Multiple Intelligences Study

Multiple
Intelligences
revisited
Rolf Palmberg
About the author
Rolf Palmberg is a senior lecturer at Åbo Akademi University at Vaasa, where

he teaches foreign-language methodology in the university teacher-training
programmes for class teachers, foreign-language teachers and special-education
teachers.
E-mail: [email protected].
Website: http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/.
Postal address: P.O. Box 311, FI-65101 Vaasa, Finland.
About this eBook
Title front page photo: Scene from the village of Al Hamra, Ras al Khaimah,
United Arab Emirates. © Rolf Palmberg (2008). Small photo in upper right
corner: Sign on a house in Kiev, Ukraine. © Rolf Palmberg (2008).
This eBook is a revised and updated version based on two previously published
eBooks: Basic Multiple Intelligences for EFL Teachers (Palmsoft
Publications 2010) and Activities and Exercises for Logical-Mathematical
Learners of English (Palmsoft Publications 2009). English-language versions
of portions of the eBook(s) have been published in various journals and
newsletters as indicated in the Acknowledgement section at the end of each
chapter.
© Rolf Palmberg (2011).

2
CONTENTS
1. Learning about Multiple Intelligences 4
- Background (4)
- Typical learner characteristics (5)
- A selection of classroom exercises (6)
- MI profiles (15)
- Effects on learning (16)
- Choosing appropriate classroom activities (17)
- The MI Theory and EFL (17)
- Outline of the present eBook (18)
2. Starting with Multiple Intelligences 19
- Read a book on multiple intelligences (19)

- Identify your MI profile (19)
- Identify your students’ MI profiles (21)
- Categorise classroom activities according to intelligence types (23)
- Combine language skills activities and intelligence types (23)
- Suggest language skills activities for different intelligence types (24)
- Identify the MI profile of a foreign-language workbook (25)
- Identify the MI profile of a foreign-language lesson (26)
- Prepare an MI-based lesson outline (28)
3. Catering for Multiple Intelligences 30
- One for all – all for one (30)

- The SAFER teaching model (31)
- Additional features (32)
4. Working with Multiple Intelligences:

an EFL lesson plan focusing on occupations 33

an EFL lesson plan focusing on houses 38

an EFL lesson plan focusing on Christmas 43
3
7. Catering for logical-mathematical learners 54
- Operation MathLog (55)

- Twenty-one reasons for counting (58)
- Way of the sausage (59)
- Pupils counting pupils (61)
- Colour Street (62)
- Mary’s puzzle (66)
- The house of numbered rooms (69)
- Chop Suey (72)
- The Greek t-shirt (76)
- In the kitchen (79)
- Pitch black or snow white? (81)
- A ‘Buffet snack’ sign (84)
- Lost in the classroom (87)
- Tri-national borders (89)
- Going Dutch (93)
- Word play (96)
8. Caught in a tangled web of intelligences 99
- Confused? (99)
- Wrapping things up (101)
References 102
Solutions 108
4
1
Learning about
MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES
Background
Learners – and individuals in general – can be described and categorised in a

variety of ways. In 1983, Howard Gardner, a well-known psychologist and the
creator of the “Multiple Intelligences (MI) Theory”, suggested that all
individuals have personal intelligence profiles that consist of combinations of
seven different intelligence types. These intelligences are (Gardner 1983, 1993):
verbal-linguistic
logical-mathematical
visual-spatial
bodily-kinaesthetic
musical-rhythmic
intrapersonal
interpersonal
Gardner later added an eighth intelligence type to the list, that of naturalist
intelligence. At the same time he suggested the existence of a ninth intelligence
type, that of existentialist intelligence (Gardner 1999).
5
Typical learner characteristics
Learners who represent these intelligence types typically display the following
characteristics (based on Gardner 1983, 1993, 1999; Berman 2002; Christison
2005):
Linguistic learners enjoy expressing themselves orally and in writing and love
wordplay, jokes, riddles and listening to stories. Logical-mathematical
learners display an aptitude for numbers, reasoning, logic and problem solving,
whereas visual-spatial learners tend to think in pictures and mental images and
enjoy illustrations, charts, tables and maps. Bodily-kinaesthetic learners
experience learning best through various kinds of movement, including
mimicking, dancing and role play, while musical learners respond to music
and learn best through songs, patterns, rhythms and musical expression.
Intrapersonal learners are reflective, analytical and intuitive about who they
are and how and what they learn, whereas interpersonal learners like to
interact with others and learn best in groups or with a partner. Naturalist
learners love the outdoors and enjoy classifying and categorising activities.
Existentialist learners, finally, are concerned with philosophical issues such as
the status of mankind in relation to universal existence. In learning situations,
they need to see “the big picture” in order to understand minor learning points
and details.
To make it easier to remember the characteristics of each of Gardner’s nine

intelligence types, Thomas Armstrong introduced the following memory tags
(Armstrong 1999):
linguistic intelligence “word smart”

logical-mathematical intelligence “number/reasoning smart”
visual-spatial intelligence “picture smart”
bodily-kinaesthetic intelligence “body smart”
musical intelligence “music smart”
intrapersonal intelligence “self smart”
interpersonal intelligence “people smart”
naturalist intelligence “nature smart”
existentialist intelligence “existence smart”
6
A selection of classroom exercises
The classroom exercises presented here cater specifically for the nine different
learner types. (In real life, of course, all classroom exercises cater for at least
three or four learner types at the same time. Language exercises, for example,
are – hopefully – always linguistic, and, secondly, either intrapersonal or
interpersonal.)
An exercise for linguistic learners
There are eighteen wild animals hiding in the grid below. The words may be
written horizontally, vertically, diagonally, forwards, and backwards. Challenge
the students to find as many wild animals as possible in three minutes.
S G E W W L W P D A D M
O K F U B E A R B E Z A
R R E K A N S G Q B E G
E C D F T D X O F L O N
C L E H F K L V U R C Y
O L E O P A R D I N Y F
N R R P F N R L R Y Z N
I D A F H G L I E W Q D
H Y U J N A C K G O P Z
R B G C B R N O I L U P
B E A S E O R T T F P X
O R J H M O C H X Q D I
The “wild animals” exercise was first published in Palmberg (2003). It was
created using Word Search, one of many puzzle-maker options available free
of charge on the Puzzlemaker website maintained by Discovery Education. For
a list of the eighteen animals, see the Solutions section (page 108).
7
Another exercise for linguistic learners
For those who prefer exercises that concentrate on words rather than letters, the
Wordle website offers a lovely option that appeals to logical-mathematical and
visual learners as well. After you have entered a sentence (or a very short text)
into a box and pressed “Go”, the program creates a scrambled version of the
input for the learners to unscramble or work with according to your instructions.
The title of this eBook, for example, could look like this, Wordle style:
(For a full-sized version of the above image, go to

http://www.wordle.net/show/wrdl/2736980/Untitled.)
An exercise for logical-mathematical learners
The sentences in the box on page 8 have to be arranged in a (chrono)logical

order. Ask the learners to work individually and indicate the correct order by
filling in the figures 1-12 in the first column: “1” for the activity that comes first,
“2” for the one that comes next, and so on. When they have decided on the
correct order, ask them to form pairs. Next, ask them to look at the sentences as
they are listed on the handout and, taking turns, tell each other why the first
sentence (“Eat the toast”) must or cannot come before the second one (“Plug in
the toaster”); why the second one must or cannot come before the third one
(“Push the lever down”), and so on.
The twelve sentences originate from “A piece of toast”, an exercise presented in

Romijn and Seely (1981). The “must or cannot” part of the above exercise was
inspired by the “Practice” section of a website entitled “Multiple Intelligences
for Adult Literacy and Education”, maintained by Literacyworks. For a
selection of other types of exercises for logical-mathematical learners, see
Chapter Seven.
8
Eat the toast.

Plug in the toaster.
Push the lever down.
Put some jam on the toast.
Put the bread in the toaster.
Put the toast on a plate.
Spread some butter on the toast.
Spread the jam around with a knife.
Take out a slice of bread.
Take out the toast from the toaster.
Wait for a little while.
Watch the butter melt.
An exercise for visual-spatial learners
What rooms are there in the house plan? Divide the students into groups of
three and ask each group to agree as to which rooms there are in the following
house plan:
This exercise is one of the phases of the lesson plan outlined in Chapter Five.
9
An exercise for bodily-kinaesthetic learners
Ask the students to move around in the classroom and interview each other
about their Christmas habits. More specifically, they have to find out at what
time their classmates normally get up, go to bed, have breakfast, have lunch,
have dinner, exchange presents, and watch television. The information given by
their friends has to be written down on specially-prepared worksheets, such as
the one outline below:
name gets goes to has has has exchanges watches

up bed breakfast lunch dinner presents television
This is a modified version of a task entitled “On Christmas Eve”; presented in

Christison (2005). It is also one of the phases of the lesson plan outlined in
Chapter Six.
An exercise for musical learners
Display the lyrics of a well-known song on an overhead transparency, for

example “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer”, and let the students listen to the
song while reading the song text. You will find the text on the Twelve Days of
Christmas website.
Next, switch off the overhead projector and hand out copies of the worksheet on
page 10. Ask the students to fill in the missing words (indicated by numbered
gaps in the song text).
10
Rudolph, the [1] reindeer [1]

had a very [2] nose. [2]
And if you ever saw him,
you would even say it [3]. [3]
All of the other [4] [4]

used to laugh and call him [5]. [5]
They never let poor Rudolph
join in any reindeer [6]. [6]
Then one [7] Christmas Eve [7]

[8] came to say: [8]
“Rudolph with your nose so [9], [9]
won’t you guide my [10] tonight?” [10]
Then all the reindeer loved him

as they [11] out with glee, [11]
Rudolph the red-nosed reindeer,
you’ll go down in [12]! [12]
This exercise is part of one of the phases of the lesson plan outlined in Chapter
Six.
An exercise for intrapersonal learners
Display a limerick on an overhead transparency, for example the one about a

man from Beijing. Let the students find out which words on which lines rhyme
with which words:
There once was a man from Beijing.

All his life he hoped to be King.
So he put on a crown,
Which quickly fell down.
That small silly man from Beijing.
11
Next, hand out the templates for creating basic limericks shown below and ask
the students to work individually and produce at least two limericks of their
own:
Template A
There once was a ______________ from __________________.

All the while s/he hoped _______________________________.
So s/he _______________________________.
And _________________________________.
That ___________________ from ___________________.
Template B
I once met a _________________ from ___________________.

Every day s/he _______________________________________.
But whenever s/he ______________________.
The _________________________________.
That strange ___________________ from ___________________.
The limerick and the handout are from Leslie Opp-Beckman’s website entitled
People Interested in Zippy and ZAny Zcribbling (or simply P I Z Z A Z !...).
An exercise for interpersonal learners
Divide the students into pairs and hand out half a dialogue to each student (one
student in each pair is “Student A”; the other is “Student B”; see page 12). Ask
the students to act out the dialogue in turns by following the instructions. Note
that Student A only has (and sees) the left (blue) half of the handout; Student B
has (and sees) only the right (red) half.
12
Student A Student B
(Call Student B on the phone.)
(The phone is ringing.) Answer the

phone. Say your name.
Greet your friend and say your name.
Return greeting.
Suggest something to do in the

afternoon.
Disagree and give a reason why not.
Agree and say you are sorry. Suggest

something else do the next day.
Disagree and give a reason why not.
Agree. Suggest something else do on

the day after tomorrow.
Agree. Suggest a meeting-place and a

time say goodbye.
Accept and say goodbye.
Exercises of this type are called skeleton dialogues. As opposed to word-for-

word dialogues, skeleton dialogues are controlled in their practice of fixed
language functions, but uncontrolled in that they allow students to use structures
and vocabulary according to their own choice and level of proficiency. The
skeleton dialogue presented above is a slightly modified version of one
presented in Abbs and Freebairn (1980).
13
An exercise for naturalist learners
Ask the students (individually, in pairs, or in groups of three) to divide the

classroom objects below into (natural) groups. It is up to the students to decide
(agree) how many groups there are, what the groups are, and what qualifies
individual words to belong to particular groups.
blackboard calculator cd-player

computer crayon encyclopaedia
eraser map notebook
overhead projector pen pencil
poster reference book ruler
(a pair of) scissors tape recorder video equipment
This exercise was first published in Palmberg (2003). Note that all arranging
activities are per definition naturalist. Activities aimed at naturalist learners
need not as such deal with the theme of nature in order to be naturalist – a
misinterpretation which is frequently encountered in the literature on multiple
intelligences.
An exercise for existentialist learners
Existentialist learners, as mentioned above, need to see “the big picture” in

order to understand minor parts and details. Typical classroom activities for
existential learners are therefore more difficult to list. This exercise, however,
could in my opinion be categorised as suitable for existential learners:
Ask the students to present their personal family relationships in the form of a
family tree, using the vocabulary items in this box:
aunt brother cousin

daughter father granddaughter
grandfather grandmother grandson
great-grandfather great-grandmother husband
mother nephew niece
sibling sister son
uncle wife
14
There are several ways in which family trees can be drawn. The one below
(taken from a wikiHow web page entitled “How to draw a Family Tree”) is a
basic model for beginners. If you have visual-spatial learners in the class, you
could encourage them to elaborate on the model by using boxes for males and
circles for females and perhaps a simple colour code to indicate whether
somebody is one of the student’s blood relations or somebody who has married
into his or her family (as suggested on the About.com.: English as 2nd
language web page entitled “Family relationships”).
One of the best ways for foreign-language teachers to cater for this type of
intelligence is therefore to start each lesson by introducing the teaching goals
and by telling their students where the linguistic input of the present lesson
(whether related to themes or grammar points) fits in with the linguistic input of
previous taught lessons, i.e. in relation to a larger context.
Very suitable reading and discussion exercises for existentialist learners can
often be found in books that focus on the use of metaphors in order to stimulate
the readers’ imagination and feelings – “True Holiness”, for example, is a very
thought-provoking text from The Magic of Metaphor: 77 Stories for
Teachers, Trainers & Thinkers (Owens 2001). Two other useful titles written
especially for foreign-language teaching purposes are The Power of Metaphor
- Story Telling & Guided Journeys for Teachers, Trainers and Therapists
(Berman & Brown 2000) and In a Faraway Land (Berman 2010).
15
MI profiles
As stated in the introductory paragraph of this chapter, all individuals have

personal intelligence profiles – so-called “MI profiles” – that consist of
combinations of different intelligence types. It is not, however, so much a
matter of either possessing or not possessing specific intelligence types. Even if
a specific type of intelligence may in theory be non-existent in some individuals,
the large majority of us do have at least a minimal degree of all intelligence
types. According to Mary Ann Christison, most people are somewhere in the
middle of the scale, with a few intelligences highly developed, most modestly
developed, and one or two underdeveloped (Christison 2005).
Note that the nine different intelligence types that form a person’s MI profile do
not – contrary to what is occasionally claimed in the literature – add up to a
total of 100 percent. In fact, each intelligence type has its own value that ranges
from (virtually) zero to 100 %. This misunderstanding probably originates from
the fact that some books and articles use pie charts to demonstrate what MI
profiles look like. In such pie charts, however, the intelligence types are in most
cases proportionally represented. Each sector or “slice” can therefore only show
the strength of the intelligence type its represents in relation to the other
intelligence types, not the strength of each intelligence type in its own right
(which is of course much more informative and interesting).
The best way to show a person’s MI profile graphically is using a bar chart,
where each of the nine bars represents a specific intelligence type, for example
like this (presented in Palmberg 2003):
16
Also note that people’s MI profiles are not static. Unlike traditional IQ,
intelligence as defined by Gardner in his MI theory, can – and does – change
(Gardner 1999). This means that the nine intelligence types can develop, and
also be developed. To quote the title of a paper written by Walter McKenzie:
“It’s not how smart you are – It’s how you are smart!” (McKenzie 1999a).
Effects on learning
Depending on their personal MI profiles, people tend to develop their own

