GSWU-NAFLU-KMU vs. NLRC
GSWU-NAFLU-KMU vs. NLRC
GSWU-NAFLU-KMU vs. NLRC
GR No. 165757
17 October 2006 RULING:
Topic: Authorized Causes 1. Since the corp validly evidenced that it was experiencing
serious business losses, while the Union failed to present
Doctrine: concrete evid contrary to such, the latter’s claim of ULP could
Art. 283. Closure of establishment and reduction of not prosper. ULP refers to acts that violate the worker’s right
personnel. The employer may also terminate the to be organized and non-obervance of the CBA. If not, the act
employment of any employee due to the installation of labor isn’t deemed as an ULP.
saving devices, redundancy, retrenchment to prevent losses
or the closing or cessation of operation of the establishment Under Art. 283 of the LC, valid causes of the termination
or undertaking unless the closing is for the purpose of pertain to: (a) installation of labor saving devices; (b)
circumventing the provisions of this Title, by serving a written redundancy; (c) retrenchment to prevent losses; and (d) the
notice on the workers and the Ministry of Labor and closing /cessation of operations of the
Employment at least one (1) month before the intended date establishment/undertaking due to business losses. Hence,
thereof. In case of termination due to the installation of labor the termination of the EEs herein was for cause.
saving devices or redundancy, the worker affected thereby
shall be entitled to a separation pay equivalent to at least his 2. With regard to the notice requirement, the Labor Arbiter
one (1) month pay or to at least one (1) month pay for every found, and it was upheld by the NLRC and the Court of
year of service , whichever is higher. In case of retrenchment Appeals, that the written notice of closure or cessation of
to prevent losses and in cases of closures or cessation of Galaxies business operations was posted on the company
operations of establishment or under taking not due to bulletin board one month prior to its effectivity. The mere
serious business losses or financial reverses, the separation posting on the company bulletin board does not, however,
pay shall be equivalent to one (1) month pay or at least one- meet the requirement under Article 283 of serving a written
half (1/2) month pay for every year of service, whichever is notice on the workers. The purpose of the written notice is to
higher. A fraction of at least six (6) months shall be inform the employees of the specific date of termination or
considered one (1) whole year. closure of business operations, and must be served upon
them at least one month before the date of effectivity to give
FACTS: them sufficient time to make the necessary arrangements.In
• Galaxie Steel Corp was engaged in the business of order to meet the foregoing purpose, service of the written
manufacturing & sale of re-bars and steel billets. notice must be made individually upon each and every
• However, due to serious business losses equal to employee of the company.
about P127M, Galaxie decided to close down its business
operations. In Business Services of the Future Today, Inc. v. Court of
• Thru a written notice filed on 30 July 1999, it Appeals, which reiterated the ruling in Agabon v. National
informed the DOLE of its intended closure and the Labor Relations Commission this Court held that where the
termination of its EEs effective on 31 Aug. 1999. dismissal is for an authorized cause, the lack of statutory
• It also posted notice of its closure on its corporate due process should not nullify the dismissal, or render it
bulletin board. illegal, or ineffectual. However, the employer should
• In response, the Union filed a suit for illegal indemnify the employee, in the form of nominal damages,
dismissal, ULP and money claims against Galaxie. for the violation of his right to statutory due process.
• The LA held that the closure of Galaxie’s business
was valid, but granted the EEs their money claims. The NLRC WHEREFORE, the assailed Decision dated March 26,
affirmed but removed the monetary awards. 2004 and Resolution dated October 19, 2004 issued by the
• The Union argued that the real reason for the corp’s Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 68669 are AFFIRMED with
closure of business was because of its anti-union stance, and the MODIFICATION that respondent Galaxie Steel
not because of serious business losses. Corporation is ORDERED to PAY each of the individual
petitioners the amount of P20,000.00 as nominal damages for
ISSUE/S: non-compliance with statutory due process.
W/N Galaxie was guilty of ULP. – No. Authorized cause was
present in this case. SO ORDERED.