sxb

Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1

. ao RHGGI,i\, E fB,, euse sor.il n. nurjuri rsrzt ess-gasa

r EB, z z0ts?d-#A,#il,"8fi$Hti3,'#B'fffi?,VJF
fktgi{i^S_ G. ehiLi i ,rU EASTERN DTVISION
ILED
uLEriK,
^, u.s. orsrRici cbuhr
TINITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEB r ?, 2Ai8
CASE NuMtPaftirate judge Sit:;rey t. Schenkier
v.
United States District Court
ATTII,A GYULAI

CRTMTNAL coMPr,AII{r
lgcn 096
MAGISTRATE' J UbGE SCH ENIflm
I, the complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
From on or about August 7,zOLt to on or about July ?, 20L6, at Chicago, in the Northern District
of Illinois, Eastern Division, the defendant violated:
Code Section Offense Description

Title 18, United States Code, Section Defendant engaged in a scheme to defraud, and
1343 to obtain money and property by means of
materially false and fraudulent pretenses
representations, promises and concealment of
material facts, and for the purpose of executing
such scheme, caused to be transmitted by means
of wire communication in interstate commerce,
certain writings, signs, and signals, in violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.

This criminal complaint is based upon these facts:

CO
Spr Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI)

Sworn to before me and signed in my presence.

City and state: Chicago. Illinois SIDNEY I. SCIIENKIER. U.S. Magistrate Judge
Printed name and Title
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 2 of 20 PageID #:2

LINITED STATES DISTRICT COURT )

AFFIDAYIT

I, Cory Johnsrud, first being duly swom under oath, hereby depose and state as follows:

1. I am a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of lnvestigation ("FBI"), and I am

assigned to its Chicago Division. I have been employed by the FBI as a Special Agent since

approximately June zll7,during which time I have completed training in fraud investigation

methods, financial analysis, and asset forfeiture. As a result, I am familiar with schemes

involving the use of false statements to defraud investors. I am currently assigned to an FBI squad

dedicated to the investigation of federal wire and mail fraud offenses, as well as related financial

crimes.

2. The information contained in this affrdavit is based upon my personal knowledge,

as well as information provided to me by other law enforcement officers. It is also based upon

my review of subpoenaed records, records obtained without the use of a subpoena, and on

information provided to me by non-law enforcement personnel. Because this affidavit is

submitted for the limited purpose of establishing probable cause, it does not set forth each and

every fact that I have learned during this investigation.

3. This affidavit is made for the limited purpose of establishing probable cause to

support a criminal complaint alleging that, from in or about August 20ll and continuing through

in or about July 2016, ATTILA GYULAI engaged in a scheme to defraud, and to obtain money

and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises and

concealment of material facts, and, for the purpose of executing such scheme, caused to be
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 3 of 20 PageID #:3

transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce certain writings, signs, and

signals, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 (wire fraud).

4. As further stated below, there is probable cause to believe that GYULAI engaged

in a scheme to defraud the minority shareholders in Our Sangha,LLC dlblaBnbeya restaurant by

making false statements and representations about his use of shareholder funds and the revenue

from the operation of the restaurant. Specifically, there is probable cause to believe that GYULAI

misappropriated Embeya's funds for his own personal benefit, and not for the operation of the

restaurant.

FACTS ESTABLISHING PROBABLE CAUSE

5. Embeya was a modern Asian restauranl located at 564 West Randolph Street,

Chicago, Illinois 6066I. Our Sangha, LLC was the corporate entity that operated Embeya

restaurant. According to Illinois Secretary of State records, Our Sangha was incorporated on or

about October 17,2011 and its registered agent was GYULAI.

6. Since approximately luly 2017, the FBI has conducted an investigation based on

allegations that GYULAI misappropriated company funds from Embeya restaurant. This

investigation has included, among others things, a review of company documents, bank and credit

card account records, and interviews of witresses. As a result of the investigation, and as further

detailed below, there is probable cause to believe that GYULAI has engaged in a wire fraud

scheme, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.

