MOWD2012 Audit Report
MOWD2012 Audit Report
MOWD2012 Audit Report
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
Regional Office No. 10
Cagayan de Oro City
The report consists of four (4) parts, namely: Part I – Audited Financial
Statements, Part II – Findings and Recommendations, Part III – Status of Implementation
of Prior Year’s Audit Recommendations, which were discussed with concerned
management officials and staff and Part IV – the Annexes.
We acknowledge the support and cooperation extended to our Audit Group by the
officials and employees of the Misamis Occidental Water District.
LYNN S. F. SICANGCO
Director IV
Regional Director
Republic of the Philippines
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
Regional Office No. 10
Cagayan de Oro City
Gentlemen:
The report consists of four (4) parts, namely: Part I – Audited Financial
Statements, Part II – Findings and Recommendations, Part III – Status of Implementation
of Prior Year’s Audit Recommendations, which were discussed with concerned
management officials and staff and Part IV – the Annexes.
We have requested the General Manager, Misamis Occidental Water District, for
the information on the actions taken on the recommendations, contained in the report,
within sixty (60) days from the date of receipt thereof.
We acknowledge the support and cooperation extended to our Audit Group by the
officials and employees of the Misamis Occidental Water District.
ON THE
August 2, 2013
Madam:
The audit was conducted to (a) verify the level of assurance that may be placed on
management’s assertions on the financial statements; (b) recommend agency
improvement opportunities; and (c) determine the extent of implementation of prior
year’s audit recommendations.
Our report consists of four parts, namely: Part I - Audited Financial Statements;
Part II – Findings and Recommendations; Part III - Status of Implementation of Prior
Year’s Audit Recommendations and Part IV – the Annexes. The observations and
recommendations were communicated to Management thru Audit Observation
Memorandum and discussed with management officials and staff. Their comments are
included in the appropriate portion of this report.
There is reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free of material
misstatements and are prepared in accordance with the Philippine Financial Reporting
Standards (PFRS)/accounting principles generally accepted in the Philippines.
Our audit was conducted in accordance with the Philippine Standards on Auditing
(PSA) and we believe that the audit evidence we have obtained provides reasonable basis
for our audit opinion/report.
Introduction
Initially, MOWD composes two cities and three municipalities namely: the Cities
of Ozamis and Oroquieta, and the Municipalities of Clarin, Tudela and Calamba,
Misamis Occidental. On May 7, 2003, the MOWD Board of Directors approved the
exclusion of the Calamba Waterworks System from the coverage of MOWD in its Board
Resolution No. 030 series 2003.
Presently MOWD provides water services to Ozamis City; and the municipalities
of Clarin and Tudela after the de-annexation of Oroquieta City effective 15 April 2010.
The Water District is getting financial and technical assistance from the Local
Water Utilities Administration (LWUA), a Government-Owned and/or Controlled
Corporation created by virtue of PD 198 which purpose is to provide financial and
technical assistance to Local Water Districts. In fact MOWD at present has an
outstanding various loan balances including its arrears with LWUA in the amount of
Php142,906,276.67 as of December 31, 2012.
Goal
Vision
Mission
Organizational Set up
Operational Highlights
Financial Highlights
Scope of Audit
The audit foci for the financial and compliance audit are accounts receivables,
loans payables and the property, plant and equipment.
Value for money audit was also conducted on the utilization of water supply by
the District.
The following audit observations and recommendations were discussed with the
concerned agency officials in an exit conference conducted on July 17, 2013.
2. Accounts receivable earned covering computation for fines and penalties and
water meter fees amounting to P 1,569,730.38 were not booked up in violation
of Section 18, Volume I of the Manual on National Government Accounting
System, thus understating the receivables account of the District by the same
amount.
We have recommended to require all the drivers to fill up the driver’s trip
ticket completely and accurately relative to fuel consumption as well as
require passengers to sign every time they use the vehicle for audit purposes.
8. The District’s Purchase Orders are signed by the Bids and Awards
Committee (BAC) Chairman instead of the Head of the Procuring Entity in
violation Section 12 of Republic Act No. 9184 dated July 22, 2002.
13. The District could have earned more had they intensified information,
education campaign as well as determined the unaccounted water utilization
since water utilization of rated production capacity is only 58% resulting to
underutilization of water production available to consumers. Moreover,
water accounted for is only 41% of the total available for distribution thus,
resulting to 59% unaccounted water or losses.
During the year, the Agency remitted to the Bureau of Internal Revenue the total
amount of taxes of P 3,418,400.52 broken down to P 1,403,651.98 for personal services,
franchise P 1,540,034.38 and P 474,714.16 for purchases and contracts.
Out of the twenty one (21) prior years’ audit recommendations, eighteen (18)
were fully implemented and three (3) were partially implemented.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
The Chairman
Board of Directors
Misamis Occidental Water District
Ozamis City
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial
statements in accordance with Philippine Financial Reporting Standards. This
responsibility includes: designing, implementing and maintaining internal control
relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements and are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud error, selecting and applying appropriate
accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the
circumstances.