favourite way (or ways) of learning foreign languages. For vocabulary learning,
for example, some prefer traditional rote learning. Others divide the foreign
words into parts or components and concentrate on memorising these instead.
Some look for similarities between the foreign-language words and
grammatical structures and the corresponding words and structures in their
mother tongue or other languages they may know. Some people find mnemonic
devices helpful, at least occasionally. Others have adopted different types of
accelerated learning techniques and use them on a more or less permanent basis.
One such technique, to give but one example, was introduced in the 1970’s as
the “keyword method” (Atkinson 1975). It requires learners to create a mental
picture for the foreign word they want to remember, another picture for the
meaning of the word, and then to link the two pictures together. Similar
techniques can of course be applied to grammatical structures as well.
The keyword method is interesting, considering that most of us know very little
about how memory actually works. According to Giorgi Lozanov, the creator of
Suggestopedia, we use only six per cent of our memory capacity (Lozanov 1992),
whereas Tony Buzan, one of the world’s leading experts on accelerated learning
techniques and the inventor of the concept of mind maps, claims that we do in
fact use less than that, only one per cent (see Buzan & Buzan 1996). In one of
his many books on this topic he describes in detail the relationship between
memory, lexical networks, and mind maps (Buzan 1991). On his commercial,
family-run website, entitled Buzan world, there are many tests for measuring
the potential ability to increase our personal memory capacity.
17
Choosing appropriate classroom activities
Another effect of students having unique MI profiles is that they also tend to
have their own favourite classroom exercises and activities. Some of these were
already mentioned in the section describing typical learners. Other classroom
activities include the following (selected from “Activities to Develop the Eight
Intelligences”; Berman 2002):
linguistic intelligence word building games

logical-mathematical intelligence logical-sequential presentations
visual-spatial intelligence mind maps
bodily-kinaesthetic intelligence relaxation exercises
musical intelligence jazz chants
intrapersonal intelligence learner diaries
interpersonal intelligence brainstorming
naturalist intelligence background music in the form of
sounds created in the natural world
For more examples of classroom activities, see the section “Categorise

classroom activities according to intelligence types” in Chapter Two.
The MI Theory and EFL
One of the most important messages of Howard Gardner’s MI theory is this: if

education is to work as effectively as possible, students’ MI profiles should be
taken into account rather than ignored. As far as the teaching of EFL is
concerned, there are three very recommendable books that apply Gardner’s MI
theory exclusively to EFL teaching. These are Michael Berman’s A Multiple
Intelligences Road to an ELT Classroom (2002), Mary Ann Christison’s
Multiple Intelligences and Language Learning (2005), and Multiple
Intelligences in EFL, a book written by Herbert Puchta and Mario Rinvolucri
(2005). All three books contain a theoretical background and a comprehensive
selection of photocopiable worksheets and handouts for all age groups.
18
Outline of the present eBook
As the title of the present eBook suggests, it comprises basic information about
Gardner’s MI theory in general and logical-mathematical intelligences in
particular. It describes in detail three lesson plans based on the MI theory.
Although the aim is, for practical reasons, exclusively on EFL, the lessons,
exercises and activities described are in most cases – after some modification –
suitable for all language teachers regardless of the foreign language(s) they
teach.
This eBook is a revised and updated synthesis of two previously published

eBooks. Chapters One through Six are revised and updated versions of the
corresponding chapters in Basic Multiple Intelligences for EFL Teachers
(Palmsoft Publications 2010), whereas Chapter Eight is a revised portion of the
first chapter of that eBook. Chapter Seven, finally, is a reorganised and
somewhat abridged version of the contents of Activities and Exercises for
Logical-Mathematical Learners of English (Palmsoft Publications 2009).
19
2
Starting with
Although Gardner’s MI theory celebrated its 25th anniversary in 2008, many

foreign-language teachers are still unfamiliar with the theory. Then there are
others who feel that the theory is too general to be directly applicable to their
particular field of interest, i.e. foreign-language teaching. Then again, Gardner
never intended nor expected his theory to be used and/or applied by educators
(Gardner 2006). It is said that he was very surprised when he was once
approached by a group of primary-school teachers who wanted to start an MI
school (Anonymous 2008). As for foreign-language teaching, he was in fact
doubtful whether his thinking could be of much help (Gardner 2006).
This chapter suggests different kinds of activities for language teachers who
know (of) Gardner’s MI theory but do not exactly how and where to start.
Read a book on Multiple Intelligences
The more one knows, the better. It is therefore always a good idea to start by
reading some of the available literature on the topic (other than this eBook).
This advice applies to everybody, beginners and false beginners alike. You will
find many items to choose among in the References section of this eBook:
books, articles and online resources.
Identify your MI profile
To identify your personal MI profile, there are several checklists to choose

among. The easiest way to find one is to use Google – a search for the string
“multiple intelligences checklist” will result in more than 12 000 hits. One of
the most well-known checklists is Walter McKenzie’s “Multiple Intelligences
Survey” (McKenzie 1999b). It requires potential test-takers to tick those out of
a total of 90 statements with which they agree. The statements are grouped into
20
nine sections (ten statements for each section), each representing one of
Gardner’s nine intelligence types. Having ticked all relevant statements, the
test-taker is asked to add up the number of ticks for each section and to multiply
the results of each section by ten.
Although McKenzie’s checklist is available on the Web, it is not interactive.

This means that the checklist has to be printed out (or read on the screen), and
the scores received for each section have to be plotted on a bar chart using pen
and paper. Those who want to identify their MI profiles using computers might
be interested in McKenzie’s book, Multiple Intelligences and Instructional
Technology. It provides a conceptual framework for integrating technology
across the curriculum and comes with a bonus CD ROM that includes an Excel-
based MI survey that creates MI profiles (McKenzie 2005).
Another option is to complete the interactive assessment test offered by

Literacyworks. Their website is entitled “Multiple Intelligences for Adult
Literacy and Education” and has a section where you can identify your
preferred intelligences by filling in an assessment form. The form was designed
by Terry Armstrong and comprises 56 statements listed in no particular order.
Your task is to read the statements and, for each statement, to decide how well
it describes you. Your options are: (1) the statement does not describe you at
all; (2) the statement describes you very little; (3) the statement describes you
somewhat; (4) the statement describes you pretty well; and (5) the statement
describes you exactly. (In my opinion this is much better than having to be
categorical and choose between ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ only.) When you have
completed the form and pressed a specific button, the scores received for your
top three intelligences (ranging from 5.0 to 0.0) will be displayed on the screen
together with strength summaries and suggestions on how to work with these
strengths in your lessons. Note that the test includes only eight of the
intelligence types (all but existentialist intelligence).
A third option is to try the Multiple Intelligences Self-Inventory, an animated

test produced by Educational Broadcasting Corporation (2004). This test is
interactive too and only takes a few minutes to complete.
There also exists an Emotional Intelligence Test, designed by John Mayer, Peter
Salovey and David Caruso. The full name of the test includes the names of its
creators: the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT).
The test attempts to measure the four key branches of the model referred to in
the “Background” section in Chapter One, i.e. perceiving emotions, facilitating
thought, understanding emotions, and managing emotions. Altogether, the
21
MSCEIT consists of 141 items and takes at least half an hour to complete
(Mayer, Salovey & Caruso 2002).
Identify your students’ MI profiles
When setting out to identify students’ MI profiles using checklists, foreign-

language teachers should preferably use a version that is easier (from a
language point of view) and less comprehensive than the checklist designed by
McKenzie (1999b). Terry Armstrong’s assessment test on the Literacyworks
website “Multiple Intelligences for Adult Literacy and Education” could also be
difficult for young learners since it was designed specifically with adults in mind.
The checklists presented by Mary Ann Christison are aimed particularly at EFL
students and therefore very useful for this purpose. Her checklists contain eight
of the intelligence types (all but existentialist intelligence) and require potential
test-takers to rank a number of statements according to whether they disagree (0
points), strongly agree (2 points), or are somewhere in between (1 point). By
adding up the number of points, students will find out their strongest and their
weakest intelligence. The checklists come in four versions: one for beginners,
one for intermediate-level learners, one for advanced (or adult) learners, and
one for prospective EFL teachers (Christison 2005).
It should be pointed out that with younger students, checklists could also be
filled in the form of teacher-student interviews, as suggested by Evangeline
Harris Stefanakis. For example, in one of her checklists (called a “Student
Profile”; modified from Haggerty 1995), students are required to decide how
often they do specific things (“almost never”, “sometimes”, “often” or “almost
always”) (Harris Stefanakis 2002).
Kristen Nicholson-Nelson’s argues for the use of portfolios for a variety of

purposes (Nicholson-Nelson 1998). One of the six portfolio types she describes
is called the “Multiple Intelligences Portfolio”. All students in the class are
asked to collect into their personal portfolios different kinds of material (for
example poems, completed worksheets, essays, dialogues, and drawings) that
they have produced themselves, either in class or as homework. Since every
intelligence type has to be represented in the portfolio, the students have to code
the contents of their portfolios according to the intelligence type(s) that each
item caters for to ensure that they have correctly identified all intelligence types.
Throughout the school semester, students are allowed to exchange earlier
22
produced material with more recent material, if they think that the latter can
better cater for a specific intelligence type. When working with portfolios for
several semesters in a row, students will become more and more familiar with
the concept of multiple intelligences and – hopefully – at the same time develop
(at least) some of their intelligence types (Nicholson-Nelson 1998).
Other ways of identifying students’ MI profiles include asking them to

demonstrate their strongest intelligences through personal learning journals,
autobiographies, art activities, discussion groups, and one-to-one interviews
(activities selected from a list published on the homepage of the Simcoe County
District School Board; SCBE 1996).
It is clear that the better the teacher knows his or her students, the better he or
she can teach them. In her book, Multiple Intelligences and Portfolios: A
Window into the Learner’s Mind, Evangeline Harris Stefanakis takes the
concept of portfolios one step further and emphasises the importance of creating
all-inclusive students profiles based on their multiple intelligences. Not only
should students complete personal checklists, she says, they should also assess
themselves and reflect on their learning on a regular basis. Everything should be
written down and all documentation be collected in the form of portfolios. If
possible, the students’ parents should be encouraged to participate in the
creation of such student portfolios through regular observation and
documentation. In doing so, students would gain valuable insights about
themselves. Teachers, on the other hand, would learn to know their students
better through their own observation and by regularly studying the student-parent
created portfolios (Harris Stefanakis 2002).
23
Categorise classroom activities according to intelligence types
Study the list of activities in the box presented below (most of the activities
originate from Berman 2002 and Christison 2005). Reflect for a minute or so on
each activity and try to decide how you would organise it in your classroom:
background music brain gym

brainstorming completing worksheets
cooperative learning tasks group discussions
independent learning stations listening to lectures
logic puzzles making collages
memorisation mime
optical illusions pair work
peer teaching personal goal setting
problem solving project work
reading texts role plays
singing songs storytelling
using charts and maps visualisations
word games writing short essays
Next, categorise the activities according to the intelligence types that they cater
for. Note that many of these activities can be interpreted and organised in a
variety of ways, and different teachers will therefore no doubt categorise them
somewhat differently. Furthermore, note that most of the activities can be
categorised to cater for several intelligence types at the same time. For example,
each activity is always either intrapersonal or interpersonal – and sometimes
both!
Combine language skills activities and intelligence types
In a skilfully designed chart entitled “Teaching Intelligently: Language Skills

Activities Chart” (Tanner 2001), Rosie Tanner suggests one classroom activity
in the intersection of each of the four language skills (vertical columns) and
each of the eight different intelligences contained in the chart (horizontal rows).
24
The “Reading” column in Tanner’s chart below contains the following activities
(but not necessarily in this particular order):
1 Learners answer true/false questions about a text.

2 Learners compare two characters or opinions in a text.
3 Learners discuss answers to questions on a text in groups.
4 Learners listen to music extracts and decide how they relate to a
text they have read.
5 Learners predict the contents of a text using an accompanying
picture or photo.
6 Learners reflect on characters in a text and how similar or different
they are to them.
7 Learners re-order a cut-up jumbled reading text.
8 Learners work with a text on environmental issues.
Write down Gardner’s intelligence types (all but existentialist intelligence) on a

piece of paper and see if you can combine them with the eight activities in the
box above – there is one activity for each intelligence type. Note that most of
the activities can in fact cater for several intelligence types at the same time –
all of them, for example, are linguistic. You must therefore use your logical-
mathematical intelligence and the method of elimination to arrive at the “correct”
answers. To check whether your answers match the ones suggested by Tanner,
see the Solutions section (page 108).
Suggest language skills activities for different intelligence types
Prepare a chart similar to the one described above, placing the three remaining
language skills (speaking, writing and listening) in the vertical columns and
each of the eight different intelligences (or nine, if you want to include
existentialist intelligence) on the horizontal rows (idea based on Dexter 1999).
Next, fill in the (empty) intersections of at least one of the three language skills
and each of the different intelligence types. A friendly piece of advice: do not
try to come up with very complicated classroom activities – the ones that come
to mind first are usually the best!
25
When you have finished, show your list of activities to a friend or a colleague in
order to find out whether he or she can accept your suggestions. Or even better:
if your friend or colleague also wants to get started with multiple intelligences,
ask him or her to prepare a similar list of activities. Then you can compare and
discuss your suggestions in a much more profitable way.
If you have access to Tanner’s original chart (Tanner 2001), you can compare
that too with your list of activities. For the benefit of those who do not have
Tanner’s chart, see the Solutions section for her suggestions as far as
“Speaking” is concerned (page 109).
Identify the MI profile of a foreign-language workbook
Another interesting activity is to identify the MI profile of a foreign-language

workbook, for example the one that you yourself are using. You will find this
activity especially appealing if you are a logical-mathematical person.
Here is what you have to do. Start by counting the number of activities that the
workbook contains and then decide for each activity which intelligence types it
caters for. Take careful notes and keep in mind that most activities can cater for
several intelligence types. For example, you will most probably find that all
activities are linguistic – it is, after all, a foreign-language workbook that you
are analysing! Another thing to watch out for is that every activity is by
definition either intrapersonal or interpersonal – and sometimes both! (For some
of the difficulties involved in the identification of MI profiles of foreign-
language workbooks, see Palmberg 2001, 2002.)
Creative teachers have always had the enviable ability to look at a given
language activity and immediately know how it could be used in the classroom.
Creativity, however, should be set aside in this particular context. On the
contrary, one should be very strict when interpreting the instructions of each
activity. For example, only activities that explicitly state that they are intended
for pair or group work should be categorised as interpersonal. Activities such as
“Make a list of what you like and don’t like and then compare your lists in
pairs.”
should be categorised both as intrapersonal and interpersonal. All remaining