Information Obtained from Shareholder A

7. On or about August 18, 2Ol7 .and on or about October 17, 2017,I interviewed

Shareholder A and his wife. From approximately 2012 through 2015, Shareholder A was the
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 4 of 20 PageID #:4

Executive Chef at Embeya restaurant and a minority shareholder in Our Sangha. According to

Shareholder A, he and GYULAI met when they worked together at the Elysian Hotel in Chicago.

GYULAI was a matager and Shareholder A was a sous chef for the hotel restaurant. When

Shareholder A learned that the owners of the Elysian Hotel were looking to sell the hotel,

Shareholder A and GYULAI discussed opening an Asian restaurant in Chicago.

8. According to Shareholder A, in order to start the restaurant, he and GYULAI

prepared a business plan and also leased space at 564 W. Randolph Street in Chicago.

Shareholder A and GYULAI also executed an Operating Agreement for Our Sangha on or about

April lg,2Ol2. Shareholder A stated that the Operating Agreement identified the owners of Our

Sangha as Class A shareholders. GYULAI was a 46.5% owner of Our Sangha and GYULAI's

wife was a l0o/o owner, which together made them the majority owners of Our Sangha. According

to Shareholder A, GYULAI was given the largest percentage of equity because he had developed

the business plan, had experience in the industry, and would provide a majority of the start-up

capital necessary to open the business. Shareholder A was a 15.5o/o owner and his brother,

Shareholder B, was a28oh owner.

g. According to Shareholder A, around the same time the Operating Agreement was

drafted, GYULAI and Shareholder A obtained a Small Business Association loan from Ridgestone

Bank (nlkla Byline Bank)t in the amount of approximately $985,000. Shareholder B was also a

borrower and guarantor of the loan. According to Shareholder A, while he signed the loan

documents, he found out later that the loan documents prepared by GYULAI stated that

Shareholder B's properties had been pledged as collateral for the loan. According to Shareholder

I The Small Business Administration loan was originally obtained from Ridgestone Bank. On or around June 9,
2016, Byline Bank acquired Ridgestone Bank. Byline Bank currently owns the loan.
J
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 5 of 20 PageID #:5

A, GYULAI gave him the loan documents to sign, and he signed where GYULAI had indicated,

but did not fully comprehend the loan documents. According to Shareholder A, GYULAI did not

inform him that his brother's properties would be pledged as collaterai for the loan.

10. In addition, GYULAI, Shareholder A, and others were listed as Class B

shareholders in the Our Sangha Operating Agreement. According to Shareholder A, he and

GYULAI decided they would need $500,000 in working capital for the restaurant, and having

working capital was also necessary to obtain the Ridgestone bank loan. According to Shareholder

A, working capital referred to money that would be used to purchase restaurant supplies,

equipment, fumishings, or pay for unexpbcted expenses during the start-up of the business when

there was a cash shortfall at the restaurant. GYULAI was to provide and raise a total of $300,000,

and Shareholder A was to provide and raise a total of $200,000 from family and friends. All

contributors of funds towards the $500,000 would become Class B shareholders. Each percentage

ownership of Class B shares was worth $5,000. According to Shareholder A, he and GYULAI

managed to invest and raise the $500,000 to start Embeya, and the Class B shareholders were

identified in the Operating Agreement. This $500,000 was placed in escrow at the outset and was

used as collateral to obtain the Ridgestone Bank loan.

I l. According to Shareholder A, Embeya opened in Septemb er 20l2with great success

and excellent reviews by dining critics. GYULAI operated the front of the house, GYULAI's

wife was the Director of Marketing, Shareholder A was the Executive Chef, and Shareholder A's

wife ran the bar and beverage program.