Auditor’s Responsibility
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the
financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness on
the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
1
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide basis of our audit opinion.
As discussed in finding Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 13, Part II of the report, the accuracy and
reliability of the contested loans payables amounting to P85,677,581.09 transferred to
OCWD as a result of de-annexation together with the accompanying assets could not be
ascertained due to incomplete documentation; loan payables balance of MOWD at year
end amounting to P142,906,276.67 did not reconcile with the statement from Local Water
Utilities Administration of P182,752,127.46 or a difference of P39,845,850.79;
unrecorded loans amortizations in arrears amounting to P8,963,027.00; Account
receivable per general ledger amounted to P18,970,206.58 unreconciled with the
subsidiary ledger of P19,474,411.29 or a difference of P504,204.71; Water sales in the
Statement of Income and Expenses amounted P86,488,168.41 differs by P17,040,618.41
from the reports/records in Commercial Division amounting to P64,447,550.00; and the
unrecorded account receivables earned on fines and penalties of P1,569,730.38.
Audit Opinion
In our opinion, subject on the effects of the matters discussed in the Bases for Audit
Opinion paragraph, the financial statements present fairly, the financial position of
Misamis Occidental Water District, Ozamis City as of December 31, 2012 and of its
financial performance and its cash flows for the year ended in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the Philippines and International Financial
Reporting Standards.
Other Matters
The exit conference for the results of the financial and compliance audit of the CY 2012
operations was conducted on July 17, 2013.
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
By:
EDWIN G. CANIOS
State Auditor V
Supervising Auditor
July 31, 2013
2
Misamis Occidental Water District
Maningcol, Ozamiz City
Tel Nos. (088) 521-0339/Telefax (088) 521-1743
FERDINAND D. REVELO
General Manager
3
MISAMIS OCCIDENTAL WATER DISTRICT
Maningcol, Ozamiz City
Detailed Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2012
(With Comparative Figures for 2011)
Current Assets
Cash and Cash equivalents
Cash- Collecting Officers Note 2 P 227,931.23 P 138,364.47
Cash in Bank - Local Currency Note 2 3,897,081.06 419,581.03
Receivables
Accounts Receivable - Customers Note 3 18,970,206.58 17,427,003.87
Due from Officers & Employees Note 4 146,270.52 146,270.52
Advances to Officers & Employees Note 5 10,764.14 35,617.77
4
LIABILITIES & EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable Note 11 P 733,475.26 P 1,125,797.37
Due to BIR Note 13 173,312.34 179,619.60
Due to GSIS Note 12 1,069.57 481,841.32
Due to PAG-IBIG - 2,160.92
Due to PHILHEALTH - 28,325.00
Guaranty Deposits- customers Note 14 20,840.00 576,081.12
Guaranty deposits-meter - 8,939.37
Non-Current Liabilities
Loans Payable- Domestic Note 15 142,906,276.67 153,617,307.67
TOTAL LIABILITIES P 143,834,973.84 P 156,020,072.37
5
MISAMIS OCCIDENTAL WATER DISTRICT
Maningcol, Ozamiz City
Detailed Statement of Income and Expenses
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
(With Comparative Figures for 2011)
Other Income
Interest Note 21 28,225.04 26,050.58
Miscellaneous Note 22 74,521.78 129,940.39
Gain on sale of disposed assets Note 23 - 425,603.40
GROSS INCOME 86,750,806.18 76,297,970.11
EXPENSES
Personal Services
Salaries and wages Note 24 16,870,856.19 15,168,147.78
Other compensation Note 25 2,940,577.78 2,816,055.09
Personnel benefits and contributions Note 26 2,361,663.16 2,168,516.66
Other personnel benefits Note 27 4,361,537.86 4,146,133.69
Maintenance and other operating expenses Note 28
Traveling 848,553.36 774,931.64
Training and scholarship 288,900.00 213,711.00
Supplies and materials-fittings 388,723.38 820,890.78
Utility - electricity 11,061,860.43 9,698,715.27
Communication 298,095.51 223,930.12
Membership dues and contribution to
organizations 35,358.52 27,404.52
Advertising 109,329.23 92,702.72
Printing and binding 38,509.00 73,455.40
Rent 15,000.00 15,000.00
Representation 6,491.00 12,219.25
Transportation and delivery 8,940.00 7,387.00
Rewards and other claims/donations&wreath 8,089.90 9,793.95
Professional services 1,449,485.74 1,651,993.79
6
Repairs and maintenance 376,477.71 385,949.99
Confidential, intelligence,extraordinary 78,693.84 79,121.35
Taxes, insurance premiums and other
fees 1,949,450.16 125,008.99
Bad debts 455,494.80 332,973.96
Depreciation 9,760,806.08 9,604,044.18
Others operation & maintenance
expenses 499,218.01 365,053.58
Note
Financial expenses 29
Bank charges 109,603.88 100,247.07
Interest - loans 21,355,213.00 22,755,566.00