activities should, by default, be categorised as intrapersonal learners.
26
When you have analysed all the activities in the workbook it is time for some
maths. Let’s say that the workbook contains a total of 160 activities and
exercises. According to your judgement, 120 of them cater for intrapersonal
learners and 18 for naturalist learners (to give but two examples). The values of
the two bars that represent intrapersonal intelligence and naturalist intelligence
should therefore indicate 75 % (120 out of 160) and 15 % (18 out of 120),
respectively, in MI profile of that particular workbook. (See the bar chart in the
section entitled “MI profiles” in the previous chapter.)
A follow-up activity
How many activities did you find that cater for five or six different intelligences
at the same time? Did any of them appeal to you more than the others? Why?
Next, compare your favourite activity with the one described in the introductory
paragraphs of Chapter Three. Which one do you prefer? Why?
Another follow-up activity
Did you identify two or three representative, typical activities or exercises for
each of the nine intelligence types? If you did, take a closer look at the activities
you found. Are there specific intelligence types that are often linked to each
other? Or, to put it differently, are there specific intelligence types that can
often be catered for through one single type of activity? If this is the case, why
is it so?
Identify the MI profile of a foreign-language lesson
Reflect on one of your most recent foreign-language lessons and make a list of
the main phases it contained. Then decide for each phase which intelligence
types it catered for. Take careful notes and keep in mind that most phases can
(and do) cater for several intelligence types. For example, the large majority of
them are – hopefully – linguistic. Another thing to bear in mind is that every
phase is by definition either intrapersonal or interpersonal – and sometimes
both!
Next you have to do some simple maths. For the sake of simplicity, let’s say
that your lesson contained ten phases. Of these, seven catered for interpersonal
27
learners and four for logical-mathematical learners (to give but two examples).
The values of the two bars that represent interpersonal intelligence and logical-
mathematical intelligence should therefore indicate 70 % (seven out of ten) and
40 % (four out of ten), respectively, in MI profile of that particular foreign-
language lesson. (For a general MI profile, see the bar chart in the section
entitled “MI profiles” in the previous chapter or the end of Chapter Six for an
MI profile of a foreign-language lesson based on the number of phases.)
It should be pointed out that operating with phases (which can vary a lot both as
far as numbers and length are concerned) when attempting to identify the MI
profile of a given lesson can of course only give a very rough idea of how
things really are. If you were to do this properly, you would of course have to
operate not with the number of phases, but with the amount of time actually
spent on each phase. Or, to put it differently: you should calculate
(approximately) how many minutes of the total lesson time that you actually
catered for each different intelligence type (and take into account that many
intelligence types were in fact catered for simultaneously for some of the time).
This information should then be translated into an MI profile of the foreign-
language lesson in question in the same way as for workbooks: in percentages.
For example, the value of the musical-intelligence bar is 55 % if this
intelligence type was catered for during 25 minutes out of 45 minutes (or, in
this case, the total lesson time).
A follow-up activity
Assume that you had to do the very same lesson again, this time with a class
consisting of, say, only bodily-kinaesthetic learners. Give carefully prepared
answers to (at least) these five questions:
1 What phases would you do in exactly the same way? Why?

2 What phases would you do differently? Why?
3 How would you change or modify the phases that you listed in the
previous question? Why?
4 What classroom activities would you leave out altogether? Why?
5 Are there any specific activities that you would use instead of the
ones you listed in the previous question? If so, which ones would
you use and why?
28
Another follow-up activity
Assume that you had to do the very same lesson for a third time, this time
having to cater for all the nine intelligence types. Go through the “MI Lesson
Plan Checklist” at the end of this chapter and make notes of any adjustments
you might want to do.
Prepare an MI-based lesson outline
Assume that you are going to teach a given topic to a group of foreign-language
learners. Select the topic to be taught (such as shopping, at the zoo, flowers …)
and make sure that you have a specific learner group in mind (for example
beginners, intermediate-level learners, or advanced learners). Write down the
topic on a large sheet of paper and draw a circle around it. If possible, set up
detailed teaching goals. Make notes of all tasks, texts, exercises, visual aids,
classroom activities, and songs that relate to the given topic (and teaching
goals) that you come to think of. It does not matter at this stage whether some
of them appear unrealistic or impractical.
Arrange your ideas according to the intelligence type that, in your opinion, each
task, text, exercise, visual aid, classroom activity, song etc. will be most
suitable for. (If you are a visual-spatial person, you may want to draw nine new
circles around the central circle and draw lines from the central circle to each of
the new circles. Label the new circles according to each intelligence, and write
down each task, text, exercise, visual aid, classroom activity, and song into the
appropriate circles; idea based on Armstrong 1999).
If you feel that you have no more fresh ideas, read through the very practical
teaching suggestions listed on the Literacyworks website “Multiple
Intelligences for Adult Literacy and Education” for the various intelligences.
Make notes of the ones that appeal to you and might fit into your lesson. After a
while, take an overall look at your sheet of paper. Are there any activities that
can be combined? Are there activities that can be modified to fulfil the teaching
goals more efficiently? Are there activities that do not seem at all suitable for
the present purpose?
To wrap things up, arrange, and, if needed, rearrange the (remaining) ideas and
activities into a lesson outline that is logical and fulfils the teaching goals of the
proposed lesson. Make sure that your lesson caters for all of the nine multiple
intelligences. Consult the “MI Lesson Plan Checklist” presented on page 29 if
you need more ideas.
29
An MI lesson plan checklist
intelligence checklist yes no

linguistic Have you included reading, speaking,
listening, writing, spelling activities,
word games?
logical-mathematical Have you included grammar practice,
problem-solving tasks, logic puzzles,
calculations, critical thinking activities?
visual-spatial Have you included visuals, colour,
pictures, graphs, video?
bodily-kinaesthetic Have you included movement, role play,
drama, hands-on activities?
musical Have you included music, sounds,
intonation practice, rhythm?
intrapersonal Have you included private learning time,
self-reflexion, learning diaries?
interpersonal Have you included pair work,
communicative tasks, role play, group
work, discussions?
naturalist Have you included nature-related topics,
classification activities, categorisation
tasks?
existentialist Have you told your students where
the linguistic input of the present lesson
fits in with the linguistic input of the
previous lesson and why the activities of
the present lesson are important for real
life?
This is an elaborated version of a checklist presented in Nicholson-Nelson

(1998).
Acknowledgement
This chapter is a revised and updated version of a paper called “Starting with
multiple intelligences – activities for foreign-language teachers”, published in
Developing Teachers.com Newsletter 2 (2003).
30
3
Catering for
One for all – all for one
The existence of a large number of different MI profiles does not of course

mean that foreign-language teachers have to prepare individual lesson plans for
every student in the class. Many language exercises can cater for several
intelligence types at the same time, as the following example suggested by
Stuart Redman and Rod Ellis (1990) illustrates.
In a three-step activity on the topic “Man and Nature”, students are first
required to identify the eight animals in a picture, using dictionaries if necessary.
They are then asked to work in pairs and decide (a) which of the sixteen
adjectives shown in a box they normally associate with each of the eight animals
and (b) whether there are words in the box that cannot be used when describing
animals. Next, the students are required to work in groups and decide which of
the animals they would most like to preserve (and why), provided that the
animals were all endangered species (Redman & Ellis (1990).
The students thus use their visual-spatial intelligence to identify the animals,
their linguistic intelligence to describe the animals and to discuss whether or not
they should be preserved, their intrapersonal intelligence to work individually,
their interpersonal intelligence to work in pairs and groups, their naturalist
intelligence to classify the animals, and – provided that the students are mature
enough – their existentialist intelligence to argue for or against the protection of
the animals of their choice.
In a similar way, but in so-called phases rather than steps, the three sample
lesson plans introduced in chapters Four, Five, and Six will demonstrate how
Gardner’s MI theory can in practice be applied to foreign-language classroom
teaching in order to cater for the nine intelligence types.
31
The SAFER teaching model
If you did (at least some of) the activities suggested in Chapter Two, you
already have a good idea of what lesson plans that cater for all intelligence
types must contain. But there are also other factors involved in the planning of a
good foreign-language lesson. Some of these have been cleverly incorporated
by Michael Berman into his “SAFER Teaching Model” (Berman 2002).
According to his model there are five important factors that teachers should
take into consideration when planning foreign-language lessons in order to
make their students feel SAFER. Note that Berman’s model does not
necessarily spell out how to do things when teaching – it reminds teachers what
to take into account when planning and teaching!
The five factors emphasised in Berman’s SAFER Teaching Model are the
following (Berman 2002):
The letter “S” in the SAFER acronym stands for “scene”, or, to use Berman’s
own words: teachers should “set the scene to create optimal learning
conditions”. He therefore introduces different kinds of relaxation techniques to
be used and also discusses the positive effects of music in the classroom (with
the aim of decreasing students’ stress and thus increasing their ability to learn).
The letter “A” stands for “authentic”, or, to quote Berman: teachers should
“provide learners with an authentic reason for doing the session: in other words,
sell the lesson to the class”.
The letter “F” stands for “feature”: teachers should ensure that the main feature
of the lesson caters for Gardner’s intelligence types. This, of course, is what this
eBook is all about.
The letter “E” stands for “error”. Teachers should develop their personal policy
regarding learner errors: whether to correct, when to correct, and how to correct.
The advice given in different methodology books can differ enormously
depending on which particular language-teaching method(s) the authors believe
in.
The letter “R”, finally, stands for “review”. This is something that the large
majority of textbook authors agree on: repetition is important, whether carried
out as instant or continuous review.
32
Additional features
The sample lesson plans introduced in Chapters Four, Five, and Six were
originally presented in Palmberg (2003). They are to some extent based on
Berman’s SAFER model, but they also include additional features that facilitate
learning and help teachers create supportive and relaxed learning environments.
The following features in particular can promote students’ self-esteem (adapted
from Palmberg 2003):
- sharing the goals of the lesson with the students
Knowing the main topic and the teaching goals of the lesson at a very early
stage makes students more secure. This insight is of course of greatest
importance especially when it comes to existentialist learners. Furthermore,
knowledge of the teaching goals makes students realise that what they are going
to learn is in fact useful also in real life – an insight that will hopefully motivate
them to participate actively in the various phases of the lesson.
- exploiting and emphasising the existence of the potential vocabulary in the

foreign language
When students realise that not all foreign-language words are necessarily new
(and therefore “difficult”) when first encountered, their self-confidence
increases and learning is facilitated. The importance of incorporating into
foreign-language teaching so-called “potential vocabulary” – i.e. foreign-
language words that are recognisable (and easily guessable) owing to
similarities that exist between these words and their translational equivalents in
the students’ mother tongue – was first suggested in the late 1960s by Russian
linguists (cited in Takala 1984; further discussed in Palmberg 1990).
- providing students with “support frames” containing the vocabulary items and
key phrases needed for communicative activities
Good language students can in most cases manage without this kind of teaching
aids since they will probably learn the words and key phrases very quickly
anyway. Slow students, on the other hand, feel much more secure knowing that
they only have to look at the blackboard or the overhead transparency – which
should be kept displayed throughout the communicative activity – to revise any
wanted language items needed both for communication and comprehension
purposes (see chapters Four, Five and Six for examples of support frames).
33
4
Working with
MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES:
an EFL lesson plan focusing on occupations
The purpose of this chapter is twofold: first, to demonstrate how teachers can
cater optimally for students with different intelligence profiles during a foreign-
language lesson and second, to show that this can be easily achieved using
everyday classroom activities and techniques while at the same time creating a
learning environment in which students feel secure and relaxed.
As early as in 1976, Earl Stevick pointed out that memory works at its best
when the new subject matter appeals to the students and they can organise what
they are learning into familiar patterns (Stevick 1976). The ability to remember
new vocabulary items is further increased when students are allowed to use
their imagination during the learning process (as during the categorisation task
during Phase Nine). Conscious effort (referred to by Stevick as “depth”) is
required from students in order to enable foreign vocabulary items to be
properly processed and transferred from the short-term memory into the long-
term memory.
Teaching goals of the foreign-language lesson
The goals of this lesson are for participating students to be able, in the foreign
language, to say their names, to tell their occupation, to ask for other people’s
names and occupations, to produce the words for a number of occupations, and
to understand the meaning of a number of occupations.
Phase One
Start the lesson by playing a well-known song indicating an occupation or

occupations, for example Rod Stewart’s “I’m sailing”. Invite the students to
guess the topic of the lesson.
34
Phase Two
Share the goals of the lesson with the students. Invite them to suggest different
situations in which they might have to introduce themselves and be able to ask
for somebody else’s name and occupation in a foreign language.
Phase Three
Ask the students to name some occupations that they already know in the
foreign language.
Phase Four
Display an overhead transparency showing a list of ordinary occupations, such

as doctor, teacher, cook, mechanic, musician, waiter, baker, nurse, farmer,
policeman, soldier, artist, worker, butcher, carpenter, and postman.
Go through the meaning of the occupations in two steps:
(1) by asking the students to read through the list and try to figure out how
many occupations they can tell the meaning of (either because they already
know the word or because they can guess the meaning of the foreign-language
word owing to the fact that it is similar to the translational equivalent of the
corresponding mother-tongue word);
(2) by explaining to them the meaning of the remaining occupations.
Next, practise the pronunciation of the occupations with the students.
Phase Five
Ask the students to write down the list of occupations on a lined sheet of paper;
one occupation on each line. Or, if you want to save lesson time, hand out a
(pre-prepared) worksheet to each student.
35
Phase Six
Write the key phrases “What is your name? My name is ...” and “What is your
occupation? I’m a(n) ...” on the blackboard (in the appropriate foreign language
to be practised, if not English).
The support frame could look for example like this:
What is your name?