12. According to Shareholder A, although Embeya was successful, he and his wife

became suspicious of GYULAI after some time. GYULAI refused to allow Shareholder A or his
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 6 of 20 PageID #:6

wife to review Embeya's general ledger in order to examine Embeya's financial condition. He

also saw GYULAI and his wife take lavish personal vacations and wear expensive clothing during

Embeya's operation.

13. According to Shareholder A, when his wife began asking for more hnancial

information, GYULAI excluded her from meetings. In particular, Shareholder A stated that his

wife discovered that the restaurant had $3 million in gross revenue during the first ten months of

operation, but neither Shareholder A nor his brother had received any net profits or distributions

as Class A shareholders. After confronting GYLILAI with this fact, Shareholder A stated that his

wife was fired from her restaurant positionby GYULAI in20l4.

14. Furthermore, Shareholder A stated that, on multiple occasions, he confronted

GYULAI about why he had not received any profits or distributions in accordance with the

Operating Agreement. According to Shareholder A, on those occasions, GYULAI stated that

there was not enough money coming in to the restaurant to make those payments.

15. According to Shareholder A, in or about January 2015, after returning from an

overseas trip, GYULAI fired Shareholder A, and removed his name from company records and as

an authorized signor on the restaurant's business accounts. GYULAI also called the police to

remove'Shareholder A from the premises.

16. After he was fired, Shareholder A filed a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook

County, Illinois against Our Sangha and GYULAI for the approximately $90,000 of unpaid wages

that Shareholder A stated he was owed. Through the civil discovery process, Shareholder A

stated that he obtained substantial financial information that showed GYULAI misappropriated

funds from Embeya.

11. First, Shareholder A stated that he discovered that GYULAI and his wife did not

put up any of their own funds for their 28o/o in Class B ownership arrdthat he borrowed the funds

from familyand friends. Accordingto ShareholderA, afterreceivingback some ofthe funds held

in escrow t1-2}l3, GYULAI almost immediately used the funds held in escrow at fudgestone

Bank to pay back his family members and friends the money they provided to GYULAI.

According to Shareholder A, GYULAI concealed these payments from him, and Shareholder A's

friends and family who were also Class B Shareholders. In addition, according to Shareholder A,

approximately one year later, Shareholder A and GYULAI purportedly paid back himself and all

Class B shareholders the total initial investment of approximately $500,000. At that time,

Shareholder A and GYULAI discussed and decided to pay back the initial investrnent to all the

Class B Shareholders. According to Shareholder A, however, this resulted in GYULAI being

paid as a Class B shareholder when he had not invested any funds in the business, and had paid

back his family and friends that helped fund his portion of the Class B contributions. GYULAI

concealed this payment of $140,000 to him and his wife from Shareholder A and the other Class

B shareholders.

18. Second, Shareholder A stated that he discovered that GYULAI was using company

funds to pay personal expenses. Specifically, Shareholder A stated that GYULAI would take

money from Embeya's business bank account, deposit it into his personal Chase bank account,

and then pay his personal expenses such as plane tickets, credit card bills, cell phone bills, his

home mortgage, and a car lease, among other things. Moreover, according to Shareholder A,

GYULAI wrote company checks to himself which GYULAI then cashed. Shareholder A also

stated he discovered that GYULAI withdrew $50,000 from Embeya's bank account in March
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 8 of 20 PageID #:8

2014, deposited it into his personal account in March 2014, and then used those funds to open and

trade stock in a personal E-Trade trading account beginning in May 2014.

19. Third, Shareholder A determined that GYULAI looted the remaining funds in the

Embeya accounts when the restaurant closed. In or aroun d,2016,Shareholder A discovered that

Embeya was closing. Around the same time, Shareholder A and his wife discovered that

GYULAI had sent, via wire transfer, approximately $100,000 from Embeya's business bank

account to his personal account. GYULAI then wired approximately $100,000 to bank accounts

in Canada. Shareholder A also leamed that GYULAI and his wife had left the United States, had

defaulted on their mortgage payments, and had abandoned their car on the street. Through

reviewing additional bank records and their own investigation, Shareholder A and his wife learned

that GYULAI had traveled to several different countries around the world after Embeya closed,

including Canada,Mexico, and Hungary. At this time, Shareholder A does not know where

GYULAI or his wife are currently residing and his attempts to contact them have been

unsuccessful. According to Shareholder A, GYULAI and his wife have deactivated their social

media accounts, and have not made any purchases or transactions using known credit cards or bank

accounts.