Other - Misc. Income deduction 49,808.22 38,928.02
TOTAL EXPENSES P 75,726,736.76 P 71,707,881.80
Net Income ( loss) before tax 4,590,088.31
Less: Provision for (benefit from)income tax (1,724,106.70)
NET INCOME AFTER TAX P 11,024,069.42 P 2,865,981.61
7
MISAMIS OCCIDENTAL WATER DISTRICT
Maningcol, Ozamiz City
Detailed Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
(With Comparative Figures for 2011)
2012 2011
Cash flow from operating activities
Note
Cash inflows: 30
Service income P 1,760,289.15 P 1,977,147.12
Business income 79,249,981.69 69,224,508.73
Other income 3,474,123.58 3,246,501.30
Other receipts 734,316.90 1,179,339.53
Total Cash inflows P 85,218,711.32 P 75,627,496.68
Note
Cash outflows: 31
Personal services-Salaries & wages 16,870,856.19 15,168,147.78
Maintenance and other operating expenses 24,848,826.98 23,871,881.05
Payables 7,045,598.07 6,164,653.91
Total Cash outflows P 48,765,281.24 P 45,204,682.74
Total Cash provided from operating activities P 36,453,430.08 P 30,422,813.94
8
MISAMIS OCCIDENTAL WATER DISTRICT
Maningcol, Ozamiz City
Detailed Statement of Changes in Equity
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
(With Comparative Figures for 2011)
2012 2011
Government Equity
Balance, beginning P 5,135,677.35 P 2,433,517.35
Doanted Capital
Balance, beginning 42,091.41 2,702,160.00
Additions/(deductions) 42,091.41
Balance, end P 42,091.41 P 2,744,251.41
Restricted Capital
Balance, beginning 10,664,595.49 8,469,884.87
Prior period adjustments 14,612,837.45 (559,588.67)
Changes during the period (111,682.32)
Net income/(loss) for the period 11,024,069.42 2,865,981.61
Balance, end P 36,301,502.36 P 10,664,595.49
9
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AGENCY PROFILE
The Misamis Occidental Water District (MOWD) is an independent entity, a non- profit Government Owned
and Controlled Corporation (GOCC) which provides and caters public service. It was creadted by the Provincial
Board of Misamis Occidental by virtue of the Board Resolution No. 105-1 issued on July 13, 1973. It comprises
of one (1) city and two (2) municipalities, the city of Ozamiz and the municipalites of Clarin and Tudela.
The accounting procedures adhered by the water district is in conformance with the Commerical Practices
Manual of LWUA, the sole authority governing the use and disposal of water resources pursuant to Presidential
Decree 198.
However, part of the accounting system implemented by the water district is in accordance with the New
Government Accounting System (NGAS). Recording of transactions specifically on Revenue/Income were based
on accrual method of accounting.
Note 1 - CASH COLLECTING OFFICER - includes cash collectons still in the possession of the cashier
awaiting deposit to the depository banks. The balance comprise the following
Note 2 - CASH IN BANK - LOCAL CURRENCY - represents deposits and savings in the bank readily
available for general expenditures in the operation and maintenance of the Water District.
10
Note 3 - ACCOUNT RECEIVABLE - CUSTOMERS refers to all unsettled water bill accounts of the
concessioner (active and in-active) connections. As of December, 2012, accounts receivable-customer totalled
Note 4 - DUE FROM OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES this were the receivable from MOWD employees, to
wit:
Note 5 - ADVANCES TO OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES - Cash advances were the amount granted to
officers and employees of the water district intended for a specific purpose essentially on defraying expenses like
pier diems on travels on seminars and trainings and the like. Total unliquidated amount as of December 31, 2012
amounted to P10,764.14 which composed of the following officers and employees;
Note 6 - MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES INVENTORIES - This account pertains to unused and unissue
materials and fittings which are kept in the stock-room for future use of the water district in its operation.
Composition as follows:
Note 7 - Prepayments - The amount of P5,000.00 prepayments pertaines to the unexpired portion of the
payments of the television broadcast which contract ends on April, 2013.
11
Note 8 - Sinking Fund - Sinking Fund pertains to cash set aside to reserve to secure outstanding obligations of
the water district to Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA). Total funds reserved for the year 2012
amounted to P3,280,076.22.
Note 9 - OTHER INVESTMENTS - The amount of P7,000.00 investment pertains to the deposit of 7 cylinders
of liquid chlorine.
Note 10 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - The acquisition costs and accumulated depreciation as
of December 31, 2012 were as follows:
12
Acquisition Cost Accum. Dep'n Net Book Value
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Obligations of the water district that can be settled with in one year.
