Political Law Bar Exam 2017
Political Law Bar Exam 2017
Political Law Bar Exam 2017
I.
A priority thrust of the Administration is the change of the form of government from unitary
to federal. The change can be effected only through constitutional amendment or revision.
a. What are the methods of amending the Constitution. Explain briefly each method. (3%)
b. Cite at least three provisions of the Constitution that need to be amended or revised to
effect the change from unitary to federal, and explain briefly why. (3%)
II.
A.
Under the doctrine of immunity from suit, the State cannot be sued without its consent. How
may the consent be given by the State? Explain your answer. (3%)
B.
The doctrine of immunity from suit in favor of the State extends to public officials in the
performance of their official duties. May such officials be sued nonetheless to prevent or
undo their oppressive or illegal acts, or to compel them to act? Explain your answer. (3%)
C.
Do government-owned or -controlled corporations also enjoy the immunity of the State from
suit? Explain your answer. (3%)
III.
State A and State B, two sovereign states, enter into a 10-year mutual defense treaty. State A
finds that more progressive State B did not go to the aid of State A when it was threatened by
its strong neighbor State C. State B reasoned that it had to be prudent and deliberate in
reacting to State C because of their existing trade treaties.
a. May State A unilaterally withdraw from its mutual defense treaty with State B? Explain
your answer. (2.5%)
b. What is the difference between the principles of pacta sunt servanda and rebus sic
stantibus in international law? (2.5%)
c. Are the principles of pacta sunt servanda and rebus sic stantibus relevant in the treaty
relations between State A and State B? What about in the treaty relations between State B
and State C? Explain your answer. (2.5%)
IV.
a. What is the pardoning power of the President under Art. VIII, Sec. 19 of the Constitution?
Is the exercise of the power absolute? (4%)
b. Distinguish pardon from amnesty. (4%)
V.
a. What is the right of legation, and how is it undertaken between states? Explain your
answer. (2%)
b. Under this right, may a country like Malaysia insist that the Philippines establishes a
consulate in Sabah to look after the welfare of the Filipino migrants in the area? Explain your
answer. (2%)
VI.
A.
The President appoints the Vice President as his Administration’s Housing Czar, a position
that requires the appointee to sit in the Cabinet. Although the appointment of the members of
the Cabinet requires confirmation by the Commission on Appointment (CA), the Office of
the President does not submit the appointment to the CA. May the Vice President validly sit
in the Cabinet? (2.5%)
B.
The Executive Department has accumulated substantial savings from its appropriations.
Needing P3,000,000 for the conduct of a plebiscite for the creation of a new city but has no
funds appropriated soon by the Congress for the purpose, the COMELEC requests the
President to transfer funds from the savings of the Executive Department in order to avoid a
delay in the holding of the plebiscite.
May the President validly exercise his power under the 1987 Constitution to transfer funds
from the savings of the Executive Department, and make a cross-border transfer of
P3,000,000 to the COMELEC by way of augmentation? Is your answer the same if the
transfer is treated as aid to the COMELEC? Explain your answer. (4%)
VII.
Give the limitations on the power of the Congress to enact the General Appropriations Act.
Explain your answer. (5%)
VIII.
A bank acquired a large tract of land as the highest bidder in the foreclosure sale of the
mortgaged assets of its borrower. It appears that the land has been originally registered under
the Torrens system in 1922 pursuant to the provisions of the Philippine Bill of 1902, the
organic act of the Philippine Islands as a colony of the USA. Sec. 21 of the Philippine Bill of
1902 provided that “all valuable mineral deposits in public lands in the Philippine Islands,
both surveyed and unsurveyed, are hereby declared to be free and open too exploration,
occupation, and purchase, and the land in which they are found to occupation and purchase,
by citizens of the United States, or of said Islands.” Sec. 27 of the law declared that a holder
of the mineral claim so located was entitled to all the minerals that lie within his claim but he
could not mine outside the boundary lines of his claim.
The 1935 Constitution expressly prohibited the alienation of natural resources except
agricultural lands. Sec. 2, Art. XII of the 1987 Constitution contains a similar prohibition,
and proclaims that all lands of public domain, waters, minerals, coal, petroleum, and other
mineral oils, all forces of potential energy, fisheries, forests, or timber, wildilfe, flora, and
fauna, and other natural resources are owned by the State. This provision enunciates the
Regalian Doctrine.
