Baguio Water District vs. Trajano

730 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED
Baguio Water District vs. Trajano

*
No. L-65428. February 20, 1984.
BAGUIO WATER DISTRICT, petitioner, vs. HON.

CRESENCIANO B. TRAJANO in his official capacity as
the Director of the Bureau of Labor Relations of the
Ministry of Labor and Employment, and BAGUIO WATER
DISTRICT EMPLOYEES LABOR UNION, respondents.
Labor Law; Civil Service Law; The Baguio Water District

personnel are covered by the Civil Service Law under P.D. 198, as
amended by P.D. 1497.·It is obvious that the public respondent
erred when he said: „Contrary to appellantÊs claim, said provision
has not been amended much more abrogated expressly or impliedly
by PD 1497 which does not make mention of any matter on Civil
Service Law or collective bargaining.‰
Same; Same; Same.·The BWD is a corporation created
pursuant to a special law·P.D. No. 198, as amended. As such its
officers and employees are part of the Civil Service. (Sec. 1, Art. XII-
B, Constitution; P.D. No. 868.)
PETITION to review the decision of the Director of the

Bureau of Labor Relations.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
_______________
* SECOND DIVISION.
731
VOL. 127, FEBRUARY 20, 1984 731

Antonino Espiritu & Severino Z. Beltran, Jr. for
petitioner.
The Solicitor General for respondents.
ABAD SANTOS, J.:
This is a petition to review the decision of the public

respondent which affirmed that of a Med-Arbiter calling for
a certification election among the regular rank and file
employees of the Baguio Water District (BWD).
The Baguio Water District was formed pursuant to Title
II·Local Water District Law·of P.D. No. 198, as amended.
The BWD is by Sec. 6 of that decree „a quasi-public
corporation performing public service and supplying public
wants.‰
A part of the public respondentÊs decision rendered in
September, 1983, reads in part.
„We find the appeal [of the BWD] to be devoid of merit. The records
show that the operation and administration of BWD is governed
and regulated by special laws, that is, Presidential Decrees Nos.
198 and 1497 which created local water districts throughout the
country. Section 25 of Presidential Decree (PD) 198 clearly provides
that the district and its employees shall be exempt from the
provisions of the Civil Service Law and that its personnel below
supervisory level shall have the right to collectively bargain.
Contrary to appellantÊs claim, said provision has not been amended
much more abrogated expressly or impliedly by PD 1497 which does
not make mention of any matter on Civil Service Law or collective
bargaining.‰ (Rollo, p. 59.)
We grant the petition for the following reasons:
1. Section 25 of P.D. No. 198 was repealed by Sec. 3 of

P.D. No. 1479; Sec. 26 of P.D. No. 198 was amended
to read as Sec. 25 by Sec. 4 of P.D. No. 1479. The
amendatory decree took effect on June 11, 1978.
Sec. 25 of P.D. No. 198 was originally written as follows:
„Sec. 25. Exemption from Civil Service.·The district and its

employees, being engaged in a proprietary function, are hereby
732

exempt from the provisions of the Civil Service Law. Collective

bargaining shall be available only to personnel below supervisory
levels: Provided, however, That the total of all salaries, wages,
emoluments, benefits or other compensation paid to all employees
in any month shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of average net
monthly revenue, said net revenue representing income from water
sales and sewerage service charges, less pro-rata share of debt
service and expenses for fuel or energy for pumping during the
preceding fiscal year.‰
After P.D. No. 198 was amended by P.D. No. 1479, Sec. 25
now reads:
„Sec. 25. Authorization.·The district may exercise all the powers

which are expressly granted by this Title or which are necessarily
implied from or incidental to the powers and purposes herein
stated. For the purpose of carrying out the objectives of this Act, a
district is hereby granted the power of eminent domain, the exercise
thereof shall, however, be subject to review by the Administration.‰
It is obvious that the public respondent erred when he said:

„Contrary to appellantÊs claim, said provision has not been
amended much more abrogated expressly or impliedly by
PD 1497 which does not make mention of any matter on
Civil Service Law or collective bargaining.‰
2. The agencies of the Ministry of Labor and

Employment do not compare notes.
In NLRC Case No. RAB-I-0053-82, Beneco Employees