My name is ...
What is your occupation?
I’m a(n) ...
Next, teach the meaning of these phrases and practise their pronunciation with
the students.
Phase Seven
Display an overhead transparency showing pictures representing the selected

occupations; with the foreign-language word for each occupation written under
or next to the picture (there are very nice illustrations to be found for this
purpose for example in Wright 1994).
Again, practise the pronunciation of the occupations and revise the phrases
written in the support frame.
Phase Eight
Give each student a slip of paper (cut from a photocopied paper version of the
overhead transparency) containing a randomly selected picture representation of
one of the occupations and the foreign-language word for the occupation. It
does not matter if there are fewer students in the class than there are
occupations or if several students are assigned the same occupation, so long as
there is at least one occupation that is not assigned to anybody.
36
Ask the students to walk around in the classroom, asking each other about their
names and occupations. (To ensure that everybody asks for everybody else’s
name, not only their occupation, each student could be assigned a new name in
the foreign language.) Ask the students to take notes of each other’s names and
occupations but not to show their slips of paper to anybody. When they are
finished, ask them to find out which occupation(s) was/were best represented in
the classroom (their own occupation included) and which occupation(s)
was/were not represented at all.
Phase Nine
Ask the students to work individually and decide for each occupation whether it
is
(a) a predominantly male or female occupation;
(b) a basically safe or risk-filled occupation; or
(c) an occupation which requires basic skills in a foreign language or not.
Phase Ten
Ask the students to compare and discuss their results in pairs or in groups of
three, preferably in the foreign language.
Phase Eleven
During the last three or four minutes of the lesson, ask the students to think
about today’s topic (with the overhead projector switched off). Ask them to jot
down on a piece of paper the main phases of the lesson (using just a couple of
words). Next, ask them to check how many occupations they can still
remember.
37
Catering for the various intelligence types
The various intelligence types are catered for during the following phases of the
foreign-language lesson outlined above:
intelligence phase(s)
linguistic intelligence all phases
logical-mathematical intelligence phase 8
visual-spatial intelligence phases 4, 6, 7 and 8; possibly 11
bodily-kinaesthetic intelligence phase 8
musical intelligence phase 1
intrapersonal intelligence phases 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 11
interpersonal intelligence phases 4, 7, 8 and 10
naturalist intelligence phase 9
existentialist intelligence phases 1 and 9; possibly 11
Acknowledgement
This chapter is a revised and updated version of a paper called “Catering for
multiple intelligences – a foreign-language lesson plan involving occupations”,
published in ELT Newsletter (January 2002) and in Ma Luz C. Vilches (ed.):
Learning to Teach. Teaching to Learn. Issues, Options, and Directions in
Language and Literature Education. 6th ESEA Conference Papers. Part
III. Manila 2003: The ACELT Journal 7:1.
38
5
Working with
an EFL lesson plan focusing on houses
The purpose of this chapter is the same as that of the previous one: first, to
demonstrate how teachers can cater optimally for students with different
intelligence profiles during a foreign-language lesson and second, to show that
this can be easily achieved using everyday classroom activities and techniques
while at the same time creating a learning environment in which students feel
secure and relaxed. Earl Stevick’s observations about depth (see Chapter Four)
do of course apply here as well (Stevick 1976).
language, to understand the words used for rooms and common words related to
houses, to ask specific questions about houses, to produce the words for
common rooms found in houses, to describe houses, and to argue in favour of
their own as well as against other people’s opinions.
Phase One
Share the goals of the lesson with the students. Invite them to suggest real-life
situations in which they might have to discuss or describe houses in a foreign
language.
39
Phase Two
Tell the students that they are going to hear a text entitled “Our House” and that
their task is to answer the questions in the box below (displayed on an overhead
transparency). Go through the questions together and make sure that everybody
understands all the words.
1 What is the colour of the house?

2 How many floors are there in the house?
3 Which rooms are on the ground floor?
4 Which rooms are on the first floor?
5 What is kept on the second floor?
6 Where is the fireplace?
Next read out the text in the box below and ask the students to fill their answers.
Our House
I live in a big yellow house near the main road. Our house has
eight windows and two balconies that overlook a big garden.
On the ground floor there are a kitchen, a hall, a living-room
with many paintings on the walls, a dining-room where we
have all our meals, a bathroom, a toilet, a computer room
with lots of books in a giant bookcase that fills the whole wall,
and a garage. In front of the house there are a garden, a
swimming-pool, and a large, green fountain with fish.
On the first floor there are three bedrooms, a bathroom, and

a small toilet. On the second floor there is an attic which has
all kinds of old furniture. Behind the house there is a
vegetable garden. We have a large basement too, with a cosy
sitting-room and an open fireplace.
40
Phase Three
If needed, read out the text one more time and ask the students to recheck their
answers. Then ask them to discuss their answers in pairs or in groups or three or
four.
Phase Four
Ask the students to make individual lists of all the rooms they would like to
have in their dream house. (Invite them to consult bilingual dictionaries if
necessary.) Also, ask them to specify whether their dream house is new or old, a
single-family house or in a block of flats, located in a city or in the countryside,
etc.
Play a house-related song (e.g. “Our house”, performed by Crosby, Stills and
Nash) at a low volume in the background while the students are working.
Phase Five
Divide the students into groups of three and give each group a copy of the
house plan shown below. Ask each group to agree as to which rooms there are
in the house plan and at the same time try to include as many elements as
possible from every group member’s dream house.
41
Phase Six
When the students are finished, invite them to walk around in the classroom,
discussing and comparing house plans. Ask them to make notes of the types of
houses included in everybody else’s individual house plans while walking
around, and also of the rooms found in the house plans agreed upon within the
groups.
Phase Seven
Divide the students into new groups of three and ask each group (a) to decide
among themselves which rooms were the most popular ones and (b) to
categorise the existing house types into whatever number and kind of categories
that they find appropriate.
Phase Eight
Play the background song one more time (at a higher volume) and ask the
students to concentrate specifically on the lyrics. (If you decided to use the
Crosby, Stills and Nash song “Our House”, you will find the lyrics on NIEHS
Kids’ Pages, a website comprising a collection of sing-along songs that is
maintained by the National Institutes of Health, Department of Health &
Human Services. You need to hand out the lyrics or display them on an
overhead transparency.) If the students are familiar with the song (or if they like
singing) you could also ask them to sing along.
Next, ask the students to decide what the text is all about and then share their
thoughts with somebody sitting nearby.
Phase Nine
During the last three or four minutes of the lesson, ask the students to think
about today’s topic (with the overhead projector switched off). Ask them to jot
down on a piece of paper the main phases of the lesson (using just a couple of
words). Next, ask them to check how many different kinds of rooms they can
still remember. Play “Our House” in the background (at a low volume).
42
An alternative final phase
Another way of finishing the lesson is to hand out an alternative version of the
text used for Phase Two, one copy for each student. In the modified version, all
nouns have been deleted and replaced with one single word (but totally
irrelevant as far as the topic is concerned), for example ‘sausage’. For further
instructions, see the “Way of the Sausage” exercise presented in Chapter Seven.
logical-mathematical intelligence phases 2 and 7; possibly 6 and 9
visual-spatial intelligence phase 5; possibly 2, 6 and 8
bodily-kinaesthetic intelligence phase 6
musical intelligence phases 4, 8 and 9
intrapersonal intelligence phases 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9
interpersonal intelligence phases 3, 5, 6, 7 and 8
naturalist intelligence phase 7; possibly 4 and 5
existentialist intelligence phases 1 and 9; possibly 4 and 6
Acknowledgement
This chapter is a revised and updated version of a paper entitled “Catering for
multiple intelligences. A foreign-language lesson plan involving houses”,
published in TEFL.net Inspire! Magazine (November 2005).
43
6
Working with
an EFL lesson plan focusing on Christmas
The purpose of this chapter is the same as those of the two previous ones: firstly,
to demonstrate how teachers can cater optimally for students with different
intelligence profiles during a foreign-language lesson and secondly, to show
that this can be easily achieved using everyday classroom activities and
techniques while at the same time creating a learning environment in which
students feel secure and relaxed.
Furthermore, in order to maintain maximal student activity and interest

throughout the lesson, it comprises a variety of language activities and teaching
techniques that at the same time optimise students’ talking time. Special
attention has been paid to co-operative learning and peer teaching, because, as
pointed out for example by Anita Woolfolk, the best teacher for a student is
another student (Woolfolk 2001).
Note that Phase Three involves work at independent learning stations, i.e. pre-
designated places in the classroom where each place has been allocated to a
specific type of language task.
language, talk about food and objects relating to Christmas. They will also be
able to ask their friends about the way(s) they celebrate Christmas and to
describe their own Christmas traditions, to make suggestions, and to argue in
favour of their own as well as against other people’s opinions.
44
Phase One
Share the goals of the lesson with the students. Invite them to suggest real-life
situations in which they might have to discuss Christmas in a foreign language
or describe how they celebrate Christmas in their home.
Phase Two
Hand out a worksheet containing two columns of Christmas-related vocabulary

items (homework from the previous lesson). One column lists English words
and the second column words in the students’ mother tongue. The students’ task
is to match the English words with their mother-tongue equivalents.
For Swedish-speaking students, for example, the worksheet has the following
information:
1. bell a. julsång
2. candle b. skorsten
3. card c. spishylla
4. carol d. strumpa
5. chimney e. ren
6. decoration f. ljus
7. fireplace g. mistel
8. gift h. julgröt
9. gingerbread i. kort
10. mantelpiece j. snögubbe
11. mistletoe k. julskinka
12. reindeer l. prydnad
13. sleigh m. julfrid
14. snowman n. pepparkaka
15. stocking o. spis, eldstad
16. tree p. klocka
q. träd
r. gåva, present
s. släde
t. julkyrka
45
After a couple of minutes, display the correct answers on an overhead

transparency (e.g. in the form 1-p, 2-f, 3-i, 4-a, 5-b, 6-l, 7-o, 8-r, 9-n, 10-c, 11-
g, 12-e, 13-s, 14-j, 15-d, 16-q) and ask the students to make sure that they have
got the correct Swedish equivalent for each English word.
Phase Three – getting organised
Divide the students into five groups and tell them that for the next half an hour
or so they are going to work at five independent learning stations (one group
per station). Next, provide each student with an individual two-page worksheet.
Tell them that although they work as groups, each student must fill in all
answers in his or her worksheet. Inform them that there are no correct answers
at their disposal and that at five-minute intervals (timed and announced by the
teacher) they must stop working and move on to the next learning station,
clockwise.
A sample two-page worksheet can be found on pages 52-53.
Phase Three – Station A
At Station A there is a detailed picture of a living-room decorated for Christmas.

There are various kinds of mistakes in the picture, such as misspellings (e.g. in
Christmas greetings) or logical inconsistencies (e.g. a wall calendar displaying
July the 31st or an object placed upside down). The students’ task is to spot as
many mistakes as possible and list them in their worksheets. Suitable pictures
can be found in course books and on the Web. Be warned, however, you will
most probably find that you have to modify them for the present purposes or
perhaps even create suitable pictures yourself.
Phase Three – Station B
At Station B students have to categorise given objects according to what one

can do with them. They have to discuss (and preferably agree on) which of the
following things or objects:
a chimney, a fireplace, a gingerbread, a mantelpiece, a mistletoe,

a reindeer, a sleigh, a snowman, candles, stockings
46
they can
(a) find in a forest?

(b) buy in a department store?
(c) make themselves?
(d) eat?
(e) wrap up in a parcel?
(f) put into a pocket?
There are, obviously, no correct answers, and many of the things listed can of
course be categorised in different ways, depending on the creativity of the
participating students. If, for example, the reindeer was made of chocolate it
could well be eaten and if it was a small toy version of a real reindeer it could
probably be put in a pocket. It is up to the students to decide whether they are
allowed to list individual objects in their worksheets or only objects agreed
within the group.
Phase Three – Station C
At Station C there is a computer preset to show a video clip selected from the
Video Nation website. In the video clip, entitled “Christmas List”, a little girl
called Sheri is writing her Christmas list to Father Christmas. The students’ task
is to watch the video clip and answer the following questions in their
worksheets:
1 What presents does Sheri want?

2 Where does she send the letter?
3 How will she get her presents?
4 What will she do when she wakes up at Christmas?
There is enough time to watch the video clip twice, should the students wish to
do so.
47
Phase Three – Station D
At Station D students have to match the halves of fifteen words that have been
chopped in half and write them down in their worksheets. One of the words is
not a Christmas word. Which word is it?
The chopped-up words are:
ation ca ca chi
Chri clas decor deer
fire ft gi ginge
igh king letoe lpiece
mante mist mney place
pre rbread rd rein
rol sent sle sroom
stmas stoc
Phase Three – Station E
At Station E there is a computer preset to play “Rudolph the Red-Nosed

Reindeer”, a song selected from the collection of Christmas carols presented on
the Twelve Days of Christmas website. The students’ task is to listen to the
song while reading the song text displayed on the computer screen. When the
students have listened to the song they have to turn away from the screen and
fill in the missing words in their worksheets (the missing words are indicated by
numbered gaps in the song text).
48
Depending on the proficiency level of the students, there may also be words in
the song that are totally new to them. In such a case it is a very good idea to
have a pre-prepared support frame available at the station for the students to
consult before listening to the song, for example like this:
shiny = glänsande
glow = glöda
join = ta del av
foggy = dimmig, disig
bright = lysande
guide = leda, visa vägen
glee = glädje
Phase Four
Divide the students into new groups of three or four when all learning stations
have been visited by all groups. Ask them to compare and discuss their
worksheet notes within the new groups and agree upon the correct answer for
each task.
Phase Five
Introduce a communicative task that requires students to move around in the

classroom interviewing their classmates about their Christmas habits (this is a
modified version of a task entitled “On Christmas Eve”; presented in Christison
2005). More specifically, ask them to find out at what time their friends
normally get up, go to bed, have breakfast, have lunch, have dinner, exchange
presents, and watch television. The support frame (displayed on an overhead
transparency or written on the blackboard) has the following information:
At what time do you normally ...

on Christmas Eve?
49
Practise asking this question with the students a couple of times and remind
them that the verb (indicated by three dots in the support frame) must be in its
basic form:
“At what time do you normally get up on Christmas Eve?”
Next, hand out specially-prepared worksheets (one worksheet for each student)
and ask them to write down the times told them by their friends.
The worksheet has the following information:
name gets goes to has has has exchanges watches

up bed breakfast lunch dinner presents television
Phase Six
Depending on the number of students in the class, there will probably not be
enough time for everybody to interview everybody else. Therefore, after about
ten minutes or so, invite the students to compare their notes in order to specify
the range of times that people prefer to perform the various activities. Ask them
to decide what the biggest time difference is between the earliest time and the
latest time at which someone normally performs a certain activity on Christmas
Eve.
Phase Seven
Organise the students into new groups consisting of about four of five people in
each group. Tell them that their task is to find out which activity has the biggest
time difference and to suggest possible reasons for this.
50
(You will find that the most probable outcome is either ‘exchanging presents’
or ‘watching television’, depending of course largely on the cultural and/or
religious background of the individual students.)
Phase Eight
Ask the students to return to their own seats and, for a minute or so, to think
about today’s topic. Next, ask them to start working on individual English-
language essays entitled “What Christmas means to me”. Tell them to base their
arguments on their personal Christmas traditions and on the result of the group
discussions. Challenge them to incorporate into their essays as many different
Christmas words as possible and to finish the essays at home for the next
English lesson.
logical-mathematical intelligence phases 3A, 3D and 6
visual-spatial intelligence phases 3A and 3C; possibly 3E
bodily-kinaesthetic intelligence phases 3 [when moving between
stations] and 5
musical intelligence phase 3E
intrapersonal intelligence phases 1, 2 and 8
interpersonal intelligence phases 3 [all stations], 4, 5, 6 and 7
naturalist intelligence phase 3B
existentialist intelligence phases 1 and 8
If the above information were to be presented in the form of a bar chart (see the
section entitled “MI profiles” in Chapter One), the MI profile of the Christmas
lesson would look something like this:
51
Acknowledgement
This chapter is a modified version of a paper called “It’s Christmas time – an

EFL lesson plan”, published on the Developing Teachers.com website (2009).
52
WORKSHEET PAGE 1 [OF 2]
Station A:
Spot the errors in the picture.
Station B:
Which of the things can you
(a) find in a forest?
(b) buy in a department store?
(c) make yourself?
(d) eat?
(e) wrap up in a parcel?
(f) put into your pocket?
Station C:
What presents does Sheri want?
Where does she send her letter?
How will she get her presents?
What will she do when she wakes

up at Christmas?
53
WORKSHEET PAGE 2 [OF 2]
Station D:
What are the Christmas words?
Which is the extra word?
Station E:
Fill in the missing words:
Rudolph, the [1] reindeer [1]

had a very [2] nose. [2]
And if you ever saw him,
you would even say it glows.
All of the other [3] [3]

used to laugh and call him [4]. [4]
They never let poor Rudolph
join in any reindeer [5]. [5]
Then one [6] Christmas Eve [6]

[7] came to say: [7]
“Rudolph with your nose so
bright,
won’t you guide my [8] tonight?” [8]
Then all the reindeer loved him

as they [9] out with glee, [9]
Rudolph the red-nosed reindeer,
you’ll go down in [10]! [10]
54
7
Catering for
LOGICAL-MATHEMATICAL LEARNERS
Language lessons, obviously, can also be planned for just one intelligence type,
whenever needed. As the title of this chapter indicates, the exercises presented
are all aimed specifically at logical-mathematical learners of EFL. At the same
time, of course, each exercise caters for a varying number of other intelligence
types as well. The only difference, compared with other intelligence types, is
that exercises aimed at logical-mathematical learners are often very difficult to
“translate” into other target languages. In some cases they cannot be used in the
teaching of other languages at all owing to the uniqueness of languages.
These exercises all emphasise different aspects of EFL vocabulary knowledge.

