Limitations of Mfrs 136
Limitations of Mfrs 136
Limitations of Mfrs 136
Regulators, standard setters and practitioners have expressed concerns that accounting
standards and regulations have become too much and too complex and that this has resulted in
negative consequences for the users. There are some limitations of the MFRS 136: impairment of
asset.
1) Too wordy
The words used in MFRS 136 is too wordy and make the users difficult to understand the
content. The users have to put more effort to acquire and process this information in order
to understand it well. In order to process the information, the users have to repeat their
readings two or three times. They also have to jot down the important information or make
2) Complicated
The explanation in MFRS 136 are too complicated because there are too many elements
should be reflected in the calculation of an assets value in use. There are also many
requirements in identifying an asset that may be impaired. The users have to identify when
recoverable amount shall be determined. These requirements use the term an asset but
apply equally to an individual asset or a cash-generating unit. The users have to understand
how to measure the recoverable amount of the asset. Besides, they also have to recognize
and measure an impairment loss and it have several steps to follow to find those amount.
3) Too many disclosure.
(a) The amount of impairment losses recognized in profit or loss during the period and the
(b) The amount of reversals of impairment losses recognized in profit or loss during the
period and the line item(s) of the statement of comprehensive income in which those
(c) The amount of impairment losses on revalued assets recognized in other comprehensive
(d) The amount of reversals of impairment losses on revalued assets recognized in other
for which the carrying amount of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives
(a) The carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the unit (group of units).
(b) The carrying amount of intangible assets with indefinite useful lives allocated to the
(c) The basis on which the units (group of units) recoverable amount has been determined
(d) the units (group of units) recoverable amount if it is based on value in use:
(e) If the units (group of units) recoverable amount is based on fair value less costs of
disposal, the valuation technique(s) used to measure fair value less costs of disposal. An
(f) If a reasonably possible change in a key assumption on which management has based
its determination of the units (group of units) recoverable amount would cause the units