Accounts Payable 733,475.26
Due to GSIS 1,069.57
Due to National Gov't Agencies-BIR 173,312.34
TOTAL 907,857.17
Note 11 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLES - These were obligations of the water district to supplier and other
that were not settled at the end of the year, to wit:
13
Lim, Marina Carmen T. Honorarium of security guard,per diem, 74,479.87
13th mo payof casual for 2012
LRCA Trading sublersible pump 244,998.00
Ozamiz Allied Conts.supply 30 bags cement 7,050.00
PLDT telephone bill12/2012 4,342.24
Quinones,Allien travel expenses 11,095.88
Rockstar Aggregates 20cu.m. crushed stone 15,800.00
Shell Sto.Nino & Gen. Mdse. diesel fuel & lubricants for Innova 19,961.17
Suan, Genesis V. overtime,12/2012 593.94
TOTAL 733,475.26
Note 12 - DUE TO GSIS - The amount of P1,069.57 is the net amount of the remittance and premiums
deducted from employees and employer's share to be remitted on the following month of January, 2013.
Particulars Amount
Tax withheld on wages,December 2012 111,258.28
Tax withheld on suppliers, December 2012 62,054.06
TOTAL 173,312.34
Note 14 - GUARANTY DEPOSIT CUSTOMER - The outstanding balance of P20,840.00 pertains to the
deposits received from consumers who availed water services from the water district (TWS).
Note 15 - LONG TERM LOANS PAYABLE - DOMESTIC - The amount of the P142,906,276.67 were
the outstanding liabilities of the water district to the LWUA. As of December 2012 loan account balances
followed:
Loan # Amount
3412-R 9,159,837.22
3412-S 9,427,158.52
3281-R 1,236,254.24
3281-S 399,266.35
4-1820 R 5,955,109.09
4-1820 S 7,004,964.31
2124 RL-A 55,109,562.41
2124 RL-B 34,092,665.29
2468-RL 20,521,459.24
TOTAL 142,906,276.67
14
Note 16 - OTHER DEFERRED CREDITS - The amount of P1,981,596.17 pertaines to the collection of
water maintenance fee (WMF) from the registered concessionaires.
Note 17 - EQUITY
Government Equity 5,135,677.35
Donated Capital 42,091.41
Retained Earnings 36,301,502.36
TOTAL EQUITY 41,479,271.12
Note 18 - WATER SALES - pertains to the total billings of the water district in the amount of
P81,488,168.41, breakdown as follows:
Note 19 - OTHER BUSINESS & SERVICE - pertains to the amount collected on installation fees for
new service connections, reconnection fees, inspection fees and other water revenues totaled
P1,760,289.15 in 2012.
Note 20 - FINES AND PENALTIES - were the amount collected on the overdue water bills of the
concessionaires and penalties on illegal tapping of service connections totaled P3,399,601.80.
Note 21 - INTEREST - This pertains to the income from bank interest on all depository banks for the year
2012 in the amount of P28,225.04.
Note 22 - MISCELLANEOUS - pertains to miscellaneous non operating income of the district amounted
to P74,521.78. This includes income/excess of cost from sales of fittings to outsiders, other damage
fittings and others.
Note 23 - GAIN ON SALE OF ASSETS - It is derived from the sale of unserviceable and fully
depreciated assets. For the year 2012, the district did not sell any assets.
15
Note 24 - SALARIES AND WAGES - It includes salaries of regular, casual and job order employees of
the district. The total amount as follows:
Regulars 14,734,402.94
Casual & job orders 2,136,453.25
Total 16,870,856.19
Note 27 - OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFIT -consists of other benefits received by the employees for
the year 2012 as follows:
Advertising 109,329.23
Printing 38,509.00
Rental 15,000.00
Representation 6,491.00
Transportation & delivery 8,940.00
Rewards & other claims,donation & wreath 8,089.90
Professional Fees;
Legal services 84,000.00
Directors fees &
remuneration 842,765.74
Security services 342,720.00
General & Janitorial
services 180,000.00 1,449,485.74
NOTE 30 - CASH INFLOWS from operating activities - These are cash receipts from the ff:
Service Income;
Misc. Service Revenues 1,717,241.31
Other Water Revenues 43,047.84 1,760,289.15
Other Income;
Penalty Charges 3,399,601.80
Misc. Non-Operating
Revenues 74,521.78 3,474,123.58
Other Receipts;
Refund from Cash Advance 49,071.42
Other Receipts 685,245.48 734,316.90
Total 85,218,711.32
NOTE 31 - CASH OUTFLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES - These are cash disbursements
from the following:
Reliable financial statements are always the results of accurate data and
reconciled amounts between the controlling and subsidiary accounts.
In the District, the preparation of the general ledger is lodge with the
administrative and finance division while the maintenance of the subsidiary ledgers is
lodge with the commercial division since the names of all the consumers/concessionaires
are maintained by them as an aid in the preparation of targeting the revenue for the
district. .
Our audit showed that accounts receivable per general ledger amounted to
P18,970,206.58 while in the subsidiary ledger it is P19,474,411.29 or a difference of
P504,204.71 (Annex A). The bases of recording the amount in the general ledger are the
billings statements, collections reports, as well as adjustments coming from the
commercial division. On the other hand, the amounts recorded in the subsidiary are also
taken from these reports on a cumulative basis thus, resulting to a difference in amounts.