Some of them concentrate on the finding and identification of existing words or
understanding texts and sentences. Others focus on the development of learners’
critical thinking skills and their ability to explore and understand multiple-
meaning words and riddles. Sometimes the exercises require learners to have
access to the Web, and in many cases they come with accompanying worksheets.
The exercises presented in this chapter all derive from the eBook Activities and
Exercises for Logical-Mathematical Learners of English (Palmsoft
Publications 2009). They are (with page numbers indicated within parentheses):
“Operation MathLog” (54), “Twenty-one reasons for counting” (58), “Way of
the sausage” (59), “Pupils counting pupils” (61), “Colour Street” (62), “Mary’s
puzzle” (66), “The house of numbered rooms” (69), “Chop Suey” (72), “The
Greek t-shirt” (76), “In the kitchen” (79), “Pitch black or snow white?” (81), “A
‘Buffet snack’ sign” (84), “Lost in the classroom” (87), “Tri-national borders”
(89), “Going Dutch” (93), and “Word play” (96). Whenever applicable, the
original sources are acknowledged separately for each exercise.
55
Operation MathLog
Operation MathLog is an internet-based maze designed to develop learners’
ability to explore and understand how language works and at the same time
increase their knowledge of English vocabulary. It comprises a selection of
language tasks of various kinds and different levels of difficulty, for example:
 anagrams (learners have to rearrange the letters of given words to form

other words),
 acronym tasks (learners have to work with words formed from the initial
letters of phrases or compound terms),
 enclosures (learners have to find words that are hidden in given words or
sentences),
 riddles (learners have to solve riddles according to given clues),
 jumbled sequences of letters (learners have to rearrange sequences of
letters that lack spaces and punctuation marks in order to create coherent
text),
 word search grids (learners have to find words that are hidden in word
grids either horizontally, vertically, diagonally, forwards, or backwards,
 categorisation tasks (learners have to categorise words according to given
criteria),
 word chop exercises (learners have to identify words that have been
chopped in half),
 cryptograms (learners have to decipher messages where letters have been
exchanged according to a specific code; see e.g. Singh 1999),
 problem-solving tasks (learners have to find out the answer to logical
problems based on given facts about people and/or specific circumstances),
and, of course, combinations of these. The tasks sometimes involve follow-up

steps that require learners to arrange or rearrange given words in a specific
order, to decide what theme or topic given words have in common, to spot the
odd man out, etc.
Although Operation MathLog is called a maze, the route is mainly linear.

Learners do occasionally face choice situations that appear to be true choices;
yet the only purpose of these choices is to make sure that learners at specific
stages of the maze have in fact solved all previous tasks. Unlike traditional
adventure programs from the early days of CALL (see e.g. Higgins & Johns
1984; Davies & Higgins 1985), there are no help functions available.
56
The opening web page
The opening web page of Operation MathLog looks like this:
WELCOME TO OPERATION MATHLOG
Do you like wordplay, riddles, numbers and logical puzzles?

Do you like mazes, problem solving and mystery stories?
Then OPERATION MATHLOG could be something for you.
In this maze you will come across a series of mathematical-logical

language tasks. You must solve each task correctly; otherwise you
won’t find your next task. How far can you go? Can you make it till
the end?
PS! It’s a very good idea to keep a record of the names and types of
all tasks and keywords.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For your first task, replace the word mathlog in the address line of
this web page with the same word, but with the letters written in
reverse order. Then press ENTER.
Procedure
These are the only instructions given to potential players (i.e. learners). Each
language task is presented on its own web page, but the only website address
available to learners is that of the opening web page. In order to figure out the
address of the following task, learners must first solve the (very simple) task
presented on the opening web page. The same principle then applies throughout
the maze: the word that constitutes the solution to a given task is the new
keyword (or one of the possible keywords) that must be entered into the website
address instead of the current keyword.
In situations where learners come across tasks that they cannot solve, truly
logical-mathematical learners will probably be tempted to take on Operation
MathLog as a logical rather than a linguistic challenge in their efforts to “beat
the machine” (to quote Higgins & Johns 1984). They may, for example, try to
locate any remaining tasks by using their knowledge of computer technology
instead. In order to prevent, or at least to make computerised search more
57
complicated, all web pages have (with the exception of the opening web page)
deliberately been left ‘orphan’. This means that there are no hyperlinks to take
learners from one web page to another; a fact that makes the maze ‘internet-
based’ rather than ‘web-based’ (cf. Smith & Baber 2005). The website
addresses contain no easily recognisable keywords that could help potential
hackers, either.
Acknowledgement
The opening web page of Operation MathLog has been online since
September 2005. Its target group and the target learners referred to in this
eBook are, by and large, people sharing the same interest, numbers and logical
reasoning. Five of the tasks presented on the Operation MathLog web pages
have therefore been transformed into suitable exercises for this eBook. The five
tasks are “Colour Street”, “The house of numbered rooms”, “Chop Suey’, “In
the kitchen”, and “Pitch black or snow white?”, and they will not be
acknowledged separately. For obvious reasons, the website addresses of these
tasks will not be revealed here.
Earlier versions of portions of this part of the eBook first appeared in CALL
Review (Spring 2006) and in 2006 International Conference. Beyond the
Horizon: Extending the Paradigm of TEFL (Seoul 2006: The Korea
Association of Teachers of English).
58
Twenty-one reasons for counting

This exercise provides young learners in particular with a motivating reason for
reciting numbers from 1 to 21 in a foreign language.
Procedure
The rules are simple. Learners work in pairs, and each learner must add either
one or two numbers to an accumulating list of numbers starting from one. The
learner who says 21 has lost. A typical dialogue might go like this:
Learner A: One,
Learner B: two, three,
Learner A: four, five,
Learner B: six, seven,
Learner A: eight,
Learner B: nine, ten,
Learner A: eleven, twelve,
Learner B: thirteen,
Learner A: fourteen, fifteen,
Learner B: sixteen, seventeen,
Learner A: eighteen,
Learner B: nineteen, twenty,
Learner A: twenty-one.
After of couple of tries some of the learners will most probably have figured out
how they can (almost) always beat their partner. Can you figure it out?
Acknowledgement
This exercise first appeared in IATEFL Voices 194 (2007). The smiley images
are used courtesy of Smiley Central.
59
Way of the sausage

Language teachers often spend the first ten or fifteen minutes of a lesson
revising texts that were introduced to the learners during a previous lesson.
Here is an exercise that provides variety and pupil motivation and, what is
more, keeps the learners alert. It is suitable for individual work, pair work, and
group work.
Step One
Take a familiar text, for example this one (the first paragraph of the text entitled
“Our House”):
Our House
I live in a big yellow house near the main road. Our house has
eight windows and two balconies that overlook a big garden.
On the ground floor there are a kitchen, a hall, a living-room
with many paintings on the walls, a dining-room where we
have all our meals, a bathroom, a toilet, a computer room
with lots of books in a giant bookcase that fills the whole wall,
and a garage. In front of the house there are a garden, a
swimming-pool, and a large, green fountain with fish.
Step Two
Prepare a text version where all nouns have been deleted and replaced with one
single (but totally irrelevant) word, for example ‘sausage’. The text in the box
above would thus read:
60
Our Sausage
I live in a big yellow sausage near the main sausage. Our

sausage has eight sausages and two sausages that overlook a
big sausage. On the ground sausage there are a sausage, a
sausage, a sausage with many sausages on the sausages, a
sausage where we have all our sausages, a sausage, a sausage,
a sausage with lots of sausages in a giant sausage that fills the
whole sausage, and a sausage. In front of the sausage there are
a sausage, a sausage, and a large, green sausage with sausages.
Step Three
Hand out copies of the modified text to the learners. Tell them that their task is
to recreate the original text individually, in pairs or in groups of three, either
orally or in writing (depending on the teaching goals of the lesson and the time
available). If the learners like the exercise (and most of them inevitably will),
challenge them to prepare similar exercises at home (to be used later in class).
Acknowledgement
This exercise is based on a teaching idea by Neville Britten (1983). In his paper
Britten suggested that 25 words in the target text be substituted with 25
(different) words for the learners to find. The ‘sausage’ version of Britten’s idea
was first presented in Palmberg and Palmqvist (1988) and, twenty years later, in
an abstract on the TeAchnology website.
61
Pupils counting pupils

This very short exercise is an alternative way of finishing a lesson that has
introduced and practised the vocabulary needed to talk about the different parts
of the face. At the same time it will remind learners of the fact that there exist
so many words in English that have multiple meanings.
The Final Step but One
Revise the vocabulary items needed to talk about the different parts of the face.
Remember that the word ‘pupil’ must be included and make sure that the pupils
understand that it means ‘the opening in the centre of the iris of the eye’.
The Final Step
Finish the lesson by asking the pupils how many pupils there are in the
classroom. They will most probably come up with a number of incorrect
answers before the correct one, even after they have first discovered that ‘pupil’
also means ‘somebody who is learning in school’. Make sure that you know the
answer before asking the question.
Solution
See the Solutions section (page 109).
Acknowledgement
This exercise first appeared in Palmberg (2004) as part of a lesson plan entitled
“Hands and arms and legs”.
62
Colour Street
The purpose of this exercise is to practise learners’ logical thinking skills and at
the same time provide them with something meaningful to talk about. The
exercise is suitable for all proficiency levels.
Step One
Prepare a transparency of the worksheet on page 64 and enough copies for the
learners (one copy each). Also, prepare enough copies of the fact sheet on page
65 and cut the copies into pieces (one piece of information on every slip of
paper). The fact sheet contains six pieces of information, which means that
every sixth learner will have identical slips of paper. Finally, print out a copy of
the final task on page 65 (to be kept on the teacher’s desk).
Step Two
Display the transparency of the worksheet on an OHP. Explain to the learners

that their task is to walk around in the classroom and, by talking to each other
and by using logical thinking, find out who lives in which house. Explain to
them how to fill in the worksheet and emphasise that they should talk to their
classmates, think, rethink, and avoid guessing.
Step Three
Hand out one worksheet and one slip of paper to each learner. Tell the learners
to walk around in the classroom and ask each other what they know about the
people who live on Colour Street. Advise them to make careful notes on their
worksheets of what they learn. Remind them that they should tell the people
who ask them questions only what is stated on their own slips of paper (NOT
what they have already written on their worksheets). Also, remind them that
they should TALK to each other; NOT show anybody their slips of paper or
worksheets.
63
Step Four
Tell learners who have completed their worksheets that there is a final task
waiting for them on the teacher’s desk.
Solutions

64
COLOUR STREET – WORKSHEET
INSTRUCTIONS
There are five houses on Colour Street. As you can see, they all have different
colours. The houses come in this order:
Five people live on Colour Street, one person in each house. Their names are, in
alphabetical order:
Mr Blue, Mrs Green, Mr Red, Mrs White, and Mr Yellow.
Your task is to find out who lives in which house.
Make notes in this box:
Write down all facts in this box:

the owner the red the yellow the blue the white the green
of … house house house house house
Mr / Mrs
first
name
family
name
65
COLOUR STREET – FACT SHEET
1 Nobody lives in a house with the same colour as his or her name.
2 Elsie White likes Bryan, her neighbour.
3 Frank and Bruce are neighbours.
4 Mr Red has only got one neighbour.
5 Bruce is always cheerful despite his name.
6 Claire lives next to the white-coloured house.
COLOUR STREET – FINAL TASK
When you have decided who lives in which house,

you must take
1. the 1st letter from the name of the person who lives in the first
house,
2. the 2nd letter from the name of the person who lives in the
second house,
3. the 3rd letter from the name of the person who lives in the
third house,
4. the 4th letter from the name of the person who lives in the
fourth house,
5. the 5th letter from the name of the person who lives in the
fifth house.
What word do the letters spell?

66
Mary’s puzzle
Reading a text in a foreign language is a complex process. It involves a variety
of skills, ranging from what Neville Grant (1987) calls “plain sense reading”
through “deductive reading” to “projective reading”. Plain sense reading,
according to Grant, requires nothing more than what the term implies – i.e. the
ability to understand what is stated in a text. Deductive reading involves the
ability to draw inferences – deductions – from what is stated in a text. Or, in
Grant’s words, learners should be able to do more than just “read the lines”;
they should also be able to “read between the lines”. Projective reading, finally,
involves the ability to relate a text to one’s personal opinions, knowledge,
imagination, and experience. To put it differently: learners should be able to
“read beyond the lines”.
This exercise practises learners’ deductive as well as projective reading skills

simultaneously. The text consists of just five – albeit cleverly designed –
sentences. Yet most of the learners will no doubt have to revise their thinking
several times during the exercise. It is suitable for most proficiency levels.
Step One
Prepare an OHP transparency of the text entitled ‘Mary’s Puzzle’.
MARY’S PUZZLE
1. Mary was on her way to school.

2. She was very worried about the maths lesson.
3. Last week she couldn’t control the class.
4. It wasn’t fair of the maths teacher to leave class responsibility to
her.
5. After all, it’s not part of a xxx’s duties to teach.
67
Hand out a copy of the worksheet on page 68 to the learners (one copy each)
and display the first of the five sentences on the OHP transparency. Ask the
learners to write down on their worksheets a short answer to the question ‘Who
is Mary?’ and give a reason why they think so. Next, ask them to share their
thoughts in pairs or in groups of three or four.
Step Two
Display the second sentence on the OHP transparency. Again, ask the learners
to write down an answer to the question ‘Who is Mary?’ and then share their
answers with their classmates. Remind them that they do not have to stick to
their original guess – they may change their answers whenever they want.
Steps Three, Four and Five
These steps follow the same procedure as the previous steps: read, think, write
and discuss. For the fifth sentence, however, tell the learners that they must now
decide who Mary is. Keep prompting for suggestions until someone comes up
with the correct (or an acceptable) answer. You may have to help the learners
with occupations for which they do not know the English words.
Solution
Acknowledgement
The text ‘Mary’s Puzzle’ originates from Sanford and Garrod’s book
Understanding Written Language (1981), rendered in its Finnish version as
‘Tuulan arvoitus’ in Blom, Linnankylä and Takala (1988). The present exercise
is a modified version of the procedure described in Blom, Linnankylä and
Takala, where learners are asked to give their answers to the question ‘Who is
Mary?’ only in writing.
68
MARY’S PUZZLE – WORKSHEET
Fill in this box when you have read sentence 1:

Who is Mary? What makes you think so?




