1) This case involves a marriage between a Filipina woman, Imelda Pilapil, and a German man, Erich Geiling, that ended in divorce in Germany. 2) Erich Geiling filed for and was granted a divorce from Imelda Pilapil by a German court based on failure of their marriage and living apart. 3) After the divorce was granted, Erich Geiling filed criminal complaints for adultery against Imelda Pilapil, alleging she had affairs while still married. However, the court ruled the divorce decree dissolved the marriage, so the adultery complaints must be dismissed as Erich Geiling was no longer her spouse.
1) This case involves a marriage between a Filipina woman, Imelda Pilapil, and a German man, Erich Geiling, that ended in divorce in Germany. 2) Erich Geiling filed for and was granted a divorce from Imelda Pilapil by a German court based on failure of their marriage and living apart. 3) After the divorce was granted, Erich Geiling filed criminal complaints for adultery against Imelda Pilapil, alleging she had affairs while still married. However, the court ruled the divorce decree dissolved the marriage, so the adultery complaints must be dismissed as Erich Geiling was no longer her spouse.
1) This case involves a marriage between a Filipina woman, Imelda Pilapil, and a German man, Erich Geiling, that ended in divorce in Germany. 2) Erich Geiling filed for and was granted a divorce from Imelda Pilapil by a German court based on failure of their marriage and living apart. 3) After the divorce was granted, Erich Geiling filed criminal complaints for adultery against Imelda Pilapil, alleging she had affairs while still married. However, the court ruled the divorce decree dissolved the marriage, so the adultery complaints must be dismissed as Erich Geiling was no longer her spouse.
1) This case involves a marriage between a Filipina woman, Imelda Pilapil, and a German man, Erich Geiling, that ended in divorce in Germany. 2) Erich Geiling filed for and was granted a divorce from Imelda Pilapil by a German court based on failure of their marriage and living apart. 3) After the divorce was granted, Erich Geiling filed criminal complaints for adultery against Imelda Pilapil, alleging she had affairs while still married. However, the court ruled the divorce decree dissolved the marriage, so the adultery complaints must be dismissed as Erich Geiling was no longer her spouse.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Imelda Manalaysay Pilapil, petitioner,
Vs. Hon. Corona Ibay-Somera, Hon. Luis C. Victor,
And Erich Ekkehard Geiling, respondents G.R. No. 80116 June 30, 1989 Facts: The case pertains the marriage of a Filipina, Imelda Manalaysay and a German national, Erich Ekkehard Geiling which ended in a foreign absolute divorce. They were married before the Registrar of Births, Marriages and Deaths at Friedenweiler, Federal Republic of Germany. The marriage started auspiciously enough, the couple lived in Malate, Manila for some time, where their only child, Isabella Pilapil Geiling was born. Thereafter, marital discord set in. It was followed by a separation de facto. Private respondent initiated a divorce proceeding against petitioner in Germany before the Schoneberg Local Court. He claimed that there were was failure of their marriage and that they have been living apart. Schoneberg Local Court, Federal Republic of Germany, promulgated a decree of divorce on the ground of failure of marriage of the spouses. German law said court was locally and internationally competent for the divorce proceeding and that the dissolution of said marriage was legally founded on and authorized by the applicable law of that foreign jurisdiction. More than five months after the issuance of the divorce decree, private respondent filed two complaints for adultery alleging that, while still married to said respondent, petitioner had an affair with a certain William Chia and Jesus Chua. After corresponding investigation, it was recommended to be dismissed on the ground of insufficiency of evidence. However, the respondent city fiscal approved a resolution and directing the filing of the two complaints for adultery. Issue: Whether the resolution be set aside. Whether the petitioner be charged of adultery. Ruling: Yes, the resolution should be set aside, and No, the petitioner should be dismissed of adultery. It is because of Nationality Theory wherein the final divorce decree under the private respondent’s national law have already been obtained and was no longer the offended spouse prior to his filing the criminal complaint.