May the Government, on the basis of the Regalian Doctrine enunciated in the constitutional
provisions, deny the bank its right as the owner of the mineral resources underneath the
surface of its property as recognized under the Philippine Bill of 1902? Explain your answer.
(5%)
IX.
A. Ambassador Robert of State Alpha committed a very serious crime while he headed his
foreign mission in the Philippines. Is he subject to arrest by Philippine authorities? Explain
your answer. (3%)
B. Extradition is the process pursuant to a treaty between two State parties for the surrender
by the requested State to the custody of the requesting State of a fugitive criminal residing in
the former. However, extradition depends on the application of two principles – the principle
of specialty and the dual criminality principle. Explain these principles. (4%)
C.
The President signs an agreement with his counterpart in another country involving
reciprocity in the treatment of each other country’s nationals residing in the other’s territory.
However, he does not submit the agreement to the Senate for concurrence.
Sec. 21, Art. VII of the Constitution provides that no treaty or international agreement shall
be valid and effective without such concurrence.
Is the agreement signed by the President effective despite the lack of Senate concurrence?
Explain your answer. (4%)
X.
A.
Under the enrolled bill doctrine, the signing of a bill by both the Speaker of the House of
Representatives and the President of the Senate and the certification by the secretaries of both
Houses of Congress that the bill was passed on a certain date are conclusive on the bill’s due
enactment. Assuming there is a conflict between the enrolled bill and the legislative journal,
to the effect that the enrolled bill signed by the Senate President and eventually approved by
the President turned out to be different from what the Senate actually passed as reflected in
the legislative journal.
a. May the Senate President disregard the enrolled bill doctrine and consider his signature as
invalid and of no effect? (2.5%)
b. May the President thereafter withdraw his signature? Explain your answer. (2.5%)
B.
Sec. 26(2), Art. VI of the Constitution provide that no bill passed by either House of
Congress shall become a law unless it has passed three readings on separate days and printed
copies of it in its final form have been distributed to the Members of the House three days
before its passage.
XI.
Sec. 17, Art. VI of the Constitution establishes an Electoral Tribunal for each of the Houses
of Congress, and makes each Electoral Tribunal “the sole judge of all contests relating to the
election, returns, and qualifications of their respective Members.” On the other hand, Sec.
2(1).C Art. IX of the Constitution grants to the COMELEC the power to enforce and
administer all laws and regulations “relative to the conduct of an election, plebiscite,
initiative, referendum, and recall.”
Considering that there is no concurrence of jurisdiction between the Electoral Tribunals and
the COMELEC, state when the jurisdiction of the Electoral Tribunals begins, and the
COMELEC’s jurisdiction ends. Explain your answer. (4%)
XII.
The Congress establishes by law Philippine Funds, Inc., a private corporation, to receive
foreign donations coming from abroad during national and local calamities and disasters, and
to enable the unhampered and speedy disbursements of the donations through the mere action
of its Board of Directors. Thereby, delays in the release of the donated funds occasioned by
the stringent rules of procurement would be avoided. Also, the releases would not come
under the jurisdiction of the Commission on Audit (COA).
a. Is the law establishing Philippine Funds, Inc., constitutional? Explain your answer. (3%)
b. Can the Congress pass the law that would exempt foreign grants from the jurisdiction of
the COA. Explain your answer. (3%)
XIII.
a. What are the elements to be established in order to hold the superior or commander liable
under the doctrine of command responsibility? (4%)
b. May the doctrine of command responsibility apply to the President for the abuses of the
armed forces (AFP and PNP) given his unique role as the commander-in-chief of all the
armed forces? Explain your answer. (4%)
XIV.
To fulfill a campaign promise to the poor folk in a far-flung area in Mindanao, the President
requested his friend, Pastor Roy, to devote his ministry to them. The President would pay
Pastor Roy a monthly stipend of P50,000 from his discretionary fund, and would also erect a
modest house of worship in the locality in an area of the latter’s choice.
Does the President thereby violate any provisions of the Constitution? Explain your answer.
(3%)
XV.
a. According the Sec. 3, Art. VIII of the Constitution, the Judiciary shall enjoy fiscal
autonomy. What does the term “fiscal autonomy” signify? Explain your answer. (3%)
b. May a complaint for disbarment against the Ombudsman prosper during her incumbency?
Explain your answer. (3%)
c. Sec. 3, Art. XI of the Constitution states that “[n]o impeachment proceedings shall be
initiated against the same official more than once within a period of one year.” What
constitutes initiation of impeachment proceedings under the provision? (3%)