69
The house of numbered rooms

This exercise practises learners’ text-reconstruction skills. It is suitable for most
proficiency levels, provided that the learners are familiar with the vocabulary
included in the text.
Step One
Explain to the learners that the text (displayed on an OHP transparency):
I live in a red house near the main road. Our house has eight rooms and
two balconies that overlook a big garden.
could also be conveyed like this (displayed on an OHP transparency):
ILIVEINAR EDHOUSENE ARTHEMAI NROADOU RHOUSEHA

SEIGHTRO OMSANDTW OBALCONI ESTHATOV ERLOOKAB
IGGARDEN
Give the learners enough time to notice that there are no spaces or punctuation
marks. Answer their questions, if there are any.
Step Two
Ask the learners to form pairs or groups of three and hand out copies of the
worksheet on page 71. Give each learner his or her own worksheet, and
emphasise that everyone has to fill in a worksheet of their own even if they
work in pairs or in groups. Tell them that their task is to arrange the groups of
letters in the box in their correct order and to provide the text with spaces and
punctuation marks. Remind them that they must not add or delete any letters.
They must not change the order of letters, either.
70
Step Three
When most of the learners have completed the task, ask them to share and
compare their findings with their classmates.
Solution

71
THE HOUSE OF NUMBERED ROOMS – WORKSHEET
INSTRUCTIONS
To be able to read the text, you must put the groups of letters in the box
below in their correct order and provide the text with spaces and
punctuation marks. Do not add or delete letters. Do not change the order of
letters.
This is the beginning of a text: ILIVEINAB
NDFLOORTH TONTHESE ORTHEREI ING-ROOMAB
LALIVING- ALLTOILE IGHOUSEO DATOILE
EREAREAKI REEBEDRO HEREARETH OMSABATHR
STFLOORT NTHEGROU ROOMADIN ATHROOMAN
TCHENAHAL CONDFLO OOMANDASM TONTHEFIR
The text ends with this group of words (not included in the box):
SANATTIC.
Write your passage in the box below. Use both lowercase and uppercase letters,
and don’t forget to add spaces and punctuation marks.
72
Chop Suey
The purpose of this exercise is to increase learners’ vocabulary knowledge and
their awareness of possible (and impossible) letter combinations in English
words. It is suitable for intermediate and advanced learners of EFL. Like many
other exercises presented in this eBook, it encourages the use of dictionary
work in the classroom. As has been pointed out for example by Julie Moore, it
is crucial that EFL teachers keep training their learners in the use of both
monolingual and bilingual dictionaries (Moore 2005).
Step One
Hand out the worksheet on page 75 to the learners (one copy each). Tell them
that there are twenty English words hiding in the grid, but that each word has
been split into two parts (Task One). The topic (and most of the vocabulary)
should be familiar to the learners, whose task is to identify which two word
parts belong together and then combine the two parts to recreate the original
words.
Ask the learners to work individually and write down the identified words in the
first box on their worksheets. When they have identified enough words, ask
them to fill in the topic that is shared by the words found (to be written into the
second box). Finally, when they have identified all the words, ask them to
decide which word has nothing to do with the topic (now using the third box).
Step Two
When most of the learners have found most of the words, display the following
word list on an OHP transparency:
73
chin
cheeks
ears
eyes
eyebrows
eyelids
eyelashes
forehead
freckles
hair
jaws
lips
mouth
neck
nose
nostrils
skirt (the odd man out)
teeth
throat
tongue
Go through the word list and make sure that the learners know what the words
mean. Leave the transparency displayed on the OHP and ask the learners to
continue their work. Invite them to consult the word list whenever needed.
Step Three
After a while, ask the learners to form pairs and discuss the word parts
displayed on the worksheet. Invite them to look at the forty word parts and, for
each word part, decide whether
(a) it is an English word

(b) it could be an English word
(c) it cannot be an English word.
Each word part should be written down in one of the three boxes on the
worksheet (Task Two). Also, ask the learners to discuss and (preferably) agree
on their reasons for categorising the word parts the way they did.
74
Step Four
Hand out bilingual dictionaries to each pair of learners and ask them to check
their results.
Step Five
When most of the learners have completed the task, ask them to form new
groups of three or four and compare their findings with each other. If differing
interpretations arise, be prepared to act as an authority on the subject. Some of
the learners might, for example, argue that IDs, PS and SE are in fact words
(even if they are technically abbreviations.)
Solution
Acknowledgement
This word grid was created in 2005 using an authoring program entitled Word
Chop. Word chop was one of the alternatives offered by Discovery School on
their Worksheet Generator website (which, unfortunately, has changed its
selection of available authoring programs since then).
75
CHOP SUEY – WORKSHEET
TASK ONE (individual work)
Combine the word parts in the box into words
ch che ck ea eks es ey eyeb

eyel eyela fore frec gue ha head ids
in ir ja kles li mou ne no
nost oat ps rils rows rs rt se
shes ski tee th th thr ton ws
List the twenty words in the box below:
Which is the topic?
Which of the words has nothing to do with the topic?
TASK TWO (pair work)
List the word parts that (you think) are English words in the box below:
List the word parts that (you think) could be English words in the box below:
List the word parts that (you think) cannot be English words in the box below:
76
The Greek t-shirt

As stated in the introduction to ‘Mary’s puzzle’, reading a text in a foreign
language is a complex process. In Neville Grant’s words, learners should be
able to read “between the lines” – which he calls “deductive reading” – but also
“beyond the lines” – which he calls “projective reading”. There is, however,
always the risk that learners may be tempted to draw too many inferences from
their personal experience when reading a text. To balance their eagerness to
read far beyond the lines, here is an exercise to remind them of the dangers
involved in assuming too much when interpreting a text. The exercise is
suitable for intermediate and advanced learners of EFL.
Step One
Hand out the worksheet on page 78 to the learners (one copy each). Ask them to
read through the text entitled ‘Have you been to Greece?’ several times and to
use bilingual dictionaries to check any unfamiliar words. Next, ask them write
down their first impressions of Michael as a person and to make a list of
everything they know about Michael for a fact.
Step Two
Divide the learners into pairs and ask them to discuss Michael and to compare
their lists of facts. Encourage them to give reasons for their opinions and
assumptions.
Step Three
Display the background information shown on page 77 on an OH transparency.

Next, ask the learners to rethink everything that they thought were facts but that
proved in fact to be false assumptions. How could these misunderstandings
have been avoided from a language point of view?
77
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Michael has just returned from a week’s holiday in Hawaii. He never

drinks alcohol, but in order to cope with the hot sun he had to drink
lots of mineral water every day. He has visited Greece only once, when
he was a little boy of three. The t-shirt he’s wearing is a gift from his
sister who visited Greece some time ago.
Acknowledgement
The original version of this paper first appeared as “The Greek T-shirt – facts
vs. assumptions” on TEFL.net’s Idea Thinktank website (2009).
78
THE GREEK T-SHIRT – WORKSHEET
HAVE YOU BEEN TO GREECE?
It is December. Michael is standing in the arrival hall at Helsinki airport,

tanned and relaxed. He is wearing a white T-shirt with a red text saying
Kos, Greece. Peter, an old friend from long ago, sees him and walks up to
him.
“Hi, Michael. Have you been to Greece?”

“Yes, I have.”
“How was it?”
“To be honest, I can hardly remember anything at all.”
“You must remember something. What was the weather like?”
“It was raining non-stop every day.”
“Then how can you be so tanned?”
“I spent five or six hours in the sun every day last week.”
“Have you had a lot to drink lately?”
“Indeed I have. Several litres every day.”
Peter shakes his head and walks away.
TASK ONE
Write down your first impressions of Michael as a person:
TASK TWO
List everything you know about Michael for a fact:

79
In the kitchen
This exercise is an alternative way of finishing a lesson during which the
teacher has introduced and the learners have practised the vocabulary needed to
talk about objects found in kitchens. There is no reason to tell the learners that
the exercise is a continuation of the kitchen trail. Truly logical-mathematical
learners will no doubt discover the connection long before everybody else.
The Final Step but Two
Revise the vocabulary items needed to talk about objects found in kitchens.
Make sure to include the words needed for this exercise, too.
The Final Step but One
Tell the learners that there is one more exercise to be done before the end of the
lesson. Their task is to find so-called ‘enclosures’ or, to put it differently, words
that are hidden in given words or sentences. The hidden word can be enclosed
in one single word or it can span several words in the sentence (spaces should
be ignored). Examples are ‘cat’ in ‘education’ and ‘two’ in ‘he cannot work’
respectively:
education
he cannot work
The Final Step
work individually or in pairs and follow the instructions given on the worksheet.
Encourage them to use bilingual dictionaries if needed.
Solution

80
IN THE KITCHEN – WORKSHEET
These seven sentences all contain at least one hidden word per sentence.
The word can be enclosed in one single word or it can span several
words in the sentence. Fill in all the hidden words that you can find in
Box One. When you have found at least one hidden word in every
sentence, start looking for the ones that are commonly associated with
one specific place. Write the name of that place in Box Two. Here is a
clue for you: the words you are looking for are all between three and
seven letters long.
1. They are smuggling drugs.

2. She is a member of the national ad league.
3. Would you irritate a potential customer? 4.
These films are not for kids.
5. Mary believes in acupuncture.
6. He is listening to a stereo performance.
7. His love never reads love stories.
BOX ONE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
BOX TWO
81
Pitch black or snow white?

Playing with letters and words are exercises that appeal to logical-mathematical
people. Here is a puzzle that involves a well-known fairytale and anagrams. It is
suitable for intermediate and advanced learners and requires online access to the
Web.
Step One
Tell the learners that an anagram is a reordering of the letters in a word or a

phrase to form another word or phrase. The word sword, for example, is an
anagram of the English word words. An example of a more complex anagram
is the rearrangement of the letters in ‘Clint Eastwood’ as ‘Old West action’.
Write these examples on the blackboard to illustrate your point. Ask the
learners to give examples of funny anagrams they know either in English or in
their mother tongue.
Step Two
Divide the learners into pairs and provide each pair with a computer. Hand out
the worksheet on page 83 to them (one copy each). Ask them to read the
instructions in the worksheet and try to figure out what the missing word is.
Give them no clues whatsoever.
Step Three
If none of the learners comes up with any suggestions within the next few
minutes, tell them that they have three clues at their disposal:
(1) the words “once upon a time”,

(2) the title of the anagram puzzle,
(3) the number of existing (or would-be) anagrams.
82
Step Four
When someone comes up with the correct answer (probably in his or her mother
tongue), ask the learners to use a search engine of their choice (for example
Alltheweb, Alta Vista or Google) to find the English names of Snow White’s
seven dwarfs (and especially the missing one). Ask them to write down the
names in Box One.
Step Five
Ask the learners to go to the Anagram Genius website and try to create funny
anagram of the words ‘fairytale’ and/or ‘snow white’. Ask them to write down
some of their findings in Box Two and to use bilingual dictionaries or an online
dictionary (for example Merriam-Webster Online) to find out what the
anagrams mean (if anything at all). Tell the learners that they should write
down the meanings in Box Two.
Step Six
groups of three or four and share and compare their findings with each other.
Solution
Acknowledgement
The ‘Clint Eastwood’ anagram was found on the Anagram Genius website. It
also offers a downloadable anagram creator for your amusement.
83
PITCH BLACK OR SNOW WHITE? – WORKSHEET
Once upon a time there were six anagrams and a missing word:
1 HALF BUS
2 EEL SPY
3 YES ZEN
4 GYP RUM
5 POD YE
6 COD
Your task is to unscramble the letters of the six anagrams and figure
out what the missing word is.
BOX ONE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
BOX TWO
84
A ‘Buffet snack’ sign

As has already been pointed out, projective reading, as described by Grant
(1987), involves the ability to “read beyond the lines”, or, to put it differently,
the ability to relate a text to one’s personal opinions, knowledge, imagination,
and experience. What, if anything, changes when the “lines” to be understood
comprise both words and images? The present exercise gives learners of
English at most proficiency levels something meaningful to talk about and at
the same practises their projective reading skills.
Step One
Display the photo on page 85 on an OHP transparency. Ask the learners to

study the photo for half a minute and, individually, try to figure out what it tries
to communicate?
Step Two
Hand out the worksheet on page 86 to the learners (one copy each) and ask
them to discuss and answer the questions in pairs or in groups of three.
Step Three
Step Four
Tell the learners that the sign was photographed outside a pool bar at a hotel in
Agadir, Morocco. French is Morocco’s unofficial second language and most of
the country’s tourists come from France, so it should come as no surprise that
French is the first language on the sign. The remaining languages indicate that
there are also many tourists coming to Morocco from the United Kingdom,
Germany and Spain. The hotel owners obviously do not want their customers to
enter the pool bar in (wet) swimwear, since this could mean that the next
customers get their clothes wet.
85
Step Five
Ask the learners to form new groups and discuss how the text and/or the image
on the sign could be changed to avoid any misunderstandings.
© Rolf Palmberg (2009).

86
BUFFET SNACK – WORKSHEET
With your partner or in your group, discuss the questions below and try to agree
on your answers. Write down your answers and comments for each question.
QUESTIONS
1. What are the four languages

on the sign?
2. In what country (or countries)

would you expect to see a sign
like this?
3. Where (type of place) do you
think this sign is posted?
4. Are all kinds of shirts allowed

inside that place?
5. What about shoes?
6. And what about trousers?
7. What is the general purpose

of the sign?
8. Who do you think put it up,

and for whom?
87
Lost in the classroom

This exercise is an alternative way of finishing a lesson during which the
teacher has introduced and the learners have practised the vocabulary needed to
talk about objects found in the classroom. It is suitable for young learners in
particular. The learners can work individually or in pairs.
Step One
Hand out the worksheet on page 88 to the learners (one copy each). Tell them
that there are eleven words hiding in the word grid and that they are all objects
that are normally found in the classroom. The words they may be written
horizontally, vertically, diagonally, backwards, forwards, upwards or
downwards.
Step Two
After a couple of minutes, display an OHP transparency showing the mother-

tongue equivalents of the classroom words to help the learners along. Invite
them to use bilingual dictionaries whenever needed.
Step Three
When most of the learners have completed the task, ask them to form groups of
three or four and share and compare their findings with each other.
Solution
See the Solutions section (pages 111-113).
Acknowledgement
This word grid was created using an authoring program entitled Word Search,
one of the many alternatives available on Discovery Education’s Puzzlemaker
website.
88
LOST IN THE CLASSROOM – WORKSHEET
INSTRUCTIONS
There are eleven words hiding in the word grid below. They are the names of
things that you can normally find in the classroom. Your task is to identify and
circle the words. NOTE that the words they may be written horizontally,
vertically, diagonally, backwards, forwards, upwards or downwards. Can you
find all the words?
K R U L E R J N
O E D P Y X M O
O T Z P R B G Y
B S B A J L L A
C O M P U T E R
N P A E E Q A C
L M T R P N L S
R K S E D F G T
Write the words in this box:

89
Tri-national borders
Geography can provide foreign-language learners with many interesting topics
to talk about. The lesson plan outlined below offers many extra spices for
logical-mathematical learners and is suitable for most proficiency levels.
Step One
Tell the learners that you have a geography puzzle for them. Next, display the
following information on an OHP transparency:
A GEOGRAPHY PUZZLE
You are standing on the Dutch-French border.