Also, part of the receivables are generated from the report of the Billing and Collection
Clerk of Tudela Water System whose software for billing and collection program is not
compatible with the MOWD Office adding to the difference in the balances recorded in
the books.
Management replied that “ The balance after its adjustment made by the finance
section as of this writing is reduced from P504,204.71 to P207,456.81. Supporting
documents to this effect is at the Finance Office should there be need for examination.
Recommendation noted and acted upon.”
“Please be informed that, the Senior Corporate Account Analyst has drawn a JEV
No. 13-05-0330 dated May 31, 2013, making an adjustment of P 296,747.90 which
covers for double entries in taking up water sales leaving an unadjusted balance of
P207,456.81.”
20
maintenance of subsidiary ledgers for accounts receivable from the Commercial
Division to the Accounting Section, Finance Division after both records have been
reconciled so that the Commercial Division can concentrate on the marketing aspect
of the District
The accounts receivable of the agency comprises the water sales, other
business/services coming from water installations, and fines and penalties. The accrual
method of accounting is used in recognizing water sales while the cash method is used
for other income-water meter installations, and fines and penalties which are inconsistent
in application.
During the year, examination of amounts from the subsidiary ledger in the
commercial division showed that total accounts receivables amounted to P21,052,605.56
where P 19,474,411.29 is for water sales, P 1,517,352.82 for fines and penalties, and
P52,377.56 for water meter fees. However, the accounting section has no subsidiary
ledger of their own and the amount recorded in the general ledger of P 18,970,206.58 was
taken from billings statements, collection reports, and adjustmentsand disregarding the
amount of P1,569,730.38 (Annex B) computed for fines and penalties and water meter
fees as earned for the period. Management alleged that not all fines and penalties are
collected because there were times when these are foregone just to collect the arrears in
water sales. But there was also no policy as to when to forego collections of fines and
penalties and who is authorized to approve these. Thus, total recorded receivable in the
books is understated by P1,569,730.38.
Management commented that “ The non-recording of the fines and penalties at the
finance section was stopped sometime in 2005. It is booked as revenue/other income
upon its collection while the water maintenance fee is booked up as other deferred credits
per COA AOM No. 2.2-2005.”
21
“Considering this year’s Auditor’s recommendation, the Management is cognizant
and will adhere to it effective August 2013.”
During the year, total water sales of the District amounted to P81,488,168.41 with
an account receivables of P18,970,206.58 or 23% recognized in the books. But the actual
total receivables amounted to P21,052,605.56 including fines and penalties and water
meter sales. Out of the total receivables of P21,052,605.56, P15,181,243.40 or 72%
(Annex C) covers receivables in arrears. During the year, the total provision for
allowance for bad debts amounted to P1,609,697.98 which is only 11% of the total
amount in arrears.
We made a query on the basis on the provisionof allowance for bad debts but the
District has none.
Also, in the general ledger, only one controlling account is maintained for the
receivables since the active accounts and the inactive accounts were not separated.
Moreover, management alleged that there are various parts of the city dominated by
lawless elements where collections are low and cutting of meters is hard to implement.
Though, the move is very necessary but also at the risk or expense of the employees
involved.
22
Thus, the condition showed that the District is deprived of the much needed
resources as well as the possible benefits they will have, had they collected their
receivables promptly.
The OCWD was de-annexed last April 2010 per Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) dated April 15, 2010 (Annex D) and duly approved by LWUA on May 7, 2010.
In that MOA, loans payable amounting to P 269,769,314.87 of MOWD was shared to
OCWD per agreed sharing of 70:30 based on the number of connections for outstanding
loans and per approved program of work per water systems for the new loans. The result
was that MOWD will shoulder P 184,091,733.79 while OCWD will shoulder
P85,677,581.08. However, that sharing was not accepted by OCWD. So, on September
28, 2012, after careful evaluation and review, the Board of Directors of MOWD issued
Resolution No. 30 (Annex E) revising the sharing such that MOWD will shoulder
P190,989,489.00 and OCWD will shoulder P57,509,071.46.
23
Sometime in March 2010, the Board of Directors of MOWD was taken over by
LWUA due to non-payment of loan arrearages which amounted at that time to over six
million pesos already. From that time up to the present, three (3) of the Board of
Directors comes from LWUA and two (2) from the locality.
Our audit showed that, at year end, the OCWD still has not accepted the amount
of loans payable shared to them, thus, at the LWUA level, the total loans payable is still
in the name of MOWD. Moreover, the amount of loans payable is inaccurate at
P142,906,276.67 which is only based on original MOA while after reconciliation with
LWUA statement, it is more or less P 182,752,127.46. We have prepared the
reconciliation/presentation on the final sharing of loans payable account for OCWD and
MOWD taking into account the final report from the loans department of the LWUA
(Annex F).
Management replied that they took note of the finding and to be deliberated yet by the
MOWD Board of Directors. They further stated that “Please be informed that the OCWD,
on May 14, 2013 issued Resolution No. 38, accepting the fifty seven million (57M)
revised loan sharing between MOWD and OCWD” (Annex G).
