American International Group: Case Analysis
American International Group: Case Analysis
American International Group: Case Analysis
Case Analysis
Abelgas, Chona
Homboy, Germaine
Latag, Keziah Ro
Mamad, Ogie
Tura, Realyn
Point of View
Financial Analyst
Areas of consideration
financing resources
industry analysis
economic performance
Recommendation
We recommend the course #1 which is to maximizing the
remaining resources.
Plan of Action
Since financial statement is confidential, we assume this figure
below:
$182B – received from the US Government for their Treasury
Bills.
Assuming half of $182B is payable for all the clients in AIG and
half will be their cash on hand. Therefore, $91B add the 1.6 fine in
the case and add the assuming other expenses of $10M; all the
liabilities will be 92,610,000,000. Thus, assets will be $91B, add all
the assets that are sold which is amounting to $100B a total of
$191B.
191,000,000,000
Current Ratio =
92,610,000,00
0
= 2.06:1
In simple term, the current ratio of 2.06:1.00 means AIG has
more than enough to cover its current liabilities if they come due.
Conclusion
We conclude that AIG needs to maximize their assets than its
liabilities so that, the company will not barred down that appears to
be unfavorable. According to (Current Ratio|
Investopedia https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currentratio.
asp#ixzz57mMj6hsJ) February 21, 2018, The higher the current
ratio, the more capable the company is of paying its obligations, as it
has a larger proportion of asset value relative to the value of its
liabilities. However, a high ratio (over 3) does not necessarily indicate
that a company is in a state of financial well-being either. Thus, it
should be allocated properly. And to better assess whether or not
these issues are present, a liquidity ratio more specific than the
current ratio is needed. Moreover, it’s better to utilize well all the
company’s resources than sacrificing the American Group Standing.