What is the name of the nearest international airport?
Depending on the learners’ interest in and knowledge of geography, you may

get a wide range of comments. Some may claim that the puzzle cannot be
solved at all, since it apparently does not contain enough information. Others
may say that the correct answer will of course depend on your exact location.
Learners who know their European map well will point out that this is a trick
question: the Netherlands and France do not share a border!
Or do they?
If you are lucky, the class expert in geography will tell his or her classmates
that the answer can only be Princess Juliana Airport on Sint Maarten. Sint
Maarten is the Dutch half of the divided Dutch-French island in the Caribbean.
The French part of the island is called Saint-Martin, but it has no international
airport. Both Sint Maarten and Saint-Martin are integral parts of their respective
homelands, so the Dutch-French border does exist. But it is not in Europe, as
one might expect. It is in the Americas.
90
Step Two
Tell the learners that it’s time to shift their focus from bi-national to tri-national
borders. A tri-national border (often called a tripoint) is the place where the
borders of three neighbouring countries meet. Contrary to what one might
assume, the number of tripoints on a given continent has little to do with the
number of countries on that continent. North and Central America, for example,
comprises twenty-three countries. Yet there are only two tripoints. One of them
is the one between Belize, Guatemala, and Mexico; the other one is the one
between El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.
Next, hand out some atlases and detailed maps of Europe to the learners and
invite them to work in pairs. Ask them to study the map(s) for not more than
half a minute and then make a guess: How many international tripoints are there
in Europe?
Step Three
At this point you must either pre-teach or revise the English names for the
European countries and their adjectives. You may also have to remind the
learners that some countries have different words for the actual adjective, for a
person from that country, and for the country’s language.
Step Four
Hand out the worksheet on page 92 to the learners (one copy each). First of all,
ask them to fill in the number of presumed tripoints on the worksheet. Next, ask
them to answer the remaining questions and write down their answers. Remind
them to fill in the names of the tripoints in this form:
The Finnish-Norwegian-Swedish tripoint
not “the tripoint between Finland, Norway and Sweden”.
Have a sufficient number of dictionaries available to enable learners to check

the correct adjectives for the different countries. If you find that your atlases
and maps of Europe are not detailed enough, a good solution is to have a
number of computers logged onto Google Earth.
91
Step Five
Step Six
If there is still time, invite the learners to do one of two things:
either
study the pictures of some of the tripoints and tripoint areas displayed at my
European Tripointing website and choose their favourite tripoint
or
put their knowledge of European tripoints to the test by doing a multiple-choice

geography quiz called the Tripoint Guru.
NOTE!
A real tripoint guru needs no map to answer the questions correctly.
Solution
See the Solutions section (page 113). (Answers to the questions in the Tripoint
Guru quiz are displayed on the Tripoint Guru website.)
Acknowledgement
An outline of this lesson plan first appeared on the Teaching Ideas website.
The smiley image is used courtesy of Smiley Central.
92
TRI-NATIONAL BORDERS – WORKSHEET
Answer this question first:

How many international tripoints are there Answer:
in Europe? Write down your guess.
In the right- Dry tripoints: Wet tripoints:

hand columns,
list all the
European
tripoints that
you can find.
Remember to
indicate
whether the
tripoints are
dry (located on
land) or wet
(located in a
river or in a
lake).
Which country has the largest number of Answer:

tripoints? How many tripoints has it got?
Which European Answer:

countries have no
tripoints at all?
93
Going Dutch
Some countries have different words for the actual adjective, for a person from
that country, and for the country’s language. But can we trust adjectives that
seemingly indicate nationality? Or are they all Greek to us? This multi-step
exercise is suitable for advanced learners and requires bilingual and
monolingual English dictionaries.
Step One
Write the following expressions on the blackboard:
Russian roulette
French fries
Turkish bath
German measles
Ask the learners if they know what the expressions mean. Next, ask them which
of these expressions (if any) actually have anything to do with the country to
which they refer. Finally, invite anyone who has similar examples to share them
with you and their classmates.
Step Two
work in pairs and fill in the blanks in the ten sentences on the worksheet (all
sentences have expressions that include the word ‘Dutch’. Ten of the twenty
words in the box are the correct ones. Invite the learners to use monolingual
dictionaries to check their answers.
Step Three
When most of the learners have completed the task, ask them to form new pairs
to share and compare their findings with.
94
Step Four
Next, ask the learners to stay with their new partner and use bilingual
dictionaries and try to find (and agree on) good translations or translational
equivalents in their mother tongue for the ‘Dutch’ expressions.
Step Five
Again, when most pairs have completed the task, ask them to form new groups
of three or four and share and compare their findings with each other.
Solution
Acknowledgement
The idea for this exercise originates from Palmberg (1984).

95
GOING DUTCH – WORKSHEET
TASK ONE. Fill the blanks in the ten sentences below using ten of the twenty
words in the box. If needed, use a monolingual dictionary.
auction, beer, brother, cap, coat, comfort, concert,

courage, door, double, fight, kissing, made, party,
pig, sale, table, treat, uncle, went
1. A Dutch __________ is a door that is divided horizontally. You can shut the
upper part and lower part separately.
2. He was very angry and talked to me like a Dutch __________.
3. I could not understand a word of what he was saying. He must have been
talking __________ Dutch.
4. I bought this car at a Dutch __________. They reduced the price little by
little and soon I had enough money to buy it.
5. Let’s get drunk. I need a lot of Dutch __________ to be able to do this.
6. They don’t want to have any babies so she wears a Dutch __________.
7. We __________ Dutch with each other the other day when we had lunch: we
shared the expenses equally.
8. Last week we had a Dutch __________ which was quite the opposite:
everyone paid his or her own meal.
9. There was a Dutch __________ outside our house last night. A lot of
drunken men were screaming and quarrelling for over an hour.
10. Dutch __________ means that things could have been worse.
TASK TWO. Use a bilingual dictionary to find out how to translate the ‘Dutch’
expressions into your mother tongue. Number the translations and write them
down on the other side of this worksheet.
96
Word play
The purpose of this exercise is to increase learners’ vocabulary awareness and
at the same time practise their dictionary skills. It is aimed primarily at
intermediate and advanced learners, but its level of difficulty can easily be
modified by selecting words that are more suitable to the learner group(s) in
question. Note that the shorter the words selected, the easier the task.
Step One
Ask the learners to write down about ten words from a given topic, for example
from the one introduced during their previous English lesson (in this case
‘objects found in the classroom’). Tell them to concentrate on words that have,
preferably, no more than five letters. After a minute or so, ask them to call out
words from their lists, one learner and one word at the time.
Step Two
Choose two of the words that were called out, for example “desk” and “board”.
(You may have to do a little prompting in order to get the words you want –
otherwise you will have a hard time to produce a word sequence like the one
below quickly enough). Next, write the word sequence
desk deck beck back bark bard board
on the blackboard and ask the learners, in pairs, to figure out what you do with
each word in the list to produce the following word in the list. In other words,
what do you do with desk to produce deck; with deck to produce beck; with
beck to produce back; with back to produce bark; with bark to produce bard;
and finally, with bard to produce board? Ask the learners to come up with as
simple and general rules as possible.
97
Step Three
After a couple of minutes, ask them what rules they have come up with, if any.
Somebody will hopefully suggest (either or both of) these two rules:
You may change a letter in the word

You may add a letter to the word
If so, tell the learners that there are two additional rules, and then display the
complete set of rules on an OHP:
You may change a letter in the word

You may add a letter to the word
You may delete a letter from the word
You may NOT change the order of letters in any word
Discuss the rules and if needed, give clarifying examples.
Step Four
Choose two other words from the list of classroom words suggested by the
learners and write them on the blackboard. Challenge the learners to see how
quickly they can produce a similar sequence of words, starting with one of the
two words on the blackboard and ending with the other one. Invite them to aim
at as short a word sequence as possible, and tell them to follow the four rules
displayed on the OHP. Also, encourage the use of monolingual dictionaries to
ensure that the words created really are English words.
Step Five
Ask those learners who have finished their word sequences to check what the
words used mean in their mother tongue. Next, ask them to prepare short stories
that contain the words used in their word sequences, preferably in the same
order.
98
Step Six
Invite all pairs to present their word sequences to their classmates. Ask
everyone to make sure that all words used in the word sequences really are
English words. One way of doing this is to ask anyone in doubt to ask the
presenters what the words mean in their mother tongue.
Step Seven
If there is still time, ask those learners who had time to prepare short stories to
read some of them out in class.
Acknowledgement
This is the third version of an exercise first presented in Palmberg (2004) and
later in Palmberg (2006).
99
8
Caught in
A TANGLED WEB OF INTELLIGENCES
Confused?
The more you read and learn about multiple intelligences, the more confused
you are likely to get. The main reason is that Gardner’s initial classification has
been refined and expanded over the years, not only by others, but also by
Gardner himself.
Thus, in the 1990s, Gardner’s intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligence types

were further expanded by two other psychologists, Peter Salovey and John
Mayer, who introduced the concept of emotional intelligence (Salovey & Mayer
1990). In order to be emotionally intelligent, one must, according to Daniel
Goleman (who popularised the concept) have personal competence, i.e. know
how to manage oneself, as well as social competence, i.e. know how to manage
relationships (Goleman 1995). Goleman later redefined his definition of
emotional intelligence to include the abilities of knowing one’s emotions,
motivating oneself, recognising emotions in others, and handling relationships
(Goleman 1998). Peter Salovey, in turn, developed the concept of emotional
intelligence together with another colleague of his, David Caruso. In their
opinion there are four key branches of emotional intelligence that are crucial for
good leadership: perceiving emotions, facilitating thought, understanding
emotions, and managing emotions (Caruso & Salovey 2004).
When discussing the existence of a ninth intelligence type, existentialist

intelligence, Gardner also used an alternative term, spiritual intelligence
(Gardner 1999). As Michael Berman sees it, the ninth intelligence could in fact
consist of two entirely different intelligence types, i.e. existentialist intelligence
and spiritual intelligence (Berman 2001). In a much debated book entitled SQ -
The Ultimate Intelligence, Danah Zohar and Ian Marshall do their best to
prove scientifically that spiritual intelligence does exist. They also describe
various ways in which this type of intelligence can be identified and how it can
help facilitate a dialogue between reason and emotion, between mind and body.
100
According to Zohar and Marshall the indications of a highly developed SQ

include a high degree of self-awareness, a capacity to be flexible, and a
tendency to see the connections between diverse things (Zohar & Marshall
2000).
The existence of yet another related intelligence type has been suggested, that
of metaphoric intelligence. According to Jeanette Littlemore, who defines this
intelligence type as the ability to comprehend and produce novel metaphors,
metaphoric intelligence should be regarded as an intelligence type in its own
right. She defends her case in a paper entitled “Metaphoric intelligence and
foreign language learning” by presenting both theoretical and empirical
evidence (Littlemore 2001) and claiming that metaphoric intelligence does
indeed meet Gardner’s criteria for the existence of an intelligence type (these
criteria are explained in detail in Gardner 1983). It seems that metaphoric
intelligence – if it exists – shares many characteristics with Gardner’s ninth
intelligence type, whether called existentialist intelligence or spiritual
intelligence (discussed e.g. in Berman 2001).
The maybe biggest controversy, however, probably lies in the term

“intelligence” itself. In his MI theory, Gardner describes human cognitive
competence as “a set of abilities, talents, or mental skills, which I call
intelligences”. Although the term “intelligence” unavoidably leads many
people’s thoughts to the traditional intelligence quotient and the specific
abilities it represents, this is the term that has been used throughout this eBook.
Gardner acknowledges that he could have called these skills anything else but
“intelligences”, but he also admits that his theory would probably had drawn
less public attention if he had (Gardner 2006). Not surprisingly, there are
several alternative terms that are used by people who claim that they can
understand Gardner’s theory much better if they avoid or ignore the term
“intelligence” altogether and use terms such as “talents” or “aptitudes” instead
(see Weinreich-Haste 1985). Gardner also emphasises that multiple
intelligences are not the same as learning styles (the most dominant categories
being visual, auditory and tactile/kinaesthetic), although there is, naturally, a
great deal of overlapping between these different approaches or ways of
learning (see for example the work done by Dunn & Dunn 1999 and Kolb
1984). For a summary of some of Gardner’s most important criteria for what
constitutes an intelligence type in its own right, see Puchta and Rinvolucri
(2005). For some of the credibility problems associated with Gardner’s MI
theory, including the concept of intelligence itself, see Kerr (2009).
101
Wrapping things up
One simple but possible way of summarising the state of the art would be to
distinguish between three basic groups of intelligence types – IQ, EQ, and SQ.
Although – as pointed out by Wayne Rimmer – scientists are in principle not
very happy with categories that overlap, teachers are probably more
comfortable with loose boundaries (Rimmer 2010). IQ, in such a categorisation,
refers to the traditional intelligence quotient that is measured using a test
originally designed in the early 1900s by Alfred Binet and his colleagues. IQ
tests, however, concentrate almost exclusively on people’s logical-mathematical
and linguistic intelligence. EQ refers to emotional intelligence, be it the model
popularised by Daniel Goleman or the model refined by Peter Salovey and his
colleagues. SQ, finally, refers to the controversial area of spiritual-existentialist-
metaphoric intelligence.
Acknowledgement
This chapter is a revised and reorganised portion of the end of the first chapter
originally published in Basic Multiple Intelligences for EFL Teachers (see
page 1 of this eBook).
102
REFERENCES
Abbs, B. & I. Freebairn (1980). Building Strategies. London: Longman.
About.com.: English as 2nd language. “Family relationships”.

http://esl.about.com/library/vocabulary/bl_relatives.htm.
Anagram Genius. www.anagramgenius.com.
Anonymous (2008). “The 25th anniversary of the publication of Howard

Gardner’s Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences.”
Howard Gardner. http://pzweb.harvard.edu/PIs/MIat25.pdf.
Armstrong, T. (1999). 7 Kinds of Smart: Identifying and Developing Your

Multiple Intelligences. New York: Plume Books.
Atkinson, R. C. (1975). “Mnemotechniques in second-language learning.”

American Psychologist 30.
Berman, M. (2001). Intelligence Reframed for ELT. London: Golem Press.
Berman, M. (2002). A Multiple Intelligences Road to an ELT Classroom.

Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing. Second Edition.
Berman, M. (2010). In a Faraway Land. Ropley, Hampshire: O-Books.
Berman, M. & D. Brown (2000). The Power of Metaphor - Story Telling &
Guided Journeys for Teachers, Trainers and Therapists. Carmarthen:
Crown House Publishing.
Blom, L., P. Linnankylä & S. Takala (1988). Tekstien avaaminen luokassa.

Jyväskylän yliopisto. Kasvatustieteiden tutkimuslaitoksen julkaisusarja B.
Teoriaa ja käytäntöä.
Britten, N. (1983). “Reactive reading.” Practical English Teaching 3:3.
Buzan, T. (1991). Use Both Sides of Your Brain. New York: Plume Books.
Buzan, T. & B. Buzan (1996). The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant
Thinking to Maximize Your Brain’s Untapped Potential. New York:
Plume Books.
103
Buzan world. http://www.buzanworld.com.
Caruso, D. R. & P. Salovey (2004). The Emotionally Intelligent Manager.