20. Shareholder A has obtained, as of May 2017 , an approximately $1.4 million default

judgment in his civil lawsuit against Our Sangha and GYULAI on claims for breach of fiduciary

duty, breach of contract, and conversion. According to Shareholder A, he and his brother are now

solely responsible for the outstanding loan with Ridgestone Bank for almost $1 million, and his

brother's properties, placed as collateral, were at risk of being foreclosed by Ridgestone Bank.

Shareholder A and his brother have worked with the bank to make monthly payrnents on the loan
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 9 of 20 PageID #:9

in order to save the properties and avoid defaulting on the loan. '

21. According to Shareholder A, he did not receive his share of distributions as a

minority shareholder commensurate with GYULAI's withdrawals from the Embeya bank account.

Shareholder A stated that, even when Embeya was closing in or about 2OI6,GYULAI took the

$100,000 left in the accounts for himself without any distributions to the other shareholders in Our

Sangha, or consideration of the outstanding Ridgestone Bank loan.

Our Sangha Operating Agreement

22. I have obtained and reviewed a copy of the Our Sangha operating agreement dated

April 19, 2012. The operating agreement identifies the Class A shareholders -- GYULAI as a

46.5% owner, Shareholder A as a 15.5Yo owner, Shareholder B as a28Yo owner, and GYULAI's

wife as a l0%o owner. The operating agreement also includes an ownership schedule for Class B

members, which include GYULAI, his wife, Shareholder A, Shareholder B, and family and friends

ofboth GYULAI and ShareholderA. Accordingto the Operating Agreement, each Class B share

is worth $5,000. GYULAI and his wife were 28%o Class B shareholders, which meant they

purchased $140,000 in shares. Similarly, Shareholder A had l% of Class B Shares, which meant

he purchased $5,000 of Class B shares.

23. According to the Operating Agreement, the Class B shareholders were entitled to

80% of any distributions to the company prior to repayment of their initial investment; the Class

A shareholders (including GYULAI and Shareholder A) were entitled to 20o/o of any distributions

made by the company. After paytng off the Class B shareholders their initial investment, the

Class A members were entitled to 80%o of any distributions and the Class B shareholdercto 20%o

of any distributions.
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 10 of 20 PageID #:10

24. Based on my review of the operating agreement, nothing in the agreement suggests

that GYULAI was permitted to take distributions as a Class A or Class B shareholder without

paylng out the other shareholders in Our Sangha, LLC. Rather, the Operating Agreement states

that any net profits or net losses of the LLC shall be distributed to the members (shareholders)

according to their percentage ownership in Our Sangha, LLC. Further, according to the

agreement, GYULAI, as the managing member, has discretion on when and how much to pay in

dishibutions, but states that he "shall endeavor to make quarterly distributions to the Members."

25. In addition, the Operating Agreement also provides that, in the event of dissolution

of the LLC, creditors would be paid first to satisff the liabilities of Our Sangha, followed by

distributions to Class A and Class B members in accordance with each shareholder's percentage

ownership stake. According to fudgestone Bank records, the $985,000 loan was still an

outstanding liability of Our Sangha at the time that Embeya closed. The loan balance with

Ridgestone Bank was approximately $464,885.19 as of September 15, 2017.

