intensity by a factor of (2)2 = 4
10 HVLs reduce intensity by a factor of (2)10 = 1024

• Care must be taken in choice of the purity of the attenuating sheets


especially at low energies due to photoelectric absorption.

• Also need scatter free environment (away from walls etc.)

• Beams are thus specified in terms of their HVL and kV.


30kV and below
Instead of HVL we use Half Value Depth (HVD).
HVD = depth in water at which absorbed dose rate
falls to half of its value at the surface.

Fixed
SSD

detector
water

You might also like