Section 111 of Presidential Decree 1445 provides that the highest standards of
honesty, objectivity and consistency shall be observed in the keepings of accounts to
safeguards against inaccurate or misleading information.
24
Less: Amortization computed by LWUA@
P 3,003,079 Apr. 2010 to Dec. 2012 - 99,101,607
Amount of loan arrearages due Dec. 2012 P8,963,027
=========
This computed accrued loans payable in arrearages is not booked up in the loans
payable general ledger account nor in the accrued accounts payable at year end thus,
understating the total payables by the same amount and giving misleading information
about the financial condition of the District and affects the decision making of the users
thereof.
Also, our review on the financial statements showed that the District has a sinking
fund of over three million pesos which is not being used.
Management commented that “After BOD Resolution No. 41-2013, the Finance
had booked already the said arrears. As far as the use of the sinking fund is concerned,
this will be presented by the Management to the Board for action/approval.”
Number 2 of the specific rules and regulations of COA Circular No. 77-61 of the
Manual on Gasoline Consumption provides that the use of government vehicles shall be
properly controlled and regulated through properly accomplished and duly approved
Driver’s Trip Tickets which should be serially numbered, a summary of which shall be
made at the end of the month in a Monthly Report of Official Travels for audit purposes.
The Monthly Report of Fuel Consumption of Motor Transportation shall also be
submitted to the Auditor for verification, to determine the reasonableness of fuel
consumed during the period. The report shall show among others, the different types of
motor vehicles utilized by the agency during the month, total distance travelled, total fuel
used and the normal fuel consumption for each vehicle.
25
Our examination of the disbursement vouchers for gasoline purchases showed that
driver’s trip tickets were not filled up completely and accurately.
The District is purchasing gasoline from Lim Ho Chuan Seng Enterprises and
Shell Sto. Nino and General Merchandise. Every time an official travel is approved, the
concerned driver is given a duly approved POL withdrawal slip for the manager of the
gasoline station which shows the authorized quantity of gasoline needed. Based on this,
the gasoline station issues a charge slip which will be collated as one of the supporting
documents for the statement of account prepared at the end of the month. The
withdrawal of gasoline is properly documented.
However, in the driver’s trip tickets, the data on fuel consumption is not filled-up
as to beginning balance, issued/received and used, as well as the balance at the end of the
trip, even the data on the used mileage. Moreover, in some vouchers, data on the
authorized passengers were not filled up too. Thus, verification as to consumption of
gasoline as well as who used the vehicle cannot be made.
Management commented that “As far as the speedometers of the MOWD vehicles
are concerned, out of none (9) vehicles only two (2) are functional. The seven (7) are
second hand vehicles which were purchased way back in 1975.”
“The trip tickets were properly filled up except the portion of the gasoline
consumption due to defective/non-functional speedometers of the seven (7) vehicles. The
Management will try its best to have all the defective speedometers repair or install. The
passengers affixed their signatures in a separate sheet of paper attached to their trip ticket
per Audit advised sometime in July 2011. The new Audit recommendation is noted.”
Section 3.1.1 of COA Circular No. 2009-001 provides that within five (5)
working days from the execution of a contract by the government or any of its
subdivision, agencies or instrumentalities, including government-owned or controlled
corporations and their subsidiaries, a copy of said contract and each of all the documents
forming part thereof by reference or incorporation shall be furnished to the Auditor of the
26
agency concerned. The reason for this is to make an initial review of the said contracts so
that defects or deficiencies can be easily communicated to the Agency for correction.
Our review of the purchase orders and other government contracts of the Agency
showed that copy of these were not submitted to the Auditor within the reglementary
period. Although we do not hold office in the vicinity of the Agency but our Office is
still very accessible to the agency.
In addition, it is also the duty and responsibility of the agency officials to furnish
copies of delivery documents within twenty four (24) hours after acceptance of deliveries
of goods and services to enable the Auditor to conduct inspection of said deliveries.
Thus, initial review could not be made because management have not passed the
required contracts and supporting documents as well as inspection of deliveries since the
delivery documents were not also furnished to the Auditor. Management apologized for
their inadvertent lapse and promised to submit these contracts to follow COA rules and
regulations upon receipt of the observation.
8. The District’s Purchase Orders are signed by the Bids and Awards
Committee (BAC) Chairman instead of the Head of the Procuring Entity in
violation Section 12 of Republic Act No. 9184 dated July 22, 2002.
Section 12 of RA No. 9184 provides that the BAC shall have the following
functions: advertise and/or post the invitation to bid, conduct pre-procurement and pre-
bid conferences, determine the eligibility of prospective bidders, receive bids, conduct the
evaluation of bids, undertake post-qualifications procedures, recommend award of
contracts to the Head of the Procuring Entity (HOPE) or his duly Authorized
representative. Letter (j) of Section 5 of the same Act provides that the Head of Procuring
Entity is the governing board or its duly authorized official for government-owned and/or
controlled corporation.