Information Obtained from Shareholder B

26. On or about September 28, 2017, and November 2, 2017,I conducted interviews

of Shareholder B, who is a 28%o minority shareholder in Our Sangha. Shareholder B stated that

he is the brother of Shareholder A, and became involved in Embeya restaurant because of his

brother. Shareholder B stated that, before the formation of the restaurant, he flew to Chicago in

or about November 20ll arrd had dirurer with GYULAI. At the dinner, they agreed that all three

would be the owners of the new restaurant.

27. According to Shareholder B, GYULAI verbally told him that he and his brother

(Shareholder A) would jointly have a 43oh ovtnership in the new restaurant as Class A
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 11 of 20 PageID #:11

shareholders. However, Shareholder B stated that he was not sent a full copy of the operating

agreement for the restaurant, and thus did not have the opportunity to read the complete agreement.

Shareholder B stated that GYULAI sent him only the pages of the operating agreement that he

needed Shareholder B to sign to create the business. Because Shareholder B trusted GYULAI

and GYULAI told Shareholder B that if he did not sign the documents, the restaurant opening

would be delayed, he signed the pages that GYULAI needed him to sign without viewing the

complete operating agreement.

28. Shareholder B stated that, in 2}l4,he attempted to sell one of his properties and
learned that the property was actually pledged as collateral for the Our Sangha loan with

Ridgestone Bank. He later learned that all three of his properties were being used as collateral

for the Ridgestone loan. Shareholder B stated that GYULAI did not tell him that his properties

were being used as collateral on the loan, and that if he had known this fact prior to investing in

the business and signing the operating agreement and bank loan, he would not have agreed to use

his properties as collateral.

29. Shareholder B also stated that, during Embeya's operation, he repeatedly asked

GYULAI for copies of operational reports and profit and loss reports, but he was never provided

them. In approximately 2014, Shareholder B flew to Chicago to meet with GYULAI and to obtain

further detail about Embeya's finances, but he stated that GYULAI avoided him when he was in

Chicago. At times when Shareholder B was able to talk to GYULAI, he asked him why no

distributions were made to the owners of the company. According to Shareholder B, GYULAI

stated that he had plans for the money at thattime, including opening a patio at Embeya.

30. Shareholder B stated that he received one payment from his investment of Embeya

10
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 12 of 20 PageID #:12

of approximately $70,000 in or about 2014, which he understood was a repayment of his initial

cash investment.2

Information Obtained from Shareholder C

31. On or about October 25,2017,I interviewed Shareholder C. Shareholder C is a

relative of Shareholder A. According to Shareholder C, in or around 2010 or 2011, he was

approached by Shareholder A to invest in a restaurant business. ln or around2012, Shareholder

C invested $100,000 for the operation of Embeya

32. Shareholder C stated that he received and reviewed the Operating Agreement from

GYULAI, and executed the agreement with the understanding that he was an investor and would

receive aportion ofthe profits when distributed. The Operating Agreement identifies Shareholder

C as a 20YoClassB shareholder.

33. Shareholder C stated that he often went to Embeya to dine, and stated that it was

always busy. He stated that he asked GYULAI for financial reports of the business and a Form

K-l, but GYULAI did not respond to his requests. In or around2014, Shareholder C stated that

he was repaid his initial investment of $100,000, but he did not receive any profit checks or

distribution after that.

34- In or around 2015, Shareholder C learned that GYULAI had fired Shareholder A

as the head chef and questioned GYULAI about it. According to Shareholder C, GYULAI stated

that the restaurant only had $3 million in revenue whereas GYULAI expected to earn $5 million

in revenue, so he fired Shareholder A.

35. Shareholder C stated that he learned through reading the newspaper that Embeya

2 Financial records show that the Class A Shareholders, which were GYULAI, his wife, Shareholder A and
Shareholder B, received only one distribution in or about December 2014 totaling $125,000
11
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 13 of 20 PageID #:13

was closing. Shareholder C attempted to call GYULAI and his wife but could not reach them.

Shareholder C explained that he did not receive any notice of the restaurant's closing and he did

not receive any distributions at the time the restaurant closed.