Labor Union, et al vs. Baguio Water District, the Second
Division of the NLRC held:
„Upon absorption of herein complainant by BWD by virtue of the

terms of the aforementioned agreement, he automatically became a
government employee. As such, his terms and conditions of
employment are governed by the Civil Service law, rules and
regulations and therefore any dispute or controversy arising from
such employment status is removed from the jurisdiction of the
Labor Arbiter and this Commission pursuant to Article 277 of the
Labor Code, as amended, which We hereby reproduce below:
733
VOL. 127, FEBRUARY 20, 1984 733

ÂART. 277. Government employees.·The terms and conditions of

employment of all government employees, including employees of
government-owned and controlled corporations, shall be governed by the
Civil Service Law, rules and regulations. Their salaries shall be
standardized by the National Assembly as provided for in the New
Constitution. However, there shall be no reduction of existing wages,
benefits and other terms and conditions of employment being enjoyed by
them at the time of the adoption of the Code.Ê
„As one of the issues raised before Us in this appeal is one of

jurisdiction, We rule to dismiss the above-entitled case based on the
ground of lack of jurisdiction.
„WHEREFORE, the appealed Decision is hereby Reversed. Case
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.‰ (Rollo, p. 64.)
The Union appealed to this Court but in G.R. No. 63184 a

resolution dated April 24, 1983, dismissed its appeal for
lack of merit.
3. The BWD is a corporation created pursuant to a

special law·P.D. No. 198, as amended. As such its
officers and employees are part of the Civil Service.
(Sec. 1, Art. XXI-B, Constitution; P.D. No. 868.)
WHEREFORE, the petition is granted and the questioned

decision of the public respondent is hereby set aside. No
costs.
SO ORDERED.
Aquino, Concepcion, Jr., Guerrero, De Castro and

Escolin, JJ., concur.
Makasiar (Chairman), J., I reserve my vote.
Petition granted and decision set aside.
Notes.·The fact that petitioner holds a civil service

eligibility for the position of chief of police affords him no
protection after he accepted a conditional appointment
which was temporary in nature. (Carillo vs. Court of
Appeals, 77 SCRA 170.)
Dishonesty and falsification by employee in the
accomplishment of information sheets attached to the
734
Fereira vs. Intermediate Appellate Court
application for appointment constitute sufficient grounds

for dismissal from the civil service. (De la Cruz vs.
Mudlong, 84 SCRA 280.)
The GSIS Charter and the Civil Service Law can stand
together where the welfare and interest of an employee of a
government-owned corporation are at stake, and more so
when the government-owned or controlled corporation
exercises proprietary functions, such as the Philippine
National Railways. (Soriano vs. PNR, 84 SCRA 722.)
A special counsel who served efficiently for four years
may be removed from office only for cause. (Roque vs.
Ericta, 53 SCRA 156.)
Mistake or acquiescence of officials resulting in the
nonobservance of rules does not render the legal
requirements ineffective or unenforceable. (Cantillo vs.
Arrieta, 61 SCRA 55.)
··o0o··
© Copyright 2018 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.

Baguio Water District vs. Trajano

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Baguio Water District vs. Trajano

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Baguio Water District vs. Trajano

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

730 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

Baguio Water District vs. Trajano

BAGUIO WATER DISTRICT, petitioner, vs. HON.

Labor Law; Civil Service Law; The Baguio Water District

PETITION to review the decision of the Director of the

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

VOL. 127, FEBRUARY 20, 1984 731

ABAD SANTOS, J.:

This is a petition to review the decision of the public

We grant the petition for the following reasons:

1. Section 25 of P.D. No. 198 was repealed by Sec. 3 of

Sec. 25 of P.D. No. 198 was originally written as follows:

„Sec. 25. Exemption from Civil Service.·The district and its

732 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

exempt from the provisions of the Civil Service Law. Collective

„Sec. 25. Authorization.·The district may exercise all the powers

It is obvious that the public respondent erred when he said:

2. The agencies of the Ministry of Labor and

In NLRC Case No. RAB-I-0053-82, Beneco Employees

„Upon absorption of herein complainant by BWD by virtue of the

VOL. 127, FEBRUARY 20, 1984 733

ÂART. 277. Government employees.·The terms and conditions of

„As one of the issues raised before Us in this appeal is one of

The Union appealed to this Court but in G.R. No. 63184 a

3. The BWD is a corporation created pursuant to a

WHEREFORE, the petition is granted and the questioned

Aquino, Concepcion, Jr., Guerrero, De Castro and

Petition granted and decision set aside.

Notes.·The fact that petitioner holds a civil service

application for appointment constitute sufficient grounds

© Copyright 2018 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like