The BAC shall sign the canvass papers or may delegate the same to the General
Services Officer and the signing of the contract shall be done by the Board or may
authorize the same to the General Manager. The canvass papers may be served by the
canvasser or purchaser who is administratively under the General Services.
27
Our review of the disbursement vouchers showed that the purchase orders of the
District are signed by the Chairman of the BAC which is a weakness in the internal
control procedures of any agency. The BAC prepares the recommendation of the winning
bidder or supplier but in no case signs for the contract since fiscal responsibility rests
with the HOPE.
Section 4 (p), Chapter 2 of the NGAs Manual, Volume I provides that assets
declared by proper authorities as obsolete and unserviceable, including assets of the
agency no longer used, shall be classified to “Other Assets” account from the
corresponding inventory and property, plant and equipment accounts.
Base on the financial statements as of December 31, 2012, the total reported
property, plant and equipment account amounted to P153,545,708.59. Out of this
28
amount, the said Other Assets held for sale account amounted to P7,739,143.53 which
represents the unserviceable properties of the agency.
Ocular inspection conducted by the auditor revealed that there are some
unserviceable properties of the District and no application was made for its disposal and
eventual dropping from the books of accounts. On the other hand, the inspection
disclosed the following information, (Annex H):
Thus, the total reported unserviceable assets listed under “Other Assets
held for Sale is overstated by P1,677,044.52 representing serviceable and/or other reasons
listed above to fully account for the properties of the District.
29
COA Circular 85-55A provides the standards on excessive, unnecessary,
extravagant and unconscionable ways and methods of transactions. Unnecessary is
procuring goods and materials which not needed by the Agency.
The LWUA technical engineers came to Ozamis to inspect the program of works
which was to construct the water system using gravity from the Dalingap Spring.
However, after inspection, the LWUA engineers recommended instead to source water by
drilling deep wells for the pumping stations instead of using the gravity for fear of
insufficient water supply. Thus, the LWUA, as the lending institution, knew that there
was diversion of plans because the technical engineers came from their Office. The BOD
of MOWD issued Resolution No. 081-2003 (Annex I) requesting the LWUA for the
revision of the approved P161,079,000 million program of work to include water districts
request for change of water source of the Ozamis-Clarin sub-system project from the
development of Dalingap Spring to construction of deep well source/s and to update the
costing of work items under the program of work without exceeding the total project cost.
It is worthwhile to mention that, before the signing of contract per Resolution No. 065-
2003 (Annex J) on August 11-12, 2003, the bidding of the supply and delivery of pipes
was made on July 28, 2003. In spite of this, the LWUA still made the delivery of
construction materials for the program of work for Dalingap Spring amounting to
P8,041,319.35 which were no longer needed resulting to storage of these construction
materials in the bodega without the hope of using them. Also, the local technical engineer
in charge of the project was negligent for not informing the Manager that the delivered
materials were no longer needed. Nine years has passed and these construction materials
are still in the bodega and have consumed and continue consuming interest expense and
principal without return of investment but losses and more losses if not corrected.
30
Lack of Phil-GEPS Publication
Management noted our audit recommendation and will work on the installation of
the MOWD website.
31
12. Retained Earnings balance soared up to P36,301,502.36 from P10,664,595.49
as reflected at the year-end financial statements, due to an adjustment
erroneously credited to Prior Years Adjustment account resulting from
Oroquieta City de-annexation, and inadequate provision for Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts thus giving misleading information and henceforth
affecting the decision making of the users of the financial statements.
Section 111 of Presidential Decree (PD) 1445 provides that: “The highest
standards of honesty, objectivity and consistency shall be observed in the keepings of
accounts to safeguards against inaccurate or misleading information”.
The December 31, 2012 year-end financial statements showed retained earnings
balance amounting to P36,301,502.36. At a glance, the firm appeared so profitable.
However, verification revealed that the significant soaring up of the Retained Earnings
account was brought about by an adjustment amounting to P14,483,161.55 which was
erroneously credited to Prior Year’s Adjustment account instead of crediting the same to
Utility Plant in Service (UPS) on actual assets transferred to the newly created Oroquieta
City Water District due to de-annexation, thus blowing up the Retained Earnings.
Records also showed that the net income in 2011 amounting to P2,865,981.61
went up to P11,024,069.42 in 2012 with an extraordinary increase of P8,158,087.81 or
285%. Water Sales increased by P10,765,408.52 or 15.22% from P70,722,759.89 to
P81,488,168.41 despite the reduction of area of operations due to de-annexation and
creation of Oroquieta City Water District. However, the water sales in the Statement of
Income and Expenses amounting P86,488,168.41 differs by P17,040,618.41 from the
reports/records in Commercial Division C amounting to P64,447,550.00. Further
verification disclosed that an Allowance for Doubtful Accounts amounting to
P1,609,697.98 was only 8% of the Accounts Receivables of P18,970,206.58 which was
so inadequate. Considering that 65% of this receivables or P12,907,912.26 were aging 6
months or more and 50% of which or P 6,453.956.13 ran for more than more than 5
years, collectivity of which was dim. These would most likely fall into bad debts or
doubtful accounts. Failure to set up the provisions for the estimated doubtful accounts to
a more or less adequate level had understated the expenses and overstated the net income.