Information Obtained from Shareholder D

36. According to the Operating Agreement, Shareholder D was a 2oh sharcholder in

Our Sangha. On or about October 20,2017,I interviewed Shareholder D. Shareholder D stated

that she is the cousin of Shareholder A and invested $10,000 in Our Sangha n2012. Shareholder

D stated that she signed the Our Sangha Operating Agreement and understood that she was entitled

to any distributions as one of the shareholders of the company.

37. According to Shareholder D, she went to Embeya approximately once or twice a

week to eat and believed the restaurant was doing well as it was always crowded with diners.

Shareholder D also stated that she asked GYULAI for the restaurant's financial reports but

GYULAI never provided any.

38. According to Shareholder D, she received her $10,000 investment back in 2013 or

2014. After requesting it, Shareholder D also received a K-l for 2014 in order to support her tax

filing and payment of taxes on the capital gains distribution. The K-l stated that Sharehold,er D

had a profit distribution of approximately $3,000 for 2014. However, Shareholder D stated she

never actually received distributions from Our Sangha, apart from her $10,000 initiai investment.

In 2015, Shareholder D stated that she attempted to withdraw as an investor. Shareholder D stated

that GYULAI did not respond to her communications.

Financial Analysis of Embeya's and GYULAI's Accounts

39, The FBI has conducted a review of Embeya's and GYULAI's bank accounts, and

t2
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 14 of 20 PageID #:14

Embeya's general ledger. As part of the FBI's investigation, the FBI has obtained records for the

MB Financial Bank business checking account in the name of Our Sangha, LLC (dlbla Embeya).

The bank produced records that showed, among other things, that this account was opened on or

about December 6,2011 and GYULAI, along with Shareholder A, were listed as authorized

signers on the account. However, the FBI's investigation has revealed that GYULAI controlled

the company bank account. According to Shareholder A, he stated that although he was listed as

an authorized signer on the account, GYULAI controlled the restaurant's bank account and made

all the financial decisions. Moreover, on checks issued by GYULAI, I recognize his signature on

the check by comparing it to the signature on GYULAI's bank opening account records, loan

documents, and the Operating Agreement. Moreover, in a civil deposition taken in Shareholder

A's wage lawsuit on or about February 3,2016, GYULAI testified that he authorized the checks

for the return of the Class B shareholders investments, and for checks that he made payable to

himself and his wife. Furthermore, on or about February 7,2018,I interviewed Accountant A,

who was the accountant for Embeya from in or about October 2012 through in or about October

2015. According to Accountant A, GYULAI controlled the business bank account and made all

decisions on checks that were issued. In addition, the FBI has obtained and reviewed the personal

bank account records for GYULAI and his wife, along with Embeya's general ledger, which

identified the company' s business transactions.

40. During this review, the FBI has determined that there is probable cause to believe

that: (l) GYULAI misappropriated approximately $140,000 in firnds when he paid back all Class

B shareholders their initial capital investment; (2) GYULAI misappropriated approximately

$65,000 in company funds for stock trading for his own personal benefit; and (3) GYULAI

13
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 15 of 20 PageID #:15

misappropriated approximately $100,000 in company funds when Embeya closed its operations

and effectively dissolved, leaving Shareholder A and Shareholder B responsible for the liabilities

of Our Sangha, including the Ridgestone Bank loan.

Improper Shareholder Payments to GYULAI

41. The FBI's review of financial records has determined there is probable cause to

believe that GYULAI misappropriated approximately $140,000 under the guise of paying himself

and his wife back their initial capitalinvestment as a Class B Shareholder.

42. On or about April 20, 2012, GYULAI and Shareholder A firnded the Ridgestone

Bank Escrow Account with approximately $486,806 in connection with the $985,000 loan

discussed above. This deposit represented the funds from all the Class B shareholders that was

necessary to obtain the loan and was placed in escrow with Ridgestone Bank. GYULAI's portion

as a 28o/o Class B Shareholder, namely $140,000, was flmded using money from his personal

account that he had borrowed from family and friends, and was not funded with his own money.

