Success and Failures of Carp and Carper
Success and Failures of Carp and Carper
Success and Failures of Carp and Carper
CARP:
There are two streams of thought with respect to CARP. The first concludes that
CARP is a failure and needs to be ended. The second argues that CARP has its
fair share of accomplishments and needs to be extended with some reforms.
The first group wants to junk CARP but disagrees on the future of redistributive
reforms. A more radical faction demands an end to the current CARP and the
passage of the genuine agrarian reform bill. Finally, a group of big landowners is
simply determined to end CARP.
CARP started in 1988 with the passage of Republic Act No. 6657, otherwise
known as the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law. It was signed into law by
President Corazon Aquino on June 10, 1988. The Department of Agrarian Reform
(DAR) was created to implement CARP.
CROP failure is perhaps the most dreaded of all agricultural pursuits. Farmers can
only watch helplessly and imagine the cost of the collapse of their income,
plans and investments. They can decide on two things – replant or abandon the
enterprise. In most instances the farmers continue to cultivate believing that a
new effort will give enough to recover their losses. When there is hope, there is
possibility of recovery. The farmers are mostly fatalistic but they have faith in
God’s providence.
On the other hand if there is no more hope and cultivating further will only mire
them in greater penury and misery then farmers take a different route, like a shift
to other crops and begin anew or let go of the land. This is the same with the
Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program. There is CARP failure, so to speak not
only for the beneficiaries but even the militants whose members are wont to
forcibly take over the land before the Department of Agrarian Reform has
declared that every legal requirement had been complied with and the land is
ready for distribution.
CARPER:
One of the main goals during the extension period should be the
completion of land distribution by June 30, 2014. The program should get PhP
150 billion for five years or PhP 30 billion per year for land acquisition and
distribution and agrarian justice delivery (a total of 60 percent share for the two
components), and for support services (40 percent). CARPER introduced other
meaningful reforms articulated by farmers and rural women’s organizations,
agrarian reform advocates, and the Catholic Church. These measures aim to
address loopholes in CARP and problems that have arisen from its
implementation and which have beset the program since its inception more
than two decades ago.