LN1-1 Urban Economics
LN1-1 Urban Economics
LN1-1 Urban Economics
Urban Economics
Lecture Notes I
Who cares?
Businessmen: Where to locate firms? How big the market will be?
Policy makers: Policies that combat urban problems will increase the vitality of
cities, helping them to grow.
What is a City?
Why do cities exist?
Why do cities became so important in the last century?
Why do we observe industry clusters?
What determines city size?
Why are there different types of cities?
Equilibrium
Partial Equilibrium
General Equilibrium Have you ever played SimCity?
For review:
Nicholson, Microeconomic Theory, Chapter 2
O’Sullivan, “Urban Economics”, Appendix.
Principal City
Principal city is the largest place (municipality) in each MSA.
Possibly many principal cities in a given MSA.
Minimum requirements
Population size: At least 250,000 people.
Employment size: At least 100,000 workers.
Geographic entities
Administrative or Legal:
State, County, Consolidated City, School District, Voting
District, ZIP codes, etc…
Statistical:
MSA, UA, UC, Census Tract, Blocks, etc..
Is that enough?
Comparative Advantage
Output per hour Opportunity Cost
North South North South
Bread 1 2 1 shirt 3 shirts
Shirts 1 6 1 loaf 1/3 loaf
AUTARKY
Production = Consumption
Why?
Econ 137 - Summer 2007 30
Example: Trading costs and Specialization
Assume P = 2 shirts per loaf and t= ½ hour per trade
South
If trade: +6s- 2b=+6s- 4s=2s gain = 1 bread gain
If transport cost: - 1/2 hour = 1 bread lose Transform hours
North into the
If trade: +1b- 1s=+2s- 1s= 1 shirt gain good that you’d
produce if no trade
If transport cost: - 1/2 hour = 1/2 shirt lose (the one you resign)
Specialization in Trade:
Middlemen (trading firms)
Trading cities along rivers, railroads, ports, etc.
Specialization in Trade:
Middlemen (trading firms)
Trading cities along rivers, railroads, ports, etc.
Is that enough?
0.75
0.25
Factory cost
Miles from Factory
4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4
Factory
No specialization
shirts are produced in factories,
bread at home [surplus sold to workers, no need to
set up bread factory]
Bread producers,
(buy shirts)
Innovations in manufacturing
Productivity shock that shift average labor costs. (e.g sewing machines,
interchangeable parts for manufacturing, etc).
Innovations in transportation
Turnpikes, railroads, steamships, etc.
Innovations in agriculture.
Steel plow, agricultural science, fertilizers, etc.
Econ 137 - Summer 2007 44
Market Area: Innovation in manufacturing
Cost of factory cloth Cost of factory cloth
1.00 Cost of homemade cloth
Net cost of cloth (bread)
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.10
Miles from Factory
4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4
Worker
productivity
increases
from 8 3.6miles
shirts/hour
to 20
shirts/hour
0.50
0.25
4.5miles
Transportation
costs reduce from
8 miles/hour to 12
miles/hour
Econ 137 - Summer 2007 46
Market Area: Innovation in agriculture
1.25 Cost of factory cloth Cost of factory cloth
Net cost of cloth (bread) 1.00 Cost of homemade cloth
0.75
0.50
0.25
4 miles
Shock in
agriculture from 1
bread/hour to 1.25
bread/hour
Econ 137 - Summer 2007 47
Factory cities: Material oriented firms
The same logic applies in cases in which the final output
can be easily transported but the raw materials have a
high transportation cost.
In these cases firms will locate around raw materials plants
(instead of locating around consumers).
Workers of firms then will locate in that area to save on
commuting costs, generating factory cities.
Knowledge Spillover
Econ 137 - Summer 2007 55
LE – Sharing Input Suppliers
A cluster of several firms:
Generate sufficient demand to allow intermediate input
producers to exploit scale economies.
Reduce face2face time and transport costs.
Allow intermediate suppliers to produce a wide variety.
4 4
Fixed labor supply (120 in isolated site (the only firm)
and 240 in clustered site (with another firm)).
Assume shock correlation =- 1when clustered. Total
Demand? Lh + Ll = LCluster = 400 − 8w
400 − L Total demand
w= and wages fixed
8
Econ 137 - Summer 2007 57
LE - Labor Pooling [Switching Costs]
Isolated Place Clustered Site Corr=- 1
W, $ Wage, $
60 60
TD
40 40
30
20
10
DL DH DL DH
TD
30
20
Loss in bad times (higher salary)
=80x$10+40x$10/2=$1000
10
DH DL DH
L 0.15 0.35 30
E[w]=$20
H 0.35 0.15
10
wHH = (480 − L) / 8
wLL = (320 − L) / 8 DLL
E[D] DHH
E [ w] = 50 − 0.125 L
Econ 137 - Summer 2007 61
LE - Labor Pooling [Switching Costs]
Isolated Place Each firm in Clustered Site [firm demand]
W, $
W, $
HH
30 30
20 HL
LH
10
10
LL
DL DH DL DH
What if correlation=1?
Knowledge Spillover
Innovation is correlated with industry clusters [Dumais, Ellison and Glaeser
(2001)]. Econ 137 - Summer 2007 66
Localization Economies – Empirical tests
Worker Productivity:
Elasticity of Output per worker with respect to Industry Output:
∂ ( qI / LI ) QI
ε qI / LI ,QI = Office sector=0.27
∂QI qI / LI
Plant Births:
Location choice by new firms:
∂BI QI Electronics=0.43
ε B ,Q =
I I
∂QI BI
Employment Growth: [Rosenthal and Strange (2000)
Add 1000 Software Jobs in Jobs in New Establishments
in Zip-Code Area Increase by
1-mile radius around zip code area 11.7 jobs
1-5 miles from zip-code area 0.8
6-10 miles from zip-code area 0.8
35 33
30
26
25 25
25
22
20
15
14 14
15
10
10
7
5 4
0
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990
Silicon Valley Route 128
Econ 137 - Summer 2007 71
Typical cases of industrial clustering
Silicon Valley and Route 128
Silicon Valley
Regional advantages
World class academic institutions (Stanford and Berkeley)
Defense agencies in California (Lockheed in 1956)
Nice weather !!!
Agglomeration economies
Professional and social networks
High turnover (35%). Average job tenure (2 years)
Good jobs search and matching
Flat hierarchies (entrepreneurship and experimentation)
Collective learning (encourages innovation)
Econ 137 - Summer 2007 72
Typical cases of industrial clustering
Silicon Valley and Route 128
Route128
Regional advantages
World class academic institutions (MIT)
Federal government. Department of Defense has accounted for
over 60% of federal R&D in the state.
Agglomeration economies (compared to Silicon Valley)
More government contracts and secrecy (less entrepreneurship)
Less social networks
Less job turnover and more average tenure.
Vertical hierarchies
This may explain why Silicon Valley has been more successful
Econ 137 - Summer 2007 73
Summary Ch. 3 O’Sullivan
Location Economies (lower production costs as industry wide output
increases) occur because firms in an industry cluster benefit from
sharing (1) the suppliers of intermediate inputs, (2) a labor pool, and
(3) information
What is a City?
Why do cities exist?
Why do cities become so important in the last century?
Why do we observe industry clusters?
What determines city size?
Why are there different types of cities?