Indeed, from in or about August 2011 through in or about April2012, GYULAI received at least

$375,489 his JP Morgan Chase personal account ending in 3530 from family and friends.
in
The remainder of funds that went into escrow account came from the other Class B Shareholders,

including Shareholder A and his family and friends who were identified as Class B Shareholders

in the Operating Agreement.3

43 . Between May 201 3 and July 2013, GYULAI paid back approximately $ 147,578 to

3 Among the checks issued to fund the Ridgestone Bank escrow account was a check for approximately $67,000
from GYULAI's wife. However, it is likely that check was for GYULAI's father-in-law's investment as a Class B
Shareholder, for which he owed approximately $60,000. Besides this check, the records do not show another
transaction where GYULAI's father-in-law funded his contribution for his Class B ownership shares. Moreover, in
a civil deposition in or about February 3,2016, GYULAI testified that his father-in-law's investment likely was
deposited in a personal account first before being transferred to the business account.
14
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 16 of 20 PageID #:16

the family and friends who funded his Class B ownership interest in the restaurant using Embeya

company funds. During the FBI's review of the financials, the FBI did not find any repayments

of ownership interests to other Class B shareholders during the time frame of May 2013 through

July 1, 2013.

44. After GYULAI paid the family and friends who flrnded his Class B ownership

interest in the firm, as described above, between in or about March 2014 andin or about lure20l4,

GYULAI repaid the Class B Shareholders that were listed on the Operating Agreement
approximately $450,000.4 As part of this repayment, GYULAI and his wife received $140,000

purportedly as repayment of their initial capital investrnent as Class B Shareholders. However,

as described above, GYULAI had borrowed those funds from family and friends to fund his and

his wife's 28o/o Class B shares, and had already used company funds to pay them back in2013.

GYULAI and his wife were not entitled to a Class B repayment in 2014. Thus, GYULAI

fraudulently misappropriated approximately $140,000 through the above transactions to the

detriment of the other Class B shareholders.

Misappropriation of Company Funds by GYULAI

45. As part of the FBI's investigation, the FBI reviewed whether GYULAI
misappropriated company funds during Embeya's operation to the detriment of all shareholders,

including Shareholders A and B. There is probable cause to believe that GYULAI

misappropriatedat least $65,000 in company funds as follows:

a One Class B shareholder did not receive

a. First, GYULAI took approximately $50,000 in company funds and deposited it into

a personal bank account at Fifth Third Bank. Specifically, on or about March 12,2014,

GYULAI issued a check from Embeya's business account at MB Financial Bank ending

in 1346 made payable to ATTILA GYULAI in the amount of $50,000. Subsequently, on

or about March 72,2O14,GYULAI deposited the $50,000 in his personal checking account

ending 1ft7894 at Fifth Third Bank. On or about March 13,2014, GYULAI then wired

$50,000 to an individual at a bank located in Hungary.

b. Second, GYULAI took approximately $15,000 in company funds and deposited it

into a personal bank account at Fifth Third Bank. Specifically, oo or about March 21,

2014, GYULAI issued a check from Embeya's business account at MB Financial Bank

ending in L346 made payable to Cash in the amount of $ 15,000. Subsequently, on or about

March 21,2014, GYULAI deposited approximately $15,660 in his personal checking

account ending in7894 at Fifth Third Bank.

c. On or about March 21, 2014, GYULAI then wire transferred approximately

$15,000 from his personal checking account to the same individual at a bank located in

Hungary that GYULAI wired money to on or about March 13,2014. On or about May

12,2014, the individual located in Hungary then wired $64,000 back to GYULAI. On or

about May 15, 2014, GYULAI made a $15,000 savings withdrawal from his Fifth Third

Bank account ending in7894 and wired approximately $55,000 to GYULAI's personal E-

Trade account on or about May 19,2014.

t6
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 18 of 20 PageID #:18

46. In summary, through the above series of transactions, GYULAI misappropriated

approximately $65,000 from the company by sending the funds to his personal E-trade account

and withdrawing $15,000 in cash.