This condition was cited under our observation no. 3.
32
Accounts in the financial statement not fairly presented would give misleading
information and henceforth affecting decision-making of the users of the financial
statements.
13. The District could have earned more had they intensified information,
education campaign as well as determined the unaccounted water utilization
since water utilization of rated production capacity is only 58% resulting to
underutilization of water production available to consumers. Moreover,
water accounted for is only 41% of the total available for distribution thus,
resulting to 59% unaccounted water or losses.
The Misamis Occidental Water District is presently serving Ozamis City and the
municipalities of Tudela and Clarin. It has four (4) existing water pumping stations
namely, the Nailon in Tudela, Cocok, Bacolod, Carangan stations in Ozamis City. It has
also one (1) spring at Segatic, Clarin being run by gravity. These pumping stations and
the spring have water rated production capacity of 9,983,148 cubic meters during the year
which is equivalent to P579,016,784.00 in monetary value.
Our review of the water utilization during the year, showed that the District has
pumped 5,666,219 cubic meters available for distribution which is equivalent to
P328,639,592.00. However, out of this available for distribution, only 2,577,902 cubic
meters which is equivalent to P149,517,206 were covered with water meters resulting to
unaccounted water of 3,088,317 cubic meters which is 59% and is equivalent to
33
P179,116.586. The unaccounted water covers unmetered utilization, allowable losses and
non-revenue consumption, losses due to illegal connections, and defective meters among
others. The unaccounted water utilization is higher than the accounted water sales,
resulting to lesser income but the same water maintenance cost for the District (Annex
K).
34
Part III - Status of Implementation of Prior Year’s Audit
Recommendations
35
Part III - Status of Implementation of Prior Year’s Audit
Recommendations
AAR CY 2010
36
Audit Observation Recommendation Status of
Implementation
AAR CY 2011
4. The district paid its Interim We recommended that Management Partially Implemented
Board of Directors their submit its legal basis for the
financial assistance and cash payment of financial assistance and
gift totaling P141,000.00 cash gift to the Interim Board of
without legal basis. Directors’ or the same shall be
considered as unauthorized and
therefore it should be refunded in
full.
37
Audit Observation Recommendation Status of
Implementation
10. The Cash in Bank current We recommend that the Fully Implemented
account balance of P224,196.83 Management require the Finance
was in accurate by least Officer and Cashier to coordinate
P5,645.09 due to stale check closely so the stale check will be
which remained unadjusted in cancelled and properly adjusted to
the books as of December 31, present an accurate cash account
2011. balance.
11. The hiring of a contractor Submit justifications why payment Fully Implemented
purposely for the shall be allowed in audit when it
upgrading/enhancement of failed to comply with the necessary
38
Audit Observation Recommendation Status of
Implementation
39
Audit Observation Recommendation Status of
Implementation
40
Audit Observation Recommendation Status of
Implementation
41
Audit Observation Recommendation Status of
Implementation
42
Audit Observation Recommendation Status of
Implementation
43
PART IV - ANNEXES
44
PART IV - ANNEXES
Annex H - List of Other Assets Held for Sale with Auditor’s List of Other
Assets Held for Sale with Auditor’s Remarks
Commercial Division
Per Susidiary Ledger
Types of Source Total Water Sales Penalty Water Meter Advances No. of
Submitted by:
Commercial Division
Per Susidiary Ledger
Types of Source Total Water Sales Penalty Water Meter Advances No. of
Receivables Receivable Fees (Not included as Receivables) Concessioners
Active Finance 6,420,408.50 6,029,846.09 374,254.85 16,307.56 57,767.50 12140
TWS 836,566.90 780,350.40 51,986.50 4,230.00 - 5357
Inactive Finance 12,163,013.08 11,194,161.97 943,751.11 25,100.00 32,595.34 5357
TWS 1,632,617.08 1,470,052.83 147,360.36 6,740.00 -
TOTAL 21,052,605.56 19,474,411.29 1,517,352.82 52,377.56 90,362.84 22854
↓
P 1,569,730.38 To Finding No. 1
Recognizing Water sales only:
Per SL 19,474,411.29
Per GL 18,970,206.58 To finding No.1
504,204.71
Submitted by:
Receivable
Submitted
by:
9.28.10 Resolution No. 30 Outstanding 166,734,411.01 53,087,590.12 Revised based on reconciled record of LWUA on the various
MOWD Arrears 14,253,379.73 4,121,481.34 loan balance as of April 30, 2010
CWS Share 10,001,699.00 -
Cash left for DMB - 300,000.00
TOTAL 190,989,489.74 57,509,071.46
OVERALL
TOTAL 195,868,867.51 61,512,056.53 *Amount to be accepted by OCWD
To Finding No. 4
Submitted by:
Submitted by: