Smart Grids and Micro Grids
Smart Grids and Micro Grids
Smart Grids and Micro Grids
What are they really?
by
Bruce A. Mork, Ph.D., P.E.
Wayne W. Weaver, Ph.D., P.E.
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering
Presented at the Minnesota Power Systems Conference
Brooklyn Center, MN
November 3‐5, 2009
Michigan Tech
Quick Overview of EE Power
• Six faculty, 35 grad students, 60 UGs
• Responding to workforce needs:
– 14 online courses: EE3010 … EE6210
– Online MSEE (~40 enrolled)
– Online certificate, advanced certificate (~25 enrolled)
– DOE Transportation electrification program
• State‐of‐the‐art labs
– Relaying
– Power Electronics
– Motor Drives
• Power & Energy Research Center
– Multi‐disciplinary, industry partners
Motivation for this presentation
• Steadily increasing media buzz, little substantive
information.
• Only a small subset of possibilities are being
discussed. Smart meter ≠ smart grid.
• Little practical sense for what is possible:
– a) now, and b) in the foreseeable future, and
– What are the technology and financial bottlenecks?
• Since this presentation was scheduled,
• IEEE PES General Meeting in Calgary
• More useful info recently published
• Mipsycon, Monday Seminar, Thursday Tutorials
How do you define Smart Grid?
• Wikipedia: …delivers electricity from suppliers to
consumers using digital technology to control appliances at
consumer's homes to save energy, reduce cost and increase
reliability and transparency.
• Green Energy Act (Canada): A nickname for an ever‐
widening palette of utility applications that enhance and
automate the monitoring and control of electrical distribution.
• DOE: The Smart Grid transforms the current grid to one that
functions more cooperatively, responsively and organically.
Engineer’s Definition
• That depends…
• Basically: embedded processors + sensors + data
sharing, communications & distributed control.
Generation 4 or “G4.”
• Policy‐makers & media: smart meters and energy
marketing.
• Transmission/operations: wide‐area monitoring &
control & protection, special switching ops.
• Distribution: automation, reliability, time of day
metering, integration of DR, renewables.
Components of a Smart Grid
• Hardware
– Sensors, Embedded processors
– Integration with other hardware
• Basic Software
– SCADA, Energy management
– Vector processors
• Communications
– Slow (existing SCADA or EMS, more or less)
– High‐speed, high‐bandwidth (need to develop)
Transmission Applications
• Phasor measurement units (PMUs) and
synchrophasors.
• Grid integration of renewables,
• Advanced metering, operations
• Wide Area: WAM, WAC, WAMPAC
– Emergency control
– Voltage Stability: Dynamic VAr control, avoiding
voltage collapse
– Angle Stability: Load shedding, Intelligent system
separation
System restoration: remote tie‐line closing.
Emergency Control
(figure from Kundur)
Distribution Applications
• AMI ‐ Application of smart meters
• Real‐time pricing
• Demand side management
• Distribution automation
– Automatic high‐speed transfer, reconfiguration
• DR (Distributed Resources), DG (Dist Gen)
• CES (Community Energy Storage)
• Optimizing efficiency, reliability, carbon footprint
On Customer Side of Meter
• Load Management (coordinated w/utility)
• Integration of energy resources as micro‐grid
– Interconnection with Utility
– Interruptible Loads (water heater, heat, AC)
– Electric or hybrid‐electric vehicle
– Generation: solar, wind, micro‐hydro
– Energy storage: battery
– Optimal control according to goal of customer
Requirements, Concerns
– Communications bandwidth for “fast”
wide area applications
– Time delays, GPS time‐tagging
– Interoperability
– Information overload, database sharing
– Cyber security
– Information security, privacy
– Complexity, reliability of technology
applications themselves.
References
1. U.S. Department of Energy, The Smart Grid: An Introduction.
http://www.oe.energy.gov/SmartGridIntroduction.htm
2. IEC TC57: IEC61850 architecture for substation automation, IEC
61970/61968 — the Common Information Model CIM.
3. IEEE C37.118 – synchrophasors
4. IEEE P2030 Draft Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology
and Information Technology Operation with the Electric Power System, and
End‐Use Applications and Loads.
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc21/2030/2030_index.html
5. IEEE Power & Energy Magazine, Sept/Oct 2009, “Smart Grid: What is it
Really”
6. IEEE Potentials Magazine, Sep/Oct 2009, “Cascading Power Grid Failures”
7. ASEE Prism, Oct 2009, “Untangling the Grid.”
Observations
• It’s early on in a new series of technologies.
Vendors competing for market share, new
standards are developing.
• Try to take a holistic view of the system and
interaction/interoperability
– Generation
– Transmission
– Distribution
– Customer side: microgrid, green buildings
On Customer Side of Meter
• Load Management (coordinated w/utility)
• Integration of energy resources as micro‐grid
– Interconnection with Utility
– Interruptible Loads (water heater, heat, AC)
– Electric or hybrid‐electric vehicle
– Generation: solar, wind, micro‐hydro
– Energy storage: battery
– Optimal control according to goal of customer
What is a Micro‐Grid?