47. From account and payroil records obtained, the FBI also determined that GYULAI

and his wife received regular payroll deposits in their account through a payroll processing

company as their compensation, and thus the transfers identified above were not part of their

compensation. Specifically, the bank records showed that GYULAI and his wife received

approximately $575,000 in regular direct deposits into their bank accounts from 2012 t}rrolgh

2016.

Misappropriation of Funds Near the End of Embeya's Operations

48. As part of the FBI's investigation, the FBI reviewed financial records to determine

whether GYULAI misappropriated company funds before Embeya closed to the detiment of all

other shareholders, including Shareholders A and B. As shown below, there is probable cause to

believe that GYULAI misappropriated approximately $118,750 in company funds that were

remaining in the company's account before leaving the United States, as follows:

a. First, GYULAI took approximately $15,000 in company funds and deposited it into

a personal Etrade account. Specifically, on or about January 4,2016, GYULAI issued a

check from Embeya's business account at MB Financial Bank endingin 1346 and made it

payable to Cash in the amount of $15,000. Subsequently, on or about January 4,2016,

GYULAI deposited the $15,000 in his personal checking account ending in 5665 at MB

Financial Bank. On or about January 4,2016, GYULAI wire transferred approximately

$14,992.14 from that account to his personal account at E Trade Bank.

t7
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 19 of 20 PageID #:19

b. Second, GYULAI misappropiated $103,750 from Embeya's account and sent it to

overseas accounts. Specifically, on or about June 3, 2076, GYULAI transferred

approximately $103,750 from Embeya's MB Financial Bank account ending in 1346 to

GYULAI and his wife's personal JP Morgan Chase account ending in 3530. On or about

lune7,2016, GYULAI made an international wire transfer from this account to an account

located at Royal Bank of Canada in the amount of $20,000. In addition, on or about June

7, 2016, GYULAI made an international wire transfer from the account to a Toronto

Dominion Bank account in the name of GYULAI's wife for approximately $80,000.

Embeya closed its business on or about June 18, 2016.

49. At the time that GYULAI transferred out the $103,750 from the Embeya account,

it represented a significant amount of the funds left in the account

50. At the time that GYULAI withdrew these funds, the Ridgestone Bank loan was still

outstanding.

Request for Issuance of a Complaint and Arrest Warrant

51. Based upon the foregoing information, there is probable cause to believe that, from

in or about August 20ll andcontinuing through in or about July 2016, GYLILAI devised, intended

to devise and participated in a scheme to defraud, and to obtain money and propert y, narnely at

least $300,000, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and

promises, and by concealment of material facts, and for the purpose of executing that scheme, and

attempting to do so, caused to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate

cotrrmerce, certain signs, sounds and signals. In particular, for the purpose of executing the

aforesaid scheme, and attempting to do so, GYULAI knowingly caused to be hansmitted an

18
 Case: 1:18-cr-00096 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/18 Page 20 of 20 PageID #:20

international wire transfer from GYULAI's JP Morgan Chase bank account in the amount of

$20,000 on or about J:urrie 7 , 2016 to a Royal Bank of Canada account, in violation of Title i 8,

United States Code, Section 1343.

CONCLUSION

52. Based on the above information, I respectfully submit that there is probable cause

to believe that wire fraud offenses, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section l343,have

been committed by GYULAI, and therefore respectfully request that this Court issue a criminal

complaint and arrest warrant for GYULAI.

ohnsrud

Federal Bureau of Investigation

swom before me thistth day of February z}l},at Chicago, Illinois.

The I. Sc

Northern Distict of Illinois

t9