M.B Chapter 11-2
M.B Chapter 11-2
M.B Chapter 11-2
2
A, kg D, kg
Air = 0.995
Water, 100 % Condenser 3
Water = 0.005 Distillate
W, kg 1.0
Acetone = 0.99
Water = 0.01
1.0
Absorber Distillation B, kg
Column Column
Acetone = 0.04
Water = 0.96
1 2 1.0
4
System 2 Distillation Column (2) + Condenser (3)
For Steady State Conditions
Input = Output
F=D+B (4)
Acetone Balance
0.19 F = 0.99 D + 0.04 B (5)
D = 34.89 kg
F=D+B
B=F-D
B = 221.05 - 34.897 = 186.15 kg 5
Example 11.3: Multiple Units with Reactions
In the face of higher fuel costs and the uncertainty of the
supply of a particular fuel, many companies operate two
furnaces, one fired with natural gas and the other with fuel
oil. In the RAMAD Corp., each furnace has its own supply of
oxygen; the oil furnace uses as a source of oxygen a stream
that has the following composition: O2 20%, N2 76%, and
CO2 4%. The stack gases from both furnaces exit using a
common stack.
6
• During one blizzard, all transportation to the RAMAD Corp. was cut off, and
officials were worried about the dwindling reserves of fuel oil because the natural-
gas supply was being used at its maximum rate possible. The reserve of fuel oil
was only 560 bbl. How many hours could the company operate before shutting
down if no additional fuel oil was attainable? How many pound moles per hour of
natural gas were being consumed? The minimum heating load for the company
when translated into the stack gas output was 6205 lb mol/hr of dry stack gas.
Analysis of the fuels and stack gas at this time is shown in Table. Also, calculate the
percent increase in toxic emissions of aesenic and mercury per hour caused by the
combustion of fuel oil rather than natural gas. The molecular weight of the fuel oil
was 7.91 lb/lb mol, and its density was 7.578 lb/gal.
7
Natural Gas Fuel Oil ( API Gravity =24.0) Stack Gas
Mol % (Orsat Analysis)
CH4 96% C 50 N2 84.93%
C2H2 2% H2 47 O2 4.13%
CO2 2% S 3 CO2 10.84%
SO2 0.10%
Emission Factor
Arsenic Mercury
Natural gas 2.30 x 10-4 lb/106 ft3 1.34 x 10-4 lb/106 ft3
14
From Equation (4)
0.03 F = 6.21
F = 207 lb moles
Put in Eq (1)
3.88 G + 0.94 (207) = 2 W
W = 1.94 G + 97.29 (6)
From Eq (3)
1.58 A + 1.52 A* = 10540
10540 - 1.52 A*
A= 6670.8 0.96 A * (7)
1.58 15
Put W and A from Eq (6) and (7) in Eq (2)
0.42 (6670.8 - 0.96 A*) + 0.04 G + 0.48 A* = 1869.74 + (1.94 G + 97.29)
A* = 24.73 G - 10901.05
From Eq (5)
1.02 G + 0.50 (207) + 0.04 (24.73 G - 10901.5) = 672.40
G = 500 lb moles (Answer of Part b)
Part a
207 lb moles 7.91 lb gal 1 bbl
hr lb moles 7.578 lb 42 gal
= 5.14 bbl / hr
For 560 bbl
𝟓𝟔𝟎
𝒕= = 108.9 hrs
𝟓.𝟏𝟒
16
The arsenic and the mercury produced are: The increase in levels of
Oil arsenic and mercury are:
(5.14 bbl/hr)(42 gal/bbl) = 216 gal/hr
Arsenic
8.55 4.11 105
(100) 108%
5
216 gal 3.96 10 lb 4 4.11 10
5
Arsenic 3
8.55 10 lb 12.78 2.40 105
10 gal Mercury 5
(100) 433%
4
2.40 10
216 gal 5.92 10 lb 5
Murcury 3
12.78 10 lb
10 gal
Natural Gas
(488 lb mol/hr)(359 ft 3 /lb mol) = 1.79 x 105 ft 3 /hr
1.79 105 ft 3 2.30 104 lb 5
Arsenic 6 3
4.11 10 lb
10 ft
1.79 105 ft 3 1.34 104 lb 5
Mercury 6 3
2.40 10 lb
10 ft
EXAMPLE 11.4: Analysis of a Sugar Recovery
Process Involving Multiple Serial Units:
Figure E 11.4 shows the process and the known data.
You are asked to calculate the compositions of every
flowstream, and the fraction of the sugar in the cane
that is recovered.
18
19
Basis M, 1000 lb/hr of sugar Pulp Balance
Crystalizer as System E (0.14) = G (0.95) + H (0)
K=L+M (1) From Eq (3) G = E - H
Sugar Balance: (0.4) K = 0 + 1000 (1) E (0.14) = (0.95) E - (0.95) (6666.67)
K = 2500 lb/hr E = 7819 lb/hr
From Eq (1) Putting in Eq (3)
L = 1500 lb/hr G = 1152.3 lb/hr
(a) Evaporator as System Using Sugar Balance
H=J+K (2) (0.13)E = (0.15) H + G (x GS )
Sugar Balance: (0.15) H = 0 + 2500 (0.40) (0.13)7819 (0.15)6666.67 + (x GS )1152.3
H = 6666.67 lb/hr (x GS ) 0.0143
From Eq (2)
(xWG ) = 0.05 - 0.0143 = 0.0357
J = 4166.76 lb/hr
(b) Screen as System
E=G+H (3)
20
(c) Mill as System
F=E+D (4)
Pulp Balance: (0.59) F = (0.14) 7819 + (0.80) D
(e) Mill as System
F = 24574 lb/hr
1000
D = 16755 lb/hr 100 25%
(0.16)(24600)
(d) Sugar Balance around Mill The process is not efficient because
Sugar Balance: (0.16) F = x SD D (0.13) E only 25% of sugar is received as
x SD D = 2915 lb/hr final product.
Sugar Lost in Bagasse
2915
= 100 74%
(0.16)(24600)
21
EXAMPLE 11.5 Production of a Hormone in
Connected Reactors
Figure shows two different reactor configurations to produce a
hormone.
The relation that gives the growth (generation in Equation (10.1» of the
hormone in each vessel in the steady state is the Monod equation
max Cs
K s Cs