How to Develop and Use the Four Key Emotional Skills of Leadership.
New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Christison, M. A. (2005). Multiple Intelligences and Language Learning. A

Guidebook of Theory, Activities, Inventories, and Resources. San
Fransisco: Alta Books.
Davies, G. & J. Higgins (1985). Using Computers in Language Learning: A

Teacher’s Guide. London: CILT.
Developing Teachers.com. http://www.developingteachers.com.
Dexter, P. (1999). “Teaching to different learning styles.” In Dexter, P. & S.

Sheerin (eds): Learner Independence Worksheets 2. Whitstable, Kent:
IATEFL.
Discovery Education’s Puzzlemaker.

http://puzzlemaker.discoveryeducation.com/.
Dunn, R. & K. Dunn (1999). The Complete Guide to the Learning Styles.
Inservice System Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Educational Broadcasting Corporation (2004). Multiple Intelligences Self-

Inventory. http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/mi/index.html.
EnglishClub.com. http://www.esldepot.com/.
European tripointing. http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/borders3.htm.
European tripoint statistics.

http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/tristats.htm.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. The Theory of Multiple Intelligences.

New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences. The Theory in Practice. New

York: Basic Books.
104
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed. Multiple Intelligences for the

21st Century. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons. New York: Basic

Books.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More

Than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. New York:

Bantam Books.
Google Earth. http://earth.google.com/.
Grant, N. (1987). Making the Most of Your Textbook. London & New York:
Longman.
Haggerty, B. (1995). Nurturing Intelligences: A Guide to Multiple

Intelligences Theory and Teaching. Menlo Park, California: Addison-
Wesley.
Harris Stefanakis, E. (2002). Multiple Intelligences and Portfolios: A

Window into the Learner’s Mind. Portsmouth, New Hampshire:
Heinemann.
Higgins, J. & T. Johns (1984). Computers in language learning. London:

Collins.
Kerr, P. (2009). “Should ‘Multiple Intelligences Theory’ play a role in

teachereducation programmes?” The TTED SIG Newsletter 2.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: experience as the source of

learning and development. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice
Hall.
Literacyworks. “Multiple Intelligences for Adult Literacy and Education”.

http://literacyworks.org/mi/home.html.
Littlemore, J. (2001). “Metaphoric intelligence and foreign language learning.”

Humanising Language Teaching Magazine 3:2.
Lozanov, G. (1992). Suggestology and Outlines of Suggestopedy. New York:

Gordon & Breach.
105
Mayer, J., P. Salovey & D. R. Caruso (2002). Mayer-Salovey-Caruso

Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT). Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health
Systems.
McKenzie, W. (1999a). “It’s not how smart you are – it’s how you are smart!”
http://surfaquarium.com/Mi/nine_intelligences.pdf.
McKenzie, W. (1999b). “Multiple Intelligences Survey”.

http://surfaquarium.com/MI/inventory.htm.
McKenzie, W. (2005). Multiple Intelligences and Instructional Technology.

Eugene, Oregon: ISTE.
Merriam-Webster Online. http://www.merriam-webster.com/.
Moore, J. (2005). “Natural language learning (3).” English Teaching

professional 36.
Nicholson-Nelson, K. (1998). Developing Students’ Multiple Intelligences.

New York: Scholastic Professional Books.
NIEHS Kids’ Pages. http://kids.niehs.nih.gov/music.htm.
Operation MathLog. http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/mathlog.htm.
Opp-Beckman, L. P I Z Z A Z !...
http://www.uoregon.edu/~leslieob/pizzaz.html.
Owen, N. (2001). The Magic of Metaphor: 77 Stories for Teachers, Trainers

& Thinkers. Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing.
Palmberg, R. (1984). “Om nationaliteter och engelska idiom.” Tempus 4.
Palmberg, R. (1990). “Improving foreign-language learners' vocabulary skills”.

RELC Journal 21:1.
Palmberg, R. (2001). “Multiple intelligences and EFL coursebook exercises.” In

Gill, M., A. Johnson, L. M. Koski, R. D. Sell & B. Wårvik (eds): Language,
Learning, Literature. Studies Presented to Håkan Ringbom. Turku:
English Department Publications 4. Åbo Akademi.
106
Palmberg, R. (2002). “Catering for multiple intelligences in EFL coursebooks.”

Humanising Language Teaching Magazine 4:1.
Palmberg, R. (2003). Multipla intelligenser för språklärare. Karperö:

Palmsoft Publications.
Palmberg, R. (2004). Developing EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Awareness.

EnglishClub.com.
Palmberg, R. (2006). “Vocabulary awareness activities for EFL learners.”

IATEFL Voices 189.
Palmberg, R. & O. Palmqvist (1988). “Varying text revision.” Practical

English Teaching 8:3.
Puchta, H. & M. Rinvolucri (2005). Multiple Intelligences in EFL.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & Esslingen: Helbling
Languages.
Redman, S. & R. Ellis (1990). A Way with Words: Vocabulary Development

Activities for Learners of English. Book 2. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Rimmer, W. (2010). “Preview of R. Palmberg: Basic Multiple Intelligences for

EFL Teachers.” Humanising Language Teaching Magazine 12:5.
Romijn, E. & C. Seely (1981). Live Action English. Book 2. Oxford:

Pergamon Press.
Salovey, P. & J. Mayer (1990). “Emotional intelligence.” Imagination,

Personality, and Cognition 9.
Sanford, A. J. & Garrod, S. C. (1981): Understanding written language:

Explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence. New York: Wiley.
SCBE (1996). “Multiple Intelligences Theory”.

http://www.paec.org/planetdiscovery/air/strategies/mitheory.pdf.
Singh, S. (1999). The Code Book: The Evolution of Secrecy from Mary,
Queen of Scots to Quantum Cryptography. New York: Doubleday.
Smiley Central. http://www.smileycentral.info/.

107
Smith, D. G. & E. Baber (2005). Teaching English with information

technology. London: Modern English Publishing.
Stevick, E. (1976). Memory, Meaning and Method. Rowley: Newbury House.
Takala, S. (1984). Evaluation of Students' Knowledge of English

Vocabulary in the Finnish Comprehension School. Jyväskylä: Reports
from the Institute for Educational Research Vol. 350.
Tanner, R. (2001). “Teaching intelligently.” English Teaching professional

20.
Teaching ideas. http://www.teachingideas.co.uk/.
TeAchnology. http://www.teach-nology.com/.
TEFL.net’s Idea Thinktank. http://edition.tefl.net/ideas/.
The Tripoint Guru. http://www.vasa.abo.fi/users/rpalmber/tri-guru.htm.
Twelve Days of Christmas.

http://www.12days.com/library/carols/default.html.
Video Nation. http://www.bbc.co.uk/videonation/feature/christmas.
Weinreich-Haste, H. (1985). “The varieties of intelligence: an interview with

Howard Gardner.” New Ideas in Psychology 3:4.
wikiHow. “How to draw a Family Tree”. http://www.wikihow.com/Draw-a-

Family-Tree.
Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Wordle. http://www.wordle.net.
Wright, A. (1994). 1000 Pictures for the Teacher to Copy. London: Nelson
ELT.
Zohar, D. & I. Marshall (2000). SQ - The Ultimate Intelligence. London:

Bloomsbury.
108
SOLUTIONS
WILD ANIMALS
The animals are (in alphabetical order): bear, buffalo, deer, elephant, fox,
giraffe, gorilla, jaguar, kangaroo, leopard, lion, monkey, panther, rhinoceros,
snake, tiger, wolf, and zebra.
In the grid below, the position of the first letter of each animal has been marked
by the colour red to help you along:
O R J H M O C H X Q D I
LANGUAGE SKILLS ACTIVITIES
The correct answer (according to Tanner 2001) is:
language skills activity intelligence type

1. linguistic
2. logical-mathematical
3. interpersonal
4. musical
5. visual-spatial
6. intrapersonal
7. bodily-kinaesthetic
8. naturalist
109
LANGUAGE SKILLS ACTIVITIES
The “Speaking” column in Tanner’s chart contains the following activities

(Tanner 2001):
intelligence type speaking skill activity

verbal-linguistic In groups, learners discuss statements about a
controversial topic.
logical-mathematical Learners in a group each have a picture. They
discuss and re-order them, without showing them,
to create a story.
visual-spatial In pairs, learners discover the differences between
two pictures without showing them to each other.
bodily-kinaesthetic Learners play a game where they obtain
information from various places in the classroom
and report back.
musical-rhythmic Learners listen to a musical video clip (with the
TV covered up) and discuss which images might
accompany the music.
intrapersonal Learners record a speech or talk on a cassette.
interpersonal Learners read problem-page letters and discuss
responses.
naturalist Learners discuss an environmental issue.
PUPILS COUNTING PUPILS
Count the number of people in the classroom, including you. Multiply the
number by three, and then subtract one. The result is the correct answer to your
question. Why? Because each person in the classroom has two pupils, and in
addition to that each person is a pupil – except for you, the teacher!
COLOUR STREET
The people on Colour Street are, in this order: Mr Bryan Yellow, Mrs Elsie
White, Mrs Claire Green, Mr Bruce Blue, and Mr Frank Red.
The answer to the final task is (not surprisingly, considering the topic) a colour:
black.
110
MARY’S PUZZLE
Mary is the school secretary.
THE HOUSE OF NUMBERED ROOMS
This is the unscrambled version of the text:
I live in a big house. On the ground floor there are a kitchen, a hall, a living-
room, a dining-room, a bathroom and a toilet. On the first floor there are three
bedrooms, a bathroom and a small toilet. On the second floor there is an attic.
CHOP SUEY
The following word parts are existing English words: fore (meaning ‘in the
front’), ha (a humorous exclamation), head (the word has several meanings),
ids (the plural form of a psychological term for ‘the deepest part of the
unconscious mind’), in (a preposition), no (meaning ‘not’, ‘not any’), oat
(something made from a grass-like plant), rows (lines of people or things), ski
(one of a pair of long narrow pieces of wood), tee (a specially shaped piece of
plastic on which a golf ball is placed before it is hit) and ton (a unit of weight).
The word part shes is almost a word, but the apostrophe is missing (she’s).
The word parts es and ir are literally word parts (a suffix and a prefix,
respectively), but not words. (in, of course, is not only a word; it is also a
prefix.)
Some of the words parts, for example che, gue, nost and rils, contain perfectly
acceptable letter combinations and there is no logical reason why they have not
been assigned any meaning in English.
Most of the remaining words cannot be English words since they either lack
vowels or contain letter combinations that do not exist in initial or end positions
of English words.
111
IN THE KITCHEN
The hidden words are (in this order) ‘mug’, ‘ladle’, ‘teapot’, ‘fork’, ‘cup’,
‘toaster’ and ‘oven’.
PITCH BLACK OR SNOW WHITE?
Happy is the missing dwarf.
LOST IN THE CLASSROOM
The eleven classroom words hiding in the grid

are ’board’, ’book’, ’computer’, ’crayon’, ’desk’, ’glue’, ’map’, ’paper’, ’pen’,
’poster’, and ’ruler’.
Three of the words are written horizontally: two forwards (‘computer’ and
‘ruler’) and one backwards (‘desk’):
K R U L E R J
O E D P Y X M
O T Z P R B G
B S B A J L L
C O M P U T E
N P A E E Q A
L M T R P N L
R K S E D F G
Four words are written vertically: one downwards (‘paper’) and three upwards
(‘book’, ‘poster’, and ‘crayon’):
112
K R U L E R J
O E D P Y X M
O T Z P R B G
B S B A J L L
C O M P U T E
N P A E E Q A
L M T R P N L
R K S E D F G
Three of the words are written diagonally: two downwards (going to the right)
(‘board’ and ‘pen’) and one downwards (going to the left) (‘glue’):
K R U L E R J
O E D P Y X M
O T Z P R B G
B S B A J L L
C O M P U T E
N P A E E Q A
L M T R P N L
R K S E D F G
The last word is written diagonally upwards (going to the right) (‘map’):
113
K R U L E R J
O E D P Y X M
O T Z P R B G
B S B A J L L
C O M P U T E
N P A E E Q A
L M T R P N L
R K S E D F G
TRI-NATIONAL BORDERS
There are 48 international tripoints in Europe (for a complete list, see my

European tripoint statistics website). Austria has the largest number of
international tripoints: nine. Nine European countries (Denmark, Iceland,
Ireland, Malta, Monaco, Portugal, San Marino, United Kingdom, and Vatican
City) have no international tripoints.
GOING DUTCH
The correct expressions are, in this order: ‘Dutch door’, ‘Dutch uncle’, ‘double
Dutch’, ‘Dutch auction’, ‘Dutch courage’, ‘Dutch cap’, ‘went Dutch’, ‘Dutch
treat’, ‘Dutch concert’, and ‘Dutch comfort’.

Multiple Intelligences Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Multiple Intelligences Study

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Multiple Intelligences Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are the main topics covered in the document?

What are the main topics covered in the document?

What is the SAFER teaching model?

What is the SAFER teaching model?

Multiple

Rolf Palmberg is a senior lecturer at Åbo Akademi University at Vaasa, where

About this eBook

© Rolf Palmberg (2011).

2. Starting with Multiple Intelligences 19

- Read a book on multiple intelligences (19)

3. Catering for Multiple Intelligences 30

- One for all – all for one (30)

4. Working with Multiple Intelligences:

5. Working with Multiple Intelligences:

6. Working with Multiple Intelligences:

7. Catering for logical-mathematical learners 54

- Operation MathLog (55)

8. Caught in a tangled web of intelligences 99

Learners – and individuals in general – can be described and categorised in a

Typical learner characteristics

To make it easier to remember the characteristics of each of Gardner’s nine

linguistic intelligence “word smart”

A selection of classroom exercises

An exercise for linguistic learners

Another exercise for linguistic learners

(For a full-sized version of the above image, go to

An exercise for logical-mathematical learners

The sentences in the box on page 8 have to be arranged in a (chrono)logical

The twelve sentences originate from “A piece of toast”, an exercise presented in

Eat the toast.

An exercise for visual-spatial learners

An exercise for bodily-kinaesthetic learners

name gets goes to has has has exchanges watches

This is a modified version of a task entitled “On Christmas Eve”; presented in

An exercise for musical learners

Display the lyrics of a well-known song on an overhead transparency, for

Rudolph, the [1] reindeer [1]

All of the other [4] [4]

Then one [7] Christmas Eve [7]

Then all the reindeer loved him

An exercise for intrapersonal learners

Display a limerick on an overhead transparency, for example the one about a

There once was a man from Beijing.

There once was a ______________ from __________________.

I once met a _________________ from ___________________.

An exercise for interpersonal learners

(Call Student B on the phone.)

(The phone is ringing.) Answer the

Greet your friend and say your name.

Suggest something to do in the

Disagree and give a reason why not.

Agree and say you are sorry. Suggest

Disagree and give a reason why not.

Agree. Suggest something else do on

Agree. Suggest a meeting-place and a

Accept and say goodbye.

Exercises of this type are called skeleton dialogues. As opposed to word-for-

An exercise for naturalist learners

Ask the students (individually, in pairs, or in groups of three) to divide the

blackboard calculator cd-player

There once was a from ____.

I once met a _ from ___.