Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 860 views

    Wilmer Jaldon Orosco, A205 008 796 (BIA Dec. 7, 2017)

    Uploaded by

    Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC
    In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) declined to consider an interlocutory DHS appeal challenging the administrative closure of proceedings to allow the respondent to pursue a provisional unlawful presence waiver (Form I-601A). The decision was issued by Member Ellen Liebowitz.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Wilmer Jaldon Orosco, A205 008 796 (BIA Dec. 7, 2017)

    Uploaded by

    Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC
    860 views2 pages
    In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) declined to consider an interlocutory DHS appeal challenging the administrative closure of proceedings to allow the respondent to pursue a provisional unlawful presence waiver (Form I-601A). The decision was issued by Member Ellen Liebowitz.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) declined to consider an interlocutory DHS appeal challenging the administrative closure of proceedings to allow the respondent to pursue a provisional unlawful presence waiver (Form I-601A). The decision was issued by Member Ellen Liebowitz.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    860 views2 pages

    Wilmer Jaldon Orosco, A205 008 796 (BIA Dec. 7, 2017)

    Uploaded by

    Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC
    In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) declined to consider an interlocutory DHS appeal challenging the administrative closure of proceedings to allow the respondent to pursue a provisional unlawful presence waiver (Form I-601A). The decision was issued by Member Ellen Liebowitz.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    U.S.

    Department of Justice

    Executive Office for Immigration Review

    Board ofImmigration Appeals


    Office ofthe Clerk

    5107 Leesburg Pzlce. Suite 2000


    Falls Church, Virginia 22041

    Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC | www.irac.net


    Harr, Karla OHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel • WAS
    Montagut & Sobral 1901 S. Bell Street, Suite 900
    5693 Columbia Pike, Ste. 201 Arlington, VA 22202
    Falls Church, VA 22041

    Name: JALDIN OROSCO, WILMER A 205-008-796

    Date of this notice: 12/7/2017

    Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.

    Sincerely,

    Donna Carr
    Chief Clerk

    Enclosure

    Panel Members:
    Liebowitz, Ellen C

    J. � � • •

    Userteam: Docket

    For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit


    www.irac.net/unpublished/index

    Cite as: Wilmer Jaldon Orosco, A205 008 796 (BIA Dec. 7, 2017)
    U.S. Department of Justice Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals
    �xecutive Office for Immigration Review

    Falls Church, Virginia 22041

    File: A205 008 796 - Arlington, VA Date: DEC - 7 2017

    In re: Wilmer JALDIN OROSCO

    Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC | www.irac.net


    IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS

    INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

    ONBEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Karla Harr, Esquire

    ONBEHALF OF OHS: Juliana J.Bae


    Assistant Chief Counsel

    The Department of Homeland Security has filed an interlocutory appeal from the Immigration
    Judge's September 20, 2017, decision to administratively close the respondent's removal
    proceedings to allow him to pursue a Form 1-60 IA, Application for Provisional Unlawful Presence
    Waiver.

    To avoid piecemeal review of the questions which may arise in the course of proceedings,
    this Board does not ordinarily entertain interlocutory appeals. See Matter of Ruiz-Campuzano,
    17 l&N Dec. 108 (BIA 1979); Matter of Ku, IS l&N Dec. 712 (BIA 1976); Matter of Sacco,
    15 l&N Dec. 109 (BIA 1974) We have, however, on occasion ruled on the merits of interlocutory
    .

    appeals where we deemed it necessary to address important jurisdictional questions regarding


    the administration of the immigration laws, or to correct recurring problems in the handling
    of cases by Immigration Judges. See, e.g., Matter ofGuevara, 20 l&N Dec. 238 (BIA 1990, 1991},
    and cases cited therein; Matter ofDobere, 20 l&N Dec. 188 (BIA 1990). We are not persuaded
    that this appeal has been shown to present a significant jurisdictional question about the
    administration of the immigration laws or a recurring problem in Immigration Judges' handling of
    cases. Thus, the question raised in this interlocutory appeal does not fall within the limited ambit
    of cases where we deem it appropriate to exercise our jurisdiction. Accordingly, the following
    order will be entered.

    ORDER: The record shall be returned to the Immigration Court with no further action.

    FOR THEBO

    Cite as: Wilmer Jaldon Orosco, A205 008 796 (BIA Dec. 7, 2017)

    You might also like