• Small, independent power system
• Increased reliability with distributed generation
• Increase efficiency with reduced transmission length
and CHP
• Easier integration of alternative energy sources
• PROBLEM: Control
• Damping/Stability
• Islanding
• Load sharing
• Energy Management
Components of a Microgrid
• Defining
– Multiple Distributed Generation Points
– Control System / Energy Management
• Additional
– Utility Interconnection Switch – Point of Common
Coupling (PCC)
– Energy Storage
Microgrid Application
• Communities/Neighborhoods
• Corporate/Academic Campuses
• Buildings
• Military base camps
• Naval Systems
Community Microgrid Structure
PCC
Corporate Building/Campus
Microgrids
HVAC
PCC
CHP
Home Microgrids
PCC
PHEV
DC Home Microgrid
Smart-
Energy Solar
Appliances
Storage
PCC
PHEV
Major Microgrid Test Sites
• N. America
– CERTS/AEP – Dolan OH (100 kVA)
– Northern Power Systems – Waitsfield VT (500
kVA)
– BC Hydro ‐ Boston Bar BC (10 MVA)
• Asia
– Shimizu Corp – Tokyo Japan (500 kVA)
– Sendai Japan (1 MVA)
• Europe
– Kythnos Island Greece (15 kVA)
– DEMOTEC ‐ Kassel Germany
Standards for Microgrid
• At PCC
• IEEE‐1547: Standards for Interconnecting
Distributed Resources with Electric Power
Systems
• UL‐1741: Inverters, Converters and
Controllers for use in Independent Power
Systems
• Harmonics
• Anti‐Islanding
Anti‐Islanding
• UL1741 Test Load Circuit at PCC
• Resonant RLC load
• Techniques include phase/frequency drift
Technical Hurdles:
Control and Communications
• Grid connection
– Sync and re‐connect
– Power Export
• Centralized Control System
– Global optimization
– Single point of failure
• Distributed control
– Modularity/flexibility
– Local optimization
Communication/Control Structure
Reciprocating H2
Fuel
Utility Generator Storage
Cell
Electrolyser
PCC
Batteries Wind
Communication
User
Biomass
Super
Capacitors
Users Pluggin Hybrid
Droop: Traditional Paralleling
Method
P1 + P2 = PL
Q1 + Q2 = QL
Microgrid Study
PCC
Droop in a Microgrid
Advance Distributed Control
• Every “element” of power system has multiple
objectives/commitments
– Point of Load Converter: Service load power, maintain stability
– Energy Sources: Supply power, maintain stability
– Distribution: Route energy most efficiently, maintain stability
• System events/faults can destabilize.
• Action taken by one “elements” influence all other
components.
• Game‐Theoretic Method: Determine optimal
local trajectory given anticipated trajectories
of all other components.
Game‐Theoretic Approach to
Energy Manament
• Convert components into equivalent impedances.
• The individual dynamics are
( vi )
2
V2 R8 V3
y69
P5 5
y57
6
P6
600
600
R5 y45 y46 R6 400
400
P (W)
P (W)
6
y14 200
5
200
1
0
0 2
2 V1 2 2
2 1
1 1
1
R6 (Ω) 0 0 R5 (Ω)
R6 (Ω) 0 0 R5 (Ω)
Game‐Based Energy Management
• Objective Functions
– Loads
– Sources
– Storage
• Game “Rules”
– Teams
– Stakelberg (leader / follower )
– “Win” game by maintaining stable,
efficient system
Summary
• “Microgrid” is a broad definition of a small
power system
• Benefits include reliability, efficiency,
renewables
• Challenges:
– Control
– Communications
– Utility interface at PCC
Solution to Game
• “Solution” is an equilibrium point (Nash) were each player
2
L5(R6)
600 600 1.5 L6(R5)
R6 (Ω)
400 400
P (W)
P (W)
1 NE
5
200 200
0 0
2 2
0.5
22 2
1 1
1 1
R6 (Ω) 0 0 R5 (Ω) R6 (Ω) 0 0 R5 (Ω) 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
R5 (Ω)
CERTS Microgrid
Eto, Joseph, Robert Lasseter, Ben Schenkman, John Stevens, Harry Volkommer, Dave Klapp, Ed
Linton, Hector Hurtado, Jean Roy, Nancy Jo Lewis. Consortium for Electric Reliability
Technology Solutions (CERTS). 2008. CERTS Microgrid Laboratory Test Bed. California Energy
Commission, Public Interest Energy Research Program. CEC-500-2008-XXX.
Mathematical Coupling of
Microgrid Elements
x&1 = f1 ( x1 , v1 , i1 , u1 )
x&i = f i ( xi , vi , ii , ui )
x&2 = f 2 ( x2 , v2 , i2 , u2 )